Saturday, August 6, 2022

ENTERTANMENT FOR $5 - AWARD-WINNING HISTORICAL FICTION

 IF YOU LIKED KATHRYN STOCKETT'S THE HELP...... You will love this story!


One of the Greatest Rags to Riches Story Told


FICTION: 

THE AIR BETWEEN OUR TUBS: Borrowed Dreams


Available on eBook for $5.

https://www.amazon.com/AIR-BETWEEN-OUR-TUBS-Borrowed-ebook/dp/B09F1DKHQW/ref=sr_1_




THE AIR BETWEEN OUR TUBS: Borrowed Dreams

The novel is narrated by the protagonist herself, in a style infused with all the wit and wisdom she needs to draw on to survive the trials she encounters. The music of the prose captures the verve and passion of the lives it traces, and the arc of the narrative follows an epic trajectory, encompassing a vision as broad and embracing as the love that animates her awareness.   

 

Winner of the Hackney Literary Awards

The Air Between Our Tubs explores the depths of human depravity, and the resilience that enables us to triumph over it. In situations of the most dire violence and inhumanity shines a gleam of love, endurance, and commitment to a belief in the possibility of goodness. The novel is a testament to the capacity of these values and beliefs to persist and overcome in the face of the evil they encounter. Despite the heart-wrenching realities it explores, The Air Between Our Tubs is a book of profound hope and ultimately a love story. 

                                                       LEWARO ROAD

 



Silent Cries, Broken Whispers


CHAPTER 6

The morning of that last summer at Grandview was unlike any before. A stillness hovered over our shack that jarred my young thoughts from the moment my eyes opened. What was wrong? Why hadn’t Daddy gotten up to head to the fields? Momma went about getting a pot of grits on like she was sleepwalking.

“Alex, you and Sarah go down by the river and pick your daddy some them wild grapes. That ’a make ’im feel better. Go on now.”

“What’s wrong with ’im, Momma?” Brother didn’t seem to expect an answer.

Silently she shuffled about, shaking her head at nothing, till she finally pointed us to the door. That was always her signal she wanted us out of the way. There’d be no grits that morning.

I always loved to meander down to the riverbank with my brother where there’d be a thicket of wild muscadine grapes or berries waiting. I squatted for the low vines as Brother reached for the higher. I loved listening to his tales of when the river would one day carry him off on some adventure. At the water’s edge I chattered on ’bout this or that. Alex barely grunted at my notions. Even so, we put a bit more grapes into the basket than our mouths. I remember asking how many basketfuls we could eat in a day. He said nothing and that silence spread like a ground hugging fog. You see, Alex had stopped picking and was gazing up the slope to where Samuel stood staring back. Why’d he come down to the river? He and Daddy only went fishing with Alex on Sunday and they never let me come.

“Alex, you and lil’ Sarah come on back,” Sam said. “Your ma be needin’ you. Come on now.”

Alex didn’t move. It was as if he couldn’t. Still, his eyes followed Samuel. Sam’s boots snapped the vines that lay over the path as he headed back up.

“Why’d Samuel come? Daddy up there waitin’?”

Most times Alex would rather jab me with a pointy stick than hold my hand. Yet he said nothing as he gripped mine.

Up ahead Samuel turned to see if we were following. His expression never broke loose from the haunted look he’d come with. I looked up at my brother, but he only mirrored that fear. You see, nobody had ever come looking for us down by the river. Why would they? It wasn’t near dark and the river wasn’t swollen from the rains. Our eyes darted back and forth looking for the comfort that would not be found. In crashing moments, the reality of that morning would hit me like a belt across my tender face.

The door to our shack was wide open and ’croppers, most I knew, were staring in. What were they looking for? Their heavy silences were deeper than the one I awoke to. Jane, Samuel’s wife, was working near where Momma fiddled with some old bent tins. She stared into their emptiness like she was hunting for something she’d lost. Jane worked at the fireplace and mumbled bits and pieces of her thoughts to Momma. I figured it was woman-talk as I didn’t understand the half of it. Still, I searched their sorrowful glances for something their words hadn’t revealed.

Momma dropped her tin cans yet did not reach for them. She looked down at her feet like she’d simply lost them forever. Lost what, I wondered? Lost forever is a frightening feeling. I felt that fear as Momma’s eyes strayed from mine, looking lost.

Jane finished filling a poultice with smelly bits of roots and herbs, which she dipped in vinegar and squeezed over the fire. Our shack quickly filled with ashy steam. She took the poultice over to my daddy and dabbed it on his forehead and looked to be telling him a secret. He flinched, but still only gazed at the timbers above as if he was searching for something he’d lost. Or was he merely trying to hold on to what he was losing?

I went to show Daddy our basket of wild grapes, but Jane shooed me back with one flip of her wrist.

“Back away, chil’e,” she said.

With her finger pointing at my face she looked hard into my eyes to make sure I minded. At that I knew for sure there was trouble even before Momma gasped and put her hands to her mouth like something was about to fall out. I guessed she didn’t want nobody to hear if the sadness in her eyes drained through her lips that couldn’t close because of all those heavy sobs about to fall out. Again, Momma’s hands cupped her mouth when she heard Jane telling Daddy a secret about Jesus and that it ’a soon be over. I guess Jesus heard her prayer, as on her last word my daddy’s eyes stopped blinking forever.

I knew what had arrived at our door that day had brought the silent cries of one who has nothing and nowhere to hide from the void of it all. Who might save us? Who even would? Still Momma reached out.

 “Sarah, go up to the big house. When ya get to the lawn, yell for Mas’er Burney to come.”

Walking about the shack like she was in the wrong place, Mama’s voice faded to whispers like somebody done wrung her throat.

My broken thoughts pounded to whispers in my head. Why’d I need to go up to Jackson’s? What was I gonna tell Burney? I ain’t never said a word to Jackson’s daddy.

Jane wanted me gone, too. “Go on chil’e.”

Momma’s chin trembled when she noticed Alex sitting in the corner with his arms twisted about his head as though hiding his eyes could push it all away. What was it he so feared?

More alone than I could have realized, I sifted my silent cries, wondering why I needed to stop at the lawn up there at the big house? Did Momma forget that I’d long been past the lawn that moated it to play with Jackson? Or did she know I didn’t really count—that to the white folks up there I was just as invisible as the fever that had visited my shack? Only a nobody; one of those who ain’t ’posed to go that far into the shadows of the big house, I recalled Ella saying, unless the white folks are tossing scraps on Christian day. Yet I don’t remember them tossing much of anything our way but misery. Still when I came close to the lawn for some inexplicable reason I stopped. There I yelled over the invisible barrier that now pricked at my fears. My feet felt strangely anchored on the dirt side even as my shadow loomed over the soft green lawn that ended steps from the white veranda; that certain boundary that I’d never seen before now held me back. So, I yelled over it.

“Mas’er Burney come quick! Hurry, come quick!”

I yelled for my daddy so Jesus would come and pull him back from Momma’s sorrow and deliver us from the silence he’d fallen under. I yelled till I thought my throat might come out. It didn’t, but Jackson did. Maybe Jesus could hear me then.

 Jackson looked deep into my eyes as he teetered over the banister. I said no more, as the words wouldn’t come. Jackson said nothing back, and ran to his door, yelling even harder than he’d ever yelled at ol’ Isaac. He knew something was wrong, too. You see, there was no distance between Jackson and me.

 “Daddy! Come out! Sarah’s here!” Jackson yelled through the open door that was always closed to us.

What could I do to get Burney’s attention? If my voice gave out like Momma’s, would he hear my fears?

Still I knew, knew that only Jackson could get his daddy to come out, ’cause never before had any ’cropper come to the big house yelling for a Burney’s attendance.

“Daddy, I said come out! Your horses got loose again and they’s eatin’ up Momma’s roses. Daddy!”

Jackson knew Burney didn’t like dealing with nothing but his prize horses, and didn’t take to his son’s manipulations, against which he was as defenseless as his momma’s daily brew of tales she’d long dunked him in about her shopping. Nevertheless, he had to keep an eye on his former property, even if it was only driven by his son’s foot stomping for attention.

Burney stepped out reading his newspaper with scant intention of going beyond his fragrant world. Now as I look back, he never really did.

“Daddy, your horses got out again!” Jackson pointed down to the shacks but that didn’t fool Burney none.

“Where’s my horses, Son? I bet they’re in the stables where they belong, ain’t they?”

“No, they’s down visitin’ Sarah. Go see!”

Jackson glanced my way to convey that his strategy was working as usual. But Burney didn’t look to me for confirmation of his son’s tall tale. I doubt if he even knew my name, or to which of his former slaves I was kindred.

“Now, Son, how are they eatin’ your ma’s roses if they’re down in the shacks? That where your ma does her gardenin’? With our niggers? If you interrupted my breakfast for nothin’, I’m tellin’ Ella to whoop your butt good!”

“She already done it. You forgot,” Jackson said.

In their convoluted ways Jackson and his nanny always covered for each other.

“Between you and your ma my memory sure seems to fail somewhere, don’t it?”

Jackson always knew how to direct traffic at Grandview.

“Yeah, down by Sarah’s,” he replied.

Burney headed down the path to the shacks, all the while mumbling something mean about the ’croppers; the very ones whose backs provided him with a life that floated ever so seamlessly on that cool veranda hanging with the scent of jasmine.

 Burney walked past me like I didn’t exist. I knew to him I didn’t, ’cause his eyes, like ol’ Issac’s, were that cold shade of near colorless blue. About the color pond water reflects on a winter’s day. He couldn’t see me, so how could his heart feel the anguish of those crumbling moments? Burney yet had to follow me, as he had no idea where Owen and Minerva, born to his property, dwelled.

I glanced back to see if Burney followed, as he looked all so blind to everything but the inconvenience of it all. The corners of his mouth told me so. They’d turned down so hard his young face appeared crimped. Still, he followed me to my door. There the ’croppers swayed an open path for the master—their eyes respectfully downcast as he walked up nodding to nobody. But then he probably couldn’t see us.

All was silent in that dark ashy shack ’cept for Momma’s wailing at the foot of the moss-stuffed bed. Then, choking on her sobs, she struggled onto the bed and across my daddy’s legs. She grabbed on to them as if she could pull him back from the other side; But she could only lay there wailing tattered pieces of her heart. I stood wondering why my daddy couldn’t pick up those pieces like he had so many times when the heat of the fields had sunk her low. Hold her sobbing head? Wipe her tears away? Because only her silent cries were left and even those were all but spent.

My daddy still stared up at that small hole in the timbers that surrendered a glint of light over his brow. Alex yet sat in the corner where he’d pulled himself tighter into his arms. There was little to go.

“Why ain’t you out in the fields?” Burney demanded. “This ain’t Sunday. Isaac’s knows to get them crops in before the first rains. I’ll cut you off all food credits if you don’t get out there, and I mean now!”

But we knew what he meant even before he spewed the words. His glaring eyes spoke louder than his voice. Burney’s words were hard, mean and therefore true to his deepest heart—that part of his soul that could not follow Jesus to the doorsteps of the downtrodden. So why do I yet look back after all these years searching for a glint of tenderness in his eyes, a drop of humanity somewhere in his uttering? ’Cause there was so much from his seven-year-old son? The heat of his anger singed my thoughts for I quickly realized where the ugly words that ol’ Isaac openly spewed at the ’croppers came from; they were born from the very depths of the soul of one Robert Burney, former slave owner. And I also knew why he didn’t mouth them himself. For those deeds he had Isaac around so his Christian mouth remained unsullied by the coarseness that his wife would surely claim to be offended by. But then maybe a mouth roughened by coarse words can’t savor a mint julep. How could I have known?

 The ’croppers withdrew in silence. Minerva moaned and choked as Burney stared on. His mouth twitched and his words fumbled as they reloaded.

 “Owen, he dead…” Momma whispered.

Now like Alex she cried with no tears.

 “He gone to Jesus. Now you ain’t got ’im no more. No, you ain’t!”

Her words were tangled in her sobs but still hit the walls like an ax hits dry timber and landed, splinter by broken syllable. I stood there fearful of my heart bleeding me away till nobody could see me. Not my daddy for sure. His still open eyes could see me no longer, and I yet begged for him to.

Burney jolted the way Miss Burney always did at the sight of me in her rose garden.

“Fever! Damn you!” Burney yelled. “You brought me to a shack with the fever! Look at you, you got it too!”

He reared back from Owen’s stare.

“Owen dead…” Momma repeated; her sinking eyes still pleaded. But Lord, it was all too late.

I always cried when Alex did—figured I could rely on his instincts. That day I would have cried all the same as I struggled to sort the whys. Why was my daddy sleeping with his eyes open? Why was Alex sobbing so pitifully? Why did Momma seem lost and so far away?

“Don’t…don’t separate my kids. Don’t run ’em off like stray dogs. We been workin’ all our days fer you. Jesus is watchin’!”

 Momma lilted to her knees, like she always did when she prayed, but there was no prayer left. She crawled over to clutch at Burney’s ankles and beg for something that was too broken to possess again. Her twisted body folded at his dusty boots, which brought the look of terror to Burney’s ashen face. Still I wondered how he would comfort her? Wipe her tears on the sleeve of his white shirt like he did Jackson’s nose? Was he gonna sit a spell to offer thanks for all the years of work he’d squeezed out of Owen Breedlove? No, that was not why he’d come to our shack. There were no flowers hidden in his clinched fists or tenderly arranged somewhere his bitter words.

 “Ain’t nobody in the world watchin’ a nigger die!”

But, Lord, somebody was watching. With my own eyes I’d seen much, and no, there was nobody counting. Not the life of Owen Breedlove; nobody but Jesus that is. Tell me what dying is? Why is Burney mad at Momma? I could no longer cry as loud as my brother, yet I still tried.

Momma mumbled broken whispers to comfort Alex and me.

“The Lord is my Shepherd. Though I walk through the shadow of death…”

But I reckoned the words were too brittle for the Lord to hear, even if He wanted to.

Momma’s face screamed, but her words only crumbled to the ground next to her mouth. “God is watchin’ you!”

Minerva Breedlove died the next day.

Something was gone, but how could I have known that it was my childhood?

 



THE AIR BETWEEN OUR TUBS: Borrowed Dreams

The novel is narrated by the protagonist herself, in a style infused with all the wit and wisdom she needs to draw on to survive the trials she encounters. The music of the prose captures the verve and passion of the lives it traces, and the arc of the narrative follows an epic trajectory, encompassing a vision as broad and embracing as the love that animates her awareness.   

 

Winner of the Hackney Literary Awards

The Air Between Our Tubs explores the depths of human depravity, and the resilience that enables us to triumph over it. In situations of the most dire violence and inhumanity shines a gleam of love, endurance, and commitment to a belief in the possibility of goodness. The novel is a testament to the capacity of these values and beliefs to persist and overcome in the face of the evil they encounter. Despite the heart-wrenching realities it explores, The Air Between Our Tubs is a book of profound hope and ultimately a love story. LEWARO ROAD

 



NON-FICTION:  WHO KILLED JANE STANFORD? 

A Cardinal Sin at Stanford University

REVIEW: ‘Who Killed Jane Stanford?’

 • June 12, 2022 4:59 am

SHARE

Jane Stanford could have been saved by a fart. That, at least, is what her doctors, friends, and community accepted in 1905 when the cofounder of Stanford University spoke her last words: "This is a horrible death to die."

A physician claimed that Mrs. Stanford overate at lunch and had considerable gas, which prompted a heart attack. The president of Stanford University refused to accept that Jane’s death was unnatural. Members of the Stanford family repeated the lie that Jane died of heart failure.

Historian, Stanford University professor, and two-time Pulitzer Prize finalist Richard White rejects this relayed account and swaps it for one more interesting: murder. As White explores in his new book Who Killed Jane Stanford?, the philanthropist had powerful enemies. Many of them were involved in an elaborate plot to kill the heiress and seize her estate for themselves. In his detailed account of the Gilded Age mystery, White dives into the century-old cold case and at last names a killer.

Just before bed on the evening of January 14, 1905, Jane drank from a glass of Poland Spring water. She immediately detected bitterness and began to vomit. Jane called in her secretary Bertha Berner, who agreed that the water tasted peculiar. Toxicology reports showed that Jane was poisoned by strychnine, a chemical commonly found in rat poison. She survived that occasion.

To recover from the stress of the incident, Jane vacationed at the Moana Hotel in Honolulu, Hawaii. On February 28, just six weeks after she was initially poisoned, Jane retired to her bedroom and drank from a glass of bicarbonate mixed with water. She immediately became ill. Jane again summoned Bertha Berner, who witnessed a series of spasms, during which the heiress declared she had again been poisoned. By the time doctors arrived, it was too late. Physicians concluded the cause of death was a lethal dose of strychnine.

Thousands of miles away in California, Stanford University officials clamored to rule the death natural. A classified murder or suicide could prohibit the university from receiving the widow’s estate—and university president David Starr Jordan couldn’t afford that risk.

It was 20 years earlier that Jane and Leland Stanford founded Stanford University. The couple established the college in memory of their son Leland Jr., who died of typhoid a year earlier. When her husband passed, the college became for Jane "the memorial of a dead son, and of a dead husband."

Jane was intimately involved in Stanford’s affairs, which, according to the author, vexed Jordan. When she questioned a faculty pick or an administrative decision, it demanded from the university president an agreeable response.

Jordan was a eugenicist who thought the French "dissolute and slovenly,' he despised southern Italians, and he thought Mexicans were ‘ignorant, superstitious, ill-nurtured, with little self-control and conception of industry or thrift.'" He also viewed Stanford as constantly overstepping her authority—but Jordan subordinated those views in exchange for the cushy title. He ignored Jane’s concerns over college management until she threatened that position. He even "said in confidence to certain students that things would be better at the University when she had passed away."

The president was no stranger to scandals, including the abrupt termination of faculty members for representing opinions contrary to the administration’s. In 1903, a professor blamed the "liar, hypocrite, and coward" Jordan for his unusual power to haphazardly hire and fire faculty members. Jane planned to terminate Jordan shortly after her February trip to Hawaii.

The control Jane sought in the university’s inner workings alarmed Jordan. She could be temperamental and selfish, and, with such a large chunk of the university’s endowment under her control, Jordan had to be strategic in their partnership. But the president wasn’t the only person close to Jane who manipulated her for money.

Jane paid well her close friend and personal secretary of 30 years, Bertha Berner, who accompanied her on many overseas travels, including that last and fatal trip to Hawaii. Berner inherited $15,000 and a home when the heiress died—and the maid was present for not one, but two instances in which her boss was poisoned.

White introduces a host of other players who likely played a part in Jane’s death: the corrupt law enforcement officers who botched the investigation, shady private detectives who ignored toxicology reports, house servants who stood to gain substantial inheritances. All of these fall short next to the killer White finally names.

Jane dedicated herself, her wealth, and her family’s memory to the university. A staunch spiritualist with Christian influence, she was "as close to Catholic as a Protestant could be." The Stanfords claim that their deceased son visited them in a vision and encouraged the couple to live for humanity and "build a university for the benefit of poor young men, so they can have the same advantages the rich have."

Jane Stanford lived for humanity. But in death, humanity deserted her. White’s investigation is a thrilling tale of Gilded Age deceit, wealth, and death. Rest assured, his conclusion is much more riveting than flatulence.

Who Killed Jane Stanford? A Gilded Age Tale of Murder, Deceit, Spirits and the Birth of a University
by Richard White
W.W. Norton, 384 pp., $35

Published under: Book reviews

THE DEMOCRAT PARTY'S GAMER PARASITE LAWYERS AND THEIR PAYMASTERS ON WALL STREET - Congress Approves Corporate Welfare Scheme in Undisputed Victory for Democrats

 JUDICIAL WATCH’S TEN MOST CORRUPT LIST

NO ONE HAS SUCKED OFF BIG BANKSTERS MORE THAN BARACK OBAMA AND NOT ONE EVER WENT TO PRISON! AND 'CREDIT CARD' JOE WAS THE OBOMB'S V.P. BECAUSE OF HIS LONG HISTORY OF SUCKING OFF BANKSTERS.

President Barack Obama: During his presidential campaign, President Obama promised to run an ethical and transparent administration. However, in his first year in office, the President has delivered corruption and secrecy, bringing Chicago-style political corruption to the White House. JUDICIAL WATCH


ON THE VERY LAST DAY OF AMERICA, THE PIG POLITICIANS WILL BE SUCKING BRIBES FROM THE CRIMINALS ON WALL STREET AND BANKSTERS.

THE COUNTRY IS NOW SO PROFOUNDLY CORRUPT THAT THE BANKSTERS WILL PUT THEIR OWN IN THE WHITE HOUSE AS PRESIDENT. CANDIDATES MUST BE A  GAMER LAWYER WITH A LONG HISTORY OF PROTECTING CRIMINAL BANKSTERS!

NEO-FASCIST MARK ZUCKERBERG SAYS HE WILL ELECT OBOMB FOR A THIRD TERM!

Barack Obama Calls for More Censorship: First Amendment ‘Does Not Apply to Facebook and Twitter’


JUDICIAL WATCH’S TEN MOST CORRUPT LIST

President Barack Obama: During his presidential campaign, President Obama promised to run an ethical and transparent administration. However, in his first year in office, the President has delivered corruption and secrecy, bringing Chicago-style political corruption to the White House. JUDICIAL WATCH

https://ca-judicial-performance-hoax.blogspot.com/2022/04/lawless-lawyers-bankster-regime-of.html


THE IMAGE OF TWO GAMER LAWYERS OWNED BY BIG BANKSTERS: OBAMA'S 'CREDIT CARD' JOE AND WALL STREET CHUCKY!

WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 14: Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and U.S. President Joe Biden speak briefly to reporters as they arrive at the U.S. Capitol for a Senate Democratic luncheon July 14, 2021 in Washington, DC. President Biden is on the Hill to discuss with Senate Democrats the …


Hauser also didn’t like the prevalence of Big Law talent on the Department of Justice team, which signaled to him that the Biden administration could go soft on corporate malefactors. Alexander Nazaryan


VIDEO

Ralph Nader: Biden's First Year Proves He Is Still a "Corporate Socialist" Beholden to Big Business

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jTIUtjkDss&t=28s

 

Congress Approves Corporate Welfare Scheme in Undisputed Victory for Democrats

-

 

Never underestimate ’s ability to revive dead bills, and bad ideas, if enough money is used to revive them.

Oh, and political need – that’s key, too.

Such is the case with the revival and swift passage of a massive subsidy bill for the computer chip industry that, on its own, would have taken  to bizarre new heights. This being Congress – and it also being an election year – the price tag ballooned with an extra $200 billion or so in federal spending, grants, giveaways and old-fashioned pork.

It’s enough to make even the most cynical of us think we are starry-eyed optimists when it comes to pols spending other people’s money (that being taxpayer money, of course). Consider this gem:

According to various reports, the subsidies would not only provide a financial windfall for semiconductor companies in [Sen. Chuck] Schumer’s home state of  (something he openly admits), but also reportedly constitute one of the few “political wins” that the Democrats can deliver to President Biden and candidates in key battleground states like Arizona and Ohio ahead of the midterm elections in November—“huge leverage” that chipmakers and other subsidy supporters are perfectly willing to exploit today. Meanwhile, several of the congressional Republicans who support the subsidies—smaller in number than Democratic supporters but essential to the subsidies’ legislative success—also host semiconductor companies or large semiconductor consumers in their states or districts.

In other words, it’s vote-buying, but the perfectly legal, above-board, in broad daylight kind that Congress mastered even before the ink on the Constitution was dry.

And just when you think it couldn’t get any more tawdry:

Congress appears intent on subsidizing an industry making record profits, already building facilities here, and even facing a potential glut—not because doing so makes good economic sense but because the Democratic leadership and the White House need a “political win” and are under serious pressure from powerful domestic interest groups to deliver the cash. Indeed, even as the subsidies’ economic justifications dwindled, the subsidy amounts increased.

It might, possibly be a little funny…were Uncle Sam not flat broke. But hey – those bills don’t come due until long after the current crop of time servers has gone to the great campaign fundraiser in the sky.

The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the positions of American Liberty News.

Josh Hawley: FBI colluded with Big Tech to bury Hunter Biden story

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnC0cxOBCfc

VIDEO

Ralph Nader: Biden's First Year Proves He Is Still a "Corporate Socialist" Beholden to Big Business

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jTIUtjkDss&t=28s


Hauser also didn’t like the prevalence of Big Law talent on the Department of Justice team, which signaled to him that the Biden administration could go soft on corporate malefactors. Alexander Nazaryan


The Biden family's corruption 'spans the globe': Schweizer



Biden, the frontrunner among 2020 Democrats, often touts his middle-class bonafides on the campaign trail. Although Biden did not become a multi-millionaire until he left the White House in 2017, the same cannot be said of his family. In fact, several members of the Biden clan became immensely wealthy over the span of the former vice president’s 40-year political career. HARIS ALIC

Watters: The Five (CRIME) Families of the Democrat Party

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBpvvHethg0 

HOW MANY ARE LAWYERS???

Schweizer: ‘It’s Going to Be Business as Usual’ for Hunter’s Dealings

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2021/01/20/schweizer-its-going-to-be-business-as-usual-for-hunters-dealings/


Joe Biden, the corrupt, unaccomplished 47-year career politician, with a reputation of having been a proud segregationist, an unabashed plagiarist and liar, a resolute tale-teller, and a serial flip-flopper, is pretending to head up a radical social-democratic ticket for President of the United States that includes as his running mate the ambitious, disagreeable junior senator from California: Kamala Harris. 


What's behind the Biden family's 'opulent' lifestyle?

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OKIvDDNAC8

   

THE BIDEN CRIME FAMILY OF PARASITE LAWYERS IN THE MIDDLE EAST  

JAMES BIDEN RAKES IT IN!

Jesse Watters Primetime 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vt0iMhgtBmI

  

 With no moral code, no center, nothing matters. You just read what’s in the teleprompter and hit the sack by 7:00 while your degenerate son collects piles of cash for the family until you’re free to do it on your own. All you have to do is what you’re told, your handlers and the media will take care of the rest.                                                  DEREK HUNTER

 

WHERE DID ALL OF GAMER LAWYER JOE BIDEN’S BIG BUCKS COME FROM?

video

Where did Biden's millions come from?

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlS88MKI-DA

There it is.  That's the issue.  To begin, you have the corrupt family Biden.  They've been scamming us and our system well for almost fifty years.  The man is supposedly worth over 250 million dollars.  How is this possible on his salary?  It's not.  So where did his wealth come from?  Not from being a brilliant businessman. DAVID PRENTICE

Watters: The Five (CRIME) Families of the Democrat Party

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBpvvHethg0 

HOW MANY ARE LAWYERS???

Schweizer: ‘It’s Going to Be Business as Usual’ for Hunter’s Dealings

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2021/01/20/schweizer-its-going-to-be-business-as-usual-for-hunters-dealings/


Joe Biden, the corrupt, unaccomplished 47-year career politician, with a reputation of having been a proud segregationist, an unabashed plagiarist and liar, a resolute tale-teller, and a serial flip-flopper, is pretending to head up a radical social-democratic ticket for President of the United States that includes as his running mate the ambitious, disagreeable junior senator from California: Kamala Harris. 


Watchdogs Sound Alarm as Biden Tires to Strong Arm Tech Companies to Censor Green New Deal Critics

-

 

Today,  Ranking Member  (R-Ky.) and Subcommittee on the Environment Ranking Member  (R-N.M.) raised serious concerns over the ’s ongoing efforts to suppress free speech and silence any who criticize the administration’s unpopular  agenda. In a letter to White House National Climate Advisor Gina McCarthy, the Republican lawmakers highlighted how McCarthy is actively pushing  to censor legitimate criticism of Green New Deal policies and emphasized how this administration is seeking to discredit disagreement over its failed policies by blaming disinformation on social media. To conduct oversight over possible collusion of top administration officials with Big Tech companies, the lawmakers are requesting all documents and communications between White House employees and Big Tech companies regarding the  of climate-related information on social platforms.

“Your call to censor those who disagree with the Biden administration is troubling, particularly given recent plans at the Department of Homeland Security to form a Disinformation Governance Board. Committee Republicans request documents and other information regarding the use of your government office to pressure Big Tech companies to censor individuals who disagree with you,” wrote the lawmakers. “President Biden’s decision to cancel the Keystone Pipeline, attack domestic oil and gas producers, and enact other progressive Green New Deal style initiatives have led to disastrous and unpopular consequences for the American people. Instead of taking responsibility for these failed policies, the Biden Administration is blaming private companies for surging gas prices, soaring , and skyrocketing utility costs. Now, the Administration’s climate team is deflecting and discrediting legitimate criticism and disagreement over its failed policies by blaming disinformation on social media. This attack on free speech is troubling.”

In a June 9, 2022, interview, McCarthy described how the Biden Administration is pushing for tech companies to monitor climate debate on social platforms and stop allowing specific individuals to spread so-called disinformation regarding climate issues. The move appears to be an effort to silence those who criticize Green New Deal style policies that are raising the cost of energy for all Americans.

“Instead of working for the American people on solutions to bring prices down, such as streamlining the permitting process, the Administration itself promotes disinformation by blaming high gas prices on the conflict in , even though prices were rising under President Biden’s failed leadership long before ’s invasion. In fact, high energy prices are a direct result of the Administration’s war on domestic energy production. President Biden has refused to even meet with oil and gas companies choosing instead to ask Saudi Arabia for oil and gas,” continued the lawmakers.

Read the letter to McCarthy here.

The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the positions of American Liberty News.


Meet the Democrats Who Could Replace Joe Biden

At this moment, in theory, (GAMER PIG LAWYER)  Biden is going to run for re-election.

That being said, there is a significant chance he will not.  He could decide on his own not to, Dr. Jill could be charged with elder abuse for allowing him to run again, he could lose the TV remote and get permanently lost in the White House while muttering about damn fancy stupid gadgets, the decimal point on all of his prescriptions could be moved one place to the right, he could suffer a grave injury in a game of "pull my finger" that goes horribly awry, or China could just finish the job and invade before the election.  The list goes on and on.

With these myriad possibilities floating in the political ether, the few dozen Democrats around the country thinking about having a go at the top spot can hardly be blamed for engaging in just a bit of pre-planning.  Can you really fault the kids for stopping by the lawyer's office first while they are driving dad to the home?

The majority of the people mentioned below are mostly in the "first impression" stage of meeting the national electorate.  But much can be gleaned from even the glancing-blow candidacies now occurring, as those first impressions — even more so than policies and résumés — are crucial to creating the framework of a successful campaign.  Even having a presence that, while not actively horrible, is still just a bit off-putting can sink a politician, especially in a close contest.

It is possible that (GAMER PIG LAWYER) Biden will somehow cobble together the wherewithal to run (at the very least — like John Gill in the original Star Trek Nazi planet episode — be cobbled together by power-hungry staffers and such).  If that occurs, the candidates will have to think long and hard about running.  Remember, not even Teddy Kennedy could take out Jimmy Carter.  But someone will try — guaranteed.

In no particular order — because none is particularly special — here are the Democrat benchwarmers itching to move up to The Show:

  • Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer — Midwest/Rust Belt base is helpful, but her "rules for thee, not for me" COVID activities and what should be a tough re-election campaign this fall are not helpful.
  • Minnesota senator (GAMER PIG LAWYER) Amy Klobuchar — Relatively moderate and hung around long enough in 2020 to build a bit of credibility, but there is not much there there — policy or personality-wise — and reports of her "mean boss" ways are a problem.
  • New Jersey governor Phil Murphy — His proximity to the media centers in New York is an asset, as is his homespun-ish appearance, but his very, very close re-election (it was not at all supposed to be that way) is a dampener.
  • Massachusetts senator (GAMER PIG LAWYER) Elizabeth Warren — Raised her profile with a decent 2020 run, media darling, and somewhat politically astute (at least regarding her base).  She will face the headwinds of being a shrill technocrat most recognizable to the public for being Fauxcahontas.
  • Illinois governor (JUST A PIG) J.B. Pritzker — He's rich, so there's that, but he's the opposite of telegenic and is presiding over a state government that manages to be simultaneously so incredibly corrupt and disarmingly incompetent that even the national media may actually notice.
  • New Jersey senator (GAMER PIG LAWYER) Cory Booker — Nah, not really.  Seats on many, many corporate boards and foundations seem to be his future.  Sorry.
  • Colorado governor Jared Polis — An intriguing liberal/Libertarian mix who would have cross-over appeal in the general election, and he's gay, so that's politically neato.  Challenges in his home state and his party's hyper-progressive primary voter base make his road to the nomination nearly impassable.
  • California governor Gavin Newsom — The Golden Boy from the Golden State, though, unlike medieval alchemists, he has managed to turn gold into lead.  Polished, perfunctory, and pomaded, his shtick appeals to people of a certain class and mindset and repels most others. 
  • Vice President (GAMER PIG LAWYER AND CLONE OF BIDEN) Kamala Harris — She should have listened to her former boyfriend, (GAMER PIG LAWYER) Willie Brown, and held out for attorney general.  At least in that job fewer people would have noticed what an utter train wreck she is.

An aside on Gavin and Kamala — they are, politically, the same candidate.  They came up in a system in California that custom-makes coddled candidates who can thrive there but nowhere else.  Like hothouse orchids, they are un-transplantable and destined to raise and then fail to live up to the hopes of their supporters and well-wishers and craven flacks outside the state.  For a more in-depth look at this phenomenon, feel free to click here.

That being said, Newsom is one of the most likely folks to challenge Biden if he does run for re-election.  Life — good looks, other people's money, not too many questions asked — has always been easy for Gavin, so why, he thinks, would this be at al different?

Back to Murderers' Row:

  • New York congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez — The candidate who most keeps Republicans up at night — not in that way (despite her claims of being a siren/victim), but a good way nonetheless.  If she wrangled the Democratic nod, it is quite possible that any Republican candidate could be the first person since George Washington to get every single Electoral College vote (and I'm not even forgetting about D.C.).  But Republicans will have to wait for that delight, because she'll be only 34 in 2024.
  • North Carolina governor Roy Cooper — Moderate, white, straight, Southern, male ice hockey fan?  Yeah, good luck with that.
  • (GAMER PIG LAWYER) Hilary Rodham Clinton (no job title needed) — Ah, the woman scorned.  Instant base, name recognition that is off the charts, access to boatloads of cash, and a burning desire to one-up Bill.  Downsides?  To start, she managed to lose to both Donald Trump and Barack Obama and nearly lost to Bernie Sanders — die-hard Democrats might notice that.  Add that grisly track record to her many character and policy flaws, and even she might be in trouble.  But she would still run, at the very least to jumpstart the fundraising grift of the family foundation (seems all those good-hearted billionaire oligarchs stopped giving after she stopped running — who'da thunk it?).
  • Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg — White, but gay, so that won't hurt him too much.  A technocrat, a beta male, unprepossessing.  Women like him for his nesting tendencies, and he has not obviously completely blowtorched his current gig (such as it is).  He was a bit of a "shiny new thing" in 2020 — not exactly true anymore, but he's already beating Biden in the polling, so who knows?  Not likely to run against Biden, but rather more likely to be the person chosen by the powers-that-be to replace him.

Oh, there are others — Tom Steyer (skin crawl), Tulsi Gabbard (is she still a Democrat?), Andrew Yang (definitely not still a Democrat), Eric "The Spy Who Loved Me" Swalwell, Gina Raimondo (if you don't live in Rhode Island or follow the Commerce Department on Instagram, you'll have to look that one up), greener-than thou Jay Inslee, etc. are possibly lurking but have no hope of making an impact.

But there are two others whom you will know by their first names alone — Michelle and Oprah.  They might be the strongest candidates the Democrats have.  God help us all, they would be tough to beat.

Thomas Buckley is the former mayor of Lake Elsinore and a former newspaper reporter.  He is currently the operator of a small communications and planning consultancy and can be reached directly at planbuckley@gmail.com.  You can read more of his work at  https://thomas699.substack.com.

Image via Flickr, public domain



Democrats: $625B Tax Cut for Wealthy Elite ‘Essential’ Ahead of Midterms

JOHN BINDER

Democrats say cutting hundreds of billions of dollars in taxes for mostly wealthy income-earners in coastal states is “essential” to getting reelected in this year’s midterm elections.

In November, House Democrats passed President Joe Biden’s “Build Back Better Act” which includes billions in tax breaks to the wealthiest residents of blue states. Specifically, the plan would give a tax cut to about 67 percent of the nation’s richest Americans — those earning more than $885,000 every year — costing taxpayers about $625 billion.

Under Biden’s plan, those in the top one percent would receive an average tax cut of more than $16,000 this year. The tax cuts for the wealthy would be a result of the plan’s increasing the State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction cap.

Ahead of the midterm elections in November, House Democrats are warning their rich donors that they must get out and vote for them to secure the massive tax cut. Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney (D-NY) called the tax cuts for the rich “essential” in an interview with Bloomberg News.

Biden, for instance, had sought to include tax cuts for his billionaire donors in a Chinese coronavirus relief package earlier this year. The plan was ultimately cut from the package. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), in May 2020, also tried to include the plan in a coronavirus relief package. JOHN BINDER


Gaetz: Biden, Democrats Weaponizing the IRS Against Americans

1:30

Thursday on FNC’s “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) warned efforts to bolster the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) was an effort by the Biden administration and Democrats to “weaponize” the government against its people.

The Florida Republican congressman said that paired with Democrats’ opposition to firearms, had prompted him to propose legislation.

“Well, Joe Biden is raising taxes, disarming Americans, so of course, they are arming up the IRS like they’re preparing to take Volusia,” he said. “Like you mentioned, five million rounds of ammunition, 4,500 firearms, automatic weapons, and $731,000 of taxpayer money spent this year to quite literally weaponize your government against you.”

“So, it’s not really that Joe Biden and the Democrats hate guns,” Gaetz continued. “They just hate law-abiding Americans having them, and they take the money from the people to go and have their own little private arsenals, and it is particularly egregious from a country that militarizes its bureaucracies and then forces its grandmothers to go and fend for themselves on dangerous streets because they defund the police and have cashless bail and other hug-a-thug woke criminal justice policies. That’s why I’m introducing legislation to stop it.”


THE DEMOCRAT PARTY AND THEIR PIG BILLIONAIRES!

The Schumer-Manchin plan includes billions in green energy tax credits that would be swooped up by billionaires to cut their corporations’ annual tax burdens. Jeff Bezos’s Amazon notoriously employs this strategy to pay close to zero in corporate income taxes.

Breitbart News’s John Carney writes:

Amazon’s tax bills were part of the inspiration for a minimum tax. The company faced no federal corporate income tax liability in 2017 and 2018. In the years since, it has had an effective tax rate that is just a fraction of the 21 percent rate put in place by the Trump administration’s tax reforms. According to the calculations of Matthew Gardner of the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, over the past four years Amazon’s effective aggregate tax rate was just 5.1 percent. [Emphasis added]

While the alternate minimum tax would prevent companies from using deductions for capital investments or stock-based compensation, it continues to allow them to use tax credits, Daniel Bunn of the Tax Foundation told us. In fact, the bill includes hundreds of billions of dollars worth of new tax credits aimed at fostering green technology adoption. And Amazon plays in beast mode when it comes to using tax credits to reduce its tax bill. [Emphasis added]

Jeff Bezo’s retail giant said in its annual report that tax credits reduced the taxes it would have otherwise owed by $1.1 billion. The company has said that most of those tax credits are federal research and development credits, although it does not give much detail in its annual reports. The Manchin-Schumer tax bill would not touch this. Amazon will lose the benefit of the write-off for stock-based compensation, but the company will most likely at least partially offset that by using the green tech tax creditsThe end result could be no change in Amazon’s tax rate. [Emphasis added]

 

Sen. Josh Hawley Asks FTC to Investigate Amazon Deal to Buy Medical Clinic Chain

Hawley
Samuel Corum/Getty Images
2:12

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) recently sent a letter to the FTC requesting a review of the proposed $3.9 billion merger between Amazon and One Medical, a chain of medical clinics whose acquisition would mark Amazon’s latest move to take over the healthcare industry.

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) asked the FTC in a recent letter to investigate the proposed $3.9 billion buyout deal between Amazon and One Medical.

Jeff Bezos lectures normal people about climate change

Jeff Bezos lectures normal people about climate change Pool/Getty)

(STEEX/Getty)

Hawley wrote in the letter, “I realize that the FTC is currently engaged in numerous efforts to combat America’s accelerating economic concentration and the power of tech behemoths. Nevertheless, I urge you to prioritize a searching review of this particular transaction.”

Hawley stated that the acquisition would “provide Amazon with access to enormous tranches of patient data,” and while he acknowledged that HIPAA and other privacy laws could “thwart the worst potential abuses,” he noted that “loopholes exist in every legal framework.”

Hawley stated that some privacy-related scenarios “once written off as scaremongering fictions, are now a very real possibility.” Hawley provided one scenario, stating: “For instance, if an individual is diagnosed with high blood pressure by a One Medical doctor, will he later be advertised over-the-counter blood pressure medications whenever he shops at Whole Foods Market?”

Hawley also claimed that the deal would reinforce Amazon’s market dominance and may even reshape the power dynamic of the primary care space.

“It doesn’t matter if the primary care market as such is presently competitive: by having its hand in dozens of smaller markets, Amazon positions itself to eventually emerge as the dominant player in each, as cross-subsidization allows Amazon to offer services at a loss and data-driven network effects allow Amazon to market at a level its competitors cannot match,” Hawley stated.

Lucas Nolan is a reporter for Breitbart News covering issues of free speech and online censorship. Follow him on Twitter @LucasNolan


Democrats Latest Plan: Target Middle Class Americans with IRS Audits, Keep Billionaire Loopholes Open

WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 14: Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and U.S. President Joe Biden speak briefly to reporters as they arrive at the U.S. Capitol for a Senate Democratic luncheon July 14, 2021 in Washington, DC. President Biden is on the Hill to discuss with Senate Democrats the …
Drew Angerer/Getty Images
4:44

A bill backed by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Joe Manchin (D-WV) would unleash the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on middle class Americans while keeping tax loopholes open for billionaires and their multinational corporations.

The plan, which Schumer and Manchin have agreed to, would massively bulk up IRS audits and criminal investigations to the sum of tens of billions of dollars — nearly all of which will be dedicated to going after middle class Americans squeezed by inflation.

The Wall Street Journal editorial board details the scheme:

The bill earmarks $45.6 billion for “enforcement,” including “litigation,” “criminal investigations,” “investigative technology,” “digital asset monitoring” and a new fleet of tax-collector cars. The result will be far more audits, civil suits and criminal referrals. [Emphasis added]

The main targets will by necessity be the middle- and upper-middle class because that’s where the money is. The Joint Committee on Taxation, Congress’s official tax scorekeeper, says that from 78% to 90% of the money raised from under-reported income would likely come from those making less than $200,000 a year. Only 4% to 9% would come from those making more than $500,000. [Emphasis added]

The IRS knows the super-wealthy employ lawyers and accountants who make litigation time-consuming and risky. It also knows that Democrats would howl if the agency pursues fraud in the earned-income tax credit program, despite what the IRS has estimated are $18 billion in improper payments each year. [Emphasis added]

At the same time, tax provisions hugely benefitting billionaires and their multinational corporations would go untouched.

The Schumer-Manchin plan includes billions in green energy tax credits that would be swooped up by billionaires to cut their corporations’ annual tax burdens. Jeff Bezos’s Amazon notoriously employs this strategy to pay close to zero in corporate income taxes.

Breitbart News’s John Carney writes:

Amazon’s tax bills were part of the inspiration for a minimum tax. The company faced no federal corporate income tax liability in 2017 and 2018. In the years since, it has had an effective tax rate that is just a fraction of the 21 percent rate put in place by the Trump administration’s tax reforms. According to the calculations of Matthew Gardner of the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, over the past four years Amazon’s effective aggregate tax rate was just 5.1 percent. [Emphasis added]

While the alternate minimum tax would prevent companies from using deductions for capital investments or stock-based compensation, it continues to allow them to use tax credits, Daniel Bunn of the Tax Foundation told us. In fact, the bill includes hundreds of billions of dollars worth of new tax credits aimed at fostering green technology adoption. And Amazon plays in beast mode when it comes to using tax credits to reduce its tax bill. [Emphasis added]

Jeff Bezo’s retail giant said in its annual report that tax credits reduced the taxes it would have otherwise owed by $1.1 billion. The company has said that most of those tax credits are federal research and development credits, although it does not give much detail in its annual reports. The Manchin-Schumer tax bill would not touch this. Amazon will lose the benefit of the write-off for stock-based compensation, but the company will most likely at least partially offset that by using the green tech tax creditsThe end result could be no change in Amazon’s tax rate. [Emphasis added]

President Joe Biden and House Democrats tried to pass a similar tax plan last year as part of the administration’s “Build Back Better” agenda that has failed to catch on in Congress.

That plan would have targeted an additional nearly 600,000 working and middle class Americans earning less than $75,000 a year with IRS audits. Of those new IRS audits, more than 313,000 would have targeted the poorest of Americans who earn $25,000 or less a year.

Similar to the Schumer-Manchin bill, Biden’s plan would have provided a $625 billion tax cut for the wealthiest Americans living in blue states — paid for by working and middle class Americans.

John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Email him at jbinder@breitbart.com. Follow him on Twitter here


Breitbart Business Digest: Manchin’s Tax Hike Does Not Touch Amazon’s Biggest Tax Break

(J. Scott Applewhite/AP Photo, David Ryder/Getty Images)
J. Scott Applewhite/AP Photo, David Ryder/Getty Images
5:39

Amazon is not sweating the corporate tax hike in the Joe Manchin-approved climate spending bill.

The deceptively named Inflation Reduction Act would impose an alternative minimum tax on companies with over $1 billion in financial profits. It levies a 15 percent tax on financial account income, the kind that gets reported to investors in quarterly and annual company filings.

Amazon’s tax bills were part of the inspiration for a minimum tax. The company faced no federal corporate income tax liability in 2017 and 2018. In the years since, it has had an effective tax rate that is just a fraction of the 21 percent rate put in place by the Trump administration’s tax reforms. According to the calculations of Matthew Gardner of the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, over the past four years Amazon’s effective aggregate tax rate was just 5.1 percent.

Amazon founder Jeff Bezos (Phil McCarten/UPI)

Last year, President Joe Biden singled out Amazon’s ability to avoid paying more in taxes, saying it was “just wrong” that a company so profitable could pay so little. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) has made Amazon her personal tax piñata, frequently saying the company should be required to pay much more in taxes. When Sens. Warren, Ron Wyden (D-OR), and Angus King (I-ME) proposed a similar 15 percent minimum tax last year, they specifically said they were targeting Amazon.

The day Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) announced he had reached a deal with Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) to raise taxes and hike spending on climate change pork, Amazon’s shares were trading around $121. On Wednesday, they closed above $134, a ten percent gain in less than a week. Amazon reported earnings that beat Wall Street’s expectations during that week, which explains the jump. But it does not seem like investors are worried that Amazon may soon face a tax bill three times larger than in recent years.

There’s good reason for that. While the alternate minimum tax would prevent companies from using deductions for capital investments or stock-based compensation, it continues to allow them to use tax credits, Daniel Bunn of the Tax Foundation told us. In fact, the bill includes hundreds of billions of dollars worth of new tax credits aimed at fostering green technology adoption. And Amazon plays in beast mode when it comes to using tax credits to reduce its tax bill.

Jeff Bezo’s retail giant said in its annual report that tax credits reduced the taxes it would have otherwise owed by $1.1 billion. The company has said that most of those tax credits are federal research and development credits, although it does not give much detail in its annual reports. The Manchin-Schumer tax bill would not touch this. Amazon will lose the benefit of the write-off for stock-based compensation, but the company will most likely at least partially offset that by using the green tech tax credits. The end result could be no change in Amazon’s tax rate.

It’s possible that Amazon’s tax rate could even fall if it aggressively cashes in on the climate change tax credits.

Amazon Hires Senior Senate Aide, Boosting Efforts to Stymie New Tech Antitrust Bill

Anna Edgerton, Leah Nylen and Emily Birnbaum 

(Bloomberg) -- Amazon.com Inc. hired a senior Republican congressional aide, bolstering its efforts to stymie a new antitrust bill aimed at US technology companies, according to two people familiar with the hire. 

Amazon has hired a senior Republican congressional aide.
© BloombergAmazon has hired a senior Republican congressional aide.

Most Read from Bloomberg


Judd Smith was the Senate Judiciary Committee’s counsel as the panel wrote and approved a bill that would restrict the way Amazon can offer products to consumers and interact with its competitors. His move to Amazon, the e-commerce giant that has been vilified by lawmakers for its market dominance, will play into efforts to ensure that the legislation doesn’t receive a vote in the full Senate. By hiring him, Amazon is bringing in a powerful voice on the top issues facing the committee.

Smith helped negotiate changes to the legislation as he worked with Republican offices to push the bill forward, according to two other people familiar with his work. Smith was the lead antitrust aide for Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley, one of the original Republican cosponsors of the bill, according to one of the people. 

While Smith will be barred from lobbying Senate Judiciary staff and members for a year after his departure from the committee, he could be influential in convincing House Republicans to vote against the measure if it passes the Senate. Smith previously worked with former Pennsylvania Representative Tom Marino, who was the top Republican on the subcommittee responsible for antitrust. 

The American Innovation and Choice Online Act would prohibit major online platforms like Amazon, Alphabet Inc.’s Google, Facebook parent Meta Platforms Inc., and Apple Inc. from giving advantages to their own products over those of rivals. The bill’s sponsors and its advocates had pushed Senate leadership to take up the measure before lawmakers leave for a four-week summer break.

The House Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee has advanced a similar bill aimed at concentration in the internet economy. The House and Senate would have to pass the same version of the bill for President Joe Biden to sign it into law.

Smith will join the public policy team with Amazon Web Services to help lobby Republicans, said two of the people. All four of the people asked not to be identified discussing an internal decision. 

Amazon and Smith didn’t respond to requests for comment.

Minnesota Democrat Amy Klobuchar has led efforts to get the bill on the Senate floor, but Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said the Senate won’t have time to take it up this week before the August recess.

(Updates with additional details beginning in the third paragraph)

Most Read from Bloomberg Businessweek


Leaked IRS data expose manipulation of US tax system by the ultra-wealthy

Kevin Reed

The nonprofit news organization ProPublica published on Wednesday an analysis of the top 400 income earners in the US. The report reveals how much income tax the wealthy elite pay and illustrates how the US tax system is itself structured to benefit the personal wealth of a handful of individual billionaires and multimillionaires.

Based on a trove of leaked IRS data, the ProPublica report shows that it took an average of $110 million in income per year between 2013 and 2018 to enter the top 400 list. The data confirm what many already know—that the tax laws in America are structured to benefit the super-rich and that this set-up is a contributing factor in the overall growth of social inequality in the US.

 

Billionaires Warren Buffett, Jeff Bezos, Michael Bloomberg, Elon Musk (All originals from Wikimedia Commons)

The report shows that the highest earning Americans do not pay the highest income tax. ProPublica notes, “On average, the rate of income tax that people pay does climb as incomes ascend into the top 1 percent, but when you get to the range of $2 million to $5 million, that trend stops. The group earning in this range, composed mostly of business owners and workers with extremely high salaries, paid an average income tax rate of 29 percent from 2013 to 2018. After that, average tax rates actually drop the further up in income you go.”

The analysis begins by pointing out that many billionaires “didn’t even come close” to making the top 400 list because they use write-offs to erase taxable income. “Other billionaires, like Warren Buffett, simply avoid income even as their wealth rises,” the report says.

Buffet’s average personal wealth was $70 billion across the six years of the ProPublica report— from 2013 to 2018–but his average income during that timeframe was just $27 million and he is not on the top income earners list.

The report also explains that billionaires often use the “Buy, Borrow, Die” method in which they “borrow against their wealth to avoid taxes, then their estates are able to skirt taxes after their deaths.”

While one aspect of the data published by ProPublica shows how the super-rich “work” the system to their significant advantage, the report also says “in the American system, there’s a huge difference between how we tax wages and how we tax investments. Income from financial assets is generally taxed at a lower rate.”

As in every country of the world, the extent of inequality in the US is difficult to comprehend due its sheer magnitude. The ProPublica report explains, for example, that it would take a typical American with an income of $40,000 per year “to work for 2,750 years to make what the lowest-earning person in this group made in one,” and the typical American “would have to work for 25,000 years to make $1 billion,” which was made on average by the top 11 individuals on the list.

Tech billionaires represent 10 of the top 15 income earners and most of their income came from selling stocks. Among the names on this list are Bill Gates (Microsoft, $2.85 billion), Larry Ellison (Oracle, $1.07 billion), Steve Balmer (Microsoft, $1.05 billion), Sergey Brin (Google, $1.04 billion), Larry Paige (Google, $990 million) and Jeff Bezos (Amazon, $832 million). These billionaires paid an average of 18 percent in taxes on their income over six years.

The largest group of super-wealthy income earners come from the hedge fund industry. Representing approximately one-fifth of the entire list (80 individuals), the income of the hedge fund managers comes directly from stock trades, options and the other financial instruments of their firms. While these individuals are less known to the public, the founder of Citadel, Kenneth Griffin, raked in an average of $1.68 billion per year from 2013 and 2018 and paid an effective 29.2 percent in taxes.

Founders of private equity firms were another group that ProPublica found stood out on the top 400 list. These individuals make their money by buying companies and reselling them at a profit. The top 10 income earners in this group paid an effective average tax rate of 20 percent between 2013 and 2018.

The greatest combination of highest incomes and lowest tax rates for the super-rich stemmed from those who made stock sales taxed at the lower rate that was established in 2013 during the Obama administration. The report says that since then, the “long-term capital gains rate has been 20 percent, about half the top rate on ordinary income (37 percent in 2018).”

Former Microsoft CEO Bill Gates benefited from this arrangement because his average yearly income of $2.85 billion came from sales of his former company’s stock and, as the report notes, “every penny of Gates’ taxable income was eligible for the lower rate” and this was generally true for the other tech billionaires as well.

Others who also benefited from the lower dividend tax rate enacted by the Democratic Party were the Walton (Walmart) and DeVos (Amway) family heirs. The report says that “the 11 Walton descendants in the top 400 saved $371 million a year due to this tax change.”

One individual who came in for specific mention in the ProPublica report is billionaire and former mayor of New York City, Michael Bloomberg. Bloomberg successfully achieved one of the lowest tax rates of anyone on the top 400 list. Bloomberg took annual income deductions of more than $1 billion, mostly through charitable contributions. The report says, “From 2013 to 2017, he also wrote off an average of $409 million each year from what he’d paid in state and local taxes.”

Although the Trump-era 2018 tax overhaul limited those deductions to $10,000, the bill introduced a new massive deduction that Bloomberg took advantage of. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was rushed through the legislative process and permitted so-called “pass through” profits to avoid taxation. For Bloomberg, this law enabled him to claim an income deduction of more the $183 million and reduce his taxes by nearly $68 million. On an average income of $2.05 billion, Bloomberg paid an effective tax rate of 4.1 percent, which is lower than the rate paid by an average American worker making $40,000 to $50,000 per year (5 percent).

While the owners and executives of tech monopolies, private equity and hedge fund businesses paid between 17 and 26 percent effective tax rates, the owners of manufacturing businesses paid on average 30 percent in taxes.

The publication of the income tax data by ProPublica comes amid a campaign for the Biden administration to push for a 20 percent minimum tax rate on all US households with net worth of $100 million or more. It is expected that this proposal will never make it to the floor of the US Senate given that Senator Joe Manchin (Democrat from West Virginia) has already said he will not support it and the entirety of congressional Republicans are opposed to it.

Certain elements within the ruling elite are concerned that the grotesque levels of social inequality—including the rigging of the tax system to nakedly benefit wealth accumulation by the ultra-rich—has primed the conditions for a social eruption in the US which threatens to overturn the entire capitalist order. A group called Patriotic Millionaires—a network of wealthy individuals who advocate raising taxes on their class—responded to the ProPublica report by saying that “it’s time to tax billionaires.”

ProPublica Reveals How Soros, Bezos, and Other Famous Billionaires Avoid Paying Taxes

 

US corporate profits, CEO pay surged in 2021 while inflation slashed real wages

Shannon Jones

The corporate assault on US workers’ living standards during the pandemic intensified in 2021. While inflation slashed living standards for most of the population, corporate profits surged to their highest levels in decades, rising 25 percent year over year to $2.81 trillion. The rise is even greater—37 percent—when taxes are factored in. This is the highest figure since records began in 1948.

 

Worker in an Amazon fulfilment centre (AP Photo/David McNew)

At the same time, according to a report by Compensation Advisory Partners, US CEO pay increased in 2021 by an average of 19 percent at the 50 companies surveyed, a record amount. Leading the field was Discovery CEO David Zaslav, who took in a staggering $246.6 million. Amazon CEO Andy Jassy received a pay package valued at $212.7 million, mostly from stock options.

Others cashing in included:

· Apple CEO Tim Cook, who took in $99 million last year

· Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger, who received $178.6 million

· Chad Richison, CEO of Paycom Software, who was paid $211,131,206

· Lawrence Culp Jr., CEO of General Electric, who pocketed $73,192,032

· Mike Sievert, T-Mobile CEO, who received $54,914,015

· Leonard Schleifer, CEO of Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, who took in $135,350,121.

Surging profits on Wall Street boosted the average employee bonus in the New York securities industry to a record $257,500 last year, according to state officials.

The statistics on corporate profits and executive pay expose the blatant profiteering by large corporations during the pandemic. Companies have been able to raise prices far beyond increases in production costs, vastly inflating profit margins.

According to a report by a watchdog group, the top 25 global oil companies reaped $237 billion in profits in 2021. Last year, oil giant ExxonMobil posted its largest profit in seven years, $23 billion, as increased oil prices added $100 billion to its sales revenues. Saudi Aramco, a major oil and gas company owned and managed by the Saudi royal family, reported $110 billion in profits last year, a 124 percent increase from 2020.

Logistics giant Amazon reported $33.4 billion in after-tax profits in 2021, up from $21.3 in 2020.

Despite COVID and chip shortages, US auto companies enjoyed a profit surge. Ford recorded $17.9 billion in after-tax profits, following a loss in 2020. GM reported $14.3 billion in 2021 earnings.

The official inflation rate was 6.7 percent last year. Inflation has accelerated in 2022, with prices rising 7.9 percent year over year in February 2022, eclipsing year-over-year wage gains of 5.1 in February and 5.6 percent percent in March.

According to Bloomberg Economics, the average American household will spend $5,200 more this year to buy the same goods and services it purchased last year. With prices on basic commodities set to rise even higher due to the war in Ukraine and US and NATO sanctions on Russia, a further assault on living standards is being prepared.

Even though real wages are declining in many sectors, Wall Street is expressing concern over the tight labor market, which has allowed workers to press for higher wages. The US jobs report for March, released Friday by the Labor Department, reported the addition of 431,000 jobs, the 11th straight month of job gains surpassing 400,000. The official unemployment rate fell to 3.6 percent in March, close to the 3.5 percent pre-pandemic rate, which was a 50-year record low.

In fact, the figure for new jobs was lower than predicted by economists, and far below the average of 600,000 over the past six months. More threatening to the ruling class are near-record highs of unfilled jobs and voluntary quits.

In remarks Friday morning after the release of the jobs report, President Biden hailed the increase in hiring, citing “Record job creation. Record unemployment declines. Record wage gains.” However, the reality is quite different for workers, whose paltry wage gains are being eaten up by rising prices for gasoline, electricity, food and other necessities.

The most significant job gains have been for workers in the retail sector and leisure and hospitality, such as hotels and restaurants. These sectors have historically paid poverty-level wages.

The resistance of workers to laboring for near-starvation wages in the midst of a deadly pandemic, and ongoing supply chain bottlenecks due to shortages of workers in key sectors such as trucking, potentially put workers in a strong position to fight for significant improvements in living standards.

In 2021, strikes took place in a number of key industries as workers sought to fight back against rising prices and the impact of decades of wage stagnation. These struggles for the most part took the form of rebellions against the trade union bureaucracies, which for decades have worked to impose brutal cuts in wages and the destruction of working conditions, in line with their transformation into corporatist appendages of the corporations and the capitalist state.

In a number of contract struggles last year, unions settled for pay raises well below the rate of inflation, including Volvo (average 2 percent annually over 6 years), Nabisco (2-2.5 percent annual raises), Kellogg’s (one-time 3 percent for “legacy” workers), and Dana Corporation (as low as 1 percent annually for top pay scales).

In each of these cases, the unions sabotaged the struggles of workers, keeping the strikes isolated and shutting them down at the point where they threatened to seriously impact corporate profits and inspire solidarity action by other workers both in the US and internationally. Workers were forced to vote without having time to adequately review the terms of the contract and were often denied the right to see the full contract language.

At Volvo and other workplaces, unions called strikes only after workers had voted multiple times by massive margins against sellout agreements brought back by union officials.

In one of the latest acts of treachery, the Steelworkers union blocked strike action by 30,000 US oil workers and rammed through a sellout deal with wage increases far below the rate of inflation, even as the oil giants continued to gouge the public with spiraling gas prices.

In recognition of the vital services of the unions in suppressing workers’ wage demands and squashing strikes, the Biden administration has made a central focus of its anti-working class policy the promotion of the trade unions, appointing a “Task Force on Worker Organizing and Empowerment,” including national security cabinet officials. In a report issued in February, the task force made a series of recommendations to encourage unionization by government contractors, with the aim of “promoting stability” and “minimizing disruption”—that is, preventing strikes.

Fearing that low levels of unemployment will encourage workers to battle back against raging inflation by demanding significant wage increases, US financial authorities are taking measures to slow down the economy by increasing interest rates. Remarking on the fact that there are 1.8 job openings for every unemployed worker, US Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell said, “By many measures, the labor market is extremely tight, significantly tighter than the very strong job market just before the pandemic,” adding that it was tight to “an unhealthy level.”

After raising rates by 0.25 percent in March, the Federal Reserve is indicating support for a more substantial 0.5 percent rise in May. The central bank has already said it plans at least six more rate increases in 2022, the first increases in three years.

The last round of rate increases set off a precipitous fall in the stock market, inducing the Federal Reserve to rescind its rate hikes. Since then, the markets have become even more inflated as the US Treasury pumped trillions of dollars into Wall Street. The turn toward deflationary policies threatens to upset this financial house of cards in dramatic fashion.

Growing sections of workers are defying the pro-corporate unions, including oil refinery workers in Richmond, California, who have voted down two sellout contracts pushed by the United Steelworkers’ union and gone on strike to secure a substantial wage increase and an end to brutal overtime and unsafe working conditions. They are joined by 5,000 teachers on strike in Sacramento, California and tens of thousands of other workers with looming contract expirations. This is part of a growing movement of workers internationally fueled by inflation, inequality and the growing threat of world war.

Reports of the unrestrained profiteering by the financial elite will only further fuel workers’ anger over declining living standards and the criminal mismanagement by all sections of the political establishment of the pandemic. The impending war danger and the demands that workers finance another huge military buildup at the expense of wages and social services will heighten class tensions.

This social anger must be consciously directed against the capitalist system, its political parties, the Democrats and Republicans, as well as the pro-capitalist trade unions. The way forward requires the building of new, genuinely democratic organizations of struggle—rank-and-file committees in every factory, school and workplace—and a political movement of the working class, international in scope, to end the subordination of the productive forces to the profit drive of big business. The working class must assume direction of economic and social life based on a new, higher principle—production for human need, not profit—that is, socialism.