Critics
point to the lessons from the last time Congress tackled his issue, the Immigration Reform and Control Act
(IRCA), a 1986 law that legalized 3 million undocumented immigrants. Both sides
acknowledge the law produced substantial fraud, leading to nearly triple the
number of new residents created by the law.
BUT
THE THING IS, THERE ARE NOT 11 MILLION ILLEGALS IN AMERICAN BORDERS, THERE ARE
CLOSER TO 40 MILLION. AND THE LA RAZA DEMS HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO INTENTIONS OF
ENFORCING ANY LAW, LET ALONE ONE AGAINST THEIR PARTY BASE of ILLEGALS.
OBAMA
HAS ALREADY SABOTAGED E-VERIFY TO EASE MORE ILLEGALS INTO AMERICAN JOBS, AND
THEN SABOTAGED STATES’ RIGHTS TO BLOCK ILLEGALS FROM VOTING BY HAVING ID’s.
DURING
AN EMPLOYMENT CRISIS OF THE LAST FOUR YEARS UNDER OBAMA, 2/3 OF ALL JOBS WENT
TO IMMIGRANTS, BOTH LEGAL AND ILLEGAL.
WORKPLACE
ENFORCEMENT OF LAWS PROHIBITING THE EMPLOYMENT OF ILLEGALS IS DOWN 70%! WHAT
ELSE DO YOU NEED TO KNOW… THE ILLEGALS ALREADY KNOW IT! IT WILL NEVER BE
ENFORCED.
It’s
simple math, says Mr. Mehlman, adding, “how can you possibly do background
checks on 11 million people? It just won’t happen.”
THAT SO, MR. JORGE-MARIO?
THERE ARE ONLY EIGHT STATES WITH
A POPULATION GREATER THAN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, A COUNTY THAT HANDS OUT $600
MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS, PRIMARILY ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS. IN
THIS COUNTY, 94% OF ALL JOBS GO TO ILLEGALS USING STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY
NUMBERS!
THE LA RAZA-CONTROLLED STATE
LEGISLATURE RECENTLY PASSED A LAW MAKING IT ILLEGAL FOR EMPLOYERS TO USE
E-VERIFY! VIVA LA RAZA SUPREMACY?
THE TAX-FREE MEXICAN
UNDERGROUND ECONOMY IS CALCULATED TO BE IN EXCESS OF $2 BILLION PER YEAR.
THE STATE OF CA PUTS OUT $22
BILLION PER YEAR IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS, WHICH NOT ONE LEGAL VOTED FOR.
This expectation
sells this target population short, says Jorge-Mario Cabrera, spokesman for the
Coalition for Humane Immigrants Rights of Los Angeles (CHIRLA). “Nobody wants to go
where they are not wanted and cannot legally find a job to support them or
their family,” he says. “I do not foresee a wave of illegal immigration,
because most of these people realize the political situation in the US is very
dire when it comes to undocumented immigrants.”
Immigration
reform: Will 'amnesty' produce more illegal immigration?
Supporters
of immigration reform that includes of a path to citizenship say that the US is
not as attractive a destination as it once was for illegal immigration.
Los Angeles
Immigration
reform is in the air. A bipartisan Senate group unveiled its proposals on
Monday, and the president is scheduled to announce his own package on Tuesday.
Both contain provisions for legalizing some 11 million undocumented immigrants
now in the US.
·
But,
just as there promises to be no easy consensus on a final deal, there is little
agreement about how much the overall reforms will actually stem the flow of
illegal immigration across America’s borders. Critics of the proposals say a
path to citizenship invites more undocumented migrants, while supporters of the
move to legalize many who have lived and worked in the US for years say it is
not an open invitation to new illegal immigration.
Critics
point to the lessons from the last time Congress tackled his issue, the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA), a 1986 law that
legalized 3 million undocumented immigrants. Both sides acknowledge the law produced
substantial fraud, leading to nearly triple the number of new residents created
by the law.
"The
message will go out,” says Ira
Mehlman, Seattle-based national spokesman for the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), “telling
people to bring their rent receipts and pay stubs real or not.” The situation will
be a replay of the 1986 law, only on a larger scale, he says. It’s simple math, says Mr. Mehlman, adding,
“how can you possibly do background checks on 11 million people? It just won’t
happen.”
This expectation sells
this target population short, says Jorge-Mario Cabrera, spokesman for the
Coalition for Humane Immigrants Rights of Los
Angeles (CHIRLA). “Nobody wants to go where they are not wanted and cannot
legally find a job to support them or their family,” he says. “I do not foresee
a wave of illegal immigration, because most of these people realize the
political situation in the US is very dire when it comes to undocumented
immigrants.”
The
proposed reforms will not encourage illegal immigration in the future for three
reasons, says David Koelsch, director of the Immigration Law Clinic at the
University of Detroit Mercy School of Law.
- The proposed pathways to
legal status will be long and expensive, he says via e-mail, “So any
reward for future illegal immigration is distant.”
- The birth rate in Mexico
is in rapid decline and domestic industry's wages are rising, “making the
US less attractive,” he says.
- The US economy is still not recovered, "so there
is not a strong draw for illegal immigration,” he adds. A sustained 1.75
to 2.25 percent growth rate does not even keep our native population
employed, he says.
The
reality “is that our border is more secure than it has been in years past and
as immigration talks heat up, our border agents and patrol will be well aware
of the need for greater vigilance,” says immigration lawyer and law professor Michael
Wildes, who is managing partner of Wildes & Weinberg in New
York City and represented the government in immigration cases in his time
as a US Attorney.
The
law needs to have enough teeth that it doesn't open the door to greater illegal
immigration, he adds. “Whether that means tougher sanctions or steeper fines is
up to Congress to decide. But the penalties need to be more stringent because
once a pathway to citizenship is defined, there is even less of an excuse for
employers to hire undocumented workers and for folks to come here illegally and
remain illegal.”
While
the numbers tell a story of declining illegal immigration, still a path to
citizenship for those now in the country illegally may be a political problem
for those who want to pass comprehensive immigration legislation, says David
Mark, editor in chief of the website Politix.
“It
just seems like common sense to most people that if you make it easier to
become legal, that will attract others as well,” he adds. “It is naive to think
otherwise.”
*
The Obama administration has also cut worksite enforcement efforts
by 70%, allowing illegal immigrants to continue working in jobs that rightfully
belong to citizens and legal workers.
*
THE ENTIRE REASON THE BORDERS ARE LEFT OPEN IS TO CUT WAGES!
"We could cut unemployment in half simply by reclaiming the
jobs taken by illegal workers," said Representative Lamar Smith of Texas,
co-chairman of the Reclaim American Jobs Caucus. "President Obama is on
the wrong side of the American people on immigration. The president should
support policies that help citizens and legal immigrants find the jobs they
need and deserve rather than fail to enforce immigration laws."
VIVA LA RAZA! THE INVASION AND
OCCUPATION IS NOW EXPANDING TO ALL OTHER 49 STATES!
*
Illegal labor pool and its impact on
unemployment rates
http://www.onenewsnow.com/politics-govt/2012/12/20/illegal-labor-pool-and-its-impact-on-unemployment-rates
*
WHY THE JOBS GO TO ILLEGALS:
“What employers really
want in many cases by hiring immigrants is to hold down wage costs, experts
say.”
HERE’S
HOW NO E-VERIFY BREAKS DOWN:
*
Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal
CA MAKES
E-VERIFY ILLEGAL! COURTESY THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA!
Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal
Here is an example of why hiring illegal aliens is not economically productive
for the State of California...
You have 2 families..."Joe Legal" and "Jose Illegal". Both
families have 2 parents, 2 children and live in California.
"Joe Legal" works in construction, has a Social Security Number,
and makes $25.00 per hour with payroll taxes deducted...."Jose
Illegal" also works in construction, has "NO" Social Security
Number, and gets paid $15.00 cash "under the table".
Joe Legal...$25.00 per hour x 40 hours $1000.00 per week, $52,000 per year
Now take 30% away for state and federal tax
Joe Legal now has $31,231.00
Jose Illegal...$15.00 per hour x 40 hours $600.00 per week, $31,200.00 per year
Jose Illegal pays no taxes...
Jose Illegal now has $31,200.00
Joe Legal pays Medical and Dental Insurance with limited coverage
$1000.00 per month
$12,000.00 per year
Joe Legal now has $19,231.00
Jose Illegal has full Medical and Dental coverage through the state and local
clinics at a cost of $0.00 per year
Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00
Joe Legal makes too much money is not eligible for Food Stamps or welfare
Joe Legal pays for food
$1,000.00 per month
$12,000.00 per year
Joe Legal now has $ 7,231.00
Jose Illegal has no documented income and is eligible for Food Stamps and
Welfare
Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00
Joe Legal pays rent of
$1,000.00 per month
$12,000.00 per year
Joe Legal is now in the hole... minus (-) $4,769.00
Jose Illegal receives a $500 per month Federal rent subsidy
Jose Illegal pays rent
$500.00 per month
$6,000.00 per year
Jose Illegal still has $25,200.00
Joe Legal now works overtime on Saturdays or gets a part time job after work.
Jose Illegal has nights and weekends off to enjoy with his family.
Joe Legal's and Jose Illegal's children both attend the same school. Joe Legal
pays for his children's lunches while Jose Illegal's children get a government
sponsored lunch.
Jose Illegal's children have an after school ESL program. Joe Legal's children
go home.
Joe Legal and Jose Illegal both enjoy the same Police and Fire Services, but
Joe paid for them and Jose did not pay.
Don't vote/support any politician that supports illegal aliens...
Its WAY PAST time to take a stand for America and Americans!
MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com
OBAMA HAS
FILLED HIS ADMINSTRATION WITH PRIMARILY LA RAZA PARTY MEMBERS.
Here’s his
Sec. Labor, HILDA SOLIS:
While in
Congress, she opposed strengthening the border fence, supported expansion of
illegal alien benefits (including driver's licenses and in-state tuition
discounts), embraced sanctuary cities that refused to cooperate with federal
homeland security officials to enforce immigration laws, and aggressively
championed a mass amnesty. Solis was steeped in the pro-illegal alien worker
organizing movement in Southern California and was buoyed by amnesty-supporting
Big Labor groups led by the Service Employees International Union. She has now
caused a Capitol Hill firestorm over her new taxpayer-funded advertising and
outreach campaign to illegal aliens regarding fair wages:
*
Michelle Malkin
The U.S. Department of Illegal Alien Labor
President Obama's Labor Secretary Hilda Solis is supposed to
represent American workers. What you need to know is that this longtime
open-borders sympathizer has always had a rather radical definition of
"American." At a Latino voter registration project conference in Los
Angeles many years ago, Solis asserted to thunderous applause, "We are all
Americans, whether you are legalized or not."
That's right. The woman in charge of enforcing our employment laws
doesn't give a hoot about our immigration laws -- or about the fundamental
distinction between those who followed the rules in pursuit of the American
dream and those who didn't.
While in
Congress, she opposed strengthening the border fence, supported expansion of
illegal alien benefits (including driver's licenses and in-state tuition
discounts), embraced sanctuary cities that refused to cooperate with federal
homeland security officials to enforce immigration laws, and aggressively
championed a mass amnesty. Solis was steeped in the pro-illegal alien worker
organizing movement in Southern California and was buoyed by amnesty-supporting
Big Labor groups led by the Service Employees International Union. She has now
caused a Capitol Hill firestorm over her new taxpayer-funded advertising and
outreach campaign to illegal aliens regarding fair wages:
"I'm here to tell you that your president, your secretary of
labor and this department will not allow anyone to be denied his or her
rightful pay -- especially when so many in our nation are working long, hard
and often dangerous hours," Solis says in the video pitch. "We can
help, and we will help. If you work in this country, you are protected by our
laws. And you can count on the U.S. Department of Labor to see to it that those
protections work for you."
To be sure, no one should be scammed out of "fair
wages." Employers that hire and exploit illegal immigrant workers deserve
full sanctions and punishment. But it's the timing, tone-deafness and
underlying blanket amnesty agenda of Solis' illegal alien outreach that has so
many American workers and their representatives on Capitol Hill rightly upset.
With double-digit unemployment and a growing nationwide revolt
over Washington's border security failures, why has Solis chosen now to hire
250 new government field investigators to bolster her illegal alien workers'
rights campaign? (Hint: Leftists unhappy with Obama's lack of progress on
"comprehensive immigration reform" need appeasing. This is a quick
bone to distract them.)
Unfortunately, the federal government is not alone in lavishing
attention and resources on workers who shouldn't be here in the first place. As
of 2008, California, Florida, Nevada, New York, Texas and Utah all expressly
included illegal aliens in their state workers' compensation plans -- and more
than a dozen other states implicitly cover them.
Solis' public service announcement comes on the heels of
little-noticed but far more troubling comments encouraging illegal alien
workers in the Gulf Coast. Earlier this month, in the aftermath of the BP oil
spill, according to Spanish language publication El Diario La Prensa, Solis
signaled that her department was going out of its way to shield illegal
immigrant laborers involved in cleanup efforts. "My purpose is to assist
the workers with respect to safety and protection," she said. "We're
protecting all workers regardless of migration status because that's the
federal law." She told reporters that her department was in talks with
local Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials who had visited
coastal worksites to try to verify that workers were legal.
No word yet on whether she gave ICE her "we are all
Americans, whether you are legalized or not" lecture. But it's a safe bet.
*
MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com
OBAMA’S
LA RAZA INFESTED ADMINISTRATION HELPS MILLIONS OF ILLEGALS DEFRAUD AMERICA AND
GRAB AN AMERICAN JOB!
WELFARE
FOR ILLEGALS IN CA NOW EXCEEDS $22 BILLION PER YEAR. AND HALF THE MURDERS IN CA
ARE BY MEXICAN GANGS!
10 Things
You Need to Know About Obama’s Amnesty
Yesterday,
the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) began accepting applications for
deferred action through US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). FAIR
has been closely tracking developments in President Obama’s executive amnesty
since its announcement on June 15. Below are some of the things you need to
know about the President’s unilateral changes to U.S. immigration policy.
- President Obama’s
amnesty will add nearly
2 million workers
– possibly more – to the U.S. job market. This is a negligent economic and
social policy with over 8% unemployment and half of recent young college
graduates unemployed or underemployed.
- Lax documentation
requirements to prove eligibility. DHS
application instructions explicitly state that only copies of documents
will be required to meet the eligibility criteria for amnesty including
length of presence in the U.S., education, and even identity. Also,
illegal aliens will be able to submit any and all documents they deem
relevant to prove their eligibility. Virtually any form of documentation
will be accepted, from report cards and plane tickets to mere personal
correspondence.
- The Administration is
making this up as they go along. In June, President Obama touted this policy as the
“right thing to do” for some of the best and brightest. However, it is
clear that the educational, residency and character requirements are
becoming increasingly lax as more details about the implementation of the
amnesty emerge.
- No face-to-face
interview required.
Most applications will be approved based only on the documentation submitted.
- Few safeguards against
and limited consequences for filing fraudulent applications or documents. If DHS is actually
diligent enough to identify fraud, the new amnesty instructions merely
state that the Administration “may” elect to penalize illegal aliens by
denying immigration benefits or placing them into removal proceedings.
However, since illegal aliens are only required to submit copies – which
lack identifiers of authenticity – it is unknown how USCIS employees will
be able to identify fraud in the first place.
- USCIS turns blind eye to
past illegal employment. Illegal aliens may use employment records to show
eligibility for amnesty despite the fact illegal aliens are barred from
working in the U.S. Past employers of illegal alien applicants are not
likely to face prosecution for hiring illegal aliens.
- Family of deferred
action recipients will also reap the benefits. Application
instructions
explicitly
state that information collected on an illegal alien will not be used
against him or her, or their “family members and guardians,” for the
purpose of immigration enforcement.
- Illegal aliens granted
work authorization can obtain Social Security cards. Illegal aliens granted
deferred action must apply for employment authorization if they present an
“economic necessity.” Once received, DHS work authorization will allow
them to apply for a Social Security Number and possibly other benefits
like driver’s licenses.
- Illegal aliens with a
criminal history DO qualify. DHS says only felony convictions will make
illegal aliens ineligible for amnesty, and even then, convictions won’t
necessarily be considered if they are expunged. Additionally, criminal
convictions in foreign countries will go undetected and DHS will “exercise
discretion” when considering juvenile records.
- USCIS doesn’t have a
great track record. Earlier
this year, the
DHS Inspector General found that
USCIS leadership told employees to rubber-stamp applications for
immigration benefits – including work authorization. In
leaked documents
to the Associated Press, USCIS estimated that it will review 3,000
deferred action and work authorization applications daily, only increasing
the pressure to overlook possible fraud and approve benefits quickly.
*
“What's needed to discourage illegal
immigration into the United States has been known for years: Enforce existing
law.” ….. CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR
*
ARTICLE BELOW:
The study, based on 2010 and
2011 census data, found that 43 percent of immigrants who have been in the U.S.
at least 20 years were using welfare benefits, a rate that is nearly twice as
high as native-born Americans and nearly 50 percent higher than recent
immigrants.
*
“The principal beneficiaries of our current immigration policy
are affluent Americans who hire immigrants at substandard wages for low-end
work. Harvard economist George Borjas estimates that American workers lose $190
billion annually in depressed wages caused by the constant flooding of the
labor market at the low-wage end.” Christian Science Monitor
*
“Law
enforcement and public safety have taken a back seat to attempts to satisfy
immigrant advocacy groups,” Crane told the panel of congressmen.
“What
we're seeing is our Congress and national leadership dismantling our laws by
not enforcing them. Lawlessness becomes the norm, just like Third World
corruption. Illegal aliens now have more rights and privileges than Americans.
If you are an illegal alien, you can drive a car without a driver's license or
insurance. You may obtain medical care without paying. You may work without
paying taxes. Your children enjoy free education at the expense of taxpaying
Americans.”
*
Slow
path to progress for U.S. immigrants
43% on welfare after 20 years
Immigrants
lag behind native-born Americans on most measures of economic well-being — even
those who have been in the U.S. the longest, according to a report from
the Center for
Immigration Studies,
which argues that full assimilation is a more complex task than overcoming
language or cultural differences.
The
study, which covers all immigrants, legal and illegal, and their U.S.-born
children younger than 18, found that immigrants tend to make economic progress
by most measures the longer they live in the U.S. but lag well behind
native-born Americans on factors such as poverty, health insurance coverage and
homeownership.
The study, based on 2010 and
2011 census data, found that 43 percent of immigrants who have been in the U.S.
at least 20 years were using welfare benefits, a rate that is nearly twice as
high as native-born Americans and nearly 50 percent higher than recent
immigrants.
The
report was released at a time when both major presidential candidates have
backed policies that would make it easier to immigrate legally and would boost
the numbers of people coming to the U.S.
Steven A.
Camarota,
the center’s research director and
author of the 96-page study, said it shows that questions about the pros and
cons of immigration extend well beyond the sheer numbers and touch on the
broader consequences of assimilating a population defined by tougher
socioeconomic challenges.
“Look,
we know a lot of these folks are going to be poor, we get it. But don’t tell
the public it’s all going great, which is the story line I think a lot of
people want to sell,” Mr. Camarota said. “There is
progress over time. Every measure shows improvement over time, but still, the
situation does not look like we’d like it to look, particularly for the
less-educated. They lag well behind natives even when they’ve been here for two
decades, and that is very disconcerting.”
Federal
law requires that the government deny immigrant visas to potential immigrants
who are likely to be unable to support themselves and thereby become public
charges.
On
Tuesday, a handful of Republican senators wrote to the Homeland Security and
State departments asking them to explain why they don’t consider whether
potential immigrants would use many of the nearly 80 federal welfare programs
when they evaluate visa applications.
Neither
department responded to messages Tuesday seeking a response to the senators’
letter.
Expanding legal immigration is a contentious issue for
voters, the vast majority of whom tell pollsters that they want the levels
either retained or decreased.
But
most politicians want legal immigration expanded.
During his time in the U.S. Senate, Barack
Obama backed bills that would
have dramatically boosted legal immigration, potentially by hundreds of thousands
a year. As president, he has called for the same thing.
(LA RAZA DEMS FEINSTEIN AND BOXER HAVE THREE (3) TIMES ATTEMPTED
A “SPECIAL AMNESTY” FOR 1.5 MILLION “CHEAP” LABOR ILLEGAL FARM WORKERS. THEY DO
THIS ON BEHALF OF THEIR FILTHY RICH BIG AG BIZ DONORS…. DESPITE THE FACT THAT
ONE-THIRD OF ALL “CHEAP” FARM WORKERS WILL END UP ON WELFARE! – CA NOW PUTS OUT
$22 BILLION PER YEAR IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS!!! ON TOP OF THIS COUNTIES
HAND OUT MORE, WITH LOS ANGELLES LEADING. L.A. COUNTY PAYS OUT $600 MILLION PER
YEAR IN WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS, PRIMARILY ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS! NOT ONE AMERICAN
(LEGAL) VOTED TO BE MEXICO’S WELFARE STATE! DEMS ARE THE PARTY of ILLEGALS!)
“We need to provide our farms
a legal way to hire workers that they rely on, and a path for those workers to
earn legal status. And our laws should respect families following the rules —
reuniting them more quickly instead of splitting them apart,” Mr.
Obama said in a major speech
on the subject in El Paso, Texas, in 2011.
His
presumed Republican challenger, Mitt Romney, in June called for
increasing legal immigration for students who study in high-tech fields and
admitting unlimited family members of those who hold green cards.
“Our
immigration system should help promote strong families as well — not keep them
apart. Our nation benefits when moms and dads and their kids are all living
together under the same roof,” Mr. Romney told the National
Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials.
Mr. Camarota’s report took a broad look
at the immigrant population and found that immigrants are contributing to major
changes in American society, including that one-fourth of public school
students now speak languages other than English at home.
It
also found that immigrants as a population lead complex economic lives that
aren’t easily put into one category or another.
Immigrants
made up more than half of all farmworkers, 41 percent of taxi drivers and 48
percent of maids and housecleaners, but they also represented about one-third
of all computer programmers and 27 percent of doctors.
The
statistics varied greatly by geography. In Massachusetts, native-led households
averaged $89,000 in income while immigrant households averaged $66,000.
In
Virginia, immigrant-led households averaged $93,000 in income, far outstripping
native households’ $80,000 average. Likewise, immigrant families averaged a
larger tax burden in Virginia — though they also had higher rates of use of
welfare or Medicaid.
The center found that use of
public benefits varied dramatically based on where immigrants originated.
Mexicans
were most likely to use means-tested benefit programs, with 57 percent, while 6
percent of those from the United Kingdom did. The rate for native-born
Americans is 23 percent.
Mr. Camarota said a key dividing
line is educational attainment. Immigrants who have been in the U.S. 20 years
and who have bachelor’s degrees or higher make slightly more than the average
native-born American. But immigrants with only high school educations make less
no matter how long they have been in the U.S.
“The
fact is the less-educated in particular — they don’t do well over time,” he
said. “It’s not reasonable to expect an immigrant who comes to America with
only a high school education to close the gap with the native-born.”
Scholars
debate whether the current wave of immigrants will assimilate differently from
those in the 1800s and at the start of the 20th century.
George Borjas, a Harvard
University professor, has argued that second-generation Americans — the
children of today’s immigrants — will fall behind in wages by about 10 percent
by 2030.
(THE BELOW
STATS HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH ASSIMILATION! COME TO MEXIFORNIA WHERE 90% OF ALL
SERVICE SECTOR AND CONSTRUCTION JOBS ARE HELD BY MEXICANS. YOU WON’T HEAR THEM
SPEAKING ENGLISH!)
But
in “Assimilation Tomorrow,” a report released in November, Dowell Myers and
John Pitkin said immigrants of the 1990s eventually will attain high rates of
homeownership and 71 percent will become U.S. citizens by 2030.
Those
authors said immigrants were set back by the recent recession but were still on
track to follow the same assimilation path as previous waves of immigrants.
(THE THING IS… MOST SOURCES
PUT THE NUMBER OF ILLEGALS AT 40 MILLION AND BREEDING FAST! THERE ARE 12
MILLION OF THESE “11 MILLION” ILLEGALS IN SOUTHERN CA ALONE!)
They
also said a program to legalize the estimated 11 million illegal immigrants in
the U.S. would be critical to helping assimilation.
*
“What we're seeing is our
Congress and national leadership dismantling our laws by not enforcing them.
Lawlessness becomes the norm, just like Third World corruption. Illegal aliens
now have more rights and privileges than Americans. If you are an illegal
alien, you can drive a car without a driver's license or insurance. You may
obtain medical care without paying. You may work without paying taxes. Your
children enjoy free education at the expense of taxpaying Americans.”
FAIR Legislative
Update July 30, 2012
ICE,
Border Patrol Unions Denounce Administration's Immigration Policies
At
a Capitol Hill press conference last Thursday, leaders from the two unions
representing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents and Border Patrol
agents denounced the Obama Administration's immigration policy. Flanked by
Senators Jeff Sessions (R-AL), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), and David Vitter (R-LA),
these two union leaders painted a stark picture of the state of immigration
enforcement across the United States.
ICE union leader Chris Crane, who represents over 7,000 agents,
decried the Obama Administration's policy of "prosecutorial
discretion," which directs enforcement agents to release illegal aliens
who do not meet the Administration's enforcement priorities. Calling it "a
failing policy," Crane described how the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) had launched it without any planning or foresight. "Every manager in
the field is interpreting these new policies different," Crane said.
"It's impossible to even get a picture of what our priorities are now. I
have never seen or heard of the type of fly by the seat of your pants,
disorganized confusion in a law enforcement organization like what we are
currently experiencing at ICE." (CQ Transcript, July 26, 2012)
Mr.
Crane also sharply criticized the President's new policy that grants
"deferred action" to illegal aliens who meet the eligibility criteria
for the DREAM Act. In particular, he warned of wide-spread abuse of the
process. "Prosecutorial discretion for DREAMers," Crane said,
"is solely based on the individual's claims. Our orders are: if an alien
says they went to high school, then let them go; if they say they have a GED,
then let them go. Officers have been told that there is no burden for the alien
to prove anything. .... At this point, we do not understand why DHS has any
criteria at all, as there is no requirement or burden to prove anything on the
part of the alien. We believe a significant number of people who are not
DREAMers are taking advantage of this practice to avoid arrest." (Id.)
Meanwhile Border Patrol Council President George McCubbin
criticized the attempt by DHS to portray the drop in illegal alien arrest rates
as a sign of success. The drop in arrest rates, McCubbin said, had more to do
with the Administration's change in enforcement tactics than its success at
combating illegal immigration. He noted as examples, DHS's termination of
immigration checks at transportation hubs near the border and its recent
decision to close nine border patrol stations. "Apprehensions at just one
of our stations have fallen from over 600 annually to just under 30 even though
now they have 10 times the number of agents assigned to that one station."
In short, McCubbin said, "Our agency has made it impossible for the agents
to go out there and do their jobs." (Id.)
Like
Crane, McCubbin also had strong words regarding President Obama's policy of
"prosecutorial discretion." "The action taken by President Obama
undermines immigration enforcement. Fraud will run rampant and our agents will
have to err on the side of caution to grant prosecutorial discretion so that
they don't put themselves into a position where they may find themselves
involved in a civil lawsuit. ... The agents we represent are not happy
regarding this. We feel as if we are political victims." (Id.)
*
OBAMA
FUNDS LA RAZA SUPREMACY WHICH OPERATES OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE UNDER LA RAZA VP
CECILIA MUNOZ
CECILIA MUNOZ IS ONE OF OBAMA’S MANY LA RAZA SUPREMACIST
OPERATING OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE. NO ADMINISTRATION IN HISTORY HAS BEEN SO
INFESTED WITH A FOREIGN BASED POLITICAL PARTY AS OBAMA’S.
THE FASTEST
GROWING POLITICAL PARTY IN AMERICAN IS THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA
–THE PARTY of ILLEGALS AND MEXICAN SUPREMACY. THEIR GOAL IS OBAMA AMNESTY OR
CONTINUED NON-ENFORCEMENT, NO E-VERIFY, OPEN BORDERS AND DE FACTO CITIZENSHIPS
WITH DRIVERS’ LICENSES!
VIVA LA RAZA!
YOU ARE! OBAMA HAS SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED THE FUNDING TO EXPAND MEXICAN
SUPREMACY IN OUR BORDERS!
On Thursday, Director of Intergovernmental Affairs Cecilia Muñoz
blogged that the Department of Homeland Security will review its entire
deportation caseload - that's 300,000 cases -to "clear out low
priority" cases and "make more room to deport people who have been
convicted of crimes or pose a security risk."
Obama's lowest priority: some deportation
cases
Tuesday,
August 23, 2011
PresidentObama is in a pickle. Immigration enforcement actually is working - or,
at least, it was working.
Under the Obama
administration, the government has removed almost 400,000 illegal immigrants
annually. That's 4 percent of the 10 million illegal immigrants estimated to be
living in America - and it sends a warning to those thinking of illegally
entering the United States.
Thanks to the
Secure Communities program, which requires local law enforcement to share
arrestees' fingerprints with Washington, about half of those deported have
criminal records. According to the administration, the vast majority of the
rest either re-crossed the border after deportation or were recently caught.
So what did the
White House announce last week? On
Thursday, Director of Intergovernmental Affairs Cecilia Muñoz blogged that the
Department of Homeland Security will review its entire deportation caseload
-that's 300,000 cases - to "clear out low priority" cases and
"make more room to deport people who have been convicted of crimes or pose
a security risk."
Sen.
Dick Durbin, D-Ill., told the New York Times that the policy would protect
youths with clean criminal records whose parents brought them into the country
when they were minors. That is, he likened the Obama policy to his proposed
legislation, the Dream (Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors)
Act.
Actually, the
Obama policy goes much further than shielding minors. Under the guise of
"prosecutorial discretion," a Department of Homeland Security memo
advises officials to consider a number of "positive factors" before
prosecuting offenders. "Positive factors" include military service,
"long-time lawful permanent" residency, "minors and elderly
individuals," nursing, pregnant and disabled.
On the one hand,
the policy seems smart - let the government concentrate on deporting threats to
public safety.
On the other
hand, the White House essentially has announced that individuals who break
federal immigration law are a "low priority" and unlikely to face
legal consequences. So much for deterrence.
Worse, the new
policy will allow individuals who have been caught up in a Secure Communities'
review to apply for work permits. Mark Krikorian, executive director of the
pro-enforcement Center for Immigration Studies, said that the new policy makes
getting arrested equivalent to winning the lottery: "Their fellow illegal
aliens who were not arrested don't get work authorization."
Krikorian
calls the new policy "administrative amnesty." Obama failed to
persuade Congress to change the law. Now with the 2012 presidential election
looming, he changed policies implemented in the Clinton and George W. Bush
years by fiat.
Bush's Secure
Communities program enabled Obama to boast that his administration delivered
the greatest number of illegal immigrant removals ever - 395,165 - in Fiscal
Year 2009. In 2010, the number fell. Last month, he told the National Council
of La Raza, "Here's the only thing you should know. The Democrats and your
president are with you."
Re-election,
after all, is his highest priority.
*
FROM
JUDICIAL WATCH
GET ON THEIR E-NEWS!
Obama Starts Suspending Deportations TO BUILD HIS PARTY BASE of
ILLEGALS
Last
Updated: Tue, 08/23/2011 - 4:14pm
Keeping its promise to
suspend deportations for a broad class of illegal immigrants, the Obama
Administration has officially started the process that’s expected to spare tens
of thousands from removal in the coming months.
Among the first illegal
aliens to benefit from the president’s backdoor amnesty plan is a Mexican man
living in Florida. He got busted a few years ago after applying for a work
permit and was earmarked for deportation. Earlier this month local media
portrayed the man, Manuel Guerra, as a desperate undocumented workertrying to build a new life
after fleeing violent street gangs in his native Mexico.
This week the 27-year-old,
who has lived in the U.S. illegally for more than a decade, became the poster
child for Obama’s newly implemented amnesty program. Federal immigration
authorities officially suspended his deportation, according a mainstream
newspaper report that says Guerra had been caught in a“tortuous and seemingly
failing five-year court fight against deportation.”
Guerra
was spared after a working group from the departments of Homeland Security and
Justice met to start reviewing 300,000 deportation cases pending before
immigration courts nationwide. Under Obama’s new plan, authorities will have wide discretion to halt deportationsand will be encouraged to do
so in cases where illegal immigrants attend school, have family in the military
or are primary bread winners.
The stealth amnesty plan was
first introduced last year in case Congress doesn’t pass legislation to legalize
the nation’s 12 million undocumented immigrants. Earlier this year political
appointees at U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), actually
issued a directive to enact “meaningful immigration reform absent legislative
action.” The plan includes delaying deportation indefinitely (“deferred
action”), granting green cards, allowing illegal immigrants to remain in the
U.S. indefinitely while they seek legal status (known as “parole in place”) and
expanding the definition of “extreme hardships” so any illegal alien could meet
the criteria and remain in the country.
This goes hand in hand with
the president’s new blueprint for immigration reform, which was recently issued
by the White House. Titled “Building A 21stCentury
Immigration System,”
the plan strives to strengthen the U.S. economy and“competitiveness” by
creating a legal immigration system that reflects the nation’s “values and
diverse needs.” After all, it claims that the“overwhelming majority” of people
living in the U.S. with “no legal status” are“simply seeking a better life for
themselves and their children.”
The president’s new plan,
which has already allocated $8 million to community groups that operate
immigrant “integrational programs,”also expands “anti discrimination provisions
of immigration law” and provides more “comprehensive anti-retaliation
protections.”
*
NATIONAL COUNSEL of LA RAZA
"THE RACE" - MEX FASCISM IN OUR BORDERS:
NCLR Funding Skyrockets After Obama Hires Its VP
06/17/2011
A Judicial Watch investigation reveals that federal funding for a Mexican La
Raza group that for years has raked in millions of taxpayer dollars has
skyrocketed since one of its top officials got a job in the Obama White House.
The influential and politically-