Thursday, November 2, 2017

PELOSI DECLARES THAT GOP TAX BILL DESIGNED TO PLUNDER MIDDLE CLASS...... EXCUSE ME!?! - WHAT DO PELOSI'S LA RAZA MEXICAN WELFARE STATE ON OUR BACKS DO ALREADY???

HAD ENOUGH OF THE RICH PLUNDERING THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS?


"The tax bill represents an intensification of the social 

counterrevolution of the past four decades that has 

devastated the living standards of millions of workers while 

increasing social inequality and the wealth of the financial 

elite to unprecedented levels. It initiates a new stage in the 

plundering of society by the corporate oligarchy."



TWITTER TRUMPER trades WALL for tax cuts for the super rich…. But he doesn’t pay taxes!!!

TRUMP: For more tax cuts for the rich, NO (REAL) WALL, NO E-VERIFY, NO LEGAL NEED APPLY and NO ENFORCEMENT!




CALIFORNIA: MEXICO’S LOOTED WELFARE STATE


Mark Levin: ‘There Is a Big, Ugly Side to Illegal Immigration’

Thursday on Levin TVnationally syndicated radio show host Mark Levin warned about the dangers of illegal immigration saying, “There is a big, ugly side of illegal immigration,” Levin said. “There’s all kinds of crimes being committed by people who aren’t supposed to be here.”


Adios, California          
A fifth-generation Californian laments his state’s ongoing economic collapse.
By Steve Baldwin
American Spectator, October 19, 2017
What’s clear is that the producers are leaving the state and the takers are coming in. Many of the takers are illegal aliens, now estimated to number over 2.6 million. 
The Federation for American Immigration Reform estimates that California spends $22 billion on government services for illegal aliens, including welfare, education, Medicaid, and criminal justice system costs. Liberals claim they more than make that up with taxes paid, but that’s simply not true. It’s not even close. FAIR estimates illegal aliens in California contribute only $1.21 billion in tax revenue, which means they cost California $20.6 billion, or at least $1,800 per household.

Nonetheless, open border advocates, such as Facebook Chairman Mark Zuckerberg, claim illegal aliens are a net benefit to California with little evidence to support such an assertion. As the Center for Immigration Studies has documented, the vast majority of illegals are poor, uneducated, and with few skills. How does accepting millions of illegal aliens and then granting them access to dozens of welfare programs benefit California’s economy? If illegal aliens were contributing to the economy in any meaningful way, California, with its 2.6 million illegal aliens, would be booming.

Furthermore, the complexion of illegal aliens has changed with far more on welfare and committing crimes than those who entered the country in the 1980s. 
Heather Mac Donald of the Manhattan Institute has testified before a Congressional committee that in 2004, 95% of all outstanding warrants for murder in Los Angeles were for illegal aliens; in 2000, 23% of all Los Angeles County jail inmates were illegal aliens and that in 1995, 60% of Los Angeles’s largest street gang, the 18th Street gang, were illegal aliens. Granted, those statistics are old, but if you talk to any California law enforcement officer, they will tell you it’s much worse today. The problem is that the Brown administration will not release any statewide data on illegal alien crimes. That would be insensitive. And now that California has declared itself a “sanctuary state,” there is little doubt this sends a message south of the border that will further escalate illegal immigration into the state.

Indeed, California goes out of its way to attract illegal aliens. The state has even created government programs that cater exclusively to illegal aliens. For example, the State Department of Motor Vehicles has offices that only process driver licenses for illegal aliens. With over a million illegal aliens now driving in California, the state felt compelled to help them avoid the long lines the rest of us must endure at the DMV. 
And just recently, the state-funded University of California system announced it will spend $27 million on financial aid for illegal aliens. They’ve even taken out radio spots on stations all along the border, just to make sure other potential illegal border crossers hear about this program. I can’t afford college education for all my four sons, but my taxes will pay for illegals to get a college education.




JUDICIAL WATCH

Illegal Immigration Costs U.S. Taxpayers a Stunning $134.9 Billion a Year



THE ENDLESSLY HISPANDERING DEMOCRAT PARTY funded by Wall Street’s biggest criminals says it is “ALL NEW”…. Meaning open borders to keep wages depressed and no regulation of plundering banks!
It’s Obama’s wet dream!

OPIOID ADDICTION IN AMERICA:
OBAMA AND HIS CRONIES IN BIG PHARMA AT WORK!

DEATH OF THE AMERICAN MIDDLE-CLASS AND THE STAGGERING COST OF MEXICO’S WELFARE STATE AND CRIME TIDAL WAVE ON AMERICAN BACKS.


 ILLEGALS & WELFARE
70% OF ILLEGALS GET WELFARE!

Nearly One Million Sex Crimes Committed by Illegal Immigrants In The United States.

“According to the Centers for Immigration Studies, April '11, at least 70% of Mexican illegal alien families receive some type of welfare in the US!!! cis.org”
CIS

So when cities across the country declare that they will NOT be sanctuary, guess where ALL the illegals, criminals, gang members fleeing ICE will go???? straight to your welcoming city. So ironically the people fighting for sanctuary city status, may have an unprecedented crime wave to deal with along with the additional expense.
*
$17 Billion dollars a year is spent for education for the American-born children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies.
*
$12 Billion dollars a year is spent on primary and secondary school education for children here illegally and they cannot speak a word of English.
*
$22 billion is spent on (AFDC) welfare to illegal aliens each year.
*
$2.2 Billion dollars a year is spent on food assistance programs such as (SNAP) food stamps, WIC, and free school lunches for illegal aliens.
*
$3 Million Dollars a DAY is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens.
30% percent of all Federal Prison inmates are illegal aliens. Does not include local jails and State Prisons.
*
2012 illegal aliens sent home $62 BILLION in remittances back to their countries of origin. This is why Mexico is getting involved in our politics.
*
$200 Billion Dollars a year in suppressed American wages are caused by the illegal aliens.
*
Nearly One Million Sex Crimes Committed by Illegal Immigrants In The United States.

POPULATION EXPLOSION FOR GRINGO WELFARE

THE HORDES OF ILLEGALS KEEP COMING…. Despite America’s jobs, housing and Mexican crime tidal wave.


Pelosi: GOP Tax Bill 'Designed to Plunder Middle Class'




By Susan Jones | November 2, 2017 | 11:32 AM EDT


House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) (Photo: Screen grab/C-SPAN)
(CNSNews.com) - Even before House  Republicans announced details of their tax reform plan on Thursday, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi came out to condemn it.

"Good morning, everyone," she told a news conference. "It's a morning in which we are waiting in anticipation to see what further harm the Republicans will do with their deficit-increasing, job-killing, tax-cutting-for-the-rich bill that they're going to present today.


"But what we do know is what they have voted on already -- the budget which is the framework for where we go from here."

Pelosi said Republicans are unveiling a tax bill "designed to plunder the middle class" in order to put more money into the pockets of the wealthiest one percent.

"While Repubicans ambush the American people with this half-baked tax bill, written in the dark, to be raced through Congress before it is understood, we already know some of what to be the truth," she said.

"It raises taxes on the middles class -- millions of middle-class families across the country; borrows trillions from the future -- from our childdren and grandchidren's future to give tax cuts to the wealthiest; encourages corporations to ship jobs overseas; and the budget ransacks Medicare -- half-a-trillion cut from Medicare and Medicaid."

Pelosi insisted that Democrats want real bipartisan tax reform: "We stand ready to join Republicans at the table to produce growth, to create good-paying jobs that reduce the deficit -- that help keep America number one."

Pelosi said Republicans are perpetuating "a catastrophic transfer of wealth from the middle class to corporations and the wealthy."

She also said the Republican tax bill will be punitive to certain states, including her home state of California, because it removes the deduction for state and local income taxes. Those taxes are very high in states such as California and New York.
As CNSNews.com reported,  the state and local tax deduction, according to the latest Internal Revenue Service data, was taken by 42,502,130 tax filers—or 95 percent of the 44,671,840 tax filers who itemized their deductions in tax year 2015.

A number of Democrats appeared with Pelosi, each one of them blasting the Republican budget and tax reform plan, particularly the plan to eliminate the state and local tax deduction.


TRUMPERNOMICS: THE SUPER RICH 

APPLAUD TWITTER’S TAX PLAN!

"The tax overhaul would mean an unprecedented windfall for the super-rich, on top of the fact that virtually all income gains during the period of the supposed recovery from the financial crash of 2008 have gone to the top 1 percent income bracket."

Republicans unveil multitrillion-dollar tax cut for corporations and the rich

By Barry Grey
3 November 2017
The Republican leadership of the House of Representatives released a tax bill Thursday that will give corporations and the rich in America trillions of dollars in tax cuts and starve the federal government of revenues, setting the stage for a frontal attack on core social programs such as Social Security and Medicare.
The Trump White House and congressional Republicans plan to rush the 429-page measure through Congress and have it signed into law by Christmas, using expedited procedures to evade a filibuster in the Senate and dispense with public hearings.
The bill amounts to a Wall Street wish list. Its 
centerpiece is an immediate cut in the 
corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 20 
percent, which will save US corporations $2 
trillion over the next ten years.
It also effectively reduces the tax rate on 
corporate income generated by overseas 
operations from 35 percent to 10 percent, 
allowing giant companies such as Apple and 
Amazon to repatriate the hundreds of billions
of dollars they have stashed away overseas to 
avoid US taxes, by charging a one-time rate 
of 12 percent.
It maintains the top personal income tax rate of 39.6 percent (down from 70 percent in 1980), but applies it to households making more than $1 million a year, up from the current threshold of $500,000. It doubles the exemption for estate taxes to $11 million and eliminates the tax entirely in six years, providing a huge windfall for the wealthiest 0.2 percent of the population. By guaranteeing the ability of the financial aristocracy to pass on its wealth in full to succeeding generations, it effectively establishes a dynastic caste at the very top of society that recalls the feudal nobility of the Middle Ages.
The bill eliminates the Alternative Minimum Tax, which almost exclusively impacts the wealthy, and reduces to 25 percent the tax on so-called “pass through” income reported by business owners.
The proposal roughly doubles the standard tax deduction for middle-income families. However, to keep the loss of federal revenue from handouts to corporations and the wealthy to $1.5 trillion over ten years, as required by the budget resolution passed last month, the measure repeals or reduces current tax deductions that chiefly benefit workers and middle-class people. These include deductions for mortgage interest payments, state and local taxes, student loans, medical expenses, moving costs, adoptions and tax credits for retired and disabled people.
As a result, millions of Americans will be 
forced to pay higher taxes to subsidize the 
theft of trillions of dollars by the financial 
oligarchy that controls both political parties 
and rules the country.
The tax bill represents an intensification of the social counterrevolution of the past four decades that has devastated the living standards of millions of workers while increasing social inequality and the wealth of the financial elite to unprecedented levels. It initiates a new stage in the plundering of society by the corporate oligarchy.
The nonpartisan Tax Policy Center analyzed the framework for the current bill released by the Republicans in September, which reduced the top personal income tax rate from 39.6 to 35 percent. It concluded that by 2027, low- and moderate-income families with children would receive little or no tax cuts, and many would see tax increases. It said 80 percent of benefits would go to the top 1 percent of households, while the bottom 80 percent of the population would get less than 13 percent of the tax cuts and their after-tax incomes would rise by less than half of one percent.
The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, using Tax Policy Center data, concluded that even if the top tax rate remains at 39.6 percent, the top 1 percent, who make more than $733,000 a year, would see average tax cuts of $90,000 in 2018 and receive 45 percent of the total net tax cut.
The top one-tenth of 1 percent of households, those with incomes above $3.4 million, would receive average tax cuts of $507,000 in 2018, a boost in their after-tax income of 7.2 percent. Those making less than $75,000 would see their after-tax income increase by only 0.9 percent.
Wall Street celebrated the bill with an 81-point surge in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, bringing the blue chip index to a new record high. The Dow has climbed by 25 percent since Trump’s election, building on the boom of the Obama years, when, on the basis of massive bank bailouts and wage cuts for auto and other workers, it more than tripled from its March 2009 low, in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crash.
Trump and the Republicans are trying to con the public with absurd and shameless lies, calling the bill a “tax cut for the middle class” that will “create jobs and raise wages.” At a White House photo op with House Speaker Paul Ryan, Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady and other House Republicans, the billionaire speculator-turned-president hailed the bill as the biggest tax cut in US history. He and his congressional counterparts laughed and grinned, almost salivating over the prospect of pumping trillions more into the coffers of the rich and driving up their own stock portfolios in the process.
The tax package that eventually passes, whatever minor amendments are incorporated into the bill unveiled Thursday, will not create jobs or raise wages. It will no more benefit the working class than the tax cuts passed under Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush, with the support of the Democrats, or Obama’s multitrillion-dollar bank bailout. The additional money will go to more and bigger mansions, more private jets and private islands, more exclusive gated communities and similar obscene excesses, with a portion reserved for increasing the bribes to politicians of both parties.
As always, the Republicans are establishing the right-wing framework for new attacks on the working class and the Democrats are mounting a cynical show of opposition, while ensuring that the Republican proposals are enacted virtually intact. The biggest problems Trump faces in pushing the bill through come from dissident House Republicans from states such as New York and California that will be hardest hit by the removal of middle-class tax deductions, and from a group of fiscal hawks who object to the explosive growth of budget deficits and debt that will result from the measure.
Democratic House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and her Senate counterpart Charles Schumer held a joint press conference at which they denounced the bill as a handout to the rich. But the real position of the Democratic Party was spelled out by House Whip Steny Hoyer, who was interviewed on the CNBC business channel.
Asked if he and the Democrats supported a cut in corporate taxes, Hoyer said, “I agree on both lowering the corporate tax rate and finding a way to repatriate corporate dollars.” He noted that Obama had called for a corporate tax cut in a State of the Union address. The problem, he said, was that “the Republicans won’t agree to do this in a bipartisan manner.”
A number of Democrats from states that voted for Trump, including Senator Sherrod Brown of Ohio, a trade war “populist” close to the trade union bureaucracy, have met with Trump or publicly offered to discuss a common tax-cut plan. Others include Senator Joe Donnelly of Indiana, Jon Tester of Montana and Joe Manchin of West Virginia.




THOMAS LIFSON - THE RISE OF HATE WHITEY IN AMERICA

The rise of overt, unapologetic anti-white racism



Two recent incidents demonstrate that racial hatred toward whites is gaining acceptance, even approval from people in positions of institutional authority.
Yesterday, the Daily Wire reported:
Employees within the Democratic National Committee are looking for new employees in the Technology Department. However, the DNC is apparently not interested in your resume if you happen to be a white male.
In an email issued to DNC insiders on Monday, Data Services manager Madeleine Leader announced that the Technology Department is looking to fill several positions and asked interested parties to forward the openings to their colleagues.
She included the following caveat:
I personally would prefer that you not forward to cisgender straight white males, since they're already in the majority.
Her honesty may cost her dearly. Instead of quietly deep-sixing résumés from white males unless they are pretending to be women, as no doubt would have happened, she had to make the illegal policy a public matter.  The DNC still hopes to capture some votes from white males, so it has been forced to react, as Olivia Beavers reports in The Hill:
The DNC denied that the email was "authorized" in any way by the organization.
"The email in question was not authorized by the DNC nor was it authorized by senior leadership," DNC spokesman Michael Tyler said in a statement to The Hill.
"All hiring decisions at the DNC are made consistent with the DNC's commitment to equal employment opportunity and hiring an inclusive and talented staff that reflects the coalition of the Democratic Party, because our diversity is our greatest strength."
The fact that Ms. Leader felt comfortable voicing bias against white males tells us that this is an everyday, common sentiment in her political circle.
A similar mindset is evident in this shocking incident in Canada, as reported by Hank Berrien of the Daily Wire:
As she has done before, last month, Lido Pimienta, a Colombian-Canadian singer, asked audience members of color to move to the front and white members to move to the back. Unlike other times she has made that request, some white members refused to act in accordance with her request, including a white female volunteer who was reportedly there to photograph the show.
The photographer and an unknown number of other Caucasians refused to be discriminated against, just as Rosa Parks refused to yield her seat at the front of the bus in Montgomery, Alabama, when blacks were relegated to the back.  For that defiance in challenging racial segregation, Ms. Parks became an immortal hero.
Not so for the whites who stood on the same principle in Halifax.
The festival's organizers called the photographer's response "aggressive and racist," even as it admitted that "details have not been disclosed."  The festival organizers backed the segregationist move by the singer and apologized to her, as Billboard reported:
"We will not accept this behavior and neither should you," the statement reads in part. "Be responsible for your friends – talk to them and support them as they move towards unpacking their racism. People of Color deserve safe spaces and it is your responsibility to help. It is also ours."
Lido Pimienta, for her part, offered an excuse that would have been equally applicable to Rosa Parks.
"I never asked white folks to leave my show, I would never do that," Pimienta said in an email Q&A with Billboard about the incident. "I never ask men to leave my show, I ask them to share the space in a more significant manner as an act of love and solidarity with people who, outside of the music show bubble, have to constantly justify their existence to the world."
Rosa Parks was not asked to leave the bus – just to move to the back.

Lido Pimienta at a performance in Toronto (Canadian Press).
Here is the groveling statement that the Halifax festival posted to Facebook:
Dear attendees, fans, artists, staff, volunteers, and folks otherwise involved in the Halifax Pop Explosion. On Thursday, October 19 at the Marquee Club, a white HPX volunteer along with several other white people in the audience reacted to Lido Pimienta inviting "brown girls to the front" of the venue with overt racism. This volunteer was removed by Lido herself. They have since received notification from the festival that they are no longer welcome to volunteer with us.
We will not accept this behaviour and neither should you. Be responsible for your friends – talk to them and support them as they move towards unpacking their racism. People of Colour deserve safe spaces and it is your responsibility to help. It is also ours.
The Halifax Pop Explosion has worked hard in the past year to learn what embracing anti-racism and actively being inclusive of People of Colour and 2SLGBTQ+ folks entails. We take responsibility for missed opportunities to actively support POC artists this year and promise to build meaningful infrastructures within our festival through which to better support these communities in the future.
Halifax Pop Explosion is committing to providing our team with anti-oppression and anti-racism training. Additionally, we will be working with local organizations over the next year to create a list of local resources for our community. We also want to make this list available to those who create unsafe and uncomfortable space at our shows and venues by demonstrating racism, homophobia, transphobia, misogyny, and other discriminatory behaviours, so they too can begin unpacking their discriminatory behaviour. As a festival, we will also spend the next several months addressing ways we can make our festival spaces safer for women, POC, and 2SLGBTQ+ folks.
To Lido Pimienta: we are sorry that one of our volunteers interrupted your art, your show, and your audience by being aggressive and racist. We have so much respect for the art and music you create and the space you make for women, people of colour, transgender, and non-binary people. The way you interact with the world acts and provides a thoughtful example. You are a role model to us and many people in our community. We see it. We feel it. We hope you will work with us again.
To the POC in the audience on Thursday night: we are sorry your night was interrupted, and perhaps ruined, by one of our volunteers. We are going to try our best as a festival to create ways to make our spaces safer and more accessible for you. We hope we can rebuild some trust and that you will come back to our shows.
Thanks everyone for reading. We are fielding many discussions already. If you would like to make your voice heard in these discussions, please don't hesitate to contact the organization directly by emailing talkback@halifaxpopexplosion.com. We are listening.
- Georgie Dudka, on behalf of the Board of Directors for Halifax Pop Explosion
This will not end well.

ZOGBY

“In Mexico, a recent Zogby poll declared that the vast majority of Mexican citizens hate Americans. [22.2] Mexico is a country  saturated with racism, yet in denial, having never endured the social development of a Civil Rights movement like in the US--Blacks are harshly treated while foreign Whites are often seen as the enemy. [22.3] In fact, racism as workplace discrimination can be seen across the US anywhere the illegal alien Latino works--the vast majority of the workforce is usually strictly Latino, excluding Blacks, Whites, Asians, and others.”


PEW POLL: MEXICANS LOATH AMERICANS, BUT AIM TO JUMP THE BORDER ANYWAY…. THE LOOTING IS STILL GOOD!

BRIAN C JOONDEPH - FOREIGNERS, ILLEGALS AND THEIR CRIME TIDAL WAVE..... You thought they jumped our borders to become good American citizens?

Mark Levin: ‘There Is a Big, Ugly Side to Illegal Immigration’



  

Thursday on Levin TVnationally syndicated radio show host Mark Levin warned about the dangers of illegal immigration saying, “There is a big, ugly side of illegal immigration,” Levin said. “There’s all kinds of crimes being committed by people who aren’t supposed to be here.”



Illegal immigration has temporarily taken a back seat to the latest social justice and #NeverTrump campaigns of NFL kneelers and rodeo clown congresswomen listening in on the president’s calls to the families of fallen soldiers. Lots can sti...

A Simple Way for Trump to Slow the Tide of Illegal Immigrants


Illegal immigration has temporarily taken a back seat to the latest social justice and #NeverTrump campaigns of NFL kneelers and rodeo clown congresswomen listening in on the president’s calls to the families of fallen soldiers.
Lots can still happen in the back seat, as many teenagers know. Border wall prototypes are being developed and illegal immigration is down, just because of the new sheriff in Washington, D.C.
Consequences of illegal immigration have not abated, however, as evidenced by a recent story from Boston. “Sreynuon Lunn, under arrest for the beating of an elderly woman in a wheelchair while robbing her of $2,000 cash.”
This career criminal from Cambodia was left alone because, “Law enforcement had no right to arrest or detain Lunn or anyone else at the request of Federal immigration authorities, pursuant to a civil immigration order.” So there. A win for social justice. A big loss for the elderly woman.
Also in Boston, an African immigrant with a resume of two violent bank robberies received, “a nine-month wrist slap so that he wouldn’t be deported.” Nine months behind bars to plan his next bank robbery and bad luck for future victims of his violence.
Then there was this week’s truck-driving terrorist in 

Manhattan, entering the U.S. under a “diversity VISA 

program.”  Attention diverted from the Mueller indictment 

circus to real life consequences of U.S. immigration policy. The 

only diversity is in the methods of killing Americans. From 

airplanes and guns to vehicles.
No sooner did President Trump, under his presidential authority, issue an executive order limiting travel from “countries of concern,” as the Obama administration described them, a liberal judge issued a temporary stay, negating the President’s constitutional prerogative. Aside from the separation of powers bit, which to the left is a one-way street only applicable when benefiting their agenda, there are the real-life consequences of a feckless and irresponsible immigration policy.
One could ask Kate Steinle, if she was still alive, 

what happens when a multiple-times deported 

felon continues to return to the U.S. after each 

deportation, only to be protected in one of 

300 sanctuary cities in the U.S.
Kate didn’t survive in the world of liberal judges and Democrat legislators, safe from the folly of their judicial fiats and legislation. Short of Attorney General Jeff Sessions and his Department of Justice enforcing the law, seriously and with teeth, another approach might be simpler and more effective. One requiring only a memo from the president to the Department of Homeland Security and a few other relevant agencies.
Simply settle refugees and illegal immigrants in sanctuary cities. More specifically into the progressive, virtue-signaling neighborhoods that liberal judges and politicians call home.
The U.S. District Court judge blocking Trump’s first travel ban earlier this year is from Seattle. How about settling a few busloads of refugees in Bellevue, Mercer Island or whatever neighborhood the judge lives in? I’m sure he would be perfectly comfortable with Syrian or Somalian “youth” or unvetted migrants from Central America roaming the same streets where his wife goes for her morning walk, or his kids or grandkids walk to school.

The Ninth Circuit Court in San Francisco is also known for replacing the Constitution with social justice, creating their own laws based on what feels fair and virtuous at the moment. San Francisco is already a sanctuary city, but why not double down?
Dreamers crossing our southern border should be placed on a bus and dropped off in Berkeley, Nob Hill or Silicon Valley. Residents of these safe enclaves can graduate from virtue-signaling to walking the walk, welcoming the masses into their neighborhoods. Roaming the parks where their kids play, frequenting the malls where their families shop.
Let’s not forget the college towns. Boulder, Ithaca, Ann Arbor, Cambridge or Durham. Include Manhattan, Brooklyn, Hyde Park and Georgetown, neighborhoods where most residents believe Trump is a white supremacist, racist pig for proposing sensible limits on immigration.
This is the NIMBY approach, not in my backyard. If you want liberal policies then live with their consequences. First hand, not from a well-policed enclave with a high wall or fence around your home. Live it in your own backyard. Not Kate Steinle’s backyard. Or that of the elderly lady in Boston.
Liberals never want to live under the rules they want the hoi polloi to experience. Remember the wind farm in Nantucket Sound that was blocked by Ted Kennedy as it cluttered the view from his Hyannis Port compound? Mess up the view in somebody else’s backyard but not in the Kennedy’s.
Senator Rand Paul proposed something similar, a constitutional amendment no less. The premise was simple. “Congress shall make no law applicable to a citizen of the United States that is not equally applicable to Congress.” Call it the “what’s good for the goose is good for the gander” amendment. Apply it to judges as well through executive branch directives.
Would things change? You bet. Judges, perched upon their moral high horses, are quick to decree that the country see the world as they do, especially when it comes to social justice issues. Judges have legislated abortion and same-sex marriage without the constitutional authority to do so based on the Tenth Amendment. There is little consequence to most of us with these decisions.
On immigration, however, their decisions have life or death consequences to many, including Kate Steinle. If an illegal immigrant or unvetted refugee raped or murdered a family member of a judge, representative or senator, you can bet the moralizing would be replaced by outrage and reconsideration of dangerous policies and judicial rulings.
Why should the elite be immune from the effects of their actions? Simply settle refugees and illegal immigrants into liberal neighborhoods and watch how quickly the virtue signalers develop a new attitude and demand existing immigration law be vigorously enforced.

Brian C. Joondeph, MD, MPS, a Denver based physician and writer. Follow him on Facebook,  LinkedIn and Twitter.

HOW “CHEAP” IS ALL THAT INVADING “CHEAP” LABOR?
Natalio Vitervo-Vasquez was deported twice but returned to provide “cheap” labor. He can’t read or write and raped his 10-year-old daughter.

“Prosecutors say the girl, who was 11-years-old at the time, went to a medical center where it was determined she was pregnant. Officials say she would have conceived the child at ten years of age.”

AMERICA vs MEXICO: CLASHING CULTURES
By Frosty Wooldridge


Mexicans cheat, distribute drugs, lie, forge documents, steal and kill as if it’s a normal way of life. For them, it is. Mexico’s civilization stands diametrically opposed to America’s culture.

The legal age of sexual consent in Mexico is 12 years old. Sex with children at this age and younger is socially acceptable in Mexico. For example: A Mexican Lopez-Mendez pleaded guilty to sexual assault on a 10 year old girl in West Virginia.

Adios, California          
A fifth-generation Californian laments his state’s ongoing economic collapse.
By Steve Baldwin
American Spectator, October 19, 2017
What’s clear is that the producers are leaving the state and the takers are coming in. Many of the takers are illegal aliens, now estimated to number over 2.6 million. 
The Federation for American Immigration Reform estimates that California spends $22 billion on government services for illegal aliens, including welfare, education, Medicaid, and criminal justice system costs. Liberals claim they more than make that up with taxes paid, but that’s simply not true. It’s not even close. FAIR estimates illegal aliens in California contribute only $1.21 billion in tax revenue, which means they cost California $20.6 billion, or at least $1,800 per household.

Nonetheless, open border advocates, such as Facebook Chairman Mark Zuckerberg, claim illegal aliens are a net benefit to California with little evidence to support such an assertion. As the Center for Immigration Studies has documented, the vast majority of illegals are poor, uneducated, and with few skills. How does accepting millions of illegal aliens and then granting them access to dozens of welfare programs benefit California’s economy? If illegal aliens were contributing to the economy in any meaningful way, California, with its 2.6 million illegal aliens, would be booming.

Furthermore, the complexion of illegal aliens has changed with far more on welfare and committing crimes than those who entered the country in the 1980s. 
Heather Mac Donald of the Manhattan Institute has testified before a Congressional committee that in 2004, 95% of all outstanding warrants for murder in Los Angeles were for illegal aliens; in 2000, 23% of all Los Angeles County jail inmates were illegal aliens and that in 1995, 60% of Los Angeles’s largest street gang, the 18th Street gang, were illegal aliens. Granted, those statistics are old, but if you talk to any California law enforcement officer, they will tell you it’s much worse today. The problem is that the Brown administration will not release any statewide data on illegal alien crimes. That would be insensitive. And now that California has declared itself a “sanctuary state,” there is little doubt this sends a message south of the border that will further escalate illegal immigration into the state.

Indeed, California goes out of its way to attract illegal aliens. The state has even created government programs that cater exclusively to illegal aliens. For example, the State Department of Motor Vehicles has offices that only process driver licenses for illegal aliens. With over a million illegal aliens now driving in California, the state felt compelled to help them avoid the long lines the rest of us must endure at the DMV. 
And just recently, the state-funded University of California system announced it will spend $27 million on financial aid for illegal aliens. They’ve even taken out radio spots on stations all along the border, just to make sure other potential illegal border crossers hear about this program. I can’t afford college education for all my four sons, but my taxes will pay for illegals to get a college education.


JUDICIAL WATCH

Illegal Immigration Costs U.S. Taxpayers a Stunning $134.9 Billion a Year


http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2017/09/illegal-immigration-costs-u-s-taxpayers-stunning-134-9-billion-year/




CATASTROPHIC CRIME SURGE IN MEX-

OCCUPIED CALIFORNIA


Half the murders in Mexifornia are now by Mex gangs!

OPEN BORDERS:

IT'S ALL ABOUT KEEPING WAGES DEPRESSED AND PASSING ALONG

THE ILLEGALS' WELFARE AND CRIME COSTS TO THE AMERICAN

MIDDLE CLASS!



“That Washington-imposed policy of mass-immigration floods the market with foreign laborspikes profits and Wall Street values by cutting salaries for manual and skilled labor offered by blue-collar and white-collar employees. It also drives up real estate priceswidens wealth-gaps, reduces high-tech investment, increases state and local tax burdens, hurts kids’ schools and college education, pushes Americans away from high-tech careers, and sidelines at least 5 million marginalized Americans and their families, including many who are now struggling with opioid addictions.” ---- NEIL MUNRO


THE MEXICAN INVASION of AMERICA’S OPEN and UNDEFENDED BORDERS

One in every eleven persons born in Mexico has gone to the U.S. The National Review reported that in 2014 $1.87 billion was spent on incarcerating illegal immigrant criminals….Now add hundreds of billions for welfare and remittances!  MICHAEL BARGO, Jr…… for the AMERICAN THINKER.COM