THE DOCTRINE OF THE N.A.F.T.A. GLOBALIST DEMOCRATS IS TO SERVE THE BILLIONAIRE CLASS WITH ENDLESS WAVES OF INVADING 'CHEAP' LABOR SUBSIDIZED WITH WELFARE FUNDED BY TAXES ON MIDDLE AMERICA.
In many speeches, Mayorkas says he is building a mass migration system to deliver workers to wealthy employers and investors and “equity” to poor foreigners. The nation’s border laws are subordinate to elites’ opinion about “the values of our country,” Mayorkas claims.
WHY ARE ALL BILLIONAIRES DEMOCRATS FOR OPEN BORDERS?
BIDEN'S PROMISED SURRENDER OF OUR BORDERS IS ALL ABOUT KEEPING WAGES DEPRESSED. IT IS MERELY A CONTINUATION OF THE 'CHEAP' LABOR POLICIES OF CLINTON, OBOMB AND NAFTA JOE WHO WORKED WITH CLINTON TO PERPETRATE NAFTA!
End Of The Middle Class: Americans Are Suffering As Prices Rising On Thousands Of Different Products
“The Democrats had abandoned their working-class base to chase what they pretended was a racial group when what they were actually chasing was the momentum of unlimited migration”.
DANIEL GREENFIELD
Liberalism is a Cancer on America. How Did We Get to This Point?
Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing on Friday. (Photo by Alexei Druzhinin / Sputnik / AFP via Getty Images)
Moscow (CNSNews.com) – Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping presented a common front against the United States during their summit in Beijing just hours before the Winter Olympics opening ceremony.
Following a three-hour long meeting, the two leaders published a lengthy joint statement, pledging to stand together to oppose NATO expansion, the AUKUS nuclear submarine partnership, potential U.S. deployment of intermediate range missiles in either Europe or Asia, and “interference by outside forces in the internal affairs of sovereign countries under any pretext.”
Russia also reaffirmed “its support for the one China principle, confirms that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China, and opposes any forms of independence of Taiwan.”
Taiwan’s foreign ministry called the declaration an “insult to the peaceful spirit embodied by the Olympic rings.”
The Putin-Xi statement also declared that cooperation between the two countries had surpassed the level of traditional alliances. “Friendship between the two states has no limits, there are no forbidden areas for cooperation,” it said.
Vasily Kashin, a professor at the Moscow-based National Research University Higher School of Economics, said the statement showed that Russia and China were becoming increasingly aligned on sensitive geopolitical issues.
“If earlier China could remain aloof from some European subjects, and Russia from some Asian ones, now they will begin to get closer and talk about joint actions,” he told the Gazeta.ru news website.
Lü Xiang, a research fellow at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the CCP paper Global Times that it marked the first time that the two governments have expressed a common position in writing on all “the major issues and strategic questions.”
Lü predicted that the “unprecedented” bilateral cooperation would have broader geopolitical significance since they are the only countries powerful enough to oppose Washington.
“The solidarity between China and Russia gives a new definition to the world order, as they share common knowledge about where the major threats to global stability come from.”
Putin and Xi also signed 16 agreements in areas ranging from space cooperation to cultural exchange. The deals included a 25-year contract for Russian gas conglomerate Gazprom to supply China with an additional 10 billion cubic meters of gas annually through a new route in the Russian Far East, and a 10-year agreement for Russian oil giant Rosneft to deliver 100 millions tons of oil annually to China through Kazakhstan.
The two countries are also currently in an advanced stage of negotiations for the Power of Siberia-2 pipeline, which would deliver up to 50 bcm of Russian gas to China per year through Mongolia.
Putin’s visit to China comes at a sensitive time for Russia. Over the past several months, the U.S. and its allies have accused Moscow of preparing to invade neighboring Ukraine, pointing to a Russian military buildup of more than 100,000 troops near the Ukrainian border.
Last week, the Biden administration claimed that Russia was plotting a false flag attack against pro-Russian rebels in eastern Ukraine so that it could have a pretext for declaring war. So far, however, the administration has made no evidence public.
Although Russia has repeatedly insisted that it has no intention of invading Ukraine, it has also warned of a “military-technical” response if the West does not provide it with legally binding security guarantees against further NATO expansion or deployment of the alliance’s military infrastructure near Russia’s borders.
A series of US-Russian security talks last month failed to result in a diplomatic breakthrough.
In the meanwhile, however, Moscow has sought to close flanks with Beijing. Russia’s Ambassador to China Andrey Denisov told the South China Morning Post last month that Russia was constantly updating China on how its security talks with the U.S. were progressing.
For its part, Washington has urged Beijing to use its influence with Moscow to help defuse tensions in Europe. On Friday, Daniel Kritenbrink, assistant secretary of State in the Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs, told reporters the U.S. wanted China to “encourage Russia to pursue diplomacy and de-escalation in Ukraine.”
“That is what the world expects from responsible powers,” he said. “If Russia further invades Ukraine and China looks the other way, it suggests that China is willing to tolerate, or tacitly support Russia's efforts to coerce Ukraine, even when they embarrass Beijing, harm European security, and risk global peace and economic stability.”
HOW MANY OF THESE PIGS ARE GAMER LAWYERS?
“Protect and enrich.” This is a perfect encapsulation of the Clinton (LAWYERS-2) Foundation and the (LAWYERS-2) Obama book and television deals. Then there is the Biden (LAWYERS-3) family corruption, followed closely behind by similar abuses of power and office by the (LAWYER) Warren and Sanders families, as Peter Schweizer described in his recent book “Profiles in Corruption.” These names just scratch the surface of government corruption (YOU CAN ADD LAWYER KAMALA HARRIS AND LAWYER CHUCK SCHUMER TO THE PATHEION OF DEMOCRAT BRIBES SUCKING CORRUPT LAWYER POLITICIANS!).
BRIAN C JOONDEPH
Schweizer: ‘It’s Going to Be Business as Usual’ for Hunter’s Dealings
Joe Biden, the corrupt, unaccomplished 47-year career politician, with a reputation of having been a proud segregationist, an unabashed plagiarist and liar, a resolute tale-teller, and a serial flip-flopper, is pretending to head up a radical social-democratic ticket for President of the United States that includes as his running mate the ambitious, disagreeable junior senator from California: Kamala Harris.
I’d be inclined to disagree with Don except for one thing: Biden has proven to be a very adept criminal mastermind. For decades, he has funneled millions of dollars to his children and siblings and, especially, to his debauched, deviant son, Hunter. ANDREA WIDBURG
There it is. That's the issue. To begin, you have the corrupt family Biden. They've been scamming us and our system well for almost fifty years. The man is supposedly worth over 250 million dollars. How is this possible on his salary? It's not. So where did his wealth come from? Not from being a brilliant businessman. DAVID PRENTICE
The book is a devastating chronicle of political corruption. From Ukraine to Mexico to China, Hunter Biden's private correspondence shows how he and his family leveraged his father's position to win high-paying, low-work gigs with shady foreign actors—and how Joe's official actions at times directly benefited his family's financial backers.
ALANA GOODMAN
The fact that Hunter's market value was derived from hisfather's position seemed to be a source of resentment forthe younger Biden, even as he continued to cash in on thename. Hunter complained in texts to his daughter that hehad financially supported the Biden clan for three decadesand that "pop" takes a cut of "half [my] salary." Financiarecords and correspondence reported on by Devineindicate that money from Hunter's business accounts wasused to cover Joe's AT&T bill and home maintenanceexpenses and that a portion of at least one major Chinadeal was earmarked for the elder Biden.ALANA GOODMAN
The book, titled Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite., lays out how Hunter Biden and his business partners, in addition to his numerous Rosemont-branded entities and ventures, was deeply involved with an entity called the Burnham Financial Group.
In short, Hunter Biden was not cutting business deals in Japan or Great Britain, where disclosure rules and corporate governance might require greater scrutiny. These were deals in the truly dark corners of the world.
KATRINA WONG
Why is the New York Times suing for access to State Department correspondence on Hunter Biden and Romania?
In its lawsuit, filed in federal court in Manhattan, the NYT states that it had on two separate occasions placed requests under the Freedom of Information Act.
The State Department had responded that the requested records would be provided only after April 15, 2023. The law requires all federal agencies to respond to a FOIA request within 20 business days unless there are "unusual circumstances."
The NYT's suit is obviously an effort to expedite the State Department's timeline for the FOIA disclosures.
To be precise, the NYT had requested access to emails, memos, and other records from 2015 to 2019 from U.S. embassy officials in Bucharest, including former U.S. ambassador to Romania Hans Klemm, mentioning a number of individuals such as Hunter Biden and his former business associate, Tony Bobulinski.
Politico reports that the goal behind the exercise was to investigate if embassy officials did any special favors on behalf of private businesses such as that of Hunter Biden.
1. The possible improper use of federal government resources to assist and advance private business interests with connections to United States government officials.
2. The possible evasion of the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) by those private business interests.
3. The non-enforcement of FARA by the federal government in relation to those private business interests.
This would raise questions about possible conflicts of interest and corruption.
In a statement to Politico, a New York Times spokesperson said, "As a routine part of their reporting, NYT journalists regularly seek potentially newsworthy information from a variety of sources, including from the U.S. government through FOIA requests."
"We're hopeful the government will promptly release any relevant documents, and as always we are prepared to pursue our request through a lawsuit if necessary. Just as we do on any line of reporting, we will assess the newsworthiness of the material once we receive it," the spokesperson added.
The State Department has declined to comment on the situation.
Last year, the U.K. Daily Mail reported that an email from Hunter's laptop shows that Hunter was hired by Romanian real estate tycoon Gabriel Popoviciu to overturn his bribery conviction through a massive propaganda campaign with help from V.P. Joe's government connections and former FBI director Louis Freeh. Despite the efforts, Popoviciu was convicted of bribery.
Emails also showed that Freeh "donated" $100,000 to a trust for two of President Biden's grandchildren as he sought to pursue "some very good and profitable matters" with him.
Perhaps this is what the NYT is looking into?
Back in October 2020, less than a month prior to Election Day, the New York Post had reported about Hunter Biden's misplaced laptop that contained emails that proved that Hunter Biden had introduced his father, who was vice president, to a top executive from Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company. This contradicts Joe Biden's claim that he's "never spoken to my son" about his overseas business dealings.
Burisma was paying Hunter around $1 million a year when Biden was vice president; the amount was cut in half two months after Biden left office.
This was a clear case of nepotism, conflict of interest, and corruption.
Mainstream media outlets scoffed at a New York Post's story, while Facebook and Twitter prevented the stories from circulating.
The Media Research Center study discovered that one of every six Biden voters (17%) said he would not have voted for Biden if he had known the facts about various news stories the mainstream news media refused to cover and that social media chose to block.
The question remains: why would the NYT, who have been willing propagandists for the Democrats, suddenly develop the urge to pursue to truth and sue a Democrat State Department?
Back in 2019, the NYT's Kenneth Vogel was among the rare few in the mainstream media that covered the Hunter story and even described Hunter as both a "significant liability" for Biden. Throughout the 2020 presidential campaign, the Biden team regularly expressed anger at the Times over Vogel's coverage of Hunter Biden, while Democrats viciously attacked him on all forums possible.
Perhaps Vogel is merely doing his job in pursuing the story or maybe he is taking on the Bidens? Perhaps Vogel is taking on the Bidens as a vendetta for the abuse he previously received?
It does give the NYT an occasion to feign fairness and claim that it was tough on Biden.
Another possible explanation is that the Washington Media-Democrat complex are tired of Biden's incompetence. They think Biden's abominable record of misgovernance will cause them to lose rather emphatically to the Republicans during the midterms in November.
However, what the Democrats fear most is that Biden may lose in a landslide to Donald Trump in 2024. Polls show Biden losing support among all traditional Democrat voter groups.
Perhaps the NYT is being used as a proxy in this struggle. It has certainly placed Biden in a Catch-22.
If Biden's State Department were to reveal communication records that prove a clear case of conflict of interest and corruption, Joe certainly looks bad and could be forced out of office. Their attempt to stall the handover of information makes them appear guilty, as if they have something to conceal. They could be accused of obstructing the path of the news media.
It will be interesting to see if the NYT will actually publish a story that reveals Hunter Biden's shady web of international business relationships cultivated when his father was vice president.
The story perhaps is being used as leverage for the Democrats to compel Biden not to run in 2024 and keep him under control while he occupies the White House.
It is unlikely they would want him out before 2024 since that would make Kamala Harris president, and even the Democrats know that is worse than bumbling old Biden.
In the coming weeks, if CNN, MSNBC, and other propaganda outfits amplify this NYT vs. Biden State Department story, we can be sure that powers that be in Washington want Biden out of the way.
FUK CHINA!!!
ALONG WITH THEIR RENT
BOY JOE 'BRIBES' BIDEN!
'
Joe Biden, in his days in the Senate, was very partial to China, as he voted against revoking China’s most-favored nation status and in 2007 opposed the idea of applying any tariffs on China despite their obvious unfair trade practices. However, it was as Vice President that he became wholly enamored with the country and its leadership. STEVE McCANN
Schweizer Hits Another Home Run on Biden-China Corruption
Peter Schweizer is an Oxford graduate, former Hoover Institution Fellow, and cofounder and president of the Government Accountability Institute of Tallahassee, Florida. He is a widely read and interviewed investigative journalist and has authored popular and well received books on political corruption: Clinton Cash, Extortion, Throw Them All Out, and Architects of Ruin.
The book is the usual fare from Schweizer — based on well documented and researched financial records that support assertions of the author. In this book, the focus is corruption in high places that results from cozy entanglements with China. This book focuses on the Chinese communist connections for good reasons: China has set about a long-term effort to compromise the political, business, cultural, academic, and scientific elements of America as a set up for creating global Chinese hegemonic control and dominance. The Chinese have accomplished a great deal in the decades since the ill begotten Kissinger Nixon opening to China in 1972, followed by the Clinton-Bush acquiescence to admission of China into the World Trade Association that was finalized with favored status in 2001.
Through these decades, the wolf, bear, coyote China has gradually expanded its dominance of world trade and economics by stealing intellectual property, using bribes and influence-purchasing, and standard espionage and propaganda methods.
The point of Red-Handed is exposing the participation of persons of influence in the West who have been compromised by Chinese efforts to buy influence and power — on a scale not previously seen.
Mr. Schweizer had a big scandal to investigate but a good team of researchers to help him organize the exposé — an exposé that warns of short-term and long-term danger for the survival of Western nations and the ascendancy of a savage and murderous Chinese communist tyrannical autocracy stained by a history of ethnic, religious, and domestic pogroms, persecutions, and genocide of immense and barbaric proportions that are numerous and stunning, extending forward from the millions of deaths of Mao's Cultural Revolution and the Great Leap Forward that resulted in the deaths of millions of Chinese from starvation and systematic political purges to modern-day activities that subjugate Tibet, Hong Kong, the domestic religious minorities while pursuing external influence and dominance.
Now under new leadership, China continues to commit atrocities domestically and expand its influence in foreign political and economic matters, which raises the question — how do the compromised oligarchs of the West who are ensnared in the Chinese web of influence sleep at night or excuse their complicity? Is money enough to justify complicity with barbaric malevolence? When does the complicity become the role of accessory to crimes ranging all the way to treason?
With the foregoing in mind, the best this review can do is identify and briefly describe and introduce evidence of the treasonous or traitorous American perps who have sold their positions, stature, and influence to the Chinese political peddlers. Mr. Schweizer's systematic reviews and investigative revelations include the following (in order of the chapters) — and after every short summary comes my choice of a few words to describe the corruption and treason:
An introduction featuring the ROPE, alluding to the apocryphal commie saying that the capitalists will sell the communists the rope they can use to hang the capitalists. This chapter is a warning and an exposition of how brutal and cruel socialist systems can infiltrate and influence — ultimately devour civil society from the inside. How American core concepts can be compromised with cheap talk and promises — brutality can dominate civility, and culture can be eviscerated by aggressive activist advocacy of Marxist nonsense. The key, though, is the complicity of American citizens. (vice, infidelity and treachery)
A chapter on the evil and corrupt Biden family and its selling out to worldwide opportunities for corruption, but particularly Chinese influence-peddling. (decadence and depravity)
A wearying and maddening description of the corruption and pandering, grifting, and shilling by the denizens of capitol hill — Feinstein and family, Swallwell, Pelosi and family, McConnell and Chou, former congress people like Senators Boehner, Lott, Breaux, Baucus, and of course a long list of congressmen, also from both sides of the aisle — all selling their souls and positions of trust. (degradation and degeneration)
The culture of power and money lust of the American Corporate Community and its major players — BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, Bridgewater, Google, Microsoft, Intel, Twitter, and Musk — and, of course, Gates — that draws them to a plutocracy that would never hesitate to betray America for a financial advantage or an opportunity to be a part of a global powerhouse oligarchy complicit with and colluding with malefactor government tyrannies. (avarice, cupidity, and rapaciousness)
The special place of diplomats and the chattering class as the lubricant for the social and societal resets best exemplified by pretentious poseurs like Kissinger, with so many others that the author exposes as self-promoting narcissists who achieve a grandeur that they consider to be well deserved, a grandeur usually as part of the dominant oligarchy — the list of exposed poseurs by the author is impressive because they saturate public life. (egoist and megalomaniac)
A special chapter set aside for the Bush and Trudeau families, who have been served by their associations with China at the expense of their home countries. (betrayers and quislings)
Academia, for various reasons, provides excellent examples of the perfidy of betrayal, but of course academics consider themselves beyond such pedestrian concepts as loyalty, fealty, family, tradition, constitutional government, since they are pursuing the greater good...and their greater good. They also identify themselves as "experts," essential to the survival of the world and progress of mankind, although many have no marketable or real-world valuable skills. (overweening, smug, and vainglorious)
Mr. Schweizer saves the last chapter for a grand summary and proposal to reverse the corruption he's put on display that endangers the survival of America. The key phrase he uses is "Elite Capture," and the elites are vulnerable. He warns that republics are easy prey for autocrat countries' intel and military influence-peddling and sabotage.
Clean up the lobbying and influence-peddling in D.C., and enforce foreign agent registration.
No lobbying and influence-peddling by foreign intel and military entities.
Clean up research and academics from influence-peddling and ban joint research.
Ban foreign military and intel company listings on the stock exchanges.
Engagement with foreign governments is a dangerous business. Stop the looseness.
Transparency and all conflicts declared on all "experts" proposed by media, government, or academia.
Most of all, a return to the constitutional concepts of limited government and strict equality under the law, equal administration of the laws, no favorites or exceptions.
Mr. Schweizer has received deserved praise for this excellent book, which is a product of extraordinary research. I hope my introduction results in your decision to read it. Three hundred fifty-two pages of your time.
