Friday, July 13, 2018

BILL DONOHUE - AMERICANS DO NOT SUPPORT PLANNED PARENTHOOD'S BABY BUTCHERIES FOR CASH

ABORTION KILLS…. the innocent!

PLANNED PARENTHOOD:
America’s baby murdering factories…. Your tax dollars at work

“I Cut the Vocal Cord So The Baby Can't Scream.”

Dr. Leah Torres, an OB/GYN in Salt Lake City, Utah, said that when she performs certain abortions she cuts the vocal cord of the baby so "there's really no opportunity" for the child to scream. She also described herself as a "uterus ripper outer" because she performs hysterectomies.

CALIFORNIA HANDS BILLIONS IN WELFARE TO INVADE AND BREED ANCHOR BABIES… LA RAZA WILL DOUBLE U.S. POPULATION…. and yet…..

Planned Parenthood executives and supporters were on Capitol Hill this week lobbying lawmakers to protect the millions of dollars the nation’s largest abortion provider gets from taxpayers every year and to announce nationwide “speak-outs” during the upcoming congressional recesses.

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/04/rep-barbara-lee-la-raza-dem-ca-says.html

Americans Don’t Support Roe v. Wade

“I Cut the Vocal Cord So The Baby Can't Scream.”


Bill Donohue
 By Bill Donohue | July 13, 2018 | 4:12 PM EDT


(Screenshots)
As a social scientist who has analyzed and written about polling data for many years, I am always taken aback when I encounter dishonest surveys. The latest example of this is a survey done by Gallup on the subject of abortion; it follows a pattern established by the Pew Research Center on this subject.
The survey results on abortion taken by these two polling institutions, both of which enjoy a good reputation, were recently cited by those worried that Roe v. Wade may be overturned.
In a New York Times op-ed article published on July 12, Nation magazine writer Katha Pollitt—she is known for saying abortion is a “positive social good”—cited a 2017 Pew survey showing that a large majority of Americans support Roe v. Wade's legalization of abortion.
Also on July 12, the Hill ran a headline, “Poll Finds Strong Support for Roe v. Wade,” citing the results of a Gallup poll that was just released; similar headlines appeared in other media outlets on this survey.
Pew and Gallup dropped their standards in issuing these surveys. How?  By taking a simple-minded approach to a complex issue.
Any poll that offers only two choices on an issue that most Americans have very mixed feelings about is dishonest. The researchers at Pew and Gallup know this to be true—they have even done surveys in the past that accurately tap how conflicted the public is on abortion—yet they undertook a poll that made it impossible to reveal the nuances.
The Gallup poll that was released July 12 asked respondents, “Would you like to see the Supreme Court overturn its 1973 Roe v. Wade decision concerning abortion, or not?” It found that 64 percent believe the ruling should stand and 28 percent want it overturned. In January 2017, Pew released its findings showing that the figures were 69 percent and 28 percent, respectively.
Last month, I wrote a news release titled, “Majority Oppose Roe v. Wade.” According to the two polls I just cited, I must be wrong. But I am not. They are. To top things off, my proof comes by way of a Gallup poll released on June 11.
That poll found that 53 percent of Americans said abortion should be legal in only a few circumstances (35%) or in no circumstances (18%). This means that a majority of Americans reject abortion-on-demand, which is what Roe v. Waderendered! Moreover, 48 percent said abortion is “morally wrong”; 43 percent disagreed.
My point is that by collapsing the survey responses to a "yes" or "no" on Roe does not get at the more nuanced responses that most Americans have about this issue. Most Americans do not think that abortion should be legal for any reason whatsoever, or for any time during pregnancy. Yet that is what Roe allows.
Just as misleading, the Pew survey mentioned by Pollitt shows that most Catholics think Roe should stand. But a more sophisticated survey shows the opposite.
In 2015, I commissioned a scientific survey of 1,000 Catholics; it was conducted by The Polling Company. I had a hand in crafting the questions (my doctorate is in sociology), all of which were designed to get at issues that the big survey houses refuse to query.
The survey found that 50 percent of Catholics identify as pro-life, and 38 percent as pro-choice. That was just the beginning. When the data were disaggregated, more revealing results were found.
For example, 17 percent of all Catholics said abortion should be prohibited in all circumstances; 17 percent said it should be legal only to save the life of the mother; and 27 percent said abortion should be legal only in cases of rape, incest or to save the life of the mother. That's 61 percent who are mostly pro-life.
Among those who are pro-choice, only 5 percent said that abortion should be allowed for any reason and at any time. Another 4 percent said any reason was okay, but there should be none after the first six months of pregnancy. And 17 percent said abortion should be legal for any reason, but not after the first three months of pregnancy. That's 26 percent who are mostly pro-choice.
Another way of looking at it is to consider how Catholics feel about the current law. Under Roe, abortion is effectively allowed for any reason and at any time. This makes us unique: No nation in the world has more liberalized abortion laws than the United States, including the Scandinavian countries. Now think about it: If only 5 percent agree with the current law, that means 95 percent of Catholics reject what Roe permits.
Pew and Gallup could also probe respondents more deeply on this issue—asking a series of related questions—so when they do not, they are dropping their standards, eliciting findings that distort the truth.
This is too serious an issue for polling houses not to dig deep, uncovering the qualified responses that most Americans have regarding abortion.
Bill Donohue is President and CEO of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, the nation's largest Catholic civil rights organization. He was awarded his Ph.D. in sociology from New York University and is the author of seven books and many articles.



Cuomo Threatens to Sue If Supreme Court Overturns Roe V. Wade


“I Cut the Vocal Cord So The Baby Can't Scream.”


On July 11, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo threatened to “sue” if the Supreme Court overturned the 1973 abortion rights case Roe v. Wade. The governor fears the precedent set by the case would be in jeopardy if Brett Kavanaugh, nominated to fill the seat formerly held by the retired Justice Anthony Kennedy, were to be confirmed.
Speaking to a group of supporters in Poughkeepsie, New York, he made the comment in the context of calling on conservatives in the New York state Senate to pass a law that would enact the position on abortion taken in Roe v. Wade.
“I want to get it done before the Supreme Court does that because I don’t want any gap in a woman’s right to protection, and we have a better legal case when the Supreme Court acts because I will sue when the Supreme Court acts, and I want the New York law in place,” he said.
Cuomo, a lawyer and former state attorney general, did not elaborate on who or what he proposed to sue, and a message to his press office seeking clarity on his comment was not returned. Given the immunity courts and judges have from civil prosecution, the threat seemed like more of a battle cry than an actionable promise, said New York University law professor Oscar Chase.
“It’s a very bizarre idea,” he said. “It sounds like something off the top of his head, that he wants to protect women’s rights.”
Laura Little, a professor of law and government at Temple University, said: “I’m confused by the idea of him suing. … It’s not clear what kind of lawsuit that he would bring. States don’t generally sue the federal government and there’s significant immunity principles that prevent those [cases] from going forward.”
Jonah Goldberg, a senior editor at the National Review, told Fox News: “It’s like he’s a taste tester for a lead paint factory. It’s a sure sign of the desperation of a lot of the liberal activist groups.”
Kavanaugh’s appointment is significant given that the nine-justice court has a five-to-four conservative majority. Kennedy, while conservative, was often a swing vote and helped write the opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which affirmed the right to an abortion found in Roe v. Wade.
If the Senate, which has a 51–49 Republican majority, confirms Kavanaugh, the court would likely become more conservative.
Responding to questions about abortion on the campaign trail, President Donald Trump had said it should be left to the states to decide. More recently, he told Fox’s Maria Bartiromo on July 1, that he would not ask his nominees their stance on the controversial issue, but that he would pick a “conservative.”
“Maybe someday it will be [left] to the states, you never know how that’s going to turn out. That’s a very complex question,” Trump said.
Also on July 11, Cuomo signed an executive order that would ensure women can get contraceptive services, through their health insurers, including Medicaid, without having to pay for them.
 “I Cut the Vocal Cord So The Baby Can't Scream.”

REP. BUDDY CARTER (R-GA) TO INTRODUCE BILL THAT WOULD PREVENT ILLEGALS FROM STEALING SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS TO STEAL JOBS.... PELOSI, SCHUMER, KAMALA HARRIS and MEXICO ENRAGED!

Exclusive—Buddy Carter Introduces Bill to Prevent Illegals from Stealing Americans’ Social Security Numbers



Screenshot
Screenshot
604








Rep. Buddy Carter (R-GA) told Breitbart News in an exclusive interview on Thursday about his new legislation that would prevent illegal immigrants from using Americans’ Social Security numbers, protect citizens’ privacy, and deter illegal immigration.

On Wednesday, Rep. Carter introduced H.R. 6333, Tax Identity Protection Act, which would direct the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to help protect Americans from illegal immigrants from fraudulently using their Social Security numbers.
In his press release this week, the Georgia Republican said that he contacted the IRS and the agency told him that they were not “in the position to notify victims” that their Social Security numbers were used fraudulently. The IRS “blamed it on a computer system.”
Rep. Carter Breitbart News why he decided to sponsor this legislation, saying, “After we found out that last June of 2017 that the Inspector General in the Treasury Department had noted that there was like 1.4 million illegal immigrants that were fraudulently using Social Security numbers of American citizens, we knew wanted to do something about that.”
The Georgia Republican slammed the IRS for doing nothing to prevent illegal immigrants from stealing Americans’ Social Security numbers, or, at least notify American citizens about the fraud.
“That was probably the most egregious part of it. It was not only that the IRS was not notifying citizens that their Social Security number had been compromised and used by illegal immigrants, it was also the attitude, to be quite honest with you,” Congressman Carter said. “They were nonchalant, they said they couldn’t do anything about it, that’s how the computer system works.”
“It’s just a catastrophe in the making, and we found appalling that the IRS was taking a lackadaisical view toward to it,” Carter added.
Congressman Carter then suggested that most illegal immigrants try to obtain Americans’ Social Security numbers “to gain longer access” to America. The Georgia Republican said that his legislation “would deter people who are doing this, using these Social Security numbers fraudulently and it would be easier to identify them because I’m sure right now they can stay longer to slip under the radar.”
Carter’s legislation has several cosponsors from across the Republican spectrum. Freedom Caucus members such as Reps. Joe Barton (R-TX), Scott Perry (R-PA) and other Republicans such as Reps. Joe Wilson (R-SC) and Doug LaMalfa (R-CA) have sponsored the bill.
Carter said that many of his colleagues “were very concerned about it, they were outraged by it,” when he heard about illegal immigrants stealing Americans’ Social Security numbers and IRS doing nothing about it.
The Georgia Republican added, “There should be bipartisan support.”
Carter told Breitbart News that his legislation reinforces the need for a wall on America’s southern border and stronger border and immigration enforcement.
The Georgia Republican said, “It proves the point there are bad actors out there, who are coming in and this would be another example where we need to secure our borders and make certain that those who are bad actors can be taken out of the country.”



CT Sen. Chris Murphy Gets ‘Earful’ on Illegal Immigration Stance



Chris Murphy, Richard Blumenthal
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite
795

Sen. Chris Murphy from Connecticut heard angry comments from some of his state’s citizens about his and his Democratic Party’s positions on open borders and amnesty for illegal immigrants.

Murphy, a Democrat seeking re-election to a second term in the U.S. Senate this year, is a progressive who wore a green “Defender of the Universe” T-shirt while conducting his third annual walk across the state.
According to a report in the Telegraph, Murphy received an “earful” from Connecticut citizens about the Democrats’ stance on open borders for illegal immigrants and the recent call for the abolition of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) by some. Murphy said he does not support abolishing ICE.


Gary Pavano, an air-conditioner repairman, told Murphy he did not want his tax dollars supporting illegal immigrants in detention facilities.
“I email you!,” Pavano said. “Why didn’t you answer? I email you all the time. I get a boiler-plate answer!”
The news report continued:
“I can’t support you anymore,” said John O’Brien, an unaffiliated voter from Berlin with a Trump sticker on his car. O’Brien was a former union Democrat, he said, but abandoned the party because “I’m not getting Social Security increases because we are supporting people like them,” referring to undocumented immigrants.
Murphy reminding [sic] him that waves of immigrants throughout history — like O’Brien’s ancestors — sought to come to this country.
Similarly, Ann Reilly said Murphy’s walk across the state was a “show.”
Reilly confronted the senator about the effects of illegal immigration on the economy and asserted immigrants should remain in their countries while they apply for asylum in the U.S.
“There a [sic] lots of people who legitimately come to the border because they fear for their life or their kids’ lives,” Murphy responded.
“You could say that, quite honestly, going into Hartford and New Britain, parts of the areas, right?” Reilly interrupted. “My husband and I, we’re starting to watch Fox News in the morning, and I’m like ‘Oh my God!’”
“Ecuador and Hartford, Connecticut are, respectfully, not the same.” Murphy countered, however.
As the Telegraph observes, Murphy received a very different response while walking in Hartford as most people complained of President Donald Trump’s crackdown on illegal immigration.
Murphy told them that for Democrats to gain control in November, they might focus on economic issues in the way Bernie Sanders did in 2016.
“Democrats often pay way too much attention to identity politics and cultural and social issues, at the expense of the kitchen table issues that I’m hearing about on this walk,” Murphy said.
Murphy is also a major proponent of gun control in the Senate. He recently referred to Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Trump’s nominee to the Supreme Court, as a “Second Amendment radical.”

AMERICAN POVERTY and the LA RAZA 

MEXICAN WELFARE STATE on AMERICA’S 

BACKS.



"Congress must prioritize four repairs for the immigration system before contemplating any DACA-style amnesty negotiation, said Brat:

1. Ending chain migration and the visa lottery;

2. Mandating employer use of E-Verify;

3. Construction of a southern border wall; and

4. Interior enforcement of immigration law." REP. DAVE BRAT


AMERICA vs MEXICO: CLASHING CULTURES



By Frosty Wooldridge



Illegals cheat, distribute drugs, lie, forge documents, steal and kill as if it’s a normal way of life. For them, it is. Mexico’s civilization stands diametrically opposed to America’s culture.



Mark Levin:

‘Unbridled Immigration, Legal and Illegal, Is Taking the Country Down’


This annual income for an impoverished American family is $10,000 less than the more than $34,500 in federal funds which are spent on each unaccompanied minor border crosser.

study by Tom Wong of the University of California at San Diego discovered that more than 25 percent of DACA-enrolled illegal aliens in the program have anchor babies. That totals about 200,000 anchor babies who are the children of DACA-enrolled illegal aliens. This does not include the anchor babies of DACA-qualified illegal aliens. 
JOHN BINDER


AMERICA: YOU’RE BETTER OFF BEING AN ILLEGAL!!!


“Open border advocates, such as Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg, claim illegal aliens are a net benefit to California with little evidence to support such an assertion. As the CIS has documented, the vast majority of illegals are poor, uneducated, and with few skills. How does accepting millions of illegal aliens and then granting them access to dozens of welfare programs benefit California’s economy? If illegals were contributing to the economy in any meaningful way, CA, with its 2.6 million illegals, would be booming.” STEVE BALDWIN – AMERICAN SPECTATOR




E-Verify Ignored in DACA Negotiations Because ‘Members of Congress Know It Will Work’



Members of Congress broadly oppose a legislative nationwide E-Verify mandate for employers because “they know it will work,” said NumbersUSA’s Rosemary Jenks, explaining why E-Verify is not being pushed in congressional negotiations for an amnesty deal for recipients of the Obama administration’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). Jenks further noted that both parties are beholden to special interests supportive of “mass migration.”

 DACA THIEVES: WAVING THEIR MEX FLAGS IN OUR FACES AND THEN CASHING THEIR WELFARE CHECKS


JOBLESS AMERICA: Push 2 for English and go to the end of the line of illegals!

95 MILLION AMERICANS (Legals) HAVE NO WORK AS THE BORDERS ARE FLOODED WITH FOREIGNERS SUCKING UP JOBS, WELFARE AND VOTING DEMOCRAT FOR MORE!


IMPORTING ILLITERACY

TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED WE NEED ENDLESS HORDES OF ILLITERATES JUMPING OUR BORDERS AND JOBS!

That really build a nation? Or just generate “cheap” labor for fast food operators?

 

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/11/daca-fails-loathing-of-literacy-and.html



I.R.S. ILLEGALS STOLEN 1.3 MILLION IDENTITIES!

THEY STEAL SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS TO STEAL JOBS, DRIVE ILLEGALLY, CONTRACT IN THE TRADES ILLEGALLY, AND VOTE FOR MORE ILLEGALLY and do it by invitation of the Democrat Party!

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/03/irs-documets-13-million-identity-thefts.html

 

Mexicans cheat, distribute drugs, lie, forge documents, STEAL and kill as if it’s a normal way of life. For them, it is. Mexico’s civilization stands diametrically opposed to America’s culture.  FROSTY WOOLDRIDGE

Rep. Black Introduces ‘Zero-Tolerance’ Bill for Illegal Immigration



By Gavi Greenspan | July 11, 2018 | 4:02 PM EDT


Rep. Dianne Black (Screen Capture)
(CNSNews.com) – On July 10, Rep. Diane Black (R-Tenn.) introduced the Zero Tolerance for Illegal Entry Act, which would make it a felony to cross the U.S border illegally and would mandate an E-Verify system for American employers to ensure that they are not hiring illegal immigrants.

The law would make illegally crossing the border for the first time a felony instead of a misdemeanor and would up the penalty from six months or less to a year and a day or more. (The full text of Section 275 as it currently stands can be found here.)
The proposed law would also mandate the E-Verify verification system for U.S. businesses to ensure that the people they hire are not illegal immigrants. The legislation says “all employers in the United States shall participate in E-Verify, with respect to all employees recruited, referred, or hired by such employer on or after the date that is 1 year after the date of the enactment of this subsection."

(Image: YouTube)
In a press release, Rep. Black said,  “The United States government should never prioritize illegal immigrants over American citizens. We must have a zero tolerance policy when it comes to illegal border crossings and sanctuary cities, and we must give ICE the resources they need to do their job as they protect our nation.”
“By no longer creating incentives to come to our country unlawfully, we also discourage families from sending their children on an often dangerous journey to reach our southern border,” states the release.
Black continued, “The Zero Tolerance for Illegal Entry Act works hand in hand with law enforcement to ensure that we are doing all we can to uphold the dignity of our border. President Trump has been clear about illegal immigration from day one, and we know that he is committed to protecting our nation for future generations. We must do all we can to deter the criminal abuse of our border – it has gone on for far too long.”
The anti-illegal immigration organization NumbersUSA also praised the legislation, stating it would protect American jobs, reduce illegal immigration, and hold sanctuary jurisdictions accountable for obstructing the enforcement of Federal immigration law.”