Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Who's Accountable For Failure? - Investors.com

Who's Accountable For Failure? - Investors.com

JUDICIARY COMMITEE TO DEBATE E-VERIFY

NOTHING WOULD PUT MORE LEGALS IN AMERICAN JOBS THAN E-VERIFY!

HERE'S WHO IS FIGHTING ! AGAINST ! E-VERIY:

1. BARACK OBAMA AND HIS LA RAZA INFESTED ADMINISTRATION.

2. OBAMA'S LA RAZA SUPREMACIST SEC OF (ILLEGAL) LABOR, HILDA SOLIS.

3. OBAMA'S LA RAZA PARTY MEMBER NOMINEED TO THE COURT, SONIA SOTOMAYER,

4. THE U.S. CHAMBER of COMMERCE ON BEHALF OF EMPLOYERS OF "CHEAP" LABOR ILLEGALS.

5. THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA.

6. CORRUPT LA RAZA DEMS ON BEHALF OF THEIR DONORS, INCLUDING FEINSTEIN, BOXER, PELOSI AND REID.

7. MEXICO

*





Judiciary Committee To Debate E-Verify Thursday
Take Action Now To Preserve State Enforcement Authority!

After introducing a new version of the bill Monday, the House Judiciary Committee announced that on THURSDAY it will mark up the “Legal Workforce Act” (now H.R. 2885), a bill that would require all employers nationwide to use the E-Verify employment eligibility verification program

While FAIR has always supported mandatory E-Verify, we are asking our members to take action to ensure the committee adopts important improvements to the bill. As introduced, Section 6 of H.R. 2885 (entitled “Preemption”) would eliminate the authority of state and local governments to revoke the business licenses of employers who knowingly hire illegal aliens. This language will invalidate many state immigration enforcement laws, undo the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting, 536 U.S.__ (2011), and impede the ability of states to penalize employers who profit off cheap illegal labor.

Members of the House Judiciary Committee can solve this problem by striking Section 6 and replacing it with language that allows the states to go after employers who hire illegal aliens—a right now recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court!

Call members of the Judiciary Committee NOW! Tell them:

You want a mandatory E-Verify law that is enforceable by both state and federal authorities.
State and local governments must be able to enforce our immigration laws when the federal government refuses to do so!
Find out how to contact members of the Judiciary Committee

*


http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/07/judicial-watch-obamas-amnesty-wll.html


MEXICANS SAY AMNESTY WILL BOOST THEIR INVASION… OBAMA SAYS HIS CONTINUED NON-ENFORCEMENT OF LAWS PROHIBITING THE EMPLOYMENT OF ILLEGALS IS JUST AS GOOD!

ELIZABETH WARREN vs OBAMA'S CRIMINAL BANKSTER DONORS

NO ONE WORKS HARDER FOR HIS CRIMINAL BANKSTER DONORS THAN BARACK OBAMA!


“What haunts the Obama administration is what still haunts the country,” wrote Frank Rich in New York Magazine. “The stunning lack of accountability for the greed and misdeeds that brought America to its gravest financial crisis since the Great Depression.”
*
http://nymag.com/news/frank-rich/obama-economy/presidents-failure/
*
http://nymag.com/news/frank-rich/obama-economy/presidents-failure/

*
They could have come in and brought Wall Street to justice, making perfectly clear to the American people who was really behind the crisis.
*
The Obama team did the opposite. It supported TARP during the campaign and administered the second bucket of funds once in office. It rejected efforts to rescind Wall Street bonuses and held meetings with bank presidents. It delayed financial regulation for more than a year and wrote the law in as non-punitive a fashion as possible. At one point, President Obama told an assemblage of Wall Street CEOs that “my administration is the only thing between you and the pitchforks.”
*
But the fact remains: the White House chose to stand between Wall Street and the pitchforks. Rather than joining with the public against the bankers who had caused the crisis, they were joining with the Bush administration and the bankers to chart a cooperative path back to record profits for the financial industry
*
Elizabeth Warren vs. the banks
By Ezra Klein, Published: September 13
Elizabeth Warren is set to make her Senate candidacy official Wednesday. That means she’ll spend the next year or so running against Scott Brown in Massachusetts. At least, that’s what it’s supposed to mean. In practice, expect Warren to spend the next year or so running against an altogether different opponent: Wall Street.
Joshua Roberts
BLOOMBERG
The Democrats’ political troubles are best explained by a quick glance at the unemployment rate. If the economy was creating more jobs, they would be finding more votes. But some commentators have latched onto a political explanation, too. “What haunts the Obama administration is what still haunts the country,” wrote Frank Rich in New York Magazine. “The stunning lack of accountability for the greed and misdeeds that brought America to its gravest financial crisis since the Great Depression.”
In this telling, the economy might be the central problem for Democrats, but it didn’t strictly have to be their problem. The markets crashed on Bush’s watch, after all. The horribly unpopular -- but stunningly effective -- TARP bailout was passed under his administration, too. Democrats could have come in and made a clean break. They could have come in and brought Wall Street to justice, making perfectly clear to the American people who was really behind the crisis. That might not have healed the economy any faster. But perhaps it would have protected Democrats from some of the blame.
The Obama team did the opposite. It supported TARP during the campaign and administered the second bucket of funds once in office. It rejected efforts to rescind Wall Street bonuses and held meetings with bank presidents. It delayed financial regulation for more than a year and wrote the law in as non-punitive a fashion as possible. At one point, President Obama told an assemblage of Wall Street CEOs that “my administration is the only thing between you and the pitchforks.”
The Obama administration had its reasons for doing all this. The economy couldn’t begin to recover until the markets unfroze, and the markets were not going to unfreeze if the White House launched a war against Wall Street. Same goes for financial regulation: it might have been popular to use the policy to punish the banks, but it would have delayed the recovery, and perhaps led to regulations so stringent that future growth would also be threatened.
But the fact remains: the White House chose to stand between Wall Street and the pitchforks. Rather than joining with the public against the bankers who had caused the crisis, they were joining with the Bush administration and the bankers to chart a cooperative path back to record profits for the financial industry. Insofar as Americans saw the financial crisis as an “us vs. them” moment, the White House fell into the “them” category as often as they fell into the “us” category. And that can’t have helped their political fortunes.
During this period, Elizabeth Warren was a lonely voice for consumers, and against the administration’s treatment of the banks, during this period. As one of the watchdogs for the TARP funds, Warren regularly and publicly clashed with Tim Geithner over the deal the administration was giving to the banks. “You’re telling me that these financial instruments that are bought by very sophisticated parties are going to be treated effectively like deposits in checking accounts and savings accounts.” Warren snapped at one hearing. “They ended up effectively with 100-cent-on-the-dollar government guarantees for which they had never paid.” The look on Geithner’s face tells you all you need to know about the relations between the two at the time.
Then, it was Warren’s idea for a consumer protection agency that became the administration’s central populist demand in the financial-regulation bill. They were never able to explain how the law would actually punish the banks, but they could at least explain how it would help consumers. And the answer to that question, basically, was “we’re going to do what Elizabeth Warren told us to do.”
All of which will make Warren’s candidacy an interesting test case for a very particular theory of the current political moment. Unlike most Democrats, she’s not tainted by the bailout. Unlike most Republicans, she’s not held back by a mistrust of all regulation. She can run the campaign against Wall Street that many have been hoping to see for the last three years.
Scott Brown, for one, can already see it coming. Brown was a reluctant “yes” on the financial-regulation law, and the cost of his support was significantly reducing the strength of the bill. But to hear him tell it now, he was the country’s lead Wall-Street reformer. “I worked very hard to make sure that banks didn’t act like casinos with our money,” he told New England Cable News. “So the bill that she was apparently working on...I worked on it, I voted on it, I pushed it through...There’s a big difference between talking and actually doing it.”
But Warren, who oversaw the TARP funds and then led the consumer protection agency through its first year, was one of very few financial reformers who got to do it rather than just talk about it. And Brown’s record, which includes opposing the bill’s bank tax, watering down the Volcker rule, and receiving more than $140,000 in contributions from the financial industry, is going to make the question of what exactly he was doing a bit harder to answer. Perhaps that wouldn’t matter against a normal candidate. But it’s going to matter against Warren.

*
Obamanomics: How Barack Obama Is Bankrupting You and Enriching His Wall Street Friends, Corporate Lobbyists, and Union Bosses

BY TIMOTHY P CARNEY


Editorial Reviews
Obama Is Making You Poorer—But Who’s Getting Rich?
Goldman Sachs, GE, Pfizer, the United Auto Workers—the same “special interests” Barack Obama was supposed to chase from the temple—are profiting handsomely from Obama’s Big Government policies that crush taxpayers, small businesses, and consumers. In Obamanomics, investigative reporter Timothy P. Carney digs up the dirt the mainstream media ignores and the White House wishes you wouldn’t see. Rather than Hope and Change, Obama is delivering corporate socialism to America, all while claiming he’s battling corporate America. It’s corporate welfare and regulatory robbery—it’s Obamanomics.
Congressman Ron Paul says, “Every libertarian and free-market conservative needs to read Obamanomics.” And Johan Goldberg, columnist and bestselling author says, “Obamanomics is conservative muckraking at its best and an indispensable field guide to the Obama years.”
If you’ve wondered what’s happening to America, as the federal government swallows up the financial sector, the auto industry, and healthcare, and enacts deficit exploding “stimulus packages,” this book makes it all clear—it’s a big scam. Ultimately, Obamanomics boils down to this: every time government gets bigger, somebody’s getting rich, and those somebodies are friends of Barack. This book names the names—and it will make your blood boil.
*

Obama Is Making You Poorer—But Who’s Getting Rich?
Goldman Sachs, GE, Pfizer, the United Auto Workers—the same “special interests” Barack Obama was supposed to chase from the temple—are profiting handsomely from Obama’s Big Government policies that crush taxpayers, small businesses, and consumers.
Investigative reporter Timothy P. Carney digs up the dirt the mainstream media ignores and the White House wishes you wouldn’t see. Rather than Hope and Change, Obama is delivering corporate socialism to America, all while claiming he’s battling corporate America. It’s corporate welfare and regulatory robbery—it’s Obamanomics. In this explosive book, Carney reveals:
* The Great Health Care Scam—Obama’s backroom deals with drug companies spell corporate profits and more government control
* The Global Warming Hoax—Obama has bought off industries with a pork-filled bill that will drain your wallet for Al Gore’s agenda
* Obama and Wall Street—“Change” means more bailouts and a heavy Goldman Sachs presence in the West Wing (including Rahm Emanuel)
* Stimulating K Street—The largest spending bill in history gave pork to the well-connected and created a feeding frenzy for lobbyists
* How the GOP needs to change its tune—drastically—to battle Obamanomics
If you’ve wondered what’s happening to our country, as the federal government swallows up the financial sector, the auto industry, and healthcare, and enacts deficit exploding “stimulus packages” that create make-work government jobs, this book makes it all clear—it’s a big scam. Ultimately, Obamanomics boils down to this: every time government gets bigger, somebody’s getting rich, and those somebodies are friends of Barack. This book names the names—and it will make your blood boil.
*
Praise for Obamanomics
“The notion that ‘big business’ is on the side of the free market is one of progressivism’s most valuable myths. It allows them to demonize corporations by day and get in bed with them by night. Obamanomics is conservative muckraking at its best. It reveals how President Obama is exploiting the big business mythology to undermine the free market and stick it to entrepreneurs, taxpayers, and consumers. It’s an indispensable field guide to the Obama years.”
—Jonha Goldberg, LA Times columnist and best-selling author
“‘Every time government gets bigger, somebody’s getting rich.’ With this astute observation, Tim Carney begins his task of laying bare the Obama administration’s corporatist governing strategy, hidden behind the president’s populist veneer. This meticulously researched book is a must-read for anyone who wants to understand how Washington really works.”
—David Freddoso, best-selling author of The Case Against Barack Obama
“Every libertarian and free-market conservative who still believes that large corporations are trusted allies in the battle for economic liberty needs to read this book, as does every well-meaning liberal who believes that expansions of the welfare-regulatory state are done to benefit the common people.”
—Congressman Ron Paul
“It’s understandable for critics to condemn President Obama for his ‘socialism.’ But as Tim Carney shows, the real situation is at once more subtle and more sinister. Obamanomics favors big business while disproportionately punishing everyone else. So-called progressives are too clueless to notice, as usual, which is why we have Tim Carney and this book.”
—Thomas E. Woods, Jr., best-selling author of Meltdown and The Politically Incorrect Guide™ to American History
*
• Hardcover: 256 pages
• Publisher: Regnery Press (November 30, 2009)
• Language: English
• ISBN-10: 1596986123
• ISBN-13: 978-1596986121

*
MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com
*
http://www.MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com

http://www.FAIRUS.org

http://www.JUDICIALWATCH.org

http://www.ALIPAC.us

On immigration, Rick Perry takes heat for Texas DREAM Act

On immigration, Rick Perry takes heat for Texas DREAM Act

U.S. poverty totals hit a 50-year high

U.S. poverty totals hit a 50-year high

CAN AMERICA AFFORD EQUAITY? By Hoyt Hilsman

SOME ONE HAS TO PAY FOR WALL ST.’s RAPE AND PILLAGE, THE CORRUPTION OF POLITICIANS, AND THE MEXICAN WELFARE STATE IN OUR BORDERS. WALL ST WILL PASS ALONG THEIR LOSES, MEXICO WILL KEEP EXPORTING POVERTY, CRIMINALS AND ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS. AND THE MIDDLE CLASS…. We’re fucked!

*
Conservatives argue that subsidizing the rich and large multinational corporations, along with cutting government spending, will create jobs. The question, however, is what jobs and for whom?
*
THE REALITY FOR JOE LEGAL, v JOSE ILLEGAL:
(BUT JOE LEGAL STILL GETS THE TAX BILLS TO PAY FOR JOSE ILLEGAL’S LA RAZA WELFARE STATE IN OUR BORDERS)
*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/joe-american-legal-vs-la-raza-jose.html
*

Hoyt Hilsman
Journalist, screenwriter, critic, former candidate for Congress


Can America Afford Equality?

Posted: 9/13/11 09:43 AM ET
In his recent book, Pinched, about the Great Recession, author Don Peck points out that the top 1 percent of Americans possess as much wealth as the bottom 90 percent. In terms of income growth, two out of every three dollars in growth goes to the top 1 percent, while the other 99 percent share one lousy buck.
A 2005 report by Citigroup concluded that the future of the American economy did not depend on the much-vaunted American consumer, but rather rested on the spending and investments of the very wealthy. The Citigroup analysts called this a plutonomy, in which economic growth is powered by the wealthy few. The global economy, with its rapid rate of change and complexity, said the analysts, would be exploited primarily by the "rich and educated."
The Republicans in Congress have, in effect, endorsed this view of the future of the American economy by arguing that economic growth rests on tax cuts for the wealthy and large corporations, cutting expenditures on social programs for the poor and middle class, and reducing government regulation of businesses, including environmental and safety rules. All this fits nicely into an economic view of America as two separate groups -- the rich and the rest of us.
Conservatives argue that subsidizing the rich and large multinational corporations, along with cutting government spending, will create jobs. The question, however, is what jobs and for whom? While the high-tech and financial industries clustered in places like Seattle, San Francisco, Boston and New York have quickly rebounded with high-paying jobs for the educated elite, entrepreneurs and Fortune 500 executives, jobs for the middle-class are rapidly disappearing, and there is little prospect that simply improving the lot of the rich and highly educated will help the vast majority of Americans to find a decent job.
Even if one concedes the argument (which I for one do not) that most of the future growth will come from the richest 1 percent of Americans and the handful of multinational corporations, is it really in the interest of America to wander down that primrose path? Throughout recent history, virtually every society that has ignored the fundamental principle of equality has run into serious trouble. A stroll through the leafy streets of an upper-class enclave in South America or the high walls of a Middle Eastern compound for the wealthy -- all equipped with machine-toting guards and high-tech surveillance cameras -- should convince anyone that, despite the economic benefits of a plutonomy, the social price is too great for any nation to endure.
America has always been -- and still remains -- dedicated to the principle of equality, even though (or perhaps because) many of its citizens had to overcome centuries of injustice and oppression. Equality of opportunity and equal treatment under the law are foundations of American society. These principles are not mere abstractions -- they have been critical to the tremendous success of the American economy over the past two hundred and thirty-five years. From small businesses to farmers, from steel workers to janitors, America represents the dream of a better life, based on equality of opportunity. While the odds are often long, and the dream is fading, there remains the hope that, with hard work and passion, success is still possible in America.
However, if we as Americans accept the idea that the only hope for our future rests with the rich and the multinationals, and that we must abandon the fundamental principle of equality of opportunity, then perhaps we need to take another look at the American Dream. Even if it is not strictly in our economic interest, don't we have an obligation to the "bottom 90 percent" of American society who are so easily dismissed as irrelevant to future economic growth? Do we really want to live in a country with a slightly higher GDP, but where 90 percent of the people live in stagnation or worse? And what would be the social consequences of abandoning our commitment to equality and tossing the American Dream overboard?
As President Obama pointed out in his speech to Congress recently, that is not the kind of America any of us want. It is certainly true that the American economy -- along with the global economy -- is in the midst of a deep crisis. There is great suffering as people lose their jobs, their houses and their future. And we must do everything we can to find jobs for the jobless and homes for the homeless. But we cannot forget our deep devotion to the principles that America was founded upon, and must not sacrifice our commitment to equality in the face of this crisis.
*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/09/american-poverty-vs-mexicos-solution.html
*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/09/california-poverty-rate-rises-in-2010.html
MEXIFORNIA: THE DEATH of the AMERICAN DREAM (BOOK)
*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/book-mexifornia-shattering-of-american.html

Budget chief seeks wholesale reordering of government priorities

Budget chief seeks wholesale reordering of government priorities

REALITY OF RICK PERRY'S JOBS SUCCESS IN TEXAS: VIVA LA RAZA???

PERRY LOVES TO TAUT ALL THE JOBS IN TEXAS. HE WON’T BE OPENING HIS MOUTH ABOUT THE FACT THESE JOBS PAY MISERABLE WAGES AND ARE HELD BY “CHEAP” LABOR ILLEGALS!
*
THE REALITY FOR JOE LEGAL, v JOSE ILLEGAL:
(BUT JOE LEGAL STILL GETS THE TAX BILLS TO PAY FOR JOSE ILLEGAL’S LA RAZA WELFARE STATE IN OUR BORDERS)
*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/joe-american-legal-vs-la-raza-jose.html


On Immigration -- Perry Loses Big in Florida Debate -- Romney, Bachman (Gov. Perry was booed)
On Immigration -- Perry Loses Big in Florida Debate -- Romney & Bachmann Hold Ground

By Roy Beck, Updated Monday, September 12, 2011

(Further down are Roy's live blogs while listenting to the Tea Party/CNN-sponsored debate tonight in Florida. First, though, is Roy's overall analysis at the end of the debate. As always, our only interest in this debate is immigration.)

Gov. Perry was booed as he painted himself into an even tighter corner tonight as a candidate who boasts of offering incentives for illegal immigration and who apparently can't imagine illegal aliens ever going home. Attacked by several candidates for his position, he didn't back off a bit.

Quite a number of mainstream media commentators and editorialists have lauded Perry for supposedly appealing to Hispanic voters by rejecting rank-and-file Republicans' distaste for illegal immigration.

Former Sen. Santorum opened the in-state tuition issue when asked what candidates would do to seek Hispanic votes. He said it appeared that Perry thought the answer was offering in-state tuition for illegal aliens, with which Santorum made it clear he does not agree.

Perry responded that he was proud that Texas offers in-state tuition to illegal aliens regardless of how they got here because that is the "American way."

That brought the most direct attack on his position by Rep. Bachmann. She suggested that rewarding illegal behavior most decidedly is NOT the American way and was similar to Pres. Obama's own promotion of DREAM Act types of rewards for illegal immigration.

Perry objected that what he did in Texas did not involve amnesty, which is what the DREAM Act is. He was right about that. In-state tuition is part of the DREAM Act but a rather small part of a bill that would provide citizenship and permanent work permits to a couple million illegal aliens. He would have been wise to let it go at that, but he came back a couple minutes later and painted himself in a much worse light.

Perry claimed that what he did on in-state tuition was a state's rights issue. If another state wants to do something different, then that is fine with him. Well, actually, Congress has long made it against federal law for a state to offer in-state tuition to illegal aliens . . . UNLESS that state offers in-state tuition to U.S. citizens who live in other states. Texas does not treat legal citizens of other states as well as it treats illegal aliens in this regard and, thus, is in violation of federal law. Neither the Bush nor Obama Justice Departments has been willing to go after outlaw states like Texas on this account.

But it got worse.

Perry said Texas had a choice of either helping illegal aliens who want to contribute to get a college education or have to pay for them on the public dole. His statement indicated that the public has no choice but to subsidize these illegal aliens either through college tuition or on some form of welfare. Nowhere was there a recognition that another option would be for illegal aliens to go home.

As usual, former Gov. Romney provided the broadest view on immigration, saying that of course you don't give in-state tuition and other rewards to people who have broken immigration laws. He scolded GOP candidates who don't recognize that a central tenet of the Republican Party is a support for the rule of law. He said that appealing to Hispanic voters by supporting law-breaking is the wrong approach. Instead, Romney said, the appeal should be to what Hispanic Americans already know and that is that they are looking for opportunity.

Thus far, about the only positive thing on immigration that we have heard from Perry is his support for border security -- as long as it doesn't require too much fencing. But we've seen no recognition that nearly half of illegal aliens came to the country legally. No amount of border security can deal with them. Perry has bad-mouthed E-Verifying new hires to keep from employing illegal aliens. It is disheartening that even though commentators for weeks have suggested that Perry has a big job to persuade Americans that he is not another George Bush on immigration, he really hasn't provided any reason to believe otherwise.

But the rest of the candidates tonight provided little reason to be hopeful, either.

No candidate showed any sign of being able to use the immigration issue to appeal to 22 million Americans who are unable to find a full-time job. Nobody brought up the massive foreign-worker importation currently underway when asked how they would improve the economic circumstances of Americans. In fact, former Gov. Huntsman again talked about wanting more immigration. And Santorum again bragged about his immigrant roots and "immigration is an important lifeblood of this country . . . I believe in immigration."

When asked from the audience how they would move illegal aliens out of the country, not a single candidate thought to mention attrition through enforcement, especially by taking away their jobs.

Wolf Blitzer did throw the candidates off soon after the question was asked by inserting a tweet question about how to appeal to Latino voters. It almost seemed like Blitzer wanted to make sure nobody gave a serious answer about reducing the illegal population. But no candidate was able to stay focused on the fact that there is an answer for the 11 million illegal aliens that is not mass amnesty and that is not mass deportation -- and that is attrition through enforcement.

We did not hear from Paul, Gingrich or Cain on immigration. If they had felt strongly and wanted to be known as having a position, they could have spoken up and demanded a chance to answer. None did, that I could see.

On immigration tonight, Perry and Huntsman lose big. Santorum seems all about "illegal bad but lots of legal immigration good." Bachmann and Romney stand out as champions of the rule of law. The others appeared to not care. All of them failed to show real compassion for the millions of unemployed Americans by relating immigration policy to jobs.

*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/09/american-poverty-vs-mexicos-solution.html
*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/09/california-poverty-rate-rises-in-2010.html

California poverty rate rises in 2010 for fourth year in a row

California poverty rate rises in 2010 for fourth year in a row

Poverty… HOW DO WE DEAL WITH IT? FOR MEXICO THE SOLUTION IS EASY. THEY SIMPLY EXPORT THEIR POOR OVER OUR BORDERS FOR WELFARE, “FREE” MEDICAL, “FREE” EDUCATION, AND OUR JOBS. OH, YES, AND JAILS!

*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/09/american-poverty-vs-mexicos-solution.html

*

AMERICAN POVERTY vs Mexico's Solution For Poverty: EXPORT IT!

Poverty… HOW DO WE DEAL WITH IT? FOR MEXICO THE SOLUTION IS EASY. THEY SIMPLY EXPORT THEIR POOR OVER OUR BORDERS FOR WELFARE, “FREE” MEDICAL, “FREE” EDUCATION, AND OUR JOBS. OH, YES, AND JAILS!


AS OBAMA, AND HIS CORRUPT LA RAZA DEMS, FEINSTEIN, BOXER, PELOSI, REID, et al PUSH OUR BORDERS OPEN WIDER FOR HORDES MORE ILLEGALS TO HOP AND KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED, AMERICAN POVERTY ONLY SOARS.
FEINSTEIN, BOXER AND PELOSI HAVE GOTTEN FILTHY RICH OFF THEIR ELECTED OFFICES THROUGH CORRUPTION, AND SIPHONING OFF DONOR “CONSULTANT FEES” TO MEMBERS OF THEIR FAMILIES AND BACK ROOM DEALS THEY PUSH IN CONGRESS… THE REST OF US IN MELTDOWN MEXIFORNIA MUST PAY FOR THE LA RAZA WELFARE STATE THAT COST CA $20 BILLION PER YEAR.
MEXICO HAS A BETTER PLAN TO DEAL WITH POVERTY. THEY EXPORT IT! THEY EXPORT THEIR POOR, ILLITERATE, PREGNANT AND THEIR COMMON CRIMINALS TO LOOT OUR NATION.
IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY ALONE, WHERE HALF THE JOBS ARE HELD BY ILLEGALS USING STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS, PAYS OUT $600 MILLION IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS!
WE ARE MEXICO’S JOBS, WELFARE, JAILS AND “FREE” MEDICAL PROGRAM!

*
MEXIFORNIA: THE DEATH of the AMERICAN DREAM (BOOK)

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/book-mexifornia-shattering-of-american.html

*
THE REALITY FOR JOE LEGAL, v JOSE ILLEGAL:
(BUT JOE LEGAL STILL GETS THE TAX BILLS TO PAY FOR JOSE ILLEGAL’S LA RAZA WELFARE STATE IN OUR BORDERS)
*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/joe-american-legal-vs-la-raza-jose.html

*


Record number of Americans in poverty
By Joseph Kishore
14 September 2011
The poverty rate in the US soared to 15.1 percent in 2010, its highest level since 1993, according to a report released by the Census Bureau on Tuesday. Household incomes continued to fall sharply, amidst the worst jobs crisis since the Great Depression of the 1930s, and the number of people without health insurance increased.
The bureau's report documents a shocking decline in the living standards of millions of people, a devastating indictment of the policies of the Obama administration and the entire political establishment. The new figures cover conditions one year after the supposed beginning of the recovery in June 2009.
The poverty rate increased nearly a full percentage point, from 14.3 percent in 2009. It was the third consecutive annual increase in the poverty rate and the fourth consecutive annual increase in the number of people living in poverty. Last year, there were 46.2 million people living in poverty, defined at the absurdly low level of about $22,000 a year for a family of four and $11,000 a year for an individual.
The number of people earning less than twice the poverty rate (about $44,000 for a family of four) stood at 103 million in 2010, or about 34 percent of the population.
The percentage of children under 18 living in poverty increased from 20.7 percent to 22.0 percent. A total of 16.4 million children live in poverty, equivalent to the population of New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago and Houston combined.
The total number of people in poverty is equivalent to the combined population of the 50 largest cities in the United States. There are more people in poverty in the US in 2010 than during any year on record going back to 1959.
Since 2007, the poverty rate has increased from 12.5 percent to 15.1 percent, or 2.6 percentage points.

The poverty rate for African-Americans increased at a particularly rapid rate, from 25.8 percent in 2009 to 27.4 percent in 2010.
Millions of people live in what is known as “deep poverty,” with incomes less than 50 percent of the official poverty level (or less than about $11,000 a year for a family of four). The deep poverty rate increased from 6.3 percent in 2009 to 6.7 percent in 2010, an increase of 1.5 million to a total of 20.5 million people.
While children under 18 represent 24.4 percent of the overall population, they make up 36 percent of the population (7.5 million individuals) living in deep poverty.
The absolute number of people living in deep poverty and the deep poverty rate are both at the highest level since the government began tabulating these figures in 1975.
The Census report also documented a continued decline in income for working people, with the real median household income falling to $49,445 in 2010, down 2.3 percent ($1,154) from 2009. Since 2007, the report notes, “real median income has declined 6.4 percent and is 7.1 percent below the median household income peak that occurred in 1999.”
These averages mask the enormous inequality that has become the central feature of American society. The lowest 20 percent of households, with incomes of $20,000 or less, saw their share of total income fall from 3.4 percent to 3.3 percent. The top 20 percent took home more than 50 percent of all money income.
A report by the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities notes that since 1999, real income “has fallen 12.1 percent for those at the 10th income percentile but only 1.5 percent for those at the 90th percentile. The income gap between those at the 10th and 90th percentile was this highest on record.”
Since 1999, real household income has fallen 5.5 percent for non-Hispanic whites, 14.6 percent for African Americans, 8.9 percent for Asians and 10.1 percent for Hispanics, according to the Census report.
For men with full-time, year-round jobs, the real median income is about the same today as it was in 1973, having remained largely flat for three decades.
Mass unemployment is a major driving force behind the decline in living standards, as corporations utilize the jobs crisis to push through wage and benefit cuts for those who are able to find work. Since 2007, the number of year-round, full-time workers fell by 9.4 million, a fall without parallel since the Great Depression.
These conditions have continued into 2011. Official unemployment stands at 9.1 percent, with the most recent jobs report from the Labor Department showing zero net job growth last month. The level of long-term unemployment is at a historic high. The percent of the population unemployed increased from 16.1 percent to 16.3 percent.

The number of people without health insurance in the United States was 49.9 million in 2010, an increase of nearly one million over 2009. The rise in the uninsured is a particularly damning exposure of the fraud of Obama's health care “reform,” which was in fact an opening shot in a drive to reduce health care costs for corporations and the government.
The rise in poverty is a product of the long-term decline of American capitalism, combined with the ferocious class war waged by the ruling class, now led by the Obama administration. Mass impoverishment is the outcome of a deliberate policy that has resulted in a vast transfer of wealth into the hands of a small corporate and financial aristocracy.
These indices of mass social distress come at a time of record profits, with corporations sitting on a cash hoard estimated at more than $2 trillion. The government has handed over trillions of dollars to the banks, inflating the stock market while bailing out the wealthy. Far from leading to an economic revival, the conditions for the vast majority of the population have suffered a catastrophic decline.
Amidst clear signs of a world economy sinking into a depression, the response of the ruling class is to push for massive austerity. States and local governments throughout the country are implementing cuts in the most basic programs to prevent poverty. The Michigan state government, for example, passed a measure this month that will cut 41,000 people from welfare assistance, including nearly 30,000 children, beginning October 1.
Meanwhile, after outlining a phony jobs proposal that will do nothing to address the unemployment crisis, the Obama administration is set to propose trillions of dollars in cuts to health care and retirement programs.
The administration has made a point of insisting that a proposal being worked on by a bipartisan budget deficit committee must include deep cuts in Medicare and Medicaid, the main federal health care programs.
To fight against these conditions, the working class must enter into industrial and political struggle.
The Socialist Equality Party calls for emergency measures to eliminate poverty, including a multi-trillion dollar public works program to employ tens of millions of workers in high-paying, productive jobs rebuilding infrastructure and meeting other critical social needs. A livable income to meet all basic needs is a social right that must be guaranteed to everyone.
To pay for this program, the SEP fights for a radical redistribution of wealth, including a 90 percent tax on all incomes over $500,000. Corporations, currently engaged in a hiring strike, must be taken over by the working class and run democratically in the interests of social need.
The implementation of these measures is impossible outside of a direct attack on the interests of the wealthy and on the capitalist two-party system, through the building of a mass socialist political movement of the working class.
*

THE LOOTING OF AMERICAN – MEXICO’S EXPORTATION OF POVERTY, CRIMINALS AND PREGNANT WOMEN TO ANCHOR THE MEXICAN WELFARE STATE IN OUR BORDERS!

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/09/obamas-free-medical-for-his-la-raza.html


*


DO YOU EVER WONDER WHEN THESE ARTICLES POP UP ALL OVER THE NATION EVERY DAY, WHY MEXICO DOESN’T FOR ONCE CARE FOR THEIR OWN?
THE ONLY THING MEXICO DOES IS ENDLESSLY RANT THAT THE STUPID GRINGOS OWE ILLEGALS AN EXPANDED WELFARE STATE, EASIER LOOTING, BORDERLESS CROSSING, QUICK TO THE FRONT OF ALL JOBS, WELFARE, AND VOTING LINES IN THE UNITED STATES.

MEXICO ONLY OPENS IT’S BIG MOUTH TO BLAME AMERICAN FOR NOT EXPANDING THE MEXICAN WELFARE STATE FAST ENOUGH. YOU MAY FIND IT SURPRISING THAT MEXICO HAS MORE BILLIONAIRES THAN SAUDI ARABIA OR SWITZERLAND!
IN FACT THE RICHEST MAN IN THE WORLD IS NO LONGER BILL BATES, IT IS CARLOS SLIM, OWNER OF THE NEW YORK TIMES, NOW MOUTHPIECE FOR LA RAZA PROPAGANDA!
*

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/07/california-pays-out-125-billion-on-la.html

*
Calif. Hospitals Spend $1.25 Bil On Illegal Immigrants
*
07/05/2011

While the Obama Administration halts deportations to work on its secret amnesty plan, hospitals across the U.S. are getting stuck with the exorbitant tab of medically treating illegal immigrants and some are finally demanding compensation from the federal government.
The group that represents most of the nation’s hospitals and medical providers recently urged President Obama to work with Congress to reimburse them for the monstrous cost of treating illegal immigrants. Federal law requires facilities to “treat and stabilize individuals” regardless of their immigration status, but federal support for the services remains “virtually nonexistent,” according to a letter submitted by the American Hospital Association to the president.
This week officials in California, the state with the largest concentration of illegal immigrants, joined the call for federal compensation after revealing that hospitals there spend about $1.25 billion annually to care for illegal aliens. The figure skyrocketed from $1.05 billion in 2007, according to California Hospital Association figures quoted in a local news report.
The problem will only get worst, according to officials, who say the $1.25 billion for 2010 could actually be higher. They complain that federal law forces them to treat patients in emergency rooms regardless of immigration status yet they get stuck with the financial burden. This has forced many hospitals to curtail services or close beds and could ultimately compromise healthcare.
Nationwide, U.S. taxpayers spend tens of billions of dollars annually to provide free medical care for illegal immigrants with states that border Mexico taking the biggest hit. Adding to the problem is the fact that Mexico, the country that provides the largest amount of illegal immigrants in the U.S., has long promoted America’s generous public health centers. It even operates a Spanish-language program (Ventanillas de Salud, Health Windows) in about a dozen U.S. cities that refers its nationals—living in the country illegally—to publicly funded health centers where they can get free medical care without being turned over to immigration authorities.
*
THESE FIGURES ON WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY ARE DATED. IT NOT EXCEEDS $600 MILLION PER YEAR!!! (source: Los Angeles County & JUDICIAL WATCH)
*
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1949085/posts
*
LOS ANGELES – A MEXICAN WELFARE AND CRIME STATE WHERE THE JOBS ALSO GO TO ILLEGALS
http://mex¬icanoccupa¬tion.blogs¬pot.com/20¬11/04/mexi¬can-welfar¬e-state-in¬-los-angel¬es.html

*
One tragic thing about this book is that it was written in 2003. Since then the Mexican occupation has doubled. Welfare to illegals is up to $20 BILLION in California. Welfare to illegals in sanctuary city Los Angeles is past $600 million per year, while Mexican gangs murder all over the state. Yet the lifer-politicians continue to fight for open borders, more perks for illegals, and their illegal votes!
*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/04/mexico-demands-free-health-care-for.html
*

http://justcommonsense-lostinamerica.blogspot.com/2011/03/where-to-go-when-your-local-emergency.html
*

For some, a struggle WHO THINKS ABOUT THE STRUGGLE OF THE AMERICANS?


Some illegal immigrants have used stolen Social Security numbers to qualify for health programs -- a form of medical identity theft increasingly on hospital radars. Many more scramble to pay for their medicine and doctors visits in cash, a challenge in an economy where day-laborer work has dried up.


*
Mexico Promotes Free U.S. Healthcare For Illegal Immigrants

Time to wake up people! With unemployment at 12% and the state going broke, our tax dollars are going to pay for healthcare for hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens. To the tune of over a billion dollars a year!


Read on:

Mexico's government operates programs in about a dozen American cities that refers its nationals--living in the U.S. illegally--to publicly funded health centers where they can get free medical care without being turned over to immigration authorities.

The program is called Ventanillas de Salud (Health Windows) in Spanish and its mission is to help illegal immigrants find U.S. hospitals, clinics and other government programs where they can get free services without being deported for violating federal immigration laws.

Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, San Diego and Indiana are among the cities where Mexican consulates operate the health referral system which annually costs U.S. taxpayers billions of dollars. In Los Angeles County alone, illegal immigrants cost taxpayers nearly $440 million in health services annually and a whopping $1.1 billion statewide.

The Mexican consul in Los Angeles proudly announced that nearly 300,000 Mexicans in the area have benefited from his government's health referral program, which he says actually saves the county money by encouraging immigrants to seek preventive care rather than waiting for more expensive emergency treatment.

The Southern California operation promises to assess "consulate clients" for eligibility to government-funded health insurance and other primary care services and offers free legal assistance to those who are denied coverage. Its goal is to improve access to health services for immigrants of Mexican origin by formalizing a health education, medical home referral and insurance enrollment program.

In Chicago, the Mexican consul's Spanish-language web site heavily promotes the Illinois Department of Health's low-cost prescription medicine program for illegal aliens and various free medical services throughout the state. It encourages all Mexicans in the area to pursue the valuable U.S. government-financed services for their entire family.

The Indiana-based program boasts that it serves thousands of "Mexican nationals" living in that state as well as Ohio, Kentucky and southern Illinois. Mexican officials claim that its highly successful pro-health program sends out a clear message to other Mexican consulates throughout the country and the world.

Although these programs facilitate people to remain in the country illegally, Mexico is working hard to expand them to all 47 U.S. consulates to better serve its nationals. In the meantime, U.S. taxpayers will keep picking up the exorbitant tab of medically treating the millions who live in the country illegally.

www.judicialwatchwatch.org


*
MEXICO BREEDS LA RAZA OCCUPATION WITH ANCHOR BABY WELFARE IN OUR BORDERS:

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/08/anchor-babies-how-mexico-anchors-la.html
*
"Remember 187 -- the Proposition to deny taxpayer funds for services to
non-citizens -- was the last gasp of white America in California."
---Art Torres, Chairman of the California Democratic Party

Anchor Baby Power
La Voz de Aztlan has produced a video in honor of the millions of babies that have been born as US citizens to Mexican undocumented parents. These babies are destined to transform America. The nativist CNN reporter Lou Dobbs estimates that there are over 200,000 "Anchor Babies" born every year whereas George Putnam, a radio reporter, says the figure is closer to 300,000. La Voz de Aztlan believes that the number is approximately 500,000 "Anchor Babies" born every year.
The video below depicts the many faces of the "Anchor Baby Generation". The video includes a fascinating segment showing a group of elementary school children in Santa Ana, California confronting the Minutemen vigilantes. The video ends with a now famous statement by Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez of the University of Texas at Austin.

http://www.aztlan.net/anchor_baby_power.htm

*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/08/obama-care-barack-and-nancy-pelosis.html

Record number of Americans in poverty

Record number of Americans in poverty

Notes on the social crisis in America

Notes on the social crisis in America