Wednesday, April 7, 2010

Los Angeles MELTDOWN UNDER MEXICAN OCCUPATION - 31 GANGS

LA RAZA MAYOR ANTONIO “TACO RUNT” VILLARAIGOSA’S LOS ANGELES MELTDOWN.

“The 80 men and women already identified are affiliated with 31 gangs and have come to a "mutual understanding" to forgo rivalries, keep the peace and share business, according to Peter Shutan, the deputy city attorney.”

latimes.com
Sweeping injunction targets 'commuter drug dealers' in downtown L.A.
By Kate Linthicum
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
11:22 AM PDT, April 7, 2010
In an aggressive new tack in the city's crackdown on drug-dealing on skid row, L.A. prosecutors on Wednesday announced a criminal injunction targeting "commuter dealers" who come into downtown from other parts of town to sell their goods.

The L.A. City Attorney's Office said this is the first time they have aimed an injunction at drug dealers rather than gangs. The injunction would ban 80 drug dealers from entering skid row, and would allow prosecutors to ban up to 300 additional dealers who police identify in the future.

The 80 men and women already identified are affiliated with 31 gangs and have come to a "mutual understanding" to forgo rivalries, keep the peace and share business, according to Peter Shutan, the deputy city attorney.

The ban still requires a judge's OK, but it has already reignited the debate over the role of police on skid row, where distinguishing between addicts and dealers can be difficult.

Critics say that some of the people included in the injunction may be addicts themselves who sell drugs to support their own habits. Skid row is the last stop for many, they say, and the bans could end up separating addicts who sometimes carry or sell drugs from the rehabilitation services they need.

Of particular concern to the activists is the part of the injunction that would allow police and the city attorney to ban up to 300 more people -- now identified in the injunction simply as "John Does" -- so long as they can prove to a judge that the people targeted are dealing drugs.

"If you see a guy committing a crime, you arrest him, you don't put him on a list and say, 'I think this guy is going to commit a crime,' " said gang expert Alex Alonso. "Now if a 'John Doe' is hanging out with one of the 80 people on that list, he better watch out. He could get served, he probably will get served."

Alonso said the injunction would give the police too much discretion in skid row, an area that has been home to the city's most concentrated police presence since 2006, when Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and then-LAPD Chief William Bratton deployed 50 extra officers there as part of the controversial Safer City initiative. Dozens of undercover narcotics officers were deployed to the same area.

In 2009, the LAPD made 3,638 drug arrests on skid row, according to the LAPD. Roughly 38% of those were for sales activity, and 45% were for possession.

The city attorney's office says the injunction is designed to protect people like Iris Mingo, a skid row resident and former crack user who says she has been sober for 18 months. Mingo says she faces temptations every time she walks out of her door because dealing is so rampant in the neighborhood.

"Now I'm free, but don't think it don't come up on me," said Mingo, 56. "It can be very trying."

Several social service providers welcomed news of the injunctions. Although banning the 80 alleged dealers will likely create "a vacuum" that new dealers will fill, getting current dealers off the street will give former drug addicts a better chance at recovery, said Andy Bales of the Union Rescue Mission.

"This is the best news we've had in a while," Bales said.

Although skid row arrest rates have soared and most crime rates have plunged -- LAPD statistics show that property crime dropped 44% and violent crime dropped 40% between 2005 and 2009 -- the drug problem persists.

At the Union Rescue Mission early Tuesday morning, one man died of a suspected heroin overdose in the shelter's overflow dormitories. The same morning, another man died of a suspected overdose at the Midnight Mission across the street.

Much violence on skid row is drug-related.

Last year the area was rocked by a double homicide that police say was linked to the drug trade inside the Lamp Lodge, a respected facility that provides shelter and counseling to the homeless. Commander Blake Chow of the LAPD's Central Division called drugs "probably the biggest threat to the community right now."

The injunction, Chow said, would help police "protect the homeless from the predators coming from other parts of the city." Of the dealers, he said, "we can arrest them and arrest them and arrest them, but what we need to do is keep them away."

Gary Blasi, a UCLA professor who studies homelessness, said injunctions might allow police to stop anyone on the street without probable cause so long as they look like one of the 80 people on the the list. The ban if approved, would not take effect for months. The people listed in the junction will have a chance to challenge it at a preliminary hearing that will be held in the next few weeks or months, said Bruce Riordan, the city attorney's director of anti-gang operations.

Another two to three months after that there will be another hearing in which a judge can choose to make it permanent.

Violating the injunction would be a misdemeanor offense.

EXPLOTATION OF ILLEGALS - Isn't That The Reason They're Invited Here?

MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com


The REALITY OF THE MEXICAN INVASION, IS THAT IT IS BY INVITATION!

IT’S ALL ABOUT EXPLOITATION OF WORKERS AND KEEPING WAGES DEPRESSED.

THIS IS WHY MOST OF THE FORTUNE 500 ARE GENEROUS DONORS TO LA RAZA “THE RACE” THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of AMERICA.

THIS IS WHY THE U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, FRONTING FOR THE CORPORATE INTERESTS, DEMANDS AMNESTY, OPEN BORDERS, NO WALL, NO E-VERIFY, AND THAT NO JOBS GO TO LEGALS.

THIS IS WHY HISPANDERING OBAMA, PELOSI, AND REID CREATED A “JOBS” BILL THAT HANDED TAX DEDUCTIONS TO EMPLOYERS OF ILLEGALS!

IT’S ALL ABOUT CORPORATE PROFITS. PROFITS CAN NEVER BE HIGH ENOUGH! WAGES CAN NEVER BE LOW ENOUGH.


HOW MUCH DOES ALL THIS “CHEAP” MEXICAN LABOR COST? IN LOS ANGELES ALONE, WELFARE PAID TO ILLEGALS IS $600 MILLION PER YEAR!!! (SOURCE: JUDICIAL WATCH. org)



April 7, 2010
EDITORIAL
The Labor Department Wakes Up
The Department of Labor has begun a long-overdue campaign to protect workers’ rights, a core part of its job that was sorely neglected in the fiercely antiregulatory Bush era. The campaign, “We Can Help,” uses public-service announcements, a Web site and a phone hot line to encourage workers — particularly those in construction, janitorial fields, hotels, food services and home health care — to report employer abuses. It also adds 250 investigators, a one-third increase, to the department’s wage and hour division.
We hope this opens a concerted effort by Hilda Solis, the labor secretary, to energize her department’s somnolent bureaucracy. Workers need the protection.
Last fall, a comprehensive investigation uncovered rampant abuses of low-wage workers in factories, stores, construction sites, offices, warehouses and private homes. The study, released by the Center for Urban Economic Development, the National Employment Law Project and the U.C.L.A. Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, surveyed more than 4,000 workers in Los Angeles, Chicago and New York.
The workers — many undocumented immigrants — told of employers who ignored the minimum wage, denied overtime, illegally docked their pay for the cost of tools or transportation, or forced them to work without pay before or after their shifts. More than a quarter had been paid less than the minimum wage, often by more than $1 an hour. Violations typically robbed workers of $51 a week, from an average paycheck of $339.
The new campaign rightly points out that all workers, including the undocumented, deserve to be paid for their labor. These are truths too often forgotten. If you work in this country, you are protected by its laws. And if unscrupulous employers can exploit the most vulnerable employees, no workers are safe. The best way to improve jobs and lives for all workers in America is to give those who are silent and exploited the courage and means to speak up.
*
The NEW privileged class, ILLEGALS
This is why you work From Jan - May paying taxes to the government ....with the rest of the calendar year is money for you and your family

If they do not have privileges over the rest of the population I will eat my shit..............

Take, for example, an illegal alien with a wife and five children. He takes a job for
$5.00 or 6.00/hour. At that wage, with six dependents, he pays no
income tax, yet at the end of the year, if he files an Income Tax Return, with his fake Social Security number,
he gets an "earned income credit" of up to $3,200..... free.

He qualifies for Section 8 housing and subsidized rent.

He qualifies for food stamps..

He qualifies for free (no deductible, no
co-pay) health care.

His children get free breakfasts and lunches at school.

He requires bilingual teachers and books.

He qualifies for relief from high energy bills..

If they are or become, aged, blind or disabled, they qualify for SSI.
Once qualified for SSI they can qualify for Medicare. All of this is at (our) taxpayer's expense .

He doesn't worry about car insurance, life insurance, or homeowners insurance.

Taxpayers provide Spanish language signs, bulletins and printed material.

He and his family receive the equivalent of $20.00 to $30.00/hour in benefits.

Working Americans
are lucky to have $5.00 or $6.00/hour left after Paying their bills and his.

The American taxpayers also pay for increased crime, graffiti and trash clean-up.

Cheap labor? YEAH RIGHT! Wake up people!

*
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR


from the May 28, 2009 edition - http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0528/p09s01-coop.html
What will America stand for in 2050?
The US should think long and hard about the high number of Latino immigrants.
By Lawrence Harrison

PALO ALTO, CALIF.
President Obama has encouraged Americans to start laying a new foundation for the country – on a number of fronts. He has stressed that we'll need to have the courage to make some hard choices. One of those hard choices is how to handle immigration. The US must get serious about the tide of legal and illegal immigrants, above all from Latin America.
It's not just a short-run issue of immigrants competing with citizens for jobs as unemployment approaches 10 percent or the number of uninsured straining the quality of healthcare. Heavy immigration from Latin America threatens our cohesiveness as a nation.
The political realities of the rapidly growing Latino population are such that Mr. Obama may be the last president who can avert the permanent, vast underclass implied by the current Census Bureau projection for 2050.

CALIFORNIA'S MELTDOWN - The Weight of the MEXICAN OCCUPATION - WE ARE MEXICO'S WELFARE & PRISON SYSTEMS!

From the Los Angeles Times

CAPITOL JOURNAL

Illegal immigrants are a factor in California's budget math

George Skelton
Capitol Journal

February 2, 2009

From Sacramento — Based on my e-mail, a lot of folks think the solution to California's state budget deficit is to round up all the illegal immigrants and truck them down to Mexico.

Wrong. Even if it were logistically possible and the deportees didn't just climb off the truck and hitch another ride back up north, their absence from the state wouldn't come close to saving enough tax dollars to balance a budget that has a $42-billion hole projected over the next 17 months.

Painful cuts in education, healthcare and social service programs still would be needed. Sharp tax increases would be required.

That said, let's be honest: Illegal immigration does cost California taxpayers a substantial wad, undeniably into the billions.

But it hasn't been PC for officeholders to talk about this for years, ever since Gov. Pete Wilson broke his pick waging an aggressive campaign for Proposition 187. That 1994 ballot initiative sought to bar illegal immigrants from most public services, including education. Voters approved the measure overwhelmingly, but it was tossed out by the courts.

Wilson was demonized by Democrats within the Latino community. And many think the Republican Party never has recovered among this rapidly growing slice of the electorate.

So it's not a topic that comes easily to the tongues of politicians, even Republicans.

Besides, most of the policy issues are out of California's hands. The federal government has jurisdiction over the border. Federal law decrees that every child is entitled to attend public school, regardless of immigration status. And every person -- here illegally or not -- must be cared for in hospital emergency rooms.

But the state does add a few benefits that aren't required.

And as Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and legislative leaders dig into the books trying to find billions in savings, at least a brief look at what's being spent on illegal immigrants seems in order.

First, nobody seems to know exactly. Numbers vary widely, depending which side they come from in the ongoing angry debate over whether people who entered the country illegally to work should be allowed to stay or loaded on the southbound truck.

But here are some no-agenda numbers:

* There were 2.8 million illegal immigrants living in California in 2006, the last year for which there are relatively good figures, according to the nonpartisan Public Policy Institute of California. That represented about 8% of the state's population and roughly a quarter of the nation's illegal immigrants. About 90% of California's illegal immigrants were from Latin America; 65% from Mexico.

* There are roughly 19,000 illegal immigrants in state prisons, representing 11% of all inmates. That's costing $970 million during the current fiscal year. The feds kick in a measly $111 million, leaving the state with an $859 million tab.

* Schools are the toughest to calculate. Administrators don't ask kids about citizenship status. Anyway, many children of illegal immigrants were born in this country and automatically became U.S. citizens.

If you figure that the children of illegal immigrants attending K-12 schools approximates the proportion of illegal immigrants in the population, the bill currently comes to roughly $4 billion. Most is state money; some local property taxes.

* Illegal immigrants aren't entitled to welfare, called CalWORKs. But their citizen children are. Roughly 190,000 kids are receiving welfare checks that pass through their parents. The cost: about $500 million, according to the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst's Office.

Schwarzenegger has proposed removing these children from the welfare rolls after five years. It's part of a broader proposal to also boot off, after five years, the children of U.S. citizens who aren't meeting federal work requirements. There'd be a combined savings of $522 million.

* The state is spending $775 million on Medi-Cal healthcare for illegal immigrants, according to the legislative analyst. Of that, $642 million goes into direct benefits. Practically all the rest is paid to counties to administer the program. The feds generally match the state dollar-for-dollar on mandatory programs.

So-called emergency services are the biggest state cost: $536 million. Prenatal care is $59 million. Not counted in the overall total is the cost of baby delivery -- $108 million -- because the newborns aren't illegal immigrants.

The state also pays $47 million for programs that Washington does not require: Non-emergency care (breast and cervical cancer treatment), $25 million; long-term nursing home care, $19 million; abortions, $3 million.

Schwarzenegger has proposed requiring illegal immigrants to requalify every month for Medi-Cal benefits, except pregnancy-related emergencies.

There also are other taxpayer costs -- especially through local governments -- but those are the biggies for the state. Add them all up and the state spends well over $5 billion a year on illegal immigrants and their families.

Of course, illegal immigrants do pay state taxes. But no way do they pay enough to replenish what they're drawing in services. Their main revenue contribution would be the sales tax, but they can't afford to be big consumers, and food and prescription drugs are exempt.

My view is this: These people are here illegally and shouldn't be, regardless of whether they're just looking for a better life. Do it the legal way. And enforce the law against hiring the undocumented.

On the other hand, they are here. We can't have uneducated kids and unhealthy people living with us. We have moral obligations and practical imperatives.

The Obama administration and Congress need to finally pass an immigration reform act that allows for an agriculture work program and a route to citizenship.

Meanwhile, California should be honest about the costs. Illegal immigrants are not the sole cause of the state's deficit. But they are a drain.

ILLEGALS and CALIFORNIA'S MELTDOWN

From the Los Angeles Times
CAPITOL JOURNAL
Illegal immigrants are a factor in California's budget math
George Skelton
Capitol Journal

February 2, 2009

From Sacramento — Based on my e-mail, a lot of folks think the solution to California's state budget deficit is to round up all the illegal immigrants and truck them down to Mexico.

Wrong. Even if it were logistically possible and the deportees didn't just climb off the truck and hitch another ride back up north, their absence from the state wouldn't come close to saving enough tax dollars to balance a budget that has a $42-billion hole projected over the next 17 months.

Painful cuts in education, healthcare and social service programs still would be needed. Sharp tax increases would be required.

That said, let's be honest: Illegal immigration does cost California taxpayers a substantial wad, undeniably into the billions.

But it hasn't been PC for officeholders to talk about this for years, ever since Gov. Pete Wilson broke his pick waging an aggressive campaign for Proposition 187. That 1994 ballot initiative sought to bar illegal immigrants from most public services, including education. Voters approved the measure overwhelmingly, but it was tossed out by the courts.

Wilson was demonized by Democrats within the Latino community. And many think the Republican Party never has recovered among this rapidly growing slice of the electorate.

So it's not a topic that comes easily to the tongues of politicians, even Republicans.

Besides, most of the policy issues are out of California's hands. The federal government has jurisdiction over the border. Federal law decrees that every child is entitled to attend public school, regardless of immigration status. And every person -- here illegally or not -- must be cared for in hospital emergency rooms.

But the state does add a few benefits that aren't required.

And as Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and legislative leaders dig into the books trying to find billions in savings, at least a brief look at what's being spent on illegal immigrants seems in order.

First, nobody seems to know exactly. Numbers vary widely, depending which side they come from in the ongoing angry debate over whether people who entered the country illegally to work should be allowed to stay or loaded on the southbound truck.

But here are some no-agenda numbers:

* There were 2.8 million illegal immigrants living in California in 2006, the last year for which there are relatively good figures, according to the nonpartisan Public Policy Institute of California. That represented about 8% of the state's population and roughly a quarter of the nation's illegal immigrants. About 90% of California's illegal immigrants were from Latin America; 65% from Mexico.

* There are roughly 19,000 illegal immigrants in state prisons, representing 11% of all inmates. That's costing $970 million during the current fiscal year. The feds kick in a measly $111 million, leaving the state with an $859 million tab.

* Schools are the toughest to calculate. Administrators don't ask kids about citizenship status. Anyway, many children of illegal immigrants were born in this country and automatically became U.S. citizens.

If you figure that the children of illegal immigrants attending K-12 schools approximates the proportion of illegal immigrants in the population, the bill currently comes to roughly $4 billion. Most is state money; some local property taxes.

* Illegal immigrants aren't entitled to welfare, called CalWORKs. But their citizen children are. Roughly 190,000 kids are receiving welfare checks that pass through their parents. The cost: about $500 million, according to the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst's Office.

Schwarzenegger has proposed removing these children from the welfare rolls after five years. It's part of a broader proposal to also boot off, after five years, the children of U.S. citizens who aren't meeting federal work requirements. There'd be a combined savings of $522 million.

* The state is spending $775 million on Medi-Cal healthcare for illegal immigrants, according to the legislative analyst. Of that, $642 million goes into direct benefits. Practically all the rest is paid to counties to administer the program. The feds generally match the state dollar-for-dollar on mandatory programs.

So-called emergency services are the biggest state cost: $536 million. Prenatal care is $59 million. Not counted in the overall total is the cost of baby delivery -- $108 million -- because the newborns aren't illegal immigrants.

The state also pays $47 million for programs that Washington does not require: Non-emergency care (breast and cervical cancer treatment), $25 million; long-term nursing home care, $19 million; abortions, $3 million.

Schwarzenegger has proposed requiring illegal immigrants to requalify every month for Medi-Cal benefits, except pregnancy-related emergencies.

There also are other taxpayer costs -- especially through local governments -- but those are the biggies for the state. Add them all up and the state spends well over $5 billion a year on illegal immigrants and their families.

Of course, illegal immigrants do pay state taxes. But no way do they pay enough to replenish what they're drawing in services. Their main revenue contribution would be the sales tax, but they can't afford to be big consumers, and food and prescription drugs are exempt.

My view is this: These people are here illegally and shouldn't be, regardless of whether they're just looking for a better life. Do it the legal way. And enforce the law against hiring the undocumented.

On the other hand, they are here. We can't have uneducated kids and unhealthy people living with us. We have moral obligations and practical imperatives.

The Obama administration and Congress need to finally pass an immigration reform act that allows for an agriculture work program and a route to citizenship.

Meanwhile, California should be honest about the costs. Illegal immigrants are not the sole cause of the state's deficit. But they are a drain.

AN AMERICAN SEES & SPEAKS: Los Angeles Under Mexican Occupation - LAWS DON'T APPLY TO ILLEGALS!

Characteristic of Mexican invaders is their absolute contempt for laws. They flee from a lawless country, and then want to turn this nation into the same Mexican dumpster.

Mexicans are the biggest CRIME TIDAL WAVE since Wall Street banksters! They are the biggest identity thieves, car thieves, they drive illegally by the millions without car insurance, license with their vehicles registered in the names of “nominees” (green card holders) to avoid impounding when they get pulled over drunk.

THERE ISN’T A COMMUNITY IN THE UNITED STATES THAT ISN’T INVADED BY MEXICANS AND HAVE THE CRIME STATS TO PROVE IT!

STEVE POIZNER AS GOV WOULD END MEXICAN WELFARE. MEG WHITMAN HAS VOWED TO EXPAND IT AS SHE BUYS CA AND WANTS THE ILLEGALS’ ILLEGAL VOTES!

AN AMERICAN SEES & SPEAKS
Turning into Mexico:
*
Heartwarming Illegal Alien Story
________________________________________
Date: 2010-04-07, 5:53AM PDT
Reply To This Post
________________________________________

I moved into a new neighborhood a while ago. It is nice, clean, quiet and predominately middle class. However, there was one house with about 3 families of illegal aliens. They were running an illegal car detailing business right in front of their house using noisy compressors and spraying unknown cleaning agents on the cars with all the runoff going right into the gutter and into a drain that goes right into the ocean. The noise would start about 7am every day including weekends. Absolutely no respect for anyone of course. Well, I called the city and got a code enforcer to not only shut their noisy polluting business down but also it forced them to pack up their junk and flock of anchor babies and move because they could no longer pay the rent. Adios criminals. Everyone should do the same and clean up their neighborhoods.
• it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests


PostingID: 1680305493

FAIRUS.org - TRUE IMMIGRATION REFORM means JOBS FOR LEGALS!

SUPPORT FAIRUS.org! MOVING TO END THE MEXICAN INVASION, OCCUPATION, AND EVER EXPANDING WELFARE and PRISON STATE.


RECLAIM AMERICAN JOBS CAUCUS ( and not for ILLEGALS with STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS)


ARE YOU WAITING FOR SOMEONE ELSE TO DEFEND YOUR JOB, HOME AND COUNTRY? OBAMA AND HIS LA RAZA DEMS ARE SELLING US OUT AS FAST AS OBAMA CAN CON JOB US!
*
*
True Immigration Reformers Brief Capitol Hill Staff on Immigration Policy

On Monday, March 22, the newly-formed Reclaim American Jobs Caucus (see FAIR’s Legislative Update, March 22, 2010) invited representatives from pro-immigration enforcement organizations to brief Capitol Hill staff on immigration policy. The well-attended briefing gave various Congressional offices the opportunity to have a rational, informative dialog with organizations on immigration policy just one day after thousands of amnesty supporters staged a rally on the National Mall. (See FAIR’s Legislative Update, March 22, 2010). Participants in the Capitol Hill briefing included: Dan Stein, President of FAIR; Mark Krikorian, Executive Director of the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS); Carol Swain, Professor of Political Science at Vanderbilt University and author of Debating Immigration; Mike Cutler, a Fellow at CIS; and Roy Beck, CEO of NumbersUSA.
The briefing primarily focused on the adverse effect that mass immigration has on employment rates in the United States. Krikorian cited statistics debunking the pro-amnesty lobby’s argument that illegal aliens “do jobs Americans won’t do,” including the fact that more than 70 percent of employees in the service industry are native-born, according to the Department of Labor. Professor Swain presented a wealth of data proving that mass immigration harms the employment prospects of native-born minorities the most, and argued that E-Verify should be expanded and made mandatory. Cutler, a former agent with the now-defunct Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), focused on the national security implications of mass immigration, and Beck argued that lowering immigration rates would immediately get unemployed Americans back to work.
FAIR President Dan Stein noted: “Ultimately, this is about the American Dream and the ability of Americans right across the spectrum in our political society to feel that they’re working in a fair labor market where employers are required to hire those who are lawfully authorized to work. It’s about trust and respect. It’s about trusting that the government has the ability to manage immigration properly; that the laws against hiring illegal workers are going to be enforced properly; that employers in a sense have obligations to respect that law. And it’s about respecting the rule of law, and respecting our borders, respecting our sovereignty, and respecting us as a people; that we have the self-confidence…to stand firm and say that our immigration laws can and must be enforced.” (Video, March 22, 2010).
*
MEXICAN OCCUPATION.blogspot.com

RUNNING FOR GOVERNOR – STEVE POIZNER (R) claims he would end the Mexican welfare and prison state. READ HIS ARTICLE FROM THE LOS ANGELES TIMES BELOW.
*
RUNNING FOR GOVERNOR – Meg Whitman (R) has promised increased benefits to illegals, and has condemned Santa Clarita City Councilman for speaking out about the devastation Mexicans have caused his city. Whitman knows that Reps. Linda and Loretta Sanchez of Orange County (sisters) where elected by THE VOTES OF ILLEGALS. Whitman hispanders for the illegals’ votes!
*
RUNNING FOR GOVERNOR – Attorney General Jerry Brown (D), has never done anything about the Mexican invasion. On his list of California’s TOP 10 CRIMINALS, ALL ARE MEXICANS!
*
RUNNING FOR LT. GOVERNOR – Mayor of S.F. Gavin Newsom (D) turned San Francisco into a “sanctuary city” for illegals. Newsom is LA RAZA ENDORSED hispanderer.
*
RUNNING FOR A FOURTH TERM FOR U.S. SENATOR, BARBARA BOXER (D) has been endorsed by LA RAZA and has worked hard for the ever expanding MEXICAN WELFARE STATE. Boxer has been in the senate for 18 years now, and has never had a bill go to law. She’s is a major reason why California is in meltdown. She has long siphoned off special interests “campaign contributions” as “CONSULTANT FEES” she’s paid her son, Oakland lawyer, Douglas Boxer. Boxer has voted HELL NOT to end this brazen form of CORRUPTION. These bribes amount to HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS YEARLY!
*
“The principal beneficiaries of our current immigration policy are affluent Americans who hire immigrants at substandard wages for low-end work. Harvard economist George Borjas estimates that American workers lose $190 billion annually in depressed wages caused by the constant flooding of the labor market at the low-wage end.” Christian Science Monitor

*
WOULD STEVEN POIZNER AS GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA MOVE TO END THE MEXICAN OCCUPATION, WELFARE AND PRISON STATE? WOULD THAT MEAN JOBS FOR AMERICANS? WOULD THAT MEAN THE STATE WITH THE HIGHEST STATE TAX WOULD NO LONGER BEING PAYING OUT BILLIONS FOR THE MEXICAN WELFARE AND PRISON STATE?
THE MEXICAN INVASION AND OCCUPATION IS BY INVITATION, NOT BY ACCIDENT! IT IS AS DIRECTED BY WALL STREET INTERESTS, AS PART OF THEIR BATTLE AGAINST PAYING LIVING WAGES! THE OCCUPATION BY MEXICO DEPRESSES WAGES $300 TO $400 BILLION PER YEAR! THIS IS WHY MOST OF THE FORTUNE 500 ARE MAJOR LA RAZA “THE RACE” DONORS. IT IS WHY WALL STREET’S LOBBYIST, THE U. S. CHAMBER OF COMMENCE ENDLESSLY PUSH FOR OPEN BORDERS, NO LAW ENFORCEMENT, NO E-VERIFY, AND NO WALL. OBAMA HAS ACCOMMODATED THIS ENDLESSLY BY HALTING THE WALL WITH NARCOMEX, TAKING HUNDREDS OF BORDER GUARDS OFF OUR BORDERS EVEN AS THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS OPERATE IN INCREASINGLY MORE AMERICAN CITIES. OBAMA HAS CUT FUNDING TO STATES SO THEY WOULD BE UNABLE TO DEAL WITH THE MEXICAN INVASION AND OCCUPATION. HE APPOINTED LA RAZA JANET NAPOLITANO TO MAKE HOMELAND SECURITY NOW “HOMELAND SECURITY = PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP”. EVEN OBAMA’S SUPREME COURT APPOINTMENT OF SOTOMAYER WAS AN ACT OF HISPANDERING. SOTOMAYER IS KNOWS AS A “WISE LATINA BITCH”, THAT HAD LONG SERVED THE CORPORATE INTERESTS AND ON THE BENCH HAS REFERRED TO ILLEGALS AS “UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS”. OBAMA REFERS TO ILLEGALS AS “UNREGISTERED VOTERS”. WALL STREET REFERS TO ILLEGAL AS “CHEAP” LABOR!

“As economist Philip J. Romero concluded in a 2007 study, "illegal immigrants impose a 'tax' on legal California residents in the tens of billions of dollars.”

*
MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com

LOS ANGELES MOST WANTED CRIMINALS – A WHO’S WHO OF LA RAZA “THE RACE”???
MURDER, RAPE, SEX OFFENDERS AND MEXICANS
VILLARAIGOSA’S MEXICAN OCCUPATION
WE ARE MEXICO’S WELFARE AND PRISON SYSTEM!

Thank you OP for the original posting. I went to that site and looked at all 206 Most wanted criminals in Los Angeles. Out of 206 criminals--183 are hispanic---171 of those are wanted for Murder.

Why do Americans still protect the illegals??

http://www.dailybreeze.com/ci_11255121?appSession=934140935651450&RecordID=&PageID=2&PrevPageID=&cpipage=1&CPISortType=&CPIorderBy=


TEN MOST WANTED IN CALIFORNIA ON ATTORNEY GENERAL’S LIST:
ALL MEXICANS!
TEN MOST WANTED CRIMINALS IN CALIFORNIA ARE MEXICANS!
http://ag.ca.gov/wanted/mostwanted.php?fid=mostWantedFugitives_2010-01

*
FROM JUDICIAL WATCH. org … get on their emails!

SANCTUARY COUNTY LOS ANGELES SPENDS $600 MILLION ON WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS

Illegal immigration continues to have a “catastrophic impact on Los Angeles County taxpayers,” the veteran county supervisor (Michael Antonovich) who revealed the information has said.

*
County Spends $600 Mil On Welfare For Illegal Immigrants
Last Updated: Thu, 03/11/2010 - 3:14pm
For the second consecutive year taxpayers in a single U.S. county will dish out more than half a billion dollars just to cover the welfare and food-stamp costs of illegal immigrants.
Los Angeles County, the nation’s most populous, may be in the midst of a dire financial crisis but somehow there are plenty of funds for illegal aliens. In January alone, anchor babies born to the county’s illegal immigrants collected more than $50 million in welfare benefits. At that rate the cash-strapped county will pay around $600 million this year to provide illegal aliens’ offspring with food stamps and other welfare perks.

THE EXORBITANT FIGURE DOES NOT INCLUDE THE ENORMOUS COST OF EDUCATING, MEDICALLY TREATING, OR INCARCERATING ILLEGALS ALIENS. THIS COSTS THE COUNTY AN ADDITIONAL ONE BILLION DOLLARS.

The exorbitant figure, revealed this week by a county supervisor, doesn’t even include the enormous cost of educating, medically treating or incarcerating illegal aliens in the sprawling county of about 10 million residents. Los Angeles County annually spends more than $1 billion for those combined services, including $500 million for healthcare and $350 million for public safety.
About a quarter of the county’s welfare and food stamp issuances go to parents who reside in the United States illegally and collect benefits for their anchor babies, according to the figures from the county’s Department of Social Services. In 2009 the tab ran $570 million and this year’s figure is expected to increase by several million dollars.
Illegal immigration continues to have a “catastrophic impact on Los Angeles County taxpayers,” the veteran county supervisor (Michael Antonovich) who revealed the information has said. The former fifth-grade history teacher has repeatedly come under fire from his liberal counterparts for publicizing statistics that confirm the devastation illegal immigration has had on the region. Antonovich, who has served on the board for nearly three decades, represents a portion of the county that is roughly twice the size of Rhode Island and has about 2 million residents.
His district is simply a snippet of a larger crisis. Nationwide, Americans pay around $22 billion annually to provide illegal immigrants with welfare benefits that include food assistance programs such as free school lunches in public schools, food stamps and a nutritional program (known as WIC) for low-income women and their children. Tens of billions more are spent on other social services, medical care, public education and legal costs such as incarceration and public defenders.
*
MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com

REALITY ON OBAMA'S "RECOVERY" - next assault on American Middle Class is his AMNESTY

Wsws.org
ASK YOURSELF WHY OBAMA CONTINUES HIS BACKROOM SELLOUT TO ILLEGALS. IS IT PART OF HIS SELLING OUT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO HIS WALL STREET DONORS, OR FOR THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES?

“Perhaps most ominous, the number of long-term unemployed—those laid off at least 27 weeks—shot up by 414,000 to reach 6.5 million. This category accounts for more than 40 percent of jobless workers, a far higher percentage than in the deep recession of 1981-82. The average length of unemployment in March rose to 31 weeks, the highest level on record going back more than six decades.”

“Average hourly wages continued their protracted decline.”

*

No economic recovery for the working class


7 April 2010
Last Friday’s US unemployment report, which showed a net payroll gain of 162,000 jobs in March, has been seized on by the Obama administration and much of the media as confirmation of official claims that the recession is over and a recovery in the jobs market has begun.
Calling the Labor Department report for March “the best news we’ve seen on the jobs front in more than two years,” President Obama said, “We are beginning to turn the corner.” The New York Times began its report on the jobs data with the words, “The clouds have parted.”
A closer look at the figures, however, leads to far less sanguine conclusions. The net gain in non-farm payrolls was far less than the 200,000 to 300,000 that had been predicted by most economists. Moreover, 88,000 of the new hires were temporary—including 48,000 brought on to conduct the US census survey.
The so-called underemployment rate, which includes those involuntarily working part-time and those who have given up looking for work, rose to 16.9 percent, the third straight monthly increase. The ranks of people seeking full-time employment but forced to work part-time increased to the staggering level of 9.1 million.
Perhaps most ominous, the number of long-term unemployed—those laid off at least 27 weeks—shot up by 414,000 to reach 6.5 million. This category accounts for more than 40 percent of jobless workers, a far higher percentage than in the deep recession of 1981-82. The average length of unemployment in March rose to 31 weeks, the highest level on record going back more than six decades.
Average hourly wages continued their protracted decline.
In the 27th month of a recession that has wiped out over 8 million jobs, the US economy produced fewer new full-time jobs than are needed to keep pace with the normal monthly growth in the labor market. Despite a slight uptick in manufacturing and construction—following months of contraction—the report reflects an economy mired in slump with no prospect of bringing unemployment down to pre-crisis levels for years to come.

(REALITY ON OBAMA: “CHANGE” IS MERELY AN ACCELERATED VERSION OF THE 20 YEARS OF CORPORATE RAPE AND PILLAGE – NO REGULATION – NO REAL TAXES UNDER BUSH, HILLARY, BILLARY, BUSH! No Wonder Obama Surrounded Himself With The Most Corrupt Of All Of These Administrations.)
To the extent that a slight increase in production in the real economy has occurred, it has been bound up with a massive assault on the jobs, wages, benefits and living standards of the working class. The ruling elite, spearheaded by the Obama administration, is using the economic crisis to effect a permanent reduction in the conditions of workers.
New and lower benchmarks for wages and working conditions are being set that will remain in place. They are not temporary. On this basis, corporate profits have soared despite near double-digit unemployment and depressed consumer spending.
The deterioration in the social position of the working class is reflected particularly sharply in productivity figures. In the fourth quarter of 2009, when the US gross domestic product (GDP) surged by 5.6 percent, productivity—the amount of production squeezed from each worker—rose at an annual rate of 6.9 percent. Unit labor costs fell sharply, by 5.9 percent. Inflation-adjusted hourly wages fell by 2.8 percent from the prior quarter.
These figures document a sharp rise in the intensity of the exploitation of the labor force.
Another indication of the class character of the so-called recovery is the divergence between GDP and a measure of national income—gross domestic income (GDI). In the third quarter of 2009, the GDI was still contracting even as the GDP rose 2.2 percent. The current gap between GDP and GDI is the biggest on record.
This statistical divergence reflects the fact that the present recovery is largely a rebound in corporate profits and the wealth of the financial elite, while the living standards of the vast majority of Americans are continuing to fall. This is a recovery in which class divisions and social inequality are widening.
(WALL STREET LOVES OBAMA! AND NOT JUST HIS BANKSTER DONORS!)
This can be seen further in a list published Sunday by the New York Times of the 30 highest-paid US corporate CEOs. Fully 10 of the 30 preside over firms that registered declines in revenue and net income in 2009, yet recorded gains in total return—a measure linked to the change in the company’s stock price. All but three of these CEOs saw their compensation increase over 2008.
The “success” of these corporations, and of their chief executives, was due overwhelmingly to cost-cutting measures that, even in the face of reduced revenues and income, drove up the firms’ share value. This provides a snapshot of the degree to which the “recovery” has been based on ruthless downsizing, wage-cutting and speedup.
To give a few examples:
* The third highest-paid CEO, Ray R. Irani of Occidental Petroleum, received $31.4 million, an increase of 39 percent. His firm suffered a 37 percent decline in revenue, a 57 percent decline in net income, but a 38 percent increase in total return.
* Susan M. Ivey, number 27 on the list, got an 84 percent increase in pay to $16.2 million. Her company, Reynolds American, recorded declines in revenue and net income of 5 and 28 percent, respectively, while its total return soared by 40 percent.
* Andrew N. Liveris of Dow Chemical, number 28 on the list, received $15.7 million, a pay hike of 23 percent. His company’s revenue fell 22 percent, its net income fell 61 percent, but its total return jumped 87 percent.
Alongside cost-cutting and increased exploitation of labor, the recovery has been sustained by government bailouts of the banks and a virtually unlimited supply of cheap credit by central banks in the US and around the world. This has driven up stock prices all out of proportion to the state of the real economy and fueled even greater speculative excesses than those which precipitated the 2008 financial crash. Recent weeks, for example, have seen an explosive growth in the junk bond market.
Far from resolving the underlying contradictions of world capitalism, this plundering of public resources has intensified them. Massive, structural imbalances in the global economy—particularly between deficit countries, led by the US, and exporting, surplus countries, led by China and Germany—have grown more pronounced.
Facing record levels of state debt and budget deficits, the US is seeking to increase its exports at the expense of its rivals, but so are all of the other major deficit countries, while surplus nations such as China and Germany fiercely defend their export markets. At the same time, the emptying of state treasuries to rescue the financial elite has increased the pressure for draconian austerity measures to reduce government outlays. This, in turn, can only further depress consumption, making the competition between countries for export markets all the more ferocious and increasing the likelihood of outright trade and currency wars.
The Obama administration, which has pledged to double US exports in five years, appears to be basing its economic strategy on driving down American labor costs to the point where US manufacturing can be at least partially revived as a cheap labor center for export abroad.
Under conditions of long-term mass unemployment, declining wages, growing poverty, record personal bankruptcies and soaring home foreclosures, the entire economy increasingly resembles a house of cards. The revival of the housing market, which is key to any genuine recovery, appears highly problematic with home foreclosures expected to rise from 1.7 million in 2009 to 2.2 million this year.
For the working class, there is no real recovery within the framework of the capitalist system. To avert ever more brutal conditions of exploitation and poverty, it must organize its resistance on the basis of a socialist, revolutionary and internationalist perspective.
Barry Grey