Saturday, July 2, 2016

BONIFACIO OSEGUERA-GONZALEZ IS AN ILLEGAL. HE HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH THREE COUNTS OF MURDER

News that 170,000 criminal illegal aliens have avoided deportation has consequences beyond mere statistics.  An illegal alien in Oregon, deported six times since 2003, has been charged with three counts of murder and one count of attempted ...


Killer of three in Oregon was deported six times


By Rick Moran


News that 170,000 criminal illegal aliens have avoided deportation has consequences beyond mere statistics.  An illegal alien in Oregon, deported six times since 2003, has been charged with three counts of murder and one count of attempted murder in a quadruple-shooting at a rural blueberry farm.
Bonifacio Oseguera-Gonzalez, 29, has no significant prior criminal convictions, but ICE asked Oregon authorities to turn him over to them if he's released from custody in the current case, the agency said in a statement to The Associated Press on Friday.
Oseguera-Gonzalez pleaded not guilty to three counts of aggravated murder and one count of attempted murder Tuesday in Marion County Superior Court.
His attorney, Deborah Burdzik, did not immediately return a call seeking comment about his immigration status.
Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump tweeted about the case Friday, saying the suspect "should have never been here."
Two men who lived at the blueberry farm in the Willamette Valley town of Woodburn, in northwest Oregon, died at the scene of Monday's shooting. The third victim, the girlfriend of another resident who was not home at the time, was pronounced dead at a hospital.
A third man was seriously wounded but survived and is able to speak with investigators.
The Oregon State Police arrested Oseguera-Gonzalez a few hours later on Interstate 84 in the Columbia River Gorge, about 100 miles northeast of Woodburn.
He acknowledged to authorities in an interview that he shot four people, according to a probable cause statement.
The victims were identified as Ruben Rigoberto-Reyes, 60; Edmundo Amaro-Bajonero, 26; and Katie Gildersleeve, 30, of Logsden.
Motive is important to the criminal case but largely irrelevant when looking at the big picture.  Trump is right: this man should never have been here.  That he has been deported and snuck his way back in the U.S., or he has avoided deportation altogether, is a clear sign of a failed immigration system. 
It will be interesting to see this murderer's history.  Was he released previously by a sanctuary city?  Was he ever in the custody of ICE?  For how long?  These are questions that need answers if we're ever going to get ahead of the battle to reduce the number of illegals who live in America.





Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/07/killer_of_three_in_oregon_was_deported_six_times.html#ixzz4DHvLQ8Jg
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook




925,000 Aliens Ordered Removed Have Not Departed
One year after Kate Steinle's death,
no progress on enforcement


WASHINGTON, DC (July 1, 2016) — Our 

nation's immigration-enforcement system 

remains dysfunctional on the one-year

anniversary of the killing of Kate Steinle in 

San Francisco by a five-time-deported illegal-

alien felon, according to a new report by the 

Center for Immigration Studies. The report

reveals that at this time last year, more than

925,000 aliens who had been ordered 

removed from the United States had not 

departed. Most are still at large in American 

communities, including more than 170,000 

convicted criminals.

The report includes maps showing the countries of citizenship of these aliens. View the full analysis at:http://cis.org/vaughan/non-departed-925000-aliens-ordered-removed-are-still-here

Jessica Vaughan, director of policy studies at the Center and author of the report, found that the number of non-departed post-final-order aliens has grown about 20 percent since 2012.

According to Vaughan, these aliens, who have all exhausted all due process and appeals, are still here because they skipped out on their immigration proceedings, or because their home country refused to take them back, or because of local sanctuary policies that prevent their deportation, as in the case of Steinle's killer.

Said Vaughan: "These figures are a disturbing indication of profound dysfunction in our immigration system. Hundreds of thousands of the illegal aliens living here have already gone through the deportation process, but they are still here. And tens of thousands of deportable criminal aliens are still at large causing harm in American communities. Following through on these deportation orders would be an easy way to lighten the fiscal and social burden that immigration imposes, and improve public safety to boot."

Aliens from Mexico, El Salvador, Honduras and 

Guatemala compose about 60 percent of the 

aliens. A disproportionate number of the non-



departed criminal aliens are citizens of Cuba.

Vaughan said, "The size of the non-departed population could be reduced if immigration agencies used more efficient forms of due process to shorten the proceedings, if visa sanctions and other tools were used to incentivize cooperation from countries that refuse to accept their citizens back, and if steps were taken to deter local sanctuary policies."

THE OBAMA SABOTAGE OF HOMELAND SECURITY - 925,000 CRIMINALS AT LARGE

925,000 Aliens Ordered Removed Have Not Departed
One year after Kate Steinle's death,
no progress on enforcement


WASHINGTON, DC (July 1, 2016) — Our 

nation's immigration-enforcement system 

remains dysfunctional on the one-year

anniversary of the killing of Kate Steinle in 

San Francisco by a five-time-deported illegal-

alien felon, according to a new report by the 

Center for Immigration Studies. The report

reveals that at this time last year, more than

925,000 aliens who had been ordered 

removed from the United States had not 

departed. Most are still at large in American 

communities, including more than 170,000 

convicted criminals.

The report includes maps showing the countries of citizenship of these aliens. View the full analysis at:http://cis.org/vaughan/non-departed-925000-aliens-ordered-removed-are-still-here

Jessica Vaughan, director of policy studies at the Center and author of the report, found that the number of non-departed post-final-order aliens has grown about 20 percent since 2012.

According to Vaughan, these aliens, who have all exhausted all due process and appeals, are still here because they skipped out on their immigration proceedings, or because their home country refused to take them back, or because of local sanctuary policies that prevent their deportation, as in the case of Steinle's killer.

Said Vaughan: "These figures are a disturbing indication of profound dysfunction in our immigration system. Hundreds of thousands of the illegal aliens living here have already gone through the deportation process, but they are still here. And tens of thousands of deportable criminal aliens are still at large causing harm in American communities. Following through on these deportation orders would be an easy way to lighten the fiscal and social burden that immigration imposes, and improve public safety to boot."

Aliens from Mexico, El Salvador, Honduras and 

Guatemala compose about 60 percent of the 

aliens. A disproportionate number of the non-

departed criminal aliens are citizens of Cuba.

Vaughan said, "The size of the non-departed population could be reduced if immigration agencies used more efficient forms of due process to shorten the proceedings, if visa sanctions and other tools were used to incentivize cooperation from countries that refuse to accept their citizens back, and if steps were taken to deter local sanctuary policies."


There can be no citizenship by fraud



If I come to your country and swear to obey its laws, when in fact I am totally dedicated to destroying you, my oath means nothing.  It is a perjured oath.  If I deceive you into believing my false oath, any legal citizenship that is granted under false pretenses is therefore null and void.

U.S. citizenship is not an irreversible decision.  We rarely take away citizenship, although there may be some cases from the 1950s.  If it becomes necessary to require sharia-believing Muslims to make an open choice between one or the other, the United States would be well within normal legal bounds to withdraw both citizenship and U.S. residency. 

As Newt Gingrich pointed out the other day, Sharia-following Muslims cannot have any national loyalty.  The two are explicitly contradictory.

If I come to your country and swear to obey its laws, when in fact I am totally dedicated to destroying you, my oath means nothing.  It is a perjured oath.  If I deceive you into believing my false oath, any legal citizenship that is granted under false pretenses is therefore null and void.

U.S. citizenship is not an irreversible decision.  We rarely take away citizenship, although there may be some cases from the 1950s.  If it becomes necessary to require sharia-believing Muslims to make an open choice between one or the other, the United States would be well within normal legal bounds to withdraw both citizenship and U.S. residency. 

As Newt Gingrich pointed out the other day, Sharia-following Muslims cannot have any national loyalty.  The two are explicitly contradictory.

New Statistics: Immigration Enforcement
Continues Decline in 2016

Sharpest declines occurred in Chicago, New Orleans, Detroit, and Atlanta field offices

WASHINGTON, DC (July 19, 2016) — The human cost of suppressing immigration enforcement was highlighted on the opening day of the Republican National Convention, featuring speeches by Americans whose family members were killed by illegal aliens. The latest ICE deportation statistics, the focus of a new report by the Center for Immigration Studies, give context to these stories: deportations have continued to decline in 2016, putting the country on pace to have the lowest number of deportations since 2006.

Jessica Vaughan, the Center’s director of policy studies and author of the report, writes, 

“These statistics reveal an alarming 

deterioration in immigration enforcement. The

economic, social, and public safety 

consequences of this surely will be a 

lamentable legacy of the Obama 

administration.”

Deportations of criminals have also continued to decline – more than 60 percent since 2011 - despite the Obama administration’s repeated claims to prioritize their removal. According to the Center’s report, “ICE internal metrics, including arrests, detainers and charging documents issued, show that enforcement in the interior has reached the lowest level of this administration. Most of ICE’s workload (72%) is still made up of cases referred from the Border Patrol rather than aliens arrested in the interior of the country.”


The present administration’s deceptive practice of including hundreds of thousands of border cases in ICE deportation totals allowed President Obama to claim “record deportations” beginning in 2012, even as deportations from the interior decreased sharply.

The new statistics also show ICE’s continued failure to comply with the congressional detention mandate. In the current year to date, the ICE detention rate is 16 percent below capacity. Detention allows enforcement of removal orders and ensures that aliens who are charged with violations actually will show up in court.  “Though space is available, ICE has released more than 86,000 criminal aliens from its custody since 2013, including more than 19,000 in 2015.”


Contact: Marguerite Telford
202-466-8185, mrt@cis.org



There can be no citizenship by fraud



If I come to your country and swear to obey its laws, when in fact I am totally dedicated to destroying you, my oath means nothing.  It is a perjured oath.  If I deceive you into believing my false oath, any legal citizenship that is granted under false pretenses is therefore null and void.

U.S. citizenship is not an irreversible decision.  We rarely take away citizenship, although there may be some cases from the 1950s.  If it becomes necessary to require sharia-believing Muslims to make an open choice between one or the other, the United States would be well within normal legal bounds to withdraw both citizenship and U.S. residency. 

As Newt Gingrich pointed out the other day, Sharia-following Muslims cannot have any national loyalty.  The two are explicitly contradictory.

If I come to your country and swear to obey its laws, when in fact I am totally dedicated to destroying you, my oath means nothing.  It is a perjured oath.  If I deceive you into believing my false oath, any legal citizenship that is granted under false pretenses is therefore null and void.

U.S. citizenship is not an irreversible decision.  We rarely take away citizenship, although there may be some cases from the 1950s.  If it becomes necessary to require sharia-believing Muslims to make an open choice between one or the other, the United States would be well within normal legal bounds to withdraw both citizenship and U.S. residency. 

As Newt Gingrich pointed out the other day, Sharia-following Muslims cannot have any national loyalty.  The two are explicitly contradictory.



Obama’s Divide-and-Rule Presidency

 

The president is near the end of an eight year train wreck presidency, the result of which is that every social issue is more divisive, more unsolvable, and more dishonestly framed than ever before.  It is no secret that he has done nothing for the black community, whose unemployment and crime rates are rising every day, while he demonizes police and lauds racist activists who condone assassination and lawlessness.  Hillary Clinton has promised to be Barack Obama in a pantsuit, which means the downward trend will continue as the Democrat practice of “Promise Everything, Deliver Nothing, Blame Others” goes on in perpetuity.

The black community allows itself to be played this way each and every election cycle, and reliably elects progressive politicians who care more about the profitability of corruption than about their lives or hardships.  Indeed, we know that the majority of these individuals live in Democrat controlled cities and states, where Democrat policies ensure that nothing changes for the better, but will often change for the worse if given minimal time.  Somehow, the dots remain unconnected.   Nevertheless, the party can’t afford to allow the black community to consider other options, including the message of success and advancement via the content of one’s character and work ethic.  The party motto ought to be “Strength Through Failure”.
Thankfully for the Democrats, there are groups like Black Lives Matter, the New Black Panthers, and every organization that preaches Black Liberation Theory or Theology.  Trinity United Church comes to mind, but the Dallas racist didn’t need a church when he had so many other pan-African hate groups to follow.  History tells us that nothing stirs the supposedly big hearts and closed minds of leftists like race-based radical hate groups. 

It is no longer chic for the party to support the old Klan, which was entirely peopled by Democrats in its heyday, and was used as an enforcement tool by the local Democrats to keep people in their predetermined social places.  Fortunately for the Democrats, there is a new Klan on the block: Black Lives Matter.  It’s still populated by Democrats and is still prepared to use violence and assassination to keep people in their social slots.  Ironically, the old Klan and the new Klan are both devices to keep blacks in their predetermined places, just exactly where the Democrat party wants them.  The self-inflicted damage being done to the image of black Americans by this group is incalculable, and is ensuring that restoring trust is now generations away, if it happens at all.  It is not lost on whites that there is racial hatred toward them for merely existing, hardly a starting point for dialogue.  Lies and hatred don’t presage a healing process.

In a country of 340 Million people, we periodically see stories on the news about a police shooting, sometimes a couple within a short period, usually of a suspect who we end up finding out was far from random, far from peaceful, and far from innocent.  Of course, we don’t find that out until well after the left has framed the narrative with lies about the reasons for the confrontation or the risks to the police.  Given the extent to which such events, as unfortunate as they are when erroneous, serve the left’s agenda it is safe to conclude that we would hear about more of them if there were more of them.  That so much is made of the ones that do occur is testament to the fact that they are not a daily occurrence, as the progressives would have us believe.  If such events were as common as they claim, we would hear about them every day, all day, non-stop, and there would be in inexhaustible supply of them.

Needless to say, we already know that.  We all live in the same country as the propagandists.  If they had evidence of rampant and systemic murder by police, they would do anything to publish it.  When such evidence does not exist, however, it becomes necessary to lie.  This is a tactic of other leftist special interest groups, as well.  There are countless stories of activists for gay rights, or women’s rights, or race frauds, who fabricate stories of abuse, violence, gang rape, etc. because there are so few truthful examples of these events occurring in a country the activists hate for the bigotry it continually fails to demonstrate.  Sometimes it’s a Tawanna Brawley scam, other times a slur on a cake from Whole Foods, and yet other times it’s college gang rapes that never happened.  If the systemic hatred and violence was so common, the elaborate frauds would be needless overkill.

We also know that elitist progressives are nothing if not master liars and puppeteers.  They have spent years tailoring and refining their manipulation of the black communities, inflaming their resentment, bitterness and hopelessness by reminding them of how little progress they have been able to make, without reminding them that the Democrats have led them for decades to this dead end and made sure they stayed there.  You will never hear the Democrat mayor or governor of a blue city or state admit that they have been so busy nurturing and feeding their own corruption that they simply never got around to bothering to try to make things better.  You will certainly never hear them remind their dependents that black men and women occupy the highest offices of the country, proving systemic racism has long since been defeated, and the fault lies elsewhere.  Something must be done to distract them, to prevent them from pausing long enough to think, to discourage them from any critical thinking whatsoever, hopefully while enraging them.  They must be played.

So, here we go again.  An election is coming up, and the Democrats can’t afford for their minority captives to stray.  What better way to ensure allegiance than to fabricate a false narrative of wholesale murder, support it with infuriating lies and half-truths that will eventually be dispelled too late to make a difference, and step back while the inevitable violence escalates?  The president can claim to support police because he mouths words to that effect, while actually throwing his entire support behind the radicals, whose leaders he entertains at the White House, and whose actions he enables by faulting the police for his loyalists’ violence and murder.  He can claim to have the cops’ backs, while elevating Al Sharpton, and holding planning conferences with professional agitators, protestors and anarchists, as he has done throughout his presidency, whether during the “Occupy” phase, or the Ferguson phase, or now. 

Of course, those emotional votes are paid for with the innocent lives of Honest to God American patriots.  The president is coldly unconcerned that the upheaval and violence he condones brings with it the loss of selfless American men and women who do more in one day to serve their country and the president’s voters than this president has done in his entire life.  They risk their lives, and their families’ futures, while the president risks being exposed as nothing more than the radical community organizer and race profiteer he never stopped being.  If the president did nothing for a day, the world would be a better place.  If the police did nothing for a day, it would take years to catalogue all the crimes that would be done by those who will vote for the Democrat party candidates this fall.  At the hands of this president’s voters, more police will die to irreparably change America.  It is a price the president is prepared to have others pay. 





END SANCTUARY CITIES? HOW WILL THAT IMPACT THE MEXICAN CRIME TIDAL WAVE?


Senate to Vote on Bill Punishing ‘Sanctuary’ Cities

Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., describes his bill punishing "sanctuary" cities as addressing what he views as a public safety issue. (Photo: Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call/Newscom)

The Senate will vote next week on legislation that would block congressional funding to cities and municipalities that don’t comply with immigration-related requests from the federal government.
Since the killing in San Francisco last July of 32-year-old Kathryn Steinle and the arrest in her death of an illegal immigrant from Mexico with multiple deportations, Republicans in Congress have sought to punish local jurisdictions that have “sanctuary” policies limiting their cooperation with requests from federal immigration officials.
Police charged Juan Francisco Lopez-Sanchez with Steinle’s murder. The San Francisco sheriff at the time of Steinle’s death, Ross Mirkarimi, carried out a policy that barred communication with immigration authorities in virtually all circumstances.
Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., is the sponsor of the sanctuary city bill coming before the Senate for a procedural vote as early as next Wednesday. He describes the bill as intended to address what he views as a public safety issue.
The Daily Signal is the multimedia news organization of The Heritage Foundation.  We’ll respect your inbox and keep you informed.

“Ultimately it’s about keeping our communities safe,” Toomey told reporters during a conference call Thursday, adding:
It’s crazy for a city or municipality to willfully release dangerous criminals just because the person is here illegally. It defies common sense, and we need to end these policies for the sake of our security.
Toomey, who is up for re-election, represents a state whose major city, Philadelphia, limits its cooperation with federal immigration authorities.
Along with Toomey’s bill, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., scheduled a vote next week on legislation from Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, that also is meant to address Steinle’s death.
That measure, known as “Kate’s Law,” would increase mandatory minimum prison sentences for immigrants convicted of repeatedly entering the country illegally.

“It defies common sense and we need to end these policies for the sake of our security,” says @SenToomey of “sanctuary” cities.
In October, the Senate voted on these two measures as one combined bill, but the effort failed after Democrats expressed opposition especially to “Kate’s Law.”
The bills will be voted on separately this time. The votes are procedural, meaning 60 votes are required to invoke cloture and move forward with debate on either measure.
Supporters of sanctuary policies note that because of a 2014 federal appeals court ruling, which said that complying with immigration requests is optional for localities, those jurisdictions are free to enact their own policies.
In addition, some local law enforcement officials have expressed concern that they would be legally liable if they accidently held a U.S. citizen without a warrant at the request of federal immigration authorities.
To address this issue, Toomey said his legislation specifies that local jurisdictions cannot be sued for complying with requests from the federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency.
A person who believes his constitutional rights have been violated can still sue, but the local agency could not be held liable.
The federal government encourages local jurisdictions to cooperate with immigration requests, which recently have changed in substance.
In November 2014, President Barack Obama, as part of his executive actions on immigration, issued a directive to end a controversial program called Secure Communities. That program had required local law enforcement to hold arrested illegal immigrants for deportation, even without probable cause.
Critics of the program, created in 2008 under President George W. Bush and expanded by Obama, said it punished immigrants arrested for less serious crimes such as minor traffic violations.
With the Priority Enforcement Program, which replaced it, local authorities are supposed to notify ICE only when they plan to release someone on whom federal officials have requested information.
ICE, however, can still issue a detainer if it believes it has probable cause to deport an illegal immigrant who has been arrested, even if the person hasn’t been convicted.