Wednesday, September 15, 2010

STOP Immigration NOW... (All of it!) .... An American Sees & Speaks

STOP Immigration NOW... (All of it!)

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 2010-09-15, 2:33PM PDT
Reply to: comm-uqhah-1955971552@craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------



We need to stop Immigration immediately. Illegal and legal. That's right I am saying what needs to be said. Close the borders round up the illegals and deport. And unfortunately for anyone who wants to come here legally they will have to wait until we get back on "Our" feet. Hey guys we've been hit by an earthquake, tornado, floods, fires in the form of who and what is in power. We are in disaster mode now. What happens when inflation hits? Can you afford that $10 a gallon milk for your kids to drink or will you register with the government for handouts? Yeah it's that serious. It's about to hit the proverbial fan. We can no longer sustain ourselves as a nation never mind illegals or any new people. We need help we can't afford to lend money that we have to borrow. Come on guys let's go - regroup take back our rights. Start lobbying your State to look into secession. The main job of the federal government is protection(not to give out hand outs) They haven't even done that right! They have used our military to "globalize" more. We need to dismantle this monster before its too late.

Location: All of it!

MEXICO - A dumpster of a country

MEXICANS ARE THE MOST VIOLENT AND RACIST PEOPLE IN THE HEMISPHERE! THEY COMMIT MORE MURDERS DAILY THAN ANY OTHER CULTURE! IN LOS ANGELES ALONE, MEXICAN GANGS MURDER BLACKS IN COLD BLOOD ROUTINELY. THERE ARE MORE MEX GANG MURDERS IN L.A. ALONE THAN ANY E.U. NATION!
AS ALWAYS… THIS SHAMELESS COUNTRY THAT EXPORTS THEIR PREGNANT OVER OUR BORDERS FOR “FREE” ANCHOR BABY BIRTHING AND 18 YEARS OF WELFARE… BLAMES THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHO HAVE PERMITTED 38 MILLION OF THEM OVER OUR BORDERS AND INTO OUR JOBS, WELFARE, OR JAILS!

*
WHILE THEIR OWN CULTURE IS A DUMPSTER THAT DROVE THEM OVER OUR BORDERS, THEY REMAIN CONTEMPTUOUS OF OUR LANGUAGE, CULTURE, FLAG, AND CUSTOMS!
"Where there's a Mexican, there's Mexico!" President Calderon... SO TRUE, A MEXICAN DUMPSTER
“A recent Pew poll indicated that a very large percentage of Americans of Mexican descent regard themselves as Mexicans. Not Mexican-Americans, not American-Mexicans. Just Mexicans.”

“In Mexico, a recent Zogby poll declared that the vast majority of Mexican citizens hate Americans. [22.2] Mexico is a country saturated with racism, yet in denial, having never endured the social development of a Civil Rights movement like in the US--Blacks are harshly treated while foreign Whites are often seen as the enemy. [22.3] In fact, racism as workplace discrimination can be seen across the US anywhere the illegal alien Latino works--the vast majority of the workforce is usually strictly Latino, excluding Blacks, Whites, Asians, and others.”

Just over half, 54 percent, say it is important that they change to assimilate into society, yet about two-thirds, 66 percent, say Latinos should maintain their distinct culture.



*
ALWAYS THE STUPID GRINGOS’ FAULT THAT MEXICO IS A DUMPSTER OF A COUNTRY!

But this is not the way things are. We are dealing with a situation generated, to a great extent, by the market for drugs and weapons in the United States and by the refusal of many Americans to recognize their own portion of responsibility in these tragic events. The drug war will have to be resolved on both sides of the border.



In Mexico, a War Every Century
By ENRIQUE KRAUZE
Mexico City
EVERY 100 years, Mexico seems to have a rendezvous with violence. As the country gathers on Wednesday night for the ceremony of the “grito” — the call to arms that began the war for independence from Spain — we are enduring another violent crisis, albeit one that differs greatly from those of a century and two centuries ago.
In 1810 and 1910, revolutions erupted that lasted 10 years or more and were so destructive that both times it took decades for the country to re-establish its previous levels of peace and progress. Both episodes furthered Mexico’s political development, however, and our collective memory centers on these two dates that have taken on such symmetrical and mythical significance.
In 2010, Mexico is again convulsed with violence, though the size and scope of today’s conflict does not even remotely approach that of 1810 or 1910. This war is unfolding within and between gangs of criminals, who commit violent acts that are fueled only by a competitive lust for money. This is strikingly different from the revolutions of 1810 or 1910, which were clashes of ideals.
In 1810, Mexican-born Spaniards — the creoles — saw no recourse other than violence as the means to gain independence from Spain. Their principles were inspired by the doctrines of 16th-century thinkers like the Jesuit Francisco Suárez, who argued for “popular sovereignty.” But the creoles were also driven by specific grievances: they had long resented domination by men from the Iberian Peninsula; they were also indignant that the seemingly inexhaustible wealth of New Spain had been the principal financial resource for the frivolousness and senseless wars of the Spanish empire.
Yet the crown repeatedly ignored opportunities that might have avoided violent revolution — Spain certainly could have loosened connections with its overseas dominions and granted Mexico some degree of independence. When the provincial priest Miguel Hidalgo y Costilla shouted his call to arms, the grito, from the steps of his Dolores church, the war for independence finally exploded.
Shortly afterward, a vast, mostly Indian army, armed mainly with slings, stones and bludgeons, conquered various regional capitals, stopping just short of Mexico City itself. Though Father Hidalgo was captured and executed in 1811, the uprising continued under the leadership of another priest, José María Morelos, who would also be seized and killed by the Spanish government. But Mexico would finally gain its independence in September 1821.
From 1810 to 1821, the war for independence cost about 300,000 lives in a population of around 6 million. Afterward, state income, agricultural, industrial and mining production, and, above all, the availability of capital for investment did not reach their pre-1810 levels until the 1880s. And the material desolation was followed by almost five decades of insecurity on the roads, political instability and grievous civil and international wars.
There was also a series of confrontations between the country’s Liberal and Conservative factions until the victory of President Benito Juárez over the Conservatives and the French army that supported them. Following this unstable period, the Liberal government separated church and state and adopted a stable, electoral political structure.
Unfortunately for our fledgling democracy, Porfirio Díaz, Juárez’s greatest general, seized power in 1876. Still, under his long authoritarian regime, Mexico achieved notable material progress in the development of industry, the transportation network and foreign trade.
In 1910, after more than three decades of dictatorship, a large portion of the population believed that violence was the only way to overthrow Díaz. A brief, purely democratic revolution attained its aim but was soon reversed through a military coup supported by the American ambassador.
This new assault on the honor and well-being of the country — along with other accumulated grievances of peasants, workers and the nationalistic middle class — led to the first true social revolution of the 20th century.
The revolution of 1910 was even more destructive than the one in 1810. About 700,000 of some 15 million Mexicans died in warfare or through illness or starvation. An additional 250,000 emigrated to the United States. Industrial production plummeted. Ranches, haciendas and cities were demolished. And from 1926 to 1929 came the additional devastation of the Cristero war between Catholic peasants and the anti-clerical government; the state’s eventual victory took 70,000 lives.
Beginning in 1929, the country re-established a central government (though unlike the Juárez presidency, it was not a democratic one) under the hegemony of the Institutional Revolutionary Party. The government carried vast agricultural reforms, substantially improved the conditions for workers, established public institutions for social welfare that are still alive and well and oversaw decades of growth and stability. In the view of most historians, the great social reforms accomplished by later governments justified the Mexican Revolution’s decade of violence.

Today, a handful of powerful criminal groups has unleashed a blood-soaked and utterly illegitimate wave of violence against the Mexican government and Mexican society. This “war,” which rages in too many cities and states of my country, has created a truly Hobbesian situation of human brutality.
This situation is, in part, an unintentional result of Mexico’s definitive transition to democracy. In the past 10 years, there has been a centrifugal effect on power, loosening the authoritarian hand of the president and giving more latitude to local forces that, unfortunately, have included drug cartels and other criminal enterprises.
This war, though, will have to be won — and economic growth will have to be revivified — within the rules of democracy. Congress and President Felipe Calderón must agree on reforms to make the economy more open, competitive and efficient. And the struggle against organized crime will require a centralized police force that is more honest and professional; secure prisons; better control of the customs apparatus and the flow of money; and changes in the judicial system, along with nationwide campaigns against drug addiction.
Despite a bloody mythology that venerates the great protagonists of 1810 and 1910, most of whom met brutal deaths, the common denominators of our national history have been social, ethnic and religious coexistence; the peaceful construction of cities, villages and communities; and the creation of a rich cultural mosaic. Many of us want to believe that we are living through a nightmare from which, one morning, we will simply wake up, once again at ease.
But this is not the way things are. We are dealing with a situation generated, to a great extent, by the market for drugs and weapons in the United States and by the refusal of many Americans to recognize their own portion of responsibility in these tragic events. The drug war will have to be resolved on both sides of the border.
Nonetheless, on Wednesday night, as we have on every Sept. 15 for 200 years, Mexicans will gather together in the central squares of our cities and towns, even in the smallest and most remote villages. At midnight, we will hear a local governing official re-enact the grito uttered by Miguel Hidalgo, the “father of the fatherland.”
All the plazas across Mexico will be filled with light and music and color. And in the historic center of Mexico City, we will watch the fireworks and the parades and we will hear President Calderón ring the church bell once sounded by Miguel Hidalgo and then we will shout, jubilantly, with genuine feeling: “Viva México!”
Enrique Krauze is the editor of the magazine Letras Libres and the author of “Mexico: Biography of Power.” This article was translated by Hank Heifetz from the Spanish.

WELLS FARGO - Big Tarp Welfare Cheat & BANKSTERS TO THE MEX DRUG CARTELS!

BUT HEY….. WE DID INCREDIBLY WELL BY CREATING A SOCIALIZED (LOSES) NO-STRINGS WELFARE STATE FOR BANKSTER CRIMINALS ON WALL ST…. Why flip off Main Street now?

HERE’S A CASE WHERE A RICH BANK GOT RICHER WITH OBAMA SOCIALIZED WELFARE FOR BANKSTERS: The Case of Wells Fargo… LA RAZA DONORS AND BANKSTERS TO THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS!


“Wells Fargo said last month that first-quarter profit jumped 53 percent from a year earlier as borrowers rushed to refinance mortgages amid record-low interest rates.”

*
Lou Dobbs Tonight
Monday, November 12, 2007

Mortgage giants Wells Fargo and Bank of America are accused of slapping dubious fees on homeowners struggling to save their homes. With fewer new mortgages being written, these
companies appear to be leaning on these lucrative fees to stay profitable—with devastating consequences for homeowners.



MORTGAGE CRIMES

WELLS FARGO last week was presented with a “shark of the year award” by Minesota ACORN for its predatory lending. According to ACORN, WELLS FARGO uses fraud and deception to trap homeowners into mortgages with high interest rates, excessive fees, and harmful terms. ACORN has filed class actions suits all over the country against WELLS FARGO to stop their predatory lending practices. “Wells has gotten away with unfair, abusive, and illegal lending in our communities for years,” said Illinois ACORN President Bea Jackson (www.ACORN.ORG).

A FEW OF WELLS FARGO’S MORTGAGE TACTICS:

— Promising low interests rates, and then charging high rates, even to borrowers with good credit.

— Misleading homeowners into refinancing out of perfectly good first mortgages and into new loans which cost the borrowers much more.

— Financing large - and often hidden – fees into loans. Many borrowers were charged 7.5-11% of what they borrowed in fees. And since fees were added into their loans they continue to pay Wells interest on the money they borrowed to pay Wells itself.

--- Trapping borrowers with prepayment penalties which require them to pay thousands of dollars more if they want to escape into a better deal.

— Attempting to escape from any legal consequences of their actions by slipping mandatory arbitration clauses — which try to prevent borrowers from takin them to court — into virtually all of their high cost loans.

---- Making sure these “arbitrations” are heard by arbitrators that have received a great deal of money from Wells to find the “right” resolution.

*
WELLS FARGO INSTANT CHECK

Department of Corporations Files $38 Million Suit Against Wells Fargo Financial; Instant Loan Checks Result in $871,000 In Excess Interest for Unsuspecting Customers

Business Editors
SACRAMENTO, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 10, 2003
The Davis Administration today announced that the Department of Corporations has filed suit in the Superior Court of Sacramento County seeking civil penalties of up to $38.8 million to stop Wells Fargo Financial California, Inc., a licensed consumer finance lender, from overcharging its "instant loan check" customers and to void their overcharged loans.

*
WELLS FARGO – BANKSTERS TO THE MEX DRUG CARTEL… and where NO American need apply for a bankster job!

CA MORTGAGE LICENSE REVOKED FOR WELLS FARGO!

DEPARTMENT OF CORPORATIONS

The San Diego Union
By Craig D. Rose May 3, 2003
Wells Fargo mortgage license is revoked
State takes action over interest dispute


Citing a pattern of overcharging borrowers, state regulators yesterday revoked the mortgage lending license of Wells Fargo, but the bank will continue to make and service loans under federal jurisdiction.
The California Department of Corporations said Wells Fargo, the state's largest mortgage lender, has been charging consumers interest for days disallowed by state regulation.
"Wells Fargo charged consumers interest on their mortgages more than one day before being recorded, an admitted violation of California law," said Demetrios Boutris, state commissioner of corporations. "If Wells Fargo is not going to abide by California's laws, it has no right to California's licenses."

*

WELLS FARGO – LA RAZA DONORS AND BANKSTERS TO THE DRUG CARTELS!

YOUR BANKSTER WELFARE CHECKS AT WORK!


HEY, ANYONE ACTUALLY BELIEVE FOX IS NOT IN ON MEX DRUG CARTEL MONEY? HE’S A FREAKING MEX!
*

Wells Fargo, which owns Wachovia, immediately entered into a deferred prosecution agreement and paid the federal government $160 million in fines.

*
Several other U.S. banks have also been discovered flouting money-laundering laws.

No wonder former Mexican president Vicente Fox, a conservative businessman, is
urging his country to legalize the production, sale and distribution of drugs
"as a strategy to weaken and break the economic system that allows cartels to earn
huge profits."

Calderon's military surge was backed by more than $1.2 billion in drug war aid from former President Bush, and by several hundred million more from the Obama administration.

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/2010/08/20/2010-08-20_mexico_drug_war_boosts_us_firms.html#ixzz0xaCMzkz0
Bloody Mexico drug war boosts U.S. gun shops, banks

Juan Gonzalez - News

Friday, August 20th 2010, 4:00 AM

Romero/ReutersMexican military has spent billions of
dollars fighting endless drug war, with little to show
but profits for banks and gun dealers in U.S.
*

CRIMINAL BANKSTERS WELLS FARGO AT WORK:
“Major banks, led by Wells Fargo, US Bancorp and JPMorgan Chase, provide more than $2.5 billion in credit to large payday lenders, researchers at the Public Accountability Initiative estimated in a report released Tuesday.”


Big banks bankroll payday lenders, study says
By Nathaniel Popper
Los Angeles Times
NEW YORK — People who pay high fees to borrow from so-called payday lenders generally don't have bank accounts, but that doesn't mean banks aren't making money from them.
Major banks, led by Wells Fargo, US Bancorp and JPMorgan Chase, provide more than $2.5 billion in credit to large payday lenders, researchers at the Public Accountability Initiative estimated in a report released Tuesday.
The financing provides vital support for an industry criticized for charging effective annual interest rates that can top 400 percent, the researchers said.
"Not having financing would shut the big players down," said Kevin Connor, a co-author of the report and a director of the nonprofit research group that has been critical of big business.
Some major banks have shied away from doing business with payday lenders because of concerns about their practices or about the sector's image.
"Certain banks have notified us and other companies in the cash-advance and check-cashing industries that they will no longer maintain bank accounts for these companies due to reputational risks and increased compliance costs," Advance America, the biggest payday lender, wrote in a regulatory filing.
Citigroup says it doesn't lend to the industry. Bank of America has financed some payday lenders but tries to avoid doing so, applying a stricter-than-usual screening process when they apply for credit, bank spokesman Jefferson George said. "We have a limited appetite for doing business with them," he said.
Wells Fargo provided credit lines to six of the eight largest publicly traded payday lenders and also provided early financing to help the businesses expand, according to Tuesday's report
A spokesman for Wells Fargo said the company sought to provide equal access to credit for all "responsible companies."
"We exercise strict due diligence with payday lenders and check-cashing companies to ensure that they, just like us, do business in a responsible way and meet the highest standards," spokesman Gabriel Boehmer said.
"We put payday lenders through an additional level of scrutiny that other companies and industries might not have to go through," he said.
A JPMorgan Chase spokesman declined to comment, while US Bancorp did not respond.
Payday lenders typically charge $15 in fees for each $100 borrowed, fees that are charged each time a loan is rolled over for two more weeks. The Center for Responsible Lending, a Washington, D.C. -based research and lobbying group that has been critical of the banking industry, estimates that the average effective annual interest rates on these loans is 417 percent.
Uriah King, a policy specialist at the center, called the financing from big banks to payday lenders particularly offensive because banks have received taxpayer-paid bailouts and can still borrow at interest rates near zero because of Federal Reserve monetary policy.
Steve Schlein, a spokesman for the Community Financial Services Association of America, a trade group representing payday lenders, defended the industry, saying it helped struggling Americans.
"Payday-loan companies are in fact good creditors because their customers are good creditors," he said.
George Goehl, director of National People's Action, a community-organizing group and the study's sponsor, said banks that finance payday lenders should instead make that cash available to struggling borrowers as short-term loans at reasonable rates.