Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Report: US States' Financial Woes Eroding Services - ABC News - CALIFORNIA BANKRUPTED FROM WELFARE TO ILLEGAL MEXICANS

Report: US States' Financial Woes Eroding Services - ABC News





CA UNDER MEX OCCUPATION OPERATES $16 BILLION IN DEFICITS, WHILE PUTTING OUT $20 BILLION IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS. THESE ARE STATE COSTS. ADD WHAT THE COUNTIES ARE FORCED TO PAY OUT AND THEN THE AMOUNT PRIVATE HOSPITALS MUST PAY FOR MEXICO’S “FREE” MEDICAL ($1.3 BILLION YEARLY!).

WILL MEXICO BANKRUPT AMERICA? OR JUST TAKE ALL OUR JOBS?

BOK: Mexifornia: SHATTERING OF AN AMERICAN DREAM (illegals call it their DREAM ACT)




*

LOS ANGELES ANCHOR BABY WELFARE PROGRAM:


THESE FIGURES ON WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY ARE DATED. IT NOT EXCEEDS $600 MILLION PER YEAR!!! (source: Los Angeles County & JUDICIAL WATCH)


California spending annually $22 billion to support illegals
Going To the Top!

By Susan Tully


I've been at the immigration reform and enforcement table for about 20 years. I've worked with activists during all those years. But last week, in Los Angeles, I had a first-time-ever experience at an activist brain storming session.

Gathered for an update on Stop AB131, the petition drive to gather signatures to force a ballot initiative as to whether the California taxpayers should fund college grants to illegal aliens, I asked the top activist leaders from Southern California how the signature drive was going.

They started updating me with the positive response from California residents who signed the petitions, but then admitted about 500,000 more signatures were still needed. When I said there was only a little more than three weeks to go to meet the January 5th deadline, suddenly their faces dropped at once, and the room went completely silent.

It was easy to read on each of their faces; the task was nearly impossible! Without big money to pay signature gatherers or a tsunami of petitions flooding in, the taxpayers of California will be forced to give grant money to illegal aliens for college, on top of the $22 billion they are spending annually in California to support the illegal alien population.

While all of our minds were racing and searching for suggestions as to how to accomplish this daunting task of gathering signatures, Lupe Moreno, long time Hispanic leader from Santa Ana, said "Can we have a prayer?" Everyone agreed to pray.

As the prayer went around the table, people expressed their sorrow for the lack of leadership in the State of California and in the nation to protect the interest of American citizens, and asked for divine guidance in helping them understand the harm their policies are inflicting on millions of innocent people in the state. In all the years I have worked on this issue, I had not witnessed the sort of sincere emotion that was expressed in that room.

(THE FASTEST GROWING POLITICAL PARTY IN AMERICA IS THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA! AND WE ARE FORCED TO FUND IT!)

You see, the politicians in California are happy to give money the state doesn't have to illegal aliens to attend college, while they cut the budgets and slash programs for public safety, right and left. The American citizen's interests and safety are simply collateral damage for seeking and appealing to the illegal alien lobby.

These activists in California have already learned what the rest of the nation is about to learn. We the people. . . are the only ones looking out for the best interest of American citizens. With few exceptions, we have no national leadership on the issue of stopping the illegal migration flow into our nation.

American citizenship or the benefits thereof have become a commodity for politicians to pander and barter away. They will grant de facto citizenship through sanctuary policies, in-state tuition, non-compliance with Secure Communities, grants for college, etc., etc., etc. President Obama and most the Republican presidential hopefuls are peddling various versions of amnesty proposals if they are elected next year.

What do these politicians want in return? They are hoping to leverage enough votes in key states to put them over the top in 2012, no matter what it costs the American people. This is futures betting: The politicians are gambling the nation's future in hopes of winning the next election.

So while the state can't afford to pay its bills or provide decent services to citizens, these California activists watch their elected leaders lavish still more benefits for people who don't have a legal right to be in the country. And while their child might have to pay out-of-state tuition to go to college in another state, thousands of illegal aliens are going to college at in-state tuition rates in California that they are subsidizing.

In addition they know that millions of other illegal alien parents are receiving food stamps, Medicaid, housing assistance and dozens of other state and local benefits for their American-born children, while they have to decide which bills will be paid this month and which will have to wait.

It's not hard to understand why the activist of California need all the help they can get. Please go to www.stopAB131.com and lend a hand to our friends and family and the people of California to do what needs to be done for the good of our children first.
*
LA RAZA DEMS BUILD THE "DREAM ACT" LIFE FOR LA RAZA OFF THE AMERICANS BACK! NOT ONE AMERICAN VOTED FOR ONE DREAM ACT HANDOUT!

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2012/01/mexifornia-la-raza-supremacy-legals.html



THE OBAMA CATCH, RELEASE AND REGISTER (ILLEGALS) TO VOTE PROGRAM:

ARTICLE

8 Out of 10 Illegals Apprehended in 2010 Never Prosecuted
http://www.alipac.us/article-6162-thread-1-0.html


MEXICO BUILDS THE LA RAZA “THE RACE” WELFARE STATE IN OUR BORDERS

Lou Dobbs Tonight Monday, February 11, 2008

In California, League of United Latin American Citizens has adopted a resolution to declare "California Del Norte" a sanctuary zone for immigrants. The declaration urges the Mexican government to invoke its rights under the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo "to seek third-nation neutral arbitration of ....disputes concerning immigration laws and their enforcement." We’ll have the story. Last year, Prince William County, Virginia passed an initiative to allow local police to check the immigration status of anyone in police custody. The county recently held its first immigration training session for local police officers. We’ll have a look inside the training. Mexican President Felipe Calderon is in New York today on the first leg his five-day tour across America to meddle in immigration issues in the United States. This is his first visit to the U.S. since he became President in 2006, but he will not meet with President Bush or any of the presidential candidates, who he has accused of spewing anti-immigrant rhetoric (READ UP ON WHAT MEXICO DOES TO IMMIGRANTS AND ILLEGALS IN THEIR OWN COUNTRY. IT WOULD HAVE MADE THE NAZIS JEALOUS – NEVER UNDERESTIMATE MEXICO’S STAGGERING HYPOCRISY!) .

Lou Dobbs Tonight

Tuesday, September 4, 2007 In his first state of the union speech since becoming president of Mexico, Felipe Calderon criticized the U.S. government and its efforts to shut down illegal immigration. During the speech Calderon proclaimed that “Mexico does not end at its borders” and that “where there is a Mexican, there is a Mexico.” Tune in for a full report on Calderon’s vigorous fight to protect Mexican interests in the United States—even when they’re built on illegal immigration. CALDERON, VIA HIS LA RAZA OCCUPATION HEADQUARTERS IN MORE THAN 50 MEXICAN CONSULATES, HAS SUE AMERICAN STATES TO KEEP THE BORDERS OPEN, DEMANDED EXPANDED HEALTHCARE, AND HAS SAID HELL NO!!! TO HAVING MEXICAN CRIMINALS EXPORTED BACK TO NARCOMEX SO THAT COUNTRY PAYS THEIR OWN PRISON COSTS!

SINCE THE BELOW WAS PUBLISHED, LA RAZA SUPREMACIST BARACK OBAMA WAS ELECTED WITH A PLATFORM OF OPEN BORDERS, NO E-VERIFY, NO LEGAL NEED APPLY, CATCH AND THEN RELEASE MEX CRIMINALS, OPEN BORDERS FOR MEX TRUCKERS HAULING DRUGS AND ILLEGALS, AND AMNESTY or at least CONTINUED NON-ENFORCEMENT.

WIKILEAKS HAS PUBLISHED OBAMA’S LA RAZA AGENDA OF OPEN BORDERS. IT’S ALL BOUT KEEPING WAGES DEPRESSED.

 Lou Dobbs' commentary appears weekly on CNN.com.

*

NEW YORK (CNN) -- Mexican President Felipe Calderon Sunday demanded the United States surrender its sovereignty, abandon the rule of law and accede to Mexico's inherent supremacy.

Lou Dobbs says Mexican President Felipe Calderon is showing "blatant hypocrisy" on immigration.

In his state of the union address to the Mexican nation, Calderon established his imperialistic imperatives: "I have said that Mexico does not stop at its border, that wherever there is a Mexican, there is Mexico. And, for this reason, the government action on behalf of our countrymen is guided by principles, for the defense and protection of their rights." ILLEGALS HAVE MORE “RIGHTS” OR LET’S CALL IT LA RAZA SUPREMACY IN OUR BORDERS THAN THEY DO IN THEIR OWN! THAT’S WHY MEXICO’S BIGGEST EXPORTS NEXT TO DRUGS, ARE CRIMINALS, THE POOR, AND PREGNANT WOMEN!

Calderon protested the U.S. government's increased raids on illegal employers of illegal alien employees and work site enforcement. In what is little more than a faint nod to the Bush administration's responsibility to enforce U.S. immigration law, the Department of Homeland Security had planned to send out notices to employers from the Social Security Administration informing them of non-matching records between an employee's name and Social Security number. These employers would then be forced to resolve any discrepancy within 90 days or be required to dismiss the employee or face up to $10,000 in fines for knowingly hiring illegal immigrants.

But then, ethnocentric advocacy groups and some labor unions, trying to bolster their membership, sued to stop the crackdown on hiring illegal alien workers. A federal judge in California last week issued a temporary restraining order blocking the plan, giving a victory to the AFL-CIO, the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Immigration Law Center, all of which brought the suit alleging DHS exceeded its authority in making the rule.

That U.S. District Court judge ruled as if she were an employee of the Mexican government, rather than the U.S. government. Homeland Security was simply enforcing existing immigration laws. Are we not a nation that follows the rule of law? If not, we're no country at all.

Calderon must have been delighted by the judge's decision. Calderon, like his predecessors, Carlos Salinas and Vicente Fox, has failed miserably to establish policies that would create jobs for the Mexican people and to eliminate shameful, unchecked corruption and incompetence in the Mexican government.

Even by Mexico's standards, Calderon's blatant hypocrisy is breathtaking. Calderon told the Washington Post more than a year ago that he believes laws are not a relative concept, nor subject to a personal concept of justice. Calderon declared a big difference between himself and his rival for the Mexican presidency, Manuel Lopez Obrador, was this: "I believe in the rule of law." Obviously he does not believe in the rule of U.S. law on U.S. soil.

Calderon can't have it both ways. He cannot fail his citizens at home and then act as the Great Imperialist Protector of his citizens who are driven by poverty and corruption to enter the United States illegally. The United States provides Mexico with an annual surplus of $65 billion in trade, an estimated $25 billion in remittances from Mexican citizens living and working here illegally, and at least another $25 billion generated by the illegal drug trade across our southern border.

But it is President Bush and this Congress who should be most embarrassed, because they are failing to assert rights for Americans in their own country, rights far short of those demanded by Calderon for his citizens living illegally in our nation.



OBAMA’S LA RAZA SANCTUARY CITY-STATES NO GO ZONES FOR LEGALS:


*

LA RAZA-OCCUPIED MEX GANG INFESTED LOS ANGELES:

M.E.Ch.A IS THE MEXICAN FASCIST SEPARATIST PARTY THAT EMBRACES THE NOTION THAT THE U.S. SOUTHWEST BELONGS TO MEXICO. BUY GRINGO-PAID ANCHOR BABY BREEDING OF LA RAZA IN OUR BORDERS, VIOLENCE, AND ILLEGALS’ VOTING, THEY PROCLAIM THEIR AGENDA.

*



LOS ANGELES MAYOR ANTONIO VILLARAIGOSA IS A MEMBER OF M.E.Ch.A. – HE IS ALSO OBAMA’S GET OUT THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES FOR MEX-OCCUPIED LOS ANGELES – MEX GANG CAPITAL OF AMERICA!



*

Agendas of MEChA, La Raza, MALDEF, and Southwest Voter Registration Projects These are transcripts of live, recorded statements by elected U.S. politicians, college professors, and pro-illegal alien activists whose objective is to take control of our country "by vote if possible and violence if necessary!"

*

CONGRESSMAN JOE BACA:

“That we increase our numbers at every level.” JOE BACA



“Through love of having children, we are going to take over.”  AUGUSTIN CEBADA, BROWN BERETS, THE LA RAZA FASCIST PARTY

*




*



THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ALONE PUTS OUT $600 MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS, MOST OF THIS TO PAY THE MEXICAN WOMEN THAT HOP OUR BORDERS TO GIVE BIRTH TO THEIR ANCHOR BABIES, AND THEN COLLECT 18 YEARS OF WELFARE. THIS CHILDREN BORN IN OUR BORDERS WILL STILL ALSO BE CITIZENS OF MEXICO!








Notes show Fed sees ominous signs for economy - ONLY OBAMA'S CRIMINAL BANSKTERS DOING WELL and STILL LOOTING

Notes show Fed sees ominous signs for economy

BOOK: THE CORRUPTION CHRONICLES - TOM FITTON'S NEW BOOK ON THE STAGGERING CORRUPTION OF OBAMA'S REGIME

THE NEW BLOCKBUSTER
FROM JUDICIAL WATCH PRESIDENT TOM FITTON

ABOUT THE CORRUPTION CHRONICLES

~ PUBLISHED BY SIMON AND SHUSTER’S THRESHOLD EDITIONS ~

THE FULLY DOCUMENTED FACTS BEHIND:

  • The Solyndra Debacle
  • Obama’s Watergate: Operation Fast and Furious
  • The Obama Administration’s $20 Billion Extortion Scheme
  • The Unprecedented Threat to the Integrity of the 2012 Elections
  • The Czar Investigation Stonewall
  • The Undermining of Our Nation’s Immigration Laws
  • 9/11 Secrets

BECAUSE NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW!

In 2008, Barack Obama made a promise to have the “most transparent administration” of any U.S. president; it was the very cornerstone of his campaign. No secrets. No masks. No smoke and mirrors. No excuses. But over the next four years, President Obama’s administration would prove to be one of the most guarded and duplicitous of our time.
Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch, America’s largest nonpartisan government watchdog (challenging George W. Bush as well as Bill Clinton), has been investigating Obama ever since he splashed onto the national scene in 2006. Now Fitton exposes devastating secrets the Obama administration has desperately fought—even in court—to keep from the American public. For a while, the Obama stonewall seemed to be holding. Until now. And the revelations are astonishing.

WHAT OTHERS ARE SAYING…

“Tom is doing things the corrupt Obama Justice Department is refusing to do, like cleaning up American voter rolls from dead and ineligible voters. Some Washington organizations talk, and some fight. Tom Fitton fights.” —J. CHRISTIAN ADAMS, author of Injustice: Exposing the Racial Agenda of the Obama Justice Department
“No one digs deeper and more effectively into the bowels of government than Judicial Watch. Read what they report today. It will be news tomorrow.” — PETER F. SCHWEIZER, author of Throw Them All Out

Author Tom Fitton
TOM FITTON brings more than twenty years’ experience in conservative public policy to his role as president of Judicial Watch, America’s largest and most effective government watchdog. Mr. Fitton has testified to Congress, appeared on every major television network, and is a recognized expert on government corruption and congressional and judicial ethics. Mr. Fitton has been president of Judicial Watch for fourteen years, and he holds a B.A. from George Washington University.

SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN and HER CRIMINAL BANKSTER PAYMASTERS - THE OLD CA WHORE AND FORECLOSURE - BLAME IT ON FEINSTEIN!


YOU CAN BLAME THE OLD WHORE SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN FOR THE FACT AMERICANS CAN’T RENEGOTIATE THEIR MORTGAGES IN BANKRUPTCY COURT.

WHORE FEINSTEIN, AMERICA’S BIGGEST WAR PROFITEER, HAS TAKEN HUGE BRIBES FROM CRIMINAL BANKSTERS WELLS FARGO and BANK of AMERICA. SHE FRONTED FOR THE BANKSTERS’ BANKRUPTCY REFORM EVEN THOUGH HER PAYMASTERS AT WELLS FARGO HAD HAD THEIR CA MORTGAGE LICENSE REVOKED SINCE 2003 FOR CORPORATE FRAUD.

NO CRIME BY ANY OF HER CRIMINAL BANKSTER PAYMASTERS UPSETS THIS OLD WHORE!

WHEN THE BANKSTER-WRITTEN “REFORM” CAME TO A VOTE, FEINSTEIN, BOXER, CLINTON AND BIDEN VOTED AS THE BANKSTERS INSTRUCTED. WHILE OBAMA DID NOT VOTE FOR THE BANKSTERS’ “REFORM”, HE WENT LIMP WHEN HE WAS HANDING OUT TO HIS BANKSTER DONORS BILLIONS IN WELFARE.

NO PRESIDENT IN HISTORY HAS TAKEN MORE MONEY FROM BANKSTERS THAN OBAMA!

HIS CRIMINAL BANKSTERS’ PROFITS ARE SOARING… SO ARE THEIR CRIMES…. And  FORECLOSURES!

California Gold Rush? Righting Underwater Mortgages

Posted: 07/16/2012 5:21 pm


Ever since the housing bubble collapsed, the Federal government has refused to take major initiatives to help underwater homeowners. As a result, we are likely to see close to one million foreclosures both this year and next, with the numbers only gradually slipping back to normal levels by the end of the decade.

The inaction cannot be attributed to a lack of opportunity. At the time the TARP bailout was being debated in the fall of 2008 many progressive members of Congress wanted to have a provision that would at least temporarily alter bankruptcy law to allow judges to rewrite the terms of a mortgage.

Under current law, home mortgages are treated differently than any other type of debt. Bankruptcy judges are prohibited from altering the terms of a mortgage in any way. If a homeowner cannot meet the terms of the mortgage, they lose the house. Congress could have allowed bankruptcy judges to rewrite mortgages that were written during the housing bubble frenzy, but it backed away from this opportunity.

Similarly, Congress could have temporarily changed the rules on foreclosure to allow foreclosed homeowners to stay in their homes for a substantial period of time (e.g. five years) as renters paying the market rent. This would have assured underwater homeowners substantial housing security.

Either of these measures would have radically altered the relationship between investors and homeowners. They would have given homeowners a serious weapon that they could use to threaten lenders and hopefully persuade them to agree to modify underwater mortgages. However, since Congress did not take any action to shore up the position of homeowners, we are still sitting here with more than 11 million homeowners underwater five years after house prices began their plunge.

This failure at the national level provides the backdrop for a plan by a group of investors, Mortgage Resolution Partners (MRP), to try to get through some of the morass in the housing market. MRP has been working with public officials in San Bernardino, California, to arrange to use the government's power of eminent domain to condemn underwater mortgages.

As background, San Bernardino is ground zero in the housing bubble. Prices doubled or even tripled in the bubble years. They then plunged when the bubble burst, with prices now often less than half of their 2006 peaks. Half of the mortgages in the county are underwater.

This collapse has not only destroyed the life savings of hundreds of thousands of homeowners, it also has wrecked the economy of the region. In this context, the prospect of using the power to condemn property to bring many underwater homeowners back above water must sound very appealing.

MRP's plan is to have the county condemn underwater mortgages in private mortgage pools. The logic is that these underwater mortgages are causing serious harm to the community. When people are seriously underwater in their homes they are likely to lack both the means and the incentive to properly maintain their home. Of course, the monthly payment on a mortgage that might exceed the current value of a home by 50 percent or more (and carry a high interest rate) is a huge drain on the purchasing power of homeowners.

The case for focusing on mortgages in private mortgage pools is that it is generally quite difficult to sell these mortgages out of the pool. This means that even if, in principle, it might be advantageous for both the investors and the homeowners to have pools sell underwater mortgages to third parties like MRP who would rewrite the terms, the rules of the mortgage pools makes it unlikely that the mortgage will be sold.

This is exactly the sort of situation where public action like condemnation is appropriate. The public action allows for a solution that can benefit all the parties but is obstructed by bureaucratic rules that were written to cover a different set of circumstances. (It is important to remember that investors can contest in court the compensation they are provided for condemned mortgages to ensure that they get fair market value.)

It is difficult to see a good argument against this approach. Some have claimed that this sort of tactic will cause lenders to be more reluctant to lend in the future. If the point is that lenders may have second thoughts the next time house prices go into a bubble, then we should certainly hope that condemnation will have this effect.

Others have been critical because MRP is a private company that is doing this to make a profit. I've met with several of the top people at MRP, they certainly don't hide the fact that they expect to make money on this deal. But that hardly seems a reason for nixing the plan. There are very few instances where there has been a public condemnation in which private firms didn't stand to profit in some way.

MRP's plan is not going to rescue the country's underwater homeowners. At best it will directly help the limited segment of this group whose mortgages are in private label securities. However, it may serve as an example of the benefits of principal write-downs and perhaps prod Fannie and Freddie, as well as the banks, to be more willing to go this route.



Follow Dean Baker on Twitter: www.twitter.com/DeanBaker13


CA IS A GREAT PLACE TO PERPETRATE MORTGAGE FRAUD ON CONSUMERS.

HERE'S THE CASE OF RUSSIAN CRIMINAL OLEG KHERSONSKY:

http://olegkhersonsky.blogspot.com/2012/07/lawsuit-for-mortgage-fraud-filed.html

Arpaio shocked by comedian's profanity - GEORGE LOPEZ IS ONLY ONE MORE FOUL-MOUTHED IGNORANT LA RAZA SUPREMACIST RACIST!

Arpaio shocked by comedian's profanity




JUST LAST WEEK MORE NARCOMEX TUNNELS WERE DISCOVERED UNDER THE AX BORDER! YOU WON’T READ ABOUT THAT IN THE LA RAZA PRESS of the NEW YORK TIMES!!!
ARIZONA IS UNDER ASSAULT BY MEXICO AND OBAMA’S LA RAZA INFESTED ADMINISTRATION!
WHILE OBAMA’S CORRUPT HOLDER DEPT of JUSTICE HAS NEVER PROSECUTED ANY OF OBAMA’S CRIMINAL BANKSTER DONORS, DOJ IS ENDLESSLY HARASSING LEGALS IN AZ WITH LAWSUITS TO SABOTAGE E-VERIFY, TO SABOTAGE AZ’S ATTEMPT TO PROTECT THEIR BORDERS AGAINST THE MEX INVASION AND OCCUPATION AND TO PREVENT ILLEGALS FROM VOTING!
LEGALS IN AZ ARE FORCED TO PAY OUT MILLIONS IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS. NOT ONE LEGAL VOTED TO BE LOOTED BY LA RAZA!
TALK ABOUT “TERRORISM”…. THE BIGGEST TERRORIST THREAT THIS NATION FACES HOPS OUR BORDER DAILY TO LOOT, RAPE, MOLEST CHILDREN, STEAL, AND COMMIT ANY CRIME THEY CAN… THEY ARE THE MEXICANS!
NEXT TO MEXICO CITY, PHOENIX IS THE CAPITAL OF MEX KIDNAPPING.
PHOENIX IS THE LARGEST CENTER FOR MEX CAR THEFT.
PHOENIX IS THE LARGEST CENTER FOR VIOLENT HOME INVASION!
LOOK AT MEXIFORNIA, NOW LA RAZA-OCCUPIED! ACCORDING TO CA ATTORNEY GEN KAMALA HARRIS (LA RAZA DEM FOR OPEN BORDERS), NEARLY HALF THE MURDERS IN CA ARE BY MEX GANGS! HALF THE PRISON POPULATION OF THAT LA RAZA INFESTED STATE ARE MEXICANS.
IN LOS ANGELES, THE MEX WELFARE CAPITAL, OF THE TOP 200 MOST WANTED CRIMINALS, 183 ARE MEXICANS, AND MOST OF THE REST RUSSIANS!
LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUTS OUT $600 MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS… NOT ONE LEGAL VOTED TO BE LOOTED BY LA RAZA!
COPS MAKE MISTAKES ALL THE TIME! THEY KNOW THAT ONE OF MEXICO’S BIGGEST INDUSTRIES IN OUR BORDERS NEXT TO DRUGS IS THE MANUFACTURING OF FRAUD DOCS!
“One plaintiff, Manuel de Jesus Ortega Melendres, is a Mexican citizen who had a valid visa when Sheriff Arpaio’s deputies arrested him in 2007. He said he was handcuffed and held for hours, not read his rights or allowed a phone call, or told why he had been arrested. Two other plaintiffs, Velia Meraz and Manuel Nieto, were accosted by deputies at gunpoint during a neighborhood sweep, for no explained reason. They are citizens.”

FROM MEX-OWNED NEW YORK TIMES – MOUTHPIECE FOR THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA’S PROGANDA!
July 15, 2012
Sheriff Joe on Trial
Five years after he started “crime suppression” sweeps that terrorized Latino neighborhoods across Maricopa County, Arizona, Sheriff Joe Arpaio is finally having to explain himself. Not to TV crews in Phoenix or to fawning hosts on Fox News, but before a federal judge.
The trial in Melendres v. Arpaio, a class-action civil-rights lawsuit, is scheduled to begin Thursday in Federal District Court in Phoenix. The plaintiffs, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, accuse the sheriff of waging an all-out, unlawful campaign of discrimination and harassment against Latinos and those who look like them.
They say the sheriff and his deputies — aided by ad hoc civilian “posses,” anonymous phone tipsters, even motorcycle gangs — made illegal stops, searches and arrests, staged wrongful neighborhood and workplace raids, and provoked widespread fear among citizens, legal residents and undocumented immigrants alike.
One plaintiff, Manuel de Jesus Ortega Melendres, is a Mexican citizen who had a valid visa when Sheriff Arpaio’s deputies arrested him in 2007. He said he was handcuffed and held for hours, not read his rights or allowed a phone call, or told why he had been arrested. Two other plaintiffs, Velia Meraz and Manuel Nieto, were accosted by deputies at gunpoint during a neighborhood sweep, for no explained reason. They are citizens.
The outrages to be presented to the court can be added to a long list of abuses going back years, on the streets of Maricopa and in the sheriff’s jails. As early as 2008, The East Valley Tribune of Mesa, a city outside Phoenix, published a series of articles examining the immigration raids as a law-enforcement disaster. While deputies scoured the county making baseless immigration arrests, they neglected other duties, racking up millions of dollars in overtime and showing up ever later to emergencies while the number of criminal arrests and prosecutions plummeted.
Despite those results, Sheriff Arpaio kept going. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano could have condemned his actions years ago and refused to work with him. But instead, he was allowed to continue the abuse, even as his squad of immigration enforcers deputized under the federal 287(g) program grew to 160, by far the country’s largest. The sheriff became a right-wing celebrity, courted by politicians eager to win the anti-immigrant vote. One of these was Mitt Romney, who accepted his endorsement for president in 2008.
This case is only the first of what is likely to be a string of civil rights challenges against immigration actions in Arizona. A civil lawsuit, brought by the Justice Department, accusing Sheriff Arpaio of systematic and widespread civil rights abuses, is moving through the courts.
Last month, the United States Supreme Court declined to overturn the section of Arizona’s immigration law that requires local officers to check the papers of suspected illegal immigrants. But it said the provision could be challenged on equal-protection grounds, if there is evidence of racial profiling in the way it is carried out. The trial this week does not deal with police conduct under that law, but it does suggest that racial profiling is a deep-seated problem, certainly in Maricopa County.
Sheriff Arpaio is facing the voters for a sixth term this fall. He has long insisted that he answers to no one but the county’s residents, who keep re-electing him. If voters won’t put an end to his abuses, the courts and the Constitution will have the final word.

California spending annually $22 billion to support illegals

Going To the Top!

By Susan Tully


I've been at the immigration reform and enforcement table for about 20 years. I've worked with activists during all those years. But last week, in Los Angeles, I had a first-time-ever experience at an activist brain storming session.

Gathered for an update on Stop AB131, the petition drive to gather signatures to force a ballot initiative as to whether the California taxpayers should fund college grants to illegal aliens, I asked the top activist leaders from Southern California how the signature drive was going.

They started updating me with the positive response from California residents who signed the petitions, but then admitted about 500,000 more signatures were still needed. When I said there was only a little more than three weeks to go to meet the January 5th deadline, suddenly their faces dropped at once, and the room went completely silent.

It was easy to read on each of their faces; the task was nearly impossible! Without big money to pay signature gatherers or a tsunami of petitions flooding in, the taxpayers of California will be forced to give grant money to illegal aliens for college, on top of the $22 billion they are spending annually in California to support the illegal alien population.

While all of our minds were racing and searching for suggestions as to how to accomplish this daunting task of gathering signatures, Lupe Moreno, long time Hispanic leader from Santa Ana, said "Can we have a prayer?" Everyone agreed to pray.

As the prayer went around the table, people expressed their sorrow for the lack of leadership in the State of California and in the nation to protect the interest of American citizens, and asked for divine guidance in helping them understand the harm their policies are inflicting on millions of innocent people in the state. In all the years I have worked on this issue, I had not witnessed the sort of sincere emotion that was expressed in that room.

(THE FASTEST GROWING POLITICAL PARTY IN AMERICA IS THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA! AND WE ARE FORCED TO FUND IT!)

You see, the politicians in California are happy to give money the state doesn't have to illegal aliens to attend college, while they cut the budgets and slash programs for public safety, right and left. The American citizen's interests and safety are simply collateral damage for seeking and appealing to the illegal alien lobby.

These activists in California have already learned what the rest of the nation is about to learn. We the people. . . are the only ones looking out for the best interest of American citizens. With few exceptions, we have no national leadership on the issue of stopping the illegal migration flow into our nation.

American citizenship or the benefits thereof have become a commodity for politicians to pander and barter away. They will grant de facto citizenship through sanctuary policies, in-state tuition, non-compliance with Secure Communities, grants for college, etc., etc., etc. President Obama and most the Republican presidential hopefuls are peddling various versions of amnesty proposals if they are elected next year.

What do these politicians want in return? They are hoping to leverage enough votes in key states to put them over the top in 2012, no matter what it costs the American people. This is futures betting: The politicians are gambling the nation's future in hopes of winning the next election.

So while the state can't afford to pay its bills or provide decent services to citizens, these California activists watch their elected leaders lavish still more benefits for people who don't have a legal right to be in the country. And while their child might have to pay out-of-state tuition to go to college in another state, thousands of illegal aliens are going to college at in-state tuition rates in California that they are subsidizing.

In addition they know that millions of other illegal alien parents are receiving food stamps, Medicaid, housing assistance and dozens of other state and local benefits for their American-born children, while they have to decide which bills will be paid this month and which will have to wait.

It's not hard to understand why the activist of California need all the help they can get. Please go to www.stopAB131.com and lend a hand to our friends and family and the people of California to do what needs to be done for the good of our children first.
*

LA RAZA DEMS BUILD THE “DREAM ACT” LIFE FOR LA RAZA OFF THE AMERICANS BACK! NOT ONE AMERICAN VOTED FOR ONE DREAM ACT HANDOUT!


*

THE ILLEGAL (MEXICAN) CRIME TIDAL WAVE:


http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/heather-mac-donald-illegal-alien-crime.html



ACCORDING TO CA ATTORNEY GEN KAMALA HARRIS, NEARLY HALF OF ALL MURDERS IN CA ARE BY MEX GANGS!

THERE HAVE BEEN MORE THAN 2,000 CALIFORNIANS MURDERED BY MEXICANS THAT FLED BACK OVER THE BORDER TO MEXICO TO AVOID PROSECUTION!

YOU REALLY WANT AMNESTY AND MORE OPEN BORDERS???


*
CA HAS THE MOST EXPENSIVE PRISON SYSTEM IN THE COUNTRY. HALF THE INMATES ARE MEXICANS.
ACCORDING TO CA ATTORNEY GENERAL KAMALA HARRIS NEARLY HALF OF THE MURDERS IN CA ARE BY MEXICAN GANGS!
OF HER OWN TOP MOST WANTED CRIMINALS, ALL ARE MEXICANS!
OF THE TOP 200 MOST WANTED CRIMINALS IN LOS ANGELES, 176 ARE MEXICANS. MOST OF THE REMAINING ARE RUSSIANS!
*
206 Most wanted criminals in Los Angeles. Out of 206 criminals--183 are hispanic---171 of those are wanted for Murder.

Why do Americans still protect the illegals??

http://www.dailybreeze.com/ci_11255121?appSession=934140935651450&RecordID=&PageID=2&PrevPageID=&cpipage=1&CPISortType=&CPIorderBy=

*
TEN MOST WANTED CRIMINALS IN CALIFORNIA ARE MEXICANS!
CNN RECENTLY REPORTED THAT THE NUMBER OF MEX GANG MEMBERS EXCEEDS ONE MILLION!

Lou Dobbs Tonight    
And there are some 800,000 gang members in this country: That’s more than the combined number of troops in our Army and Marine Corps. These gangs have become one of the principle ways to import and distribute drugs in the United States. Congressman David Reichert joins Lou to tell us why those gangs are growing larger and stronger, and why he’s introduced legislation to eliminate the top three international drug gangs.
*
http://ag.ca.gov/wanted/mostwanted.php?fid=mostWantedFugitives_2010-01
<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]-->
<!--[endif]-->
*
“What we're seeing is our Congress and national leadership dismantling our laws by not enforcing them. Lawlessness becomes the norm, just like Third World corruption. Illegal aliens now have more rights and privileges than Americans. If you are an illegal alien, you can drive a car without a driver's license or insurance. You may obtain medical care without paying. You may work without paying taxes. Your children enjoy free education at the expense of taxpaying Americans.”
206 Most wanted criminals in Los Angeles. Out of 206 criminals--183 are hispanic---171 of those are wanted for Murder.

Why do Americans still protect the illegals??

http://www.dailybreeze.com/ci_11255121?appSession=934140935651450&RecordID=&PageID=2&PrevPageID=&cpipage=1&CPISortType=&CPIorderBy=

*
TEN MOST WANTED CRIMINALS IN CALIFORNIA ARE MEXICANS!
*
“In Mexico, a recent Zogby poll declared that the vast majority of Mexican citizens hate Americans. [22.2] Mexico is a country saturated with racism, yet in denial, having never endured the social development of a Civil Rights movement like in the US--Blacks are harshly treated while foreign Whites are often seen as the enemy. [22.3] In fact, racism as workplace discrimination can be seen across the US anywhere the illegal alien Latino works--the vast majority of the workforce is usually strictly Latino, excluding Blacks, Whites, Asians, and others.”
*
ARIZONA IS A STATE UNDER OBAMA’S DEPT. of JUSTICE ASSAULT. ALONG WITH THREE OTHER AMERICAN STATES, OBAMA HAS SHOVED HIS LA RAZA SUPREMACY AGENDA OF OPEN BORDERS, SANCTUARY CITIES, DREAM ACTS, NO E-VERIFY, NO I.D. TO INCONVENIENCE ILLEGALS VOTING!
WHILE OBAMA HAS STATIONED 2,500 TROOPS IN AUSTRALIA, HE HAS REPEATEDLY SABOTAGED OUR BORDERS WITH NARCOMEX AND ASSURE THE MEX DRUG CARTELS THAT MEX TRUCK DRIVERS COULD ENTER OUR BORDERS WITH THEIR HUMAN CARGO AND DRUGS, SOMETHING WHICH BUSH PROHIBITED.
*
MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com
FAIRUS.org
JUDICIALWATCH.org
ALIPAC.us
*
THE LA RAZA CRIME TIDAL WAVE
NEARLY HALF OF ALL MURDERS IN CA ARE BY MEXICAN GANGS!


*
Pinal County Sheriff: Mexican drug cartels now control parts of Arizona
SHARETHIS.addEntry(); ShareThis
Posted: 06/11/2010
CASA GRANDE, AZ - Two men shot earlier this week could be the result of the ongoing battle between Mexican drug cartels now spilling over deep into Arizona, officials say.
Pinal County investigators say  an area  known as the smuggling corridor now stretches from Mexico's border to metro Phoenix.
The area , once an area for family hiking and off road vehicles has government signs warning residents of the drug and human smugglers.
Night vision cameras have photographed military armed cartel members delivering drugs to vehicles along Highway 8.
"We are three counties deep. How is it that you see pictures like these, not American with semi and fully automatic rifles. How is that okay?" asked Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu.
Babeu said he no longer has control over parts of his county.
"We are outgunned, we are out manned and we don't have the resources here locally to fight this," he said at a Friday news conference.
Five weeks ago Deputy Louie Puroll was ambushed and shot as he tracked six drug smugglers. 
Sheriff Babeu said the ambush mirrored military tactics.
Even more disturbing, Babeu said the man who called in to 911 operators for help seemed to know a lot about the sheriff deputy's case.
"He told operators they could find him where the deputy was shot and talked about our search helicopter. Things that were talked about on the news," Babeu said.
When operators asked the fatally wounded man how he knew the area, he claimed he sold cantelope near mile post 150.
Both men were found dead several hours later.
Detectives say next to them was a Bushmaster automatic rifle used by police officers for patrolling. It does not appear to be stolen.
Investigators also revealed that an autopsy showed strap marks on one of the men that likely came from hauling heavy loads, they suspect were drugs.
One of the men, deputies say, was voluntarily deported seven times.
Babeu said he doesn't believe the drug cartel problems will not be solved when SB 1070 becomes a law, or with President Obama's promise of 1,200 troops spread out among four border states.
"It will fall short. What is truly needed in 3,000 soldiers for Arizona alone," Babeu said.
*
KEEP THIS IN MIND AS YOU WITNESS OBAMA AND HIS LA RAZA HISPANDERING ADMINISTRATION’S ENDLESS ASSAULT ON THE PEOPLE OF ARIZONA FOR MORE “CHEAP” LABOR ILLEGALS, KNOWN TO HIM AS “UNREGISTERED VOTERS”.
Gov. Brewer: Most border-crossers are drug 'mules' for Mexican cartels
Expanding on comments made at a candidates' debate, Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer said today she believes that most illegal immigrants crossing the border are "mules" carrying drugs for Mexican cartels.
"I believe today, under the circumstances that we're facing, that the majority of the illegal trespassers that are coming into the state of Arizona are under the direction and control of organized drug cartels and they are bringing drugs in," Brewer told the Associated Press.
"There's strong information to us that they come as illegal people wanting to come to work. Then they are accosted and they become subjects of the drug cartel," she said.
During the June 15 Republican debate she said she believed that most illegal immigrants did not enter the United States for work. She then associated illegal immigrants with drug smuggling, drop houses, extortion and other criminal activity, according to AP.
The state law she signed making it a crime to be in Arizona illegally will take effect next month.
*
By Dennis Wagner, The Arizona Republic
On May 9, a 15-year-old girl walked into Arizona through the San Luis port of entry, near Yuma, with 5 pounds of marijuana strapped around her belly, Customs and Border Protection records show.
She was busted by customs officers.
Later that day, a 16-year-old boy tried the same thing with 2 pounds of cannabis taped to his legs. He, too, was arrested.
The marijuana, with a combined street value of $72,000, was confiscated.
The juveniles — both U.S. citizens — were turned over to police, but others keep taking their place.
In the past two years, Homeland Security officials have witnessed a disturbing development along the Mexican border: kid smugglers.
"It's going up," said Michael Lowrie, a public-affairs agent for the U.S. Border Patrol. "Not a whole lot, but more than we've seen in, well, pretty much ever."
The Border Patrol does not keep data on juvenile drug runners caught trying to sneak into Arizona. Customs and Border Protection records show 130 minors were caught attempting to bring drugs through entry ports from Sonora into Arizona during fiscal 2009, an 83% increase over the previous year.
Teresa Small, a Customs and Border Protection spokeswoman in San Luis, said narcotics organizations are recruiting American teens with claims that they won't face major punishment if caught.
"Drug-trafficking organizations lead them to believe they will not have a substantial sentence," Small said. Prison terms are not uncommon for teen smugglers.
The problem escalated last year to a point where federal and local authorities created programs to warn Yuma County students about the dangers and consequences of drug smuggling. The federal campaign includes a presentation by border agents.
Judge Maria Elena Cruz said she has noticed a surge of young smugglers who are stunned when she orders them incarcerated.
Small said most of the youthful offenders are Americans with family members in Mexico. She said port officers generally refer suspects to local authorities for prosecution under Arizona law, rather than to the federal justice system.
"One thing for sure: They will get the hardest punishment possible," Small said.
Still, the cases pile up.
On June 24, Customs and Border Protection reported, a 16-year-old American boy was arrested at the San Luis port of entry with cocaine taped to his leg.
"They think they're going to get away with it or get a slap on the wrist," Lowrie
*
“PHOENIX – Federal authorities said Wednesday they plan to sue an Arizona county sheriff and his office over allegations of civil rights violations, including the racial profiling of Hispanics.”
Justice Department planning to sue Arizona sheriff Arpaio over alleged racial profiling
Published May 10, 2012
| Associated Press
advertisement
PHOENIX – Federal authorities said Wednesday they plan to sue an Arizona county sheriff and his office over allegations of civil rights violations, including the racial profiling of Hispanics.
The U.S. Justice Department has been seeking an agreement requiring sheriff Joe Arpaio office to train officers in how to make constitutional traffic stops, collect data on people arrested in traffic stops and reach out to Hispanics to assure them that the department is there to also protect them.
Arpaio has denied the racial profiling allegations and has claimed that allowing a court monitor would mean that every policy decision would have to be cleared through an observer and would nullify his authority.
DOJ officials told a lawyer for Arpaio on April 3 that the lawman's refusal of a court-appointed monitor was a deal-breaker that would end settlement negotiations and result in a federal lawsuit.
The "notice of intent to file civil action" came Wednesday from Assistant U.S. Attorney General Thomas Perez in a letter to an Arpaio lawyer.
Perez, who heads the DOJ's civil rights division, noted that it's been more than 100 days since the sheriff's office received the DOJ's findings report and federal authorities haven't met with the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office counsel since Feb. 6 to discuss the terms of a consent agreement.
At a news conference Wednesday afternoon, Arpaio defended himself in the face of the pending lawsuit.
"If they sue, we'll go to court. And then we'll find out the real story," he said. "There's lots of miscommunication emanating from Washington. They broke off communications.
"They're telling me how to run my organization. I'd like to get this resolved, but I'm not going to give up my authority to the federal government. It's as simple as that," Arpaio added.
Last December, the DOJ released a scathing report accusing Arpaio's office of racially profiling Latinos, basing immigration enforcement on racially charged citizen complaints and punishing Hispanic jail inmates for speaking Spanish in Arizona's most populous county.
The DOJ also accused Arpaio of having a culture of disregard for basic constitutional rights.
The civil rights allegations have led some Arpaio critics to call for his resignation, including the National Council of La Raza, a prominent advocacy group for Latinos.
The sheriff's office also is facing criticism over more than 400 sex-crimes investigations -- including dozens of alleged child molestations -- that hadn't been investigated adequately or weren't examined at all over a three-year period ending in 2007.
Arpaio has apologized for the botched cases, reopened 432 sex-crimes investigations and made 19 arrests.
Separate from the civil rights probe, a federal grand jury has been investigating Arpaio's office on criminal abuse-of-power allegations since at least December 2009. That grand jury is examining the investigative work of the sheriff's anti-public corruption squad.
The self-proclaimed toughest sheriff in America has been a national political fixture who has built his reputation on jailing inmates in tents and dressing them in pink underwear, selling himself to voters as unceasingly tough on crime and pushing the bounds of how far local police can go to confront illegal immigration.
*

“PHOENIX – The state senator in Arizona who wrote the nation's toughest law against
illegal immigrants said Tuesday he's collecting support across the country from
legislators to challenge automatic U.S. citizenship to the children of illegal
immigrants.”

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2012/02/anchor-babies-arizona-fights-la-raza.html
*


ANOTHER NARCOMEX TUNNEL FOUND ALONG OBAMA’S OPEN AND UNDEFENDED AZ BORDERS!

PLEASE EMAIL THIS BLOG POSTING TO YOUR FAMILY AND FRIENDS! YOUR STATE IS NEXT TO FALL TO MEXICO!
WILL ARIZONA BECOME THE NEXT LA RAZA-OCCUPIED MEXICAN WELFARE STATE LIKE CA?
WILL MEXICO BANKRUPT AMERICA LIKE IT HAS CA?

OBAMA HAS ALWAYS PUSHED TO PUT ILLEGALS IN OUR JOBS. HIS SEC. of (illegal) LABOR IS A LA RAZA SUPREMACIST!
OBAMA SUED THE STATE of ARIZONA TO SABOTAGE E-VERIFY, WHICH WOULD EFFECTIVELY END ILLEGALS GETTING OUR JOBS USING STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS.
DEMS ARE THE PARTY of ILLEGALS.
IN MEX-OCCUPIED MEXIFORNIA – THE LA RAZA WELFARE STATE, THE LA RAZA FACTION (illegals) of the CA STATE LEGISLATURE, PASSED A LAW MAKING IT ILLEGAL FOR EMPLOYERS TO USE E-VERIFY. LA RAZA DEM JERRY BROWN COULDN’T SIGN IT FAST ENOUGH!
LA RAZA SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN HAS LONG HIRED ILLEGALS AT HER S.F. HOTEL, ONLY MILES FROM HER $16 MILLION DOLLAR WAR PROFITEER’S MANSION.
LA RAZA NANCY PELOSI HAS LONG HIRED ILLEGALS AT HER ST. HELENA, NAPA WINERY. SHE’S VOWED THE WALL WILL NEVER BE BUILT.
SEN. BARBARA BOXER, and REID OF LA RAZA-OCCUPIED NEVADA WERE BOTH REELECTED ON OBAMA’S PLATFORM OF OPEN BORDERS, NO REAL WALL, NO E-VERIFY, GRINGO-PAID DREAM ACTS, MUCHO WELFARE FOR ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS AND AMNESTY, or at least CONTINUED NON-ENFORCEMENT.
LOOK AROUND YOU! WHERE DO YOU SEE AN NON-HISPANIC IN A JOB? NOT IN THE SERVICE OR HOSPITALITY SECTORS. NOT IN CONSTRUCTION.

GIVING ILLEGALS OUR JOBS, EVEN DURING THIS PERIOD OF UNEMPLOYMENT CRISIS IS HOW THEY BUY THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES.
THE MEXICAN OCCUPATION OF 40 MILLION ILLEGALS, WHICH NOW IS EXPANDING ACROSS OUR ENTIRE NATION, KEEPS WAGES DEPRESSED FROM $300 TO $400 BILLION PER YEAR!

YOU WONDERED WHY MOST OF THE FORTUNE 500 AND THE U.S. CHAMBER of COMMERCE FIGHTS AGAINST E-VERIFY, AND ARE GENEROUS DONORS TO THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA?
OBAMA’S IMPERIAL AMNESTY – THE DEMS’ PROGRAM OF BIT BY BIT BY BIT AMNESTY UNTIL THERE ARE ENOUGH ILLEGAL VOTING THEY WILL HAVE VOTED FOR EVEN MORE LA RAZA IN PUBLIC OFFICE THAN ARE THERE ALREADY!

VIVA LA RAZA? PUSH 2 FOR ENGLISH! IT’S HERE ALREADY!!!
*
THE REALITY OF OBAMA’S LA RAZA AGENDA: Illegals Come First – GRINGOS GET THE TAX BILLS TO PAY FOR THE MEX INVASION, OCCUPATION, WELFARE STATE and CRIME TIDAL WAVE!

FAIRUS.org
FEDERATION FOR AMERICAN IMMIGRATION REFORM
FAIR CHARACTERIZES THE OBAMA, AND LA RAZA DEMS PLAN FOR AMNESTY AS FOLLOWS:
That's why, throughout 2009 FAIR has been tracking every move the administration and Congress has made to undermine our immigration laws, reward illegal aliens and burden taxpayers.
  • Foot-dragging on proven methods of immigration law enforcement including border structures and E-Verify.
  • Appointment of several illegal alien advocates to important administration posts.
  • Watering down of the 287(g) program to limit local law in their own jurisdictions.
  • Health care reform that mandates a “public option” for newly-arrived legal immigrants as well as illegal aliens.

FROM MEX-OWNED NEW YORK TIMES – MOUTHPIECE OF LA RAZA PROPAGANDA and SUPREMACY:

June 16, 2012
For Many Immigrants, Policy Offers Joy and Relief
By IAN LOVETT
LOS ANGELES — Ana Sochitl graduated from the University of California, Los Angeles, on Saturday, with a degree in sociology. But until Friday, she had worried that even after she threw her cap into the air, she would be stuck at her job at a taco shop, the price of having immigrated here illegally at age 4.
But a day after President Obama announced an executive action to permit hundreds of thousands of young illegal immigrants to remain in this country, Ms. Sochitl said that instead of a life working at a taco shop, she was going to look for a job that uses her degree, working in a rehabilitation center.
“Before this, I wondered what I was going to do with my life,” said Ms. Sochitl, 21. “This is opening a door for me. Now I can get a job that uses my degree. I can do something with myself.”
For many immigrants here, especially students like Ms. Sochitl, Mr. Obama’s announcement on Friday of his plan to offer work permits to some illegal immigrants under 30 years old who came to the United States before age 16, unleashed a wave of joy and relief, undercut with wariness about if and how the policy might be implemented. The policy does not grant any permanent legal status.
At the taco shop where Ms. Sochitl works in Boyle Heights, a center of Latino culture in Los Angeles and a home to immigrants from all over the world, everyone knew someone who stood to benefit from the new policy.
Even patrons who were already citizens, like María Cano, who came here from Mexico in 1979, reacted with emotion as they named cousins or neighbors who might now be able to stay in the country legally.
“Immigrants have helped build this society for many, many years, and I think it’s time that we were recognized and given a chance,” Ms. Cano, 46, said, tearing up as she spoke. “I know so many people whose parents brought them here illegally, who went to school and started working here. And now there is finally hope for them.”
For Ms. Cano, like many others in this solidly Democratic neighborhood, the new policy reaffirms her plans to support Mr. Obama in November.
But even in this area, some other Latinos had grown frustrated with the president, as immigration reform efforts stalled in Congress.
Vilma Berrios, who immigrated from El Salvador in 1975 and is now a citizen, voted for Mr. Obama in 2008. As she sat in MacArthur Park, another gathering place for immigrants, she spoke of her conflicted feelings.
She said she did not support Mr. Obama anymore, because so many people had been deported under his administration. But she added that if he followed through on the promises he made Friday, she would vote for him again.
“I have to think about who I’m going to vote for,” Ms. Berrios, 59, said in Spanish. “If he completes what he promised today, I will vote for him. It’s very important. But I want immigration reform that will benefit everyone.”
Angelica Salas, executive director of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles, said Friday’s announcement had the potential to reinvigorate enthusiasm for Mr. Obama among many Latinos.
“It is a game changer for him,” Ms. Salas said. “It is very motivating. It kind of keeps the hope people had for this president alive.”
Still, after years of disappointment in efforts to change immigration laws, some remained skeptical, reserving their excitement until they saw how the new policy would be implemented.
“We heard the news, and it’s great, but it’s just a first step,” said Maxima Guerrero, 22, a college student who wore a shirt that read, “I Am Undocumented” to a rally in downtown Los Angeles. “When I see it in action, then I’ll say, ‘This is fantastic.’ For now, we’re just getting the ball rolling.”
And most important, Ms. Guerrero said, the new policy did not at all diminish the need for comprehensive immigration reform — a sentiment that nearly everyone in East Los Angeles echoed.
José Pérez, 60, runs the farmers’ market in Boyle Heights with his wife and daughter. On Friday night at the market, as a singer on stage crooned in Spanish and locals perused stands selling cherries, tamales and handmade jewelry, Mr. Pérez said he hoped that eventually, a new immigration policy would offer legal status to everyone in his community.
“I know so many people who graduate, and then that’s it; they can’t do nothing,” Mr. Pérez said. “This is a country of immigrants. Why don’t we help these people who need to be helped?”
*
Obama Administration Challenges Arizona E-Verify Law
The Obama administration has asked the Supreme Court to strike down a 2007 Arizona law that punishes employers who hire illegal aliens, a law enacted by then-Governor Janet Napolitano.  (Solicitor General's Amicus Curiae Brief).  Called the “Legal Arizona Workers Act,” the law requires all employers in Arizona to use E-Verify and provides that the business licenses of those who hire illegal workers shall be repealed.  From the date of enactment, the Chamber of Commerce and other special interest groups have been trying to undo it, attacking it through a failed ballot initiative and also through a lawsuit. Now the Chamber is asking the United States Supreme Court to hear the case (Chamber of Commerce v. Candelaria), and the Obama Administration is weighing in against the law.
To date, Arizona’s E-Verify law has been upheld by all lower courts, including the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Ninth Circuit, in particular, viewed it as an exercise of a state’s traditional power to regulate businesses.  (San Francisco Chronicle, June 2, 2010).  Obama’s Justice Department, however, disagrees. Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal said in his filing with the Supreme Court that the lower courts were wrong to uphold the statute because federal immigration law expressly preempts any state law imposing sanctions on employers hiring illegal immigrants.  Mr. Katyal argues that this is not a licensing law, but “a statute that prohibits the hiring of unauthorized aliens and uses suspension and revocation of all state-issued licenses as its ultimate sanction.”  (Solicitor General's Amicus Curiae Brief, p. 10).  This is the administration’s first court challenge to a state’s authority to act against illegal immigration, and could be a preview of the battle brewing over Arizona’s recent illegal immigration crackdown through SB 1070. 
Napolitano has made no comment on the Department of Justice’s decision to challenge the 2007 law, but federal officials said that she has taken an active part in the debate over whether to do so. (Politico, May 28, 2010).   As Governor of Arizona, Napolitano said she believed the state law was valid and became a defendant in the many lawsuits against it. (Id.).
*

Obama soft on illegals enforcement


Arrests of illegal immigrant workers have dropped precipitously under President Obama, according to figures released Wednesday. Criminal arrests, administrative arrests, indictments and convictions of illegal immigrants at work sites all fell by more than 50 percent from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009.

The figures show that Mr. Obama has made good on his pledge to shift enforcement away from going after illegal immigrant workers themselves - but at the expense of Americans' jobs, said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the Republican who compiled the numbers from the Department of Homeland Security's U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE). Mr. Smith, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, said a period of economic turmoil is the wrong time to be cutting enforcement and letting illegal immigrants take jobs that Americans otherwise would hold.
*
Obama Quietly Erasing Borders (Article)


Article Link:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=240045
<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]-->
<!--[endif]-->
*
OBAMA PUT A LA RAZA SUPREMACIST IN AS SEC. OF LABOR TO ASSURE ILLEGALS GET OUR JOBS FIRST!
“Labor Secretary Hilda Solis, a former California congresswoman with close ties to the influential La Raza movement, announced the “We Can Help” project with great fanfare a few days ago.”
*
THE OBAMA LA RAZA INFESTED ASSAULT ON LEGALS OF THE STATE of ARIZONA ON BEHALF OF HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE of ILLEGALS!
WHY HASN’T OBAMA BEEN IMPEACHED FOR BEING AN AGENT OF MEXICAN INTERESTS?
OBAMA IGNORES PLEAS FOR NATIONAL GUARD TROOPS
Lawmakers from states bordering Mexico are ticked off. More than a year after they asked the White House for National Guard troops to be deployed there, the Obama administration still has not formally responded.
In March 2009, governors of Texas and Arizona -- along with many of their states' Capitol Hill legislators -- pleaded with the White House to better secure their citizens and businesses from the swelling tide of smugglers, illegal immigrants and Mexican drug-war violence spilling over the border.
Topics: Illegal Immigration, President Obama, request National Guard troops, border violence, smugglers
May 8, 2010
Scripps Howard News
Sun-Times Media, LLC

The administration promised to study the request and get back to them.

They didn't, Texas Gov. Rick Perry and Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer say. Last month, Brewer complained that she had pleaded five times in letters to President Obama for more federal muscle, to no avail.
The administration says it has not been ignoring the border problems, noting that there now are airborne drones conducting surveillance flights; a full complement of 20,000 Border Patrol agents; a 653-mile border fence in place, and about $70 million sent in law-enforcement aid.
The governors say the border area remains unacceptably dangerous, citing the March murder of an Arizona rancher and the wounding of an Arizona deputy this month.
U.S. Senators John McCain and Jon Kyl, both Arizona Republicans, issued an urgent request

*
OBAMA’S ATTORNEY GENERAL SAYS JUSTICE MAY SUE ARIZONA OVER NEW IMMIGRATION LAW…. Which Only Mirrors EXISTING FEDERAL UNENFORCED LAW!!!
Attorney General Eric Holder says the Justice Department may sue Arizona over its new immigration law.


Washington (CNN) -- Attorney General Eric Holder said Sunday that the Justice Department was considering a federal lawsuit against Arizona's new immigration law.

"We are considering all of our options. One possibility is filing a lawsuit," Holder told NBC's "Meet the Press." Possible grounds for the lawsuit would be whether the Arizona law could lead to civil rights violations, he said.

By the CNN Wire Staff
May 9, 2010

The recently enacted Arizona law initially allowed police to ask anyone for proof of legal U.S. residency, based solely on a police officer's suspicion that the person might be in the country illegally. Arizona lawmakers soon amended the law so that officers could check a person's status only if the person had been stopped or arrested for another reason.

Critics say the law will lead to racial profiling, while supporters say it involves no racial profiling and is needed to crack down on increasing crime involving illegal immigrants.

In Arizona, the city councils of Tucson and Flagstaff have decided to challenge the new immigration law in court.

Holder told ABC's "This Week" program that one concern about the Arizona law is that "you'll end up in a situation where people are racially profiled, and that could lead to a wedge drawn between certain communities and law enforcement, which leads to the problem of people in those communities not willing to interact with people in law enforcement, not willing to share information, not willing to be witnesses where law enforcement needs them."

"I think we could potentially get on a slippery slope where people will be picked on because of how they look as opposed to what they have done, and that is, I think, something that we have to try to avoid at all costs," Holder added.

Holder said comprehensive federal immigration reform is the best approach for the problem of illegal immigrants crossing U.S. borders. His stance echoed the approach favored by President Obama, who last week criticized the Arizona law and said he wants Congress to work on the issue this year.

Comprehensive immigration reform would include continuing government efforts to secure borders from illegal immigrants, as well as steps to crack down on businesses that employ them, Obama said at a Cinco de Mayo celebration at the White House.

In addition, he said, those living illegally in the United States would have to pay a penalty and any taxes they owe, learn English and "make themselves right with the law" before starting the process of gaining U.S. citizenship.
*
HOW MANY AMERICANS MURDERED BY ILLEGALS SINCE THIS LOU DOBBS BROADCAST?
PHOENIX ARIZONA – MEXICAN KIDNAPPING
Lou Dobbs Tonight
Tuesday, September 9, 2008

Since Mexican President Felipe Calderon started his crackdown on drug cartels and corrupt law enforcement two years ago, more than 4,000 people have been killed. The death toll among law
enforcement has topped 500. Kidnappings and violence are spreading across the border, and now the AP reports Mexican cartels have green-lighted hits against targets in the U.S. We’ll talk to Phoenix police about becoming the kidnapping capital of the nation and the rapid increase in other crimes linked to Mexico the city is coping with.
*
Lou Dobbs Tonight
 Monday, June 16, 2008
 Tonight, we’ll have all the latest on the devastating floods in the Midwest and all the day’s news from the campaign trail. The massive corporate mouthpiece the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is holding a “North American Forum” to lay out its “shared vision” for the United States, Canada and Mexico – which is to say a borderless, pro-business super-state in which U.S. sovereignty will be dissolved. Undercover investigators have found incredibly lax security and enforcement at U.S. border crossings, according to a new report by the Government Accountability Office. This report comes on the heels of a separate report by U.C. San Diego that shows tougher border security efforts aren’t deterring illegal entries to the United States.
*
THE FIGURE BELOW IS DATED. CNN REPORTS THERE ARE MORE THAN A MILLION MEX GANG MEMBERS LOOTING IN OUR BORDERS.
ACCORDING TO CA ATTORNEY GEN KAMALA HARRIS , A LA RAZA DEM FOR OPEN BORDERS, NEARLY HALF OF ALL MURDERS IN MEXIFORNIA ARE BY MEX GANGS.
THERE HAVE BEEN MORE THAN 2,000 CALIFORNIANS MURDERED BY MEXICANS THAT FLED BACK OVER THE BORDER TO AVOID PROSECUTION.
YOU REALLY WANT AMNESTY, OPEN BORDERS AND LA RAZA SUPREMACY?

*
Lou Dobbs Tonight    
And there are some 800,000 gang members in this country: That’s more than the combined number of troops in our Army and Marine Corps. These gangs have become one of the principle ways to import and distribute drugs in the United States. Congressman David Reichert joins Lou to tell us why those gangs are growing larger and stronger, and why he’s introduced legislation to eliminate the top three international drug gangs.
*
So, we have Mexican gangs virtually controlling parts of the United States and making threats against American law enforcement officials, but does it stop there? Of course not. Mexico is also SUING Arizona over its new illegal immigration law.
Our country is being occupied!!!! That sentence alone should be a ringing call for action! Laws are being broken. People in Arizona are being killed and threatened. Arizona takes action, and what does Obama do? Does he send troops in to wipe out the gangs? No, he's going to sue Arizona! What's wrong
SURRENDER TO MEXICO:
What ever happened to 'American' soil?
By Bobby Eberle June 23, 2010 7:13 AM

*
EVEN AS THE MEX DRUG CARTELS POUR OVER OUR BORDERS, OBAMA HAS TAKEN HUNDREDS MORE GUARD OFF SINCE SEPT 2009! AND THE OBAMA DECLARES “BORDER SECURITY” IS THE HALLMARK OF HIS PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP!
IN 2012, OBAMA STATIONED 2,500 TROOPS IN AUSTRALIA… YES, AUSTRALIA EVEN HAS HE PROMISES ILLEGALS OPEN BORDERS WITH NARCOMEX!
Lou Dobbs Tonight
Monday, September 28, 2009
And T.J. BONNER, president of the National Border Patrol Council, will weigh in on the federal government’s decision to pull nearly 400 agents from the U.S.-Mexican border. As always, Lou will take your calls to discuss the issues that matter most-and to get your thoughts on where America is headed.

*
ACCORDING TO SENATOR LAMAR SMITH OF TEXAS, WHEN CHALLENGING SO- CALLED “HOMELAND SECURITY = PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIPS” LA RAZA JANET NAPOLITANO, AS TO WHY OUR BORDERS ARE WIDE OPEN TO NARCOMEX, OBAMA HAS CUT ENFORCEMENT BY MORE THAN 60% IN ALL AREAS.
Obama soft on illegals enforcement
Arrests of illegal immigrant workers have dropped precipitously under President Obama, according to figures released Wednesday. Criminal arrests, administrative arrests, indictments and convictions of illegal immigrants at work sites all fell by more than 50 percent from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009.
The figures show that Mr. Obama has made good on his pledge to shift enforcement away from going after illegal immigrant workers themselves - but at the expense of Americans' jobs, said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the Republican who compiled the numbers from the Department of Homeland Security's U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE). Mr. Smith, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, said a period of economic turmoil is the wrong time to be cutting enforcement and letting illegal immigrants take jobs that Americans otherwise would hold.
*
THE OBAMA LEGACY OF DUPLICITY, CORRUPTION, BANKSTER CRIMES, OPEN BORDERS AND ENDLESS HISPANDERING FOR THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES!
WHILE BARACK OBAMA GIVES HIMSELF A B+ (HIS BANKSTERS GAVE HIM THE GRADE) JUDICIAL WATCH’S GRADE IS A BIT MORE REALISTIC:
JUDICIAL WATCH.org
With trillion dollar bailouts, government-run healthcare, banks and car companies, ACORN corruption, attacks on conservative media, illegal alien amnesty, unprecedented and dangerous new rights for terrorists, perks for campaign donors—this is the Obama legacy—and we haven't even gotten through the first year of his presidency!
*
latimes.com
What Arizonas immigration law really says
It's not about racial profiling; it's about upholding the law.
Dan Stein
April 30, 2010
"As we exercise the right to advocate our views, and as we animate our supporters, we must all assume responsibility for our words and actions before they enter a vast echo chamber and reach those both serious and delirious, connected and unhinged." Those words were written by former President Clinton in a New York Times op-ed marking the 15th anniversary of the Oklahoma City bombing.

While Clinton's finger-wagging was directed at critics of the Obama administration, his caution against overblown rhetoric might also be heeded by the vast echo chamber bent on whipping up hysteria in response to a recently passed Arizona law designed to effectively address illegal immigration.

Arizonans have endured decades of federal neglect of immigration enforcement. Half of illegal border crossings now occur in Arizona, and our study found that state taxpayers spend more than $2 billion a year on education and healthcare for illegal immigrants and their children. The porous border is virtually a welcome mat for criminal organizations that run drugs and other contraband through the state. Kidnappings in Phoenix are at an all-time high, and the killing last month of rancher Robert Krentz -- police suspect by an illegal immigrant -- is only the latest graphic example of the impact that rampant illegal immigration has on ordinary Arizonans.

Faced with an ongoing crisis and little help from Washington, Arizona has been forced to respond to protect its residents and its financial resources. This month, the legislature passed and Gov. Jan Brewer signed SB 1070. Among other things, this law requires all law enforcement officers in Arizona to act on reasonable suspicion that an individual is in the country illegally.

The reaction from advocates for illegal immigrants to SB 1070 -- which, according to opinion polls, is supported by some 70% of Arizonans -- can only be described as incendiary and irresponsible, not to mention patently inaccurate. Los Angeles Cardinal Roger Mahony invoked images of Nazi Germany and Soviet totalitarianism. Reform Immigration for America, an umbrella coalition of pro-amnesty groups, warned ominously that "it's racial profiling, and it encapsulates the hatred we are fighting." ACORN's Bertha Lewis declared, "If this bill passes, Arizona is declaring itself an apartheid state."

SB 1070 is not a mandate for Arizona police to seek out illegal immigrants. It conforms fully with the Constitution's 4th Amendment protections against unreasonable search and seizure. Under the law, Arizona police are prohibited from racially profiling or stopping anybody merely because of appearance or ethnicity. They may inquire about immigration status only if there is justification for the stop under the Constitution -- such as investigating a possible crime -- and there is reasonable suspicion that the individual is in the U.S. illegally.

And what is reasonable suspicion? Reasonable suspicion might include the lack of any sort of valid U.S. identification documents that police officers routinely request from anyone who is lawfully stopped. The law expressly states that race, color or ethnicity does not constitute reasonable suspicion of illegal presence in the U.S. In reality, SB 1070 does nothing more than require police in Arizona to protect the citizenry and uphold responsibilities abrogated by the federal government.

A ruling by the U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals this year provides firm legal footing for Arizona's law. In Estrada vs. Rhode Island, the court affirmed that the failure of an alien to possess alien registration documents represents probable cause for state or local police to arrest the person for a federal misdemeanor committed in the officer's presence, or detain that person until the individual's status can be verified.

Predictably, those who have consistently opposed all efforts to enforce U.S. immigration laws are resorting to a campaign of lies and distortions to fight implementation of the law.

SB 1070, plain and simple, will allow police to identify and detain people because of the laws they violate, not because they happen to meet a particular racial or ethnic profile. What it demands is that state law enforcement officers no longer turn a blind eye in situations in which they reasonably suspect that an individual they have encountered is violating U.S. immigration laws.

Dan Stein is president of the Federation for American Immigration Reform.
*
THE SCARY REALITY OF THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY AT WORK!

Arizona Leads the Way Against Illegal Immigration
Posted by Jacob Laksin on Apr 27th, 2010 and filed under FrontPage.
Jacob Laksin is managing editor of Frontpage Magazine. He is co-author, with David Horowitz, of One-Party Classroom: How Radical Professors at America's Top Colleges Indoctrinate Students and Undermine Our Democracy. His work has appeared in the Wall Street Journal, the Philadelphia Inquirer, The Weekly Standard, City Journal, Policy Review, as well as other publications. Email him at jlaksin@gmail.com.
If you’ve been following the news from Arizona in recent days, you’ve probably heard that the state’s Republican governor, Jan Brewer, has just signed into law a “racist” bill that will punish Hispanics, stamp out civil rights, create a police state – and trample on the Constitution for good measure. You also may have heard that the Arizona law will “undermine basic notions of fairness,” at least according to President Obama, who has called the law “misguided” and ordered the Justice Department to find some way to challenge its standing.
Apocalyptic rhetoric notwithstanding, the Arizona law is not at all controversial in substance. All it does is deputize state police to determine whether people are in the country legally and to question them if there is reasonable suspicion that they’re not. Of course, that function should properly be handled by the federal government. But because the government has made so little effort to enforce immigration laws, border states that bear the brunt of illegal immigration – an estimated 460,000 illegal immigrants call Arizona home – have been forced to take action on their own terms.
The concept behind the immigration law is straightforward: If you enforce laws against illegal immigration, you will have less of it. That was also the idea behind Arizona’s Legal Arizona Workers Act, which required the state’s employers to verify the immigration status of new hires using the federal government’s E-Verify program. Businesses eager to avoid the burdens of verification and pro-illegal immigration groups also opposed that measure, filing suit to prevent its passage, but emerging evidence seems to suggest that it had the desired effect: Since being implemented in January 2008, the LAWA has resulted in a substantial decrease of illegal immigration.
The new law seeks to continue that progress. It does so mostly by making state crimes what are already federal crimes. For instance, the Arizona law makes it a crime to be in the country illegally – in other words, it enforces the national law. The Arizona law also requires police to question people about their immigration status if they have reasonable cause to suspect that they’re illegal immigrants. To prevent abuse or racial discrimination, the law also includes provisions banning racial profiling, and the measure itself has nothing to do with race or ethnicity, as the bill’s foes claim. Still, given that the majority of the state’s illegal immigrants are from neighboring Mexico, it is inevitable that the majority of those targeted by the law will be Hispanic. That says more about the demographics of illegal immigration than the allegedly discriminatory agenda of Arizona authorities.
Concerns about the abuse of civil liberties are similarly overblown. The Arizona law will require anyone arrested for a crime to have their immigration status established before their release. In theory, this should already be the law of the land; but so-called “sanctuary city” laws enacted by cities and municipalities across the country have prevented police from enforcing immigration laws. Such laws certainly benefit felons who escape deportation. How they profit the country at large is less apparent. The Arizona law also requires residents to carry ID or immigration registration documents at all times. That too is reasonable. A valid ID is already required to qualify for government and public assistance programs available to citizens and requiring one form of valid ID – whether a drivers license a government-issue ID — hardly marks the onset of Nazi Germany. Indeed, no less than President Obama has previously expressed support for a national ID card.
While some have criticized Arizona for taking the initiative against illegal immigration, it’s hard to find fault with the state’s sense of urgency. Last month’s murder of Arizona cattle rancher Rob Krentz was just example of the crime problem that unchecked illegal immigration has helped create and the problems its poses for American justice. Although Kentz was known for providing illegals with food and water, police found tracks at the murder scene leading to the Mexican border. They made no arrests in the case. In that climate of lawlessness, the state cannot be blamed for passing a law that may help offer a solution. Moreover, with the Obama administration and Congressional Democrats threatening to take up immigration reform – that is, amnesty for the 11-million plus illegal immigrants in this country unmatched by serious enforcement measures going forward – states like Arizona are left with a choice of doing something to combat the problem or leaving it to the federal government to make it worse.
LA RAZA, “THE RACE” – THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of AMERICA AT WORK:
If there is an ugly side revealed by the Arizona law, it is in the extremism of pro-illegal immigration groups. On Monday, opponents of the Arizona law used refried beans to smear swastikas on the Arizona state Capitol. Another champion of illegal immigration, Mexican President Felipe Calderon, made the not-so-veiled threat that Mexican trade and political relations with Arizona would suffer if it cracked down on illegals.
WE ARE MEXICO’S WELFARE AND PRISON SYSTEM! SAVE NARCOMEX MILLIONS!
Defying these opponents and braving slander in much of the press coverage, Arizona has taken the lead in enforcing the country’s immigration laws and protecting the rights and interests of its citizens. For the Left, the new law makes Arizona a model of an “American-style police state.” For those serious about border security and law enforcement, it makes
*
So, we have Mexican gangs virtually controlling parts of the United States and making threats against American law enforcement officials, but does it stop there? Of course not. Mexico is also SUING Arizona over its new illegal immigration law.
Our country is being occupied!!!! That sentence alone should be a ringing call for action! Laws are being broken. People in Arizona are being killed and threatened. Arizona takes action, and what does Obama do? Does he send troops in to wipe out the gangs? No, he's going to sue Arizona! What's wrong
SURRENDER TO MEXICO:
What ever happened to 'American' soil?
By Bobby Eberle June 23, 2010 7:13 AM
      
I might be a little slow here, but isn't America a sovereign nation? Doesn't it have borders and land and citizens? Didn't Americans fight battles and wars and negotiate land deals to establish this country and set up a federal government to protect the sovereign nation? Ok, I'm just asking, because now we have Mexican drug gangs camped out on American soil, and Barack Obama is doing nothing about it! Isn't protecting the country THE fundamental function of the president and those in Washington?
Before we get into some details, check out this headline from FoxNews.com: Mexican Gangs Maintain Permanent Lookout Bases in Hills of Arizona. Did you read it? Ok... rest five seconds and read it again. This is completely insane!
Mexican drug cartels have set up shop on American soil, maintaining lookout bases in strategic locations in the hills of southern Arizona from which their scouts can monitor every move made by law enforcement officials, federal agents tell Fox News.

The scouts are supplied by drivers who bring them food, water, batteries for radios -- all the items they need to stay in the wilderness for a long time.

"To say that this area is out of control is an understatement," said an agent who patrols the area and asked not to be named. "We (federal border agents), as well as the Pima County Sheriff Office and the Bureau of Land Management, can attest to that."
Not only are the drug and illegal alien traffickers setting up bases on American soil, they are also issuing threats. As Joshua Rhett Miller reports, "Police officers in a small Arizona border city are on heightened alert following a tip that a Mexican drug cartel will put them in its crosshairs if they conduct off-duty busts."
The threat stems from a marijuana seizure made this month by two off-duty police officers riding on horseback in an unincorporated area east of Nogales, a city of roughly 20,000, Police Chief Jeffrey Kirkham told FoxNews.com.

"The word was that these particular officers would be targeted if they were ever in that area again and were not on duty and intercepted any drug trafficking," Kirkham said. "It said they should look the other way."
So, we have Mexican gangs virtually controlling parts of the United States and making threats against American law enforcement officials, but does it stop there? Of course not. Mexico is also SUING Arizona over its new illegal immigration law.
Mexico on Tuesday asked a federal court in Arizona to declare the state's new immigration law unconstitutional, arguing that the country's own interests and its citizens' rights are at stake.

Lawyers for Mexico on Tuesday submitted a legal brief in support of one of five lawsuits challenging the law. The law will take effect July 29 unless implementation is blocked by a court.
Arizona's new law known as SB-1070 "requires police investigating another incident or crime to ask people about their immigration status if there's a "reasonable suspicion" they're in the country illegally. It also makes being in Arizona illegally a misdemeanor, and it prohibits seeking day-labor work along the state's streets." This law, as many of you know, is basically a restatement of federal law... a federal law that the federal government does not enforce. In addition, this law is much more lax than Mexican immigration law. However, that point seems to be missed in Mexico's lawsuit.
And the list grows... Mexican gangs controlling parts of the U.S. and making threats against American cops. In addition, Mexico is suing Arizona to make sure that the illegal alien "business" keeps right on flowing. Does it stop there? Unfortunately, yes, because there is NO action being taken by Obama and his team!
Just watch any interview with a Democrat "strategist" regarding what's going on in Arizona, and they will pull out their "comprehensive immigration reform" talking points. Just like Obama is doing with the Gulf oil spill, they are taking a situation that needs immediate action and turning it into a call for some left-wing legislation. Our country is being occupied!!!! That sentence alone should be a ringing call for action! Laws are being broken. People in Arizona are being killed and threatened. Arizona takes action, and what does Obama do? Does he send troops in to wipe out the gangs? No, he's going to sue Arizona! What's wrong

*
Immigration advocacy groups to challenge Arizona law
By Jonathan J. Cooper and Paul Davenport
Sunday, April 25, 2010; A08
PHOENIX -- Arizona's governor is vowing that the state's tough new law targeting illegal immigration will be implemented with no tolerance for racial profiling, but at least two advocacy groups are preparing legal challenges and Mexico is warning that the law could affect cross-border relations.
Gov. Jan Brewer (R) on Friday signed into law a bill that supporters said would take handcuffs off police in dealing with illegal immigration in Arizona, the nation's busiest gateway for human and drug smuggling from Mexico and home to an estimated 460,000 illegal immigrants.
The law requires police to question people about their immigration status -- including asking for identification -- if they suspect that someone is in the country illegally. It has sparked fears among legal immigrants and U.S. citizens that they will be hassled by police because they look Hispanic.
The Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund said it plans to challenge the law, which it said "launches Arizona into a spiral of pervasive fear, community distrust, increased crime and costly litigation, with nationwide repercussions."

CATHOLIC AND MEXICAN CHURCHES WERE TOLD BY LA RAZA “THE RACE” NOT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE 2010 CENSUS TO KEEP THE AMERICAN PEOPLE FROM KNOW THAT THAT OUR GOVERNMENT’S PROPAGANDA THAT THERE WERE ONLY 12 MILLION ILLEGALS IS JUST THAT! LA RAZA FASCIST PROPAGANDA! MOST SOURCES PUT THE NUMBER AT 38 MILLION AND BREEDING LIKE BUNNIES!
William Sanchez, president of the National Coalition of Latino Clergy and Christian Leaders Legal Defense Fund, said his group is preparing a federal lawsuit against Arizona to stop the law from being applied. The group represents 30,000 evangelical churches nationwide, including 300 Latino pastors in Arizona.
THERE ARE CALCULATED TO BE 38 MILLION OF THESE “SHOCKED” MEXICAN FLAG WAVERS IN THIS COUNTRY AND IN OUR JOBS!
<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]-->
<!--[endif]-->
"Millions of Latinos around the country are shocked," Sanchez said.
Current law in Arizona and most other states does not require police to inquire about immigration status, and many police departments prohibit officers from asking out of fear of losing immigrants' cooperation in other investigations.
Brewer ordered the state's law enforcement licensing agency to develop a training course on how to implement the law without violating civil rights. "We must enforce the law evenly, and without regard to skin color, accent or social status," she said. "We must prove the alarmists and the cynics wrong."
The measure will take effect in July or August, depending on when the legislative session ends.
Immigrants unable to provide documentation of legal presence could be arrested, jailed for as long as six months and fined $2,500. Legal immigrants will be required to carry paperwork proving their status.
The law also allows suits against government agencies that hinder enforcement of immigration laws and toughens restrictions on hiring illegal immigrants and knowingly transporting them.
"It's going to change our lives," said Emilio Almodovar, a 13-year-old U.S. citizen from Phoenix. "We can't walk to school anymore. We can't be in the streets anymore without the [police] thinking we're illegal immigrants."

MEXICO WARNS!!!! FUCK MEXICO! THEY ARE A SHAMELESS DUMPSTER OF A COUNTRY RUN BY DRUG DEALERS!
ISN’T IT TIME TO FLIP OFF MEXICO THAT HAS SENT MILLION OF PREGNANT WOMEN OVER OUR BORDERS TO GET ON GRINGO WELFARE FOR 18 YEARS?!?!

Mexico warned that the law could affect cross-border relations, with Foreign Secretary Patricia Espinosa saying her country would have to "consider whether the cooperation agreements that have been developed with Arizona are viable and useful." Francisco Loureiro, an immigration activist who runs a shelter in Nogales, Mexico, called the measure "racist" and said it would lead to additional police abuses.

HOW DO THE ONE MILLION MEX GANGS TREAT THEIR VICTIMS? THERE ARE 500 – 1000 MEX GANG RELATED MURDERS IN LOS ANGELES ALONE! 95% OF ALL ARRESTS FOR MURDER ARE MEXICANS! THESE COST NEARLY MILLION EACH JUST TO PROSECUTE. ON LOS ANGELES TOP 200 WANTED CRIMINALS, 176 ARE MEXICANS! ON A.G. TOP 10 MOST WANTED CRIMINALS IN CA, ALL ARE MEXICANS.
WHY NOT LET MEXICO PAY FOR THE COST OF THEIR OWN PRISON SYSTEM?

"Police in Arizona already treat migrants worse than animals," he said. "There is already a hunt for migrants, and now it will be open season under the cover of a law." Loureiro said about 250 deported immigrants have been arriving nightly at his shelter and that most say they were detained by police.
After signing the legislation, Brewer said critics were "overreacting" and vowed not to tolerate racial profiling.
"We in Arizona have been more than patient waiting for Washington to act," she said. "But decades of inaction and misguided policy have created a dangerous and unacceptable situation."
-- Associated Press
*
DOES ANYONE DOUBT THAT IN MEX OCCUPIED GANG AND WELFARE CAPITAL OF LA RAZA LAND, LOS ANGELES THAT ILLEGALS TAKE PRIORITY? THEY DO IN JOBS! 47% OF THOSE WITH A JOB ARE FREAKING ILLEGALS USING STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS!

Gregory Kane: Do Latinos take priority over whites in Arizona?
By: Gregory Kane
May 6, 2010
America's open-borders crowd didn't just play the race card in the nation's latest immigration debate. This bunch whipped out an entire deck.
We have none other than the Revvum Al Sharpton himself -- who no one has described as "Mr. Racial Harmony" -- weighing in with these gems.
"The Arizona immigration bill is an affront to the civil rights of all Americans and an attempt to legalize racial profiling."
That one was from the April 25 edition of the Wall Street Journal. The following one is from Reuters:
"I am calling for the resignation and removal of Sheriff [Joe] Arpaio. Harassment based on color is nothing short of racial profiling, which many of us helped to fight to make against the law."
Sharpton was referring to the sheriff of Maricopa County in Arizona. What's Arpaio's offense, in the good revvum's view? Why, taking our nation's immigration laws seriously, of course, and rounding up those who violate them. Here's more of Sharpton continuing his anti-Arpaio rant, taken from the Reuters story:
"Arpaio needs to be confronted. He needs to be removed. We also need to suspend the law that he is using. We must stand with our brown brothers and sisters."
Sharpton lives nowhere near Arizona. If you're wondering where he found the chutzpah to dredge up with this "we" stuff, you're not alone.
Sharpton isn't alone either, not when it comes to making spurious, knee-jerk charges of racism in the wake of Arizona passing a law that allows cops to question those legally stopped about their immigration status.
It's high time somebody pointed out the real racists in this controversy. And yes, that would be many of those making the charges of racism.
Frankly, I suspect much of the reaction comes from those who are worried about how their lawns are going to be cut if there's a mass deportation of illegal immigrants. (A word of advice: cut 'em your darned selves.)
Don't non-Hispanic Arizonans get any consideration? (Actually, I suspect that many of the reported 70 percent of Arizonans who support the law are Hispanic, which makes the racism of those screaming racism even more obvious and egregious.) One of those non-Hispanic Arizonans is a woman named Elisabeth Grey, who posted this comment in reaction to the Wall Street Journal story:
"I live in a Tucson neighborhood that is a major drug corridor. In the last four months there have been over 24 violent home invasions resulting in a number of deaths. It's harvest time now for marijuana in Mexico and Central America. We expect the number of deaths to increase.
"One of the other tragedies is human trafficking. 'Coyotes' bring vans overfilled with illegal immigrants across the border, and because the load is more than the vehicle is designed for, the vehicle will often roll, or go off the road, killing the innocent people on board."
What Grey is telling us is that, in Arizona, the illegal immigrant problem is now also a public safety problem. And police are allowed to make stops -- of people on the street and in vehicles -- when crime reaches an outrageous level. If those stopped in vehicles don't have proper identification, then any competent police officer will ask those people a string of questions to determine who they are.
Here's what the opponents of Arizona's new law are saying, and it's the most outrageously racist thing of all: Police should be allowed to ask anyone legally stopped about their identities except Hispanics.
Examiner Columnist Gregory Kane is a Pulitzer-nominated news and opinion journalist who has covered people and politics from Baltimore to the Sudan.

*
MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com
From the above blog, email articles to those concerned about Obama’s endless push for amnesty.
FAIRUS.org
JUDICIAL WATCH.org
ALIPAC.us
*
WE ARE MEXICO’S WELFARE and PRISON SYSTEMS!
“Mexico’s government has provided its nationals with valuable tools to help them cross the border safely but Dominguez is the first American resident, with a salary provided by U.S. taxpayers, to openly promote such a gadget. A few years ago Mexican officials published a 32-page booklet (Guia Del Migrante Mexicano) with safety tips for border crossers and distributed hand-held satellite devices to ensure the violators complete their journey safely.”
*
KEEP THIS IN MIND AS YOU WITNESS OBAMA AND HIS LA RAZA HISPANDERING ADMINISTRATION’S ENDLESS ASSAULT ON THE PEOPLE OF ARIZONA FOR MORE “CHEAP” LABOR ILLEGALS, KNOWN TO HIM AS “UNREGISTERED VOTERS”.
Gov. Brewer: Most border-crossers are drug 'mules' for Mexican cartels
Expanding on comments made at a candidates' debate, Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer said today she believes that most illegal immigrants crossing the border are "mules" carrying drugs for Mexican cartels.
"I believe today, under the circumstances that we're facing, that the majority of the illegal trespassers that are coming into the state of Arizona are under the direction and control of organized drug cartels and they are bringing drugs in," Brewer told the Associated Press.
"There's strong information to us that they come as illegal people wanting to come to work. Then they are accosted and they become subjects of the drug cartel," she said.
During the June 15 Republican debate she said she believed that most illegal immigrants did not enter the United States for work. She then associated illegal immigrants with drug smuggling, drop houses, extortion and other criminal activity, according to AP.
The state law she signed making it a crime to be in Arizona illegally will take effect next month.
*
AZ Governor: Obama, Calderon Both Want Illegal Immigration to Continue to Increase Liberal Vote in U.S.

Wednesday, October 20, 2010
By
Terence P. Jeffrey

President-elect Barack Obama meets with Mexico's President Felipe Calderon in Washington. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)
(CNSNews.com) - Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer told CNSNews.com that she believes neither President Barack Obama of the United States nor President Felipe Calderon of Mexico wants to secure the U.S.-Mexico border because they hope illegal aliens will increase liberal voters in the United States.
“I think it’s just amazing that the Mexican government, along with President Calderon and the bordering governors that interact with us, they do not want our borders secure,” Brewer said in a telephone interview today. “I mean, they have made it very, very clear.”
When asked why she believed Calderon does not want the U.S.-Mexico border secured, Brewer said, “I believe that he believes that he is helping out the federal administration and they are looking at it in a political mode to bring in newly registered illegal immigrants to register to vote.”
Brewer, a Republican, also said Calderon “wants those dollars that they are raising here in Arizona and in all America being sent back to Mexico to push up his economy.”
Asked whether she thinks Calderon wants Mexican citizens to vote in U.S. elections after they have been given an amnesty and have become citizens of the United States or while they are still illegal aliens, Brewer said: “Probably both.”
Brewer said she does not believe President Barack Obama wants to secure the U.S.-Mexico border and that he wants both an amnesty for illegal aliens and a continuing flow of illegal aliens across the border because he believes that will increase the liberal voting bloc in the United States.
“You think President Obama would like to amnesty the illegal aliens in the United States today because, for one thing, he believes they would become liberal voters and support candidates and politicians who would advance his views of what America should be?” CNSNews.com asked Brewer.
“I do,” she said.
“And you believe he would like to continue the flow of illegal aliens into the United States, for among other reasons, to increase the potential voting bloc of people who would support his agenda?” CNSNews.com asked.
“I do,”said Brewer.
Here is a partial transcript of Gov. Jan Brewer’s (R.-Ariz.) conversation with CNSNews.com:
Gov. Jane Brewer: "Every country in the world can secure their borders. We are the strongest country in the world. And, I mean, if America can’t secure their borders, who can? And I will note, Terry, that I think it’s just amazing that the Mexican government, along with President Calderon and the bordering governors that interact with us, they do not want our borders secure. I mean, they have made it very, very clear.  But they are building a fence on the southern portion of Mexico to keep the Guatemalans out."
CNSNews.com Editor in Chief Terry Jeffrey: "Why do you believe that President Calderon does not want the U.S. border secure?"
Brewer: "I believe that he believes that he is helping out the federal administration and they are looking at it in a political mode to bring in newly registered illegal immigrants to register to vote."
Jeffrey: "You think that President Calderon of Mexico wants to import people to the United States—"
Brewer: "I do."
Jeffrey: "Who will vote in U.S. elections?"
Brewer: "Yes, and he wants those dollars that they are raising here in Arizona and in all America being sent back to Mexico to push up his economy."
Jeffrey: "Do you think he wants them to vote in U.S. elections after they have gotten amnesty and become citizens of the United States or as illegal aliens?"
Brewer: "I didn’t understand your question."
Jeffrey: "Well, you say that President Calderon of Mexico would like to import citizens of his country to the United States—"
Brewer: "Right."
Jeffrey: "So that they can vote in U.S. elections?"
Brewer: "Right."
Jeffrey: "Do you think he wants them to vote in U.S. elections after they have been given amnesty and become citizens of the United States or while they are still illegal aliens?"
Brewer: "Probably both."
Jeffrey: "You were secretary of state in Arizona. You were responsible for the elections in your state were you not?"
Brewer: "Right. And we cracked down big time. We clamped down big time. We were fighting an organization called ACORN.  We had complaints filed all the time. And it’s an unfortunate situation that we had to live with. But finally everybody in America got control of that issue. But the bottom line is they want people registered. They want to influence the politics in America. We want our border secured. We’re tired of it. We can’t sustain it. We can’t sustain it with the dollars for their education. We can’t sustain it for their dollars for their health care. We can’t sustain it for their incarceration. And the federal government is not doing their job."
Jeffrey: "Governor Brewer, I recently interviewed Sheriff Larry Dever of Cochise County, and I asked him what sort of confidence he had that in the remainder of his term, before his initial term, the term he has been elected to, expires in 2012, in January 2013, that President Obama would actually secure the U.S.-Mexico border, and Sheriff Dever said he had no confidence in that. He did not believe it would happen. Do you "
Brewer: "I am very doubtful of that. It doesn’t mean we are going to stop."
Jeffrey: "Do you think he wants to do it?"
Brewer: "No."
Jeffrey: "You do not believe he wants to secure the border?"
Brewer: "No, I do not believe that he does want to stop it."
Jeffrey: "Why do you think he wants to keep the border open?"
Brewer: "For all the reasons we just previously discussed.  I mean, it’s a political situation where they want that voting bloc, certainly, and foremost. And it’s been videotaped in regards to the unions that they would be able to get these people to become voters. And certainly out of the 12 million illegals that are here in regards to amnesty that would really bolster their voting records, their voters."
Jeffrey: "You think President Obama would like to amnesty the illegal aliens in the United States today because, for one thing, he believes they would become liberal voters and support candidates and politicians who would advance his views of what America should be?"
Brewer: "I do."
Jeffrey: "And you believe he would like to continue the flow of illegal aliens into the United States, for among reasons, to increase the potential voting bloc of people who would support his agenda?"
Brewer:

*
JUDICIAL WATCH
DHS is OBAMA’S PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP, AMERICAN JOBS, AND WELFARE FOR ANCHOR BABY BREEDING.
OBAMA HAS SABOTAGED OUR BORDERS WITH NARCOMEX EVEN HAS HE HAS SQUANDERED BILLIONS PROTECTING THE BORDERS OF MUSLIM DICTATORS OVER THERE!

DHS Failure Delays Border Fence Project OBAMA’S OPEN and UNDEFENDED BORDERS POLICY WRITTEN BY MEXICO.
Last Updated: Fri, 10/22/2010 - 11:25am
In the Department of Homeland Security’s latest failure to protect the nation, a costly program to place crucial electronic surveillance systems along the U.S.-Mexico border is years behind schedule and grossly over budget because the agency hasn’t adequately managed the contractor doing the work.
As a result, hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars will be wasted and the porous southern border will continue to be vulnerable despite the Obama Administration’s assurances that it’s as secure as it’s ever been. So far the troubled project, known as Secure Border Initiative Network, has cost the government $672 million although it’s nowhere near completion, according to a new report issued by the investigative arm of Congress (Government Accountability Office).
Launched by Homeland Security in 2005, the initiative aims to enhance border security by designing technological tools that enable Border Patrol agents to detect and respond to incursions along unmanned stretches of the 2,000-mile Mexican border. This includes installing unattended ground sensors, radars and cameras. The so-called virtual fence was supposed to be completed by 2011, but Homeland Security officials recently pushed the date up to 2014.
That’s because the agency has failed to properly oversee the project’s prime contractor, resulting in costly rework, numerous delays and lots of extra money. In fact Homeland Security officials stood by as the contractor provided information that was “replete with unexplained anomalies, thus rendering the data unfit for effective contractor management and oversight,” congressional investigators found.
The initiative to erect barriers—both electronic and physical—along the U.S. Mexico border has been plagued with a multitude of problems since it was implemented under the George W. Bush Administration. After funding issues got largely settled, some border mayors in Texas blocked the feds from conducting fence work on city property, a large Indian tribe (Tohono O’odham) in Arizona refused to allow a fence to be erected along a vulnerable stretch of border and the so-called virtual fence project has been delayed several times.
Last year a separate GAO report revealed that the physical fence is costing U.S. taxpayers an average of nearly $4 million per mile. The per mile costs vary considerably depending on the type of fencing, topography, materials, labor costs and the price of land acquisition, but investigators determined that serious cost overruns have led to the exorbitant average figure.
*
Miguel Perez – MEMBER of the MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA
Phoenix Civil Rights Examiner
Miguel Perez, current president of Chicanos Unidos Arizona and an active member of La Raza, also served as the vice president of the Latino civil rights organization MECHA in Fullerton California. He is the son of two Mexican immigrants. Perez plans to become a lawyer in order to protect the rights of Latinos. You can reach Perez at mperezlaraza1985@gmail.com.
*
“He has helped hundreds of former gang members gain long-term employment.”
PUBLISHED IN THE PHOENIX CIVIL RIGHTS EXAMINER
Pablo Cruz named president of Nuestros Reconquistos
Miguel Perez, Phoenix Civil Rights Examiner
November 25, 2011

Phoenix civil rights activist Pablo Cruz is replacing Manuel Longoria as the President of Nuestros Reconquistos, one of Arizona's most prominent civil rights groups. Manuel Longoria has accepted a prominent position for the U.S. Dept. of Justice.
Pablo Cruz is a former gang member and an undocumented immigrant who has gone on to represent several other former gang members in trying to make their lives better. He has helped hundreds of former gang members gain long-term employment. "I don't care who you are--everybody deserves a second chance," Cruz claims.
As the President of Nuestros Reconquistos, Pablo Cruz plans to help Latinos claim back the Southwest as part of the Latino homeland of Aztlán. "The movement to reclaim land stolen from Mexico is almost complete. Latinos will soon be able to live, work, and dream in a land where no other race is allowed."
Pablo Cruz will speak to Latino groups tomorrow morning at the Phoenix Public Library. He is expected to announce plans to help Barack Obama's re-election campaign.

http://www.examiner.com/civil-rights-in-phoenix/pablo-cruz-named-president-of-nuestros-reconquistos#ixzz1elFqF3LG

*
Judicial Watch Exposes Mexican Separatist School

Judicial Watch Exposes Mexican Separatist School Is Academia Semillas del Pueblo Training the Next Generation of Mexican Revolutionaries?

 (Washington, DC) -- Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes corruption, today announced the release of a special report, Academia Semillas del Pueblo (Seeds of the People Academy): Training the Next Generation of Mexican Revolutionaries with American Tax Dollars. Judicial Watch’s report includes excerpts of new documents obtained by Judicial Watch through the California Public Records Act that highlight the school’s radical agenda. According to the report’s introduction: “Academia Semillas del Pueblo is not much more than a training ground for the Mexican reconquista movement, which seeks to conquer the American Southwest – by force or by ballot box – and return it to Mexico.” Among the highlights of Judicial Watch’s special report: • Academia is led by Mexican revolutionary radical Marcos Aguilar, who recently told an interviewer with UCLA’s Teaching to change L.A.: “We don’t necessarily want to go to White schoolsthe White way, the American way, the neo liberal, capitalist way of life will eventually lead to our own destruction.” • Academia offers an 8th grade United States history and geography class entitled, “A People’s history of Expansion and Conflict – A thematic survey of American politics, society, culture and political economy; Emphasis throughout on the nations the U.S. usurped, invaded and dominated; Connections between historical rise of capitalism and imperialism with modern political economy and global social relations.” • Academia is funded by the Mexican reconquista organization “National Council of La Raza.” Moreover, Aguilar previously served as a leader of M.E.Ch.A., a radical student-run Chicano organization, while attending UCLA. According to M.E.Ch.A.’s official statement of principles, “Aztlan (the American southwest) belongs to indigenous people, who are sovereign and not subject to a foreign cultureWe are a union of free pueblos forming a bronze Nation.” • According to Academia’s original charter application, the school targets “communities [that] are highly self-identified as Latino.” English instruction for Academia’s students does not begin until the fourth grade. “Marcos Aguilar’s school seems to be brainwashing school children with Mexican separatist, anti-American, Marxist propaganda, and getting American taxpayers to pay for it,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “How could the Los Angeles Unified School District agree to fund this sham of a school with tax dollars?” To read a copy of Judicial Watch’s new special report, visit www.judicialwatch.org.
*
RABIDLY RACIST MAYOR ANTONIO “TACO RUNT” VILLARAIGOSA IS A MEMBER OF M.E.Ch.A
 Academia is funded by the Mexican reconquista organization “National Council of La Raza.” Moreover, Aguilar previously served as a leader of M.E.Ch.A., a radical student-run Chicano organization, while attending UCLA.
*
“Last May, the state defeated the Chamber of Commerce's suit against the law in the Supreme Court.”

Arizona shows pitfalls in Romney’s proposed national E-Verify program

Romney greets supporters in Chandler, Ariz. (Gerald Herbert/AP)
At Wednesday night's GOP debate, Mitt Romney called Arizona a "model" for immigration enforcement, singling out the state's 2007 law mandating that all employers use the national E-Verify database when hiring workers. He promised to institute a national E-Verify law if elected. "You do that, and just as Arizona is finding out, you can stop illegal immigration," he said. Last May, the state defeated the Chamber of Commerce's suit against the law in the Supreme Court.
Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, Romney's adviser on immigration issues, helped write Arizona's E-Verify law as well as Arizona's 2010 SB1070 law (Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act). At the recent Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, Kobach touted what's happened in Arizona as proof that "self-deportation"—Romney's chosen immigration strategy—is working. "People started self-deporting by the tens of thousands," after E-Verify passed, he said, according to the Hill.
Romney and Kobach are right that, on at least one level, the law has had a significant impact in Arizona. A study published last year by the Public Policy Institute of California shows that about 92,000, or 17 percent, of the Hispanic non-citizen population of Arizona left the state in the year after the state passed E-Verify legislation; most of those who moved were probably illegal immigrants. (THEY PROBABLY MOVED TO MEXIFORNIA!)  PPI researchers told Yahoo News that the law—not the recession, or highly-publicized raids targeting illegal immigrants—was the most likely cause of the exodus.
Yet while PPI's research helps predict what might happen if an E-Verify system were implemented nationally, as Romney hopes, it exposes some of the less-desirable side-effects of the law as well. In Arizona, the non-citizen Hispanic workers who did stay behind increasingly shifted into a shadow economy, said Magnus Lofstrom, a co-author of the study. The self-employment rate among non-citizen Hispanics in Arizona nearly doubled post-E-Verify, and a higher proportion of people who said they were self-employed lived in poverty and lacked health insurance.
Lofstrom told Yahoo News that the informal economy would grow significantly nationwide if a national E-Verify system were established. While illegal immigrants in Arizona were able to move to other states to find work, their choices would be significantly limited if E-Verify were implemented nationally; the only real (and unlikely) option would be to for undocumented workers to move to another country. In other words, we'd be much more likely to see an increase in informal employment rather than a massive movement among illegal immigrants to "self-deport."
(RIDDING OURSELVES OF THE LA RAZA OCCUPIERS WILL NOT BE EASY. THEY’RE VOTING MORE LA RAZA SUPREMACIST INTO OFFICE EVERY ELECTION! IT WILL BRING A DECLINE IN THE STAGGERING COST OF THE MEXICAN WELFARE STATE ($600 MILLION PER YEAR IN LA RAZA INFESTED LOS ANGELES COUNTY ALONE), AND ALSO THE STAGGERING MEXICAN CRIME RATES. ACCORDING TO CA ATTORNEY GEN. KAMALA HARRIS, HALF OF ALL MURDERS IN CA ARE BY MEXICAN GANGS! THE CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR CHARACTERIZES CA AS THE “MEXICAN GANG CAPITAL of AMERICA”.)
What would that mean? An increase in informal employment among the nation's estimated 11 million illegal immigrants would result in lower tax revenues--since non-self employed illegal immigrants are more likely to have taxes withheld from their paychecks--higher poverty levels among illegal immigrants, and a higher potential for employer abuse, said Lofstrom. (Right now, America has a relatively small shadow economy compared to other developed countries, like Italy.)
Another snag with instituting a national E-Verify program is that the current system cannot detect identity fraud. A 2009 government-commissioned study found that E-Verify only flags illegal immigrants half the time, because it can't detect when a worker is using documents that belong to someone else. (Employers enter in Social Security or alien registration numbers, birthdates and names of employees into the database, which figures out whether they match the federal immigration and Social Security databases.) To combat this fraud, Romney has said he supports biometric ID cards for immigrants that would contain a fingerprint or other identifying device that clears them for work. Romney hasn't explicitly said that every person in America should have this card--an idea that many libertarians object to. But without being adopted universally, undocumented people could still use false documents. (The Romney team had not responded to requests for comment from Yahoo News by the time this article was published.) Mandatory national ID cards have played a starring role in failed bipartisan immigration reform proposals in Congress over the past few years.
In Arizona, there is no state-wide system to make sure businesses are using E-Verify. Rather, individual citizens are asked to expose employers that they suspect of hiring illegal immigrants to their local district attorneys. Yet district attorneys were not granted the power to subpoena businesses that are suspected of hiring illegal immigrants, and some DAs have complained that the law is an unfunded mandate for their offices, according to Judy Gans, immigration policy director at Arizona University's Udall Center. Only three businesses were prosecuted under the law in the first three years after it passed.
But business owners still worry that E-Verify's high error rate could leave them open to prosecution. Republicans in Arizona's state Senate are now moving to change the law at their request. Republican state senator Jerry Lewis, who defeated anti-illegal immigration hardliner Russell Pearce last year in a historic recall election, is co-sponsoring a bill with seven other Republican senators to provide "safe harbor" to businesses that use E-Verify but still accidentally hire unauthorized workers.
Lewis, who is backing Romney, told Yahoo News that he is not a fan of Kobach's draft immigration laws.
"Does Kobach's presence in Romney's campaign create a difficulty for him? I believe it does," Lewis said. "I think people want a real solution and I don't think the legislation that has been drafted by Kobach is a real solution." Lewis said the immigration laws "polarize people."
Lewis added that he thinks Romney will eventually agree with him that making all illegal immigrants leave the country is not a solution to the country's immigration problems.
"I think he'll realize that there is a place for a real solution to the issue, and it's not just let's get everybody that's undocumented out of the country," Lewis said.
ARIZONA, UNDER LA RAZA OCCUPATION, ENDORSES ROMNEY, WHILE THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS STILL STAND BEHIND THEIR MAN OBAMA!
OBAMA HAS SUED THE AMERICAN PEOPLE OF AZ ON BEHALF OF HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE OF ILLEGALS, HAS SABOTAGED E-VERIFY IN AZ, AND MADE BORDER SECURITY A JOKE!
NEXT TO MEXICO CITY, PHOENIX IS THE CAPITAL OF MEXICAN KIDNAPPING, HOME INVASION, CAR THEFT, AND GATEWAY FOR THE SOUTHERN INVASION OF THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS!

*
PAT BUCHANAN ON OBAMA’S HISPANDERING FOR  THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES:
What is the response of Barack Obama, who took an oath to see to it that federal laws are faithfully executed?
He is siding with the law-breakers. He is pandering to the ethnic lobbies. He is not berating a Mexican regime that aids and abets this invasion of the country of which he is commander in chief. Instead, he attacks the government of Arizona for trying to fill a gaping hole in law enforcement left by his own dereliction of duty.
*
TOWNHALL.com

Whose Country Is This? THE MEXICANS KNOW WE ARE A LOOTED COLONY OF NARCOMEX!


Pat Buchanan
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
With the support of 70 percent of its citizens, Arizona has ordered sheriffs and police to secure the border and remove illegal aliens, half a million of whom now reside there.
Arizona acted because the U.S. government has abdicated its constitutional duty to protect the states from invasion and refuses to enforce America's immigration laws.
"We in Arizona have been more than patient waiting for Washington to act," said Gov. Jan Brewer. "But decades of inaction and misguided policy have created an unacceptable situation."
We have a crisis in Arizona because we have a failed state in Washington.
What is the response of Barack Obama, who took an oath to see to it that federal laws are faithfully executed?
He is siding with the law-breakers. He is pandering to the ethnic lobbies. He is not berating a Mexican regime that aids and abets this invasion of the country of which he is commander in chief. Instead, he attacks the government of Arizona for trying to fill a gaping hole in law enforcement left by his own dereliction of duty.
He has denounced Arizona as "misguided." He has called on the Justice Department to ensure that Arizona's sheriffs and police do not violate anyone's civil rights. But he has said nothing about the rights of the people of Arizona who must deal with the costs of having hundreds of thousands of lawbreakers in their midst.
How's that for Andrew Jackson-style leadership?
Obama has done everything but his duty to enforce the law.
Undeniably, making it a state as well as a federal crime to be in this country illegally, and requiring police to check the immigration status of anyone they have a "reasonable suspicion" is here illegally, is tough and burdensome. But what choice did Arizona have?
The state has a fiscal crisis caused in part by the burden of providing schooling and social welfare for illegals and their families, who consume far more in services than they pay in taxes and who continue to pour in. Even John McCain is now calling for 3,000 troops on the border.
Police officers and a prominent rancher have been murdered. There have been kidnappings believed to be tied to the Mexican drug cartels. There are nightly high-speed chases through the barrios where innocent people are constantly at risk.
If Arizona does not get control of the border and stop the invasion, U.S. citizens will stop coming to Arizona and will begin to depart, as they are already fleeing California.
A country that cannot control its borders isn't really a country anymore, Ronald Reagan reminded us.
What we are talking about here is the Balkanization and breakup of a nation into ethnic enclaves. A country that cannot control its borders isn't really a country anymore, Ronald Reagan reminded us.
The tasks that Arizonans are themselves undertaking are ones that belong by right, the Constitution and federal law to the Border Patrol, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and Homeland Security.
Arizona has been compelled to assume the feds' role because the feds won't do their job. And for that dereliction of duty the buck stops on the desk of the president of the United States.
Why is Obama paralyzed? Why does he not enforce the law, even if he dislikes it, by punishing the businessmen who hire illegals and by sending the 12 million to 20 million illegals back home? President Eisenhower did it. Why won't he?
*
OBAMA THE HISPANDERING PRESIDENT SELLING OUT HIS OWN COUNTRY FOR THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES!
*

Because he is politically correct. Because he owes a big debt to the Hispanic lobby that helped deliver two-thirds of that vote in 2008. Though most citizens of Hispanic descent in Arizona want the border protected and the laws enforced, the Hispanic lobby demands that the law be changed.
Fair enough. But the nation rose up as one to reject the "path-to-citizenship" -- i.e., amnesty -- that the 2007 plan of George W. Bush, McCain, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama envisioned.
Al Sharpton threatens to go to Phoenix and march in the streets against the new Arizona law. Let him go.

JOBS? NO LEGAL NEED APPLY HERE!

Let us see how many African-Americans, who are today frozen out of the 8 million jobs held by illegal aliens that might otherwise go to them or their children, will march to defend an invasion for which they are themselves paying the heaviest price.
Last year, while Americans were losing a net of 5 million jobs, the U.S. government -- Bush and Obama both -- issued 1,131,000 green cards to legal immigrants to come and take the jobs that did open up, a flood of immigrants equaled in only four other years in our history.
What are we doing to our own people?
Whose country is this, anyway?
America today has an establishment that, because it does not like the immigration laws, countenances and condones wholesale violation of those laws.
Nevertheless, under those laws, the U.S. government is obligated to deport illegal aliens and punish businesses that knowingly hire them.
This is not an option. It is an obligation.
Can anyone say Barack Obama is meeting that obligation?
*
FAIRUS.org
The Administration's Phantom Immigration Enforcement Policy
According to DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s borders (Southwestern or otherwise) are secure, and gaining control is not even a goal of the department.
By Ira Mehlman
Published on 12/07/2009
Townhall.com
The setting was not quite the flight deck of the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln with a “Mission Accomplished” banner as the backdrop, but it was the next best thing. Speaking at the Center for American Progress (CAP) on Nov. 13, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano declared victory over illegal immigration and announced that the Obama administration is ready to move forward with a mass amnesty for the millions of illegal aliens already living in the United States.


WILL MEXICO BANKRUPT AMERICA LIKE IT HAS MEXIFORNIA?




BOOK: Mexifornia: SHATTERING OF AN AMERICAN DREAM (illegals call it their DREAM ACT)






Calif. Hospitals Spend $1.25 Bil On Illegal Immigrants

July 05, 2011

While the Obama Administration halts deportations to work on its secret amnesty plan, hospitals across the U.S. are getting stuck with the exorbitant tab of medically treating illegal immigrants and some are finally demanding compensation from the federal government.The group that represents most of the nation’s hospitals and medical providers recently urged President Obama to work with Congress to reimburse them for the monstrous cost of treating illegal immigrants. Federal law requires facilities to “treat and stabilize individuals” regardless of their immigration status, but federal support for the services remains “virtually nonexistent,” according to a letter submitted by the American Hospital Association to the president.This week officials in California, the state with the largest concentration of illegal immigrants, joined the call for federal compensation after revealing that hospitals there spend about $1.25 billion annually to care for illegal aliens. The figure skyrocketed from $1.05 billion in 2007, according to California Hospital Association figures quoted in a local news report.The problem will only get worst, according to officials, who say the $1.25 billion for 2010 could actually be higher. They complain that federal law forces them to treat patients in emergency rooms regardless of immigration status yet they get stuck with the financial burden. This has forced many hospitals to curtail services or close beds and could ultimately compromise healthcare.Nationwide, U.S. taxpayers spend tens of billions of dollars annually to provide free medical care for illegal immigrants with states that border Mexico taking the biggest hit. Adding to the problem is the fact that Mexico, the country that provides the largest amount of illegal immigrants in the U.S., has long promoted America’s generous public health centers. It even operates a Spanish-language program (Ventanillas de Salud, Health Windows) in about a dozen U.S. cities that refers its nationals—living in the country illegally—to publicly funded health centers where they can get free medical care without being turned over to immigration authorities.

Read more about illegal immigration



*

Most Illegal Immigrant Families Collect Welfare

April 05, 2011

Surprise, surprise; Census Bureau data reveals that most U.S. families headed by illegal immigrants use taxpayer-funded welfare programs on behalf of their American-born anchor babies.Even before the recession, immigrant households with children used welfare programs at consistently higher rates than natives, according to the extensive census data collected and analyzed by a nonpartisanWashington D.C. group dedicated to researching legal and illegal immigration in the U.S. The results, published this month in a lengthy report, are hardly surprising.Basically, the majority of households across the country benefitting from publicly-funded welfare programs are headed by immigrants, both legal and illegal. States where immigrant households with children have the highest welfare use rates are Arizona (62%), Texas, California and New York with 61% each and Pennsylvania(59%).The study focused on eight major welfare programs that cost the government $517 billion the year they were examined. They include Supplemental Security Income (SSI) for the disabled, Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF), a nutritional program known as Women, Infants and Children (WIC), food stamps, free/reduced school lunch, public housing and health insurance for the poor (Medicaid).Food assistance and Medicaid are the programs most commonly used by illegal immigrants, mainly on behalf of their American-born children who get automatic citizenship. On the other hand, legal immigrant households take advantage of every available welfare program, according to the study, which attributes it to low education level and resulting low income.The highest rate of welfare recipients come from the Dominican Republic (82 %), Mexico and Guatemala (75%) and Ecuador (70%), according to the report, which says welfare use tends to be high for both new arrivals and established residents.

Read more about illegal immigration

*


CA UNDER MEX OCCUPATION OPERATES $16 BILLION IN DEFICITS, WHILE PUTTING OUT $20 BILLION IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS. THESE ARE STATE COSTS. ADD WHAT THE COUNTIES ARE FORCED TO PAY OUT AND THEN THE AMOUNT PRIVATE HOSPITALS MUST PAY FOR MEXICO’S “FREE” MEDICAL ($1.3 BILLION YEARLY!).

WILL MEXICO BANKRUPT AMERICA? OR JUST TAKE ALL OUR JOBS?

*

LOS ANGELES ANCHOR BABY WELFARE PROGRAM:


THESE FIGURES ON WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY ARE DATED. IT NOT EXCEEDS $600 MILLION PER YEAR!!! (source: Los Angeles County & JUDICIAL WATCH)


California spending annually $22 billion to support illegals
Going To the Top!

By Susan Tully


I've been at the immigration reform and enforcement table for about 20 years. I've worked with activists during all those years. But last week, in Los Angeles, I had a first-time-ever experience at an activist brain storming session.

Gathered for an update on Stop AB131, the petition drive to gather signatures to force a ballot initiative as to whether the California taxpayers should fund college grants to illegal aliens, I asked the top activist leaders from Southern California how the signature drive was going.

They started updating me with the positive response from California residents who signed the petitions, but then admitted about 500,000 more signatures were still needed. When I said there was only a little more than three weeks to go to meet the January 5th deadline, suddenly their faces dropped at once, and the room went completely silent.

It was easy to read on each of their faces; the task was nearly impossible! Without big money to pay signature gatherers or a tsunami of petitions flooding in, the taxpayers of California will be forced to give grant money to illegal aliens for college, on top of the $22 billion they are spending annually in California to support the illegal alien population.

While all of our minds were racing and searching for suggestions as to how to accomplish this daunting task of gathering signatures, Lupe Moreno, long time Hispanic leader from Santa Ana, said "Can we have a prayer?" Everyone agreed to pray.

As the prayer went around the table, people expressed their sorrow for the lack of leadership in the State of California and in the nation to protect the interest of American citizens, and asked for divine guidance in helping them understand the harm their policies are inflicting on millions of innocent people in the state. In all the years I have worked on this issue, I had not witnessed the sort of sincere emotion that was expressed in that room.

(THE FASTEST GROWING POLITICAL PARTY IN AMERICA IS THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA! AND WE ARE FORCED TO FUND IT!)

You see, the politicians in California are happy to give money the state doesn't have to illegal aliens to attend college, while they cut the budgets and slash programs for public safety, right and left. The American citizen's interests and safety are simply collateral damage for seeking and appealing to the illegal alien lobby.

These activists in California have already learned what the rest of the nation is about to learn. We the people. . . are the only ones looking out for the best interest of American citizens. With few exceptions, we have no national leadership on the issue of stopping the illegal migration flow into our nation.

American citizenship or the benefits thereof have become a commodity for politicians to pander and barter away. They will grant de facto citizenship through sanctuary policies, in-state tuition, non-compliance with Secure Communities, grants for college, etc., etc., etc. President Obama and most the Republican presidential hopefuls are peddling various versions of amnesty proposals if they are elected next year.

What do these politicians want in return? They are hoping to leverage enough votes in key states to put them over the top in 2012, no matter what it costs the American people. This is futures betting: The politicians are gambling the nation's future in hopes of winning the next election.

So while the state can't afford to pay its bills or provide decent services to citizens, these California activists watch their elected leaders lavish still more benefits for people who don't have a legal right to be in the country. And while their child might have to pay out-of-state tuition to go to college in another state, thousands of illegal aliens are going to college at in-state tuition rates in California that they are subsidizing.

In addition they know that millions of other illegal alien parents are receiving food stamps, Medicaid, housing assistance and dozens of other state and local benefits for their American-born children, while they have to decide which bills will be paid this month and which will have to wait.

It's not hard to understand why the activist of California need all the help they can get. Please go to www.stopAB131.com and lend a hand to our friends and family and the people of California to do what needs to be done for the good of our children first.


*
LA RAZA DEMS BUILD THE "DREAM ACT" LIFE FOR LA RAZA OFF THE AMERICANS BACK! NOT ONE AMERICAN VOTED FOR ONE DREAM ACT HANDOUT!

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2012/01/mexifornia-la-raza-supremacy-legals.html



THE OBAMA CATCH, RELEASE AND REGISTER (ILLEGALS) TO VOTE PROGRAM:

ARTICLE

8 Out of 10 Illegals Apprehended in 2010 Never Prosecuted
http://www.alipac.us/article-6162-thread-1-0.html


PLEASE EMAIL THIS BLOG POSTING TO YOUR FAMILY AND FRIENDS! YOUR STATE IS NEXT TO FALL TO MEXICO!