Friday, March 4, 2011

CALDERON IS MAD AT U.S. AMBASSADOR TO MEXICO - HE PROBABLY ONES A FEW MORE BILLIONS IN GRINGO WELFARE FOR ALL HIS LIP TO AMERICANS!


MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com

*

Go to http://www.MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com and read articles and comments from other Americans on what they’ve witnessed in their communities around the country. While most of the population of California is now ILLEGAL, the problems, costs, assault to our culture by Mexico is EVERYWHERE. copy and pass it to your friends.

*





“Where there’s a Mexican, there’s Mexico!” Calderon… and ain’t it so!





EVERY INCH OF MEXICO IS CORRUPT! AND THEY ARE STILL RANTING THAT IT’S ALL AMERICA’S FAULT, EVEN AFTER WE’VE PERMITTED 38 MILLION OF THEM OVER OUR BORDERS AND INTO OUR JOBS!

*

HOW MANY, MANY TIMES HAVE WE READ ABOUT MEXICAN DRUG GANGS WALKING RIGHT OUT OF MEXICAN PRISON AND INTO WAITING LIMOUSINES?!?

*



“In Pascual’s defense, I must say that after nearly a year here in Mexico I, too, am rather astonished by how infrequently Mexico’s army actually engages gangsters in real shoot’em-ups. Losing only 300 soldiers in this confrontation, which has cost more than 35,000 lives, means someone isn’t fighting as hard as they could, in my estimation.”



*



Carlos Pascual, U.S. ambassador to Mexico, wobbles on a tightrope

Posted: 03 Mar 2011 03:40 PM PST

It has become eminently clear in the past 10 days that Mexican President Felipe Calderon neither likes nor trusts U.S. ambassador Carlos Pascual.

Calderon has said so twice now in public.

First came a lengthy interview in El Universal Feb. 22 in which Calderon fired a verbal mortar blast, saying Pascual suffers from “ignorance.” Calderon apparently referred to this Wikileaks cable signed by Pascual that discusses a lack of coordination between Mexican agencies and ministries in fighting organized crime.

“It speaks of lack of coordination between our agencies,” Calderon told El Universal. “I have no reason to tell him how many times I meet with my security cabinet. It’s none of his business. But his ignorance ends up in a distortion of what happens in Mexico, and it affects and causes annoyance on our team.”

Pascual, of course, didn’t respond in public to the criticism. That's him in the photo.

By several accounts, when Calderon met with President Obama a few hours ago in the White House, Pascual was there in the room.

This morning, Calderon blasted away again at Pascual in a meeting with reporters and editors at the Washington Post. He said that tensions over the Wikileaks cable had “risen so dramatically that he could no longer work with the American ambassador in his country,” this Post story says.

Here’s more from the Post article:

"It's difficult if suddenly you are seeing the courage of the army [questioned]. For instance, they have lost probably 300 soldiers ... and suddenly somebody in the American embassy, they [say] the Mexican soldiers aren't brave enough," Calderon told Washington Post reporters and editors.

"Or you decide to play the game that they are not coordinated enough, and suddenly start to bring information to one agency and not to the other and try to get them to compete."

Calderon's remark appeared to be a reference to a cable signed by Ambassador Carlos Pascual that described how the Mexican navy captured a major trafficker after U.S. officials gave them information that the Mexican army had not acted upon.

"We have an expression in Mexico, which says, 'Don't help me, compadre,'" Calderon said sarcastically, using the Spanish word for a close friend.

Asked whether he could continue to work with the U.S. ambassador, the Mexican leader said, "That is a question that maybe I will talk [about] with President Obama."

In Pascual’s defense, I must say that after nearly a year here in Mexico I, too, am rather astonished by how infrequently Mexico’s army actually engages gangsters in real shoot’em-ups. Losing only 300 soldiers in this confrontation, which has cost more than 35,000 lives, means someone isn’t fighting as hard as they could, in my estimation.

So what do Calderon’s outbursts mean? Perhaps he’s under pressure from the army in ways that are not public. The U.S. government clearly favors the Mexican navy, a smaller but scrappier force that has chalked up numerous victories against the bad guys. Certainly, the army is not the only entity within the Mexican government that fares poorly in Wikileaks cables. Genaro Garcia Luna, the former federal police officer and intelligence official who is now Secretary of Public Security, a Cabinet-level position, also comes out poorly.

It’s not just Wikileaks that casts doubt on Garcia Luna either. A book released last fall by journalist Anabel Hernandez called Los Senores del Narco links Garcia Luna to a circle of corrupt officials, some of whom favor the powerful Sinaloa Cartel. Despite this odor, Calderon keeps Garcia Luna on. Some observers I talk to portray Garcia Luna in a sinister light, casting him in a role similar to that of Vladimiro Montesinos, the Rasputin like intelligence chief of Alberto Fujimori, the jailed former president of Peru.

Returning to Pascual’s fate, his situation presents a dilemma to Hillary Clinton at Foggy Bottom. Even if Pascual’s cables are accurate depictions of the situation inside the Calderon administration, keeping him clearly may hurt important ties with Calderon. Throwing him under the bus, on the other hand, could send a signal to other foreign leaders that if they scream loud enough, they can get rid of a U.S. ambassador doing his job capably.



*

COMMENT FROM OBSERVER31 – WASHINGTON POST:



What chutzpah from Calderon !!! (I would have used a stronger work, but my comment would have gotten deleted ). Corruption everywhere, especially in the police, government, and amongst politicians, and the problem is Wikileaks, he says !



And what a stupid idea to allow Mexican truckers into the country ! Great way to facilitate the flow of illegal drugs (and people) into the U.S., which will result in the spread of organized crime in this country.



*

RCNTN POSTS:

Here is a soluation to Calderons problem we bring home our soilders fro the middle east and place them along the entire length of the Mexican border.With orders to kill any one attempting to cross then we stop all mail and money transfers from the US to Mexico. All hispanic s have 10 days to provide proof of citizenship or become prisoners until they can be returned to Mexico. This should stop the flow of guns south and drugs north and rid our country of the illegals Problem solved

3/4/2011 10:33:35 AM



*

RALPHINPHNX POSTS:



So,did anyone else notice in that picture of Comrade White House Butler & Messiah Barack Hussein Obama and the Head Mexican

Thug Felipe Calderon.that Obama appears to

getting ready to bow deeply and kiss Calderon rear end now then? Obama worst US

President ever! So,why hasn't Congress done it's duty and Impeached Obama by now?



Time to Deport White House Butler Obama

to Mexico along with Obama's 40 Milion

Undocumented Democrat Illegal Alien Voters

and Secure the Border! Deport all Illegal

Alien,starting with the one from Kenya in

the White House and Jail All Illegal Alien

Employers here and now! Vote all Incumbents Democrat & Republican Out in

2012 and 2014! Just Say NO to Obama!

3/4/2011 10:13:57 AM



*

BETHG1841 POSTS:



magnifco1000 wrote:

Thank you Wikileaks! For years, Mexico has been doing nothing and playing charades with the US government. The diplomatic niceties have only masked the lawlessness and lack of control on the border. All Wikileaks is doing is pointing out the truth. Isn't this better then the lies of "ever improving cooperation," and the other poppycock we keep hearing about Mexico?

==========================================

Please. Do not place Assange in the hero category. Do you really think that he released documents to promote world peace? There is no compassion or

regret for the lives that he has put at risk.

It's all about power and world recognition. Personal gain was his only motive.



Make no mistake about it. Calderon isn't here to help repair damages between our countries. He's here for more funding. How many Mexican officials are lining their pockets with U.S. taxpayer dollars and blood money from the cartels?



Why wouldn't WaPo write a real story on this critical issue. The cartels have pushed their ownership across the border. They are forcing landowners off their land with death threats. Will the federal government finally acknowledge the seriousness of the problem and close the borders when the Mexican flag is raised in the state capitals?



*

Calderon: WikiLeaks caused severe damage to U.S.-Mexico relations

By Mary Beth Sheridan

Washington Post Staff Writer

Thursday, March 3, 2011; 9:49 PM

Mexican President Felipe Calderon said Thursday that the release of State Department cables criticizing Mexico's anti-drug fight had caused "severe damage" to its relationship with the United States and suggested that tensions had risen so dramatically that he could no longer work with the American ambassador in his country.

Calderon's comments were the strongest to date on the secret cables distributed by WikiLeaks, which have threatened to disrupt what both sides have hailed as increasingly close cooperation against Mexico's violent drug gangs.

The Mexican president, at the start of a one-day visit to Washington, suggested that the release of the cables had caused turmoil on his national security team. He took aim at one U.S. cable that said that Mexican military officials had "risk-averse habits."

"It's difficult if suddenly you are seeing the courage of the army [questioned]. For instance, they have lost probably 300 soldiers ... and suddenly somebody in the American embassy, they [say] the Mexican soldiers aren't brave enough," Calderon told Washington Post reporters and editors.

"Or you decide to play the game that they are not coordinated enough, and suddenly start to bring information to one agency and not to the other and try to get them to compete."

Calderon's remark appeared to be a reference to a cable signed by Ambassador Carlos Pascual that described how the Mexican navy captured a major trafficker after U.S. officials gave them information that the Mexican army had not acted upon.

"We have an expression in Mexico, which says, 'Don't help me, compadre,'" Calderon said sarcastically, using the Spanish word for a close friend.

Asked whether he could continue to work with the U.S. ambassador, the Mexican leader said, "That is a question that maybe I will talk [about] with President Obama." The two leaders were scheduled to meet at midday.

Pressed on whether he had lost confidence in Pascual, Calderon paused and then said, "It's difficult to build and it's easy to lose."

U.S. officials have defended Pascual's work and said he would attend the meeting Thursday between Calderon and Obama.

Pascual and the embassy in Mexico are "doing tremendous work to advance U.S. national interests and to support our Mexican partners in - both in the security space but [also] across the full range of the relationship," a senior U.S. official said in a conference call with reporters on the eve of the visit. He spoke under ground rules of anonymity.

If Pascual was recalled, he would be the most prominent U.S. casualty of the WikiLeaks scandal. Only one American ambassador has had to leave the country where he was based because of the cables - Ambassador Gene Cretz, who took an extended break from Libya before the anti-government demonstrations erupted there.

Pascual did not answer an e-mail seeking comment.

Calderon is under intense pressure to curb violence that has soared since he unleashed the Mexican army against powerful drug-trafficking gangs. Over 35,000 Mexicans have been killed in drug-related violence during the past four years.



How Much Will Obama Kiss Up to Mexican Dictator Calderon? YOU'VE SEEN HIM KISS UP TO SAUDIS DICTATOR!

AS TO BE EXPECTED, THAT HARD NEGOTIATOR, BARACK OBAMA WENT LIMP AT THE FEET OF MEX DICTATOR, CALDERON.


NO ONE WORKS HARDER FOR MEXICO THAN BARACK OBAMA!



MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com

*

Go to http://www.MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com

*

Instead, for Obama, dealing with Mexico means suing Arizona over immigration enforcement because it reaps Latino votes. It's time he looked at U.S. interests and made his decisions as America's leader.

*

INVESTORS.com



Editorial: Mexican Shuffle

Posted 03/03/2011 06:57 PM ET

Diplomacy: Like a guilt-ridden divorced dad, President Obama met with Mexico's President Calderon Thursday — and quickly caved in to all he asked. That's a jackpot for Mexico. But for the U.S., it's a mixed bag.



The only reason Thursday's White House meeting between President Obama and Mexican President Felipe Calderon wasn't a complete loss for the U.S. was that some of the Mexican leader's agenda was to persuade Obama to respect free markets, honor U.S. treaty obligations, and help win Mexico's war spilling over the U.S. border.



Up until now, Obama's paid scant attention to any of these issues, seeing Mexico solely in domestic political terms. With time getting short, Calderon's hasty visit was met with Obama caving in to all of his requests.



Even so, there was some good news on one front from this White House summit.



President Obama announced at long last that the U.S. would restore Mexican trucking rights in the U.S. after Congress let a pilot program enacted under NAFTA expire in 2009.



That mistake cost U.S. companies $2.4 billion in retaliatory Mexican tariffs, and tens of thousands of U.S. jobs. Mexico, remember, is America's third-largest trading partner, and the impact was big.



In this case, caving in to Calderon wasn't a bad thing.



Obama had let the truck program expire largely to please the Teamsters' union, which hates competition. Pleasing Calderon effectively pitches this union over the side and should restore some of the U.S. jobs lost as a result of two years of pointless tariffs.



A second cave-in, however, wasn't nearly as good for Americans. Obama announced that though the U.S. would continue to help Mexico win its war against the drug cartels, U.S. agents in Mexico must continue to work unarmed.



That may sound insane to Americans, but it was exactly what Calderon sought — a manifestation of longstanding historic consensus in that country, and a nod to his own domestic political interests.



Unfortunately, it ill serves American interests, and Obama should have insisted Calderon give in.



Last month, two U.S. agents of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency were assaulted by armed Mexican cartel thugs on a highway in San Luis Potosi, leaving Special Agent Jaime Jorge Zapata, 32, dead.



Obama could have read Calderon the Riot Act on that one — insisting that those who help Mexico in its war at least be able to defend themselves. If we are to see Mexico's war as serious, old attitudes must be discarded.



But that didn't happen, largely because Obama acted like a softy — not out of any real interest in the issues, but because he's paid so little attention. Obama's policies are basically reactions to events.



Instead, for Obama, dealing with Mexico means suing Arizona over immigration enforcement because it reaps Latino votes. It's time he looked at U.S. interests and made his decisions as America's leader.





*

MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com

*

Go to http://www.MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com and read articles and comments from other Americans on what they’ve witnessed in their communities around the country. While most of the population of California is now ILLEGAL, the problems, costs, assault to our culture by Mexico is EVERYWHERE. copy and pass it to your friends.



*

Report Illegals & Employers Toll Free... (866) 347-2423

INS National Customer Service Center Phone: 1-800-375-5283.

http://www.ice.gov/ ICE, ice, ICE

http://www.reportillegals.com/



*

Colorado Alliance for Immigration Reform

www.CAIRCO.org





http://www.FAIRUS.org



http://www.JUDICIALWATCH.org



http://www.ALIPAC.us



*

http://blogs.mcclatchydc.com/mexico/2011/01/getting-over-the-border-fence-fast.html



*

Obama Quietly Erasing Borders (Article)





Article Link:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=240045





CONTACT THE HISPANDERING LA RAZA PARTY PRESIDENT HERE:



You can contact President Obama and let him know of your opposition to amnesty for illegal aliens:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/CONTACT/



SANCTUARY CITIES WHERE ILLEGALS RULE - SUPPORTED BY OBAMA'S CORRUPT DEPT. OF LA RAZA JUSTICE


MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com

*

Go to http://www.MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com



*

SANCTUARY CITIES ARE CITIES WHERE THE AMERICAN TAX PAYERS PAY FOR MEX WELFARE AFTER THE ILLEGAL TAKES THE AMERICAN’S JOB.



FOR OBAMA, SANCTUARY CITIES ARE WHERE ILLEGALS VOTE AND VOTE OFTEN FOR HIM.



HE HAS HIS CORRUPT DEPT OF JUSTICE SUE THE LEGALS OF ARIZONA, BUT KEEP THEIR MOUTHS SHUT ABOUT CITIES WHERE LA RAZA SUPREMACY HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED.



*



The Obama administration will sue Arizona for trying to help Washington enforce federal immigration laws, but flatly rejects the notion of suing sanctuary cities that blatantly defy those same laws.





Hans A. von Spakovsky

Law-Enforcement-Free Sanctuaries



The Obama administration will sue Arizona for trying to help Washington enforce federal immigration laws, but flatly rejects the notion of suing sanctuary cities that blatantly defy those same laws. That announcement two weeks ago revealed the hypocrisy and utter contempt for the rule of law rampant in Eric Holder’s Justice Department.

It was the latest example of the Department letting partisan politics, rather than the interests of justice and the impartial enforcement of the law, drive its legal decisions. In this instance, it both threatens national security and undermines public confidence in our legal system.

Holder’s refusal to sue sanctuary cities is an abrogation of his responsibility as the nation’s chief federal law enforcement officer. Unlike Arizona, many of these cities have policies that violate federal law.

The Obama administration claims Arizona’s law will “disrupt federal immigration enforcement.” But the only thing it could possibly disrupt is federal non-enforcement. As the elections approach, Holder’s suit may help gin up enthusiasm among the president’s more radical political allies, such as La Raza. But using the law enforcement powers of the federal government to achieve political ends is a dangerous abuse of power.

*

EVERY STATE NOW HAS LA RAZA ILLEGALS VOTING FOR LA RAZA DEMS, AMNESTY OR AT LEAST OBAMA’S CONTINUED NON-ENFORCEMENT.



*

By MARTIN ESPINOZA

THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

Published: Friday, March 19, 2010 at 6:45 p.m.

Last Modified: Friday, March 19, 2010 at 6:45 p.m.

Sonoma County Sheriff Bill Cogbill said Friday he wants to clear the air over a key local issue expected to turn out thousands of Latino immigrants and their supporters to a march and rally in downtown Santa Rosa on Sunday.

(YOU THOUGHT THERE WAS A PLACE IN MEXIFORNIA NOT UNDER MEX OCCUPATION?)

Thousands march in Santa Rosa for immigration reform

The issue is a new system in which fingerprints taken from people booked in the county ail are sent electronically to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, databases.

Cogbill said Friday the new program is not a local policy, nor is there any official agreement between the county and ICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

“We didn’t have a choice in it,” Cogbill said. “They came to us just to let us know this is happening.”

He said that even before the “biometric” fingerprinting program was launched in Sonoma County this month, fingerprints were routinely sent to the state Department of Justice, which would then have them checked for criminal history against databases maintained by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

But under a new initiative being rolled out gradually across the country, the FBI now is sending fingerprints to ICE.

Cogbill said he personally approves of the program because it helps more effectively identify illegal immigrants with criminal backgrounds. But he stressed, “we’re not doing anything different from our end” and there’s no agreement between the Sheriff’s Office and ICE.

ICE spokeswoman Virginia Kice said the program, known as Secure Communities, is the latest tool being used to target illegal immigrants with dangerous criminal backgrounds, many of whom would otherwise “slip through the cracks.”

Top priority, she said, is illegal immigrants who commit crimes such as murder, rape, robbery, kidnap and drug offenses.

“Our desired outcome is to see that person removed from the United States,” Kice said.



(REALITY CHECK: MEXICANS ARE THE MOST VIOLENT, RACIST AND CRIMINALLY PRONE. THERE ARE OVER A MILLION MEXICAN GANG MEMBERS ALONE IN OUR OPEN AND UNDEFENDED BORDERS!)



But immigrant rights advocates say it’s not just people with serious criminal backgrounds that will be affected. Organizers of Sunday’s march charge that local jails hold illegal immigrants who have committed minor infractions, such as traffic violations.

“They’re not just taking cars, they’re putting people in jail,” said Alvarez.

(THE OL’ GRINGO IS A RACIST CRAP!)

He said he believes law enforcement officials are “profiling” immigrants based on their appearance, a claim Cogbill and other local law enforcement officials strongly reject.

Secure Communities, Kice said, recently has been expanded to Orange County, bringing the number of participating counties to 12. The others are Los Angeles, Ventura, San Diego, Imperial, Santa Barbara, San Luis Obispo, Sacramento, Solano, San Joaquin and Stanislaus counties.

There are 120 jurisdictions in 16 states now on board, she said. By next year, Secure Communities should be present in every state and should have nationwide coverage by 2013.





18,000 ILLEGAL CRIMINALS GUILTY OF MURDER, RAPE & KIDNAPPING NABBED!



Since its inception, Kice wrote in an e-mail, the program has identified “more than 18,000 aliens charged with or convicted of Level 1 crimes, such as murder, rape and kidnapping — 4,000 of whom have already been removed from the United States.”

Most of those who have not yet been deported are completing their sentences, she said. An additional 25,000 illegal immigrants charged with “Level 2 and 3 crimes,” such as burglary and serious property crimes, have been deported. This latter category of crimes represents 90 percent of the crimes committed by illegal immigrants, she said.



*

The Administration's Phantom Immigration Enforcement Policy

According to DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s borders (Southwestern or otherwise) are secure, and gaining control is not even a goal of the department.

By Ira Mehlman

Published on 12/07/2009

Townhall.com

The setting was not quite the flight deck of the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln with a “Mission Accomplished” banner as the backdrop, but it was the next best thing. Speaking at the Center for American Progress (CAP) on Nov. 13, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano declared victory over illegal immigration and announced that the Obama administration is ready to move forward with a mass amnesty for the millions of illegal aliens already living in the United States.

Arguing the Obama administration’s case for amnesty, Napolitano laid out what she described as the “three-legged stool” for immigration reform. As the administration views it, immigration reform must include “a commitment to serious and effective enforcement, improved legal flows for families and workers, and a firm but fair way to deal with those who are already here.”

Acknowledging that a lack of confidence in the government’s ability and commitment to effectively enforce the immigration laws it passes proved to be the Waterloo of previous efforts to gain amnesty for illegal aliens, Napolitano was quick to reassure the American public that those concerns could be put to rest.

“For starters, the security of the Southwest border has been transformed from where it was in 2007,” stated the secretary. Not only is the border locked up tight, she continued, but the situation is well in-hand in the interior of the country as well. “We’ve also shown that the government is serious and strategic in its approach to enforcement by making changes in how we enforce the law in the interior of the country and at worksites…Furthermore, we’ve transformed worksite enforcement to truly address the demand side of illegal immigration.”

If Rep. Joe Wilson had been in attendance to hear Secretary Napolitano’s CAP speech he might well have had a few choice comments to offer. But since he wasn’t, we will have to rely on the Department of Homeland Security’s own data to assess the veracity of Napolitano’s claims.

According to DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s borders (Southwestern or otherwise) are secure, and gaining control is not even a goal of the department. DHS claims to have “effective control” over just 894 miles of border. That’s 894 out of 8,607 miles they are charged with protecting. As for the other 7,713 miles? DHS’s stated border security goal for FY 2010 is the same 894 miles.

The administration’s strategic approach to interior and worksite enforcement is just as chimerical as its strategy at the border, unless one considers shuffling paper to be a strategy. DHS data, released November 18, show that administrative arrests of immigration law violators fell by 68 percent between 2008 and 2009. The department also carried out 60 percent fewer arrests for criminal violations of immigration laws, 58 percent fewer criminal indictments, and won 63 percent fewer convictions.

While the official unemployment rate has climbed from 7.6 percent when President Obama took office in January to 10 percent today, the administration’s worksite enforcement strategy has amounted to a bureaucratic game of musical chairs. The administration has all but ended worksite enforcement actions and replaced them with paperwork audits. When the audits determine that illegal aliens are on the payroll, employers are given the opportunity to fire them with little or no adverse consequence to the company, while no action is taken to remove the illegal workers from the country. The illegal workers simply acquire a new set of fraudulent documents and move on to the next employer seeking workers willing to accept substandard wages.

In Janet Napolitano’s alternative reality a mere 10 percent of our borders under “effective control” and sharp declines in arrests and prosecutions of immigration lawbreakers may be construed as confidence builders, but it is hard to imagine that the American public is going to see it that way. If anything, the administration’s record has left the public less confident that promises of future immigration enforcement would be worth the government paper they’re printed on.

As Americans scrutinize the administration’s plans to overhaul immigration policy, they are likely to find little in the “three-legged stool” being offered that they like or trust. The first leg – enforcement – the administration has all but sawed off. The second – increased admissions of extended family members and workers – makes little sense with some 25 million Americans either unemployed or relegated to part-time work. And the third – amnesty for millions of illegal aliens – is anathema to their sense of justice and fair play.

As Americans well know, declaring “Mission Accomplished” and actually accomplishing a mission are two completely different things. When it comes to enforcing immigration laws, the only message the public is receiving from this administration is “Mission Aborted.”

*

*

FIFTEEN THINGS YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT LA RAZA “THE RACE” and the LA RAZA DEMS’ PUSH TO EXPAND MEX SUPREMACY TO BUY THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES:



by Michelle Malkin

(get Malkin’s book on OBAMA NOTED below!)





Only in America could critics of a group called "The Race" be labeled racists. Such is the triumph of left-wing identity chauvinists, whose aggressive activists and supine abettors have succeeded in redefining all opposition as "hate."

Both Barack Obama and John McCain will speak this week in San Diego at the annual conference of the National Council of La Raza, the Latino organization whose name is Spanish for, yes, "The Race." Can you imagine Obama and McCain paying homage to a group of white people who called themselves that? No matter. The presidential candidates and the media have legitimized "The Race" as a mainstream ethnic lobbying group and marginalized its critics as intolerant bigots. The unvarnished truth is that the group is a radical ethnic nationalist outfit that abuses your tax dollars and milks PC politics to undermine our sovereignty.

*

Here are 15 things you should know about "The Race":

*

15. "The Race" supports driver's licenses for illegal aliens.

*

14."The Race" demands in-state tuition discounts for illegal alien students that are not available to law-abiding U.S. citizens and law-abiding legal immigrants.

*

13. "The Race" vehemently opposes cooperative immigration enforcement efforts between local, state and federal authorities.

*

12. "The Race" opposes a secure fence on the southern border.

*

11. "The Race" joined the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee in a failed lawsuit attempt to prevent the feds from entering immigration information into a key national crime database -- and to prevent local police officers from accessing the data.

*

10. "The Race" opposed the state of Oklahoma's tough immigration-enforcement-first laws, which cut off welfare to illegal aliens, put teeth in employer sanctions and strengthened local-federal cooperation and information sharing.

*

9. "The Race" joined other open-borders, anti-assimilationists and sued to prevent Proposition 227, California's bilingual education reform ballot initiative, from becoming law.

*

8. "The Race" bitterly protested common-sense voter ID provisions as an "absolute disgrace."

*

7. "The Race" has consistently opposed post-9/11 national security measures at every turn.

*

6. Former "Race" president Raul Yzaguirre, Hillary Clinton's Hispanic outreach adviser, said this: "U.S. English is to Hispanics as the Ku Klux Klan is to blacks." He was referring to U.S. English, the nation's oldest, largest citizens' action group dedicated to preserving the unifying role of the English language in the United States. "The Race" also pioneered Orwellian open-borders Newspeak and advised the Mexican government on how to lobby for illegal alien amnesty while avoiding the terms "illegal" and "amnesty."

*

5. "The Race" gives mainstream cover to a poisonous subset of ideological satellites, led by Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan, or Chicano Student Movement of Aztlan (MEChA). The late GOP Rep. Charlie Norwood rightly characterized the organization as "a radical racist group … one of the most anti-American groups in the country, which has permeated U.S. campuses since the 1960s, and continues its push to carve a racist nation out of the American West."

*

4. "The Race" is currently leading a smear campaign against staunch immigration enforcement leaders and has called for TV and cable news networks to keep immigration enforcement proponents off the airwaves -- in addition to pushing for Fairness Doctrine policies to shut up their foes. The New York Times reported that current "Race" president Janet Murguia believes "hate speech" should "not be tolerated, even if such censorship were a violation of First Amendment rights."

*

3. "The Race" sponsors militant ethnic nationalist charter schools subsidized by your public tax dollars (at least $8 million in federal education grants). The schools include Aztlan Academy in Tucson, Ariz., the Mexicayotl Academy in Nogales, Ariz., Academia Cesar Chavez Charter School in St. Paul, Minn., and La Academia Semillas del Pueblo in Los Angeles, whose principal inveighed: "We don't want to drink from a White water fountain, we have our own wells and our natural reservoirs and our way of collecting rain in our aqueducts. We don't need a White water fountain … ultimately the White way, the American way, the neo liberal, capitalist way of life will eventually lead to our own destruction."

*

2. "The Race" has perfected the art of the PC shakedown at taxpayer expense, pushing relentlessly to lower home loan standards for Hispanic borrowers, reaping millions in federal "mortgage counseling" grants, seeking special multimillion-dollar earmarks and partnering with banks that do business with illegal aliens.

*

1. "The Race" thrives on ethnic supremacy -- and the elite sheeple's unwillingness to call it what it is. As historian Victor Davis Hanson observes: "[The] organization's very nomenclature 'The National Council of La Raza' is hate speech to the core. Despite all the contortions of the group, Raza (as its Latin cognate suggests) reflects the meaning of 'race' in Spanish, not 'the people' -- and that's precisely why we don't hear of something like 'The National Council of the People,' which would not confer the buzz notion of ethnic, racial and tribal chauvinism."

*

The fringe is the center. The center is the fringe. Viva La Raza.

*

“Wherever there’s a Mexican, there is Mexico!”... President Calderone. As an American living under Spanish speaking Mexican occupation, I would add to this “Where there’s a Mexican, there’s a violent Mexican gang!”



MATT DAMON Asks If Obama Punked Us - AREN'T WE ALL, ALL BUT HIS BANKSTER DONORS, ASKING THE SAME???

REALITY IS THAT MOST OF AMERICA WAS PUNKED BY BARACK OBAMA! INTERESTINGLY, HIS BANKSTER DONORS GOT IT RIGHT!



OBAMA BANKSTER DONORS COULD NEVER HAVE KNOWN HOW MUCH ONE MAN COULD DO FOR THEM. THEY’VE PILLAGED A NATION, BROUGHT AN ECONOMY TO ITS KNEES, CONNED A MASSIVE WELFARE BAILOUT, NO REAL REGULATION, STAGGERING BONUSES, AND NOT ONE WENT TO PRISON!



LET’S CALL IT “FRIENDS IN HIGH WHITE HOUSE PLACES!”



*

Obama and Hollywood: The Honeymoon Is Over

Matt Damon is the Latest Among Hollywood's Liberal Elite to Break With the President



March 4, 2011



The honeymoon is apparently over.



Actor Matt Damon, one of the liberal elite's first

celebrity Obama backers, told CNN's Piers Morgan

Thursday that he has been disappointed in President

Obama's performance.



Asked if he was happy with the man he once so

vocally supported, the actor responded, "No. I really

think he misinterpreted his mandate. A friend of mine

said it the other day and I thought it was a great line:

'I no longer hope for audacity,'" a take on Obama's

"Audacity of Hope" book title.



On Afghanistan, Damon said he doesn't believe the

"mission there has been very well articulated. And I

think it would help to kind of reframe the way we're

thinking about being there and why we're there."



But Damon is not the first -- nor, surely, will he be

the last -- of Obama's high-profile Hollywood

supporters to express disappointment in the

president's accomplishments.



Barbra Streisand appeared on "Larry King Live" --

hosted by Morgan's predecessor -- in December

where she complained about both Obama specifically

and Democrats in general.



She conceded that Obama "has an open mind; he has

an open heart. And he's cool and he's very smart." But

Streisand said she was disappointed in him for not

having "used his executive privilege ... to get rid of

'don't ask, don't tell,'" the policy barring openly gay

Americans from military service.



Streisand said she went to Europe during last year's

midterm elections because she didn't want to be

around for a "bloodbath."



The substantial losses her party suffered were a result

of "a mistake on the Democrats' part that they have not

gotten their message across in communicating all that

they have done that is good," she said



Her take on the tax-cut compromise? "I mean, I'm one



of those people who are going to benefit," she

replied. "But it's not fair to working people in America.

It's just not fair."



Of course, Hollywood is hardly a monolith. And many

of the president's supporters continue to stand by

their man, among them George Clooney and Oprah

Winfrey.



Appearing on "Morning Joe" with Joe Scarborough last

month, Winfrey -- a longtime ardent supporter --

urged Obama's critics to show some level of respect"

for the president, even when they disagree with him.



"I believe that what he really wants is for this country

to be greater, stronger more innovative. Those

principles are what really enforces his beliefs," the

queen of daytime TV said, quipping that, "Everybody

complaining ought to try [being president] for a

week."



Damon, for his part, expressed a different sentiment

Thursday. On the president's State of the Union

address last month, Damon said, "He's doubled down

on a lot of things. ... He didn't even say the word

'poverty.' You've got millions of people languishing

in it."







Robert Redford complained last summer that Obama

was not taking enough action to clean up the BP gulf

oil spill.



"The voters sent Obama to Washington to be a bold

and visionary leader," the actor told Keith Olbermann,

the former host of MSNBC's "Countdown."



"We don't need a disaster-manager, we need a leader."



Director Spike Lee also blasted the president for his

oil-spill response, or lack thereof.



"I don't know why Obama ever trusted these BP guys.

They would lie to their mothers," Lee said to GQ in

August. "[Former BP president Tony] Hayward does

not give a [expletive]. The thing we don't talk about is

that 11 Americans lost their lives and it took seven

weeks to invite their families to the White House. I'm

not trying to bash my man, but that's a long time."



In an echo of many criticisms leveled at the Bush

administration for its response to the devastating

Katrina floods in New Orleans, Lee called Obama out

for "environmental racism."



"If this oil spill would have reached the Hamptons,

Martha's Vineyard [where Lee summers], Cape Cod,

that [expletive] would have been fixed," he said.



In an interview with the British paper Guardian

January 2010, "Glee" star Jane Lynch called Obama a

"huge disappointment" for not taking bolder action on

gay rights.



"Shouldn't there be safeguards against the majority

voting on the rights of a minority?" she asked. "If

people voted on civil rights in the '60s, it would have

never happened. It took somebody like [President]

Lyndon Johnson going, 'F*** all of you. I'm going to

do this.' Obama won't do it."



But it's not just Hollywood that has lost a lot of its

love. Obama's approval ratings fell by 11 percent

across the board in 2010, according to the most

recent Gallup poll.



Still, with all the flack the president has gotten from

the left wing of his party, one would think his

moderate bona fides should have earned him some

GOP respect by now.



One would be wrong. Newt Gingrich, the former

congressmen who spearheaded Capitol Hill's 1994

so-called Republican revolution, has announced he

may explore a 2012 bid for the presidency.



"The rule of law," Gingrich complained, "is being

replaced by the rule of Obama.



*

DO YOU THINK OBAMA PUNKED US?



IF SO, SINCE WHEN? THE FIRST DAY?



"There is a populist and conservative revolt against Wall Street and financial elites, Congress and government," Democratic pollster Stanley Greenberg warned in an analysis this week. "Democrats and President Obama are seen as more interested in bailing out Wall Street than helping Main Street."



*

OBAMA’S CON JOB ON REGULATION WILL NOT IMPACT HIS LARGEST BANKSTER DONORS! WHO’D OF THOUGHT???



“Obama's rhetoric covered the whole financial industry, but the key changes will affect only a few high-profile players, including JPMorgan Chase & Co., while sparing investment banks like Goldman Sachs Group Inc.”

*

WHAT DID THE BANKSTERS KNOW ABOUT OUR ACTOR OBAMA THAT WE DIDN’T KNOW?

Records show that four out of Obama's top five contributors are employees of financial industry giants - Goldman Sachs ($571,330), UBS AG ($364,806), JPMorgan Chase ($362,207) and Citigroup ($358,054).



The president's actions and tactics haven't matched his lofty language, breeding a cynicism that has doomed his cause.

Jonah Goldberg

December 22, 2009

On his own terms, President Obama is a failure.



During the presidential campaign, he fought hammer and tongs with Hillary Rodham Clinton on the best way to govern. Clinton, casting herself as a battle-scarred political veteran, argued that diligence, dedicated detail work and working the system were essential for success.



Obama, donning the mantle of a redeemer descending from divine heights, argued that his soaring rhetoric was more than "just words" but a way out of the poisonous, partisan gridlock of yesteryear. Early on in New Hampshire, he proclaimed that his "rival in this race is not other candidates. It's cynicism."



Occasionally the Obama-Clinton argument was explicit -- such as when they sparred over who was more important to the Civil Rights Act, Martin Luther King Jr. or Lyndon Johnson -- but it was always there, implicit in everything from their body language and stagecraft to position papers and platforms.



The great irony of it all is that it seems they were both wrong.



Obama's rhetoric in fact looks to be the best way to achieve a Clintonian agenda. But a Clintonian agenda is the worst possible way to live up to Obama's rhetoric.



From his 2004 keynote speech onward, Obama rejected the partisan divide. He earned points by insisting that invidious descriptions of political opponents were deleterious to civic health and distracted us from the fact that "we are one people, all of us pledging allegiance to the stars and stripes, all of us defending the United States of America."



In a June primary victory speech, Obama said he was "absolutely certain that generations from now, we will be able to look back and tell our children . . . this was the moment -- this was the time -- when we came together to remake this great nation."



So, does anyone feel like Americans are coming together?



Obama the outsider hasn't changed the way Washington works; he's worked Washington in a way that only an outsider with no respect for the place would dare.



Consider his signature domestic priority: healthcare reform. After a year of working on it, his progressive base is either profoundly disappointed with him or seethingly angry. His Republican and conservative opponents are not only furious, they are emboldened. And independents -- who've been deserting the Democrats in polls and off-year elections -- are simply disgusted with the whole spectacle. Most important, an administration that once preened over its people-power roots, can't even claim that Americans like what he's doing.



The bill does have its supporters: inside-the-Beltway pundits and Capitol Hill deal-makers, the pharmaceutical industry and the supposedly rapacious insurance companies (don't take my word for it, just ask Howard Dean -- or your stockbroker).



Under the Clintonian paradigm of governance, Nebraska Democrat Ben Nelson's parlaying of his pro-life objections to the Senate bill into a windfall for his state and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders' leveraging of his socialist principles for billions in special deals would be dramatic twists in a conventional story of LBJ-style arm-twisting.



But Clintonian means cannot further Obamaian ends. For the last year Obama's party has made a mockery of everything Obama was supposed to represent. The tone has gotten worse as his communications staff spent the year demonizing Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and Fox News. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer called opponents of their health proposals "un-American." Just over the weekend, Rhode Island's Sheldon Whitehouse insisted that Senate opposition is being driven, in part, by "Aryan support groups."



Everywhere you look, the sizzle doesn't match the steak. He won the Nobel Peace Prize as he (rightly) sent even more men off to war. He promised the oceans would stop rising but delivered a nonbinding something-or-other in Copenhagen.



In his special healthcare address to Congress in September, he said, "I am not the first president to take up [the cause of healthcare reform], but I am determined to be the last." Those were just words, and everyone, including Obama, knew it. Indeed, the only grounds for supporting the bill, according to progressives, is that it is a "first step" or a "starter house" that they'll build on for years, even generations, to come. In other words, the healthcare debate is not only not going to end, it's going to get uglier for as far as the eye can see.



But here's the point: Obama's rhetorical audacity breeds cynicism, because utopianism always comes up short. Obama has many victories ahead of him, but his cause is already lost.

*

August 9, 2009

OP-ED COLUMNIST

Is Obama Punking Us?

By FRANK RICH

“AUGUST is a challenging time to be president,” said Andrew Card, the former Bush White House chief of staff, as he offered unsolicited advice to his successors in a television interview last week. “I think you have to expect the unexpected.”

He should know. Thursday was the eighth anniversary of “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.,” the President’s Daily Brief that his boss ignored while on vacation in Crawford. Aug. 29 marks the fourth anniversary of Hurricane Katrina’s strike on the Louisiana coast, which his boss also ignored while on vacation in Crawford.

So do have a blast in Martha’s Vineyard, President Obama.

Even as we wait for some unexpected disaster to strike, Beltway omens for the current White House are grim. Obama’s poll numbers are approaching free fall, we are told. If he fails on health care, he’s toast. Indeed, many of the bloviators who spot a fatal swoon in the Obama presidency are the same doomsayers who in August 2008 were predicting his Election Day defeat because he couldn’t “close the deal” and clear the 50 percent mark in matchups with John McCain.

Here are two not very daring predictions: Obama will get some kind of health care reform done come fall. His poll numbers will not crater any time soon.

Yet there is real reason for longer-term worry in the form of a persistent, anecdotal drift toward disillusionment among some of the president’s supporters. And not merely those on the left. This concern was perhaps best articulated by an Obama voter, a real estate agent in Virginia, featured on the front page of The Washington Post last week. “Nothing’s changed for the common guy,” she said. “I feel like I’ve been punked.” She cited in particular the billions of dollars in bailouts given to banks that still “act like they’re broke.”

But this mood isn’t just about the banks, Public Enemy No. 1. What the Great Recession has crystallized is a larger syndrome that Obama tapped into during the campaign. It’s the sinking sensation that the American game is rigged — that, as the president typically put it a month after his inauguration, the system is in hock to “the interests of powerful lobbyists or the wealthiest few” who have “run Washington far too long.” He promised to smite them.

No president can do that alone, let alone in six months. To make Obama’s goal more quixotic, the ailment that he diagnosed is far bigger than Washington and often beyond politics’ domain. What disturbs Americans of all ideological persuasions is the fear that almost everything, not just government, is fixed or manipulated by some powerful hidden hand, from commercial transactions as trivial as the sales of prime concert tickets to cultural forces as pervasive as the news media.

As Democrats have pointed out, the angry hecklers disrupting town-hall meetings convened by members of Congress are not always ordinary citizens engaging in spontaneous grass-roots protests or even G.O.P. operatives, but proxies for corporate lobbyists. One group facilitating the screamers is FreedomWorks, which is run by the former Congressman Dick Armey, now a lobbyist at the DLA Piper law firm. Medicines Company, a global pharmaceutical business, has paid DLA Piper more than $6 million in lobbying fees in the five years Armey has worked there.

But the Democratic members of Congress those hecklers assailed can hardly claim the moral high ground. Their ties to health care interests are merely more discreet and insidious. As Congressional Quarterly reported last week, industry groups contributed almost $1.8 million in the first six months of 2009 alone to the 18 House members of both parties supervising health care reform, Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer among them.

Then there are the 52 conservative Blue Dog Democrats, who have balked at the public option for health insurance. Their cash intake from insurers and drug companies outpaces their Democratic peers by an average of 25 percent, according to The Post. And let’s not forget the Democratic Senate Campaign Committee, which has raked in nearly $500,000 from a single doctor-owned hospital in McAllen, Tex. — the very one that Obama has cited as a symbol of runaway medical costs ever since it was profiled in The New Yorker this spring.

In this maze of powerful moneyed interests, it’s not clear who any American in either party should or could root for. The bipartisan nature of the beast can be encapsulated by the remarkable progress of Billy Tauzin, the former Louisiana congressman. Tauzin was a founding member of the Blue Dog Democrats in 1994. A year later, he bolted to the Republicans. Now he is chief of PhRMA, the biggest pharmaceutical trade group. In the 2008 campaign, Obama ran a television ad pillorying Tauzin for his role in preventing Medicare from negotiating for lower drug prices. Last week The Los Angeles Times reported — and The New York Times confirmed — that Tauzin, an active player in White House health care negotiations, had secured a behind-closed-doors flip-flop, enlisting the administration to push for continued protection of drug prices. Now we know why the president has ducked his campaign pledge to broadcast such negotiations on C-Span.

The making of legislative sausage is never pretty. The White House has to give to get. But the cynicism being whipped up among voters is justified. Unlike Hillary Clinton, whose chief presidential campaign strategist unapologetically did double duty as a high-powered corporate flack, Obama promised change we could actually believe in.

His first questionable post-victory step was to assemble an old boys’ club of Robert Rubin protégés and Goldman-Citi alumni as the White House economic team, including a Treasury secretary, Timothy Geithner, who failed in his watchdog role at the New York Fed as Wall Street’s latest bubble first inflated and then burst. The questions about Geithner’s role in adjudicating the subsequent bailouts aren’t going away, and neither is the angry public sense that the fix is still in. We just learned that nine of those bailed-out banks — which in total received $175 billion of taxpayers’ money, but as yet have repaid only $50 billion — are awarding a total of $32.6 billion in bonuses for 2009.

It’s in this context that Obama can’t afford a defeat on health care. A bill will pass in a Democrat-controlled Congress. What matters is what’s in it. The final result will be a CAT scan of those powerful Washington interests he campaigned against, revealing which have been removed from the body politic (or at least reduced) and which continue to metastasize. The Wall Street regulatory reform package Obama pushes through, or doesn’t, may render even more of a verdict on his success in changing the system he sought the White House to reform.

The best political news for the president remains the Republicans. It’s a measure of how out of touch G.O.P. leaders like Mitch McConnell and John Boehner are that they keep trying to scare voters by calling Obama a socialist. They have it backward. The larger fear is that Obama might be just another corporatist, punking voters much as the Republicans do when they claim to be all for the common guy. If anything, the most unexpected — and challenging — event that could rock the White House this August would be if the opposition actually woke up.

*

The Mexican occupation of 38 million illegals depress wages $200 - $300 billion per year for Americans. These same Americans are forced to pay the staggering welfare costs of the occupation as well. Welfare paid to illegals in Mexican occupied Los Angeles, is nearly $40 MILLION PER MONTH. In Los Angeles, 47% of those employed are ILLEGALS.



*

Octoer 17, 2009

OP-ED COLUMNIST

Impatiently Waiting

By CHARLES M. BLOW

When, Mr. President? When will your deeds catch up to your words? The people who worked tirelessly to get you elected are getting tired of waiting. According to a Gallup poll released on Wednesday, Americans’ satisfaction with the way things are going in the country has hit a six-month low, and those decreases were led, in both percentage and percentage-point decreases, by Democrats and independents, not by Republicans.

The fierce urgency of now has melted into the maddening wait for whenever.

Take health care reform. Because of the president’s quixotic quest for bipartisanship, he refused to take a firm stand in favor of the public option. In that wake, Democrats gutted the Baucus bill to win the graces of Olympia Snowe — a Republican senator from a state with half the population of Brooklyn, a senator who is defying the will of her own constituents. A poll conducted earlier this month found that 57 percent of Maine residents support the public option and only 37 percent oppose it.

She is certainly living up to the state’s motto: Dirigo. That’s Latin for “I lead.” And the Democrats have followed. For shame.

When will the president take the risk of standing up for his convictions on health care instead of sacrificing good policies for good politics? (Or maybe not even good politics since a one-sided compromise is the same as a surrender.)

And health care is only one example.

On the same weekend that gay rights protesters marched past the White House, the president again said that his administration was “moving ahead on don’t ask don’t tell.” But when? This month? This year? This term?

As we prepare to draw down troops from the disaster that was the war in Iraq, we may commit more troops to the quagmire that is the war in Afghanistan and the government may miss its deadline for closing the blight that is the prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.

Obama pledged to stem the tide of job losses and foreclosures and to reform the culture of the financial sector. Well, the Dow just hit 10,000 again while the national unemployment rate is about to hit 10 percent. And the firms we propped up are set to dole out record bonuses while home foreclosures have hit record highs. Main Street is still drowning in crisis while Wall Street is awash in Champagne. When will this imbalance be corrected?

Candidate Obama pledged to make the rebuilding of New Orleans a priority, but President Obama whisked into the city on Thursday for a visit so brief that one Louisiana congressman dubbed it a “drive-through daiquiri summit.” The president spent more time on the failed Olympic bid in Copenhagen than he did in the Crescent City.

At the town hall in New Orleans, Obama appealed for patience. He said, “Change is hard, and big change is harder.” Is that the excuse? Now where have I heard that before? Oh, yeah. From George Bush.



UNEMPLOYMENT RATES BETTER? OR SIMPLY FEWER LEGALS BOTHER TO APPLY???

TODAY, OBAMA, THE U.S. CHAMBER of COMMERCE, LA RAZA DONORS OF THE FORTUNE 500, MEXICO, AND THE LA RAZA DEMS, FEINSTEIN, PELOSI, WAXMAN, LOFGREN, REID, BECERRA, BACA, SANCHEZ SISTERS ALL PUSH NEW PLOYS FOR AMNESTY or at least continued NON-ENFORCEMENT of LAWS PROHIBITING THE EMPLOYMENT of ILLEGALS.


FROM HIS FIRST DAY IN OFFICE, THE HISPANDERING PRESIDENT HAS VOWED AMNESTY, OPEN BORDERS AND ILLEGALS IN OUR JOBS.

OBAMA ADDED TO HIS LA RAZA INFESTED ADMIN LA RAZA FASCIST HILDA SOLIS, TO ASSURE ILLEGALS FIRST PICK OF OUR JOBS.

OBAMA HAS ENDLESSLY SABOTAGED E-VERIFY, AS HAVE ALL THE LA RAZA DEMS, TO ASSURE THEIR CORPORATE PAYMASTERS WAGES WILL BE DEPRESSED WITH HORDES MORE ILLEGALS.

AND THEY’RE COMING OVER OUR BORDERS EVERY DAY! PERHAPS AS MANY AS TWO MILLION PER YEAR!!!



*

JOBLESS? NO LEGAL NEED APPLY!

SEEKING TECH WORK IN SILICON VALLEY? NO AMERICAN NEED APPLY! THERE’S TOO MANY BOATLOADS OF CHINESE AND INDIANS ARRIVING WEEKLY!



*



Jobless? More Employers Say You Need Not Apply

Although More Americans Got Jobs in February, One Category of Workers Got Kicked to the Curb



March 4, 2011



Unemployment fell in February to 8.9 percent, and

US companies added 192,000 people to their

payrolls, but one category of workers is increasingly

facing an overt form of discrimination. (For more on

Friday's employment report from the US Labor

Department, CLICK HERE.) In the bad old days of the

1800s, when it was legal for employers to

discriminate against anyone they pleased, job

postings used to say things like: "No Irish Need

Apply." Now the unemployed, it seems, have become

the new Irish: In advertisement after advertisement,

employers come right out and tell them they're not

wanted.



Right now CareerBuilder, one of the biggest job sites

on the web, has a posting for an entry-level engineer.

The candidate, it says, will perform structural analysis

of telecommunications cell towers. A civil engineering

degree is required, an undergrad GPA of at least 3.4

as is knowledge of AutoCAD. Some travel is required.



Oh, and there's one other thing: "No layoff

candidates."



What?!



You heard right: If you've been laid off or are out of

work, pal, scram -- this employer, like many others,

doesn't want you. You're damaged goods.



Look anywhere where jobs are posted, and you'll see

more examples. This discrimination isn't subtle. It's

not covert. It's right out in the open, stated in the

listings: A phone manufacturer looking to fill a

marketing job stipulates "No unemployed candidates

will be considered at all." An electronics firm looking

for an engineer says it will "Not consider/review

anyone NOT currently employed regardless of the

reason." A Craigslist posting for an assistant

restaurant manager in New Jersey says all applicants

"Must be currently employed."



So prevalent is this new form of discrimination that

the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in

February held hearings on it. The EEOC press release

announcing them bore the catchy title "Out of Work?



Out of Luck."



Testifiers included Christine Owens, executive

director of the National Employment Law Project, a

national nonprofit group that advocates on behalf of

low-age and unemployed workers, and persons

facing unfair or unlawful barriers to employment.



Owens says it's hard to know how widespread

discrimination against the jobless has become, but

she has seen human resource professionals widely

quoted to the effect that turning away the unemployed

is a growing trend. As for the help wanted notices,

"What you see stated in the advertisements is just the

tip of the iceberg," Ownes says. "For every ad that's

explicit, many more have the same policy but don't

say so. We think it's widely happening and that it's

grounds for concern, especially in an economy where

job growth is so slow and so many qualified people

are looking for work. It imposes an artificial and

arbitrary barrier that job seekers shouldn't have to

deal with."



She cited in her EEOC testimony the case of a Texas

job seeker, an experienced pharmaceutical sales rep,

who received from an executive recruiter an e-mail

stating one express caveat: "Candidates must be

currently employed or must have left the industry

within the last six months."



By ALAN FARNHAM

Jobless? More Employers Say You Need Not Apply

Although More Americans Got Jobs in February, One Category of Workers Got Kicked to the Curb



In the 2½ years that Kelly Wiedemer, 45, has been out

of work, she's received this kind of brush-off more

than once.



Wiedemer, a former operations analyst, got a call last

summer from a local technical college that was

looking for an analyst. When she went in for her

interview, the man who questioned her asked her

about her experience and previous work. "He asked

about my background, and I explained that I was an

operations analyst." She felt she was doing a good

job of selling herself. They talked for about five

minutes.



"Then he asked me how long I'd been out of work,"

she says. "I told him." His facial expression changed.

"As soon as he heard that, it was over." He asked her

"in an accusatory tone" why she had been out of work

for so long. What had she been doing? "I told him I'd

been taking training courses to increase my skill set.

I'd also done volunteer work. He did not respond."



"It was humiliating," says Wiedemer. "It's not like I

haven't been looking for a job. It's not like I decided

to take a couple of years off." On her way home, she

says, "I didn't know whether to scream or cry."



In November she saw an ad on Careerbuilder.com for

a business analyst. It sounded ideal. Not only was it

just a few miles from where Wiedemer lives, it paid the

same as her old job and had almost exactly the same

responsibilities. The listing said the applicant would

need to know how to implement a particular kind of

software package -- the same one that Wiedemer had

implemented in her prevous job. "I knew that system,"

she says. "I knew it better than the guys we called to

come fix it for us."



She fired off her resume and got a response the very

next day.



The recruiter, she says, was at first excited. Then the

interview turned to how long Wiedemer had been out

of work. The excitement cooled. Wiedemer says the

recruiter said: "Here's what I'm going to do. I'm

willing to submit your resume to the hiring manager

-- but I'll be honest: Your long employment gap will

be a tough sell."



Wiedemer never got another interview.



"It was such a perfect fit," she says dejectedly. "A

perfect opportunity. I could have brought a lot to the

table for them. They didn't even want to talk to me. It's

like all my skill sets had no value to these people."



It's one thing, she says, "to get kicked to the curb." It's

another to think, "I might never work in my old

capacity again, at any rate of pay. The possibilities



are slim for anybody who's been out of work as long

as I have."



Owens says that while discrimination against the

unemployed may be cruel and may be outrageous, it's

not clear that it's illegal. That's one reason the EEOC

held hearings -- to get opinions on that question.



Were the EEOC to decide to prohibit the practice, says

Owens, there are two ways the commission could go

about it. They could determine that such

discrimination is itself illegal, or they could find that

although legal it works a disproportionate hardship

on certain categories of job seekers already protected

by law, such as the elderly, the disabled, women and

members of various ethnic minorities. To the extent,

says Owens, that an employer says the applicant must

be recently employed or out of work no longer than

six months, the stipulation disproportionately affects

older workers, who tend to go unemployed for longer

periods than the young. And the EEOC, she says,

enforces laws against age discrimination.

*

Help Make E-Verify Mandatory!

Call Your Representatives and Tell Them to Support H.R. 800

Despite a national unemployment rate of 9.4 percent, seven million illegal aliens continue to hold jobs in the United States. However, Congress can put an end to this injustice to American workers by making the E-Verify program permanent and mandatory for all employers. E-Verify—the free online program administered by the Department of Homeland Security that allows employers to verify the eligibility of employees to lawfully work in the U.S.—is currently used by over 246,000 employers. However, because E-Verify is not mandatory for all employers, a number of unscrupulous businesses continue to employ illegal aliens, allowing them to take American jobs and drive down wages.

To stop this injustice to American workers, Rep. John Carter (R-TX) introduced bi-partisan mandatory E-Verify legislation last month that would stop the job killing practice of hiring illegal aliens. Carter’s bill, H.R. 800 (“Jobs Recovery by Ensuring a Legal American Workforce Act of 2011”) would require ALL employers to use E-Verify to check the employment eligibility status of both new hires and current employees. In addition, H.R. 800 provides for the following necessary reforms:

• Increases employer fines for employing illegal aliens—quadrupling the fine for employers discovered to have hired an illegal alien three or more times.

• Prohibits employers from deducting wages paid to (or on behalf of) an illegal alien from their gross income.

• Requires the IRS to disclose to the Social Security Commissioner and Homeland Security Secretary the taxpayer identity information of employers employing illegal aliens.

FAIR strongly supports H.R. 800. We now need your help. Call your Representatives today and urge sign on as a co-sponsor of H.R. 800! It’s time to help the American worker and make E-Verify mandatory once and for all!

To find your Representative’s phone number, click here.




POSTED! NO LEGAL NEED APPLY! IT'S THE OBAMA JOBS PLAN!

CAN’T, OR DON’T WISH TO SPEAK ENGLISH? ARE YOU A LA RAZA GRINGO HATING RACIST MEXICAN? HAVE A POCKET FULL OF STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY CARDS?




JUST COME TO LOS ANGELES, OPERATED IN MEXICO AS THEIR WELFARE, “FREE” ANCHOR BABY BIRTHING CENTERS, JOBS AND JAILS PROGRAM.

IN LOS ANGELES ANY ILLEGAL CAN GET A JOB AT:

TARGET

CVS DRUGS

ROSS STORES

99 CENT ONLY STORES

CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL

McDONALDS

BURGER KING

SOUP PLANTATION

AND ANY AND ALL FOOD SERVICES PLACES.. POSTED! NO LEGAL NEED APPLY!

*



Over the last few weeks Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) have issued “notices of inspection” to Chipotle Mexican Grill, the popular fast-food burrito chain, at about 60 of its restaurants in Virginia and Washington, D.C. (LA Times, Feb. 7, 2011; My Fox DC, Feb. 7,

*



LOS ANGELES IS MEXICO’S WELFARE OFFICE. THAT COUNTY PUTS OUT $600 MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE JUST TO ILLEGALS.

THERE ARE ONLY EIGHT STATES WITH A POPULATION GREATER THAN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, WHERE 50% OF ALL JOBS ARE HELD BY ILLEGALS USING STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS.

OBAMA, AND HIS LA RAZA DEMS, FEINSTEIN, PELOSI, BOXER, WAXMAN, along with Hispanic fascist Reps. BECERRA, BACA, and the notorious racist SANCHEZ SISTERS, all LA RAZA SUPREMACIST, have promised ILLEGALS CONTINUED BIT BY BIT AMNESTY AND ILLEGALS IN OUR JOBS, OR AT LEAST CONTINUED NON-ENFORCEMENT!

*

MEXICANS COME TO THIS NATION TO LOOT! THE VAST MAJORITY ARE INVOLVED IN CRIMES BORDER TO BORDER!

*

Fraudulent Document Mill Busted ( The notorious MS-13 gang)



Fraudulent Document Mill Busted in Virginia

The Loudon County Sheriff’s Gang Intelligence Unit last week dismantled a document production mill which provided hundreds or even thousands of fraudulent IDs to illegal aliens. (Washington Post, Feb. 4, 2011) Sheriff’s deputies found evidence of at least 500 fraudulent documents in the Sugarland, Virginia facility, including social security cards, driver’s licenses, work visas and permanent resident cards. (Id.)



Law enforcement officials took four Salvadoran nationals into custody, and later charged three with manufacturing fraudulent documents. (Id.) Two of the individuals arrested had been previously deported, and the third man had an expired temporary protected status. (Id.) Police said the trio will likely face additional charges. (Id.)



FAIR’s sources in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) were not surprised at the gang connection in this bust. The notorious MS-13 gang has a large percentage of Salvadoran members and is reputed to produce fraudulent and altered documents for use by illegal aliens.



*



ICE Audits Popular Burrito Chain, Hundreds Fired (Employers may face criminal charges)





ICE Audits Popular Burrito Chain, Hundreds Fired





Over the last few weeks Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) have issued “notices of inspection” to Chipotle Mexican Grill, the popular fast-food burrito chain, at about 60 of its restaurants in Virginia and Washington, D.C. (LA Times, Feb. 7, 2011; My Fox DC, Feb. 7, 2011) The “notices of inspection” are warnings to the restaurant-chain that ICE will be conducting Form I-9 audits on its stores in an effort to discover unlawfully employed illegal aliens. (Id.) Form I-9 audits require employers to submit copies of I-9 employment-eligibility forms and other payroll documents to ICE officials for review. (Denver Post, Feb. 9, 2011) If documents are falsified, employers are given a warning, must dismiss the workers involved, and may be fined or face criminal charges in some instances. (Id.; See ICE Fact Sheet: Form I-9 Inspection Overview; Dec. 1, 2009)



The recent audits reflect the Obama Administration’s 2009 announcement that it plans to shift away from worksite enforcement actions (utilized by the Bush Administration) that focus on the illegal actions of both the employers and employees to a more employer oriented worksite enforcement strategy. (Fox News Latino, Feb. 8, 2011; CNN News, Feb. 8, 2011) Rather than taking illegal workers into custody, the current system of I-9 audits penalize companies discovered to have “knowingly” employed an illegal alien in violation of federal law (See INA Sec. 274A). ICE has nearly doubled its audits of employers in the last year to more than 2,700, but experts complain that this new policy is misleading. (Fox News Latino, Feb. 8, 2011) For example, under the Obama Administration’s I-9 audit program, ICE may or may not fine employers who have violated the law and ICE may issue a notice of intent to fine for a certain dollar amount, only to have that fine later reduced. And while employers usually fire the workers who cannot provide documentation that they are authorized to work, ICE does not detain or deport the illegal workers, leaving them free to find work elsewhere.



ICE’s activity in Washington, D.C. and Virginia comes shortly after ICE audited roughly 50 Chipotle restaurants in Minnesota at the end of last year. That audit resulted in the dismissal of hundreds of employees. (Reuters, Feb. 9, 2011) In response, protesters carried signs outside of one of the chain’s Minneapolis restaurants stating, “Chipotle: You cannot sell Mexican food and then sell out Mexican workers.” (Time, Feb. 9, 2011) However, Tanya, a 35-year-old woman who had been working illegally at the chain remarked, “I believe that when you go to apply there, they know beforehand that you don’t have papers.” (The Huffington Post, Feb. 8, 2011) Chipotle now faces a lawsuit from dismissed workers alleging that Chipotle violated Minnesota law by not immediately giving them their earned compensation upon their dismissal. (Fox News Latino, Feb. 9, 2011)



Chipotle spokesman, Chris Arnold, said that Chipotle uses a two-tier system of verifying its workers’ eligibility for employment. (Fox News Latino, Feb. 8, 2011) He explained that in the first step the hiring manager reviews the employment documents and then human resources personnel conduct a review. (Id.) “In spite of those two reviews for every set of documents, we still apparently had a number of people whose documents were not valid,” Arnold commented. (Id.) “On one hand, we must comply with ICE requirements to verify the status of every employee we hire, but we must do that without discriminating and violating the mandate of the Department of Justice,” Arnold said. (Washington Examiner, Feb. 7, 2011) According to Arnold, Chipotle is speaking with ICE about expanding its use of the E-Verify program, citing that it already uses it in states that require it such as Arizona and North Carolina. (Fox News Latino, Feb. 8, 2011)


OBAMA & MEXICO'S OPEN BORDERS AGENDA: keeping wages depressed with hordes of illegals!


WHY OBAMA WANTS WILLIAM DAILY…. OPEN BORDERS!



OBAMA HAS INFESTED HIS ADMINISTRATION WITH LA RAZA PARTY MEMBERS TO PUSH FOR AMNESTY, “CHEAP” MEX LABOR IN OUR JOBS TO KEEP HIS CORPORATE PAYMASTERS HAPPY AND GENEROUS, AND HAS TURNED OUR NATION’S SECURITY INTO Dept. Homeland Security = PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP!

ANYTHING TO KEEP THE HORDES OF ILLEGALS CLIMBING OUR BORDERS!

WILLIAM DAILY IS CLOSELY IDENTIFIED WITH BIG OBAMA DONOR, BANKSTER CRIMINALS J.P. MORGAN!

WHEN OBAMA GETS OUT OF BED, HE MARCHES FOR HIS BANKSTERS AND LA RAZA!



FROM CREOLE FOLKS



Obama Seeks Brother of "Chicago Mob Boss" for Top White House Post

The roaches and con-artist, fake journalist on cable news are all lying about William Daley being all this and all that, this man is an open borders, down with America, free trade globalist. MSNBC and Gretta "the Scientology" Van Susteren from Fox News are knowingly deceiving the public about D. Issa & his letter to "business owners"=which they made into such a BIG DAM DEAL, but no one says anything whenBarrack Hussein Obama, comes around with all of these shady bankers, hedge fund managers and Wall St. Tycoons, which he puts in his cabinet. All of Obama's meeting with Wall Street asking, "What can I do for you?" is never something covered by Keith Oberman or Rachel Maddow.

(Bloomberg) -- President Barack Obama is considering naming William Daley, a JPMorgan Chase & Co. executive and former U.S. Commerce secretary, to a high-level administration post, possibly White House chief of staff, people familiar with the matter said.

Such a move, which is still under discussion, would bring a Washington veteran -- and someone with strong business ties -- into the administration as Obama sets out an agenda for the second half of his term while dealing with a Republican majority in the House of Representatives.

*



Obama Quietly Erasing Borders (Article)





Article Link:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=240045





CONTACT THE HISPANDERING LA RAZA PARTY PRESIDENT HERE:



You can contact President Obama and let him know of your opposition to amnesty for illegal aliens:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/CONTACT/



*

UCLA PROFESSOR CALLS FOR MEXICAN REVOLT IN UNITED STATES

http://video.yahoo.com/watch/7165215?fr=yvmtf



*

Wake up America!!! Illegal Immigration has to be stopped. Take a look at this website and see where all your tax dollars are going: http://immigrationcounters.com/



*

*

FAIRUS.org

The Administration's Phantom Immigration Enforcement Policy

According to DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s borders (Southwestern or otherwise) are secure, and gaining control is not even a goal of the department.

By Ira Mehlman

Published on 12/07/2009

Townhall.com

The setting was not quite the flight deck of the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln with a “Mission Accomplished” banner as the backdrop, but it was the next best thing. Speaking at the Center for American Progress (CAP) on Nov. 13, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano declared victory over illegal immigration and announced that the Obama administration is ready to move forward with a mass amnesty for the millions of illegal aliens already living in the United States.

Arguing the Obama administration’s case for amnesty, Napolitano laid out what she described as the “three-legged stool” for immigration reform. As the administration views it, immigration reform must include “a commitment to serious and effective enforcement, improved legal flows for families and workers, and a firm but fair way to deal with those who are already here.”

Acknowledging that a lack of confidence in the government’s ability and commitment to effectively enforce the immigration laws it passes proved to be the Waterloo of previous efforts to gain amnesty for illegal aliens, Napolitano was quick to reassure the American public that those concerns could be put to rest.

“For starters, the security of the Southwest border has been transformed from where it was in 2007,” stated the secretary. Not only is the border locked up tight, she continued, but the situation is well in-hand in the interior of the country as well. “We’ve also shown that the government is serious and strategic in its approach to enforcement by making changes in how we enforce the law in the interior of the country and at worksites…Furthermore, we’ve transformed worksite enforcement to truly address the demand side of illegal immigration.”

If Rep. Joe Wilson had been in attendance to hear Secretary Napolitano’s CAP speech he might well have had a few choice comments to offer. But since he wasn’t, we will have to rely on the Department of Homeland Security’s own data to assess the veracity of Napolitano’s claims.

According to DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s borders (Southwestern or otherwise) are secure, and gaining control is not even a goal of the department. DHS claims to have “effective control” over just 894 miles of border. That’s 894 out of 8,607 miles they are charged with protecting. As for the other 7,713 miles? DHS’s stated border security goal for FY 2010 is the same 894 miles.

The administration’s strategic approach to interior and worksite enforcement is just as chimerical as its strategy at the border, unless one considers shuffling paper to be a strategy. DHS data, released November 18, show that administrative arrests of immigration law violators fell by 68 percent between 2008 and 2009. The department also carried out 60 percent fewer arrests for criminal violations of immigration laws, 58 percent fewer criminal indictments, and won 63 percent fewer convictions.

While the official unemployment rate has climbed from 7.6 percent when President Obama took office in January to 10 percent today, the administration’s worksite enforcement strategy has amounted to a bureaucratic game of musical chairs. The administration has all but ended worksite enforcement actions and replaced them with paperwork audits. When the audits determine that illegal aliens are on the payroll, employers are given the opportunity to fire them with little or no adverse consequence to the company, while no action is taken to remove the illegal workers from the country. The illegal workers simply acquire a new set of fraudulent documents and move on to the next employer seeking workers willing to accept substandard wages.

In Janet Napolitano’s alternative reality a mere 10 percent of our borders under “effective control” and sharp declines in arrests and prosecutions of immigration lawbreakers may be construed as confidence builders, but it is hard to imagine that the American public is going to see it that way. If anything, the administration’s record has left the public less confident that promises of future immigration enforcement would be worth the government paper they’re printed on.

As Americans scrutinize the administration’s plans to overhaul immigration policy, they are likely to find little in the “three-legged stool” being offered that they like or trust. The first leg – enforcement – the administration has all but sawed off. The second – increased admissions of extended family members and workers – makes little sense with some 25 million Americans either unemployed or relegated to part-time work. And the third – amnesty for millions of illegal aliens – is anathema to their sense of justice and fair play.

As Americans well know, declaring “Mission Accomplished” and actually accomplishing a mission are two completely different things. When it comes to enforcing immigration laws, the only message the public is receiving from this administration is “Mission Aborted.”

CULTURE of CORRUPTION: Obama and His Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks, Cronies & LA RAZA INFESTED ADMINISTRATION At War With American Workers


FOR OBAMA IT’S SIMPLE: SERVICE HIS BANKSTER DONORS, HISPANDER FOR THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES! HE DOESN’T NEED FOR GIVE A HOOT ABOUT THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS! WE JUST GET THE TAX BILLS TO PAY FOR HIS BANKSTERS’ PILLAGE, AND THE STAGGERING COST OF THE MEXICAN WELFARE STATE IN OUR COUNTRY!


ARE AMAZED AT HOW UTTERLY BRAZEN THESE CORPORATE OWNED POLITICIANS ARE?

GET THIS BOOK!

Culture of Corruption: Obama and His Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks, and Cronies

by Michelle Malkin

Editorial Reviews

In her shocking new book, Malkin digs deep into the records of President Obama's staff, revealing corrupt dealings, questionable pasts, and abuses of power throughout his administration.

From the Inside Flap

The era of hope and change is dead....and it only took six months in office to kill it.

Never has an administration taken office with more inflated expectations of turning Washington around. Never have a media-anointed American Idol and his entourage fallen so fast and hard. In her latest investigative tour de force, New York Times bestselling author Michelle Malkin delivers a powerful, damning, and comprehensive indictment of the culture of corruption that surrounds Team Obama's brazen tax evaders, Wall Street cronies, petty crooks, slum lords, and business-as-usual influence peddlers. In Culture of Corruption, Malkin reveals:

* Why nepotism beneficiaries First Lady Michelle Obama and Vice President Joe Biden are Team Obama's biggest liberal hypocrites--bashing the corporate world and influence-peddling industries from which they and their relatives have benefited mightily

* What secrets the ethics-deficient members of Obama's cabinet--including Hillary Clinton--are trying to hide

* Why the Obama White House has more power-hungry, unaccountable "czars" than any other administration

* How Team Obama's first one hundred days of appointments became a litany of embarrassments as would-be appointee after would-be appointee was exposed as a tax cheat or had to withdraw for other reasons

* How Obama's old ACORN and union cronies have squandered millions of taxpayer dollars and dues money to enrich themselves and expand their power

* How Obama's Wall Street money men and corporate lobbyists are ruining the economy and helping their friends In Culture of Corruption, Michelle Malkin lays bare the Obama administration's seamy underside that the liberal media would rather keep hidden.





Product Details

• Hardcover: 376 pages

• Publisher: Regnery Publishing (July 27, 2009)

• Language: English

• ISBN-10: 1596981091

• ISBN-13: 978-1596981096

*

*

MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com

MEXICO: A FAILED NATION - But Still Wants this Nation to Fail Into Being Another Mexico!

MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com


*

Go to http://www.MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com and read articles and comments from other Americans on what they’ve witnessed in their communities around the country. While most of the population of California is now ILLEGAL, the problems, costs, assault to our culture by Mexico is EVERYWHERE. copy and pass it to your friends.

*

EVERY DAY THERE ARE 8 CHILDREN SEXUALLY MOLESTED BY ILLEGALS

DO YOU REALLY WANT AMNESTY FOR THIS INVADING CULTURE?

Illegal Alien rapes 8 year old Maryland Girl

An illegal alien, Marcos Banegas, raped an 8 year old girl, for the second time and cops did not turn him over for deportation. The Sanctuary City of Montgomery County in Maryland has a D.A. that is refusing to call child rape a violent crime, even though the 8 year old girl was also sodomized by the illegal alien.

http://creoleneworleans.typepad.com/creole_folks/2011/01/illegal-alien-rapes-8-year-old-maryland-girl.html



Montgomery Counrty in Maruland allowed an illegal alien to rape and sodomize an 8 year old girl twice but he was still not deported

*

THE MEXICANS ARE THE MOST RACIST AND VIOLENT CULTURE IN THE HEMISPHERE.

THE ONLY THING THE MEX GOV HAS EVER DONE FOR THEIR PEOPLE IS EXPORT THEM OVER OUR BORDERS TO LOOT!

THESE ILLEGALS ARRIVE WITH THEIR HATRED OF AMERICANS, LOATHING OF OUR CULTURE, LANGUAGE AND FLAG, AND THEN HOP OUR JOBS, WELFARE EVEN AS THEY WAVE THEIR MEX FLAGS IN OUR FACES AND DEMAND WE SPEAK SPANISH.

PUSH 2 FOR ENGLISH.



*

AMERICA vs MEXICO: CLASHING CULTURES

By Frosty Wooldridge

Anyone understand why Mexicans fail at a successful civilization? Ever wonder why millions of them invade the United States in search of a better life? Have you noticed that once they arrive, they create the same kind of ‘society’ in the United States ? Unconsciously, they create the same conditions they left behind. You can take the boy out of the ghetto, but you can't take the ghetto out of the boy. For example, in Denver in December, illegal alien Navi dragged his girlfriend to death behind his car. Illegal alien Cruz shot his girlfriend dead in the back because she wouldn’t reconcile with him. Illegal alien Ruizz ran over and killed Justin Goodman, but Ruizz drove away from the scene leaving Goodman to die. In Greeley , Colorado they suffered 270 hit and run accidents in one year. Over 80 percent of hit and run wrecks in Denver involve illegal aliens. Denver boasts the drug smuggling capital of the West as well as the people smuggling mecca of the country. Illegals cheat, distribute drugs, lie, forge documents, steal and kill as if it’s a normal way of life. For them, it is. Mexico ’s civilization stands diametrically opposed to America ’s culture. Both countries manifest different ways of thinking and operating. With George Bush’s push to create the “Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America” by dissolving our borders with Mexico , he places all Americans at risk. Would you become friends with neighbors who throw their trash on city streets and parks, create ghettoes wherever they enclave their numbers, promote corruption, deal in violence, encourage drug use, manifest poverty, endorse sexism and downgrade education? America ’s culture and Mexico ’s culture remain diametrically opposed to one another. America ’s fought Mexico and won. Today, Mexico invades America with sheer numbers of poor. However, cultures rarely change and neither do their people. As you can see from the ten points below, everything about Mexico degrades everything about America . For further information, you may visit www.immigrationshumancost.org and www.limitstogrowth.org where you will find a plethora of information by a brilliant journalist Brenda Walker. Her original report may be viewed on www.Vdare.com on January 17, 2007 under the title: “Ten Reasons Why America Should Not Marry Mexico .” I suggest you read more of her work. She exemplifies incisive, sobering and shocking information. These ten point stem directly from Brenda Walker’s work. Let’s examine why America must not entangle itself by merging with Mexico . The legal age of sexual consent in Mexico is 12 years old. Sex with children at this age and younger is socially acceptable in Mexico . For example: A Mexican Lopez-Mendez pleaded guilty to sexual assault on a 10 year old girl in West Virginia . His excuse: sex with young girls was common with his people. He said, “I was unaware that it was a crime.” Mexicans remain the most sexist males next to Islamic men. Both boast the most misogynous cultures in the world. Rape and other violence toward women are not treated as serious crimes. In Mexico , a custom known as “rapto” whereby men kidnap women for sex is regarded as harmless amusement. Mexican society regards women little more than objects. Crime and violence remain mainstays of Mexican culture. Drug cartels and the Mexican army coordinate their massive efforts to promote drug distribution not only in Mexico but into the USA . Mexico City suffers the second highest crime rate in Latin America . Kidnapping remains second only to Columbia for ransom money. Beheadings, killings and gun fire erupt at drug distribution points on the US/Mexican border. Spontaneous hanging continues in Mexico . A mob beat up and burned to death two policemen on live television in 2004 in Mexico City . As Brenda Walker wrote, “Mexicans do not have the same belief as Americans that the law is central to the equitable functioning of a complex nation. It’s the Third World .” Mexicans abhor education. In their country, illiteracy dominates. As they arrive in our country, only 9.6 percent of fourth generation Mexicans earn a high school diploma. Mexico does not promote educational values. This makes them the least educated of any Americans or immigrants. The rate of illiteracy in Mexico stands at 63 percent. Drunk driving remains acceptable in Mexico . As it stands, 44,000 Americans die on our nation’s highways annually. Half that number stems from drunken drivers. U.S. Congressman Steve King reports that 13 American suffer death from drunken driving Mexicans each day. Alcoholism runs rampant in Mexican culture. They suffer the most DUI arrests. Mexicans set the benchmark for animal cruelty. Mexicans love dog fighting, bullfighting, cock fighting and horse tripping. Those blood sports play in every arena and backyard in Mexico . They expand into America as more Mexicans arrive. They also engage in “steer-tailing” where the rider yanks the animal’s tail in an attempt to flip it to the ground. In horse tripping, they run the animals at full gallop around a ring, then, use ropes to trip them at full speed. It’s a death sentence as the horses break their legs, teeth, shoulders and necks—all to the delight of the cheering Mexican fans. As La Raza confirms, Mexicans maintain the most racist society in North America . “For the Hispanic race, everything; for anyone outside the race, nothing!” Guadalupe Loaeza, a journalist, said, “Mexican society is fundamentally racist and classist. The color of your skin is a key that either opens or shuts doors. The lighter your skin, the more doors open to you.” Corruption becomes a mechanism by which Mexico operates. Corruption remains systemic. The Washington Post wrote, “ Mexico is considered one of the most corrupt countries in the hemisphere.” They feature drug cartels, sex slave trade, people smuggling, car theft cartels, real estate scam cartels, murder for money and, you must bribe your mail man to get your mail. Last, but not least, Mexicans are Marxists. They promote a one party government. As with any kind of Marxism, brutal totalitarian rule keeps the rich in power and everyone else subservient. As we allow millions of Mexicans to colonize our country, we can’t help but be caught up in these ten deadly cultural traits of Mexicans. With over 12 million Mexicans here today, the predictions grow to as many as 20 even 40 million Mexicans in a few decades as they come here for a better life. The fact remains, as they come to America for a better life, they make our lives a living hell.

*

*

Obama Quietly Erasing Borders (Article)





Article Link:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=240045





CONTACT THE HISPANDERING LA RAZA PARTY PRESIDENT HERE:



You can contact President Obama and let him know of your opposition to amnesty for illegal aliens:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/CONTACT/



*

UCLA PROFESSOR CALLS FOR MEXICAN REVOLT IN UNITED STATES

http://video.yahoo.com/watch/7165215?fr=yvmtf



*

Wake up America!!! Illegal Immigration has to be stopped. Take a look at this website and see where all your tax dollars are going: http://immigrationcounters.com/



See: CFR’s Plan to Integrate the U.S., Mexico and Canada

http://www.proliberty.com/observer/20050816.htm The Great Alien Invasion - What's Happening Now http://www.rense.com/general69/inva.htm

*

"Bush Secret Border Wars" Mayhem and terror in Southern states to protect government drug cartels

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2005/140805borderwars.htm Mexican/Bush Crime

*

“Through love of having children, we are going to take over.” AUGUSTIN CEBADA, BROWN BERETS, THE LA RAZA FASCIST PARTY



http://www.aztlan.net/anchor_baby_power.htm





*

206 Most wanted criminals in Los Angeles. Out of 206 criminals--183 are hispanic---171 of those are wanted for Murder.



Why do Americans still protect the illegals??



http://www.dailybreeze.com/ci_11255121?appSession=934140935651450&RecordID=&PageID=2&PrevPageID=&cpipage=1&CPISortType=&CPIorderBy=



*

TEN MOST WANTED CRIMINALS IN CALIFORNIA ARE MEXICANS!

http://ag.ca.gov/wanted/mostwanted.php?fid=mostWantedFugitives_2010-01

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53103 Did you know illegals kill 12 Americans a day?



http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/1738432/posts FBI Crime Statistics - Crimes committed by illegals.

*

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2011/feb2011/mexi-f10.shtml

Pentagon official: US could send troops to fight Mexican “insurgency”

*

http://www.congressandimmigration.com/The_Dark_Side_Index.htm



Recent Heritage Studies ................HERITAGE.org

*

EVERYDAY THERE IS A KIDNAPPING BY A MEXICAN IN PHOENIX!



http://arizona.mugshotlist.com/



http://arizona.mugshotlist.com/mugshots/male/



http://arizona.mugshotlist.com/mugshots/female/

*

illegals vs crime



http://www.usillegalaliens.com/impacts_of_illegal_immigration_property_crimes_and_operation_predator.html



http://www.usillegalaliens.com/impacts_of_illegal_immigration_crime.html



http://www.cis.org/mortensen/bratton



http://articles.latimes.com/2008/sep/08/local/me-jail8

*

http://www.numbersusa.com

*

http://www.capsweb.org

*

http://www.fairus.org

*

http://www.immigrationwatchdog.com

*



206 Most wanted criminals in Los Angeles. Out of 206 criminals--183 are hispanic---171 of those are wanted for Murder.



Why do Americans still protect the illegals??



http://www.dailybreeze.com/ci_11255121?appSession=934140935651450&RecordID=&PageID=2&PrevPageID=&cpipage=1&CPISortType=&CPIorderBy=



*

TEN MOST WANTED CRIMINALS IN CALIFORNIA ARE MEXICANS!

http://ag.ca.gov/wanted/mostwanted.php?fid=mostWantedFugitives_2010-01

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53103 Did you know illegals kill 12 Americans a day?



http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/1738432/posts FBI Crime Statistics - Crimes committed by illegals.

*

http://www.mexica-movement.org/ They claim all of North America for Mexico!





*

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2011/feb2011/mexi-f10.shtml

Pentagon official: US could send troops to fight Mexican “insurgency”