TYSON HAS LONG BEEN IDENTIFED WITH THE DEMOCRAT PARTY FOR OBVIOUS REASONS.
Tyson Foods Faces Boycott After Firing 1,200 Americans, ‘Would Like to Employ’ 42,000 Migrants - AND BIDEN - MAYORKAS - SCHUMER HAVE USHERED OVER THE BORDER 15 MILLION TO PICK FROM.
MEXICO and the
MEX FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA “THE RACE” endorse JEB BUSH –
BUSH VOWS TO
OUT HISPANDER THE GREAT HISPANDERER BARACK OBAMA AND EXPAND THE LA RAZA WELFARE
STATE IN AMERICA’S OPEN BORDERS …. Mexicans already get all our jobs!
BUSH VOWS THAT
THE BUSH FAMILY TRADITION OF LOOTING THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS CAN BE EXPANDED
WITH OBAMA’S AMNESTY HOAX TO LEGALIZE MEXICO’S LOOTING. SUCH WILL KEEP WAGES
DEPRESSED TO THIRD WORLD LEVELS.
VIVA LA RAZA
SUPREMACY? WATCH ILLEGALS VOTE FOR BUSH!
"They hauled them down to the
border," Sakuma said. "Three days later, they were standing in our
office, but they had a different name and a different Social Security
number."
FREMONT,
NEBRASKA SAYS HELL NO TO LA RAZA’S EXPANDING OCCUPATION OF AMERICA!
Immigrants flocked
to the meatpacking plants surrounding Fremont, Neb., during the last decade,
nearly tripling the local Latino population and prompting some city leaders to propose
an ordinance that would ban renting to those in the country illegally.
Nebraska town's
anti-immigration rule stands, but furor persists -immigration rule in Fremont, Neb.
Nati Harnik / Associated PressRenters in Fremont, Neb., are required
to obtain a $5 permit and swear they reside legally in the United States. The
ordinance has divided the small Midwestern town.
Renters in Fremont, Neb., are
required to obtain a $5 permit and swear they reside legally in the United
States. The ordinance has divided the small Midwestern town..... THEY SHOULD SEE WHAT MEXICANS HAVE DONE TO LA RAZA-OCCUPIED LOS ANGELES, NOW A MEX DUMPSTER!
Nebraska town's
anti-immigration ordinance 'shreds human relations,' attorney says
Fremont, Neb.,
ordinance requires renters to swear they are legal residents
U.S. Supreme Court refuses to review Nebraska town's anti-immigration
rule
Immigrants flocked to the meatpacking plants surrounding
Fremont, Neb., during the last decade, nearly tripling the local Latino
population and prompting some city leaders to propose an ordinance that would
ban renting to those in the country illegally.
The lasting, public
outrage that followed shocked many in the mild-mannered Midwestern outpost of
26,000 people about 30 miles northwest of Omaha.
"Conflict is
uncomfortable — especially when it's with people you work with or live near and
have to see at the grocery store," said Virginia Meyer, 27, a mother of
two who eventually fought the ordinance.
Fremont immigration ordinance takes effectVideo: The small Nebraska city of
Fremont has started requiring $5 licenses for anyone who wants to rent there as
part of rules aimed at battling illegal immigration.
This week, the U.S.
Supreme Court decided not to review the ordinance adopted in 2010, a triumph
for supporters who predicted more cities would follow their lead. Appeals
courts in other states, however, have blocked similar ordinances, and cities
may wonder whether it was worth the uproar.
"It would be
reckless for any city to undertake an ordinance like this," said Thomas
Saenz, president and general counsel of the Mexican American Legal Defense and
Education Fund, which sued to block it.
He said the
ordinance, which took effect April 10, "shreds human relations." It
requires renters to purchase a $5 permit from the city and swear that they have
permission to live in the United States legally.
The Supreme Court
has often avoided addressing controversial immigration cases, leaving the
matter to states and Congress to resolve.
The justices
declined to address similar ordinances that lower courts struck down, seemingly
setting up a conflict with the current case, said David Weber, a law professor
at Creighton University in Omaha.
"They
purposely ducked the question," said Weber, who lives near Fremont and has
witnessed how divisive the ordinance has become.
"We're so
homogenous that these fault lines are starting to develop," and the
question remains, he added, "How do these states, especially in the
Midwest, that have been so homogenous for so much time, deal with these issues
of assimilation and immigration that the border states have been dealing with
for years?"
Conflict is
uncomfortable - especially when it's with people you work with or live near and
have to see at the grocery store.- Virginia Meyer, resident of Fremont, Neb.
So far, 140 people
have applied for the renters' permit, less than half of what was expected, and
none has had a questionable residency status, according to Fremont Police Chief
Jeffrey Elliott.
Then-City
Councilman Bob Warner, a construction superintendent, Democrat and lifelong
Fremont resident, proposed the ordinance in 2008. Now 85 and retired from the
council, Warner said he was responding to complaints from constituents about
new immigrants straining local clinics, schools and police.
One woman told him
about walking a few blocks to the local elementary school to sign her daughter
up for kindergarten only to discover that she was one of only a few children in
the class of 18 who spoke fluent English.
The swift pace of
immigration concerned people. Residents worried Fremont would become another
Schuyler, a town about 30 miles west that is known for its skyrocketing Latino
population, more than 65% of the roughly 6,000 residents.
Fremont's ordinance
survived several challenges, including a repeal proposal in February that
failed by a vote of 60% to 40%. Meyer campaigned for the repeal. She grew up in
Minneapolis, where she lived and studied among Latino neighbors.
"I benefited a
lot from being around that diversity, and I wanted my kids to really experience
that and celebrate that instead of the tension I saw around Fremont," she
said.
Meyer travels to
Schuyler occasionally for her job at a local agriculture and rural policy
center. Instead of a town overrun by outsiders, she sees something else: a
booming local economy.
"There's
restaurants, music playing downtown, young families, culture — that town feels
alive. To reject all that's going on in that community and say we don't want
Fremont to be like Schuyler is kind of shortsighted," Meyer said.
The ACLU of
Nebraska, along with MALDEF, sued to block the ordinance. They argued that the
city should not be allowed to enforce federal immigration law, which opens the
door for discrimination.
"Not all
Latinos living in Fremont are undocumented," said Alonzo Rivas, MALDEF's
Chicago-based regional counsel, noting that one of the plaintiffs in the
group's lawsuit is a legal resident — although his wife isn't. "People who
are here legally may be caught in this ordinance."
Supporters of the
ordinance enlisted Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, a conservative
Republican known for championing similar ordinances that ultimately failed in
Hazleton, Pa., and Farmers Branch, Texas. Kobach claimed victory Tuesday, not
just for Nebraska, but for states covered by the federal appeals court that has
so far affirmed the ordinance, including Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri
and the Dakotas. That court found that the ordinance did not discriminate
against Latinos or interfere with federal immigration laws.
Now that the
Supreme Court refused to hear the case, Kobach said, "all the cities there
have to do is adopt the Fremont ordinance word for word and they will be on
safe ground."
But in Fremont,
tensions linger, Meyer said. She knows ACLU and MALDEF lawyers are searching
for signs of discrimination under the ordinance, and if they continue to pursue
a lawsuit, it could be costly for her city.
"We're not out
of the woods yet," she said. "It doesn't feel like a victory."
The US should think long
and hard about the high number of Latino immigrants.
The principal beneficiaries of our current immigration policy are affluent
Americans who hire immigrants at substandard wages for low-end work. Harvard
economist George Borjas estimates that American workers lose $190 billion
annually in depressed wages caused by the constant flooding of the labor market
at the low-wage end.
HERITAGE
FOUNDATION: OBAMA’S AMNESTY WOULD ADD 100 MORE ILLEGALS AND COST AMERICANS
(Legals) BILLIONS AND BILLIONS…. actually, it already does! CA alone puts out
$22 billion per year in social services to illegals with counties handing out
even more!
Besides
blowing off congress to give illegal immigrants backdoor amnesty, the Obama
administration is also letting businesses that hire undocumented workers off
the hook by drastically reducing fines and enforcement, a new federal audit reveals.
THE MEXICAN TAX-FREE UNDERGROUND ECONOMY IN LOS ANGELES
COUNTY ALONE IS CALCULATED TO BE IN EXCESS OF $2 BILLION PER YEAR!
LOOTERS
L.A.
Mexico declares
Los Angeles officially under LA RAZA SUPREMACY occupation.
LOS ANGELES,
MEXIFORNIA – LA RAZA WELFARE CAPITAL OF AMERICA, GATEWAY FOR THE MEXICAN DRUG
CARTELS, AND A MEXICAN DUMPSTER WHERE NO LEGAL NEED APPLY!
LA RAZA SISTERS
of CORRUPTION, FEINSTEIN, BOXER and PELOSI are all advocates for Obama’s
amnesty hoax to legalize Mexico’s looting! They are guilty by greed of turning
CA into a Mexican dumpster!
As an example, the inspector
general offers ICE’s Los Angeles field office which has flouted federal policy
by creating its own private system of worksite enforcement. During the
three-year period considered by the watchdog the office conducted 147 investigations,
with 7% resulting in fines and 55% in warnings. Even in instances where more
than half of a business’s federal employee verification forms (known as I-9)
had “substantive errors” the federal agents in L.A. only issued warnings
instead of fines. One business mentioned in the report had its fine slashed an
astounding 78%, from $4.9 million to a little over $1 million.
WHY BIG PHARMA
LOVES BIG OBAMA… and his looting of America…
The more information that comes to light about
the plans being offered through Obamacare demonstrates that, in their rapacious
drive to increase profits, private insurance companies are not only charging steep
premiums—some 30 percent higher than in the present individual market—but are
peddling cut-rate policies with staggering
out-of-pocket costs, which also limit access to doctors and hospitals.
While
the Obama Administration halts deportations to work on its secret
amnesty
plan, hospitals across the U.S. are getting stuck with the exorbitant tab of
medically treating illegal immigrants and some are finally demanding
compensation from the federal government.
The politics of
Healthcare Reform
from the AP -
"Immigration
analyst James R. Edwards Jr. reported last week in National Review that
"no health legislation on the table requires federal, state or local
agencies -- or private institutions receiving federal funds -- to check the
immigration status of health-program applicants, so some of the money
distributed via Medicaid and tax credits inevitably would go to illegal
aliens." Moreover, the Senate Finance Committee plan creates a preference
for illegal aliens by exempting them from the mandate to buy insurance.
That's right. Lawabiding, uninsured Americans would be fined
if they didn't submit to the ObamaCare prescription.
Lawbreaking bordercrossers and deportation fugitives would
be spared.
For years,
advocates of uncontrolled immigration have argued that illegals aren't getting
free health care, and that even if they were, they'd not be draining government
budgets. The fiscal crisis in California gives lie to those talking points. In
March, the Associated Press reported that Sacramento and Contra Costa counties
were slashing staff and closing clinics due to the prohibitive costs of
providing nonemergency health services for illegals.
"The general situation there is being faced by nearly
every health department across the country, and if not right now,
shortly," Robert M. Pestronk of the National Association of County and
City Health Officials, told the AP."
GOP: OBAMA’S AMNESTY HANDOUT WILL COST THE
AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS BILLIONS!
more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast