Sunday, October 16, 2011

BANK of AMERICA - CRIMINAL BANKSTERS - A debit of gratitude to Bank of America

A debit of gratitude to Bank of America

BOTH CRIMINAL BANKSTERS BANK of AMERICA and WELLS FARGO ARE MAJOR DONORS TO THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA.

BOTH HAND OUT ACCOUNTS USING PHONY MEXICAN CONSULATE I.D.s.

BOTH HAVE HANDED OUR MORTGAGES TO ILLEGALS SUBMITTING PHONY I.D.s, AND STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS.

WELLS FARGO WAS THE BANKSTER OF CHOICE FOR THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS.

WELLS FARGO IS THE BIGGEST BACKER OF PAY DAY LOAN SHARKS.

NEITHER B of A, OR WELLS FARGO HIRE AMERICAN BORN. GO TO ANY OF THEIR BAY AREA BRANCHES AND ONLY FIND VISA PEOPLE FROM INDIAN OR TAWAIN.

WELLS FARGO HAD THEIR CALIFORNIA MORTGAGE LICENSE REVOKED IN 2003. IT REMAINS REVOKED. FOR THE VERY CRIMES WELLS FARGO WAS CONVICTED OF, THEY SIMPLY WENT ALL OVER THE COUNTRY AND CAUSED THE SAME MORTGAGE DEVASTATION.

CLOSE YOUR ACCOUNT TODAY!

MEXICO'S OUT-OF-CONTROL PRISONS - The Mexican Culture of Violence

Mexico's out-of-control prisons

Posted: 16 Oct 2011 06:59 AM PDT

A prison riot in Matamoros left 20 inmates dead yesterday, the latest incident to show how little control authorities exercise in most prisons.

A detailed anatomy of how the riot started and how it unfolded is something you will never learn from any newspaper in Matamoros. I’ve looked on the Expreso and El Diario newspaper websites from Matamoros, and nary a word about the prison riot. The editors would probably get killed if they printed information.

The public security office in Tamaulipas state has issued a statement with only the barest of facts.
In reality, prison violence breaks out monthly somewhere in the country, and scores of inmates are dead already this year. Here’s a quick breakdown as reported in El Universal this morning:

/ Durango: 12 die in a prison riot Jan. 11, and nine more die on May 19 in same place.

/ Nuevo Laredo, Tamaulipas state: A disturbance on July 15 in the prison leaves seven inmates dead. Fifty-six inmates escape.

/Ciudad Juarez: Seventeen inmates die when a gun battle breaks out between inmates.

/ Topo Chico, Nuevo Leon: Two inmates are beaten to death Sept. 26 for fighting one another.

/ Cadereyta, Nuevo Leon: A battle between inmates leaves seven dead and 12 injured.

In some prisons, inmates don’t just have homemade zip guns. They have real firearms, even automatic weapons. Several were found in the last week again in one of the prisons in Ciudad Juarez.

Mexico has no death penalty, but getting sent to prison can be a de facto death sentence.

AN IMMIGRANT IN CALIFORNIA POSTS ABOUT LA RAZA SUPREMACY WHERE HE LIVES

CaliScotsman at 9:44 AM October 16, 2011
I constantly get amazed by the illegal advocates who claim their representing "immigrant rights", well I'm an immigrant, a LEGAL immigrant who became a citizen this year after a long and expensive process and these losers DO NOT represent my wishes and aspirations.

And yet these advocates try to convince people that mass preferential illegal immigration of the poor and uneducated from a specific ethnicity, (and how racist is that?), is a good thing and that they're only "heer to wurk, sob, sob.."

Well I tell, after the influx of illegals into my SoCal neighbourhood, and yes they're easy to identify, crime went up, multifamily homes became the norm, property prices plummeted, gangs increased, graffiti, loud music etc basically the quality of life in the area dropped.

Tell me again how this benefits me and my legal neighbours?.......still waiting...

Wouldn't vote for Republicans though, they take their marching orders from the religious primitives.

Democrats are such a corrupt bunch in CA, pandering to the illegal advocates. Wouldn't vote for them either.

Michele Bachmann vows to finish Mexico border fence

Michele Bachmann vows to finish Mexico border fence

AS OBAMA HAS PUSHED OUR BORDERS WIDER OPEN, TAKEN GUARDS OFF THE BORDER, TURNED THE DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY INTO A PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP, AND PRACTICED CATCH AND RELEASE OF ILLEGALS PICKED UP, IT IS INTERESTING TO READ ABOUT A POLITICIANS THAT BELIEVES OUR BORDERS SHOULD BE SECURED AGAINST NARCOmex!

LA RAZA'S LIES - THE MEXICAN FASCIST PROPAGANDA MACHINE

THE FASTEST GROWING PARTY IN AMERICA IS NOT THE TEABAGGERS! IT IS THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA! FINANCED BY MEXICO, MOST OF THE FORTUNE 500 AND….YOUR TAX DOLLARS!

BY HEATHER MacDONALD

*
Lies that the illegal alien lobby perpetuates:

Lie #1: Illegal aliens take jobs Americans won't do.

*
Truth: Americans are willing to do most jobs at a fair wage, but they won't do those jobs at "slave wages" or minimum wage. Thus, American workers are constantly replaced by illegal aliens willing to work for half or a third of what American workers once received. These jobs that once afforded a middle class life style now only offer illegal alien workers poverty level wages, resulting in the shrinkage of the "American Middle Class" and the enormous growth of an ever-increasing "underclass" dependent on government entitlements.

*
Lie #2: Illegal aliens contribute more to the economy and tax base than they take.

*
Truth: A large portion of illegal aliens work for cash "under the table" paying no taxes. The great majority of illegals make $6-$8 per hour, ($12,480 - $16,640 per year). At such income levels, not only is there no tax due, but they also qualify for the "earned income tax credit". In California, public education alone costs over $7,500 per pupil. Multiply that times 2-4 children, add the costs of free school breakfast and lunch, free medical care, food stamps, housing subsidies, and other entitlement "give-aways". Harvard Professor George Borjas estimates illegal immigration costs the U.S. 70 billion dollars per year and Californians $1,300 per household annually in additional taxes. The Center for Immigration Studies estimate that the average Mexican illegal alien will use $55,200 more in public services during his lifetime than he pays in taxes. (THERE ARE ONLY EIGHT STATES WITH A POPULATION GREATER THAN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, WHICH IS UNDER MEXICAN OCCUPATION. THERE, HALF OF ALL JOBS GO TO ILLEGALS USING STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS. COUNTY PROPERTY TAXES GO TO PAY $600 MILLION PER YEAR!!! IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS! THE TAX-FREE MEXICAN ECONOMY IS CALCULATED TO BE $2 BILLION IN THIS COUNTY ALONE, AND MEXICANS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR 95% OF THE WARRANTS FOR MURDER!)

Lie #3: Without illegal alien farm labor, a head of lettuce would cost $3.00.
(SEE BELOW DIANNE FEINSTEIN AND BOXER FOR BIG AG BIZ DONORS)

*
Truth: It already costs $3.00. You just make a $1.00 down payment at the grocery store. The government finances the other two dollars until tax time, when the additional $2.00 balance is extracted from your wallet in the form of higher taxes. The Agriculture industry gets cheap labor and higher profits, while shifting all the social costs of illegal immigrant labor to the American tax payer.


Lie #4: Most illegal aliens come here only to seek work and are law-abiding "citizens".

*
Truth: In Los Angeles, as of January, 2004, 95 percent of all outstanding warrants for homicide (which total 1,200 to 1,500) target illegal aliens. Up to two-thirds of all fugitive felony warrants (17,000) are for illegal aliens. A confidential California Department of Justice study reported in 1995 that 60 percent of the 20,000-strong 18th Street Gang in southern California is illegal; police officers say the proportion is actually much greater. The bloody gang collaborates with the Mexican Mafia, the dominant force in California prisons, on complex drug-distribution schemes, extortion, and drive-by assassinations, and commits an assault or robbery every day in L.A. County. The gang has grown dramatically over the last two decades by recruiting recently arrived youngsters, most of them illegal, from Central America and Mexico.

(Source: The Illegal-Alien Crime Wave, by Heather MacDonald, City Journal, Winter 2004)
Also see the list of contributors to the National Council of La Raza ("The Race").
*

JUDICIAL WATCH.org
County’s Monthly Welfare Tab For Illegal Aliens $52 Million
09/07/2010

As the mainstream media focuses on a study that reveals a sharp decline in the nation’s illegal immigrant population, monthly welfare payments to children of undocumented aliens increased to $52 million in one U.S. county alone.
The hoopla surrounding last week’s news that the annual flow of illegal immigrants into the U.S. dropped by two-thirds in the past decade overlooked an important matter; the cost of educating, incarcerating and medically treating illegal aliens hasn’t decreased along with it, but rather skyrocketed to the tune of tens of billions of dollars annually.

THIS FIGURE DOES NOT INCLUDE EXTRA MILLIONS PAID FOR ANCHOR BABIES

Those figures don’t even include the extra millions that local municipalities dish out on welfare payments to the U.S.-born children of illegal immigrants, commonly known as anchor babies. In Los Angeles County alone that figure increased by nearly $4 million in the last year, sticking taxpayers with a whopping $52 million tab to provide illegal immigrants’ offspring with food stamps and other welfare benefits for just one month.
That means the nation’s most populous county, in the midst of a dire financial crisis, will spend more than $600 million this year to provide families headed by illegal immigrants with welfare benefits. In each of the past two years Los Angeles County taxpayers have spent about half a billion dollars just to cover the welfare and food-stamp costs of illegal immigrants. Additionally, the county spends $550 million on public safety and nearly $500 million on healthcare for illegal aliens.
About a quarter of the county’s welfare and food stamp issuances go to parents who reside in the United States illegally and collect benefits for their anchor babies, according to the figures from L.A. County’s Department of Social Services. Nationwide, Americans pay around $22 billion annually to provide illegal immigrants with welfare perks that include food assistance programs such as free school lunches in public schools, food stamps and a nutritional program (known as WIC) for low-income women and their children.

SANCTUARY CITIES - OBAMA BUILDS HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE of ILLEGALS

NO PRESIDENT IN HISTORY HAS WORKED HARDER FOR A FOREIGN OCCUPIER THAN BARACK OBAMA!

1. OBAMA FUNDS LA RAZA SUPREMACY WITH OUR TAX DOLLARS.

2. LA RAZA NOW OPERATES OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE UNDER CECILIA MUNOZ

3. OBAMA’S SEC. OF (ILLEGAL) LABOR IS LA RAZA SUPREMACIST HILDA SOLIS.

4. OBAMA’S DHS IS HEADED BY OPEN BORDERS ADVOCATE, AND LA RAZA SUPREMACIST JANET NAPOLITANO, AND IS NOW DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY = PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP.
5. OBAMA’S NOMINEE TO THE COURT, SONIA SOTOMAYER IS A LA RAZA PARTY MEMBER AND HAS A LONG HISTORY OF PANDERING TO THE CORPORATE INTERESTS LIKE OBAMA.

6. OBAMA’S CHIEF OF STAFF, BILL DALEY, IS LIKE OBAMA, AN ADVOCATE FOR KEEPING WAGES DEPRESSED WITH OPEN BORDERS AND HORDES OF ILLEGALS IN OUR JOBS.

7. DEPT OF JUSTICE NOW OPERATES TO EXPAND LA RAZA SUPREMACY AND IS SUING LEGALS IN ARIZONA AND ALABAMA ON BEHALF OF LA RAZA.

*
OBAMA’S HISPANICAZATION OF AMERICA FOR THE LA RAZA VOTE:
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/obamas-hispanicazation-of-america-push.html
*
WIKI LEAKS EXPOSES OBAMA’S OPEN BORDERS AGENDA – BUILDING A BORDERLESS TERRITORY WITH NARCOMEX:
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/wikileaks-exposed-obamas-la-raza-open.html
*
OBAMA’S LA RAZA PARTY INFESTED ADMINISTRATION:
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/06/obamas-administration-infested-with.html

*

Obama Administration Refuses to Sue Sanctuary Cities
Obama Administration Refuses to Sue Sanctuary Cities

Less than a week after suing Arizona to block its immigration law, SB 1070, critics are pressing the Obama administration to go after “sanctuary cities” that deliberately look the other way when it comes to illegal immigration. The Department of Justice last week responded that it will not sue these cities, which prohibit local law enforcement from inquiring about an individual’s legal status or alerting immigration authorities when they encounter illegal immigrants, because it believes passive refusal to follow the law is not as egregious as Arizona’s passage of a law that “actively interferes” with federal law. Justice Department spokeswoman for Attorney General Eric Holder inexplicably argued, “There is a big difference between a state or locality saying they are not going to use their resources to enforce a federal law, as so-called sanctuary cities have done, and a state passing its own immigration policy that actively interferes with federal law.” (The Washington Times, July 14, 2010).

Representative Lamar Smith (R-TX), who authored the 1996 federal law which requires states and localities to cooperate with federal authorities on immigration enforcement, criticized the Justice Department’s politically convenient stance on sanctuary cities. "For the Justice Department to suggest that they won't take action against those who passively violate the law …. is absurd," said Rep. Smith. "Will they ignore individuals who fail to pay taxes? Will they ignore banking laws that require disclosure of transactions over $10,000? Of course not." (The Washington Times, July 14, 2010).

Arizona Governor Jan Brewer has also noted the irony of the Obama administration’s refusal to sue localities to strike down their sanctuary policies, which she said could also be considered a “patchwork” of immigration laws across the country. (Brewer Statement, July 6, 2010). Senator David Vitter (R-LA) similarly noted, “This administration’s idea of immigration enforcement is to go after the states and local officials actually trying to enforce the laws on the books. They are demonizing those that look to protect our border and end illegal immigration while giving a wink and nod of approval to sanctuary cities that don't enforce our laws.” (Vitter Press Release, July 15, 2010).
*
8 New American Gateways For Immigrants

By Neema P. Roshania, Kiplinger.com
Jun 29th, 2010
The economic recovery may be slow and uncertain. Immigration remains a hot button political issue. But there's one positive trend that will keep benefiting smaller cities in the years ahead: Their growing appeal to immigrant poppulations.

Though New York, Los Angeles, Miami, Chicago and other large U.S. cities remain hubs for immigrants, newcomers from abroad are increasingly settling in smaller communities across the U.S., lured by a lower cost of living, more job opportunities, and a support structure of fellow immigrants. In return, these communities get a rejuvenated work force and a consumer base.
Here are eight rapidly emerging gateway communities for immigrants. All are likely to remain popular with foreign newcomers, despite stepped-up enforcement of federal immigration laws. Some may surprise you.
Benton/Washington Counties, Ark.

Home to large employers such as Wal-Mart in Bentonville and Tyson Foods in nearby Springdale, these northwest Arkansas counties have seen enormous growth in their immigrant populations over the past decade.
Foreign born residents now make up more than 20% of Springdale's population. The area's chicken farms, construction industry, corporate headquarters, and low cost of housing remain a strong magnet.
With Hispanics accounting for most of the increase, the region is seeing more ethnic bakeries, restaurants, media outlets, and other businesses. The once nearly homogeneous local school districts have added English as a second language to their curricula in addition to special programs to help involve parents in their children's education.
Portland and Salem, Ore. (Marion/Multnomah counties)

The growth of the area's technology industry draws highly skilled immigrant workers to northwest Oregon, where they're joining earlier arrivals -- refugees from Southeast Asia, Africa, eastern Europe and Russia.
Fairfax County, Va.
In this large suburban county bordering Washington, D.C., immigrants make up almost 30% of the population. The recession hasn't been felt here as much as it has in other parts of the country and construction, and service jobs are still plentiful. Fairfax County is across the Potomac River from the nation's capital, which, along with other large cities, has long been a draw for immigrants.
There's also a strong immigrant presence among service workers, especially in health care, restaurants, and cleaning services. Nearly 40% of the region's immigrant population arrived within the past decade. Many own their own businesses. And they are encouraging more family members and friends from the old country to join them.
Shelbyville, Tenn. (Bedford County)
Though the foreign born population in Shelbyville hovers around the national average, the small city and its environs have become a mecca for refugees from Egypt, Myanmar (formerly known as Burma), and Somalia. There are jobs in Shelbyville's food processing plants and other factories.
Cape Coral, Fla. (Lee County)
Southwest Florida's Gulf Coast has strong agriculture and service sectors. In 2000, Cape Coral's foreign born population was 8.7%, relatively low compared with national average of 11.1%. In the past decade it has increased by about 250% -- putting it above the national average.
Boise, Id. (Ada County)
Attracted to the area by job opportunities in agriculture and an affordable cost of living, Boise's immigrant population has climbed by more than 50% over the past decade.
Gwinnett County, Ga.
The foreign born population in Gwinnett County has more than doubled since 2000, and now represents about 25% of the county's total population. Drawn to the area by an abundance of jobs in the service sector and the low cost of housing, the immigrants are mostly Hispanic. They are carving out a livelihood in a region where blacks have traditionally been the most visible minority. Gwinnett also has one of the highest rates of illegal immigration in the U.S. -- authorities estimate that half of all foreign born residents of the county are unauthorized.
Raleigh-Durham-Cary, N.C. (Wake/Durham/Chatham Cos.)

North Carolina's 394% immigrant growth rate in the 1990s was the fastest among Southern states, and the trend has continued in the 21st century. The Raleigh-Durham area has been hub to much of this growth.
The draw? Affordable housing and jobs at Research Triangle Park -- one of the country's largest technology development centers -- as well as in the construction and service sectors. The recession and stricter enforcement of immigration laws in the Tar Heel State are slowing immigration growth -- at least for now. But many experts think migration could pick up again as the economy recovers.
In Pictures: 8 New American Gateways for Immigrants
Sources: Census Bureau, University of Southern California, Moody's Economy.com

ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION MYTHS - By Heather Mac Donald

Heather Mac Donald
Illegal Immigration Myths

Cutting through the baloney on what to do about illegals
1 May 2006
As the nation braced for another demonstration of illegal alien power today, the press has been trotting out “fear engulfs the illegal alien community” stories, following the arrests last month of over 1,000 illegal aliens working for IFCO Systems North America. For instance: IMMIGRANTS PANICKED BY RUMORS OF RAIDS, reported the New York Times; ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS FEAR ROUNDUP, announced the Wall Street Journal; TALK OF IMMIGRANT ARRESTS IN AUSTIN FUELS FEAR, blared the Austin American-Statesman; and PATIENTS, FEARING INS RAIDS, DON’T SEEK HEALTH CARE, the Contra Costa Times warned.
And what exactly is wrong with that? The premise of all such stories is that the government has acted unconscionably in causing illegal aliens to fear deportation, however remote the risk. Worrying about deportation is a cruel burden that no illegal alien should have to live with, the reporters imply—and their sources state outright. “It doesn’t help society or anyone to have these people running scared,” Mexican consul general Jorge Guajardo told the Austin American-Statesman. The stories sympathetically reported on illegal aliens too nervous to attend karate class, shop, get their free medical examinations, or pick up their subsidized prescription drugs. Somewhat braver illegals go out only to pick up their children from taxpayer-subsidized school or Head Start programs.
After Border Patrol agents arrested a few hundred illegal aliens in southern California cities in 2004, the Los Angeles Times ran similar stories bemoaning the resultant fear among illegal aliens and quoting advocates and politicians blasting the Border Patrol’s outrageous behavior.
This ubiquitous journalistic conceit exposes two myths and raises a public policy question. The first myth is that illegal aliens live in the shadows. The “shadows” claim then becomes an urgent reason why Congress must pass a legalization plan: so that 11 million people can come out of hiding. In fact, illegal aliens live in the full blaze of day. Only when confronted with the merest hint that immigration enforcement is even possible do they curtail their movements—and then elite thinking immediately declares such curtailment a gross injustice.
But even if it were true that illegals lived in the shadows, why is that unfair? The bargain they chose was clear: if you come here illegally, the law says that you should face deportation. It is a measure of how surreal our immigration practice has become that it is now “mean-spirited” simply to raise the possibility in an illegal’s mind that his deportation risk is real, much less actually to deport him.
The second myth is that the only way to reduce the illegal alien population is through “mass deportations”—assumed by the enlightened to be patently cruel. The fear stories make clear, however, that the illegal alien population has burgeoned precisely because illegals assume that they face no risk of enforcement. As soon as there is any move toward upholding the law, calculations change. Were enforcement actions to continue, the calculations made by illegals already here and those planning to come would change even more radically: many illegals would go home and many fewer would enter. As Jessica Vaughan points out in a recent report for the Center for Immigration Studies, after the Department of Homeland Security deported 1,500 illegal Pakistanis after 9/11, 15,000 more illegal Pakistanis left the country on their own. We have no reason to believe that illegal Hispanics and other populations would not follow a similar course.
For this voluntary flight to happen, however, the threat of enforcement must be credible. Perversely, the federal government makes sure that the opposite is the case. As soon as “illegal alien fear” stories appear, immigration policy-makers repudiate any intention of more widespread legal action and reassure illegal aliens that they have no reason to worry. Immigration and Customs Enforcement spokesman Virginia Tice told the Wall Street Journal last week that rumors of arrests of illegal aliens were “baseless. We don’t conduct random raids.”
Many immigration officials even fear the “d” word. A CNN reporter called me last year for a comment on whether an illegal Chinese man, trapped in an elevator in New York for several days, should be deported. A Department of Homeland Security spokesman had referred the reporter to me, because he was unwilling to offer any opinion himself on whether deportation was in order.
When the Denver Post, in 2002, took up the cause of Jesus Apodaca, an illegal alien in Denver denied in-state tuition to the University of Colorado, Congressman Tom Tancredo was the only public official who suggested that deportation might be more appropriate. ICE stayed mum.
And that leads to a key question, usually ducked: What does the country want regarding deportation? If an official from the agency responsible for protecting our borders is unwilling to call for the removal of a single illegal alien once the illegal has a face and a name, where does that leave us? Right-wing talk radio hosts and their audiences complain about border-breaking and informal legalization measures like driver’s licenses and matricula consular cards. But they usually avoid the next question: if not legalization, then, what? If ICE were to start upholding the immigration law and regularly removing illegals, the press would go into overdrive, painting each removal action as a heart-wrenching injustice.
It is a calculated falsehood by the open borders lobby that mass “round-ups” are the only way to stop the invasion of illegals. But it is true that consistent enforcement actions will be necessary to broadcast that our national sanctuary policy has come to an end. Some polls suggest that the public would support such actions, and virtually all polls show that the American people certainly have a far stricter stance toward illegals than do the press and the political class—something to keep in mind before we devise our next feckless immigration bill.

WHAT WOULD MEXICO DO ABOUT RANTING AMERICAN INVADERS DEMANDING SUPREMACY?

Heather Mac Donald

What Would Mexico Do with Protesting Illegals?

Deport them on the spot.

10 April 2006

The Mexican government constantly hectors the American people about how we should treat its illegal migrants. President Vicente Fox, Foreign Secretary Ernesto Derbez, and Mexican consuls in the United States insist that Americans should be grateful for the hundreds of thousands of surplus Mexicans who break across our border each year. Without them, these leaders explain, the American economy would grind to a halt (never mind that Mexico’s management of its own affairs would seem to undercut the officials’ economic expertise). Therefore, as a token of appreciation for keeping us afloat, say the Mexican apologists, we must grant amnesty to the law-breakers and reward them for illegal entry with a host of rights.
Fine. If Mexico wants to dictate our immigration policy to us, let’s follow their example to the letter. That example is particularly relevant on this further day of protests demanding amnesty for illegals. Among the demonstrators in at least 60 cities nationwide will undoubtedly be thousands of border lawbreakers. What would Mexico do? The answer is easy: deport them on the spot. In 2002, a dozen American college students, in Mexico legally, participated peacefully in an environmental protest against a planned airport outside of Mexico City. They swiftly found themselves deported as law-breakers for interfering in Mexico’s internal affairs.
If Mexico was willing to strip these students of their duly-obtained travel visas, imagine what it would have done had the students broken into the country surreptitiously—not just summary deportation but undoubtedly howls of complaint to the U.S. government for winking at this double violation of Mexican sovereignty. Open borders propagandists in the U.S. constantly present deportation as a patent act of cruelty that no right-thinking person would tolerate. Yet Mexico has no qualms about deporting not just illegals but legal immigrants as well whom it deems fractious.
If participation in an environmental protest constitutes unlawful interference in Mexico’s internal affairs, how much more intrusive would it deem mass demonstrations to legalize immigration law-breakers? No issue is more central to a country’s sovereignty than immigration policy. Yet we won’t be seeing any statements by Mexican diplomats today urging its citizens in the U.S. to refrain from efforts to influence American laws.
It is particularly delicious to imagine what would happen if American students in Mexico ran the American flag up a flag pole over an upside down Mexican flag, as students in a Southern California high school did last month. An international crisis! Each participant would be promptly ejected and possibly the American ambassador as well. When President Ernesto Zedillo tried to revise Mexican textbooks in the 1990s to be more favorable toward U.S. foreign policy, Mexico’s pundits denounced him as a traitor. Yet Mexican consuls in the U.S. work mightily to disseminate Mexican textbooks in U.S. schools and they have raised not a peep of remonstrance against Mexican protesters carrying signs such as THIS IS STOLEN LAND and WE DIDN’T CROSS THE BORDER, THE BORDER CROSSED US during the mass demonstrations last month.
Efforts to portray the student protesters in particular as modern day civil rights crusaders are laughable. Far from representing a sacrifice, cutting school is something of a tradition among Hispanics in the U.S., who have a high school dropout rate of just under 50 percent. Taxpayers must pay for the schooling of illegal aliens and their children, yet local schools get stiffed on their per-pupil payments from their state governments because truancy rates are so high. Immigration protests just drive the base truancy rate up higher. In December 2003, the school district in Santa Ana, California, the most Spanish-speaking large city in the country, promised to raffle off a color TV set to students who came to school on the day of a statewide protest against the repeal of a California law granting drivers licenses to illegal aliens. The streets won out over the free TV, and the district lost thousands of dollars in state funds.
Then there’s the question of whom we should favor in our immigration policy. Accept only the economic cream of other countries. Mexico’s immigration law grants preferences to scientists and other professionals likely to contribute to “national progress.” Peasants with third-grade educations aren’t high on their wish list; in fact they do everything they can to keep them out. Local observers have often alleged Mexico’s brutal treatment of impoverished Central Americans crossing its borders. Yet according to Mexican officials, millions of uneducated, unskilled campesinos are just what the American economy needs.
You have to admire the Mexican elites. They have a clear-sighted understanding of their country’s national interest—which lies above all in getting as many Mexican citizens as possible into the U.S. for their billions of dollars in remittances—and they’re unapologetic about pursuing it. Mass demonstrations that include illegal residents demanding that Mexico override its laws to accommodate them wouldn’t cow those elites for an instant. Too bad American officials can’t summon the same commitment to the wishes of the American people, who overwhelmingly oppose the rewarding of law breaking. The U.S. government isn’t about to deport the thousands of illegals who will be exploiting the American right to protest today, but it should at least not be swayed by their mass show of force.

Local News | Farm-labor shortage a crisis, Gregoire says | Seattle Times Newspaper

Local News | Farm-labor shortage a crisis, Gregoire says | Seattle Times Newspaper

IT'S ALL ABOUT MAINTAINING A MASS OF "CHEAP" LABOR ILLEGALS TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED. HOWEVER, ALL THIS "CHEAP" LABOR IS NOT SO CHEAP!

CA ALONE PUTS OUT $20 BILLION PER YEAR IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS. ONE-THIRD OF ALL FARM LABORERS END UP ON WELFARE.

ON TOP OF THIS, LOS ANGELES PAYS OUT $600 MILLION IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS.

WHEN LA RAZA OCCUPIES, THE CRIME RATES SOAR! MEXICANS ARE VIOLENT PEOPLE WITH NO RESPECT FOR ANY LAWS OR ORDINANCES.

ACCORDING TO CA ATTORNEY GENERAL, KAMALA HARRIS, NEARLY HALF OF ALL MURDERS IN CA ARE BY MEXICAN GANGS.

VIVA LA RAZA?

YOU DO IF YOU'RE A DEM!

63% Put Border Control Ahead Of Legalizing Illegal Immigrants

63% Put Border Control Ahead Of Legalizing Illegal Immigrants

MOST AMERICANS HAVE NO IDEA OF THE DEVASTATING COST OF THE MEXICAN INVASION, OR THE CRIME TIDAL WAVE THAT COMES WITH IT!

THE CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL KAMALA HARRIS HAS DECLARED THAT NEARLY HALF OF ALL MURDERS IN CA ARE BY MEXICAN GANGS!

VIVA LA RAZA LOOTING?

OBAMA DOES! HE'S DESPERATE TO PERFORM HIS "CHANGE" PRODUCTION ON THEM ALSO!

BACHMANN & CAIN ON ILLEGALS

START ADDING UP THE BILLS FOR ALL THAT “CHEAP” LA RAZA LABOR! CA ALONE PUTS OUT $20 BILLION PER YEAR IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS. ON TOP OF THIS FIGURE, LOS ANGELES COUNTY PAYS OUT $600 MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS!

THE STATE of CA JUST RAISED TUITION RATES FOR LEGALS, AND THEN JERRY BROWN HANDED OVER SPECIAL LA RAZA DISCOUNTS FOR ILLEGALS.

THE NEXT DAY HE SIGNED A “FUCK GRINGOS” BILL INTO LAW THAT MAKES IT ILLEGAL TO USE E-VERIFY, WHICH IS WHY MOST OF THE JOBS GO TO ILLEGALS!

VOTE FOR A DEMOCRAT AND YOU’RE VOTING TO EXPAND THE LA RAZA OCCUPATION AND EVER EXPANDING WELFARE STATE.

WANT TO TALK ABOUT MEXICAN CRIME TIDAL WAVES? ACCORDING TO THE CA A.G., NEARLY HALF OF ALL MURDERS ARE BY MEXICAN GANGS!!!

*
BACHMANN ON THE LA RAZA OCCUPATION:

“She also cited figures from a conservative group, the Federation for American Immigration Reform, maintaining that illegal immigration costs taxpayers $133 billion a year, most of it spent on education.”

*
FROM THE NEW YORK TIMES – MEX-OWNED PROPAGANDA MOUTHPIECE FOR LA RAZA SUPREMACY
October 15, 2011

At Rallies, 2 Candidates Deliver Blistering Attacks on Illegal Immigration
By TRIP GABRIEL and EDWARD WYATT

PERRY, Iowa — Two Republican candidates vying for of the party’s conservative base issued full-throated attacks Saturday on illegal immigration.
Herman Cain, the former business executive who has emerged as a front-runner in some polls, said he would build an electrified fence on the border with Mexico that could kill people who try to cross illegally. Representative Michele Bachmann of Minnesota vowed to make English the government’s official language, to build a “secure double fence” and to eliminate “taxpayer-funded benefits for illegal aliens.”
Mr. Cain, speaking at a Tea Party-sponsored rally in Tennessee, made some of his most pointed remarks yet on the issue. He said he might use military troops “with real guns and real bullets” to stop intruders.
Responding to anyone who might consider his remarks “insensitive,” Mr. Cain said the real fault lies with some illegal immigrants. “It’s insensitive for them to be killing our citizens, killing our border agents,” he said. “That’s what’s insensitive. And that mess has to stop.”
Deploying equally strong language, Mrs. Bachmann gave one of the great stem-winding speeches of her campaign. She described illegal immigration as an economic as well as a security threat. “This issue cannot be allowed to stand without fighting back,” she said, drawing applause from a crowd of about 60.
It was no coincidence that she spoke in this Iowa community with the same name as Gov. Rick Perry of Texas. The campaign billed the event as “Bachmann Takes it to Perry Rally.”
Mr. Perry stole much heat and light from Mrs. Bachmann after entering the Republican presidential race this summer, but since then he has been damaged when conservative voters learned of some immigration policies he advocated in Texas.
Even as he has fallen back in polls nationally and in Iowa, Mrs. Bachmann has not been the beneficiary — primarily, that has been Mr. Cain.
Mrs. Bachmann’s appeal seemed targeted at voters in Iowa, where her campaign has placed most if its bets ahead of the caucuses early next year.
In the speech, she attacked the law Mr. Perry signed in 2001 allowing undocumented students who graduate from a Texas high school to attend a state college on in-state tuition. She said it violates a 1996 federal law.
She also cited figures from a conservative group, the Federation for American Immigration Reform, maintaining that illegal immigration costs taxpayers $133 billion a year, most of it spent on education.
This week, some leading conservative evangelical pastors issued an appeal to the Republican candidates to soften their rhetoric and proposals on immigration, warning that the debate was stigmatizing and alienating Hispanics, who have flocked to evangelical churches in recent years. The appeal came from Richard Land of the Southern Baptist Convention; Matthew D. Staver, dean of the law school at Liberty University; and the Rev. Samuel Rodriguez, president of the largest national conference of Hispanic evangelical churches.
Brent A. Wilkes, vice chairman of the National Hispanic Leadership Agenda, said Mr. Cain’s remarks were reflective of increasingly harsh prescriptions offered by the Republican candidates for dealing with illegal immigration.
“These folks who come across the border are at most committing a misdemeanor,” Mr. Wilkes said. “To suggest that they would be electrocuted or shot would be to treat them harsher than we treat murderers or rapists.”
Mrs. Bachmann insisted she was not taking aim at Hispanics. It is a matter of fairness, she said. She pointed to her own family of “honest, hard-working” Norwegian immigrants, who came to Iowa seven generations ago.
“When they came in, they agreed they’d learn our Constitution, they’d live under the laws of Iowa and the United States, they agreed to learn English and to assimilate into their society.”
“It’s high time,” she said, “we stand up again unashamedly” for American values.
Most of the audience applauded. One dissenter who heard her, Eddie Diaz, a resident of Perry, said, “I’m tired of candidates on both sides using scare tactics against illegal immigrants.”
Trip Gabriel reported from Perry, and Edward Wyatt reported from Harriman, Tenn. Julia Preston contributed reporting from New York.