Tuesday, May 18, 2010

LEGALS CAN'T VOTE TO END SANCTUARY CITY WELFARE - But Illegals Are Voting For HISPANDERING POLITICIANS!

DO YOU EVER THINK THAT IT’S A BIT STRANGE THAT AMERICANS (LEGALS) ARE UNABLE TO VOTE FOR PAYING OUT BILLIONS IN WELFARE AND PRISON SYSTEMS FOR ILLEGALS, WHILE ILLEGALS ARE OUT THERE VOTING FOR THE HISPANDERING POLITICIANS EVERY ELECTION?!?!




SAN FRANCISCO IS A “SANCTUARY” CITY, WHICH ONLY MEANS THAT ILLEGALS DON’T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT SILLY GRINGO LAWS AND THAT THE VOTERS MUST FOOT THE BILL FOR THE COST OF ILLEGALS WITHOUT GETTING TO VOTE ON IT!

WHY IS IT THAT WAY?

BECAUSE MOST POLITICIANS AT ALL LEVELS ARE BOUGHT AND OWNED BY BUSINESS WHICH IS AT WAR WITH LEGALS OVER PAYING LIVING WAGES!

IN S.F. SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN HAS LONG ILLEGALLY HIRED ILLEGALS AT HER HOTEL. SHE’S LONG FLIPPED OFF HER CONSTITUENTS AND WORKED FOR OPEN BORDERS, AMNESTY AND NO E-VERIFY.

NANCY PELOSI ALSO HAS LONG ILLEGALLY HIRED ILLEGALS AT HER NAPA WINERY. SHE’S HEAVILY INVESTED IN OPERATIONS LIKE SUNKIST, WHICH DO NOT PAY LIVING WAGES TO PICKERS.

MAYOR GAVIN NEWSOM IS ANOTHER HISPANDERER EAGER TO BUY THE ILLEGALS’ ILLEGAL VOTES.

THE INVASION OF ILLEGALS COSTS S.F. ABOUT $300 MILLION A YEAR. IN LOS ANGELE COUNTY, ALSO “SANCTUARY”, ILLEGALS COLLECT $600 MILLION. IN SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ILLEGALS COLLECT MILLIONS IN WELFARE.

“CHEAP” MEXICAN LABOR IS STAGGERINGLY EXPENSIVE, BUT IF WE DIDN’T HAVE THE MEXICAN INVASION, EMPLOYERS OF ILLEGALS MIGHT HAVE TO PAY A LIVING WAGE.

WE CAN’T HAVE THAT!!! IT SMACKS OF SOCIALISM, OR EVEN COMMUNISM!


WE CAN’T HAVE ILLEGALS THINKING THE LAWS APPLY TO THEM!!! NOT THAT ANY OF THEM DO! PRISON COSTS FOR ILLEGAL MEXICANS COST THE STUPID GRINGOS OF MEXIFORNIA A BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR.

“Sheriff Michael Hennessey, who opposes the change, said Secure Communities effectively would gut San Francisco's sanctuary policy and likely result in more undocumented immigrants facing deportation.”

Supervisors take aim at feds over immigration enforcement
Five San Francisco supervisors have signed on to a nonbinding resolution that would urge local law enforcement officials to opt out of participating in the federal ''Secure Communities'' program, which is being rolled out across the United States and is slated to start in San Francisco next month.
As part of the program, the fingerprints of those booked are automatically sent to a state justice department database accessed by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency, known as ICE.
Under current policy in San Francisco, the sheriff's department only reports suspected felons whose immigration status cannot be readily determined to ICE for further review.

The Chronicle
Eric Mar: SF shouldn't play nice with ICE.
Under the new program, anyone booked in jailed, whether for a felony, misdemeanor or infraction, would be reported automatically; local law enforcement no longer would get to decide who to report.
Sheriff Michael Hennessey, who opposes the change, said Secure Communities effectively would gut San Francisco's sanctuary policy and likely result in more undocumented immigrants facing deportation.
''Thus, immigrants who are booked for extremely minor charges -- like selling ice cream bars without a permit -- would be torn from their families without due process and reported for deportation,'' said a press release issued by the office of Supervisor Eric Mar, chief sponsor of the resolution.
Federal immigration officials have said that due to staffing constraints, the target of Secure Communities continues to be felons and repeat offenders.
Co-sponsoring Mar's resolution, which will be introduced formally at Tuesday's board meeting, are Supervisors John Avalos, David Campos, Chris Daly and Sophie Maxwell. Backers of the legislation have planned a 9 a.m. press conference on Tuesday on the steps of City Hall. Don't expect Mayor Gavin Newsom to show up. He has said he is OK with the federal program on the grounds that local sanctuary programs never were meant to protect criminal behavior.


Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/cityinsider/detail?entry_id=63776#ixzz0oHMvjwcr

MEXICO EXPORTS THEIR POOR

MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com

THE RICHEST MAN IN THE WORLD IS NO LONGER LA RAZA CONTRIBUTOR BILL GATES! IT IS MEXICAN BILLIONAIRE CARLOS SLIM.
THERE ARE MORE BILLIONAIRES IN MEXICO, NOT EVEN INCLUDING THE NARCO DRUG LORDS, THAN IN SAUDI ARABIA OR SWITZERLAND.
HOW’D THAT HAPPEN? WE’VE TAKEN 38 MILLION OF MEXICO’S POOR, ILLITERATE, CRIMINAL AND FREQUENTLY PREGNANT AND HANDED THEM THE AMERICAN DREAM. A DREAM STOLEN FROM US BY BANKSTERS, WALL ST., AND THE POLITICIANS THEY OWN!

EXPORTING POVERTY... we take MEXICO'S 38 million poor, illiterate, criminal and frequently pregnant

........ where can we send AMERICA'S poor?

The Mexican Invasion................................................

Mexico prefers to export its poor, not uplift them

March 30, 2006 edition

http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0330/p09s02-coop.html

Mexico prefers to export its poor, not uplift them
At this week's summit, failed reforms under Fox should be the issue, not US actions.

By George W. Grayson WILLIAMSBURG, VA.

At the parleys this week with his US and Canadian counterparts in Canc├║n, Mexican President Vicente Fox will press for more opportunities for his countrymen north of the Rio Grande. Specifically, he will argue for additional visas for Mexicans to enter the United States and Canada, the expansion of guest-worker schemes, and the "regularization" of illegal immigrants who reside throughout the continent. In a recent interview with CNN, the Mexican chief executive excoriated as "undemocratic" the extension of a wall on the US-Mexico border and called for the "orderly, safe, and legal" northbound flow of Mexicans, many of whom come from his home state of Guanajuato. Mexican legislators share Mr. Fox's goals. Silvia Hern├índez Enriquez, head of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations for North America, recently emphasized that the solution to the "structural phenomenon" of unlawful migration lies not with "walls or militarization" but with "understanding, cooperation, and joint responsibility." Such rhetoric would be more convincing if Mexican officials were making a good faith effort to uplift the 50 percent of their 106 million people who live in poverty. To his credit, Fox's "Opportunities" initiative has improved slightly the plight of the poorest of the poor. Still, neither he nor Mexico's lawmakers have advanced measures that would spur sustained growth, improve the quality of the workforce, curb unemployment, and obviate the flight of Mexicans abroad. Indeed, Mexico's leaders have turned hypocrisy from an art form into an exact science as they shirk their obligations to fellow citizens, while decrying efforts by the US senators and representatives to crack down on illegal immigration at the border and the workplace. What are some examples of this failure of responsibility? • When oil revenues are excluded, Mexico raises the equivalent of only 9 percent of its gross domestic product in taxes - a figure roughly equivalent to that of Haiti and far below the level of major Latin American nations. Not only is Mexico's collection rate ridiculously low, its fiscal regime is riddled with loopholes and exemptions, giving rise to widespread evasion. Congress has rebuffed efforts to reform the system. Insufficient revenues mean that Mexico spends relatively little on two key elements of social mobility: Education commands just 5.3 percent of its GDP and healthcare only 6.10 percent, according to the World Bank's last comparative study. • A venal, "come-back-tomorrow" bureaucracy explains the 58 days it takes to open a business in Mexico compared with three days in Canada, five days in the US, nine days in Jamaica, and 27 days in Chile. Mexico's private sector estimates that 34 percent of the firms in the country made "extra official" payments to functionaries and legislators in 2004. These bribes totaled $11.2 billion and equaled 12 percent of GDP. • Transparency International, a nongovernmental organization, placed Mexico in a tie with Ghana, Panama, Peru, and Turkey for 65th among 158 countries surveyed for corruption. • Economic competition is constrained by the presence of inefficient, overstaffed state oil and electricity monopolies, as well as a small number of private corporations - closely linked to government big shots - that control telecommunications, television, food processing, transportation, construction, and cement. Politicians who talk about, much less propose, trust-busting measures are as rare as a snowfall in the Sonoran Desert. Geography, self-interests, and humanitarian concerns require North America's neighbors to cooperate on myriad issues, not the least of which is immigration. However, Mexico's power brokers have failed to make the difficult decisions necessary to use their nation's bountiful wealth to benefit the masses. Washington and Ottawa have every right to insist that Mexico's pampered elite act responsibly, rather than expecting US and Canadian taxpayers to shoulder burdens Mexico should assume.

WHY ILLEGALS HATE ARIZONA'S LAW - Which Only Mirrors UNENFORCED EXISTING FED LAWS...

AN AMERICAN SEES & SPEAKS


The main reason Illegals and Libgressives hate Arizona law is..... (They are afraid it will be effective.)
________________________________________
Date: 2010-05-18, 1:38AM PDT
Reply To This Post
________________________________________

They are not objecting to the Arizona law because it seems racist, (they are foul racists themselves, the organization called "La Raza" means "The Race.") They object because it will be effective, it will work.

The single strongest reason the Illegal Alien lobby is trying to break and weaken support for the new Arizona law and efforts to assist in enforcing our Federal laws by adopting the same rules the Federals use, and now state authorties can participate where the Federal Government has utterly failed in enforcing the border integrity and internal immigration control.

They don't like the Arizona law because they fear it will be very effective... They prefer the immigration laws to be virtually ignored as the Federals do except for a few photo ops for publicity. . . . Yes, they like our laws to be unenforced... But now that Arizona can't take it anymore with the illegals destroying all of the state with criminal gangs, no jobs left, English not spoken, disease, drunk driving and crashing, and public costs bankrupting the taxpayers and business going under due to citizens leaving the state in droves being replaced by ignorant immigrants with more costs than contributions to offer..

So, if the law is enforced and now effective, they hate the law, because they want to stay and suck off the state full of productive citizens who are easy marks for them.

Are We Mexico's Welfare, Birthing, Prison and Jobs System? OBAMA THINKS SO!

We are MEXICO’S WELFARE, BIRTHING, PRISON, AND JOBS SYSTEM!

THE FASTEST GROWING POLITICAL PARTY IN AMERICAN, and yes they are voting! is LA RAZA! “THE RACE”, THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of AMERICA for MEXICAN SUPREMACY.
LA RAZA IS FUNDED BY MOST OF THE FORTUNE 500, YOUR TAX DOLLARS AND NARCOMEX!
*

Sonora, Mexico Is Angry? (USA is LoL!)

MEXICO IS ANGRY !

Arizona Governor Jan Brewer deserves to be a candidate for USA President.

The shoe is on the other foot and the Mexicans from the State of Sonora, Mexico do not like it.

Can you believe the audacity of Mexico's politicans and people?

The State of Sonora is angry at the influx of Mexicans into Mexico. Nine state legislators from the Mexican State of Sonora traveled to
Tucson to complain about Arizona's new employer crackdown on illegal's from Mexico. It seems that many Mexican illegal's are returning to
their hometowns and the officials in the Sonora state government are ticked off.

The nine state legislators from Sonora were in Tucson on Tuesday to state that Arizona 's new Employer Sanctions Law will have a
devastating effect on the Mexican state. At a news conference, the legislators said that Sonora, - Arizona's southern neighbor, - made up of mostly small towns, - cannot handle the demand for housing, jobs and schools that it will face as Mexican workers return to their hometowns from the USA without jobs or money.

The Arizona law, which took effect Jan. 1, punishes Arizona employers who knowingly hire individuals without valid legal documents to work in the United States. Penalties include suspension of, or loss of, their business license.

The Mexican legislators are angry because their own citizens are returning to their hometowns, placing a burden on THEIR state government. 'How can Arizona pass a law like this?' asked Mexican Rep Leticia Amparano-Gamez, who represents Nogale . 'There is not one person living in Sonora who does not have a friend or relative working in Arizona ,' she said, speaking in Spanish. 'Mexico is not prepared for this, for the tremendous problems it will face as more and more Mexicans working in Arizona and who were sending money to their families return to their home-towns in Sonora without jobs,' she said. 'We are one family, socially and economically,' she said of the people of Sonora and Arizona.

Wrong!

The United States is a sovereign nation, not a subsidiary of Mexico, and its taxpayers are not responsible for the welfare of Mexico's citizens. It's time for the Mexican government, and its citizens, to stop feeding parasitically off the United States and to start taking care of its/their own needs. Too bad that other states within the USA don't pass a law just like that passed by Arizona.

Maybe that's the answer, since our own Congress will do nothing!

New Immigration Laws: Read to the bottom or you will miss the message...

1. There will be no special bilingual programs in the schools.
* * * * * * * *
2. All ballots will be in this nation's language.
* * * * * * * *
3.. All government business will be conducted in our language.
* * * * * * * *
4. Non-residents will NOT have the right to vote no matter how long they are here.
* * * * * * * *
5. Non-citizens will NEVER be able to hold political office
* * * * * * * *
6 Foreigners will not be a burden to the taxpayers. No welfare, no food stamps, no health care, or other government assistance programs.
Any burden will be deported.
* * * * * * * *
7. Foreigners can invest in this country, but it must be an amount at least equal to 40,000 times the daily minimum wage.
* * * * * * * *
8. If foreigners come here and buy land... options will be restricted. Certain parcels including waterfront property are reserved for citizens
naturally born into this country.
* * * * * * * *
9. Foreigners may have no protests; no demonstrations, no waving of a foreign flag, no political organizing, no bad-mouthing our president or
his policies. These will lead to deportation.
* * * * * * * *
10. If you do come to this country illegally, you will be actively hunted &, when caught, sent to jail until your deportation can be arranged. All
assets will be taken from you.
* * * * * * * * *
Too strict ? The above laws are current immigration laws of MEXICO !

These sound fine to me. NOW, how can we get these laws to be America 's Immigration Laws?