Wednesday, January 25, 2017

OBAMA FLOODS U.S. WITH 2 MILLION ILLEGAL CRIMINALS! - Trump to target flood of refugees, criminal illegals in executive orders

Trump to target flood of refugees, criminal illegals in executive orders: President Trump on Wednesday is expected to shift to illegal immigration issues and target law-breaking criminal illegals and the wave of largely Muslim refugees flooding into the country. Also in focus will be so-called sanctuary cities. Trump criticized federally-funded cities such as San Francisco that block federal officials from seizing illegals in their jails and he has promised to deport some two million aliens convicted of crimes. Incoming Attorney General Jeff Sessions has called for an end to sanctuary cities and federal funding to those that block federal agents. White House officials gave sketchy details of the president's plans to reporters and key congressional lawmakers, but some have emerged. Reuters had a story about the focus on the Middle East and Washington Post reporter Robert Costa tweeted on the border and sanctuary cities.

Trump to target flood of refugees, criminal illegals in executive orders


President Trump on Wednesday is expected to shift to illegal immigration issues and target law-breaking criminal illegals and the wave of largely Muslim refugees flooding into the country.
Also in focus will be so-called "sanctuary cities." Trump criticized federally-funded cities such as San Francisco that block federal officials from seizing illegals in their jails and he has promised to deport some two million aliens convicted of crimes. Incoming Attorney General Jeff Sessions has called for an end to sanctuary cities and federal funding to those that block federal agents.
White House officials gave sketchy details of the president's plans to reporters and key congressional lawmakers, but some have emerged. Reuters had a story about the focus on the Middle East and Washington Post reporter Robert Costa tweeted on the border and sanctuary cities.
Other sources said that the president will focus on refugees from Muslim nations. Under former President Obama, some 18,000 Syrian refugees were let into the U.S., and their background checks by the United Nations has been questioned. Trump has pledged to put the brakes on the refugee influx from warring Muslim countries.
In a signal that Trump plans to make sanctuary cities and criminal illegals a key target, at least two "angel" families victimized by the aliens are planning to participate in the signing of anti-illegal immigration executive orders, sources told Secrets.

Among those traveling to Washington is Steve Ronnebeck, whose son Grant, 21, was killed while working at a convenience store in Mesa, Arizona. The killer was illegal Apolinar Altamirano, who had recently been let out of jail after a conviction for burglary and other crimes.
Another is Mary Ann Mendoza, who had written a letter to former President Obama who sought action and against illegal immigrants after her son was killed in a crash by a drunk illegal.

Jessica M. Vaughan, director of policy studies for the Center for Immigration Studies, said, "These actions are very good news, and will be welcomed with relief in communities all over the country. The Obama administration's tolerance of illegal immigration and unreasonable restrictions on enforcement had tragic results, and it's appropriate that one of President Trumps first acts is to undo some of these policies."

Her group has charted the damage criminal aliens and sanctuary cities have done to the country and said that Trump has the support of a majority of Americans.
"The interest groups that clamor for more immigration want all the public discussion to be about the illegal aliens who got work permits under DACA, but these actions targeting criminal aliens are more important for the well-being of our communities. This is one of the reasons people voted for Donald Trump – to return some sanity to our immigration system."
Paul Bedard, the Washington Examiner's "Washington Secrets" columnist, can be contacted at pbedard@washingtonexaminer.com

NAROCOMEX PRESIDENT ENRIQUE PENA-NIETO COMES LOOTING: WILL HE BRING A PLANE LOAD OF ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS FOR WELFARE?

Let me give President Enrique Peña-Nieto a little credit for taking the initiative and setting up a meeting with President Trump.  He is under a lot of political pressure south of the border.  Let me give President Trump credit for a...


"The American Southwest seems to be slowly returning to the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a single shot."  --- EXCELSIOR --- national newspaper of Mexico

REMITTANCES ….. are only part of Mexico’s looting… and billions for anchor  baby breeders, billions for heroin sales and then do the numbers!




Mexicans abroad sent home nearly $2.4 billion in transfers in November, 24.7 percent higher than a year earlier, marking their fastest pace of expansion since March 2006, according to Mexican central bank data on Monday…

'El Presidente' Enrique Peña-Nieto coming to Washington


Let me give President Enrique Peña-Nieto a little credit for taking the initiative and setting up a meeting with President Trump.  He is under a lot of political pressure south of the border.  Let me give President Trump credit for accepting the visit.  It shows me that both sides want to get something good started.
This is from the L.A. Times:
The Mexican president’s early visit to the Trump White House underscores the importance that Mexico City places on having smooth relations with the new  U.S. administration, despite candidate Trump’s many broadsides against Mexico and Mexicans.
According to a statement released by the Mexican government, Peña Nieto told Trump on Saturday that he hopes to work together "with a focus on respect for the sovereignty of both nations and shared responsibility."
Beyond the politics, Mexico and the U.S. have serious common interests, from cartels that kill Mexicans and bring drugs to the U.S. to over $500 billion in trade.   
Sadly, many of Mr. Trump's statements have actually been a huge boost for the Latin American left.  In other words, Mr. Trump has become the latest version of the Ugly Gringo so much of the left likes to scream about.     
My hope is that President Trump understands the importance of a change in tone and a stable Mexico and Latin America.    
The latest IMF forecast is for Latin America to grow slowly over the next couple of years: 1.2% in 2017 and 2.1%  in 2018.
Such lousy growth will put tremendous political pressures on center-right leaders in Argentina, Chile, and even Mexico.  It will be boon a for leftists, who do not have answers but can march with anti-Trump placards and blame free-market policies for the decline.
So let's hope President Trump sees the big picture when he sits down with President Peña-Nieto.
First, I support the border fence, but constantly saying that Mexico will pay for it puts President Peña-Nieto in an awful position back home.  In other words, build the fence and move on.    
Second, we can renegotiate NAFTA and other trade deals, but let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater.   
I understand the argument that NAFTA has taken some manufacturing south of the border, but it has also been great news for U.S. exporters, who are selling Mexico a lot of goods and services.  This is a summary of our trade with Mexico:
Mexico was the United States' 2nd largest goods export market in 2015.
U.S. goods exports to Mexico in 2015 were $236 billion, down 1.6% ($3.9 billion) from 2014 but up 97% from 2005. 
U.S. exports to Mexico are up 468% from 1993 (pre-NAFTA). 
U.S. exports to Mexico account for 15.7% of overall U.S. exports in 2015.
The top export categories in 2015 were: machinery ($42 billion), electrical machinery ($41 billion), vehicles ($22 billion), mineral fuels ($19 billion), and plastics ($17 billion).
U.S. exports of agricultural products to Mexico totaled $18 billion in 2015, our 3th largest agricultural export market. 
Leading categories include: corn ($2.3 billion), soybeans ($1.4 billion), dairy products ($1.3 billion), pork & pork products ($1.3 billion), and beef & beef products ($1.1 billion).
U.S. exports of services to Mexico were an estimated $30.8 billion in 2015, 2.7% ($807 million) more than 2014, and 36.7% greater than 2005 levels. 
It was up roughly 196% from 1993 (pre-NAFTA). 
The United States has a services trade surplus of an estimated $9.2 billion with Mexico in 2015, down 12.7% from 2014.
Let me add a couple of points:
1) We've had surpluses with Mexico before and currently have a deficit.  It changes, as these things tend to do.
2) I see a lot of jobs in the U.S. when we exports billions of dollars in machinery, plastics, and others.  Some American companies are indeed making these and selling them to Mexico.   
So let's be sensible and work this out between neighbors.
Yes, I know that Mexico could do more to stop illegal immigration.  At the same time, we could do more in fighting the illegal drug consumption flooding Mexico with dollars supporting cartels.
Let's start fresh and find some common ground.  There is the potential for lots of common ground!
P.S. You can listen to my show (Canto Talk) and follow me on Twitter.
OPEN BORDERS and HEROIN: AMERICAN POLITICIANS PARTNER WITH THE LA RAZA MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS!

CAUTION!

GRAPHIC IMAGES of America coming under Mex Occupation

The NARCOMEX drug cartels now operate in all major American cities and haul back to NARCOMEX between $40 top $60 BILLION from sales of HEROIN!



 UNDER THE LA RAZA SUPREMACIST OBAMA, THE MEX DRUG CARTELS NOW OPERATE BORDER TO UNDEFENDED BORDER
Mexican cartel smugglers have taken full advantage of the system in order to maximize their profits from human smuggling as well as the smuggling of illegal aliens. In 2014, Mexico’s Gulf Cartel was able to make approximately $38 million in a matter of months off human smuggling alone.

AMERICA: NO LEGAL NEED APPLY

REPORT: The assault to finish off the American middle-class is NOT over


“The report noted that many illegals don't have jobs or have difficulty in landing good jobs because of local laws.”

“However, it identified several states that have begun easing employment laws so that illegals can get a job.”


TRUMP FOLDS TO LA RAZA MEX FASCIST MOVEMENT
Says the “WALL” will now be only “NO TRESSPASSING” signs posted every hundred miles!
*
“He's showing more empathy for illegal aliens than he is for American citizens.  Shouldn't it be the concerns of Americans he should be considering first, before the feelings of illegals?  These people are taking taxpayer money and American jobs, some committing crimes, and many are not assimilating and speaking English, and Trump wants them to stay?”

 ILLEGALS & WELFARE
70% OF ILLEGALS GET WELFARE!
“According to the Centers for Immigration Studies, April '11, at least 70% of Mexican illegal alien families receive some type of welfare in the US!!! cis.org”
After Trump victory:
Mexican peso plummets amid ruling class unease
MEXICO DOES NOT WANT THEIR 40 MILLION LOOTING MEXICANS AND MEX CRIMINAL BACK!!!

January 27, 2017

Why Mexico will pay for the wall

The debate around Donald Trump's wall has been shaped by liberal and media narratives that focus on illegal immigrants in the U.S.  The left has painted a picture of compassion for these immigrants, making them the entirety of the story.  Sanctuary cities have declared safe havens for illegal immigrants, without really distinguishing between the good and the bad among them.  They have also spun numbers about temporarily declining immigration rates to diminish the significance of the problem.  Liberals have labeled opponents of open borders hard-hearted racists.  Immigration has become one of those narrative stories, filled with human suffering, compassion, and demonized enemies, that liberals love to love.
What liberals have ignored is the severe consequences of slack U.S. borders for Mexico.  Mexican society and the Mexican economy have been severely distorted and held hostage for decades by criminal gangs that make their living smuggling drugs and migrants into the U.S.  Their access to and control over the U.S. border are precisely what has brought them power and wealth, while unleashing a long-term scourge on Mexican society.  These gangs murder, kidnap, 

and extort innocent Mexican citizens.  They 

corrupt the Mexican police and military.  They 

transport illegal migrants to the U.S. – extorting, 

exploiting, raping, and murdering them along the 

way.  They transport drugs to the U.S., 

undermining our civil society and killing our 

citizens.  They instill fear and violence across 

Mexican society, preventing it from achieving the 

stable, middle-class society that NAFTA 

promised.  These truths are well documented in 

news reports, testimony from ranchers who own 

border land, and movies.
Where is liberals' compassion, in their self-absorption and attachment to their own narratives, for the honest citizens of Mexico who are victimized in their own country by the criminal gangs fostered and financed by open U.S. borders?
Liberals have a narrative about the tons of illegal drugs these gangs transport into the U.S., too.  It goes something like this: we did drugs when we were young (Choomer Obama), and it didn't harm us.  Look at us now: we're running things, and isn't the world a better place?  Those deplorables dying of heroin overdoses in flyover country?  The real problem is the War on Drugs.  If only we legalized and taxed drugs, unfortunates could get drugs easily and wouldn't have to go into debt and commit crimes to finance their habits.  With the taxes, we could finance more social programs.  The people who can't control themselves?  We can medicalize their addictions and give them unlimited health care.
Shutting down the U.S. border will reduce or eliminate the power and wealth of these criminal gangs and their stranglehold over Mexican society.  Once they no longer have access to the U.S. border, they will no longer have access to the source of their wealth and power.
Trump's wall will eliminate the reign of terror under which Mexico's honest citizens have lived for a long time.  The benefits that a wall will bring to Mexican civil society and to law and order should be reasons for liberals to support Trump's wall.  These benefits are also why Mexico, once it has overcome the perceived affront to its dignity, will gladly pay.
Shutting down the U.S. border will also 

dramatically reduce the flow of illegal drugs 

into the U.S., with all their negative economic 

and social consequences.
I'm waiting for a liberal to argue against these benefits, but I haven't found one yet.

CAUTION!


HERE IS THE MEXICO POURING OVER OUR OPEN AND UNDEFENDED BORDERS AND HAULING BACK BILLIONS FROM HEROIN SALES!

GRAPHIC IMAGES of America coming under Mex Occupation

The NARCOMEX drug cartels now operate in all major American cities and haul back to NARCOMEX between $40 top $60 BILLION from sales of HEROIN!




ILLEGALS & WELFARE
70% OF ILLEGALS GET WELFARE!
“According to the Centers for Immigration Studies, April '11, at least 70% of Mexican illegal alien families receive some type of welfare in the US!!! cis.org”
CIS

 REVOLUTION IN MEXICO: Will It Spread Over America’s Open Borders?
LOS ANGELES: Mexico’s Second Largest City, First Place for Billion Dollar Mexican Welfare, Number 1 for Mexican Murder and Western Gateway For the LA RAZA Mexican Drug Cartels
TEXAS GOV FIGHTS BACK LA RAZA MEX OCCUPATION!
WHY ARE ILLEGALS ABOVE THE LAW?

SANCTUARY CITIES and SANCTUARY STATE of CALIFORNIA: The LA RAZA welfare state on our backs!

"The American Southwest seems to be slowly 

returning to the jurisdiction of Mexico 

without firing a single shot."  --

EXCELSIOR --- national newspaper of 

Mexico



REMITTANCES ….. are only part of Mexico’s 

looting… and billions for anchor  baby breeders, 

billions for heroin sales and then do the numbers!




Mexicans abroad sent home nearly $2.4 billion in transfers in November, 24.7 percent higher than a year earlier, marking their fastest pace of expansion since March 2006, according to Mexican central bank data on Monday…

BETSY EVOS LEADS TRUMP'S ASSAULT ON AMERICA'S YOUTH

Senate moves toward confirmation of billionaire opponent of public schools

Senate moves toward confirmation of billionaire opponent of public schools

By Isabelle Belanger 
25 January 2017
The confirmation of Trump’s pick for education secretary, billionaire proponent of school privatization Betsy DeVos, is being rushed through despite blatant conflicts of interest and her ignorance of basic federal education laws. In a letter Monday, Tennessee Republican Senator Lamar Alexander, chairman of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor & Pensions, rejected Democratic Party requests for a second hearing. The Republican-controlled Senate will vote on the confirmation January 31.
DeVos and her husband are estimated to have a net worth of $5 billion. Her family has donated a quarter of million dollars to four of the senators—including Alexander—present at her first education committee hearing on January 17. The family has paid nearly a $1 million to 21 Republican senators who will vote on her confirmation next week, in addition to the $2.25 million the DeVos’ gave last fall to the Senate Leadership Fund, a super PAC tied to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.
The first hearing took place before the Office of Government Ethics was able to review the immense DeVos financial holdings for potential conflicts of interests. Both Dick and Betsy DeVos have investments and political ties to numerous organizations committed to school privatization and right-wing religious objectives, which could directly benefit from her confirmation.
One involves the student loan collection agency Performant, 

which does business with the Department of Education. The 

family’s private investment and management firm, RDV 

Corporation, is affiliated with LMF WF Portfolio, a limited 

liability corporation listed in regulatory filings as one of 

several firms involved in a $147 million loan to Performant 

Financial Corporation, the Washington Post reported.
Performant had 14 contracts worth more than $20 million—equivalent to 23 percent of its revenue—with the Department of Education. It recently lost a contract bid and is now protesting the decision with the Government Accountability Office.
If confirmed, the Post reported, “DeVos would be in 

a position to influence the award of debt collection, 

servicing and recovery contracts, in addition to the 

oversight and monitoring of the contracts. She would

also have the authority to revise payments and fees 

to contractors for rehabilitating past-due debt.”
Rejecting the request for a second hearing, Alexander said DeVos was currently answering “837 written follow-up questions” and that she has already “spent considerably more time answering questions of committee members than either of President Obama’s education secretaries. I do not know why our committee should treat a Republican nominee so differently than the nominee of a Democratic president.”
During the January 17 hearing DeVos demonstrated her hostility towards public education and the basic democratic principle that all children, regardless of socio-economic background, race or disabilities, should be provided a high-quality public education.
After being asked if she agrees that all schools—public, charter or private—that receive federal funding should be required to comply with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), a federal civil rights law, she responded that it would be a “matter … best left to the states.” She then referred to a Florida program that requires parents to sign away their IDEA rights in exchange for a private school voucher.
When asked by Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) if all schools receiving federal funds, whether public, charter or private schools receiving voucher money, should be held to the same standards of accountability, she repeatedly evaded the question, stating only that she supports “accountability.”
When questioned about gun-free zones around schools, proposed after the Sandy Hook, Connecticut school massacre in 2012, DeVos gave a bizarre answer citing the need for guns to protect against grizzly bear attacks in a Wyoming school.
As the World Socialist Web Site detailed in its series, “Betsy DeVos: Religion and profit in the war on public education” (Part One and Part Two), the appointment of DeVos is aimed at destroying public education and funneling even more public money into the hands of for-profit charter operators, religious institutions and other businesses. She is one of several Trump cabinet and sub-cabinet selections, including for the departments of Health and Human Services, Housing and Urban Development and Labor, as well as the EPA, who are tasked with destroying social reforms that the corporate and financial oligarchy considers illegitimate deductions from their profit.
DeVos, the former Republican Party chairwoman in Michigan and chair of the school privatization group American Federation for Children, pushed for laws for the use of public funds to pay for private school tuition and the spread of charter schools, with little or no oversight. Michigan now has one of the highest number of charters and largest percentage run by for-profit companies in the country.
Last week, the state School Reform Office announced that 38 schools—including 24 in Detroit—could soon be closed because they have ranked in the bottom five percent for academic performance since 2014. If the schools are not closed, under the state’s law, academics can be put under the control of a CEO, the principal and half the staff can be replaced or the school could be converted into a charter school.
The grandstanding of the Democrats as the defenders of public education, however, is completely fraudulent. The stage was set for DeVos by the Democrats who have colluded with the Republicans in a decades-long assault on public education. In the 1990s, President Bill Clinton first adopted the right-wing, pro-market nostrums of “school choice” long promoted by the Republican right and it has been central to the Democratic Party, on the federal, state and local level, ever since.
For eight years, the Obama administration and congressional Democrats worked with Republicans to implement and intensify the anti-public-school measures contained in the Bush administration’s No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. The use of standardized tests to scapegoat teachers for the educational problems caused by decades of school cuts and the growth of poverty escalated under Obama. Restrictions on allocations of Title I funding, intended to increase financial support to schools serving high percentages of students in poverty, were replaced by competitive grants known as Race To The Top, pitting poor schools against each other in a competition for desperately needed Title I funds. The number of students in charter schools more than doubled under Obama and his education secretary, Arne Duncan.
Far from “grilling” DeVos at the hearing, Democrats never asked about her financial and political ties to organizations such as the Acton Institute, which is dedicated to ending compulsory education for children and legalizing child labor. In the end, this was political theater.
Committee members include Patty Murray (D-Washington), who has long experience collaborating with Republicans to enact deep social cuts, Hillary Clinton’s former running mate Tim Kaine (D-Virginia), who called for a 26 percent reduction in funding to public colleges and universities in Virginia in his final term as Governor, and Elizabeth Warren (D-Massachusetts) who, in her book, The Two Income Trap: Why Middle-Class Parents Are Going Broke, (2003), called for the introduction of a universal school voucher that would allow families to send their children to any public school, which would to the closure of many inner-city schools.
The handing of the education secretary’s position to a billionaire and avowed enemy of public education will lead to an immense escalation of the war against this most basic democratic right. Neither the Democrats nor the teacher unions will do anything to oppose these attacks. The American Federation of Teachers and the National Education Association, which openly collaborated with Obama, will, if anything, be more willing to offer up their services in suppressing the opposition by teachers, out of fear that they will be cut out of the process of pro-business “school reform.”
The coming months and years will see the eruption of social opposition to the destruction of public education. This must be politically independent from both corporate-controlled parties and advance an anti-capitalist program against the domination of society by the corporate and financial aristocracy, which is now putting one of its own in charge of public education.

US student loan corporation faces lawsuit for cheating millions

THE LOOTING OF AMERICA! FUCKERS AT NAVIENT TAKE LESSONS FROM AMERICA'S BIGGEST PLUNDERING BANKSTERS!
US student loan corporation faces lawsuit for cheating millions
By Seb Gomez
24 January 2017
Navient, the largest servicer of student loans in the United States, has recently been targeted by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and the state attorneys general of Washington and Illinois for misleading borrowers and other illegal practices that increased the loan repayment costs for millions.
Navient oversees some $300 billion in student loans for more than 12 million borrowers, 6 million of which are under contract with the Department of Education. In total the Delaware-based corporation, which was formed out of Sallie Mae in 2014, accounts for nearly one fourth of all student loan borrowers. The lawsuit alleges that every account may have been affected by the malpractice.
Navient is charged with misleading borrowers away from cheaper income-based payment plans in order to inflate loans with higher interest rates. Borrowers are legally allowed to change payment plans as they please. However, Navient is accused of advising its customer service employees to press customers away from the income-based plans and into forbearance, a short-term postponement of payment normally appropriate for those with temporary financial difficulty.
Those placed into forbearance without proper knowledge of the terms face significantly higher costs, which generally increase the longer the payments are postponed. Such costs include the accumulation of unpaid monthly interest and the addition of unpaid interest to the principal balance of the loan, resulting in a recalculation of the loan based on the compounded interest.
The court filing concluded that from 2010 to 
2015, Navient enrolled 1.5 million borrowers 
in two or more consecutive forbearances, 
more than 470,000 in three consecutive 
forbearances, and 520,000 in four or more. 
In total this amounted to nearly $4 billion in 
extra interest revenue for the company over 
those 5 years.
The lawsuit points out that Navient customer service employees had been incentivized to mislead customers. The longer the call, the less these workers are paid. The process to transition a customer into an income-based payment plan requires multiple and lengthy conversations as well as an online or paper application with income tax documentation.
By contrast, forbearance enrollment can be completed with one phone call and without any paperwork. These findings reveal that the company’s practices had effectively ensured that the employees tasked with helping customers would be financially burdened to actually do so.
Navient also neglected to inform those able to enroll in income-based plans that their enrollment required recertification after a 12-month period. The lawsuit notes that failure to recertify in a timely manner typically increases monthly payments by hundreds to even thousands of dollars and delays the progress toward loan forgiveness.
In addition to Navient’s cost-cutting and selective presentation of information to student loan holders, the company is charged with careless overview of the accounts of injured military veterans. Permanently injured veterans are eligible to have their federal student loans discharged. However, on numerous accounts, Navient improperly marked the forgiven loans as defaults, ruining veterans’ credit scores.

BLOG: BEING A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE WILL NEVER STOP YOU FROM DOING BUSINESS WITH THE U.S. GOVERNMENT!
Navient and its predecessor, Sallie Mae, have a history of government lawsuits and investigations spanning nearly two decades.
In 2014, Navient was fined $60 million by the Justice Department and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) for illegally overcharging military customers. That lawsuit found that the company had intentionally ignored the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, which caps loan interest rates at 6 percent for active military personnel. In 2008, Sallie Mae struck a settlement with the state of New York for $2 million for conflict of interest practices. The company was found to have been paying for the entertainment and travel expenses of school officials it was doing business with.
The recent filing by the CFPB came just two days before the inauguration of now President Donald Trump. The New York Times reported that immediately following the November election, Navient’s stock value rose to nearly $18 from around $13, reflecting speculation among shareholders that the incoming administration would move to further deregulate finance— including the potential dismemberment of the CFPB.
The CFPB was established by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010. Since its inception, Republican politicians have unanimously opposed the largely harmless organization, but now with Republican control of the House, Senate and White House, even such nominal reforms can be expected to be pulled back in the near future.
Currently, total student debt towers at more 
than $1.4 trillion, surpassing both credit card 
and auto loan debt. A report released earlier 
this month by the CFPB also found that the 
number of Americans aged 60 and over still 
paying for student debt has quadrupled since 
2005, increasing from 700,000 to 2.8 million
seniors.


THE  GIG JOB – In America, No Legal Need Apply


"Possibly most affected by this shift in the economy is the 

Millennial generation, those  aged 18-30. The report notes that 

more than half of those under age 25 participate in independent 

work, not just in the United States but throughout the European 

Union as well."



AMERICA’S YOUTH STARVE

FOR EIGHT YEARS BARACK OBAMA AND HIS HAREM OF 

CORRUPT DEM POLS HAVE  SABOTAGED OUR BORDERS 

TO EASE TENS OF MILLIONS OF ILLEGALS INTO OUR 

JOBS, WELFARE OFFICES AND VOTING BOOTHS. 






The new reports show that in addition to “traditional” coping strategies of skipping meals and eating cheap food, these teens and pre-teens are increasingly forced into shoplifting, stealing, selling drugs, joining a gang, or selling their bodies for money in a struggle to eat properly.


AMERICA STUDENTS STARVE:

Report on the impact of OBAMA-

CLINTONOMICS


THE IMPACT OF TRUMPERnomics AND THE MASSIVE TRANSFER OF WEALTH TO THE SUPER RICH

AMERICA: One paycheck and two illegals away from homelessness.


"The economists found that the pre-tax share of national income received by the
bottom half of the US population has been cut nearly in half since 1980, from 20
percent to 12 percent, while the income share of the top one percent has nearly
doubled, from 12 percent to 20 percent."



SOARING POVERTY IN AMERICA’S OPEN BORDERS




TRUMPERNOMICS FOR THE SUPER RICH:


“In the US, the working class will confront a government 

unlike any other in American history, which will continue and

intensify a decades-long social counterrevolution overseen by 

the Democrats and Republicans. The incoming Trump 

administration is manned by billionaires, generals and arch 

reactionaries. It is a government of, by and for the oligarchy, 

committed to destroying every remaining gain won by 


workers over the past century.”