HERE'S THE REASON WHY CA SCHOOLS ARE No. 48 OUT OF 50 STATES.
Mass Immigration Driving School Segregation
By John Wahala
CIS Immigration Blog, August 10, 2017
. . .
The isolation felt by immigrants has been well documented. Researchers have found that it takes the average person several years to become fluent in English. One study concluded that an English learner in California has less than a 40 percent chance to be proficient after 10 years of schooling in the United States. Add the stress of adapting to a new culture and it is no surprise that these students are alienated. Given the option, many have chosen to be with their international peers who share common experiences and struggles. A young woman interviewed by Gross, who attends the immigrant school on the Cardozo campus in D.C., explains that the teachers and students of the mainstream high school treat the newcomers differently and that the groups rarely mingle. She has found a new family in the immigrant school.
That sense of solidarity facilitates the learning process. But it also cements immigrant segregation from the rest of the student body. As Gross points out, there is no plan to transition students out of the immigrant schools; it is up to them whether they stay or go. Most, like the young woman featured in the Atlantic article, will choose a nurturing environment alongside their international peers. This will likely improve their academics, but will it make them better American citizens?
The growth of immigrant schools challenges the traditional goal of an integrated society. An initial reason for the establishment of public schools in the 19th century was to assimilate immigrants into an American national identity. Part of this integration was forming relationships with American peers. This, however, has been occurring with less and less frequency in our current era of mass immigration. Researchers have described the present state of public schools as being "re-segregated across racial/ethnic, linguistic, and economic divisions." Academic Gary Orfield, whom Gross quotes in her article, has found that more than three-quarters of Hispanic students attend majority-minority schools. Nearly 40 percent of Hispanics attend schools that are 90-100 percent minority.
. . .
https://cis.org/Wahala/Mass-Immigration-Driving-School-Segregation
While you were sleeping, Mexico was invading, occupying,
looting and voting Democrat for more.
“In 1960, according to a USC demographic study, fewer than 10%
of the people in the Los Angeles County area were Latino. By 2008, according to
federal census estimates, almost half were Latino. Roughly the same was true in
the city of Los Angeles.”
''California is going to be a
Hispanic state," said Mario Obeldo, former head of MALDEF. "Anyone
who does not like it should leave." And MEChA's goal is even more radical:
an independent ''Aztlan,'' the collective name this organization gives to the
seven states of the U.S. Southwest – Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New
Mexico, Texas and Utah.”
LA RAZA AGENDA: 3 Examples
Richard Alatorre, Los Angeles City Council "They're afraid we're going
to take over the governmental institutions and other institutions. They're
right. We will take them over. . We are here to stay."
Mario Obledo, California Coalition of Hispanic Organizations and California
State Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare under Jerry Brown, also
awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by Bill Clinton "California is
going to be a Hispanic state. Anyone who doesn't like it should leave."
Jose Pescador Osuna, Mexican Consul General We are practicing "La
Reconquista" in California."
Here are a few facts you should
consider when you finally look around yourself and see only Mexicans….Mexicans
driving, Mexicans in our jobs, Mexicans in our welfare office, Mexicans
flooding our healthcare systems, and Mexicans and only Mexicans at all
construction sites.
CALIFORNIA UNDER MEXICAN
OCCUPATION:
The State Government of CA hands
illegals more than $30 BILLION per year in social services. That’s the state
level we’re talking about. Counties hand out even more with Mex-occupied Los
Angeles leading at $1 BILLION in welfare for Mexico’s anchor baby breeders. No
legal in Los Angeles or California were ever given the opportunity to vote on
Mexico’s welfare state in our open borders.
California has the largest and most
expensive state prison system in the nation. Half the inmates are illegals from
Mexico.
There have been more than 2,000
Californians murdered by Mexicans that fled back across the border to avoid
prosecution.
According to former CA Attorney
General Kamala Harris, now CA senator and advocate for amnesty, nearly HALF the
murders in CA are by Mexican gangs.
Los Angeles is America’s and
Mexico’s second largest city. Approximately 93% of the murders are committed by
Mexicans.
The Los Angeles Police department
publishes a list with images of the 200 most wanted criminals in Los Angeles.
About 186 at any given time are Mexicans. Most of the rest are Russian and
Armenians.
The County of Los Angeles spends
about $300 million yearly to jail Mexican criminals.
The City of Los Angeles spends
about $10 MILLION per year to clean up Mexican graffiti.
The City of Los Angeles has more
than 100,000 homeless and bout 5 MILLION illegals housed and in jobs.
The tax-free underground economy in
Los Angeles County is estimated to be in excess of $2 BILLION per year.
The City of Los Angeles tetters on
bankruptcy. It will be the largest bankruptcy in American history and will end
all City employee pensions. Still there will be no cuts related to the Mexican
occupation.
California ranks No. 48 out of 50
states for abominable lower education quality. Mexicans loathe literacy and
speaking the gringo language. Most Mexicans graduate from high school not being
able to read at a third-grade level.
At Santee Public High School in Los
Angeles, classes are taught in Spanish. Books are in Spanish and school
assemblies end in “!Viva Mexico, Viva Mexico!”.
Many public schools in CA have
prohibited Legals from wearing American flag T-shirts on Cinco de Mayo day.
California’s Attorney General
Xavier Becerra has been described in the press as a “Puss spewing racist”.
Mexicans think of themselves as LA RAZA “The Race”. The A.G.’s website no
longer list California’s most wanted criminals as they were all MEXICANS.
Becerra, as Congressman, sucked in bribes from Mexican criminals.
There have been more than 82
private enterprise hospitals and clinics in CA driven into bankruptcy due to
Mexico’s occupation of CA. It’s calculated that Mexico’s “free” gringo-paid
healthcare in CA cost legals $1.5 BILLION per year. No illegal in Mexico
received ANY medical attention, welfare or jobs.
The La Raza Sanctuary City of West
Hollywood, which employs hordes of illegals, banned the use of gas leaf blowers
in 1987. No City ordinances anywhere in CA ever apply to illegals. The City
handed out more than 400 fines to gardeners who were all illegals from Mexico.
The fines were never paid and were deemed uncollectable as these gardeners all
had fraudulent IDs. Therefore they were out there driving unlicensed and
uninsured. No illegal caught using a gas leaf blower and with fraudulent ID was
or will ever be prosecuted. In CA La Raza is above the law.
In Los Angeles there have been
numerous murders of innocent black Americans by Mexican gangs who were
“ethnically cleansing” their hoods.
LA RAZA Gov Jerry Brown has signed
each and every bill put before him that would expand Mexico’s supremacy in CA.
Both houses of the state legislature are now controlled by Mexico.
Gov Jerry Brown has openly
proclaimed that California is the Mexican’s “second home”, but when it comes to
jobs, a tax-free lifestyle, welfare, “free” medical, education and housing for
many, CA is the Mexican’s first home.
Former Mayor of Los Angeles and now
candidate for Governor, Antonio Villaraigosa is a former member of the racist,
violent, fascist separatist movement of M.E.Ch.A.
Mexico has 50 consulates in
American compared with the United Kingdom which has only 8. These consulates
are LA RAZA headquarters to help Mexicans claim their “rights”, which is more
welfare and “free” medical.
Jose Pescador Osuna, Mexican Consul General We are
practicing "La Reconquista" in California."
ILLEGALS
COSTING CALIFORNIA BILLIONS
By
Jerry Seper 2004 ( THINK IT’S GOTTEN ANY BETTER SINCE 2004?)
THE
WASHINGTON TIMES Published December 7, 2004
Illegal
immigration costs the taxpayers of California -- which has the highest number
of illegal aliens nationwide -- $10.5 (NOW $30 BILLION) billion a year for
education, health care and incarceration, according to a study released
yesterday. A key finding of the report by the Federation for American
Immigration Reform (FAIR) said the state's already struggling
kindergarten-through-12th-grade education system spends $7.7 billion a year on
children of illegal aliens, who constitute 15 percent of the student body. The
report also said the incarceration of convicted illegal aliens in state prisons
and jails and uncompensated medical outlays for health care provided to illegal
aliens each amounted to about $1.4 billion annually. The incarceration costs
did not include judicial expenditures or the monetary costs of the crimes
committed by illegal aliens that led to their incarceration. "California's
addiction to 'cheap' illegal-alien labor is bankrupting the state and posing
enormous burdens on the state's shrinking middle-class tax base," said
FAIR President Dan Stein. "Most Californians, who have seen their taxes
increase while public services deteriorate, already know the impact that mass
illegal immigration is having on their communities, but even they may be
shocked when they learn just how much of a drain illegal immigration has
become," he said.
ALIEN NATION: Secrets of the
Invasion….. It
S all about keeping wages depressed!
May
2006 – ALIEN NATION: Secrets of the Invasion – Why America's government invites
rampant illegal immigration
It's
widely regarded as America's biggest problem: Between 12 and 20 million aliens
(MOST SOURCES SUGGEST THERE ARE MUCH MORE LIKELY NEARLY 40 MILLION ILLEGALS
HERE NOW) – including large numbers of criminals, gang members and even
terrorists – have entered this nation illegally, with countless more streaming
across our scandalously unguarded borders daily.
The
issue polarizes the nation, robs citizens of jobs, bleeds taxpayers, threatens
America's national security and dangerously balkanizes the country into
unassimilated ethnic groups with little loyalty or love for America's founding
values. Indeed, the de facto invasion is rapidly transforming America into a
totally different country than the one past generations have known and loved.
And
yet – most Americans have almost no idea what is really going on, or why it is
happening.
While
news reports depict demonstrations and debates, and while politicians promise
"comprehensive border security programs," no real answers ever seem
to emerge.
But
there are answers. Truthful answers. Shocking answers.
In
its groundbreaking May edition, WND's acclaimed monthly Whistleblower magazine
reveals the astounding hidden agendas, plans and people behind America's
immigration nightmare.
Titled
"ALIEN NATION," the issue is subtitled "SECRETS OF THE INVASION:
Why government invites rampant illegal immigration." Indeed, it reveals
pivotal secrets very few Americans know. For example:
Did
you know that the powerfully influential Council on Foreign Relations – often
described as a “shadow government" – issued a comprehensive report last
year laying out a five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North
American economic and security community" with a common "outer
security perimeter"?
Roughly
translated: In the next few years, according to the 59-page report titled
"Building a North American Community," the U.S. must be integrated
with the socialism, corruption, poverty and population of Mexico and Canada.
"Common perimeter" means wide-open U.S. borders between the U.S.,
Mexico and Canada. As Phyllis Schlafly reveals in this issue of Whistleblower:
"This CFR document asserts that President Bush, Mexican President Vicente
Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin 'committed their governments' to
this goal when they met at Bush's ranch and at Waco, Texas, on March 23, 2005.
The three adopted the 'Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America'
and assigned 'working groups' to fill in the details. It was at this same
meeting, grandly called the North American Summit, that President Bush pinned
the epithet 'vigilantes' on the volunteers guarding our border in
Arizona."
The
CFR report – important excerpts of which are published in Whistleblower – also
suggests North American elitists begin getting together regularly, and
presumably secretly, "to buttress North American relationships, along the
lines of the Bilderberg or Wehrkunde conferences, organized to support
transatlantic relations." The Bilderberg and Wehrkunde conferences are
highly secret conclaves of the powerful. For decades, there have been
suspicions that such meetings were used for plotting the course of world events
and especially the centralization of global decision-making.
Did
you know that radical immigrant groups – including the League of United Latin
American Citizens (LULAC), the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational
Fund (MALDEF), the Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan (MEChA) and the National Council of La Raza (La Raza) – not only share a
revolutionary agenda of conquering America's southwest, but they also share
common funding sources, notably the Ford and Rockefeller foundations?
''California
is going to be a Hispanic state," said Mario Obeldo, former head of
MALDEF. "Anyone who does not like it should leave." And MEChA's goal
is even more radical: an independent ''Aztlan,'' the collective name this organization
gives to the seven states of the U.S. Southwest – Arizona, California,
Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas and Utah. So why would the Rockefeller and
Ford foundations support such groups? Joseph Farah tells the story in this
issue of Whistleblower.
Why
have America's politicians – of both major parties – allowed the illegal alien
invasion of this nation to continue for the last 30 years unabated? With
al-Qaida and allied terrorists promising to annihilate major U.S. cities with
nuclear weapons, with some big-city hospital emergency rooms near closure due
to the crush of so many illegals, with the rapid spread throughout the U.S. of
MS-13, the super-violent illegal alien gang – with all this and more, why do
U.S. officials choose to ignore the laws of the land and the will of the people
to pursue, instead, policies of open borders and lax immigration enforcement?
The
answers to all this and much more are in Whistleblower's "ALIEN
NATION" issue.
Is
there hope? Or is America lost to a demographic invasion destined to annihilate
its traditional Judeo-Christian culture, and to the ever-growing likelihood
that nuclear-armed jihadists will cross our porous borders and wreak
unthinkable destruction here?
There
most definitely is hope, according to this issue of Whistleblower. Although
most politicians of both major political parties have long since abdicated
their responsibility for securing America's borders and dealing effectively
with the millions already here illegally, there are a few exceptions – most
notably Colorado Rep. Tom Tancredo.
May's
Whistleblower includes an exclusive sneak preview of Tancredo's forthcoming
blockbuster book, "In Mortal Danger: The Battle for America’s Border and
Security." In an extended excerpt, Whistleblower presents Tencredo's
expert and inspired analysis of exactly how to solve the nation's most vexing
problem.
MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com
REALITY OF THE MEXICAN OCCUPATION AND MEXICAN
SUPREMACY:
Banned: The American Flag on Cinco de Mayo
by Kevin McCullough
When
200 hispanic students skipped school last week and marched through downtown
Morgan Hill, California chanting "Si se puede" intermixed with
"We want respect," none were banned from school attendance on their
return.
When
five students, one of them an American from latino roots, wore American flags
to school as a sign of patriotic speech, they were labeled incendiary. They
were instructed to turn their shirts inside-out so as to cover up the American
flag. And when they refused to surrender their first amendment right to
expression, they were given unexcused absences.
Assistant
Principal Miguel Rodriguez called the flag draped wardrobe
"incendiary" because the students had chosen to worn them on May 5,
popularly known as Cinco de Mayo. (A date that "celebrates" Mexico's
defeat of the French in a single battle, in a war that Mexico eventually lost.)
The
school's administration went further in claiming the five students were
attempting "to start a fight" and "adding fuel to the
fire."
Latino
parents chimed in and chided the five students (one of which is of Mexican
ethnic heritage) saying, "we're all offended by it."
One
parent, Teresa Casillas, claimed her hispanic children were upset by the
behavior of the boys wearing the flagged shirts, calling it disrespectful.
Yet
for all the outcry, not an ounce of proof has erupted that the boys made any
actions of provocation--except wear the shirts on Cinco De Mayo.
One
of the more ignorant utterances by one of the hispanic student protestors
summed up the stupidity best, "It's disrespectful to do it on Cinco de
Mayo," said Jessica Cortez, a Live Oak sophomore. "They can be a
patriot on some other day. Not that specific day."
And
so this is what the argument has been reduced to.
I
mean, you do understand don't you that Cinco de Mayo is not even celebrated en
masse by Mexicans?
Yet
the militant, belligerent, children of latinos living in Morgan Hill are
exhibiting symptoms of a problem that is widespread. Raw naked entitlement that
not only flouts the laws, but has now led to the limiting of the most
legitimate expression whose freedom should always be protected: patriotism.
It
was bad enough that the Obama administration went on a systematic campaign to
discredit the recent right of the state of Arizona to reinforce federal
guidelines for immigration. It was bad enough that the lies were widely told,
and never retracted by news agencies that should have known better.
THE WEEK
Latino
power comes full circle in L.A.
Once there was only Edward Roybal in a position of power. Today, as it did
long ago, authority rests in many Latino hands.
By Cathleen Decker
April 11, 2010
The announcement last week that Archbishop Jose
Gomez of San Antonio will replace Cardinal Roger Mahony as head of the local
Catholic diocese capped an assertion of power on the part of Latinos in Los
Angeles that is remarkable in its seeming speed.
For decades, only one Latino held unquestioned
public power: Edward R. Roybal, the first Latino to win a seat on the Los
Angeles City Council. He spent 13 years there, then moved to Congress to serve
30 years, most of that time as the region's only Latino representative.
Now the power positions held by Latinos in the Los
Angeles area are multiple and manifest. Besides the Mexico-born archbishop, who
is in line to become the first U.S. prelate of Latino heritage to become a
cardinal, there is the mayor. The speaker of the Assembly. The sheriff. A
county supervisor. Several members of the City Council, of Congress, of the
Legislature, of the Los Angeles school board. The head of the most influential
civic entity, organized labor.
"It is coming full circle," said UC
Berkeley associate professor Lisa GarcÃa Bedolla, the author of two books on
Latino politics. "That's what Los Angeles looked like before becoming part
of the United States."
It is hardly accidental, however. The moves to the
top in politics and other endeavors have required equal parts population
shifts, hard-fought legal pursuit and political strategizing.
Population numbers are only the most obvious
propellant for the ambitions of both the community and its leaders.
In
1960, according to a USC demographic study, fewer than 10% of the people in the
Los Angeles County area were Latino. By 2008, according to federal census
estimates, almost half were Latino. Roughly the same was true in the city of
Los Angeles.
While trailing the population levels -- because of
lagging citizenship numbers -- the ranks of Latino voters also swelled over
those decades.
But their efforts to win elections were thwarted by
political lines drawn to diminish their heft. In the mid-1980s, legal
challenges began to chip away at those hurdles. First came a legal assault on
the Los Angeles City Council's district boundaries, which led to the creation
of what was called at the time a "Latino district."
GLORIA MOLINA – RACIST LATINA BITCH
Next came a federal court fight over the Board of
Supervisors. A judge ultimately decided that the board had drawn its lines to
intentionally discriminate against Latinos. The judge's ruling led directly to
the election, in early 1991, of Gloria Molina to the board.
As inspiring to the community as the two legal
moves were, however, they essentially accounted for a single seat each. A more
prosaic development, term limits, would ultimately do far more, according to
GarcÃa Bedolla.
Beyond the churning of legislative and council
seats was the coincident rise of organized labor as a factor benefiting Latinos
and other minority candidates. Miguel Contreras, who took over the county labor
federation in 1996, ran it like a powerhouse until his death in 2005. His widow
and fellow union leader, Maria Elena Durazo, now heads the labor organization.
"They explicitly included immigrants . . .
[which] made the Latino community a political force in progressive politics in
a way they hadn't been before," GarcÃa Bedolla said.
A conspiring assist came, at the same time, from
the non-Latino head of the local Catholic Church. Mahony had made a name as a
friend of immigrants and Latinos before he arrived in Los Angeles in 1985. As
the Latino population of the area swelled, he waded into a host of civic
entanglements on their behalf.
He publicly defended janitors during a nasty
strike. He came out early and forcefully against Proposition 187, the 1994
measure to strip state services from illegal immigrants. (It passed
overwhelmingly but was largely struck down by the courts.)
Kenneth Burt, the author of "The Search for a
Civic Voice," a history of California Latino politics, credited Mahony for
keeping peace in Los Angeles between groups seeking power and those afraid of
losing it.
"He had a tremendous impact in empowering the
Latino community and in sending a powerful signal that the rise of Latinos
should not be seen as a threat," he said. "Even though he's Irish,
he's the first Latino cardinal in spirit."
All told, the taking of power has been stunning in
its breadth. A Loyola Marymount University study of the top 100 elected
positions in Los Angeles from 1959 to 2009 found that for years, only one man
-- Roybal -- made the list. The numbers increased only gradually until 1991,
when altered political lines and long-thwarted ambition pushed the percentage
of Latino seats to 18%. By last year, 33% were held by Latinos.
More subtle, perhaps, has been the more or less
tranquil way that change has been accomplished. Although there have been
periods of contention, the flow of power from whites and blacks to Latinos has
happened with far less gnashing than might have been expected years ago.
In part, that is because both politicians and
interest groups have worked at it. Los Angeles' mayor, Antonio Villaraigosa,
won election in his second attempt by attracting African American voters to go
along with the Latino and Jewish voters who had earlier supported him. One of
the main forces behind the career of former Assembly Speaker Karen Bass, an
African American now running for Congress, has been the Latino-dominated labor
movement.
Still, tensions are never far from view. The
Republican primary for governor is currently aboil with the subject of illegal
immigration, a perennial flash point. Although so far the issue has been of
little consequence in the campaign, its presence suggests that some element of
the public remains uncomfortable.
"I don't think you can get rid of so many
decades of that competition and animosity quickly," said GarcÃa Bedolla.
"I think it's going to be a while before we stop having that sense that
anything that is good for me is bad for you."
JUDICIAL WATCH.org – get on their email lists
Feds Probe University’s Device To Help Illegal
Border Crossers
Last Updated: Wed, 04/07/2010 - 12:21pm
Nearly half a year after a professor at a public
university spent taxpayer dollars to create a tool that helps Mexicans enter
the United States illegally, the area’s congressional delegation has finally
decided to investigate the matter.
The activist Chicano professor (Ricardo Dominguez)
at the University of California San Diego, a major public institution not far
from the Mexican border, proudly announced his new invention—Transborder
Immigrant Tool—in November without scrutiny from university officials or the
feds. The idea is to help Mexicans enter the U.S. illegally by mapping the
safest routes through the notoriously rigorous southern border desert.
The innovative technology is a simple mobile
application —inserted into the cheapest available cell phone on the
market—which guides illegal aliens through the least dangerous routes, areas
with shelter, food, water and so-called Quaker help centers that provide
medical attention and directions to the nearest major U.S. highway. The mobile
program is touted as an “intelligent agent algorithm” that parses out the best
routes and trails on a particular day and hour so that Mexicans can cross the
“vertiginous landscape” as safely as possible.
Dominguez, a tenured visual arts professor, was
inspired to create the technology by the thousands of Mexicans who have died on
their journeys north because they got lost in the treacherous terrain. For months
he boasted about his new Transborder Immigrant Tool, but the publicity campaign
has come to a screeching halt and his tenure is at risk because federal
lawmakers are finally looking into the matter.
(CONGRESSMEN BILBRAY, AND HUNTER ARE TWO OF THE
VERY FEW ELECTED IN MEXIFORNIA NOT WORKING FOR EXPANDING THE MEXICAN INVASION)
The area’s three representatives in the U.S.
House—Brian Bilbray, Duncan Hunter and Darrell Issa—are demanding that the
university’s chancellor provide a precise accounting of public funds associated
with the Transborder Immigrant Tool. Referring to it as a “troubling use of
taxpayer dollars,” the legislators point out that those who worked on the
device may be committing a federal felony by encouraging illegal immigration.
Dominguez has dismissed the probe as a sort of
witch hunt, assuring that he used less than $10,000 in taxpayer grants and
suggesting the congressman should be more concerned about the cost of
investigating him. That amount, the professor believes, will be much more than
what he spent on the entire project to help illegal border crossers.
Mexico’s government has provided its nationals with
valuable tools to help them cross the border safely but Dominguez is the first
American resident, with a salary provided by U.S. taxpayers, to openly promote
such a gadget. A few years ago Mexican officials published a 32-page booklet
(Guia Del Migrante Mexicano) with safety tips for border crossers and
distributed hand-held satellite devices to ensure the violators complete their
journey safely.
