Tuesday, January 12, 2010

LIBERAL THINK TANK CLAIMS AMNESTY WOULD BE GOOD FOR.......MEXICO? We Are Mexico's Welare State!

MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com
MEXICAN OCCUPATION, AND THE MEX WELFARE STATE CREATED BY THE LA RAZA DEMS, AND THE CONGRESSIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS THINK THE OCCUPATION IS GOOD FOR THE STUPID GRINGOS!
IN REALITY IT IS THESE SAME STUPID GRINGOS THAT ARE MOST FUCKED OVER BY THE MEXICAN INVASION AND OCCUPATION.
*

Liberal Think Tank Claims Amnesty Would Benefit Economy
Last week, the Center for American Progress (CAP) – a well-known liberal think tank headed by John Podesta, former chief of staff to President Clinton – released a report claiming that amnesty would boost the U.S. economy. The report, entitled “Raising the Floor for American Workers: The Economic Benefits of Comprehensive Immigration Reform” is the latest attempt by amnesty supporters to persuade Americans to support legalizing millions of illegal aliens currently in the U.S. Authored by a professor of Chicana and Chicano studies at UCLA, Dr. Raúl Hinojosa-Ojeda, the report argues that granting amnesty to the more than 11 million illegal aliens currently residing in the United States would actually benefit the economy. (Center for American Progress, January 2010).

(MOST ILLEGALS WORK IN LOW-SKILL JOBS LIKE ILLEGAL AND BANNED LEAF-BLOWERS, MEX GANGS, DRUG CARTEL, BIRTHING WELFARE SYSTEM, AND CAR THIEVES)
(AMNESTY FOR 38 MILLION ILLEGALS IS IN FACT A DEVICE TO PERMIT ILLEGALS AN EVEN GREATER ACCESS TO WELFARE. THERE’S NO BARRIER TO WELFARE IN MEX GANGLAND OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, WHICH PAYS OUT $50 MILLION PER MONTH IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS – THE STATE OF CA PAYS OUT $10 - $20 BILLION PER YEAR IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS. YET DESPITE THIS THERE IS NO TALK ABOUT ENDING THE MEXICAN WELFARE STATE WHEN IT COMES TO BALANCING THE STATE’S STAGGERING DEFICITS.)
The report claims that amnesty would generate add $1.5 trillion to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) over ten years. (Page 11). Although the assertion that the GDP would grow following the passage of an amnesty may be true, the report fails to take into account the added fiscal burden that an amnesty would place on the U.S. welfare system. According to the Pew Hispanic Center, most illegal aliens work in low-skill, low-wage jobs. (Pew Hispanic Center, April 14, 2009). While amnesty may result in a marginal increase in the wages of these illegal aliens, it will not provide them with a higher level of education, greater job skills, or higher earning potential. Amnesty will, however, allow low-wage earning illegal aliens to access the more than 70 separate programs comprising the U.S. welfare system. Experts have estimated that this increased fiscal burden would cost American taxpayers approximately $700 billion per year. (The Heritage Foundation, November 23, 2009).

(CORPORATIONS ADDICTED TO “CHEAP” (MISERABLE WAGES) LABOR. THERE IS A REASON WHY MOST OF THE FORTUNE 500 ARE GENEROUS DONORS TO THE MEXICAN RACIST FASCIST PARTY OF LA RAZA… The Race!)
In addition, any increase in GDP only measures that country’s total economic output and not income distribution. The main economic beneficiaries of an amnesty program would be the illegal aliens themselves and corporations addicted to cheap labor. American taxpayers would pay for such a system, as they are now, by subsidizing the education, welfare, and judicial systems that absorb these low-skill, low-educated, and low-wage workers.
(CNN: THE MEXICAN OCCUPATION DEPRESSES WAGES FOR LEGALS $300 - $400 BILLION PER YEAR! THAT’S WHY THERE’S AN OPEN INVITATION OVER OUR OPEN AND UNDEFENDED BORDERS!)
Moreover, Hinojosa-Ojeda’s suggestion that amnesty, coupled with massive increases in legal immigration, would raise the wages of native-born Americans has been refuted by numerous studies. (Page 15). Harvard Professor George Borjas, one of the nation’s leading immigration economists, has estimated that immigration reduces wages for low-skilled, native-born Americans by 7.4 percent. (Borjas Paper, November 2003). In addition, research compiled by Steven Camarota of the Center for Immigration Studies has shown that “immigration reduce[s] wages for American workers by 10 percent in some occupations.” (Center for Immigration Studies, November 2009). The arguments of both experts support the proposition that comprehensive amnesty legislation would increase the labor supply through massive increases in both legal and illegal immigration, which would only further drive down the wages of native-born Americans.
AMNESTY WOULD END ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION? MOST PUSHING FOR AMNESTY ALSO PUSH FOR “CHAIN MIGRATION” WHICH WOULD LEGALLY PERMIT THE EXTENDED FAMILIES OF ILLEGALS GRANTED AMNESTY TO BRING ON UP THE REST OF THEIR CLANS. WELFARE AND SOCIAL SECURITY , LET ALONE THE CRIME WAVE THAT COMES WITH THE MEXICAN OCCUPATION; WHAT ARE THOSE FIGURES?)
Finally, the CAP study fails to take into account that enacting an amnesty program would do nothing to end illegal immigration. It would only create a new cycle by which employers lure illegal workers, who come to the U.S., take jobs and depress wages. (For more, see FAIR’s Report on Amnesty and Joblessness).

OKLAHOMA - ILLEGALS LOATHE EDUCATION & ENGLISH

A CL POSTING ON EDUCATION IN OKLAHOMA

They did not do a breakdown of the test results along racial lines, you know why? It's those illegal wetback Mexican alien anchor babies I keep saying are diluting our educational system (since at least 1980) and dragging native Hispanics into the educational-knowledge black hole. Native Hispanics cannot make any gains on all fronts if they keep shipping illiterate illegals over here. Sorry it's the truth.

75 Percent of Oklahoma High School Students Can't Name First President (NATION)
________________________________________
Date: 2009-09-18, 4:34AM CDT
Reply to: comm-efsfw-1380209652@craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]
________________________________________

75 Percent of Oklahoma High School Students Can't Name the First President of the U.S.
Posted: Updated:
Gilbert Stuart's 1796 oil on canvas portrait of George Washington on display at Washington's National Portrait Gallery. A majority of Oklahoma high school students could not name Washington as the nation's first president in a recent survey. (AP Photo) Gilbert Stuart's 1796 oil on canvas portrait of George Washington on display at Washington's National Portrait Gallery. A majority of Oklahoma high school students could not name Washington as the nation's first president in a recent survey. (AP Photo)

News9.com

OKLAHOMA CITY -- Only one in four Oklahoma public high school students can name the first President of the United States, according to a survey released today.
The survey was commissioned by the Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs in observance of Constitution Day on Thursday. Brandon Dutcher is with the conservative think tank and said the group wanted to find out how much civic knowledge Oklahoma high school students know.

The Oklahoma City-based think tank enlisted national research firm, Strategic Vision, to access students' basic civic knowledge. "They're questions taken from the actual exam that you have to take to become a U.S. citizen," Dutcher said. A thousand students were given 10 questions drawn from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services item bank. Candidates for U.S. citizenship must answer six questions correctly in order to become citizens. About 92 percent of the people who take the citizenship test pass on their first try, according to immigration service data. However, Oklahoma students did not fare as well. Only about 3 percent of the students surveyed would have passed the citizenship test.

Dutcher said this is not just a problem in Oklahoma. He said Arizona had similar results, which left him concerned for the entire country. "Jefferson later said that a nation can't expect to be ignorant and free," Dutcher said. "It points to a real serious problem. We're not going to remain ignorant and free."

Question % of Students
Who Answered Correctly
What is the supreme law of the land?
28

What do we call the first ten amendments to the Constitution?
26

What are the two parts of the U.S. Congress?
27

How many justices are there on the Supreme Court?
10

Who wrote the Declaration of Independence?
14

What ocean is on the east coast of the United States?
61

What are the two major political parities in the United States?
43

We elect a U.S. senator for how many years?
11

Who was the first President of the United States?
23

Who is in charge of the executive branch?
29
______________________________________________________

They did not do a breakdown of the test results along racial lines, you know why? It's those illegal wetback Mexican alien anchor babies I keep saying are diluting our educational system (since at least 1980) and dragging native Hispanics into the educational-knowledge black hole. Native Hispanics cannot make any gains on all fronts if they keep shipping illiterate illegals over here. Sorry it's the truth.
• Location: NATION
• it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests


PostingID: 1380209652

LA RAZA DEMANDS SPECIAL EDUCATION FOR ILLEGALS - Gringos Pay!

ON EDUCATING THE ILLEGALS: Ever wonder why Mexico doesn’t educate their own people?
Worse public schools. America’s public schools already suffer under severe budget constraints, causing large class sizes, textbook shortages, and leaky ceilings. Yet, US law requires that all illegals receive free public education K-12. The Federation for American Immigration Reform estimates that this costs $7.4 billion dollars each year.

The birthrate among illegals is more than double that of legal US residents. The Pew Hispanic Center calculates that within seven years, the children of immigrants, legal and illegal, will account for one in nine school-age children in the US. The Urban Institute estimates that already, 15% of all school children in California are illegals, many of whom speak little English. These students are usually mainstreamed in classes with native English speakers. This means that teachers must slow down instruction, denying native English speakers their right to an
appropriate-level education.
The challenge is even greater because not all those students’ native language is Spanish: For example, in my nearest major school district, San Francisco, it would not be unusual to find a class that had native speakers of Chinese, Russian, Tagalog, Spanish, and English. Imagine the challenge of trying to educate them all. If your child were in that class, would you be confident that he or she would receive a quality education?
Immigrant children pose less obvious challenges to the schools. Barbara Nemko, the Napa County Superintendent of Schools, points out examples: “Unless she speaks Spanish, we have a hard time justifying hiring an even an excellent teacher… So much of our staff development
time must now be allocated to dealing with the needs of ‘English Language Learners.’ Our immigrant kids also come to school with serious health problems that we must address. For example, dentists now visit our high-immigrant schools providing dental services at no
cost to the student.”

Immigrant advocacy groups such as the Mexican-American Legal Defense Fund (MALDEF) and La Raza have additionally burdened the public schools by demanding that schools provide special controversial programs such as bilingual education, in which students are taught in Spanish for much of the day. Bilingual education programs exist throughout California even
after longitudinal research has not demonstrated their effectiveness and after a voter-approved an on those programs.

MALDEF and La Raza also pushed through legislation that allows, in 19 states, illegal immigrants to not only attend any public university in those states, but to pay in-state tuition, while legal residents of neighboring states must pay the out-of-state rate which is three to eight times more. It’s quite an injustice, for example, that a legal resident can be denied admission to taxpayer-supported Berkeley and must attend community college so an illegal foreign national can attend Berkeley—at in-state rates! And often, because of reverse discrimination admission
policies, the illegal is admitted with B grades while the rejected legal resident may have Agrades.

MOVING TO MEXICO: Is There A Gringo Welfare State Down There?

tle: MOVING TO MEXICO - MUST READ! (L.V. Comment Page)
Read this today. Thought I'd share it with you. I'm sure pyrostevo won't mind, since he probably didn't make it up either.

Moving to Mexico

Dear Mr. President, Senate and House of Representatives:

I'm planning to move my family and extended family (18-20 mouths) into Mexico for my health, and I would like to ask you to assist me.

We're planning to simply walk across the border from the U.S. into Mexico , and we'll need your help to make a few arrangements.

We plan to skip all the legal stuff like visas, passports, immigration quotas and laws. I'm sure they handle those things the same way you do here.

So, would you mind telling your buddy, President Calderon, that I'm on my way over? Please let him know that I will be expecting the following:

1. Free medical care for my entire family.

2. English-speaking government bureaucrats for all services I might need, whether I use them or not.

3. All Mexico government forms need to also be printed in English.

4. I want my kids to be taught Spanish by English-speaking (bi-lingual) teachers.

5. Schools need to include classes on American culture and history.

6. I want my kids to see the American flag on one of the flag poles at their school.

7. Please plan to feed my kids at school for both breakfast and lunch.

8. I will need a local Mexican driver's license so I can get easy access to government services.

9. I do plan to get a car and drive in Mexico, but, I don't plan to purchase car insurance, and I probably won't make any special effort to learn local traffic laws.

10. In case one of the Mexican police officers does not get the memo from their president to leave me alone, please be sure that every patrol car has at least one English-speaking officer.

11. I plan to fly the U.S. flag from my house top, put U S. flag decals on my car, and have a gigantic celebration on July 4th. I do not want any complaints or negative comments from the locals.

12. I would also like to have a nice job without paying any taxes, or have any labor or tax laws enforced on any business I may start.

13. Please have the president tell all the Mexican people to be extremely nice and never say a critical things about me or my family, or about the strain we might place on their economy.

I know this is an easy request because you already do all these things for all his people who come to the U.S. from Mexico .
I am sure that President Calderon won't mind returning the favor if you ask him nicely.

Thank you so much for your kind help,

Sincerely, US Citizen & Taxpayer

NEW JERSEY EXPANDS MEXICAN WELFARE STATE - LA RAZA OCCUPATION -Who Pays?

FAIRUS.org GET THEIR EMAILS FOR UPDATES ON MEXICAN INVASION, OCCUPATION AND THE SELLOUT TO THEM BY THE LA RAZA DEMS!
*
New Jersey Lawmakers Push to Grant Tuition Breaks for Illegal Aliens
Lawmakers in New Jersey are poised to give in-state tuition to illegal aliens following a recent flurry of activity from pro-amnesty groups. The special interest groups have launched an eleventh-hour attempt to grant in-state tuition to illegal aliens before Governor Corzine leaves office this month. The outgoing governor supports the long-stalled legislation and has said it is one he would “put high on the agenda.” (The Star-Ledger, December 10, 2009). Corzine lost his re-election bid to Gov.-elect Christie, who opposes the idea and has stated that only lawful taxpayers deserve a tuition break because they help subsidize in-state tuitions. Id. The bill, which advocates have been pushing for eight years, passed state Senate and Assembly committees last week. (The Philadelphia Inquirer, January 8, 2010). However, a vote on the controversial legislation scheduled for last week was postponed by state Senators, which could indicate the bill lacks the votes needed to pass. (Gannett State Bureau, January 7, 2010). Both the Senate and the Assembly will take up the bill Monday, which is the last day of the legislative session. Id.
On the federal level, amnesty advocates in the House are also pushing similar legislation. On December 15, 2009, Representatives Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.) and Solomon Ortiz (D-Tex.), along with over 90 other amnesty supporters in the House of Representatives, introduced a radical amnesty bill, H.R. 4321, the “Comprehensive Immigration Reform for America’s Security and Prosperity Act of 2009,” (CIR ASAP). This legislation contains a sweeping amnesty program that would legalize millions of illegal aliens in the United States. (See FAIR’s Legislative Update, December 22, 2009). The DREAM Act (also known as the Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors Act), is sprinkled throughout the bill. The DREAM Act was re-introduced in Congress in March 2009, and grants amnesty to a broad range of individuals who meet certain minimal educational requirements and permits states to give taxpayer subsidized in-state tuition to illegal aliens. (See FAIR's Legislative Analysis of the DREAM Act, March 2009; To learn more about activity on the DREAM Act this year, read FAIR’s Legislative Updates from March 30, 2009, April 13, 2009, and April 27, 2009).
Critics of the DREAM Act point out that there are a limited number of college admissions spots available for incoming freshman each year, and that for every illegal alien who enters college, an American citizen is displaced from enrolling in college. (See, e.g. CNN Newsroom video). Eleven states currently give discounted tuition to foreign students who are in the country illegally, and amnesty advocates are working hard to push lawmakers in other states to pass similar measures despite the current economic crisis and the unpopularity of granting tax-subsidized benefits to illegal aliens.
FAIR has just released a detailed summary of CIR ASAP. See our in-depth analysis of the bill for more information.

FAIRUS.org - LA RAZA DEMS DEMAND HEALTHCARE FOR ILLEGALS

FAIR Legislative Update January 11, 2010


My Interests | All >
Interests: Legislative Update -- Return to Top --
Legislative Update
Add to My Interests


Hispanic Caucus Considering Health Care Flip-Flop
As Congressional leaders return to Washington to negotiate a final health care bill, immigration-related differences between the House and Senate versions may be forcing the pro-amnesty Congressional Hispanic Caucus to reconsider its support for health care reform.

This was the news on Capitol Hill last week as House and Senate leaders agreed to bypass the formal conference committee and instead pass the health care bill back and forth between the Senate and House. Under this scenario, the House would take up the Senate bill and either adopt it wholesale or amend it and send it back to the Senate. This process would continue with the bill “ping ponging” back and forth between the House and the Senate until the two chambers pass an identical bill. (TPMDC, January 4, 2010).

This process, however, is immediately putting the CHC under pressure regarding the bill’s immigration provisions. In November, when the House originally considered health care legislation (H.R.3962), the CHC insisted that illegal aliens have access to the health care exchange created in the bill. On November 5, 2009 – just two days before the House passed its bill – CHC Chairwoman Nydia Velazquez (D-NY) announced that her 20-member caucus would vote against the final House bill if it included the Senate language barring illegal aliens from participating in the exchange. After a meeting with President Obama, Velazquez told Roll Call that the CHC had “made it very clear that we support the language that is in the House. We expect that the current language will not change.” (Roll Call, November 5, 2009). Ultimately, the language did not change, and the bill passed by the slimmest of margins: 220 -215. (Roll Call Vote #887, November 7, 2009).

Despite the CHC’s position, the Obama Administration said it would not support illegal alien participation in the health care exchange and the Senate followed suit, passing legislation prohibiting such access (H.R. 3590). (See FAIR’s Legislative Update, November 23, 2009). The negotiations in the Senate were so tense and the compromise so tenuous that Senators warned any changes would risk their support. Desperate to deliver on President Obama’s domestic policy priority, Congressional leaders are pressuring House members to accept the Senate compromise.

Thus, the CHC must now decide whether to concede to the Senate language. Last week, Capitol Hill blogs indicated that the CHC was considering capitulating on its position in exchange for a promise from the Obama Administration that the White House would begin pushing amnesty legislation in early 2010. (TPMDC, January 4, 2010). However, on January 5, The Atlantic reported that the CHC had not reached such an agreement. In fact, a spokesperson from the CHC stated that the caucus’ position “remains the same: it opposes provisions in the Senate health care bill that would negatively impact immigrants.” (The Atlantic, January 5, 2010).

Votes on health care legislation are expected to occur sometime over the course of the next three weeks. Stay tuned to FAIR for the latest developments.