Sunday, April 3, 2011

This Was A Post Made On CRAIGS LIST, D.C. POLITICS FORUM and removed with a flagging overrided by RICHARD HILARY GIBSON

MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com


*

Go to http://www.MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com and read articles and comments from other Americans on what they’ve witnessed in their communities around the country. While most of the population of California is now ILLEGAL, the problems, costs, assault to our culture by Mexico is EVERYWHERE. copy and pass it to your friends.

*

THE UNITED KINGDOM HAS ABOUT EIGHT CONSULATES IN THIS COUNTRY. TO EXPAND THEIR MEXICAN WELFARE SYSTEM, INCLUDING “FREE” BIRTHING, “FREE” MEDICAL, JOBS AND JAILS PROGRAMS IN OUR BORDERS, MEXICO HAS APPROXIMATELY 50 CONSULATES, WHICH ARE LA RAZA HEADQUARTERS.

*

EVEN THE ISLAND OF CATALINA, GATEWAY FOR THE MEX DRUG CARTELS VIA SEA, NOW HAS A CONSULATE!



WHILE MEXICO BEATS THE CRAP OUT OF ANY ILLEGAL THAT CROSSES THEIR BORDERS, THEY ARE EVER THERE RANTING FOR MUCHO GRINGO WELFARE. IT’S ALL PART OF LA RAZA SUPREMACY.

ILLEGALS ABOVE THE LAW!!!

*

FROM JUDICIAL WATCH.org

Mexico Promotes Free U.S. Healthcare For Illegal Immigrants



Time to wake up people! With unemployment at 12% and the state going broke, our tax dollars are going to pay for healthcare for hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens. To the tune of over a billion dollars a year!





Mexico's government operates programs in about a dozen American cities that refers its nationals--living in the U.S. illegally--to publicly funded health centers where they can get free medical care without being turned over to immigration authorities.



The program is called Ventanillas de Salud (Health Windows) in Spanish and its mission is to help illegal immigrants find U.S. hospitals, clinics and other government programs where they can get free services without being deported for violating federal immigration laws.



Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, San Diego and Indiana are among the cities where Mexican consulates operate the health referral system which annually costs U.S. taxpayers billions of dollars. In Los Angeles County alone, illegal immigrants cost taxpayers nearly $440 million in health services annually and a whopping $1.1 billion statewide.



The Mexican consul in Los Angeles proudly announced that nearly 300,000 Mexicans in the area have benefited from his government's health referral program, which he says actually saves the county money by encouraging immigrants to seek preventive care rather than waiting for more expensive emergency treatment.



The Southern California operation promises to assess "consulate clients" for eligibility to government-funded health insurance and other primary care services and offers free legal assistance to those who are denied coverage. Its goal is to improve access to health services for immigrants of Mexican origin by formalizing a health education, medical home referral and insurance enrollment program.



In Chicago, the Mexican consul's Spanish-language web site heavily promotes the Illinois Department of Health's low-cost prescription medicine program for illegal aliens and various free medical services throughout the state. It encourages all Mexicans in the area to pursue the valuable U.S. government-financed services for their entire family.



The Indiana-based program boasts that it serves thousands of "Mexican nationals" living in that state as well as Ohio, Kentucky and southern Illinois. Mexican officials claim that its highly successful pro-health program sends out a clear message to other Mexican consulates throughout the country and the world.



Although these programs facilitate people to remain in the country illegally, Mexico is working hard to expand them to all 47 U.S. consulates to better serve its nationals. In the meantime, U.S. taxpayers will keep picking up the exorbitant tab of medically treating the millions who live in the country illegally.



www.judicialwatchwatch.org







http://www.MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com



*

Illegals’ medical bills top $35.7M

Taxpayers hit hard for trips to ER



By Jessica Van Sack
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
http://www.bostonherald.com
Local Politics

Beleaguered Bay State and U.S. taxpayers coughed up a staggering $35.7 million this year in free emergency health care for more than 52,000 illegal aliens in Massachusetts, sparking outrage from candidates and critics who back a tougher line on immigration.

The figures — released by Gov. Deval Patrick’s administration under an order for the Secretary of State’s office and after more than a month of ducking questions — show illegal immigrants who belong to MassHealth Limited received $33.8 million in taxpayer-funded in-patient hospital care this year.

They also made 6,160 visits to the state’s overburdened emergency rooms in the fiscal year ending in June for an additional cost of $1.9 million, a Herald analysis shows.

Article URL: http://www.bostonherald.com/news/politics/view.bg?articleid=1291805

*

*

MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com



latimes.com

Opinion

California must stem the flow of illegal immigrants

The state should go after employers who hire them, curb taxpayer-funded benefits, deploy the National Guard to help the feds at the border and penalize 'sanctuary' cities.



Illegal immigration is another matter entirely. With the state budget in tatters, millions of residents out of work and a state prison system strained by massive overcrowding, California simply cannot continue to ignore the strain that illegal immigration puts on our budget and economy. Illegal aliens cost taxpayers in our state billions of dollars each year. As economist Philip J. Romero concluded in a 2007 study, "illegal immigrants impose a 'tax' on legal California residents in the tens of billions of dollars."



*



“Through love of having children, we are going to take over.” AUGUSTIN CEBADA, BROWN BERETS, THE LA RAZA FASCIST PARTY





Illegal Aliens Cause Massive Cuts For US Seniors (THESE ARE DATED FIGURES. CALIFORNIA ALONE PUTS OUT NEARLY $20 BILLION. LOS ANGELES COUNTY ALONE PAYS OUT $600 MILLION IN WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS, WHILE IT’S SCHOOLS ARE IN MELTDOWN AND MEXICAN GANGS FLOURISH!)

1. $11 Billion to $22 billion is spent on welfare to illegal aliens each year in California alone!

Welfare for illegals in “sanctuary city” Los Angeles County is $600 million per year (source: JudicalWatch.org).

*

2. $2.2 Billion dollars a year is spent on food assistance programs such as food stamps, WIC, and free school lunches for illegal aliens.

*

3. $2.5 Billion dollars a year is spent on Medicaid for illegal aliens.

*

4. $12 Billion dollars a year is spent on primary and secondary school education for children here illegally and they cannot speak a word of English!

*

5. $17 Billion dollars a year is spent for education for the American-born children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies. 1 in 5 births in Los Angeles are by Mexicans that crossed our borders for “free” birthing and then 18 years of welfare. 1 in 10 the rest of the country!

*

6. $3 Million Dollars a DAY is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens. In California alone ONE BILLION IS SPENT BY STATE PRISONS to maintain illegals, many of whom are still operating their gang and drug operations. In sanctuary city Los Angeles, approximately $300 million per year is spent on jails to incarcerate illegals

*

7. 30% percent of all Federal Prison inmates are illegal aliens.

*

8. $90 Billion Dollars a year is spent on illegal aliens for Welfare and Social Services by the American taxpayers.

*

9. $300-$400 Billion Dollars a year in suppressed American wages are caused by the illegal aliens.

*

10. The illegal aliens in the United States have a crime rate that's two-and-a-half times that of white non-illegal aliens. In particular, their children, are going to make a huge additional crime problem in the US. In sanctuary County of Los Angeles, there are 500 – 1,000 murders by Mexican illegals. They cost the county nearly one million dollars each to prosecute. Over 90% of all warrants for homicide is for a Mexican illegal! Of Los Angeles’ TOP 200 MOST WANTED CRIMINALS, 176 ARE MEXICANS! There have been 2,000 Californians murdered by illegals that fled back to Mexico to avoid prosecution. The rate for re-arrests of illegals is staggering.

*

11. During the year of 2005 there were 4 to 10 MILLION illegal aliens that crossed our Southern Border also, as many as 19,500 illegal aliens from Terrorist Countries. Millions of pounds of drugs, cocaine, meth, heroin and marijuana, crossed into the U. S from the Southern border.

*

12. The National Policy Institute, estimated that the total cost of mass deportation would be between $206 and $230 billion or an average cost of between $41 and $46 billion annually over a five year period.

*

13. In 2006 illegal aliens sent home $45 BILLION in remittances back to their countries of origin. Banks such as La Raza donors Wells Fargo and Bank of America, both illegal open bank accounts for illegals, and handed millions in mortgages to illegals with stolen I.D.

*

14. 'The Dark Side of Illegal Immigration: Nearly One Million Sex Crimes Committed by Illegal Immigrants In The United States Total cost is a whoopin'... $338.3





*

VISIT THIS SITE FOR INFO ON OUR NATION’S IDENTITY AS WE BECOME ANNEXED BY MEXICO

THE BRADLEY REPORT ON AMERICAN’S NATIONAL IDENTITY

BRADLEYPORJECT.org

*





"Remember 187 -- the Proposition to deny taxpayer funds for services to

non-citizens -- was the last gasp of white America in California."

---Art Torres, Chairman of the California Democratic Party

Anchor Baby Power

La Voz de Aztlan has produced a video in honor of the millions of babies that have been born as US citizens to Mexican undocumented parents. These babies are destined to transform America. The nativist CNN reporter Lou Dobbs estimates that there are over 200,000 "Anchor Babies" born every year whereas George Putnam, a radio reporter, says the figure is closer to 300,000. La Voz de Aztlan believes that the number is approximately 500,000 "Anchor Babies" born every year.

The video below depicts the many faces of the "Anchor Baby Generation". The video includes a fascinating segment showing a group of elementary school children in Santa Ana, California confronting the Minutemen vigilantes. The video ends with a now famous statement by Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez of the University of Texas at Austin.



http://www.aztlan.net/anchor_baby_power.htm



*

THESE FIGURES ON WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY ARE DATED. IT NOT EXCEEDS $600 MILLION PER YEAR!!! (source: Los Angeles County & JUDICIAL WATCH)

*

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1949085/posts

*

LOS ANGELES – A MEXICAN WELFARE AND CRIME STATE WHERE THE JOBS ALSO GO TO ILLEGALS

http://mex¬icanoccupa¬tion.blogs¬pot.com/20¬11/04/mexi¬can-welfar¬e-state-in¬-los-angel¬es.html

*

EXPORTING POVERTY... we take MEXICO'S 38 million poor, illiterate, criminal and frequently pregnant

The Mexican Invasion................................................

Mexico prefers to export its poor, not uplift them

http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0330/p09s02-coop.html

*

Where To Go When Your Local Emergency Room Goes Bankrupt?"





During the past ten years 84 California hospitals have declared bankruptcy and closed down their Emergency Rooms forever. Financially crippled by legistlative and judicial mandates to treat illegal aliens have bankrupted hospitals! In 2010, in Los Angeles County alone, over 2 million illegal aliens recorded visits to county emergency rooms for both routine and emergency care. Per official figures, the cost is $1,000 dollars for every taxpayer in Los Angeles County.

http://justcommonsense-lostinamerica.blogspot.com/2011/03/where-to-go-when-your-local-emergency.html

*

Colorado Alliance for Immigration Reform

www.CAIRCO.org





http://www.FAIRUS.org



http://www.JUDICIALWATCH.org



http://www.ALIPAC.us



*

http://blogs.mcclatchydc.com/mexico/2011/01/getting-over-the-border-fence-fast.html





California Lawyer RICHARD HILARY GIBSON knocks off all posts on ILLEGAL immigraiton from CRAIGS LIST


CRAIGS LIST is a free and open forum to post opinions and articles of a political nature. Unfortunately, CRAIGS LIST has permitted one man, a CA tech lawyer named RICHARD HILARY GIBSON to take over virtually all CRAIGS LIST rants and politics forums.


TODAY RICHARD HILARY GIBSON has already deleted four (4) posts on illegal immigration from CRAIGS LIST San Francisco, POLITICS FORUM.

In fact, Gibson knocks them off all forums he stalks.

IF YOU HAVE ATTEMPTED TO POST ON THIS FREE FORUM, BUT WONDERED WHY YOUR POST DISAPPEARED WITHIN MINUTES, Gibson was probably stalking that particular site on that day.

Give him a call!

Richard Gibson


GIBSON LAW PC

21800 Oxnard Street, Suite 310

Woodland HIlls, California 91367

Telephone: 818-716-7950

Facsimile: 818-716-7995

E-mail: Rick@GibsonLawLA.com

Web: http://www.BankruptcyExpertsLA.com

Facebook: RichardGibsonLA



GIBSON HAS LONG HARASSED, STALKED, AND FLAGGED POSTERS ON CL.



HERE’S ONE POSTER’S OBSERVATION OF GIBSON FROM 2008



HERE GIBSON IS EXPOSED IN ALBUQUERQUE

this is why the albuquerque r&r is dead (BE WARNED HE IS HERE TOO)



Reply to: pers-773897254@craigslist.org

Date: 2008-07-28, 5:23PM PDT



it's D-E-A-D, wanna know why? Because that ass-hole HUGE/tiny/krusty/vato/UTBT/LA-ABQ-LA and 50 more fake names)killed it and now he's on your board - (I recognize the writing style and the same old stupid pics). Watch out for "Dude". He starts out benign but then metastasizes into a vile worm that will strangle your board and bring it to a halt. He'll post under many different names and will cross-talk with himself. He's inflammatory, a troll and a professional spammer (if there even is such a thing). He's infactuated with fat women, mercilessly making fun of retarded people and he posts pictures of feces. He gets on an "illegals" kick. Be warned. He's a pseudo-intellect, is homophobic, a woman hater and some have accused him of being a pedophile. Once he takes over, he'll flag every post but his own. He killed Santa Fe's board too. Step on this cockroach before he ruins your board.

*

OBAMA HAS APPEALED TO LA RAZA FOR THE ILLEGALS' VOTES AGAIN, NOW HE APPEALS TO WALL ST. FOR MORE OF THE LOOT THEY HAVE PILLAGED FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE

MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com


*

Go to http://www.MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com and read articles and comments from other Americans on what they’ve witnessed in their communities around the country. While most of the population of California is now ILLEGAL, the problems, costs, assault to our culture by Mexico is EVERYWHERE. copy and pass it to your friends.

*



OBAMA IS AN EXCELLENT ACTOR, BUT FOOLS NO ONE AT THIS POINT!



FROM HIS FIRST DAY IN OFFICE HE’S DONE NOTHING BUT SERVICE CORPORATE CRIMINALS, MOST OF WHICH KNEW HE WOULD WHEN THEY STUFFED HIS POCKETS FULL OF LOOT THE FIRST TIME, AND LA RAZA “THE RACE”.

OBAMA CAN’T OPEN OUR BORDERS FAST ENOUGH FOR THE ILLEGALS TO BUY THEIR ILLEGAL VOTES, OR FILL IS ADMINISTRATION WITH ENOUGH LA RAZA MEXICAN FASCIST TO SERVICE THE EVER EXPANDING MEXICAN OCCUPATION.

HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN AN AMERICAN PRESIDENT THAT SUES A STATE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE MEXICAN INVADERS, DRUG CARTELS, AND MEXICO’S MILLIONS OF EXPORTED POOR, AND CRIMINAL???

HE’S ONE OF THE MOST CORRUPT AND ETHICALLY SQUALID PRESIDENTS IN AMERICAN HISTORY!



*

Obama reelection campaign expected to tap big-money donors

By Dan Eggen and Perry Bacon Jr., Saturday, April , 6:01 PM

Facing an energized Republican Party and deep-pocketed conservative groups, President Obama is kicking off his 2012 reelection campaign with a concerted push for help from wealthy donors and liberal groups unbound by spending limits.

The strategy — which could begin in earnest as early as Monday with the formation of an official presidential committee — suggests a notable shift in emphasis for a president who has long decried the outsize role of money in politics.

Obama frequently points with pride to the role that smaller donors played in his 2008 election, when his campaign also openly discouraged spending by outside organizations. But now Obama finds himself seeking out the kind of big-money donations he has often criticized while encouraging independent groups to raise and spend unlimited money on his behalf.

Obama’s campaign manager-in-waiting, Jim Messina, has asked the party’s biggest supporters to raise $350,000 each this year, to be shared by Obama’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee, far higher than goals set during the 2008 cycle.

The effort could yield $140 million or more by the start of 2012, a pace likely to provide a major advantage to Obama and his party over potential GOP rivals. By comparison, Republican challenger Mitt Romney has set a minimum goal of $50 million for the primaries, though GOP strategists expect him to raise more.

The official start of Obama’s Chicago-based campaign is expected this week with an announcement to supporters and the filing of paperwork with the Federal Election Commission, advisers said. That will be followed by a whirlwind of major fundraisers scheduled later this month in Chicago, New York and California focused on both wealthy and middle-class donors.

With the 2012 presidential contest shaping up to be the most expensive political race in U.S. history, Obama last week traveled to New York to ask for help from dozens of wealthy Democrats. The first stop was the trendy Red Rooster Harlem restaurant, which played host to a 50-person, $30,800-a-head fundraising dinner for the DNC. Then it was off to the nearby Studio Museum for a thank-you reception with about 250 loyal donors, aimed at lining up support for the 2012 campaign.

“The dinner will be no more than 6 tables so that the President has time to spend at each table,” organizers noted in an e-mail message to attendees.

Senior Democratic aides say the early push among wealthy contributors makes sense given the lack of a primary race to inspire small donors. But DNC spokesman Brad Woodhouse said the campaign also will reach out to a broad group of potential contributors, including an aggressive use of Facebook, Twitter and other social media.

“Small donors, grass-roots donors, medium-sized and major donors were all part of the mix in 2008, and they will be again in 2012,” Woodhouse said. “We didn’t rely on one type of donor then, nor will we now.”

Democratic strategists say the aggressive fundraising goals are aimed in part at intimidating Republican rivals, who bested Democrats in overall political spending in 2010. The effort is expected to be bolstered by an outside group, now in the planning stages, headed by former White House aides Bill Burton and Sean Sweeney, advisers said.

“This president is quite strong, and already has a very developed list of supporters from the previous time,” said Richard Danzig, the Clinton administration Navy secretary who helped raise more than $500,000 for Obama in 2008. “He has all the advantages of being an incumbent.”

Yet the race is dogged by fears among supporters that Obama may not be able to match the historic fundraising juggernaut of 2008, when the candidate brought in nearly $750 million, much of it from small contributions solicited online. Some backers worry that a limping economy and disaffection among liberal activists and Wall Street donors could dampen Obama’s fundraising ability this time around.

“It’s a different climate,” said one longtime donor who, like many others, spoke on the condition of anonymity in order to talk frankly about the challenges facing the campaign. “The donor community has been disengaged from the White House.”

Republicans also criticize Obama for setting such lofty fundraising goals while in office: “Between the domestic and international crises currently facing the country, the president should demonstrate leadership for our country, not just his party,” said Republican National Committee spokesman Sean Spicer.

Obama’s senior advisers and many of his biggest financial supporters are optimistic, saying he should have little difficulty matching his 2008 fundraising record. At the same time, backers say, Obama will continue his efforts to limit the influence of special interests, again refusing to accept donations from corporate political-action committees or registered lobbyists. He also will urge outside groups to disclose their donors, aides said.

Peter Buttenwieser, a Philadelphia education consultant who helped raise more than $500,000 for Obama in 2008, said, “Once things get rolling and people take a look at the options, the campaign will raise all the money it needs.”

Since 2008, when Obama shattered records for online campaign donations, he has frequently cast himself as having reshaped politics by relying more heavily on average Americans than the super-wealthy. He told CNBC earlier this year that “the vast majority of the money I got was from small donors all across the country.”

That depends on the definition of “small”: About a third of the money he raised during the general election campaign did come from donors who gave $200 or less, a notably larger proportion than previous races, according to the Campaign Finance Institute think tank. But about 42 percent of the money came from donors giving $1,000 or more.

Obama also formed a group of “bundlers” who collected checks from their friends and earned special access to him and his staff, just as previous candidates of both parties had done before, and he declined public financing to avoid spending limits.

Some Democratic donors and campaign experts say the millions of middle-income people who donated to Obama three years ago may not have the motivation to give again. The 2012 campaign will lack the combination of factors that animated the 2008 contest: a fresh-faced candidate who could be the first black president; polarizing opponents like Hillary Rodham Clinton and Sarah Palin; and the eagerness of Democrats to end Republican control of the White House.

“He begins the race with the biggest donor base in presidential history, but you also have to add the dimension that it will be hard to replicate the historic nature of his candidacy,” said Anthony Corrado, a campaign-finance expert at Maine’s Colby College.

Obama also will be hobbled by rocky relations with the business community and softer support among some liberals.

“His refusal to fight Republicans or Wall Street corporations has left small-dollar donors much less inspired than in 2008,” said Adam Green at the Progressive Change Campaign Committee.

The president himself has acknowledged he may face a deficit in enthusiasm, one that he is urging supporters to overcome.

“Obviously the first time around it’s like lightning in a bottle,” Obama said at a recent DNC reception in Washington. “There’s something special about it, because you’re defying the odds. And as time passes, you start taking it for granted that a guy named Barack Hussein Obama is president of the United States. It’s not.”

*

Obama’s Economic Advisers: International Socialists, Union Thugs, NBC Execs, Soros Scholars, Subprime Lenders, Amnesty Shills, and Campaign Cronies





Posted on February 24, 2011 by Ben Johnson

http://floydreports.com/obama%E2%80%99s-economic-advisers-international-socialists-union-thugs-nbc-execs-soros-scholars-subprime-lenders-amnesty-shills-and-campaign-cronies/





*

MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com

*

Go to http://www.MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com and read articles and comments from other Americans on what they’ve witnessed in their communities around the country. While most of the population of California is now ILLEGAL, the problems, costs, assault to our culture by Mexico is EVERYWHERE. copy and pass it to your friends.

*

OBAMA HAS TWO AGENDAS. SERVICING BANKSTER DONORS, AND PUSHING OUR BORDERS OPEN FOR MORE ILLEGALS. HE KNOW WE WON’T BE PUNKED BY HIS PERFORMANCES THE SECOND TIME AROUND!

*

“Records show that four out of Obama's top five contributors are employees of financial industry giants - Goldman Sachs ($571,330), UBS AG ($364,806), JPMorgan Chase ($362,207) and Citigroup ($358,054).”



OBAMA & the CROOKS HE RUNS WITH... RUNNING THE NATION UNDER

MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com


*

Go to http://www.MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com and read articles and comments from other Americans on what they’ve witnessed in their communities around the country. While most of the population of California is now ILLEGAL, the problems, costs, assault to our culture by Mexico is EVERYWHERE. copy and pass it to your friends.

*

Obama’s Economic Advisers: International Socialists, Union Thugs, NBC Execs, Soros Scholars, Subprime Lenders, Amnesty Shills, and Campaign Cronies





Posted on February 24, 2011 by Ben Johnson

http://floydreports.com/obama%E2%80%99s-economic-advisers-international-socialists-union-thugs-nbc-execs-soros-scholars-subprime-lenders-amnesty-shills-and-campaign-cronies/



*

Obama’s Economic Advisers: International Socialists, Union Thugs, NBC Execs, Soros Scholars, Subprime Lenders, Amnesty Shills, and Campaign Cronies



Posted on February 24, 2011 by Ben Johnson

by Ben Johnson

The media enthused when Barack Obama bloviated during his State of the Union Address, “We need to out-innovate, out-educate, and out-build the rest of the world.” They now enthuse that the president has appointed members to his new Council on Jobs and Competitiveness allegedly designed to cut down inefficient regulations and unnecessary government burdens. None of the media announced that the appointees are a collection of globalists, media elites at NBC News, union thugs, amnesty activists, employees of Soros-funded think tanks, wealth redistributionists, business failures in the subprime lending industry, and Chicago cronies. Nonetheless, today’s issue of USA Today is already spinning the story under the headline, “Obama Wants Business World’s Best Ideas on Jobs.”



Where he would get those ideas is anyone’s guess.



Richard Trumka is perhaps the most conspicuous choice on this job-creating council. Trumka, who recently admitted to Astroturfing the protests in Wisconsin and around the country, is president of the AFL-CIO and a longtime Big Labor activist with a shady history. Michelle Malkin has noted that Trumka led the United Mine Workers when a non-union worker named Eddie York was shot to death in the midst of a mining strike. The UMW aided all eight union members present at the scene of the crime and disciplined none of them. In a separate incident, Trumka incited a crowd in Illinois to “kick the s–t out of every last” person who crossed the UMW picket line. Working his way up the ranks, as AFL-CIO treasurer he was implicated in two money-laundering scandals involving the Teamsters. He said if he were forced to testify before Congress, he would invoke the Fifth Amendment. Trumka climbed the ladder by gripping the coattails of John Sweeney, the union’s former president and member of the Democratic Socialists of America. Sweeney and Trumka saw the union donate more than $200 million in political aid to the Democrats in 2008 and send out more than 250,000 “volunteers,” many of whom worked for Obama in swing states. On February 15, Barack Obama awarded Sweeney the Medal of Freedom.







After succeeding Sweeney as the union’s president in September 2009, Trumka decided to further radicalize the union. Just last fall, Trumka insisted, “We need to fundamentally restructure our economy and re-establish popular control over the private corporations which have distorted our economy and hijacked our government. That’s a long-term job but one we should start now.” To that end, Trumka has worked with European socialists to establish a global tax, a measure that is also a top priority of Obama’s Science Czar John Holdren. Last year, Trumka carried out his threats to go after Democrats who opposed ObamaCare’s “public option,” failing to oust Arkansas Senator Blanche Lincoln as the Democratic nominee.







The new council position provides no real boost to Trumka; he doesn’t need one. Although certain members of Obama’s Cabinet have not heard from the president after serving two years into his administration, Trumka recently boasted: “I’m at the White House a couple times a week. Two, three times a week. I have conversations everyday with someone in the White House or in the administration. Everyday.”







Trumka is not the only union thug with a seat at the table.







Joseph T. Hansen helps Trumka present the Labor Left’s views. Hansen is president of the United Food and Commercial Workers Union (UFCW) and chairman of Change to Win, the AFL-CIO’s major union rival (the one formed by SEIU). Like Trumka, Hansen is already a frequent presidential advisor. Hansen serves as a member of Obama’s Advisory Committee on Trade Policy and Negotiations. Hansen, too, helped elect Obama. UFCW’s political action committee, United Food & Commercial Workers International Union Active Ballot Club, spent $673,309 on Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign and $3.5 million on Democratic candidates in 2008 and 2010.







Perhaps Hansen’s most valuable contribution, though, was his union’s most famous alumna, Buffy Wicks. Wicks ran the union’s Wake Up Wal-Mart campaign. During her time on UFCW’s payroll, the union announced “an exciting new partnership” with ACORN. After honing her community organizing skills on that crusade, she ran the 2008 Obama campaign on the West Coast and Missouri, for which she was rewarded with a position in Valerie Jarrett’s Office of Public Engagement. Wicks famously presided over the conference call instructing publicly funded artists to produce political propaganda to advance the president’s agenda. (Left-wing activist Sally Kohn recently admitted the administration presided over a series of such potentially illegal meetings.) In addition to his union’s assault on the nation’s largest employer, Hansen is part of the group America’s Agenda, an alliance of Big Labor and Big Business whose members work to promote national health care. Coincidentally, the UFCW also received an ObamaCare waiver.







Hansen, too, is an international socialist and amnesty advocate. His biography at the UFCW website states, “His early experience with global unionism provided him with the foresight to realize that only global solidarity can confront global corporations.” Translated, that means, “Workers of the world, unite.”







Hansen advocates amnesty for illegal aliens. He accused Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) of violating the Fourth Amendment “rights” of illegal immigrants during workplace raids in the Bush years. Hansen co-authored a piece for The Huffington Post demanding “immigration reform” (read: amnesty) for the nation’s 13 million illegal immigrants, claiming that would raise wages for all Americans. His co-author, SEIU International Secretary-Treasurer Eliseo Medina, was more forthcoming about his real intentions. An honorary chair of the Democratic Socialists of America, Medina admitted he supported the bill because “it puts 12 million people on the path to citizenship and eventually voters…we will create a governing coalition for the long-term, not just for an election cycle.” Hansen has served as president of Union Network International (UNI), an international union, since 2003.







Laura D’Andrea Tyson, another appointee, is currently a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress. CAP, which received significant start-up money from George Soros, is the most influential think tank in the Obama administration, housing such intellectual giants as Van Jones. Tyson is also a professor in the business school at the University of California at Berkeley, and formerly its dean. She sits on the advisory board for Newman’s Own Foundation, which heavily funds left-wing causes. Tyson gave a preview of her economic advice in an August op-ed for the New York Times entitled, “Why We Need a Second Stimulus.” She argued, “Our national debate about fiscal policy has become skewed, with far too much focus on the deficit…too much worry about the size of government.” Echoing the economic savant Nancy Pelosi, Tyson wrote, “Two forms of spending with the biggest and quickest bang for the buck are unemployment benefits and aid to state governments. The federal government should pledge generous financing increases for both programs through 2011.”

Monica C. Lozano is “Publisher and CEO of La Opinión, the nation’s largest Spanish language daily newspaper,” as well as CEO for impreMedia LLC. The White House press release states Lozano sits on the boards of “several non-profit organizations.” It omits the fact that one of these happens to be the National Council of La Raza. La Raza (“The Race”) supports giving drivers licenses, voting rights, and in-state tuition to illegal immigrants. Its generous donors include George Soros. Gray Davis appointed Lozano a regent of the University of California in 2001. However, her own academic career seems less than stellar. She described her undergrad days at the University of Oregon in Eugene, saying, “I studied sociology and political science for the most part, and became involved in a women’s collective that put out a newspaper called Women’s Press…Keep in mind that this was when women’s studies was born.” She did not finish her degree but instead bummed around Latin America before using her family connections to land her job at La Opinión, a newspaper founded by her grandfather. “When I came to La Opinión in 1985, I came without direct newspaper experience, no daily print experience whatsoever,” she confessed. “It’s a family-owned and operated company, started by my grandfather, then my dad and my brother and my sister, and so obviously my relationship to what I was doing and why I was here was different than most people who had worked their way up through the ranks to end up editing a major newspaper. They really opened the doors and asked me to come in, knowing full well that I didn’t have sort of a traditional background and experience that you would find in most managing editors.” She defends the newspaper as challenging the Roman Catholic Church, supporting abortion on demand, condom distribution, and needle-exchange programs for junkies. She admitted candidly, “I think, people have seen me as being too liberal or too left-wing.” However, she will not challenge her readership on one important point: she will not ask them to learn the English language. Lozano has said as far as she is concerned, language balkanization is here to stay – so get used to it, Gringo! “[A]ll of our readership studies show that even when 40 percent of our readers have been here twelve years or over, they still prefer to read in Spanish,” she said.” Even though they’re perfectly bilingual and proficient in English, they still prefer to be informed in Spanish. They prefer reading Spanish.” One need hardly guess her position on illegal immigration. Lozano’s lack of business preparation hardly hampered her business growth due to a bustling trade in illegals and the near-complete lack of assimilation of the nation’s Hispanic population, urged by academia. At least her business succeeded, unlike that of another council member’s family business.



Penny Pritzker is a longtime Chicago crony of Barack and Michelle Obama and Valerie Jarrett. An heiress to the Pritzker fortune (Hyatt hotels, etc.), she served as Obama’s 2008 national finance chairwoman. Chicago Sun Times columnist Lynn Sweet notes that Pritzker cost Superior Bank customers a pretty penny by pushing the bank to invest in subprime loans, the kernel of the housing market collapse and current recession. Bert Ely, a banking consultant, testified before Congress that “Superior was effectively facilitating very sleazy lending.” When federal regulators seized the bank in 2001, the institution left 1,400 customers without some of all of their savings. Pritzker addressed the situation, writing, “I am proud of how my family responded to this situation.” The Washington Post reported that this performance put her “at the top of Obama’s list” for Commerce Secretary, a post she declined. That has not kept her or her family from closely advising the first couple. Penny Pritzker’s husband, Bryan Traubert, serves on the President’s Commission on White House Fellowships; so does Cindy Moelis, the Executive Director of the Pritzker Traubert Family Foundation established by Penny and Bryan. Yet another Pritzker, Rachel Pritzker Hunter, is the treasurer of Media Matters and a member of the Democracy Alliance, one of the many groups George Soros established to pool and distribute money from wealthy elites to far-Left causes. Other women on the new economic council have been more successful but no less radical.



Sheryl Sandberg is the Chief Operating Officer of FaceBook. Sandberg entered the public eye as chief of staff to Bill Clinton’s Treasury Secretary, Lawrence Summers. She also serves on the board of the center-Left Brookings Institution and a group known as V-Day. And what is V-Day? It is the international feminist organization founded by playwright Eve Ensler, which produces “annual benefit performances of The Vagina Monologues.” The play’s thorough-going vulgarity – including a slang term for vagina that begins with “c” and questions about the odor omitted from that orifice – is the least offensive part of the play. The script gives a positive portrayal of a 24-year-old lesbian seducing and raping a 13-year-old girl. (Subsequent scripts raise the minor’s age to 16.) Before the 2004 election, V-Day produced a show at the Apollo Theater entitled “Vaginas Rock, Chicks Vote.” As part of V-Day, Sandberg helps bring Ensler’s glorification of deviate pedophilia to new audiences around the country.



Jeffrey Immelt, who will head the council, is CEO of General Electric, the parent company of NBC, and whose holdings include MSNBC, the president’s favorite network. Its political action committee, GEPAC, donated $2.4 million to Democrats. Immelt’s colleagues at GE told BusinessWeek they hope Immelt’s role in the administration will give him inside information about policies set “to impact GE coming out from Washington.” Others have noted how Obama’s “green energy” agenda benefits GE, as well as mainland China. By one estimate, GE received $49 million in federal stimulus grants alone. However, Immelt is not the only NBC interest represented on the board.



Brian L. Roberts, as head of Comcast, made the decision to become majority owner of NBC Universal. By chance, on the very day he announced he would be merging the two media titans, he sent Barack Obama a letter endorsing ObamaCare. Upon sealing the deal, he enthused, “The single most awesome asset that comes from this deal is NBC News.” He gave a not-very-convincing promise that the Peacock Network’s public affairs coverage would “keep down the middle, whatever that means.”







That is not to say the president appointed nothing but extremists to this panel. There are some genuine business authorities, including some Republicans. They serve as eyewash. As with his Cabinet picks, which lulled some pseudoconservatives into sycophancy, the moderates exist to provide cover for the council’s radical members, who alone have Obama’s ear.







Not only does this council not include business’s “best ideas,” it is virtually a retread of an earlier presidential advisory group. No fewer than nine members of the “new” council already serve on the President’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board.







Despite the abundance of Big Labor and Big Business appointees, not everyone is represented. Small businesses were frozen out of the discussion, as they have been from the entire administration, although they are the engine of economic growth. Jean Card of the National Federation of Independent Business, observing the council’s makeup, remarked, “It feels like (an effort to win) political points.”







Small business people and the taxpayers have no place in the administration. Meanwhile, USA Today reports that Valerie Jarrett, the main conduit of radicals into the Obama administration, is maintaining her “longevity” in the White House.







Unlike the mainstream media, we have seen the Obama administration’s version of America’s economic future: It is globalist, socialist, unionized, borderless, politically correct, run by heiresses and people with family connections, has a state-run media, speaks Spanish, and made a generous campaign contribution to the Democratic Party before it could even get a seat at the table.



Pardon me if I object.

*

OBAMA IS AN EXCELLENT ACTOR, BUT FOOLS NO ONE AT THIS POINT!



FROM HIS FIRST DAY IN OFFICE HE’S DONE NOTHING BUT SERVICE CORPORATE CRIMINALS, MOST OF WHICH KNEW HE WOULD WHEN THEY STUFFED HIS POCKETS FULL OF LOOT THE FIRST TIME, AND LA RAZA “THE RACE”.

OBAMA CAN’T OPEN OUR BORDERS FAST ENOUGH FOR THE ILLEGALS TO BUY THEIR ILLEGAL VOTES, OR FILL IS ADMINISTRATION WITH ENOUGH LA RAZA MEXICAN FASCIST TO SERVICE THE EVER EXPANDING MEXICAN OCCUPATION.

HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN AN AMERICAN PRESIDENT THAT SUES A STATE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE MEXICAN INVADERS, DRUG CARTELS, AND MEXICO’S MILLIONS OF EXPORTED POOR, AND CRIMINAL???

HE’S ONE OF THE MOST CORRUPT AND ETHICALLY SQUALID PRESIDENTS IN AMERICAN HISTORY!



*

Obama reelection campaign expected to tap big-money donors

By Dan Eggen and Perry Bacon Jr., Saturday, April , 6:01 PM

Facing an energized Republican Party and deep-pocketed conservative groups, President Obama is kicking off his 2012 reelection campaign with a concerted push for help from wealthy donors and liberal groups unbound by spending limits.

The strategy — which could begin in earnest as early as Monday with the formation of an official presidential committee — suggests a notable shift in emphasis for a president who has long decried the outsize role of money in politics.

Obama frequently points with pride to the role that smaller donors played in his 2008 election, when his campaign also openly discouraged spending by outside organizations. But now Obama finds himself seeking out the kind of big-money donations he has often criticized while encouraging independent groups to raise and spend unlimited money on his behalf.

Obama’s campaign manager-in-waiting, Jim Messina, has asked the party’s biggest supporters to raise $350,000 each this year, to be shared by Obama’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee, far higher than goals set during the 2008 cycle.

The effort could yield $140 million or more by the start of 2012, a pace likely to provide a major advantage to Obama and his party over potential GOP rivals. By comparison, Republican challenger Mitt Romney has set a minimum goal of $50 million for the primaries, though GOP strategists expect him to raise more.

The official start of Obama’s Chicago-based campaign is expected this week with an announcement to supporters and the filing of paperwork with the Federal Election Commission, advisers said. That will be followed by a whirlwind of major fundraisers scheduled later this month in Chicago, New York and California focused on both wealthy and middle-class donors.

With the 2012 presidential contest shaping up to be the most expensive political race in U.S. history, Obama last week traveled to New York to ask for help from dozens of wealthy Democrats. The first stop was the trendy Red Rooster Harlem restaurant, which played host to a 50-person, $30,800-a-head fundraising dinner for the DNC. Then it was off to the nearby Studio Museum for a thank-you reception with about 250 loyal donors, aimed at lining up support for the 2012 campaign.

“The dinner will be no more than 6 tables so that the President has time to spend at each table,” organizers noted in an e-mail message to attendees.

Senior Democratic aides say the early push among wealthy contributors makes sense given the lack of a primary race to inspire small donors. But DNC spokesman Brad Woodhouse said the campaign also will reach out to a broad group of potential contributors, including an aggressive use of Facebook, Twitter and other social media.

“Small donors, grass-roots donors, medium-sized and major donors were all part of the mix in 2008, and they will be again in 2012,” Woodhouse said. “We didn’t rely on one type of donor then, nor will we now.”

Democratic strategists say the aggressive fundraising goals are aimed in part at intimidating Republican rivals, who bested Democrats in overall political spending in 2010. The effort is expected to be bolstered by an outside group, now in the planning stages, headed by former White House aides Bill Burton and Sean Sweeney, advisers said.

“This president is quite strong, and already has a very developed list of supporters from the previous time,” said Richard Danzig, the Clinton administration Navy secretary who helped raise more than $500,000 for Obama in 2008. “He has all the advantages of being an incumbent.”

Yet the race is dogged by fears among supporters that Obama may not be able to match the historic fundraising juggernaut of 2008, when the candidate brought in nearly $750 million, much of it from small contributions solicited online. Some backers worry that a limping economy and disaffection among liberal activists and Wall Street donors could dampen Obama’s fundraising ability this time around.

“It’s a different climate,” said one longtime donor who, like many others, spoke on the condition of anonymity in order to talk frankly about the challenges facing the campaign. “The donor community has been disengaged from the White House.”

Republicans also criticize Obama for setting such lofty fundraising goals while in office: “Between the domestic and international crises currently facing the country, the president should demonstrate leadership for our country, not just his party,” said Republican National Committee spokesman Sean Spicer.

Obama’s senior advisers and many of his biggest financial supporters are optimistic, saying he should have little difficulty matching his 2008 fundraising record. At the same time, backers say, Obama will continue his efforts to limit the influence of special interests, again refusing to accept donations from corporate political-action committees or registered lobbyists. He also will urge outside groups to disclose their donors, aides said.

Peter Buttenwieser, a Philadelphia education consultant who helped raise more than $500,000 for Obama in 2008, said, “Once things get rolling and people take a look at the options, the campaign will raise all the money it needs.”

Since 2008, when Obama shattered records for online campaign donations, he has frequently cast himself as having reshaped politics by relying more heavily on average Americans than the super-wealthy. He told CNBC earlier this year that “the vast majority of the money I got was from small donors all across the country.”

That depends on the definition of “small”: About a third of the money he raised during the general election campaign did come from donors who gave $200 or less, a notably larger proportion than previous races, according to the Campaign Finance Institute think tank. But about 42 percent of the money came from donors giving $1,000 or more.

Obama also formed a group of “bundlers” who collected checks from their friends and earned special access to him and his staff, just as previous candidates of both parties had done before, and he declined public financing to avoid spending limits.

Some Democratic donors and campaign experts say the millions of middle-income people who donated to Obama three years ago may not have the motivation to give again. The 2012 campaign will lack the combination of factors that animated the 2008 contest: a fresh-faced candidate who could be the first black president; polarizing opponents like Hillary Rodham Clinton and Sarah Palin; and the eagerness of Democrats to end Republican control of the White House.

“He begins the race with the biggest donor base in presidential history, but you also have to add the dimension that it will be hard to replicate the historic nature of his candidacy,” said Anthony Corrado, a campaign-finance expert at Maine’s Colby College.

Obama also will be hobbled by rocky relations with the business community and softer support among some liberals.

“His refusal to fight Republicans or Wall Street corporations has left small-dollar donors much less inspired than in 2008,” said Adam Green at the Progressive Change Campaign Committee.

The president himself has acknowledged he may face a deficit in enthusiasm, one that he is urging supporters to overcome.

“Obviously the first time around it’s like lightning in a bottle,” Obama said at a recent DNC reception in Washington. “There’s something special about it, because you’re defying the odds. And as time passes, you start taking it for granted that a guy named Barack Hussein Obama is president of the United States. It’s not.”



*

*

OBAMA HAS TWO AGENDAS. SERVICING BANKSTER DONORS, AND PUSHING OUR BORDERS OPEN FOR MORE ILLEGALS. HE KNOW WE WON’T BE PUNKED BY HIS PERFORMANCES THE SECOND TIME AROUND!

*

“Records show that four out of Obama's top five contributors are employees of financial industry giants - Goldman Sachs ($571,330), UBS AG ($364,806), JPMorgan Chase ($362,207) and Citigroup ($358,054).”



*

FROM CREOLE FOLKS



Obama Seeks Brother of "Chicago Mob Boss" for Top White House Post

The roaches and con-artist, fake journalist on cable news are all lying about William Daley being all this and all that, this man is an open borders, down with America, free trade globalist. MSNBC and Gretta "the Scientology" Van Susteren from Fox News are knowingly deceiving the public about D. Issa & his letter to "business owners"=which they made into such a BIG DAM DEAL, but no one says anything whenBarrack Hussein Obama, comes around with all of these shady bankers, hedge fund managers and Wall St. Tycoons, which he puts in his cabinet. All of Obama's meeting with Wall Street asking, "What can I do for you?" is never something covered by Keith Oberman or Rachel Maddow.

(Bloomberg) -- President Barack Obama is considering naming William Daley, a JPMorgan Chase & Co. executive and former U.S. Commerce secretary, to a high-level administration post, possibly White House chief of staff, people familiar with the matter said.



*

Obamanomics: How Barack Obama Is Bankrupting You and Enriching His Wall Street Friends, Corporate Lobbyists, and Union Bosses



BY TIMOTHY P CARNEY





Editorial Reviews

Obama Is Making You Poorer—But Who’s Getting Rich?

Goldman Sachs, GE, Pfizer, the United Auto Workers—the same “special interests” Barack Obama was supposed to chase from the temple—are profiting handsomely from Obama’s Big Government policies that crush taxpayers, small businesses, and consumers. In Obamanomics, investigative reporter Timothy P. Carney digs up the dirt the mainstream media ignores and the White House wishes you wouldn’t see. Rather than Hope and Change, Obama is delivering corporate socialism to America, all while claiming he’s battling corporate America. It’s corporate welfare and regulatory robbery—it’s Obamanomics.

Congressman Ron Paul says, “Every libertarian and free-market conservative needs to read Obamanomics.” And Johan Goldberg, columnist and bestselling author says, “Obamanomics is conservative muckraking at its best and an indispensable field guide to the Obama years.”

If you’ve wondered what’s happening to America, as the federal government swallows up the financial sector, the auto industry, and healthcare, and enacts deficit exploding “stimulus packages,” this book makes it all clear—it’s a big scam. Ultimately, Obamanomics boils down to this: every time government gets bigger, somebody’s getting rich, and those somebodies are friends of Barack. This book names the names—and it will make your blood boil.

*



Obama Is Making You Poorer—But Who’s Getting Rich?

Goldman Sachs, GE, Pfizer, the United Auto Workers—the same “special interests” Barack Obama was supposed to chase from the temple—are profiting handsomely from Obama’s Big Government policies that crush taxpayers, small businesses, and consumers.

Investigative reporter Timothy P. Carney digs up the dirt the mainstream media ignores and the White House wishes you wouldn’t see. Rather than Hope and Change, Obama is delivering corporate socialism to America, all while claiming he’s battling corporate America. It’s corporate welfare and regulatory robbery—it’s Obamanomics. In this explosive book, Carney reveals:

* The Great Health Care Scam—Obama’s backroom deals with drug companies spell corporate profits and more government control

* The Global Warming Hoax—Obama has bought off industries with a pork-filled bill that will drain your wallet for Al Gore’s agenda

* Obama and Wall Street—“Change” means more bailouts and a heavy Goldman Sachs presence in the West Wing (including Rahm Emanuel)

* Stimulating K Street—The largest spending bill in history gave pork to the well-connected and created a feeding frenzy for lobbyists

* How the GOP needs to change its tune—drastically—to battle Obamanomics

If you’ve wondered what’s happening to our country, as the federal government swallows up the financial sector, the auto industry, and healthcare, and enacts deficit exploding “stimulus packages” that create make-work government jobs, this book makes it all clear—it’s a big scam. Ultimately, Obamanomics boils down to this: every time government gets bigger, somebody’s getting rich, and those somebodies are friends of Barack. This book names the names—and it will make your blood boil.

*

• Hardcover: 256 pages

• Publisher: Regnery Press (November 30, 2009)

• Language: English

• ISBN-10: 1596986123

• ISBN-13: 978-1596986121











A WARNING ABOUT THE CRAIGS LIST INTERNET STALKER & HIS ASSAULT ON FREE SPEECH AND CL POSTERS

Anyone that has attempted to post on the CRAIGS LIST politics or rants forums around the country, is familiar with the CL FLAGGER-STALKER, RICHARD HILARY GIBSON, a retired los angeles tech lawyer.




Gibson harasses, threatens, stalks, flags and then urges CL posters he’s harassing to commit suicide.



He also challenges posters that may not know he’s on the other side of the country, to meet for a fight.



It is common for this los angeles lawyer to threaten to murder posters, or to offer rewards for the murder of those he’s stalking.



*

Judge: Free Speech No Defense for Urging Suicide

Minn. judge finds ex-nurse used Internet to aid 2 suicides, rejects free speech claims





Freedom of speech is no defense for a former nurse

who engaged in "lethal advocacy" when he

encouraged an English man and Canadian woman to

kill themselves after searching for depressed people

over the Internet, a Minnesota judge said in

delivering a guilty verdict against the man.



The judge found William Melchert-Dinkel, 48, guilty

Tuesday of two counts of aiding the suicides of Mark

Drybrough, 32, of Coventry, England, who hanged

himself in 2005, and Nadia Kajouji, 18, of Brampton,

Ontario, who jumped into a frozen river in 2008.

Melchert-Dinkel declined a jury trial and left his fate

to Rice County District Judge Thomas Neuville.



Melchert-Dinkel's attorney, Terry Watkins, said the

defense was disappointed with the verdict and

planned to appeal. Watkins said appellate courts will

have to answer whether Melchert-Dinkel's actions

rose to the level of a crime or were protected speech

in the context in which they occurred, given the

defense view that the victims were already

predisposed to suicide and his online statements

didn't sway them.



In his ruling, Neuville stuck mostly to a dispassionate

recitation of the facts in the case. The judge again

rejected the defendant's argument that his actions

amounted to free speech, affirming a pretrial ruling

he issued in November. He also reaffirmed his

rejection of the defense claim that Melchert-Dinkel's

online statements didn't sway the victims.



"Melchert-Dinkel was not merely expressing ideas

about suicide The court finds that defendant's speech

imminently incited the victims to commit suicide, and

can be described as 'lethal advocacy,' which is

analogous to the category of unprotected speech

known as 'fighting words' and 'imminent incitement of

lawlessness,'" Neuville wrote.



After sentencing, which is scheduled for May 4,

Watkins said, his next stop will be the Minnesota

Court of Appeals, and the defense is prepared to

appeal to higher courts if necessary. He said the

defense didn't dispute the facts as the judge laid them

did it for the "thrill of the chase." He acknowledged

participating in online chats about suicide with up to

20 people and entering into fake suicide pacts with

about 10 people, five of whom he believed killed

themselves.



Drybrough's mother, Elaine Drybrough, said she was

glad the judge agreed Melchert-Dinkel was guilty. If

he had been cleared, she said, it would have sent a

signal to other people contemplating similar actions

that encouraging suicides is permissible.



"He's been told it's not all right," she said.



Kajouji's mother, Deborah Chevalier, said she's

concerned the penalty won't be in line with the crime

and that Melchert-Dinkel's appeal will delay a final

resolution.



"I've said all along that a crime is just as vile and

offensive whether it be committed in our own homes

or over the Internet," she said in an e-mail.



During oral arguments in February, Watkins called his

client's behavior "sick" and "abhorrent" but said it

wasn't a crime. He said Drybrough had been ill for

years and went online seeking drugs to overdose,

while Kajouji was going through a rough time in her

life, had a miscarriage after drinking heavily and was

depressed. Watkins said they were both intelligent

people who wouldn't be swayed by his client's online

"babbling."



Beaumaster said Melchert-Dinkel's intent was to see

them die, and the law is designed to protect

vulnerable people.



"That's the point. That's who he looked for," he said.

"He targeted individuals he knew he could have an

influence on. Were they predisposed? Absolutely!"



Minnesota authorities began investigating in March

2008 when an anti-suicide activist in Britain claimed

someone in the state was using the Internet to

manipulate people into killing themselves.



The Minnesota Board of Nursing revoked Melchert-

Dinkel's license in 2009.

out in his 42-page ruling, but disagreed on whether

they added up to proof of guilt beyond a reasonable

doubt.



"We will carry this as far as judicially allowed,"

Watkins said.



Minnesota's rarely used aiding suicide law carries a

maximum penalty of 15 years in prison and a

$30,000 fine. Data from the Minnesota Sentencing

Guidelines Commission show that since 1994, only

six people have been sentenced on the charge. One

was sent to prison for four years; the rest received

local jail time, probation or both.



Rice County Attorney Paul Beaumaster said he would

seek a sentence consistent with the earlier cases.



"I think justice was served," Beaumaster said. "I think it

was a just verdict based on the facts of the case, and

convictions were earned on both counts."



Prosecutors said Melchert-Dinkel, who lives in the

southern Minnesota city of Faribault, was obsessed

with suicide and hanging and sought out potential

victims online. When he found them, prosecutors

said, he posed as a female nurse, feigned compassion

and offered step-by-step instructions on how they

could kill themselves. Melchert-Dinkel told police he





*

Hoods going DOWN! (Pizza Knight)

________________________________________

Date: 2011-03-30, 7:56PM EDT

Reply To This Post

________________________________________



HA HA Hood got himself in trouble. Whats wrong Hood, I thought you were so smart. Why don't you respond to this post and insult me or post a degrading picture?

Oh thats right you can't because you made an agreement to keep your sorry ass out of jail for cyber bullying and harassment. I've waited over 2 years for this day and it has finally come.

Now I see why you don't show your whole body in the picture. You are one fat fuck. Kill yourself.



*



THIS IS PROBABLY ONE OF GIBSON’S CROSS-POSTINGS.



mcfly (just saying)

________________________________________

Date: 2011-03-10, 5:23PM EST

Reply To This Post

________________________________________



And the world is also full of crazy people that stalk threaten and then KILL people because of some dumbass like this WHITEY guy. It works both ways! Whitey did cross the line when he turned it from bitching and bickering, to an all out threat to kill a person. ranting and raving is not against the law! BUT THREATENING TO KILL SOMEONE IS! check yourself fool like Blossom said.

• Location: just saying

• it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests





PostingID: 2258524929

________________________________________



*

NITE PSYCHO, (BLOSSOMRAYNE)

________________________________________

Date: 2011-03-21, 3:32PM EDT

Reply To This Post

________________________________________



OMG! YOU ARE SO RIGHT! YOU GOT ME! THANKS FOR POINTING THAT OUT! I SHOULD KILL MYSELF! YUP! HEY FRIENDS AND ENEMIES ...HOW SHOULD I END MY LIFE? WITH A GUN, KNIFE, ROPE, RUN OUT IN TRAFFIC, FUCK MYSELF TO DEATH? CHOKE ON A BIG COCK? HELP ME ...HOW SHOULD I DO IT?!!!! ALL YOUR INPUT WOULD BE GREATLY WELCOMED! THANKS AND HAVE A BEAUTIFUL DAY! OR SHOULD I FIND A FIRE SOMEWHERE AND JUMP OFF IN IT?

KISS

KISS

<3

YOU KNOW WHERE I WORK, COME GET ME! YOU WANT ME DEAD SO BAD, WHY DONT YOU DO IT!? YOU AINT SHIT! PERIOD! YOU AINT SHIT! JUST ANOTHER FUCKING PATHETIC LOSER HERE IN R&R. PERIOD!

• Location: BLOSSOMRAYNE

• it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests





PostingID: 2278155609



*

re: RE HIV+Trading (USA) (telling truths)

________________________________________

Date: 2011-03-26, 2:01PM EDT

Reply To This Post

________________________________________



You are just a big piece of shit trading Secrets, you come in here and continue to pretend to be other people and talk shit. We all know it is Blossoms pic. that has already been established dumbfuck!! JESUS FUCKING CHRIST! Go kill yourself already.

IT IS BLOSSOMS PIC, another posted, as in TRADING LIES and Night Slut. THE fact is that the info they posted isn't Blossoms and if Blossom truly posted that link she would state she had kids and all her true info. EVERYTHING, with the EXCEPTION of the pic, is 'NOT" Blossoms info. And some fuckup also posted RAVENSNEST as her name. WE ALL KNOW BLOSSOM IS A PROUD LADY AND IF SHE TRULY POSTED THAT FUCKING POST SHE WOULD HAVE PUT BLOSSOMRAYNE, NOT RAVENSNEST. BLOSSOM AND RAVEN ARE CYBOR FRIENDS. Blossom wouldn't do that to raven. And Raven knows this. I can see this is gonna be a long day of dealing with sorry fucking stupid son of a bitches!

One other thing I must point out, when the asshole posted that bullshit ad and put blossoms pic and ravensnest as her name, they fucked up, because you have to send proof of who you are to change the name on your account. A drivers license, or state ID card. I would like to see this happen. Stupid SOB's! Fucking ignorant as they come!

• Location: telling truths

• it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests





PostingID: 2287912523

________________________________________



*



Richard Gibson

GIBSON LAW PC

21800 Oxnard Street, Suite 310

Woodland HIlls, California 91367

Telephone: 818-716-7950

Facsimile: 818-716-7995

E-mail: Rick@GibsonLawLA.com

Web: http://www.BankruptcyExpertsLA.com

Facebook: RichardGibsonLA



GIBSON HAS LONG HARASSED, STALKED, AND FLAGGED POSTERS ON CL.



HERE’S ONE POSTER’S OBSERVATION OF GIBSON FROM 2008



HERE GIBSON IS EXPOSED IN ALBUQUERQUE

this is why the albuquerque r&r is dead (BE WARNED HE IS HERE TOO)



Reply to: pers-773897254@craigslist.org

Date: 2008-07-28, 5:23PM PDT



it's D-E-A-D, wanna know why? Because that ass-hole HUGE/tiny/krusty/vato/UTBT/LA-ABQ-LA and 50 more fake names)killed it and now he's on your board - (I recognize the writing style and the same old stupid pics). Watch out for "Dude". He starts out benign but then metastasizes into a vile worm that will strangle your board and bring it to a halt. He'll post under many different names and will cross-talk with himself. He's inflammatory, a troll and a professional spammer (if there even is such a thing). He's infactuated with fat women, mercilessly making fun of retarded people and he posts pictures of feces. He gets on an "illegals" kick. Be warned. He's a pseudo-intellect, is homophobic, a woman hater and some have accused him of being a pedophile. Once he takes over, he'll flag every post but his own. He killed Santa Fe's board too. Step on this cockroach before he ruins your board.

*

THE BELOW WAS PROBABLY POSTED BY GIBSON. HE LIKES TO POST ABOUT IS INTERNET CRIMES.



Poncho/Gibson

________________________________________

Date: 2010-03-08, 9:39PM MST

Reply to: comm-gu26g-1635332619@craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]

________________________________________



Poncho posts under so many names in CL forums that he has to use a data base to keep track of all his lies. He is fully capable of posting on both sides of an issue to cause confusion, and then will create a new name to agree with the point of view he wishes to put forward. He can act stupid, or post an absolute brilliant post, complete with correct spelling and punctuation.



Don't take my word for it though....just go to the various forums he posts in, and ask them. Seattle, Phoenix, all over California, Texas and others as well. Just go into a forum look for his name. If it isn't there, just ask them......most all have had problems with his bullshit.



Since I think YOU are Poncho posting as someone else to take heat off that name, I would like to ask you pointedly just HOW you know Poncho is all you claim he is? Just because he says so? Keep your eyes open and watch his crap. It's out there in many different forums.



Just how the hell do you know anyone has posted using his name? Because he claims it????? He has claimed to be "gone"...on trips, and then you can go see his posts in other forums. They are NOT anyone else, because only he can do the Poncho character like he does. They are all typical Poncho posts, even when he claims they are someone else. Now...why would anyone want to use Poncho's name to post a post exactly like HE would post one?



They wouldn't. You are Poncho, I believe, trying as hard as possible to lead everyone away from your antics. Every time he disappears for a while, it's because he has gotten caught on something downright stupid, or he has made serious threats and is called on them. HE is CONSTANTLY posting under other poster's names to discredit them, and has gotten caught on that many times as well. He has even admitted it at various times, then of course denies it all later. They guy is a total nutcase, and has ruined many political forums with his crap and need for attention. Wherever he is, it's all about Poncho, and not at all about politics.



If it weren't for what it could lead to, I would agree to flag off anything that doesn't pertain to politics, but then, you have censorship, and I have to ask WHO will decide whether or not it is actually related to politics or not.....fuzzy area at times.

• it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests





PostingID: 1635332619





Editorials & Opinion | What would MLK say about a nation at war against workers? | Seattle Times Newspaper

Editorials & Opinion What would MLK say about a nation at war against workers? Seattle Times Newspaper


OBAMA’S ESTABLISHED HISTORY OF HISPANDERING….


Lou Dobbs Tonight

CNN -- July 27 Pilgrim: Well presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama voiced support for yesterday's court ruling that struck down Hazleton's illegal immigration law. Senator Obama called the federal court ruling a victory for all Americans. The senator said comprehensive reform is needed so local communities do not continue to take matters into their own hands. Senator Obama was a supporter of the Senate's failed immigration bill, which would have given amnesty to millions of illegal aliens.

*l

Lou Dobbs Tonight

Tuesday, September 9, 2008



Since Mexican President Felipe Calderon started his crackdown on drug cartels and corrupt law enforcement two years ago, more than 4,000 people have been killed. The death toll among law

enforcement has topped 500. Kidnappings and violence are spreading across the border, and now the AP reports Mexican cartels have green-lighted hits against targets in the U.S. We’ll talk to Phoenix police about becoming the kidnapping capital of the nation and the rapid increase in other crimes linked to Mexico the city is coping with.

*



Lou Dobbs Tonight

Monday, June 16, 2008

Tonight, we’ll have all the latest on the devastating floods in the Midwest and all the day’s news from the campaign trail. The massive corporate mouthpiece the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is holding a “North American Forum” to lay out its “shared vision” for the United States, Canada and Mexico – which is to say a borderless, pro-business super-state in which U.S. sovereignty will be dissolved. Undercover investigators have found incredibly lax security and enforcement at U.S. border crossings, according to a new report by the Government Accountability Office. This report comes on the heels of a separate report by U.C. San Diego that shows tougher border security efforts aren’t deterring illegal entries to the United States.

*

CNN RECENTLY REPORTED THAT THE NUMBER OF MEX GANG MEMBERS EXCEEDS ONE MILLION!



Lou Dobbs Tonight

And there are some 800,000 gang members in this country: That’s more than the combined number of troops in our Army and Marine Corps. These gangs have become one of the principle ways to import and distribute drugs in the United States. Congressman David Reichert joins Lou to tell us why those gangs are growing larger and stronger, and why he’s introduced legislation to eliminate the top three international drug gangs.

*

EVEN AS THE MEX DRUG CARTELS POUR OVER OUR BORDERS, OBAMA HAS TAKEN HUNDREDS MORE GUARD OFF SINCE SEPT 2009! AND THE OBAMA DECLARES “BORDER SECURITY” IS THE HALLMARK OF HIS PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP!

Lou Dobbs Tonight

Monday, September 28, 2009



And T.J. BONNER, president of the National Border Patrol Council, will weigh in on the federal government’s decision to pull nearly 400 agents from the U.S.-Mexican border. As always, Lou will take your calls to discuss the issues that matter most-and to get your thoughts on where America is headed.



MEXICO ANNOUNCES THAT CALIFORNIA IS FULLY OCCUPIED! JOBS GO TO ILLEGALS FIRST! MUCHO WELFARE ON HAND! FREE ANCHOR BABY BIRTHING WELFARE NOW!


MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com



*

Go to http://www.MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com



HOW MANY TIMES OVER DO WE PAY FOR THE MEXICAN WELFARE STATE IN OUR BORDERS?



FROM ARTICLE BELOW:

“Meanwhile, the budget deficit continues to grow beyond expectation. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has called an emergency session of the incoming legislature to come up with more cuts to address the state’s projected $25.4 billion budget shortfall for the next fiscal year. This is after year-after-year cuts to social services and programs benefiting the working class.”

*

CA OPERATES DEFICITS OF $20 BILLION A YEAR, AND PUTS OUT $20 BILLION PER YEAR BEING MEXICO’S WELFARE, FREE ANCHOR BABY BIRTHING CENTER, JOBS & JAILS SYSTEMS, AS ILLEGALS WAVE THEIR MEX FLAG IN OUR FACE AND REFUSE TO SPEAK ENGLISH!



latimes.com

Opinion

California must stem the flow of illegal immigrants

The state should go after employers who hire them, curb taxpayer-funded benefits, deploy the National Guard to help the feds at the border and penalize 'sanctuary' cities.



Illegal immigration is another matter entirely. With the state budget in tatters, millions of residents out of work and a state prison system strained by massive overcrowding, California simply cannot continue to ignore the strain that illegal immigration puts on our budget and economy. Illegal aliens cost taxpayers in our state billions of dollars each year. As economist Philip J. Romero concluded in a 2007 study, "illegal immigrants impose a 'tax' on legal California residents in the tens of billions of dollars."



*

The danger, as Washington Post economics columnist Robert Samuelson argues, is that of “importing poverty” in the form of a new underclass—a permanent group of working poor.

*

Lou Dobbs Tonight

Wednesday, June 10, 2009



Gov. Schwarzenegger said California is facing “financial Armageddon”. He is making drastic cuts in the budget for education, health care and services. But there is one place he isn’t making cuts… services for illegal immigrants. These services are estimated to cost the state four to five billion dollars a year. Schwarzenegger said he is “happy” to offer these services. We will have a full report tonight.



*

SOMEONE MUST PAY FOR THE MEXICAN WELFARE AND COST OF GANG CRIME IN MEXIFORNIA! BUSINESS WILL NOT BE. THEY WANT THE ILLEGALS, PAY MISERABLE WAGES TO ILLEGALS, AND THEN PASS ALONG THE REAL COST TO LEGALS IN THE FORM OF WELFARE TO ILLEGALS.

*

California state workers’ union pushes through cuts in pay and pensions

By Jack Cody

18 November 2010

The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) in California has pushed through an agreement that will reduce pay and pension benefits for state and city workers. The contract, which was approved just one week after the elections, is an indication of the type of austerity measures that will be imposed—with the complicity of the unions—throughout the state and across the US.

The 95,000 workers in the union voted to accept the cuts on November 9 after the SEIU and the state government presented a yes vote as the only way to avoid furloughs.

Effective immediately, all workers’ retirement contributions will increase by 3 percent. The contract establishes a two-tiered pension system, effectively raising the retirement age for new hires. Current employees will be able to retire at 55 with pensions equal to 2 percent of their pay for every year they work. New hires will not be eligible for this option until they are 60.

The SEIU is touting as a major accomplishment a supposed one-year prohibition on furlough days written into the contract. Yet, workers will take a 4.62 percent pay cut that comes with 12 mandatory days off per year. Far from putting an end to furlough days, this contract has effectively institutionalized them.

With budget shortfalls on the horizon for the foreseeable future in California, further furloughs for state workers will almost certainly be an option on the table at the end of the one-year period.

(CALIFORNIA, THE EPICENTER OF THE HOUSING CRISIS… WE CAN THANK BANKSTERS WELLS FARGO AND BANK of AMERICAN, AND THE POLITICIANS THEY OWN LIKE DIANNE FEINSTEIN, ALWAYS THERE TO FIX THE SYSTEM ON THEIR BEHALF)

California, the epicenter of the housing crisis that precipitated the global financial crash of 2008, has faced budget deficits in the tens of billions of dollars for three consecutive years. The Democrats and the Republicans, along with the media, are collaborating in an effort to scapegoat workers’ pensions for the ongoing fiscal crises.

Meanwhile, the budget deficit continues to grow beyond expectation. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has called an emergency session of the incoming legislature to come up with more cuts to address the state’s projected $25.4 billion budget shortfall for the next fiscal year. This is after year-after-year cuts to social services and programs benefiting the working class.

That the ratification of the SEIU contract and the announcement of the estimated increase in the state’s budget deficit came just weeks after a contentious election is no accident. Schwarzenegger and the Democrats in the state legislature doubtless knew about the size of the deficit well in advance of the election.

The SEIU has close ties to the Democratic Party in general, and to the incoming governor, Jerry Brown, in particular. The union devoted millions of dollars in dues to the Brown campaign, even as the candidate said that he would make cutting state worker pensions a priority. Brown and his Republican rival, Meg Whitman, turned the highly publicized race into a competition over who would more aggressively attack pensions once in office (see “Right-wing consensus in California gubernatorial elections”).

Having helped put Brown in office, the SEIU and other unions will be used as an instrument for further attacks against workers’ living standards. Facing a massive deficit in his first year in office, it is all but certain that Brown will go on the offensive against government employee wages and pensions. When this happens, SEIU officials will likely invoke extenuating circumstances in the attempt to force further concessions on their members.

*

New Polls Show Broad-Based Support for Immigration Enforcement

While pro-amnesty advocates increase their pressure on the Obama Administration to pass “comprehensive immigration reform,” recent polls show strong support for immigration enforcement, even among minorities, business executives, union members, and parishioners. In February, Zogby released the results of a survey of roughly 700 Hispanic, 400 African-American, and 400 Asian-American likely voters. The Zogby poll found that, when asked to choose between enforcement that would cause illegal aliens in the country to go home or offering them an amnesty, 52 percent of Hispanics, 57 percent of Asian-Americans, and 50 percent of African-Americans support the enforcement option. (CIS Backgrounder, February 2010). A Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) analysis of the poll results concluded that despite the perception that minority voters support amnesty as a monolithic bloc, the reality is that minorities “want enforcement and less immigration.” (Id.).

Another Zogby poll released in February illustrates the gap between pro-amnesty special interests and the people that these groups purport to represent. Special interest business groups like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Essential Worker Immigration Coalition often team with special interest labor groups like the AFL-CIO and the Service Employees International Union to lobby Congress in support of amnesty and in opposition to immigration enforcement. However, the Zogby poll found that 59 percent of executives (e.g., CEOs, CFOs, etc.), 67 percent of small business owners, and 58 percent of union households support enforcement of our immigration laws over granting amnesty to illegal aliens. (CIS Backgrounder, February 2010).

In addition, a December Zogby poll of 42,026 likely voters similarly found that most parishioners and congregants would choose a policy of immigration enforcement that would cause illegal aliens to go home over an amnesty program. These results conflict with policies supported by many religious leaders, who have actively lobbied for passage of an amnesty. According to the Zogby poll, 64 percent of Catholics, 64 percent of “Mainline” Protestants, 76 percent of “Born-Again” Protestants, and a 43 percent plurality of Jews chose the enforcement option over amnesty. (CIS Backgrounder, December 2009).

One of the main reasons such a wide range of Americans favor immigration enforcement over amnesty is that the American people generally see illegal immigration as a strain on the U.S budget. A March 3 national telephone survey conducted by Rasmussen Reports found that “67 percent of U.S. voters say that illegal immigrants are a significant strain on the U.S. budget.” (Rasmussen Reports, March 3, 2010). Of voters polled, two-out-of-three (66 percent) said the availability of government money and services draw illegal immigrants to the United States and 68 percent said gaining control of the border is more important than legalizing the status of undocumented workers already living in the United States. (Id.). Of particular importance, 80 percent of voters said the issue of immigration will be somewhat important in determining how they will vote in the next congressional election; half (50 percent) said it will be very important to them. (Id.).

*

CALIFORNIA’S DIM FUTURE… we see today under MEXICANOCCUPATION, ever expanded by PELOSI, BOXER, FEINSTEIN, WAXMAN, LOFGREN, AND THE GROWING LA RAZA PARTY with Reps. Sanchez sisters, Baca and Becerra!



*

MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com







From the Los Angeles Times

Illegal immigrants again in the budget spotlight

The economic downturn has activists pushing for a measure that would limit the services Californians provide.

By Anna Gorman and Teresa Watanabe



July 10, 2009



As California lawmakers struggle with a budget gap that has now grown to $26.3 billion, one of the hottest topics for many taxpayers is the cost to the state of illegal immigrants.



The question of whether taxpayers should provide services to illegal residents became a major political issue in California's last deep recession, culminating in the ballot fight over Proposition 187 in 1994. That history could repeat itself in the current downturn, as activists opposed to illegal immigration have launched a campaign for an initiative that would, among other things, cut off welfare payments to the U.S.-born children of illegal immigrants. Those children are eligible for welfare benefits because they are U.S. citizens.



State welfare officials estimate that cutting off payments to illegal immigrants for their U.S.-born children could save about $640 million annually if it survives legal challenges.



California has roughly 2.7 million illegal residents, according to an April 2009 report from the authoritative Pew Hispanic Center, accounting for about 7% of the state's population. State officials estimate that they add between $4 billion and $6 billion in costs, primarily for prisons and jails, schools and emergency rooms. Beyond those services, the illegal population adds to the overall cost of other parts of local government, from police and fire protection to highway maintenance and libraries.



On the other side of the ledger, illegal residents pay taxes -- sales taxes on what they buy, gasoline taxes when they fuel their cars, property taxes if they own homes. The total is hotly debated, although most researchers agree that the short-term costs to state and local government are bigger than the revenues.



Many companies that hire illegal workers also withhold Social Security and income taxes from their paychecks, based on workers' invalid Social Security numbers. That money goes mostly to the federal government, not to localities. The Social Security Administration estimates that in 2007, illegal residents nationwide contributed a net of $12 billion to the system.



The largest costs to California's budget from its illegal residents are in three areas:



* Education: The state has no official count of how many students are in the country illegally because school districts do not ask. But the state legislative analyst estimated, based on data from the Pew Hispanic Center, that the state's 6.3 million public school students include about 300,000 illegal residents. At an annual cost of about $7,626 each, the total comes to nearly $2.3 billion.



* Prisons: In fiscal year 2009-10, California expects to spend about $834 million to incarcerate 19,000 illegal immigrants in the state's prisons. In Los Angeles County, illegal immigrants add between $370 million and $550 million annually to criminal justice costs, including prosecution, defense, probation and jails, according to Supervisor Mike Antonovich.



* Healthcare: The expected state tab for healthcare in fiscal 2009-10 is $703 million for as many as 780,000 illegal immigrants. Of that, $486 million goes to emergency services. But low-income illegal residents are also eligible for some nonemergency health services, including prenatal and postpartum care, abortions, breast and cervical cancer treatment and certain types of long-term care, such as stays in nursing homes. Most of the nonemergency care for illegal immigrants was authorized by the Legislature in the 1980s.



Much of those costs are beyond the control of state officials. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1982 that the Constitution forbids school districts to turn away children who are illegal immigrants. And federal law requires emergency rooms to treat everyone, regardless of citizenship.



How serious a problem those costs are is a subject of constant debate. "It is a catastrophic hit . . . on every level of government," Antonovich said.



State Sen. Denise Moreno Ducheny (D-San Diego) who heads the Senate budget committee, counters that illegal immigrants are net contributors through their taxes and labor in farming and other industries. Cutting services to illegal residents is "penny wise and pound foolish," Ducheny said.



The Center for Continuing Study of the California Economy, based in Palo Alto, has analyzed research on the costs of illegal immigration. Most studies show that at least in the short term, illegal immigrants, who tend to be poorer and have more children than average, use more in public services than they contribute in taxes, the center found.



But the center's director, Stephen Levy, said some of the long-term effects were positive. Educating illegal immigrant children, for instance, helps them eventually land better jobs and higher salaries, benefiting Californians with increased tax payments and more sophisticated work skills.



Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has said it is wrong to blame illegal immigrants for the state's fiscal problems. He has, however, proposed to limit welfare and nonemergency healthcare for illegal immigrants and their families. So far, the Legislature has rejected his plans.



One of the governor's proposals would place a five-year limit on state welfare payments to the U.S.-citizen children of illegal immigrants. That would affect approximately 100,000 U.S.-born children in about 48,000 California households headed by illegal immigrants, who receive a monthly average of $472. The measure could save $77 million annually, according to the governor's office.



Under another proposal, the governor could commute the sentences of some illegal immigrant felons in state prisons and shift them to federal detention centers. It costs the state $48,000 to incarcerate a prisoner, and the federal government reimburses about 12 cents on the dollar, according to state finance officials. The administration estimates that commuting sentences of 8,500 felons, along with other sentencing changes, could save $182 million, although other state analysts question that.



State cuts in health services could shift costs to counties, some of which have begun denying treatment to illegal immigrants to close their own budget gaps. "It really is a punt," said Farra Bracht of the Legislative Analyst's Office. "We just keep shoving more and more to the counties. . . . They are the providers of truly last resort."



Many state officials have called on the federal government to increase the payments it makes to the state for costs associated with illegal immigrants, because controlling the borders is a federal responsibility. So far, however, Washington lawmakers, faced with large deficits of their own, have not been willing.



And others say the nation's humanitarian traditions and long-term interests compel extending a helping hand to people such as Delia Godinez.



Godinez, a 43-year-old undocumented Mexican immigrant, left an abusive family and lives in transitional housing. Four of her five children are citizens and receive a total of about $650 each month from the state's CalWorks program. She also receives about $500 in federal food stamps and other vouchers.



Without the aid, the unemployed Godinez said, she wouldn't be able to provide for her family. She is studying English and hopes one day to open a business and get off welfare.



"I don't want to be my whole life with that help," she said.



Many advocates say the ultimate solution is to reduce illegal immigration, not to cut off critical services that could jeopardize public health and safety.



"When people come into the U.S., even illegally, they cross more than a physical barrier; they cross a moral barrier," said Steven Camarota of the Washington-based Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates immigration restrictions. "We don't like it if someone can't go to the emergency room. That's just our way."

*

MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com

FAIRUS.org

JUDICIALWATCH.org

ALIPAC.us

*

JUDICIAL WATCH

SANCTUARY COUNTY LOS ANGELES SPENDS $600 MILLION ON WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS

County Spends $600 Mil On Welfare For Illegal Immigrants

Last Updated: Thu, 03/11/2010 - 3:14pm

For the second consecutive year taxpayers in a single U.S. county will dish out more than half a billion dollars just to cover the welfare and food-stamp costs of illegal immigrants.

Los Angeles County, the nation’s most populous, may be in the midst of a dire financial crisis but somehow there are plenty of funds for illegal aliens. In January alone, anchor babies born to the county’s illegal immigrants collected more than $50 million in welfare benefits. At that rate the cash-strapped county will pay around $600 million this year to provide illegal aliens’ offspring with food stamps and other welfare perks.

20 STATES GOV CANDIDATES SAY NO TO THE MEXICAN OCCUPATION - AS OBAMA EXPANDS IT DAILY

MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com


*

Go to http://www.MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com and read articles and comments from other Americans on what they’ve witnessed in their communities around the country. While most of the population of California is now ILLEGAL, the problems, costs, assault to our culture by Mexico is EVERYWHERE. copy and pass it to your friends.



*

THESE FIGURES ON WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY ARE DATED. IT NOT EXCEEDS $600 MILLION PER YEAR!!! (source: Los Angeles County & JUDICIAL WATCH)

*

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1949085/posts

*

LOS ANGELES – A MEXICAN WELFARE AND CRIME STATE WHERE THE JOBS ALSO GO TO ILLEGALS

http://mex¬icanoccupa¬tion.blogs¬pot.com/20¬11/04/mexi¬can-welfar¬e-state-in¬-los-angel¬es.html



*



2O GOV CANDIDATES VOW TO FIGHT FOR AMERICAN AGAINST OBAMA’S LA RAZA AMNESTY!



“The prevalence of the issue means the Obama administration could find itself battling Arizona-style flare-ups in statehouses across the country, raising pressure on the White House and Congress to break the deadlock in Washington over comprehensive immigration reform.”



*

POLITICO



Gov. candidates in 20 states endorse anti-immigration laws



By: Carrie Budoff Brown

September 2, 2010 04:31 AM EDT



It’s not just Arizona.



In states far from the Mexico border — from liberal Massachusetts to moderate Iowa — Democrats and Republicans in gubernatorial races are running on strict anti-illegal-immigration platforms, pledging to sign an array of tough enforcement measures into law come January.



Of the 37 gubernatorial races this year, candidates in more than 20 states have endorsed adopting a strict Arizona-style immigration law or passing legislation that makes it harder for illegal immigrants to live, work and access basic public benefits in their states, according to a POLITICO analysis.



The prevalence of the issue means the Obama administration could find itself battling Arizona-style flare-ups in statehouses across the country, raising pressure on the White House and Congress to break the deadlock in Washington over comprehensive immigration reform.



The Justice Department sued Arizona in hopes of discouraging other states from following its lead and won a ruling blocking provisions of the law that immigrant advocates found most objectionable. But that hasn’t stopped some gubernatorial candidates from trying to one-up each other on the issue.



Georgia Democratic nominee Roy Barnes endorses an Arizona-style law for the state, saying he would sign similar legislation if elected. So does Georgia’s Republican nominee, former U.S. Rep. Nathan Deal, a staunch critic of comprehensive immigration reform who used the first ad of his primary campaign to endorse the Arizona crackdown.



“If President Obama sues us too, we’re going to defend ourselves,” said Brian Robinson, communications director for Deal. “We’ve got to protect Georgia taxpayers if President Obama won’t.”



Alabama Republican Robert Bentley, who holds a double-digit lead over his Democratic challenger, vows to create “an environment that is unwelcoming to illegal immigrants.” He drafted a 10-point plan for what he describes as one of the most pressing problems facing the state, where the Pew Research Center found the immigrant population has at least doubled since 2005.



And in Massachusetts, Republican Charles Baker and independent Timothy Cahill are battling for the toughest-on-immigration title, while Democratic Gov. Deval Patrick takes hits from immigrant advocates for not being “proactive” enough.



The flood of get-tough statements could be just that — campaign talk that fades against the hard realities of governing and legal threats by the Justice Department. The outcome of a U.S. appeals court hearing on the Arizona law set for early November is likely to determine whether the state-level push stalls out or gains momentum.



But polls show voters want the government to stop the flow of illegal immigrants. And with Congress unlikely to act anytime soon, gubernatorial candidates are arguing that, as chief executives, they will try to do the job that they say the federal government has neglected.

The political pull can be fierce. At least three Republicans who initially expressed concern with the Arizona law walked back their opposition after taking heat from their party.

Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum scrambled to match the hard line of his challenger, Rick Scott, by introducing a proposal late in the primary election campaign that he said would go further than the Arizona law, but McCollum still lost. Wisconsin Republican Scott Walker went from skeptic to supporter of Arizona’s approach, as did Nebraska Gov. Dave Heineman, who has said he will work with the state attorney general to craft a law similar to Arizona's for the 2011 legislative session.



“In the absence of federal action, we will see devastating policies at the state and local level, as demagogues rush in to fill the breach,” said Deepak Bhargava, executive director of the Center for Community Change, an immigrant advocacy group. “That is why it is critical that there is a renewed effort on the federal level.”



With state budgets in crisis and the economy struggling, candidates are framing the debate in financial terms, not simply as a law-and-order issue.



Illegal immigrants are already ineligible for all major government benefits, but that hasn’t stopped gubernatorial nominees from pledging to go even further in tightening verification requirements for public aid programs to establish an applicant’s legal status.



"This is purely about politics and not substance," said Jon Blazer, a public benefits attorney for the National Immigration Law Center, adding that the law is already restrictive.



Candidates are embracing E-Verify, a federal database that allows employers to check an employee’s Social Security number against government records. Only federal contractors are required to use the system, which has been criticized as unreliable. And governors in 13 states have signed legislation or executive orders mandating some level of participation from employers.



But if anti-illegal-immigration candidates win in November, more states, including Iowa, Georgia and Alabama, appear likely to jump on board or expand the program. Colorado Republican Dan Maes would require all private employers in his state to use E-Verify — the crux of his vision for legislation that “reduces the incentives to live, work and transfer funds from Colorado.”

Other top targets include scholarships, in-state tuition and driver’s licenses for illegal immigrants — flash points in states across the country.

In Massachusetts, Baker would tell state lawmakers to send him a package of hard-hitting immigration measures identical to a package that passed the Democratic-controlled state Senate this year but was eliminated from the final budget bill because of Gov. Patrick’s opposition, Baker spokesman Rick Gorka said.

It was considered an unusually tough measure for a state long represented by the late Sen. Ted Kennedy, the architect of the modern-day immigration system. But a confluence of factors contributed to its near passage, spurred on by Arizona, including a poll of Massachusetts voters showing strong support for the crackdown and the case of Obama’s Kenyan aunt, who was living in public housing while she fought a deportation order.

The package expanded efforts to block illegal immigrants from accessing public benefits, established a telephone line for people to anonymously report people they suspect of being illegal and required companies working with the state to confirm the legal status of their hires.



“We would make sure state services are for state residents,” Gorka said. “This is a cost-saving measure; it is a responsible measure.”



Massachusetts had been known as one of the most welcoming to immigrants in the country, Eva Millona, executive director of the Massachusetts Immigration and Refugee Advocacy Coalition said. But lately, she said, “this is the most anti-immigrant climate we have witnessed.”



Even Patrick has turned cautious, doing little to act on a series of pro-immigrant recommendations from a state advisory panel. “Deval hasn’t been as proactive as we would have liked him to be,” said Millona, a co-chairwoman of the panel.



In New Mexico, a border state that has traditionally taken a more lenient approach than adjacent Arizona, Democrat Diane Denish and Republican Susana Martinez would stop issuing driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants. But Martinez would go a step further in repealing the 2003 state law and revoking thousands of licenses. Martinez, who won the Republican primary by making her opponent look weak on border security, would also eliminate taxpayer-funded lottery scholarships.



“Not only does this provide further incentive for illegal immigrants to come to New Mexico,” Martinez says on her campaign website, “it is simply wrong to provide free scholarships to illegal immigrants when members of the military stationed in New Mexico are not eligible for the same benefits.”



Taking a position that goes further than other GOP candidates, former Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad, who is trying to unseat the Democratic governor, said a long-standing Supreme Court decision that forced states to educate the children of illegal immigrants should be overturned.



And when people are stopped for a criminal or traffic violation, they should be detained and turned over to the federal government if they can’t prove their legal status, Branstad has said.



“Iowans are frustrated,” Branstad spokesman Tim Albrecht said. “Either we are going to enforce the laws or we are not going to enforce the laws, and Gov. Branstad is on the side of wanting to enforce those laws.”



Millona said the November elections will be a test: A strong showing by enforcement-only proponents could make it harder for Democrats and Republicans to come together on a comprehensive overhaul next year.



“If they don’t win, it will be very clear — as it is clear to most of us — that the enforcement-only measures don’t work,” Millona said.



*

ARTICLE



8 Out of 10 Illegals Apprehended in 2010 Never Prosecuted

http://www.alipac.us/article-6162-thread-1-0.html





Obama Quietly Erasing Borders (Article)





Article Link:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=240045



*

Lou Dobbs Tonight

Monday, September 28, 2009





And T.J. BONNER, president of the National Border Patrol Council, will weigh in on the federal government’s decision to pull nearly 400 agents from the U.S.-Mexican border. As always, Lou will take your calls to discuss the issues that matter most-and to get your thoughts on where America is headed.



*

Obama Administration Caught Arming Mexican Illegal Alien Rebels



DISCUSS THIS NATIONAL PRESS RELEASE WITH OUR ONLINE ACTIVISTS AT...

http://www.alipac.us/ftopicp-1205835.html#1205835



BACKGROUND ARTICLES ON OPERATION GUN RUNNER AND FAST AND FURIOUS...

http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-230424.html



Update and Release on NC Victory against bogus Mexican ID for illegals

ALIPAC Responds to NC Legislator's Personal Attacks

http://www.alipac.us/article6196.html



*



CONTACT THE HISPANDERING LA RAZA PARTY PRESIDENT HERE:



You can contact President Obama and let him know of your opposition to amnesty for illegal aliens:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/CONTACT/