Monday, February 29, 2016

THE INDICTMENT OF HILLARY CLINTON


 MORE HERE:

Hillary Clinton's mishandling of classified information by using her private, unsecured server to store sensitive documents makes it look more and more as though a criminal case is being developed against her by the FBI. One by one, her campai...


Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton may be the most pathetic presidential nominee of any major political party in our nation's history.


Just How Bad a Candidate Will Hillary Be?

I asked last March, "Just How Bad a Candidate Would Hillary Be?"  As Hillary locks up the Democrat nomination, the question is "Just How Bad a Candidate Will Hillary Be?"  Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton may be the most p...


I asked last March, "Just How Bad a Candidate Would Hillary Be?"  As Hillary locks up the Democrat
nomination, the question is "Just How Bad a Candidate Will Hillary Be?"   Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton may be the most pathetic presidential nominee of any major political party in our nation's history.



First dispel the myth of her husband as a consummate politician.  Bill was a flop as governor of Arkansas and as president of the United States.  Bill managed to be the only Democrat in Arkansas state history to lose re-election as governor and won two presidential elections with a minority of the popular vote.  He entered the White House with huge Democrat majorities at every level of government and left with Democrats in the minority at every level of government. 

Bill Clinton was impeached, disbarred, and found in contempt of court while president, which was a worse record of determined malfeasance than any president in history.  As an ex-president, Clinton seems frail, dull, and testy – as evidenced most recently by his snapping angrily at a veteran in South Carolina asking about Hillary ending corruption in the  Veterans Administration.

Since my article last March, the women who have been harassed, threatened, and raped by Clinton have served notice that they will not be quiet while his wife, Hillary, ignores and dismisses them.  This is a problem Hillary has never addressed but cannot ignore, as Republican candidates have made clear, in a presidential election. 

The hideous behavior of Hillary towards these women brutalized by her husband is one problem.  A related problem is the limp appeal of "women's issues" in electoral campaigns.  Consider the utter failure in the 2014 election cycle of every candidate who based a campaign on "women's issues."  Further, the failure of Hillary to attract young
women in primaries against an ancient Vermont Socialist shows how little she appeals to female voters.


If there is an issue that motivates Americans across the spectrum, it is trust, because we have been lied to so often and so cavalierly by Washington politicians.  No sane person trusts Hillary.  She not only lies even when the truth would serve as well, but she lies about telling the truth, as in her recent CBS interview.  She lies almost as much as her husband.

Compounding this pathological dishonesty are the natural consequences of aging, obesity, and health problems that strongly suggest a slowing down of her mental processes.  The ravages of immoral life and old age clearly have
reduced her husband into a very dull mind, and it is likely that many of the same abuses of youth harrowing her husband are affecting her, too.


There is another aspect to her lying.  Hillary has a very ordinary brain, artificially inflated by the left because leftists always consider those who agree with them "smart."  In college she followed the familiar path of lackey to leftism.  Hillary failed the District of Columbia Bar Examination; nearly everyone who takes it passes.  Her legal career was
constructed around her husband's political success. 


Hillary has for decades been surrounded by flacks and toadies whose work is making Hillary seem and feel intelligent.  Some of the emails released from her server note that these minions, among themselves, note that she
is often confused.  The numerous unforced errors in her campaign also suggest a rather mean old lady used to bullying rather than reasoning.  This, too, becomes over time a mental limp, a cognitive sloth, an atrophied intellect.


The stench of criminal conspiracy follows Hillary, and that is because Hillary is so utterly conspiratorial in nature, but these crimes are also so frequent that if the FBI and Justice Department does nothing, then the Justice Department itself may face future investigation – indeed, some of us may ask why we even need a department to protect criminals like Hillary. 

Finally, Hillary cannot embrace that "change" Americans want when she has been a Washington insider so long.  How can Hillary campaign for those goals in a general election when the only real selling point she has is
"experience"?  There is nothing Hillary says that is not hopelessly tired and hackneyed rhetoric, and nothing that inspires hope. 


Forget the fact that she is finally dispatching the non-Democrat running against her for the Democrat nomination, and ignore the general polls today, which mean nothing.  Hillary will be swamped this November.   

THE INDICTMENT OF HILLARY CLINTON: Will Barack Obama Protect His Protege Like He Protected His Crony Banksters???

As Barack Obama finishes his final year, his attorney general, in all likelihood, will execute the greatest instance of prosecutorial discretion in the history or our nation. Prosecutorial discretion refers to the fact that under American l...



PROTECTING AMERICA'S BIGGEST WHITE COLLAR CRIMINAL, HILLARY CLINTON, SO SHE CAN BECOME PRESIDENT AND BILLARY CAN GO ON LOOTING BRIBES THROUGH PHONY SPEECHES!



Brace yourself for the greatest prosecutorial discretion event in history


As Barack Obama finishes his final year, his attorney general, in all likelihood, will execute the greatest instance of prosecutorial discretion in the history or our nation. Prosecutorial discretion refers to the fact that under American law, government prosecuting attorneys have nearly absolute powers. A prosecuting attorney has power
on various matters including those relating to choosing whether or not to bring criminal charges, deciding the nature of charges, plea bargaining and sentence recommendation. This discretion of the prosecuting attorney is called prosecutorial discretion.


Prosecutorial discretion has also been described as a type of legal “triage.”  When the ability or capacity to prosecute is curtailed or restricted, the cases that are the most egregious are moved to the top the list, and
those less so are dismissed, thus the discretion.
(In traffic court, there are ten speeders and only the capacity to
prosecute five.  Those over the speed limit to the greatest degree are prosecuted.)


Of late, prosecutorial discretion is in high use within the illegal immigration crisis regarding the limited numbers of courts and judges.

But what indeed is required is reasoning and legal ground to employ the “discretion.”  As time passes, as the Democrat nominating convention nears, the reason that eventually will be employed for this discretion
gains weight.


Loretta Lynch has already broken the seal on her foray into the morass of  prosecutorial discretion.  She dismissed the IRS investigation.
Justice Department officials used “prosecutorial discretion” to shelter former IRS official Lois Lerner
from a grand jury after she was held in contempt of Congress. “I believe that in the exercise of prosecutorial discretion, the matter was handled and was resolved,” Attorney General Loretta Lynch told the House Judiciary Committee[.]


Lerner is just the beginning.  The IRS dismissal, large enough on its own scale and importance, will be but a side event in this attorney general’s career.  For the longer the Hillary email “scandal” plays out, the more protracted the discovery and analysis by the FBI, and the deeper into the campaigning and nomination process we go, the less likely any indictment of Ms. Clinton.  It will likely involve a discretionary event by Loretta Lynch.

The more Hillary becomes the likely nominee, the greater the political aspects of the FBI’s work.  To now dethrone the Democrat nominee with an indictment is much more difficult than if it had been done after the Iowa caucus.  And the closer we get to the convention, the more distasteful and difficult any action against Hillary.

Just as Bill Clinton’s lying to a grand jury could not bring impeachment, for it would be too difficult for the country, we might just have his wife creating a very similar “difficulty” for the country.  “What would it say of our system, our country?” will be the mantra if she is indicted at the 11th hour.  The compliant media will assist in developing such reasoning and afford Loretta Lynch her justification for prosecutorial discretion and a dismissing of any charges that might prohibit Hillary from further campaigning or serving as president.


Hillary’s popularity and the “no harm, no foul” argument will be used.  And that is only if Mr. Comey goes the distance.



Brace yourself.