Thursday, September 14, 2023

BIDENOMICS AND JOE'S ASSAULT ON MIDDLE AMERICA FOR HIS WALL STREET CRONIES - Breitbart Business Digest: The UAW Is Fighting Bidenomics and Bidenflation

THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS CONTRO U.S. BORDER BRINGING JOE'S UNREGISTERED DEM VOTERS OVER THE BORDER


Breitbart Business Digest: The UAW Is Fighting Bidenomics and Bidenflation

United Auto Workers members walk in the Labor Day parade in Detroit, Monday, Sept. 4, 2023. (AP Photo/Paul Sancya)
AP Photo/Paul Sancya

Which Side Are You On?

The looming strike by the United Auto Workers is as much a protest against Bidenomics as it is the policies of General Motors, Ford Motor Company, and Stellantis.

More than a decade ago, as U.S. automakers were teetering on the verge of collapse and two in the grip of bankruptcy amid the Great Recession, the unions and the autoworkers they represent made many concessions to keep the Big Three afloat. A big one was the agreement to accept contracts that no longer tied worker pay to inflation.

The pressure put on the unions at the time was tremendous. The Obama administration relentlessly pushed for acceptance of its program, largely because it wanted to claim credit for rescuing the auto industry. The workers were threatened with economic ruin if they did not sacrifice to prop up their failing employers. Politically, the unions were left adrift, abandoned by the Democrats who had long been their allies and finding little welcome among a Republican party still dominated by establishment types enthralled to the agenda of big business and Wall Street.

At the time, the concession on automatic inflation adjustments for wages did not seem too costly. The Federal Reserve had a hard won credibility on its promise to keep inflation low. Since the early 1990s, annual inflation mostly bounced around near three percent. Over time, prices were still climbing, but there were no sudden jolts that threatened to bury negotiated wage increases below unmanageable cost of living increases.

In the years that followed, the promise of low inflation was kept—and then some. The Federal Reserve officially targeted two percent inflation, and its biggest challenge in those years was often raising inflation to that target. The loss of an automatic inflation adjustment did not sting because inflation appeared to have been tamed.

The Great Betrayal

All that changed shortly after Joe Biden took control of the White House and pressed a Democrat-controlled Congress to enact the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan Act. Inflation went from 1.8 percent in 2019 to seven percent in 2021. (It had fallen to 0.3 percent amid the lockdowns in 2020.) Despite assurances from the Biden administration and the Fed that inflation was a passing phenomenon—transitory, they said—inflation persisted, clocking in at 6.5 percent for the full year in 2022.

It was even worse in the Detroit region that is America’s automaking heartland. While inflation peaked at 8.9 percent year-over-year in June of 2022 for the U.S. as a whole, in the Labor Department’s Detroit-Warren-Dearborn district, it rose all the way to 9.7 percent. Over the last 12 months, while nationwide 12-month inflation has fallen to 3.7 percent, in Michigan it is running 5.9 percent.

While all Americans have been hard hit by the surge of inflation tied to Biden’s deficit spending, Detroit’s autoworkers have had it far worse than most of their fellow Americans. The place we once called the Arsenal of Democracy was ground zero for Bidenflation’s destructive explosion.

Employees of the Plymouth plant in Detroit usher the last passenger automobile off the assembly line as the auto industry heeds the nation’s call to become “the Arsenal of Democracy” and turns its complete attention to military production for World War II on January 31, 1942. (Getty Images)

American autoworkers assemble a Jeep at the Ford River Rouge Plant in Detroit, Michigan, during World War II. (Charles Phelps Cushing/ClassicStock/Getty Images)

Autoworkers assemble Dodge Army trucks for World War II in January 1942. (Universal History Archive/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)

American autoworkers work day and night to build tanks for World War II in Detroit, Michigan, at the Chrysler plant converted for tank production on June 18, 1942. (Underwood Archives/Getty Images)

The promise of low inflation was broken by the bloated fiscal policies of the Biden administration and the loose money policies of the Federal Reserve.

It only made matters worse that the Democrats time and again sought to downplay inflation or pass the buck onto the greed of corporations or Putin’s invasion of Ukraine. As recently as this month, Democrat leftist stalwart Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York was circulating the idea that inflation was just “propaganda.” Even when Democrats admit inflation has been problematic and linked to excessive fiscal and monetary expansion, they act as if it were a sacrifice necessary because of the pandemic. Never have they mentioned that the sacrifice was borne more heavily by some than others, much less acknowledged the prices paid by our autoworkers.

What had become of the party that once stood by the autoworkers? Where was the apology for breaking the promise of holding inflation low? Where was the gratitude for the extra-burden of inflation visited upon them in the name of “rescuing” America from a pandemic-induced economic crisis that had already passed?

President Joe Biden and Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D-MI) listen as GM CEO Mary Barra gives them a tour of GM electric vehicles at the Detroit Auto Show on Sept. 14, 2022, in Detroit. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

General Motors CEO Mary Barra leads President Joe Biden on a tour of the Detroit Auto Show on Sept. 14, 2022, in Detroit. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

Meanwhile, it has been a boom time for the Big Three. “The North American businesses of Ford Motor Co., General Motors Co. and Stellantis NV have had a couple of outstanding years, as the pandemic’s factory shutdowns, followed quickly by rebounding demand, gifted Detroit with pricing power,” Bloomberg’s Liam Denning wrote in a recent article. Stellantis saw its adjusted operating income margin grow from 11.9 percent in 2021 to 13 percent in 2022. The North American operating margin grew to 16.4 percent.

Mary Barra, GM’s chief executive, saw her pay rise to 362 times the median worker’s earnings in 2022, up from 203 times in 2019. Inflation probably has not hurt her buying power by much.

There Is Power in the Union

No wonder one of the top demands of the UAW is the return of cost-of-living adjustments. The companies have offered to pay inflation bonuses to help repair the damage inflation has done to the earning power of workers. To accept that, however, unions would have to once against trust that inflation will be contained. Given the betrayal of the last promise is still a fresh wound, that is a very big ask.

The betrayal of the autoworkers by the Biden administration goes beyond inflation, 0f course. The Biden administration has been pushing policies to electrify most new vehicles within a decade or so. That rush toward electric vehicles will mean a rapid decline in payrolls for autoworkers—even as the automakers enjoy Inflation Reduction Act subsidies. Although the Biden administration claims there will be many new “clean and green” jobs, no plausible estimates see a net increase in employment for autoworkers from the transition. You don’t need as many people on the electric vehicle assembly line as you do to build a gas-fueled car. It also has not gone without notice by the unions that many of the proposed new green manufacturing plants are in anti-union, right-to-work states.

Even if you are a big believer in the notion that climate change is an existential threat that requires transformation and sacrifice, how can requiring an outsized sacrifice by autoworkers be justified? If we are all to benefit from rushing the process to electric vehicles, why are autoworkers left paying the price?

Very Little Threat to Economic Growth, No Real Inflation Threat at All

Despite what you may have heard from the establishment business press or the Big Three’s media allies, a strike would not be ruinous to the U.S economy. Analysts at Bank of America estimate a full UAW strike at all three manufacturers would be a drag on GDP growth of 0.1-0.2 percentage points annualized per week due to lost production. A strike that lasted a full quarter at all three manufacturers—a very unlikely event—could drag GDP growth down by 1.6 t0 2.2 percentage points, according to Bank of America’s analysts. In an economy growing at a faster than three percent rate, that’s not a catastrophe.

There’s also likely to be little upward pressure on inflation—even if the unions win their fight for higher wages. The new contract will directly affect around 150,000 workers, or 0.1 percent of the U.S. workforce. Very likely much of the increased cost would be absorbed by manufacturers margins rather than car customers.

“This means that even a one-time increase of 30% would only boost wage growth by a few basis points. Therefore, it will not be a significant contributor to wage inflation by itself, which in turn means limited upward pressure on price inflation from wages,” Bank of America’s analysts conclude.

The fight over Bidenflation and Bidenomics is reminiscent of much older fights for workers. As a time-honored union songs says:

It is we who plowed the prairies, built the cities where they trade.
Dug the mines and built the workshops, endless miles of railroad laid
Now we stand outcast and starving midst the wonders we have made
But the union makes us strong.

Solidarity forever!

EconomyBidenomicsBreitbart Business Digestelectric vehicleElectric VehiclesinflationInflation Reduction ActuawUnited Auto Workers










What JPMorgan just said should serve as a warning for all Americans. Yesterday, speaking at an industry event organized by Barclays, CEO Jamie Dimon sounded the alarm on a slew of headwinds that will hit the U.S. economy hard in the next couple of months, and pointed to several risks that could deal heavy blows to consumers, investors, businesses and banks. On Monday, he weighed in on how new regulation by the Fed will impact customers in the coming months. The changes will certainly not make them happy. Dimon explained how plans for new capital rules in the United States could damage the attractiveness of bank stocks, and make banking costs go even higher for consumers.  He argued that the Fed’s “'Basel III Endgame' reforms” would make loans even more expensive, and would force banks to reduce the amount of money they lend, which could drive banking activities into less regulated sectors. Dimon stressed that more lenders could run into problems just like Silicon Valley Bank did this spring. “Any crisis that damages Americans’ trust in their banks damages all banks — a fact that was known even before this crisis,” he wrote. “Even when it is behind us, there will be repercussions from it for years to come," he emphasized. He also said that it is  “a huge mistake” to think that the U.S. economy will boom “for years” given that there are so many risks out there. With interest rates still going up, conditions will become even more recessionary, and “you are going to see more people out there with problems”. It is for that reason that JPMorgan has just reiterated its bearish stance on the stock market, urging its clients to stay defensively positioned. Analysts at the firm also adjusted the bank's investment strategy in response to rising commodity prices and the potential spike in inflation. JPMorgan strategist Marko Kolanovic also noted that the increased potential for bank turbulence, an oil shock, and slowing growth is poised to send stocks back toward their 2022 lows, as reported by Bloomberg News.  We still have three more months to go before this year is done, and a lot more can happen in financial markets. One of the biggest concerns right now is the real estate sector. Warren Buffet’s investment partner and vice president of Berkshire Hathaway, Charlie Munger recently observed that hundreds of banks are exposed to commercial real estate loans that are at risk of going into default. He thinks there is trouble ahead for the U.S. commercial property market. “A lot of real estate isn’t so good anymore,” Munger said. “We have a lot of troubled office buildings, a lot of troubled shopping centers, a lot of troubled other properties. There’s a lot of agony out there.” These are the very early chapters of this crisis. But when even the head of one of the biggest financial institutions on the planet is worried about growing risks, we should definitely brace for pain because much worse is yet to come. Although it may take a while for all the dominoes to fall, we won’t be able to avert a decline that is already in motion. The clock is ticking, and time is running out for the U.S. financial system.

Americans Worked More, But Earned Less, as August’s Inflation Reduced Real Earnings

CRAIG BANNISTER | SEPTEMBER 13, 2023
DONATE
Text Audio
00:0000:00
Font Size

Adjusted for inflation, Americans earned less in August – even though they worked more hours – the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported Wednesday.

Due to a seasonally-adjusted 0.6% jump in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) compared to July, real average weekly earnings decreased 0.1% over the month, despite a 0.3% increase in the average number of hours worked.

August’s 0.2% improvement in average weekly earnings from July fell short of the month’s 0.6% increase in prices, resulting in the dip in real average weekly earnings.

For production and nonsupervisory employees, the loss in real wages was even more severe. Here, real average weekly earnings decreased 0.3% over the month, as a 0.3% increase in the average workweek failed to offset a 0.6% drop in real average hourly earnings.

In August, a seasonally-adjusted 10.6% increase in the cost of gasoline was the largest contributor to the 0.6% spike in the price index for all-items, accounting for over half of the rise from July. A 0.3% rise in the cost of shelter – the 40th straight monthly increase - also contributed to the increase in prices.

The business and economic reporting of CNSNews.com is funded in part with a gift made in memory of Dr. Keith C. Wold.

BLS: Real Earnings, Production+Nonsupervisory

UPDATE-Bidenomics: Five Charts the Media Don’t Want You to See

CRAIG BANNISTER | AUGUST 30, 2023
DONATE
Text Audio
00:0000:00
Font Size

UPDATED 9/14/23

Liberal media are declaring Bidenomics a success - but, hard numbers tell a much different story – regardless of whether the measure is how much Americans are paying, earning or saving.

Gas prices:

While gas prices held steady under Pres. Donald Trump (down four cents a gallon), they’ve surged 63% in the first 31 months of Pres. Joe Biden’s term. From January 2021 to August of this year, the average price of a gallon of gas (all grades) has increased from $2.42 to $3.95, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

 

Gas price graph

Real Wages:

After accounting for inflation, real wages earned by Americans have declined under Biden. In the first quarter of 2021, median weekly real earnings averaged $373. But, by the second quarter of this year, average real earnings had fallen to $365.

Under Trump, however, real wages rose from $352 on January 1, 2017, to $373 on January 1. 2021.

Real wages are calculated using Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) median usual weekly earnings for full-time employees at least 16 years old and are represented in terms of quarterly 1982-84 Consumer Price Index (CPI) seasonally-adjusted dollars.

Real wages graph

Consumer Price Index:

Consumer prices rose 7.6% in the 48 months of the Trump Administration, from a CPI of 243.618 in January 2021 to one of 262.035 in December 2020.

In contrast, prices have already risen more than twice as much, 16.6%, in just 31 months under Biden. Less than two-thirds of the way through his term, the CPI has risen from 262.650 in January of 2021 to 306.269 last month (August 2023), putting it on pace to increase more than three times as much as it did during Trump's full, four-year term.

CPI graph

Mortgage Rates:

It’s also costing far more to finance a home purchase, under the Biden Administration.

Mortgage rates today are more than twice the average rate home buyers paid when Trump left office, Freddie Mac data reveal. Under Biden’s predecessor, the average 30-year fixed mortgage rate fell by a third, from 4.09% to 2.77%. But, by September 7, 2023, mortgage rates had more than doubled, increasing by more than four percentage points, to 7.12%.

Mortgage rates graph

Savings Rates:

With Americans earning less and spending more, their average savings rate has declined under Biden.

From February 1, 2017 to February 1, 2021, the average personal savings rate increased 86%, from 7.2% to 13.4%. But, by July1 of this year, it had plummeted to 3.5% - a mere quarter of its pre-Biden level – according to Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (FRED) calculations, incorporating BLS data.

The business and economic reporting of CNSNews is funded in part with a gift made in memory of Dr. Keith C. Wold.

Personal Savings Rate in July 2023

 

Suggested Reading by MRCTV

JOE BIDEN'S 15 MILLION INVADERS MAY GET AMNESTY TO THEY CAN BRING UP THE REST OF MEXICO - DHS Chief Mayorkas Calls for Amnesty as DACA Is Ruled Unconstitutional Again

JOE BIDEN PICKED THIS CUBAN GAMER LAWYER MAYORKAS TO DESTROY THE AMERICAN BORDER TO KEEP THE BILLIONAIRES FOR CHEAP LABOR SATISFIED WITH NAFTA JOE BIDEN'S GLOBALIST DOCTRINE

DHS Chief Mayorkas Calls for Amnesty as DACA Is Ruled Unconstitutional Again

US Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas looks on during a back-to-school K-12 Cybersecurity Summit in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on August 8, 2023. (Photo by Brendan Smialowski / AFP) (Photo by BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images)
Nathan Posner/Anadolu Agency/BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images

After a federal judge again ruled unconstitutional former President Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas says Congress must pass amnesty.

This week, United States District Judge Andrew Hanen ruled DACA to be unconstitutional after first having found in 2021 that the program was illegally created by the Obama administration. The case is likely to be appealed to the Supreme Court for the third time.

Today, more than half a million illegal aliens remain in the U.S. thanks to securing DACA protections from deportation. Mayorkas said now is the time for Congress to pass an amnesty for those enrolled in DACA, as well as those eligible for the program.

“Congress has failed to act, and now DREAMers face an uncertain future, waiting to receive the permanent protection they deserve,” Mayorkas said in a statement:

… DHS will continue to advocate on behalf of DACA recipients every day, in the courts and through our actions. We stand ready to work with Congress on an enduring solution for our DREAMers. [Emphasis added]

WATCH: Sen. Chuck Schumer: Amnesty for Illegals is “Only Way We’re Going to Have a Great Future in America”

C-SPAN
0 seconds of 1 minute, 6 secondsVolume 90%

In February, Sens. Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) proposed their “DREAM Act” amnesty that would provide green cards and, eventually, naturalized American citizenship to nearly two million illegal aliens enrolled and eligible for DACA.

The amnesty has failed to gain traction in Congress.

As Breitbart News reported in 2017, a DACA amnesty would open a surge of chain migration — where newly naturalized citizens can bring an unlimited number of foreign relatives to the U.S. — ranging from 10 million to 19 million foreign nationals.

A prior Breitbart News analysis found that a DACA amnesty would cost American taxpayers some $115 billion by opening Obamacare rolls to newly legalized illegal aliens. Meanwhile, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has estimated that such an amnesty would cost taxpayers $26 billion.

That same CBO report suggests that about one in five DACA illegal aliens, after an amnesty, would end up on food stamps, while at least one in seven would go on Medicaid.

In 2013, CBO analysis stated that the “Gang of Eight” amnesty plan would “slightly” push down wages for American workers. A 2020 CBO analysis stated that “immigration has exerted downward pressure on the wages of relatively low-skilled workers who are already in the country, regardless of their birthplace.”

WATCH: Activist Slams Kamala Harris for Lack of Action on Amnesty for Illegal Aliens

Ali-Jae Nicolai / Breitbart News
0 seconds of 2 minutes, 24 secondsVolume 90%

John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Email him at jbinder@breitbart.com. Follow him on Twitter here.


WHAT IMPACT HAS 50 MILLION ILLEGALS NOW IN THE OPEN BORDER HAVE ON DEPRESSED WAGES AND THE HOUSING CRISIS. WHAT IF THEY ALL WENT BACK HOME.... BUT THEN WHO WOULD VOTE DEMOCRAT FOR MORE???

How NYC errs on illegals and the city budget

The other shoe has dropped in New York City. Officials knew it was coming, but they still fail to recognize the reason for it happening.

Mayor Eric Adams recently announced a 5% budget cut across all programs and services. Five percent may not seem like much, but the cuts show the budget moving in the wrong direction as far as politicians are concerned. Without money, they can’t buy votes with increasing services for residents. In a press release from the mayor’s office, the cuts are needed to “stabilize the city’s finances given the convergence of circumstances threatening New York City’s financial stability.”

This is simply because the city is receiving less money from taxes and state and federal funding at a time when the need for services is increasing because of the inflow of illegal immigrants seeking safety, since the city is a sanctuary city.

According to the press release, “the city faces substantial fiscal disruption if circumstances do not change.”

The city primarily blames the 110,000 illegal immigrants for the problem. “Today, with approximately 10,000 asylum seekers still arriving each month, the city estimates this mounting crisis will cost taxpayers $12 billion over three fiscal years -- an amount that will continue to grow without federal and state intervention and support,” according to the mayor’s office.  

The press release conveniently leaves out that the city essentially invited these immigrants by declaring itself a sanctuary city. No, in the mind, of New York City politicians, the problem is that the federal government isn’t paying for the city’s illegal residents.

Because New York foolishly declared itself a sanctuary city, thinking it was far enough away from the problem that it could safely virtue signal, all residents, including those in the city legally, are starting to pay the price.

However, the problem isn’t only illegals. It is the city’s progressive policies that have led to residents and businesses leaving. While this has reduced the city’s need for services slightly, it has reduced its tax revenues even more. This is because the residents most likely to leave are those who need fewer services.

The city hasn’t reached San Francisco or Portland level of decay, but it is a picture of what is to come if New York doesn’t change its policies.

It won’t, because it doesn’t understand the problem is primarily how the municipality operates.

“Desperate times calls for desperate measures, and these are desperate times,” said Chief Advisor Ingrid P. Lewis-Martin. “The federal government has all but abandoned New York City, and the state is not doing its fair share to assist New York City, which is managing a federal humanitarian crisis on a municipality’s budget. As a result, our administration has to make tough decisions.”

Although cutting the budget is a good sign, since progressives usually just raise taxes to make up shortfalls, the problem is that the budget cuts are a Band-Aid while the problem isn’t being treated.

The city has already tried pawning the illegal immigrants off on other municipalities. What the officials need to do is lobby the federal government to enforce its immigration laws. Meanwhile, it should also revoke its sanctuary city status.

Likewise, the city should also start enforcing its laws or passing laws that will make the city a safer place to live. If New York becomes a safe place to live, residents will live there, which will attract and retain businesses. This will increase tax revenues and ease the burden on all taxpayers.

Michael A. Letts is the CEO and Founder of In-VestUSA, a national grassroots non-profit organization helping hundreds of communities provide thousands of bulletproof vests for their police forces through educational, public relations, sponsorship, and fundraising programs. 

CONTACT: Jerry McGlothlin for Michael Letts 919-437-0001 jerry@specialguests.com.

Image: RawPixel



Federal Investigators: Biden’s DHS Freeing Over 60K Border Crossers into American Towns Every Month

US President Joe Biden smiles during a joint press conference with Finland's President after the US-Nordic leaders summit in Helsinki on July 13, 2023. (Photo by Antti Aimo-Koivisto / Lehtikuva / AFP) / Finland OUT
Antti Aimo-Koivisto/Lehtikuva/HERIKA MARTINEZ/AFP via Getty Images

President Joe Biden’s Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is releasing more than 60,000 border crossers into American cities and towns every single month, federal investigators reveal.

DHS Inspector General (IG) Joseph Cuffari issued the report this month, focusing primarily on the revelation that Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas is losing track of nearly 2-in-10 border crossers that the agency is releasing into the United States interior.

Also of note, though, Cuffari details Biden’s expansive catch and release network.

From March 2021 through August 2022, an 18-month period, DHS released more than a million border crossers into the U.S. interior — a foreign population close to the size of Dallas, Texas.

Specifically, Cuffari writes that Mayorkas is using three pipelines to release border crossers into the U.S. interior: Notices to Appear (NTAs), prosecutorial discretion, and Parole + ATD, which stands for Alternatives to Detention.

Through NTAs, alone, DHS has released more than 430,000 border crossers into the U.S. interior from March 2021 to August 2022. During that same period, more than 318,000 border crossers were released using Parole +ATD, and another nearly 95,000 were released using prosecutorial discretion.

The figures indicate that monthly, DHS is releasing more than 60,000 border crossers into American cities and towns every month, the equivalent of adding a foreign population the size of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, to the nation’s population every 30 days.

In total, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) estimates that Biden and Mayorkas have welcomed five million border crossers and illegal aliens to the U.S. since early January 2021.

John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Email him at jbinder@breitbart.com. Follow him on Twitter here


NYC Pays Al Qaeda Terror State $200M to Rent Hotel Rooms to Illegal Aliens

Paying for your own destruction.

[Editor’s note: Make sure to read Daniel Greenfield’s contributions in Jamie Glazov’s new book: Barack Obama’s True Legacy: How He Transformed America.]

The Roosevelt Hotel claims that it’s the place “where classic elegance meets contemporary luxury”. Classic elegance and luxury at the midtown Manhattan hotel looks like busloads of migrant invaders arriving and camping outside the golden doors. The scene is no better inside where 41 migrants have been arrested for beating wives, girlfriends and significant others.

There have also been assaults on employees and an arrest for child endangerment.

While the Roosevelt Hotel may have an old name, Mayor Eric Adams and New York City actually leased it from Pakistan for $220 million. That amounts to paying $210 per room for each night that an illegal alien invader uses it to smoke meth or abuse their wives and daughters.

The Roosevelt Hotel was named after Teddy. You can imagine what he would have done if thousands of foreigners had invaded a hotel and turned it into a drug den on his watch.

In a city where a quarter of young children live in poverty, that $220 million could probably be put to better use than paying the Islamic terror state linked to the September 11 attacks on New York City for the privilege of housing the hordes of invaders in “contemporary luxury”.

Mayor Adams has already jettisoned his promise of universal day care to care for the migrants.

Inside the Roosevelt from the gilt sign at the entrance to the art deco halls has been tarnished. Migrants squat under the massive crystal chandelier in the ballroom and sleep on the red carpet. Despite supposedly being poor and desperate, many are swiping and clicking through their smartphone apps while they wait for their next taxpayer-funded benefit to arrive.

Once the setting for movies like Wall Street and The French Connection, the storied hotel is now home to another kind of corrupt crime story. The black marble pillars and spacious rooms have been fully occupied by an endless invading army that continues to stream across the border. The smells and the level of filth are reflective of the three remaining working showers.

The massive influx of migrants has made the area near Grand Central Station as unsafe as it was in the 1970s. Despite the hotel being supposedly reserved for families, Central American and African male migrants in their twenties wearing blue surgical masks that cover most of their faces swarm the area and move in packs at night around nervous tourists and local businesses.

The fame of the Roosevelt Hotel appears to have traveled along the migrant pipeline and male migrants have fought, sometimes violently, to stay there instead of being relocated to homeless shelters. Local businesses, already battered by the pandemic, have been hit hard by the crisis.

The cost of housing the invaders is being paid to the Pakistani government. Even though

Pakistan International Airlines, under the control of the terror state’s government, was barred from flying directly to the United States after 9/11, it was allowed to take over the hotel and run it into the ground. The Biden administration has since allowed PIA to resume direct flights.

The Pakistani government harbored Osama bin Laden. Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif had initiated negotiations with Al Qaeda and offered to “reestablish normal relations.” Former  Prime Minister Imran Khan, nicknamed ‘Taliban Khan’, had called Bin Laden a “martyr”.

Now New Yorkers are stuck paying hundreds of millions of dollars to an Islamic terror state tied to the attacks that killed so many fellow residents and citizens to provide luxury housing for the latest wave of the invaders. Osama bin Laden would be proud of what is happening here.

Beyond Pakistan, other foreign business interests are also benefiting from the foreign invasion.

Chinese developer Jubao Xie, who put up the world’s tallest Holiday Inn in Manhattan, got $190 a night, $93,000 a day and $2.8 million a month to house the invaders. The skyscraper hotel, a bafflingly ugly eyesore, was in trouble before the migrant bailout was approved by a bankruptcy judge. A number of other foreign owned hotels are also benefiting from the arrangement.

The use of high-end hotels to house the illegal invaders has not only wrecked classic storied hotels like the Roosevelt or the Paramount, but it has also ruined the surrounding areas that the Giuliani administration had struggled to drag away from the blight that had overtaken Midtown.

Where tourists are supposed to arrive by train, take in Broadway shows and go to a nice restaurant afterward, the streets swarm with migrant thieves, beggars and madmen.

Row Hotel, a classic Times Square hotel that promises  “comfort and security while away from home” turned into another migrant hellhole. That’s where Daniel Hernandez Martinez, a migrant who was arrested six times for five assaults in two months, attacked a man with a bike tire.

Martinez was responsible for a one-man crime wave in the Times Square area. The criminal migrant was apparently staying in a $500 a night hotel which a former worker described as a

‘free for all’ of drugs, sex and violence where the rooms have been trashed and defiled.

Messages at the formerly stylish hotel described everything from a 10-year-old girl drunk alone in the room to an intruder carrying a machete. “Every day, we find about ten kids alone in their hotel rooms, either drinking or doing drugs. Weapons will be in the room,” a worker described.

And while America’s enemies are laughing and profiting, we are doing this to ourselves.

Open borders is only half the story. At a local level, the other half of the story is the ‘right to shelter’ regulations like those in New York City and other epicenters of the migrant invasion that guarantee everyone a room regardless of how illegal, violent or diseased they may be.

The homeless industrial complex claimed that the only reason junkies were wandering the streets was that an unfair capitalist system had deprived them of affordable housing. They invented a ‘right to shelter’ and radical leftist politicians who came to power implemented it.

A decade ago, I wrote about the rise of “homeless by choice” in which migrants, tourists and traveling junkies showed up in New York City to claim their “three meals a day, a microwave oven, TV, free laundry, free Internet, free health care and a prepaid cell phone with 300 minutes a month.”

And I warned that it would end badly. Now instead of a few thousand junkies, there are tens of thousands of migrants. And they’re just the beginning. Each of them also wants their free phones, health care, meals and everything else they think that they’re entitled to.

Including a stay in a luxury hotel.

Back then, one in four homeless in New York listed addresses outside the city. Today it’s probably the vast majority. There’s no longer even the pretense of a homeless problem.

New York City’s homeless problem just consists of people from other countries showing up in the city and demanding a room at the Roosevelt, the Row or the Paramount. Why be a sucker and pay $300 bucks for a hotel when you can just arrive as a refugee and demand a free room.

The taxpayers will pay for it and hand over the cash to Pakistan to finance more terrorism.

Avatar photo

Daniel Greenfield

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.

Reader Interactions


It's not fun being a sanctuary city anymore

Once upon a time, it was so much fun being a sanctuary city.  It made you popular with immigration activists and the self-declared "enlightened" class.  Suddenly, sanctuary cities are about dealing with migrants who accepted your invitation.  As someone said on the TV, it's like inviting a bunch of people for dinner and then realizing that you can't pay the bill.

The problem is really serious in the so-called "blue cities" as Naomi Lin recently wrote:    

New York City's struggle to care for about 110,000 immigrants who have arrived in the city since last year is having political repercussions for President Joe Biden, more than 200 miles away in Washington, D.C.

But the political ramifications for Biden are not only emanating from New York City but also other Democratic-run cities, including Boston, Chicago, and Philadelphia, before next year's election.   

What is unfolding in New York City regarding immigrants is "a prime example of what happens when you combine bad local policies with poor enforcement of federal immigration laws," according to Republican strategist Lanhee Chen.

"NYC's policies have created a permissive environment where, unsurprisingly, migrants have fled to seek shelter," Chen, policy director of Sen. Mitt Romney's (R-UT) 2012 presidential campaign, told the Washington Examiner. "Even blue-state governors like Maura Healey in Massachusetts have decried the 'crisis of inaction' within the Biden administration when it comes to enforcement of federal immigration laws."

Crisis of inaction?  A permissive environment?  How about a good case of demagogic policies meeting reality?   

I don't feel sorry for any of these Democrats.  They played this issue against Governor Greg Abbott in Texas.  They preached tolerance, diversity, inclusion, and everything else.

Now, Mayor Eric Adams is threatening to make budget cuts and the governor of Massachusetts doesn't know what to do.  Sorry, but I can't feel their pain.

P.S.  Check out my blog for posts, podcasts and videos.

Image: Tim Pierce



When it comes to illegal aliens, Democrat mayors seem deliberately dense

America is struggling with illegal aliens, but the situation is fixable. Before dealing with the immigrants already here, we must stop the ones who keep coming. There must be a blindness to logic in leftists, willful or not, who don’t seem to see this. I don’t know which is scarier—they actually don’t see a logical solution, or they do see one but refuse to consider it.

Thanks to Gregg Abbott’s and Ron DeSantis’s decision to ship illegal aliens to “sanctuary cities,” we got to see a panicked Mayor Eric Adams announce New York City’s potential destruction. It seems the uncontained influx of illegals has presented the city with a multi-billion-dollar cost to house and feed them. After available hotel rooms were gone, school gymnasiums, rec centers, and other facilities were called into use. And then, the master stroke…NYC is starting to ship the excess to other boroughs, flooding their facilities, parks, and schools. Worse, with school starting, non-English speaking illegal aliens will fill the classrooms alongside little Johnny, making the issue even more personal for parents.

Image: Eric Adams. YouTube screen grab.

If I didn’t have a soul (and a heart for the borough residents), the schadenfreude would be delicious:

New York City’s newly-elected Mayor Eric Adams, a Democrat, expressed deep concerns during a recent town hall meeting about the increasing influx of undocumented immigrants into the city, warning that the situation could potentially lead to the city’s destruction. Mayor Adams cited the significant challenges posed by the rising numbers of illegal immigrants and the strain it’s putting on the city’s resources.

[snip]

“I don’t see an ending to this. I don’t see an ending to this,” he said. “This issue will destroy New York City. Destroy New York City. We’re getting 10,000 migrants a month. One time we were just getting Venezuela. Now we getting Ecuador. Now we getting Russian-speaking coming through Mexico. Now we’re getting western Africa. Now we getting people from all over the globe have made their minds up that they’re going to come through the southern part of the border and coming into New York City. And everyone is saying it’s New York City’s problem.

“It’s gonna come to your neighborhoods. All of us are going to be impacted by this,” he continued. “I said it last year when we had 15,000. I’m telling you now with 110,000. The city we knew, we’re about to lose. And we’re all in this together. All of us. Staten Island is saying, ‘send them out to Manhattan,’ Manhattan is saying, ‘send them out to Queens,’ Queens is saying, ‘send them out to Brooklyn.’”

Note that he says nothing about fixing the problem by closing the border, as anyone with three working brain synapses could figure out. It’s just like watching the water spew from the broken pipe in your basement but being unable to comprehend that the pipe must be repaired. Adams can’t see that no amount of bailing and buckets—or relocations—will have any effect on the flooding problem.

It’s not just in New York. Los Angeles’s communist mayor, Karen Bass, announced that the city is no longer extending an open invitation to illegal immigrants. This comes just two months after the city council voted to become a sanctuary city in response to Gregg Abbott’s illegal alien relocation policy. The vote came with the usual leftist gobbledy-gook about being “a place that values and dignifies all human life, no matter who they are or where they come from,” and included de rigueur words about “dignity and compassion.” Then, reality hit them between the eyes.

Chicago has the same problem. Worse, Chicago Democrats’ political base consists of its black citizens—and they are growing outraged as the city ignores them in favor of illegals. What these black citizens have worked so hard for is being freely handed over to people they see as invaders. Sounding very MAGA, Chicago’s blacks claim that illegals don’t follow the laws, only to find the government doesn’t care:

“I understand that everyone deserves a chance, but this chance was given. Now they are abusing the chance, and now the people that live here that pay taxes here and take care of the block are the ones being ignored,” Gage Park resident Julio Ocampo said.

They’re learning that the Marxist-leftist influencers in DC want open borders, with an endless flood of illegals, because they see it as a means to perpetual power. However, they failed to see that the people most directly affected by the influx will not stand for it for long. That’s one reason Joe Biden is trying to pass an order to force illegal aliens to remain in Texas. Governor Abbot has indicated he’ll double his order for more busses.

As a famous radio pundit once said: “Liberalism is a mental disorder.” I don’t think we can see a clearer example than Democrats and the fallout from illegal immigration. These leaders are either incompetent and should be fired, or they are doing it on purpose, in which case they should be in jail. Which is it?

Lewis Dovland is a passionate observer of America’s future direction with a focus on exposing the “Big Picture” end goals of the progressive Marxist movement and how we can prevail. Email at Lewis.Dovland@gmail.com.


Sanctuary City NYC to Cut Services, Police Overtime to Pay for Migrants

UNITED STATES -September 6: Dozens of migrants/immigrants families are seen arriving from Texas at the Port Authority Bus Terminal early Wednesday September 6, 2023. Accordingly to activist Power Malu from the organization Artists, Athletes and Activists New York City has removed the MTA buses from transporting immigrants from the bus …
Luiz C. Ribeiro for NY Daily News via Getty Images

The sanctuary city of New York City is set to cut overtime for New York Police Department (NYPD) officers, as well as city services across the board, to pay for tens of thousands of border crossers and illegal aliens living off New Yorkers.

According to the New York Post, Mayor Eric Adams’s (D) office is asking the NYPD, as well as other public agencies like the New York City Fire Department (FDNY), to make plans to dramatically cut their overtime costs.

“The mayor will … issue a directive to implement an overtime reduction initiative for our city’s four uniformed agencies (NYPD, FDNY, DOC/DSNY),” Adams’ office wrote in a memo obtained by the Post. “These agencies must submit a plan to reduce year-to-year [overtime] spending.”

The two other agencies mentioned are the Department of Corrections (DOC) and the Department of Sanitation (DSNY).

Likewise, Adams is directing every city agency to make five percent budget cuts so New Yorkers can afford the $12 billion price tag that comes with the arrival of the more than 110,000 border crossers and illegal aliens that have arrived in the city since the spring of last year.

WATCH: Democrat NYC Councilman: We Need Remain in Mexico, We Can’t Pay for Migrants While They Wait Ten Years for Asylum Hearings

0 seconds of 5 minutes, 41 secondsVolume 90%

“While our compassion is limitless, our resources are not,” Adams said:

This is a sobering fact, and that’s why today’s decision was not made lightly. At this time, we are asking all of our agencies to submit a plan to reduce their city-funded spending in each year of our financial plan… [Emphasis added]

Even with the five percent budget cuts and slashing of overtime for NYPD officers and FDNY firefighters, Adams’ office suggests such plans will pay for just two-thirds of the costs associated with illegal immigration to the city.

Adams made national waves last week when he delivered an honest speech to New Yorkers, warning them that illegal immigration “will destroy New York City.”

“It’s going to come to your neighborhoods. All of us are going to be impacted by this,” Adams continued. “I said it last year when we had 15,000. I’m telling you now with 110,000. The city we knew, we’re about to lose.”

WATCH: NYC Mayor: Migrant Crisis Will Destroy New York City

0 seconds of 3 minutes, 3 secondsVolume 90%

John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Email him at jbinder@breitbart.com. Follow him on Twitter here.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8kfbKfm1vHo


Bidenomics Broke America: Real Household Income Suffers Biggest Drop In 12 Years

US President Joe Biden arrives for the entertainment portion of the evening after a black-tie dinner for Governors and their spouses at the White House in Washington, DC on February 11, 2023. (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS / AFP) (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images)
Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images

The official tally is in and it is brutal: Americans suffered the biggest drop in household income in 2022 in a dozen years.

Real median household income was $74,580 in 2022, a drop of 2.3 percent from the prior year, the Census Bureau said Tuesday.

This is the biggest drop in household income since 2010, when it household income fell 2.6 percent. That means it is worse than the pandemic decline of 2.2 percent. It is the fourth worst year in records going back to 1985.

The declines were driven by high inflation. The measure of inflation that is used to calculate real income rose 7.8 percent, the worst inflation since 1981.

The real median earnings of all workers—including part-time and full-time workers—declined 2.2 percent between 2021 and 2022. Median earnings of those who worked full-time, year-round fell 1.3 percent in 2022.

The figures are even worse once taxes are figured into the equation.  Real median post-tax household income in 2022 fell 8.8 percent in 2022.

Income inequality also got worse in 2022 once taxes are calculated. Pre-tax, income inequality—as measured by an gauge of income distribution called the Gini index—declined for the first time since 2007. After taxes, however, the index increased 3.2 percent. An increase in the Gini index signals increasing income inequality.

The official poverty rate in 2022 was 11.5 percent, with 37.9 million people in poverty. This was unchanged from the prior year.

 



Breitbart Business Digest: Bidenomics Summer Ends with Americans More Pessimistic About Their Finances

President Joe Biden buys ice cream in Traverse City, Michigan on July 3, 2021. (MANDEL NGAN/Getty Images)
MANDEL NGAN/Getty Images

The Bidenomics Summer Gambit Goes Bust

If Joe Biden was hoping this would be a hot Bidenomics summer, he has got to be feeling pretty disappointed right now.

The best way to think about the Bidenomics push from the White House is as a bet on a strengthening economy and cooling inflation. In some ways, this was an outlandish gambit because the odds were always against what Wall Street has been calling “immaculate disinflation. The most likely outcomes were that inflation would remain persistently high or the economy would significantly slow down.

Most economists saw the latter outcome—sluggish growth or even an outright recession—as the most likely. A few analysts—including the folks who bring you Breitbart Business Digest—argued that we were most likely to see high inflation paired with an economy that would continue to grow at a pace that Federal Reserve officials describe as “above trend.”

The trouble for Biden was that neither of these outcomes looked particularly pleasant in terms of the 2024 election. If the economy fell into a recession in the second half of this year or early next year, Biden would be making a plea for another four years amid rising unemployment. If inflation stayed hot, Biden would look ineffectual on what poll after poll shows to be the top issue for voters.

So, the Biden gambit was to shoot the moon: bet on the improbable outcome and claim credit for it. It was never likely to pay off, but there was little downside because if the economy did not improve, Biden was likely to suffer in November. Might as well try for the maximum upside.

The Economy Did “Immaculately Disinflate” a Bit

Earlier this summer, the improbable outcome was looking increasingly less improbable. Inflation made a big climb down, helped in part by the fact that prices rose so much last year that the year-over-year numbers were always going to look flattering. The economy actually accelerated from the first quarter’s two percent rate of growth to the second quarter’s 2.1 percent rate. Now it looks as if the economy could grow at a better than three percent rate in the third quarter.

However, there have been signs that the inflation story was not as benevolent as it appeared to be. Underlying inflation, for example, has remained even more persistent than headline inflation. While the headline consumer price index (CPI) peaked at 9.06 percent in June of last year, median CPI did not peak until February of this year. Where headline CPI fell all the way from nine percent down to around three percent in June of this year, median CPI has only declined from February’s seven percent to July’s 6.1 percent.

Headline CPI and Median CPI

Looking at the month-to-month changes in median CPI, we see that there has been no downward trend at all. After registering 0.6 percent in February, median CPI clocked in at 0.4 percent for four months in a row. It fell in July down to a more moderate 0.2 percent but is likely to climb again when the August numbers are released later this week.

Inflation, in other words, has proven stickier than most economists expected or the Biden administration hoped.

Increasing Public Pessimism

The public clearly views Bidenomics as a flop. On Monday, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York released the results from its monthly survey of consumer expectations. This showed that consumers are increasingly pessimistic about the labor market and household finances. On inflation, the public’s views were largely unchanged.

The share of the public that says it expects their own household financial situation to be “much better” a year from now slipped from 3.9 percent in July to 3.5 percent in August. The share expecting things to be “somewhat better” dropped from 25.4 percent to 20.3 percent, a significant slide.

Those expecting their household financial situation to be about the same climbed from 44.1 to 46.9 percent. Those expecting things to be somewhat worse fell from 27.7 percent to 24.9 percent (a thin silver lining for Biden), but those expecting things to get much worse climbed to 4.4 percent from 3.9 percent.

The New York Fed’s survey also asks consumers to compare how they are now to a year ago. The share saying things have gotten much better dipped from 3.3 percent to 3.1 percent. The share saying things are “somewhat better” fell to 14.9 percent from 18.2 percent. The share saying they expect no change rose to 41.9 percent from 38.7 percent.

In the retrospective question, there was a dip in the “somewhat worse” response: from 32.7 percent to 29.5 percent. Unfortunately for Biden, all of that change is explained by those moving down into the category of people who say things are much worse now than a year ago. This rose from 7.1 percent to 10.6 percent from July to August.

A recent poll by the Wall Street Journal found that around three in five voters disapprove of Biden’s handling of the economy. Sixty-three percent say they do not like how Biden has handled the issue of inflation.

Of course, the last hand in the game has not been dealt. There’s still a chance that the Bidenomics bet pays off. But from the perspective of September 2023, that still looks like a long shot.


Congress reconvenes amid budget crisis as US federal deficit doubles

Members of the US House of Representatives return to Washington on Tuesday with only three weeks, including 12 days of scheduled legislative sessions, before the end of the 2023 fiscal year on September 30. At that point, unless a new budget is passed, or a “continuing resolution” to authorize further government spending, the federal government will begin a partial shutdown.

The stage has been set for yet another round of political theater over the budget deficit, in which the Republicans will posture as the defenders of “fiscal responsibility” (which never includes cuts in the bloated Pentagon budget), while Democrats posture as advocates of “fairness” and “compassion” (knowing that any proposed tax increases on the wealthy or social spending for the poor can never be enacted because of Republican opposition).

This degraded process will end, as it always does, with further cuts in social spending, while the military and the super-rich, the two principal clients of both capitalist parties, go entirely unscathed.

The political conflict over the budget has been exacerbated by two reports released on September 6 indicating that the federal deficit for the current fiscal year will double, from $1 trillion in fiscal 2022 (October 1, 2021 through September 30, 2022) to $2 trillion in fiscal 2023.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) reported that the US Treasury had already borrowed $1.6 trillion in the current fiscal year, with nearly two months to go. The CBO projected a full-year deficit of $1.7 trillion, with spending up 10 percent over fiscal 2022 and revenues down 10 percent.

The same day, the right-wing think tank Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget said that it was projecting a $2 trillion deficit by September 30. The group said that by its calculations, federal spending was up 16 percent compared to a year ago, while revenues were down 7 percent.

The CBO estimated that individual income and payroll taxes would drop by $313 billion this year, largely due to the decline in the stock market last year, which slashed capital gains taxes and reduced taxable income for corporations. At the same time, remittances from the Federal Reserve to the Treasury—effectively, profits from its lending to banks—fell by $98 billion. This is largely due to the effect of higher interest rates on the home mortgage market.

The main components of the increase in spending from FY 2022 to FY 2023 included:

$244 billion from a 12 percent rise in the total cost of the three main entitlement programs—Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. This had two main contributing factors: continued high rates of retirement among the “baby boom” generation, and a continuing pandemic-related ban on states removing Medicaid recipients from the rolls—a prohibition that the Biden administration allowed to expire in May.

$146 billion from a 34 percent increase in interest payments on federal debt, largely due to the extremely rapid rise in interest rates. The CBO now estimates that the federal government will pay $10 trillion in interest over the next ten years, a staggering sum that will go largely to wealthy investors and big banks.

$100 billion or more in military spending. There is an increase of $67 billion for the regular Pentagon budget. A further sum, not yet estimated but perhaps as large, is due to increased military and financial aid to Ukraine and other fiscal consequences of the US-NATO proxy war against Russia.

$91 billion from a one-time increase in spending by the Department of Education. This is a budget anomaly, as the Biden administration chose to record the entire long-term cost of its reduction in student loan debt in the month of July. This sum amounts to just over 5 percent of the $1.7 trillion in total student loan debt.

The latest figures have fueled demands from the Republican Party and the corporate media—including publications closely aligned with the Democratic Party—for urgent action to slash the deficit through major cuts in domestic social spending, particularly in the entitlement programs that constitute the major social support for the elderly, disabled and sick.

There are few calls within the capitalist political establishment for cuts in military spending, and none at all for cuts in interest payments, although these constitute a form of tribute paid by the federal government to the billionaires. In effect, after repeatedly slashing taxes for the wealthy, most recently in the 2017 Trump tax cut, the federal government is now compelled to borrow from the super-rich to make up the lost revenue, and pay them billions in interest.

On August 31, the Biden administration threw its support behind an effort to pass a continuing resolution, after concluding that it would be impossible for both houses of Congress to approve 12 separate budget bills, one for each major department or group of departments, by September 30.

President Joe Biden and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy of California walk down the House steps Friday, March 17, 2023, on Capitol Hill in Washington. [AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib]

Budget Director Shalanda Young indicated that there had to be some spending increases within the framework of a continuing resolution to avoid the crippling of several key programs, including $1.4 billion for the Women, Infants and Children nutrition program, whose budget has been depleted by record high food prices. She warned that without new funding, WIC would have to cut benefits and implement waiting lists in October.

The House Freedom Caucus, the fascistic wing of the House Republicans, is spearheading the demands for massive spending cuts. The group recently demanded that the discretionary spending level set last May in the debt ceiling deal between President Biden and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy be lowered from $1.59 trillion to $1.47 trillion, a cut of $120 billion, or about 8 percent.

Members of the caucus declared that they would vote against any budget or continuing resolution unless it included a series of ultra-right proposals, including billions in funding to resume building Trump’s wall on the US-Mexico border, the restoration of Trump’s “remain in Mexico” policy toward asylum seekers, and a measure to address “the unprecedented weaponization of the Justice Department and FBI”—effectively a demand for the dropping of federal charges against ex-president Trump.

Last week, fascist Georgia Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene added a new demand: “I’ve already decided I will not vote to fund the government unless we have passed an impeachment inquiry on Joe Biden.”

Such demands might appear delusional for a group that controls fewer than 10 percent of the seats in one house of Congress, but in capitalist politics, it is the fascist tail that wags the legislative dog. Any member of the Freedom Caucus can force a new election for House speaker, under the procedure that McCarthy was compelled to accept in January as a condition for a handful of ultra-right members dropping their blockade of his election.

McCarthy is now faced with the threat that unless he embraces the Freedom Caucus demands, he could lose his post. He has already voiced support for the spending cuts called for by the Freedom Caucus, claiming that the debt ceiling deal only set a ceiling on spending, not a floor. “We can always go lower,” he said.

Meanwhile, senators in both parties are seeking to add several special appropriations to any continuing resolution or budget bill, including $24 billion more for the war in Ukraine, and $16 billion for states like Hawaii and Florida that have been devastated by fires, heat waves, hurricanes or floods. McCarthy suggested he would back the disaster aid, but not the additional money for Ukraine, which led to a public rebuke by Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, an all-out supporter of the war with Russia.

In the increasingly likely event of a deadlock on the budget, the federal government would begin a partial shutdown on October 1. Many federal workers would be furloughed or instructed to come to work without paychecks if they are deemed “essential.” There would be no immediate effect on the military or paramilitary police forces like the Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, but most civilian Pentagon workers would be sent home.

Biden Gets Confused for 13 Seconds, Takes Question After Saying It’s Bedtime – Then Is Shut Down Mid-Sentence by Press Sec.

CRAIG BANNISTER | SEPTEMBER 11, 2023
DONATE
Text Audio
00:0000:00
Font Size

After fumbling for 13 seconds to collect his thoughts, and struggling desperately to finish answering a reporter’s question, Pres. Joe Biden declared it was time for him to go to bed – but, stayed to take another question, prompting Press Sec. Karine Jean-Pierre to cut him off in mid-sentence after he confuses two parts of the world.

Speaking in Hanoi on Sunday, Pres. Biden had just finished smearing people who refute his climate-doom ideology as “lying, dog-faced pony soldiers,” when he became confused for 13 seconds as he tried to figure out what his next “orders” were. Finally, his staff told him what to do next:

Pres. Biden: “Well, there’s a lot of lying, dog-faced pony soldiers out there about — about global warming, but not anymore. All of a sudden, they’re all realizing it’s a problem. And there’s nothing like seeing the light.

“For — and let’s see…I’m just following my orders here.

“Uh…

“Staff, is there anybody I haven’t spoken to?

(Cross-talk.)

“No, I ain’t calling on you. I’m calling on — I said there were five questions.

Karine Jean-Pierre: “Anita — Anita from VOA.”

Pres. Biden: “Anita from VOA.”

Biden then appeared to become exhausted and gasped to get words out as he fought to finish a sentence about U.S.-China relations, after which he told his audience that he needed to go to bed:

“I just think that there are other things on leaders’ minds, and they respond to what’s needed at the time.

“And look, nobody…likes….having…celebrated…international meetings if you don’t know what you want…at the meeting, if you don’t have a gameplan. He may have a gameplan; he just hasn’t shared it with me.

“But I tell you what: I don’t know about you, but I’m going to go to bed.”

But, Biden didn’t go to bed. Instead, he stayed and began to answer another question.

After the president confused the “Third World” with the “Southern Hemisphere,” his press secretary cut him off and called an end to the event as exit-music swelled:

Pres. Biden: “We talked about what we talked about at the conference overall. We talked about stability. We talked about making sure that the Third World — the — excuse me — ‘Third World’ — the — the — the Southern Hemisphere had access to change, it had access —

“We — it wasn’t confrontational at all. He came up to me. He said (cut off)

Jean-Pierre: “Thank — thank you, everybody. This ends the press conference. Thank you.”

Ironically, while Biden’s talk began at 9 p.m. Indonesia Time (ICT), he was actually speaking before noon U.S. Eastern Time.