Thursday, May 26, 2016

LA RAZA GOVERNOR JERRY BROWN BACKS $2 BILLION PLAN TO DEAL WITH CALIFORNIA'S HOMLESS - CALIFORNIA YEARLY HANDS MEXICAN OCCUPIERS MORE THAN $30 BILLION IN SOCIAL SERVICES

California Governor Jerry Brown backs $2 billion plan to deal with the state’s homeless

AS THE DEMOCRAT PARTY EXPANDS MEXICO'S LOOTING AND WELFARE STATE TO ALL STATES, POVERTY AND JOBLESSNESS IS HANDED LEGALS.

"That, combined with massive unemployment and poverty-wage jobs, as well as the evisceration of any social safety net, has ensured a human catastrophe unequaled since the Great Depression."

California Governor Jerry Brown backs $2 billion plan to deal with the state’s homeless

By Kevin Martinez and Adam Mclean
26 May 2016
Democratic Governor of California Jerry Brown has backed a $2 billion plan from the state senate to ostensibly reduce the state’s homeless population, which is the largest in the country. Brown’s plan would entail raising state funds with bonds, which would be paid back in 20 to 30 years with money allocated from Proposition 63, approved by voters in 2004.


BLOG: NEARLY HALF OF THE STATE'S 35 MILLION ARE MEXICAN ILLEGALS OR THE ANCHOR CHILDRE OF ILLEGALS.


The so-called “millionaires’ tax” was originally meant to fund mental health services. It will now be used to fund 10,000 to 14,000 new housing units, even though the total homeless population in the state is 116,000. Even if the proposal is enacted and the homes are built, less than a tenth of the state’s homeless would find shelter under this plan.

The Prop 63 tax does not even make a dent in the fortunes of the rich. Only the wealthiest 0.1 percent of California’s taxpayers, about 30,000 people who earn more than $1 million a year, will have to pay a tax rate of 10.3 percent on every dollar they make over $1 million, instead of the usual 9.3 percent.
The high cost of living in the state combined with high rents and unaffordable housing has condemned tens of thousands to a life on the streets. That, combined with massive unemployment and poverty-wage jobs, as well as the evisceration of any social safety net, has ensured a human catastrophe unequaled since the Great Depression.

California accounts for 20 percent of the nation’s homeless, and, given the cost of living in the state, it is not hard to determine why. Since the start of this year, rent has increased 6.7 percent in Los Angeles alone, with the average two-bedroom apartment costing $2,650 a month, according to Apartment List. This is not even the most expensive city in California. In San Francisco, rent for a two-bedroom apartment averages $4,760.


BLOG: THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES HAS A ONE BILLION DOLLAR YEARLY MEXICAN ANCHOR BABY WELFARE COST

Los Angeles County has the largest homeless population in the state, but the bond money from this plan would not solve the problem. Officials have set aside $150 million for homeless services, but estimate that it would take 15,341 more permanent housing units to seriously address the homeless population’s needs, or more than double what is currently allocated.

The city of Los Angeles has already approved an oft-touted $1.87 billion plan to address homelessness by Democratic Mayor Eric Garcetti, though this plan has yet to be implemented and officials are still unclear on how they plan to fund it.

Meanwhile, in San Diego, affectionately called “America’s Finest City,” authorities have begun a crackdown on boats and RVs parked on the streets containing homeless people. A two-year old law which prevents large campers from being stationary in parking spots near the beach became permanent law last week.

The law essentially criminalizes the homeless and pushes some onto the street when they would rather be living in their cars. While other coastal cities applied similar bans, San Diego had to wait until a law was crafted to cover the entire county.

The fact that the money for the current plan is not coming from any new source is also telling. Money that was originally allocated for the mentally ill is now to be spent on a different, but completely connected social problem. An estimated 30 percent of homeless people have some form of mental illness.

Nonetheless, this has not stopped Brown and state Democrats from utilizing their “solution” to the homeless crisis for the most cynical of reasons, improving the “progressive” image of the party before the November elections. This has prompted former Senate President pro-tem Darrell Steinberg to declare, “Homelessness knows no partisan lines” and to advocate working with the Republicans to pass the deal.

Brown has a long record of working with development and housing companies to secure higher profits and smoother business at the expense of the working class, going all the way back to his time as mayor of Oakland.

In vetoing AB1229, a proposed 2013 bill that would have mandated developers to invest a minimum in low-income housing projects, Brown offered the market-oriented explanation: “As mayor of Oakland, I saw how difficult it can be to attract development to low and middle income communities. Requiring developers to include below-market units in their projects can exacerbate these challenges…”

He continues this today. The current proposal he is backing may come bundled with additional “reforms” that would launch deeper attacks against the working class. In his administration’s most recent May budget revision, Brown contemplates adding to the proposal:

“…additional legislation requiring ministerial ‘by right’ land use entitlements for multifamily infill housing developments that include affordable housing. This would help constrain development costs, improve the pace of housing production, and encourage an increase in housing supply.”

In this context, “by right” refers to the freedom of developers to take certain actions without a normally required permit, typically issued after a municipal review process. This is tantamount to eliminating what rules exist to ensure basic living standards for low income tenants, which could include everything from utilities to the stability of the buildings themselves.

This section of the May revision finishes, somewhat ominously, with, “It is counterproductive to continue providing funding for affordable housing under a system that slows down approvals in areas already vetted and zoned for housing.” This is a thinly veiled assertion that current funding for low income housing–certainly not limited to this proposal–will be put on the chopping block if such deregulation is not enacted.

The money would be awarded on a competitive grant basis, meaning counties would have to fight one another to receive the largest share. This is not unlike President Obama’s education “reforms,” which force schools to compete for federal funds.

Not only does this proposal do nothing to address the roots causes of homelessness, namely capitalism, but it is tied to reforms that will ultimately result in even greater attacks on the working class. It provides further proof that the Democratic Party, no less than the Republican, is an instrument of Wall Street through and through.
 

"This is the other Mexico," he said of the United States, which is home to an estimated 11 million Mexican immigrants.

 LA RAZA DEM JERRY BROWN HISPANDERING FOR ILLEGALS' VOTGES


WHAT LA RAZA JERRY WILL NOT BE SHARING ARE THE FACTS ON THE TENS OF BILLIONS IN WELFARE SICKS OUT OF MEXIFORNIA, OR THAT MOST CRIMES, INCLUDING MURDER, ARE COMMITTED BY MEXICANS!

Will Hispandering Barack Obama Pardon His LA RAZA Party Base of Illegals? HILLARIA CLINTON HAS PROMISED OBAMA'S AMNESTY TO 40 MILLION LOOTING MEXICANS

Would Obama Trump The Donald by pardoning illegals?

With every passing day, Donald Trump's chances of winning the presidency increase.

Hillary Clinton's campaign is floundering.  She has no message aside from "Elect me; I'm a woman."  She is hated by 30 to 40% of Democratic voters who prefer Bernie Sanders – or, for that matter, anybody but her.  Her e-mail problems are growing worse – from the inspector general's recent report to the ongoing FBI investigation.  And Trump has indicated that he is willing to use every single bit of dirt from her 30-year-long trail of sleaze against her in the general campaign.
 
One of Trump's primary issues, and an issue that is the cause of much his popularity, is his promise to end illegal immigration and deport some 12 to 20 million illegals already in the U.S.  It's an issue that resonates broadly with the white working class, whose standard of living has been steadily eroded by offshoring jobs to China and Mexico.
 
The Obama administration's policy of letting illegals from a third-world country stay in the U.S. to compete with native-born Americans for jobs and government benefits adds insult to injury.
 
As Trump's chances of winning increase, it's time to start asking a pretty important question: what will a lame-duck Obama do between November and January if Trump does actually win?

My guess is that Obama will pardon a substantial number (if not all) of the illegals to sabotage Trump's deportation plan.
Here's why I think it could happen.  First, "Improper Entry by Alien" is a pardonable offense against the United States.  Eight U.S. Code Sec. 1325 defines it as a crime with prison sentences ranging from 6 months to 2 years; thus, the president does have the power under Article II of the Constitution to grant pardons for it.

Second, Obama has consistently sided with foreigners against American interests.  Refusal to deport large numbers of illegals is one example, but there are numerous others.

Obama told Russian president Medvedev that he would be "more flexible after his last election."  His national security adviser recently admitted that the press and the public were intentionally hoodwinked on the Iran nuclear deal.  Obama bowed to Saudi princes and apologized to Iran for the 1953 Mossadegh coup.  He bypassed Congress and allied with the British and French to attack Libya.  He announced in Berlin in 2008 that he is a "citizen of the world."

Obama went to Nelson Mandela's funeral – but spurned Justice Scalia's.  He claimed to be born in Kenya to his own publisher, instigating the "birther controversy" he later snidely mocked.

Obama identifies with third-worlders, not Americans.  It would fit a pattern for him to choose the side of Mexican illegals over American citizens and over U.S. immigration law.

Third, there is precedent for a mass pardon.  In 1977, Jimmy Carter pardoned hundreds of thousands of individuals who evaded the draft during the Vietnam War.

Could Obama trump Trump by issuing a blanket lame-duck pardon?  He could, and I think he would.  The Democratic Party has abandoned the white native-born American working class.  Its core constituencies are liberal whites with a globalist outlook and minority racial groups who vote on the basis of identity politics.  Pardoning illegals after a Trump victory would strengthen the 21st-century Democratic Party base and cement Obama's legacy on the globalist, anti-American, anti-white, pro-minority left.  It's a win-win for him.

The possibility that Obama's last official act will be to "fundamentally transform" America by making 12 to 20 million third-worlders permanent residents of the U.S. is something to think about more and more as November approaches and the Trump juggernaut rolls on.
 
With every passing day, Donald Trump's chances of winning the presidency increase.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/05/would_obama_trump_the_donald_by_pardoning_illegals.html#ixzz49mATtxfB

Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook



BARACK OBAMA PUTS OUT MILLIONS TO GET ILLEGALS REGISTERED TO VOTE DEM!


APRIL 18, 2016

Otherwise a Democrat commander-in-chief and his open-borders Domestic Policy Director wouldn’t be operating such a costly project. Judicial Watch wrote about the new