OBAMA SEES HIS AGENDA AS PROTECTING HIS CRIMINAL BANKSTER DONORS, HANDING DREAM ACTS OF WELFARE AND AMNESTY TO ILLEGALS TO BUY THEIR STILL ILLEGAL VOTES, AND TO MAKE SURE THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS GETS THE TAX BILLS FOR ALL THE BANKSTERS' LOOTING AND THE LA RAZA "THE RACE" MEXICAN WELFARE STATE IN OUR BORDERS.
CA ALONE PUTS OUT $22 BILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS. NOT ONE LEGAL VOTED TO BE LOOTED BY MEXICO!
WHEN OBAMA AND HOLDER
ARE NOT APPEARING AT LA RAZA CONVENTIONS IN OUR BORDER TO HISPANDER FOR THE
ILLEGALS’ VOTES, THEY ARE ADVANCING THE LA RAZA SUPREMACY AGENDA!
DO A SEARCH FOR BARACK
OBAMA AND LA RAZA!
OBAMA USES TAX DOLLARS
TO FUND THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA.
FORMER LA RAZA
SUPREMACIST VP CECELIA MUNOZ OPERATES OUT OF THE OBAMA WHITE HOUSE!
WHILE OBAMA AND HOLDER BUST THEIR
ASSES FOR ILLEGALS, ASK THEM WHAT THEY’VE DONE FOR BLACK AMERICA!!!!
Hans A. von Spakovsky
Law-Enforcement-Free
Sanctuaries
The Obama
administration will sue Arizona for trying to help Washington enforce federal
immigration laws, but flatly rejects the notion of suing sanctuary cities that
blatantly defy those same laws. That announcement two weeks ago
revealed the hypocrisy and utter contempt for the rule of law rampant in Eric
Holder’s Justice Department.
It
was the latest example of the Department letting partisan politics, rather than
the interests of justice and the impartial enforcement of the law, drive its
legal decisions. In this instance, it both threatens national security and
undermines public confidence in our legal system.
The
very weakness of the Department’s legal arguments in the Arizona suit betrays
its political genesis. As the brief filed on behalf of Arizona by nine other
states persuasively argues, Arizona is not interfering with federal authority:
it has neither created new categories of aliens nor attempted to independently
determine the immigration status of aliens. Arizona’s law simply requires local
law enforcement officers to check the immigration status of individuals
arrested for other reasons. This is exactly the regulatory scheme of concurrent
enforcement envisioned by federal immigration law.
The
Justice Department’s suit directly contradicts the 2005 Supreme Court decision
in Muehler v. Mena. In that case, all nine justices upheld the right of local
police officers to question a detained individual’s immigration status while a
search warrant was being executed. The suit also flies in the face of Estrada
v. Rhode Island, in which the First Circuit Court of Appeals this February
upheld a state trooper’s questioning of immigration status during a traffic
stop. This is the exact policy being implemented in Arizona.
Federal courts have long upheld the power of state law
enforcement officers to arrest those who violate federal law, as long as it is
also a violation of state law, includingimmigration laws. The inherent
authority of local police to arrest immigration violators was outlined in 2002
in a legal memorandum issued by the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal
Counsel. Yet Attorney General Holder has filed a lawsuit making claims
completely at odds with an opinion issued by his own department.
Holder’s
suit also conflicts directly with federal immigration law. The Illegal
Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. §1373)
specifically mandates that no federal, state, or local government can
“prohibit, or in any way restrict, any government entity or official from
sending to, or receiving from, the Immigration and Naturalization Service [now
Immigration and Customs Enforcement or ICE], information regarding the
citizenship or immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of any individual,” a
provision upheld by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in 1999. Congress
wanted local governments to get information on immigration status from the
federal government – and that is exactly what the Arizona law requires for
anyone arrested in the state. Yet Holder is trying to prevent Arizona officials
from checking “the citizenship or immigration status” of “any individual.”
Now
we’re awaiting a ruling by a federal judge on the Justice Department’s request
for a temporary injunction to stop the law from going into effect on Thursday.
It’s clear, though, that the only way that judge could possibly rule in the
Department’s favor is by ignoring the law and this precedent.
Justice
Department spokesman Tracy Schmaler asserts that Arizona is “actively”
interfering with federal law while sanctuary cities are just not using their
resources to enforce federal law. This bogus claim displays fundamental
ignorance of these federal legal requirements. Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the
ranking Republican on the House Judiciary committee and the chief author of the
1996 immigration law, rightly calls it “absurd.” Cities like San Francisco not
only do not enforce federal immigration laws, some violate it by protecting
aliens from deportation and refusing to cooperate with or provide information
to immigration officials.
As
the nine states note in their brief, the Justice Department is trying to negate
the “preexisting power of the States to verify a person’s immigration status
and similarly seeks to reject the assistance that the States can lawfully
provide to the Federal government.” Holder’s claim that Arizona is interfering
with federal power to regulate immigration is near frivolous.
Arizona
simply requires that law enforcement personnel (1) ascertain the immigration
status of people they have lawfully detained for some other reason and (2)
report to the federal government the presence of any detainee determined to be
here illegally. If the Obama administration wants to ignore that information
and reject that assistance, it has that option. The only possible
“interference” with federal power is the risk that the feds might be publicly
embarrassed by a policy of non-enforcement. Apparently the White House and DOJ
consider embarrassment a federal offense.
Holder
makes one further -- yet equally absurd -- claim: that by trying to deter the
movement of illegal aliens into Arizona, the state is restricting interstate
commerce and thus violates the Commerce Clause. How can deterring the entry of
people who have no legal right to enter possibly violate interstate commerce?
It is the same as saying that -- notwithstanding federal laws that bar
importation of heroin -- a state that busts heroin traffickers is flouting the
Commerce Clause.
Federal
law stipulates that any person who “conceals, harbors, or shields from
detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection,” an
illegal alien is committing a crime. It is also criminal just to “encourage”
residence by illegal aliens. Yet sanctuary cities like San Francisco have
enacted formal policies that embrace all these illegal acts. Such policies lead
directly to further crimes, such as the vicious murder of a father and his two
sons on a San Francisco street. The killer was an illegal alien with two prior
felony convictions -- yet on neither occasion did San Francisco authorities
notify the feds of his presence. Had they done so, he would not have been able
to gun down Tony Bologna, 48, and his sons Michael, 20, and Matthew, 16, as
they sat in their car on June 16, 2008.
Holder’s
refusal to sue sanctuary cities is an abrogation of his responsibility as the
nation’s chief federal law enforcement officer. Unlike Arizona, many of these
cities have policies that violate federal law.
The
Obama administration claims Arizona’s law will “disrupt federal immigration
enforcement.” But the only thing it could possibly disrupt is federal
non-enforcement. As the elections approach, Holder’s suit may help gin up
enthusiasm among the president’s more radical political allies, such as La
Raza. But using the law enforcement powers of the federal government to achieve
political ends is a dangerous abuse of power.
*
Blog
| Judicial Watch | Because no one is above the law!DOJ: Immigration Apprehensions Lowest Since 1972
July 23, 2012 |
Newly released government records seem to indicate
that the Obama Administration got to work right away on its stealth amnesty plan,
drastically slashing the number of immigration apprehensions during its first
two years in power.
Apprehensions for immigration violations plummeted
dramatically from 1.8 million in 2000 to an all-time low of 516,992 in 2010,
according to a report released this month by the Department of Justice
(DOJ). The document was created by a special division of the DOJ (Bureau of
Justice Statistics) that collects and disseminates information on crime and the
operation of the justice system.
Less than two years into the Obama presidency, the
number of immigration violation apprehensions was at the lowest level since
1972, according the federal report. Arrests, however, tripled from 25,205 to
82,438, but this is deceiving because apprehensions
are instances in which foreign nationals are caught in the U.S. illegally.
Arrests refer to the booking of an individual by U.S. Marshals for violating
federal immigration law.
Under this formula, if a lot less illegal
immigrants are getting “apprehended” or caught in the first place, simply
increasing the number of actual “arrests” is not going to cut it. For the
purpose of the DOJ stats, apprehensions and arrests represent events and not
actual individuals because some illegal aliens could be apprehended or arrested
on multiple occasions.
Not surprisingly, the core of the apprehensions
took place at or near the Mexican border with the Tucson Arizona sector leading
the way in 2010 with 212,202. The others are; San Diego (68,565), Rio Grande
Valley (59,766), Laredo (35,287), El Centro (32,562) and Del Rio (14,694). An
overwhelming chunk of the illegal immigrants, 83%, were citizens of Mexico
though an increasing number (12%) came from Central American countries.
Here are a few other interesting stats revealed in
the DOJ’s report, which keep in mind, only covers up to 2010. The most common
immigration offense charged in federal court in 2010 was illegal reentry (81%)
with two-thirds of the defendants having a prior felony arrest and more than
half a prior felony conviction. They include large numbers of drug-related and
violent felonies, according to the report.
The bottom line is that this appears to be yet
another tidbit supporting the Obama Administration’s backdoor amnesty plan,
which has become bolder over the years. Last month the president proudly
announced—at a Rose Garden press conference—a controversial plan to spare nearly 1 million young illegal immigrants from deportation,
even as the administration works behind the scenes granting stealth amnesty to
many more undocumented aliens.
As of the end of May, 4,585 deportation cases were closed under a special Homeland Security program—prosecutorial
discretion—created last summer to conduct “an unprecedented review of all
immigration cases pending in the immigration courts and incoming cases.” The
number continues rising, according to ICE figures obtained by a nonpartisan
data research center that studies the government.
*HOW CHEAP IS THAT STAGGERINGLY EXPENSIVE “CHEAP” MEXICAN LABOR?
FACTOR IN THE CRIME TIDAL WAVE THAT COMES WITH IT, THE LA RAZA CONTEMPT FOR OUR LANGUAGE, FLAG AND CULTURE, AND WE ARE SIMPLY FORCED TO PAY FOR OUR OWN INVASION BY MEXICO!
A 2004 Heritage Fund study found the average lifetime cost of low-skilled immigrant households was about $1.2 million to taxpayers - about the net benefit to taxpayers of a college-educated family.
*
*“The
Obama administration will sue Arizona for trying to help Washington enforce
federal immigration laws, but flatly rejects the notion of suing sanctuary
cities that blatantly defy those same laws.”
SANCTUARY
CITY BALTIMORE – THE SPREAD OF MEX SUPREMACY
Illegal Aliens Want Sanctuary Policies In Writing
Last Updated: Fri, 08/27/2010 - 3:34pm
Lawmakers
and police in a major U.S. city have reassured illegal immigrants that they’re
protected under longtime sanctuary policies amid demands from open borders advocates
that the measures be formalized in writing.
A
group of Latino activists, clergy and civil rights leaders took to the street
this week to command Baltimore officials to further solidify the city’s
measures to shield illegal aliens from federal authorities. Like many law
enforcement agencies across the nation, Baltimore Police bans its officers from
inquiring about suspects’ immigration status.
Now
emboldened illegal immigrants want the policy in
writing to
reduce crime and help bridge the gap between officers and immigrants after the
recent murders of three Hispanic men in the area. The most recent victim, a
Honduran, was clubbed and beaten with a wooden stake by a mentally disturbed
teen who professed to hate “Mexicans.” Illegal immigrants are more prone to
cooperate in these sorts of police investigations if the department has a
written don’t-ask-don’t-tell immigration policy, their advocates say.
But
Baltimore Police Chief Frederick Bealefeld asserts that a written policy is
unnecessary because his officers never ask about immigration status as per the
citywide sanctuary measures. In the three years he’s served as department head,
Bealefeld says he hasn’t heard “one
utterance on enforcement of immigration laws.” For their part, city
officials assure residents that they should trust police to focus on fighting
violent crime, not enforcing immigration laws.
This
week a Maryland legislator threw a wrench in Baltimore’s sanctuary public
relations campaign by announcing a proposed bill that will give citizens the
power to sue public
officials who
violate federal immigration laws. If the measure passes, citizens can file
complaints against public officials in circuit court and, if convicted, the
official could be booted from office or face criminal
charges.
*
COLORADO IS NOW 20% ILLEGALS, AND THEY ARE VOTING IN DROVES,
WHICH IS WHY OBAMA’S HOLDER-LA RAZA DEPT of JUSTICE HAS MOVED TO SABOTAGE ALL
STATES EFFORTS TO REQUIRE VOTER IDs!
*“The
Obama administration will sue Arizona for trying to help Washington enforce
federal immigration laws, but flatly rejects the notion of suing sanctuary
cities that blatantly defy those same laws.”
SANCTUARY
CITY BALTIMORE – THE SPREAD OF MEX SUPREMACY
Illegal Aliens Want Sanctuary Policies In Writing
Last Updated: Fri, 08/27/2010 - 3:34pm
Lawmakers
and police in a major U.S. city have reassured illegal immigrants that they’re
protected under longtime sanctuary policies amid demands from open borders
advocates that the measures be formalized in writing.
A
group of Latino activists, clergy and civil rights leaders took to the street
this week to command Baltimore officials to further solidify the city’s
measures to shield illegal aliens from federal authorities. Like many law
enforcement agencies across the nation, Baltimore Police bans its officers from
inquiring about suspects’ immigration status.
Now
emboldened illegal immigrants want the policy in
writing to
reduce crime and help bridge the gap between officers and immigrants after the
recent murders of three Hispanic men in the area. The most recent victim, a
Honduran, was clubbed and beaten with a wooden stake by a mentally disturbed
teen who professed to hate “Mexicans.” Illegal immigrants are more prone to
cooperate in these sorts of police investigations if the department has a
written don’t-ask-don’t-tell immigration policy, their advocates say.
But
Baltimore Police Chief Frederick Bealefeld asserts that a written policy is
unnecessary because his officers never ask about immigration status as per the
citywide sanctuary measures. In the three years he’s served as department head,
Bealefeld says he hasn’t heard “one
utterance on enforcement of immigration laws.” For their part, city
officials assure residents that they should trust police to focus on fighting
violent crime, not enforcing immigration laws.
This
week a Maryland legislator threw a wrench in Baltimore’s sanctuary public
relations campaign by announcing a proposed bill that will give citizens the
power to sue public
officials who
violate federal immigration laws. If the measure passes, citizens can file
complaints against public officials in circuit court and, if convicted, the
official could be booted from office or face criminal
charges.
*
DICK LAMM, GOVERNOR OF COLORADO on the LA RAZA AGENDA and the
DEATH OF THE AMERICAN DREAM
We know Dick Lamm as the former
Governor of Colorado. In that context his thoughts are particularly poignant.
Last week there was an immigration overpopulation conference in Washington, DC,
filled to capacity by many of America's finest minds and leaders. A brilliant
college professor by the name of Victor Hansen Davis talked about his latest
book, "Mexifornia," explaining how immigration - both legal and
illegal was destroying the entire state of California. He said it would march
across the country until it destroyed all vestiges of The American Dream.
Moments later, former Colorado Governor Richard D. Lamm stood up and gave a stunning speech on how to destroy America. The audience sat spellbound as he described eight methods for the destruction of the United States. He said, "If you believe that America is too smug, too self-satisfied, too rich, then let's destroy! America. It is not that hard to do. No nation in history has survived the ravages of time. Arnold Toynbee observed that all great civilizations rise and fall and that 'An autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.'"
"Here is how they do it," Lamm said: "First, to destroy America, turn America into a bilingual or multi-lingual and bicultural country." History shows that no nation can survive the tension, conflict, and antagonism of two or more competing languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual; however, it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. The historical scholar, Seymour Lipset, put it this way: "The histories of bilingual and bi-cultural societies that do not assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension, and
tragedy." Canada, Belgium, Malaysia, and Lebanon all face crises of national existence in which minorities press for autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided. Nigeria suppressed an ethnic rebellion. France faces difficulties with Basques, Bretons, and Corsicans."
Lamm went on: Second, to destroy America, "Invent 'multiculturalism' and encourage immigrants to maintain their culture. I would make it an article of belief that all cultures are equal. That there are no cultural differences. I would make it an article of faith that the Black and Hispanic dropout rates are due solely to prejudice and
discrimination by the majority. Every other explanation is out of bounds.
Third, "We could make the United States an 'Hispanic Quebec' without much effort. The key is to celebrate diversity rather than unity. As Benjamin Schwarz said in the Atlantic Monthly recently: "The apparent success of our own multiethnic and multicultural experiment might have been achieved not by tolerance but by hegemony. Without the dominance that once dictated ethnocentricity and what it meant to be an American, we! are left with only tolerance and pluralism to hold us together." Lamm said, "I would encourage all immigrants to keep their own language and culture. I would replace the melting pot metaphor with the salad bowl metaphor. It is important to ensure that we have
various cultural subgroups living in America enforcing their differences rather than as Americans, emphasizing their similarities."
"Fourth, I would make our fastest growing demographic group the least educated. I would add a second underclass, unassimilated, undereducated, and antagonistic to our population. I would have this second underclass have a 50% dropout rate from high school."
"My fifth point for destroying America would be to get big foundations and business to give these efforts lots of money. I would invest in ethnic identity, and I would establish the cult of 'Victimology.' I would get all minorities to think that their lack of success was the fault of the majority. I would start a grievance industry blaming all
minority failure on the majority population."
"My sixth plan for America's downfall would include dual citizenship, and promote divided loyalties. I would celebrate diversity over unity. I would stress differences rather than similarities. Diverse people worldwide are mostly engaged in hating each other - that is, when they are not killing each other. A diverse, peaceful, or stable society is against most historical precedent. People undervalue the unity it takes to keep a nation together. Look at the ancient Greeks. The Greeks believed that they belonged to the same race; they possessed a common language and literature; and they worshipped the same gods. All Greece took part in the Olympic games. A common enemy, Persia, threatened their liberty. Yet all these bonds were not strong enough to overcome two factors: local patriotism and geographical conditions that nurtured political divisions. Greece fell. "E. Pluribus Unum" -- From many, one. In that historical reality, if we put the emphasis on the 'pluribus' instead of the 'Unum,' we will balkanize America as surely as Kosovo."
"Next to last, I would place all subjects off limits; make it taboo to talk about anything against the cult of 'diversity.' I would find a word similar to 'heretic' in the 16th century - that stopped discussion and paralyzed thinking. Words like 'racist' or 'xenophobe' halt discussion and debate. Having made America a bilingual/bicultural country, having established multi-culturism, having the large foundations fund the! doctrine of 'Victimology,' I would next make it impossible to enforce our immigration laws. I would develop a mantra: That because immigration has been good for America, it must always be good. I would make every individual immigrant symmetric and ignore the cumulative impact of millions of them."
In the last minute of his speech, Governor Lamm wiped his brow. Profound silence followed. Finally he said,. "Lastly, I would censor Victor Hanson Davis's book "Mexifornia." His book is dangerous. It exposes the plan to destroy America. If you feel America. deserves to be destroyed, don't read that book."
There was no applause. A chilling fear quietly rose like an ominous cloud above every attendee at the conference Every American in that room knew that everything Lamm enumerated was proceeding methodically, quietly, darkly, yet pervasively across the United States today.
Discussion is being suppressed. Over 100 languages are ripping the foundation of our educational system and national cohesiveness. Even barbaric cultures that practice female genital mutilation are growing as we celebrate 'diversity.' American jobs are vanishing into the Third World as corporations create a Third World in America - take note of California and other states - to date, ten million illegal aliens and growing fast. It is reminiscent of George Orwell's book "1984." In that story, three slogans are engraved in the Ministry of Truth building: "War is peace," "Freedom is slavery," and "Ignorance is strength."
Governor Lamm walked back to his seat. It dawned on everyone at the conference that our nation and the future of this great democracy is deeply in trouble and worsening fast. If we don't get this immigration monster stopped within three years, it will rage like a California wildfire and destroy everything in its path, especially The American Dream.
Moments later, former Colorado Governor Richard D. Lamm stood up and gave a stunning speech on how to destroy America. The audience sat spellbound as he described eight methods for the destruction of the United States. He said, "If you believe that America is too smug, too self-satisfied, too rich, then let's destroy! America. It is not that hard to do. No nation in history has survived the ravages of time. Arnold Toynbee observed that all great civilizations rise and fall and that 'An autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.'"
"Here is how they do it," Lamm said: "First, to destroy America, turn America into a bilingual or multi-lingual and bicultural country." History shows that no nation can survive the tension, conflict, and antagonism of two or more competing languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual; however, it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. The historical scholar, Seymour Lipset, put it this way: "The histories of bilingual and bi-cultural societies that do not assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension, and
tragedy." Canada, Belgium, Malaysia, and Lebanon all face crises of national existence in which minorities press for autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided. Nigeria suppressed an ethnic rebellion. France faces difficulties with Basques, Bretons, and Corsicans."
Lamm went on: Second, to destroy America, "Invent 'multiculturalism' and encourage immigrants to maintain their culture. I would make it an article of belief that all cultures are equal. That there are no cultural differences. I would make it an article of faith that the Black and Hispanic dropout rates are due solely to prejudice and
discrimination by the majority. Every other explanation is out of bounds.
Third, "We could make the United States an 'Hispanic Quebec' without much effort. The key is to celebrate diversity rather than unity. As Benjamin Schwarz said in the Atlantic Monthly recently: "The apparent success of our own multiethnic and multicultural experiment might have been achieved not by tolerance but by hegemony. Without the dominance that once dictated ethnocentricity and what it meant to be an American, we! are left with only tolerance and pluralism to hold us together." Lamm said, "I would encourage all immigrants to keep their own language and culture. I would replace the melting pot metaphor with the salad bowl metaphor. It is important to ensure that we have
various cultural subgroups living in America enforcing their differences rather than as Americans, emphasizing their similarities."
"Fourth, I would make our fastest growing demographic group the least educated. I would add a second underclass, unassimilated, undereducated, and antagonistic to our population. I would have this second underclass have a 50% dropout rate from high school."
"My fifth point for destroying America would be to get big foundations and business to give these efforts lots of money. I would invest in ethnic identity, and I would establish the cult of 'Victimology.' I would get all minorities to think that their lack of success was the fault of the majority. I would start a grievance industry blaming all
minority failure on the majority population."
"My sixth plan for America's downfall would include dual citizenship, and promote divided loyalties. I would celebrate diversity over unity. I would stress differences rather than similarities. Diverse people worldwide are mostly engaged in hating each other - that is, when they are not killing each other. A diverse, peaceful, or stable society is against most historical precedent. People undervalue the unity it takes to keep a nation together. Look at the ancient Greeks. The Greeks believed that they belonged to the same race; they possessed a common language and literature; and they worshipped the same gods. All Greece took part in the Olympic games. A common enemy, Persia, threatened their liberty. Yet all these bonds were not strong enough to overcome two factors: local patriotism and geographical conditions that nurtured political divisions. Greece fell. "E. Pluribus Unum" -- From many, one. In that historical reality, if we put the emphasis on the 'pluribus' instead of the 'Unum,' we will balkanize America as surely as Kosovo."
"Next to last, I would place all subjects off limits; make it taboo to talk about anything against the cult of 'diversity.' I would find a word similar to 'heretic' in the 16th century - that stopped discussion and paralyzed thinking. Words like 'racist' or 'xenophobe' halt discussion and debate. Having made America a bilingual/bicultural country, having established multi-culturism, having the large foundations fund the! doctrine of 'Victimology,' I would next make it impossible to enforce our immigration laws. I would develop a mantra: That because immigration has been good for America, it must always be good. I would make every individual immigrant symmetric and ignore the cumulative impact of millions of them."
In the last minute of his speech, Governor Lamm wiped his brow. Profound silence followed. Finally he said,. "Lastly, I would censor Victor Hanson Davis's book "Mexifornia." His book is dangerous. It exposes the plan to destroy America. If you feel America. deserves to be destroyed, don't read that book."
There was no applause. A chilling fear quietly rose like an ominous cloud above every attendee at the conference Every American in that room knew that everything Lamm enumerated was proceeding methodically, quietly, darkly, yet pervasively across the United States today.
Discussion is being suppressed. Over 100 languages are ripping the foundation of our educational system and national cohesiveness. Even barbaric cultures that practice female genital mutilation are growing as we celebrate 'diversity.' American jobs are vanishing into the Third World as corporations create a Third World in America - take note of California and other states - to date, ten million illegal aliens and growing fast. It is reminiscent of George Orwell's book "1984." In that story, three slogans are engraved in the Ministry of Truth building: "War is peace," "Freedom is slavery," and "Ignorance is strength."
Governor Lamm walked back to his seat. It dawned on everyone at the conference that our nation and the future of this great democracy is deeply in trouble and worsening fast. If we don't get this immigration monster stopped within three years, it will rage like a California wildfire and destroy everything in its path, especially The American Dream.
Immigration Invasion - View From A Border Patrol
Officer
*
What we're seeing is our
Congress and national leadership dismantling our laws by not enforcing them.
Lawlessness becomes the norm, just like Third World corruption. Illegal aliens
now have more rights and privileges than Americans. If you are an illegal
alien, you can drive a car without a driver's license or insurance. You may
obtain medical care without paying. You may work without paying taxes. Your
children enjoy free education at the expense of taxpaying Americans.
*
“A major
economic drawback, though, to allowing thousands...probably millions...of US
businesses to pay under-market wages and benefits to undocumented workers is
that it depresses wages for all workers in the US. All Americans workers, then
have decreased incomes, lower benefits and higher rates of poverty and hunger.
“
OBAMA & HIS DEPT of LA RAZA JUSTICE
These attitudes are institutionalized in the courses they
take from ethnic studies departments and in the organizations they join. This
homeland was lost to the “brutal ‘gringo’ invasion,” and the goal of the “Plan”
is the reconquest” of that lost
homeland, and restitution for that historical crime. The racist drift of all
this is apparent in the motto of MEChA: “For the Race everything, outside the
Race, nothing.” “Many universities, for example, have chapters of a group
called MEChA, the “National Chicano Student Movement of Aztlán,” the mythical
land allegedly stolen by Americans in the Mexican War. This fantasy history
claims that the whole Southwest was once Aztlán, the homeland of La Raza, the
“bronze” race, who are “the Chicano inhabitants and civilizers of the northern
land of Aztlán from whence came our forefathers,” as the “Plan of Aztlán” puts
it.
What Obama’s Quick Illegal Immigrant Fix Ignores
Posted By Bruce Thornton On June 19, 2012 @ 12:23 am In Daily
Mailer,FrontPage
America’s
ward-heeler-in-chief just bought some votes with the policy equivalent of a keg
of beer and a slab of bacon. Obama’s memorandum to Homeland Security head
Napolitano to stop the deportation of illegal aliens brought here as children
and granting them work permits bypassed Congress, that branch of government our
quaint Constitution makes responsible for such policy. Obama said so himself
last year when he reminded people that he couldn’t “change the law
unilaterally” and “We have to pass bills through the legislature and then I can
sign it.” But the need to stanch the bleeding from a week of economic bad news
for his reelection campaign has given the president Constitutional amnesia. If
Obama had been sincerely interested in crafting a legal, bipartisan, permanent
solution to this problem, he could have negotiated with Florida Republican
Senator Marco Rubio, who has crafted a more sensible solution than last year’s
Dream Act, and worked through Congress. But
the need to throw some goodies to Latino voters in several swing states
critical for his own reelection was more important than actually governing
according to the Constitution.
Obama’s accompanying
rationale for this decision, moreover, was full of unexamined assumptions and
sentiments. “These are young people who study in our schools, they play in our
neighborhoods, they’re friends with our kids, they pledge allegiance to our
flag. They are Americans in their heart, in their minds, in every single way
but one: on paper,” Obama said. They “face the threat of deportation to a
country that [they] know nothing about, with a language that [they] may not
even speak.” They “for all intents and purposes, are Americans. They’ve been
raised as Americans, understand themselves to be part of this country.” All
those statements are loaded with begged questions that point to the bigger
problem we have with immigration both legal and illegal––the question of
national identity and national loyalty.
No doubt, many of these
young immigrants match Obama’s description. I’d bet that those who have served
in the military do. But many do not,
particularly the university students usually showcased by their champions. From
my years of experience as a teacher in a university about half Hispanic,
hundreds of them illegal immigrants mostly from Mexico, I know that many see
themselves as Mexican or Chicano first, and Americans second, if at all. They travel to Mexico and speak Spanish,
and have imbibed an anti-Americanism that casts them as victims of American
imperialism and racism who deserve reparations for those historical crimes.
These attitudes are institutionalized in the courses they
take from ethnic studies departments and in the organizations they join. This
homeland was lost to the “brutal ‘gringo’ invasion,” and the goal of the “Plan”
is the reconquest” of that lost
homeland, and restitution for that historical crime. The racist drift of all
this is apparent in the motto of MEChA: “For the Race everything, outside the
Race, nothing.” “Many universities, for example, have chapters of a group
called MEChA, the “National Chicano Student Movement of Aztlán,” the mythical
land allegedly stolen by Americans in the Mexican War. This fantasy history
claims that the whole Southwest was once Aztlán, the homeland of La Raza, the
“bronze” race, who are “the Chicano inhabitants and civilizers of the northern
land of Aztlán from whence came our forefathers,” as the “Plan of Aztlán” puts
it.
Obviously, MEChA scorns
assimilation to American culture and identity, promoting instead a Mexican
identity called “Chicanismo,” which “involves a personal decision to reject
assimilation and work towards the preservation of our cultural heritage” and
the recovery of a “bronze culture for a bronze people.” Thus MEChA “is
committed to ending the cultural tyranny suffered at the hands of institutional
and systematic discrimination that holds our Gente [people] captive.” If you
need further evidence that this ideology is hostile to American culture and
identity, consider a poem published at California State University Fresno in La
Voz de Aztlán, a state-subsidized campus newspaper that functions as
MEChA’s house organ: “America the land robbed by the white savage / the land of
the biggest genocide / the home of intolerance / the place where dreams come to
die / the place of greed and slavery,” and so on for another two dozen lines.
Clearly, students who
accept such an ideology are hardly going to be “Americans in their heart, in
their minds, in every single way,” as the president claimed. Rather, they will
identify themselves as victims of America from which they feel alienated. They
will not believe, like earlier immigrants, that living in America allows them
to improve their lives by enjoying the freedom and economic opportunity
unavailable to them in their ancestral country. Rather, they will think that
they are owed reparations from the country that unjustly stole a region of
their true homeland. As the Chicano activist slogan goes, “We didn’t cross the border, the border crossed us.” This
historical lie justifies ignoring the responsibilities immigrants to the United
States traditionally have accepted, which is to assimilate to the country they
live in by accepting its language, traditions, and political principles. With
the mythic history of unjust displacement, however, the burden is now on the
mainstream culture to adapt to and accommodate the culture of those it
allegedly oppressed and robbed of their land. The
dominant culture must expiate its historical crimes with various sorts of
reparations and entitlements, particularly special consideration for illegal
aliens like free tuition in public universities, drivers licenses, welfare and
health care, or quasi-amnesties such as the Dream Act.
Such a legitimization of
illegal aliens thus is merely part of what the “Plan of Aztlán” calls
“restitution”: “Restitution for past economic slavery, political exploitation,
ethnic and cultural psychological destruction and denial of civil and human
rights.” A “reconquest” impossible by force will be achieved through demography
and the abandonment of the old model of assimilation, in an attempt to make
California more like the culture illegal aliens risk their lives to leave, and
less like the America that has given them greater freedom and opportunity.
We should not simply
assume, then, as the president and other supporters of amnesty do, that people
here illegally consider themselves Americans and give America their loyalty
just because they were brought here as children. No doubt many do, but how do
we know? We need to figure out a way to vet all immigrants to this
country to ensure that we give the privilege of citizenship only to those who
will not subordinate being an American to being something else. Given how
thoroughly multicultural identity politics, predicated on American crime and
oppression, permeates schools, popular culture, and government programs, merely
living the bulk of one’s life here is no guarantee of American identity.
Determining whether or not immigrants, including those brought here as children,
truly understand and accept the core principles and values of our political
order is the most serious challenge we face in dealing with 11 million illegal
immigrants.
Obama’s quick-fix may win
him some votes, but it does nothing to make sure residence in the country is
reserved only for those immigrants who understand why America is exceptional,
feel blessed to live here, and are proud to be Americans.
Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.
*
A CHRISTIAN VIEWPOINT - THE IMMORALITY of ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION:http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2012/07/the-immorality-of-mexican-invasion.html
*
Newsmax
Obama's 'Hispanicazation' of America
Monday, January 10, 2011 08:28 AM
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/08/obamas-hispanicazation-of-america-most.html
WHO IS OBAMA'S LA RAZA PARTY BASE of ILLEGALS?
FIFTEEN THINGS YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT LA RAZA “THE RACE”
by Michelle Malkin
Only in America could critics of a group called "The Race" be labeled racists. Such is the triumph of left-wing identity chauvinists, whose aggressive activists and supine abettors have succeeded in redefining all opposition as "hate."
Both Barack Obama and John McCain will speak this week in San Diego at the annual conference of the National Council of La Raza, the Latino organization whose name is Spanish for, yes, "The Race." Can you imagine Obama and McCain paying homage to a group of white people who called themselves that? No matter. The presidential candidates and the media have legitimized "The Race" as a mainstream ethnic lobbying group and marginalized its critics as intolerant bigots. The unvarnished truth is that the group is a radical ethnic nationalist outfit that abuses your tax dollars and milks PC politics to undermine our sovereignty.
*
Here are 15 things you should know about "The Race":
*
15. "The Race" supports driver's licenses for illegal aliens.
*
14."The Race" demands in-state tuition discounts for illegal alien students that are not available to law-abiding U.S. citizens and law-abiding legal immigrants.
*
13. "The Race" vehemently opposes cooperative immigration enforcement efforts between local, state and federal authorities.
*
12. "The Race" opposes a secure fence on the southern border.
*
11. "The Race" joined the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee in a failed lawsuit attempt to prevent the feds from entering immigration information into a key national crime database -- and to prevent local police officers from accessing the data.
*
10. "The Race" opposed the state of Oklahoma's tough immigration-enforcement-first laws, which cut off welfare to illegal aliens, put teeth in employer sanctions and strengthened local-federal cooperation and information sharing.
*
9. "The Race" joined other open-borders, anti-assimilationists and sued to prevent Proposition 227, California's bilingual education reform ballot initiative, from becoming law.
*
8. "The Race" bitterly protested common-sense voter ID provisions as an "absolute disgrace."
*
7. "The Race" has consistently opposed post-9/11 national security measures at every turn.
*
6. Former "Race" president Raul Yzaguirre, Hillary Clinton's Hispanic outreach adviser, said this: "U.S. English is to Hispanics as the Ku Klux Klan is to blacks." He was referring to U.S. English, the nation's oldest, largest citizens' action group dedicated to preserving the unifying role of the English language in the United States. "The Race" also pioneered Orwellian open-borders Newspeak and advised the Mexican government on how to lobby for illegal alien amnesty while avoiding the terms "illegal" and "amnesty."
*
5. "The Race" gives mainstream cover to a poisonous subset of ideological satellites, led by Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan, or Chicano Student Movement of Aztlan (MEChA). The late GOP Rep. Charlie Norwood rightly characterized the organization as "a radical racist group … one of the most anti-American groups in the country, which has permeated U.S. campuses since the 1960s, and continues its push to carve a racist nation out of the American West."
*
4. "The Race" is currently leading a smear campaign against staunch immigration enforcement leaders and has called for TV and cable news networks to keep immigration enforcement proponents off the airwaves -- in addition to pushing for Fairness Doctrine policies to shut up their foes. The New York Times reported that current "Race" president Janet Murguia believes "hate speech" should "not be tolerated, even if such censorship were a violation of First Amendment rights."
*
3. "The Race" sponsors militant ethnic nationalist charter schools subsidized by your public tax dollars (at least $8 million in federal education grants). The schools include Aztlan Academy in Tucson, Ariz., the Mexicayotl Academy in Nogales, Ariz., Academia Cesar Chavez Charter School in St. Paul, Minn., and La Academia Semillas del Pueblo in Los Angeles, whose principal inveighed: "We don't want to drink from a White water fountain, we have our own wells and our natural reservoirs and our way of collecting rain in our aqueducts. We don't need a White water fountain … ultimately the White way, the American way, the neo liberal, capitalist way of life will eventually lead to our own destruction."
*
2. "The Race" has perfected the art of the PC shakedown at taxpayer expense, pushing relentlessly to lower home loan standards for Hispanic borrowers, reaping millions in federal "mortgage counseling" grants, seeking special multimillion-dollar earmarks and partnering with banks that do business with illegal aliens.
*
1. "The Race" thrives on ethnic supremacy -- and the elite sheeple's unwillingness to call it what it is. As historian Victor Davis Hanson observes: "[The] organization's very nomenclature 'The National Council of La Raza' is hate speech to the core. Despite all the contortions of the group, Raza (as its Latin cognate suggests) reflects the meaning of 'race' in Spanish, not 'the people'-- and that's precisely why we don't hear of something like 'The National Council of the People,' which would not confer the buzz notion of ethnic, racial and tribal chauvinism."
The fringe is the center. The center is the fringe. Viva La Raza.
Obama Quietly Erasing Borders
Article Link:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=240045
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2012/04/why-mexico-illegals-endorse-obamas-la.html
OBAMA’S JOBS PLAN IS CALLED LA RAZA AMNESTY!
“The response of the Obama
administration and the entire political establishment to the collapse of the
so-called “recovery” is to reject out of hand any significant spending to
generate jobs.”
*
THE ENTIRE REASON THE BORDERS ARE LEFT OPEN IS
TO CUT WAGES!
“We could cut unemployment in half simply by reclaiming the jobs
taken by illegal workers,” said Representative Lamar Smith of
Texas, co-chairman of the Reclaim American Jobs Caucus. “President Obama is on
the wrong side of the American people on immigration. The president should
support policies that help citizens and legal immigrants find the jobs they
need and deserve rather than fail to enforce immigration laws.”
Lloyd Billingsley
The DREAM and the Nightmare
In California, students are better off being illegal immigrants than legal.
30 March 2012
The DREAM and the Nightmare
In California, students are better off being illegal immigrants than legal.
30 March 2012
Last
year, Governor Jerry Brown signed the California DREAM Act, which makes
students in the country illegally eligible for grants and waivers to attend one
of the state’s public colleges or universities. The students must have attended
school in the state for three years, “affirm that they are in the process of
applying to legalize their immigration status,” and show both financial need
and academic achievement. Assemblyman Gil Cedillo, the Los Angeles Democrat who
authored the DREAM Act, hails the legislation as a victory for those “in the
country through no fault of their own.” Opponents such as Republican
assemblyman Tim Donnelly—a first-term legislator not given to
understatement—called Cedillo’s legislation the “California Nightmare Act,” said it is “morally wrong,” and would create “a new entitlement that is going to cause tens of thousands of people
to come here illegally from all over the world.”
Poster
children for the DREAM Act abound. Mandeep Chahal, for example, was six years
old when her parents brought her to the United States from India. Chahal wants
to be a doctor; her fellow students at Los Altos High School near Palo Alto
voted her the person “Most Likely to Save the World.” That’s a tall order, but
to deny such a person the opportunity seems unreasonable. “Many parents of
these children pay taxes for many services they cannot get,” argues Cedillo.
Cedillo’s
point implies that illegal immigrants are the only ones subject to this
dynamic. But consider: my taxes subsidize the Medi-Cal system, which provides
medical care for low-income state residents, but I couldn’t “get” health care
that way, even in the year my income was so low that my daughter qualified for
a Pell Grant. Likewise, the taxes of, say, a California welder help pay for
top-drawer pensions and benefits for state
government employees, but he can’t enjoy those benefits himself. Neither is he
entitled to get a government job merely because his taxes help pay the salaries
and benefits of workers at the Department of Motor Vehicles, CalTrans, the
California Air Resources Board, the Franchise Tax Board, California’s
Department of Education, the State Board of Equalization, the Coastal
Commission, and on and on.
The
taxes of a fast-food worker help subsidize the University of California at
Berkeley, but nothing guarantees that taxpayer admission to Berkeley. The
state’s Master Plan for Higher Education does
guarantee everyone a place in the system, whether at a community college, a
state university, or within the UC system. But no one is promised a place at
the top, and the system grants no special favors to legal immigrants. When I
came to the United States, legally, in 1977, I had been studying at the
University of Windsor, a four-year school in my hometown of Windsor, Ontario. I
wanted to continue my studies at San Diego State University but was not allowed
to transfer because I hadn’t attended high school in California. SDSU
administrators suggested I try the state’s community college system, which
seemed a step down from what I had in mind. But eventually, I put two children
through San Diego State. They’re now working in productive careers, a tax
burden to no one. No legislation rewards parents for that achievement or for
coming to the United States with proper documents.
Cedillo’s law, by contrast,
rewards those who came to California illegally. Will the law, therefore,
encourage more people to enter the state illegally, as Donnelly and other
critics assert?
(IN FACT THERE ARE MORE THAN
11 MILLION ILLEGALS IN SOUTHERN CA ALONE! NOW NEARLY 40% OF CA ARE ILLEGALS,
33% OF NEVADA AND 24% OF COLORADO. MOST
NON LA RAZA PROPAGANDA SOURCES BUT THE NUMBER OF ILLEGALS AT 40 MILLION
AND BREEDING LIKE BUNNIES!)
Recall
how Congress passed and President Ronald Reagan signed the Immigration Reform
and Control Act of 1986, which gave amnesty to several million undocumented
immigrants. A quarter of a century later, the number of illegal immigrants
stands at 11.5 million. It seems clear
that the 1986 act didn’t discourage foreign nationals from entering the United
States without signing the guest book. One of those who obtained
citizenship under the Act was Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa, who made his way
through UC Berkeley and Harvard Medical School and is now associate professor
of neurosurgery and oncology at the Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center in
Baltimore. Quinones-Hinojosa and others who have spoken out in support of the
DREAM Act often give the impression that their cases are typical of illegal
aliens. Not exactly. Amnesty measures, however well-intentioned, usually bring
unintended consequences.
THE REALITY OF LA RAZA’S LOOTING OF CA:
Consider Ignacio Mesa Viera,
subject of a recent front-page story in the Sacramento Bee.
He came to the United States illegally in 1979 to work and help his family, as
he explained, but was convicted on a drug offense in 1995. He was deported but
returned to the United States, whereupon he was busted for another drug offense
in 2008. Before his recent deportation, the U.S. government was paying for
Viera’s kidney dialysis, a treatment that can cost more than $60,000 a year. “I
imagine that the reason they don’t want to let me stay in this country,” Viera
told the Bee, “is they don’t want to be paying for this.”
Cedillo
and his colleagues need to know that everybody’s taxes pay for services they
and their children “cannot get”—including kidney dialysis and other expensive
medical treatments courtesy of the federal government. Meantime, as a University of California report noted last year, tens of
thousands of middle-class, taxpaying legal residents are being squeezed out of
an affordable college education even as the legislature contrives to provide
scholarships for the children of illegal aliens. The lawmakers’ solution is to create yet another
entitlement in the form of a new $1 billion scholarship program for students
whose families earn less than $150,000 a year. Such is life in the Golden
State, even with a DREAM Act in place.
Lloyd
Billingsley is the author of Hollywood Party:
How Communism Seduced the American Film Industry in the 1930s and 1940s and the former editorial
director of the Pacific Research Institute.
*
*
OBAMA
HAS PROMISED HIS LA RAZA “THE RACE” PARTY BASE of ILLEGALS AMNESTY, NO
E-VERIFY, NO I.D. FOR REQUIRED OF ILLEGALS VOTING… OR AT LEAST CONTINUED
NON-ENFORCEMENT!
OBAMA
HANDS MASSIVE WELFARE TO ILLEGALS, ALONG WITH OUR JOBS TO BUY THE ILLEGALS'
ILLEGAL VOTES!
The
truth about the DREAM Act
Published
March 20, 2012
|
FoxNews.com
The
DREAM Act has become a rallying cry for President Obama, members of his
administration, and liberal Democrats everywhere. President Obama has vowed to
“keep fighting for the DREAM Act,” which would grant amnesty to millions of
illegal immigrants.
It’s
true when listeners or those polled don’t know the facts that the DREAM Act has
some appeal. After all, we are all naturally sympathetic when children are
involved.
But
the descriptions of the DREAM Act voiced by President Obama and his cohorts are
not accurate. And the consequences are never told.
DREAM
Act supporters claim that only children would benefit from such a bill, but the
facts tell another story. Under most DREAM Act proposals, amnesty would be
given to individuals up to the age of 30—not exactly children. And some other
proposals don’t even have an age limit.
These
supporters also maintain that illegal immigrants can’t go college without the
DREAM Act. But the truth is that illegal immigrants can already go to college
in most states.
And
ultimately, most versions of the DREAM Act actually don’t even force illegal
immigrants to comply with all the requirements in the bill, such as going to
college or joining the military. The administration can waive requirements
because of “hardship”at its complete discretion.
DREAM Act proposals are
also a magnet for fraud. Many illegal immigrants will fraudulently claim they
came here as children or that they are under 30. And the federal government has
no way to check whether their claims are true or not.
Such massive fraud occurred after the 1986 amnesty for illegal
immigrants who claimed they were agricultural workers. Studies found two-thirds
of all applications for the 1986 amnesty were fraudulent.
(ANYONE THAT THINKS THERE ARE ONLY 11 MILLION ILLEGALS IN OUR
BORDERS SHOULD COME VISIT CA! LOOK AROUND AND TRY TO FIND A NON-HISPANIC
ENGLISH SPEAKING LEGAL! CA IS NOW 40% ILLEGAL. NEVADA IS NOW 33% ILLEGAL.
COLORADO IS NOW 20% ILLEGAL. AND LA RAZA IS NOW MOVING INTO THE AMERICAN SOUTH)
And
this amnesty did nothing to stop illegal immigration. In 1986, there were about
three million illegal immigrants living in the U.S. Today, there are an
estimated 11 million illegal immigrants in the U.S. and about seven million of
them work here, unfairly taking jobs from unemployed Americans.
While DREAM Act
supporters claim that it would only benefit children, they skip over the fact
that it actually rewards the very illegal immigrant parents who knowingly
violated our laws. Once their children become U.S. citizens, they can petition
for their illegal immigrant parents and adult siblings to be legalized, who
will then bring in others in an endless chain.
This
kind of chain migration only encourages more illegal immigration, as parents
will bring their children to the U.S. in hopes of receiving citizenship.
President Obama tried to
get the DREAM Act passed during a lame duck session about a year ago but it
faced bipartisan opposition in Congress. This hasn’t stopped the administration
from passing its agenda. The Obama administration does everything it can to let
illegal immigrants stay here, which compounds the problem.
Political
appointees at the Department of Homeland
Security recently issued new deportation guidelines that amount to
backdoor amnesty and strike another blow at millions of unemployed U.S.
workers.
Under
the administration’s new deportation policy, DHS officials review all incoming
and most pending cases before an immigration court to determine if the illegal
immigrant can remain in the U.S. Since the administration has made clear that
many illegal immigrants are not considered priorities for removal, including
potential DREAM Act beneficiaries, this could open the door to allow millions
of illegal immigrants to live and work in the U.S. without a vote of Congress.
The Obama administration
has also cut worksite enforcement efforts by 70%, allowing illegal immigrants
to continue working in jobs that rightfully belong to citizens and legal
workers. And the list goes on and on – this administration has a pattern
of ignoring the laws and intent of Congress.
The United States is based on the rule of law but the Obama
administration already has dirty hands by abusing administrative authority to
grant amnesty to illegal immigrants. The DREAM Act doesn’t stop illegal
immigration—it only encourages more of it by rewarding lawbreakers.
Rep.
Lamar Smith (R-Texas) is Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee