Wednesday, May 13, 2015

OBAMA AND HIS BANKSTERS FEAR SEN. WARREN Dem Senator Accuses Obama of Sexism Toward Elizabeth Warren | The Weekly Standard

Dem Senator Accuses Obama of Sexism Toward Elizabeth Warren | The Weekly Standard


SEN. ELIZABETH WARREN:

Did Obamanomics destroy the American
middle class and build the LA RAZA Mexican
welfare state in its place?



 

OBAMANOMICS: Sen. Warren: Trickle Down Economics ‘Cut the Heart Out of the Middle Class’

Sen. Warren: Trickle Down Economics ‘Cut the Heart Out of the Middle Class’

(CNSNews.com) -- Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) was critical of so-called trickle down economics, saying that it “cut the heart out of America’s middle class” at an event at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. on Tuesday.

 
Warren, who is politically left-wing, made the comments during an

event hosted by The Roosevelt Institute, a non-profit organization

that is designed to “carry forward the legacy and values of Franklin

and Eleanor Roosevelt,” which released a new report, “Rewriting

the Rules of the American Economy” at the event.


The report claims “that current economic rules, embraced for more

than 35 years, are grounded in false assumptions” and the rules

“must be fundamentally rewritten to address economic inequality.”

The report was written by Joseph E. Stiglitz, the Chief Economist at

the Roosevelt Institute. 


OBAMANOMICS: The massive transfer of the American economy to the 1% and total devastation of the AMERICAN MIDDLE-CLASS to build a DEM DICTATORSHIP…..

and the banksters are investing massive amounts of loot in Hillary Clinton, a disciple of OBAMANOMICS!

Income inequality grows FOUR TIMES FASTER under Obama than Bush.



THE UNLEASHING OF WALL STREET’S
 
BIGGEST MONSTERS and the ASSAULT
 
ON  the AMERICAN MIDDLE-CLASS 
 
STARTED WITH BILL CLINTON.

You think Hillary’s any different? Obama’s crony banksters don’t!!!



THE “HOPE and CHANGE” CLOWN’S LIES ON UNEMPLOYMENT as more illegals jump our borders…………..

In fact, The Obama Administration’s policies have been aimed at reviving US manufacturing on the basis of a significant reduction of workers’ wages.

As a result of these policies, the National Employment Law Project concluded in 2014 that “While the manufacturing sector has grown in recent years, wages are lower, the jobs are increasingly temporary, and the promised benefits have yet to be realized.”


 
PATRICK BUCHANAN

After Obama has completely destroyed the American economy, handed millions of jobs to illegals and billions of dollars in welfare to illegals…. WHAT COMES NEXT?


 
THE OBAMA CONSPIRACY to DESTROY THE AMERICAN MIDDLE-CLASS and BUILD THE DEMOCRAT PARTY WITH INVADING MEXICANS.
President Barack Obama and Mexico Partner to Expand the LA RAZA MEXICAN WELFARE STATE in America through "amnesty"
“The watchdogs at Judicial Watch discovered documents that reveal how the Obama administration's close coordination with the Mexican government entices Mexicans to hop over the fence and on to the American dole.” Washington Times 
WEALTH FOR RICHEST DOUBLES UNDER
OBAMA – POVERTY IS FOUR TIMES GREATER THAN UNDER BUSH.
ILLEGALS STILL GET OUR JOBS AND BILLIONS IN WELFARE OFF OUR
BACKS!
Amnesty… it’s all about keeping wages depressed.
“As a result of the soaring stock market, the 400 richest individuals in the United States, whose wealth has doubled since 2009—the era of Obama. They now have a combined net worth of $2.29 trillion, larger than the annual output of the 130 poorest countries in the world.”

HERITAGE FOUNDATION
 
ROBERT RECTOR: Importing poverty…. WE ALSO IMPORT ALL THEIR CRIMINALS




BORDERS, NO E-VERIFY, NO ENFORCEMENT and NO LEGAL NEED APPLY!

GOP: OBAMA’S AMNESTY HANDOUT WILL COST THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS BILLIONS!

 
 

 

RASMUSSEN: Support Is Growing for Government-Paid College - EVEN AS OBAMA AND HIS CRONIES LOOT HIGHER EDUCATION

Support Is Growing for Government-Paid College


NO ONE KNOWS HOW TO ORCHESTRATE AN ASSAULT
ON THE AMERICAN PEOPLE MORE THAN BARACK
OBAMA and a  PACK OF HIS CRIMINAL BANKSTERS!

… now expanded to pillaging of AMERICAN STUDENTS

more at this link
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/05/president-barack-obama-and-jp-morgan.html



Obama now looting the American student while he hands billions in DEM DREAM ACTS of WELFARE to illegals… his bankster cronies at JPMorgan cleaning up on students also!


“But as the Federal Reserve attempts to lower

borrowing costs for everyone from households and

small businesses to large corporations and Wall Street

banks, student borrowers have not been able to

benefit.”

 



The fraud of Obama’s “Student Aid Bill of Rights”

By Nancy Hanover
23 March 2015
Last week President Obama announced a series of executive actions that he dubbed a “Student Aid Bill of Rights.”
The initiative is partially an exercise in damage control. It follows a series of lawsuits and scandals involving the Department of Education (DOE). The government agency has become the target of growing anger for protection of predatory student loan collection agencies, its bailout of the for-profit career college chain Corinthian and its overall profit-taking from student loans.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2015/03/barack-obama-and-his-crony.html
 
The 43 million Americans who owe some $1.3 trillion in student loan debt were offered zero forgiveness. In fact, Obama does not propose even one measure to actually lessen the ever-escalating cost of college or encroach on the lucrative business of student loan debt. All the “rights” remain in the hands of the government, the banks and hedge funds.
 Far from a “Bill of Rights” Obama continues to deliver a fraudulent bill of goods. At every point, his administration has protected the financial industry in looting an entire generation of students, preventing millions of young people from either attaining the education they desire or making them pay through the nose for the rest of their lives.
 
 
 

EXPANDING THE LA RAZA MEXICAN OCCUPATION ON GRINGOS' BACKS! U.S. to Spend $2 Mil on Attorneys for Illegal Alien Minors

U.S. to Spend $2 Mil on Attorneys for Illegal Alien Minors

COP CRIMES IN AMERICA - No charges in Madison, Wisconsin police killing of unarmed youth

No charges in Madison, Wisconsin police killing of unarmed youth


THE “HOPE and CHANGE” CLOWN’S LIES ON UNEMPLOYMENT as more illegals jump our borders…………..

In fact, The Obama Administration’s policies have been aimed at reviving US manufacturing on the basis of a significant reduction of workers’ wages.

As a result of these policies, the National Employment Law Project concluded in 2014 that “While the manufacturing sector has grown in recent years, wages are lower, the jobs are increasingly temporary, and the promised benefits have yet to be realized.”


 
PATRICK BUCHANAN

After Obama has completely destroyed the American economy, handed millions of jobs to illegals and billions of dollars in welfare to illegals…. WHAT COMES NEXT?

 

AMERICA’S SECOND REVOLUTION, THIS TIME AGAINST DESPOTS ON WALL STREET and the POLITICIANS THAT SERVE THEM, STARTED IN BALTIMORE!
 

 
THE UNLEASHING OF WALL STREET’S LOOTING BANKSTERS STARTED UNDER CLINTON!

WAS EXPANDED UNDER BUSH, AND BLOWN QUADRUPLED UNDER OBAMANOMICS.

CAN WE AFFORD HILLARY???


By the time of Bill Clinton’s election in 1992, the Democratic Party had completely repudiated its association with the reforms of the New Deal and Great Society periods. Clinton gutted welfare programs to provide an ample supply of cheap labor for the rich, including a growing layer of black capitalists, and passed the 1994 Federal Crime Bill, with its notorious “three strikes” provision that has helped create the largest prison population in the world.

 

ASSAULT ON THE AMERICAN MIDDLE-CLASS - UNIONS PARTNER WITH WALL STREET - UAW ready to sanction new subclass of low-paid US auto workers

UAW ready to sanction new subclass of low-paid US auto workers


THE CONSPIRACY TO DESTROY THE AMERICAN
MIDDLE-CLASS: Unions Partner with Obama and His Wall
Street Cronies


 

AMERICA'S SECOND REVOLUTION STARTED IN BALTIMORE - The Baltimore upheaval: On race and class in America

The Baltimore upheaval: On race and class in America


AMERICA’S SECOND REVOLUTION, THIS TIME AGAINST DESPOTS ON WALL STREET and the POLITICIANS THAT SERVE THEM, STARTED IN BALTIMORE!

 


 THE UNLEASHING OF WALL STREET’S LOOTING BANKSTERS STARTED UNDER CLINTON!

WAS EXPANDED UNDER BUSH, AND BLOWN QUADRUPLED UNDER OBAMANOMICS.

CAN WE AFFORD HILLARY???

By the time of Bill Clinton’s election in 1992, the Democratic Party had completely repudiated its association with the reforms of the New Deal and Great Society periods. Clinton gutted welfare programs to provide an ample supply of cheap labor for the rich, including a growing layer of black capitalists, and passed the 1994 Federal Crime Bill, with its notorious “three strikes” provision that has helped create the largest prison population in the world.


The stunning revelation is just one of many in the new book, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich.

THE GLOBAL CRIME WAVE of HILLARY and BILLARY… the Bonnie and Clyde of Corrupt Democrat Politics – The bankster-funded politics for the 1% , open borders, no LEGAL need apply and amnesty for 40 million looting Mexicans.


 

SHOULD THE CLINTON FOUNDATION BE SHUTDOWN? They started selling access to the Lincoln Bedroom - Now they are a political scam selling out American intererest globally


Just like EVA and JUAN PERON, the money just keeps rolling in!

 

BILLARY and HILLARY CLINTON - SELLING OUT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND 
GETTING RICH DOING IT!
 


Another possible explanation is that the Clintons don't
 
believe voters will really care that much. The renting of the
 
Lincoln  Bedroom to people who gave $5.4 million to the
 
Democratic  National Committee in 1995 and 1996 did no
 
lasting damage to Bill's approval ratings. Neither did the
 
1996 fundraising scandal involving illegal foreign donations,
 
which the Los Angeles Times reported on just before the
 
president easily won a second term.

 

Wall Street analyst: 'Shut down Clinton Foundation'
 

Prominent D.C. attorney joins in call for criminal investigation


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/05/wall-street-analyst-shut-down-clinton-foundation/#bWuUrwpRx4vyJyMk.99

NEW YORK – A prominent lawyer and a top government watchdog in the nation’s capital are calling for the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation to be shut down as a Wall Street analyst prepares to issue a second report documenting what he believes is systematic financial fraud warranting a criminal investigation.

Wall Street analyst and investor Charles Ortel, in his first report of his in-depth probe of the Clinton Foundation, found what he characterizes as an elaborate system devised by the Clintons to enrich themselves through schemes such as skimming tens of millions of dollars from U.N. levies imposed on airline travelers.

His second report, some 300 pages of analysis set for release Monday on his website, documents what he calls material irregularities, errors and omissions in financial regulatory reporting since the foundation’s inception.

Ortel believes that once his findings have been studied, state and local law enforcement authorities will initiate multiple criminal investigations and charge the Clintons with “private inurement,” the crime of enriching themselves through a nonprofit organization.

He explained that the burden of proof, under state and federal laws, will be on the Clintons to demonstrate that their foundation was not operated as a systematic fraud designed to enrich themselves and their associates.

Peter Schweizer already has charged in his bestselling book, “Clinton Cash,” that the Clintons accepted foreign donations designed to influence U.S. policy when Hillary Clinton was secretary of state.

After examining Ortel’s first two reports, Tom Fitton, president of

Washington-based Judicial Watch, told WND there is now enough

evidence to warrant a grand jury investigation into the Clintons’

foundation and its various related charitable entities to examine

evidence of extortion, bribery, money laundering, inurement and

the destruction of documents.

“The question is no longer whether Hillary Clinton can win the Democratic primaries for president,” Fitton told WND. “The question now is whether Bill and Hillary Clinton can stay out of jail.”


Fitton said Judicial Watch is filing Freedom of Information Act requests in its ongoing investigations of the Clinton Foundations and Hillary Clinton’s withholding of emails through the use of a private server while she was secretary of state.

Washington-based attorney Cleta Mitchell, an expert in tax-exempt organizations who has represented tea-party and other conservative groups in the IRS scandal, agreed with Fitton.

“I am today going to call on New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman to do his job and file proceedings to demand the Clinton Foundation and its various subgroups immediately stop fundraising in New York until [they] comply with New York law,” Mitchell told WND.

She noted Schneiderman has required that all charitable foundations in the country doing business in New York state be registered in New York and turn over their donor list.

“I am demanding the same standard must be applied to the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation, as well as to the Clinton Global Initiative and Clinton Health Access Inc., as well as any other operational units the Clintons have constituted to raise charitable contributions in New York,” Mitchell said.

Ortel has reached the same conclusion.

“If the regulatory violations in filing financial reports that I’ve documented had occurred to anyone else other than the Clintons, the Clinton Foundation would have been closed years ago, with state and federal criminal investigations begun immediately,” he said.

Ortel alleges criminal fraud

In his second report, Ortel concentrates on the construction and architecture of Clinton Foundation financial statements and required independent audits filed for its largest constituent element, the Clinton Health Access Initiative, also known as CHAI.

Ortel distinguishes his analysis from Schweizer’s analysis of foreign contributions to the Clinton Foundation, noting Schweizer admits he does not have proof of a criminal quid pro quo.

Ortel points out that under New York state law, a tax-exempt organization “of a size that the Clinton Foundation attained long ago must file information returns that are wholly true and accurate, not false and misleading.”

“The Clinton Foundation’s declarations to authorities, and, therefore, to the public, are, therefore, fraudulent,” he writes.

In New York state, he notes, where the Clinton Foundation has operated for years, state law specifically exempts authorities from burdensome requirements of documenting intent or harm in efforts to prove charity defendants are guilty of criminal fraud.

Ortel’s second report, he says, documents the Clinton Foundation “has repeatedly made declarations that are false while also omitting to state relevant facts concerning the true nature of its endeavors.”

“These repeated falsehoods and omissions constitute a long-standing pattern of deception that appears to constitute a criminally fraudulent scheme,” he said.

In a table included in his second report, Ortel documents that Clinton Foundation audit statements in the years 2005 through 2009 were filed with regulators after the Clinton Foundation filed the IRS Form 990 tax reporting statement with the IRS, even though federal law requires the Form 990 to be derived from the audit statement.
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2015/05/audit-clinton-foundation.jpg

Ortel summarized his findings:

  • For 2005, the IRS filing for the Clinton Foundation was submitted 35 days past the final legally mandated deadline, in violation of federal and state laws.
  • For 2006, the IRS filing was made just before the final legally mandated deadline; however, the companion, required independent audit was evidently filed 56 days following the IRS filing, which is in violation of federal and state laws.
  • For 2007, the IRS filing was again made just before the final legally mandated deadline; however, the companion, required independent audit was filed 30 days following the IRS filing, which is in violation of federal and state laws.
  • For 2008, the IRS filing was made just after the final legally mandated deadline; however, the companion, required independent audit was filed 45 days following the IRS filing, which is in violation of federal and state laws.
  • For 2009, the IRS filing and the companion audit were submitted by the final legally mandated deadline; however, contends Ortel, these documents and all documents previously mentioned concerning 2005 through 2009 are riddled with material, uncorrected, false, misleading and incomplete statements and financial disclosures.

Ortel explains in his report that “unlike individual taxpayers who stand a small chance of being audited by the IRS after they volunteer information concerning income and expense on relevant tax forms, all public charities of the size the Clinton Foundation has been since its original authorization as a tax-exempt organization must procure an independent audit of their financial statements by a competent and empowered firm of accounting professional who have access to all relevant supporting schedules.”

Ortel notes the independent audit must be attached to the tax-exempt organization’s IRS filing as elements of the IRS Form 990 and supporting schedules call for reconciliation of numerous financial figures with information contained in the independent audit.

He finds that for calendar years 2005 through 2009, the Clinton Foundation “filed false and materially misleading informational returns to governmental authorities.”

“In addition, the Clinton Foundation submitted documents it held out to authorities and to the general public as being independent certified audits of its financial statements – these documents (repeatedly submitted after Forms 990 were filed) were neither ‘independent,’ nor ‘audits’ within accepted meanings contemplated under applicable laws.”

Despite an extensive search, Ortel was unable to find on the Clinton Foundation website or on any state or federal government website an independent audit of the Clinton Foundation since inception that validates revenue or expense-line items.

Instead, Ortel notes the BKD accounting firm reliance letters submitted with the Clinton Foundation financial statements for the years 2005-2009 are characterized by BKD as “audit reviews.” This suggests the accounting firm limited the audit to reviewing financial statements produced by the Clinton Foundation without attempting to reconstruct or validate the statements independently.

‘Minimal resources to accounting and legal’

Ortel further documents that in the years 2007 through 2013, the Clinton Foundation allocated what he considered minimal financial resources to discharge financial reporting requirements, compared to resources spent for travel and conference expenses for the Clintons and other unspecified foundation staff or related persons.

Clinton Foundation expenses for legal and accounting versus travel and conferences, 2007-2013:




expenses-clinton-foundation

Ortel argues the allocation of such minimal resources to legal and accounting constituted fraud.

“The Clinton Foundation failed to exercise proper care in operating a sprawling multinational organization prudently to serve valid public interests,” he writes.

‘Misleading statements pleading innocence’

Since April 20, when Ortel issued his first report on the Clinton Foundation, credible representatives of the foundation quickly admitted that publicly available filings submitted in connection with one or more fiscal years contain errors and promised that any material errors found as part of a renewed self-examination would be corrected.

“I also want to address questions regarding our 990 tax forms,” said Maura Pally, acting CEO of the Clinton Foundation, in a statement on the foundation’s website on April 26.

“We have said that after a voluntary external review is completed, we will likely re-file forms for some years,” she said. “While some have suggested that this indicates a failure to accurately report our total revenue, that is not the case. Our total revenue was accurately reported on each year’s form – our error was that government grants were mistakenly combined with other donations. Those same grants have always been properly listed and broken out and available for anyone to see on our audited financial statements, posted on our website.”

Pally continued: “So yes, we made mistakes, as many organizations of our size do, but we are acting quickly to remedy them, and have taken steps to ensure they don’t happen in the future. We are committed to operating the Foundation responsibly and effectively to continue the life-changing work that this philanthropy is doing every day. I encourage you to read more about that good work at www.clintonfoundation.org.”

Ortel accused Pally of trying to mislead the public by suggesting the Clinton Foundation irregularities, errors and omissions in filing financial reports were minor, technical mistakes of no material nature.

“Ms. Pally’s comments are themselves materially misleading for many reasons,” Ortel continues to argue, “including that the Clinton Foundation has neither procured nor published independent audits of any financial statements that were prepared by fully informed and professional accounting firms, and done so on a rigorously considered and consolidated basis in the approximately 15 years since the foundation was created.”

Ortel says Pally should know from her previous work with New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg’s charitable endeavors, which are much larger than the Clinton Foundation, that prominent public charities “devote appropriate resources, both financial and otherwise, to explain fully how they are actually meeting their authorized tax-exempt purposes, how they protect and serve the interests of their donors, and how they take great pains to comply, on a timely and thorough basis with informational report requirements in relevant legal jurisdictions.”

At Bloomberg Philanthropies, Pally provided strategic direction for programmatic activities and oversight of operational management, according to her bio on the Clinton Foundation website.

Ortel further points out that even more recently, Bill Clinton compounded errors in the evolving Clinton Foundation narrative when he stated there was nothing “sinister” in the management or operation of the foundation.

In an interview that aired on NBC’s “Today” show May 4, he said, “There’s almost no new fact that’s known now that wasn’t known when she ran for president the first time.”

Ortel insists otherwise.

“Actually, there is something sinister when donors with modest means make contributions to a suspect enterprise which they could have sent to one or more properly organized and validly operating tax-exempt organizations,” he writes.

“Moreover, repeatedly making demonstrably false, materially misleading, and incomplete informational filings concerning the activities of tax-exempt organizations to relevant governmental authorities and to the general public is illegal,” he stresses, “particularly when these are made by someone such as Bill Clinton who is a lawyer, serves as a director and officer, and certainly is in position to exercise significant influence over the Clinton Foundation and over its constituent entities.”

‘Criminal inurement’

In his second report, Otel contends that “given its alleged and continuing offenses,” the “malefactors operating the Clinton Foundation be removed and disciplined, in the process of shutting down the Foundation altogether.”

“So far, the Clinton’s and their supporters have been able to deflect pubic criticism by pointing out that Schweizer’s allegations amount to charging the Clintons with using their foundation to commit bribery, a criminal offense with a very high threshold of proof in a criminal court,” Ortel says.

“My charges involve financial mismanagement and gross irregularities, inaccuracies and other errors in financial reporting, alleging the Clintons were guilty of inurement.”

He says inurement is an offense “so antithetical to the purpose of government allowing tax-favored status to charitable offenses that state and federal law requires closing a foundation found to have committed material errors in financial reporting, with the burden of proof shifting to the foundation to prove financial reporting was done correctly and not done in error as a means of perpetrating a criminal fraud.”

The IRS defines “inurement” in strict terms: “A section 501(c)(3) organization must not be organized or operated for the benefit of private interests, such as the creator or the creator’s family, shareholders of the organization, other designated individuals, or persons controlled directly or indirectly by such private interests. No part of the net earnings of a section 501(c)(3) organization may inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual. A private shareholder or individual is a person having a personal and private interest in the activities of the organization.”

Inconsistent, incomplete and confusing

A search of relevant government databases showed considerable inconsistency and confusion regarding whether or not the Clinton Foundation (listed also as the William J. Clinton Foundation and the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation), the Clinton Global Initiative and the Clinton Health Access Initiative are separately structured corporations registered with the relevant departments of state.

The Clinton Foundation website lists the address of the offices of the Clinton Foundation and CGI as 1271 6th Avenue in New York City. No address is listed for the Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc.

The Clinton Foundation website lists no address for the Clinton Foundation, CGI or CHAI, indicating only that the Clinton Presidential Center is located “along the Arkansas River in Little Rock,” consisting of a museum, a library and archives.

The Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation 2013 IRS Form 990, the most recent such form posted on the Clinton Foundation website, lists the address as 610 President Clinton Avenue, 2nd Floor, Little Rock, Arkansas, with the name of the principal officer, Eric Braverman, listed at 1271 6th Avenue in New York City. The IRS Exempt Organizations Select Check shows the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation listed as a tax-exempt foundation but has no listing for either the Clinton Global Initiative or the Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc.




clinton-foundation

Separately filed IRS 990s are not available for either the Clinton Global Initiative or the Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc.

For 2013, there is no separate address, IRS Form 990 or separate financial report filed on the Clinton Foundation website for either CGI or CHAI, both of which are reported along with the foundation in the same IRS Form 990 and consolidated in financial statements for the Dec. 31, 2013, report that Price Waterhouse Coopers LLP prepared for the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation.

New York

A search of the New York Department of State Division of Corporations database on the Internet found no filings in New York state for the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation, the William J. Clinton Foundation or the Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc. But it found a listing for CGI Global International Inc., registered as a New York corporation with an initial filing date of March 18, 1999, with a New York Department of State process address in Albany, the only listed address.

The New York Department of State corporation database list the “current entity status” for CGI Global International Inc. as “Inactive – Dissolution by Proclamation/ Annulment of Authority (June 25, 2003).”

The New York Attorney General’s Office lists the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation as a registered charity incorporated in Arkansas with an address at 610 President Clinton Avenue, Little Rock, Arkansas. The Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc. is registered as an Arkansas corporation with an address at 383 Dorchester Ave., Suite 400, Boston, Massachusetts. The Clinton Global Initiative is not registered as a New York charity.

Despite the Clinton Global Initiative not being registered with the New York secretary of state as a corporation licensed to do business, or with the New York attorney general as a charitable foundation registered to do business, the Clinton Foundation website documents the CGI 2014 Annual Meeting was held in New York City on Sept. 21, 2014.

Arkansas

A search of the Arkansas Secretary of State Corporations website under the William J. Clinton Foundation listed as a “fictitious name” produced a listing for the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation at 610 President Clinton Avenue in Little Rock, that detailed 23 “fictitious names,” including the Clinton Foundation HIV/AIDS Initiative and the Clinton Global Initiative. A search of the same database for the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation produced no listing.

A search of the Arkansas Secretary of State Corporations website for the Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc. found an Arkansas corporation under that name with a board of directors different than the board of directors listed in the Arkansas database for the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation. The Arkansas Secretary of State Corporations website listed the Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc. as a having its principal address at 383 Dorchester Avenue, Suite 400, in Boston, Massachusetts, with John R. Tisdale, Bill Clinton’s lawyer, listed as the local registered agent at 200 West Capitol, Suite 2300, Little Rock, Arkansas.

WND previously reported Ortel’s concern the agreement to extend former Clinton Foundation CEO Braverman’s employment contract in December 2014, combined with his subsequent and sudden departure just days later in January, is suspicious.

On March 1, investigative reporter Kenneth P. Vogel, writing in Politico magazine, found that in December 2015 the board of the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Foundation had approved a salary of more than $395,000 plus bonuses to hire the Yale-educated Braverman, while voting to extend his board term through 2017.

Vogel noted that Braverman, who had worked with Chelsea Clinton at McKinsey & Company consultancy had been recruited “with the former first daughter’s support to help impose McKinsey-like management rigor to a foundation that had grown to a $2 billion charitable powerhouse.”

Braverman’s sudden departure shook the New York financial world.

Ortel, a frequent guest on Bloomberg television and a contributor to the Washington Times and others, began his Wall Street career in 1980 with Dillon, Read, & Co., followed by the Bridgeford Group and Chart Group.

His international investment analysis frequently centers on complex legal and financial structures. He is currently managing director of Newport Value Partners LLC, which provides independent investment research to professional investors. He is a graduate of the Horace Mann School, Yale College and the Harvard Business School.

In an article published Aug. 4, 2009, demonstrating the financial analysis for which Ortel is perhaps best known on Wall Street, Forbes magazine noted he first broadcast his concerns about General Electric’s earnings quality in 2008, when the stock was trading above $30 a share. A year later, GE’s market value had plunge by about $200 billion, to $13 a share.

 


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/05/wall-street-analyst-shut-down-clinton-foundation/#bWuUrwpRx4vyJyMk.99



 
audit-clinton-foundationTHE UNLEASHING OF WALL STREET’S BIGGEST

BANSTERS and the ASSAULT ON  the AMERICAN

MIDDLE-CLASS  STARTED WITH BILL CLINTON.

You think Hillary’s any different? Obama’s crony banksters

don’t!!!




THE UNLEASHING OF WALL STREET’S BIGGEST

MONSTERS and the ASSAULT ON  the AMERICAN

MIDDLE-CLASS  STARTED WITH BILL CLINTON.
 

You think Hillary’s any different? Obama’s crony banksters don’t!!!
HILLARY CLINTON: A dedicated disciple of OBAMANOMICS – Why else

would his banksters invest so much in her???
“That her candidacy is announced without calling for any particular policies underscores the fact that the election is not about the American people deciding the course of policy, but rather the vetting of candidates to serve the interest of the financial oligarchy.”
“There is, of course, no acknowledgment that Clinton was part of an administration that oversaw and continues to oversee the greatest transfer of wealth from the bottom to “those at the top” in US history.”
Just like EVA and JUAN PERON, the money just keeps rolling in!

 

BILLARY and HILLARY CLINTON - SELLING OUT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND

GETTING RICH DOING IT!
 
HILLARY CLINTON: GLOBAL LOOTER LIKE A THIRD-WORLD DICTATOR IN THE MAKING!
“Schweizer: Clinton Donors, Relatives Got Rich Off Haiti Contracts, US Taxpayers”
 Clinton Cash” author Peter Schweizer reported on the US taxpayer money and contracts in Haiti profited Clinton Foundation donors and Clinton relatives.”
Clinton Foundation Put On Watch List Of

Suspicious ‘Charities’
“This decision wasn’t made because of the Clinton Foundation’s remarkably lucrative sideline as a uranium superstore for Russian strongmen, but because its finances are opaque and dishonest, and because such a tiny amount of the money it rakes in actually goes to charitable endeavors. “The Clinton family’s mega-charity took in more than $140 million in grants and pledges in 2013 but spent just $9 million on direct aid,” notes the New York Post. “The group spent the bulk of its windfall on administration, travel, and salaries and bonuses, WITH THE FATTEST PAYOUTS GOING TO FAMILY FRIENDS.”
JUDICIAL WATCH:
STATE DEPT. DOCS REVEAL CONCERN ABOUT BILL CLINTON’S ACTIVITIES WITH SAUDI DICTATORS
Hillary Clinton bellies with the 9-11 invading Saudi dictatorship like Obama. She’s collected her bribes for pushing the Bush-Saudi wars against Iraq and Obama smells the dirty Saudis loot coming for his presidential libaray!
HOW TO BUY HILLARY CLINTON: From selling overnights at the White House, she’s become a global influence peddler.
“Hillary Clinton takes a course of action that

benefits those donors, in many cases, I think,

outlined in the book, she is reversing course on

policy prescriptions.”
“Schweizer said he had found “a pattern of behavior…the proof is, you look at a series of actions in which money flows to the Clintons, either through speaking fees or Clinton Foundation donors.”
HILLARY RED CHINA
“I smell bribes!” the first words Hillary spoke in Chinese!
The stunning revelation is just one of many in the new book, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich.
IMF PREDICTS THAT OBAMANOMICS and the GLOBAL LOOTING BY OBAMA’S CRIMINAL CRONY BANKSTERS WILL SOON DESTROY THE AMERICAN ECONOMY.
The International Monetary Fund warned Wednesday that the world economy would remain locked in a pattern of slow growth, high unemployment and high debt for a prolonged period. The forecast, contained in the organization’s updated World Economic Outlook (WEO), marks a shift from previous economic projections in acknowledging that there is little prospect of a return to the growth levels that prevailed prior to the 2008 Wall Street crash.
The document’s grim analysis amounts to a tacit acknowledgement that the crisis ushered in nearly seven years ago by the financial meltdown is of a historical and fundamental character, and that the underlying problems in the global capitalist system have not been resolved.
THE ASSAULT on the AMERICAN MIDDLE-CLASS by the DEMOCRAT PARTY:
“By large margins, even in opinion polls conducted by the corporate-controlled media, the American people support sharp increases in taxes on the wealthy to fund social programs and provide jobs for the unemployed; they oppose cuts in Social Security and Medicare and view education, health care and other public services as basic rights; they oppose government spying on the telephone and Internet usage of ordinary Americans, as well as other police-state measures; and they oppose overseas military interventions in the Middle East, Africa and Asia. The Democratic and Republican presidential candidates stand on the other side of the barricades on all these issues.”

 
HILLARY CLINTON: A dedicated disciple of OBAMANOMICS – Why else would his banksters invest so much in her???
“That her candidacy is announced without calling for any particular policies underscores the fact that the election is not about the American people deciding the course of policy, but rather the vetting of candidates to serve the interest of the financial oligarchy.”
“There is, of course, no acknowledgment that Clinton was part of an administration that oversaw and continues to oversee the greatest transfer of wealth from the bottom to “those at the top” in US history.”
HILLARY CLINTON: GLOBAL LOOTER LIKE A THIRD-WORLD DICTATOR IN THE MAKING!
“Schweizer: Clinton Donors, Relatives Got Rich Off Haiti Contracts, US Taxpayers”
 Clinton Cash” author Peter Schweizer reported on the US taxpayer money and contracts in Haiti profited Clinton Foundation donors and Clinton relatives.”
Clinton Foundation Put On Watch List Of

Suspicious ‘Charities’
“This decision wasn’t made because of the Clinton Foundation’s remarkably lucrative sideline as a uranium superstore for Russian strongmen, but because its finances are opaque and dishonest, and because such a tiny amount of the money it rakes in actually goes to charitable endeavors. “The Clinton family’s mega-charity took in more than $140 million in grants and pledges in 2013 but spent just $9 million on direct aid,” notes the New York Post. “The group spent the bulk of its windfall on administration, travel, and salaries and bonuses, WITH THE FATTEST PAYOUTS GOING TO FAMILY FRIENDS.”
JUDICIAL WATCH:
STATE DEPT. DOCS REVEAL CONCERN ABOUT BILL CLINTON’S ACTIVITIES WITH SAUDI DICTATORS
Hillary Clinton bellies with the 9-11 invading Saudi dictatorship like Obama. She’s collected her bribes for pushing the Bush-Saudi wars against Iraq and Obama smells the dirty Saudis loot coming for his presidential libaray!
HOW TO BUY HILLARY CLINTON: From selling overnights at the White House, she’s become a global influence peddler.
“Hillary Clinton takes a course of action that benefits those donors, in many cases, I think, outlined in the book, she is reversing course on policy prescriptions.”
“Schweizer said he had found “a pattern of behavior…the proof is, you look at a series of actions in which money flows to the Clintons, either through speaking fees or Clinton Foundation donors.”
HILLARY RED CHINA
“I smell bribes!” the first words Hillary spoke in Chinese!
The stunning revelation is just one of many in the new book, Clinton Cash: The Untold Story of How and Why Foreign Governments and Businesses Helped Make Bill and Hillary Rich.
 
THE ASSAULT on the AMERICAN MIDDLE-CLASS by the DEMOCRAT

PARTY:
“By large margins, even in opinion polls conducted by the corporate-controlled media, the American people support sharp increases in taxes on the wealthy to fund social programs and provide jobs for the unemployed; they oppose cuts in Social Security and Medicare and view education, health care and other public services as basic rights; they oppose government spying on the telephone and Internet usage of ordinary Americans, as well as other police-state measures; and they oppose overseas military interventions in the Middle East, Africa and Asia. The Democratic and Republican presidential candidates stand on the other side of the barricades on all these issues.”

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2015/04/oba
HILLARY CLINTON: A dedicated disciple of OBAMANOMICS – Why else would his banksters invest so much in her???
 

“That her candidacy is announced without calling for any particular policies underscores the fact that the election is not about the American people deciding the course of policy, but rather the vetting of candidates to serve the interest of the financial oligarchy.”
“There is, of course, no acknowledgment that Clinton was part of an administration that oversaw and continues to oversee the greatest transfer of wealth from the bottom to “those at the top” in US history.”
 
 
LIKE EVA AND JUAN PERON, THE MONEY JUST KEEPS ROLLING IN!

 

Clinton Foundation reveals up to $26 million in additional payments

 

Clinton Foundation reveals up to $26 million in additional payments

 

By Rosalind S. Helderman and Tom Hamburger May 21 at 9:53 PM

The Clinton Foundation reported Thursday that it has received as much as $26.4 million in previously undisclosed payments from major corporations, universities, foreign sources and other groups. THE OTHER “GROUPS” ARE THE MUSLIM DICTATORS WHOSE BORDERS HILLARY HAS VOWED TO PROTECT AS WELL AS OBAMA!

The disclosure came as the foundation faced questions over whether it fully complied with a 2008 ethics agreement to reveal its donors and whether any of its funding sources present conflicts of interest for Hillary Rodham Clinton as she begins her presidential campaign.

The money was paid as fees for speeches by Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton. Foundation officials said the funds were tallied internally as “revenue” rather than donations, which is why they had not been included in the public listings of its contributors published as part of the 2008 agreement.

According to the new information, the Clintons have delivered 97 speeches to benefit the charity since 2002. Colleges and universities sponsored more than two dozen of these speeches, along with U.S. and overseas corporations and at least one foreign government, Thailand.

The payments were disclosed late Thursday on the organization’s Web site, with speech payments listed in ranges rather than specific amounts. In total, the payments ranged between $12 million and $26.4 million.

The paid appearances included speeches by former president Bill Clinton to the Ni­ger­ian ThisDay newspaper group for at least $500,000 and to the

The money was paid as fees for speeches by Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton. Foundation officials said the funds were tallied internally as “revenue” rather than donations, which is why they had not been included in the public listings of its contributors published as part of the 2008 agreement.

According to the new information, the Clintons have delivered 97 speeches to benefit the charity since 2002. Colleges and universities sponsored more than two dozen of these speeches, along with U.S. and overseas corporations and at least one foreign government, Thailand.

The payments were disclosed late Thursday on the organization’s Web site, with speech payments listed in ranges rather than specific amounts. In total, the payments ranged between $12 million and $26.4 million.

The paid appearances included speeches by former president Bill Clinton to the Ni­ger­ian ThisDay newspaper group for at least $500,000 and to the

The money was paid as fees for speeches by Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton. Foundation officials said the funds were tallied internally as “revenue” rather than donations, which is why they had not been included in the public listings of its contributors published as part of the 2008 agreement.

According to the new information, the Clintons have delivered 97 speeches to benefit the charity since 2002. Colleges and universities sponsored more than two dozen of these speeches, along with U.S. and overseas corporations and at least one foreign government, Thailand.

The payments were disclosed late Thursday on the organization’s Web site, with speech payments listed in ranges rather than specific amounts. In total, the payments ranged between $12 million and $26.4 million.

The paid appearances included speeches by former president Bill Clinton to the Ni­ger­ian ThisDay newspaper group for at least $500,000 and to the

The foundation, which has raised $2 billion since Bill Clinton left the White House, has emerged as a political headache for Hillary Clinton amid recent controversies over donations. The foundation, along with the Clintons’ paid speaking careers, have provided additional avenues for foreign governments and other interests to gain entrĂ©e to one of America’s most prominent political families. Some Republicans have charged that Hillary Clinton, during her tenure as secretary of state, was in a position to reward foundation donors.

 

Thursday’s disclosure is one of a number of instances in recent weeks in which the foundation has acknowledged that it received funding from sources not disclosed on its Web site.

The ethics agreement was reached between the foundation and the Obama administration to provide additional transparency and avoid potential conflicts of interest with Hillary Clinton’s appointment as secretary of state.

The agreement placed restrictions on foreign government donations, for instance, but the foundation revealed in February that it had violated the limits at one point by taking $500,000 from Algeria.

Thursday’s release regarding speaking fees follows earlier disclosures showing how the lecture circuit has also made the Clintons personally wealthy.

Last week, Hillary Clinton disclosed that she and her husband made around $25 million since January 2014 from speeches; Bill Clinton also was paid more than $104 million from 2001 through 2012 by delivering speeches.

The Clintons reported that income on federally required personal financial disclosure forms filed by Hillary Clinton as a senator, secretary of state and now a declared presidential candidate.

But the new disclosure indicates that the former president has also spent considerable time speaking on the foundation’s behalf — 73 times since 2002.

Hillary Clinton has delivered 15 such speeches, including one address to Goldman Sachs and another to JPMorgan Chase. Chelsea Clinton, who has

taken on an increasingly active role at the foundation, has collected fees for the charity from nine organizations.

The foundation did not provide dates for the speaking engagements.

Vincent Salamone, a spokesman for the Office of Government Ethics, said this week that speeches delivered by public officials or their spouses acting as an “agent” of a charitable group in which the payment is made directly to the organization need not be disclosed in financial filings of public officials.

Brian Fallon, a spokesman for the Clinton campaign, said that analysis explains why the Clintons did not disclose the speeches while Hillary Clinton was a senator and then secretary of state.

While the Clinton Foundation has annually disclosed its donors since 2008, the foundation said Thursday that organizations that paid for Clinton speeches have not before been included in those lists because they were paying for a service and not making a tax-deductible donation.

Craig Minassian, a spokesman for the foundation, said the new release came as part of the foundation’s continuing commitment to transparency. Nonprofit groups are not required by law to release any information about their funders.

“In addition to the more than 300,000 donors who are all listed on our web site, posting these speeches is just another example of how our disclosure policies go above and beyond what’s required of charities,” he said in a statement.

“Like other global charities, the Clinton Foundation receives support from

“Like other global charities, the Clinton Foundation receives support from individuals and organizations across all sectors of society, backgrounds and ideologies because they know our programs are improving the lives of millions of people around the world,” he also said.

A foundation official indicated the speech dollars have been disclosed as revenue in annual tax filings to the IRS. The official indicated that the foundation will now update the public speech list four times a year, much as it has said it will do with other donors now that Clinton’s campaign has launched.

The Clintons have indicated that they donate significant personal funds to the foundation each year. The foundation official said that the couple have not considered speech revenue to be part of their personal charitable giving, and Fallon said they have never taken a deduction on their taxes for the fees.

There was one entity clearly associated with a foreign government that provided speaking fees, of $250,000 to $500,000 for a speech by Bill Clinton: The energy ministry in Thailand.

The U.S. Islamic World Forum also provided $250,000 to $500,000 to the foundation for a speech by Bill Clinton, according to the new disclosure. The event was organized in part by the Brookings Institution with support from

the government of Qatar.

In addition, the list is studded with overseas corporations and foundations.

They included the South Korean energy and chemicals conglomerate Hanwha, which paid $500,000 to $1,000,000 for a speech by Bill Clinton.

China Real Estate Development Corp. paid the foundation between $250,000 and $500,000 for a speech by the former president. The Qatar First Investment Bank, now known as the Qatar First Bank, paid fees in a similar range. The bank is described by Persian Gulf financial press as specializing in high-net-worth clients.

The Telmex Foundation, founded by Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim, provided between $250,000 and $500,000 for a speech by Hillary Clinton.

The new data shows that a number of public education institutions paid the foundation for speeches by Bill, Hillary or Chelsea Clinton.

Those speeches drew backlash on some campuses, as

universities paid hundreds of thousands to the Clinton charity at

a time of rising tuitions and slashed university budgets.

After the academic sponsors, financial services and health-industry-related firms heavily populated the list of domestic sponsors.

 

Rosalind Helderman is a political enterprise and investigations reporter for the Washington Post.

Tom Hamburger covers the intersection of money and politics for The Washington Post.