But, Obama does not have to wait for Congress to “protect our borders”
• January 25th, 2011 10:12
• By Dave Gibson, Immigration Reform Examiner
During the President’s 2011 State of the Union speech, Obama said: “I strongly believe that we should take on, once and for all, the issue of illegal immigration. I am prepared to work with Republicans and Democrats to protect our borders, enforce our laws and address the millions of undocumented workers who are now living in the shadows.”
Of course, Obama is the president and as such can order the active duty military to our border with Mexico (with orders to actually stop illegal crossers) at any time. If there is an immediate threat to this nation, the president can order as many troops and equipment as is needed to confront that threat.
The invasion of this country by the violent Mexican drug cartels and the hellish life they have created for those Americans living in the American Southwest presents a clear and present danger, and is one that only the U.S. military can adequately answer.
Futhermore, federal law already dictates that we “protect our borders.” However, we have simply not had a U.S. president who has chosen to actually carry out that order and enforce immigration laws in 50 years, since President Dwight D. Eisenhower did so.
The fact is that Obama does not have to “work with Republicans and Democrats to protect our borders.” He can do it himself using existing laws.
Of course, Obama does not really want our border with Mexico defended and immigration laws enforced. If he did…he would have already done it.
Unfortunately, the state of this union will continue to weaken until we elect a leader who places the welfare and safety of Americans before any desires of cheap labor and potential votes.
Continue reading on Examiner.com: But, Obama does not have to wait for Congress to “protect our borders” - National Immigration reform
Examiner.com
http://www.examiner.com/immigration-reform-in-national/but-obama-does-not-have-to-wait-for-congress-to-protect-our-borders?render=print#print#ixzz1D1zeXnxE
OBAMA’S BIT BY BIT AMNESTY – AND FLIP-OFF OF THE WILL OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE
DEPT. HOMELAND SECURITY = PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP
Feds moving to dismiss some deportation cases
Critics assail the plan as a bid to create a kind of backdoor 'amnesty'
By SUSAN CARROLL
Copyright 2010, HOUSTON CHRONICLE
Aug. 24, 2010, 9:00PM
The Department of Homeland Security is systematically reviewing thousands of pending immigration cases and moving to dismiss those filed against suspected illegal immigrants who have no serious criminal records, according to several sources familiar with the efforts.
Culling the immigration court system dockets of noncriminals started in earnest in Houston about a month ago and has stunned local immigration attorneys, who have reported coming to court anticipating clients' deportations only to learn that the government was dismissing their cases.
Richard Rocha, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement spokesman, said Tuesday that the review is part of the agency's broader, nationwide strategy to prioritize the deportations of illegal immigrants who pose a threat to national security and public safety. Rocha declined to provide further details.
Critics assailed the plan as another sign that the Obama administration is trying to create a kind of backdoor "amnesty" program.
Raed Gonzalez, an immigration attorney who was briefed on the effort by Homeland Security's deputy chief counsel in Houston, said DHS confirmed that it's reviewing cases nationwide, though not yet to the pace of the local office. He said the others are expected to follow suit soon.
Gonzalez, the liaison between the Executive Office for Immigration Review, which administers the immigration court system, and the American Immigration Lawyers Association, said DHS now has five attorneys assigned full time to reviewing all active cases in Houston's immigration court.
Gonzalez said DHS attorneys are conducting the reviews on a case-by-case basis. However, he said they are following general guidelines that allow for the dismissal of cases for defendants who have been in the country for two or more years and have no felony convictions.
In some instances, defendants can have one misdemeanor conviction, but it cannot involve a DWI, family violence or sexual crime, Gonzalez said.
Massive backlog of cases
Opponents of illegal immigration were critical of the dismissals.
"They've made clear that they have no interest in enforcing immigration laws against people who are not convicted criminals," said Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates for strict controls.
"This situation is just another side effect of President Obama's failure to deliver on his campaign promise to make immigration reform a priority in his first year," said U.S. Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas. "Until he does, state and local authorities are left with no choice but to pick up the slack for prosecuting and detaining criminal aliens."
Gonzalez called the dismissals a necessary step in unclogging a massive backlog in the immigration court system. In June, there were more than 248,000 cases pending in immigration courts across the country, including about 23,000 in Texas, according to data compiled by researchers at Syracuse University.
'Absolutely fantastic'
Gonzalez said he went into immigration court downtown on Monday and was given a court date in October 2011 for one client. But, he said, the government's attorney requested the dismissal of that case and those of two more of his clients, and the cases were dispatched by the judge.
The court "was terminating all of the cases that came up," Gonzalez said. "It was absolutely fantastic."
"We're all calling each other saying, 'Can you believe this?' " said John Nechman, another Houston immigration attorney, who had two cases dismissed.
Attorney Elizabeth Mendoza Macias, who has practiced in Houston for 17 years, said she had cases for several clients dismissed during the past month and eventually called DHS to find out what was going on. She said she was told by a DHS trial attorney that 2,500 cases were under review in Houston.
"I had five (dismissed) in one week, and two more that I just received," Mendoza said. "And I am expecting many more, many more, in the next month."
Her clients, all previously charged with being in the country illegally, included:
An El Salvadoran man married to a U.S. citizen who has two U.S.-born children. The client had a pending asylum case in the court system, but the case was not particularly strong. Now that his case is terminated, he will be eligible to obtain permanent residency through his wife, Mendoza said.
A woman from Cameroon, who was in removal proceedings after being caught by the U.S. Border Patrol, had her case terminated by the government. She meets the criteria of a trafficking victim, Mendoza said, and can now apply for a visa.
Memo outlines priorities
Immigrants who have had their cases terminated are frequently left in limbo, immigration attorneys said, and are not granted any form of legal status.
"It's very, very key to understand that these aliens are not being granted anything in court. They are still here illegally. They don't have work permits. They don't have Social Security numbers," Mendoza said. "ICE is just saying, 'At this particular moment, we are not going to proceed with trying to remove you from the United States.' "
In a June 30 memo, ICE Assistant Secretary John Morton outlined the agency's priorities, saying it had the capacity to remove about 400,000 illegal immigrants annually — about 4 percent of the estimated illegal immigrant population in the country. The memo outlines priorities for the detention and removal system, putting criminals and threats to national security at the top of the list.
Up to 17,000 cases
On Tuesday, ICE officials provided a copy of a new policy memo from Morton dated Aug. 20 that instructs government attorneys to review the court cases of people with pending applications to adjust status based on their relation to a U.S. citizen. Morton estimates in the memo that the effort could affect up to 17,000 cases.
Tre Rebsock, the ICE union representative in Houston, said even if the efforts involve only a fraction of the pending immigration cases, "that's going to make our officers feel even more powerless to enforce the laws."
susan.carroll@chron.com
*
Obama Quietly Erasing Borders (Article)
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=240045
WND Exclusive PREMEDITATED MERGER
Obama quietly erasing borders
Dem administration advancing 'North American Union' agenda
Posted: December 15, 2010
10:20 pm Eastern
By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2010 WorldNetDaily
NOGALES, AZ - DECEMBER 10: U.S. agricultural inspector Mike Ollman questions a motorist entering the United States at the U.S.-Mexico border crossing on December 10, 2010 at Nogales, Arizona. Despite Arizona's tough immigration enforcement laws, thousands of Mexican citizens have permits to work in the U.S. and commute daily from their homes across the border in Mexico. Border crossings, known as ports of entry, are run by the U.S. Office of Field Operations, which is part of the department of U.S. Customs and Border Protection. Port personnel are the face at the border for most visitors and cargo entering the United States and are authorized to stop, question, search and examine everyone entering the country.
Acting quietly, below the radar of U.S. public opinion and without congressional approval, the Obama administration is implementing a key policy objective of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, or SPP, to erase the border with Mexico and Canada.
The administration is acting under a State Department-declared policy initiative described in a March 23 fact sheet titled "United States-Mexico Partnership: A New Border Vision."
"Mexico and the United States have a shared interest in creating a 21st century border that promotes the security and prosperity of both countries," the State Department declared. "The U.S. and Mexican governments have launched a range of initiatives that challenge the traditional view of 'hold the line' and are developing a framework for a new vision of 21st centuryborder management."
At the same time, CTV News in Canada has obtained a draft copy of a declaration between the U.S. and Canada entitled "Beyond theBorder: A Shared Vision for Perimeter Security and Competitiveness," to be implemented by a newly created Canadian-U.S. "Beyond the Border Working Group."
Get "The Late Great USA" and find out how America is giving away its sovereignty
The two documents strongly suggest the Obama administration is pursuing a stealth bureaucratic methodology to establish a common North Americanborder around the continent, encompassing the U.S., Canada and Mexico, while simultaneously moving to erase the borders between the U.S. and Mexico as well as between the U.S. and Canada.
Under the Bush administration's SPP, the U.S., Mexico and Canada organized some 20 different "shadow government" bureaucratic working groups composed of agency heads and undersecretaries in the three nations. The groups span a wide range of policy areas, from e-commerce, to aviation policy, toborders and immigration, trilateral travel, transportation, energy, environment, food and agriculture, health and financial services.
WND has reported since 2006 that a blueprint published in 2005 by the Council on Foreign Relations entitled "Building a North America Community" called for the establishment of a common security perimeter around North America by 2010 to facilitate the free movement of people, trade and capital between the three nations of North America.
In his 2001 book, "Toward a North American Community," American University professor Robert Pastor, a co-chair of the CFR blue ribbon committee that authored "Building a North American Community," called for the creation of a North American Commission, a North American Parliament, and a North American Court on Trade and Investment.
The language of the documents declaring "A New Border Vision" with Mexico and Canada could easily have been lifted directly from the CFR report or Pastor's book.
The 2005 CFR report "Building a North American Community" called on page xvii of the Foreword for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security perimeter, the boundaries of which would be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter."
CTV News reported that the language of the draft agreement specified that "A New Border Vision" for the U.S. and Canada would involve "a perimeter approach to security, working together within, at, and away from theborders of our two countries in a way that supports economic competitiveness, job creation and prosperity, and in a partnership to enhance our security and accelerate the legitimate flow of people and goods between our two countries."
Similarly, the U.S. State Department fact sheet calling for "A New Border Vision" with Mexico specified five areas of "joint border management, co-responsibility for cross-border crime, and shared commitment to the efficient flow of legal commerce and travel," namely: enhancing public safety, securing flows of people and goods, expediting legitimate commerce and travel, engaging border communities, and setting policy.
Under "setting policy," the State Department fact sheet with Mexico called for achieving rapid policy change through "an agile inter-agency process within each country as well as a means by which both governments can easily coordinate at a bi-national level."
This provides additional support for the conclusion that the bureaucratic "working groups" established under SPP in the Bush administration will continue to operate under Obama administration.
CTV News reported that the draft declaration of "A New Border Vision" with Canada similarly also specified a cross-border policy agenda, including:
* An integrated cargo security strategy;
* A joint approach to port and border security and screening;
* Cross-border sharing of information between law enforcement agencies;
* A closer working relationship between the two militaries in the event of emergencies;
* A new level of collaboration on preventing and recovering from counter attacks.
Affirming the continuance of the working group process, the draft declaration with Canada specifies the U.S. and Canada "intend to address threats at the earliest point possible, including outside the perimeter of our two countries."
The origin of the SPP can be traced to a trilateral summit meeting in Waco, Texas, March 23, 2005, between President George W. Bush, then-Mexican President Vicente Fox and then-Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin.
At the end of the Waco summit, the three leaders simply declared that the U.S., Mexico and Canada were now in the Security and Prosperity Partnership, without the signing of any international agreement between the three countries or the ratifying of any trilateral treaty by the U.S. Senate.
The SPP in the administration of President Bush appeared designed to replicate the steps taken in Europe over a 50-year period following the end of World War II to transform an economic agreement under the European Common Market into a full-fledged regional government, operating as the European Union, with its own currency, the euro, functioning as the sole legitimate currency in what has become known as "the eurozone."
The concern was that under the SPP, the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA, could evolve into a regional government, the North American Union, with a regional currency, the Amero, designed to replace the U.S. dollar, the Mexican peso and the Canadian dollar.
WND has reported analysts have believed the North American integration plan will proceed incrementally, largely below the radar, since the SPP was declared "dead" by one of its chief architects, American University Professor Robert A. Pastor, who for nearly 15 years has been a major proponent of building a "North American Community."
*
Rep. Barletta Seeks Answers
from Attorney General over Backdoor Amnesty
Freshman Congressman Lou Barletta (R-PA) sent U.S. Attorney
General Eric Holder a letter last Friday demanding answers regarding the
Administration's use of prosecutorial discretion to grant backdoor amnesty to
certain illegal aliens up to the age of thirty. This policy was announced
in Secretary Napolitano's June 15 memorandum ordering Department of Homeland
Security personnel to grant deferred action to illegal aliens meeting criteria
similar to that of the failed DREAM Act.
In his letter to the Attorney General, Rep. Barletta charged the
Administration with usurping Congressional authority. Noting that Congress had
repeatedly rejected the DREAM Act, Rep. Barletta wrote, "[W]hen similar
measures that would implement these same policies were presented to Congress,
Congress rejected them. The implementation of the new immigration policy that
is contrary to the expressed will of the Congress violates the
Constitution."
Rep. Barletta also asked Attorney General
Holder whether he believed Secretary Napolitano's memorandum was
constitutional. "As the most senior lawyer in our country, I would like to
know your opinion about the constitutionality of Secretary Napolitano's
actions." Barletta inquired. Holder's Justice Department has yet to
comment on the Administration's use of prosecutorial discretion to grant
deferred action to broad categories of illegal aliens. Stay
tuned to FAIR for more details...
*
CECILIA MUNOZ IS ONE OF
OBAMA’S MANY LA RAZA SUPREMACIST OPERATING OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE. NO
ADMINISTRATION IN HISTORY HAS BEEN SO INFESTED WITH A FOREIGN BASED POLITICAL
PARTY AS OBAMA’S.
THE FASTEST GROWING
POLITICAL PARTY IN AMERICAN IS THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA – THE PARTY
of ILLEGALS AND MEXICAN SUPREMACY. THEIR GOAL IS OBAMA AMNESTY OR CONTINUED
NON-ENFORCEMENT, NO E-VERIFY, OPEN BORDERS AND DE FACTO CITIZENSHIPS WITH
DRIVERS’ LICENSES!
VIVA LA RAZA! YOU ARE!
OBAMA HAS SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED THE FUNDING TO EXPAND MEXICAN SUPREMACY IN
OUR BORDERS!
On Thursday, Director of
Intergovernmental Affairs Cecilia Muñoz blogged that the Department of Homeland
Security will review its entire deportation caseload - that's 300,000 cases -
to "clear out low priority" cases and "make more room to deport
people who have been convicted of crimes or pose a security risk."
*
Obama's lowest priority: some deportation
cases
Tuesday, August 23, 2011
President Obama is in a pickle. Immigration enforcement
actually is working - or, at least, it was working.
Under the Obama
administration, the government has removed almost 400,000 illegal immigrants
annually. That's 4 percent of the 10 million illegal immigrants estimated to be
living in America - and it sends a warning to those thinking of illegally
entering the United States.
Thanks to the Secure
Communities program, which requires local law enforcement to share arrestees'
fingerprints with Washington, about half of those deported have criminal
records. According to the administration, the vast majority of the rest either
re-crossed the border after deportation or were recently caught.
So what did the White
House announce last week? On Thursday,
Director of Intergovernmental Affairs Cecilia Muñoz blogged that the Department
of Homeland Security will review its entire deportation caseload - that's
300,000 cases - to "clear out low priority" cases and "make more
room to deport people who have been convicted of crimes or pose a security
risk."
Sen. Dick Durbin,
D-Ill., told the New York Times that the policy would protect youths with clean
criminal records whose parents brought them into the country when they were
minors. That is, he likened the Obama policy to his proposed legislation, the
Dream (Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors) Act.
Actually, the Obama
policy goes much further than shielding minors. Under the guise of
"prosecutorial discretion," a Department of Homeland Security memo
advises officials to consider a number of "positive factors" before
prosecuting offenders. "Positive factors" include military service, "long-time
lawful permanent" residency, "minors and elderly individuals,"
nursing, pregnant and disabled.
On the one hand, the
policy seems smart - let the government concentrate on deporting threats to
public safety.
On the other hand, the
White House essentially has announced that individuals who break federal
immigration law are a "low priority" and unlikely to face legal
consequences. So much for deterrence.
Worse, the new policy
will allow individuals who have been caught up in a Secure Communities' review
to apply for work permits. Mark Krikorian, executive director of the
pro-enforcement Center for Immigration Studies, said that the new policy makes
getting arrested equivalent to winning the lottery: "Their fellow illegal
aliens who were not arrested don't get work authorization."
Krikorian calls the new
policy "administrative amnesty." Obama failed to persuade Congress to
change the law. Now with the 2012 presidential election looming, he changed
policies implemented in the Clinton and George W. Bush years by fiat.
Bush's Secure Communities
program enabled Obama to boast that his administration delivered the greatest
number of illegal immigrant removals ever - 395,165 - in Fiscal Year 2009. In
2010, the number fell. Last month, he told the National Council of La Raza,
"Here's the only thing you should know. The Democrats and your president
are with you."
Re-election, after all,
is his highest priority.
*
FROM JUDICIAL WATCH
GET ON THEIR E-NEWS!
Obama Starts Suspending Deportations
Last
Updated: Tue, 08/23/2011 - 4:14pm
Keeping
its promise to suspend deportations for a broad class of illegal immigrants,
the Obama Administration has officially started the process that’s expected to
spare tens of thousands from removal in the coming months.
Among
the first illegal aliens to benefit from the president’s backdoor amnesty plan
is a Mexican man living in Florida. He got busted a few years ago after
applying for a work permit and was earmarked for deportation. Earlier this
month local media portrayed the man, Manuel Guerra, as a desperate
undocumented worker
trying to build a new life after fleeing violent street gangs in his native
Mexico.
This
week the 27-year-old, who has lived in the U.S. illegally for more than a
decade, became the poster child for Obama’s newly implemented amnesty program.
Federal immigration authorities officially suspended his
deportation,
according a mainstream newspaper report that says Guerra had been caught in a
“tortuous and seemingly failing five-year court fight against deportation.”
Guerra
was spared after a working group from the departments of Homeland Security and
Justice met to start reviewing 300,000 deportation cases pending before
immigration courts nationwide. Under Obama’s new plan, authorities will have wide discretion to
halt deportations
and will be encouraged to do so in cases where illegal immigrants attend
school, have family in the military or are primary bread winners.
The
stealth amnesty plan was first introduced last year in case Congress doesn’t
pass legislation to legalize the nation’s 12 million undocumented immigrants.
Earlier this year political appointees at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services (USCIS), actually issued a directive to enact “meaningful immigration
reform absent legislative action.” The plan includes delaying deportation
indefinitely (“deferred action”), granting green cards, allowing illegal
immigrants to remain in the U.S. indefinitely while they seek legal status
(known as “parole in place”) and expanding the definition of “extreme
hardships” so any illegal alien could meet the criteria and remain in the
country.
This
goes hand in hand with the president’s new blueprint for immigration reform,
which was recently issued by the White House. Titled “Building A 21st
Century Immigration System,” the plan strives to strengthen the U.S. economy and
“competitiveness” by creating a legal immigration system that reflects the nation’s
“values and diverse needs.” After all, it claims that the “overwhelming
majority” of people living in the U.S. with “no legal status” are “simply
seeking a better life for themselves and their children.”
The
president’s new plan, which has already allocated $8 million to community
groups that operate immigrant “integrational programs,” also expands “anti
discrimination provisions of immigration law” and provides more “comprehensive
anti-retaliation protections.”
*
FROM
JUDICIAL WATCH
http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/jun/nclr-funding-skyrockets-after-obama-hires-its-vp
NCLR Funding Skyrockets After Obama Hires Its VP
06/17/2011
A Judicial Watch investigation reveals that federal funding for a Mexican La
Raza group that for years has raked in millions of taxpayer dollars has
skyrocketed since one of its top officials got a job in the Obama White House.
The influential and politically-connected National Council of La Raza (NCLR)
has long benefitted from Uncle Sam's largess but the group has made a killing
since Obama hired its senior vice president (Cecilia Muñoz) in 2009 to be his
director of intergovernmental affairs.
Ignored by the mainstream media, Judicial Watch covered the appointment because
the president issued a special "ethics waiver" to bring Muñoz aboard
since it violated his own lobbyist ban. At the pro illegal immigration NCLR,
Muñoz supervised all legislative and advocacy activities on the state and local
levels and she was heavily involved in the congressional immigration battles
that took place in the George W. Bush Administration.
She also brought in a steady flow of government cash that's allowed the
Washington D.C.-based group to expand nationwide and promote its leftist,
open-borders agenda via a network of community organizations dedicated to
serving Latinos.Among them are a variety of local groups that provide social
services, housing counseling and farm worker assistance as well as
publicly-funded charter schools that promote radical Chicano curriculums.
Judicial Watch published a special report on this a few years ago.
This week a JW probe has uncovered details of the alarming increase in federal
funding that these NCLR groups have received since Muñoz joined the Obama
Administration. In fact, the government cash more than doubled the year Muñoz
joined the White House, from $4.1 million to $11 million.
Not surprisingly, a big chunk of the money (60%) came from the Department of
Labor, which is headed by a former California congresswoman (Hilda Solis) with
close ties to the La Raza movement. Since Obama named her Labor Secretary,
Solis has launched a nationwide campaign to protect illegal immigrant workers
in the U.S. Just this week Solis penned declarations with Guatemala and
Nicaragua to preserve the rights of their migrants.
The NCLR also received additional taxpayer dollars from other federal agencies
in 2010, the JW probe found. The Department of Housing and Urban Development
doled out $2.5 million for housing counseling, the Department of Education
contributed nearly $800,000 and the Centers for Disease Control a quarter of a
million.
Additionally, NCLR affiliates nationwide raked in tens of millions of government
grant and recovery dollars last year thanks to the Muñoz factor. An offshoot
called Chicanos Por La Causa (CPLC) saw its federal funding nearly double to
$18.3 million following Muñoz' appointment.
A social service and legal assistance organization (Ayuda Inc.) that didn't
receive any federal funding between 2005 and 2008 got $600,000 in 2009 and
$548,000 in 2010 from the Department of Justice. The group provides immigration
law services and guarantees confidentiality to assure illegal aliens that they
won't be reported to authorities.
*
SHOCKING FACTS ON OBAMA’S FUNDING OF THE MEXICAN
SUPREMACIST MOVEMENT OF LA RAZA
*
*
*
*
OBAMA’S
I.C.E. IS ONE MORE AGENCY TO EXPAND HIS
LA RAZA PARTY BASE OF ILLEGALS!
ICE IS OBAMA’S AGENCY FOR
NON-ENFORCEMENT.
*
*
ACTUALLY, WHAT OBAMA REALLY MEANS WE
ARE A NATION OPEN TO FURTHER INVASION, OCCUPATION AND LA RAZA SUPREMACY IN
ORDER TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED FOR HIS WALL ST. PAYMASTERS!
THERE IS A REASON WHY OBAMA HAS
SABOTAGED E-VERIFY!
THERE IS A REASON WHY OBAMA USES TAX
DOLLARS TO FUND THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA (google CECELIA MUNOZ)
THERE IS A REASON WHY OBAMA’S SEC.
of (illegal) LABOR IS LA RAZA SUPREMACIST HILDA SOLIS!
OBAMA’S
I.C.E. IS ONE MORE AGENCY TO EXPAND HIS
LA RAZA PARTY BASE OF ILLEGALS!
WILL THERE BE A WAR WITH MEXICO?
THERE ALREADY IS! THE MEX DRUG CARTELS
OPERATE IN 2,500 AMERICAN CITIES AND HAUL BACK $60 BILLION. THERE ARE 38
MILLION MEXICANS IN OUR BORDERS LOOTING OUR JOBS, WELFARE, AND VOTING FOR MORE
LA RAZA DEMS TO SERVICE THEM!
VIVA LA RAZA? PUSH 2 FOR ENGLISH AND TELL
ME!
*
They
claim all of North America for Mexico!
WHAT
IS THERE TO SAY ABOUT AN AMERICAN PRESIDENT THAT HAS CONTEMPT FOR OUR BORDERS
AND EVEN SABOTAGES THEM TO BUILD HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE OF ILLEGALS, HAS
CONTEMPT FOR OUR SOVEREIGNTY LAWS, SABOTAGES E-VERIFY TO ASSURE ILLEGALS GET
OUR JOBS, FIGHTS AGAINST VOTER I.D. TO ASSURE ILLEGALS EASY ACCESS (again) TO
OUR VOTING, AND SUES FOUR AMERICAN STATES ON BEHALF OF HIS LA RAZA AGENDA?????
NO
ADMINISTRATION IN HISTORY IS AS INFESTED WITH A FOREIGN POLITICAL PARTY AS
OBAMA’S IS WITH LA RAZA SUPREMACIST PARTY!
NO
PRESIDENT HAS HANDED SO MUCH TAX PAYER
FUNDING TO A FOREIGN PARTY AS OBAMA HAS IN FUNDING THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of
LA RAZA!
The Obama administration’s campaign
to suspend the deportations of most illegal aliens has been subject to intense
scrutiny since 2010, when the press uncovered a United States Citizenship and
Immigration Services memo that contemplated various “administrative
alternatives” to bypass Congress and implement stealth amnesty for illegal
aliens. A subsequent Houston Chronicle story exposed an effort by the
administration to suspend the deportations of illegal aliens who supposedly
have not been convicted of any “serious” crimes.
*
– including the dismissal of charges
against illegal alien criminals convicted of violent crimes.
*
“The court’s ruling shows the
secrecy games by the Obama DHS. Clearly the Obama administration wants to
obscure the truth about its lawless illegal alien deportation policy.
*
“The court’s ruling shows the
secrecy games by the Obama DHS. Clearly the Obama administration wants to
obscure the truth about its lawless illegal alien deportation policy.
*
The tough and outspoken president of
the National ICE Council, Chris Crane, has opposed many of
the president’s strategies, arguing that Obama’s policies force ICE officials
to disregard the law.
In separate statements, officials from the border patrol agents union have also
criticized Obama's immigration and border security policies.
On one occasion, while testifying
before the House Judiciary subcommittee, Crane accused Obama of pandering to
Latino groups for political gain.
“Law enforcement and public safety
have taken a back seat to attempts to satisfy immigrant advocacy groups,” Crane
told the panel of congressmen.
*
COURT CRITICIZES OBAMA DHS ON STEALTH AMNESTY DOCUMENT
By NWV News Writer Jim Kouri
February 6, 2012
© 2012 NewsWithViews.com
A watchdog group that investigates,
exposes and prosecutes government corruption announced Thursday that the United
States District Court for the District of Columbia issued a ruling criticizing
President Barack Obama’s Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for failing to
abide by Freedom of
Information Act
(FOIA) law.
According
to Jill Farrell, Director of Public Affairs for Judicial Watch, JW officials
filed their original FOIA request with DHS on August 30, 2010, and then
followed up with a lawsuit on March 23, 2011, after the DHS
stonewalled
the release of records.
The Obama
administration filed a Motion for Summary Judgment in the lawsuit on August 4,
2011, asking the court to terminate the watchdog group’s lawsuit. U.S. District Judge Colleen
Kollar-Kotelly
granted DHS’s motion regarding some select records, but also denied the motion
in part and chastised the agency for its inadequate explanations as to why it
was withholding certain documents:
• Regarding assertions of
attorney-client privilege, the court listed a series of “egregious” examples
demonstrating DHS’s unwillingness to specify reasons for exempting documents
from disclosure and concluded, “In the end, DHS’s generalized and non-specific
showing fails to satisfy the court that the attorney-client privilege has been
properly invoked in connection with the information withheld from Judicial
Watch.”
• The court drew a similar conclusion
regarding memoranda and communications that DHS was withholding pursuant to the
attorney work product privilege, which protects materials “prepared in
anticipation of litigation or for trial by or for another party or its
representative.” The court ruled: “Absent a more particularized showing from
DHS, the Court cannot conclude that DHS has applied the appropriate standard in
this case…”
• Regarding the deliberative process
privilege, which protects “documents reflecting advisory opinions,
recommendations and deliberations comprising a part of the process by which
governmental decisions and policies are formulated,” Judge Kollar-Kotelly
wrote, “The Court agrees with Judicial Watch that DHS has failed to provide
sufficient factual context for much of the information withheld under the
deliberative process privilege to allow the Court to conclude that the
privilege has been properly invoked.”
Although the court had the ability to force disclosure under these
circumstances, Judge Kollar-Kotelly allowed DHS one “final” opportunity to
establish the applicability of these privileges to the information withheld
from Judicial Watch.
The Obama administration’s campaign
to suspend the deportations of most illegal aliens has been subject to intense
scrutiny since 2010, when the press uncovered a United States Citizenship and
Immigration Services memo that contemplated various “administrative alternatives”
to bypass Congress and implement stealth amnesty for illegal aliens. A
subsequent Houston Chronicle story exposed an effort by the
administration to suspend the deportations of illegal aliens who supposedly
have not been convicted of any “serious” crimes.
Documents
previously uncovered by Judicial Watch show that DHS officials misled Congress
and the public about the scope of the immigration enforcement policy change,
which gave wide latitude to local immigration officials to dismiss illegal
alien deportation cases – including
the dismissal of charges against illegal alien criminals convicted of violent
crimes. The Obama administration announced recently that it would
effectively halt any enforcement actions (on an alleged “case-by-case” basis)
against any illegal alien who has not committed any other “serious” crimes.
“The court’s ruling shows the
secrecy games by the Obama DHS. Clearly the Obama administration wants to
obscure the truth about its lawless illegal alien deportation policy. The Obama DHS believes it should
be able to withhold records from the American people without explanation or
justification. We’re pleased the court would not allow DHS to continue its
contempt for FOIA law. We look forward to continuing our legal pursuit of these
records,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
Illegal
Deportation Actions by Obama Administration
Aspart of
President Barack Obama's "new immigration and deportation strategy,"
all U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers must complete a training
program that stresses removing high-risk offenders while at the same time forgo
the deportation of illegal immigrants with clean records and strong ties to
their communities, said the ICE officers' union
officials on
Friday.
According
to federal law enforcement officials, a majority of ICE’s commanding officers
and prosecuting attorneys have completed the training seminar, but the National
ICE Council, which represents agency’s more than 6,000 immigration officers,
has not allowed its members to enroll in the new training program.
The tough and outspoken president of
the National ICE Council, Chris Crane, has opposed many of
the president’s strategies, arguing that Obama’s policies force ICE officials
to disregard the law.
In separate statements, officials from the border patrol agents union have also
criticized Obama's immigration and border security policies.
On one occasion, while testifying
before the House Judiciary subcommittee, Crane accused Obama of pandering to
Latino groups for political gain.
“Law enforcement and public safety
have taken a back seat to attempts to satisfy immigrant advocacy groups,” Crane
told the panel of congressmen.
*
“What we're seeing is our Congress
and national leadership dismantling our laws by not enforcing them. Lawlessness
becomes the norm, just like Third World corruption. Illegal aliens now have
more rights and privileges than Americans. If you are an illegal alien, you can
drive a car without a driver's license or insurance. You may obtain medical
care without paying. You may work without paying taxes. Your children enjoy
free education at the expense of taxpaying Americans.”
THE LA RAZA PRESIDENT’S SABOTAGE OF OUR
COUNTRY’S BORDERS FOR ILLEGALS’ VOTES!
*
“PUNISH OUR ENEMIES”… does that mean assault the legals of Arizona that
must fend off the Mexican invasion, occupation, growing criminal and welfare
state, as well as Mex Drug cartels???
OBAMA TELLS ILLEGALS “PUNISH OUR ENEMIES”
Friends of ALIPAC,
Each day new reports come in from across the nation that
our movement is surging and more incumbents, mostly Democrats, are about to
fall on Election Day. Obama's approval ratings are falling to new lows as he
makes highly inappropriate statements to Spanish language audiences asking
illegal alien supporters to help him "punish our enemies."
*
“While the declining job
market in the United States may be discouraging some would-be border crossers,
a flow of illegal aliens continues unabated, with many entering the United
States as drug-smuggling “mules.”
*
As the liberal news
media, far-left Democrats, and labor unions push for the “Hispanicazation” of
U.S. culture, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano
says the U.S. border has never been more secure.
*
HISPANDERING LA RAZA ENDORSED HILLARY BLAMES
AMERICAN AGAIN FOR MEX INVASION SHE AND BILLARY HELPED CREATE!
In Mexico City, she
announced that the U.S. appetite for illegal drugs and the easy acquisition of
guns from the United States by Mexicans are the root causes of the Mexican
crime wave. “Blame America” has become the global agenda of the Democratic
Party.
*
Newsmax
Obama's
'Hispanicazation' of America
Monday, January 10, 2011
08:28 AM
By: James Walsh
Casting a shadow on economic recovery efforts in
the United States is the cost of illegal immigration that consumes U.S.
taxpayer dollars for education, healthcare, social welfare benefits, and
criminal justice. Illegal aliens (or more politically correct, “undocumented
immigrants”) with ties to Mexican drug cartels are contributing to death and
destruction on U.S. lands along the southern border.
While the declining job market in the
United States may be discouraging some would-be border crossers, a flow of
illegal aliens continues unabated, with many entering the United States as
drug-smuggling “mules.”
Increasingly vicious foot soldiers of the Mexican drug cartels are taking
control of U.S. lands along the border, especially since U.S. Border Patrol units
have been reassigned, some to offices 60 to 80 miles inland.
The U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) early last
year posted signs warning citizens to avoid Interstate 8 between Casa Grande
and Gila Bend, Ariz., because of criminal activity in the area, an area that
includes protected natural areas precious to the nation.
In reaction to public outrage over the signs, the BLM removed the offensive
wording in October 2010, replacing it with the following: Visitor Information
Update—Active Federal Law Enforcement Patrol Area.
As the liberal news media, far-left
Democrats, and labor unions push for the “Hispanicazation” of U.S. culture,
U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano says the U.S.
border has never been more secure.
Perhaps she is basing this on the reduced number of apprehensions, which
result, of course, from reassigning Border Patrol agents inland.
In a recent New York Times article, Nicholas Kristof criticized U.S. citizens
for not speaking a foreign language and suggested that “Every child in the
United States should learn Spanish.” He concluded that as the United States
increasingly integrates economically with Latin America, Spanish will be
crucial for the United States.
For decades, the liberal left has argued that Latin America is essential for
U.S. business and trade. Kristof states that Latin America “is finally getting
its act together” but fails to mention the Obama administration’s $2 billion
loan of U.S. taxpayer money in 2009 to Brazil’s Petrobras oil company for deep
off-shore oil drilling. Obama confidant George Soros, through the Soros Fund
Management LLC, until recently owned millions of dollars of Petrobras stock.
Kristof suggests that one day Spanish-speaking Americans will be part of daily
life in the United States and that workmen such as mechanics will be able to
communicate easily with Spanish-speaking customers.
He fails to explain why these customers will not be speaking English. After
all, the ability to speak, read, and write English remains a requirement for
U.S. citizenship.
President Barack Obama gives lip service to increasing border control resources
with limited funding and personnel. Many officials, including the governors of
Texas and Arizona, are skeptical regarding the Obama administration’s resolve.
They resent that the United States is being blamed for the killing fields on
both sides of the Mexico-U.S. Border.
For instance, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in March 2009, during her
first official visit to Mexico, placed the blame for the Mexican drug cartels’
vicious murders on the United States.
In Mexico City, she announced that the
U.S. appetite for illegal drugs and the easy acquisition of guns from the
United States by Mexicans are the root causes of the Mexican crime wave. “Blame
America” has become the global agenda of the Democratic Party.
The Obama administration’s plan to resolve the immigration chaos is to
offer amnesty to all comers. President Obama re-affirms his support of a “pathway
to citizenship” (amnesty) for illegal aliens in 2011.
The administration, however, has announced no plans to control the influx of
future waves of illegal aliens or their skyrocketing costs to the nation. The
administration, which condones U.S. sanctuary cities and states, has no plans
to file charges against them for violations of federal immigration law. Nor
does the administration seem concerned about the environmental impact that
illegal aliens have on the ecology of the United States.
Many national forests, parks, monuments, wilderness areas, and wildlife refuges
— once the pride of the nation — are serving today as marijuana fields for
illegal alien gangs.
Former Democratic Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi reportedly said to a
gathering of illegal aliens in California in 2009 that U.S. immigration laws
were “un-American,” suggesting that they need not be obeyed. Concerned citizens
can only trust that the new speaker of the House, John Boehner, as part of
congressional oversight of federal agencies, will demand enforcement of
existing immigration laws.
When will President Obama recognize that illegal immigration is slowing
economic recovery? Can he resolve the chaos while still appeasing his Hispanic
base?
To maintain his populist aura, the president is in the habit of saying one
thing to one audience and the opposite to another.
One Obama apologist explained, “Campaign rhetoric is one thing,” suggesting
that governing is another. The deliberate Hispanicazation of the United States
to secure a block of votes is quite another.
FAIRUS.org
The Administration's Phantom Immigration Enforcement Policy
According to DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s borders (Southwestern or otherwise) are secure, and gaining control is not even a goal of the department.
By Ira Mehlman
Published on 12/07/2009
Townhall.com
The setting was not quite the flight deck of the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln with a “Mission Accomplished” banner as the backdrop, but it was the next best thing. Speaking at the Center for American Progress (CAP) on Nov. 13, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano declared victory over illegal immigration and announced that the Obama administration is ready to move forward with a mass amnesty for the millions of illegal aliens already living in the United States.
Arguing the Obama administration’s case for amnesty, Napolitano laid out what she described as the “three-legged stool” for immigration reform. As the administration views it, immigration reform must include “a commitment to serious and effective enforcement, improved legal flows for families and workers, and a firm but fair way to deal with those who are already here.”
Acknowledging that a lack of confidence in the government’s ability and commitment to effectively enforce the immigration laws it passes proved to be the Waterloo of previous efforts to gain amnesty for illegal aliens, Napolitano was quick to reassure the American public that those concerns could be put to rest.
“For starters, the security of the Southwest border has been transformed from where it was in 2007,” stated the secretary. Not only is the border locked up tight, she continued, but the situation is well in-hand in the interior of the country as well. “We’ve also shown that the government is serious and strategic in its approach to enforcement by making changes in how we enforce the law in the interior of the country and at worksites…Furthermore, we’ve transformed worksite enforcement to truly address the demand side of illegal immigration.”
If Rep. Joe Wilson had been in attendance to hear Secretary Napolitano’s CAP speech he might well have had a few choice comments to offer. But since he wasn’t, we will have to rely on the Department of Homeland Security’s own data to assess the veracity of Napolitano’s claims.
According to DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s borders (Southwestern or otherwise) are secure, and gaining control is not even a goal of the department. DHS claims to have “effective control” over just 894 miles of border. That’s 894 out of 8,607 miles they are charged with protecting. As for the other 7,713 miles? DHS’s stated border security goal for FY 2010 is the same 894 miles.
The administration’s strategic approach to interior and worksite enforcement is just as chimerical as its strategy at the border, unless one considers shuffling paper to be a strategy. DHS data, released November 18, show that administrative arrests of immigration law violators fell by 68 percent between 2008 and 2009. The department also carried out 60 percent fewer arrests for criminal violations of immigration laws, 58 percent fewer criminal indictments, and won 63 percent fewer convictions.
While the official unemployment rate has climbed from 7.6 percent when President Obama took office in January to 10 percent today, the administration’s worksite enforcement strategy has amounted to a bureaucratic game of musical chairs. The administration has all but ended worksite enforcement actions and replaced them with paperwork audits. When the audits determine that illegal aliens are on the payroll, employers are given the opportunity to fire them with little or no adverse consequence to the company, while no action is taken to remove the illegal workers from the country. The illegal workers simply acquire a new set of fraudulent documents and move on to the next employer seeking workers willing to accept substandard wages.
In Janet Napolitano’s alternative reality a mere 10 percent of our borders under “effective control” and sharp declines in arrests and prosecutions of immigration lawbreakers may be construed as confidence builders, but it is hard to imagine that the American public is going to see it that way. If anything, the administration’s record has left the public less confident that promises of future immigration enforcement would be worth the government paper they’re printed on.
As Americans scrutinize the administration’s plans to overhaul immigration policy, they are likely to find little in the “three-legged stool” being offered that they like or trust. The first leg – enforcement – the administration has all but sawed off. The second – increased admissions of extended family members and workers – makes little sense with some 25 million Americans either unemployed or relegated to part-time work. And the third – amnesty for millions of illegal aliens – is anathema to their sense of justice and fair play.
As Americans well know, declaring “Mission Accomplished” and actually accomplishing a mission are two completely different things. When it comes to enforcing immigration laws, the only message the public is receiving from this administration is “Mission Aborted.”
http://www.FAIRUS.org
http://www.JUDICIALWATCH.org
http://www.ALIPAC.us
UCLA PROFESSOR CALLS FOR MEXICAN REVOLT IN UNITED STATES
http://video.yahoo.com/watch/7165215?fr=yvmtf
Wake up America!!! Illegal Immigration has to be stopped. Take a look at this website and see where all your tax dollars are going:
http://immigrationcounters.com
See: CFR’s Plan to Integrate the U.S., Mexico and Canada
http://www.proliberty.com/observer/20050816.htm
The Great Alien Invasion - What's Happening Now http://www.rense.com/general69/inva.htm
*
"Bush Secret Border Wars" Mayhem and terror in Southern states to protect government drug cartels
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2005/140805
borderwars.htm Mexican/Bush Crime
*
“Through love of having children, we are going to take over.” AUGUSTIN CEBADA, BROWN BERETS, THE LA RAZA FASCIST PARTY
http://www.aztlan.net/anchor_baby_power.htm
THE MEXICAN CRIME TIDAL WAVE SPREADS ACROSS THE UNITED
STATES
Everyday there are 12 Americans murdered by Mexicans and 8
children molested!
California Attorney Gen Kamala Harris announced that nearly
HALF of all murders in Mex-occupied CA are by MEX GANGS!
*
WILL MEXICO BANKRUPT AMERICA?
CALIFORNIA UNDER MEXICAN-OCCUPATION PAYS OUT $22 BILLION PER
YEAR IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS!
*
WILL OHIO BE BANKRUPTED BY THE LA RAZA MEX-OCCUPATION THAT
NOT ONE LEGAL VOTED FOR?
*
HOW MANY BILLIONS ARE MARYLANDERS FORCED TO PAY FOR MEX
WELFARE AND LOOTING?
*
BARACK OBAMA, FIRST HISPANDERING LA RAZA “THE RACE”
PRESIDENT – HIS LA RAZA SUPREMACIST INFESTED ADMINISTRATION:
*
OBAMA AND MEXICO PROMISE ILLEGALS JUMPING OUR BORDERS
OBAMACARE, “FREE” MEDICAL, “FREE” ANCHOR BABY BIRTHING = 18 YEARS WELFARE, AND
OUR JOBS!
*
ROBERT RECTOR: THE STAGGERING COST OF MEXICO’S INVASION,
OCCUPATION AND EVER GROWING WELFARE STATE
*
ONE OF MEXICO’S BIGGEST EXPORTS NEXT TO DRUGS, AND CRIMINALS
ARE PREGNANT WOMEN. THESE POOR DESPERATE WOMEN JUMP OUR BORDERS FOR “FREE”
ANCHOR BABY BIRTHING = 18 YEARS OF WELFARE FOR EACH CHILD.
THE CHILDREN BORN OF MEXICANS THAT ILLEGALLY CROSSED OUR BORDERS
IS AN AMERICAN CITIZEN BUT STILL A CITIZEN OF MEXICO.
*
THE LOOTING OF AMERICA BY MEXICO, BARACK OBAMA and ERIC
HOLDER
OBAMA’S HISPANICAZATION of AMERICA:
*
ANCHOR BABIES – HOW MEXICO ANCHORS THEIR OCCUPATION AND
EXPAND THEIR WELFARE STATE IN OUR BORDERS!
*
FIFTEEN THINGS YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT LA RAZA “THE RACE”
by Michelle Malkin
Only in America could critics of a group called
"The Race" be labeled racists. Such is the triumph of left-wing
identity chauvinists, whose aggressive activists and supine abettors have
succeeded in redefining all opposition as "hate."
Both Barack Obama and John McCain will speak this
week in San Diego at the annual conference of the National Council of La Raza,
the Latino organization whose name is Spanish for, yes, "The Race."
Can you imagine Obama and McCain paying homage to a group of white people who
called themselves that? No matter. The presidential candidates and the media have
legitimized "The Race" as a mainstream ethnic lobbying group and
marginalized its critics as intolerant bigots. The unvarnished truth is that
the group is a radical ethnic nationalist outfit that abuses your tax dollars
and milks PC politics to undermine our sovereignty.
*
Here are 15 things you should know about "The Race":
15. "The Race" supports driver's licenses for illegal aliens.
*
14."The Race" demands in-state tuition
discounts for illegal alien students that are not available to law-abiding U.S.
citizens and law-abiding legal immigrants.
*
13. "The Race" vehemently opposes
cooperative immigration enforcement efforts between local, state and federal
authorities.
*
12. "The Race" opposes a secure fence on the southern border.
*
11. "The Race" joined the American-Arab
Anti-Discrimination Committee in a failed lawsuit attempt to prevent the feds
from entering immigration information into a key national crime database -- and
to prevent local police officers from accessing the data.
*
10. "The Race" opposed the state of
Oklahoma's tough immigration-enforcement-first laws, which cut off welfare to
illegal aliens, put teeth in employer sanctions and strengthened local-federal
cooperation and information sharing.
*
9. "The Race" joined other open-borders,
anti-assimilationists and sued to prevent Proposition 227, California's
bilingual education reform ballot initiative, from becoming law.
*
8. "The Race" bitterly protested common-sense voter ID provisions
as an "absolute disgrace."
*
7. "The Race" has consistently opposed post-9/11 national security
measures at every turn.
*
6. Former "Race" president Raul
Yzaguirre, Hillary Clinton's Hispanic outreach adviser, said this: "U.S.
English is to Hispanics as the Ku Klux Klan is to blacks." He was
referring to U.S. English, the nation's oldest, largest citizens' action group
dedicated to preserving the unifying role of the English language in the United
States. "The Race" also pioneered Orwellian open-borders Newspeak and
advised the Mexican government on how to lobby for illegal alien amnesty while
avoiding the terms "illegal" and "amnesty."
*
5. "The Race" gives mainstream cover to a
poisonous subset of ideological satellites, led by Movimiento Estudiantil
Chicano de Aztlan, or Chicano Student Movement of Aztlan (MEChA). The late GOP
Rep. Charlie Norwood rightly characterized the organization as "a radical
racist group … one of the most anti-American groups in the country, which has
permeated U.S. campuses since the 1960s, and continues its push to carve a
racist nation out of the American West."
*
4. "The Race" is currently leading a
smear campaign against staunch immigration enforcement leaders and has called
for TV and cable news networks to keep immigration enforcement proponents off the
airwaves -- in addition to pushing for Fairness Doctrine policies to shut up
their foes. The New York Times reported that current "Race" president
Janet Murguia believes "hate speech" should "not be tolerated,
even if such censorship were a violation of First Amendment rights."
*
3. "The Race" sponsors militant ethnic
nationalist charter schools subsidized by your public tax dollars (at least $8
million in federal education grants). The schools include Aztlan Academy in
Tucson, Ariz., the Mexicayotl Academy in Nogales, Ariz., Academia Cesar Chavez
Charter School in St. Paul, Minn., and La Academia Semillas del Pueblo in Los
Angeles, whose principal inveighed: "We don't want to drink from a White
water fountain, we have our own wells and our natural reservoirs and our way of
collecting rain in our aqueducts. We don't need a White water fountain …
ultimately the White way, the American way, the neo liberal, capitalist way of
life will eventually lead to our own destruction."
*
2. "The Race" has perfected the art of
the PC shakedown at taxpayer expense, pushing relentlessly to lower home loan
standards for Hispanic borrowers, reaping millions in federal "mortgage
counseling" grants, seeking special multimillion-dollar earmarks and
partnering with banks that do business with illegal aliens.
*
1. "The Race" thrives on ethnic supremacy
-- and the elite sheeple's unwillingness to call it what it is. As historian
Victor Davis Hanson observes: "[The] organization's very nomenclature 'The
National Council of La Raza' is hate speech to the core. Despite all the
contortions of the group, Raza (as its Latin cognate suggests) reflects the
meaning of 'race' in Spanish, not 'the people'-- and that's precisely why we
don't hear of something like 'The National Council of the People,' which would
not confer the buzz notion of ethnic, racial and tribal chauvinism."
The fringe is the center. The center is the fringe. Viva La Raza?