Sunday, September 3, 2017


President Trump has donated one million dollars of his own money for the Texas flood recovery, and even many Hollywood celebrities are pitching in with their own money and fundraising efforts to help. But does anyone think Hillary Clinton will loosen...

Will Hillary donate book tour ticket sales to Texas flood victims?

President Trump has donated one million dollars of his own money for the Texas flood recovery, and even many Hollywood celebrities are pitching in with their own money and fundraising efforts to help. But does anyone think Hillary Clinton will loosen her money grubbing grip on book tour ticket sales to help Texas?
So far, there is no word from Hillary if she’ll donate any of the book tour money to the Texas flood recovery effort. Even so, you might think Hillary would have enough pull to get the Clinton Foundation to give something to help the recovery efforts in Texas.
Given that Hillary was a heartbeat away from the presidency, do you think the liberal media will lambast her for not immediately stepping up to help? And if and when she does pitch in with a donation or fundraising, will the liberal media attack her relentlessly for waiting so long to do so?
In either case, will the liberal media run story after story about how Hillary Clinton is a heartless selfish opportunist with nary a drop of sympathy for the Texas flood victims? Don’t hold your breath.



LOOTER OF THE POOR….. But she served Obama’s crony bank$ter$ well!

Hillary holds a fire sale

Pay-to-play is alive and well with Hillary Clinton, now that she's charging$2,375.95 a pop to hear her pitch her new book for sale called 'What Happened?'
Two thousand bucks? To hear her shill a book you could order just as easily on Amazon if you really wanted it? Seems she hasn't changed a bit from her glory days shaking down donations for the Clinton Foundation in exchange for favors. Back then, she was charging between $1 million and $5 million a head for access to Herself and her State Department from any gamy player with the bucks to shell out - sultans, emirs, oligarchs, goons. They all had money that was welcome and the Clinton Foundation rolled in the dough as she sold the State Department for a price.
That was her zenith, an upward progression from her salad days of selling White House access through coffees and nights in the Lincoln bedroom, which she sold earlier for the same access to herself and her political favors.
It's characterized Hillary Clinton's political career from the get-go.
Which calls to mind that at a mere $2,000 a pop, Hillary seems to be holding a fire sale, especially since the ticket, at least in Canada, covers places for two people. Without an office to sell and favors to dispense, she shrinks precipitously in her price to the public. It must be some sort of humiliation since she's always for sale for something - to go from $5 million to a lousy $2,000 is enough to make one throw an ashtray. It's tough times when you are shilling very little of value.



LOOTER OF THE POOR….. But she served Obama’s crony bank$ter$ well!


The same period has seen a massive growth of social inequality, with income and wealth concentrated at the very top of American society to an extent not seen since the 1920s.

“This study follows reports released over the past several months documenting rising mortality rates among US workers due to drug addiction and suicide, high rates of infant mortality, an overall leveling off of life expectancy, and a growing gap between the life expectancy of the bottom rung of income earners compared to those at the top.”

Hillary Clinton shows her sensitive side

Hillary Clinton never disappoints and is always good for a story.  It is impossible to make up the stuff she says.
Hillary is out promoting her new book, What Happened, to educate us on why the United States made such an error in electing Trump instead of her.
Hillary tells us that when Trump stood behind her on the debate stage, her thoughts were as follows:
My skin crawled.  It was one of those moments where you wish you could hit pause and ask everyone watching 'well, what would you do?  Just two days prior, the world heard Trump brag about groping women.
This is beyond credibility, good taste, and civility.  It is about as low as possible, even for a Clinton.
Without speculating on Hillary's thoughts, other than that she will say and do anything to sell a book and make a buck, let us count some of  the real events that did not make Hillary's "skin crawl":
1. Bill Clinton raping Juanita Broaddrick, and then Hillary threatening Broaddrick.  Hillary stands by her man.

2. Bill Clinton groping Kathleen Willey in the White House.  Hillary stands by her man.

3. Bill's abuse of Monica Lewinsky, such as but not limited to the cigar, followed by Bill  lying by denying that  he had "sexual relations with that woman."  Hillary stands by her man.

4. Bill paying a fine for perjury in a deposition and having his law license suspended.  Hillary stands by her man

5. Hillary bragging and cackling about how she got a rapist cleared of a statutory rape charge by attacking and destroying the victim, a twelve-year-old girl.

6. Hillary lying about the cause of the attack on Benghazi, blaming the attack on a video.

7. Hillary approving the sale of 20% of our uranium to the Russians and receiving millions of dollars in contributions to the Clinton Foundation and having Bubba get $500,000 for a speech in Moscow.

8. Hillary using an illegal and unsecure email system that put our country at risk, lying about it, and destroying emails.

9. Hillary making $100,000 on a $1,000 "investment" in cattle futures on her first try, claiming she read the Wall Street Journal.

10. Hillary hiding the Whitewater billing records that would have shown her involvement.

11. Hillary having Bill meet with A.G. Loretta Lynch "accidentally" at an airport days before Comey questioned her, not under oath, and gave her a pass.

This is only a partial list of Hillary's highlights, or lowlights.  I encourage the readers to add to the list their favorite Hillary stories.

Lying about the death of four brave Americans does not make Hillary's skin crawl, but standing near Trump makes her skin crawl.
Hillary has no shame, and she will say and do anything to make money and restore what is left of her reputation.
If Donald Trump does nothing else in his life, he will be a true American hero for defeating Hillary to keep her and Bubba out of the White House.

Trump Not One of Hillary's Big Creeps

The latest evidence of Hillary Clinton’s total detachment from reality is found in the excerpt from the audio version of her book What Happened in which she complains of candidate Donald Trump invading her space in the second presidential debate. Not since Captain Queeg in The Caine Mutiny have we seen such paranoia and one sincerely hopes she finds her missing strawberries. Maybe the Russians ate them. As NBC News reported:
In the first excerpts from Hillary Clinton's highly anticipated upcoming memoir, the former Democratic presidential candidate said her "skin crawled" during a debate with Donald Trump.
In audio clips of Clinton reading from the book, "What Happened," which were first obtained by MSNBC's "Morning Joe" on Wednesday, Clinton recounted her thoughts as she toyed with the idea of telling her Republican rival to "back up, you creep" as he stood behind her during the second presidential debate.
"My skin crawled," Clinton said. "It was one of those moments where you wish you could hit pause and ask everyone watching 'well, what would you do?'"
Just two days prior, Clinton said, "the world heard [Trump] brag about groping women."
Clinton said during the debate she decided against telling Trump, "back up, you creep, get away from me," and in order to keep her composure, she gripped the microphone "extra hard."
Her grasp on the truth is less firm. Consider this comes from the serial liar who dodged sniper fire in Bosnia, was named for Sir Edmund Hillary, the man who climbed Mt. Everest years after she was born, and who claimed the Benghazi terrorist attack was caused by a video.
If you actually watch replays of that debate you see no such intimidation and the only time candidate Trump was standing behind Hillary was when she crossed to his side of the stage to make a point, ending up in front of Trump who was standing by and walking around his podium.
Hillary apparently found nothing creepy about disgraced Congressman Anthony Weiner, husband of aide and confidante Huma Abedin, texting pictures of himself to young women when he wasn’t looking at classified emails from Hillary that Huma forwarded to Weiner’s laptop. Anthony Weiner is a pretty big creep in most people’s book but perhaps the biggest creep is her own husband. Weiner’s creepiness is close, but no cigar.
The fact is that Hillary Clinton rose to political prominence, captured the 2016 Democratic nomination for president, and got to be on that debate stage with Donald Trump only because she looked the other way when Bill wandered off and rode his stained coattails to the halls of power.
Hillary’s remarks allude to the kerfuffle over the “Access Hollywood” tape where Trump is heard engaging in locker room talk about groping women. That her husband Bill actually did grope women, and possibly worse is a memory she must have lost when she fell and hit her head before her Benghazi testimony.
Intimidate women? Bill Clinton used his offices of governor and president as a power tool to obtain women. At least the Secret Service, as far as we know, never actually delivered them, unlike Arkansas state troopers reportedly did. Now that is creepy, almost as creepy as the fact Hillary wanted to sit in the same chair in the same Oval Office where Monica Lewinsky serviced her husband.
Hillary was the enabler of a philandering husband. She stood by her man so she could ride his coattails to political prominence. She is women, hear her ignore her husband’s real war on woman.
Some have even suggested that when a righteously indignant President Clinton wagged his finger and said he did not have sexual relations with that woman, he added “Ms. Lewinsky” as an afterthought, just so listeners would know exactly who that woman was. The irony here is that Hillary Clinton first gained national prominence, as columnist Debra J. Saunders writes at SFGATE doing just that:
When Hillary Clinton first became a national figure in 1992, it was on “60 Minutes.” CBS correspondent Steve Kroft was asking the Clintons about Gennifer Flowers‘ claim that the Bubba and she had an affair. Bill denied the allegation. Hillary Clinton said, “I’m not sitting here, some little woman standing by my man like Tammy Wynette.” Actually, that’s exactly what she was doing.
On “60 Minutes,” Bill Clinton denied having an affair with Flowers. Well, if you listen carefully, you notice that he denied a 12-year affair with Flowers. Kroft asked: Would he categorically deny the affair? Ever the parser, Clinton answered, “I’ve said that before.”
In 1998, under oath during a deposition for the Paula Jones lawsuit, Clinton testified he had sex with Flowers in 1977. Once. Just like he didn’t inhale….
For every bad choice Bill Clinton made, he tried to evade any consequences, not by owning up, but lying. It is unthinkable to expect the former president to regulate himself. Hillary Clinton was his ever-ready enabler. Later, during the Monica Lewinsky scandal, the first lady famously blamed a “vast right-wing conspiracy.”
Gennifer Flowers, Monica Lewinsky, Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey as well as, some would suggest, a cast of thousands, have been groped, fondled, and used as sexual objects by one William Jefferson Clinton. If in Hillary’s view, Donald Trump’s “sexism” is a campaign issue, the surely the wandering eye, hand and schlong of her husband while she averted her eyes to gain power is also an issue.
And then there’s Juanita Broaddrick, who has accused President Clinton of rape.Juanita Broaddrick’s story is a credible one, and one of the many “bimbo eruptions” that Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton handled during her husband Bill’s presidential campaign As Linda Tripp, confidante of former Clinton intern Monica Lewinsky, told the Daily Mail of how Hillary both enabled and covered up Bill’s many dalliances:
Tripp said: 'His political success was largely dependent upon Hillary. He owed her a great deal. As is widely acknowledged, Hillary took care of all the 'bimbo eruptions' of which there were thousands in order to present to the world an electable candidate.
'In this endeavor she was ruthless. She destroyed women so that their stories never saw the light of day.'
Juanita Broaddrick’s story was one that saw the light of day when in January 1999, a month after Bill Clinton’s impeachment in the House, she agreed to be interviewed by NBC’s Lisa Myers. As Breitbart reports of the interview:
Her account begins in 1978, when then-Juanita Hickey was a 35-year-old Clinton campaign worker, and Attorney General Bill Clinton, who was running for governor of Arkansas, visited a nursing home where she worked as a nurse….
According to the transcript of an NBC Dateline report on Broaddrick, during that campaign stop, Clinton reportedly invited her to visit his campaign headquarters in Little Rock. Broaddrick, who was planning to go to Little Rock the following week for a seminar, called Clinton’s headquarters when she arrived and said she was surprised to be greeted on the phone by a staff member who seemed to be expecting her call. The aide directed her to telephone Clinton at his apartment.
“I did call and ask him if he was gonna be at the headquarters that day and he said no he didn’t plan to be there,” Broaddrick said. “He says, Clinton said, ‘Why don’t I just meet you for coffee in the Camelot coffee shop?'”
Broaddrick said the seminar was being held at the Camelot Hotel in Little Rock.
Clinton, however, reportedly called back later and asked if they could meet in her hotel room because there were reporters in the coffee shop.
Clinton arrived at her room and after some small talk, Broaddrick, not having yet any reason to distrust the man she supported for governor, the top law enforcement officer in her state, said he forced himself on her in a particularly brutal way.
At a Trump press conference in 2016, Broaddrick, tired of being accused of being part of a vast right wing conspiracy, and afraid that her attacker would once again occupy the White House with the woman who orchestrated the attacks on Bill Clinton’s “bimbo eruptions”, repeated her accusation:
“Actions speak louder than words,” Broaddrick said. “Mr. Trump may have said some bad words but Bill Clinton raped me and Hillary Clinton threatened me. I don’t think there’s any comparison.”
Broaddrick, who has said Hillary threatened her, appeared with fellow Clinton sexual assault victims Paula Jones and Kathleen Willey appeared in an interview at presidential suite of the historic Watergate and related the tale of Bill’s assaults and their fear of Hillary’s retaliation:
In an exclusive video interview at the presidential suite of the historic Watergate Hotel, the victims of Bill Clinton’s alleged sexual assault -- Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Willey, and Paula Jones -- got together for the first time in person to express their personal fear of Hillary Clinton and to warn voters that Clinton does not stand for women’s issues.
The three women, who say their lives were forever changed by their experiences with the Clintons, used words like “terrified” and “frightened” to describe their feelings about the prospects of a Hillary Clinton presidency…
 “We were not willing participants,” Broaddrick said. “These were crimes.” In a separate interview, Broaddrick shared her own story of brutal sexual assault which she says Bill Clinton perpetrated against her.
Willey called out NBC News’ Andrea Mitchell and CNN’s Jake Tapper by name, challenging them: “These are not infidelities. A rape is not an infidelity. These are crimes. Any other people would be in jail…
“This is no longer about infidelities, indiscretions, girlfriends, sex, interns -- none of those. This is about a serial rapist, a predator, and his wife who has enabled his behavior all of these years.”
Later in this interview, Jones, Willey, and Broaddrick expressed fear at how a potential President Hillary Clinton would use the power of her office.
“It terrifies me and it should terrify all women,” Jones stated about Hillary’s presidential ambitions.
“It should terrify all men and women,” Willey added. “She will annihilate any enemy. All of her enemies. Anybody who has spoken against her. Across the board for I don’t know how many years. She will get rid of them.”
“No woman who advocates for women attacks the victims of sexual assault be it by her husband or anybody else,” said Willey.
The women argued that the term “enabler” best describes Hillary Clinton’s role in her husband’s alleged sexual crimes.
“There is not a better word for any of this,” stated Broaddrick. “Especially when she threatened me personally.”
Willey added, “She is complicit in everything that he has done.”
“She had helped him do it,” asserted Jones.
“She has turned a blind eye for decades against what he has done” stated Broaddrick. “And she has been the main one to help cover this up. And go after us.”
If Hillary Clinton is worried about someone breathing down her neck, perhaps it should be a Trump Department of Justice that has reopened the investigation into her multiples felonies regarding mishandling classified emails and deleting emails that were under subpoena, to name a few.
Hillary Clinton has met a few creeps in her life, but President Trump is not one of them.
Daniel John Sobieski is a freelance writer whose pieces have appeared inInvestor’s Business DailyHuman 

August 25, 2017

Hillary Clinton, FBI investigations, and FBI 'matters'

The Federal Bureau of Investigation is always there to conduct investigations and catch criminals.  But it doesn't take much for these investigations by the powerful law enforcement agency to end up as witch hunts – or, worse still, as under-investigated, whitewashed "matters."  It's all a matter of degree.
How do we know when we've got a witch hunt and not a genuine investigation?  When the investigation is conducted where there is no known crime.
Twelve FBI agents raided former Donald Trump adviser Paul Manafort's house unannounced – and as far as can be told, there was no known crime, at least not one the public has been allowed to know about.
An investigation is an investigation, even one as questionable as the Manafort investigation.  But then there's also something the bureau calls a "matter."
A "matter," or a pretend investigation, occurs when the bureau doesn't seem to want to investigate as rigorously as it should.
Take the case of Hillary Clinton.  Hillary intentionally violated security laws for four years, and the FBI came up with the semblance of an investigation, which included a scheduled interview with the prime perpetrator, Hillary Clinton.
But instead of the normal investigative procedures, the kind seen if the suspected person under the microscope were one of us, the bureau in the Clinton "matter" agreed to the stipulation that the pretend interview not be recorded.  It also excused Hillary from any oath to tell the truth, despite it being a crime to lie to an FBI agent. 
Anyone who believes that there was ever a serious investigation into Clinton's "matter" probably also believes that Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton talked about grandchildren out on that tarmac.

If former FBI director James Comey agreed to Hillary's terms in this "matter," what else did he 






PETER HITCHENS: Diana's greatest legacy is the destruction of our monarchy
PUBLISHED: 21:00 EDT, 2 September 2017 UPDATED: 08:58 EDT, 3 September 2017

Princess Diana
Princess Diana
We are already living in a republic. We just don’t know it yet. Diana Spencer, perhaps the most brilliant politician of our age, destroyed the British monarchy 20 years ago.
The current Queen continues to occupy the throne solely because she has been transformed by skilled public relations into the nation’s favourite grandmother. Her survival is personal, not political. 
She goes through the motions of being the Sovereign, but is well aware that one false step could bring the weeping mobs out again, not weeping but snarling, and who knows how that would end?
It began in those ghastly weeks in 1997 when all pretence ended that Britain contained a ‘silent majority’ which would one day assert itself and defy the moral and cultural revolution that was eating away at our country.
Millions, to be sure, whispered to each other in private places that they were not part of the strange semi-pagan festival of fake emotion, as the crowds piled up their plastic-wrapped flowers and shed tears over a person they had never met. But they had no rallying point. They did nothing. 
They were cowed by a dictatorship of grief, even if the grief was largely self-pity. When the Blair creature appropriated Diana as a saint and martyr of New Labour, nobody contradicted him. For alas, it was true. She really was the People’s Princess, if by ‘the People’ you mean the new resentful Britain of wounded feelings, which utterly rejects all the old dutiful rules of behaviour, and which also has no time for, and no understanding of, hereditary monarchy.
In that moment was born the deadly, subversive idea that the true heir to the throne, Prince Charles, should never reign, but that we should ‘skip a generation’ and hand the vacant throne (when the vacancy inevitably comes) to Diana’s son – because he is her son.
New and credible versions of this idea have been floated in two fictional dramas, House Of Cards and Charles III. The Prince himself can do nothing about this. No matter how hard he has tried to fill the gap in his sons’ lives left by the death of their mother, no matter how thoughtful he is and no matter how seriously he takes his task, the gossip never ends.
What this means is monarchy based on opinion poll, not on lawful right. And that’s the end of monarchy. Let’s speculate further into the future. Charles abdicates to please the crowds. William takes the Crown. But he who rules by permission of the polls also falls on the whim of the polls. And when those polls turn on a once-popular William, as they will, he too will be gone, and Buckingham Palace will be a museum. I wouldn’t give it that long.
Does it matter? Yes. First because, by having a non-political monarch we can respect, we are freed to be properly disrespectful towards politicians, while remaining loyal to our country. Without a monarch, loyalty can demand political submission.
Also, the British monarch is like the king on a chessboard. He cannot attack. But by occupying his square he prevents others from doing so – politicians who long for the supremacy that monarchs have, who yearn to be escorted by booted cavalry and greeted with trumpets, and who want us to respect them even when they don’t deserve it. Especially when they don’t deserve it.
It’s not an accident that most of the longest-lasting free, law-governed countries in the world are constitutional monarchies. Yet we seem keen to throw this advantage away, because we no longer know who we are or how we came to be so free and happy.

Read more:
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

JOBS? 95 MILLION NOT IN LABOR FORCE...... But in America, no legal need apply!

The Shocking Staggering Cost of Mexico’s Invasion, Occupation, Looting and Crime Tidal Wave…. Then they go out and vote Democrat for more!
 94,785,000 Not in Labor Force; At 62.9%, Labor Force Participation Stuck Near 38-Year Low

By Susan Jones | September 1, 2017 | 8:42 AM EDT

The Labor Department’s Bureau of Labor Statistics announced on Friday that the economy added 156,000 jobs last month, fewer than analysts anticipated, and the August unemployment rate increased a tenth of a point to 4.4 percent.
( – Heading into the Labor Day weekend, the latest jobs report is a disappointment.
Tthe number of Americans over age 16 who are not in the labor force – for whatever reason – remained stubbornly high in August, at 94,785,000.  That is partly attributed to the rising number of retirements among Baby Boomers.
As recently as December 2016, a record 95,102,000 Americans were not in the labor force, and the number has hovered near that record high so far in 2017.
At the same time, the labor force participation rate -- the percentage of the civilian, non-institutional population that is either working or actively seeking work – was unchanged in August at 62.9 percent, near its 38-year low of 62.4 percent set in September 2015.
The higher the participation rate, the better for the overall economy.
The Labor Department’s Bureau of Labor Statistics announced on Friday that the economy added 156,000 jobs last month, fewer than analysts anticipated, and the August unemployment rate increased a tenth of a point to 4.4 percent.
In the eight months since January, the number of employed Americans has set five records, most recently in July. But in August, BLS counted 153,439,000 Americans as employed – 74,000 fewer than in July.

The effects of Hurricane Harvey are not included in the most recent BLS report.
In August, the nation’s civilian noninstitutionalized population, consisting of all people age 16 or older who were not in the military or an institution, reached 255,357,000. Of those, 160,571,000 participated in the labor force by either holding a job or actively seeking one.

The 160,571,000 who participated in the labor force equaled 62.9 percent of the 255,357,000 civilian noninstitutionalized population.
According to BLS, the August job gains occurred in manufacturing, construction, professional and technical services, health care, and mining.
Employment growth has averaged 176,000 a month so far this year, lower than the average monthly gain of 187,000 in 2016.
BLS has revised downward the number of jobs added in June (from +231,000 to +210,000) and in July (+209,000 to +189,000). With these revisions, employment gains in June and July combined were 41,000 less than previously reported.
According to the most recent Federal Reserve Beige Book, an anecdotal summary of current economic conditions, labor markets are tightening for both low- and high-skilled positions, particularly in the construction and IT sectors. The report noted that contacts across a broad range of industries reported a shortage of qualified workers, which has limited hiring.
Wages continued to grow at a modest to moderate pace in most Federal Reserve Districts, and many firms attributed these wage gains to tighter labor market conditions.


Natalio Vitervo-Vasquez was deported twice but returned to provide “cheap” labor. He can’t read or write and raped his 10-year-old daughter.

“Prosecutors say the girl, who was 11-years-old at the time, went to a medical center where it was determined she was pregnant. Officials say she would have conceived the child at ten years of age.”


Here’s how it breaks down; will make you want to be an illegal!


REPORT: The assault to finish off the American middle-class is NOT over

“The report noted that many illegals don't have jobs or have difficulty in landing good jobs because of local laws.”

“However, it identified several states that have begun easing employment laws so that illegals can get a job.”


“The greatest criminal threat to the daily lives of American citizens are the Mexican drug cartels.”

“Mexican drug cartels are the “other” terrorist threat to America. Militant 

Islamists have the goal of destroying the United States. Mexican drug 

cartels are now accomplishing that mission – from within, every day, in 

virtually every community across this country.” JUDICIALWATCH
REMITTANCES ….. are only part of Mexico’s looting… and billions for anchor  baby breeders, billions for heroin sales and then do the numbers!

Mexicans abroad sent home nearly $2.4 billion in transfers in November, 24.7 percent higher than a year earlier, marking their fastest pace of expansion since March 2006, according to Mexican central bank data on Monday…

“According to the Centers for Immigration Studies, April '11, at least 70% of Mexican illegal alien families receive some type of welfare in the US!!!”

So when cities across the country declare that they will NOT be sanctuary, guess where ALL the illegals, criminals, gang members fleeing ICE will go???? straight to your welcoming city. So ironically the people fighting for sanctuary city status, may have an unprecedented crime wave to deal with along with the additional expense.
$17 Billion dollars a year is spent for education for the American-born children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies.
$12 Billion dollars a year is spent on primary and secondary school education for children here illegally and they cannot speak a word of English.
$22 billion is spent on (AFDC) welfare to illegal aliens each year.
$2.2 Billion dollars a year is spent on food assistance programs such as (SNAP) food stamps, WIC, and free school lunches for illegal aliens.
$3 Million Dollars a DAY is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens.
30% percent of all Federal Prison inmates are illegal aliens. Does not include local jails and State Prisons.
2012 illegal aliens sent home $62 BILLION in remittances back to their countries of origin. This is why Mexico is getting involved in our politics.
$200 Billion Dollars a year in suppressed American wages are caused by the illegal aliens.
Nearly One Million Sex Crimes Committed by Illegal Immigrants In The United States.

Record 95,102,000 Americans Not in Labor Force; Number Grew 18% Since Obama Took Office in 2009

By Susan Jones | January 6, 2017 | 8:49 AM EST

In this Dec. 15, 2009, file photo, President Barack Obama speaks about job creation and the economic recovery during a visit to a Home Depot in Alexandria, Va. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File)
( - Barack Obama's presidency began with a record number of Americans not in the labor force, and it's ending the same way.

The final jobs report of the Obama presidency, released Friday, shows that the number of Americans not in the labor force has increased by 14,573,000 (18.09 percent) since January 2009, when Obama took office, continuing a long-term trend that began well before Obama was sworn in.
In December, according to the Labor Department’s Bureau of Labor Statistics, a record 95,102,000 Americans were not in the labor force, 47,000 more than in November; and the labor force participation rate was 62.7 percent, a tenth of a point higher than in November.
The participation rate dropped to a 38-year low of 62.4 percent on Obama's watch, in September 2015. It was only 3-tenths of a point higher than that last month.
People over age 16 who are no longer working or even looking for work, for whatever reason (retirement, school, personal preference, or gave up), are counted as not participating in the labor force.
When President Obama took office in January 2009, 80,529,000 Americans were not in the labor force, the highest number on record. That number rose steadily during his two terms, reaching a record 95,055,000 in November 2016, then setting another record (95,102,000) in December.
BLS said the December unemployment rate increased a tenth of a point to 4.7 percent, well below the Obama-era high of 10 percent. Last month, a record 152,111,000 Americans were counted as employed, up 63,000 from November; and the number of unemployed stood at 7,529,000, an increase of 120,000 from the prior month.
But people who stop looking for a job are no longer counted as unemployed.
In an interview with a Chicago reporter yesterday, Obama said he has done "an enormous amount" to create greater economic opportunity for Americans.
"I took an economy that was about to go into a Great Depression, and we've now had a little over six years of straight economic job growth, an unemployment rate that's down below 5 percent, and incomes that have gone up and poverty that has gone down." 
Obama also conceded that "there are still folks out there who struggle and communities that are still depressed." He called it an "ongoing battle."
"We have to continue to work to make sure that kids are getting the best education they can, that jobs are being located so that people in need can access them, and that's going to be something that I suspect we'll all be working on, and folks will still be working on after I'm gone."
During Obama’s two terms in office, the number of employed Americans reached its lowest point – 138,013,000 – in December 2009. Eight years later, in December 2017, 14,098,000 Americans have been added to the employment rolls.
The government collects payroll taxes from Americans who work, and some of that money is spent on government programs that support people who do not work. So the more who work, the better for the economy.
In December, the nation’s civilian noninstitutionalized population, consisting of all people age 16 or older who were not in the military or an institution, reached 254,742,000.  Of those, 159,640,000 participated in the labor force by either holding a job or actively seeking one.
The 159,640,000 who participated in the labor force equaled 67.3 percent of the 254,742,000 civilian noninstitutionalized population.
According to BLS, total nonfarm payroll employment rose by a lackluster 156,000 in December. Over the past 3 months, job gains have averaged 165,000 per month.
Among the major worker groups, the unemployment rates for adult men (4.4 percent), adult women (4.3 percent), teenagers (14.7 percent), Whites (4.3 percent), Blacks (7.8 percent), Asians (2.6 percent), and Hispanics (5.9 percent) showed little change in December.
The number of long-term unemployed (those jobless for 27 weeks or more) was essentially unchanged at 1.8 million in December and accounted for 24.2 percent of the unemployed. In 2016, the number of long-term unemployed declined by 263,000.
The business and economic reporting of is funded in part with a gift made in memory of Dr. Keith C. Wold.



 How the Democrat party surrendered America to Mexico:

“The watchdogs at Judicial Watch discovered documents that reveal how the Obama administration's close coordination with the Mexican government entices Mexicans to hop over the fence and on to the American dole.”  Washington Times

"These figures present a scathing indictment of the social order that prevails in America, the world’s wealthiest country, whose government proclaims itself to be the globe’s leading democracy. They are just one manifestation of the human toll taken by the vast and all-pervasive inequality and mass poverty. 


The same period has seen a massive growth of social inequality, with income and wealth concentrated at the very top of American society to an extent not seen since the 1920s.

“This study follows reports released over the past several months documenting rising mortality rates among US workers due to drug addiction and suicide, high rates of infant mortality, an overall leveling off of life expectancy, and a growing gap between the life expectancy of the bottom rung of income earners compared to those at the top.”

THE LA RAZA PLAN: California’s final surrender to fly the Mexican flag within 4 years.

"The American Southwest seems to be slowly returning to the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a single shot."  -- - EXCELSIOR --- national newspaper of Mexico


They claim all of North America for Mexico!