The Mexican Invasion and Occupation: Mexico & Dems Build the LA RAZA UNIDOus Mex Welfare State

THE DOCTRINE OF THE N.A.F.T.A. GLOBALIST DEMOCRATS IS TO SERVE THE BILLIONAIRE CLASS WITH ENDLESS WAVES OF INVADING 'CHEAP' LABOR SUBSIDIZED WITH WELFARE FUNDED BY TAXES ON MIDDLE AMERICA. In many speeches, Mayorkas says he is building a mass migration system to deliver workers to wealthy employers and investors and “equity” to poor foreigners. The nation’s border laws are subordinate to elites’ opinion about “the values of our country,” Mayorkas claims.

Monday, October 17, 2022

EVICTED AMERICA - FIGHTING BACK - The Rent Revolution Is Coming - Warnock Denies His Church Evicts Tenants. Three Eviction Notices Were Filed Last Week. Building has filed more than a dozen eviction notices during pandemic

Warnock Denies His Church Evicts Tenants. Three Eviction Notices Were Filed Last Week.

Building has filed more than a dozen eviction notices during pandemic

Alana Goodman and Andrew Kerr • October 18, 2022 5:00 am

Georgia Democratic senator Raphael Warnock forcefully denied the charge that his church is trying to evict chronically homeless tenants, telling Georgia voters on Friday that those are "false charges" and an attempt to "sully Ebenezer Baptist Church." But just two days earlier, the apartment complex owned by his church filed eviction proceedings against three additional residents, with the goal of ousting tenants who owed as little as $115 in past-due rent.

Columbia Tower at MLK Village filed removal proceedings against three tenants on Oct. 12, one day after the Washington Free Beacon broke the news that the church-owned building had filed a dozen eviction lawsuits against residents of the building since the start of the pandemic.

Residents told the Free Beacon that Columbia Residential, the building’s administrators, has become more aggressive in its rent collection policies, and sent out a notice in September saying it would no longer accept late fees and would start removal proceedings after five days of non-payment.

"If you don’t pay your rent by the fifth, a dispossessory notice comes out that week," a resident told a Free Beacon reporter who visited the building in October. "They won’t accept the payment after the fifth."

The latest evictions involved tenants who were just days late paying their October rent, and owed as little as $115, according to Fulton County Magistrate Court records filed by Columbia Tower.

The records conflict with Warnock’s statements over the past week denying that Columbia Tower—which is 99-percent-owned by the Ebenezer Baptist Church, where he serves as senior pastor—has tried to oust anyone. Fulton County marshals carried out two court-ordered evictions on residents at the property, one in August 2020 and the other in February 2022.

"There have been no evictions, full stop," Warnock said when asked about the Free Beacon report during a debate on Sunday. Warnock claimed the news was "one more example of Herschel Walker and his allies lying" and "trying to sully the name of Dr. King's church, John Lewis's church, for short term-political gain."

Warnock did not respond to a request for comment.

MLK Village filed the proceedings against the three tenants last week, asking for "possession" of their apartments, plus $250 in filing fees, $75 in late fees, and additional water and sewage payments. All of the residents were late on just one month of rent for October, according to the filings, with one owing $610 and the other two owing $115 each.

Two other Columbia Tower residents who received eviction notices in September responded in court that their landlord refused to accept their rent payments.

"I offered and had money to pay my rent on or before the date I usually pay, but my landlord refused to accept it," the two residents said in their answers to Columbia Tower’s dispossessory notices.

One of the residents informed the Fulton County Magistrate Court in response to his eviction notice that Columbia Tower "drills locks in door with no probal [sic] cause didn’t give notice to vacate," and that he was "evicted for 1 night by lock change, incurred hotel fee."

The resident who said a lock was drilled into his door did not return requests for comment.

Warnock’s claim that there have been no evictions from Columbia Tower during the pandemic is not true.

Fulton County marshals carried out two court-ordered writs of possession against Columbia Tower residents during the pandemic, court records show.

One was carried out on Aug. 17, 2020, against a woman who was sued in March 2020 for just $28.55 in past-due rent, court records show. The tenant had vacated the building when the writ of possession was carried out. She would have been forcibly ejected from the apartment, however, if she was there when authorities arrived.

The second resident wasn’t so lucky. Fulton County marshals reported that they "ejected" the resident when they carried out a court-ordered writ of possession on Feb. 1, 2022, court records show. The resident was sued in September 2021 for $423 in past-due rent.

Columbia Tower dismissed four other eviction lawsuits it had filed against residents during the pandemic, but only after they paid excessive court fees that far exceeded their monthly rent.

One resident told the Free Beacon she received an eviction notice after she was just one day late paying her rent. She ultimately had to pay more than $300 in court fees—a figure equivalent to about two months’ worth of rent—to stay in her home.

Another resident, Phillip White, a 69-year-old African-American Vietnam veteran, said he had to pay $325 in court fees after Columbia Tower tried to evict him in September 2021 for $179 in past-due rent.

White received a second eviction notice in late September for failure to meet a $192 rent payment earlier that month. He told the Free Beacon he plans to fight the case in court.

Warnock contends on his campaign website that he has no day-to-day involvement in the management activities of Columbia Tower.

Ebenezer Baptist Church owns 99 percent of the property through a complex network of shell organizations connected to Ebenezer Building Foundation, a charity that delegates all management duties to the church and identifies Warnock as its principal officer.

Columbia Residential, the 1 percent owner of the building, told the Free Beacon that Ebenezer Building Foundation contracted with the firm to manage the property "on their behalf."

The church ended 2021 with cash and "cash equivalents" exceeding $1.2 million, according to audited financial statements obtained by the Free Beacon. It also paid Warnock a $7,417-per-month tax-free housing allowance in 2021 in an arrangement that allowed him to circumvent outside income limitations for U.S. senators.

All the while, residents of Columbia Tower told the Free Beacon their home is plagued by pests, maintenance problems, and filth.

The Georgia Secretary of State Office's Securities and Charities Division launched an investigation into Ebenezer Building Foundation last Wednesday to determine why the charity is operating in the state without an active registration. The charity has until Nov. 2 to bring forward evidence showing why it is exempt from registering with the secretary of state and is "therefore not in violation of the Act and Rules."

Ebenezer Baptist Church and Columbia Residential did not return requests for comment on the latest round of eviction lawsuits filed last week.

Mario Breedlove, the attorney who filed the lawsuits on behalf of Columbia Residential, also did not return a request for comment.

The Rent Revolution Is Coming

Conor Dougherty

Sat, October 15, 2022 at 7:09 AM

In this article:

Tiana Caldwell, a co-founder and board president of KC Tenants, outside the East Patrol Division Station in Kansas City, Mo., after her release on bond following the group's disruption of a city council vote on a new set of housing ordinances. (Barrett Emke for The New York Times)

KANSAS CITY, Mo. — Here’s a list of places you might imagine seeing an argument over housing policy. A city council meeting. A late-night zoning hearing. Maybe a ribbon-cutting to christen a new affordable housing complex.

Instead, there was Quinton Lucas, the mayor of Kansas City, Missouri, on a stage dressed as the pope with a half-dozen hecklers in yellow T-shirts berating his new housing plan from the audience in front of him. Lucas had arrived at the outdoor Starlight Theater on a warm August evening for a cameo appearance in a local production of “Sister Act.” Just before he walked onto the stage, the demonstrators, who belonged to a group called KC Tenants, unfurled a banner that read “Mayor Lucas: Developing Displacement.”

A pack of uniformed security guards promptly smothered the scene. During the slow procession to the exit gates that followed, members of KC Tenants chanted, “The rent is too damn high!” while the audience tried to focus on the mayor/pope and the dancing nuns.

Such is the state of housing in America, where rising costs are flaring into pockets of resistance and rage. Take two-plus years of pandemic-fueled eviction anxiety and spiking home prices, add a growing inflation problem that is being increasingly driven by rising rents, and throw in a long-run affordable housing shortage that cities seem powerless to solve. Add it up and members of the 44 million U.S. households who rent a home or apartment have many reasons to be unhappy.

That unhappiness extends across the economic spectrum. At one end are renters who aspire to buy a home but have had their dreams dashed by high home prices and, now, rising mortgage rates. At the other are low-income tenants who make up the bulk of the 11 million households that spend more than half of their income on rent. In between is a hollowed-out middle class that is steadily losing ground, although not enough to qualify for much sympathy or help.

The confluence of all these forces has fueled a swell of tenants’ rights activism that has brought organizing muscle and policies like rent control to cities far beyond the high-cost coasts. Kansas City, Missouri, with a population of 500,000, is a leading example. Where avenues are lined with brick buildings and side streets have modest houses with raised porches, the city offers little to suggest a renters’ revolution. Zillow’s home value index puts the typical Kansas City home at $230,000, or more than $100,000 below the national level.

But with a steadily expanding economy driven by the logistics and medical industries, Kansas City has seen its rents increase 8.5% from a year ago, outpacing the rest of the nation, according to rental search site Apartment List. Over the past decade, Kansas City, like many places, has added a collection of high-end towers and apartments even as its stock of low-income housing has withered. The strain from rising rents, which landlords say they need to cover their costs, is creeping from people working in low-income service professions to middle-income teachers and city workers, part of a festering affordable-housing plight that spreads across the nation each month.

KC Tenants is one result. Pairing aggressive protests with traditional lobbying, the group exploded onto the political scene during the pandemic and has since become instrumental in passing tenant-friendly laws like an ordinance that gives renters a lawyer during eviction proceedings. It has also left a trail of embittered opponents who find the group’s tactics, such as protesting outside judges’ homes, ill-suited to what many residents describe as a cordial Midwestern town.

“It’s a transition in politics for us,” said Lucas, a Democrat, who says he meets with the leaders of KC Tenants regularly, despite being a frequent target of the group’s protests. “There is a new, almost tougher political edge, in the sense that there are people who are organizing and intrigued by politics and are very angry and are not coming out of the same institutions that built a lot of us.”

America’s housing problem was simmering long before the pandemic, and tenant organizing is a well-established trade. What’s changed is the depth of the housing shortage and the suddenness with which COVID-19 and inflation have tipped smaller cities into an affordability crisis. This has widened the aperture for policies once deemed politically impossible, in a broader range of markets.

Unlike homeowners, whose budget problems are blunted by tax breaks and fixed-rate mortgages, renters are mostly unprotected from rapidly rising prices. Once cities around the country passed widespread eviction moratoriums and emergency rent caps that were followed by tens of billions of dollars in pandemic rental assistance, it was only natural for housing activists to push for some of those temporary policies to be made permanent.

Politically speaking, inflation has only helped. Nationally, rents are now 20% higher than they were in early 2020, creating an opportunity for renter-friendly laws to get baked into long-term policy.

“People take for granted that rent is always going to go up,” said Tara Raghuveer, a co-founder of KC Tenants. “There’s so little political imagination about what could be different, and now I think that’s changing.”

A hyper-focused worker who blends the rhetoric of a revolutionary with the efficiency of a chief executive, Raghuveer also directs the Homes Guarantee campaign, which works to create tenant unions around the country. She described KC Tenants as both a local movement and national experiment through which organizing ideas can be test-driven.

“I think every national organizer should be accountable to a local base,” she said.

During a three-day visit in which I hung around the office and shadowed meetings and protests, Raghuveer returned repeatedly to an idea that has become a refrain among tenant groups: the hope that growing resentment over housing costs is fostering a broad tenant identity that will inspire a wide range of renters to organize and vote with a shared interest. In the activist nomenclature, this is known as “tenants as a class.”

That’s an audacious goal in a country where homeownership is all but defined as success. An irony of the nation’s housing problem is that it’s become so pervasive that it has created as many opportunities for cleavage as it has for coalition. Need has grown faster than resources, making housing policy a prism through which a stealth conflict between the middle class and the truly poor is filtered.

Even so, what’s clear is that in Kansas City and elsewhere tenants are becoming a real constituency. That’s not something you could say as recently as a few years ago. But a few years ago the rent wasn’t quite so high.

Getting the Data

KC Tenants began, more or less, as homework.

Raghuveer, now 30, was in her final year at Harvard when she settled on a topic for her senior thesis: evictions, inspired by the work of Matthew Desmond, the Princeton sociologist and author of “Evicted,” a 2016 book that explored the housing struggles of low-income families in Milwaukee. She’d grown up in Mission Woods, a suburb on the Kansas side of the Kansas-Missouri border, and conducted her thesis research in the Kansas City metropolitan area.

After college, Raghuveer was invited to talk about her thesis in policy forums, and that’s how she met the women who would help her start KC Tenants.

One was Tiana Caldwell, whose husband contacted Raghuveer as the family bounced between hotels after being evicted from their apartment amid Caldwell’s treatment for ovarian cancer. Another was Diane Charity, a 72-year-old retiree who rents a two-bedroom townhouse and who met Raghuveer during a presentation at the local health department.

“She gave all these stats, and I said, ‘I need to talk to you,’” Charity said. “We’ve been telling these stories forever, and no one’s listening. But she had what it took. I’m sorry to say this, but to talk to white people and people in power, you got to have data.”

KC Tenants was founded in 2019 by a group that included Charity and Caldwell. A local union allowed the group to work out of its offices, and a folding table there formed KC Tenants’ first headquarters. That’s where Raghuveer was working when the COVID-19 pandemic erupted.

For all the uncertainty that the pandemic wreaked on markets and the economy, there seemed to be at least one prediction that housing experts and policymakers agreed on in its early days: a “tsunami of evictions” was imminent.

Nearly three years later, that prediction has yet to materialize. The economic recovery from the immediate shock of COVID was faster than many expected, and in the meantime trillions of dollars in federal stimulus spending and eviction moratoriums helped plug the gaps. Still, the attention that COVID brought to housing insecurity is poised to be a lasting remnant of the pandemic economy, even after rental assistance wanes and the patchwork of moratoriums expire.

It shows up in cities like Los Angeles, where the City Council this month voted to expand tenant protections for renters in the same meeting in which it voted to end its COVID-related eviction moratorium. Last year, voters in St. Paul, Minnesota, passed a rent control ordinance. The uneven rollout of federal rental aid, in which bureaucratic hurdles frequently prevented cities and states from getting money to tenants, inspired a number of cities to experiment with cash assistance programs that are now becoming a permanent feature of the policy landscape.

For organizers, the pandemic provided an almost perfect opportunity to build their ranks. Here was a crisis that affected a large number of renters pretty much all at once, in contrast to the normal state of affairs in which tenants who are falling behind or evicted are dealing with problems that seem unique to their lives and are mostly handled in private.

“Embedded in tenant organizing are deeper questions about the structure of our political economy,” said Jamila Michener, a professor of government and public policy at Cornell University who has studied tenant organizations. “It’s getting people to think about not just how you can leverage power against your landlord or get the city council to help you, but also questions like: Why does the economy seem to be rigged against people like you so systematically?”

In 2019, Jenay Manley was making $11.50 an hour at a QuikTrip gas station when a paperwork error cost her a voucher that covered a portion of her rent through the federal Section 8 housing program. To help make up for the loss, she allowed a former boyfriend who she said was abusive to move back in. One night, she texted a friend who had been displaced by a rent increase to ask what she could do. The friend, Maya Neal, suggested that she go to a KC Tenants meeting. There, she heard Caldwell tell her story of being evicted during cancer treatment.

“It was just this clarifying moment of: We’re not OK. People are not OK,” she said. “We are struggling, and no one knows. And the more of us who tell our story, the more of us realize our story is worth being told.”

A few months later, after leaving the night shift at QuikTrip, Manley, along with her sister and three children, stationed herself along Interstate 70, next to a minivan with “#CancelRent” scrawled across a window in purple marker. She was there to protest the burden of COVID on tenants in a socially distant manner.

In July 2020, KC Tenants protested the end of a local eviction moratorium and tried to halt eviction proceedings by logging onto virtual court hearings and continuously reading a script — “Every eviction is an act of violence” — so that judges and lawyers couldn’t hear one another. By October, the group’s members were chaining themselves to the courthouse doors.

They also started targeting lawyers and public officials, including through a rally in the front yard of Judge J. Dale Youngs, who oversees the circuit court in Jackson County. Youngs said in an interview that at one point the group spray-painted “FU” onto a flagstone path in his yard. He added that he did not know if “FU” was the completed thought or if the vandal was interrupted before the message could be finished.

“I’m a pretty big supporter of the First Amendment, and I’m the first to admit democracy is messy,” Youngs said. “But when you go protest in front of someone’s private home, I think the only reason you’re doing that is to let them know that you know where they live. And there’s something kind of inherently not cool about that.”

Locals argue over how effective these protests were, but there’s little doubt that housing pressures brought on by COVID helped open the door to policies that otherwise would never have happened. The biggest, by far, is a new right-to-counsel ordinance in which the city will pay for a lawyer to represent any tenant facing eviction. The measure was drafted by KC Tenants, according to Andrea Bough, the City Council member who introduced it.

In an interview in her office, Bough expressed the same anxiety I had heard all around town, including from the mayor and from low-income tenants: Even though Kansas City remains inexpensive compared with larger cities, it is spiraling into the same affordability problems as those places and is no more equipped to solve them.

“We aren’t to the point of a widespread housing crisis, but if we don’t do something we’re going to get there,” she said.

The right-to-counsel law, which went into effect this year, has already changed the landscape. Julie Anderson, a Kansas City lawyer who represents a number of local landlords, said that the cost of an eviction had risen by a factor of five and that the process now took from three months to a year, up from a month or so. Her clients are unhappy, but it’s also been good for business: Anderson said she had hired two lawyers and three paralegals to handle the extra work.

“That part of my practice was very uneventful,” she said. “Now, post-COVID, almost everything is contested.”

The Tenant Class

KC Tenants now has 4,300 members, seven full-time employees and piles of yellow T-shirts ready for distribution. The nonprofit organization operates out of a second-floor office inside a Methodist church and is funded through a mix of individual donors and foundations. It has a $450,000 annual budget.

This month, members started a separate entity, KC Tenants Power, that is registered as a 501(c)(4) and has more leeway to engage directly in politics. Like everyone else these days, Raghuveer seems to spend most of her time on video calls, talking in front of a banner that reads, “Eviction Kills.”

Tenant-organizing has been central to any number of social justice and civil rights movements stretching from the turn of the 20th century, but, in recent decades, it has rarely been successful outside localized pockets. An enduring issue in organizing tenants as a class is that homeownership is still most families’ goal.

COVID has illustrated this. Once remote workers could live anywhere they wanted, many renters left big, expensive markets for smaller cities where they could afford a home.

Raghuveer believes in a growing tenant identity, but she has no delusions. She doesn’t imagine that one day she’ll lead a protest march in which public-housing tenants lock arms with residents of luxe buildings, where one-bedroom apartments start at $3,000 a month and include access to rooftop pools and private dog parks. What she does believe is that housing instability, however it is experienced, can be a catalyst for a broader coalition that operates across traditional political lines.

She pointed to a recent effort to help a local trailer park where the county was evicting residents in order to build a jail on the property. This would normally have been an organizing no-brainer. However, during a meeting, several members of KC Tenants said they were reluctant to get involved because a number of the cars and trailers in the park had Trump stickers and flags on them. Other members responded by recalling that the group’s community agreements, which they read before every meeting, declare that KC Tenants does not make assumptions about anyone.

So a group went to knock on doors.

“This little skinny gal comes to my door, and I’m like, ‘Who in the hell is this?’” said Urban Schaefer, a resident of the park who helped organize it after meeting Raghuveer. “A lot of people were skeptical about it.”

In the end, about a dozen members of KC Tenants worked with residents to demand a better deal. And the county sweetened its offer: six months of free rent and at least $10,000 in relocation costs.

Inventing Hope

There weren’t any MAGA hats at the KC Tenants meetings I went to, but it was a generally diverse group with a variety of motivations for being there. There were Black women, who are among the people most affected by eviction both locally and nationally. There were white men, who began whatever they were about to say with acknowledgments of privilege. And there was a child of the housing bust, whose faith in the American dream was shattered when his family’s home was foreclosed on and a chain of moves followed.

During a meeting of a tenants’ union in the gentrifying Midtown neighborhood, I met an economics professor who had come because she had wanted to better understand the housing problem. Later, at meeting in a Section 8 building on the other side of Troost Avenue — long the city’s dividing line between its Black and white residents — several attendees sat in wheelchairs, and one said he’d recently slept under a bridge.

Small frictions abound. At one recent meeting, a young man talked about the “carceral state,” only to have Charity reply, “Are you talking about jail?”

This diversity is, unintentionally, the policy conundrum that Lucas and other officials are grappling with as more people look to the government for help with housing.

Around the country, developers have spent the past decade building mostly higher-end units. Eli Ungar, founder of Mac Properties, which is based in Englewood, New Jersey, and owns about 9,000 apartments, including 2,000 in Kansas City, bluntly laid out the economics. The cost of development is now so high that the most reliable way to make money is by building apartments for tenants who regard the cost of rent as “a matter of curiosity.”

This leaves two groups behind.

“The folks who think of themselves as middle class and are feeling increased worry and pressure as rents go up faster than incomes, and the people who are most vulnerable in our society and desperately need housing that no developer can provide without a massive subsidy,” Ungar said. “As a citizen, I would be entirely comfortable with my taxes being higher to provide well-maintained housing for those who can’t afford it. The question is how that is achieved, and market-rate developers are not unilaterally going to say, ‘I will reduce my income to achieve this goal.’”

Caught in the teeth of a housing problem that is growing faster than local budgets, public officials inevitably try to solve both problems at once, pitting the middle class against families who live on minimum wage or fixed incomes. This was the crux of the “Sister Act” protest.

As part of a new housing plan, Lucas had proposed a $50 million bond issue to fund low-income housing, but at the same time the mayor wanted to loosen the city’s regulations for apartment projects that receive tax breaks through a program devised to create affordable housing in market-rate projects. The shift would allow developers to substitute middle-income units for those reserved for families in the lowest income brackets.

KC Tenants framed the change as selling out families closest to the edge. Lucas’ retort was that the previous iteration of the program had resulted in no new units for anyone, and his hope was that the revisions would push developers to build middle-income housing, which the city needs as well.

In the interview, the mayor cast himself as a leader trying to navigate a difficult problem in a world of limited resources. “We don’t have a Scandinavian tax structure,” he said. “Maybe we can get to it, but I don’t know that it starts in Kansas City.”

Two days after the “Sister Act” protest, when the City Council held its vote on the plan, the chambers were packed with yellow T-shirts. After a 9-4 vote in favor of the new policy, Neal, an early KC Tenants member, yelled, “How dare you!” Security hauled her out with her arms behind her back in a scene that members’ cellphones captured from every conceivable angle.

When Neal was gone, Caldwell, the once-evicted tenant, whose cancer is now in remission, continued the chant. “Not another penny for the slumlords!” she shouted. She was removed just as fast, only instead of getting booted to an outdoor bench, like the one where Neal sat after she’d left the building, Caldwell was arrested and taken to a police station.

An hour later, the lawn outside the station was crowded with yellow shirts. Members of KC Tenants lay on the grass typing on laptops and eating pizza. A slice was waiting for Caldwell when she emerged a short time later to cheers.

“I’m feeling great,” she said to the crowd, as her 15-year-old son joined her. “I’m doing this so that my baby will never have to.”

After a chant of “Tiana, we got your back!” a small group that included Caldwell and Raghuveer went to a wine bar to relax. The bar was closing, but Raghuveer said she’d called the owner, who’d promised to keep it open for them. She added that he was a renter.

JOE BIDEN'S CUBAN MAYORKAS - GET THEM OVER THE BORDER, REGISTERED TO VOTE DEMOCRAT AND SCATTERED BORDER TO OPEN BORDER - Biden’s Border Bait-and-Switch Strands Thousands of Penniless Venezuelan Migrants

Mark Levin: Why do Democrats hate America?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pllML6OQRLk

An economy built on extraction migration also radicalizes Americans’ democratic, compromise-promoting civic culture and allows wealthy elites to ignore despairing Americans at the bottom of society.

Unsurprisingly, a wide variety of little-publicized polls do show deep and broad opposition to labor migration and the inflow of temporary contract workers into jobs sought by young U.S. graduates.

The opposition is growing, anti-establishment, multiracial, cross-sex, non-racist, class-based, bipartisan, rational, persistent, and recognizes the solidarity that Americans owe to each other.

Biden’s Border Bait-and-Switch Strands Thousands of Penniless Venezuelan Migrants

AP Photo/Fernando Vergara

NEIL MUNRO

17 Oct 20220

8:20

Media reports say some Venezuelan migrants are still being let through the U.S. border, and thousands more are pushing against the new exclusionary policy claimed by President Joe Biden’s border chief.

“No one is going to go back,” a Venezuelan migrant told the New York Post. “There’s thousands of Venezuelans on their way right now — they’re not going back.”

Border chief Alejandro Mayorkas announced his new policy on October 12. That about-face took place three weeks before the election — but 20 months after he opened the border for 150,000 poor Venezuelans who try to gain the jobs, housing, and other resources needed by American families.

The new carrot-and-stick promises expulsion back to Mexico for all illegals, and legal status for 24,000 Venezuelans — plus their families — if they apply from their home countries, such as Venezuela, Chile, and Venezuela.

But that sudden policy change has stranded more than 15,000 Venezuelan migrants on their 1,600-mile trek to Biden’s canceled welcome. Many of the stranded migrants are near the border, while others are in Central America after crossing the deadly Darien Gap jungle trail in Panama, south of Mexico.

“They basically got the bait and switch,” said Mark Krikorian, director of the Center for Immigration Studies. He continued:

The administration’s complete unfamiliarity with how migration works has benefited some migrants who wouldn’t have gotten into the United States otherwise.
But it has caused a lot of pain for others who have, in the worst, case been killed in Darien Gap or sexually exploited by cartel smugglers, or spent huge amounts of money on smuggling, whether by mortgaging their little farm or indenturing themselves with the cartels … to be essentially slaves for years.

Migrants, mostly Venezuelans, walk across the Darien Gap from Colombia into Panama hoping to reach the U.S. on Saturday, Oct. 15, 2022. (AP Photo/Fernando Vergara)

Migrants, mostly Venezuelans, walk across the Darien Gap from Colombia into Panama hoping to reach the U.S. on Saturday, October 15, 2022. (AP Photo/Fernando Vergara)

Many people are being victimized by the Mayorkas and Biden policies, he said.

The legacy media only wants to talk about the winners and not the losers, only the benefits but not the costs. And there are real costs, both to American workers and taxpayers, and [also] to a lot of migrants. Any assessment of a policy has to take into account the costs and benefits. But there’s no such thing as a win-win for everybody. It doesn’t exist — and this administration thought that it did exist for everybody that mattered to them. It didn’t work that way.

US Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas chairs a plenary session of the 9th Summit of the Americas in Los Angeles, California, June 10, 2022. (Photo by Patrick T. FALLON / AFP) (Photo by PATRICK T. FALLON/AFP via Getty Images)

Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas chairs a plenary session of the 9th Summit of the Americas in Los Angeles, California, June 10, 2022. (PATRICK T. FALLON/AFP via Getty Images)

Biden’s migration has increased immigration by at least 2.5 million since 2021. That flood of workers, consumers, and renters has cheated Americans’ on wages. It has also boosted rents and housing prices and pushed up inflation for a wide variety of goods, such as used autos and food.

President Joe Biden (BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP)

Biden’s migration has also killed thousands of migrants.

Mayorkas, a Cuban-born, pro-migration zealot opened a safe and faster route in mid-2022 for Venezuelans to get into Americans’ workplaces and homes.

Since the October 13 policy reversal, officials have bussed some Venezuelan migrants back to Mexico.

“U.S. officials on Friday sent hundreds of Venezuelan asylum seekers to Juarez, Mexico,” BorderReport.com said on October 14, the day after the claimed policy change:

A KTSM/Border Report photo crew counted about 250 people in the space of an hour, escorted by U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers to the middle of the bridge, then being monitored by Mexican immigration agents as they came down the structure.

However, it is unclear if the Venezuelans are allowed to stay in northern towns, or if they are being sent to places deep in Mexico, as promised by Mayorkas.

If allowed to stay up near the border, most of the migrants will eventually be able to sneak across at night when Mayorkas sends the border guards elsewhere.

The migrants who have made the very dangerous, expensive, and arduous trek are not giving up.

“David Escoribuela, a Venezuelan migrant preparing to walk across the river from Juarez, said he had not heard that the United States intends to subject people from his country to Title 42 public health expulsions,” BorderReport.com wrote on October 13 as the new policy was announced. Escoribuela “set off for the U.S. from Venezuela on foot about a month ago and said he was not planning to stop.”

The New York Post reported on October 16:

A day after a Venezuelan migrant was expelled from the US to Mexico, The Post witnessed her illegally crossing into America again over the weekend — just one of scores of booted asylum-seekers vowing to sneak back into the country.
…
[Angie] Pina was held by Immigration and Customs Enforcement in El Paso for a day and a half before she learned she and dozens of other Venezuelan women in the same holding cell [were to be] sent back to Mexico. “It was a crisis — we were all yelling and sobbing,” she said.

“I would like to try again because I can’t go back to Venezuela,” she told the Post.

A CNN report on October 15 described one stranded family of Venezuelans, “Morey, her husband Rodolfo and their three children”:

Morey, who is currently in Colombia, says a return to Venezuela is impossible. In 2018 her family sold their home in Santa Teresa del Tuy, an impoverished town some 30 kilometers southeast of Caracas, for US$1500 to pay for the journey to Colombia.
Now, she feels she’s been thrown into limbo. Like so many others, she cannot afford to pay for a transcontinental flight — much less for her entire family. “Under these circumstances I have nowhere to go… I am scared: what can I do?” Morey told CNN.

Pro-migration groups are urging the administration to preserve loopholes for Venezuelans — and to make it even easier for Cubans, Nicaraguans, and Haitians to migrate into Americans’ society.

Some migrants are reportedly being allowed in, perhaps under unpublicized “humanitarian” exemptions:

If the administration blocks the migrants, many will just settle in other countries, CNN reported:

“I’m in pain, I don’t know what to do now,” says Ender Dairen, a 28-year-old Venezuelan who was planning to join a group travelling north from Ecuador. But his plans changed after speaking with other migrants online.
“A couple friends are thinking of just settling down wherever they got to, somewhere between Costa Rica and Nicaragua,” he told CNN. “Every person you speak with says the same thing: the whole route collapsed; we can no longer travel.”

But a half-open policy will just ensure more migrants, said Krikorian:

The people who relied on Biden’s lawless [welcome] at the border are out of luck. Letting some of them in because ‘”Well, they already made it through the Darien Gap and to the border” is just going to encourage others. You have to rip off the bandaid … the fault here is Biden’s to begin with.

“The whole Biden administration is responsible for this,” said Kirkorian.

The President is in charge. On the other hand, the Secretary of Homeland Security [Mayorkas] is the person who is in charge of overseeing this. So this is the kind of thing that should be added to the pile of charges when he is impeached in January … They shouldn’t have lured them to the border in the first place. That’s what the whole Administration is responsible for, but Mayorkas is the man on the spot.

The political and economic establishment juices the economy by extracting migrant workers, consumers, and renters from poor countries.

Many polls show the public wants to welcome some immigration.

But the polls also show deep and broad public opposition to labor migration and the inflow of temporary contract workers into jobs needed by young U.S. graduates.

This “Third Rail” opposition is growing, anti-establishment, multiracial, cross-sex, non-racist, class-based, bipartisan, rational, persistent, and recognizes the solidarity that American citizens owe to one another.