Monday, June 27, 2011

HELP STOP OBAMA'S LA RAZA SUPREMACY AGENDA! Support Alipac!

Special Advisory: More funds are needed immediately to help ALIPAC carry on our fight against illegal immigration and Amnesty. Please visit this link when you read this email... http://www.alipac.us/content-9.html

June 27, 2011

Friends of ALIPAC,

As you can see from our homepage at alipac.us , more evidence is coming in that the Obama administration has completely departed from the U.S. Constitution. He is bypassing the U.S Congress and is nullifying our existing immigration and border laws established by those we elected.

Please read and distribute...
More Evidence Surfaces: Obama's Unlawful Amnesty for Illegal Aliens
http://www.alipac.us/article-6370-thread-1-0.html

To make matters worse, Obama has ordered the Dept. of Justice to go after lawmen like Arizona's Sheriff Joe Arpaio, North Carolina's Sheriff Terry Johnson, and any other law enforcers who will stand up on the side of the law vs. this illegal alien invasion of America.

This authoritarian implementation of invasion and Amnesty must not stand!

We will begin our response tomorrow morning. Please be ready to take action.

Unfortunately, our funds drive is at a critical level. We are almost half way through and we have only raised $7,000 of the $40,000 we must raise by the end of July to carry on the battle!

Please help us prepare for an intense week and help us get back on track by clicking on this link below to visit our secure online donations page. You can contribute any amount less than $5,000 per year by mail, credit card, or Paypal.

Donate now via...
http://www.alipac.us/content-9.html


William Gheen
Americans For Legal Immigration PAC (ALIPAC)
www.ALIPAC.us
Tel: (919) 787-6009 Toll Free: (866) 703-0864
FEC ID: C00405878

Like Chauncey Gardiner, Obama Is Profoundly Aloof

Like Chauncey Gardiner, Obama Is Profoundly Aloof

OBAMA IS NOT A LEADER...

HE'S ONLY A PERFORMER. HIS STAGED PRODUCTION IS CALLED "CHANGE".

HE OPERATES LIKE A SOVEREIGN. DRESSING THE PARTS, BUT ALWAYS LETS HIS CRIMINAL BANKSTER DONORS WRITE POLICY.

THE ONLY THING OBAMA NEEDS BESIDES THE BANKSTERS' LOOT, ARE THE VOTES OF ILLEGALS!

WALL ST.0WNED SUPREME COURT - ASSAULT ON AMERICA FOR THEIR CORPORATE MASTERS

VIVA LA RAZA?

Sonia Sotomayor opposes E-Verify requirement
True to form, she said it was illegal to make employers e-verify citizen status of new hires.

Interesting, she says a state cannot force employers to check if employees they are hiring are illegal. Thankfully the court ruled 5-3 supporting law. But now we know for sure just how extreme far left Obama's choice was. We cannot afford Obama to get another term, or you can bet this country will be overrun by illegals. I don't want this country to be poor and corrupt like Mexico, which it will if illegals overrun the country.
*


The Supreme Court and corporate America
By Tom Carter
27 June 2011
Over the past several decades, the US Supreme Court has been steadily cutting back on the fundamental democratic rights of the population while discovering more and more protections in the law for corporations and the rich.
Multinational corporations like Wal-Mart, investment banks like Janus Capital Management, energy giants like American Electric Power, and convicted corporate criminals like Jeffrey Skilling enjoy ready access to the Supreme Court. The nine justices carefully and exhaustively consider the grievances of the wealthy elite who usually receive favorable rulings. Meanwhile, cases affecting the core democratic rights and interests of the working population are heard only rarely, and when they are, the result is usually the further erosion of those rights.
A review of recent Supreme Court decisions reveals that this process has accelerated in recent months.
The Supreme Court decision last week in Wal-Mart v. Dukes provides the clearest expression of this trend (see “US Supreme Court undermines class action lawsuits in Wal-Mart ruling”). In a brazenly pro-corporate ruling, the Supreme Court unanimously overturned the decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals certifying a group of 1.5 million female employees as a class for the purposes of a class action lawsuit against Wal-Mart for sex discrimination.
The extreme right-wing majority on the court went on to hold, this time by a vote of 5-4, that the women could not be certified as a class under any legal theory. In other words, the women were stopped “at the starting gate,” as Justice Ginsburg wrote in her dissent, preventing them from even bringing the case and having a day in court. The court also held, 9-0, that the women could not recover back pay.
The decision was a tremendous boon for Wal-Mart and its well-heeled team of lawyers, which have been throwing up legal obstacles to the women’s case for more than 11 years. However, the decision has implications extending far more broadly than this particular case.
The court’s perverse rationale for rejecting the certification of the class in the Wal-Mart case—supported unanimously by the nine justices—was that because Wal-Mart was so large, the claims by the individual employees did not have enough in common to warrant a class action. In other words, the larger the corporation, the less susceptible it will be to class actions.
This rationale is a devastating blow to class actions and a spectacular boost to the largest corporations. It essentially creates a special category of corporations that are “too big” to be held accountable for their misconduct by means of a class action lawsuit. This unanimous holding in the Wal-Mart case signals that a certain limited permissiveness that once prevailed in the US legal system with regard to class actions is coming to a close.
In addition to cutting back on class actions, the court in the Wal-Mart case simultaneously dealt a major blow to employment discrimination cases. In making their case that Wal-Mart discriminated against women, the women bringing the lawsuit cited one study that female employees made up 70 percent of Wal-Mart’s hourly paid workforce, but only 33 percent of its management. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for the majority that this evidence was “worlds away from ‘significant proof’ that Wal-Mart operated under a general policy of discrimination.”
In other words, according to Scalia and a majority on the Supreme Court, in order to prove that a corporation discriminates unlawfully among its employees, an internal corporate document more or less must be uncovered titled “official discrimination policy.” Since such documents obviously do not exist in nearly every case, a wide range of discrimination cases will simply fail at the inception as a result of last week’s decision.
Finally, the court’s unanimous determination that the women could not recover back pay eliminates the economic basis for the class action. This, perhaps more than any of the other findings in the case, will discourage class actions against corporations, since a financial recovery constituted the main incentive to bring such cases in the first place.
For decades, class actions have served as one of the primary legal mechanisms through which the worst corporate excesses were held in check. These legal mechanisms are now giving way one by one under enormous corporate pressure. The nine-to-zero support on the Supreme Court in the Wal-Mart case for overturning the class certification and the removal of the option to recover back pay—including by Obama appointees Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor—exposes the subservience of the entire political establishment to corporate interests.
The Wal-Mart decision is only the latest in a string of recent Supreme Court decisions favoring corporate interests and severely narrowing access to any legal redress by ordinary citizens.
The Wal-Mart decision on class actions comes on the heels of the Supreme Court’s April decision in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, which permits corporations to put fine-print clauses in their contracts through which individuals may waive their rights to bring class actions and agree to individual “arbitration” outside of court for their claims.
Since all corporations will no doubt include such clauses in their contracts from now on, the AT&T decision effectively put an end to most varieties of class actions. For example, class action lawsuits against cell-phone companies, cable companies, utility companies, and the like for bogus surcharges in bills will be foreclosed, since these companies will include class action waivers and arbitration clauses in their contracts. After the AT&T case, the Wal-Mart case was simply another nail in the coffin of class actions.
The stream of reactionary decisions seems endless. In a decision released the same day as the Wal-Mart case, the Supreme Court worried lawsuits by government employees alleging retaliation under the First Amendment could disrupt “official activity.” In the case of Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri, the Supreme Court held that government employees could “petition the government for redress” under the First Amendment only if the employee’s complaint involves a “matter of public concern.” This decision thus shuts down the vast majority of such retaliation cases, which mostly involve claims of individual retaliation.
In a decision earlier this month in Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders, the Supreme Court intervened to protect a mutual fund investment adviser who lied about the mortgage-backed securities of its clients in the run-up to the economic collapse of 2008.
Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the Supreme Court and relying on nothing less than dictionary sophistry, held that the mutual fund investment adviser did not “make” the false statements, even though it had produced them in writing, thus shielding the mutual fund investment adviser from liability under securities regulation laws. According to Thomas, the false statements were “made” only by the corporate client, which was also part of the Janus group.
In American Electric Power v. Connecticut, also decided the same day as the Wal-Mart case, the Supreme Court unanimously went out of its way to protect energy giant American Electric Power, holding that it was primarily for the Environmental Protection Agency and not the courts to regulate pollution. The state of Connecticut had sued the energy corporation on the grounds that the corporation’s carbon emissions were contributing to climate change and thus constituted a “public nuisance.”
“The Court,” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote for the unanimous court, “endorses no particular view of the complicated issues related to carbon-dioxide emissions and climate change.” This amounts to shameful prostration before the lavishly funded energy lobby, which is endlessly attempting to refute the well-established scientific evidence of climate change.
Last month, in Turner v. Rogers, the Supreme Court held that an indigent parent was not entitled to have a lawyer appointed for him even though he faced jail time for contempt of court in family law proceeding. This case constitutes a substantial further erosion of the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause, which has traditionally required the state to appoint a lawyer for someone who faces jail time.
The Supreme Court, in theory, operates as a check on legislative and executive power, defending and upholding individual constitutional and democratic rights. In reality, in the present period of explosive social inequality and faced with a rising tide of criminality and lawlessness in the political establishment and big business, the Supreme Court functions to shield corporate criminals and to shut down legal avenues through which the worst excesses might be challenged.
Over the past two years alone, the Supreme Court has weakened the right to face one’s accuser, upheld warrant-less searches of homes, upheld the sweeping use of anti-terrorism laws against free speech and dissent, heard appeals by convicted corporate criminal Jeffrey Skilling, upheld the abuse of “material witness” warrants to jail terrorism suspects without a trial, upheld government credits to religious schools, suppressed torture photographs, upheld state executions, blocked appeals by Guantánamo Bay detainees, and abolished restrictions on big business political spending. Meanwhile, reactionary lower court rulings blocking challenges to torture and assassination on the grounds of the authoritarian “state secrets” doctrine have gone undisturbed.
It is clear that the appointments over the recent period by President Barack Obama of Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor to replace John Paul Stevens and David Souter have done nothing to reverse the court’s steady march to the right. In the final analysis, the spate of recent anti-democratic and pro-corporate opinions demonstrates that the Supreme Court is no less an instrument of the most powerful corporate and financial interests than every other branch of the US government.
*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/sonia-sotomayer-la-raza-party-member-on.html
*
THE ONLY REASON OBAMA NOMINATED SOTOMAYER WAS BECAUSE SHE’S A LA RAZA SUPREMACIST, AND HAD A LOOOOOOOOG HISTORY OF PANDERING TO BIG BUSINESS INTERESTS, IN OTHER WORDS, SHE’S OBAMA IN A SKIRT!
SOTOMAYOR ALREADY HAD A LONG HISTORY OF BEING A RANTING BITCH FROM HER THRONE ON THE BENCH. SHE’S ALSO A MEMBER OF THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA!
THE LA RAZA BITCH NO SOONER GOT HER FAT ASS ON THE HIGH COURT THAN SHE WAS REFERRING TO CRIMINALS THAT HOP OUR BORDERS AS “UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS”. OBAMA REFERS TO THEM AS “MY UNREGISTERED VOTERS!”

DEMS ARE THE PARTY FOR ILLEGALS AND LA RAZA SUPREMACY!
YOU SHOULD REFER TO THEM AS THE FUCKERS THAT TOOK YOUR JOB, AND THEN HANDED YOU THE TAX BILLS TO PAY FOR HIS RAPID ANCHOR BABY BIRTHING AND WELFARE, AS HE SHOVED HIS MEXICAN FLAG UP YOUR NOSE AND DEMANDED YOU LEARN TO SPEAK SPANISH!

*
THE REASON WHY OBAMA WANTED DALEY AS CHIEF OF STAFF IS BECAUSE DALY, LIKE OBAMA IS AN ADVOCATE FOR OPEN BORDERS, NO BORDER SECURITY, NO E-VERIFY.
THESE LA RAZA FUCKERS WILL DO ANYTHING TO ASSURE OBAMA GETS THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES AGAIN!

VIVA LA RAZA?

Sonia Sotomayor opposes E-Verify requirement
True to form, she said it was illegal to make employers e-verify citizen status of new hires.

Interesting, she says a state cannot force employers to check if employees they are hiring are illegal. Thankfully the court ruled 5-3 supporting law. But now we know for sure just how extreme far left Obama's choice was. We cannot afford Obama to get another term, or you can bet this country will be overrun by illegals. I don't want this country to be poor and corrupt like Mexico, which it will if illegals overrun the country.
*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/04/how-far-will-obama-sell-us-out-to-la.html
*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/for-obama-all-illegals-are-legal-la.html
*
OBAMA’S AMERICA: Open & Undefended Borders!

“What we're seeing is our Congress and national leadership dismantling our laws by not enforcing them. Lawlessness becomes the norm, just like Third World corruption. Illegal aliens now have more rights and privileges than Americans. If you are an illegal alien, you can drive a car without a driver's license or insurance. You may obtain medical care without paying. You may work without paying taxes. Your children enjoy free education at the expense of taxpaying Americans.”

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/feds-allow-illegal-aliens-to-cross.html

*
THE LA RAZA PRESIDENT’S SABOTAGE OF OUR COUNTRY’S BORDERS FOR ILLEGALS’ VOTES!

*
*
“PUNISH OUR ENEMIES”… does that mean assault the legals of Arizona that must fend off the Mexican invasion, occupation, growing criminal and welfare state, as well as Mex Drug cartels???

OBAMA TELLS ILLEGALS “PUNISH OUR ENEMIES”
Friends of ALIPAC,

Each day new reports come in from across the nation that our movement is surging and more incumbents, mostly Democrats, are about to fall on Election Day. Obama's approval ratings are falling to new lows as he makes highly inappropriate statements to Spanish language audiences asking illegal alien supporters to help him "punish our enemies."


*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/04/obamas-la-raza-dept-of-illegal-labor-la.html


*
“While the declining job market in the United States may be discouraging some would-be border crossers, a flow of illegal aliens continues unabated, with many entering the United States as drug-smuggling “mules.”

*
MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com
*

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/obama-red-carpet-addicted-reigning.html

HIS MAJESTY Obama joins talks on massive US budget cuts

Obama joins talks on massive US budget cuts

DEMOCRAT PARTY - Party FOR Criminal Bankster Donors & La Raza Supremacist

DEMOCRATS ARE THE PARTY OF CRIMINAL BANKSTERS, AND LA RAZA SUPREMACIST!
WHILE THEY ASSAULT THE AMERICAN WORKER ALL OVER THE COUNTRY, DEVISE AMNESTY “DREAM ACTS” PLOYS, ONE AFTER ANOTHER TO EXPAND LA RAZA SUPREMACY, THEY CAN’T FUCK OVER THE AMERICAN WORKER FAST ENOUGH TO KEEP THE OBSCENE PROFIT MARGINS OF THEIR CORPORATE PAYMASTERS FAT ENOUGH!

VIVA LA RAZA! VOTE OBAMA IS TO VOTE FOR A PIMPED BANKSTER-OWNED HISPANDERING PHONY!

*
Aided and abetted by Obama, the financial aristocracy is utilizing the crisis to further enrich itself and monopolize even more of the nation’s wealth. Hedge fund managers make more in one year than the budget deficits of entire states. A recent report showed that the richest 0.01 percent of the country, some 15,000 people, took in more than 10 percent of national income in 2008, a five-fold increase since the 1970s.
*

The Democratic Party and the assault on public workers
27 June 2011
Last Thursday, the Democratic-controlled New Jersey Assembly passed a sweeping package of pension and health care cuts and attacks on government workers’ bargaining rights drawn up by Republican Governor Chris Christie. Leaders of the state Senate, also controlled by the Democrats, said they would quickly adopt the same bill and send it to the governor’s desk to be signed into law.
The bill affects 750,000 public sector workers and retirees. The New York Times summed up its contents as follows:
“The legislation will sharply increase what state and local workers must contribute for their health insurance and pensions, suspend cost-of-living increases to retirees’ pension checks, raise retirement ages and curb the unions’ contract bargaining rights. It will save local and state government $132 billion over the next 30 years, by the administration’s estimate, and give the troubled benefit systems a sounder financial footing, mostly by shifting costs onto workers.”
New Jersey government workers will soon be paying several thousands dollars more per year into the benefit funds. The bill also strips workers of the right to negotiate over health benefits, allowing the state to impose health care terms unilaterally.
One day later, the Democratic governor of Connecticut, Dannel Malloy, threatened to lay off thousands of state workers and unilaterally impose massive spending cuts. This was his response to the rejection by the rank and file of the state’s largest public sector union of a concessions contract agreed to by the union leadership.
Malloy had worked closely with the unions to craft a budget that depended on the acceptance by state workers of a two-year wage freeze and significant increases in pension and health care costs. The governor said he would now move “full steam ahead” with plans to lay off up to 7,500 workers.
These two events underscore the basic political fact that the Democratic and Republican parties are united in support of a historic assault on the conditions of the working class in the United States.
The New Jersey legislation in many respects goes even further than the anti-worker measures passed earlier this year by Republican Governor Scott Walker in Wisconsin, which set off the largest working class demonstrations in the US in decades.
Walker had a Republican-controlled legislature. New Jersey Governor Christie, who has made his name by baiting public workers, relied on the Democratic leadership of both legislative chambers to supply the needed votes. These include Senate President Stephen Sweeney, who is an official of the ironworkers union.
The unions in both Connecticut and New Jersey—as in Wisconsin, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, California, New York and other states where Democratic as well as Republican governors are pushing through historic attacks on public workers—have demonstrated a combination of complicity and impotence. Their betrayal is bound up with their role in subordinating the working class to the Democratic Party and opposing any independent political movement of working people.
In New Jersey, which has one of the highest unionization rates in the country, the unions responded to the explosive anger of workers across the state by refusing even to call a strike, insisting instead that workers plead with the Democratic leaders to drop their support for Christie’s bill. This was under conditions where the governor’s poll numbers had plunged as a result of popular opposition to his attacks on social services and government workers.
These developments explode the efforts of the left-liberal fraternity around the Nation magazine and pseudo-socialist groups such as the International Socialist Organization (ISO) to present the unions as fighting organizations of the working class and the Democrats as fundamentally different from the Republicans.
In Wisconsin, even as the unions and the Democrats agreed to Governor Walker’s demands for vicious cuts in wages, benefits and social services, the ISO presented the fight as a battle against “anti-union” Republicans and described the Democrats as being on the side of the working class.
The events in New Jersey and Connecticut expose more clearly than ever the reactionary and duplicitous politics of these forces. They play a vital role in suppressing the struggles of the working class and blocking the development of an independent political movement against both big business parties and the capitalist system which they defend.
The wave of budget cuts and attacks on government workers is being spearheaded by the Obama White House, which is negotiating an agreement with the Republicans to impose trillions of dollars in cuts in basic social programs such as Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. Both parties are carrying out the policy of the ruling class, which is to impose the full cost of the breakdown of the capitalist system on the working class.
This entails the permanent destruction of the social gains achieved over more than a century of struggle. It is a counterrevolution in the social conditions of the vast majority of the population.
The Socialist Equality Party completely rejects the entire framework of the so-called budget debate. It is premised on a lie—that there is “no money” for jobs, decent wages and basic social services. Aside from the trillions that are expended on imperialist wars, the wealth of society is systematically plundered by the financial-corporate elite.
Aided and abetted by Obama, the financial aristocracy is utilizing the crisis to further enrich itself and monopolize even more of the nation’s wealth. Hedge fund managers make more in one year than the budget deficits of entire states. A recent report showed that the richest 0.01 percent of the country, some 15,000 people, took in more than 10 percent of national income in 2008, a five-fold increase since the 1970s.
There is no solution to the crisis for the working class outside of a mass, independent political movement to expropriate the wealth of the ruling elite and transform the major banks and corporations into public enterprises run for the common good, not private profit. This is the fight for socialism.
We urge workers to reject all calls for “sacrifice” and concessions. Throw off the dead hand of the unions and establish genuinely democratic rank-and-file committees of struggle to unite all sections of working people against layoffs, wage cuts, foreclosures and budget cuts!
The most critical issue is the building of a new revolutionary leadership to arm the coming mass struggles of the working class with a socialist program and perspective. We call on all those looking for a way to fight the attacks of the Obama administration, the two big business parties and the corporate bosses to join the Socialist Equality Party.
Barry Grey
*
CA PUTS OUT $20 BILLION PER YEAR IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS, ALL BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE LA RAZA DEMS!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/06/occupied-mexico-declares-mexifornia-no.html
*
REALITY OF JOE LEGAL v JUAN ILLEGAL. JOE LEGAL STILL GETS THE TAX BILLS TO PAY FOR THE “FREE” BIRTHING OF ALL JUAN ILLEGAL’S ANCHOR BABIES!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/joe-american-legal-vs-la-raza-jose.html
*
ALL JOBS IN MEXIFORNIA GO TO ILLEGALS!

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/06/message-from-mexifornia-no-legal-need.html
*
MEXICO BUILDS THEIR WELFARE AND JOBS PLANS IN OUR BORDERS

http://derailamnestydotcom.blogspot.com/2011/05/end-is-nearing-and-its-not-that-far.html
*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/mexifornia-california-falls-to-mexican.html
*
WHY ILLEGALS MUST GO:
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/why-illegals-must-go-by-william-gheen.html
*