Monday, February 27, 2012

CALDERON - THE MEX DRUG CARTELS LOVE HIM!

Posted: 27 Feb 2012 08:54 AM PST
It might seem surprising. Despite more than five years of heavy bloodshed in Mexico, President Felipe Calderon retains relatively high approval ratings.
Some 58 percent of those surveyed offered approval of Calderon while 29 percent neither approved nor disapproved, and 11 percent disapproved.
Also surprising: Mexicans are far less concerned about drug-related violence than they were just a year ago. In May 2011, 48 percent of those polled said security was the most important issue facing the government. The new poll found that had fallen to 33 percent.
The poll was published today in El Universal, and conducted among 1,000 people Feb. 8-13. The margin of error is said to be 3.5 percent. Unfortunately, the story appears to be behind a paywall.
Calderon registered 60 percent approval ratings in August 2008, dipping to a low of 53 percent last August. The numbers, then, have bumped up in the last six months.
Granted, Mexicans tend to put their presidents on pedestals. Calderon’s predecessor, Vicente Fox, left office in 2006 with approval ratings approaching 70 percent even though in hindsight experts call his government the lost sexenio, or six-year presidential term, because of his limited success in dismantling the scaffolding of the one-party state set up over seven decades by the authoritarian Institutional Revolutionary Party. Calderon leaves office at the end of this year.
In the final decades of the 20th century, Mexicans grew accustomed to economic turmoil during political transitions, a phenomenon that became known as the “sexenio curse.” That doesn’t happen these days. Mexico’s economy is expected to grow above 3 percent this year, only a slight dip from 3.9 percent in 2011.


SMITH: Obama budget’s backdoor amnesty

President’s spending plan weakens immigration enforcement

By Rep. Lamar Smith

-

The Washington Times

Thursday, February 23, 2012

President Obama's fiscal 2013 budget came out this month and again includes the same spending, borrowing and taxing policies that have come to define his presidency. No surprise, this spending blueprint cuts several worthwhile immigration-enforcement and border-security programs.

The president's budget continues his administration's policies of ignoring laws requiring the removal of illegal immigrants. Last year, the Obama administration issued new deportation guidelines that amount to backdoor amnesty. The spending priorities contained in his budget are no different. At least the president is consistent.

Under his budget for 2013, Mr. Obama reduces the number of detention bed spaces by 1,200 beds - from 34,000 to 32,800. The administration proposes using the resulting funds to enhance its alternatives-to-detention programs. But these programs result in higher levels of illegal immigrants disappearing into American communities.

In fact, Department of Justice records reveal that since 1996, 40 percent of all non-detained illegal immigrants in removal proceedings simply became fugitives. Unfortunately, the president's budget builds on this record of failure. Detention is the only proven method of preventing illegal immigrants from avoiding deportation.

The president's spending proposal also reduces funding for the 287(g) program by 25 percent. The 287(g) program allows state and local governments to partner with the federal government to assist in the enforcement of immigration laws. This successful program has identified tens of thousands of illegal immigrants in prisons and jails nationwide.

The Obama administration also has announced that it will no longer consider additional requests for 287(g) partnerships. It makes no sense to get rid of such a valuable program.

Mr. Obama's fiscal 2013 budget request also undermines border security and national security. Last year, the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office found that just 44 percent of the Southwestern border was under the operational control of the Border Patrol. Most of the border remains porous to human smugglers, drug traffickers and illegal immigrants.

Rather than take steps to gain control of the U.S.-Mexico border, the president's budget contains a plan to develop a "border security index" to measure enforcement progress along the Southwestern border. The administration thinks this new test will help manipulate the facts to produce a passing grade for the administration and back its claims that the border is secure.

But this index is just a cover-up for the administration's failure to fully enforce immigration laws. There is no substitute for improved border security coupled with increased interior enforcement of drug and immigration laws.

The president's budget also contains no funding for the implementation of the Real ID Act. But this comes as no surprise because the administration already has delayed this law from taking effect until January 2013. Real ID prohibits illegal immigrants, including foreign terrorists, from obtaining valid forms of identification that can be used to board planes and enter federal buildings. Real ID already has been law for six years and should be fully implemented. This is another example of the administration not enforcing current laws.

The president's spending blueprint contains no funding for expansion of the Visa Security Program (VSP). This program increases the security of the visa process at U.S. embassies and consulates in "highest-risk" countries. At visa-issuing posts where VSP exists, all applicants receive additional screening. Unfortunately, such screening exists only at 19 locations out of a list of about 50 designated "highest-risk" posts worldwide. Not expanding the VSP makes it easier for terrorists to get visas to the United States.

We must secure our borders to prevent national security threats from becoming reality. It's past time to construct a budget that reduces illegal immigration and increases border security. The president's budget takes us in the wrong direction.

Rep. Lamar Smith, Texas Republican, is chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.

For African Americans, 50 years of high unemployment | Economic Policy Institute - PAYING FOR MEXICO'S INVASION

For African Americans, 50 years of high unemployment Economic Policy Institute


SINCE RECONSTRUCTION, NOTHING HAS IMPACTED BLACK AMERICANS MORE THAN THE INVASION OF 38 MILLION MEXICANS!

JOBS GO FIRST TO "CHEAP" LABOR ILLEGALS TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED FOR THE PAYMASTERS OF POLITICIANS.

THE TRAGEDY OF AMERICAN IS THAT THE FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT HAS SOLD AN ENTIRE NATION OUT FOR THE ILLEGALS'  VOTES. OBAMA HAS SABOTAGED E-VERIFY AND HAS LA RAZA SUPREMACIST AS SEC. OF (ILLEGAL) LABOR!







CALIFORNIA UNDER LA RAZA OCCUPATION:

LOS ANGELES IS THE WESTERN GATEWAY FOR THE MEX DRUG CARTELS. THE CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR CHARACTERIZES IS TAS THE “MEX GANG CAPITAL of AMERICA”. THE CA ATTORNEY GENERAL DECLARES THAT HALF THE MURDERS IN CA ARE BY MEX GANGS! THERE ARE ONLY EIGHT (8) STATES WITH A POPULATION GREATER THAN LOS ANGELES COUNTY WHERE HALF THE JOBS ARE HELD BY ILLEGALS  USING STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS. THE LA RAZA FACTION OF THE CA STATE LEGISLATURE JUST PASSED A LAW MAKING IT ILLEGAL FOR EMPLOYERS TO USE E-VERIFY! THIS COUNTY PAYS OUT $600 MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS, PRIMARILY ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS. ONE OF MEXICO’S BIGGEST EXPORTS ARE PREGNANT WOMEN! THE CHILDREN OF THESE ILLEGALS WILL ALSO BE CITIZENS OF MEXICO.

“In the past month, you have read my four part series on the ramifications of adding 100 million immigrants to America within the next 38 years.”

PAT BUCHANAN’S NEW BOOK: “Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?”
*
THE BELOW ARTICLE COMES FROM MEX-OWNED NEW YORK TIMES, WHICH IS NOW 10% OWNED BY THE RICHEST MAN IN THE WORLD, MEXICAN CARLOS SLIM.
THE TIMES IS NOW THE MOUTHPIECE FOR LA RAZA PROPAGANDA FOR OPEN BORDERS AND AMNESTY. YOU SIMPLY WILL NOT READ ANYTHING ABOUT THE TRUE COST OF MEXICO’S INVASION, WELFARE STATE IN OUR BORDERS, OR CRIME TIDAL WAVE IN THE TIMES!

Please report, broadcast, distribute, deliver to lawmakers, post, forward, and relay far and wide!
*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/alipac-william-gheen-exposes-wikileaks.html
*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/wikileaks-exposed-obamas-la-raza-open.html
“What's needed to discourage illegal immigration into the United States has been known for years: Enforce existing law.” ….. CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR
 Lou Dobbs Tonight Monday,
June 16, 2008
The massive corporate mouthpiece the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is holding a “North American Forum” to lay out its “shared vision” for the United States, Canada and Mexico – which is to say a borderless, pro-business super-state in which U.S. sovereignty will be dissolved. Undercover investigators have found incredibly lax security and enforcement at U.S. border crossings, according to a new report by the Government Accountability Office. This report comes on the heels of a separate report by U.C. San Diego that shows tougher border security efforts aren’t deterring illegal entries to the United States.
Chamber of Commerce Says It Supports Path 'To Legitimacy' for 12 Million Illegal Aliens
Wednesday, January 12, 2011
By
Penny Starr

ALIPAC Poll on Presidential Primary REGISTER YOUR THOUGHTS TODAY!

Friends of ALIPAC,

From time to time we survey our supporters on our e-mail alert lists to learn more about what you think and what you want us to be doing. We do our best to include your input and hearing from you helps us to better represent you in the national fight against illegal immigration and against Amnesty. Please take a few short minutes to complete our six question online poll.

You will need an ALIPAC account to vote. You can create one quickly. Please use the Lost Password feature to reset your password if you are using ALIPAC 2.0 for the first time.

All poll votes are confidential. For assistance or more private feedback, please write to WilliamG@alipac.us


ALIPAC's 2012 Online Poll

Poll 1: I'm an ALIPAC Supporter and my opinion of Barack Obama is...?

http://www.alipac.us/f18/poll-1-im-alipac-supporter-my-opinion-barack-obama-251675/



Poll 2: My view on the GOP Presidential Primary?

http://www.alipac.us/f18/poll-2-my-view-gop-presidential-primary-251677/



Poll 3: My opinions of ALIPAC's performance?

http://www.alipac.us/f18/poll-3-my-views-performance-alipac-fighting-against-illegal-immigration-251679/


Poll 4: My opinion of the new ALIPAC 2.0 website is?

http://www.alipac.us/f18/poll-4-my-opinion-new-alipac-2-0-website-251680/



Poll 5: My support for ALIPAC includes any of the following? (Multiple Choice)

http://www.alipac.us/f18/poll-5-my-support-alipac-includes-any-following-mult-choice-251691/



Poll 6: Non donors only, please select all that apply (Multiple Choice)

http://www.alipac.us/f18/poll-6-non-donors-only-reasons-i-do-not-donate-alipac-mult-choice-251692/



Thank you for taking just a few short minutes to let us know what you think about these issues.

The ALIPAC Team
www.alipac.us

NARCOMEX IN MELTDOWN ON OUR OPEN & UNDEFENDED BORDERS! U.S. State Department warning maps out unsafe areas of Mexico

U.S. State Department warning maps out unsafe areas of Mexico


http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2012/02/illegals-mexican-invasion-and-fall-of.html

Santorum and Romney fight their own class war in Michigan

Santorum and Romney fight their own class war in Michigan

BUT WHO WOULD WORKER HARDER FOR ILLEGALS?

IN OUR HISTORYM, NO ONE HAS WORKED HARDER THAN HISPANDERING BARACK OBAMA!



http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2012/02/illegals-mexican-invasion-and-fall-of.html




CALIFORNIA UNDER LA RAZA OCCUPATION:

LOS ANGELES IS THE WESTERN GATEWAY FOR THE MEX DRUG CARTELS. THE CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR CHARACTERIZES IS TAS THE “MEX GANG CAPITAL of AMERICA”. THE CA ATTORNEY GENERAL DECLARES THAT HALF THE MURDERS IN CA ARE BY MEX GANGS! THERE ARE ONLY EIGHT (8) STATES WITH A POPULATION GREATER THAN LOS ANGELES COUNTY WHERE HALF THE JOBS ARE HELD BY ILLEGALS  USING STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS. THE LA RAZA FACTION OF THE CA STATE LEGISLATURE JUST PASSED A LAW MAKING IT ILLEGAL FOR EMPLOYERS TO USE E-VERIFY! THIS COUNTY PAYS OUT $600 MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS, PRIMARILY ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS. ONE OF MEXICO’S BIGGEST EXPORTS ARE PREGNANT WOMEN! THE CHILDREN OF THESE ILLEGALS WILL ALSO BE CITIZENS OF MEXICO.

“In the past month, you have read my four part series on the ramifications of adding 100 million immigrants to America within the next 38 years.”

DHS USES SOCIAL MEDIA AGAINST LEGALS - DHS = PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP - Obama's Agenda of Open & UNDEFEDED BORDERS!

DHS Uses Social Media to Monitor Backdoor Amnesty Blowback


A recently released 2011 reference guide for analysts working for the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Media Monitoring Capability program reveals its mission includes keeping an eye on those who disagree with the Administration’s backdoor amnesty initiatives. (NY Times, Feb. 22, 2012) According to the guide, DHS is directing its analysts to identify and monitor “media reports that reflect adversely on DHS,” and track reports on the Administration’s “policy changes” in immigration and the term “illegal immigration” in particular. (Id.; see also 2011 DHS Manual, pp. 5-6)

The 2011 guide raises questions about recent claims by DHS officials who portrayed the program as limited to gathering information that would help gain operational awareness about attacks, disasters or other emerging problems. In addition to the analyst guide, DHS documents released in 2009 also indicate the Department is monitoring more than terrorist activity. Those documents reveal that DHS’ Social Networking/Media Capability program placed emphasis on gauging “public reaction to major government proposals with homeland security implications.” (See EPIC webpage; see also DHS documents acquired by EPIC)

The negative reaction to DHS’ “big brother” tactics has been overwhelmingly bipartisan. On Feb. 16, the House Subcommittee on Counterterrorism and Intelligence held a hearing on DHS’ monitoring of social networking and the media. (See Subcommittee Website, Feb. 16, 2012) Chairman of the Subcommittee, Patrick Meehan (R-PA), said DHS’ collection of intelligence on media reports adversely reflecting the government crosses the line and pointed out the “chilling effect” such monitoring could have on freedom of speech. (Rep. Meehan Opening Statement, Feb. 16, 2012) Ranking Member Jackie Speier (D-CA) described DHS’ ability to “build files on bloggers” as “outrageous” and a “violation of the Privacy Act.” She also said, “This…should not be a political operation and capturing public reactions to major government proposals is not something [the government] should be doing.” (Bloomberg Government Transcript, Feb. 16, 2012)

At the same hearing, DHS Chief Privacy Officer Mary Ellen Callahan denied allegations that DHS is capturing public reactions. “[Such behavior] would not have met the privacy standards that are in the five publicly available privacy impact assessments we've done.” (Bloomberg Government Transcript, Feb. 16, 2012)

The DHS analyst guide continues a pattern of efforts by President Obama to suppress views contrary to his Administration’s, such as the White House’s “flag” program during the healthcare debate and his campaign’s AttackWatch.com. (See Politico, Aug. 17, 2009; see also EPIC webpage)


IN A TIME WHEN OBAMA PREACHES THAT NO DOLLAR SHOULD NOT BE SQUANDERED IN THE WARS OVER THERE TO PREVENT TERRORISM, HE CAN’T PUSH OUR BORDERS OPEN WIDE ENOUGH FOR MORE ILLEGALS!

*

WIKILEAKS EXPOSES OBAMA’S AGENDA OF OPEN BORDERS WITH NARCOMEX


CA LAWYER RICHARD HILARY GIBSON of WOODLAND HILLS/LOS ANGELES & THE STALKING of AMERICA USING CRAIGSLIST AS HIS PLATFORM

CA LAWYER RICHARD HILARY GIBSON SPENDS 20 HOURS A DAY, SEVEN DAYS A WEEK, INCLUDING HOLIDAYS, FLAG HARASSING, STALKING, THREATENING POSTERS AND POSTING HATES CRIMES.

GIBSON HARASSES THE HANDICAPPED - CRAIGS LIST IS HIS PARTNER!

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2012/03/ca-lawyer-richard-hilary-gibson.html


100% OF THE POSTS ON CL LOS ANGELES POLITICS AND RANTS FORUMS, AS WELL AS DETROIT, AND VIRTUALLY, IF NOT ALL CL SITES AROUND THE NATION ARE CONTROLLED BY THIS STALKER!


CRAIGSLIST DETROIT IS ANOTHER POLITICS FORUM CONTROLLED BY FLAGGING HARASSMENT BY RICHARD HILARY GIBSON.

GIBSON DELETES A POLITICAL POSTS, AND THEN QUICKLY ONE THAT EXPOSES HIM AS A STALKER.

Deleted
det politics
2012-02-27 09:22
2873505321


 



craigslist > manage posting
[ logged in as archive11@att.net ] [ logout ]




This posting has been flagged for removal. [?]




detroit metro craigslist > macomb co > community > politics

alert for the CL FLAGGER STALKER (RICHARD HILARY GIBSON)




Date: 2012-02-27, 12:22PM EST
Reply to:
your anonymous craigslist address will appear here








IF YOU'RE BEING FLAG HARASSED HERE, DROP US A NOTE. WE WILL PROVIDE INFO ON GIBS CRIMINAL STALKING, IDENTITY THEFT AND FLAGGING HARASSMENT WHICH TAKES PLACE ON ALL CL POLITICS AND RANTS FORUMS AROUND THE NATION!



·         Location: RICHARD HILARY GIBSON

·         it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests


PostingID



*



Deleted
det politics
2012-02-27 07:22
2873255133



*

craigslist > manage posting
[ logged in as archive11@att.net ] [ logout ]




This posting has been flagged for removal. [?]




detroit metro craigslist > macomb co > community > politics

Romney vs OBAMA who will work harder for ILLEGALS? (POSTED! NO LEGAL NEED APPLY)




Date: 2012-02-27, 10:22AM EST
Reply to:
your anonymous craigslist address will appear here







·         Location: POSTED! NO LEGAL NEED APPLY

·         it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests


PostingID


PAT BUCANAN'S BOOK: SUICIDE of a SUPERPOWER: WILL America Survive to 2025? - WILL AMERICAN SURVIVE MEXICO'S INVASION AND LA RAZA SUPREMACY?

PAT BUCHANAN’S NEW BOOK: “Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?”






THE BELOW ARTICLE COMES FROM MEX-OWNED NEW YORK TIMES, WHICH IS NOW 10% OWNED BY THE RICHEST MAN IN THE WORLD, MEXICAN CARLOS SLIM.

THE TIMES IS NOW THE MOUTHPIECE FOR LA RAZA PROPAGANDA FOR OPEN BORDERS AND AMNESTY. YOU SIMPLY WILL NOT READ ANYTHING ABOUT THE TRUE COST OF MEXICO’S INVASION, WELFARE STATE IN OUR BORDERS, OR CRIME TIDAL WAVE IN THE TIMES!



February 26, 2012

With Book, Buchanan Set His Fate


As the conservative polemicist Pat Buchanan prepared last fall for the release of his book “Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?,” some friends who worked with him at MSNBC were worried. The book, they told him, would provoke controversy and threaten his professional well-being.

Undeterred, Mr. Buchanan began his book tour, but his friends were right. He stopped being asked to appear on shows on MSNBC, the cable news channel where he had been employed for nearly 10 years. On Feb. 16, the channel said in a brief statement: “We’ve parted ways with Pat Buchanan. We wish him well.”  (MSNBC IS TO LIBERALS WHAT FOX IS TO CONSERVATIVES. IT IS THE LA RAZA NEWS! IT PUSHES LA RAZA NEWS AS MUCH AS MEX-OWNED NEW YORK TIMES!)

Why was he pushed out? To Mr. Buchanan, 73, a white Catholic, his departure was a disappointing overreaction both to the book — which conveyed his long-held concerns about the effects of demographic changes in the United States — and to complaints about it by liberal advocacy groups.

In the pessimistic book, he bemoaned that birthrate trends and “Third World” immigration were precipitating “the end of white America.”

At MSNBC, “there was apprehension that my book would cause some kind of explosion and firestorm, which it did not,” Mr. Buchanan said by telephone on Saturday. “To be honest, I’ve never had a better reception for a book I’ve written.”

To executives at MSNBC, however, the book’s statements were indefensible and, though they did not say so publicly, incongruent with a channel that has branded itself as progressive and forward-thinking and has a disproportionately high share of African-American and Hispanic viewers.

Though Phil Griffin, the president of MSNBC, denied that the channel’s political identity was a consideration in the breakup, he said last week, “I want MSNBC to reflect America in the 21st century, not the America of the 1940s.”

As cable news channels like MSNBC and Fox News Channel have grown highly politicized, they have become arbiters of the bounds of acceptable discourse — not always a comfortable role for those involved. A corporate allergy to controversy sometimes exists, even though controversy is what sometimes motivates channels to hire commentators and compels people to watch.

Timothy Stanley, a British historian whose biography of Mr. Buchanan, “The Crusader,” was released two weeks ago, said he thought the departure was a “marketing decision” by MSNBC, a unit of Comcast. “They took an opportunity to get rid of someone who was doing damage to their liberal brand.”

Mr. Buchanan has always been an ardent conservative. That’s why he was hired by MSNBC in 2002, after spending the previous 20 years as host of CNN’s “Crossfire” between unsuccessful runs for president. At that time, MSNBC called itself “fiercely independent” and had no clear political tilt.

Though accused by some of hate and intolerance, Mr. Buchanan was, for a long time, the visible conservative commentator on MSNBC. He was well liked by colleagues at the channel, even by those with opposite views. “Nobody was more polite, gracious and charming,” said David Shuster, who shared an office with him for several years and is now a substitute anchor for Current TV, a liberal competitor of MSNBC.

Mr. Buchanan was paid well, too. By 2007, he was making more than $500,000 a year at MSNBC, the most of any commentator, according to past and present MSNBC employees who insisted on anonymity because contract details were confidential. The employees said his salary was high in part because he was co-anchor of a show in 2002 and 2003.

And he was writing conservative calls to arms all the while. In 2002, it was “The Death of the West: How Dying Populations and Immigrant Invasions Imperil Our Country and Civilization;” in 2006, it was “State of Emergency: The Third World Invasion and Conquest of America.”

While the most recent book is “much more comprehensive,” Mr. Buchanan said, “basically the theme is the same one.”

But MSNBC is not the same channel. In the last few years it has leaned to the left, particularly in prime time, causing Mr. Buchanan to seem more and more like an outlier, even on “Morning Joe,” the talk show co-hosted by Joe Scarborough, a former Republican member of Congress. Mr. Buchanan occasionally came up against MSNBC’s boundaries. In early October he referred to President Obama as “your boy, Barack Obama” in a debate with the Rev. Al Sharpton, and some viewers took it as a racial slur, spurring him to say on “Morning Joe” the next day that he was using boxing terminology.

Two weeks later, “Suicide of a Superpower” was released and was picked apart by liberal groups like Media Matters for America. Mr. Griffin, who had an advance copy, was troubled by its overall lament of diversity and by specific insinuations, including that American Jews had made a “collective decision” to decrease their population through abortion and that the “diverse army of today” may not be superior to the all-white Confederate Army of the Civil War.

In explaining their points of view, Mr. Buchanan and Mr. Griffin found themselves saying the same thing, “Read the book.”

Mr. Stanley said that “Buchanan is very clever and careful at not saying whether the end of white America is a good or bad thing.”

The channel halted Mr. Buchanan’s appearances. He started promoting his book on Fox News, which has higher ratings than MSNBC, and other outlets. He rebuffed Mr. Griffin’s proposal for an hourlong debate with Mr. Sharpton about the book. In November, he fell ill and was hospitalized for 10 days, he said.

In January, as Mr. Buchanan’s absence gained attention, Mr. Griffin was quoted as saying that “the ideas he put forth aren’t really appropriate for national dialogue, much less the dialogue on MSNBC.” They soon started discussing severance terms, Mr. Buchanan said. MSNBC executives said they were relieved that his departure had received relatively little attention when it was announced. Dismayed, however, several of the channel’s hosts spoke up in support of him.

Mr. Scarborough and his co-host, Mika Brzezinski, said in a statement that while they disagreed “strongly” with the book, they believed “those differences should have been debated in public,” on “Morning Joe.”

Chris Matthews, a longtime friend, said on his show: “To Pat, the world can never be better than the one he grew up in as a young boy — Blessed Sacrament Church and Grade School, Gonzaga High School, Georgetown University. No country will ever be better than the United States of America of the early 1950s.”

That was one of Mr. Griffin’s points: that Mr. Buchanan was a product of a earlier era. Some conservatives called his removal “censorship.” Others said it contributed to the narrowing of the American mind — liberals at MSNBC, conservatives at Fox. Mr. Buchanan seemed to agree; “the American people are divorcing one another, they’re separating from one another,” he said. (He appeared on Fox on Feb. 17, the day after his departure was made public, though he said over the weekend that he had not been offered a job there.)

But Michael Steele, the former Republican National Committee chairman, said he was asked to be an MSNBC contributor last year specifically to create “greater ideological diversity.”

“I don’t believe Pat’s departure is a signal that Phil is backing away from that,” Mr. Steele said by e-mail. “Instead you’re beginning to see the emergence of ‘diverse’ conservative voices like Steve Schmidt, Robert Traynham, Meghan McCain and Robert Costa appearing on various shows throughout the day and evening. No doubt, Pat’s passion and fight will continue — it just may look and sound a bit different.”

*

PAT BUCHANAN ON OBAMA’S HISPANDERING FOR  THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES:

What is the response of Barack Obama, who took an oath to see to it that federal laws are faithfully executed?

He is siding with the law-breakers. He is pandering to the ethnic lobbies. He is not berating a Mexican regime that aids and abets this invasion of the country of which he is commander in chief. Instead, he attacks the government of Arizona for trying to fill a gaping hole in law enforcement left by his own dereliction of duty.

*

TOWNHALL.com



Whose Country Is This?




Pat Buchanan
Tuesday, April 27, 2010

With the support of 70 percent of its citizens, Arizona has ordered sheriffs and police to secure the border and remove illegal aliens, half a million of whom now reside there.

Arizona acted because the U.S. government has abdicated its constitutional duty to protect the states from invasion and refuses to enforce America's immigration laws.

"We in Arizona have been more than patient waiting for Washington to act," said Gov. Jan Brewer. "But decades of inaction and misguided policy have created an unacceptable situation."

We have a crisis in Arizona because we have a failed state in Washington.

What is the response of Barack Obama, who took an oath to see to it that federal laws are faithfully executed?

He is siding with the law-breakers. He is pandering to the ethnic lobbies. He is not berating a Mexican regime that aids and abets this invasion of the country of which he is commander in chief. Instead, he attacks the government of Arizona for trying to fill a gaping hole in law enforcement left by his own dereliction of duty.

He has denounced Arizona as "misguided." He has called on the Justice Department to ensure that Arizona's sheriffs and police do not violate anyone's civil rights. But he has said nothing about the rights of the people of Arizona who must deal with the costs of having hundreds of thousands of lawbreakers in their midst.

How's that for Andrew Jackson-style leadership?

Obama has done everything but his duty to enforce the law.

Undeniably, making it a state as well as a federal crime to be in this country illegally, and requiring police to check the immigration status of anyone they have a "reasonable suspicion" is here illegally, is tough and burdensome. But what choice did Arizona have?

The state has a fiscal crisis caused in part by the burden of providing schooling and social welfare for illegals and their families, who consume far more in services than they pay in taxes and who continue to pour in. Even John McCain is now calling for 3,000 troops on the border.

Police officers and a prominent rancher have been murdered. There have been kidnappings believed to be tied to the Mexican drug cartels. There are nightly high-speed chases through the barrios where innocent people are constantly at risk.

If Arizona does not get control of the border and stop the invasion, U.S. citizens will stop coming to Arizona and will begin to depart, as they are already fleeing California.



A country that cannot control its borders isn't really a country anymore, Ronald Reagan reminded us.



What we are talking about here is the Balkanization and breakup of a nation into ethnic enclaves. A country that cannot control its borders isn't really a country anymore, Ronald Reagan reminded us.

The tasks that Arizonans are themselves undertaking are ones that belong by right, the Constitution and federal law to the Border Patrol, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and Homeland Security.

Arizona has been compelled to assume the feds' role because the feds won't do their job. And for that dereliction of duty the buck stops on the desk of the president of the United States.

Why is Obama paralyzed? Why does he not enforce the law, even if he dislikes it, by punishing the businessmen who hire illegals and by sending the 12 million to 20 million illegals back home? President Eisenhower did it. Why won't he?

*

OBAMA THE HISPANDERING PRESIDENT SELLING OUT HIS OWN COUNTRY FOR THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES!

*



Because he is politically correct. Because he owes a big debt to the Hispanic lobby that helped deliver two-thirds of that vote in 2008. Though most citizens of Hispanic descent in Arizona want the border protected and the laws enforced, the Hispanic lobby demands that the law be changed.

Fair enough. But the nation rose up as one to reject the "path-to-citizenship" -- i.e., amnesty -- that the 2007 plan of George W. Bush, McCain, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama envisioned.

Al Sharpton threatens to go to Phoenix and march in the streets against the new Arizona law. Let him go.



JOBS? NO LEGAL NEED APPLY HERE!



Let us see how many African-Americans, who are today frozen out of the 8 million jobs held by illegal aliens that might otherwise go to them or their children, will march to defend an invasion for which they are themselves paying the heaviest price.

Last year, while Americans were losing a net of 5 million jobs, the U.S. government -- Bush and Obama both -- issued 1,131,000 green cards to legal immigrants to come and take the jobs that did open up, a flood of immigrants equaled in only four other years in our history.

What are we doing to our own people?

Whose country is this, anyway?

America today has an establishment that, because it does not like the immigration laws, countenances and condones wholesale violation of those laws.

Nevertheless, under those laws, the U.S. government is obligated to deport illegal aliens and punish businesses that knowingly hire them.

This is not an option. It is an obligation.

Can anyone say Barack Obama is meeting that obligation?

*

FAIRUS.org

The Administration's Phantom Immigration Enforcement Policy

According to DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s borders (Southwestern or otherwise) are secure, and gaining control is not even a goal of the department.

By Ira Mehlman
Published on 12/07/2009
Townhall.com

The setting was not quite the flight deck of the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln with a “Mission Accomplished” banner as the backdrop, but it was the next best thing. Speaking at the Center for American Progress (CAP) on Nov. 13, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano declared victory over illegal immigration and announced that the Obama administration is ready to move forward with a mass amnesty for the millions of illegal aliens already living in the United States.

Arguing the Obama administration’s case for amnesty, Napolitano laid out what she described as the “three-legged stool” for immigration reform. As the administration views it, immigration reform must include “a commitment to serious and effective enforcement, improved legal flows for families and workers, and a firm but fair way to deal with those who are already here.”

Acknowledging that a lack of confidence in the government’s ability and commitment to effectively enforce the immigration laws it passes proved to be the Waterloo of previous efforts to gain amnesty for illegal aliens, Napolitano was quick to reassure the American public that those concerns could be put to rest.

“For starters, the security of the Southwest border has been transformed from where it was in 2007,” stated the secretary. Not only is the border locked up tight, she continued, but the situation is well in-hand in the interior of the country as well. “We’ve also shown that the government is serious and strategic in its approach to enforcement by making changes in how we enforce the law in the interior of the country and at worksites…Furthermore, we’ve transformed worksite enforcement to truly address the demand side of illegal immigration.”

If Rep. Joe Wilson had been in attendance to hear Secretary Napolitano’s CAP speech he might well have had a few choice comments to offer. But since he wasn’t, we will have to rely on the Department of Homeland Security’s own data to assess the veracity of Napolitano’s claims.

According to DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s borders (Southwestern or otherwise) are secure, and gaining control is not even a goal of the department. DHS claims to have “effective control” over just 894 miles of border. That’s 894 out of 8,607 miles they are charged with protecting. As for the other 7,713 miles? DHS’s stated border security goal for FY 2010 is the same 894 miles.

The administration’s strategic approach to interior and worksite enforcement is just as chimerical as its strategy at the border, unless one considers shuffling paper to be a strategy. DHS data, released November 18, show that administrative arrests of immigration law violators fell by 68 percent between 2008 and 2009. The department also carried out 60 percent fewer arrests for criminal violations of immigration laws, 58 percent fewer criminal indictments, and won 63 percent fewer convictions.

While the official unemployment rate has climbed from 7.6 percent when President Obama took office in January to 10 percent today, the administration’s worksite enforcement strategy has amounted to a bureaucratic game of musical chairs. The administration has all but ended worksite enforcement actions and replaced them with paperwork audits. When the audits determine that illegal aliens are on the payroll, employers are given the opportunity to fire them with little or no adverse consequence to the company, while no action is taken to remove the illegal workers from the country. The illegal workers simply acquire a new set of fraudulent documents and move on to the next employer seeking workers willing to accept substandard wages.

In Janet Napolitano’s alternative reality a mere 10 percent of our borders under “effective control” and sharp declines in arrests and prosecutions of immigration lawbreakers may be construed as confidence builders, but it is hard to imagine that the American public is going to see it that way. If anything, the administration’s record has left the public less confident that promises of future immigration enforcement would be worth the government paper they’re printed on.

As Americans scrutinize the administration’s plans to overhaul immigration policy, they are likely to find little in the “three-legged stool” being offered that they like or trust. The first leg – enforcement – the administration has all but sawed off. The second – increased admissions of extended family members and workers – makes little sense with some 25 million Americans either unemployed or relegated to part-time work. And the third – amnesty for millions of illegal aliens – is anathema to their sense of justice and fair play.

As Americans well know, declaring “Mission Accomplished” and actually accomplishing a mission are two completely different things. When it comes to enforcing immigration laws, the only message the public is receiving from this administration is “Mission Aborted.”

*

MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com

*

Lou Dobbs Tonight
Monday, September 28, 2009

And T.J. BONNER, president of the National Border Patrol Council, will weigh in on the federal government’s decision to pull nearly 400 agents from the U.S.-Mexican border. As always, Lou will take your calls to discuss the issues that matter most-and to get your thoughts on where America is headed.

*