Friday, June 10, 2011

Officials call for California to withdraw from controversial illegal immigration enforcement program

Officials call for California to withdraw from controversial illegal immigration enforcement program


THE FASTEST GROWING POLITICAL PARTY IN MEXIFORNIA IS LA RAZA SUPREMACIST.

REP. XAVIER BECERRA IS A RACIST MEXICAN SUPREMACIST. HIS ONLY AGENDA IS LA RAZA, AND TURNING MEXIFORNIA INTO AN EVEN EASIER PLACE FOR ILLEGALS TO LOOT.

*
*
http://www.mexica-movement.org/ They claim all of North America for Mexico!

*
Lou Dobbs Tonight
Monday, February 11, 2008
In California, League of United Latin American Citizens has adopted a resolution to declare "California Del Norte" a sanctuary zone for immigrants. The declaration urges the Mexican government to invoke its rights under the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo "to seek third‑nation neutral arbitration of disputes concerning immigration laws and their enforcement." We’ll have the story.
*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/book-mexifornia-shattering-of-american.html

BOOK: Mexifornia: SHATTERING OF AN AMERICAN DREAM (illegals call it their DREAM ACT)

WHILE YOU WERE STRUGGLING TO PUT FOOD ON THE TABLE, THE LA RAZA DEMS, STARING WITH OBAMA DOWN, WERE PUSHING OUR BORDERS OPEN AND ILLEGALS INTO OUR JOBS. THEN THESE SAME DEMS SEND YOU THE TAX BILLS FOR THE MEXICAN WELFARE STATE IN OUR BORDERS!
*


WE CAN THANK LA RAZA DEMS FEINSTEIN, PELOSI, BOXER, LOFGREN, HONDA, FARR, AND WAXMAN, as well as the LA RAZA SUPREMACIST PARTY (CONGRESSIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS) Reps. XAVIER BECERRA, JOE BACA, LA RAZA SISTERS LINDA and LORETTA SANCHEZ FOR CREATING THE MEXICAN WELFARE STATE OF MEXIFORNIA.

THERE ARE ONLY EIGHT STATES WITH A POPULATION GREATER THAN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, WHICH PAYS OUT $600 MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS (NO LEGALS VOTED FOR THIS AS LA RAZA CONTROLS THE POLITICAL MACHINES, SUCH AS L.A. COUNTY SUPERVISOR, LA RAZA SUPREMACIST GLORIA MOLINA). THIS SAME COUNTY HAS A TAX-FREE MEXICAN ECONOMY CALCULATED TO BE MORE THAN $2 BILLION PER YEAR, AND HALF THE JOBS IN LOS ANGELES ARE HELD BY ILLEGALS USING STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS.
LOS ANGELES CITY PAYS OUT $10 MILLION PER YEAR JUST FOR MEXICAN GRAFFITI ABATEMENT, AND HAS HUNDREDS OF MEXICAN GANG MURDERS EVERY YEAR, ALL OF WHICH COST ABOUT ONE MILLION DOLLARS TO PROSECUTE BEFORE THEY END UP IN PRISON.


"California Dreamin-'Undocumented' Nirvana"

                                                        An illegal immigrant crossing the border anywhere between Nogales, Arizona and the hills east of San Diego is on a quest for "gold" far more substantial than the Spanish explorer Hernando Cortez's quest for gold five hundred years ago.  Cortez died broken and all dreams of gold died with him.

Contrast that with the illegal immigrant who is crossing over the border even as I write this.  Most likely, he's on his way to Los Angeles.  As he and his family traverse the coastal range from San Diego to Los Angeles the government has conveniently posted diamond-shaped yellow signs with the profile of two adults and a child; the sign warns drivers along the I-5 corridor to be courteous and not run them over, as they may be crossing the busy freeway in flight from a Border Patrol unit.  Note: It is far more likely that the illegal is being transported, as "cargo" behind a load of Mexican lettuce in a truck. See this: 
http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2011/05/19/20110519mexico-migrants-in-tractor-trailers-business.html  and http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/2011/05/19/20110519arizona-drug-smuggling-ring-arrests.html

Let's call that hypothetical family Juan, Juanita and little Jose.  Once they arrive in Los Angeles this illegal family will find a "welcome wagon" of bountiful government and community gifts just waiting for their arrival.  Their first stop will be a store front in a strip mall where, for less than a hundred bucks, they will be furnished with a fake Social Security card and a fake California Drivers license.  They will easily find housing because the Feds, championed by the ACLU, have dictated that it is "racist" to require proof of citizenship before renting your house or apartment.  Next stop will be to raid the local food bank meant to assist impoverished American citizens.  Now firmly established and "legal", Juan and Juanita, after registering little Jose in free public or charter schools, set out to secure employment, using some American citizen's Social Security number.

Juanita quickly finds a job as a hotel maid.  Her salary and tips amount to $2,000 dollars per month.  Juan, using his illegal contacts, quickly gets a construction job with a home remodelling contractor making $2,000 per month, all in cash, no benefits provided.  On his way home, Juan walks by a Home Depot and notes that illegal day workers are hanging out in the front of the store and learns that the "gringo" county government has mandated that Home Depot provide a restroom, water fountain and air conditioned picnic tables to ease the plight of illegal day laborers awaiting a "pickup".  (Google: Home Depots in Los Angeles ordered to install Day Labor rest facilities, I swear it is true!). 
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,286944,00.html

As Juan and Juanita become more acclimated to their new home country, they quickly learn from their illegal neighbors that there are at least two dozen taxpayer funded financial assistance programs available where the question of citizenship is verboten.  Their neighbors also recommend that Juanita get pregnant right away for that is the route for the real "mother lode" of benefits.  It gives the family access to the WIC program, welfare, free medical care under the Medicaid program, racial and economic preferences for low cost university tuition programs and a whole host of taxpayer give-aways. 

 

                                                      
       
Soon a year has passed and Juan and Juanita have raked in tens of thousands of good old American dollars.  While during a visit to a Western Union office to send money back to family in Mexico, Juan and Juanita learn from the Western Union operator that there is more "gold" to be had from Uncle Sam; "go over to that Hispanic owned tax office over there", they are urged.  "they will file your tax returns using a W7 (INIT) non-citizen tax filing".  The IRS will then return to you all of your payroll taxes and, as a bonus, will send you a check for thousands of dollars as a Child Tax Credit for little Jose.  You'll also get more money from an  Earned Income Credit because the IRS only knows about Juanita's salary" (wink, wink).

Juan, a little cautious, says "won't the IRS report us to ICE?".  "No way!", says their advisor.  By federal law the IRS is not allowed to report tax information or your address to ICE". 

So Juan and Juanita and little Jose are living the good life indeed!  Between Juan's tax-free salary and Juanita's taxable salary and financial freebies from state programs and food banks and  other goody give-aways, Juan and Juanita and little Jose are pulling in over $5,000 dollars per month and don't know what to do with all the money!

After buying a late model SUV, Juan and Juanita are cruising in high style.  Oh sure, Juan's driving is a little erratic since he hails from a small Mexican village and has no driving experience.  His new found illegal neighbors advise him not to be crazy enough to waste money on car insurance.  Very expensive they warn!  So Juan drives L.A. and truly hopes he doesn't have an accident, or god forbid, run over someone due to his driving deficiencies.  But he has now been trained to drive away from any accident because he knows that will surely get his SUV impounded and he'll be pursued in court for human and property damages.

Soon Juanita is pregnant and, as the family awaits the "mother lode" of benefits awaiting them upon the arrival of a "real American citizen", they decide to buy a home.  Soon they learn that the State of California will actually give them $40,000 dollars toward the purchase of a home!  (Google it; it's true!)  Juan and Juanita carefully select a California city that has declared itself a "sanctuary city", which denotes city governments that refuse to comply with E-Verify laws, illegal federal arrest warrants, and vows to protect the poor "undocumented immigrant" at all costs! 
http://www.sanctuarycities.info/sanctuary_state_california.htm

Now permanently ensconced in the welcoming community and enjoying the advantages of tax evasion, enriched by dozens of free federal and state social service programs, enriched further by IRS Child and Family tax credits, Juan and Juanita and little Jose are literally rolling in abundance!

Then, Juan and Juanita and little Jose hear about these "radical" gringos who are demanding that they be deported!  Juan and Juanita are very angry!  Who wouldn't be?  They have a huge investment in the continuance of the gravy train and their very wealthy quality of life is threatened!  "By God, we'll take to the streets!" cried Juan and Juanita.  "We'll march by the tens of thousands through the streets of L.A!"   "We'll scare the hell out of those gringos and we'll eventually get amnesty and the gravy train will roll on!" 

"And if that doesn't work, we'll just call anyone who opposes illegal immigration, a racist!"...that'll do the trick.  Their mind at ease, Juan and Juanita crank up the mariachi music another notch and lean back and smile.  Ah "California Dreamin!".
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/book-mexifornia-shattering-of-american.html

BOOK: Mexifornia: SHATTERING OF AN AMERICAN DREAM (illegals call it their DREAM ACT)



*
THESE FIGURES ON WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY ARE DATED. IT NOT EXCEEDS $600 MILLION PER YEAR!!! (source: Los Angeles County & JUDICIAL WATCH)
*
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1949085/posts
*
LOS ANGELES – A MEXICAN WELFARE AND CRIME STATE WHERE THE JOBS ALSO GO TO ILLEGALS
http://mex¬icanoccupa¬tion.blogs¬pot.com/20¬11/04/mexi¬can-welfar¬e-state-in¬-los-angel¬es.html

*
One tragic thing about this book is that it was written in 2003. Since then the Mexican occupation has doubled. Welfare to illegals is up to $20 BILLION in California. Welfare to illegals in sanctuary city Los Angeles is past $600 million per year, while Mexican gangs murder all over the state. Yet the lifer-politicians continue to fight for open borders, more perks for illegals, and their illegal votes!
*

OBAMA'S LA RAZA DEPT. of JUSTICE LIES ABOUT IMMIGRATION COURTS TO HIDE CORRUPTION

DEPARTMENT of JUSTICE IS MERELY ONE MORE AGENCY HANDED OVER TO OBAMA’S LA RAZA AGENDA! SABOTAGE OUR LAWS FOR THE BENEFIT OF ILLEGALS.

 FROM JUDICIAL WATCH
DOJ Lies About Immigration Courts To Hide Corruption

Last Updated: Tue, 06/07/2011 - 12:11pm
The Department of Justice distorts figures to hide from Congress pervasive corruption in the nation’s immigration court system, which allows deportable aliens to evade hearings without consequences and more than 1 million removal orders to be ignored.
Adding insult to injury, U.S. taxpayers finance the drove of appeals filed by illegal immigrants deported for criminal convictions and fraudulent marriages. From 2000 to 2007, Americans doled out $30 million for aliens’ court costs, according to a new report authored by a former immigration court judge (Mark H. Metcalf) in south Florida, considered a hotbed in the system.
The veteran jurist says the nation’s immigration courts, which are operated by the DOJ, are ruled by deception and disorder and are at the heart of a system that nurtures scandal. About 250 overwhelmed judges preside over hundreds of thousands of cases annually and rarely are their deportation orders enforced.
Even after the 2001 terrorist attacks, 50% of all aliens who were free pending trial disappeared, according to figures provided in the judge’s report. Between 2005 and 2006 the number of aliens who failed to appear at their court hearing grew to 59%.
The DOJ deceptively reported the figure as “only” 39% by combining aliens who were free pending trial with those in custody who were forced by authorities to appear in court. That allowed the so-called bail-jumpers to appear as a smaller part of a bigger overall figure.
The agency also told Congress that immigration courts rule in favor of aliens only 20% of the time when in fact its 60% and that aliens appeal deportation orders in only 8% of cases when the figure is actually 98%. Many more examples are included in the judge’s report, which refers to the DOJ’s findings as a sham.
“Accuracy, credibility, relevance, and timeliness elude this agency and the flow of believable statistics to the public,” it says. The judge suggests that Congress order its investigative arm, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to conduct an in-depth probe.

*

JUDICIAL WATCH - MEXICAN GANGS TERRORIZING BLACKS IN MEX OCCUPIED LOS ANGELES

JUDICIALWATCH.org
Mexican Gang Charged With Terrorizing Blacks
06/07/2011 - 3:54pm
 To demonstrate its loyalty to the notoriously violent Mexican Mafia prison gang, an affiliate Latino street organization has worked to cleanse a southern California city of black residents by terrorizing, threatening and intimidating them.
Details of the decades-long genocide operation in the Los Angeles County city of Azusa are laid out in a huge grand jury indictment issued by the Department of Justice this week. More than 50 Latino gang bangers, many of them surely in the U.S. illegally, have been charged for targeting blacks by beating, robbing and threatening them.
The goal was to drive blacks out of the predominantly working-class Latino city of about 46,000. The crimes were committed by members of the Azusa 13 gang, which runs a sophisticated criminal enterprise financed with lucrative drug-trafficking proceeds. The gang also taxes the area’s drug dealers and shares some of the money with the Mexican Mafia, according to the 112-page indictment.
Latino gangs have for more than a decade targeted blacks in the sprawling southern California County, which is an illegal alien hotbed that has long offered sanctuary. In the last few years alone, dozens of Latino gangbangers have been charged with murdering, harassing or attacking blacks in the area, the feds say in their indictment.
As far back as 1999 the Azusa 13 was targeting blacks in the area, prosecutors say. That year a 17-year-old member named Ralph “Swifty” Flores murdered a black teenager and was sentenced to life in prison without parole. In 2008 an illegal immigrant from a different gang murdered a Los Angeles high school footballs star shortly after completing a prison sentence for a separate felony.
*
*
75 GANG LEADERS ARRESTED IN LA RAZA INFESTED CA CENTRAL VALLEY!
*
Four in 10 homicides in California are gang-related, Harris said. Those cases also account for 80% of the state's effort to relocate witnesses whose lives are in danger because of their cooperation with law enforcement, she said.
*
latimes.com
Dozens of Central Valley gang leaders arrested in one-day sweep
By Maura Dolan
2:52 PM PDT, June 8, 2011
Police arrested 75 alleged gang leaders Tuesday in a one-day sweep in the Central Valley for offenses including attempted murder and drug trafficking, state Atty. Gen. Kamala Harris said Wednesday.

The raids, which involved helicopters and canine units, occurred at 50 locations in the cities of Madera, Los Banos, Livingston, Merced, Atwater and Dos Palos as part of the Operation Red Zone crackdown, Harris said.

It was aimed at "ruthless" and "lethal" gang leaders associated with Nuestra Familia, which was started at Folsom State Prison in 1968 and continues to be run out of the state prison system, Harris said. Nuestra Familia controls most of the Nortenos street gangs in Central California and has ties to Mexican drug cartels, according to law enforcement officials.

Growing gang violence in the Central Valley has threatened small farm communities and spawned efforts to keep young people from being recruited.

"Their conduct was terrorizing this community," Harris said at a news conference with other law enforcement officials in Los Banos, "and by extension, their conduct was bleeding through the whole state of California."

Agents from 16 local, state and federal agencies seized more than a dozen firearms, including five assault rifles; methamphetamine; marijuana plants; crack cocaine; and more than $64,000 in cash in the sweeps, authorities said.

Law enforcement officials conceded that the arrests may provoke rival gangs to expand and noted that such sweeps in the past have driven the violence from one community to another.

The operation began in August 2010 when state law enforcement officials discovered that members of Nuestra Familia, largely driven out of Salinas in earlier sweeps, had set up shop in Madera, Merced and other Central Valley cities.

Four in 10 homicides in California are gang-related, Harris said. Those cases also account for 80% of the state's effort to relocate witnesses whose lives are in danger because of their cooperation with law enforcement, she said.

The sweeps this week brought the total number of arrests in the operation to 101 and stemmed from surveillance by the attorney general's Fresno Bureau of Narcotic Enforcement, which tracked the daily movements of suspected gang leaders, Harris said. Among those arrested were two senior Nuestra Familia regiment commanders, she said.
*
CNN RECENTLY REPORTED THAT THE NUMBER OF MEX GANG MEMBERS EXCEEDS ONE MILLION!

Lou Dobbs Tonight    
And there are some 800,000 gang members in this country: That’s more than the combined number of troops in our Army and Marine Corps. These gangs have become one of the principle ways to import and distribute drugs in the United States. Congressman David Reichert joins Lou to tell us why those gangs are growing larger and stronger, and why he’s introduced legislation to eliminate the top three international drug gangs.
*
*
“What we're seeing is our Congress and national leadership dismantling our laws by not enforcing them. Lawlessness becomes the norm, just like Third World corruption. Illegal aliens now have more rights and privileges than Americans. If you are an illegal alien, you can drive a car without a driver's license or insurance. You may obtain medical care without paying. You may work without paying taxes. Your children enjoy free education at the expense of taxpaying Americans.”
*
MEXICO DOES NOT WANT THEIR CRIMINALS BACK.


*
206 Most wanted criminals in Los Angeles. Out of 206 criminals--183 are hispanic---171 of those are wanted for Murder.

Why do Americans still protect the illegals??

http://www.dailybreeze.com/ci_11255121?appSession=934140935651450&RecordID=&PageID=2&PrevPageID=&cpipage=1&CPISortType=&CPIorderBy=

*
TEN MOST WANTED CRIMINALS IN CALIFORNIA ARE MEXICANS!
*

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/06/illegal-rapes-9-year-old-stepdaughter.html
*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/06/la-raza-mexican-gang-rape.html

8 Alleged Gang Members Arrested For Kidnap And Rape For 2 Teen Girls

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53103 Did you know illegals kill 12 Americans a day?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/1738432/posts FBI Crime Statistics - Crimes committed by illegals.
*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/mexican-gangs-14-year-old-mexican-boy.html

Edgar Jimenez Lugo, who authorities said was born in San Diego, was wanted on suspicion of killing rivals — allegedly beheading some — as part of his work for a violent drug-trafficking cartel.
*
*

The Illegal-Alien Crime Wave

Heather Mac Donald

Some of the most violent criminals at large today are illegal aliens. Yet in cities where the crime these aliens commit is highest, the police cannot use the most obvious tool to apprehend them: their immigration status. In Los Angeles, for example, dozens of members of a ruthless Salvadoran prison gang have sneaked back into town after having been deported for such crimes as murder, assault with a deadly weapon, and drug trafficking. Police officers know who they are and know that their mere presence in the country is a felony. Yet should a cop arrest an illegal gangbanger for felonious reentry, it is he who will be treated as a criminal, for violating the LAPD’s rule against enforcing immigration law.

The LAPD’s ban on immigration enforcement mirrors bans in immigrant-saturated cities around the country, from New York and Chicago to San Diego, Austin, and Houston. These “sanctuary
policies” generally prohibit city employees, including the cops, from reporting immigration violations to federal authorities.
*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/06/la-raza-mexican-gang-rape.html

8 Alleged Gang Members Arrested For Kidnap And Rape For 2 Teen Girls
June 7, 2011 5:49 AM

SANTA PAULA (CBS) — Eight alleged gang members will be arraigned Tuesday afternoon for several sex crimes after police say they used social media websites to kidnap and rape young girls.
Seven adults and one juvenile will be arraigned at 1:30p.m. in Ventura County court on charges ranging from rape, conspiracy, child abuse, sexual battery by restraint and parole violations. The suspects, arrested Friday, were identified as Carlos Ek, 22; Esteban Oseguera, 18; Isaac Ek, 19; Joseph Sandoval, 18; Jonathan Gaona, 19; Dion Mendoza, 19; Adrian Garcia, 19, and a juvenile, all of Santa Paula.

*


75 GANG LEADERS ARRESTED IN LA RAZA INFESTED CA CENTRAL VALLEY!

Four in 10 homicides in California are gang-related, Harris said. Those cases also account for 80% of the state's effort to relocate witnesses whose lives are in danger because of their cooperation with law enforcement, she said.



OBAMA'S ADMINISTRATION INFESTED WITH SERVANTS OF BANKSTERS & LA RAZA SUPREMACIST LIKE JOE BIDEN

OBAMA HAS INFESTED HIS ADMINISTRATION WITH LA RAZA DEMS.
THIS INCLUDES BANKSTER-OWNED JOE BIDEN, A WALKING CLOWN.

 “During the years that Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr. was helping the credit card industry win passage of a law making it harder for consumers to file for bankruptcy protection, his son had a consulting agreement that lasted five years with one of the largest companies pushing for the changes, aides to Senator Barack Obama’s presidential campaign acknowledged Sunday.”

JOE BIDEN’S ECONOMIC POLICY: WORKING HARD FOR ILLEGALS! IT’S THE SAME AS DIANNE FEINSTEIN, BARBARA BOXER, HILLARY CLINTON, NACY PELOSI, and BARACK OBAMA (Judicial Watch.org list Feinstein, Clinton, Pelosi, and Obama on their 10 MOST CORRUPT).

JOE BIDEN’S RECORD FOR ILLEGALS:

Voted YES on allowing illegal aliens to participate in Social Security.

Voted NO on declaring English as the official language of the US government.

Voted YES on establishing a Guest Worker program.

Voted YES on giving Guest Workers a path to citizenship.

Voted NO on limit welfare for immigrants.

Rated 8% by USBC, indicating an open-border stance.


….
FLOODS  OF ILLEGALS = DEPRESS WAGES FOR LEGALS = BIG BANKER’S PROFITS = BIG CAMPAIGN BRIBES for the BIG BANKER’S WHORES… and that means BIG FORECLOSURES and your life saving evaporate! You do the math.

Here’s how it works.
Dianne Feinstein, one of the most corrupt and self-serving politicians in United States history, has used her elected office to cut herself deals on a global level. From dirty deals with RED CHINA to being Bush’s savior from impeachment for war profits her husband collects.
Feinstein is a closet big business republican. She’ll do anything including sell out her state and nation for big business campaign bribes. (If you’re wondering how Feinstein avoids prison, she pays out bribes, through her husband, Richard C. Blum, to DEMS all over including CLINTON, BOXER, KERRY, KENNEDY, and the other Bush war whore, JOE BIDEN, so they keep their mouths shut. Feinstein also has Boxer positioned on Senate’s NO ETHICS REFORM COMMITTEE to sabotage any move that would put both of them in prison.
One of her many corporate paymasters are WELLS FARGO and BANK of AMERICA (OPENSECRETS.org).
In exchange for the dirty money she collects from BIG BANKERS, she fronted the bankruptcy bill the banker’s wrote for themselves. The so called “bankruptcy reform” is the single most important issue that will cause millions of Americans, with or without a Wells Fargo or BofA mortgage product, to lose their life savings banked in their home’s equity resulting from the BIG BANKER’S GLOBAL RAPE AND PILLAGE. With the FEINSTEIN BIDEN BANKER’S BANKRUPTCY FUCK YOU OVER LAW no one can go into Open Court and get an impartial judge to clean up the miserable mortgage product, terms of which can change per the Bank’s newest rape devices. By the time we’re at the bottom of the foreclosure crisis there will be no middle-class left.
Sitting next to Feinstein, as she whored for big bankers, was her La Raza sister, Hillary “Wall $t.” Clinton, her lap-bitch Barbara Boxer, and JOE BIDEN, who has taken massive amounts of bribes from BIG BANKERS, along with his family, just like Dianne Feinstein and Missy Wall $t., and BARACK OBAMA.
Even BEFORE Feinstein was collecting bribes from Big Banker Wells Fargo, this bank already had their mortgage license in the State of California  !!   REVOKED   !!! for corruption and corporate malfeasance. Wells went into Court and attempted to have their license restored but the Court said NO. The bank simply declared itself ABOVE STATE LAW; as is the case of most banks, and went on to pillage the entire nation with their mortgage product crime wave.
Cleveland and Baltimore, as well as many cities all over the country, have been devastated by Wells Fargo’s mortgage product. Tax payers are footing the bills to demo properties all over abandoned to the foreclosure crisis. These two cities are both going after Wells Fargo for the loses.
UNFORTUNATELY the mortgage crisis is only one of the many crimes perpetrated by Wells Fargo, et al. in their global pillage.
Both Wells Fargo and Bank of America are generous contributors to LA RAZA, the racist Mexican supremacist party for OPEN BORDERS, MUCHO WELFARE, HEAVY BREEDING CATHOLICS, and AMNESTY to keep wages for legals depressed.
Although it is technically against the law to open bank accounts for illegals with phony ID’s, something the typical Mexican has pockets full of, these banks do it anyway! Mexico, eager to keep the cash flowing and has almost 50 consulates around their occupied territory of gringoland (the United Kingdom has only 8 in comparison, but then Mexican drug business is measured in billions). So lucrative for Mexico has the Mexican welfare state of gringoland become that these consulates handout “ID’s” to their people like grocery store coupons. The consulates even have rolling RVs driving around Mexican occupied territories handing out these phony, and unverified “ID’s”. ….(terrorist know this?). and  Wells Fargo and Bank of America use them to open accounts all over. Go into any bank in Mexican occupied Los Angeles and see how many illegals that can’t speak a single word of English, are making banking transactions.
It’s calculated that about 20% of these bank’s transactions with illegals is the transfer of Mexican drug money (CNN Lou Dobbs).
Another reason Feinstein’s paymaster Big Banks open accounts for illegals is that they’re great victims of BANK FEE PILLAGE. Illegals are also a highly profitable market for their mortgage products which the bank’s sell, profit from, and then dump on the mortgage market for innocent victims, and ultimately the tax payer to swallow the loses on.
There are lawsuits, and have been all along the time the old whore Feinstein was tucking their dirty money in her dirtier bra, against these banks unscrupulous “racist” profiling that results in higher interest rates to illegals and other minorities.
Wells Fargo is the biggest financial backer of PAYDAY LOAN SHARKS which victimizes the poor, illegals and our men and women fighting the Bush – Feinstein (Google Feinstein and war profiteering) war to protect Big Bush Saudi Oil profits. These payday loan sharks charge 400% interests and any attempt to curb their abuse, or credit card pillage by Big Bankers has been thwarted by DIANNE FEINSTEIN, JOE BIDEN, BARBARA BOXER and HILLARY CLINTON. They know the hand that feeds them.
You probably were watching as Congress squirmed in front of the American people while they pretended to wanna fix CREDIT CARD COMPANIES, like the one that has Joe Biden, and family, bought and paid for, abuses which cost the American people billions. Reform of the pillage by Credit Card companies will never happen!

“During that time, executives at MBNA, which was bought in 2006 by Bank of America, began donating heavily to both major political parties and many national politicians, including Mr. Biden.”

Wells Fargo and Bank of America not only pillages the American people, and does so with impunity, they DON’T HIRE AMERICAN.
Go into any WELLS FARGO or BANK of AMERICA and you won’t find any American born employees. They’re all visa people. Indians, Chinese, Iranians, Russians, any one that will work cheap except an American.
And that’s only part of the menu of rape and pillage by Feinstein’s paymasters.
Now OBAMA wants to convince us he represents change? Just look at his Wall St. financial sector donors. He’s as much of a populist as  former WalMart board member Hillary “Walmart you up the ass” Clinton. Walmart being the largest employer of illegals with stolen social security numbers in America.
Now you may understand why Dianne Feinstein, Joe Biden, Barbara Boxer, Hillary and Billary, Nancy Pelosi, as well as Barack Obama are all busting their ass for the illegals’ illegal votes and AMNESTY.
Their bankers told them they best keep the illegals’ money rolling in and wages for American DEPRESSED.
NOW COMES WELFARE FOR BANKERS…. And what are these same banker’s whores doing about foreclosure? NADA!

THE HOUSING MESS….. or really more welfare for BIG BANKERS???
FORBESThe Housing Mess
Lending Over Backward
By Joshua Zumbrun and Maurna Desmond 8-26-08
 
The FHA has been turned into the mortgage industry's lender of last resort. Taxpayer price tag? Maybe $100 billion.
DENVER -- When the nation's politicians take the stage here and later in St. Paul, Minn., you'll hear a lot of talk about saving the decrepit housing market, and lately that means one thing: The Federal Housing Administration.
Watch your wallet.
Heralded as a savior in reversing the mortgage market’s woes, risks to the agency could cost taxpayers dearly, says one mortgage expert, as Washington morphs the FHA from a helping hand for low-income home buyers into a back door bailout for the imploding mortgage industry. Trouble is, there's little choice at this point.
“Nobody is talking is talking about it, but in three years the FHA bailout is going to cost taxpayers at least $100 billion dollars,” said Guy Cecala, a mortgage industry insider and publisher of Inside Mortgage Finance. “Everybody on Capital Hill recognizes that there will be significant costs, but they’re trying to keep the housing spigot open even if it will bring in some bad water down the road.”
With investors all but gone from the mortgage market, the FHA's guarantee insures that lenders will fund loans they'd otherwise back away from. It's a role once filled by the evaporated subprime market. At the height of the lending frenzy in 2006, the proportion of loans insured by the FHA dwindled to a mere 2% of the market.
Now, lenders have nowhere else to turn. According to the Mortgage Banker’s Association, 30% of all July loan applications had FHA backing and, without a means or credit requirement, it’s the riskiest borrowers who are being shunted onto the government's books. (See "FHA's Risky Business.")
As the housing crisis cascaded, Washington looked for a mechanism to keep the mortgage market liquid. Enter the FHA. Like a competitive eater with a blindfold, the FHA is being force-fed loans that private lenders and other government programs won't swallow in an effort to shore up the industry.
Last month, the U.S. Congress passed, and President Bush signed, a massive housing bill that would allow the FHA to insure up to $300 billion of new mortgages. It also gave the Department of the Treasury authority to purchase shares of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the floundering mortgage giants.
"To this point the FHA does not need money," says Richard X. Bove of Ladenburg Thalmann. "Once the new housing act is in effect, it is very likely taxpayer money will be needed."
It's not what the agency planned. Since 2005, FHA Commissioner Brian Montgomery has been working to go the other way, pushing for modernization. Among the provisions he wanted were access to the most basic tools of risk management, the capacity to charge higher premiums to riskier borrowers and the ability to reward better bets to even out the agency’s total liabilities.
But when the housing bill passed, that idea was put on the back burner. The FHA was saddled with a one-year restriction on charging risk premiums. As a consequence, the agency's ballooning portfolio is priced with no accounting for the fact that many of its borrowers lack substantial down payments, nor are they required to.
Even in this sinking market, borrowers only need to put 3% down to qualify for FHA backing, and borrowers currently unable to pay their adjustable-rate mortgages after the rates reset are allowed to refinance into FHA-backed mortgages.
FHA Commissioner Montgomery wouldn’t hazard a final bailout figure or comment on Cecala's analysis. “Right now, we just don’t know how bad it will be,” he says.
For the obliterated lending industry, FHA insurance is a hot product because of its enticing, credit-blind terms. Mortgage outfits are lining up to become licensed FHA-lenders. Since April, the number of FHA lenders has grown to 12,000 from 10,000, pumping a flood of subprime borrowers onto FHA's rolls.
“It’s clear in this market that there are no other low down-payment type mortgages that FHA specializes in,” says Jay Brinkman, an economist at Mortgage Banker’s Association. He also said that moving forward, the sheer surge in loan volume will present a challenge because that kind of sudden growth “at any operation, no matter how well run, will expose any existing problems.”
Brinkman added that “in the longer term, the question is, 'What is the credit profile that FHA is taking on?' ”
That profile is unlikely to be good. “It’s all about adverse selection with FHA,” said Cecala. “Somebody who has a 750 credit score and 20% down is not going to pick an FHA loan. You’re definitely getting a riskier borrower that simply wouldn’t qualify for mortgage insurance in the private sector.”
With U.S. home prices down 10% in the last 12 months and expected to fall perhaps 10% more in the coming year, the vast majority of homes the FHA insures in 2008 will be underwater. Requiring only a small down payment in a declining market is extremely risky because negative home equity has proved the best indicator for default in this housing cycle.
No lender in the private sector--even Fannie and Freddie, who have higher fees in falling markets--have the risk tolerance for making losing bets like this. They all require 10% to 20% on a mortgage in this sort of environment. But they're not the government.
“If it costs upwards of $500 billion down the road, should it not be done?” asks Cecala. “If it keeps the market running and FHA becomes the lender of last resort, policymakers really don't have an alternative.”
Nor, it seems, do taxpayers.
…….
JOE BIDEN THE BANKER’S BUM BOY!.....aka Mr. Change???
August 25, 2008
Obama Aides Defend Bank’s Pay to Biden Son
By CHRISTOPHER DREW and MIKE McINTIRE
During the years that Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr. was helping the credit card industry win passage of a law making it harder for consumers to file for bankruptcy protection, his son had a consulting agreement that lasted five years with one of the largest companies pushing for the changes, aides to Senator Barack Obama’s presidential campaign acknowledged Sunday.

MBNA BUYS JOE BIDEN…. And we’re fucked!
Mr. Biden’s son, Hunter, received consulting fees from the MBNA Corporation from 2001 to 2005 for work on online banking issues. Aides to Mr. Obama, who chose Mr. Biden as his vice-presidential running mate on Saturday, would not say how much the younger Mr. Biden, who works as both a lawyer and lobbyist in Washington, had received, though a company official had once described him as having a $100,000 a year retainer. But Obama aides said he had never lobbied for MBNA and that there was nothing improper about the payments.
Campaign officials acknowledged that the connection between the Bidens and MBNA, the enormous financial services company then based in their home state of Delaware, was one of the most sensitive issues they examined while vetting the senator for a spot on the ticket.
Mr. Biden’s support for the bankruptcy changes, which were signed into law in 2005, puts him at odds with Mr. Obama of Illinois, who opposed the bill and has criticized the presumptive Republican nominee, Senator John McCain of Arizona, for supporting it. Consumer advocates and other Democratic allies remain sharply critical of Mr. Biden’s actions, saying in recent days that they could hamper the campaign’s efforts to attack the Republicans over their handling of the nation’s credit crisis.
The financial services industry began seeking relief from Congress in the mid-1990s from an increase in bankruptcies that was cutting into its profits. Its initial support came from Republican lawmakers, who repeatedly introduced bills to make it more difficult for consumers to erase their debts. During that time, executives at MBNA, which was bought in 2006 by Bank of America, began donating heavily to both major political parties and many national politicians, including Mr. Biden.
In late 1996, the company hired the younger of Mr. Biden’s two sons, Robert Hunter Biden, known as Hunter, who had just graduated from Yale Law School, as a lawyer. The company promoted Mr. Biden to senior vice president by early 1998. And after the younger Mr. Biden worked at the Commerce Department on electronic commerce issues from 1998 to 2001, MBNA hired him back on a monthly consulting contract to advise it on such issues, aides said.
Consumer advocates say that Senator Biden was one of the first Democratic leaders to support the bankruptcy bill, and he voted for it four times — in 1998, 2000, 2001 and in March 2005, when its final version passed the Senate by a vote of 74 to 25.
Travis Plunkett, legislative director of the Consumer Federation of America, a consumer group that opposed the bill, said that Senator Biden had provided a “veneer of bipartisanship” that eventually helped the credit card companies win over other Democrats. “He provided cover to other Democrats to do what the credit industry was urging them to do,” Mr. Plunkett said.
Aides to the Obama campaign said Sunday that Senator Biden’s goal was always to strike a workable compromise between the competing interests on the bankruptcy bill, and that he was not influenced by his son’s work for MBNA or the campaign donations. They said he had sought several changes in the bill to protect consumers that upset MBNA executives, then the largest employer in Delaware, while acknowledging that he also voted against other amendments proposed by other Democrats.
Hunter Biden, through his assistant at his law firm, Oldaker Biden & Belair, referred a request for comment to the Obama campaign. James Mahoney, the head of corporate communications for Bank of America, said the consulting arrangement had ended by the time Bank of America took over MBNA in January 2006.
“Senator Biden has a 35-year record fighting for people against powerful interests, whether it’s drug companies, oil companies or insurance companies,” David Wade, a spokesman for the Obama campaign, said in a statement. “He took plenty of knocks from the largest employer in his state because he demanded changes in the bankruptcy bill. But legislating requires compromise. Senators cast tough votes. Congress worked on the bankruptcy bill for nearly a decade, over five Congresses, to forge a bipartisan compromise.”
Mr. Wade added: “Senator Biden took on entrenched interests and succeeded in improving the bill for low-income workers, women and children. There were times when amendments on both sides would have blown up a bipartisan compromise backed by three-quarters of the Senate. At those moments, Senator Biden had to make the tough calls and voted to pass a bill.”
Mr. Wade said Senator Biden took extra steps to protect consumers in votes to require people in bankruptcy to continue paying child support or alimony. He also took steps to affirm that the bill exempted debtors who have serious medical problems, are veterans or are in the armed service, the aide said.
But a review of the legislative record finds as many instances when Mr. Biden joined Republicans to defeat attempts by his Democratic colleagues, including Mr. Obama, to soften the bill’s impact on those same constituencies. He was one of five Democrats in March 2005 who voted against a proposal to require credit card companies to provide more effective warnings to consumers about the consequences of paying only the minimum amount due each month. Mr. Obama voted for it.
Mr. Biden also went against Mr. Obama to help defeat amendments aimed at strengthening protections for people forced into bankruptcy who have large medical debts or are in the military; Mr. Biden argued that the amendments were unnecessary because the legislation already carved out exemptions for those debtors. And he was one of four Democrats who sided with Republicans to defeat an effort, supported by Mr. Obama, to shift responsibility in certain cases from debtors to the predatory lenders who helped push them into bankruptcy.
In many of these battles, Mr. Biden’s Democratic colleagues often voiced their frustration with the big financial interests arrayed against them. Senator Paul Wellstone specifically cited MBNA during a floor debate in March 2001 over his call for stronger protections for debtors forced into bankruptcy because of medical bills — an amendment that Mr. Biden would later vote against.
“It just so happens that the people who find themselves in terrible economic circumstances through no fault of their own — major medical bills, they have lost their jobs, or there has been a divorce — it is my view as a former political scientist and now a senator for the State of Minnesota that those people do not have the same kind of clout that MBNA Corporation has,” Mr. Wellstone said.
Mr. Biden’s supporters also point out that the Republicans controlled the Senate for much of the time when the bankruptcy bills were under consideration. MBNA employees have given Mr. Biden more than $214,000 in campaign donations over the years, the largest amount in his coffers tied to any single company. But the company’s employees have given even more lavishly to President George W. Bush and top Republican lawmakers.




THE DEMOCRAT PARTY - SERVES LA RAZA SUPREMACIST & BANKSTER DONORS

THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IS THE PARTY FOR  BANKSTER DONORS, AND LA RAZA ILLEGALS.
THE DEM STAND FOR NO-STRINGS BAILOUTS, NO PRISON TIME FOR BANKSTERS, OPEN & UNDEFENDED BORDERS, AND STAGGERING CORRUPTION!
*

OBAMA’S LA RAZA ADMINISTRATION


*
By Dave Gibson (09/17/2006) http://americandaily.com/article/15577

ON THE GROWIN POWER OF “LA RAZA” FASCISM FOR MEX SUPREMACY
*
Wsws.org
The Democratic Party and Wall Street
By Barry Grey
1 October 2008
The role of the Democratic Party in promoting the plan devised by the Bush administration and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to bail out Wall Street has exposed the real social interests that this party defends.
From the moment Paulson broached the idea of using at least $700 billion in taxpayer funds to buy worthless mortgage-backed securities from the major banks, the Democratic leadership, including the party’s presidential candidate, Barack Obama, backed the scheme.
They accepted the basic framework of Paulson’s proposal. They echoed his claims and those of Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke that immediate legislative action was required to avert an economic catastrophe.
Despite their control of both houses of Congress, the Democrats never advanced their own plan to deal with the financial crisis. With Wall Street and the entire ideology of American “free market” capitalism discredited in the eyes of the American people, and popular opposition to the bailout mounting, the Democrats were in a position, as the nominal opposition party, to demand significant reforms of the banking system.
They could have called for tougher regulation of the banks and punitive measures against the multi-millionaire architects of the financial meltdown. They did nothing of the kind.
Instead, they took the lead in secret negotiations with Paulson to draw up legislation whose entire purpose was to protect the interests of the most powerful sections of the financial elite, such as the Wall Street giant Goldman Sachs, formerly headed by Paulson. They insisted that the crisis required a bipartisan response, and that a program to place immense public resources at the disposal of Wall Street, with the most far-reaching implications for the American people, should be excluded from the election campaign and implemented before voters could register their opposition on Election Day.
There is little doubt that the outlines of the scheme Paulson presented to congressional leaders on September 19 had been discussed in advance with the Democratic leadership. Barney Frank, the Democratic chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, who has led the Democrats in their talks with Paulson, had already publicly called for a government rescue of the banks along the lines of the $160 billion bailout of the savings and loan industry carried out in the late 1980s and early 1990s.
The Democratic-backed bill that emerged last weekend from these talks conformed in all essentials to the scheme initially proposed by Paulson. The supposed improvements included at the insistence of the Democratic negotiators amounted to window dressing aimed at duping the American people into thinking their interests were being protected.
Even the token measures initially called for by some Democrats to aid distressed homeowners were dropped, at the insistence of the banking industry and the Bush administration. The bill granted Paulson virtually unlimited powers to run the bailout as he saw fit, with no serious provisions for the government to recoup the vast sums it will lose in the purchase and eventual resale of the junk assets.
Perhaps the most extraordinary provision of Paulson’s proposal, barring any court review of his actions and those of the Wall Street firms he hires to manage the bailout, was largely retained. The bill that was voted on and defeated in the House of Representatives on Monday bars anyone from challenging the bailout program in court except on grounds of violations of the US Constitution. The program, its overseers and the banks that participate cannot be sued for violating existing laws—a blatantly unconstitutional restriction that amounts to a blank check for illegality and corruption.
As this provision underscores, the Democratic leadership wants nothing to be enacted that in any way threatens the interests of the most powerful banks and investment firms. They support the Paulson bailout because they themselves are deeply embedded in the milieu of Wall Street and consider their most critical constituency to be the financial aristocracy and the richest layers of the upper-middle class.
The Democratic Party’s open alliance with Wall Street reflects the economic evolution of social layers upon which it has long based itself. The past three decades of boom on Wall Street have immensely enriched sections of the middle class which profited from the growth of financial speculation.
Not a few prominent Democratic politicians embody this process: Jon Corzine, the governor of New Jersey and former senator of the state, who made hundreds of millions of dollars as chairman and co-CEO of Goldman Sachs; New Jersey Senator Frank Lautenberg, another small businessman who became a multi-millionaire; and Bill Clinton, who has amassed a personal fortune since leaving office by associating with big players on Wall Street.
This accounts for the utter indifference of the Democratic leadership to the popular opposition to the bailout and the crisis confronting the broad mass of working people.
Leading up to Monday’s vote in the House, it was apparent that the most serious threat to the bailout bill came from right-wing Republican congressmen, who feared being thrown out of office by angry voters and sought to posture as opponents of Wall Street. They denounced the measure as an affront to “free market” capitalism and demanded instead of a direct use of taxpayer money a government guarantee against banking losses, combined with a frontal assault on social spending and even greater tax breaks for big business.
The negotiations on the bill were dominated by efforts on the part of the Democratic leadership and Paulson to appease the Republican opposition by removing the token housing provisions and adding the insurance scheme, but only as an option to be used at the treasury secretary’s discretion. The result was a united front of Wall Street spokesman Paulson, Bush and the Democratic congressional leadership.
In the event, the bill went down to defeat, with 67 percent of House Republicans voting against and 60 percent of Democrats voting in favor. The vote itself reflected the close ties between the dominant sections of the Democratic Party and Wall Street.
Only three of New York state’s 23 Democratic congressmen (13 percent) voted against the measure. All four members of the Black Congressional Caucus from New York voted “yes.” In contrast, 15 of 34 Democrats from California (44 percent) voted against the bill. This is a measure of the degree to which Democratic legislators in the environs of Wall Street identify with the interests of the financial elite.
It is significant that the media has focused its attention almost entirely on the Republican opponents of the bailout bill, while saying virtually nothing about the 95 Democrats who voted against it. Though their opposition lacks any principled basis and has been far less aggressive than that of the dissident Republicans, in their statements on the floor of Congress and elsewhere they have adopted a more openly populist tone and highlighted some of the most egregious aspects of the bailout plan. The media has ignored them because it fears their protests will legitimize and encourage the popular opposition.
In the aftermath of the bill’s defeat, the Democrats have once again taken the lead in the effort to hold a revote and push the measure through. Speaking Tuesday at the University of Nevada at Reno, Obama said that he had spoken with Bush, the Democratic majority leader of the Senate, Harry Reid of Nevada, and other leaders about reviving the bailout plan.
Obama stepped up the campaign of fear-mongering in support of the bailout, saying that its defeat would mean that “thousands of businesses could close around the country,” and “millions of jobs could be lost.”
He added, “To the Democrats and Republicans who opposed this plan yesterday, I say: Step up to the plate and do what’s right for this country.”
Both he and his Republican opponent, John McCain, announced their support for an amendment, pushed by some Republicans who voted against the bill, to raise the federal deposit insurance limit from $100,000 to $250,000—a further sop to the wealthy that would ultimately be paid for at taxpayer expense.
At the heart of the bailout plan is a drive by the most powerful sections of the financial elite to utilize the economic crisis to effect a reorganization and further consolidation of the banking industry. In a front-page article headlined “Industry is Remade in a Wave of Mergers,” the Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday:
“The notoriously fragmented American banking system is going through a decade’s worth of consolidation in a matter of weeks, with the US government often acting as matchmaker.
“At the end of last year, the three lenders that are now the largest in US banking—Bank of American Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Citigroup Inc.—collectively held 21.4 percent of all US deposits. Now, with this month’s government-backed sales of the banking assets of Washington Mutual Inc. to JPMorgan and of Wachovia Corp. to Citigroup, the Big Three instantly have a combined 31.3 percent of US deposits...
“For customers, it means less choice and the potential for higher fees as the big banks get more pricing power, further pressuring smaller rivals.”
With the assistance of the government, scores of small and mid-sized banks, and some larger ones, will disappear, and a few banking behemoths will emerge from the crisis with dictatorial power over the economic life of the country.
Whatever their minor tactical differences, both major parties are united in the defense of the financial elite and a bankrupt economic system that is preparing a social catastrophe.
The Socialist Equality Party rejects the entire framework of the bailout plan and the official debate surrounding it—a debate that proceeds entirely from the standpoint of the capitalist system, private ownership and control of the banks, and the subordination of all social needs to the enrichment of a financial oligarchy.
We call for the nationalization of the banks and major financial institutions, without compensation to their executives and big shareholders. These institutions must be turned into public utilities, controlled democratically by the working people, so that their resources can be used for productive purposes. These include the creation of jobs, a halt to foreclosures and evictions, the rebuilding of the country’s infrastructure, and the funding of education, health care and other social programs.
The Wall Street executives who are responsible for the crisis, who enriched themselves by means of financial manipulation and fraud, must be held accountable. Their assets should be confiscated and they should face criminal prosecution.
The struggle for this program requires a complete break with the Democratic Party and the building of an independent party of the working class, based on a socialist program and the fight to end the political rule of the banks and big business through the formation of a workers’ government.
This is the program being advanced by the candidates of the Socialist Equality Party in the 2008 elections—Jerry White for president and Bill Van Auken for vice president. We urge all those who see the need for a socialist alternative to support our election campaign and join the SEP.
What has FEINSTEIN, BOXER, PELOSI, ESHOO, LOFGREN, WAXMAN, HARMAN,  DONE ABOUT FORECLOSURES? NADA! THEY’RE TOO BUSY WORKING FOR THEIR BIG BANKERS AND THEIR BIG CAMPAIGN DONATIONS… aka bribes!

The DEBAUCHED FINANCIAL SYSTEM, the article reads. How about the DEBAUCHED BAY AREA WHORES that service it for big campaign bribes???


DIANNE FEINSTEIN, undoubtedly one of the most corrupt and self-serving lifer politicians in history has and will take money hand over fist from WELLS FARGO and BofA.
Even after WELLS FARGO, a global crime wave, HAD its CALIFORNIA MORTGAGE LICENSE REVOKED, AND THE COURTS REFUSE TO REINSTATE IT, Feinstein continued to front their crime wave.
It was FEINSTEIN, along with sisters in crime BARBARA BOXER, and HILLARY CLINTON that fronted for the BANKER’S BANKRUPTCY BILL to LAW, which then prevented consumers from obtaining impartial help to resolve their frequently fraudulent and certainly exploitive MORTGAGE PRODUCT. The type Wells Fargo victimized millions all over the country.
Google Wells Fargo and the Cities of Cleveland and Baltimore.
AT THIS VERY SECOND BIG BANKS ARE RIGHT IN THERE ALONG WITH GEORGE W BUSH, AND DIANNE FEINSTEIN TO MAKE SURE THE BANKRUPTCY LAWS ARE NOT REVISED TO PROTECT CONSUMERS FROM BANKER’S CRIME WAVES.
Therefore, you know that SISTER PELOSI, as corrupt as the two old corporate whores noted above any day, says the DEMS just had to capitulate to the REPUBLICANS and not restore consumer’s ability to fight BANK PREDATORS like WELLS FARGO and BANK of AMERICA in court, is UTTER CRAP.
BAY AREA LA RAZA WHORES NOT ONLY EXIST TO GIVE AWAY OUR JOBS TO FOREIGNERS, THEY ARE AS MUCH CORPORATE WHORES AS GEORGE W BUSH IS BIG BUSH SAUDI CARLYLE GROUP, and DICK CHENEY IS HALLIBURTON UP YOUR ASS.
What have these lifer whores done for us.
FUCKED US OVER FO BIG BANKS
FUCKED US OVER FOR BIG UTILITY MONOPOLIES
FUCKED US OVER FOR MORE INDIANS AND CHINESE TO TAKE OUR JOBS
FUCKED US OVER TO OUT-SOURCE OUR JOBS
FUCKED US OVER TO TURN THIS ONCE GREAT STATE INTO A MEXICAN WELFARE TERRITORY COVERED WITH MEXICAN GANGS.
FUCKED US OVER FOR BIG MANSIONS FROM BIG WAR PROFITEERING….!
FUCKED US INTO FOOD KITCHENS
FUCKED US INTO PAY DAY LOAN SHARKS… FINANCED BY WELLS FARGO!!!!!!!
Isn’t it time they went to prison?