Tuesday, February 26, 2013

AMNESTY: Obama Again Releasing Jailed LA RAZA - LA RAZA SUPREMACY


Only Mexico has more contempt for our laws and borders than Barack Obama!

THE RELEASING OF LA RAZA CRIMINALS IS A HABITUAL PATTERN FOR OBAMA… HE DOES IT WHEN NO ONE IS LOOKING!

 Newsmax

Obama Releases Jailed Immigrants Ahead of Budget Cuts

Monday, February 25, 2013 10:00 PM

By: E. J. TAMARA

The Associated Press has learned that federal immigration authorities have released a number of detainees around the country to save money.

Gillian Christensen, spokeswoman for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Washington D.C., said Monday that field offices have been directed to review their numbers of detained immigrants to ensure the jail populations stay within budgeted resources.

Christensen says an unspecified number of immigrants have been released and placed on more cost effective forms of supervision.


She says she did not have further details about those forms of supervision or how many people have been released.

Christensen says the agency will continue to pursue the cases in court and deport people when necessary.

Immigration activists say the agency most likely released detainees in California, Texas, Florida, and New Jersey.

*


MEXICAN HORDES JUMPING OUR BORDERS, JOBS AND VOTING BOOTHS FOR OBAMA’S LA RAZA SUPREMACY AMNESTY!

BARACK OBAMA HAS SQUANDERED BILLIONS PROTECTING THE BORDERS OF MUSLIM DICTATORS WHILE OUR BORDERS WITH NARCOMEX ARE LEFT OPEN AND UNDEFENDED… THE MEX DRUG CARTELS NOW OPERATE OUT OF 2,500 AMERICAN CITIES.

*

FACTUALLY, ONLY A SMALL PERCENTAGE OF ILLEGALS THAT HOP OUR BORDERS AND JOBS ARE EVER CAUGHT. THAT’S HOW THE LA RAZA DEMS HAVE IT RIGGED. CATCH AND RELEASE! THEN THEY CAN TELL AMERICANS (LEGALS) THEY’RE PROTECTING OUR BORDERS, WHILE STILL BUILDING THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA VOTER BLOCK.

*

The lunatics advocating this plan are counting on Americans to be so stupid and so gullible that they can say, "Look, the illegals left and walked back in legally. Problem solved!" They are eager to pretend to accommodate the American desires for the illegals to leave while quickly returning their slave labor force to our nation. WILLIAM GHEEN, ALIPAC
*

Border numbers rise ahead of talks on immigration

Security a hurdle for Obama


-

The Washington Times

Tuesday, January 29, 2013

 

Bottom of Form

Seeking to boost the bipartisan momentum in Congress for tackling immigration reform, President Obama said Tuesday that he now sees "a genuine desire to get this done soon" — but warned that the debate will get more heated in the weeks ahead.

Mr. Obama traveled to Las Vegas to deliver a major speech on immigration just a day after a bipartisan group of eight senators announced a framework for a bill calling for most illegal immigrants to obtain legal status "on Day One," with green cards and a full path to citizenship to follow once more action has been taken to secure the border.

"The good news is that — for the first time in many years — Republicans and Democrats seem ready to tackle this problem together," Mr. Obama said, blessing the broad outlines of the senators' deal and saying the borders are secure enough to begin granting illegal immigrants citizenship.

But the latest numbers suggest that illegal crossings from the Mexican border once again may be on the rise after falling for six years. The U.S. Border Patrol made 356,873 arrests on the border in fiscal year 2012, up 9 percent from 2011.

The Border Patrol figures that apprehensions are a good proxy for illegal crossings, so when the numbers go up, it means that the flow of illegal immigrants is rising as well.

That could complicate Mr. Obama's effort, particularly in the House, where Republicans have vowed to take a close look at the border situation.

Debate begins in earnest next week, when the House Judiciary Committee holds the first immigration hearing of the 113th Congress, followed a week later by the first Senate hearing.

Rep. Bob Goodlatte, chairman of the House panel, said lawmakers will "should cautiously study" the president's proposal.

"When we look at proposals that deal with the legal status of 11 million illegal immigrants currently living in the U.S., the American people and members of Congress have a lot of questions about how this would work, what it would cost and how it will prevent illegal immigration in the future," the Virginia Republican said.

But Sen. Patrick J. Leahy, Vermont Democrat and chairman of the Senate panel, called Mr. Obama's speech "courageous" and said he would convene his hearing the day after the president's State of the Union address.

Mr. Obama urged Congress not to let fights over details derail a bill, as has happened repeatedly.

He rejected House Republicans' idea of breaking up immigration into separate bills, saying the legislation must tackle all parts together — including a path to citizenship for the estimated 11 million illegal immigrants in the United States.

"For comprehensive immigration reform to work, it must be clear from the outset that there is a pathway to citizenship," the president said.

Ahead of his speech, Sen. Marco Rubio, Florida Republican and one of eight senators who worked on the bipartisan Senate deal, cautioned Mr. Obama against trying to outbid them.

"Let me just say this. If this endeavor becomes a bidding war to see who can come up with the easiest, quickest and cheapest pathway to a green card possible, this thing is not going to go well, folks," Mr. Rubio said on the Senate floor. "We have now a very common-sense and reasonable set of principles, and I hope that the president will say today that he hopes that process succeeds. But if his intentions are to trigger a bidding war to see who can come up with the easiest process, this is not a good start."

Mr. Obama did not try to outbid the deal and, in fact, said the deal was "very much in line" with what he supports.

His own principles, which the White House released in a fact sheet, are more detailed than the five-page framework that the senators released Monday. The brevity of the plans underscores the many hurdles that remain as both sides try to write legislation that is likely to run hundreds of pages long.

One of those hurdles emerged Tuesday: how to handle gay couples in the immigration system.

Sen. John McCain of Arizona, who led Republicans in negotiations on the framework, said their plan was silent on that issue but that extending full immigration marriage benefits to same-sex couples would be "a red flag" for him.

Mr. Obama supports extending immigration benefits to same-sex couples, spokesman Jay Carney said.

"The president has long believed that Americans with same-sex partners from other countries should not be faced with the painful choice between staying with the person they love or staying in the country they love," Mr. Carney told reporters traveling on Air Force One to Las Vegas.

That drew praise from Rep. Michael M. Honda, California Democrat, who has fought for years to extend immigration benefits to gay couples.

Mr. Obama, who late last year said he would write his own immigration bill, backed off that vow Tuesday, saying he would give Congress a chance to work out a deal.

"But it's important for us to recognize that the foundation for bipartisan action is already in place. And if Congress is unable to move forward in a timely fashion, I will send up a bill based on my proposal and insist that they vote on it right away," he said.

Sen. Charles E. Schumer, the Democrat who is leading the bipartisan group of eight senators along with Mr. McCain, said Mr. Obama handled his speech perfectly.

"He is using the bully pulpit to focus the nation's attention on the urgency of immigration reform and set goals for action on this issue. But he is also giving lawmakers on both sides the space to form a bipartisan coalition," Mr. Schumer said.

In his remarks, Mr. Obama said more action needs to be taken on border security but touted the progress made by his administration and that of his predecessor, George W. Bush.

"We put more boots on the ground on the southern border than at any time in our history. And today, illegal crossings are down nearly 80 percent from their peak in 2000," he said.


*


 

DURING OBAMA’S FIRST TERM, TWO-THIRDS OF ALL JOBS WENT TO IMMIGRANTS, BOTH LEGAL AND ILLEGAL.

TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED FOR HIS WALL STREET BOSSES, OBAMA SABOTAGES E-VERIFY!

OBAMA’S SEC. of (illegal) LABOR IS LA RAZA SUPREMACIST HILDA SOLIS.

WORKFORCE ENFORCEMENT OF LAWS PROHIBITING THE EMPLOYMENT OF ILLEGALS IS DOWN 70% UNDER OBAMA.

AMERICA – WHERE NO LEGAL NEED APPLY!

BARACK OBAMA HAS SQUANDERED BILLIONS AND THOUSANDS OF AMERICAN LIVES PROTECTING THE MUSLIM DICTATORS OVER THERE WHILE PUSHING OUR BORDERS OPEN WIDER WITH NARCOMEX (SEE WIKILEAKS EXPOSES OBAMA’S OPEN BORDERS AGENDA WITH MEXICO AT MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com)

At a time when terrorist plots against the United States remain a serious concern, 400,000 illegal crossings are 400,000 too many.

The nation cannot afford another "wink-wink" deal that is a transparent sellout of border security.

OBAMA, IN THE FACES OF HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE, HAS REFERRED TO AMERICANS THAT OBJECT TO LA RAZA SUPREMACY AS “OUR (MEXICANS) ENEMIES” (SEE ALIPAC).

OBAMA HAS PROMISED LA RAZA AMNESTY, or at least continued non-enforcement.

Does anyone believe attempted fraud in the application process will be prosecuted?

No serious observer expects any honest effort by DHS to adhere to the announced terms of the program. How will the next amnesty be different? If the goal is to evade the enforcement of current law for "humanitarian reasons," you cannot climb back up that slippery slope.

 

TANCREDO: Border control is primary problem

Immigration reform can’t ignore security

By Tom Tancredo

Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Bottom of Form

Enforcement is still the primary issue in the immigration reform debate, as it should be.

In the debates over the 2006 and 2007 amnesty proposals, there was one question amnesty proponents in Congress had a hard time answering: Why should we trust the administration to enforce a border-security agreement if no one has bothered to enforce the terms of the 1986 amnesty agreement? Does anyone think this should be less of an issue under the even more brazen anti-enforcement policies of the Obama administration?

The provisions of any "grand bargain" compromise on immigration reform are no more important than a credible plan for full and competent enforcement. The nation cannot afford another "wink-wink" deal that is a transparent sellout of border security.

Of course, there are those on both sides of the issue who think a debate on enforcement provisions is pointless. Those who distrust all enforcement promises can join hands with those who will promise anything, knowing enforcement will be abandoned once the ink is dry on the legislation. Why bother to haggle if the outcome will be meaningless three years down the road?

Let's take the example of the Dream Act provisions being implemented by the Obama administration by executive decree. Does anyone believe any applicant will be refused the benefits of the program as described in the original Department of Homeland Security (DHS) memo allowing wholesale "prosecutorial discretion"? Does anyone believe attempted fraud in the application process will be prosecuted? Already, in the first year of the program, the U.S. Border Patrol has been releasing young people apprehended on the border solely on the basis that they might qualify for amnesty.

No serious observer expects any honest effort by DHS to adhere to the announced terms of the program. How will the next amnesty be different? If the goal is to evade the enforcement of current law for "humanitarian reasons," you cannot climb back up that slippery slope.

In this atmosphere of bipartisan delusions and policy by wishful thinking about immigration law, questions about enforcement become not a minor detail but the central issue in any immigration reform "deal." In any context or on any issue, a genuine deal rests on good faith and confidence that the terms of the deal will be implemented. This necessary level of confidence is lacking in the immigration debate.

The way to overcome this mistrust and move forward to an honest and productive debate on reform of immigration law is first to demonstrate that we have achieved border security -- a goal supported by more than 80 percent of Americans. Adopting a new amnesty program for any group of illegal immigrants without first demonstrating genuine border security is an open, cynical invitation for the continuation of unacceptable levels of illegal border crossings.

The Obama administration's claim that the southwestern border "is as secure now as it has ever been" is not a statement that meets the demand for genuine border security. The southwestern border has never been secure, and it is not secure today. Most Americans will say that even if border apprehensions have declined to half the levels of 2000-05, that is small comfort. At a time when terrorist plots against the United States remain a serious concern, 400,000 illegal crossings are 400,000 too many.

Can this nation find some legal accommodation for young people brought here by their parents as small children? Probably, if it involves only legal work status and not an easy path to citizenship. The opposition to this idea comes not from callousness toward this problem but from two legitimate and compelling concerns: a well-founded distrust of administrative laxity and dishonesty in the enforcement of carefully crafted provisions, and an equally well-founded concern about the predictable consequences of granting such accommodations in the absence of true border security.

The current Republican panic over the level of Latino support for President Obama should not be allowed to distort or obscure the underlying issues in the immigration reform debate. It is both bad policy and suicidal politics to design important legislation based on delusions and wishful thinking.

Tom Tancredo, former Republican presidential candidate and congressman from Colorado, is president of the Rocky Mountain Foundation.


*

GET ON ALIPAC’S E-NEWS FOR UPDATES ON THE MEX INVASION!

AFTER ALL, YOU’RE PAYING FOR MEXICO’S LOOTING!

Why the illegals must go!

April 19, 2007
by William Gheen


President, Americans for Legal Immigration PAC (ALIPAC)
www.alipac.us

Today, Americans face an unprecedented illegal immigration crisis facilitated by multi-billion dollar drug and human importing cartels as well as corporations which are inducing the invasion by aiding and abetting illegal aliens and using their influence on the Executive Branch and elections to paralyze existing immigration laws supported by over 80% of the American citizenry.

These events are not random and chaotic. Massive illegal immigration is the result of non-enforcement and under-enforcement of our existing immigration laws.

Supporters of illegal aliens love to claim that our immigration system is broken. The system is not broken. Elite financial and political business interests who could care less about the death and devastation they are causing Americans have sabotaged the system. Their profits continue to rise as they send the rest of America spiraling downward on a path to anarchy and Third World quality-of-life conditions.

By using their influence to suspend our existing laws, these globalist special interests have deprived all Americans of political representation as well as their votes, their voice, and a functioning Republic for which our flag stands.

When the laws of the American people – debated and voted on by their duly-elected Congressional Representatives and signed into law by the President – go intentionally under-enforced by the Executive Branch, all of the principles, sovereignty, and self-governance of Americans are derailed. The will of the American public, the existing laws, the US Constitution, and the borders of our great nation are perceived as market hindrances to the global elite. We the people of America are perceived as peasants and subjects beneath the power of their influence.

The American public has spoken through our lawmakers and in numerous polls. A super majority of Americans want our existing laws enforced, those responsible for illegal immigration fined and/or imprisoned, the borders secured, and illegal aliens deported from the United States for many years or permanently. These fact remain, despite several politicized polls which attempt to manufacture consent and make you believe such views represent a minority.

The truth is that most Americans want the illegal aliens to return to the nations of which they are citizens. The rallying cry is: "Illegals Go Home!"

We could easily list 101 reasons why Americans are upset about illegal immigration. Most are concerned about the 4,000+ preventable deaths of Americans by the criminal acts of illegal aliens on our soil each year. No corporate propaganda will change the fact that most Americans do not want to surrender or capitulate to the lawless masses rushing into our nation.

No poll or politicized source is needed to prove this point because the decision is based upon our nation's successful history and basic common sense. The answer is based on something that every judge, lawmaker, and even street thug knows. The penalties must outweigh the benefits if you want to deter any action.

It is common sense and common practice in America that for any law to be a deterrent, two important factors are in play. First, the laws must be enforced, and second, the penalties for any crime must exceed the benefits to those breaking the law.

It is truly amazing that we find ourselves as a nation having to explain these basic foundations of law to corporations and politicians in the year 2007 despite their existence since the dawn of civilization! Can you imagine what would happen in America if the penalty for robbing a bank was that you had to return half of the money you stole if, and only if, you were apprehended for the crime? What if the penalty for car theft was paying a $2,000 fine if you were caught with the stolen vehicle?

The answers are clear. Within a month, you would not have a bank open in America and you would not be able to keep a car worth more than $2,000 in your driveway for more than a week. How many millions of people would quickly take up the careers of bank robber and car thief once the rewards for the crime were higher than the penalty?

If American businesses and homes left their windows and doors unlocked each night and robbers were merely removed by police when detected – only to try again the next night – what do you think would happen? If big, global businesses practiced the same non-enforcement of security similar to the lack of border security and lack of immigration enforcement they have facilitated for Americans, they would be out of business in a matter of days or weeks. If they left their doors unlocked at night and just pushed people back to the street, America would quickly descend into such chaos and anarchy that we would be unable to sustain a population of 300 million. Our population would take a hit similar to the impact of the Black Plague on Europe, and we would quickly enter a new dark age.

Since illegal aliens can never afford to compensate Americans for what they have taken, they must go. We do not need to go door to door looking for illegals to deport in America. Attrition through enforcement works. Illegal aliens are leaving the states of Georgia and Pennsylvania in droves, not because they are enforcing the laws but because they have simply announced they plan to start!

Unfortunately, the current state of affairs in America has illegals flooding in by the millions each year and many law-abiding Americans fleeing the states of California and Texas and many towns and cities in search of more safety and security. Many Americans are on the run and finding few places left to run to.

The illegal aliens are sending a clear message on the streets of Los Angeles and other major urban centers. They are saying: "This is our land. White, black, and legal Hispanics get out!"

This is great news for the housing and real estate markets, Wal-Mart, and McDonalds. They are growing the economy using rapid population growth. This is great news for big corporations and bad news for Americans.

Attrition through enforcement will work. In fact, if President George Bush were to announce on national television that America would begin securing our borders and enforcing our existing laws in one month, so many illegal aliens would leave America that Mexico would have to set up refuge stations!

Another important reason that the illegal aliens must leave for the long term is that they'll return to their home communities with a message for their neighbors that their ill-gotten gains did not pay off in America. This is the only thing that will stop, or slow, the flow. Deporting illegal aliens and sending them packing is the only real way we can put a stop to this crisis.

The politicians in DC are very aware that Americans want the illegal aliens to go. That is why their latest Scamnesty legislation includes a “touchback” provision. Under these laws, the illegal aliens can hop across the Mexican or Canadian borders where special "Ellis Island" stations are set up for them to pay a fine, receive new documentation and be back in the US within days or hours.

The lunatics advocating this plan are counting on Americans to be so stupid and so gullible that they can say, "Look, the illegals left and walked back in legally. Problem solved!" They are eager to pretend to accommodate the American desires for the illegals to leave while quickly returning their slave labor force to our nation.

They know that Americans want illegals to leave and get behind a long line of legal immigrants waiting to enter the US, including millions of people who have been waiting 5-10 years. These politicians and the illegal aliens need to be shown the way to the back of the line. The back of the line is back in the country in which they are citizens, 5-10 years down the road behind all of the talented and law-abiding people who respect our laws.

If these traitorous corporations and politicians succeed in setting up these Ellis Island stations for “Operation Touchback," the revered symbol of Ellis Island will take on a new meaning that Americans see with contempt and resentment. Ellis Island will become a name associated with the horrendous betrayal of free Americans and the deathblow to the American Republic. This is a symbol of America’s surrender and the subjugation of all her people.

If we allow the politicians in DC to sign off on the many Guest Worker, Temporary Worker, Path to Citizenship, Amnesty, Scamnesty bills written by the US Chamber of Commerce, then no wall with an army on top of it will stop the next 20 million from crashing down on our country. We will have signaled that America is weak and will capitulate and accommodate. Already, the word is out in Central and South America that they can come and stay. Each time President Bush has opened his mouth about such programs, the US Border Patrol reports massive spikes in illegal crossings.

Since there is literally no end to the stream of illegals who want to be in America, this will be the end of America as we have known it and as history has praised it.

In the past, when America has cracked down on illegal immigration and the American people have signaled they want the immigration brakes applied, the policies have worked. New laws written near the turn of the 20th century greatly reduced the amount of immigration into America. When Presidents Franklin Roosevelt and Dwight Eisenhower launched large deportation campaigns in the 1950s and 1930s, illegal immigration slowed to minuscule levels as a result.

Whether you agree or disagree with the decisions of the past, these policies were part of the successful formula that have led America to become the most opulent and successful civilization in human history.

While some argue that these enforcement measures were racist and that some American citizens of different races were improperly deported at the time, we now have the technology and methodology in place to assure that American citizens and legal immigrants are not improperly affected by our immigration enforcement efforts.

The difference in 2007 is that the globalist corporations that have hijacked the American government want to stop the American citizenry from applying the brakes this time. They have taken away our ability to determine who can enter our nation and our ability to stop armed and unarmed invasions as granted by the US Constitution.

To take away the self-governance of Americans is to kill the very thing that has made us such a great and successful nation.

In a time of crisis like this, we must stand firm on the principles that have made America an attractive and great nation. We must stand firm on the rule of law. The law must be applied equally to big corporations and illegal aliens alike lest we all become slaves subject to the plans of masters instead of a free and empowered citizenry.

Illegal aliens and corporations must endure penalties for their illegal, deadly, and destructive actions that exceed the benefits they gain from their illegal activities.

The hour is late and it is time for Americans to stand up and say with one voice...

No Amnesty! No Guest Worker! Secure our borders and enforce the existing laws! Restore the American Republic!

The illegals must go.

Illegals go home!

*

WIKILEAKS EXPOSES OBAMA'S AGENDA OF LA RAZA SUPREMACY AND AN ILLEGAL IN EVERY AMERICAN JOB TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED. THE LEGALS GET THE TAX BILLS FOR THE MEX WELFARE AND CRIME TIDAL WAVE.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2012/05/illegals-obama-promises-his-la-raza.html

*

WIKILEAKS EXPOSES OBAMA’S SECRET AGENDA OF OPEN BORDERS WITH NARCOMEX:
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/wikileaks-exposed-obamas-la-raza-open.html

Obama Quietly Erasing Borders (Article)

 

 

Article Link:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=240045

The Obama administration has also cut worksite enforcement efforts by 70%, allowing illegal immigrants to continue working in jobs that rightfully belong to citizens and legal workers.


*

THE ENTIRE REASON THE BORDERS ARE LEFT OPEN IS TO CUT WAGES!

THE LA RAZA DEMS HAVE SABOTAGED E-VERIFY TO HELP EASE MORE ILLEGALS INTO OUR JOBS. IN MEX-OCCUPIED CA, THE LA RAZA (ILLEGALS) CONTROLLED STATE LEGISLATURE PASSED A LAW MAKING IT ILLEGAL FOR EMPLOYERS TO USE E-VERIFY. OBAMA HAS SUED AZ TO STOP E-VERIFY…. HERE’S WHY:

“We could cut unemployment in half simply by reclaiming the jobs taken by illegal workers,” said Representative Lamar Smith of Texas, co-chairman of the Reclaim American Jobs Caucus. “President Obama is on the wrong side of the American people on immigration. The president should support policies that help citizens and legal immigrants find the jobs they need and deserve rather than fail to enforce immigration laws.”

*

THE BELOW FIGURES ARE DATED. IT’S NOW ESTIMATED THAT THE MEX OCCUPATION DEPRESSES WAGES FROM $300 TO $400 BILLION PER YEAR.

THIS IS WHY OBAMA SABOTAGED E-VERIFY, AND THE U.S. CHAMBER of COMMERCE SUPPORTS OBAMA’S OPEN AND UNDEFENDED BORDERS, AND SABOTAGE OF E-VERIFY!

OBAMA’S SEC. of ILLEGAL LABOR IS LA RAZA SUPREMACIST HILDA SOLIS. SHE DECLARES THAT “WE” ARE ALL AMERICANS. LEGALS AND MEX LOOTERS!

 “The principal beneficiaries of our current immigration policy are affluent Americans who hire immigrants at substandard wages for low-end work. Harvard economist George Borjas estimates that American workers lose $190 billion annually in depressed wages caused by the constant flooding of the labor market at the low-wage end.” Christian Science Monitor

*

“Listen to people from the National Council of La Raza, LULAC, CARECEN, Latino TV networks, the Piolin radio show (that’s Hispanic anti-Rush Limbaugh), and you will see that the U.S. is replete with its own Chavezes-in-waiting.”

*

LA RAZA-CONTROLLED MEXIFORNIA – CAPITAL OF MEXICAN GANGS

THE LA RAZA CRIME TIDAL WAVE

NEARLY HALF OF ALL MURDERS IN CA ARE BY MEXICAN GANGS!

 


JUDICIAL WATCH EXPOSES OBAMA’S ASSAULT ON OUR BORDERS:

 


 

THE ILLEGAL (MEXICAN) CRIME TIDAL WAVE:

 

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/heather-mac-donald-illegal-alien-crime.html

 

ACCORDING TO CA ATTORNEY GEN KAMALA HARRIS, NEARLY HALF OF ALL MURDERS IN CA ARE BY MEX GANGS!

THERE HAVE BEEN MORE THAN 2,000 CALIFORNIANS MURDERED BY MEXICANS THAT FLED BACK OVER THE BORDER TO MEXICO TO AVOID PROSECUTION!

YOU REALLY WANT AMNESTY AND MORE OPEN BORDERS???


 

CNN RECENTLY REPORTED THAT THE NUMBER OF MEX GANG MEMBERS EXCEEDS ONE MILLION!

 

ACCORDING TO CA ATTORNEY GEN KAMALA HARRIS, NEARLY HALF OF ALL MURDERS IN MEX-OCCUPIED CA ARE BY MEXICAN GANGS!

Lou Dobbs Tonight    

And there are some 800,000 gang members in this country: That’s more than the combined number of troops in our Army and Marine Corps. These gangs have become one of the principle ways to import and distribute drugs in the United States. Congressman David Reichert joins Lou to tell us why those gangs are growing larger and stronger, and why he’s introduced legislation to eliminate the top three international drug gangs.

 

*

CA HAS THE MOST EXPENSIVE PRISON SYSTEM IN THE COUNTRY. HALF THE INMATES ARE MEXICANS.

ACCORDING TO CA ATTORNEY GENERAL KAMALA HARRIS NEARLY HALF OF THE MURDERS IN CA ARE BY MEXICAN GANGS!

OF HER OWN TOP MOST WANTED CRIMINALS, ALL ARE MEXICANS!

OF THE TOP 200 MOST WANTED CRIMINALS IN LOS ANGELES, 176 ARE MEXICANS. MOST OF THE REMAINING ARE RUSSIANS!

*

206 Most wanted criminals in Los Angeles. Out of 206 criminals--183 are hispanic---171 of those are wanted for Murder.

Why do Americans still protect the illegals??

http://www.dailybreeze.com/ci_11255121?appSession=934140935651450&RecordID=&PageID=2&PrevPageID=&cpipage=1&CPISortType=&CPIorderBy=

*

TEN MOST WANTED CRIMINALS IN CALIFORNIA ARE MEXICANS!


 

*

“What we're seeing is our Congress and national leadership dismantling our laws by not enforcing them. Lawlessness becomes the norm, just like Third World corruption. Illegal aliens now have more rights and privileges than Americans. If you are an illegal alien, you can drive a car without a driver's license or insurance. You may obtain medical care without paying. You may work without paying taxes. Your children enjoy free education at the expense of taxpaying Americans.”

206 Most wanted criminals in Los Angeles. Out of 206 criminals--183 are hispanic---171 of those are wanted for Murder.

Why do Americans still protect the illegals??

http://www.dailybreeze.com/ci_11255121?appSession=934140935651450&RecordID=&PageID=2&PrevPageID=&cpipage=1&CPISortType=&CPIorderBy=

*

TEN MOST WANTED CRIMINALS IN CALIFORNIA ARE MEXICANS!


*

WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE THAT OBAMA, THE DEMOCRAT PARTY and NOW THE GOP WANT TO SURRENDER TO?

MEXICANS ARE THE MOST VIOLENT, RACIST CULTURE IN THE HEMISPHERE. THEY DO NOT HOP OUR BORDERS AND JOBS BECAUSE THEY WANT TO BE AMERICANS. THEY COME AS LOOTERS AND OCCUPIERS!

 

“In Mexico, a recent Zogby poll declared that the vast majority of Mexican citizens hate Americans. [22.2] Mexico is a country saturated with racism, yet in denial, having never endured the social development of a Civil Rights movement like in the US--Blacks are harshly treated while foreign Whites are often seen as the enemy. [22.3] In fact, racism as workplace discrimination can be seen across the US anywhere the illegal alien Latino works--the vast majority of the workforce is usually strictly Latino, excluding Blacks, Whites, Asians, and others.”

FROM WILLIAM GHEEN of ALIPAC:

“The illegal aliens are sending a clear message on the streets of Los Angeles and other major urban centers. They are saying: "This is our land. White, black, and legal Hispanics get out!”


 

THE STAGGERING CORRUPTION of BARACK OBAMA - No open door: White House denies selling access to President Obama to wealthy supporters - Washington Times

No open door: White House denies selling access to President Obama to wealthy supporters - Washington Times


REALITY… Obama is an abysmal failure. His only success is conning a nation over and over again and calling it “change”. He is Bush’s third and fourth failed terms.

“Though when President Obama claimed that the state of our union was “stronger,” one could only ask: for whom?” HOW ABOUT OBAMA’S CRIMINAL BANKSTER DONORS, AND LA RAZA PARTY BASE OF ILLEGALS???

OBAMA HAS SQUANDERED BILLIONS PROTECTING THE BORDERS OF MUSLIM DICTATORS WHILE PUSHING OUR UNDEFENDED BORDERS WITH NARCOMEX OPEN WIDER SO HE COULD BUILD  THE DEMS’ PARTY BASE of ILLEGALS.

HE HAS FILLED HIS ADMINISTRATION WITH BANKSTER-CONNECTED WHITE COLLAR CRIMINALS FROM WALL STREET TO ASSURE THE BANKS “I’m not here to punish banks!”. BANKSTER PROFITS AND CRIMES SOAR… SO DO FORECLOSURES.

DURING OBAMA’S FIRST TERM 2/3s OF ALL JOBS WENT TO IMMIGRANTS, BOTH LEGAL AND ILLEGAL. OBAMA SUED THE AMERICAN STATE OF ARIZONA, NOW GATEWAY TO THE AMERICAN SOUTHWEST FOR THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS, TO BLOCK E-VERIFY TO EASE MORE LA RAZA INTO OUR JOBS. HIS FIRST SEC. of (illegal) LABOR WAS LA RAZA SUPREMACIST HILDA SOLIS. HIS NOMINEE TO THE HIGH COURT SONIA SOTOMAYOR IS SIMPLY OBAMA IN A SKIRT WITH A LONG HISTORY OF SERVICING THE CORPORATE SPECIAL INTERESTS AS WELL AS BEING A LA RAZA PARTY MEMBER. SOTOMAYOR VOTED AGAINST IMPLEMENTING E-VERIFY NATIONWIDE. DURING OBAMA’S FIRST TERM, WORKPLACE ENFORCEMENT OF LAWS PROHIBITING THE EMPLOYMENT OF ILLEGALS PLUMMETED 70% AND IS EXPECTED TO BE NON-EXISTENT DURING HIS SECOND TERM.

OBAMA HANDS OVER AMERICAN TAX DOLLARS TO THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA, WHICH NOW OPERATES OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE UNDER CECILIA MUNOZ.

NOW OBAMA, AND HIS HAREM OF SOME OF THE MOST CORRUPT DEMS IN AMERICAN HISTORY, FEINSTEIN, BOXER, PELOSI, REID AND MENENDEZ ARE PUSHING FOR ONE OF THE BIGGEST CON JOBS PERPETRATED BY ANY PRESIDENT IN HISTORY… AMNESTY!

THE DEMS’ PROPAGANDA MACHINE CLAIMS PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP FOR 11 MILLION PRIMARILY MEXICANS. THERE ARE MORE THAN 40 MILLION MEXICANS ALREADY HERE LOOTING AND EAGER TO BRING UP THE REST OF THE FAMILY. NOT ONE OF THEM ARE INTERESTED IN BECOMING AMERICAN. THEY ARE LOOTERS AND OCCUPIERS FEEDING OFF THE AMERICA PEOPLE. CA  PAYS OUT $22 BILLION PER YEAR ON THE STATE LEVEL ALONE IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS. COUNTIES PAY OUT  MORE WITH LOS ANGELES COUNTY PAYING OUT $600 MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS, PRIMARILY ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS = 18 YEARS OF WELFARE. CA ALSO CAN CLAIM THAT NEARLY HALF OF ALL MURDERS IN THIS MEX-OCCUPIED STATE ARE BY MEXICAN GANGS. DO A SEARCH FOR MEXICAN GANGS “ETHNICALLY CLEANSING” THEIR HOODS IN LOS ANGELES AND COMPTON BY MURDERING BLACK AMERICANS. YOU WILL NOT HEAR A BLACK AMERICAN NAMED BARACK OBAMA OPEN HIS HISPANDERING MOUTH ABOUT THIS, OR THAT CA HAS THE LARGEST AND MOST EXPENSIVE PRISON SYSTEM IN THE NATION AND HALF THE INMATES ARE MEXICANS, OR THAT THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS NOW OPERATE IN 2,500 AMERICAN CITIES, OR THAT BARACK OBAMA OKAYED MEXICAN TRUCKS EASE OVER OUR BORDERS TO HAUL DRUGS AND HUMAN CARGO, SOMETHING THAT EVEN BUSH REFUSED TO DO!

BEHIND OUR BACKS, OBAMA HAS REPEATEDLY TAKEN BORDER GUARDS !OFF ! THE NARCOMEX BORDER AND CUT FUNDING TO SABOTAGE OUR NATIONAL SECURITY IN THE FACE OF THE LA RAZA MEXICAN INVASION. HIS DHS UNDER LA RAZA SUPREMACIST JANET NAPOLITANO IS NOW THE Dept. of Homeland Security = PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP and SOME AMERICAN’S JOB!

Obama recklessly claims America is ‘Stronger’ in State of the Union 

Tuesday, February 12, 2013 - The Conscience of a Conservative by Henry D'Andrea

PHOENIX, February 12, 2013 - During Barack Obama’s first State of the Union address of his second term, the President claimed that the United States is seeing more economic growth and that as a nation we are “stronger” today than we were before.

Though when President Obama claimed that the state of our union was “stronger,” one could only ask: for whom?

22.7 million Americans are unemployed, underemployed, or have given up looking for work under the Obama administration. The unemployment rate when Obama took office was 7.8%; four years later, it stands at 7.9%. Are these Americans living in a “stronger” nation?

Small business and large corporations are hesitant to hire new employees because of the ObamaCare mandate that penalizes companies for hiring more than 50 employees. Certainly, you can’t describe a country that punishes its companies for hiring new employees as “stronger”.

SOMEONE MUST PAY FOR OBAMA’S BANKSTERS’ CRIMES AND THE LOOTING OF HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE OF ILLEGALS!

Moreover, if you are born into this country today, you bring with you a $52,400 debt burden that you had no say in preventing. With an overall national debt of $16.5 trillion, how can our president deem the nation “stronger” when our children are sinking in debt?

President Obama has added over $5.9 trillion to the national debt since taking office in January 2009 that is more than any other president in American history.

Obama even once again called for investing in more “clean energy” solutions that he claims will create a safer environment for our children and promote economic growth. These “clean energy” solutions are better known as ‘crony capitalism’.

Just look at the Solyndra fiasco.

Solyndra was given $535 million in taxpayer dollars in order to create more jobs and create better alternative energy sources. Instead, Solyndra declared bankruptcy; killing 1,100 jobs all while under investigation by the FBI.

The Solyndra loan and the many other now-bankrupt ‘green energy’ companies were a disgusting and unethical smokescreen designed to propagandize the American electorate into thinking Obama was serious about job creation and lowering the cost of gas via new energy solutions.

Nearly all of the ‘green energy’ companies that received federal loan guarantees from the Obama administration had deep ties to top Obama campaign bundlers and administration officials.

It is clear that the Obama administration’s ‘green energy’ policy has basically become a campaign bundler payback program.

President Obama, your address tonight was hopeless and distasteful. The state of the union is not “stronger,” it is weaker, dismal, and doubtful.

It is time the American people saw real job growth and the unemployment rate return to a more stable number. You had four years to create more jobs and your policies have not worked thus far. It is time to try something new for your second term.

This State of the Union address only showed that the next four years under President Obama will be even more dismal than the last four.

With well over $16.4 trillion in debt and unemployment at 7.9%, President Obama should have offered the American people a real plan for turning the American economy around and returning to fiscal prosperity.

Though instead the president decided to offer the same failed policies that have proven time again to bring about more economic calamity and further push the United States into becoming a third-rate banana republic.

Henry D’Andrea is a Conservative opinion columnist at the Communities @ the Washington Times. Feel free to email Mr. D’Andrea at writedandrea@gmail.com and follow him on Twitter (@TheHenry)
*
 

OBAMA, THE BIGGEST CON JOB IN AMERICAN HISTORY?
Those of us who were bewitched by his eloquence on the campaign trail chose to ignore some disquieting aspects of his biography: that he had accomplished very little before he ran for president, having never run a business or a state; that he had a singularly unremarkable career as a law professor, publishing nothing in 12 years at the University of Chicago other than an autobiography; and that, before joining the United States Senate, he had voted "present" (instead of "yea" or "nay") 130 times, sometimes dodging difficult issues.
*
THE RICH LOVE HIM! ILLEGALS ADORE HIM! HE’S MEXICO’S ANSWER TO WELFARE. “FREE” GRINGO-PAID HEALTHCARE AND ANCHOR BABY BREEDING… EVEN THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS APPRECIATE THE WAY OBAMA HAS NEUTERED BORDER SECURITY AND HELPED THEM EASE DRUG CARTELS INTO OUR NATION.
OBAMA! THE BIGGEST PUNKSTER IN AMERICAN HISTORY!
HE WALKS ABOUT LIKE A SOVEREIGN PRETENDING TO BE ABOVE IT ALL AS HE SERVICES HIS CRIMINAL BANKSTER DONORS  AND TURNS THE WHITE HOUSE INTO HEADQUARTERS FOR THE LA RAZA SUPREMACIST PARTY.
REALITY OF AMERICAN UNDER OBAMA’S ASSAULT ON THE AMERICAN WORKER:
 OBAMA'S CRONY CAPITALISM STARTS HERE:
Proving that President Obama is the first choice of Wall Street and the American super-rich, his reelection campaign announced Wednesday that it had broken all previous records for fundraising, raking in $86 million during the second quarter of this year.
Obama campaign raises record sums from the wealthy
By Patrick Martin
15 July 2011
Proving that President Obama is the first choice of Wall Street and the American super-rich, his reelection campaign announced Wednesday that it had broken all previous records for fundraising, raking in $86 million during the second quarter of this year.
The $86 million total dwarfed the previous record for presidential reelection fundraising, the $50 million raised by George W. Bush in the third quarter of 2003. It was far above the $60 million target set by Obama’s campaign manager, Jim Messina.
Obama for America, the official name of the reelection effort, raised $47 million, while the Democratic National Committee collected $38 million, largely from fundraising events featuring the president, where big donors are allowed to give up to $30,800 apiece. Individual donations to Obama for America are limited under federal election laws to a maximum of $5,000.
By comparison, the leading Republican fundraiser, former Massachusetts governor and investment banker Mitt Romney, raised $18.25 million in the April-June quarter. The total raised by all the Republican presidential hopefuls who have filed reports with the Federal Election Commission came to only $36 million, less than half Obama’s haul.
The Obama reelection campaign will be the most lavishly funded in American history. It is expected to dwarf the $745 million Obama raised in 2008, and could top the $1 billion mark. Only two decades ago, $20 million was sufficient to finance a full-scale presidential campaign.
According to press accounts, the Obama campaign has already opened 60 offices in various states around the country, nearly a year and a half before Election Day, and hired hundreds of full-time operatives.
The vast fund-raising comes in two relatively distinct components: over half a million small donors, reflecting lingering illusions in Obama in sections of the population; and large donors, from the wealthy and the most affluent sections of the upper-middle class.
A total of 552,462 individuals gave money during the second quarter, including 260,000 who made no donations during the 2008 campaign. Of these, 98 percent were of $250 or less, with an average contribution of $69. Based on that average, the small donations accounted for less than half the total raised, about $37 million.
The remainder, about $49 million, came in large-dollar contributions, including thousands who gave the maximum of $35,800—$30,800 to the DNC and $5,000 to Obama for America.
The Washington Post noted, “Much of the tens of millions Obama raised through the Democratic National Committee came from big fundraising events that the president attended throughout the spring. Donors to the DNC can give up to $30,800, and many of those who made the maximum contribution got to attend intimate, invitation-only dinners at which the president took their questions behind closed doors.”
Moreover, the total number of small donors was deliberately inflated by a promotion run by the campaign in which anyone who gave as little as $5 was entered into a lottery for a dinner with Obama and Vice President Biden.
The Obama campaign, clearly concerned about releasing information that would demonstrate corporate America’s enthusiasm for the president’s reelection, declined to say how much Obama for America raised from large donors. These numbers will be buried in the 15,000-page report the campaign files Friday with the FEC.
The report to the FEC will also detail the amount raised by “bundlers,” those who solicit donations from a group of individuals and reach a total set by the campaign, of $350,000 or more, as well as a group called Gen44, consisting of individuals younger than 40 who raise $100,000 or more.
While the 2008 Obama campaign was regularly described as fueled by small donors, the actual figures demonstrate the opposite: Obama did indeed raise $180 million from that source, but that came to less than one-quarter of his overall fundraising. Nearly half of his total—and the bulk of the early money, critical to sustaining his campaign against the initial frontrunner, Hillary Clinton—came from big donors.
Some details of the wooing of big-ticket donors were reported in the Washington press. The Post reported June 29, “Campaign officials are working to broaden Obama’s network of ‘bundlers,’ the well-connected rainmakers tasked with soliciting big checks from wealthy donors, while seeking to preserve the aura of a grass-roots movement by luring back the kind of small Internet donations that helped shatter fundraising records four years ago. Obama has attended 28 fundraisers from coast to coast—a pace that could continue, or even accelerate, over the next several months.”
The Post noted that White House Chief of Staff William Daley, former vice chairman of JP Morgan Chase “has huddled in recent weeks over breakfasts and dinners with business leaders and Wall Street financiers in Chicago, New York and Washington,” while campaign manager Messina “made his pitch during at least two meetings in Manhattan with Wall Street executives.”
Politico described one Wall Street fundraising dinner held at Daniel, a top-drawer restaurant on Manhattan’s Upper East Side: “The tables were filled with moneymen like Marc Lasry, the billionaire founder of the hedge fund Avenue Capital; Robert Wolf, the chief executive of UBS Group Americas; and Mark T. Gallogly, a co-founder of Centerbridge Partners.”
While noting the absence of Jamie Dimon of JP Morgan Chase and Lloyd Blankfein of Goldman Sachs, this was said to be by mutual agreement—an effort to avoid photographs of the president shaking hands with the CEOs of the largest recipients of federal bailouts.
“While Wall Street executives still complain about the president’s name-calling and pressure for a regulatory overhaul,” Politico observed cynically, “many say privately that his bark has been worse than his bite.”
The event raised $2.3 million in a single evening, far more than the projected $1.5 million. Politico concluded that “Obama’s campaign set a goal of getting 400 individuals to each help raise $350,000 by year’s end. That may sound like a tall order—especially with much of Wall Street on the sidelines—but early indications suggest the effort is on track, according to people involved in the campaign.”
*

Mr. Cool turns cold

By Richard Cohen, Published: August 8

In her autobiography, Helen Gahagan Douglas recalled telling President Franklin D. Roosevelt about her visits to the camps of migrant workers. She was especially poignant about the children and their lack of Christmas toys when the president tried to stop her. “Don’t tell me any more, Helen,” FDR told the woman who is probably best known for losing a dirty Senate race to Richard Nixon. She was stunned. Roosevelt was crying. Can anyone imagine Barack Obama doing anything similar?
The answer — at least my answer — is no. And this is quite amazing when you think about it. FDR was a Hudson River squire — down to his cigarette holder and cape. Nonetheless, he could connect to the less fortunate. Obama, in contrast, was raised in the great American muddle, not rich and not poor. Yet when the stock market fell more than 500 points last week and the image that night was of the president whooping it up at his birthday party, the juxtaposition — just bad timing, of course — seemed appropriate. He does not seem to care.
This quality of Obama’s, this inability to communicate what many of us think he must be feeling, has lately cost many trees their dear lives — reams of essays and op-ed pieces. One of the more interesting ones, by Drew Westen, a psychology professor at Emory University, ran in Sunday’s New York Times. It cited Obama’s frequent inability or unwillingness to explain himself or to appear empathetic. All this is true. But Westen’s most salient point was contained in the title: “What Happened to Obama?” The answer: Nothing.
Obama has always been the man he is today. He is the very personification of cognitive dissonance — the gap between what we (especially liberals) expected of the first serious African American presidential candidate and the man he in fact is. He has next to none of the rhetorical qualities of the old-time black politicians. He would eschew the cliche, but he feels little of their pain. In this sense, he has been patronized by liberals who looked at a man and saw black and has been reviled by those who looked at a black man and saw “other.”
Westen faults Obama for his lack of storytelling abilities. But this is because Obama is himself the story. Consider for a moment that Obama’s account of how he had to fight to get medical coverage for his dying mother is not exactly true. The White House’s response to this revelation was grudging silence. It did not dispute the story and it soon died. This was because the Obama story is not what he says but who he is. That remains unchanged, and so the very people who would pummel a Republican for such a mischaracterization were silent about Obama’s. Obama did not deign to reply. He does not have to.
Obama’s communications handicap, his loathing for the pornography of politics, could cost him a second term. In the current New York Review of Books, Andrew Hacker cites the findings of the University of Virginia’s Larry Sabato to point out that “an usually high proportion” of Obama’s 2008 majority came from new voters, “notably students and minorities.” If a large number of these Obama voters are no longer elated by the historic novelty of the candidate and/or are disappointed by his performance, turnout will be depressed and Obama will be in peril. The passion of his haters is fearsome; his admirers cannot be tepid.
Only the GOP can save Obama. His political shortcomings cannot be fixed because he is who he is. He can rely on running against a party that has the soul of an actuarial table and will cut programs that the poor and the middle class adore. Whoever that Republican candidate may be, he or she will be stuck in the amber of the early primaries and caucuses where extremism runs rampant and moderates go to die. Neither Jon Huntsman nor Mitt Romney has so far shown the political dexterity to squiggle out of the box that is the Iowa or South Carolina contests.
Obama is the very soul of common sense. As he talks, I nod my head in agreement. Mostly, I think, he has done the right thing. But I doubt anyone will ever recount how he cried in the Oval Office any more than I can recall a soaring passage from a speech. This president got elected because he was cool. He could be defeated because he is cold.
*
*
OBAMANOMICS: WHY THE SUPER RICH LOVE THEIR BOUGHT OBAMA!
*
*
WASHINGTON — This is one anniversary few feel like celebrating.
Two years after economists say the Great Recession ended, the recovery has been the weakest and most lopsided of any since the 1930s.
After previous recessions, people in all income groups tended to benefit. This time, ordinary Americans are struggling with job insecurity, too much debt and pay raises that haven't kept up with prices at the grocery store and gas station. The economy's meager gains are going mostly to the wealthiest.
*
CHECK OUT OBAMA’S LA RAZA INFESTED ADMINISTRATION:


WHO IN THE OBAMA ADMIN IS NOT CONNECTED TO HIS CRIMINAL BANKSTER DONORS, OR A LA RAZA SUPREMACIST PARTY MEMBER?

 


OBAMA HAS TWO AGENDAS. SERVICING BANKSTER DONORS, AND PUSHING OUR BORDERS OPEN FOR MORE ILLEGALS. HE KNOW WE WON’T BE PUNKED BY HIS PERFORMANCES THE SECOND TIME AROUND!

*

“Records show that four out of Obama's top five contributors are employees of financial industry giants - Goldman Sachs ($571,330), UBS AG ($364,806), JPMorgan Chase ($362,207) and Citigroup ($358,054).”


*

Obamanomics: How Barack Obama Is Bankrupting You and Enriching His Wall Street Friends, Corporate Lobbyists, and Union Bosses


 

BY TIMOTHY P CARNEY

 

 

Editorial Reviews

Obama Is Making You Poorer—But Who’s Getting Rich?

Goldman Sachs, GE, Pfizer, the United Auto Workers—the same “special interests” Barack Obama was supposed to chase from the temple—are profiting handsomely from Obama’s Big Government policies that crush taxpayers, small businesses, and consumers. In Obamanomics, investigative reporter Timothy P. Carney digs up the dirt the mainstream media ignores and the White House wishes you wouldn’t see. Rather than Hope and Change, Obama is delivering corporate socialism to America, all while claiming he’s battling corporate America. It’s corporate welfare and regulatory robbery—it’s Obamanomics.

Congressman Ron Paul says, “Every libertarian and free-market conservative needs to read Obamanomics.” And Johan Goldberg, columnist and bestselling author says, “Obamanomics is conservative muckraking at its best and an indispensable field guide to the Obama years.”

If you’ve wondered what’s happening to America, as the federal government swallows up the financial sector, the auto industry, and healthcare, and enacts deficit exploding “stimulus packages,” this book makes it all clear—it’s a big scam. Ultimately, Obamanomics boils down to this: every time government gets bigger, somebody’s getting rich, and those somebodies are friends of Barack. This book names the names—and it will make your blood boil.

*


Obama Is Making You Poorer—But Who’s Getting Rich?

Goldman Sachs, GE, Pfizer, the United Auto Workers—the same “special interests” Barack Obama was supposed to chase from the temple—are profiting handsomely from Obama’s Big Government policies that crush taxpayers, small businesses, and consumers.

Investigative reporter Timothy P. Carney digs up the dirt the mainstream media ignores and the White House wishes you wouldn’t see. Rather than Hope and Change, Obama is delivering corporate socialism to America, all while claiming he’s battling corporate America. It’s corporate welfare and regulatory robbery—it’s Obamanomics. In this explosive book, Carney reveals:

* The Great Health Care Scam—Obama’s backroom deals with drug companies spell corporate profits and more government control
* The Global Warming Hoax—Obama has bought off industries with a pork-filled bill that will drain your wallet for Al Gore’s agenda
* Obama and Wall Street—“Change” means more bailouts and a heavy Goldman Sachs presence in the West Wing (including Rahm Emanuel)
* Stimulating K Street—The largest spending bill in history gave pork to the well-connected and created a feeding frenzy for lobbyists
* How the GOP needs to change its tune—drastically—to battle Obamanomics

If you’ve wondered what’s happening to our country, as the federal government swallows up the financial sector, the auto industry, and healthcare, and enacts deficit exploding “stimulus packages” that create make-work government jobs, this book makes it all clear—it’s a big scam. Ultimately, Obamanomics boils down to this: every time government gets bigger, somebody’s getting rich, and those somebodies are friends of Barack. This book names the names—and it will make your blood boil.

*
Praise for Obamanomics

“The notion that ‘big business’ is on the side of the free market is one of progressivism’s most valuable myths. It allows them to demonize corporations by day and get in bed with them by night. Obamanomics is conservative muckraking at its best. It reveals how President Obama is exploiting the big business mythology to undermine the free market and stick it to entrepreneurs, taxpayers, and consumers. It’s an indispensable field guide to the Obama years.”
—Jonha Goldberg, LA Times columnist and best-selling author

“‘Every time government gets bigger, somebody’s getting rich.’ With this astute observation, Tim Carney begins his task of laying bare the Obama administration’s corporatist governing strategy, hidden behind the president’s populist veneer. This meticulously researched book is a must-read for anyone who wants to understand how Washington really works.”
—David Freddoso, best-selling author of The Case Against Barack Obama

“Every libertarian and free-market conservative who still believes that large corporations are trusted allies in the battle for economic liberty needs to read this book, as does every well-meaning liberal who believes that expansions of the welfare-regulatory state are done to benefit the common people.”
—Congressman Ron Paul

“It’s understandable for critics to condemn President Obama for his ‘socialism.’ But as Tim Carney shows, the real situation is at once more subtle and more sinister. Obamanomics favors big business while disproportionately punishing everyone else. So-called progressives are too clueless to notice, as usual, which is why we have Tim Carney and this book.”
—Thomas E. Woods, Jr., best-selling author of Meltdown and The Politically Incorrect Guideto American History

*

·         Hardcover: 256 pages

·         Publisher: Regnery Press (November 30, 2009)

·         Language: English

·         ISBN-10: 1596986123

·         ISBN-13: 978-1596986121