Tuesday, August 25, 2015

BARACK OBAMA & HARRY REID: THE DIRTIEST OF THE DIRTY - THEY SERVE THE 1% AND EARN EVERY BRIBE THEY LICK UP! Obama rubs elbows with Harry Reid's corporate welfare lobbyists

Obama rubs elbows with Harry Reid's corporate welfare lobbyists

"Solar isn't just for the green crowd anymore," President Obama told a Las Vegas ballroom full of subsidy-seeking lobbyists, investors and corporate executives. "It's for the green eyeshade crowd, too."
The crowd cheered the President's toast to their taxpayer-provided profits, and soon Obama headed off to a $33,000-a-head fundraiser at the mansion of the billionaire owner of the local newspaper.
You, the taxpayer, paid for Obama's flight to Vegas. This is what Hope and Change looks like seven years after Obama accepted the Democratic nomination.
Obama was the keynote speaker at the National Clean Energy Summit, an annual confab organized by outgoing Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid — which tells you a lot about the nature of the event. A big theme at the conference, and in media coverage of Obama's talk, was that it's not merely "tree-huggers" who like green-energy regulations and subsidies, but also corporations.
MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

With friends such as these...

  
08/25/15 12:01 AM
He's got a point. K Street firms, giant corporations and industry lobby groups sponsored the conference. One sponsor, at the "Gigawatt Level," is Cassidy & Associates, a storied K Street firm that made its name pioneering as earmark lobbyists.
Cassidy & Associates is also a hub of Harry Reid's fundraising and political apparatus — and by extension, the policymaking apparatus of the Democratic Party. Kai Anderson, Reid's former chief of staff, is a lobbyist at Cassidy. Gerald Cassidy contributed $50,000 to Reid's Senate Majority PAC last cycle. But it gets cozier — and grosser.
Cassidy lobbyist Rebecca Lambe was also treasurer of Reid's Senate Majority PAC — the largest member-run super PAC in the 2014 election. Cassidy proudly touted Lambe's connections to Reid, and her concurrent job at Reid's SuperPAC.
Again, fundraising, lobbying, policymaking and super PACs are all rolled into a one package that is the Reid-Cassidy axis. On this axis, the National Clean Energy Summit rotated, and Obama was there to bless it all.
Other top sponsors of the conference also swim in the Reid orbit. MGM Casinos was a lead sponsor and the host of the conference. Anderson, at Cassidy, is one of their lobbyists.
ALSO FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
A glassmaker called View Inc. — they make hi-tech windows that can reduce energy usage — is in the top tier of conference sponsors. Anderson is one of their lobbyists, pushing Congress for federal earmarks, grants and contracts. View Inc., at its website, points out that their product can help institutions meet state energy regulations. Reid and Obama push for stricter energy regs, View Inc. hires Cassidy and Anderson to support such regs, and Cassidy and Anderson funnel money to Obama and Reid and their party. It's a triple play.
Others bankrolling the Vegas confab included Tom Steyer, the billionaire Democratic donor and green-energy investor who lobbies for subsidies to make his otherwise unprofitable green-energy investments profitable.
Solar City, the subsidy-dependent solar installation company run by billionaire Obama max-donor Elon Musk, was a sponsor, too. Musk's Nevada battery factory also received $1.25 billion in state subsidies.
It's kind of jaw-dropping. Reid and Obama now openly brag about how their policies deliver profits to special interests, whose lobbyist are donors and fundraisers for Reid and Obama. You may be old enough to recall when President Obama inveighed sharply against corporate lobbyists who used their connections to power in order to procure federal policies that padded their own bottom lines. But in Las Vegas, Obama happily joined and applauded corporate lobbyists who were using their connections to power in order to procure federal policies that padded their own bottom lines — and that was before he left the stage for a $3-million fundraiser.
You see what's happening here: Elected officials accrue more control over tax dollars, businessmen come to the trough for the tax dollars, the politicians demand a cut in the form of campaign contributions, and the aides demand a cut in the form of lobbying contracts or other revolving-door gigs.
ALSO FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
The insiders all win, the taxpayers and the politically unconnected companies lose. This is somehow considered acceptable because everyone shows up wearing green.
So as President Obama spends his last 16 months in office calling for dramatic climate regulation and legislation, keep in mind that he's pushing policies to subsidize his friends — including Harry Reid's friends.
Timothy P. Carney, The Washington Examiner's senior political columnist, can be contacted at tcarney@washingtonexaminer.com. His column appears Tuesday and Thursday nights on washingtonexaminer.com.

WILL CLINTON OPERATE HER CAMPAIGN FROM JAIL? Should Hillary Clinton Suspend Her Campaign?

Should Hillary Clinton Suspend Her Campaign?

IS THERE ANY DOUBT IN YOUR MIND THAT HILLARY SERVES  FIRST HERSELF, AND THEN THE 1%???

OBAMA-CLINTONomics

– Did their crony banksters ultimately destroy the global economy?

Richest one percent controls nearly 


half of global wealth


HILLARY CLINTON: DEDICATED SERVANT TO THE 1%, OBAMA’S CRIMINAL CRONY BANKSTERS and DISCIPLE of OBAMA-CLINTONOMICS for the super-rich.

The central aim of Clinton’s speech was to reassure the American financial oligarchy that, despite her occasional lukewarm denunciations of corporate criminality and social inequality, she is a right-wing, pro-business defender of Wall Street.



The speech makes clear that a Clinton presidency will pursue the same pro-Wall Street policies of the Obama administration, seeking to expand the fortunes of the super-rich at the expense of the great majority of society, while invoking “fairness” and “equality” as window dressing.


THE ULTIMATE LOOTING of AMERICA BY BIG BANKSTERS STARTED UNDER BILLARY CLINTON. THEY’VE PULLED IN HUGE BRIBES FROM BANKSTERS SINCE THEN.



“President Bill Clinton repealed the law in 1999. Glass-Steagall has long been popular with liberals, who argue the repeal was part of the deregulation they say led to the 2008 financial collapse.”

There is a reason why illegals say they will vote for LA RAZA Hillaria!


MEXICO’S BIGGEST EXPORT NEXT TO DRUGS: criminals!



Hillary Clinton’s long association and support for the Mexican fascist party of LA RAZA “The Race”.


Buying the illegals’ votes will mean amnesty for 40 million looting Mexicans! They already have our jobs.

“Sanctuary policies are especially harmful when they let criminal immigrants be released back to the street instead of removed to their home country, giving them the opportunity to continue preying on the community, creating needless new victims,” wrote Jessica Vaughan, director of policy studies at the Center for Immigration Studies, a Washington-based think tank. More than 200 cities and local jurisdictions across the country have such policies, according to CIS.

But on Thursday, the Clinton campaign clarified her position: “Hillary Clinton believes that sanctuary cities can help further public safety, and she has defended those policies going back years,” said Xochitl Hinojosa, a campaign spokeswoman, in a statement.

DICK MORRIS:


SERVING THE RICH BY FINISHING OFF THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS. CALL IT OBAMA-CLINTONomics!


"It’s at odds with the Clinton we know: the one demanding $225,000 or more for a 90-minute appearance while bemoaning the excesses of the top 1 percent, the Clinton who criticizes big banks while she and her husband make millions from them." 

Hillary Clinton bellies with Obama’s crony banksters…. ALONG WITH DONALD TRUMP!

"As for Hillary Clinton, the report on UBS is only a further demonstration of her decades of hobnobbing with the bankers and billionaires."

Mexican cultural imperialists and their leftist allies have long dreamed of a Reconquista – retaking America's Southwest on behalf of Mexico.  They have sought for decades to use illegal immigration and birthright citizenship to r...

Mexican cultural imperialists and their leftist allies have long dreamed of a Reconquista – retaking America's Southwest on behalf of Mexico.  They have sought for decades to use illegal immigration and birthright citizenship to r...


THE LA RAZA SUPREMACY PARTY OBAMA FUNDS:



We’ve got an even more ominous enemy within our borders that promotes “Reconquista of Aztlan” or the reconquest of California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas into the country of Mexico.

Mexico objects to border security portion of US immigration bill, says fences not solution

more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/06/la-raza-mexican-foreign-relations.html


MEXICO’S INVASION, OCCUPATION and LOOTING
Isn’t it by invitation of the Democrat Party?

August 25, 2015
Mexico fights for rights of 'anchor babies'
Mexican cultural imperialists and their leftist allies have long dreamed of a Reconquista – retaking America's Southwest on behalf of Mexico.  They have sought for decades to use illegal immigration and birthright citizenship to remake a vast corner of America – Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California – in the image of Mexico.
Now, a court battle is heating up in Texas that revolves around a Texas agency's refusal to grant birth certificates to illegal immigrants with children born in Texas.  As the Austin-American Statesman reports:
In a rare move, the Mexican Ministry of Foreign Affairs filed an amicus curiae brief late Monday in a lawsuit filed by four women whose children have been denied birth certificates by the Texas Department of State Health Services because of the mothers’ legal status in the country.
In the last year, officials in the Vital Statistics Unit of the department have denied parents who are in the country without authorization birth certificates for their children and have told these parents that they will not accept their “matriculas consulares” — photo identification cards issued by Mexican Consulates in the United States to Mexicans living in the country — or foreign passports without a current visa.
The lawsuit, filed in May, includes Mexican, Honduran and Guatemalan plaintiffs suing the department for what they allege is constitutional discrimination and interference in the federal government’s authority over immigration.
“This policy puts the newly born children of undocumented people in a state of drastic vulnerability,” the Mexican Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a news release issued Monday. “It violates the right to an identity guaranteed by international human rights protocols and blocks their access to basic services like health and education.”
As this case moves through the courts, it will no doubt overshadow an election campaign that – thanks to Donald Trump – has put illegal immigration and birthright citizenship at the forefront of a testy public debate.
"You either have a country or you don't," Trump said recently.  That observation – a reference to America's sovereignty – is especially timely, given that Mexico's legal arguments are, in part, based on "international human rights protocols."  The irony here is that these high-minded protocols in fact serve the cynical purposes of Mexico's politicians and economic elites.  Specifically, they give them cover to realize their dream of a Reconquista that expands their influence in America at the expense of its sovereignty – and its culture.
Interestingly, Mexico's legal action also challenges Texas officials who, it seems, believe that Mexican counselor officials have played them for fools by readily issuing identity documents to Mexicans residing illegally in Texas.  Specifically, Texas's Department of State Health Services says it has refused to recognize those identity papers “because the documents used to obtain the ‘matricula’ are not verified by the issuing party,” according to the Statesman.
Mexico's ministry, for its part, was quoted as saying, “We want to assure the recognition of (Mexican) passports and consular identifications as legitimate documents that should be enough to attest to the nationality and identity of their carriers.”
Mexico has for decades encouraged citizens of its lowest social classes – including millions of poor and uneducated members of its peasant class – to head to the U.S. illegally.  By doing this, Mexico achieves two goals: it rids itself of a vexing social problem, and it generates a staggering transfer of wealth from the U.S. back to Mexico – some $20 billion annually – as illegal immigrants send money back to relatives.  It's a win-win for Mexico.
Mexico's cynicism is boundless.  It has protested to international courts when its citizens were convicted in high-profile death penalty cases.  Yet it can be counted on to avoid financial or moral responsibility for its citizens who fuel America's crime wave and who are draining social service programs – from bankrupting hospital emergency rooms to utilizing benefits for anchor babies.
Ordinary Americans have grown increasingly outraged over what's happening in their communities.  The latest small town to head toward a Latino majority is the tiny city of Jerome, Idaho – where Hispanics now outnumber whites in the school system, according to a recent item in a newspaper in Twin Falls.
None of this is about human rights.  Rather, it's about the cynical way that Mexico and its leftist allies have played American politicians for chumps as they endeavor to enhance their own power and ideological agenda.
No wonder Donald Trump is soaring in the polls as he declares that Mexico – not the U.S. – will pay for a wall on Mexico's northern border.
Trump may be undiplomatic.  But he's no chump.
Mexican cultural imperialists and their leftist allies have long dreamed of a Reconquista – retaking America's Southwest on behalf of Mexico.  They have sought for decades to use illegal immigration and birthright citizenship to remake a vast corner of America – Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California – in the image of Mexico.
Now, a court battle is heating up in Texas that revolves around a Texas agency's refusal to grant birth certificates to illegal immigrants with children born in Texas.  As the Austin-American Statesman reports:
In a rare move, the Mexican Ministry of Foreign Affairs filed an amicus curiae brief late Monday in a lawsuit filed by four women whose children have been denied birth certificates by the Texas Department of State Health Services because of the mothers’ legal status in the country.
In the last year, officials in the Vital Statistics Unit of the department have denied parents who are in the country without authorization birth certificates for their children and have told these parents that they will not accept their “matriculas consulares” — photo identification cards issued by Mexican Consulates in the United States to Mexicans living in the country — or foreign passports without a current visa.
The lawsuit, filed in May, includes Mexican, Honduran and Guatemalan plaintiffs suing the department for what they allege is constitutional discrimination and interference in the federal government’s authority over immigration.
“This policy puts the newly born children of undocumented people in a state of drastic vulnerability,” the Mexican Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a news release issued Monday. “It violates the right to an identity guaranteed by international human rights protocols and blocks their access to basic services like health and education.”
As this case moves through the courts, it will no doubt overshadow an election campaign that – thanks to Donald Trump – has put illegal immigration and birthright citizenship at the forefront of a testy public debate.
"You either have a country or you don't," Trump said recently.  That observation – a reference to America's sovereignty – is especially timely, given that Mexico's legal arguments are, in part, based on "international human rights protocols."  The irony here is that these high-minded protocols in fact serve the cynical purposes of Mexico's politicians and economic elites.  Specifically, they give them cover to realize their dream of a Reconquista that expands their influence in America at the expense of its sovereignty – and its culture.
Interestingly, Mexico's legal action also challenges Texas officials who, it seems, believe that Mexican counselor officials have played them for fools by readily issuing identity documents to Mexicans residing illegally in Texas.  Specifically, Texas's Department of State Health Services says it has refused to recognize those identity papers “because the documents used to obtain the ‘matricula’ are not verified by the issuing party,” according to the Statesman.
Mexico's ministry, for its part, was quoted as saying, “We want to assure the recognition of (Mexican) passports and consular identifications as legitimate documents that should be enough to attest to the nationality and identity of their carriers.”
Mexico has for decades encouraged citizens of its lowest social classes – including millions of poor and uneducated members of its peasant class – to head to the U.S. illegally.  By doing this, Mexico achieves two goals: it rids itself of a vexing social problem, and it generates a staggering transfer of wealth from the U.S. back to Mexico – some $20 billion annually – as illegal immigrants send money back to relatives.  It's a win-win for Mexico.
Mexico's cynicism is boundless.  It has protested to international courts when its citizens were convicted in high-profile death penalty cases.  Yet it can be counted on to avoid financial or moral responsibility for its citizens who fuel America's crime wave and who are draining social service programs – from bankrupting hospital emergency rooms to utilizing benefits for anchor babies.
Ordinary Americans have grown increasingly outraged over what's happening in their communities.  The latest small town to head toward a Latino majority is the tiny city of Jerome, Idaho – where Hispanics now outnumber whites in the school system, according to a recent item in a newspaper in Twin Falls.
None of this is about human rights.  Rather, it's about the cynical way that Mexico and its leftist allies have played American politicians for chumps as they endeavor to enhance their own power and ideological agenda.
No wonder Donald Trump is soaring in the polls as he declares that Mexico – not the U.S. – will pay for a wall on Mexico's northern border.
Trump may be undiplomatic.  But he's no chump.

What will America stand for in 2050?
The US should think long and hard about the high number of Latino immigrants.

The principal beneficiaries of our current immigration policy are affluent Americans who hire immigrants at substandard wages for low-end work. Harvard economist George Borjas estimates that American workers LOOSE $190 billion annually in depressed wages caused by the constant flooding of the labor market at the low-wage end. 

PATRICK BUCHANAN: OBAMA’S ASSAULT  ON AMERICA BEGINS AT OUR BORDERS
“Yet nothing that happens on these borders imperils America so much as what is happening on our own bleeding border with Mexico.” Patrick Buchanan

JUDICIAL WATCH SOUNDS THE ALARM!
THE ILLEGALS’ CRIME TIDAL WAVE in our OPEN and UNDEFENDED BORDERS!
AMERICA’S THIRD-WORLD INVASION… isn’t it really ONLY about keeping wages depressed???

AN AMERICAN SEES and SPEAKS…
REALITY OF THE LA RAZA SUPREMACIST OCCUPATION:
I'm half Mexican, I live on the U.S. / Mexico international border - exactly 1.6 miles from the International bridge.
Listen, the VAST majority of these ILLEGAL SQUATERS do NOT - I repeat - DO NOT want to become U.S. citizens.
They see the U.S. as a MEAL TICKET, they DON'T want to pay taxes, wave an American flag, learn our language or follow our laws.
Mexico - far, far away from the fancy seaside resorts some of you all may have visited is a HELL HOLE.
These ILLEGAL ALIENS see the U.S. as an extension of "their area" with NO CONCERN or aspirations to be "Americans."

REALITY CHECK:
"The American Southwest seems to be slowly returning to the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a single shot."  --- Excelsior, the national newspaper of Mexico
SOME HISTORY OF THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA:
ON THE GROWIN POWER OF “LA RAZA” FASCISM FOR MEX SUPREMACY

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/04/history-of-mexican-fascist-party-of-la.html

American Taxpayers Being Forced To Support Latino Nazi Party

By Dave Gibson (09/17/06)
In 2005, the Latino group known as La Raza (The Race) was given $15.2 million in U.S. federal grants. La Raza also received an additional $4 million in so-called 'earmarks' tucked into the 2005 Housing Bill, which our Congress passed and President Bush signed. Considering the racist agenda of La Raza, giving federal funds to this group is tantamount to the U.S. funding the Nazis in the 1930's.
The comparison to the Nazi Party is well deserved. La Raza openly supports pushing all but Latino Americans out of a portion of the United States (ethnic cleansing), they call for 'Reconquista' or the re-conquest of the American Southwest by Mexico (the re-occupation of the Sudetanland), and the establishment of 'Atzlan' which is the utopian all-Latino version of the American Southwestern states (Adolf Hitler planned to called his utopia Germania).


AS MEXICO HURLS  THEIR POOR, CRIMINALS AND ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS FOR WELFARE OVER OUR BORDERS……..

Mexico Deports More Immigrants Back to Central America than the U.S. Does
MEXICO CITY (AP) — Mexico now deports more Central American migrants than the United States, a dramatic shift since the U.S. asked Mexico for help a year ago with a spike in illegal migration, especially among unaccompanied minors
Between October and April, Mexico apprehended 92,889 Central Americans. In the same time period, the United States detained 70,226 “other than Mexican” migrants, the vast majority from Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador.
That was a huge reversal from the same period a year earlier, when the wave of migrants and unaccompanied minors from Central America was building. From October 2013 to April 2014, the United States apprehended 159,103 “other than Mexicans,” three times the 49,893 Central Americans detained by Mexico.
The difference is Mexico’s new Southern Border Program, an initiative that included sending 5,000 federal police to the border with Guatemala and more border and highway checkpoints. Raids on migrants increased and authorities focused on keeping migrants off the northbound freight train known as “the Beast,” on which many have suffered mutilation injuries.
Neither U.S. nor Mexican immigration officials responded to requests for comment on the change this week, though officials in the past have said it is aimed at reducing dangers facing migrants.
“Mexico is doing the dirty work, the very dirty work, for the United States,” said Tomas Gonzalez, a Franciscan friar who runs the “72” shelter for migrants in Tenosique, a town in the southern Mexico state of Tabasco.
In the past, Mexican migration officials looked the other way as thousands rafted across the river at the border and then boarded freight trains north. In 2014, more than 46,000 unaccompanied minors from Central America crossed into the United States, leading the U.S. government to turn to the governments in Mexico and Central America to try to stanch the flow.
Mexico has proved the more efficient in deportations, which is already causing concerns among human rights groups about the new tactics.
In most cases, Mexico holds migrants only long enough to verify their nationalities, and quickly bundles them aboard buses to take them back to their home countries.
“The time that foreigners are in immigration (detention) centers depends only on the speed with which the authorities of their (home) countries confirm their nationality,” Mexico’s National Immigration Institute said in an email response to questions from The Associated Press.
Maureen Meyer of the Washington Office on Latin America think tank, which noted the dramatic change in a report this week, questions the speed Mexico is using.
“What we have heard continuously in the past year is that migrants are being so rapidly deported that even some that might have wanted to request some type of protection, or who would have been eligible for some type of humanitarian visa because they had been victims of crime in Mexico, haven’t had that opportunity,” Meyer said.
By comparison, when immigrants are caught crossing the U.S. border illegally, the process of being sent home can take anywhere from hours to years. Mexican nationals are often repatriated quickly – sometimes the same day they are caught – while migrants from other countries often spend at least a few days in U.S. custody before being flown back to their country of origin.
The deportation process can take much longer if an immigrant seeks asylum or if the person is a child traveling alone. For those immigrants who fight to stay in the United States, the wait for a court date and a final decision on their case can take several years because of backlog of more than 449,000 cases already pending in immigration courts.
According to the U.S. Department of Justice, there were about 41,920 requests for asylum in 2014, not all from Central Americans. About 49 percent of requests processed that year were granted.
Mexico grants only a tiny number of asylum requests. The latest figures, covering a nine-month period from January to September 2014, show only 1,525 people, the majority of them Central Americans, requested asylum or refugee status, and only one-sixth – 247 – were granted.
U.S. officials did not respond to questions regarding the amount of U.S. funding Mexico receives for its crackdown on the Guatemalan border, but it is making things tougher for migrants..
“It has raised the costs of the trip, it has raised costs for paying coyotes (smugglers) and the (Mexican) authorities that let them through,” said Gonzalez, the migrant activist. “It has spurred increases in everything bad – corruption and impunity – everything but human rights.”
PATRICK BUCHANAN: OBAMA’S ASSAULT  ON AMERICA BEGINS AT OUR BORDERS
“Yet nothing that happens on these borders imperils America so much as what is happening on our own bleeding border with Mexico.” Patrick Buchanan




AMERICA'S ANCHOR BABY FACTORIES: JUMP OUR BORDERS ILLEGALLY, BREED AN ANCHOR BABY FOR 18 YEARS OF GRINGO-PAID WELFARE - LOS ANGELES COUNTY ALONE HANDS MEXICAN BREEDERS ONE BILLION PER YEAR ILN WELFARE

AddThis Social Bookmarking Sharing Button Widget


One out of about every twelve newborns in the United States is an anchor baby, or the U.S.-born child of illegal migrants, according to a Pew Research Center study.

This means that one anchor baby is delivered every 93 seconds, based on the 2008 census data analyzed by the Pew.

The huge number of foreign children born on U.S. soil– roughly 340,000 per year— is also an economic imposition on Americans, who pay taxes to help raise, feed, and educate those children of illegal migrants.

Eventually, those 340,000 U.S.-born foreign children can join the U.S. workforce and compete for wages against the roughly four million children of U.S. parents that enter the slow-growing U.S. economy each year.

Only 28 percent of likely U.S. voters believe that children born to illegal migrants in this country should automatically be American citizens, according to a 2011 Rasmussen Reports survey. In fact, the proposal is so unpopular that even Jeb Bush, who favors large-scale immigration, has criticized pregnant foreigners who grab citizenship for their kids by flying into the country posing as tourists. Bush described the practice as “fraud,” and asserted that, “Frankly, it’s more related to Asian people coming into our country — having children in that organized effort, taking advantage of a noble concept, which is birthright citizenship”

The growing industry of “birth tourism” is so large that even California’s government recently cracked down on the illegal — but rarely suppressed— trade.

The federal government currently grants automatic citizenship to all U.S.-born children of illegal migrants based upon what experts say is a flawed interpretation of the 14th amendment. This interpretation is backed by progressive political advocates and wealthy business interests, and it allows a pregnant foreigner to win citizenship — and myriad financial benefits — even when laws, legislators and voters oppose her entry into the nation.

The rewards to the mother and father are huge. The mother, for example, can collect federal welfare on behalf of the child, and the adult child – as a U.S. citizen – will eventually be able to win a green card for his or her parents, despite their prior illegal entry into the United States.

As National Review writes:

71 percent of illegal-alien headed households with children received some sort of welfare in 2009, compared with 39 percent of native-headed houses with children. Illegal immigrants generally access welfare programs through their U.S.-born children, to whom government assistance is guaranteed. Additionally, U.S.-born children of illegal aliens are entitled to American public schools, health care, and more, even though illegal-alien households rarely pay taxes.

The cost of K-12 public school alone for a U.S.-born child of illegal migrants is, at a minimum, around $160,000 (using the average cost $12,300 per pupil per year). Additionally, under universities’ system of racial preferences, anchor babies will get bonus SAT and GPA points when they apply to college. Many corporations will continue this benefits program when considering their job applications as well.

Both Senator

and Congressman





have introduced bills that would correct this misapplication of the 14th amendment by ensuring citizenship is only granted to a child that has at least one parent who is either a U.S. citizen or a legal permanent resident. Presidential candidate Donald Trump has also issued a plan that would restrict this appropriation of U.S. citizenship.

But the presidential candidates favored by wealthy donors,

and Jeb Bush, have both argued that the United States should continue this controversial application of the 14th amendment that allows foreign migrants to appropriate U.S. citizenship for their children.

Marco Rubio co-authored the Senate Gang of Eight bill, which won the endorsement of La Raza and would substantially increase family chain migration.

When asked by CNBC why he defends this unpopular application of the 14th amendment, Rubio explained that he supports it because U.S.-born foreign children “are people”:

“Those are human beings and ultimately they are people, we’re not just statistics, they’re humans with stories,” Rubio said.

Read More Stories About:







THE LA RAZA SUPREMACY PARTY OBAMA FUNDS:



We’ve got an even more ominous enemy within our borders that promotes “Reconquista of Aztlan” or the reconquest of California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas into the country of Mexico.


Mexico objects to border security portion of US immigration bill, says fences not solution

more at this link – post on your Facebook and email broadcast



August 25, 2015



The drastic economic costs of 'birthright'
citizenship


NRO's Ian Tuttle totes up the cost of birthright citizenship to the American taxpayer and, to no one's surprise, discovers that the massive benefits paid out to families with anchor babies results in a boom in "birth tourism."

According to Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) legal policy analyst Jon Feere, who testified before the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security in April, between 350,000 and 400,000 children are born annually to an illegal-alien mother residing in the United States — as many as one in ten births nationwide. As of 2010, four out of five children of illegal aliens residing in the U.S. were born here — some 4 million kids. Reporting that finding, the Pew Research Center noted that, while illegal immigrants make up about 4 percent of the adult population, “because they have high birthrates, their children make up a much larger share of both the newborn population (8 percent) and the child population (7 percent) in this country.”

The cost of this is not negligible. Inflation-adjusted figures from the U.S. Department of Agriculture projected that a child born in 2013 would cost his parents $304,480 from birth to his eighteenth birthday. Given that illegal-alien households are normally low-income households (three out of five illegal aliens and their U.S.-born children live at or near the poverty line), one would expect that a significant portion of that cost will fall on the government. And that’s exactly what‘s happening. According to CIS, 71 percent of illegal-alien headed households with children received some sort of welfare in 2009, compared with 39 percent of native-headed houses with children. Illegal immigrants generally access welfare programs through their U.S.-born children, to whom government assistance is guaranteed. Additionally, U.S.-born children of illegal aliens are entitled to American public schools, health care, and more, even though illegal-alien households rarely pay taxes.

The short-term cost of “anchor babies” was revealed a decade ago in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons. “‘Anchor babies’ born to illegal aliens instantly qualify as citizens for welfare benefits and have caused enormous rises in Medicaid costs and stipends under Supplemental Security Income and Disability Income,” wrote medical attorney Madeleine Pelner Cosman. She noted the increasingly costly situation in California:

In 2003 in Stockton, California, 70 percent of the 2,300 babies born in San Joaquin General Hospital’s maternity ward were anchor babies, and 45 percent of Stockton children under age six are Latino (up from 30 percent in 1993). In 1994, 74,987 anchor babies in California hospital maternity units cost $215 million and constituted 36 percent of all Medi-Cal [California’s Medicaid program] births. Now [2005] they account for substantially more than half.

The long-term costs of birthright citizenship are even more dramatic.  Each anchor baby can sponsor family members once he or she reaches a certain age.  Of course, when they arrive, those family members will also suck up state and federal resources. 

Tuttle doesn't think it possible that current law regarding anchor babies can be changed.  Others disagree.  But this is one debate where, if Republicans can mount a coherent argument that speaks to the abuse of birthright citizenship, most Americans will be on their side.

NRO's Ian Tuttle totes up the cost of birthright citizenship to the American taxpayer and, to no one's surprise, discovers that the massive benefits paid out to families with anchor babies results in a boom in "birth tourism."

According to Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) legal policy analyst Jon Feere, who testified before the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security in April, between 350,000 and 400,000 children are born annually to an illegal-alien mother residing in the United States — as many as one in ten births nationwide. As of 2010, four out of five children of illegal aliens residing in the U.S. were born here — some 4 million kids. Reporting that finding, the Pew Research Center noted that, while illegal immigrants make up about 4 percent of the adult population, “because they have high birthrates, their children make up a much larger share of both the newborn population (8 percent) and the child population (7 percent) in this country.”



The cost of this is not negligible. Inflation-adjusted figures from the U.S. Department of Agriculture projected that a child born in 2013 would cost his parents $304,480 from birth to his eighteenth birthday. Given that illegal-alien households are normally low-income households (three out of five illegal aliens and their U.S.-born children live at or near the poverty line), one would expect that a significant portion of that cost will fall on the government. And that’s exactly what‘s happening. According to CIS, 71 percent of illegal-alien headed households with children received some sort of welfare in 2009, compared with 39 percent of native-headed houses with children. Illegal immigrants generally access welfare programs through their U.S.-born children, to whom government assistance is guaranteed. Additionally, U.S.-born children of illegal aliens are entitled to American public schools, health care, and more, even though illegal-alien households rarely pay taxes.

The short-term cost of “anchor babies” was revealed a decade ago in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons. “‘Anchor babies’ born to illegal aliens instantly qualify as citizens for welfare benefits and have caused enormous rises in Medicaid costs and stipends under Supplemental Security Income and Disability Income,” wrote medical attorney Madeleine Pelner Cosman. She noted the increasingly costly situation in California:

In 2003 in Stockton, California, 70 percent of the 2,300 babies born in San Joaquin General Hospital’s maternity ward were anchor babies, and 45 percent of Stockton children under age six are Latino (up from 30 percent in 1993). In 1994, 74,987 anchor babies in California hospital maternity units cost $215 million and constituted 36 percent of all Medi-Cal [California’s Medicaid program] births. Now [2005] they account for substantially more than half.

The long-term costs of birthright citizenship are even more dramatic.  Each anchor baby can sponsor family members once he or she reaches a certain age.  Of course, when they arrive, those family members will also suck up state and federal resources. 

Tuttle doesn't think it possible that current law regarding anchor babies can be changed.  Others disagree.  But this is one debate where, if Republicans can mount a coherent argument that speaks to the abuse of birthright citizenship, most Americans will be on their side.
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/08/the_drastic_economic_costs_of_birthright_citizenship.html#ixzz3jqAOSOJQ
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook






14TH AMENDMENT – ANCHORS TOP

SHOULD AMERICA PAY MEXICANS BILLIONS TO BREED THEIR ANCHOR BABIES FOR WELFARE?

LOS ANGELES COUNTY ALONE PUTS OUT ONE BILLION DOLLARS YEARLY IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS. IT’S THE DEMOCRAT PARTY’S LA RAZA BREEDERS FOR WELFARE PROGRAM TO ANCHOR AND EXPAND MEXICO’S WELFARE STATE IN OUR OPEN BORDERS AND BUY THEIR ILLEGAL VOTES!


Sen. David Vitter is renewing his call to change the law so that U.S. citizenship is no longer granted automatically as a result of being born on American soil.

LA RAZA – The Mexican Facscist Party of America… Senior Partner to the Democrat Party to expand Mexico’s welfare state on our backs in all 50 states.

He said Obama's ultimate motivation is to turn "Hispanics into a monolithic voting bloc that will loyally vote for Democrats." King claimed that Obama's executive amnesty is a "purely cynical move" that seeks to document "undocumented Democrats" while dividing Republicans and fracturing "our constitutional republic" and the rule of law. -------  REP. STEVE KING



THE BREEDERS!

MEXICO BREEDS GENERATION AFTER GENERATION OF “CHEAP” LABOR AND FOR BILLIONS IN GRINGO-PAID WELFARE… The Democrat Party at work…. just not for us!!!!

Mexico invaded, and anchored a LA RAZA welfare state off the backs of Americans (Legals) by breeding babies for welfare!


AS MEXICO HURLS  THEIR POOR, CRIMINALS AND ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS FOR WELFARE OVER OUR BORDERS……..

Mexico Deports More Immigrants Back to Central America than the U.S. Does


MEXICO CITY (AP) — Mexico now deports more Central American migrants than the United States, a dramatic shift since the U.S. asked Mexico for help a year ago with a spike in illegal migration, especially among unaccompanied minors


Between October and April, Mexico apprehended 92,889 Central Americans. In the same time period, the United States detained 70,226 “other than Mexican” migrants, the vast majority from Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador.
That was a huge reversal from the same period a year earlier, when the wave of migrants and unaccompanied minors from Central America was building. From October 2013 to April 2014, the United States apprehended 159,103 “other than Mexicans,” three times the 49,893 Central Americans detained by Mexico.
The difference is Mexico’s new Southern Border Program, an initiative that included sending 5,000 federal police to the border with Guatemala and more border and highway checkpoints. Raids on migrants increased and authorities focused on keeping migrants off the northbound freight train known as “the Beast,” on which many have suffered mutilation injuries.
Neither U.S. nor Mexican immigration officials responded to requests for comment on the change this week, though officials in the past have said it is aimed at reducing dangers facing migrants.
“Mexico is doing the dirty work, the very dirty work, for the United States,” said Tomas Gonzalez, a Franciscan friar who runs the “72” shelter for migrants in Tenosique, a town in the southern Mexico state of Tabasco.
In the past, Mexican migration officials looked the other way as thousands rafted across the river at the border and then boarded freight trains north. In 2014, more than 46,000 unaccompanied minors from Central America crossed into the United States, leading the U.S. government to turn to the governments in Mexico and Central America to try to stanch the flow.
Mexico has proved the more efficient in deportations, which is already causing concerns among human rights groups about the new tactics.
In most cases, Mexico holds migrants only long enough to verify their nationalities, and quickly bundles them aboard buses to take them back to their home countries.
“The time that foreigners are in immigration (detention) centers depends only on the speed with which the authorities of their (home) countries confirm their nationality,” Mexico’s National Immigration Institute said in an email response to questions from The Associated Press.
Maureen Meyer of the Washington Office on Latin America think tank, which noted the dramatic change in a report this week, questions the speed Mexico is using.
“What we have heard continuously in the past year is that migrants are being so rapidly deported that even some that might have wanted to request some type of protection, or who would have been eligible for some type of humanitarian visa because they had been victims of crime in Mexico, haven’t had that opportunity,” Meyer said.
By comparison, when immigrants are caught crossing the U.S. border illegally, the process of being sent home can take anywhere from hours to years. Mexican nationals are often repatriated quickly – sometimes the same day they are caught – while migrants from other countries often spend at least a few days in U.S. custody before being flown back to their country of origin.
The deportation process can take much longer if an immigrant seeks asylum or if the person is a child traveling alone. For those immigrants who fight to stay in the United States, the wait for a court date and a final decision on their case can take several years because of backlog of more than 449,000 cases already pending in immigration courts.
According to the U.S. Department of Justice, there were about 41,920 requests for asylum in 2014, not all from Central Americans. About 49 percent of requests processed that year were granted.
Mexico grants only a tiny number of asylum requests. The latest figures, covering a nine-month period from January to September 2014, show only 1,525 people, the majority of them Central Americans, requested asylum or refugee status, and only one-sixth – 247 – were granted.
U.S. officials did not respond to questions regarding the amount of U.S. funding Mexico receives for its crackdown on the Guatemalan border, but it is making things tougher for migrants..
“It has raised the costs of the trip, it has raised costs for paying coyotes (smugglers) and the (Mexican) authorities that let them through,” said Gonzalez, the migrant activist. “It has spurred increases in everything bad – corruption and impunity – everything but human rights.”
PATRICK BUCHANAN: OBAMA’S ASSAULT  ON AMERICA BEGINS AT OUR BORDERS
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2015/06/patrick-j-buchanan-when-obama-turned.html

“Yet nothing that happens on these borders imperils America so much as what is happening on our own bleeding border with Mexico.” Patrick Buchanan



ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS for GRINGO-PAID WELFARE!

POPULATION SURGE

MEXICO DOUBLES THE POPULATION OF AMERICA, FILLS OUR JOBS, PRISONS AND WELFARE OFFICES  AND VOTED DEM FOR MORE!





ANCHOR BABIES FOR WELFARE - HERE ARE SOME FIGURES:



To verify what I write about, visit Dr. Steven Camarata in Washington DC. He states that, “1.3 million legal immigrants arrive annually into the United States. In turn, they birth 900,000 babies annually.”




POPULATION SURGE


MEXICO DOUBLES THE POPULATION OF AMERICA, FILLS OUR JOBS, PRISONS AND WELFARE OFFICES  AND VOTED DEM FOR MORE!