THE DOCTRINE OF THE N.A.F.T.A. GLOBALIST DEMOCRATS IS TO SERVE THE BILLIONAIRE CLASS WITH ENDLESS WAVES OF INVADING 'CHEAP' LABOR SUBSIDIZED WITH WELFARE FUNDED BY TAXES ON MIDDLE AMERICA.
In many speeches, Mayorkas says he is building a mass migration system to deliver workers to wealthy employers and investors and “equity” to poor foreigners. The nation’s border laws are subordinate to elites’ opinion about “the values of our country,” Mayorkas claims.
DEMS and their allies in Big Tech (THINK ZUCKERBERG WHO HAS SPENT $400M TO GET ILLEGALS VOTING) & media regularly work to subvert election integrity laws like requiring an ID, pushing for unregulated and unmonitored mail-in voting, providing support for one-sided ballot harvesting initiatives, repealing or fighting laws intended to allow states to revise voter rolls, and pouring enormous sums of money into Democrat districts to pay for election officials and ballot boxes. ROBERT LaBELLA
Biden Likely to Extend, Expand Amnesty for Half a Million Venezuelans
President Joe Biden’s deputies may soon declare a quasi-amnesty for the roughly 250,000 wage-cutting Venezualan economic migrants they have welcomed over the border since March 2021, according to a report in Politico.
The quasi-amnesty is called Temporary Protective Status (TPS). It now grants temporary residency and work permits — and even a backdoor route to citizenship. Roughly 700,000 migrants from favored countries — including about 300,000 Venezuelans who arrived before March 2021 — now have TPS status.
The expanded TPS giveaway is being considered for about 250,000 Venezuelan migrants who arrived after March 2021, even as millions of American men have been pushed out of the workforce since 2000.
The TPS giveaway is just one of many border gateways that Biden’s deputies have opened since January 2021 to at least 1.5 million migrants, including migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Afghanistan, Ukraine, South America, and Africa.
The TPS status is rarely canceled. Pro-migration judges blocked TPS cancellations ordered by President Donald Trump.
At issue is whether to extend Temporary Protected Status for Venezuelan immigrants already in the U.S. The administration has until Monday to make its decision. It also is considering whether to expand the protections to an estimated 250,000 Venezuelans who have arrived in the U.S. after TPS was granted last year in March and therefore not eligible for the temporary legal status.
Officials are wary of redesignating TPS to apply to more Venezuelans, according to people familiar with the internal deliberations. The concern inside the White House, the people said, is that doing so will incentivize more migration at a time the administration is struggling to manage the logistical challenges and optics of record numbers of migrants arriving at the border, especially ahead of the midterm elections.
“The administration must publish a Federal Register notice by Monday — 60 days before the current designation expires Sept. 9 — to indicate if it will extend TPS for current holders,” Politico added.
Presidents have much authority to award the TPS status to favored migrants whose home countries suffer from a disaster, such as war, flood, or famine.
But the Venezuelan case is complicated by the huge number of Venezuelans who can migrate to the U.S border. Moreover, life in Venezuala is bad but likely not a humanitarian disaster. In fact, Biden’s deputies are deporting some Venezuelans back to their home countries.
“The quarter-million Venezuelans who’ve come in the past ~16 months came because of Biden’s lax policies,” said a tweet from Mark Krikorian at the Center for Immigration Studies. He continued:
Like the Haitians [who were] settled in Chile & Brazil, the [TPS] Venezuelans were living in Colombia & elsewhere and took advantage of Biden’s “La Invitación” to trade up.
“TPS is only for instances where deportable aliens cannot safely be returned …. but we deport hundreds of people a year to Venezuela,” he said.
“If we keep TPS (we shouldn’t), then it should automatically end once we deport anyone to a covered country,” he added.
Many Venezuelan migrants walked and rode vehicles from Venezuela to the United States via Panama and Mexico.
Biden’s 2021 welcome at the border motivated many more to undertake the trek, which required them to hike across the dangerous Darien Gap, where many migrants are drowned or murdered by robbers.
Business-backed migration groups are calling for the expansion of TPS to more migrant Venezuelans who aid investors by serving as consumers, renters, and workers:
Democratic politicians also want to welcome the Venezuelans, partly in hopes of eventually converting them into Democratic voters:
Biden’s deputies are changing government rules to help TPS beneficiaries get green cards and citizenship.
Extraction Migration
Since at least 1990, the D.C. establishment has extracted tens of millions of migrants and visa workers from poor countries to serve as legal or illegal workers, temporary workers, consumers, and renters for various U.S. investors and CEOs.
This economic strategy of Extraction Migration has no stopping point. It is brutal to ordinary Americans because it cuts their career opportunities, shrinks their salaries and wages, raises their housing costs, and has shoved at least ten million American men out of the labor force.
Extraction migration also distorts the economy and curbs Americans’ productivity, partly because it allows employers to use stoop labor instead of machines. Migration also reduces voters’ political clout, undermines employees’ workplace rights, and widens the regional wealth gaps between the Democrats’ big coastal states and the Republicans’ heartland and southern states.
An economy built on extraction migration also alienates young people and radicalizes Americans’ democratic, equality-promoting civic culture because it allows wealthy elites to ignore despairing Americans at the bottom of society.
The extraction migration economic policy is hidden behind a wide variety of noble-sounding excuses and explanations. For example, progressives claim that the U.S. is a “Nation of Immigrants,” that Americans have a duty to accept foreign refugees, and that the state must renew itself by replacing populations.
But this colonialism-like economic strategy also kills many migrants, exploits poor people, and splits foreign families as it extracts human-resource wealth from its poor home countries. This migration policy also minimizes shareholder pressure on companies to build up complementary trade with poor countries.
President Joe Biden must stop releasing the thousands of convicted criminal migrants who are appealing their court-ordered deportations, says a federal court.
The three-judge panel of the Firth Circuit Court of Appeals wrote:
Federal immigration law provides that the Attorney General “shall take into custody,” “shall detain,” and “shall remove” aliens convicted of certain enumerated crimes and aliens who have become subject to final orders of removal.
Biden’s Department of Homeland Security “simply lacks the [legal] authority to make that [detention release] choice when the statutes plainly mandate such categorical [detention] treatment,” the judges said.
“Had the administration won … it would have gone on releasing [convicted] criminal aliens” from detention centers, said Dale L. Wilcox, executive director and general counsel of the Immigration Reform Law Institute. “We … applaud the Fifth Circuit for denying the administration the extra time it sought to violate the law and endanger Americans,” he added.
“It’s a pretty big victory,” said Andrew Arthur, a former immigration judge who now works with the Center for Immigration Studies. “It’s extremely well written, pretty straightforward, and it really does get into some of those [detention] issues that the Supreme Court passed on last week.”
The decision comes a week after the Supreme Court dodged the core issue of whether Biden’s government is violating Congress’s “shall detain” immigration law by refusing to detain newly arrived, non-criminal migrants, even when there is open space in detention centers.
The Appeals Court decision will likely be appealed by Biden’s staff. The appeal will push the Supreme Court to again consider if Biden’s pro-migration deputies are breaking multiple laws by not detaining newly arrived illegal migrants, said Arthur.
The Appeals Court’s decision includes a graphic showing the administration’s rapid reduction of the number of criminal migrants in detention while they appeal and re-appeal their deportation orders.
The Appeals Court noted that Biden’s release policies victimize many Americans:
In fact, in 2019, [the Department of Homeland Security] itself acknowledged that criminal aliens recidivate and abscond at higher rates:
“Of the 123,128 ERO administrative arrests in FY 2019 with criminal convictions or pending criminal charges, the criminal history for this group represented 489,063 total criminal convictions and pending charges as of the date of arrest, which equates to an average of four criminal arrests/convictions per alien, highlighting the recidivist nature of the aliens that ICE arrests.”
Jose Omar Bello Reyes, a 24-year-old illegal alien, is wanted by the Tulare County Sheriff’s Office in connection to the murder of a 58-year-old man whose body was recently found at an orchard. Two other suspects, 23-year-old Jesus Manjarrez and 38-year-old Dan Eli Perez, have been arrested in connection to the murder and are being held without bail.
Reyes has been living illegally in the U.S. since the year 2000. In May 2018, Reyes was arrested by ICE and given a Notice to Appear (NTA) before an immigration judge as he faced deportation. He was released from ICE custody on a $10,000 bail in August 2018.
That criminal damage to ordinary Americans is just one part of the vast damage caused by pro-migration advocates within the government, led by Biden’s pro-migration border chief, Alejandro Mayorkas.
Biden’s officials also ignore the vast economic and civic damage to the sending countries — and the even greater direct economic harm inflicted on 300 million Americans — caused by the government’s colonialism-like policy of extracting workers, consumers, and renters from poor countries.
The case is Texas v. United States, No. 22-40367 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Extraction Migration
Since at least 1990, the D.C. establishment has extracted tens of millions of migrants and visa workers from poor countries to serve as legal or illegal workers, temporary workers, consumers, and renters for various U.S. investors and CEOs.
This economic strategy of Extraction Migration has no stopping point. It is brutal to ordinary Americans because it cuts their career opportunities, shrinks their salaries and wages, raises their housing costs, and has shoved at least ten million American men out of the labor force.
Extraction migration also distorts the economy and curbs Americans’ productivity, partly because it allows employers to use stoop labor instead of machines. Migration also reduces voters’ political clout, undermines employees’ workplace rights, and widens the regional wealth gaps between the Democrats’ big coastal states and the Republicans’ heartland and southern states.
An economy built on extraction migration also alienates young people and radicalizes Americans’ democratic, equality-promoting civic culture because it allows wealthy elites to ignore despairing Americans at the bottom of society.
The extraction migration economic policy is hidden behind a wide variety of noble-sounding excuses and explanations. For example, progressives claim that the U.S. is a “Nation of Immigrants,” that Americans have a duty to accept foreign refugees, and that the state must renew itself by replacing populations.
But the colonialism-like economic strategy also kills many migrants, exploits poor people, and splits foreign families as it extracts human-resource wealth from the poor home countries. The migration policy also minimizes shareholder pressure on companies to build up complementary trade with poor countries.
A man leaves a polling station in Benson, Arizona, on November 3, 2020. (Photo by ARIANA DREHSLER/AFP via Getty Images)
(CNSNews.com) - The U.S. Justice Department announced this week that it is suing the State of Arizona over a recently enacted state law requiring residents who haven't already done so to show proof of citizenship before they can vote in a presidential election or before they can vote by mail in any federal election.
Right now, Arizonans who register to vote using state registration forms must prove citizenship to vote in any federal, state, or local election. But Arizonans who use federal registration forms do not have to prove citizenship, and if they don't, they are permitted to vote only in federal elections.
The new law, which takes effect in January 2023, requires election officials to verify the citizenship of the "federal-only" voters who have not previously provided proof of citizenship.
The Justice Department objects to Arizona's "onerous documentary proof of citizenship requirement for certain federal elections," saying it "constitutes a textbook violation of the National Voter Registration Act."
But Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich called the lawsuit "the height of hypocrisy (and) absurdity."
"It's curious that Arizona passes a law that says you have to prove you are a citizen to vote in a presidential election or vote by mail, and at the same time, the Biden administration is going to sue us while they're allowing millions of people to illegally enter the country," Brnovich told Fox News Wednesday night.
"So I guess in addition to giving people flights and hotel rooms they now want to give them the right to vote even though they're not citizens."
Brnovich said "people can draw their own conclusions" about why the Biden Justice Department objects to proof-of-citizenship requirements. "But we know that the hard left, the neo-Marxist vision is to have no borders, and you know, they want this socialist utopia and that is why they are trying to nationalize our elections, socialize our economy.
“But I think the reality is -- I am a first-generation American -- and most people fleeing the socialist countries know they're economic basket cases, so why in the hell would they vote for Democrats when they are promising more socialism in this country?"
"In Joe Biden's twisted version of America, anyone can apparently enter the country, enter a voting booth and even a women's restroom without any consequences."
Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division said the Arizona law "turns the clock back on progress by imposing unlawful and unnecessary requirements that would block eligible voters from the registration rolls for certain federal elections."
According to the Arizona Secretary of State's Office, acceptable proofs of citizenship include:
--Arizona driver's license or ID card issued after October 1, 1966;
-- U.S. Passport, or U.S. naturalization documents;
-- Indian Census number, Bureau of Indian Affairs Card Number, Tribal Treaty Card Number, or Tribal Enrollment Number;
-- Tribal Certificate of Indian Blood or Tribal or Bureau of Indian Affairs Affidavit of Birth
Republican Gov. Doug Ducey signed the bill on March 30, writing at the time:
“Arizona has a proud history of making voting accessible. The state is a leader in secure mail-in voting, on-site early voting, and allowing counties to establish voting day polling locations that best serve their communities. Arizonans also value election integrity, which can and should exist in tandem to, not in conflict with, access to the ballot.
“In 2004, Arizona voters displayed their desire to have secure elections with the passage of Proposition 200, which required evidence of citizenship in order to register to vote. Importantly, anyone who was registered to vote in Arizona prior to Prop 200’s passage was deemed to have provided satisfactory evidence of citizenship and not required to resubmit evidence of citizenship.
“H.B. 2492 does not disturb the safe harbor granted to Arizona voters who registered to vote prior to Prop 200’s passage. What H.B. 2492 does address is a growing number of new registrants participating in elections who have not provided evidence of citizenship.”
Ducey noted that the number of "federal only" voters has risen substantially, from 21 voters statewide in 2014, when the federal form was first used to register Arizona voters who failed to provide evidence of citizenship; to 11,600 in the 2020 general election.
"In just Maricopa County alone, there are currently 13,042 active registered voters who have not provided evidence of citizenship to vote through use of the federal form," the governor wrote.
GAMER PIG PARASITE LAWYER JOE BIDEN. HE KNOW THAT NO LEGAL WILL VOTE FOR THIS POS POL!
NAFTA JOE BIDEN PLEADS WITH MEXICO AND LA RAZA TO VOTE DEMOCRAT FOR MORE. AND VOTE OFTEN!!!
"This is country belongs to Mexico" is said by the Mexican Militant. This is a common teaching that the U.S. is really AZTLAN, belonging to Mexicans, which is taught to Mexican kids in Arizona and California through a LA Raza educational program funded by American Tax Payers via President Obama, when he gave LA RAZA $800,000.00 in March of 2009!
"This is country belongs to Mexico" is said by the Mexican Militant. This is a common teaching that the U.S. is really AZTLAN, belonging to Mexicans, which is taught to Mexican kids in Arizona and California through a LA Raza educational program funded by American Tax Payers via President Obama, when he gave LA RAZA $800,000.00 in March of 2009!
Democrats Vow ‘Transformative’ Plan to Add 1M Foreign-Born Residents to U.S. Voter Rolls in 4 Years
It is the single most dangerous piece of legislation before Congress. What I call H.R.1 is the ‘Corrupt Politicians Act.’ […] It’s the number one bill. It’s not about COVID; it’s not about vaccinations; it’s not about getting people back to work; it’s not about getting kids back to school. It is about ensuring that Democrats remain in power and control for the next 100 years. It is a radical bill. What does it do? It federalizes all elections. It strikes down every election reform protection at the state level. So photo ID laws — right now in a lot of states you’ve got to use photo ID to vote — ‘The Corrupt Politician Act’ strikes that down. It sets up automatic voter registration, which would result in millions of illegal immigrants, and criminals, and felons being able to vote. The Democrats believe if illegal immigrants and felons are voting, that benefits the Democrats and keeps them in power. Not only that, it mandates universal mail-in balloting, it mandates ballot harvesting. This is all designed to facilitate fraud. SEAN MORAN
Biden’s DOJ Sues Arizona for Requiring Proof of American Citizenship to Vote
President Joe Biden’s Department of Justice (DOJ) is suing the state of Arizona for its law requiring residents to prove their United States citizenship in order to vote in presidential elections.
In March, Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey (R) signed a bill into law that requires residents to prove that they are American citizens to vote in presidential elections. The law also requires new voters to provide proof of their address.
On Tuesday, Biden’s DOJ announced its lawsuit against Arizona, claiming that the law violates the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA):
In this action, the United States challenges certain provisions of HB 2492 on the basis that they violate Section 6 of the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 and Section 101 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [Emphasis added]
One of HB 2492’s provisions violates the NVRA as interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court in Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. In that case, the Court rejected an earlier attempt by Arizona to impose a documentary proof of citizenship requirement on applicants who register to vote using the mail voter registration form prescribed by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. [Emphasis added]
HB 2492 contravenes settled law insofar as it requires Arizona registrants using the Federal Form to also submit burdensome documentary proof of U.S. citizenship to local election officials if those officials cannot otherwise confirm the applicant’s citizenship status. [Emphasis added]
The Biden administration is asking the district court to prevent Arizona’s election officials from implementing the proof of citizenship law.
The case is United States v. Arizona, No. 2:22-cv-01124-SRB in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Email him at jbinder@breitbart.com. Follow him on Twitter here.
