TYSON HAS LONG BEEN IDENTIFED WITH THE DEMOCRAT PARTY FOR OBVIOUS REASONS.
Tyson Foods Faces Boycott After Firing 1,200 Americans, ‘Would Like to Employ’ 42,000 Migrants - AND BIDEN - MAYORKAS - SCHUMER HAVE USHERED OVER THE BORDER 15 MILLION TO PICK FROM.
(CNSNews.com) -- Planned Parenthood's latest annual report, for 2018-2019, shows that the abortion giant performed a record 345,672 abortions in fiscal 2018 and received a record $616.8 million in government reimbursements and grants in the year that ended on June 30, 2019..
For the time period of Oct. 1, 2017 through Sept. 30, 2018, Planned Parenthood offices performed 345,672 abortions, according to the annual report.
Also, Planned Parenthood offices received $616.8 million in government health services reimbursements and grants for the year ending June 30, 2019.
(Getty Images)
"Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. (PPFA), is a tax-exempt corporation under Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(3) and is not a private foundation (Tax ID #13-1644147)," states the annual report. "Contributions are tax deductible to the fullest extent available under the law. Planned Parenthood affiliates have the same tax status."
“We learned two tragic facts from Planned Parenthood’s newly released annual report: that the number of children Planned Parenthood killed in the womb is at a record high and, shockingly, so is the amount of money it received from taxpayers," said Alison Centofante, director of External Affairs for Live Action.
"This abortion machine, which is responsible for the taking of more than 345,000 preborn lives this year– a number consistently on the rise -- should be defunded immediately and shut down," she said.
In a September 2016 letter urging people to join his Pro-Life coalition, Donald Trump stated that he was committed to "defunding Planned Parenthood as long as they continue to perform abortions, and reallocating their funding to community health centers that provide comprehensive health care for women."
(Getty Images)
"Together we can form this vital coalition so that Mike Pence and I can be advocates for the unborn and their mothers every day we are in the White House," stated Trump.
In 2017-18, Planned Parenthood performed 332,757 abortions (10/1/16--9/30/17) and received $563.8 million in government reimbursements and grants (for the year ending June 30, 2018). Adjusted for inflation from June 2018 to June 2019 = $573.09 million.
In 2016-17, Planned Parenthood performed 321,384 abortions and received $543.7 million in reimbursements and grants. Adjusted for inflation from June 2017 to June 2019 = $568.53 million.
A human baby murdered by saline-injection abortion. (Priests for Life)
In 2015-16, Planned Parenthood did 328,348 abortions and took in $554.6 million in government reimbursements and grants. Adjusted for inflation from June 2016 to June 2019 = $589.40 million.
In 2014-15: 323,999 abortions; $553.7 million in reimbursements and grants. Adjusted for inflation from June 2015 to June 2019 = $594.31 million.
In 2013-14: 327,653 abortions and $528.4 million in government reimbursements and grants. Adjusted for inflation from June 2014 to June 2019 = $567.86 million.
In 2012-13: 327,166 abortions and $540.6 million in reimbursements and grants. Adjusted for inflation from June 2013 to June 2019 = $593.01 million.
In 2011-12: 333,964 abortions and $542.4 million in government reimbursements and grants (for year ended June 2012). Adjusted for inflation from June 2012 to June 2019 = $605.42 million.
2010-2011: 329,445 abortions and $538.5 million in government health services grants and reimbursements. Adjusted for inflation from June 2011 to June 2019 = $611.07 million.
(Getty Images)
2009-2010: 331,796 abortions and $487.4 million in government grants and reimbursements. Adjusted for inflation from June 2010 to June 2019 = $572.77 million.
2008-2009: 324,008 abortions and $363.2 million in government grants and contracts (for year ended June 30, 2009). Adjusted for inflation from June 2009 to June 2019 = $431.31 million.
2007-2008: 305,310 abortions and $349.6 million in government grants and contracts (for year ended June 30, 2008). Adjusted for inflation from June 2008 to June 2019 = $409.28 million.
2006-2007: 289,750 abortions and $336.7 million in government grants and contracts (for year ended June 30, 2007). Adjusted for inflation from June 2007 to June 2019 = $413.93 million.
(Getty Images)
2005-2006: 264,943 abortions and $305.3 million in government grants and contracts (for year ended June 30, 2006). Adjusted for inflation from June 2006 to June 2019 = $385.41 million.
2004-2005: 255,015 abortions and $272.7 million in government grants and contracts (for year ended June 30, 2005). Adjusted for inflation from June 2005 to June 2019 = $366.28 million.
2003-2004: 244,628 abortions and $265.2 million in government grants and contracts (for year ended June 30, 2004). Adjusted for inflation from June 2004 to June 2019 = $366.78 million.
2002-2003: 227,375 abortions and $254.4 million in government grants and contracts. Adjusted for inflation from June 2003 to June 2019 = $385.62 million.
2001-2002: 213,026 abortions and $240.9 million in government grants and contracts (for year ended June 30, 2002). Adjusted for inflation from June 2002 to June 2019 = $348.41 million.
2000-2001: 197,070 abortions and $202.7 million in government grants and contracts (for year ended June 30, 2001). Adjusted for inflation from June 2001 to June 2019 = $296.51 million.
ABORTION
KI LLS…. the innocent!
PLANNED
PARENTHOOD:
America’s
baby murdering factories…. Your tax dollars at work
Dr. Leah Torres, an OB/GYN in Salt
Lake City, Utah, said that when she performs certain abortions she cuts the
vocal cord of the baby so "there's really no opportunity" for the
child to scream. She also described herself as a "uterus ripper
outer" because she performs hysterectomies.
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand:
‘Our Lives Depend On’ Protecting Abortion Rights
“Our lives depend on” protecting
abortion rights, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) claimed Friday in response to
breaking news that restrictions on the termination of unborn babies in Missouri
had been signed into law.
Reacting to an Associated Press
(AP) story that Missouri’s new law bans abortion at the eighth week of pregnancy,
Sen. Gillibrand tweeted that women’s lives depend on forcefully fighting back:
“Women can't afford for us to
take half-measures in response to an all-out onslaught on their rights. We have
to fight back like our lives depend on it. They do.”
According to the AP story, Missouri’s abortion ban
includes exceptions when the life or physical health of the mother is endangered
by pregnancy:
Missouri Gov. Mike Parson on
Friday signed a bill that bans abortions on or beyond the eighth week of
pregnancy without exceptions for cases of rape or incest, making it among the
most restrictive abortion policies in the nation.
…
The measure includes exceptions
for medical emergencies, such as when there is a risk of death or permanent
physical injuries to “a major bodily function of the pregnant woman.”
They oppose legislation to prevent them from being killed. They
pass legislation that seeks ways to ensure their death. They make outlandish
and ridiculously stupid claims as justification to do so. And when presented
with evidence to the contrary they flinch.
Recently I found myself in a conversation with perhaps the
single most influential person not currently in elective office in New York
City.
We were discussing the impact of the six or seven states that
have adopted “heartbeat bills” and Alabama’s recently passed nearly 100%
abortion ban.
This person’s observation specifically: “If Republicans don’t
stop with the pro-life issue, they will push women to vote for... (dramatic
pause inserted) ...Democrats.”
So Democrats are supported by those who want the right
to see their children dead.
In New York it was the Democrat elected Assembly and governor
who passed, signed into law, and then gave themselves a standing ovation on the
dead-of-night passage of that state’s new legalization of killing children
after they had been born.
In Virginia it was a Democrat governor who eerily described on
morning radio step by step what happens when they decide whether a born child
has the right to live or be killed.
On Friday, at a gathering of nearly 1300 New York City/Tri-State
area pastors, those gathered learned that Democrats have opposed the expansion
of crisis pregnancy centers, while actively pushing for the expansion of
abortion facility licenses. This happening while three NYC Democrat-controlled
zip codes are the only ones where abortions outnumber live births.
Democrats often claim that to be in favor of killing of children
is to be “pro-woman.” Yet they refuse to acknowledge that their policies have
ushered in the death of more than 30 million women in
recent years.
Democrats claim that no child should be forced to live a life
unwanted—that every child—they argue should know a life of love. Yet they fail
to recognize that at any single point in time there are somewhere around 2 million couplesseeking
adoption while last year Americans killed a touch more than 800 thousand innocent babies in 2018.
Democrats have argued for mandatory tax-payer funding for low
income women to have their children killed without having to pay for it. They
have also turned around and resisted efforts by then President George W. Bush
to incentivize and encourage marriage which statistically speaking
provides greater financial and emotional security for the woman and the child.
Democrats argue in favor of government administrated gun control
laws—which leave children in high crime areas far more vulnerable. Democrats
argue against common gun ownership by law abiding citizens which again would by
law leave children at the mercy of criminals. Democrats almost unilaterally
ignore the gunman’s choices in school shootings. They also never fail to
condemn gun makers. The very gun makers that produced the tools used to stop
most school shooters.
Democrats refuse to assist the children separated from real
families (not the coyote rapists) in the current immigration crisis. Democrats
also looked the other way when President Clinton signed the family separation
law, and President Obama began to enforce it.
And this week Nancy Pelosi led the charge of Democrats and for
the fiftieth consecutive time were able to kill legislation that prevented post
birth killing of children already born. Akin to the dead of night New York
State Assembly vote—Democrats on the national stage voted to keep the
killing of born children—legal.
They claim it’s all about
compassion. They cite statistics that
are in themselves so small that they—statistically speaking—almost never come
into play. Or do they?
Bottom line Democrats argue in favor and tirelessly work for the
death of children—born and unborn.
I just don’t get why.
It seems to me to be very cruel and completely lacking in the
compassion they too often invoke.
Anti-abortion activists participate in the "March for
Life," an annual event to mark the anniversary of the 1973 Supreme Court
case Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion in the US, outside the US Supreme
Court in Washington, DC, January 18, 2019. (Saul Loeb/AFP/Getty Images)
25 GOP Senators Urge That
Spending Bills Protect Pro-Life Measures
Twenty-five Republican members of the
Senate urged Appropriations Committee Chairman Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) on May
23 to preserve “all long-standing pro-life and religious freedom protections in all appropriations
bills” that advance out of the committee.
The senators also appealed to Shelby “that
you do not advance as bill-text any language that weakens pro-life and
religious liberty actions taken by the Trump administration.
“The unborn are the most vulnerable members
of our society, yet they are under attack. In 2015 alone, 638,169 unborn
children lost their lives to abortion,” they said.
“This is a terrible tragedy, and we must
continue to prevent federal funding from supporting the unjust practice of
elective abortion.”
Sens. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), Marsha
Blackburn (R-Tenn.), Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), Mike Braun (R-Ind.), Kevin Cramer
(R-N.D.), Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), Steve Daines (R-Mont.), Michael Enzi (R-Wyo.),
Deb Fischer (R-Neb.), Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.), James
Inhofe (R-Okla.), James Lankford (R-Okla.), Mike Lee (R-Utah), Rand Paul
(R-Ky.), Rob Portman (R-Ohio), James Risch (R-Idaho), Pat Roberts (R-Kan.),
Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), Ben Sasse (R-Neb.), Rick Scott
(R-Fla.), Tim Scott (R-S.C.), Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), and Roger Wicker (R-Miss.).
The signers also told Shelby that “the
right to live and worship in accordance with one’s religious beliefs is a
bedrock principle of the American founding. The First Amendment of the
Constitution prohibits Congress from interfering in the free exercise of
religion. With this in mind, it is critical to retain the longstanding riders
in appropriations legislation that safeguard the ability of citizens to live
out their faith.”
The letter to Shelby comes against a
backdrop of aggressive moves by pro-life advocates to win passage of new
legislation that significantly limits when abortions can be performed.
In Alabama, for example, Republican Gov.
Kay Ivey signed a measure that effectively bans all abortions and contains no
exceptions for rape or incest, making the new law the nation’s toughest.
Other states considering similarly
restrictive measures include Missouri and Texas.
The aggressive pro-life campaigns followed
actions in New York in which pro-abortion advocates succeeded in gaining
passage of a measure that essentially makes the procedure available right up to
the point of a baby’s birth.
Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed the
measure amid a celebration with pro-abortion advocates.
The federal measures the 25 senators seek to
protect have been in place in one form or another since passage in 1976 of the
Hyde Amendment, which prevents federal funding of abortions. The amendment was
named after former Rep. Henry Hyde (R-Ill.).
A recent Government Accounting Office report said
Planned Parenthood (PP) received more than $1.5 billion from the government
between 2013 and 2015. Planned Parenthood says it uses federal dollars for
non-abortion-related expenses.
Nationwide, PP clinics performed more than
320,000 abortions during each of those years.
President Donald Trump renewed the
Protecting Life in Global Health Policy initiative in 2017 that bars U.S.
foreign-aid dollars from being used to pay for abortions.
The policy was first instituted by
President Ronald Reagan in 1984 during a United Nations conference in Mexico
City and was continued by President George H.W. Bush and President George W.
Bush. Democratic Presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama did not observe the
Mexico City policy.
The 25 senators also encouraged Shelby to
ensure that “no riders be added that would threaten” Trump’s renewal of the
Mexico policy, and they noted that a recent Marist poll “showed that 75 percent
of Americans oppose taxpayer funding of abortion abroad.”
During 2019, manufacturing employment increased by 46,000 in the United States, which was down from the 264,000 increase in 2018 and the 190,000 increase in 2017.
“Manufacturing employment was little changed in December (-12,000),” said the BLS employment report released today. “Employment in the industry changed little in 2019 (+46,000), after increasing in 2018 (+264,000).”
Manufacturing jobs are now up 500,000 from where they were in December 2016, the month before President Donald Trump took office. In that month, 12,355,000 were employed in manufacturing in this country.
Manufacturing jobs in the United States peaked in June 1979, when they hit 19,553,000.
In Immigration Debate, Trump Says We Don’t Have Enough American Workers to Fill Skilled Labor Jobs
11:11
President Donald Trump told Fox News TV host Laura Ingraham on Friday his 2021 plans to welcome more foreign graduates will not flood the labor market for U.S. college graduates.
“I have so many companies coming into this country, you’re not going to have to worry about it,” Trump said in the interview, adding, “It is always going to be a shortage … We have so many companies coming in, from Japan … [and] China now is going to start building a lot of things.”
Trump and Ingraham did not find common ground, likely because they were talking about different parts of the immigration problem. Also, neither mentioned Ivanka Trump’s campaign to prod companies to train their own American employees for high-tech jobs.
Ingraham began the exchange by noting American graduates’ salaries have been suppressed by the flood of foreign graduates:
We don’t have a tight labor market. If we had a tight labor market, we would be seeing real increases in wages. I hear that your team is planning on advocating more foreign workers coming in for some of these high-tech companies.
Ingraham rejected business claims of shortages: “We’re seeing a plateauing of wages … There’s a never-ending appetite on the part of corporate America to bring in as much cheap labor as possible to drive down wages.”
“I’m not talking about cheap — I’m talking about brainpower,” Trump responded. “They want to hire smart people. And those people are thrown out of the country — we can’t do that,” he said, referring to foreign graduates of U.S. colleges.
Trump seems to want to help companies import a relatively small number of very clever people, such as Ivy League valedictorians. In contrast, Ingraham is trying to block companies’ effort to cut payrolls by replacing well-paid American professionals with cheap foreign graduates who have just enough skills to get the job done, regardless of quality.
“We have to allow smart people to stay in our country — if you graduate number one in your class at Harvard, [if] you graduate from the Wharton School of Finance,” Trump said. “If we tell smart people to get the hell out, that’s not America first.”
“Yes, that’s a small percentage of what [ccompanies] want,” said Ingraham.
” No, it’s not. It’s a lot,” said Trump.
But business has hired very few valedictorians among the pool of roughly 1.5 million visa workers who now hold jobs sought by American graduates.
In fact, the government does not require U.S companies to hire Americans first, and it does not screen out unskilled foreign workers. The government does not cap foreign hires and does not enforce the loopholed rules which supposedly require foreign workers to be skilled and to be paid market-level wages. Nor does the government even try to curb the large scale nepotism that allows foreign born managers in the United States to import huge numbers of foreign workers who will kick back some of their salaries to their bosses.
For example, the “Optional Practical Training” program was expanded by President G. Bush and President Barack Obama to provide employers with an extra stream of foreign graduates. Foreigners get these OPT work permits by simply enrolling in U.S. colleges, ranging from the elite Stanford University down to the so-called “visa-mill” colleges where many students can speak little English and may do very little study.
DHS posts videos of Indian migrants buying fake documents from ICE's Farmington U. sting operation.
The #OPT Optional Practical Training program is an estb.-run labor-trafficking scheme to sideline American graduates.
It will expand if #S386 becomes law http://bit.ly/39H2Zqh
In 2017, for example, federal data shows Northeastern University provided OPT work permits to 4,359 foreign graduates– or far more than the number of valedictorians. Harvard sold access to the OPT work permits to 1,875 foreigners, and Columbia University sold access to 5.59o work permits.
But even more work permits were sold to foreign students by many little known colleges. For example, in 2017, Northwestern Polytechnic University sold access to 6,060 work permits, Silicon Valley University sold 3,127 work permits, and the Illinois Institute of Technology sold 2,678.
Nationwide, universities earned roughly $30 billion a year from this labor-trafficking business, so they have little incentive to exclude low-quality migrants.
New 2018 data provided to Breitbart News by the Department of Homeland Security shows that universities provided 215,000 OPT work permits in 2018. This total consisted of 145,586 one-year OPT work permits and 69,650 three-year OPT-STEM work permits in 2018.
In 2017, the matching “Curricular Practical Training” program provided one-year work permits to roughly 100,000 foreign students at U.S. colleges — including colleges that require little or no attendance.
DHS officials have recently changed how they count the OPT and CPT work permits, so the estimated workforce now ranges from 400,000 to roughly 300,000. The older 2017 methodology was used to produce this DHS chart:
Many of these OPT graduates are hired by prestigious U.S. firms, — and by foreign managers in those elite firms — so demoting skilled U.S. graduates in lower-tier jobs, in lower-tier cities, at lower-tier wages.
The other major visa-worker program is the H-1B program. This program keeps roughly 750,000 foreign workers in U.S. college-graduate jobs. These foreign workers will often accept very low wages for these jobs — and will underbid American graduates — partly because they are hoping their employers will sponsor them for the hugely valuable prize of a green card.
Federal agencies have never released a full count of the resident H-1B workforce, but federal data shows that a huge percentage are not valedictorians and that many come from no-name universities in India.
The federal data for 2017, for example, shows that 39 percent of the H-1Bs sought by New York employers were rated as “entry-level” workers, similar to U.S. graduates. Another 26 percent were rated as just “qualified,” and only 6 percent were rated “competent.” These cheap workers have pushed hundreds of thousands of American professionals out of jobs.
This is the visa worker program which is used by companies to replace many Americans graduates. In 2016, for example, Disney outsourced Americans’ jobs to an Indian company that imported low-wage H-1B workers to do the Americans’ jobs. The American graduates were forced to train the Indians, torpedoing the claims of a shortage of skilled U.S. workers.
Ingraham reminded Trump of the Disney H-1B scandal. “You ran on people training their foreign replacements, that you ran against that. It’s humiliating for an American worker who works for a company for 30 years … to train your replacement,” Ingraham said.
“No, no, that’s different, I would never do that,” said Trump.
“Why shouldn’t we have American graduates of colleges and universities taking those jobs? Ingraham said.
“We do,” answered Trump. “But we don’t have enough of them … and we have to be competitive with the rest of the world too.”
But Trump’s deputies have done little to shrink the H-1B program. In fact, his deputies are defending the OPT program in court. Officials have also blocked a DHS plan to end the “H4 EAD” program that Obama created to persuade temporary H-1B workers to stay in U.S. jobs. The result is that many Americans are still being forced to train their workers, for example, at an AT&T finance office in North Carolina.
A Rasmussen survey shows likely voters by 2:1 want Congress to make companies hire & train US grads & workers instead of importing more foreign workers.
The survey also shows this $/class-based view co-exists w/ much sympathy for illegal migrants. #S386http://bit.ly/2ZA6WIE
Some of Trump’s supporters say his comments are demoralizing. “I gotta say just put myself through one hell of a three year period,” said one Twitter user, titled “Presto.” “Going to school for IT, working a fulltime meat cutting job all cause of the hope Donald Trump gave me. This clip kinda hurt a bit. This hurt me worse than any hit piece. Give me a spot in the middle class.”
But Trump’s focus on a relatively few valedictorians is a much lesser threat to Americans than the bipartisan push by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, to pass his pending S.386 bill.
The bill would offer foreign OPT and H-1B workers a fast-track to a new status, dubbed “Early Adjustment,” once they can persuade — or pay — their employers to sponsor them for green cards. There is no limit on the number of OPT, CPT, or H-1Bs that can be awarded each year, nor any limit on the number of foreign graduates who can be sponsored for green cards by their employers. The lack of limits ensures that Lee’s bill would allow an unlimited flood of foreign college-graduates into the jobs needed by “Presto” and other Americans to get into or to stay in the middle-class.
Notably, Trump’s daughter, Ivanka Trump, has dismissed employers’ demands for more workers and insists they step up their training programs.
“I love what’s happening because it’s forcing employers to get creative,” Trump told Gary Shapiro, the longtime CEO of the Consumer Technology Association, during a January 7 interview at its annual meeting in Las Vegas. She added:
When I hear employers [who] would come to me and they’d say, ‘We need more skilled workers, we need more skilled workers,’ and then I’d read about them laying off segments of their workforce because they were investing in productivity, and not having spent the time — when they had known three years prior they’d be making that investment and upgrading those systems — not taking the time to take those workers and reskill and then retrain them into their job vacancies, well, I have very little sympathy for that.
Her push seems to be working.
Many U.S. companies are upgrading their training programs, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce recently showcased a company that uses software to identify and hire ordinary Americans — including truckers — who may have the intellectual skills to succeed in the software business.
Ivanka tells CEOs to train Americans before asking for more immigrants.
She stood up for unemployed, ex-cons, old ppl, blacks, disabled, & non-grads.
But she was diplomatic & pleasant, so many journos simply missed her decent & strong populist message. http://bit.ly/2T6BwbI
Before serving as President, Trump was an employer, and he has repeatedly shown his sympathy for fellow employers who complain about supposed labor shortages that would force them to compete for employees by offering higher wages. But he was elected on a pro-American promise — and he has raised Americans’ wages by repeatedly rejecting business demands for more, and yet more, imported workers.
Business leaders sometimes admit that an extra supply of workers helps them force down wages. “If you have ten people for every job, you’re not going to have a drive [up] in wages,” U.S. Chamber of Commerce CEO Tom Donohue told Breitbart News on January 9. But “if you have five people for every ten jobs, wages are going to go up.”