Monday, June 13, 2011

In-Home Caregiver Accused of Molesting Autistic Boy

In-Home Caregiver Accused of Molesting Autistic Boy

Man Accused of Molesting 3 Girls at Wife's Day Care Center

Man Accused of Molesting 3 Girls at Wife's Day Care Center

Man Accused of Raping Girl 100 Times

Man Accused of Raping Girl 100 Times

AMERICANS! DOCUMENTED SUCKERS! Missing Iraq money may have been stolen, auditors say

THE LA RAZA SUPREMACY PARTY in MEXIFORNIA PUSH GRINGO-PAID SPECIAL DISCOUNTS FOR ILLEGALS

U.S. CHAMBER of COMMERCE WORKING TO PUT LA RAZA IN OUR JOBS - Here's Only One Case

HERE’S THE U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FIGHTING AMERICANS TO PUT ILLEGALS IN OUR JOBS!

Supreme Court Gives Town of Hazleton Hope

On Monday, June 6, 2011, the United States Supreme Court reviewed Lozano v. City of Hazleton, a decision from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals that struck down Hazleton’s immigration enforcement ordinance, and sent the case back for reconsideration. 
In Lozano v. City of Hazleton, apartment owners and illegal aliens living within Hazleton, Pennsylvania sued the City in an attempt to strike down its immigration enforcement ordinance. That ordinance: (1) prohibits the hiring of illegal aliens, (2) mandates the use of E-Verify for employers, (3) prohibits the knowing harboring of illegal aliens within the City, and (4) requires renters to obtain rental occupancy licenses. 
The Supreme Court determined that the Third Circuit’s decision could no longer stand given the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting, which held that states could constitutionally mandate E-Verify and suspend or revoke business licenses of employers that knowingly employ unauthorized aliens. It sent the case back to the Third Circuit with instructions to reconsider. 
FAIR’s legal affiliate, the Immigration Reform Law Institute (IRLI), assisted in drafting the Hazleton ordinance and has been representing the City of Hazleton from the beginning.  IRLI will now have the opportunity to argue the case before a new panel of judges. 

U.S. CHAMBER of COMMERCE, MEXICO and OBAMA DEMAND OPEN BORDERS and MORE "CHEAP" LABOR ILLEGALS IN OUR JOBS

THE U.S. CHAMBER of COMMERCE, MEXICO and OBAMA ARE WORKING FOR OPEN BORDERS WITH MEXICO.
MEXICO HAS ALREADY EXPORTED 40 MILLION OF THEIR POOR, ILLITERATE, PREGNANT AND CRIMINAL OVER OUR BORDERS!

Please report, broadcast, distribute, deliver to lawmakers, post, forward, and relay far and wide!
*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/alipac-william-gheen-exposes-wikileaks.html
*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/wikileaks-exposed-obamas-la-raza-open.html
“What's needed to discourage illegal immigration into the United States has been known for years: Enforce existing law.” ….. CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR

*

Big Business Takes a Look at Troubled Border 
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, one of the nation’s largest business lobbies, released a report last week detailing its recommended “Steps to a 21st Century U.S.- Mexico Border.”  (U.S. Chamber of Commerce Press Release, June 8, 2011)  The report addresses border issues that most affect the Chamber’s members and recommends action on topics such as trade, security, travel and immigration.  (See Steps to a 21st Century U.S.-Mexico Border) The Chamber asserts that the U.S. and Mexico trade more than $1 billion worth of goods every day, and as such, building a strong and stable relationship with Mexico is of paramount importance to U.S. business.  (Id.
The Chamber of Commerce report makes clear that business industries in the U.S. are affected by the escalating violence and turmoil that have come to characterize our nation’s Southern border.  Drug cartel activity has made “extreme criminal behavior” a prominent threat to U.S. business trade with Mexico.  (Id.)  The report states that significant sums of money are being spent to secure employees and provide armored transportation.  Companies conducting business with Mexico must factor in the high costs of protecting both their employees and their product, a cost which is being passed on to the consumer. 
Despite these dangers, the Chamber’s report still promotes the controversial cross-border trucking provisions of NAFTA.  The report states that eighty percent of U.S. trade products with Mexico are carried across the border by truck.  (Steps to a 21st Century U.S.-Mexican Border, p. 5)  The report, however, does not address the many concerns which have delayed implementation of the program for well over a decade, including concerns about drug-related violence.  (See FAIR Legislative Update, March 7, 2011; FAIR Legislative Update, Jan. 10, 2011) 
The Chamber also promotes expanding the Merida Initiative.  The Merida Initiative is an agreement through which the U.S. has agreed to support the governments in Mexico, Central America, Dominican Republic, and Haiti in their respective battles against organized crime.  (See U.S. Department of State)  The purpose of providing funds and other resources to these countries is to promote the national security interest of the U.S.; prevent further violence from spilling over the border; and deter drug and gang-related transnational criminal organizations from coming into our country.  (See Merida Initiative Fact Sheet
Finally, the report agrees that “illegal immigration is one of the most significant problems facing our border today.”  (Steps to a 21st Century U.S.-Mexican Border, p. 20)  The Chamber calls for immigration reform to promote security in the U.S. and create economic growth, but argues that increasing legal immigration will actually decrease illegal immigration and the help ease the related security concerns hurting businesses. 

*

ASK YOURSELF, WHAT IF OBAMA WORKED FOR THE AMERICAN WORKER AS HARD AS HE DOES THE BANKS’ OR LA RAZA ILLEGALS?
WHAT KIND OF AN AMERICA WOULD THAT “CHANGE” BE?
*
*
*
*
*
IS OBAMA REALLY THINKING OF “ECONOMIC IMPERATIVES”? OR THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES? WHAT DOES IT SAY ABOUT A PRESIDENT THAT HISPANDERS FOR ILLEGAL VOTES? THE ARE SIMPLY JOKES?

In a speech at the Chamizal National Memorial, Obama also sought to link the challenge of illegal immigration with another major political concern: economic anxiety. He said immigration reform "is an economic imperative."… “ECONOMIC IMPERATIVE” FOR WHOM? LET’S LOOK AT THE FACTS WE WILL NEVER HEAR FROM OBAMA: WE ARE MEXICO’S WELFARE, FREE BIRTHING, FREE EMERGENCY ROOM HEALTHCARE, JOBS AND JAILS PROGRAMS. THIS IS AN ECONOMIC IMPERATIVE FOR MEXICO, BECAUSE THAT NATION HAS MORE BILLIONAIRES THAN SAUDIS ARABIA! THE RICHEST MAN IN THE WORLD IS NO LONGER BILL GATES, IT IS MEXICAN CARLOS SLIM.
ALSO DEMANDING OBAMA’S NON-ENFORCEMENT AND BIT BY BIT AMNESTY IS THE U.S. CHAMBER of COMMERCE, THE FASCIST FRONT FOR BIG BUSINESS THAT DEMANDS WAGES BE DEPRESSED. MOST OF THE FORTUNE 500 ARE GENEROUS DONORS TO THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA! IN FACT YOU ARE A DONOR TOO! OBAMA HANDS OVER A FORTUNE TO THIS MEXICAN SUPREMACIST ORGANIZATION BENT ON OPEN BORDERS AND PUSH 2 FOR ENGLISH!
*
"One way to strengthen the middle class in America is to reform the immigration system so that there's no longer a massive underground economy that exploits a cheap source of labor while depressing wages for everybody else," he said……OBAMA COULD EASILY END THE EXPLOITATION OF ILLEGALS, AND ALSO PUT JOBS BACK IN THE HANDS OF AMERICAN SIMPLY BY ENFORCING THE LAWS! INSTEAD HE’S HABITUALLY SABOTAGED E-VERIFY AND RELEASE THOUSANDS OF  ILLEGALS RATHER THAN DEPORTING THEM. HIS ADMINISTRATION IS INFESTED WITH LA RAZA PARTY MEMBERS!*

But he said that illegal immigration requires a "comprehensive" solution that would also provide a path to legal status for the 11 million people living illegally in the United States. He also made another pitch for the Dream Act, which failed in the lame-duck session of Congress in December.
EVEN IF NO AMNESTY IS IN THE FUTURE, OBAMA WILL CONTINUE TO KEEP BORDERS OPEN AND UNDEFENDED, AS MEXICO DEMANDS, AND CONTINUE TO CATCH AND RELEASE ILLEGALS, CUT FUNDS FOR BORDER SECURITY, REFUSE TO ENFORCE LAWS, FILL HIS ADMINISTRATION WITH LA RAZA SUPREMACIST LIKE THE OBAMA SEC. OF LABOR, HILDA SOLIS, AND HISPANDER FOR THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES EVERY WHERE HE GOES. ARE YOU GETTING THE PICTURE THAT OBAMA DOESN’T DO MUCH OF ANYTHING FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE? IT’S ALL ABOUT HIS CRIMINAL BANKSTER DONORS, AND LA RAZA!!!OH, AND FAR AS ECONOMIC IMPERATIVE, CALIFORNIA ALONE PUTS OUT $20 BILLION PER YEAR IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS. LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUTS OUT $600 MILLION TO ILLEGALS ON WELFARE… RIGHT OUT OF YOUR PROPERTY TAXES. DO THE MATH!

latimes.com
At southern border, Obama calls immigration reform an 'economic imperative'
By Peter Nicholas and Michael A. Memoli, Washington Bureau
12:59 PM PDT, May 10, 2011
Reporting from El Paso and Washington
President Obama visited the southern border Tuesday to push for an overhaul of the immigration system, part of a renewed effort to shore up his standing among Latinos and paint Republicans as hostile to a minority group that is a growing force in U.S. politics.

In a speech at the Chamizal National Memorial, Obama also sought to link the challenge of illegal immigration with another major political concern: economic anxiety. He said immigration reform "is an economic imperative."

"One way to strengthen the middle class in America is to reform the immigration system so that there's no longer a massive underground economy that exploits a cheap source of labor while depressing wages for everybody else," he said.

The chances of passing an immigration bill are low, but the White House is taking high-visibility steps to show it is not abandoning a goal that has its roots in the 2008 campaign.

In his appearance, Obama said his administration has made great strides in stopping immigrants from illegally crossing the southern border, even as Republican critics say he can do more.

"We have strengthened border security beyond what many believed was possible," he said.

But he said that illegal immigration requires a "comprehensive" solution that would also provide a path to legal status for the 11 million people living illegally in the United States. He also made another pitch for the Dream Act, which failed in the lame-duck session of Congress in December.

The speech comes after a series of meetings between the president and various stakeholders and reform activists in the past months. It was heavily promoted by the White House on a range of social media platforms, and Obama made a campaign-like pitch for the crowd to visit the White House website to sign up in support of his call for reform.

With Obama actively running for reelection, Republicans have questioned the sincerity and timing of his immigration push.  House Speaker John A. Boehner's office said it hasn't even heard from the White House on the issue, evidence that immigration is not a serious legislative priority.

White House aides have not released a timetable for passing a bill, nor have they put forward a draft that could be the basis for congressional action.

Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said in a statement: "It seems President Obama has once again put on his campaigner-in-chief hat. The president's push to legalize millions of illegal immigrants is purely political. The president wasn't able to pass his version of immigration reform when he had large Democratic majorities in the House and Senate because of bipartisan opposition."

Following the speech, Obama was to travel to Austin for a pair of fundraisers for his 2012 reelection campaign.

*
THERE ARE ONLY EIGHT STATES WITH A GREATER POPULATION THAN LOS ANGELES COUNTY. HERE, HALF THOSE WITH A JOB ARE ILLEGALS USING STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS. BIG CHAINS LIKE TARGET, ROSS STORES, 99CENT ONLY STORES APPEAR TO ONLY HAVE HISPANIC EMPLOYEES, SOME OF WHICH CAN SPEAK NO ENGLISH, OR PREFER NOT TO.
THIS SAME COUNTY PAYS OUT (OF PROPERTY TAXES) $600 MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS (source: JUDICIAL WATCH)

*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/how-mceconomy-bombed-american-worker-by.html
How the McEconomy Bombed the American Worker
The Hollowing Out of the Middle Class
By
Andy Kroll
Think of it as a parable for these grim economic times. On April 19th, McDonald's launched its first-ever national hiring day, signing up 62,000 new workers at stores throughout the country. For some context, that's more jobs created by one company in a single day than the net job creation of the entire U.S. economy in 2009. And if that boggles the mind, consider how many workers applied to local McDonald's franchises that day and left empty-handed: 938,000 of them. With a 6.2% acceptance rate in its spring hiring blitz, McDonald’s was more selective than the Princeton, Stanford, or Yale University admission offices.
It shouldn’t be surprising that a million souls flocked to McDonald's hoping for a steady paycheck, when nearly 14 million Americans are out of work and nearly a million more are too discouraged even to look for a job. At this point, it apparently made no difference to them that the fast-food industry pays some of the lowest wages around: on average, $8.89 an hour, or barely half the $15.95 hourly average across all American industries.


MEXICO DEMANDS UTAH SURRENDER TO LA RAZA SUPREMACY - WILL OBAMA SUE UTAH ON BEHALF OF LA RAZA?

Mexico and thirteen Latin American countries signed onto an amicus (“friend of the court”) brief filed June 2, 2011, asking a federal judge to strike down Utah’s new immigration enforcement law, HB 497.

WE ARE MEXICO’S JOBS, WELFARE, “FREE BIRTHING”, AND JAILS PROGRAM.

OUR BORDERS, LAWS, LANGUAGE OR CULTURE DO NOT EXIST TO MEXICO!

Foreign Governments Ask Court to Strike Down Utah Enforcement Bill
Mexico and thirteen Latin American countries signed onto an amicus (“friend of the court”) brief filed June 2, 2011, asking a federal judge to strike down Utah’s new immigration enforcement law, HB 497. (Salt Lake Tribune, June 7, 2011)  The original plaintiffs, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and National Immigration Law Center (NILC), sued the State in May, claiming HB 497 is “preempted” by federal law.  They argue: (1) HB 497 impermissibly regulates immigration, (2) parts of HB 497 are inconsistent with federal law, and (3) Mexico has made a “formal complaint” about HB 497.  (Plaintiff’s Complaint, filed May 3, 2011; See FAIR Legislative Update, May 16, 2011) The plaintiffs also claim that HB 497 will lead to unlawful detentions and racial profiling by Utah officers, as well as violates the federally guaranteed “right to travel.” (Id.)
HB 497 contains enforcement provisions similar to Arizona’s SB 1070, which requires law enforcement officers to verify a person’s immigration status if that person has been lawfully stopped and that person is not carrying one of a handful of documents, including a valid state driver’s license from a state that does not give licenses to illegal aliens. (See FAIR Legislative Update, May 16, 2011)
In the 21-page brief, the foreign governments—which include Argentina, Peru, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Chile, Paraguay, Uruguay, Honduras, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala and Brazil—argue HB 497 harms international relations with the United States and should be ruled unconstitutional. (Salt Lake Tribune, June 7, 2011) The brief argues that the law “substantially and inappropriately burdens the consistent sovereign-to-sovereign relations between Mexico and the United States of America, interfering with the strategic diplomatic interests of the two countries and encouraging an imminent threat of state-sanctioned bias or discrimination.” (Id.) The brief continues, “Mexico has a right to protect the interests of its nationals within the limits of international law. Mexico seeks to ensure that its citizens present in the U.S. are accorded the human and civil rights granted under the U.S. Constitution and affirms that HB 497 threatens the human and civil rights of its nationals.” (Id.)
Utah Representative Chris Herrod, a co-sponsor of the bill, called the brief “ridiculous,” saying “I would like to ask the Mexican Government why they think their people are more important than other people trying to come here from other countries.” (Id.)
On May 10, 2011, the day the law was to go into effect, Federal District Judge Clark Waddoups issued a temporary restraining order of HB 497, preventing its implementation. (ABC News, May 11, 2011) The hearing for the case has been scheduled for July 14, 2011. (Id.) Stay tuned to FAIR for updates in this ongoing case…
Under Pressure, Utah State Senator Seeks to Amend Guest-Worker Amnesty Law
In an attempt to prevent further backlash, Utah State Senator Curt Bramble (R-Provo) announced last week that he plans to introduce amendments next session to Utah’s controversial guest worker amnesty law, HB 116.  (Salt Lake Tribune, June 8, 2011) 
News sources report that while Sen. Bramble intends to keep the guest worker program intact – despite its direct conflict with federal law – he now says he wants to make it more difficult for illegal aliens to obtain a work permit. One amendment he is proposing would require applicants for the guest-worker permit to continuously “have an established domicile” in the state prior to May 10, 2011, rather than merely “live in” the state as currently provided for in the law. (HB 116 § 13; Salt Lake Tribune, June 8, 2011)  According to Bramble, this amendment “wouldn’t necessarily preclude the agricultural worker, but it would have to be someone who is already here and intends to stay here.” (Salt Lake Tribune, June 8, 2011) 
Another amendment would further alter the criteria for an illegal alien to qualify for a permit.  HB 116 currently disqualifies illegal aliens who do not have health insurance or have medical debt. (HB 116 § 13)  Bramble’s anticipated amendment would change this section by disqualifying those who have general debt they are “not actively working to resolve” (rather than just “medical debt”).  (Salt Lake Tribune, June 8, 2011) 
A third proposed amendment would require illegal aliens applying for a guest worker permit to submit to the state a list of all the tax ID numbers they have used to determine whether an applicant has ever used a stolen identification number to get a job. (Id.) If so, such information would disqualify them and would be turned over to law enforcement. (Id.) Finally, under the proposed amendments children age 16 or older belonging to a family applying for a guest-work permit must undergo the same criminal background checks as their parents. (Id.)
Sen. Bramble’s announcement that he intends to offer amendments to the guest worker amnesty law comes at a time when delegates to the June 18th Utah State Republican Party Convention threaten to devise a resolution that would repeal the law.  (Salt Lake Tribune, June 8, 2011)  “Our primary opposition to HB 116 is that it violates the Constitution and the Utah Republican Party platform by granting legal status to those who are here illegally,” asserted Keri Witte, sponsor of the resolution to repeal the law. (Daily Herald, June 10, 2011)  She continued, “Since the so-called guest worker provision is such a key component of HB 116, it needs to be repealed and replaced. Unless and until Curt Bramble expresses willingness to address that key issue, I don't expect he will garner much more approval.” (Id.)

FAIR - North Carolina Houses Passes Mandatory E-VERIFY

Commentary: Mexico isn't doomed to failure | A VIEW OF LA RAZA SUPREMACY

Commentary: Mexico isn't doomed to failure McClatchy



*
Mexicans are "NOT TEAM PLAYERS" because they are fascist supremacist.

Mexico is supremely successful in EXPORTING their poor, illiterate, pregnant and criminal over our borders to assure their billionaire class, like CARLOS SLIM that the mex economy will remain in their hands.

WE ARE MEXICO'S WELFARE, JOBS, "FREE" BIRTHING CENTER, AND JAILS PROGRAM.

*
WHILE MEXICO IS NOT DOOMED, AMERICA IS! WE ONLY HAVE TO LOOK AT WHAT LA RAZA HAS DONE TO MEXIFORNIA TO GET PICTURE OF THE TRAGEDY OF THE MEXICAN INVASION, OCCUPATION AND LOOTING OF ONE STATE!

REALLY WHAT THIS ARTICLE IS ABOUT IS LA RAZA “THE RACE” MEXICAN FASCISM!
*
Posted on Mon, Jun. 13, 2011

Commentary: Mexico isn't doomed to failure

Andres Oppenheimer | The Miami Herald

last updated: June 09, 2011 12:51:06 PM
Reading the new book by Jorge Castañeda, Mañana Forever: Mexico and the Mexicans, I was struck by his observation that Mexicans tend to seek individual solutions to collective problems, while Americans and Europeans tend to seek collective solutions to collective problems.
Castañeda, one of Latin America’s sharpest intellectuals and a former Mexican foreign minister, says Mexico suffers from an acute individualism that is evident in Mexicans’ attitudes toward politics, architecture, arts and even sports.
Mexicans are not team players, he says. It is not surprising, for example, that Mexico, one of Latin America’s most populated countries, has never won a soccer World Cup, or that it has produced international music stars like Armando Manzanero or Luis Miguel — but not world-famous orchestras.
But doesn’t that apply to most Latin American countries? After all, Argentina has the world’s best soccer player Lionel Messi — and didn’t win last year’s soccer World Cup. Colombia has world-famous singer Shakira but no comparably famous orchestras, I noted during an interview with Castañeda.
“There is some truth to the fact that there is a Latin American individualist trait in all countries, but the Mexican case is exceptionally acute,” he said, noting that Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay and other Latin American countries have historically had much better soccer teams than Mexico.
Castañeda cited the fact that when you fly over Mexico City, you see a largely flat city that stretches out endlessly, with individual houses as far as the eye can see. Comparatively, when you take a picture of Buenos Aires, Sao Paulo or Caracas from the air, you see high-rise apartment buildings everywhere.
“Mexicans don’t like living in an apartment building, because they don’t think it belongs to them and don’t want to share a public space with their neighbors,” he said. “That doesn’t happen in other parts of Latin America.”
Likewise, few middle or upper-class Mexicans take the subway, or join charitable, religious, communitarian or educational institutions. Mexico ranks last in a Johns Hopkins University ranking of countries’ charitable donations, with only 0.04 percent of its gross domestic product spent on charity, he noted.
When faced with economic or social problems, Mexicans take advantage of their geographic closeness to the United States to seek the ultimate individualist solution: emigration. “Their reaction is, ‘I’m leaving; you take care of this mess,’ ” he said.
*
LA RAZA SUPREMACY – THE FASCIST ORDER OF MEXICAN SOCIETY – THE WEALTHY OWN THE ECONOMY, AND EXPORT THEIR POOR, ILLITERATE, PREGNANT & CRIMINAL OVER OUR BORDERS… AND THEY DO IT SHAMELESSLY, EVEN RANTING ON OUR FACES WHAT WE OWE THESE ILLEGALS!
*
“ In addition, Mexico already had a hierarchical structure even before the Spanish conquest, which left little room for individual initiatives, he said.”

Asked about the reasons behind this individualist culture, Castañeda cited the fact that the conquest of the Americas was not the work of Spain as a country, but the achievement of individual adventurers who often acted on their own initiative. In addition, Mexico already had a hierarchical structure even before the Spanish conquest, which left little room for individual initiatives, he said.
But, I asked, are Mexicans doomed by their history? Isn’t this a “cultural determinism” that has proven wrong in many other countries until recently seen as hopeless?
“At any given time, a country’s culture or national character or national identity, although I don’t like that term, has a significant influence on the way people act,’’ Castañeda said. “But what I maintain is that it can be changed, and that it must change, and that Mexico can only prosper if it changes it.”
My opinion: I agree. Countries are not condemned by their history. They can change. Singapore, South Korea, Ireland — even after its current financial crisis. India and China were believed to be basket cases only four decades ago and suffered famines that were never seen in Latin America before they started growing steadily in recent years.
I know many of you are thinking that none of the above-mentioned countries are in Latin America. But that’s not true: There are several countries in the region that are growing steadily. Just look at Chile, or Costa Rica, or — with luck — Brazil, and you see economic progress in our neighborhood.
What determines whether countries prosper is their national consensus on basic things, such as the need for continuity in government policies, attracting investments and improving educational standards.
There is no biological reason why Latin America’s prosperity should be a “Mañana forever” proposition. It can be achieved and it is being achieved by several countries, although unfortunately not by as many as we would like.
ABOUT THE WRITER
Andres Oppenheimer is a Miami Herald syndicated columnist and a member of The Miami Herald team that won the 1987 Pulitzer Prize. He also won the 1999 Maria Moors Cabot Award, the 2001 King of Spain prize, and the 2005 Emmy Suncoast award. He is the author of Castro's Final Hour; Bordering on Chaos, on Mexico's crisis; Cronicas de heroes y bandidos, Ojos vendados, Cuentos Chinos and most recently of Saving the Americas. E-mail Andres at aoppenheimer@miamiherald.com. Live chat with Oppenheimer every Thursday at 1 p.m. at The Miami Herald.
*
*
JUDICIALWATCH.org
Mexican Gang Charged With Terrorizing Blacks
06/07/2011 - 3:54pm
 To demonstrate its loyalty to the notoriously violent Mexican Mafia prison gang, an affiliate Latino street organization has worked to cleanse a southern California city of black residents by terrorizing, threatening and intimidating them.
*

WHEN JERRY BROWN WAS AG, THE TOP MOST WANTED CRIMINALS WERE MEXICAN. BROWN SIMPLY WENT OUT AND HISPANDERED FOR LA RAZA ILLEGAL VOTES AND BECAME GOV OF MEXIFORNIA, WHERE HIS AGENDA IS TO EXPAND LA RAZA SUPREMACY, AND THE MEX WELFARE STATE.
*
Officials call for California to withdraw from controversial illegal immigration enforcement program
By Paloma Esquivel
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
11:55 AM PDT, June 10, 2011
Seven Democratic members of California's Congressional Delegation called on Gov. Jerry Brown Friday to suspend California's participation in the Secure Communities immigration enforcement program.

In recent weeks, governors in Illinois, New York and Massachusetts sought to suspend or declined to enter into Secure Communities participation agreements. Earlier this week, the Los Angeles City Council voted nearly unanimously to support legislation allowing communities to opt out of the program.

Gov. Brown "should side with both the officers who patrol our communities and the people they protect and end Secure Communities in California," said Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-Los Angeles).
*
*
*

*
*
*
*
SATURDAY, MAY 28, 2011
California's Accelerating Demise

The end is nearing, and it's not that far away anymore. Oh, make no mistake, California will still be here, but very shortly, it won't be much like anything that people who have lived here for awhile have known.

The culture, the quality of life, pristine environment, and enviable public school systems are rapidly being segregated into ever-shrinking areas of affluence.

Anyone who has read this blog knows that the focus here is on illegal immigration.  Is the presence of people who are unlawfully in the country the only thing that has led to the Golden State's desperate financial and demographic situation, however? Clearly, no. There's been plenty of irresponsible spending by California politicians that is, at most, only marginally related to the millions of the undocumented who have set up house here.

Still, you can't escape the facts; facts that are so plain and obvious that one doesn't need to hold an MBA degree to see that much of California's economic ruin has resulted from nearly unfettered unlawful immigration from Latin America. We're rapidly absorbing the poorest and least educated that countries in that area of the world gladly send north, and the bills for having done this are coming due. California's illegal alien and anchor baby population is well over twice the size of any other state's, and not surprisingly, our state's budget deficit is also over twice the size of any other state's.

When you lack money, you borrow. California certainly has, out the yin yang. In fact, California is so far in debt that its credit rating is the lowest of all 50 states.  And when you can't borrow anymore, you do without.  California is ...

Because we have been so busy building public schools (among other things) to keep up with an exploding Hispanic population, and repeatedly raising public school teachers' compensation to convince educators to work in dreary academic conditions surrounded by limited-English learners and street criminals, we essentially stopped constructing prisons. Well the illegal alien children, and the offspring of current and former illegal aliens, who now make up the bulk of public school students here, have been graduating at rates below 50%.

Where does a person with little education, who has been raised in a family where skirting laws is everyday conduct, commonly wind up?  You guessed it.  Over half of the people in California jails and prisons are current and former illegal aliens, and their children.  In fact, we have so many illegals and anchor babies that our "gray bar hotels" are stuffed.  Jam-packed to the degree that the Supreme Court recently ruled they violate 8th Amendment protections against cruel and unusual punishment
OK, so just build more prisons, right?  Sure ... with what money?  We already spent it on teachers, free public school breakfasts and lunches, new grade school campuses, discounted college tuition for illegal aliens, and prison guards who watch over our growing population of people who didn't seem to benefit from the money we've been laying out to educate/babysit them.

The bottom line: California will be releasing tens of thousands of convicts because government officials don't have any other choice.

Therefore, when we say the Golden State "won't be much like anything that people who have lived here for awhile have known," that isn't hyperbole or agenda motivated exaggeration. It's simply reality. The most basic function of government is to protect people and property. California's government increasingly can't because the money is all gone, and so are many of the citizen taxpayers who never wanted any part of this grand liberal immigration experiment and politically correct nonsense, to begin with.


A video concerning the exodus of middle class taxpayers from California: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZC3q8P6TB54

*
http://www.mexica-movement.org/ They claim all of North America for Mexico!

*
Lou Dobbs Tonight
Monday, February 11, 2008
In California, League of United Latin American Citizens has adopted a resolution to declare "California Del Norte" a sanctuary zone for immigrants. The declaration urges the Mexican government to invoke its rights under the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo "to seek third‑nation neutral arbitration of disputes concerning immigration laws and their enforcement." We’ll have the story.

OBAMA'S "HARD TRUTH"... SURE GOIN' DOWN EASY FOR HIS CRIMINAL BANKSTER DONORS & LA RAZA PARTY BASE OF ILLEGALS!

HERE ARE 3 OF OBAMA'S TRULY HARD TRUTHS:

1. “Change” really only means an accelerated form of the BUSH-CHENEY transfer of the economy, what is left of it, to the billionaire class, and more war to protect BIG BUSH SAUDIS CARLYLE GROUP interests over in muslimland.
*
2. JOBS? No legal need apply! Jobs are for Obama’s LA RAZA party base of illegals. Ergo, open borders, no E-verify, NO WALL, neutered I.C.E., endless amnesty ploys, or at least continued NON-ENFORCEMENT of laws prohibiting the employment of illegals.
*
3. BANKSTERS’ RAPE & PILLAGE IS NOT OVER! While  they may have nearly destroyed the global economy, there’s still a few trillion for the banksters to steal, and OBAMA is their man to assure them of NO REAL REGULATION, UNLIMITED NO-STRINGS BAILOUTS and not one will go to prison!
*
MEANWHILE…. the America middle class is foreclosed on, hands their jobs to LA RAZA, and pillaged coming and going by Obama’s WALL ST. paymasters.
ARE THESE TRUTHS HARD ENOUGH?
*

*



*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/alipac-william-gheen-exposes-wikileaks.html
*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/wikileaks-exposed-obamas-la-raza-open.html
“What's needed to discourage illegal immigration into the United States has been known for years: Enforce existing law.” ….. CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR


*

Obama, where are those ‘hard truths’ you promised?

By Fred Hiatt, Published: June 12

During the 2008 campaign, Barack Obama repeatedly said he would tell Americans the hard truths — not what “you want to hear but . . . what you need to hear.”
On the most vexing challenge facing the country — how not to go bankrupt — he hasn’t lived up to the promise.
I’m not talking about Exhibit A in the Republican indictment, which is the rapid rise in the deficit over the past two years. Given the economy he inherited, Obama would have been derelict not to increase spending.
But when it comes to what has to be said and done for long-term fiscal responsibility, the president has chosen easier politics over harder truths.
His signature achievement is a health-care bill that represents, happily, a major step toward universal health care and contains some hopeful seeds of cost control. But it is also the biggest new entitlement since Medicare with little new revenue to support it. The bill does include a watered-down version of a tax on high-priced employer-provided health-care plans, but even that won’t take effect until after a second Obama term would be over.
As Congress considered naming a bipartisan fiscal commission with statutory teeth, Obama was AWOL, though presidential lobbying might have made a difference. When the toothless commission that he subsequently appointed unexpectedly coalesced around a fiscal plan that managed to attract support ranging from Dick Durbin on the left to Tom Coburn on the right, Obama refused to lend it a hand.
When Republican Paul Ryan offered his own long-term plan, Obama responded with a speech that was more a prelude to the 2012 election than a plausible invitation to negotiation.
And throughout, the president has stuck to the position, belied by his own budget numbers, that his vision of government is affordable without raising taxes on anyone but the rich.
Now the conventional wisdom in Washington has it that the presidential campaign has begun and we shouldn’t expect any serious progress toward debt reduction until 2013.
And, as if on cue, Republican candidate Tim Pawlenty is promising, yes, hard truths.
“I could promise that we can eliminate a $14 trillion debt, create jobs for 10 million people, restructure Social Security and health care, all without making any tough decisions,” he said as he prepared to announce his campaign. “Or, I could try something different. I could just tell you the truth.”
That was less than a month ago. Last week, Pawlenty offered an economic plan that set a modern-day record for wishful thinking.
It counts on a rate of growth far higher than the U.S. economy has ever sustained in the modern era. It proposes flattening and lowering income tax rates, but without — as has always been the case with flat-tax proposals — taking away any of the special-interest subsidies and deductions built into the tax code. Altogether, as Ruth Marcus reported last week, the Pawlenty plan could cost more than $11 trillion over the next 10 years.
So much for “tough decisions.”
Pawlenty’s fictions are particularly disappointing because, as a former two-term governor of a purple state, he entered the race understanding the difference between governing and pandering. Now he has set a bar of irresponsibility to which his rivals will feel pressure to stoop.
And as the incumbent has discovered, irresponsible campaign promises don’t magically fade upon election. There’s no guarantee that Obama would have behaved differently as president had he not promised during the campaign never to raise taxes on the middle class or laced into John McCain’s sensible proposal to tax employer-provided health care. But there’s no doubt that both campaign stances limited his freedom in office.
There are meaningful philosophical divisions between the parties, and campaigns are important to draw distinctions and fight them out. But most Americans aren’t extreme left or right. They wouldn’t be satisfied with the services they would get from a government spending only 18 percent of GDP, as Pawlenty proposes, but they don’t want Obama’s 25 percent either.
The hard truth, in other words, is that there will have to be compromise. Should we be soothed by those who tell us it is likely to be achieved in 2013? When the time comes, the same people will be pointing out that Obama is a lame duck, or that the new Republican president is shackled by promises that saw him or her through the primaries. And the 2014 election will be looming.
We are always somewhere in the election cycle. Compromise will require a leader to put the national interest first, to take a chance on delivering hard truths, not just promising them. That will be no easier, and no less risky, in 2013 than it is today.

NAACP: Obama must focus on jobs - The Hill's On The Money

NAACP: Obama must focus on jobs - The Hill's On The Money


NAACP: Obama must focus on jobs
*
Jealous said Congress’ attitude toward African American unemployment has been one of “hostile neglect.”
He also warned that members of the black community, President Obama’s most stalwart supporters, are growing frustrated on the lack of action on jobs.
*
NO ADMINISTRATION IN HISTORY HAS WORKED FOR ILLEGALS, OPEN BORDERS AND NON-ENFORCEMENT/AMNESTY MORE THAN BARACK OBAMA!
IT’S NOT THAT HE GIVES A FUCK ABOUT THE MILLIONS OF POOR MEXICO EXPORTS, HE DOESN’T GIVE A FUCK ABOUT POOR AMERICANS! HE SIMPLY WANTS TO KEEP HIS WALL ST. PAYMASTERS HAPPY AND GENEROUS!
*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/06/usa-2011-mcjobs-4-gas-and-underwater.html
*

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/wikileaks-exposed-obamas-la-raza-open.html

*
*
NAACP: Obama must focus on jobs
By Erik Wasson - 06/12/11 05:00 PM ET
The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) wants the Obama administration and Congress to focus above all on addressing unemployment, but is stopping short of calling for a massive new stimulus.
“Generally speaking, we first and foremost want them to pay attention to the economy and the high rates of joblessness in the black community,” NAACP President Benjamin Todd Jealous said Thursday. “It is unacceptable for us to be 2 ½ years into a recession and still be fighting for Congress to accept responsibility to get working class people back into this economy.”
Jealous said Congress’ attitude toward African American unemployment has been one of “hostile neglect.”
He also warned that members of the black community, President Obama’s most stalwart supporters, are growing frustrated on the lack of action on jobs.
“The sense on the street, and I just came back from meeting folks in Harlem for instance, the sense on the street is that the administration should be harder and more aggressive on this,” he told reporters at a Thursday press event.
NAACP chief lobbyist Hilary Shelton said Friday that the NAACP has not taken a position on a new stimulus bill although he personally believes if crafted correctly such a bill could work to boost the economy. Shelton said that the House GOP budget cuts are a disaster for the poor.
“It is a very dangerous and immoral budget we are seeing come out of the House and we will do everything we can to fight it,” Shelton said.
To address the lack of jobs, the NAACP favors passage of a local government bailout bill sponsored in the last Congress by Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.). That bill would provide $75 billion to stop layoffs in local and state government due to budget cuts.
Shelton acknowledged that the bill, not reintroduced by Miller this year, faces an uphill battle in a GOP House focused on spending cuts.
NAACP also favors renewing the expired HIRE Act tax credits which encourage hiring.
The HIRE Act provided employers with an exemption from their 6.2 percent share of social security tax on wages paid to qualifying employees, effective for wages paid from March 19, 2010 through December 31, 2010.
For each qualified employee retained for at least 52 consecutive weeks, businesses were also be eligible for a general business tax credit, referred to as the new hire retention credit, of 6.2 percent of wages paid to the qualified employee over the 52 week period, up to a maximum credit of $1,000.
Shelton said that overall the NAACP is playing defense now, protecting environmental laws like the Clear Air Act and the Obama health reform.
Jealous said that the GOP is intent on gutting the Justice Department’s civil rights division through budget cuts.
“One of the achievements of this administration has been rebuilding the Department of Justice’s civil rights division. This budget threatens that,” he said. “Enforcement was devastated by the previous administration. We can’t afford to go back.”
Shelton said that NAACP is relying on Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), Sen. Pat Leahy (D-Vt.) and Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) especially to defend against deep cuts to essential services to the poor.
He said that block granting Medicaid, as proposed in the House-passed budget, would be devastating especially for the black community.
Shelton said that as the administration looks to cut the deficit, the NAACP is urging that taxes be raised on the wealthy.