Everyone knows she stood by
her man, blamed his women, and perhaps was a psychological co-rapist for the
sake of her political ambitions. DEBORAH C TYLER
Tick...tick...tick -- The
stench of Epstein closing in on Bill Clinton
Much
of the fallout of the Jeffrey Epstein pedophilia among the powerful scandal has
fallen onto Prince Andrew of U.K., an insignificant second son of Queen
Elizabeth II. The pervert's suicide, though, and the increasingly
suspicion-arousing circumstances point to much more important people. As I've
argued before, the media scrum around Andrew seemed to be an attempt to deflect
attention from more powerful players involved with Epstein as the story burns
out and the public loses interest.
Beneficiary number
remains is Bill Clinton, whose associations with Epstein are pretty
astonishing. He's been listed on the flight logs of more than two
dozen Epstein "Lolita Express" flights. He's been a regular at
Epstein's "cowboy village" in New
Mexico with its group showers which, based on the word of maintence staff,
seemed to be all about perversion out of the public eye. He's been seen
with all those candy stripers.
Well,
now the lid's starting to bounce on that boiling pot, and maybe too soon for
Bill's tastes. The Sun of the U.K.'s new U.S. edition, now has an
astonishing series of photos of Clinton livin'
it up on Epstein's airplanes, Clinton posing with Epstein's accused pimp,
Ghislaine Maxwell, and Clinton whooping it up with underage staff, generally
partying hearty on the pervert's dime. Yet to this day he claims to know nothing
about what Epstein was about, never noticed a thing.
BILL Clinton poses side-by-side with suspected
pimp Ghislaine Maxwell - as the pair board pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s
notorious private jet.
The former US President is seen smiling on
the steps of the plane – dubbed the Lolita Express - next to Maxwell, in astonishing pictures exclusively obtained by
The Sun.
All
it can do is raise suspicions about whether Epstein's prison
"suicide" was in any way authentic - a question that even
(tick, tick, tick) 60 Minutes gave credibility
to, given the mounting evidence - and what Clinton might be trying to hide.
It's possible there are still pictures and cell phones and other
paraphernalia out there if it's not been preemptively destroyed. (After all, if
someone could have taken Epstein out to keep him from talking, how much more
likely they'd be to break and enter into some of Epstein's redoubts to destroy
the evidence.) It's conspiracy stuff, sure, but it's linked to a strange
chain of events.
Why
on earth would Clinton hang out with a revolting human being like Epstein
anyway? As Andrea Widburg has noted here, it's almost as if the
world's elites have some kind of power racket going, given that pedophilia is
all about power over the powerless. Clinton himself was out of power when he
started associating with the monster, and his wife Hillary had it while he
didn't. She even blithely ignored him when he warned her to go to Wisconsin in
2016, which cost her the election. His association had some kind of roots in
power.
What's
really strange is why the media is so intent on protecting Bill. Shouldn't he,
and for that matter, his longtime enabler Hillary Clinton be answering a few
questions from the press. To date, they are amazingly incurious. Yet as
pictures like the Sun's get out, the clock is now ticking.
Ed Buck Will
Finally Face Trial, but His Conviction Is Far From Guaranteed
Charged with the
the deaths of two men who overdosed in his apartment, the former Democratic
operative’s path to punishment could be difficult and uncertain
By
on September 11, a black man whom the authorities are calling “Joe
Doe” hurried from a West Hollywood apartment to a nearby gas station and asked
the attendant on duty to call 911. A wealthy older man had injected him with
crystal meth, Doe said, and then refused to call an ambulance when he began
overdosing.
Thus began a chain of
events that resulted, at long last, in the arrest of Ed Buck. By then the
longtime Democratic Party operative was the target of protest vigils, a
wrongful death lawsuit, and a TV news stakeout. Though two black men had been
found dead of meth overdoses in his home in a span of 18 months, and several
others were telling investigators that Buck had brought them into his residence
and injected them with a quantity of the drug that made them lose
consciousness, local prosecutors had resisted calls to make an arrest. The 911
emergency of Joe Doe propelled the case suddenly forward out of what seemed, at
least to observers, an interminable lapse of inertia. Within days after Doe was
discharged from the hospital, Buck was arrested at his home by L.A. County
sheriff’s deputies and booked on state charges in connection with Doe’s
overdose. In Doe, investigators had a witness who had escaped Buck’s apartment
alive, and what he told them gave prosecutors the break they needed to bring
long-awaited charges in what was alleged to be one of the most macabre L.A.
crime sprees in years. At that point, however, local prosecutors had
competition.
Earlier this year, at
the invitation of the L.A. County Sheriff’s Department, a federal drug task
force opened an investigation into Buck’s alleged crimes. Where L.A. County
District Attorney Jackie Lacey had previously judged the evidence insufficient
to charge Buck in the two overdose deaths in his home, the United States
attorney in L.A., Nicola Hanna, saw things differently. In a whiplash turn of
events over 48 hours, Buck was arrested, charged in state court, and then
promptly transferred to federal custody and hit with a new set of charges in
the deaths of 26-year-old Gemmel Moore and 55-year-old Timothy Dean.
This summer, the
legal drama of Ed Buck enters its improbable third act. The notoriety of Buck,
once famous as a well-connected political donor, has long since eclipsed his
renown. By the time he was handcuffed and hauled away from West Hollywood in a
sheriff’s vehicle, the name Ed Buck had come to represent many things to many
people: to local prosecutors, he is a scourge; to black and LGBTQ activists, an
avatar of status and privilege; to the right wing, a cudgel with which to bash
the Democrats; and, to black gay men working as escorts in West Hollywood, a
kind of terrifying urban legend come to life. But while the case against him
has progressed, the path to conviction is difficult and uncertain.
The Buck who appeared in court before federal Judge Frederick F.
Mumm on October 10 was a shadow of the political phenom who arrived in L.A.
three decades ago and became a major player in the local Democratic Party. He
stood, looking drawn and anxious in a loose beige prison smock. When Mumm asked
how he would plead to charges that he supplied the methamphetamine that killed
Moore and Dean, the defendant hesitated for a long moment before responding: “I
am working on one hearing aid. Not guilty.”
Family members of
Moore and Dean attended the arraignment and assembled outside court afterward.
Moore’s mother, LaTisha Nixon, later called Buck a “monster” and dismissed his
apparent weakness as an act to gain pity from the court. The families and their
activist supporters have long argued that Buck led a double life that protected
him from the consequences of his alleged crimes, likening him to a modern-day
Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. “This was a really hard case for people in society and
politics to wrap their heads around,” says Jasmyne Cannick, an L.A.-based media
consultant active in the campaign that called for Buck’s arrest. “Here you have
this white man, an animal rights activist who’s run for office and who seems
like he’s a decent guy, a good person. It was really a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde
situation.”
It’s not as if Buck
hadn’t shown occasional glimpses of a darker side: He has been the subject of
several requests for temporary restraining orders. And on at least two occasions,
his vitriolic style convinced deputies at West Hollywood’s City Hall to escort
the targets of his tirades to their cars after public meetings. Still, even to
those who had run afoul of Buck’s temper, the depth of his fall from grace is
astonishing.
“Here you have this white man, an animal rights activist who’s run
for office and who seems like he’s a decent guy. It was really a Dr. Jekyll and
Mr. Hyde situation.”
The Ed Buck of the
late 1980s was a charismatic gay political celebrity who lead a quixotic
crusade that helped bring down Evan Mecham, the rancorous Republican governor
of Arizona. The Arizona Republic said
Buck was “destined to go down in history as one of Arizona’s most unlikely
political figures.” After moving to L.A., Buck acclimated quickly, forging
political friendships with area congressmen, members of the state Assembly and
the City Council. He fostered golden retrievers, railed against private
development, and donated handsomely to scores of Democrats, including all but
one of the present members of the West Hollywood City Council. But the same
65-year-old who had grinned in photos with Hillary Clinton and former Governor
Jerry Brown was known to homeless men in WeHo’s Plummer Park as “Dr.
Kevorkian.”
Buck was being held
in early November without bond at the Metropolitan Detention Center in downtown
L.A. An official with the Federal Bureau of Prisons declined to discuss the
conditions of his confinement except to say that Buck is not permitted
visitors. In state court, where he faces separate charges of operating a drug
den and providing the drugs that caused Joe Doe’s hospitalization for a drug
overdose, Buck wore a protective blue vest, the kind meant to prevent inmates
from killing themselves and protect
them from attacks by other prisoners.
The source of Buck’s
wealth has always been shrouded in mystery. He claimed he retired in his early
30s on proceeds from the “million-dollar” sale of his business (he owned a
service that provided driver’s license information to auto insurers). A former
friend told me that more recently Buck has lived frugally off investment gains
from the stock market. Local prosecutors put forward a different theory,
arguing in a recent filing in state court that Buck “has no known source of
income” and “may be funding his lifestyle with narcotics trafficking.”
Since 2005 Buck has
donated more than a half-million dollars to political candidates and causes in
Los Angeles. Though he was once a registered Republican in Arizona, nearly all
of his donations have been linked to Democrats since he moved to West Hollywood
in 1991. He has cut checks for 40 officeholders in California, including
several in L.A. City Hall, the California Assembly, and Congress, the Los Angeles Times has reported. Some of those politicos have returned the money or redirected it
to charitable causes after Buck’s arrest. Lacey returned the $100 donation that
Buck made to her 2012 campaign for district attorney. She has said that she
doesn’t know Buck and his modest largesse played no role in the decision about
whether to prosecute him.
Whatever its source,
Buck’s fortune seems depleted. Seymour Amster, the attorney who began
representing Buck after the death of Moore, is not listed as his attorney in
the federal case. Facing a possible life sentence in federal prison, Buck has
elected to be represented by a public defender, at a cost of $500 a month,
according to a court filing. Amster has spoken for Buck in the press, saying
that Moore’s death was “a tragedy, not a crime,” which he attributed to Buck’s
having “opened his home to an individual who was troubled.” He referred to the
activist campaign against Buck as “a race war.” Amster appeared at Buck’s side
in state court, but that case is on hold until the federal case is completed,
says a spokesman for the DA’s office. Amster, who previously defended the
serial killer known as the Grim Sleeper, did not respond to messages seeking
comment.
When Moore was found dead in Buck’s apartment in 2017, the initial
investigation by the Sheriff’s Department and coroner’s office treated the
overdose as an accident. A law enforcement source told Los Angeles that this
erroneous assumption contributed to errors that investigators committed at the
scene. A year later, when Lacey decided not to prosecute Buck in Moore’s death,
prosecutors listed “inadmissible search and seizure” as one of the reasons.
Lacey later told a meeting of the Stonewall Democratic Club that investigators
had illegally seized around two grams of methamphetamine from a toolbox in
Buck’s apartment. Federal prosecutors later charged Buck with intentionally
distributing the drugs that killed Moore and Dean and three counts of drug
distribution. They must prove that the drugs provided by Buck were the drugs
that entered into the victims. Court documents in the federal case make no
mention of an illegal search.
Nearly three weeks
after Moore’s death the Sheriff’s Department reopened the investigation as a
possible homicide. It happened after Moore’s mother and a young man who had
worked as an escort for Buck aired their suspicion that Buck had supplied and
injected Moore with the drugs that killed him. Nixon told a local reporter:
“[Buck] would have my son … go out to … Santa Monica Boulevard looking for
young gay black guys so he could inject them with drugs, see their reaction and
how [they] would react and take pictures of them.” The reporter, Ryan Gierach,
had known Buck for 14 years and knew of his meth use. “I needed no convincing,”
Gierach said. “Over 13 or 14 years I’ve seen a man, a vital, vigorous,
incredible intellect, descend into a monster.”
Buck had once been a
political mentor of sorts to Gierach, opening doors and giving him inside
information until the two had a falling out in 2015 after Buck refused to lend
him money. Gierach incorporated Nixon’s lurid allegations into a news feature
that delved into Buck’s prominence in the Democratic Party and included a
recent photo of Buck with Clinton. The Drudge Report promoted the story. The
London tabloid The Daily Mail ran
its version under the headline: “Male prostitute, 26, dies of meth overdose at
Hollywood home of high-profile Democrat donor.” Fox News seemed to embrace the
story as a chance to attack multiple foes at once: Democrats, the Clintons, and
Hollywood. (On the night Buck was arrested, Tucker Carlson reported the story
with a photo showing Buck with Hillary Clinton: “Turns out when Buck wasn’t
donating to the Democrats, he liked to inject young men with narcotics in his
living room.”)
“I’ve seen a
man, a vital, vigorous, incredible intellect, descend into a monster.”
Entries from Moore’s
personal journal were published in various news outlets in which he blamed Buck
for getting him addicted to crystal meth. Moore wrote in a December 2016 entry
that Buck “gave me my first injection of chrystal [sic] meth it was very
painful, but after all the troubles, I became addicted to the pain and
fetish/fantasy.”
Eighteen months after
Moore’s death, Timothy Dean, a fashion consultant for Saks Fifth Avenue who had
performed in adult films, died of a meth overdose in Buck’s living room. Nine
months later Joe Doe fled Buck’s apartment and ended up being treated at
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center for a drug overdose.
Federal prosecutors
have the ability to charge Buck in the two deaths without having to prove that
killing them was his intent. The same statute is being used to prosecute the
men who sold the fentanyl-laced painkillers that killed rap star Mac Miller.
Lacey said in a statement that “there is no comparable statute in California
criminal law that my office could have used to charge defendant Buck in either
of the deaths.”
Investigators
eventually gathered testimony from at least nine men who said that Buck had
brought them to his home and insisted that they take drugs he gave them as
compensation for sexual services. Two of them reported that he had injected
drugs into their bodies while they were asleep. One of those two men is Joe
Doe.
With the exception of
Doe, local and federal prosecutors have differed over the credibility of
witnesses. Many have puzzled over how Buck had avoided so much as a drug charge
in the case. Nixon’s attorneys in a wrongful death lawsuit against Buck have
suggested that local prosecutors were influenced by the fact that many of the
alleged victims were homeless, black, and sex workers. The federal trial of Ed
Buck was originally scheduled to begin November 26, but has been moved to next
summer.
And there's more than a few indicators that Clinton wasn't
naive at all about Epstein. Though he wasn't accused by Epstein's credible
accuser Virginia Giuffre, Clinton's been accused repeatedly being a sexual
predator by others earlier.
She is incredibly incompetent, fundamentally dishonest, and
criminally corrupt, and these are her good qualities. KENNETH ELIASBERG
Harvey
Weinstein has been exposed in the media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary
Clinton has been exposed as the craven money-grubber she is; money over
morality is the mantra she lives by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY – AMERICAN
THINKERcom
Hillary the Punisher: Ronan Farrow says he was cut dead from
Clinton circles after he exposed Weinstein
Apparently, the queen and her moneymen are not to be
challenged.
Young Ronan Farrow learned that the hard way when he found
out he was persona
non grata from charmed social circles of Hillary Clinton
following his investigation into Hollywood movie producer Harvey Weinstein's
long career of sexual harassment and intimidation, an investigation which won
him the Pulitzer prize.
Which culminates a long road of indignities for the young
man. Seems the threats from Weinstein's minions to him were not enough. Nor was
the rejection he encountered from assorted media organizations who refused to
run his work until the New Yorker finally picked it up. Nope, the punishment
Farrow endured also extended to House Clinton, which cut him dead.
Which, to the rest of us, seems like a good thing, given their
long history of moral turpitude. But to young Ronan, it was another sling and
arrow, because he was a Democrat and that was his social circle.
“It’s remarkable how quickly even people with a long relationship
with you will turn if you threaten the centres of power or the sources of
funding around them,” Farrow told the Financial Times.
“Ultimately, there are a lot of people out there who operate in
that way. They’re beholden to powerful interests and if you go up against those
interests, you become radioactive very quickly,” he said.
Clinton appointed Farrow as her special adviser on global youth
issues in 2011 when she was secretary of state. Farrow said he had worked with
Clinton “for years” when he was looking into the Weinstein story.
Instead of praising young Ronan for standing up for the
interests of sex-harrassed women, for igniting the #MeToo movement, Hillary,
that supposed big champion of women's progress, shut him out, probably
refusing to take his calls, and in his view, solely on the grounds that
one of her most important moneymen was put out of commission. He was dead to
her.
And that tells us a lot more about Clinton than it does about
Farrow.
It's a reminder of Clinton's pay-to-play orientation, and
privilege-of-kings morality. Rules of decency do not apply to her. Women's
rights, or anyone's rights, are window dressing. Money talks. Maybe that
can be brought up next time someone bruits about her name for president
again.
Everyone knows she stood by her man, blamed his
women, and perhaps was a psychological co-rapist for the sake of her political
ambitions.
Bill and Hill - and the Evil that Men Do
If you asked one
hundred people what they think about when they hear the name Bill Clinton, a
goodly number will say womanizer, cheater – a few will use the dreadful word
rapist. And that number will increase. Time and neurology are working against
the Clintons.
Most memory training programs are simply a matter of learning how to associate memories with emotionally charged ideas. This is because the brain is designed to remember where the dangers and the goodies lie and to forget the dry statistics. The brain is more inclined to remember Jennifer Flowers than the unemployment rate in 1996. This effect has tainted the collective memory of many presidents, for example, disclosures about the mistresses of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and John Kennedy. This effect will increase for Bill Clinton both because of the outrageous nature of his conduct and the way it has and will be reported.
Most memory training programs are simply a matter of learning how to associate memories with emotionally charged ideas. This is because the brain is designed to remember where the dangers and the goodies lie and to forget the dry statistics. The brain is more inclined to remember Jennifer Flowers than the unemployment rate in 1996. This effect has tainted the collective memory of many presidents, for example, disclosures about the mistresses of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and John Kennedy. This effect will increase for Bill Clinton both because of the outrageous nature of his conduct and the way it has and will be reported.
People tend to cut
quite a bit of slack for the weaknesses of the flesh because there’s a lot of
that going around. But Hillary will gain no benefit from that latitude.
Everyone knows she stood by her man, blamed his women, and perhaps was a
psychological co-rapist for the sake of her political ambitions. Before
the next president is elected, Hillary will not only have an albatross around
her neck, she will be covered with names like Wellstone, Broaddrick, Moffet,
Ward Gracen, Brown, Dowdy, Jones, Ferguson, Zercher, Willey, and more. A majority
of those one hundred people will remember the evil the Clintons did, and their
legacy will be lost in the folds of tattered dresses and bleeding lips.
Lives -- after them, the good is oft interred with their bones. So let it be with the Clintons.
Lives -- after them, the good is oft interred with their bones. So let it be with the Clintons.
If you asked one
hundred people what they think about when they hear the name Bill Clinton, a
goodly number will say womanizer, cheater – a few will use the dreadful word
rapist. And that number will increase. Time and neurology are working against
the Clintons.
Most memory training programs are simply a matter of learning how to associate memories with emotionally charged ideas. This is because the brain is designed to remember where the dangers and the goodies lie and to forget the dry statistics. The brain is more inclined to remember Jennifer Flowers than the unemployment rate in 1996. This effect has tainted the collective memory of many presidents, for example, disclosures about the mistresses of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and John Kennedy. This effect will increase for Bill Clinton both because of the outrageous nature of his conduct and the way it has and will be reported.
People tend to cut quite a bit of slack for the weaknesses of the flesh because there’s a lot of that going around. But Hillary will gain no benefit from that latitude. Everyone knows she stood by her man, blamed his women, and perhaps was a psychological co-rapist for the sake of her political ambitions. Before the next president is elected, Hillary will not only have an albatross around her neck, she will be covered with names like Wellstone, Broaddrick, Moffet, Ward Gracen, Brown, Dowdy, Jones, Ferguson, Zercher, Willey, and more. A majority of those one hundred people will remember the evil the Clintons did, and their legacy will be lost in the folds of tattered dresses and bleeding lips.
Lives -- after them, the good is oft interred with their bones. So let it be with the Clintons.
Most memory training programs are simply a matter of learning how to associate memories with emotionally charged ideas. This is because the brain is designed to remember where the dangers and the goodies lie and to forget the dry statistics. The brain is more inclined to remember Jennifer Flowers than the unemployment rate in 1996. This effect has tainted the collective memory of many presidents, for example, disclosures about the mistresses of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and John Kennedy. This effect will increase for Bill Clinton both because of the outrageous nature of his conduct and the way it has and will be reported.
People tend to cut quite a bit of slack for the weaknesses of the flesh because there’s a lot of that going around. But Hillary will gain no benefit from that latitude. Everyone knows she stood by her man, blamed his women, and perhaps was a psychological co-rapist for the sake of her political ambitions. Before the next president is elected, Hillary will not only have an albatross around her neck, she will be covered with names like Wellstone, Broaddrick, Moffet, Ward Gracen, Brown, Dowdy, Jones, Ferguson, Zercher, Willey, and more. A majority of those one hundred people will remember the evil the Clintons did, and their legacy will be lost in the folds of tattered dresses and bleeding lips.
Lives -- after them, the good is oft interred with their bones. So let it be with the Clintons.
Hillary Clinton Is not just a sore loser, she is a total loser
As one can readily see, Hillary Clinton has been unable to recover
from having lost the 2016 presidential election -- a self-inflicted wound that
she will never cop to. Or, possibly, an act of divine intervention. She has
come up with well over a dozen reasons for her defeat -- every one but the real
one, i.e. she is a loser -- not just a sore loser, but a total loser. She
is incredibly incompetent, fundamentally dishonest, and criminally corrupt, and
these are her good qualities. In addition, she is bereft of a trace of
integrity or character, has absolutely no judgment, and is devoid of people
skills ( she’s very easy to dislike and distrust and thereby become a member of
her deplorables). The 2016 race was hers to lose, and by failing to listen to
advice on where to campaign, she managed to do just that -- lose! Thank God --
a Hillary Clinton presidency would be the last nail in America’s coffin.
We could go through the litany of Hillary Clinton’s failures –
Cattlegate, Whitewater, Travelgate, Filegate, her clumsy and opaque handling of
the health care assignment her husband handed her, her tour of duty in the U.S.
Senate, or her stint at the State Department, starting with her failure to get
the Russian word for “reset” correct and ending with her dereliction of duty in
the case of Benghazi (which produced four dead Americans, including her
“friend” Ambassador Christopher Stevens), which, on testifying before Congress,
she fobbed off with “what difference, at this point, does it make?”
But, for present purposes, I would just like to focus on the
liberties that she has always taken with the truth. When Bill Safire of the New
York Times called
her a congenital liar, he flattered her. You
see, the Clintons don’t just tell lies, they live them.
Consider her most recent whopper -- the one in which she observed,
on being asked what was her most difficult decision, that it was remaining in
her marriage. Why was this her biggest whopper? Because she had no choice but
to remain in her marriage, if, indeed, the arrangement that the Clintons have
qualifies as a “marriage,” rather than a political partnership looking to advance
the ambitions of each of the partners.
Some have applauded her incredible loyalty to Bill in view of his
tawdry behavior. However, if all they had was an “arrangement” to advance their
ambitions, his infidelities were irrelevant as far as hurt feelings were
concerned.
But they were necessary to make her both the object of sympathy
(although one has to wonder why you are deserving of pity on your husband’s
1000th marital transgression). Also, every time he got caught, so it goes,
he owed her one. Ergo, the health care assignment, her Senate term, and,
finally, her stint as Secretary of State. In each of these situations
she distinguished herself more for her failures than any accomplishment.
The point here is that Hillary had no choice but to stay in her
marriage. Without her connection to Bill Clinton, Hillary could not be
nominated for, let alone be elected to, dog catcher of even the smallest of
communities. Her successes in securing all of these positions was
achieved by attaching herself to Bill’s coattails and riding them to each one
of these positions.
So why did Hillary lose the 2016 Presidential election? Because
she’s Hillary Clinton, a born loser. And, more to the point, Hillary Clinton
belongs in the Big House, not in the White House.
BILL CLINTON: SERIAL RAPIST and his enabler, Hillary!
MONICA’S VIDEO ON SERIAL RAPIST BILL CLINTON, HUSBAND OF
SWAMP EMPRESS HILLARY CLINTON, CHARITY FOUNDATION FRAUDSTER
Harvey Weinstein has been exposed in the
media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary
Clinton has been exposed as the craven money-grubber she is; money over
morality is the mantra she lives by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY – AMERICAN THINKERcom
Monica Lewinsky says Bill Clinton hinted she should perjure
herself, arranged a farewell Christmas tryst before dumping her
Why is no
one helping or caring about all these women? Who Hillary Viciously went after. The
hypocrisy right now on the left is utterly stunning me. Bill Clinton-12 women
on record telling their stories of him sexually assaulting them starting back
in college! Imagine all the women who still have never told their stories about
him?
Eileen Wellstone (1969)
Allegation: S-exual assault
Anonymous female student at Yale University (1972)
Anonymous female student at the University of Arkansas (1974)
Anonymous female lawyer (1977)
Juanita Broaddrick (1978)
R-ape
Carolyn Moffet (1979)
Elizabeth Ward (1983)
Sally Perdue (1983)
Paula Jones (1991)
Sandra Allen James (1991)
Christy Zercher (1992)
Kathleen Willey (1993)
Monica Lewinsky. 22-year-old intern working for the President
Ronan
Farrow: Bill Clinton ‘Credibly’ Accused of Rape, Investigation Is ‘Overdue’
https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2019/11/03/ronan-farrow-bill-clinton-credibly-accused-of-rape-investigation-is-overdue/
3 Nov 20192,510
2:29
Pulitzer
Prize-winning journalist Ronan Farrow said on HBO’s Real Time With Bill Maher, that
“credible” accusations of rape had been
made against former President Bill Clinton by Juanita Broaddrick, adding that
an investigation into the allegations is now “overdue.”
Maher asked Farrow, who is
best known for helping uncover the Harvey Weinstein sexual assault scandal,
whether Clinton could have survived in today’s political climate of
hyper-awareness about sexual misconduct.
“I think that it is very important
to interject that Bill Clinton is a different conversation,” responded Farrow.
“He has been credibly accused of rape. That has nothing to do with gray areas.
I think that the Juanita Broaddrick claim has been overdue for revisiting.”
Broaddrick, a former nursing
administrator, first made the allegations against Clinton in 1999, claiming
that he raped her in her hotel room in Little Rock in 1978, when he was
Arkansas attorney general and running for governor. Clinton has denied the
allegation through his attorney.
Farrow recently accused Hillary
Clinton in his best-selling book Catch
and Kill of pressuring him during his investigations into
Harvey Weinstein’s behavior. According to Farrow, Clinton’s publicist Nick
Merrill described the story as “a concern” for her reputation.
Meanwhile,
Maher also pressed Farrow on longtime rumors that he is the son of singer
Frank Sinatra, with his mother Mia Farrow having been romantically involved
with the singer and the pair bearing a strong physical resemblance.
“Now, what do you think your father
would think about what you’re doing now?” Maher asked Farrow, in reference to
his investigative reporting.
“I knew I was walking into that so I
asked,” Farrow said. “I didn’t want to give you the sound-bite of ‘Which one?’”
In
2013, Mia Farrow said in an interview with Vanity Fair that Sinatra could
“possibly” be her son’s biological father.
“I feel like there’s no one more
#MeToo-y than Frank Sinatra,” Maher said, asking. “You do own a mirror, don’t
you?”
Farrow eventually admitted that he
“doesn’t know” what Sinatra would have thought of his journalism, but joked
that Maher could “ask my mom” for answers.
Where were the HOWLERS
when serial rapist Bill Clinton, Bill Cosby and Harvey Weinstein were on the
prowl?
http://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2016/07/30-lies-of-hillary-clinton-and-thats.html
Harvey Weinstein has been exposed in the
media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary
Clinton has been exposed as the craven money-grubber she is; money over
morality is the mantra she lives by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY – AMERICAN THINKERcom
"But
what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of
the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power,
use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and
venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear
to every person on the planet by now."
---- Patricia McCarthy -
AMERICANTHINKER.com
Leaked Julian Assange
Message:
Hillary Is A ‘Well Connected,
Sadistic Sociopath’
"But what the
Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the
American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it
to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal.
Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to
every person on the planet by now."
---- Patricia McCarthy -
AMERICANTHINKER.com
Hillary, Billary,
Cosby, Buttman Affleck, Oliver Stone, Harvey Weinstein and their boy Obomb…..
new definitions of
degradation and
sleaze.
Harvey Weinstein has been exposed in the
media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary
Clinton has been exposed as the craven money-grubber she is; money over
morality is the mantra she lives by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY – AMERICAN THINKERcom
"But
what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of
the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power,
use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and
venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear
to every person on the planet by now."
---- Patricia McCarthy -
AMERICANTHINKER.com
DO
YOU GET SICK AND TIRED OF HOLLYWOOD’S STAGGERING HYPOCRISY???
RICH LIBERALS AND
THEIR CELEBRATES P IMPS AND PERVS
…. The parasitism
of Hillary, Billary, Obomb, Heffner, Cosby, Buttman
Affleck, Oliver Stone, Weinstein and the rest.
Harvey Weinstein has been exposed in the
media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary Clinton has been exposed as the
craven money-grubber she is; money over morality is the mantra she lives
by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY – AMERICAN
THINKERcom
Former
President Bill Clinton speaks during a plenary session at a Clinton Global
Initiative meeting in Marrakech, Morocco, on May 6, 2015. (Abdeljalil
Bounhar/AP Photo)
Bill Clinton Accusers Speak
Out After Ronan Farrow Says Ex-President Was ‘Credibly Accused of Rape’
November 6, 2019 Updated: November 6, 2019
Share
Juanita Broaddrick, who has long accused
former President Bill Clinton of sexual assault, said that she
agrees with comments made by reporter Ronan Farrow.
Farrow wrote
the book “Catch and Kill: Lies, Spies and a Conspiracy to Protect Predators,”
touching on NBC News’ attempts to silence his reporting about Harvey Weinstein.
He told “Real Time with Bill Maher” that Broaddrick had credibly
accused Clinton of rape.
“Bill Clinton is a different conversation.
He has been credibly accused of rape … That is, I think the Juanita Broaddrick
claim has been overdue for revisiting,” he said on Nov. 1.
He was
answering a question from Maher, who asked a panel, “Could Bill Clinton,
if he had done what he did in 1998 survived today? Or would his own party have
thrown him under the bus?”
According to the Daily Caller, three women who have accused Clinton of assault,
including Broaddrick, said they are hoping for justice.
Clinton has
denied all of the allegations.
“I always have
thought that this should be revisited. … I would like for something to be done
in order to expose this man for all of the things that he has done and possibly
get all of his past presidential perks taken from him,” Broaddrick told the
website. “That would be my biggest goal, because I don’t think anything else can
be done after 40 years.”
Broaddrick
said that the allegations of assault never amounted to anything because of the
power he wielded.
“I think it’s
because of who it was,” she said. “[Lauer and others] are all lower characters.
Who should have been exposed was the president of the United States.”
She accused
him of rape when he was campaigning for governor of Arkansas in 1978.
Leslie
Millwee, another Clinton accuser, told the Daily Caller that she was pleased to
hear Farrow’s interest in the allegations.
“I absolutely
agree that it’s long overdue. … I think that more things are going to come to
light,” Millwee said. “I’m really excited that Ronan’s looking into it. I was
sexually assaulted three times by Bill Clinton … and I would not only like for
Juanita to get justice, you know, I’d like to get justice. I’m elated that he’s
looking into this.”
“I don’t care
what your political affiliation is—whether you lean left or right—sexual
assault is bad and wrong and it should be looked at in that way, and nothing to
do with political affiliation,” said Millwee, a former Arkansas reporter.
And Kathleen
Willey, a former aide in the White House, said that she doesn’t believe
Farrow’s interest in the topic will actually lead to charges against Clinton.
“The world
knows that the Clintons have everybody in their back pocket, and I just don’t
know who’s willing to come forward and take something like that on,” she told
the news outlet. “I certainly agree with what Ronan Farrow said. … What
does ‘revisit’ mean? Is the [district attorney] going to look into this? Is the
special counsel?” Willey said. “It’s been 40 years, and I can’t see anybody
picking the ball up and running with it.”
Willey claimed
that Clinton assaulted her in 1993 in the Oval Office while she volunteered as
an aide, according to Business Insider. Clinton denied the allegations.
Millwee alleged that the former president
sexually assaulted her in 1980 several times at the television station where
she worked. She came forward with the allegations in 2016, speaking to Breitbart.
Clinton
eventually was impeached in 1998 by the House of Representatives for lying
under oath and obstruction of justice following the publication of his
relationship with Monica Lewinsky.
The Senate
ultimately acquitted him in 1999 and he served out his second term until
January 2001.
O.K., Prince Andrew's out
of public life. Why isn't Bill Clinton?
The press is making a big deal out of Britain's Prince Andrew now
being ousted from public life, based on his pretty gamy associations with
pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. He had his hand draped around the bare midriff of a
17-year old, in one photo. He kibbitzed with Epstein after his Florida
slap-on-the-wrist conviction and there's a photograph there, too. Flight
records show he rode the Lolita Express. And incredibly, he claims he
never knew anything untoward was going on.
U.K.'s Daily Mail has this comprehensive report, reasonably
explored from a U.K. perspective. But the U.S. press has been all over it,
too. Here's CNN, Washington Post, Vanity Fair, CNBC, Time, Fox News...
It's good clean fun for the American press, given that the British
royal family is unimportant here, and relies on a pristine public image to
maintain U.K. public support which is pretty incompatible with jetting around
with Epstein, but it also raises questions about why that other famous friend
of Epstein's, Bill Clinton, who rode the Lolita Express again, and again, and
again, isn't getting the same pariah treatment. Fact is, the press hasn't
brought the disgusting thing up at all, even as Clinton's wife (and daughter)
gallivant around the country on a thinly disguised campaign for Hillary as
president.
Joe Biden's gotten all kinds of questions based on his son
Hunter's gamy business dealings. But Hillary Clinton remains immune -- and
not a word has been said in the media about hubby Bill, who's still carrying on
his public life as usual. It's as if he's out of the picture, and all those
denials he's thus far made are simply factual ... albeit about as factual
as Prince Andrew's denials.
And there's more than a few indicators that Clinton wasn't
naive at all about Epstein. Though he wasn't accused by Epstein's credible
accuser Virginia Giuffre, Clinton's been accused repeatedly being a sexual
predator by others earlier. Someone like Clinton turning up with Epstein, is pretty
obviously a matter of public interest, particularly with his wife's presidential
ambitions. Just recently, one of Clinton's accusers, Juanita Broaddrick,
gave this interview to Australia's Sky News, bringing up the constant
issues with the much-vaunted Democratic ex-president, and still seeking
justice. She's not getting any so far:
My
interview with Sky News Australia this evening
MeToo
movement "never wanted anything to do with the victims of Bill Clinton” |
Sky News Australia https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_6108127574001 …
MeToo movement "never wanted anything to do with the
victims of Bill Clinton” | Sky News Australia
Which brings up again why Clinton isn't getting any attention, let
alone ostracization, on his well-known relationship with Epstein. Why not? The
Brit press is interested in British angles, the American press should be
similarly interested in American angles. But only Prince Andrew gets the full
press attention. Maybe that's because he's not a Democrat to protect?
It just shows the press's credibility problem in conveniently
attempting to protect another Democrat from any uncomfortable questions.
Is someone gonna ask the
Clintons about all those trips to Epstein's 'cowboy village'?
The press is piling on against the U.K.'s
Prince Andrew, who's been probably credibly accused of participating in
"suicide" pervert Jeffrey Epstein's sex-with-little-girls operations.
Yes, it's wretched and
appalling. It's bad for a royal family that for decades has
portrayed itself as the embodiment of middle-class values. This
is Shaka Zulu or Genghis Khan territory.
But it's also of limited interest, given
that Prince Andrew is not even important in the royal succession lineup, and
frankly, who cares what some rich overseas princeling is up
to? The media sure didn't, up until now.
There's likely a reason for it — to
deflect attention from the growing evidence that Bill, Hillary, and
even Chelsea Clinton have had a pretty spectacularly intense association
with the very same pervert.
The Daily Mail has been on the job and has
found another credible witness, a former contractor of Epstein's at his
New Mexico "cowboy village" ranch who says the Clintons jetted in
annually on Epstein's Lolita Express and had a grand old time on Epstein's
many-camera'ed grounds. Some opening points from the Mail:
- Bill and Hillary
Clinton would stay at Jeffrey Epstein's New Mexico ranch frequently after
they left the White House, former estate workers told DailyMailTV
- The former president
was Epstein's closest 'celebrity mate' and the Clintons visited Zorro
Ranch 'a whole bunch of times', a former contractor who ran the IT system
at the property said
- The family never
stayed in the main house but bunked down in a special cowboy-themed
village created by Epstein, which lies a mile south of his own villa,
sources said
- The guest homes are
next to other traditional Wild West-style buildings such as an old
schoolhouse and saloon bar, which are all near Epstein's private airstrip,
where he arrived on his private planes
And to read the details of the report is
enough to give the gross-outs to anyone. Why were the Clintons going
to a place Epstein called his "baby-making ranch"? What
was that about Epstein having an eight-person "party
shower"? Did the Clintons do the "party
shower"? Was it on film? How many times? And
who else was in the pen with them? What about that party
room with the stripper poles? Did the Clintons go there,
too? What was the Secret Service thinking, or did Bill bug out again
on his Secret Service? And why are taxpayers paying for this farce?
Why again did Epstein have that icky
portrait of Bill Clinton wearing a blue dress on his Manhattan mansion wall?
'My contact
was Brice, their main concern was that there was no video surveillance on the
property at all. I thought this was a simple request, as they wanted
surveillance to protect their investment. It's a huge site.
'But what was
weird was that the whole time I was on site, Brice would be bragging about how
the Clintons would visit, the whole family. Not just Bill, but Bill, his wife,
their kid, and they would stay on the ranch itself.
More ickiness about Epstein's obsession
with cameras:
Instead of
using an expensive, robust camera system, which used underground cables, he
wanted a 'point-to-point wireless fluid mesh design', which means cameras are
operating via antenna, and is considerably cheaper.
After Kellogg
did an estimate and sent in a plan, he never heard back.
He said:
'They had this huge facility, but it felt like they didn't have the money to do
anything. They were trying to find the most cost-effective way to transmit
video footage and we had to come up with a point-to-point wireless fluid mesh
design because normally we want to trench everything. It saves money as you
don't have to build a trench and put in a cable.
Sound like someone who's been
blackmailed? You decide.
Now, arguably, one could argue that the
press is saying nothing about this, given that the contractor was a different
kind of witness from Virginia Giuffre, the credible young woman who says
Epstein trafficked her with Prince Andrew when she was a teenager.
But the Mail slips in something that
hasn't appeared significantly in the press at all: that Giuffre also says she
saw Bill Clinton at Epstein's pervert haunts being honored by the pedophile
himself.
Why aren't the media covering
that? Now we have the Clintons pinned at two places — the
"cowboy ranch" and the Caribbean pervert island — and no one's saying
anything. It's all about Prince Andrew.
Yet Eptein was obsessed with cameras and
obviously blackmail. He roped in Prince Andrew. But the
real question is to what extent he got the Clintons. With all these
new revelations rolling out, why is the press silent?
Image
credit: Photo montage by Monica Showalter from public domain sources.
Convicted sex offender and Mueller witness
George Nader indicted for illegal contributions to boost Hillary Clinton
Convicted sex offender George Nader, who was a key witness in
special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation, has been indicted by
United States prosecutors for his alleged role in a scheme to conceal large
sums of illegal campaign contributions to help Hillary Clinton in the 2016
election.
Nader, a 60-year-old Lebanese American lobbyist, is accused of
conspiring with Ahmad “Andy” Khawaja, the Los Angeles-based 48-year-old chief
executive of Allied Wallet, to conceal the source of more than $3.5 million in
campaign contributions to political committees associated with a presidential
candidate to gain influence during and after the 2016 campaign.
Nader and Khawaja were charged on Nov. 7 as part of a 53-count
indictment dealt by a federal grand jury in the District of Columbia. The
indictment was unsealed on Tuesday.
Khawaja gave more than $4 million to Clinton's campaign and
other Democrats during the 2016 cycle but later donated $1 million to President
Trump's inaugural committee after Clinton lost, according to the Associated Press. As he shifted his focus to Republicans after the 2016
election, the Lebanese-born Khawaja met with Trump at a Manhattan fundraiser
and got a photo with the president in the Oval Office.
The Justice Department announced on Tuesday that Khawaja
allegedly conspired with Nader to make $3.5 million in straw donations to boost
a presidential candidate from March 2016 through January 2017.
No candidate is mentioned by name, but the indictment and
campaign finance records make it clear that the money was directed towards
helping Clinton during the 2016 campaign.
"By design, these contributions appeared to be in the names
of Khawaja, his wife, and his company. In reality, they allegedly were funded
by Nader," Assistant Attorney General Brian Benczkowski of the Justice
Department’s Criminal Division and FBI Washington Field Office chief Timothy
Slater announced in a statement.
"Khawaja and Nader allegedly made these contributions in an
effort to gain influence with high-level political figures, including the
candidate. As Khawaja and Nader arranged these payments, Nader allegedly
reported to an official from a foreign government about his efforts to gain
influence," they continued.
According to the indictment, after the election Khawaja used his company to steer $1
million to Trump's inaugural committee and attended Trump's inauguration with
Nader.
The other charges in the indictment allege Khawaja and six
associates — Roy Boulos, Rudy Dekermenjian, Mohammad “Moe” Diab, Rani El-Saadi,
Stevan Hill, and Thayne Whipple — conspired to conceal executive contributions,
totaling more than $1.8 million, to various political committees in 2016
through 2018. "Among other things, these contributions allegedly allowed
Khawaja to host a private fundraiser for a presidential candidate in 2016 and a
private fundraising dinner for an elected official in 2018," Benczkowski
and Slater said.
Khawaja is also charged with obstructing the grand jury investigation
in the summer by providing a witness called to testify in the case with false
information about Nader and his connection to Khawaja’s company, while four of
his associates are charged with obstruction by lying to the FBI.
Nader is already in federal custody on other charges. In July,
he was charged with
sex trafficking for allegedly transporting a 14-year-old boy from Europe and
then abusing him. Nader pleaded not guilty in federal court in Alexandria,
Virginia.
Part of a rap sheet dating to the 1980s, Nader pleaded guilty in
1991 to a federal child porn charge involving footage of 13- or 14-year-old
boys and received a six-month sentence, served at a Baltimore halfway house.
Nader acted as a connection between Trump’s circle and Russian,
United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabian officials in 2016 and 2017 as he
pursued business deals in the Middle East. This included helping to set up a
January 2017 meeting in the Seychelles between Trump associate and Blackwater
founder Erik Prince and a Russian official with close ties to Russian President
Vladimir Putin.
As reported by the Washington Examiner, records indicate Nader visited the White House at least 13
times to meet with Trump’s then-chief strategist Steve Bannon.
Nader was interviewed by Mueller's team on multiple occasions
regarding possible UAE efforts to influence members of Trump's campaign, and was mentioned in
Mueller's final report more than 100 times.
An attorney for Nader declined
to comment to the Washington
Post, and an attorney for Khawaja could not immediately be reached by the
outlet.
Federal Election Commission records detail the
millions of dollars Khawaja admitted donating to Democratic candidates, campaigns,
and political action committees.
Khawaja told the Federal Election Commission he donated $2,700
in October 2015 and $2,700 in July 2016 to Clinton’s 2016 presidential
campaign, Hillary for America. He said he donated $135,000 in March 2016,
$150,000 in April 2016, $68,400 in June 2016, and $60,000 in September 2016 to
the Clinton campaign’s joint fundraising committee, the Hillary Victory Fund.
The records also show a donation totaling $200,400 in July 2016 to the Hillary
Action Fund, a joint fundraising effort between Clinton’s campaign and the
Democratic National Committee.
Khawaja told the FEC about donations to the DNC totaling
$231,100, in addition to donations to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign
Committee totaling $33,400 in 2016 and $43,900 in 2017 and the Democratic
Congressional Campaign Committee totaling $233,400 in 2016, $230,000 in 2017,
and $237,300 in 2018.
Khawaja also reported donating massive sums to liberal PACs,
including $1,100,000 to Priorities USA Action, the primary super PAC supporting
Clinton's campaign, and $100,000 to Senate Majority PAC in 2016. He also
donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to Senate and congressional races
around the country with a special focus on his home state of California,
including $4,200 in 2016 and $3,900 in 2017 to Schiff for Congress, the
campaign committee for House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff.
In addition, Khawaja’s company, Allied Wallet, reported giving
$550,000 to the Philadelphia 2016 Host Committee, the Democratic National
Convention’s fundraising arm, in July 2016. The business also donated hundreds
of thousands of dollars to Democratic super PACs in 2017 and 2018.
FEC records show Nader reported giving $595 in donations to
Trump’s presidential campaign committee in 2016, as well as $100 dollars to Ben
Carson's campaign, but not to any Democrats that election cycle.
Nader was a business associate of Elliott Broidy, a top Republican fundraiser and deputy
finance chairman of the Republican National Committee who resigned from
that position in April 2018 after reports that Trump lawyer Michael Cohen
negotiated a $1.6 million settlement in 2017 between Broidy and a former
Playboy model who said Broidy impregnated her. Nader and Broidy worked to influence U.S.
foreign policy in the Middle East prior to Broidy's resignation and Nader's
arrest in June.
Is that you, Bill Clinton?
New book says Epstein blackmailed politicians
Jeffrey Epstein was a bizarre
creep. Not only was he a pedophile, but he seemed to be drawn to
pulling in famous people to his pedophilery, in the interests of blackmail.
A new book lays out how strange it was,
stating that Epstein got his entire spy operation from the media empire of the
late Robert Maxwell, a sleazy tabloid-media character who was Epstein
girlfriend Ghislane Maxwell's father, and who died under mysterious
circumstances himself on his yacht, years ago. Apparently, he was
useful to the Mossad for blackmailing politicians, so they all had some kind of
relationship, and Epstein, a pedophile, was brought in. Here's an
interesting review with excerpts from Medium:
According to
the former spy, the ultimate order to embrace Epstein and involve him in the
ongoing arms deals came from "the bosses" at Israeli intelligence
headquarters.
"They
were agents of the Israeli Intelligence Services," he told James
Robertson.
"Later
on [Ghislaine] got involved with Israeli intelligence together with him. But
not in this arms deal with Iran business," Ben-Menashe also told Zev Shalev,
former CBS News executive producer and investigative journalist for the
website Narativ.
"These
guys were seen as agents. They weren't really competent to do very much. And so
they found a niche for themselves — blackmailing American and other political
figures."
He told
Robertson, "Mr. Epstein was the simple idiot who was going around providing
girls to all kinds of politicians in the United States. See, f------ around is
not a crime. It could be embarrassing, but it's not a crime. But f------ a
fourteen-year-old girl is a crime. And he was taking photos of politicians
f------ fourteen-year-old girls — if you want to get it straight. They would
just blackmail people, they would just blackmail people like that."
This, if true, tells us two things: that
Epstein was able to get away from the long arm of the law due to politics, but
he also may have had some nefarious sway over a lot of politicians, what with
his tabloid spy ties via House Maxwell and, apparently, the Israeli spy
apparat, too.
So imagine a guy like Bubba Clinton
strolling into this and indulging his enormous appetites, and not a clue as to
the forces circling him.
If even a scintilla of this is what was
going on, there may be forces out there with the wherewithal to rub out Epstein
in his prison, as well as hold enormous sway over many gullible and immoral
Western politicians.
It once again raises questions as to where
Bill Clinton was in all this. He's intersected the Epstein world all
too often for something of this nature not to ensnare. And with a
compliant media establishment, he's still getting away with saying nothing was
going on.
Image credit:
Photo illustration by Monica Showalter from public domain sources.
How Stupid Do They Think
We Are?
These days it seems like coincidence
abounds in the precincts of leftism. And an unquestioning Deep State Media are
only too happy to label anyone who points out the absurdities of the supposed
coincidences as “conspiracy theorists,” having long ago abandoned journalistic
inquisitiveness for allegiance to a political ideology.
A few examples spring to mind:
Jeffrey Epstein’s supposed suicide; a “chance” encounter on June 27, 2016
on the tarmac of Phoenix’s Sky Harbor International Airport between
then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former President Bill Clinton, whose
wife would be interviewed by FBI agents over her illegal email server five days
later; and the failure by DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz to find
“political bias” in the initiation of the Obama administration’s
outrageous and utterly illegal spying operation on the Trump presidential
campaign and presidency.
Take the case of the “suicide” of Jeffrey
Epstein. There’s a reason the phrase “Jeffrey Epstein didn’t kill himself”
being tacked onto otherwise disconnected topics by people making public
statements became a hilarious meme for a while. At the core of all good humor
is an unspoken truth. It was a populist way of saying, “We’re not buying what
you fake news media types are selling anymore.” And the flat-footed responses
of the Deep State Media reporters confronted by these unexpected “Jeffrey
Epstein didn’t kill himself” truth bombs were the best part of all.
At an LSU-Alabama football game that
President Trump attended, MSNBC reporter Monica Alba asked a Trump-voting student on live television, “What [Trump] policies stand out to
you?” The young man gamely replied, without cracking a smile or missing a beat,
“Just mainly the no-nonsense policies and especially since Jeffrey Epstein
didn’t kill himself.” Alba visibly had difficulty maintaining her
composure but being part of today’s toadying Fourth Estate that must protect
the Clintons at all cost, dutifully ignored the student’s non sequitur tweak
and edto another question.
MSNBC REPORTER: “What [Trump] policies stand out to you?”
ALABAMA STUDENT: “Just mainly the no nonsense policies and especially since Jeffrey Epstein didn’t kill himself.”
ALABAMA STUDENT: “Just mainly the no nonsense policies and especially since Jeffrey Epstein didn’t kill himself.”
She gets the joke, but knows she can’t
acknowledge it, as the word has gone out to the entire corporate media class
that no one is allowed to question the circumstances of the death of pedophile
Jeffrey Epstein, who was as thick as thieves with Bill Clinton.
And the circumstances of Epstein’s
supposed “suicide” are so outrageously questionable that any sentient person
looking at the facts would have to have undergone a lobotomy not to conclude
that a giant scam and cover-up occurred in relation to his death. But Epstein’s
ability to expose rich and powerful liberals like Mr. Clinton, Prince Andrew
and who knows how many others in his web of sexual perversion meant that the
Bat Signal had to go out to Deep State Media members everywhere that no
discussion of the possible murder of Epstein could be tolerated.
Consider the “coincidences” and anomalies
that took place in Epstein’s final days and hours. Here you have the most
high-profile criminal defendant in the United States, who had explosively
damaging information on sexual predations involving perhaps scores or hundreds
of the world’s most elite and powerful occurring aboard Epstein’s private 727
jet dubbed “The Lolita Express,” at his Caribbean estate wags nicknamed “Orgy
Island,” at his sprawling New Mexico would-be baby farm, and at his Manhattan
manse.
He finally ends up in jail at Manhattan’s
Metropolitan Correctional Center in the custody of the federal Bureau of
Prisons. He then supposedly attempted to kill myself but survived, yet was
taken off suicide watch after only six days. Then lo and behold, both guards
assigned to check on him fell asleep – simultaneously – and missed their
rounds, both cameras trained on the area around Epstein’s cell failed,
simultaneously, and the night before his death, Epstein’s one cellmate
inexplicably was removed from the cell.
After his body was found on August 10,
2019, an autopsy performed by the city’s Chief Medical Examiner’s office
determined the cause of death to be suicide after only five days, even before
all of the evidence has been collected. Famed pathologist Dr. Michael Baden,
who attended the autopsy at the behest of Epstein’s brother, gave a must-see interview to Fox News. He noted that the three bones fractured
in Epstein’s neck were indicative of homicide, not suicide. Baden said that
Epstein’s neck “had been crushed.” It was not the result of a ligature (like a
noose made from bedsheets), as was claimed. He noted the scene of the death
appeared staged to suggest suicide.
Yet, the Deep State Media pushed the
suicide narrative nonetheless, pooh-poohing anyone who suggested otherwise.
They attacked the esteemed Dr. Baden for questioning the Epstein autopsy,
with New York Magazine describing him as having
“demi-celebrity status” and being fond of “self-aggrandizement.” Never mind the
fact pattern he points to that is wildly divergent from a “suicide”
determination. But this is our corporatist media today. Accept the Deep State
narrative and move on.
Then we have Loretta Lynch and Bill
Clinton “bumping into” each other at the culmination of the FBI’s
pseudo-investigation into Hillary Clinton’s outrageously criminal conduct in
running highly classified government records over a ridiculously unsecure
personal server, surely in violation of the Espionage Act and Federal Records
Act, if not other laws.
The advance planning that goes into the
travel of both a former president and a current Attorney General by their
protective details and logistics personnel is immense. Two such officials do
not simply have their respective airplanes sidle up to each other on the tarmac
of an airport like you might bump into an old high school chum at Starbucks.
The impropriety of the Attorney General meeting privately with the spouse of
the subject of a high-profile FBI investigation was off the charts. But,
we were told, they just discussed golf outings and grandchildren. Nothing to
see here either folks. And the likes of CNN dutifully reported that it was only congressional Republicans who saw
fit to question the circumstances.
And finally, we have DOJ Inspector General
Michael Horowitz testifying to the Senate that, “We found no bias” on the part
of those who initiated the counterintelligence operation targeting the Trump
campaign, called Operation Crossfire Hurricane. His report itself said, “We did
not find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper
motivation influenced his decision [to open an investigation surveilling the
Trump campaign].”
One might reasonably ask: When top FBI
lawyer and principal in Operation Crossfire Hurricane, Lisa Page, says in an
August 2016 text to fellow Crossfire Hurricane principal, FBI official Peter
Strzok, that Trump is “not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” And
Strzok responds “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it,” isn’t that perhaps
documentary evidence of a political bias?
Perhaps Mr. Horowitz was looking for an
FBI “To Do List” entitled “Steps We Will Take to Undermine the Presidential
Candidacy of Donald J. Trump” and came up blank.
Nonetheless, the Deep State Media,
like NBC News, dutifully and breathlessly declared in its headline on
the story: “Internal Justice watchdog finds that Russia probe was justified,
not biased against Trump.”
A representative republic is severely
impaired, indeed threatened, when its constitutionally protected watchdogs in
the Fourth Estate abandon their most basic critical faculties in favor of
advancing the agenda of their preferred political party. Eventually, the
absurdities they foist upon a skeptical populace lead inevitably to their
deserved reputation as discredited Deep State handmaidens, not to be believed.
William F. Marshall has been an
intelligence analyst and investigator in the government, private, and
non-profit sectors for more than 30 years. He is a senior investigator for
Judicial Watch, Inc., and a contributor to Townhall, American Thinker, and The Federalist. (The views expressed are the
author’s alone, and not necessarily those of Judicial Watch.)
'The first time I saw him naked I thought he was deformed or intersex': Former actress Jessica Mann shocks Harvey Weinstein rape trial with graphic description of mogul and says he has NO testicles
- Former aspiring actress Jessica Mann testified about her relationship with Harvey Weinstein on Friday
- Mann, 34, a hairstylist, told the jury the first time she saw Weinstein, 67, naked she thought he was 'intersex' or a burns victim, claiming he does not have testicles and his penis 'looks like a vagina'
- When a reporter later asked Weinstein outside court if Mann's description of his body was accurate, he laughed and replied, 'Yeah, perfect'
- Mann testified that on one occasion, Weinstein made her massage his blackhead-covered back with lotion
- During a breakfast meeting at a hotel, Mann told the court Weinstein forcibly performed oral sex on her. She said she faked an orgasm and told him 'it was the best I ever had,' even though she was 'horrified'
- Mann alleges Weinstein raped her in his New York City hotel room in March 2013, when she was 27 and he was 61, after injecting his penis with erection-inducing drug
- Prosecution alleges Weinstein forcibly performed oral sex on Mann before the alleged rape, and forced himself on her a second time in November 2013, but he is not facing charges for that incident
- Mann told jurors Weinstein dragged her into a room, ripped off her pants and raped her until she blacked out; she she she then woke up to find the producer's penis in her mouth
- Weinstein allegedly apologized to Mann and suggested that she become his 'wing girl' and bring him other women to have sex with
- Defense will point to warm and flirtatious emails exchanged between Mann and Weinstein in an effort to prove their relationship was consensual
- In 2017, four years after alleged hotel room rape, Mann sent Weinstein an email that read: 'I love you, always do. But I hate feeling like a booty call'
Advertisement
Former aspiring actress Jessica Mann, whose rape allegations led to charges being brought against Harvey Weinstein, described in graphic detail on the witness stand how she thought he was 'physically deformed or intersex' when she saw him naked for the first time.
On the witness stand on Friday, the 34-year-old claimed the disgraced movie, 67, does not have testicles and his penis 'looks like a vagina'.
Mann sobbed on the witness stand as she told jurors that she was once forced to strip off her clothing during an alleged rape in a New York hotel room in March 2013. In another incident, she says that Weinstein flew into a rage after learning that she was dating an actor, and clawed at her thighs as he pulled off her pants, leaving her with bloody scratch marks.
After the alleged rape, Mann said she regained consciousness to find Weinstein's penis in her mouth and 'choked' on a 'fluid' when he climaxed.
Prosecutors hammered home the most serious charges in a case that stems from the allegations of just two of the scores of women who have accused Weinstein of violating them. A conviction could put him behind bars for the rest of his life.
Meanwhile, Weinstein's lawyers plan to seize on Mann's complicated history with the disgraced film producer, including continued interactions and warm emails she sent him, as they try to raise doubts about her credibility.
Mann's often sexually explicit testimony revealed how the producer allegedly had her massage his blackhead-covered back in a hotel room, how she faked an orgasm and falsely praised his prowess after he forcibly performed oral sex on her.
Dressed in a black top and dark slacks, with her long black hair parted on the side, Mann was shaking with nerves as she sat in the witness box at Manhattan Criminal Court and had a small blue ball, which appeared to be a stress ball.
She broke down in tears at the first question of where she was from, but then composed herself and spoke with a clear voice.
Scroll down for video
Star witness: Former Actress Jessica Mann arrives at Manhattan court to testify against Harvey Weinstein at his rape trial on Friday, marking a pivotal moment in the proceedings
Weinstein, 67, emerges from a car outside the courthouse on Friday, when the jury will hear from his accuser Jessica Mann about her alleged rape
Weinstein has been relying on a walker to get around since the beginning of his rape trial. He is seen approaching the courthouse with his walking aid on Friday
Mann told the jury that she grew up on a dairy farm in rural Washington state.
She said that her family were religious and she said she described the community where she was brought up as a 'cult, it was extremely religious Pentecostal evangelist'.
Mann said her parents divorced when she was four and she left home at 16. When she was 25, she moved to Los Angeles to pursuing an acting career.
She struggled and at one point was homeless and lived in her car, however, through her agent she was invited to parties.
Mann met Weinstein at the engagement party for Michael Lambert in the Hollywood Hills around the end of 2012 as he was talking to a friend of hers.
She said that saw an 'old man' who was wearing a tuxedo and looked 'jolly'.
Mann walked over and asked: 'Who is this guy?'
'Weinstein replied, 'I'm Harvey Weinstein' and said he produced X,Y,Z movies, I think he said Shakespeare in Love,' Mann said.
Weinstein thought she was joking, but it soon became apparent that she didn't know the film.
Later that night, Weinstein bumped into her on her own, Mann testified.
Mann said: 'He stopped me and said, 'I want to talk to you, come with me.' He started to pull me around to the side of the house. I was looking around as if to say, 'Why is this happening?'
'He said It's not good for me for anyone to see us talking,' she quoted Weinstein as telling her.
Weinstein said that he was 'interested in [Mann] as an actress' and said of her friend: 'Don't say anything to her but I'm not interested in her'.
Mann said she felt 'guilty' but gave Weinstein her number.
Mann said Weinstein once told her she reminded him of his wife, fashion designer Georgina Chapman (pictured together, right, in May 2017) because both women were 'clumsy'
Soon after, Weinstein's assistant asked Mann to come in for a meeting, and he took out to buy some books at Book Soup, a Los Angeles bookstore.
She turned up with two friends and he bought her four books, including one on Alfred Hitchcock.
Mann agreed she was 'excited' to meet with Weinstein and that it felt like he was 'interested in me for real.'
She said: 'This was the biggest…when I met Harvey I'd given up a lot to be in Hollywood. It was a big fight between me and my dad. I thought that God was blessing me for having committed to myself.'
Describing Weinstein's demeanor, she said he was mostly 'extremely passionate' about the books apart from occasion 'grunting sounds' that were an 'almost autistic trait'.
At a dinner at the Peninsula Hotel in Los Angeles, Weinstein pushed things further, Mann said.
Mann is pictured in a scene from the 2013 movie Caveman, where she played a date named Keira
Mann said: 'It started pretty normal. He was extremely interested in who I was. He asked me many questions; he wanted to know about my family; he wanted to know about my parents' divorce, how much my father made, if I had a good relationship with my parents'.
At some point, somebody came up to their table and started trying to talk to Weinstein about his film and he got into a huff.
Mann said that she 'felt sorry for him for that' because he was famous and being harassed.
Weinstein ordered the hotel staff to take the food up to his hotel suite, and Mann followed him up.
She said: 'I didn't want to go up there but I felt I was helping him.
'He started to undress himself a little bit. I thought he was getting comfortable and he walked into the bedroom. I hesitated...he said let me give you a massage and he took off his shirt.
'I said, 'No, I don't want to give you a massage.' This went on for a good few minutes. He made me feel stupid, like why did I think it was such a big deal.
'He said, 'If you're not going to let me give you a massage, give me a massage.'
'At that point he had his shirt off and lotion in his hand'.
Weinstein lay face down on the bed and Mann put the lotion on with a 'flat palm and stiff fingers'.
Asked to describe the sensation, she said: 'He had a lot, a lot of blackheads. The texture of that was uncomfortable'.
Afterwards she said that 'I did express that I was not sexual or comfortable with this with someone I don't know.'
Assistant District Attorney Joan Illuzi said: 'Were you romantically or physically attracted to the defendant?
Mann replied: 'No.'
Mann started to receive invitations from Weinstein to more events, and he offered to buy her a dress to attend a fashion show, though she declined that offer.
Weinstein asked her to meet him at the Montage Beverly Hills, and she went with a friend.
In one of the bars, Weinstein continued to talk to Mann about her acting career.
Mann said that he told her she reminded him of his wife, fashion designer Georgina Chapman, because they were 'both clumsy' and recounted how his wife 'tripped when they first met'.
Weinstein told Mann she was 'prettier than Natalie Portman' but said she had to 'clear my skin up'.
He said her friend had to 'lose weight', Mann said.
Weinstein said that he had a vampire film and that they would be great for the lead part - so long as they came up to his suite to see the scripts.
Mann said: 'I laughed and said, 'Oh no, I know what that means.' He laughed at me and said, 'I'm a harmless old man.'
'Then I got embarrassed because he made fun of me. He was like, 'Girls, you have nothing to worry about.'
Mann and her friend looked at each other and they went with him. Mann said: 'I didn't think with my friend it would be anything bad.'
When they went into Weinstein's suite, Mann said from the stand, he began to undress himself and went into the bedroom.
Mann and her friend waited in the lounge area, but Weinstein came to the doorframe of the bedroom and called Mann's name.
Mann said: 'He grabbed my arm and he closes the bedroom door and (tells my friend) we'll just be a minute.
'He had me by both arms and he came to me and was pushing me back and trying to kiss me like crazy.
'I was like, :'Woah woah woah. I told you I wasn't sexual and I don't know you,' all this stuff trying to calm it down.
'He'd pushed be back to the bathroom and we got into this sort of tussle back and forth. I was able to turn around so his back was to the wall and I was able to, hopefully, get out to the door.
'He still had me one arm and wouldn't let go and the more I fought the angrier he got and his anger scared me and I tried to calm him down.
'He was saying, 'Look, you're going to let me do something for you.' I said 'What?' He wouldn't tell me. Then he told me to sit on the bed and then that's when he went down on me.'
Asked to describe his demeanor, Mann said: 'He was very high-low, high-low. He started to manipulate me, [saying], 'You accepted my invitations to parties. You aren't leaving until I do something for you.'
Mann said she was sitting on the bed when Weinstein put his mouth in her vagina, fighting back the tears as she did so.
Mann said: 'I sort of locked up and got really quiet. I was worried about my friend out there by herself. I faked an orgasm to get out of it. He asked me how it was, if I liked it. I was nervous, so I told him it was the best I ever had'.
In fact, Mann was 'horrified, confused', she told the jury.
'I was confused about what happened, and I made the decision to begin a relationship with him. Part of that was because I was sexual with very few people.
'I entered into what I thought was going to be a real relationship, but it was extremely degrading from that point on.'
Mann (left) alleges that Weinstein raped her in his New York City hotel room in March 2013, when she was 27 and he was 61, after injecting his penis with erection-inducing drug. Weinstein's defense will argue the relationship was consensual
A prosecutor said in an opening statement that Weinstein performed oral sex on Mann (third left) against her will after inviting her to a hotel to read a script
She went on: 'He would talk very dirty to me about fantasies and compared me to other actresses he said were doing kinky and dirty things'.
Mann said that Weinstein needed a 'fix like a drug addict' from her.
Asked what kinds of things he would say to her, she quoted him as telling her: 'Do you like my big fat Jewish d***?'
Mann told the court: 'The first time I saw him naked I thought he was deformed or intersex. I didn't know if he was a burn victim but it would make sense. He does not have testicles and it appears like he has a vagina. He does have a penis.
Mann added: 'He also peed on me once. It was like being discarded after I served a purpose'.
Asked about Weinstein's hygiene, Mann said: 'It was bad. He smelled like s***, excuse me, poop'.
Mann said there was no physical attraction, but she said 'his approval would have meant so much to me.'
She described Weinstein as 'Jekyll and Hyde' because of his mood swings, and said there didn't seem to be a word to 'trigger' him into getting angry.
Mann described how on another occasion Weinstein asked her to take part in a threesome with another woman who did not speak much English.
The night started at Soho House in Los Angeles and they went back to his hotel.
Mann said Weinstein 'orchestrated' events and told them both to undress.
She said: 'He said (to the other woman) I want you to go down on her (Mann). I said I don't want her to do that. She started to be very tense.'
Mann understood that the other woman had never had a threesome before but she could not express what she was feeling because of her poor English.
Mann said that she 'saw myself in her, unable to communicate, and I broke down'.
She fled into the bathroom and Weinstein was 'upset and said I'll never do that again with you'.
Mann's rape allegation which led to criminal charges being laid against Weinstein stemmed from a trip to New York in March 2013. She said she had traveled to the city with a friend called Thomas, an agent who paid for her trip.
But she 'panicked' when she saw Weinstein checking into a hotel shortly before they were supposed to have a breakfast meeting there.
She said that 'I knew what he was trying to do' and 'pleaded' with the hotel staff not to give him a room.
Mann said Weinstein pulled her to one side and told her not to 'embarrass him' and ordered her to go upstairs.
Inside the room, Mann said she was 'so scared' that her friends would see her coming out of the room with Weinstein and 'make all these assumptions'.
She said: 'I attempted twice to open the door but he blocked the door both times. I shut down a little bit and he told me to undress and then he comes to me and grabbed my hand and forced me to start undressing myself.
'I felt panicked as my worst nightmare was that this dynamic with him was about to be seen by (my two friends).'
Mann said she was 'very angry and scared' as that was one of the most 'escalated' incidents so far.
She said: 'I gave up at that point and I undressed and he stood over me until I was completely naked and he told me to lay on the bed. He walked into the bathroom and closed the door behind him.
'He came out naked and he got on top of me and that's when he put himself inside of me'.
Mann's rape allegation which led to criminal charges being laid against Weinstein stemmed from a trip to New York in March 2013. On the witness stand on Friday, she described Weinstein checking in to a hotel where they were meant to have a breakfast meeting before he called her up to the room
Mann said Weinstein pulled her to one side and told her not to 'embarrass him' and ordered her to go upstairs where the alleged rape took place. Weinstein's lawyers will argue that Mann exchanged flirtatious texts with Weinsten after the alleged incident
While giving evidence in court, Mann burst into tears and took a few minutes to compose herself in the witness box. As she walked out of the court she could be heard sobbing loudly in the side room
Mann said that Weinstein had been giving 'commanding type statements' and was like a 'drill sergeant'.
After he finished she went into the bathroom and then she saw something that horrified her.
She said: 'I saw a needle in the trash can. I flipped out. I grabbed it and looked at it. I can't remember the name but I Googled it.'
Sobbing on the witness stand, Mann continued: 'It was the realization that he had stabbed himself with the needle and there was blood and he was inside me. I was in shock over that.'
Illuzi asked if Weinstein had used a condom and she said no.
Mann said that she later did some online research about the medication Weinstein used and said that when she Googled it what came up was a 'dead penis type thing'.
Mann said she did not tell her friends because she was 'embarrassed and wanted them to respect me'.
At breakfast Weinstein acted as if nothing had happened and asked Mann to stay another night to attend a movie premiere.
Mann resisted but eventually under pressure from her friend agreed - but she stayed at her friend's house because she was scared of Weinstein coming after her again.
Mann said that after the premiere Weinstein 'wanted me to have tea with him and his daughter Emma' as if everything was normal but she declined.
She dmitted that she continued to see Weinstein after this but tried to avoid physical contact by making excuses.
A lot of her decision was based on the needle she saw and said that she ascertained Weinstein 'could only use it so many times' before the judge cut her off.
Mann said she would 'delay' the times between them seeing each other the increase 'the likelihood of him having used' the medication, apparently meaning that month.
Illzui asked Mann about her emails to Weinstein after these incidents such as one where complained about feeling like a 'booty call' four years after the alleged incident at the Doubletree hotel.
Mann said that she wanted Weinstein to perceive her as 'innocent and naive'.
She said: 'It was like the emperor's clothes, his ego was so fragile and what made me feel safe is worshiping him.'
Illuzi asked: 'Were you afraid of the defendant?'
Mann said: 'Yes'.
Illuzi asked: 'Did that drive the tone of your emails?
Mann said: 'Yes'.
Jessica Mann points at Weinstein during his sexual assault trial. She described his penis as 'deformed' and looking like a vagina, and claimed he has no testicles
During cross-examination, Weinstein's lawyer Donna Rotunno (pictured standing) asked why Mann didn't leave during the time he asked her to give him a massage
Illuzi also asked about Weinstein's connections to famous people, in particular Bill and Hillary Clinton.
Mann said: 'He loved to tell me about Bill Clinton who was his neighbor. He would talk about all this money he would raise for big organizations. He had a story for almost anyone in the world. The biggest one for me was Bill Clinton'.
Illuzi asked about phone calls between Weinstein and Clinton and Mann said she witnessed at least three.
Weinstien would refer to Clinton as 'Mr President', she said.
Mann said: 'The last two that I saw were when he was raising money for Hillary Clinton.'
Illuzi asked: 'How did that affect your conduct with regards to the defendant?'
Mann said: 'I was intimidated more because when you are raising that amount of money for that powerful a person they are not going to want to deal with someone crying rape.'
Before lunch on Friday, Mann began to talk about the last incident with Weinstein when he allegedly raped her in a jealous rage.
She had gotten a job as a hairstylist at the Peninsula Hotel in Los Angeles through Weinstein and had started dating an actor.
Mann said that during one meeting she decided to tell Weinstein.
She said: 'I was scared to tell Harvey. He would tell me rules such as you can date anyone but you cannot date anyone in the (entertainment) industry. I would find that disrespectful and unprofessional'.
Mann said she told him she was in a relationship and he asked if he was a Wall St guy or a banker.
She said: 'I looked down and didn't say anything. He knew'.
Mann burst into tears and took a few minutes to compose herself in the witness box. As she walked out of the court she could be heard sobbing loudly in the side room.
Later in her testimony, Mann said that she knew Weinstein for around a year when the last serious incident happened at the Peninsula Hotel in Los Angeles, where she was working as a hairdresser.
Mann said that the second Weinstein realized she was seeing an actor, he 'flipped me up from my chair'.
She said: 'He was screaming: 'You owe me one more time' as he was dragging me into the bedroom. I didn't fall but I was having a lot of trouble keeping my balance because he was pulling me so fast.
'He threw me down on the bed and he was demanding that I take my clothes off. I was begging him, 'No, please, no. I have a boyfriend.''
Mann sobbed heavily as she continued her story.
She said: 'He stood over me and said take your clothes off and I said 'no' again. He said: 'I don't have time for games' and lunged at me with both hands onto my pants and he ripped my pants so hard and so fast off me that I had three scratches down each leg from the top of my thigh to right below the knee...the middle scratch had lots of blood.
'I froze and crawled back to the pillow and got into a ball and I had no strength'.
Weinstein went into the bathroom and came out and raped her, the woman told the court.
Mann blacked out and woke up to find Weinstein's penis in her mouth. She told the jury that he ejaculated a 'fluid' that 'choked' her.
Afterwards, Weinstein told her: 'OK, now you can go have your relationship and you can bring me other girls. You can be my wing girl. Then he apologized to me and said, 'I'm so sorry about earlier. I just find you so attractive I couldn't resist.''
Illuzi talked about the years afterwards and Mann said she had 'very minimal' contact with Weinstein until 2016.
Illuzi said was it right that 'something sexual' happened between her and Weinstein that year and Mann said, 'Yes.'
Illuzi asked if there was 'coercion' involved in that encounter. Mann said, 'No.'
During cross-examination, Weinstein's lawyer Donna Rotunno asked why Mann didn't leave during the time he asked her to give him a massage.
Mann said: 'I didn't want to offend him.'
Rotunno asked: 'You didn't want to offend him because you wanted what he had to offer?'
Mann said: 'He had a lot of power.'
Rotunno cut in and said: 'You liked that power?'
Mann said: 'It was in my interests not to try to hurt myself.'
Rotunno said: 'You wanted to use the power he had, correct?'
Mann said: 'No, I wanted it to be professional.'
Shortly after, Rotunno asked Mann: 'Miss Mann, you were using Harvey Weinstein?' but the judge told the witness not to answer that question.
Mann said that she has 'compassion' for Weinstein and described him 'role playing' an orgasm because she didn't think he could have one.
Rotunno brought up an email Mann received from a friend with a link to a news story on February 8, 2013, that mentioned that Weinstein had a wife.
Mann said that was the first time she knew he was married. She replied: 'Ha, ha, ha, I'm so going to ask him.'
Rotunno said: 'You decided to go out with a married man?
Mann said: 'Yes. I believe they had an open relationship.'
Rotunno asked Mann about a draft blog post that she had written on her phone, titled 'The Failed Threesome,' in which she talked about an 'older man I was casually dating.'
It was a thinly veiled account of her threesome with Weinstein, but Mann claimed it was meant as an 'exaggerated' account of reality and she never published it because it was 'painful.'
Weinstein's lawyers say Mann followed up the alleged rape with warm - even flirtatious - emails that said things like 'Miss you, big guy,' and no one 'understands me quite like you.' The defense says the messages point to a consensual relationship, not a heinous sex crime.
Not once, in more than 400 messages between the two, did the woman accuse Weinstein of harming her, his lawyers have said.
As he left the court, a reporter asked Weinstein: 'What do you think of Jessica Mann's description of your body?'
Weinstein said: 'You should see what the lawyers said,' apparently referring to comments his lawyers had just made after the hearing.
Another reporter asked him if the description of his body was true.
Weinstein laughed and said: 'Yeah, perfect'.
On Monday, jurors heard from the other woman whose allegations have led to charges in the New York case. Mimi Haleyi, a former production assistant for Project Runway, testified that Weinstein forcibly performed oral sex on her in 2006.
Weinstein has insisted any sexual encounters were consensual.
Two other accusers whose allegations are not part of the criminal charges against Weinstein also testified this week, called by prosecutors to bolster their case that he has violated many women in the same manner over the years.
Last week, Sopranos actress Annabella Sciorra testified that Weinstein overpowered and raped her after barging into her apartment in 1993 or 1994. That allegation is outside the statute of limitations, but is part of prosecutors' strategy to show that the powerful Hollywood mogul had a habit of preying on women.
Mann (center) is one of two accusers whose allegations of rape against the former producer led to criminal charges
The embattled producer's lawyers will point to Mann's warm and flirtatious emails she sent to him after the alleged rape as evidence that he did not force himself on her
Weisntein is seen going up a flight of stairs on foot on his way to court for another day of testimony on Friday
Prosecutors painted Mann (right) a young, vulnerable woman who believed the once-revered movie mogul sincerely wanted to help acting career
Two women who are not part of the criminal charges, Dawn Dunning and Tarale Wulff, have also testified that Weinstein sexually assaulted them. Prosecutors are offering their testimony as evidence of Weinstein's methods and motives.
Wulff, a former model, said from the stand on Wednesday that Weinstein masturbated in front of her and raped her at his apartment in 2005.
Dunning, a former aspiring actress-turned-costume designer, claimed Weinstein offered her movie roles in exchange for a threesome in 2004 and put his hand up her skirt, touching her vagina, during a meeting at a Manhattan hotel.
A third such witness, Lauren Young, is expected to offer her testimony against the former Miramax producer later in the trial, claiming he groped her in a hotel, masturbated and ejaculated onto a bathroom floor in February 2012 at a dinner event during Oscar season when she was 22.
In questioning those women, Weinstein's lawyers also took aim at their continued interactions with him, suggesting that a follow-up meeting or communication with Weinstein was a sign that nothing untoward had happened.
But Dr. Barbara Ziv, a sex crimes expert whom the prosecution called as a witness, testified last week that most sex assault victims continue to have contact with their attackers, sometimes because those attackers threaten retaliation if the victims tell anyone what happened.
Victims are 'hoping this is just an aberration' and they can also end up blaming themselves, Ziv testified.
Anticipating the defense's expected line of questioning Friday, prosecutor Meghan Hast told jurors in an opening statement last week that the alleged rape victim had 'buried her trauma' and was trying to navigate Weinstein's powerful grip on her by pretending she wanted to see him and saying nice things.
Prosecutors allege Weinstein took advantage of Mann, a young, vulnerable woman who believed the producer wanted to help her career (pictured arriving in court Friday)
Weinstein has insisted any sexual encounters with Mann and his other accusers were strictly consensual
Something's funny? Weinstein appeared to be in excellent spirits as he left the court for the day Friday
Weinstein, 67, was asked by a reporter if Mann's description of his body was accurate, to which he replied with a laugh, 'Yeah, perfect'
Film producer Harvey Weinstein departs New York Criminal Court after his sexual assault trial in Manhattan
To prosecutors, the woman behind the rape charge is a prime example of a Weinstein target: a young, vulnerable woman who believed the once-revered movie mogul sincerely wanted to help her fledgling career, only for him to make increasingly vile sexual advances.
'He was the old lady in the gingerbread house luring the kids in, missing the oven behind,' Hast said in her opening statement.
Hast said Mann and Weinstein met at a Hollywood party in February 2013 and Weinstein appeared to take an instant liking to her. They had several follow up meetings, ostensibly to talk about her career, but things turned more and more sexual, the prosecutor said.
At one meeting, Weinstein tried to give Mann a massage, only for her to rebuff him and offer him a massage instead, Hast said. At another meeting, the prosecutor said Weinstein invited Mann to read a script in a hotel room, where he pushed her onto a bed and forcibly performed oral sex on her.
'Realizing there was nothing she could do, [Mann] faked an orgasm, hoping that that would end it,' Hast said
Mann, Hast said, then made 'a decision that had disastrous consequences for her' and decided to have a relationship with Weinstein. Hast said Mann avoided having sexual intercourse with him for about a month, when Weinstein raped her.
Hast told jurors that Mann went on to maintain some form of a relationship with Weinstein even after that, though she felt 'trapped.'
Dawn Dunning (left) and Tarale Wulff (right) testified on Wednesday that Weinstein sexually assaulted them. They are not part of the criminal charges
The day of the alleged rape, Hast said, Mann and her actress roommate were supposed to meet Weinstein for breakfast, but instead Mann and Weinstein got into a heated confrontation that he demanded they finish in his hotel room.
There, Hast said, Weinstein started ripping the woman´s clothes off and raped her. The prosecutor said Weinstein raped the woman again in November 2013 when she was working as a hairdresser and went to cut his hair.
Weinstein has not been charged in that alleged incident.
His lawyers note that Mann's emails continued after the second alleged rape. In February 2017, she wrote Weinstein to tell him she had a scheduling conflict and couldn't make it to a hotel to see him.
'I love you, always do. But I hate feeling like a booty call,' she wrote, adding a smiling-face emoji afterward.