Sunday, October 21, 2012

MEXICANS LOOTING FOR DRUG CARTELS - Erie County deputies find $87K under illegal immigrant's car - morningjournal.com

Erie County deputies find $87K under illegal immigrant's car - morningjournal.com


ACCORDING TO MEXICAN PRESIDENT CALDERON, NARCOmex DRUG CARTELS HAUL BACK FROM $40 TO $60 BILLION IN DRUG PROFITS. CALDERON BLAMES AMERICANS FOR THIS AND ALL OTHER MEXICAN CRIMES.

ADD TO THIS $60 BILLION ALL THE MONEY PAID OUT IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS. CA ALONE PAYS OUT $22 BILLION PER YEAR, AND THEN COUNTIES PAY OUT EVEN MORE, WITH LOS ANGELES LEADING AT $600 MILLION PER YEAR.

AND THEN WE HAVE THE COST OF THE MEXICAN CRIME TIDAL WAVE. CA HAS THE LARGEST AND MOST EXPENSIVE PRISON SYSTEM IN THE UNITED STATES. HALF THE INMATES ARE MEXICANS.

ACCORDING TO CA ATTORNEY GEN. KAMALA HARRIS, NEARLY HALF OF ALL MURDERS ARE BY MEXICAN GANGS!

DO YOU REALLY WANT OBAMA'S AMNESTY or CONTINUED NON-ENFORCEMENT?


OBAMA SABOTAGES AMERICAN BORDERS AND SECURITY TO BUILD HIS PARTY BASE OF MEXICANS.
 
ONLY ILLEGALS HAVE MORE CONTEMPT THAN BARACK OBAMA FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, OUR BORDERS and LAWS
 
OBAMA HAS SQUANDERED BILLIONS PROTECTING THE BORDERS OF MUSLIM DICTATORS AS HE’S SABOTAGED OUR OWN BORDERS TO BUILD HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE OF ILLEGALS.
WHILE IN OFFICE, ILLEGALS HAVE POURED OVER OUR BORDERS AND INTO OUR JOBS, WELFARE, AND VOTING BOOTHS TO VOTE FOR MORE LA RAZA SUPREMACY.
 
3,400 Border Patrol Agents on the Chopping Block

In an amazing untold story reflecting President Obama's doubletalk on immigration, during Tuesday's town hall-style debate with Mitt Romney he claimed responsibility for putting more Border Patrol agents on our border than ever before. What he did not say is that come January 2, 2013, the president's failure of leadership could result in 3,400 Border Patrol agents losing their jobs. Also on the chopping block are 3,400 Customs and Border Protection inspectors, 932 Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) special agents, and 802 ICE deportation and removal officers.

We now learn that budget sequestration — which will slash the federal budget by 9.4 percent in 2013 for discretionary defense appropriations and by 8.2 percent in 2013 for discretionary nondefense appropriations — is actually worse than thought. A law passed 14 months ago required another 1.9 percent reduction in 2013 if the Congressional Super Committee failed to come to agreement on a budget, which is exactly what happened.

October 18, 2012
Janice Kephart
Center for Immigration Studies

Why didn't we know just how bad the cuts would be? Apparently when the Obama administration submitted its report to Congress, it "forgot" the extra 1.9 percent. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) recently told Congress the amount now will be $60.6 billion rather than the already debilitating $50 billion cuts previously expected. OMB reported exactly where the cuts would be and Rep. Norm Dicks (D-Wash.), ranking member of the House Appropriations Committee, quickly made its key aspects public in a pleading "dear colleague" letter to fellow members of Congress, asking for cooperation to solve the pending budget disaster.

While the White House is
reported to be asking other Democrats and those affected in the defense sector to stay "mum" regarding the cuts until after the election, the fact is that keeping quiet likely will not induce the president to divert from campaigning to force a budget compromise on Congress and further economic collapse on Americans.

To make an obvious point even more obvious, sequestration will enhance and underscore Obama's open border policies. Border agents are already operating in the wake of failed southwest border security policies that have left both civilians and U.S. immigration agents dead on both sides of the border and placed hundreds of guns in drug lords' hands in and out of the United States. President Obama failed to acknowledge either issue in Tuesday's debate with Mitt Romney.

Rep. Dicks' letter presents alarming concerns. Below are the key excerpts from the
15-page letter explaining current sequestration requirements and what they mean for immigration and border security. Note that only border agents dealing with enforcement are cut; no U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) personnel are included because the agency is almost entirely funded by fees paid by immigrants, businesses, etc. USCIS is responsible for implementing President Obama's Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) administrative amnesty and is necessary to process applications from those illegal aliens seeking to take advantage of the program.[INDENT]October 9, 2012
Dear Colleague:
My purpose here is to illustrate the consequences of an automatic, across-the-board, uniform percentage reduction prescribed by the Budget Control Act (BCA). This letter will examine the impact of sequestration on the whole range of Federal responsibilities and, I hope, help make the case for Congress to act responsibly by agreeing to a more sensible approach to deficit reduction.

First, let us remember the purpose of sequestration. In an effort to reduce the deficit by $2.4 trillion, the BCA captured the initial $1.2 trillion in cuts almost entirely by capping discretionary appropriations over the ten years from FY 2012 to FY 2021. To get the second installment of $1.2 trillion, Congress established the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction. Concerned, however, that the Congressional Super Committee might require additional motivation to agree on a balanced deficit reduction plan, Republicans and Democrats agreed to sequestration. Sequestration is not so much a back-up plan as an inducement for all sides to reach a compromise. Clearly, any thoughtful, deliberate agreement will be an improvement over the mechanical and indiscriminate nature of sequestration cuts. So the BCA provided plenty of time, more than one full year between the due date for the Joint Committee to propose its recommendations and the imposition of sequestration, to enable Congress and the President to try again.

To be clear: If sequestration takes effect, it is only because it failed to motivate Congressional action as intended. The across-the-board cuts take effect only because the Joint Select Committee failed, and only if, in the ensuing year, Congress and the President fail to reach agreement on a more sensible deficit reduction plan. [emphasis added]

The Sequestration Transparency Act (STA) directed OMB to report on how the Administration interprets the law related to implementing sequestration. On September 14, OMB submitted its report estimating percentage cuts for defense and nondefense appropriations based on assumptions set in the STA:

    • A reduction of 9.4 percent in 2013 for discretionary defense (function 050) appropriations for each non-exempt item
    • A reduction of 8.2 percent in 2013 on discretionary nondefense appropriations


OMB, in accordance with the STA, looked at only one aspect of sequestration. As another motivation to act, the BCA also set up a second, separate sequestration to enforce the firewall between security and non-security appropriations. Because the Joint Committee failed, a new and lower defense firewall goes into effect, requiring an additional cut in defense spending. Based on levels in the agreed upon continuing resolution for FY 2013, we estimate:

    • An additional reduction of 1.9 percent in 2013 only for discretionary defense (function 050) accounts


...
If Congress fails to replace sequestration with a responsible, long-term deficit reduction plan, Moody's has warned they will downgrade America's credit rating and the Congressional Budget Office notes they will overturn their forecast of steady growth for 2013, predicting another recession with a 9.1 percent unemployment rate. CRS estimates that sequestration alone would result in 1.4 million jobs lost in the same year.
...
Homeland Security
Required reductions of budgetary resources for the Department of Homeland Security will roll back significant progress in securing our Nation's borders, increase wait times at our Nation's land ports of entry and airports, impact aviation and maritime safety and security, leave critical infrastructure vulnerable to attacks, hamper disaster response time, and eliminate cyber security infrastructure that has been developed in recent years.
Since the sequester would not be ordered under the BCA until January, federal agencies including the Department of Homeland Security would be forced to compensate for the first quarter of spending with even greater budget cuts through the rest of the year.

Over 24,500 jobs could be lost to achieve reduced funding levels including:

    • 3,400 Border Patrol agents — a reduction in Border Patrol agents to below FY 2009 levels, from an anticipated 21,370 agents to 17,970; a cut of this magnitude would significantly impact progress along the Southwest Border. DHS would not be able to maintain the minimum number of 21,370 agents set by P.L. 112-74.
    • 3,400 Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Officers — a reduction in CBP Officers to below FY 2007 on-board levels, from an anticipated 21,775 Officers to 18,375; this reduction will significantly increase wait times at our Nation's land ports of entry.


...

    • 932 Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Special Agents – a decrease of this magnitude would significantly impact efforts to investigate crimes involving counter-proliferation, terrorism, and transnational threats.
    • 802 ICE Enforcement and Removal Operation positions – These cuts to on-board levels will significantly roll back progress that has resulted in record-high removals of illegal criminal aliens this past year.


...
In order to sustain frontline operations in recent years while facing declining budgets, DHS has already taken significant reductions to administrative and mission support functions over the past several years. Over $3 billion in cost avoidances and savings have been achieved to date, which leaves little else to cut without directly impacting frontline operations.

Where possible, DHS and its Components would attempt to avoid cutting frontline positions. However, as stated by OMB in its report to Congress, "No amount of planning can mitigate the effect of these cuts."

*

MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com, JUDICIAL WATCH.org & WIKIleaks EXPOSES OBAMA’S AGENDA OF OPEN BORDERS, FUNDING OF LA RAZA SUPREMACY, AND HISPANDERING FOR THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES!

SHOCKING!

 


 


 

 

 

OBAMA'S AGENDA FOR OPEN BORDERS AND SURRENDER TO LA RAZA SUPREMACY:

 

 


 

*

WIKILEAKS EXPOSED OBAMA'S OPEN BORDERS AGENDA WITH NARCOMEX. OPEN & UNDEFENDED BORDERS EASES ILLEGALS OVER OUR BORDERS AND INTO OUR JOBS, WELFARE LINES, AND "FREE" ANCHOR BABY BIRTHING CENTERS. LOS ANGELES COUNTY ALONE PAYS OUT $600 MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS, MOST OF THIS GOING TO ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS MEXICO EXPORTS OVER OUR BORDERS. THESE MEXICANS GET "FREE" BIRTHING, AND THEN 18 YEARS OF WEFLARE FOR EACH CHILD, ALL OF WHOM ARE STILL CITIZENS OF MEXICO. THIS IS HOW MEXICO "ANCHORS" THEIR OCCAUPTION AND EXPANDS THE LA RAZA WELFARE STATE IN OUR BORDERS!

 


 

AFTER THE BELOW 2009 REMOVAL OF BORDER TROOPS, OBAMA WENT ON TO REMOVE MORE TROOPS, SABOTAGE BUILDING OF THE WALL, AND HAS TURNED DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY INTO A LA RAZA AGENCY TO PUSH FOR OPEN BORDERS, AND DREAM ACTS FOR HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE.

THEN OBAMA PUT 2,500 TROOPS IN AUSTRALIA TO FROWN AT THE CHINESE!

 

Lou Dobbs Tonight
Monday, September 28, 2009


And T.J. BONNER, president of the National Border Patrol Council, will weigh in on the federal government’s decision to pull nearly 400 agents from the U.S.-Mexican border. As always, Lou will take your calls to discuss the issues that matter most-and to get your thoughts on where America is headed.

*

OBAMA'S HISPANICAZATION OF AMERICA:


*

OBAMA'S LA RAZA INFESTED ADMINISTRATION:


*

THE RISE OF LA RAZA SUPREMACY UNDER HISPANDERING BARACK OBAMA:


 

*

OBAMA AND THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA:
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/06/obama-mexican-supremacist-party-of-la.html

Why Americans (legals) Will Not Vote for Obama Again:


THE HISPANDERING PRESIDENT PROMISES ILLEGALS OUR JOBS, DREAM ACTS, A BORDERLESS UNION WITH NARCOMEX, AND LA RAZA SUPREMACY! 


 ILLEGALS GET THE JOBS, BUT AMERICANS (LEGALS) STILL GET THE TAX BILLS TO PAY FOR THEIR WEFLARE AND CRIME TIDAL WAVE.
ACCORDING TO CA ATTORNEY GEN. KAMALA HARRIS, NEARLY HALF OF ALL MURDERS IN CA ARE BY MEXICAN GANGS. HALF THE PRISON POPULATION IS NOW MEXICANS!
JOE LEGAL vs JOSE ILLEGAL.... THE MEXICANS ARE GANING ON US AND VOTING FOR MORE LA RAZA SUPREMACY AT EVERY ELECTION!


10 Reasons Obama Will Not Be Re-Elected


Kathleen Brush


03/07/12 - 07:00 AM EST

The following commentary comes from an independent investor or market observer as part of TheStreet's guest contributor program, which is separate from the company's news coverage.

NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- None of the four GOP contenders has emerged as a star candidate yet. But it won't take a star to defeat President Obama. His record over the last four years will be reason enough to vote him out of office.

1. The economy is struggling. Since 2008 the U.S. economic clock has been turned back 10 years. If congressional gridlock continues The Economist reckons it will continue declining. The only country that slid more than the U.S. is Greece.

2. Gas is more and more expensive. Obama said, "There is no silver bullet" to temporary rising gas prices. Temporary? On Obama's watch gas has risen from an average of $1.85 a gallon to near $4 today. He does have a solution: Americans will drive cars that get 55 mpg. In the small print, there's a warning: These cars are small. They have a clutch and roll-down windows.

3. The war in Afghanistan is a fiasco. Obama's good war has turned into a mess. We are eyeing a second Vietnam.

4. The kids are not fired up. Mr. Hope-and-Change has disillusioned his younger voter champions -- 66% voted for him in 2008. Youth unemployment is at a 60-year high. It is now over 18%. It was 14% in 2008 (10.5% in 2007).

5. Lending is still down. New bank loans remain at historic lows: Just 50% of GDP. Healthy growth calls for new loan growth of at least 100% of GDP. The 848-page Dodd Frank Act is a major contributor to bank reticence to lend.

6. He's lost the elite. In 2008, Obama carried 52% of the 1%-ers, whom he later demonized.

7. Welfare rolls are rising. Americans have always taken pride in being self-sufficient. No welfare state here. At least there didn't used to be. Welfare spending in the U.S. is up 29% on Obama's watch. Food stamps recipients are up 68% from 28 million under Bush to 47 million under Obama.

8. So is the national debt. The nation's debt has grown a whopping 65% on Obama's watch. It's gone from $10 trillion to $15.5 trillion.

9. The U.S. lost its AAA rating. Under Obama, America has had its first credit downgrade. A huge contributory factor was his inability to lead Congress.

10. House prices have plummeted. Home prices hit their peak in 2006. In 2011 they hit new lows.

In addition, we could talk about the failures of Obamacare or the fact that the U.S. is in decline, as global rankings indicate. The list goes on.

Anyone but Obama.

*

BELOW ARE A FEW MORE REASONS:

Please report, broadcast, distribute, deliver to lawmakers, post, forward, and relay far and wide!
*
ALIPAC AND WIKILEAKS EXPOSES OBAMA'S OPEN BORDERS WITH NARCOMEX AGENDA:

*

 

“What's needed to discourage illegal immigration into the United States has been known for years: Enforce existing law.” ….. CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR

 

 

President Barack Obama Sabotages American Borders to Build His Party Base of Illegals


 
 
ONLY ILLEGALS HAVE MORE CONTEMPT THAN BARACK OBAMA FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, OUR BORDERS and LAWS
 
OBAMA HAS SQUANDERED BILLIONS PROTECTING THE BORDERS OF MUSLIM DICTATORS AS HE’S SABOTAGED OUR OWN BORDERS TO BUILD HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE OF ILLEGALS.
WHILE IN OFFICE, ILLEGALS HAVE POURED OVER OUR BORDERS AND INTO OUR JOBS, WELFARE, AND VOTING BOOTHS TO VOTE FOR MORE LA RAZA SUPREMACY.
 
3,400 Border Patrol Agents on the Chopping Block

In an amazing untold story reflecting President Obama's doubletalk on immigration, during Tuesday's town hall-style debate with Mitt Romney he claimed responsibility for putting more Border Patrol agents on our border than ever before. What he did not say is that come January 2, 2013, the president's failure of leadership could result in 3,400 Border Patrol agents losing their jobs. Also on the chopping block are 3,400 Customs and Border Protection inspectors, 932 Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) special agents, and 802 ICE deportation and removal officers.

We now learn that budget sequestration — which will slash the federal budget by 9.4 percent in 2013 for discretionary defense appropriations and by 8.2 percent in 2013 for discretionary nondefense appropriations — is actually worse than thought. A law passed 14 months ago required another 1.9 percent reduction in 2013 if the Congressional Super Committee failed to come to agreement on a budget, which is exactly what happened.

October 18, 2012
Janice Kephart
Center for Immigration Studies

Why didn't we know just how bad the cuts would be? Apparently when the Obama administration submitted its report to Congress, it "forgot" the extra 1.9 percent. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) recently told Congress the amount now will be $60.6 billion rather than the already debilitating $50 billion cuts previously expected. OMB reported exactly where the cuts would be and Rep. Norm Dicks (D-Wash.), ranking member of the House Appropriations Committee, quickly made its key aspects public in a pleading "dear colleague" letter to fellow members of Congress, asking for cooperation to solve the pending budget disaster.

While the White House is reported to be asking other Democrats and those affected in the defense sector to stay "mum" regarding the cuts until after the election, the fact is that keeping quiet likely will not induce the president to divert from campaigning to force a budget compromise on Congress and further economic collapse on Americans.

To make an obvious point even more obvious, sequestration will enhance and underscore Obama's open border policies. Border agents are already operating in the wake of failed southwest border security policies that have left both civilians and U.S. immigration agents dead on both sides of the border and placed hundreds of guns in drug lords' hands in and out of the United States. President Obama failed to acknowledge either issue in Tuesday's debate with Mitt Romney.

Rep. Dicks' letter presents alarming concerns. Below are the key excerpts from the 15-page letter explaining current sequestration requirements and what they mean for immigration and border security. Note that only border agents dealing with enforcement are cut; no U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) personnel are included because the agency is almost entirely funded by fees paid by immigrants, businesses, etc. USCIS is responsible for implementing President Obama's Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) administrative amnesty and is necessary to process applications from those illegal aliens seeking to take advantage of the program.[INDENT]October 9, 2012
Dear Colleague:
My purpose here is to illustrate the consequences of an automatic, across-the-board, uniform percentage reduction prescribed by the Budget Control Act (BCA). This letter will examine the impact of sequestration on the whole range of Federal responsibilities and, I hope, help make the case for Congress to act responsibly by agreeing to a more sensible approach to deficit reduction.

First, let us remember the purpose of sequestration. In an effort to reduce the deficit by $2.4 trillion, the BCA captured the initial $1.2 trillion in cuts almost entirely by capping discretionary appropriations over the ten years from FY 2012 to FY 2021. To get the second installment of $1.2 trillion, Congress established the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction. Concerned, however, that the Congressional Super Committee might require additional motivation to agree on a balanced deficit reduction plan, Republicans and Democrats agreed to sequestration. Sequestration is not so much a back-up plan as an inducement for all sides to reach a compromise. Clearly, any thoughtful, deliberate agreement will be an improvement over the mechanical and indiscriminate nature of sequestration cuts. So the BCA provided plenty of time, more than one full year between the due date for the Joint Committee to propose its recommendations and the imposition of sequestration, to enable Congress and the President to try again.

To be clear: If sequestration takes effect, it is only because it failed to motivate Congressional action as intended. The across-the-board cuts take effect only because the Joint Select Committee failed, and only if, in the ensuing year, Congress and the President fail to reach agreement on a more sensible deficit reduction plan. [emphasis added]

The Sequestration Transparency Act (STA) directed OMB to report on how the Administration interprets the law related to implementing sequestration. On September 14, OMB submitted its report estimating percentage cuts for defense and nondefense appropriations based on assumptions set in the STA:

    • A reduction of 9.4 percent in 2013 for discretionary defense (function 050) appropriations for each non-exempt item
    • A reduction of 8.2 percent in 2013 on discretionary nondefense appropriations


OMB, in accordance with the STA, looked at only one aspect of sequestration. As another motivation to act, the BCA also set up a second, separate sequestration to enforce the firewall between security and non-security appropriations. Because the Joint Committee failed, a new and lower defense firewall goes into effect, requiring an additional cut in defense spending. Based on levels in the agreed upon continuing resolution for FY 2013, we estimate:

    • An additional reduction of 1.9 percent in 2013 only for discretionary defense (function 050) accounts


...
If Congress fails to replace sequestration with a responsible, long-term deficit reduction plan, Moody's has warned they will downgrade America's credit rating and the Congressional Budget Office notes they will overturn their forecast of steady growth for 2013, predicting another recession with a 9.1 percent unemployment rate. CRS estimates that sequestration alone would result in 1.4 million jobs lost in the same year.
...
Homeland Security
Required reductions of budgetary resources for the Department of Homeland Security will roll back significant progress in securing our Nation's borders, increase wait times at our Nation's land ports of entry and airports, impact aviation and maritime safety and security, leave critical infrastructure vulnerable to attacks, hamper disaster response time, and eliminate cyber security infrastructure that has been developed in recent years.
Since the sequester would not be ordered under the BCA until January, federal agencies including the Department of Homeland Security would be forced to compensate for the first quarter of spending with even greater budget cuts through the rest of the year.

Over 24,500 jobs could be lost to achieve reduced funding levels including:

    • 3,400 Border Patrol agents — a reduction in Border Patrol agents to below FY 2009 levels, from an anticipated 21,370 agents to 17,970; a cut of this magnitude would significantly impact progress along the Southwest Border. DHS would not be able to maintain the minimum number of 21,370 agents set by P.L. 112-74.
    • 3,400 Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Officers — a reduction in CBP Officers to below FY 2007 on-board levels, from an anticipated 21,775 Officers to 18,375; this reduction will significantly increase wait times at our Nation's land ports of entry.


...

    • 932 Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Special Agents – a decrease of this magnitude would significantly impact efforts to investigate crimes involving counter-proliferation, terrorism, and transnational threats.
    • 802 ICE Enforcement and Removal Operation positions – These cuts to on-board levels will significantly roll back progress that has resulted in record-high removals of illegal criminal aliens this past year.


...
In order to sustain frontline operations in recent years while facing declining budgets, DHS has already taken significant reductions to administrative and mission support functions over the past several years. Over $3 billion in cost avoidances and savings have been achieved to date, which leaves little else to cut without directly impacting frontline operations.

Where possible, DHS and its Components would attempt to avoid cutting frontline positions. However, as stated by OMB in its report to Congress, "No amount of planning can mitigate the effect of these cuts."

*

MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com, JUDICIAL WATCH.org & WIKIleaks EXPOSES OBAMA’S AGENDA OF OPEN BORDERS, FUNDING OF LA RAZA SUPREMACY, AND HISPANDERING FOR THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES!

SHOCKING!

 


 


 

 

 

OBAMA'S AGENDA FOR OPEN BORDERS AND SURRENDER TO LA RAZA SUPREMACY:

 

 


 

*

WIKILEAKS EXPOSED OBAMA'S OPEN BORDERS AGENDA WITH NARCOMEX. OPEN & UNDEFENDED BORDERS EASES ILLEGALS OVER OUR BORDERS AND INTO OUR JOBS, WELFARE LINES, AND "FREE" ANCHOR BABY BIRTHING CENTERS. LOS ANGELES COUNTY ALONE PAYS OUT $600 MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS, MOST OF THIS GOING TO ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS MEXICO EXPORTS OVER OUR BORDERS. THESE MEXICANS GET "FREE" BIRTHING, AND THEN 18 YEARS OF WEFLARE FOR EACH CHILD, ALL OF WHOM ARE STILL CITIZENS OF MEXICO. THIS IS HOW MEXICO "ANCHORS" THEIR OCCAUPTION AND EXPANDS THE LA RAZA WELFARE STATE IN OUR BORDERS!

 


 

AFTER THE BELOW 2009 REMOVAL OF BORDER TROOPS, OBAMA WENT ON TO REMOVE MORE TROOPS, SABOTAGE BUILDING OF THE WALL, AND HAS TURNED DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY INTO A LA RAZA AGENCY TO PUSH FOR OPEN BORDERS, AND DREAM ACTS FOR HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE.

THEN OBAMA PUT 2,500 TROOPS IN AUSTRALIA TO FROWN AT THE CHINESE!

 

Lou Dobbs Tonight
Monday, September 28, 2009


And T.J. BONNER, president of the National Border Patrol Council, will weigh in on the federal government’s decision to pull nearly 400 agents from the U.S.-Mexican border. As always, Lou will take your calls to discuss the issues that matter most-and to get your thoughts on where America is headed.

*

OBAMA'S HISPANICAZATION OF AMERICA:


*

OBAMA'S LA RAZA INFESTED ADMINISTRATION:


*

THE RISE OF LA RAZA SUPREMACY UNDER HISPANDERING BARACK OBAMA:


 

*

OBAMA AND THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA:


 

*

PREMEDITATED MERGER

Obama quietly erasing borders

Dem administration advancing 'North American Union' agenda



Posted: December 15, 2010

By Jerome R. Corsi



Acting quietly, below the radar of U.S. public opinion and without congressional approval, the Obama administration is implementing a key policy objective of the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, or SPP, to erase the border with Mexico and Canada.

The administration is acting under a State Department-declared policy initiative described in a March 23 fact sheet titled "United States-Mexico Partnership: A New Border Vision."

"Mexico and the United States have a shared interest in creating a 21st century border that promotes the security and prosperity of both countries," the State Department declared. "The U.S. and Mexican governments have launched a range of initiatives that challenge the traditional view of 'hold the line' and are developing a framework for a new vision of 21st century border management."

At the same time, CTV News in Canada has obtained a draft copy of a declaration between the U.S. and Canada entitled "Beyond the Border: A Shared Vision for Perimeter Security and Competitiveness," to be implemented by a newly created Canadian-U.S. "Beyond the Border Working Group."


The two documents strongly suggest the Obama administration is pursuing a stealth bureaucratic methodology to establish a common North American border around the continent, encompassing the U.S., Canada and Mexico, while simultaneously moving to erase the borders between the U.S. and Mexico as well as between the U.S. and Canada.

Under the Bush administration's SPP, the U.S., Mexico and Canada organized some 20 different "shadow government" bureaucratic working groups composed of agency heads and undersecretaries in the three nations. The groups span a wide range of policy areas, from e-commerce, to aviation policy, to borders and immigration, trilateral travel, transportation, energy, environment, food and agriculture, health and financial services.

WND has reported since 2006 that a blueprint published in 2005 by the Council on Foreign Relations entitled "Building a North America Community" called for the establishment of a common security perimeter around North America by 2010 to facilitate the free movement of people, trade and capital between the three nations of North America.

In his 2001 book, "Toward a North American Community," American University professor Robert Pastor, a co-chair of the CFR blue ribbon committee that authored "Building a North American Community," called for the creation of a North American Commission, a North American Parliament, and a North American Court on Trade and Investment.

The language of the documents declaring "A New Border Vision" with Mexico and Canada could easily have been lifted directly from the CFR report or Pastor's book.

The 2005 CFR report "Building a North American Community" called on page xvii of the Foreword for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security perimeter, the boundaries of which would be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter."

CTV News reported that the language of the draft agreement specified that "A New Border Vision" for the U.S. and Canada would involve "a perimeter approach to security, working together within, at, and away from the borders of our two countries in a way that supports economic competitiveness, job creation and prosperity, and in a partnership to enhance our security and accelerate the legitimate flow of people and goods between our two countries."

Similarly, the U.S. State Department fact sheet calling for "A New Border Vision" with Mexico specified five areas of "joint border management, co-responsibility for cross-border crime, and shared commitment to the efficient flow of legal commerce and travel," namely: enhancing public safety, securing flows of people and goods, expediting legitimate commerce and travel, engaging border communities, and setting policy.

Under "setting policy," the State Department fact sheet with Mexico called for achieving rapid policy change through "an agile inter-agency process within each country as well as a means by which both governments can easily coordinate at a bi-national level."

This provides additional support for the conclusion that the bureaucratic "working groups" established under SPP in the Bush administration will continue to operate under Obama administration.

CTV News reported that the draft declaration of "A New Border Vision" with Canada similarly also specified a cross-border policy agenda, including:

· An integrated cargo security strategy;

· A joint approach to port and border security and screening;

· Cross-border sharing of information between law enforcement agencies;

· A closer working relationship between the two militaries in the event of emergencies;

· A new level of collaboration on preventing and recovering from counter attacks.

Affirming the continuance of the working group process, the draft declaration with Canada specifies the U.S. and Canada "intend to address threats at the earliest point possible, including outside the perimeter of our two countries."

The origin of the SPP can be traced to a trilateral summit meeting in Waco, Texas, March 23, 2005, between President George W. Bush, then-Mexican President Vicente Fox and then-Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin.

At the end of the Waco summit, the three leaders simply declared that the U.S., Mexico and Canada were now in the Security and Prosperity Partnership, without the signing of any international agreement between the three countries or the ratifying of any trilateral treaty by the U.S. Senate

*

ALPAIC: OBAMA’S AMNESTY


 

 

 

 

Mexico Bankrupts California Hospitals - How Much Does "Free" Healthcare Cost Legals?

BLANKET AMNESTY is at hand…. 40 million illegals occupying America can now vote (legally) for even more.
 
MEXICO DIRECTS LA RAZA MEXICANS TO LOOT AMERICA!

WILL MEXICO BANKRUPT MORE CALIFORNIA HOSPITALS?

OR WILL IT BANKRUPT THE STATE ITSELF?


 
CALIFORNIA – LEGALS PAY FOR MEX OCCUPATION  

LA RAZA NANCY PELOSI’S STATE IS NOW A COLONY OF MEXICO. THE STATE HANDS OUT $25 BILLION IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS AND HALF THE MURDERS ARE BY MEX GANGS!

FOR PELOSI, IT’S ALL ABOUT BUILDING THE DEM PARTY BASE WITH LOOTING MEXICANS!

LA RAZA-OCCUPATION and LOOTING in MEXIFORNIA…. shocking!

Californians bear an enormous fiscal burden as a result of an illegal alien population estimated at almost 3 million residents. The annual expenditure of state and local tax dollars on services for that population is $25.3 billion. That total amounts to a yearly burden of about $2,370 for a household headed by a U.S. citizen.


Opinion

California must stem the flow of illegal immigrants
The state should go after employers who hire them, curb taxpayer-funded benefits, deploy the National Guard to help the feds at the border and penalize 'sanctuary' cities.

Illegal immigration is another matter entirely. With the state budget in tatters, millions of residents out of work and a state prison system strained by massive overcrowding, California simply cannot continue to ignore the strain that illegal immigration puts on our budget and economy. Illegal aliens cost taxpayers in our state billions of dollars each year. As economist Philip J. Romero concluded in a 2007 study, "illegal immigrants impose a 'tax' on legal California residents in the tens of billions of dollars."



MEXICAN CONSULATES URGE GREATER LOOTING OF AMERICANS IN CALIFORNIA

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/03/mexico-encourages-occupying-la-raza-to.html



EXPORTING POVERTY... we take MEXICO'S 38 million poor, illiterate, criminal and frequently pregnant

The Mexican Invasion................................................

Mexico prefers to export its poor, not uplift them

Where To Go When Your Local Emergency Room Goes Bankrupt?"
                                           
During the past ten years 84 California hospitals have declared bankruptcy and closed their Emergency Rooms forever.  Financially crippled by legislative and judicial mandates to treat illegal aliens have bankrupted hospitals!   In 2010, in Los Angeles County alone, over 2 million illegal aliens recorded visits to county emergency rooms for both routine and emergency care.  Per official figures, the cost is $1,000 dollars for every taxpayer in Los Angeles County.   




LA RAZA WELFARE IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY ALONE: 

THESE FIGURES ON WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY ARE DATED. IT NOT EXCEEDS $600 MILLION PER YEAR!!! (source: Los Angeles County & JUDICIAL WATCH)
 
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1949085/posts



PREGNANT WOMEN JUMP AMERICAN
BORDERS FOR THE LA RAZA WELFARE
PROGRAM TO ANCHOR AND EXPAND
MEXICO’S WELFARE STATE IN U.S.
BORDERS

 

JAMES WALSH: THE OBAMA CONSPIRACY – The Hispanicazation of America and surrender of U.S. sovereignty to Mexico.


“The watchdogs at Judicial Watch discovered documents that reveal how the Obama administration's close coordination with the Mexican government entices Mexicans to hop over the fence and on to the American dole.” Washington Times

LA RAZA FLIES THE MEX FLAG OVER THE WHITE HOUSE.

OBAMA OFFERS WHITE HOUSE AS SANCTUARY FOR HIS INVADING ILLEGALS.

W.H. HAS MORE GUARDS THAN THE U.S. BORDER OBAMA WILL NOT GO NEAR!