Wednesday, February 29, 2012

Bernanke warns lawmakers nation headed for 'massive fiscal cliff" - The Hill's On The Money - SHOULD WE CALL IT OBAMAnomics?

Bernanke warns lawmakers nation headed for 'massive fiscal cliff" - The Hill's On The Money


HERE'S WHAT OBAMAnomics HAS DONE TO THIS NATION: UNLEASHED BANKSTER LOOTERS, AND HORDES OF ILLEGAL CLIMBING OUR BORDERS AND JOBS BY INVITATION OF OBAMA'S LA RAZA INFESTED ADMINISTRATION!




"There is a populist and conservative revolt against Wall Street and financial elites, Congress and government," Democratic pollster Stanley Greenberg warned in an analysis this week. "Democrats and President Obama are seen as more interested in bailing out Wall Street than helping Main Street."

*

OBAMA’S CON JOB ON REGULATION WILL NOT IMPACT HIS LARGEST BANKSTER DONORS! WHO’D OF THOUGHT???



“Obama's rhetoric covered the whole financial industry, but the key changes will affect only a few high-profile players, including JPMorgan Chase & Co., while sparing investment banks like Goldman Sachs Group Inc.”

*

WHAT DID THE BANKSTERS KNOW ABOUT OUR ACTOR OBAMA THAT WE DIDN’T KNOW?

Records show that four out of Obama's top five contributors are employees of financial industry giants - Goldman Sachs ($571,330), UBS AG ($364,806), JPMorgan Chase ($362,207) and Citigroup ($358,054).



The president's actions and tactics haven't matched his lofty language, breeding a cynicism that has doomed his cause.

Jonah Goldberg

December 22, 2009

On his own terms, President Obama is a failure.

During the presidential campaign, he fought hammer and tongs with Hillary Rodham Clinton on the best way to govern. Clinton, casting herself as a battle-scarred political veteran, argued that diligence, dedicated detail work and working the system were essential for success.


ALIPAC fights LA RAZA SUPREMACY in INDIANA - CALL TO ARMS to end the Mexican Welfare State In Our Borders

RED ALERT! We only have a few hours to CALL CALL CALL. Unfortunately this bill has already passed 2nd reading and is likely to pass if ALIPAC's national network does not jump up and stop it with a flood of calls. When you call the main switchboard numbers, insist on speaking with the actual lawmaker's office.

Deliver the following message fast "I'm calling/writing to ask you to oppose House Bill 1326 in the Indiana Senate today! This bill provides In-State tuition for illegal aliens which scientific polling indicates is opposed by 81% of Americans. HB 1326 would replace innocent American students in the limited seats in our colleges with illegal immigrants at taxpayer expense! Please vote today with the 4/5 of your constituents that oppose instate tuition for illegals found in HB 1326 before the Indiana Senate today!"

Here is the contact info you need...
Indiana State Senate:
Indiana General Assembly: FAQs

SPECIAL NOTE: Spring on this fast. Im on the phones calling with you now. We just found out about this and we only have a few short hours to turn this around. The illegals are about to win a major battle sneaking this in in Indiana if we don't move fast and in large numbers.

More details below


URGENT! Hoosiers Say No to Instate Tuition Rates for Indiana ILLEGALS
House Bill 1326 will give in-state tuition rates to illegal aliens in Indiana! This bill has already passed the House. The Indiana State Senate will vote on it THIS morning!


OneOldVet.com

We need your immediate action to stop this!

1. Please send a short email to your State Senator demanding a NO vote on HB 1326. You may find your Senator’s contact information by clicking the Democrat or Republican buttons on the photo of the Senate Chamber found here.

Indiana General Assembly: Home

2. Please call your State Senator in the morning on Wednesday, February 29, 2012 to urge a NO vote. Toll free number: 1-800-382-9467.

You may read the bill by clicking here.

Indiana General Assembly

Here is the pertinent line from the bill:

“Provides that an individual who was enrolled in a state educational institution on or before July 1, 2011, is not lawfully present in the United States, and is a resident of Indiana may pay resident tuition at a state educational institution.”

3. Please spread the word to your like-minded friends, family members and organizations.
Thank you!!!


POST COMMENTS, QUESTIONS, FEEDBACK, or INTEL at this tracking link....

EMERGENCY! Indiana to pass in state tuition TODAY (only a few hours to move!)


THE ALIPAC TEAM
www.ALIPAC.us














CHANGE? DID YOU SEE IT? OR WAS IT ALL ONE OF OBAMA'S ENDLESS CON JOBS?


YOU HAVE TO ADMIT, OBAMA, THE RED CARPET ADDICTED PERFORMER IS A GREAT ACTOR!



Obama failed his words….BUT SURE DIDN’T FAIL HIS BANKSTER CONTRIBUTORS! THEY DONE GOOD BY THEIR BOY!



*

"There is a populist and conservative revolt against Wall Street and financial elites, Congress and government," Democratic pollster Stanley Greenberg warned in an analysis this week. "Democrats and President Obama are seen as more interested in bailing out Wall Street than helping Main Street."

*

OBAMA’S CON JOB ON REGULATION WILL NOT IMPACT HIS LARGEST BANKSTER DONORS! WHO’D OF THOUGHT???



“Obama's rhetoric covered the whole financial industry, but the key changes will affect only a few high-profile players, including JPMorgan Chase & Co., while sparing investment banks like Goldman Sachs Group Inc.”

*

WHAT DID THE BANKSTERS KNOW ABOUT OUR ACTOR OBAMA THAT WE DIDN’T KNOW?

Records show that four out of Obama's top five contributors are employees of financial industry giants - Goldman Sachs ($571,330), UBS AG ($364,806), JPMorgan Chase ($362,207) and Citigroup ($358,054).



The president's actions and tactics haven't matched his lofty language, breeding a cynicism that has doomed his cause.

Jonah Goldberg

December 22, 2009

On his own terms, President Obama is a failure.

During the presidential campaign, he fought hammer and tongs with Hillary Rodham Clinton on the best way to govern. Clinton, casting herself as a battle-scarred political veteran, argued that diligence, dedicated detail work and working the system were essential for success.

Obama, donning the mantle of a redeemer descending from divine heights, argued that his soaring rhetoric was more than "just words" but a way out of the poisonous, partisan gridlock of yesteryear. Early on in New Hampshire, he proclaimed that his "rival in this race is not other candidates. It's cynicism."

Occasionally the Obama-Clinton argument was explicit -- such as when they sparred over who was more important to the Civil Rights Act, Martin Luther King Jr. or Lyndon Johnson -- but it was always there, implicit in everything from their body language and stagecraft to position papers and platforms.

The great irony of it all is that it seems they were both wrong.

Obama's rhetoric in fact looks to be the best way to achieve a Clintonian agenda. But a Clintonian agenda is the worst possible way to live up to Obama's rhetoric.

From his 2004 keynote speech onward, Obama rejected the partisan divide. He earned points by insisting that invidious descriptions of political opponents were deleterious to civic health and distracted us from the fact that "we are one people, all of us pledging allegiance to the stars and stripes, all of us defending the United States of America."

In a June primary victory speech, Obama said he was "absolutely certain that generations from now, we will be able to look back and tell our children . . . this was the moment -- this was the time -- when we came together to remake this great nation."

So, does anyone feel like Americans are coming together?

Obama the outsider hasn't changed the way Washington works; he's worked Washington in a way that only an outsider with no respect for the place would dare.

Consider his signature domestic priority: healthcare reform. After a year of working on it, his progressive base is either profoundly disappointed with him or seethingly angry. His Republican and conservative opponents are not only furious, they are emboldened. And independents -- who've been deserting the Democrats in polls and off-year elections -- are simply disgusted with the whole spectacle. Most important, an administration that once preened over its people-power roots, can't even claim that Americans like what he's doing.

The bill does have its supporters: inside-the-Beltway pundits and Capitol Hill deal-makers, the pharmaceutical industry and the supposedly rapacious insurance companies (don't take my word for it, just ask Howard Dean -- or your stockbroker).

Under the Clintonian paradigm of governance, Nebraska Democrat Ben Nelson's parlaying of his pro-life objections to the Senate bill into a windfall for his state and Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders' leveraging of his socialist principles for billions in special deals would be dramatic twists in a conventional story of LBJ-style arm-twisting.

But Clintonian means cannot further Obamaian ends. For the last year Obama's party has made a mockery of everything Obama was supposed to represent. The tone has gotten worse as his communications staff spent the year demonizing Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and Fox News. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer called opponents of their health proposals "un-American." Just over the weekend, Rhode Island's Sheldon Whitehouse insisted that Senate opposition is being driven, in part, by "Aryan support groups."

Everywhere you look, the sizzle doesn't match the steak. He won the Nobel Peace Prize as he (rightly) sent even more men off to war. He promised the oceans would stop rising but delivered a nonbinding something-or-other in Copenhagen.

In his special healthcare address to Congress in September, he said, "I am not the first president to take up [the cause of healthcare reform], but I am determined to be the last." Those were just words, and everyone, including Obama, knew it. Indeed, the only grounds for supporting the bill, according to progressives, is that it is a "first step" or a "starter house" that they'll build on for years, even generations, to come. In other words, the healthcare debate is not only not going to end, it's going to get uglier for as far as the eye can see.

But here's the point: Obama's rhetorical audacity breeds cynicism, because utopianism always comes up short. Obama has many victories ahead of him, but his cause is already lost.

*

August 9, 2009

Op-Ed Columnist

Is Obama Punking Us?



“AUGUST is a challenging time to be president,” said Andrew Card, the former Bush White House chief of staff, as he offered unsolicited advice to his successors in a television interview last week. “I think you have to expect the unexpected.”

He should know. Thursday was the eighth anniversary of “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.,” the President’s Daily Brief that his boss ignored while on vacation in Crawford. Aug. 29 marks the fourth anniversary of Hurricane Katrina’s strike on the Louisiana coast, which his boss also ignored while on vacation in Crawford.

So do have a blast in Martha’s Vineyard, President Obama.

Even as we wait for some unexpected disaster to strike, Beltway omens for the current White House are grim. Obama’s poll numbers are approaching free fall, we are told. If he fails on health care, he’s toast. Indeed, many of the bloviators who spot a fatal swoon in the Obama presidency are the same doomsayers who in August 2008 were predicting his Election Day defeat because he couldn’t “close the deal” and clear the 50 percent mark in matchups with John McCain.

Here are two not very daring predictions: Obama will get some kind of health care reform done come fall. His poll numbers will not crater any time soon.

Yet there is real reason for longer-term worry in the form of a persistent, anecdotal drift toward disillusionment among some of the president’s supporters. And not merely those on the left. This concern was perhaps best articulated by an Obama voter, a real estate agent in Virginia, featured on the front page of The Washington Post last week. “Nothing’s changed for the common guy,” she said. “I feel like I’ve been punked.” She cited in particular the billions of dollars in bailouts given to banks that still “act like they’re broke.”

But this mood isn’t just about the banks, Public Enemy No. 1. What the Great Recession has crystallized is a larger syndrome that Obama tapped into during the campaign. It’s the sinking sensation that the American game is rigged — that, as the president typically put it a month after his inauguration, the system is in hock to “the interests of powerful lobbyists or the wealthiest few” who have “run Washington far too long.” He promised to smite them.

No president can do that alone, let alone in six months. To make Obama’s goal more quixotic, the ailment that he diagnosed is far bigger than Washington and often beyond politics’ domain. What disturbs Americans of all ideological persuasions is the fear that almost everything, not just government, is fixed or manipulated by some powerful hidden hand, from commercial transactions as trivial as the sales of prime concert tickets to cultural forces as pervasive as the news media.

As Democrats have pointed out, the angry hecklers disrupting town-hall meetings convened by members of Congress are not always ordinary citizens engaging in spontaneous grass-roots protests or even G.O.P. operatives, but proxies for corporate lobbyists. One group facilitating the screamers is FreedomWorks, which is run by the former Congressman Dick Armey, now a lobbyist at the DLA Piper law firm. Medicines Company, a global pharmaceutical business, has paid DLA Piper more than $6 million in lobbying fees in the five years Armey has worked there.

But the Democratic members of Congress those hecklers assailed can hardly claim the moral high ground. Their ties to health care interests are merely more discreet and insidious. As Congressional Quarterly reported last week, industry groups contributed almost $1.8 million in the first six months of 2009 alone to the 18 House members of both parties supervising health care reform, Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer among them.

Then there are the 52 conservative Blue Dog Democrats, who have balked at the public option for health insurance. Their cash intake from insurers and drug companies outpaces their Democratic peers by an average of 25 percent, according to The Post. And let’s not forget the Democratic Senate Campaign Committee, which has raked in nearly $500,000 from a single doctor-owned hospital in McAllen, Tex. — the very one that Obama has cited as a symbol of runaway medical costs ever since it was profiled in The New Yorker this spring.

In this maze of powerful moneyed interests, it’s not clear who any American in either party should or could root for. The bipartisan nature of the beast can be encapsulated by the remarkable progress of Billy Tauzin, the former Louisiana congressman. Tauzin was a founding member of the Blue Dog Democrats in 1994. A year later, he bolted to the Republicans. Now he is chief of PhRMA, the biggest pharmaceutical trade group. In the 2008 campaign, Obama ran a television ad pillorying Tauzin for his role in preventing Medicare from negotiating for lower drug prices. Last week The Los Angeles Times reported — and The New York Times confirmed — that Tauzin, an active player in White House health care negotiations, had secured a behind-closed-doors flip-flop, enlisting the administration to push for continued protection of drug prices. Now we know why the president has ducked his campaign pledge to broadcast such negotiations on C-Span.

The making of legislative sausage is never pretty. The White House has to give to get. But the cynicism being whipped up among voters is justified. Unlike Hillary Clinton, whose chief presidential campaign strategist unapologetically did double duty as a high-powered corporate flack, Obama promised change we could actually believe in.

His first questionable post-victory step was to assemble an old boys’ club of Robert Rubin protégés and Goldman-Citi alumni as the White House economic team, including a Treasury secretary, Timothy Geithner, who failed in his watchdog role at the New York Fed as Wall Street’s latest bubble first inflated and then burst. The questions about Geithner’s role in adjudicating the subsequent bailouts aren’t going away, and neither is the angry public sense that the fix is still in. We just learned that nine of those bailed-out banks — which in total received $175 billion of taxpayers’ money, but as yet have repaid only $50 billion — are awarding a total of $32.6 billion in bonuses for 2009.

It’s in this context that Obama can’t afford a defeat on health care. A bill will pass in a Democrat-controlled Congress. What matters is what’s in it. The final result will be a CAT scan of those powerful Washington interests he campaigned against, revealing which have been removed from the body politic (or at least reduced) and which continue to metastasize. The Wall Street regulatory reform package Obama pushes through, or doesn’t, may render even more of a verdict on his success in changing the system he sought the White House to reform.

The best political news for the president remains the Republicans. It’s a measure of how out of touch G.O.P. leaders like Mitch McConnell and John Boehner are that they keep trying to scare voters by calling Obama a socialist. They have it backward. The larger fear is that Obama might be just another corporatist, punking voters much as the Republicans do when they claim to be all for the common guy. If anything, the most unexpected — and challenging — event that could rock the White House this August would be if the opposition actually woke up.

*

The Mexican occupation of 38 million illegals depress wages $200 - $300 billion per year for Americans. These same Americans are forced to pay the staggering welfare costs of the occupation as well. Welfare paid to illegals in Mexican occupied Los Angeles, is nearly $40 MILLION PER MONTH. In Los Angeles, 47% of those employed are ILLEGALS.



*

Octoer 17, 2009

Op-Ed Columnist

Impatiently Waiting


By CHARLES M. BLOW

When, Mr. President? When will your deeds catch up to your words? The people who worked tirelessly to get you elected are getting tired of waiting. According to a Gallup poll released on Wednesday, Americans’ satisfaction with the way things are going in the country has hit a six-month low, and those decreases were led, in both percentage and percentage-point decreases, by Democrats and independents, not by Republicans.

The fierce urgency of now has melted into the maddening wait for whenever.

Take health care reform. Because of the president’s quixotic quest for bipartisanship, he refused to take a firm stand in favor of the public option. In that wake, Democrats gutted the Baucus bill to win the graces of Olympia Snowe — a Republican senator from a state with half the population of Brooklyn, a senator who is defying the will of her own constituents. A poll conducted earlier this month found that 57 percent of Maine residents support the public option and only 37 percent oppose it.

She is certainly living up to the state’s motto: Dirigo. That’s Latin for “I lead.” And the Democrats have followed. For shame.

When will the president take the risk of standing up for his convictions on health care instead of sacrificing good policies for good politics? (Or maybe not even good politics since a one-sided compromise is the same as a surrender.)

And health care is only one example.

On the same weekend that gay rights protesters marched past the White House, the president again said that his administration was “moving ahead on don’t ask don’t tell.” But when? This month? This year? This term?

As we prepare to draw down troops from the disaster that was the war in Iraq, we may commit more troops to the quagmire that is the war in Afghanistan and the government may miss its deadline for closing the blight that is the prison at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.

Obama pledged to stem the tide of job losses and foreclosures and to reform the culture of the financial sector. Well, the Dow just hit 10,000 again while the national unemployment rate is about to hit 10 percent. And the firms we propped up are set to dole out record bonuses while home foreclosures have hit record highs. Main Street is still drowning in crisis while Wall Street is awash in Champagne. When will this imbalance be corrected?

Candidate Obama pledged to make the rebuilding of New Orleans a priority, but President Obama whisked into the city on Thursday for a visit so brief that one Louisiana congressman dubbed it a “drive-through daiquiri summit.” The president spent more time on the failed Olympic bid in Copenhagen than he did in the Crescent City.

At the town hall in New Orleans, Obama appealed for patience. He said, “Change is hard, and big change is harder.” Is that the excuse? Now where have I heard that before? Oh, yeah. From George Bush.



*

GET THIS BOOK!




*

Obamanomics: How Barack Obama Is Bankrupting You and Enriching His Wall Street Friends, Corporate Lobbyists, and Union Bosses




BY TIMOTHY P CARNEY





Editorial Reviews

Obama Is Making You Poorer—But Who’s Getting Rich?

Goldman Sachs, GE, Pfizer, the United Auto Workers—the same “special interests” Barack Obama was supposed to chase from the temple—are profiting handsomely from Obama’s Big Government policies that crush taxpayers, small businesses, and consumers. In Obamanomics, investigative reporter Timothy P. Carney digs up the dirt the mainstream media ignores and the White House wishes you wouldn’t see. Rather than Hope and Change, Obama is delivering corporate socialism to America, all while claiming he’s battling corporate America. It’s corporate welfare and regulatory robbery—it’s Obamanomics.

*


Obama Is Making You Poorer—But Who’s Getting Rich?

Goldman Sachs, GE, Pfizer, the United Auto Workers—the same “special interests” Barack Obama was supposed to chase from the temple—are profiting handsomely from Obama’s Big Government policies that crush taxpayers, small businesses, and consumers.

Investigative reporter Timothy P. Carney digs up the dirt the mainstream media ignores and the White House wishes you wouldn’t see. Rather than Hope and Change, Obama is delivering corporate socialism to America, all while claiming he’s battling corporate America. It’s corporate welfare and regulatory robbery—it’s Obamanomics. In this explosive book, Carney reveals:

* The Great Health Care Scam—Obama’s backroom deals with drug companies spell corporate profits and more government control
* The Global Warming Hoax—Obama has bought off industries with a pork-filled bill that will drain your wallet for Al Gore’s agenda
* Obama and Wall Street—“Change” means more bailouts and a heavy Goldman Sachs presence in the West Wing (including Rahm Emanuel)
* Stimulating K Street—The largest spending bill in history gave pork to the well-connected and created a feeding frenzy for lobbyists
* How the GOP needs to change its tune—drastically—to battle Obamanomics



*






"There is a populist and conservative revolt against Wall Street and financial elites, Congress and government," Democratic pollster Stanley Greenberg warned in an analysis this week. "Democrats and President Obama are seen as more interested in bailing out Wall Street than helping Main Street."

*

OBAMA’S CON JOB ON REGULATION WILL NOT IMPACT HIS LARGEST BANKSTER DONORS! WHO’D OF THOUGHT???



“Obama's rhetoric covered the whole financial industry, but the key changes will affect only a few high-profile players, including JPMorgan Chase & Co., while sparing investment banks like Goldman Sachs Group Inc.”

*

WHAT DID THE BANKSTERS KNOW ABOUT OUR ACTOR OBAMA THAT WE DIDN’T KNOW?

Records show that four out of Obama's top five contributors are employees of financial industry giants - Goldman Sachs ($571,330), UBS AG ($364,806), JPMorgan Chase ($362,207) and Citigroup ($358,054).



The president's actions and tactics haven't matched his lofty language, breeding a cynicism that has doomed his cause.

Jonah Goldberg

December 22, 2009

On his own terms, President Obama is a failure.

During the presidential campaign, he fought hammer and tongs with Hillary Rodham Clinton on the best way to govern. Clinton, casting herself as a battle-scarred political veteran, argued that diligence, dedicated detail work and working the system were essential for success.




Banks post most profitable year since 2006 - The Hill's On The Money - WHY THE BANKSTER LOOTERS ARE INVESTING IN OBAMA AGAIN!

Banks post most profitable year since 2006 - The Hill's On The Money

BANKSTERS HAVE MADE MORE PROFITS IN OBAMA'S FIRST TWO YEARS THAN THEY DID IN ALL 8 YEARS UNDER BUSH!

BANKSTERS PROFITS AND CRIMES SOAR... so do foreclosures!


"There is a populist and conservative revolt against Wall Street and financial elites, Congress and government," Democratic pollster Stanley Greenberg warned in an analysis this week. "Democrats and President Obama are seen as more interested in bailing out Wall Street than helping Main Street."
*

OBAMA’S CON JOB ON REGULATION WILL NOT IMPACT HIS LARGEST BANKSTER DONORS! WHO’D OF THOUGHT???

“Obama's rhetoric covered the whole financial industry, but the key changes will affect only a few high-profile players, including JPMorgan Chase & Co., while sparing investment banks like Goldman Sachs Group Inc.”

*

WHAT DID THE BANKSTERS KNOW ABOUT OUR ACTOR OBAMA THAT WE DIDN’T KNOW?

Records show that four out of Obama's top five contributors are employees of financial industry giants - Goldman Sachs ($571,330), UBS AG ($364,806), JPMorgan Chase ($362,207) and Citigroup ($358,054).

 The president's actions and tactics haven't matched his lofty language, breeding a cynicism that has doomed his cause.

Jonah Goldberg

December 22, 2009
On his own terms, President Obama is a failure.

During the presidential campaign, he fought hammer and tongs with Hillary Rodham Clinton on the best way to govern. Clinton, casting herself as a battle-scarred political veteran, argued that diligence, dedicated detail work and working the system were essential for success.


L.A. Police Commission approves easing of car impound rules ANOTHER CASE OF LA RAZA SUPREMACY IN MEXIFORNIA

L.A. Police Commission approves easing of car impound rules

EVERY DAY THERE ARE 12 AMERICANS MURDERED BY ILLEGALS. MANY OF THESE VICTIMS ARE HIT BY ILLEGALS DRIVING UNLICENSED, UNINSURED AND DRUNK.
ONE-THIRD OF ALL DRIVERS IN LOS ANGELES ARE ILLEGALS!
THEY COME TO LOS ANGELES COUNTY WHERE WELFARE IS HANDED OUT TO THE TUNE OF $600 MILLION PER YEAR (source: JUDICIAL WATCH).
95% OF ALL MURDERS IN LOS ANGELES ARE BY MEXICANS.
DID YOU VOTE FOR LA RAZA SUPREMACY?
IN CA, ILLEGALS ARE ABOVE THE LAW, AND ARE QUICK TO REMIND THE LA RAZA DEMS THAT THEY WILL NOT GET THE LA RAZA "THE RACE" LATINO VOTE IF THEIR SUPREMACY IS NOT EXPANDED!
THERE ARE ONLY EIGHT (8) STATES WITH A POPULATIONG GREATER THAN LOS ANGELES COUNTY WHERE HALF THE JOBS GOT TO ILLEGAL USING STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS. TO DEAL WITH THIS, THE LA RAZA FACTION IN THE STATE LEGISLATURE PASSED A LAW SIGNED BY LA RAZA DEM JERRY BROWN MAKING IT ILLEGAL FOR EMPLOYERS TO USE E-VERIFY.
WHILE OBAMA, AND HIS HAREM OF CORRUPT HISPANDERING DEMS, INCLUDING PELOSI (SHE AND OBAMA LIED THAT OBAMAcare DID NOT INCLUDE ILLEGALS), FEINSTEIN, BOXER, AND REID ALL SABOTAGE E-VERIFY AND REQUIREMENTS FOR VOTERS TO HAVE I.D.S........ MITT ROMNEY HAS STATED HE WOULD IMPLEMENT E-VERIFY NATION WIDE. NOTHING WOULD HELP THE STAGGERIN UNEMPLOYMENT RATES MORE THAN TO STOP MEXICO'S EXPORT OF MILLIONS OF PEOPLE TO LOOT US!

SMITH: Obama budget’s backdoor amnesty
President’s spending plan weakens immigration enforcement
By Rep. Lamar Smith

The Washington Times
Thursday, February 23, 2012


President Obama's fiscal 2013 budget came out this month and again includes the same spending, borrowing and taxing policies that have come to define his presidency. No surprise, this spending blueprint cuts several worthwhile immigration-enforcement and border-security programs.
The president's budget continues his administration's policies of ignoring laws requiring the removal of illegal immigrants. Last year, the Obama administration issued new deportation guidelines that amount to backdoor amnesty. The spending priorities contained in his budget are no different. At least the president is consistent.

Under his budget for 2013, Mr. Obama reduces the number of detention bed spaces by 1,200 beds - from 34,000 to 32,800. The administration proposes using the resulting funds to enhance its alternatives-to-detention programs. But these programs result in higher levels of illegal immigrants disappearing into American communities.

In fact, Department of Justice records reveal that since 1996, 40 percent of all non-detained illegal immigrants in removal proceedings simply became fugitives. Unfortunately, the president's budget builds on this record of failure. Detention is the only proven method of preventing illegal immigrants from avoiding deportation.

The president's spending proposal also reduces funding for the 287(g) program by 25 percent. The 287(g) program allows state and local governments to partner with the federal government to assist in the enforcement of immigration laws. This successful program has identified tens of thousands of illegal immigrants in prisons and jails nationwide.

The Obama administration also has announced that it will no longer consider additional requests for 287(g) partnerships. It makes no sense to get rid of such a valuable program.

Mr. Obama's fiscal 2013 budget request also undermines border security and national security. Last year, the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office found that just 44 percent of the Southwestern border was under the operational control of the Border Patrol. Most of the border remains porous to human smugglers, drug traffickers and illegal immigrants.
Rather than take steps to gain control of the U.S.-Mexico border, the president's budget contains a plan to develop a "border security index" to measure enforcement progress along the Southwestern border. The administration thinks this new test will help manipulate the facts to produce a passing grade for the administration and back its claims that the border is secure.

But this index is just a cover-up for the administration's failure to fully enforce immigration laws. There is no substitute for improved border security coupled with increased interior enforcement of drug and immigration laws.
The president's budget also contains no funding for the implementation of the Real ID Act. But this comes as no surprise because the administration already has delayed this law from taking effect until January 2013. Real ID prohibits illegal immigrants, including foreign terrorists, from obtaining valid forms of identification that can be used to board planes and enter federal buildings. Real ID already has been law for six years and should be fully implemented. This is another example of the administration not enforcing current laws.

The president's spending blueprint contains no funding for expansion of the Visa Security Program (VSP). This program increases the security of the visa process at U.S. embassies and consulates in "highest-risk" countries. At visa-issuing posts where VSP exists, all applicants receive additional screening. Unfortunately, such screening exists only at 19 locations out of a list of about 50 designated "highest-risk" posts worldwide. Not expanding the VSP makes it easier for terrorists to get visas to the United States.

We must secure our borders to prevent national security threats from becoming reality. It's past time to construct a budget that reduces illegal immigration and increases border security. The president's budget takes us in the wrong direction.

Rep. Lamar Smith, Texas Republican, is chairman of the House Judiciary Committee.

HOW TO DESTROY AMERICA: A SPEECH BY GOVERNOR LAMM

By Frosty Wooldridge
February 27, 2012
NewsWithViews.com

“The problems in the world today are so enormous they cannot be solved with the level of thinking that created them.” -Einstein

In the past month, you have read my four part series on the ramifications of adding 100 million immigrants to America within the next 38 years. I don’t care how you cut it or how you deny it or how you avoid it—this human armada will change the face of America beyond recognition. None of it will be good, positive or hopeful for America or her citizens.

That 100 million people fleeing failed states, failed countries and failed environments will bring enormous poverty and illiteracy as well as cultural and religious tensions to America that will crack this civilization like Humpty-Dumpty over the edge of the Grand Canyon. Once those numbers manifest, we won’t be able to put ourselves back together again.

Back on October 3, 2003 in Washington DC, I sat dumbfounded at a speech given by former Colorado Governor Richard D. Lamm. He spoke on, “How to Destroy America.” I was the only journalist to report on the speech verbatim. The audience sat spellbound by the eight methods for destruction of the United States. Since that time, my piece on the speech has been circulated all over the world many times. His speech is being verified in the United Kingdom, France, Norway, Sweden, Holland, Canada and Australia.

Here we sit nine years later, and most of what he spoke about has come true and it is worsening exponentially as we continue absorbing 3.1 million immigrants and their children annually. I think it’s worth hearing the speech again to give you an ashes-in- your-mouth sense of the speed of this human juggernaut—brought to you by your own U.S. Congress and your continued apathy to speak up to stop it. Notice it’s not on any of the candidates’ list of things to talk about and no ABC moderator will bring it up. It’s a sacred cow to the media and all politicians—yet it is destroying this country.

Lamm said, “If you believe that America is too smug, too self-satisfied, too rich, then let’s destroy America. It is not that hard to do. No nation in history has survived the ravages of time. Arnold Toynbee observed that all great civilizations rise and fall, and that, “An autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.”

“Here is how they destroyed their countries,” Lamm said. “First, turn America into a bilingual or multi lingual and bicultural country. History shows that no nation can survive the tension, conflict and antagonism of two or more competing languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual; however, it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. The historical scholar Seymour Lipset put it this way, “The histories of bilingual and bicultural societies that do not assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension and tragedy. Canada, Belgium, Malaysia, Lebanon—all face crises of national existence in which minorities press for autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided. Nigeria suppressed an ethnic rebellion. France faces difficulties with Basques, Bretons and Corsicans.”

Lamm continued on how to destroy America, “Invent ‘multiculturalism’ and encourage immigrants to maintain their own culture. I would make it an article of belief that all cultures are equal. That there are no cultural differences! I would make it an article of faith that the Black and Hispanic dropout rates are due to prejudice and discrimination by the majority. Every other explanation is out of bounds.”

Any fool can see that Los Angeles, Detroit, Chicago, New York and Miami are no longer American cities. Houston, Dallas, Atlanta, San Francisco and many other cities are not far behind. Immigrants arrive at over 3.1 million per year, so fast and so many, that they are not assimilating into the American Dream. However, they are creating the American Nightmare for Americans. You would be insulted if you spoke English and you’re not welcome in immigrant enclaves of those cities.

“We could make the United States an “Hispanic Quebec” without much effort. The key is to celebrate diversity rather than unity. As Benjamin Schwarz said in the Atlantic Monthly recently: “The apparent success of our own multi-ethnic and multi-cultural experiment might have been achieved not by tolerance but by hegemony. Without the dominance that once dictated ethnocentrically and what it meant to be an American, we are left with only tolerance and pluralism to hold us together.”

Detroit Muslims forced businesses to install “Press 1” for Arabic, “Press 2 for Spanish” and “Press 3 for English.” We have a president that bows to Muslim leaders and last week, he apologized to Afghanistan’s President Karzi for burning a few Korans, but didn’t mention that Afghanistan soldiers executed to the back of their heads two U.S. Army officers that had nothing to do with the burnings and wounded four other U.S. military troops. Tell me again why we are sacrificing thousands of our young kids in that hell hole of Islamic insanity for the past 10 years?

Lamm added, “I would encourage all immigrants to keep their own language and culture. I would replace the melting pot metaphor with the salad bowl metaphor. It is important to ensure that we have various cultural sub-groups living in America reinforcing their differences rather than as Americans, emphasizing their similarities.”

“Fourth, I would make our fastest growing demographic group the least educated. I would add a second underclass, unassimilated, undereducated and antagonistic to our population. I would have this second underclass have a 50 percent dropout rate from high school.”

According to a CNN report, 7,000 high school students drop out of school every day, one every 26 seconds. The U.S. now features 42 million functionally illiterate Americans that cannot read, write or perform simple math. Another 50 million cannot read past the 4th grade level. Democracy requires four disciplines to flourish while remaining viable. It requires an educated population that possesses a similar moral and ethical foundation while speaking the same language. The United States, via massive immigration, is losing all four aspects. It cannot and will not remain viable much longer with the disruption of its educational systems. Conflicting languages bring a whole new can of worms to the crisis.

“My fifth point for destroying America would be to get big foundations and business to give these efforts lots of money. I would invest in ethnic identity, and I would establish the cult of “Victimology.” I would get all minorities to think their lack of success was the fault of the majority. I would start a grievance industry blaming all minority failure on the majority population.”

While a few elites in high places make billions of dollars, they corrupt America’s rule of law and undermine the Middle Class. If you’ll notice—Third World countries DO NOT sustain a Middle Class. They suffer a high class and a low class. America moves in that direction every day of this immigrant invasion. We feature 15 million unemployed and 46 million Americans subsisting on food stamps in 2012.

“My sixth plan for America’s downfall would include dual citizenship and promote divided loyalties. I would celebrate diversity over unity. I would stress differences rather than similarities. Diverse people worldwide are mostly engaged in hating each other—that is, when they are not killing each other. A diverse, peaceful or stable society is against most historical precedent. People undervalue the unity it takes to keep a nation together. Look at the ancient Greeks: “The Greeks believed that they belonged to the same race; they possessed a common language and literature; and they worshipped the same gods. All Greece took part in the Olympic games. A common enemy Persia threatened their liberty. Yet, all these bonds were not strong enough to overcome two factors…local patriotism and geographical conditions that nurtured political divisions. Greece fell. In that historical reality, if we put the emphasis on the ‘pluribus’ instead of the ‘unum’, we can balkanize America as surely as Kosovo.”

Lamm continued, “Next to last, I would place all subjects off limits—make it taboo to talk about anything against the cult of “diversity.” I would find a word similar to “heretic” in the 16th century—that stopped discussion and paralyzed thinking. Words like “racist” or “xenophobe” halt discussion and debate.”

At every juncture today, anti-American groups like the ACLU, La Raza, MALDEF, LULAC, and MECHA, which are pro illegal alien Mexican groups on U.S. soil—scream “racism” if anyone protests illegal migration. You have to wonder what will happen when they gain majority populations? (Hispanics will gain majority population by 2040.) Will they allow us to use the word “racism” as they promote their agenda of “Reconquista of Aztlan” while they break our country into pieces? At over 10 million illegal migrant Mexicans now transplanted onto U.S. soil, they are well on their way.

“Having made America a bilingual--bicultural country, having established multiculturalism, having the large foundations fund the doctrine of “Victimology,” Lamm said. “I would next make it impossible to enforce our immigration laws. I would develop a mantra: “That because immigration has been good for America, it must ALWAYS be good. I would make every individual immigrant sympatric and ignore the cumulative impact of millions of them."

President Barack Obama ceased enforcing America’s immigration laws as of December of 2011. He has filed suit against South Carolina, Alabama and Arizona for attempting to enforce their own laws against their migrant invasions.

In the last minute of his speech, Governor Lamm wiped his brow. A profound silence swept over the room. Finally, he said, “Lastly, I would censor Victor Davis Hansen’s book Mexifornia. His book is dangerous. It exposes the plan to destroy America. If you feel America deserves to be destroyed, don’t read that book.”


"Victor Davis Hanson brings a lifetime of experience in California's Central Valley to this indictment of multiculturalism and mass immigration." -- Mark Krikorian, Center for Immigration Studies

MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com, JUDICIAL WATCH.org & WIKIleaks EXPOSES OBAMA’S AGENDA OF OPEN BORDERS, FUNDING OF LA RAZA SUPREMACY, AND HISPANDERING FOR THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES!
SHOCKING!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2012/03/further-evidence-of-secret-us.html