Saturday, July 13, 2013

OBAMA'S OPEN and UNDEFENDED BORDERS - Mexican Border Crime Underreported | Judicial Watch

Mexican Border Crime Underreported | Judicial Watch

OBAMA’S OPEN and UNDEFENDED BORDERS… the invasion gets worse!

People pour out of suspected human smuggling truck in Texas


THE ADMINISTRATION MAKES IT TOP PRIORITY TO ! not ! KNOW HOW MANY FUTURE DEMS ARE CLIMBING OUR BORDERS TO LOOT!!!

E-VERIFY WOULD STOP THE MEX INVASION. THIS IS WHY HISPANDERING OBAMA and THE DEMOCRAT PARTY HAVE PROMISED LA RAZA NO E-VERIFY WILL EVER BE EMPLOYED!

Despite efforts to shore up the U.S.–Mexico border, including 650 miles of fence, 21,000 Border Patrol agents and $18 billion spent on enforcement in 2012, a recent report states that only about half of all unauthorized immigrants crossing the border from Mexico are caught.

Rise in Illegal Immigration Overwhelms Local Police | Judicial Watch

Rise in Illegal Immigration Overwhelms Local Police | Judicial Watch


OBAMA’S OPEN and UNDEFENDED BORDERS… the invasion gets worse!

People pour out of suspected human smuggling truck in Texas


THE ADMINISTRATION MAKES IT TOP PRIORITY TO ! not ! KNOW HOW MANY FUTURE DEMS ARE CLIMBING OUR BORDERS TO LOOT!!!

E-VERIFY WOULD STOP THE MEX INVASION. THIS IS WHY HISPANDERING OBAMA and THE DEMOCRAT PARTY HAVE PROMISED LA RAZA NO E-VERIFY WILL EVER BE EMPLOYED!

Despite efforts to shore up the U.S.–Mexico border, including 650 miles of fence, 21,000 Border Patrol agents and $18 billion spent on enforcement in 2012, a recent report states that only about half of all unauthorized immigrants crossing the border from Mexico are caught.

Mexicans pour over the open Texas border for Obama'a amnesty, American jobs, achor baby welfare and LA RAZA SUPREMACY they don't ge in their own country


 People pour out of suspected human smuggling truck...

THE ADMINISTRATION MAKES IT TOP PRIORITY TO ! not ! KNOW HOW MANY FUTURE DEMS ARE CLIMBING OUR BORDERS TO LOOT!!!

E-VERIFY WOULD STOP THE MEX INVASION. THIS IS WHY HISPANDERING OBAMA and THE DEMOCRAT PARTY HAVE PROMISED LA RAZA NO E-VERIFY WILL EVER BE EMPLOYED!

Despite efforts to shore up the U.S.–Mexico border, including 650 miles of fence, 21,000 Border Patrol agents and $18 billion spent on enforcement in 2012, a recent report states that only about half of all unauthorized immigrants crossing the border from Mexico are caught.

 People pour out of suspected human smuggling truck 

Here is a shocking sight: A sheriff’s department car approaches a suspected immigrant smuggling truck in Jim Wells County, Texas. As it approaches, the truck suddenly opens in the back, and about 50 people emerge from the small-sized vehicle, running away.

VIDEO HERE OF MEXICANS INVADING:


 
“That’s a lot of people,” Chief Deputy Rodrigo Ramon told the Associated Press. “If you put the math to it, at $4,500 a person, which is the average going rate. multiply that by just 45, that’s a lot of money.”

This is not the first incident like this. Near Encino, Calif., border patrol agents pulled over a Chevy Silverado. Once the truck stopped, several people took off running, according to local station KRIS.

The driver then reversed his truck into the agent’s, before bailing out himself. The agents apprehended several Guatemala citizens.

The station also reports that this happened to another vehicle suspected of human smuggling that rammed a parked agent’s car, although the driver and one passenger were arrested.

Despite efforts to shore up the U.S.–Mexico border, including 650 miles of fence, 21,000 Border Patrol agents and $18 billion spent on enforcement in 2012, a recent report states that only about half of all unauthorized immigrants crossing the border from Mexico are caught.

"The American Southwest seems to be slowly returning to the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a single shot."  ---Excelsior, the national newspaper of Mexico

Immigrating America Into a Colony of Mexico


We’ve got an even more ominous enemy within our borders that promotes “Reconquista of Aztlan” or the reconquest of California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas into the country of Mexico. With 9.2 million Mexicans now living in America, their goal of colonizing our country back into Mexico moves forward. A more sobering reality stems from the evidence that it’s Mexican-American citizens in the forefront of this disintegration of our country.

*

TEXAS FALLS TO LA RAZA SUPREMACIST

We’ve got an even more ominous enemy within our borders that promotes “Reconquista of Aztlan” or the reconquest of California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas into the country of Mexico.


BORDER LIES – How President Barack Obama and his LA RAZA infested administration endlessly lies to the American people about BORDER SECURITY…. IT DOES NOT EXIST!!!


HOW MANY TIMES HAS HISPANDERING OBAMA LIED TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ABOUT BORDER SECURITY WHILE HE WAS IN THE BACKROOM WITH LA RAZA SABOTAGING OUR BORDERS TO BUILD HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE OF ILLEGALS.

IS BARACK OBAMA THE MOST EVIL AND UN-AMERICAN MAN TO SQUAT IN THE WHITE HOUSE???


DEPORTED MEXICAN LOOTERS TELL REPORTERS… WE’LL BE RIGHT BACK! GOOD GRINGO LOOTING AHEAD!

more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast


when you get past the LIES, the SPIN and then more LIES….

AMNESTY… or continued NON-ENFORCEMENT!

Heather Mac Donald: White House doesn't want to enforce immigration

more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast


are you still being conned by Obama?

JUDICIAL WATCH on OBAMA’S SABOTAGE of HOMELAND SECURITY

“This appears to be part of the Obama Administration’s bigger plan to blow off Congress by using its executive powers to grant illegal immigrants backdoor amnesty.”

more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast



 
ILLEGALS PLUMMETED 70% DURING HISPANDERING OBAMA’S FIRST TERM… and are expected to be nonexistent during his second.

Obama and Justice Sotomayor (A LA RAZA PARTY MEMBER) Vow to Illegals to SABOTAGE E-verify!

VIVA LA RAZA SUPREMACY?


26% of Obama Supporters View Tea Party as Nation’s Top Terror Threat - Rasmussen Reports - 74% of All Americans (Legals) View Obama's LA RAZA PARTY base of Illegals Nation's Top Terror Threat

26% of Obama Supporters View Tea Party as Nation’s Top Terror Threat - Rasmussen Reports™

BARACK OBAMA’S sabotage of homeland security and the MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS that endorse his LA RAZA SUPREMACY & OPEN BORDERS AGENDA


 

ZETA MEXICAN TERORIST IN AMERICAN BORDERS...

more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast


Known for mounting the severed heads of its rivals on poles or hanging their dismembered bodies from bridges in cities throughout Mexico, Los Zetas easily has become the most feared criminal gang in Mexico.


More Americans Killed by Illegal Aliens than Iraq War, Study Says... OBAMA SAYS SO WHAT! THEY'RE MY UNREGISTERED LA RAZA VOTERS!

more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast


 

Rating President Obama on The Issues - Rasmussen Reports™ SHOULD OBAMA BE IMPEACHED FOR SABOTAGING AMERICAN BORDERS WITH NARCOMEX?

Rating President Obama on The Issues - Rasmussen Reports™

LA RAZA JANET NAPOLITANO is ENDORSED TO BE GOVERNOR of the MEXICAN WELFARE STATE of MEXIFORNIA… The Mexican Government thanks La Raza Janet for sabotage of America’s borders to turn that country in Obama’s MEX COLONY!


"The American Southwest seems to be slowly returning to the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a single shot."  ---Excelsior, the national newspaper of Mexico

Immigrating America Into a Colony of Mexico


We’ve got an even more ominous enemy within our borders that promotes “Reconquista of Aztlan” or the reconquest of California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas into the country of Mexico. With 9.2 million Mexicans now living in America, their goal of colonizing our country back into Mexico moves forward. A more sobering reality stems from the evidence that it’s Mexican-American citizens in the forefront of this disintegration of our country.


PAT BUCHANAN

WHOSE COUNTRY IS IT???

PAT BUCHANAN ON OBAMA’S HISPANDERING FOR THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES:

more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast



BUCHANAN ON HISPANDERING OBAMA’S CONTEMPT FOR OUR LAWS AND BORDERS:

What is the response of Barack Obama, who took an oath to see to it that federal laws are faithfully executed?
He is siding with the law-breakers. He is pandering to the ethnic lobbies. He is not berating a Mexican regime that aids and abets this invasion of the country of which he is commander in chief. Instead, he attacks the government of Arizona for trying to fill a gaping hole in law enforcement left by his own dereliction of duty.
 
BARACK OBAMA’S sabotage of homeland security and the MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS that endorse his LA RAZA SUPREMACY & OPEN BORDERS AGENDA
ZETA MEXICAN TERRORISM
OBAMA’S OPEN DOOR POLICY FOR THE MEX DRUG CARTELS – VIVA LA RAZA SUPREMACY AND OPEN BORDERS???
THE CARTELS NOW OPERATE IN MORE THAN 2,500 AMERICAN CITIES INCLUDING OBAMA’S CHICAGO!
more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast
Known for mounting the severed heads of its rivals on poles or hanging their dismembered bodies from bridges in cities throughout Mexico, Los Zetas easily has become the most feared criminal gang in Mexico.
More Americans Killed by Illegal Aliens than Iraq War, Study Says
more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast
 
 

ln California LA RAZA Janet Napolitano says she will live in Salinas to be nearer Mexican gangs she hopes to get registered to vote for Obama's THIRD TERM


SALINAS CALIFORNIA – A LA RAZA-OCCUPIED MEXICAN DUMPSTER CITY IN AMERICAN BORDERS… MUCH LIKE MANY CITIES IN CALIFORNIA!


We’ve got an even more ominous enemy within our borders that promotes “Reconquista of Aztlan” or the reconquest of California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas into the country of Mexico.

THE DEVASTATING COST OF MEXICO’S INVASION, OCCUPATION, LOOTING, WELFARE STATE, VIOLENCE, RACISM and CRIME TIDAL WAVE

 
more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast 


City Journal
How Unskilled Immigrants Hurt Our Economy

Immigration’s bottom line has shifted so sharply that in a high-immigration state like California, native-born residents are paying up to ten times more in state and local taxes than immigrants generate in economic benefits.

 
A handful of industries get low-cost labor, and the taxpayers foot the bill. TRANSLATE, FIRST WE GIVE OUR JOBS TO ILLEGALS, THEN WE GET THE TAX BILLS FOR THE LA RAZA MEXICAN WELFARES STATE and CRIME TIDAL WAVE!

 
Pols around the country, intent on currying favor with ethnic voting blocs by appearing immigrant-friendly, have jumped on the benefits-for-immigrants bandwagon, endorsing “don’t ask, don’t tell” policies toward immigrants who register for benefits, giving tax dollars to centers that find immigrants work and aid illegals, and enacting legislation prohibiting local authorities from cooperating with federal immigration officials.
 

Obama's Border Lies - How he built the Mexican Fascist Party of LA RAZA off the backs of the American people


BORDER LIES – How President Barack Obama and his LA RAZA infested administration endlessly lies to the American people about BORDER SECURITY…. IT DOES NOT EXIST!!!
 
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/07/border-security-flood-of-lies-from.html

BORDER SECURITY - The flood of lies from President Barack Obama - IT DOES NOT EXIST!


BORDER LIES – How President Barack Obama and his LA RAZA infested administration endlessly lies to the American people about BORDER SECURITY…. IT DOES NOT EXIST!!!

HOW MANY TIMES HAS HISPANDERING OBAMA LIED TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ABOUT BORDER SECURITY WHILE HE WAS IN THE BACKROOM WITH LA RAZA SABOTAGING OUR BORDERS TO BUILD HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE OF ILLEGALS.

IS BARACK OBAMA THE MOST EVIL AND UN-AMERICAN MAN TO SQUAT IN THE WHITE HOUSE???

DEPORTED MEXICAN LOOTERS TELL REPORTERS… WE’LL BE RIGHT BACK! GOOD GRINGO LOOTING AHEAD!

more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast



when you get past the LIES, the SPIN and then more LIES….

AMNESTY… or continued NON-ENFORCEMENT!

Heather Mac Donald: White House doesn't want to enforce immigration

more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast


are you still being conned by Obama?

JUDICIAL WATCH on OBAMA’S SABOTAGE of HOMELAND SECURITY

“This appears to be part of the Obama Administration’s bigger plan to blow off Congress by using its executive powers to grant illegal immigrants backdoor amnesty.”

more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast


Obama inflating deportation percentages ... more lies from the LA RAZA White House 

Timage 1here seems to be a big hullabaloo coming from the White House about how the Obama administration in just 4 years has "Deported more illegal aliens than Bush did in 8" . How can that be ? It's simple , manipulate the numbers , they do it with the percentages of unemployment all the time .

Let's set the record straight without all the bullshit...shall we ?

It is one of the Obama administration's favorite talking points on immigration: It has been deporting illegal immigrants in record numbers. That bolsters its credentials on enforcement and supports the argument that, now that we've gotten tough on the border, it is time to enact comprehensive immigration reform.

But figures recently unearthed by a federal lawsuit in Texas cast serious doubt on the administration's deportation claims. The number of deportations appears to have declined significantly during the president's term in office.

Jessica Vaughan, director of policy studies for the Center for Immigration Studies, has analyzed a set of largely unpublished official statistics on immigration-enforcement activity over the past five years. Earlier this month, Vaughan testified in court on behalf of a group of U.S. Immigration and Customs (ICE) agents who are suing the administration over its use of "prosecutorial discretion" in dictating how immigration law is enforced -- or not enforced. The agents are seeking an injunction against a series of policy directives from ICE and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that were designed to regulate the extent to which ICE officers could initiate deportation proceedings for illegal immigrants in their custody.

In her testimony on April 8, Vaughan noted that, contrary to the administration's claims, the number of illegal-immigrant removals has dropped 40 percent since June 2011, when ICE director John Morton issued the first of several directives outlining significant changes to the agency's enforcement policies. "There has been a significant decline in enforcement activity as measured by the number of removals," Vaughan says.
===========================================================
ICE Agent Union President Claims White House Inflates Deportation Numbers

Chris Crane, president of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers union, spoke to Mark Levin on The Mark Levin Show Thursday evening. Crane recently testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding the immigration bill working through Congress.

Crane explained how President Obama and Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano have, since the administration's start, "attempted to shut down" border enforcement and "absolutely" tied law enforcement's hands.

When Levin asked how their hands are tied, Crane explained, as an example, that ICE agents are not allowed (despite having the vested authority to do so by Congress) to arrest an individual they suspect to be an illegal alien, an illegal alien gang member, or illegal alien criminal. Instead, they are reportedly under orders to wait until the individual commits a crime, is arrested by another law enforcement agency (such as local police), jailed, and only then may an immigration agent speak with the individual.

Additionally, the deportation process can only begin if the individual has been convicted of three or more criminal offenses.

When Levin asked if this is a huge change from previous administrations, Crane responded: "Absolutely, it's a dramatic change."

Despite the Obama Administration's claims of robust border enforcement and record-high ICE deportation numbers, Crane noted how the administration actually cooks the books and inflates deportation numbers. Data that Crane obtained demonstrates that, since 2008, ICE arrests and deportations "have plummeted."

Crane explained how it works: Border Patrol (a separate agency from ICE) makes an arrest on the border, but instead of handling the deportation itself, Border Patrol hands the detainee over to ICE to deport the individual, thereby inflating the number of ICE deportations. Crane described it as a "shell game" that allows what would normally be a mere "turn-back" to be counted as a formal "deportation," thus inflating the deportation statistics.

Crane also noted that, while Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) has met with him, he has received "no response at all" to his requests for meetings with the other three Republican "Gang of 8" senators: Jeff Flake (R-AZ), John McCain (R-AZ), and Lindsey Graham (R-SC). When Levin remarked that these senators nonetheless have had time to meet with the National Council of La Raza, Crane claimed: "Those groups are now running our agency... That's why we're not arresting people, that's why we can't do our jobs -- it's because they're basically embedded in running our agency."

A "disgusted" Levin called the information "stunning" and noted: "How in the hell are we supposed to get behind any so-called immigration bill when you just heard what Chris Crane had to say?... Folks! All hands on deck! Now's the time to fight this!"

Using the "Sequester" as an excuse the Obama Administration released over 2500 illegal aliens from custody BEFORE the Sequester even took place . Now some shit-head here will say "They weren't criminals " , but the reality is that they were, so by releasing criminal illegal aliens BACK on the streets ; explain to me how that is keeping the American people safe (Y'know like he's supposed to do when he took his oath of office) .

Progressive\Liberal\Democrat\Marxist's...if their lips are moving..their lying !

 "The American Southwest seems to be slowly returning to the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a single shot."  ---Excelsior, the national newspaper of Mexico

Immigrating America Into a Colony of Mexico

more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast


We’ve got an even more ominous enemy within our borders that promotes “Reconquista of Aztlan” or the reconquest of California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas into the country of Mexico. With 9.2 million Mexicans now living in America, their goal of colonizing our country back into Mexico moves forward. A more sobering reality stems from the evidence that it’s Mexican-American citizens in the forefront of this disintegration of our country.

PAT BUCHANAN

WHOSE COUNTRY IS IT???

PAT BUCHANAN ON OBAMA’S HISPANDERING FOR THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES:

more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast


BUCHANAN ON HISPANDERING OBAMA’S CONTEMPT FOR OUR LAWS AND BORDERS:

What is the response of Barack Obama, who took an oath to see to it that federal laws are faithfully executed?

He is siding with the law-breakers. He is pandering to the ethnic lobbies. He is not berating a Mexican regime that aids and abets this invasion of the country of which he is commander in chief. Instead, he attacks the government of Arizona for trying to fill a gaping hole in law enforcement left by his own dereliction of duty.

BORDER SECURITY LIES… grounds for impeachment?

The Obama – Rubio and LA RAZA orchestrated lies on amnesty and border security… THE PROMISE MEXICO IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN!

more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/07/the-obama-and-marco-rubio-lies-about.html


OBAMA’S LA RAZA BUNKER

OBAMA’S SECRET STEALTH HEADQUARTERS to manage AMNESTY SURRENDER

“We are trying hard not to be heavy handed about what we are doing,” said Cecilia Muñoz, the director of the White House Domestic Policy Council and the president’s point person on immigration. (CECILIA MUNOZ IS A V.P. FOR THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA)

 
more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast



AMNESTY: WILLIAM GHEEN (ALIPAC) EXPOSES OBAMA’S AGENDA TO SURRENDER OUR BORDERS TO MEXICO

more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast


 

OBAMA’S OPEN and UNDEFENDED BORDERS… the invasion gets worse!

People pour out of suspected human smuggling truck in Texas


THE ADMINISTRATION MAKES IT TOP PRIORITY TO ! not ! KNOW HOW MANY FUTURE DEMS ARE CLIMBING OUR BORDERS TO LOOT!!!

E-VERIFY WOULD STOP THE MEX INVASION. THIS IS WHY HISPANDERING OBAMA and THE DEMOCRAT PARTY HAVE PROMISED LA RAZA NO E-VERIFY WILL EVER BE EMPLOYED!

Despite efforts to shore up the U.S.–Mexico border, including 650 miles of fence, 21,000 Border Patrol agents and $18 billion spent on enforcement in 2012, a recent report states that only about half of all unauthorized immigrants crossing the border from Mexico are caught.

 

 

The Devastating Cost of Mexico's Invasion, Occupation, Looting, Welfare State and Crime Tidal Wave


Heritage: Amnestied Illegals Will Get $9.4T in Benefits; Increase Debt $6.3T'

what is the REAL cost of all that “CHEAP” Mexican labor? Add it up and then factor in the MEXICAN CRIME TIDAL WAVE and the fact that the MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS now operate in 2,500 American cities!

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/05/will-obamas-amnesty-bankrupt-us.html

WHAT WILL THE OBAMA ORCHESTRATED LA RAZA MEXICAN LOOTING REALLY COST US… BESIDES THE MEX ASSAULT ON OUR CULTURE AND CRIME TIDAL WAVE….???

HERE ARE THE DEVASTATING FIGURES OBAMA and the DEMOCRAT PARTY DO NOT WANT YOU TO KNOW!!!

 more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast
 

Amnesty's price: $12,433 (PASSED OVER TO AMERICANS IN TAXES!) for every legalized immigrant household

VIVA LA RAZA AMNESTY and OBAMA’S OPEN BORDERS AGENDA???


City Journal
How Unskilled Immigrants Hurt Our Economy
 
Immigration’s bottom line has shifted so sharply that in a high-immigration state like California, native-born residents are paying up to ten times more in state and local taxes than immigrants generate in economic benefits.

A handful of industries get low-cost labor, and the taxpayers foot the bill.
Pols around the country, intent on currying favor with ethnic voting blocs by appearing immigrant-friendly, have jumped on the benefits-for-immigrants bandwagon, endorsing “don’t ask, don’t tell” policies toward immigrants who register for benefits, giving tax dollars to centers that find immigrants work and aid illegals, and enacting legislation prohibiting local authorities from cooperating with federal immigration officials.
 
 
Steven Malanga
 
The day after Librado Velasquez arrived on Staten Island after a long, surreptitious journey from his Chiapas, Mexico, home, he headed out to a street corner to wait with other illegal immigrants looking for work. Velasquez, who had supported his wife, seven kids, and his in-laws as a campesino, or peasant farmer, until a 1998 hurricane devastated his farm, eventually got work, off the books, loading trucks at a small New Jersey factory, which hired illegals for jobs that required few special skills. The arrangement suited both, until a work injury sent Velasquez to the local emergency room, where federal law required that he be treated, though he could not afford to pay for his care. After five operations, he is now permanently disabled and has remained in the United States to pursue compensation claims.

“I do not have the use of my leg without walking with a cane, and I do not have strength in my arm in order to lift things,” Velasquez said through an interpreter at New York City Council hearings. “I have no other way to live except if I receive some other type of compensation. I need help, and I thought maybe my son could come and work here and support me here in the United States.”

Velasquez’s story illustrates some of the fault lines in the nation’s current, highly charged, debate on immigration. Since the mid-1960s, America has welcomed nearly 30 million legal immigrants and received perhaps another 15 million illegals, numbers unprecedented in our history. These immigrants have picked our fruit, cleaned our homes, cut our grass, worked in our factories, and washed our cars. But they have also crowded into our hospital emergency rooms, schools, and government-subsidized aid programs, sparking a fierce debate about their contributions to our society and the costs they impose on it.

Advocates of open immigration argue that welcoming the Librado Velasquezes of the world is essential for our American economy: our businesses need workers like him, because we have a shortage of people willing to do low-wage work. Moreover, the free movement of labor in a global economy pays off for the United States, because immigrants bring skills and capital that expand our economy and offset immigration’s costs. Like tax cuts, supporters argue, immigration pays for itself.

But the tale of Librado Velasquez helps show why supporters are wrong about today’s immigration, as many Americans sense and so much research has demonstrated. America does not have a vast labor shortage that requires waves of low-wage immigrants to alleviate; in fact, unemployment among unskilled workers is high—about 30 percent. Moreover, many of the unskilled, uneducated workers now journeying here labor, like Velasquez, in shrinking industries, where they force out native workers, and many others work in industries where the availability of cheap workers has led businesses to suspend investment in new technologies that would make them less labor-intensive.

Yet while these workers add little to our economy, they come at great cost, because they are not economic abstractions but human beings, with their own culture and ideas—often at odds with our own. Increasing numbers of them arrive with little education and none of the skills necessary to succeed in a modern economy. Many may wind up stuck on our lowest economic rungs, where they will rely on something that immigrants of other generations didn’t have: a vast U.S. welfare and social-services apparatus that has enormously amplified the cost of immigration. Just as welfare reform and other policies are helping to shrink America’s underclass by weaning people off such social programs, we are importing a new, foreign-born underclass. As famed free-market economist Milton Friedman puts it: “It’s just obvious that you can’t have free immigration and a welfare state.”

Immigration can only pay off again for America if we reshape our policy, organizing it around what’s good for the economy by welcoming workers we truly need and excluding those who, because they have so little to offer, are likely to cost us more than they contribute, and who will struggle for years to find their place here.

Hampering today’s immigration debate are our misconceptions about the so-called first great migration some 100 years ago, with which today’s immigration is often compared. We envision that first great migration as a time when multitudes of Emma Lazarus’s “tired,” “poor,” and “wretched refuse” of Europe’s shores made their way from destitution to American opportunity. Subsequent studies of American immigration with titles like The Uprooted convey the same impression of the dispossessed and displaced swarming here to find a new life. If America could assimilate 24 million mostly desperate immigrants from that great migration—people one unsympathetic economist at the turn of the twentieth century described as “the unlucky, the thriftless, the worthless”—surely, so the story goes, today’s much bigger and richer country can absorb the millions of Librado Velasquezes now venturing here.

But that argument distorts the realities of the first great migration. Though fleeing persecution or economic stagnation in their homelands, that era’s immigrants—Jewish tailors and seamstresses who helped create New York’s garment industry, Italian stonemasons and bricklayers who helped build some of our greatest buildings, German merchants, shopkeepers, and artisans—all brought important skills with them that fit easily into the American economy. Those waves of immigrants—many of them urban dwellers who crossed a continent and an ocean to get here—helped supercharge the workforce at a time when the country was going through a transformative economic expansion that craved new workers, especially in its cities. A 1998 National Research Council report noted “that the newly arriving immigrant nonagricultural work force . . . was (slightly) more skilled than the resident American labor force”: 27 percent of them were skilled laborers, compared with only 17 percent of that era’s native-born workforce.

Many of these immigrants quickly found a place in our economy, participating in the workforce at a higher rate even than the native population. Their success at finding work sent many of them quickly up the economic ladder: those who stayed in America for at least 15 years, for instance, were just as likely to own their own business as native-born workers of the same age, one study found. Another study found that their American-born children were just as likely to be accountants, engineers, or lawyers as Americans whose families had been here for generations.

*

CREATING THE MEX WELFARE STATE FOR ILLEGAL LOOTERS THAT WAVE THEIR MEX FLAGS IN OUR FACES AND RANT THEY’RE DOING THE WORK WE WON’T!

*

What the newcomers of the great migration did not find here was a vast social-services and welfare state. They had to rely on their own resources or those of friends, relatives, or private, often ethnic, charities if things did not go well. That’s why about 70 percent of those who came were men in their prime. It’s also why many of them left when the economy sputtered several times during the period. For though one often hears that restrictive anti-immigration legislation starting with the Emergency Quota Act of 1921 ended the first great migration, what really killed it was the crash of the American economy. Even with the 1920s quotas, America welcomed some 4.1 million immigrants, but in the Depression of the 1930s, the number of foreign immigrants tumbled far below quota levels, to 500,000. With America’s streets no longer paved with gold, and without access to the New Deal programs for native-born Americans, immigrants not only stopped coming, but some 60 percent of those already here left in a great remigration home.

Today’s immigration has turned out so differently in part because it emerged out of the 1960s civil rights and Great Society mentality. In 1965, a new immigration act eliminated the old system of national quotas, which critics saw as racist because it greatly favored European nations. Lawmakers created a set of broader immigration quotas for each hemisphere, and they added a new visa preference category for family members to join their relatives here. Senate immigration subcommittee chairman Edward Kennedy reassured the country that, “contrary to the charges in some quarters, [the bill] will not inundate America with immigrants,” and “it will not cause American workers to lose their jobs.”

But, in fact, the law had an immediate, dramatic effect, increasing immigration by 60 percent in its first ten years. Sojourners from poorer countries around the rest of the world arrived in ever-greater numbers, so that whereas half of immigrants in the 1950s had originated from Europe, 75 percent by the 1970s were from Asia and Latin America. And as the influx of immigrants grew, the special-preferences rule for family unification intensified it further, as the pool of eligible family members around the world also increased. Legal immigration to the U.S. soared from 2.5 million in the 1950s to 4.5 million in the 1970s to 7.3 million in the 1980s to about 10 million in the 1990s.

As the floodgates of legal immigration opened, the widening economic gap between the United States and many of its neighbors also pushed illegal immigration to levels that America had never seen. In particular, when Mexico’s move to a more centralized, state-run economy in the 1970s produced hyperinflation, the disparity between its stagnant economy and U.S. prosperity yawned wide. Mexico’s per-capita gross domestic product, 37 percent of the United States’ in the early 1980s, was only 27 percent of it by the end of the decade—and is now just 25 percent of it. With Mexican farm workers able to earn seven to ten times as much in the United States as at home, by the 1980s illegals were pouring across our border at the rate of about 225,000 a year, and U.S. sentiment rose for slowing the flow.

*

THE NUMBER OF ILLEGALS IN THIS COUNTRY IS KEPT SECRET BY OUR GOV, AND BY DEMAND OF LA RAZA PARTY. MOST NON-GOV SOURCES PUT THE NUMBER AT ABOUT 38 MILLION… and breeding fast.

*

But an unusual coalition of business groups, unions, civil rights activists, and church leaders thwarted the call for restrictions with passage of the inaptly named 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act, which legalized some 2.7 million unauthorized aliens already here, supposedly in exchange for tougher penalties and controls against employers who hired illegals. The law proved no deterrent, however, because supporters, in subsequent legislation and court cases argued on civil rights grounds, weakened the employer sanctions. Meanwhile, more illegals flooded here in the hope of future amnesties from Congress, while the newly legalized sneaked their wives and children into the country rather than have them wait for family-preference visas. The flow of illegals into the country rose to between 300,000 and 500,000 per year in the 1990s, so that a decade after the legislation that had supposedly solved the undocumented alien problem by reclassifying them as legal, the number of illegals living in the United States was back up to about 5 million, while today it’s estimated at between 9 million and 13 million.

The flood of immigrants, both legal and illegal, from countries with poor, ill-educated populations, has yielded a mismatch between today’s immigrants and the American economy and has left many workers poorly positioned to succeed for the long term. Unlike the immigrants of 100 years ago, whose skills reflected or surpassed those of the native workforce at the time, many of today’s arrivals, particularly the more than half who now come from Central and South America, are farmworkers in their home countries who come here with little education or even basic training in blue-collar occupations like carpentry or machinery. (A century ago, farmworkers made up 35 percent of the U.S. labor force, compared with the under 2 percent who produce a surplus of food today.) Nearly two-thirds of Mexican immigrants, for instance, are high school dropouts, and most wind up doing either unskilled factory work or small-scale construction projects, or they work in service industries, where they compete for entry-level jobs against one another, against the adult children of other immigrants, and against native-born high school dropouts. Of the 15 industries employing the greatest percentage of foreign-born workers, half are low-wage service industries, including gardening, domestic household work, car washes, shoe repair, and janitorial work. To take one stark example: whereas 100 years ago, immigrants were half as likely as native-born workers to be employed in household service, today immigrants account for 27 percent of all domestic workers in the United States.

*

Although open-borders advocates say that these workers are simply taking jobs Americans don’t want, studies show that the immigrants drive down wages of native-born workers and squeeze them out of certain industries. Harvard economists George Borjas and Lawrence Katz, for instance, estimate that low-wage immigration cuts the wages for the average native-born high school dropout by some 8 percent, or more than $1,200 a year. Other economists find that the new workers also push down wages significantly for immigrants already here and native-born Hispanics.

EXPLOITATION OF ILLEGALS. THE NEW AMERICAN SLAVES.

Consequently, as the waves of immigration continue, the sheer number of those competing for low-skilled service jobs makes economic progress difficult. A study of the impact of immigration on New York City’s restaurant business, for instance, found that 60 percent of immigrant workers do not receive regular raises, while 70 percent had never been promoted. One Mexican dishwasher aptly captured the downward pressure that all these arriving workers put on wages by telling the study’s authors about his frustrating search for a 50-cent raise after working for $6.50 an hour: “I visited a few restaurants asking for $7 an hour, but they only offered me $5.50 or $6,” he said. “I had to beg [for a job].”

*

LA RAZA DEMS FEINSTEIN AND BOXER HAVE TAKEN BIG LOOT FROM THEIR BIG AG BIZ DONORS!

*

In many American industries, waves of low-wage workers have also retarded investments that might lead to modernization and efficiency. Farming, which employs a million immigrant laborers in California alone, is the prime case in point. Faced with a labor shortage in the early 1960s, when President Kennedy ended a 22-year-old guest-worker program that allowed 45,000 Mexican farmhands to cross over the border and harvest 2.2 million tons of California tomatoes for processed foods, farmers complained but swiftly automated, adopting a mechanical tomato-picking technology created more than a decade earlier. Today, just 5,000 better-paid workers—one-ninth the original workforce—harvest 12 million tons of tomatoes using the machines.

If the benefits of the current generation of migrants are small, the costs are large and growing because of America’s vast range of social programs and the wide advocacy network that strives to hook low-earning legal and illegal immigrants into these programs. A 1998 National Academy of Sciences study found that more than 30 percent of California’s foreign-born were on Medicaid—including 37 percent of all Hispanic households—compared with 14 percent of native-born households. The foreign-born were more than twice as likely as the native-born to be on welfare, and their children were nearly five times as likely to be in means-tested government lunch programs. Native-born households pay for much of this, the study found, because they earn more and pay higher taxes—and are more likely to comply with tax laws. Recent immigrants, by contrast, have much lower levels of income and tax compliance (another study estimated that only 56 percent of illegals in California have taxes deducted from their earnings, for instance). The study’s conclusion: immigrant families cost each native-born household in California an additional $1,200 a year in taxes.

Immigration’s bottom line has shifted so sharply that in a high-immigration state like California, native-born residents are paying up to ten times more in state and local taxes than immigrants generate in economic benefits. Moreover, the cost is only likely to grow as the foreign-born population—which has already mushroomed from about 9 percent of the U.S. population when the NAS studies were done in the late 1990s to about 12 percent today—keeps growing. And citizens in more and more places will feel the bite, as immigrants move beyond their traditional settling places. From 1990 to 2005, the number of states in which immigrants make up at least 5 percent of the population nearly doubled from 17 to 29, with states like Arkansas, South Dakota, South Carolina, and Georgia seeing the most growth. This sharp turnaround since the 1970s, when immigrants were less likely to be using the social programs of the Great Society than the native-born population, says Harvard economist Borjas, suggests that welfare and other social programs are a magnet drawing certain types of immigrants—nonworking women, children, and the elderly—and keeping them here when they run into difficulty.

Not only have the formal and informal networks helping immigrants tap into our social spending grown, but they also get plenty of assistance from advocacy groups financed by tax dollars, working to ensure that immigrants get their share of social spending. Thus, the Newark-based New Jersey Immigration Policy Network receives several hundred thousand government dollars annually to help doctors and hospitals increase immigrant enrollment in Jersey’s subsidized health-care programs. Casa Maryland, operating in the greater Washington area, gets funding from nearly 20 federal, state, and local government agencies to run programs that “empower” immigrants to demand benefits and care from government and to “refer clients to government and private social service programs for which they and their families may be eligible.”

Pols around the country, intent on currying favor with ethnic voting blocs by appearing immigrant-friendly, have jumped on the benefits-for-immigrants bandwagon, endorsing “don’t ask, don’t tell” policies toward immigrants who register for benefits, giving tax dollars to centers that find immigrants work and aid illegals, and enacting legislation prohibiting local authorities from cooperating with federal immigration officials. In New York, for instance, Mayor Michael Bloomberg has ordered city agencies to ignore an immigrant’s status in providing services. “This policy’s critical to encourage immigrant day laborers to access . . . children’s health insurance, a full range of preventive primary and acute medical care, domestic violence counseling, emergency shelters, police protection, consumer fraud protections, and protection against discrimination through the Human Rights Commission,” the city’s Immigrant Affairs Commissioner, Guillermo Linares, explains.

Almost certainly, immigrants’ participation in our social welfare programs will increase over time, because so many are destined to struggle in our workforce. Despite our cherished view of immigrants as rapidly climbing the economic ladder, more and more of the new arrivals and their children face a lifetime of economic disadvantage, because they arrive here with low levels of education and with few work skills—shortcomings not easily overcome. Mexican immigrants, who are up to six times more likely to be high school dropouts than native-born Americans, not only earn substantially less than the native-born median, but the wage gap persists for decades after they’ve arrived.

*

MEXICANS ARE THE MOST RACIST “LA RAZA”, VIOLENT CULTURES IN THE HEMISPHERE!  THEY LOATHE THIS NATION BEYOND WHAT THEY CAN LOOT. THAT INCLUDES OUR LANGUAGE, FLAG AND CULTURE!

*

Meanwhile, because their parents start off so far behind, the American-born children of Mexican immigrants also make slow progress. First-generation adult Americans of Mexican descent studied in the 2000 census, for instance, earned 14 percent less than native-born Americans. By contrast, first-generation Portuguese Americans earned slightly more than the average native-born worker—a reminder of how quickly immigrants once succeeded in America and how some still do. But Mexico increasingly dominates our immigration flows, accounting for 43 percent of the growth of our foreign-born population in the 1990s.

One reason some ethnic groups make up so little ground concerns the transmission of what economists call “ethnic capital,” or what we might call the influence of culture. More than previous generations, immigrants today tend to live concentrated in ethnic enclaves, and their children find their role models among their own group. Thus the children of today’s Mexican immigrants are likely to live in a neighborhood where about 60 percent of men dropped out of high school and now do low-wage work, and where less than half of the population speak English fluently, which might explain why high school dropout rates among Americans of Mexican ancestry are two and a half times higher than dropout rates for all other native-born Americans, and why first-generation Mexican Americans do not move up the economic ladder nearly as quickly as the children of other immigrant groups. …. BECAUSE THEY HAVE TOO MUCH CONTEMPT FOR THIS NATION, OUR LANGUAGE, LITERACY AND THE RULE OF LAW, WHICH ALL MEXICANS BELIEVE DOES NOT APPLY TO THEM!

 

 “Importing labor is far more complicated than importing other factors of production, such as commodities,” write University of California at Davis prof Philip Martin, an expert on guest-worker programs, and Michael Teitelbaum, a former member of the U.S. Commission on Immigration Reform. “Migration involves human beings, with their own beliefs, politics, cultures, languages, loves, hates, histories, and families.”

At the same time, legalization will only spur new problems, as our experience with the 1986 immigration act should remind us. At the time, then-congressman Charles Schumer, who worked on the legislation, acknowledged that it was “a riverboat gamble,” with no certainty that it would slow down the waves of illegals. Now, of course, we know that the legislation had the opposite effect, creating the bigger problem we now have (which hasn’t stopped Senator Schumer from supporting the current legalization proposals). The legislation also swamped the Immigration and Naturalization Service with masses of fraudulent, black-market documents, so that it eventually rubber-stamped tens of thousands of dubious applications.

If we do not legalize them, what can we do with 11 million illegals? Ship them back home? Their presence here is a fait accompli, the argument goes, and only legalization can bring them above ground, where they can assimilate. But that argument assumes that we have only two choices: to decriminalize or deport. But what happened after the first great migration suggests a third way: to end the economic incentives that keep them here. We could prompt a great remigration home if, first off, state and local governments in jurisdictions like New York and California would stop using their vast resources to aid illegal immigrants. Second, the federal government can take the tougher approach that it failed to take after the 1986 act. It can require employers to verify Social Security numbers and immigration status before hiring, so that we bar illegals from many jobs. It can deport those caught here. And it can refuse to give those who remain the same benefits as U.S. citizens. Such tough measures do work: as a recent Center for Immigration Studies report points out, when the federal government began deporting illegal Muslims after 9/11, many more illegals who knew they were likely to face more scrutiny voluntarily returned home.

If America is ever to make immigration work for our economy again, it must reject policies shaped by advocacy groups trying to turn immigration into the next civil rights cause or by a tiny minority of businesses seeking cheap labor subsidized by the taxpayers. Instead, we must look to other developed nations that have focused on luring workers who have skills that are in demand and who have the best chance of assimilating. Australia, for instance, gives preferences to workers grouped into four skilled categories: managers, professionals, associates of professionals, and skilled laborers. Using a straightforward “points calculator” to determine who gets in, Australia favors immigrants between the ages of 18 and 45 who speak English, have a post–high school degree or training in a trade, and have at least six months’ work experience as everything from laboratory technicians to architects and surveyors to information-technology workers. Such an immigration policy goes far beyond America’s employment-based immigration categories, like the H1-B visas, which account for about 10 percent of our legal immigration and essentially serve the needs of a few Silicon Valley industries.

*

MEXICO BANKRUPTS CALIFORNIA HOSPITALS  - MEX CONSULATES URGE LOOTING OF LEGALS

more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast


 

While the Obama Administration halts deportations to work on its secret amnesty plan, hospitals across the U.S. are getting stuck with the exorbitant tab of medically treating illegal immigrants and some are finally demanding compensation from the federal government.

*

THEY DO SO ON BEHALF OF THEIR GREEDY BIG AG BIZ DONORS!


CASE STUDY ON THE REAL COST OF MEXICO AND THE DEM’S ANCHOR BABY FACTORIES HERE:

more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast



Jose Herria emigrated illegally from Mexico to Stockton, Calif., in 1997 to work as a fruit picker. He brought with him his wife, Felipa, and three children, 19, 12 and 8 -- all illegals. When Felipa gave birth to her fourth child, daughter Flor, the family had what is referred to as an "anchor baby" -- an American citizen by birth who provided the entire Silverio clan a ticket to remain in the U.S. permanently.

Heather Mac Donald: White House doesn't want to enforce immigration

more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast



GOP: OBAMA’S AMNESTY HANDOUT WILL COST THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS BILLIONS!


*

Poll: 80% of GOP voters less likely to vote for a member of Congress who supports giving legal status to undocumented aliens.
http://www.alipac.us/content.php?r=1673-GOP-Voters-Oppose-Legalizing-Aliens-Nearly-80-Republicans-would-be-less-likely-to


The danger, as Washington Post economics columnist Robert Samuelson argues, is that of “importing poverty” in the form of a new underclass—a permanent group of working poor.