Friday, October 26, 2018

DAUGHTER OF THE TWO MOST SELF-SERVING AND CORRUPT POLS IN HISTORY, CHELSEA CLINTON SAYS SHE WILL TAKE SHORT SHOWERS AND TRAVEL ON PRIVATE JETS TO SAVE THE PLANET FOR HER PARENTS' CRONY BANKSTERS

CHELSEA CLINTON IS SAVING THE PLANET WITH SHORTER SHOWERS, PRIVATE JETS




Don't you care about the planet?
While you wallow lasciviously in your shower for a whole 5 minutes or 600 seconds, the noble heroes of the Left are sacrificing their shower time to save the planet.
Here's a heartbreaking interview with Chelsea Clinton, possible presidential candidate in 2024.
Q. What changes have you made in the past five years in your family life to be environmentally conscious?
A. I’ve always recycled and used smart light bulbs and tried to take short showers. The things that seem small are the things that if we all did would make a profound impact. 
And the really small things, like taking smaller private jets.
Chelsea Clinton opted to travel to a “clean energy” roundtable in this week in a private jet to campaign on behalf of her mother Hillary Clinton.
Clinton first attended two events in Greenville, North Carolina, stopping by a campaign office and then going to an event at East Carolina University to discuss college affordability.
After her two events in Greenville, Clinton was scheduled to attend a “clean energy roundtable” in Asheville, which is about a 5-hour drive away. But instead of driving or flying on a commercial plane, Clinton opted to a take a private jet. The NTK Network posted a tracking video that shows Clinton boarding the private jet on Wednesday.
It's important that we do everything we can to save the planet from the Flying Global Warming Monster. Like flying shorter flights while taking shorter showers on board those private jets.
Also, in huge news, Chelsea Clinton once again mentioned that she might mull running for office if someone steps down, or retires, or everyone in the Democrat Party dies leaving them with no choice but Chelsea Clinton.



THE GRIFTERS: HILLARY, BILLARY and 

CHELSEA… global looters!


"But there is no doubt in my mind that the Clintons, thoroughly practiced grifters that they are, as well as their increasingly shady daughter, will not hesitate to use  such classified information as they may be able to access for personal and political enrichment.  They've been doing it  for decades, and they're not about to stop now." RUSS VAUGHN


Hillary Clinton is simply the epitome of the rabid self – a whirlpool of selfishness, greed, and malignance.


It may well be true that Donald Trump has made his greatest contribution to the nation before even taking office:  the political destruction of Hillary Clinton and her infinitely corrupt machine. J.R. Dunn


"Hillary will do anything to distract you from her reckless record and the damage to the Democratic Party and the America she and The Obama's have created."

HILLARY & BILLARY: The Evita and Juan Peron of Wall Street

Their Looting of the Poor of Haiti IS FINALLY OVER



“The couple parlayed lives supposedly spent in “public service”
into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in
the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political
machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of
a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for the
Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes. The basic
components of the operation are lavishly paid speeches to Wall Street and
Fortune 500 audiences, corporate campaign contributions, and donations to the
ostensibly philanthropic Clinton Foundation.”

TRUMP A "GODSEND" SAYS GLAZOV'S BOOK "JIHADIST PSYCHOPATH"

“The Wahhabis finance thousands of 
madrassahs throughout the world where 
young boys are brainwashed into becoming 
fanatical foot-soldiers for the petrodollar-
flush Saudis and other emirs of the Persian 
Gulf.” AMIL IMANI

TRUMP A “GODSEND” – SAYS GLAZOV’S NEW BOOK, "JIHADIST PSYCHOPATH"



In a dire hour, America’s president pushes back a pernicious enemy.


1
We are excited to announce that Frontpage Editor Jamie Glazov's new book, Jihadist Psychopath: How He Is Charming, Seducing, and Devouring Us, is being released on December 18, 2018.
Jihadist Psychopath, which is Amazon's #1 New Release in the “Medical Mental Illness” category, offers a unique perspective on the terror war. Like no other work, it unveils the world of psychopathy and reveals, step by step, how Islamic Supremacists are duplicating the sinister methodology of psychopaths who routinely charm, seduce, capture, and devour their prey.
Jihadist Psychopath unveils how every element of the formula by which the psychopath subjugates his victim is used by the Islamic Supremacist to ensnare and subjugate non-Muslims. And in the same way that the victim of the psychopath is complicit in his own destruction, so too Western civilization is now embracing and enabling its own conquest and consumption.
One of Dr. Glazov's strongest messages in his new book (as he discusses in his new video) is his reference to President Trump as a providential “Godsend.” Glazov documents and unveils how, during this dire hour for America and for western civilization, and after the miserable catastrophe of the Obama administration, America’s president is pushing back a pernicious enemy.
Dr. Glazov's new book delivers a ground-breaking exposé of how the Jihadist Psychopath has successfully built his totalitarian plantation in the West -- a plantation on which many westerners, including many of our leaders, are now enslaved and dutifully following the Jihadist Psychopath's orders. Glazov outlines the frameworks of this tyrannical plantation and shows how those who are unwillingly trapped on it, and who yearn for freedom, can best escape. The author reveals (as he explains in his video), how the Unholy Alliance is simply in panic mode at the prospect of people waking up to the existence of the Jihadist Psychopath's plantation and shedding their fear of the smears they will face for leaving it.
We are extremely honored to share that, as the front cover of this new book reveals, Dennis Prager has affirmed that Jihadist Psychopath is "...one of the most important books of the present time."
President Trump's National Security Adviser, John Bolton, has also given glowing praise. As Dr. Glazov discusses in his videoJohn Bolton says about Jihadist Psychopath:
Hard as it is to believe, many in the West simply will not take the time and trouble to understand the threat posed by radical Islamicist terrorism. James Burnham once wrote of a similar problem with international Communism in his masterful Suicide of the West. Now, Jamie Glazov has written this century's counterpart to Burnham's classic work and will doubtless upset those determined not to analyze for themselves the nature of the underlying phenomenon.
With a Foreword written by Michael Ledeen, advance praise also comes from Geert Wilders, Robert Spencer, Steve Emerson and many other titans and scholars in the international arena. (See Amazon page for many of the blurbs).
And that's why you have to pre-order a copy now. Order Jihadist Psychopath Today!



ISLAM: THE GODLESS CULT OF DEATH, HATE, MURDER and RAPE


Which will we surrender to first? Muslims or Mexicans?

WHICH BEHEADS MORE ON U.S. UNDEFENDED BORDERS???

THE KORAN

BIBLE OF THE MUSLIM TERRORIST:


Koran 2:191 "slay the unbelievers wherever you find them"
Koran 3:21 "Muslims must not take the infidels as friends"
Koran 5:33 "Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam"
Koran 8:12 "Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Koran"
Koran 8:60 " Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels"
Koran 8:65 "The unbelievers are stupid, urge all Muslims to fight them"
Koran 9:5 "When the opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you find them"
Koran 9:123 "Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood"
Koran 22:19 "Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water, melt their skin and bellies"
Koran 47:4 "Do not hanker for peace with the infidels, behead them when you catch them".


“The tentacles of the Islamist hydra have deeply penetrated the world. The Egyptian-based Muslim Brotherhood poses a clear threat in Egypt. The Muslim Brotherhood also wages its deadly campaign through its dozens of well-established and functioning branches all over the world.”
*
“The Wahhabis finance thousands of madrassahs throughout the world where young boys are brainwashed into becoming fanatical foot-soldiers for the petrodollar-flush Saudis and other emirs of the Persian Gulf.” AMIL IMANI



Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the mastermind of 9/11/2001, said:
We will take advantage of their immigration policy to infiltrate them.

* We will use their own welfare system to provide us with food, housing, schooling, and health care, while we out breed them and plot against them. We will Caliphate on their dime.

* We will use political correctness as a weapon. Anyone who criticizes us, we will take the opportunity to grandstand and curry favor from the media and Democrats and loudly accuse our critics of being an Islamophobe.

* We will use their own discrimination laws against them and slowly introduce Sharia Law into their culture..

TO KEEP THE BORDERS WIDE OPEN, THE DEMOCRAT PARTY PUMPS MILLIONS INTO BOB MENENDEZ CAMPAIGN IN NEW JERSEY - YOU CAN'T BE TOO CORRUPT FOR THE DEMS!

Flop Sweat: Democrats Pour Nearly Three Million More Dollars Into...New Jersey


|
|
It's a mirage, right?  I still cannot bring myself to believe that the New Jersey Senate race is actually in play for Republicans, but consider a few factors: (1) Dropping one seven-figure October ad buy in the Garden State might be dismissed asa cash-flush party acting out of an abundance of caution.  But dropping a second tranche?  That's not easily spinnable.  In fact, this very much looks like genuine concern:
 (2) Maybe some more internal polls that resemble this one?

The latest Rutgers-Eagleton poll has Menendez leading Hugin 51 percent to 46 percent. But Menendez’s 2017 federal corruption trial- which ended in a mistrial- weighs him down with independents. https://politi.co/2EIufJz 

Rutgers-Eagleton poll gives Menendez a 5-point lead over Hugin


Hugin is a self-funder who's been hammering Menendez hard and building late momentum.  (3) He's even made history with a somewhat unlikely endorsement:
Inbox: Bob Hugin will be the first Republican U.S. Senate candidate endorsed by the Latino Leadership Alliance of New Jersey PAC.

I cannot imagine that Chuck Schumer's 'Senate Majority PAC' is pleased to be bailing out a deep blue state Democratic incumbent with corruption issues, but that's where we are.  And speaking of Menendez's ethical woes, one twisted irony in all of this should not get lost in the shuffle: "When the feds came after Menendez and his buddy Salomon Melgen for bribery, they flagged $600,000 that Melgen had donated to a Democratic group as part of the quid pro quo on Melgen’s end. That group? The Senate Majority PAC, of course. What a sweet deal for Menendez: Not only was his party willing to overlook all that courtroom unpleasantness and offer him another term in the Senate but the PAC his crooked friend Sal “invested” in is now repaying Menendez with a fivefold expenditure to his reelection campaign."  

I'll reiterate that I fully expect Menendez to pull this one out, but the stench emanating from his campaign is worrisome enough that national Democrats are diverting precious resources to save him.  There's political blood in the water; if the cycle were slightly more favorable to Republicans, this one might be a bona fide toss-up.  What do you say, New Jerseyans?  On the subject of bona fide toss-ups, one Senate race that's been essentially deadlocked for months is the Nevada contest, which just saw some movement:
In the closing stretch of the 2018 campaign, the question is no longer the size of the Democratic wave. It’s whether there will be a wave at all. Top operatives in both political parties concede that Democrats’ narrow path to the Senate majority has essentially disappeared, a casualty of surging Republican enthusiasm across GOP strongholds. At the same time, leading Democrats now fear the battle for the House majority will be decided by just a handful of seats...While the trend may be troubling for Democrats, the evolving political landscape remains unsettled two weeks before Election Day, even with millions of votes already cast across 20 states. There are signs that the Democrats’ position in the expanding House battlefield may actually be improving. Yet Republican candidates locked in tight races from New York to Nevada find themselves in stronger-than-expected positions because of a bump in President Donald Trump’s popularity, the aftermath of a divisive Supreme Court fight and the sudden focus on a caravan of Latin American migrants making an arduous trek toward the U.S. border.
The president's improved approval rating isn't merely reflected in an "outlier" poll or two. It's a real trend:



With the midterm elections a mere two weeks away, it can be easy to forget that politics will continue as usual afterward.  So what will happen once the midterms have been held on November 6, 2018?
Much depends on which party wins the House of Representatives.  Republicans are virtually guaranteed to win the Senate, but the House could go either way at this point.  Not long ago, the House was considered an easy win for the Democrats.  However, the Kavanaugh hearings have woken many fence-sitting Republicans from their slumber, and now control of the House is less certain.
If Republicans keep the House, Trump will likely want to enact his immigration agenda.  He spent the last two years enacting legislation congressional Republicans wanted, and in return, he will want them to enact his legislation.  If they cooperate, the wall may begin construction with congressional funding sometime in 2019.  If they don't cooperate, Trump could retaliate by vetoing any bills Republicans in Congress pass.  He hasn't vetoed a single bill yet, but he will use that power if he has to.  If Congress still refuses to cooperate, Trump will take his case to the American people.  Most Republicans will side with Trump over Congress.  If Congress still refuses to fund the wall, Trump might use the military to build it.  Congressional Republicans may vote to fund the wall, not necessarily because they support it, but because they fear losing their jobs.  The Republican base is getting tired of its leaders not delivering on immigration, and if their leaders don't start delivering soon, the base will not vote for them.  A wall, complete or not, will boost Trump's chances of being re-elected in 2020.
Another item on the agenda would be tech censorship.  Tech companies have been censoring and will continue to censor the news to prevent "fake news" and "hate speech" from spreading.  Congress may pass the Social Media Anti-Censorship Act (SMACA), which would "prohibit censorship of lawful speech on major social media platforms."
A national voter ID law could be implemented, perhaps with the government issuing a national ID card to every citizen.  Though many claim that this would be racist, a majority of Americans of all races support voter ID laws.  An ID is required for many things.  Why should voting should be different?
What if Democrats take the House?  Democrats complained that Republicans in Congress wouldn't cooperate with Obama when he was president, but if Democrats regain the House, they will make the Obama era look like a golden age of bipartisanship.  Congressional funding for the wall won't happen under any circumstances.  There will be increased calls to abolish ICE.  Few if any laws will be passed.  This will benefit Trump and the Republicans, since they can place the blame for the gridlock on the Democrats.  Most importantly, House Democrats will attempt to impeach Trump on the charges of collusion, obstruction, and treason.  The Democratic leadership won't want impeachment because it will backfire, but its rabid base will force it to go ahead.
Trump will probably be impeached in the House, with every Democrat voting to impeach and every Republican voting against impeachment.  The Senate, also voting along purely partisan lines, will not vote to convict.  Such a spectacle will tear the country even farther apart than the 2016 election and the Kavanaugh hearings did.  The attempted impeachments of Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton were highly divisive and bitterly partisan affairs, and the attempted impeachment of Donald Trump would be even more so.  Trump-supporters will be enraged by the attempted impeachment, and the resulting backlash will carry Trump to the White House a second time in 2020.
No matter who wins the House, there will be more violence and harassment from the left.  Many Democrats have been calling for an end to civility – not just ordinary Democrats, but politicians.  Maxine Waters encouraged her supporters to harass members of the Cabinet.  Hillary Clinton said, "You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for" and that civility can resume when Democrats retake Congress.
These words add fuel to an already raging fire.  Since Trump was inaugurated:
  • Sarah Huckabee Sanders was kicked out of the Red Hen restaurant in Lexington, Virginia.
  • Steve Bannon was harassed at a bookstore in Richmond, Virginia.
  • Ted Cruz was harassed at a restaurant.
  • White powder was sent to Ted Cruz.
  • Ricin was sent to Trump.
  • Mitch McConnell was harassed at a restaurant.
Not only have elected officials been harassed, but they have almost been killed.  Steve Scalise and five others were wounded while practicing for the annual congressional baseball game.  Rand Paul was attacked and wounded by a neighbor while mowing his lawn.  At this rate, its only a matter of time before someone is killed by a deranged leftist.  And these are just the politicians.  Countless Trump-supporters have been attacked and harassed, especially while wearing the red MAGA baseball cap.
The media are responsible for much of this.  They constantly demonize Trump and his supporters, portraying them as evil people who want to harm others.  There will be many who resort to harassment and violence.  And if someone does die, the media will shift the blame onto Trump, saying he created a "climate of hate" where something like this could happen.
And what will happen when Trump replaces a third Supreme Court justice?  Any new Supreme Court nominees are likely to be met with even more resistance than Kavanaugh was.  What happens if Ruth Bader Ginsburg resigns or passes away with Trump in office?  The left's reaction was bad enough when the president replaced two conservative justices; one can only imagine what their reaction will be when he replaces "the Notorious RBG." 
Farther along in the future, the 2020 election will be an even crazier version of the 2016 election.  Trump will likely win, because the anti-Trump movement has no clear leader, and there is no Democrat aside from Obama who can get Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents to the polls in large enough numbers to defeat Trump.  Even farther in the future, the 2024 Republican primaries will be a battle between establishment Republicans such as Nikki Haley and Mike Pence and populist Republicans such as Rand Paul and Ted Cruz.  But whomever Republicans nominate in 2024, he will probably lose.  Since the end of the Cold War, there has been a pattern where each president serves eight years and is then succeeded by someone from the opposing party for eight years: Bill Clinton, then George W. Bush, then Barack Obama, then Donald Trump for eight years, then a Democrat for eight years, and so on.
In 2024, the Democrats may nominate Deval Patrick, the former governor of Massachusetts.  Patrick is black, so he would get black voters to the polls in a way Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, and Al Gore could not.  Seeing how successful Obama was at winning elections, Democrats will try to recreate Obama's performance by nominating other minority candidates. 
Taking everything into account, the political situation in the United States will grow worse no matter which party wins the House this Election Day.  However, should Democrats gain a majority, the country will descend into chaos at a quicker pace, since they will open up investigation after investigation into the president that will hamper his ability to run the country.  A silver lining of Democrats winning the House is that they will continue to embarrass themselves and make President Trump look good in comparison.  But in order for the president to continue to enact his America First agenda, Republicans must retain control of the House of Representatives.
Thomas O'Malley can be contacted at thomasomalley861@yahoo.com.


Texas Democratic Party Leader Funded ‘Voter Fraud Ring,’ Says AG



Leticia-Sanchez
Leticia Sanchez
4:43






A North Texas woman recently indicted as part of a “voter fraud ring” paid the others involved in the scheme with funds provided by a Democratic Party leader, say court documents filed by the Office of Attorney General Ken Paxton this week.

Leticia Sanchez was charged with 17 felony counts of voter fraud following an investigation by Paxton’s office. Sanchez, 57, allegedly paid her co-defendants to target elderly voters in select northern Fort Worth precincts in the 2016 March Democrat Party primary election to affect the outcome of certain down-ballot candidate races.
The state’s newly filed notice of intent to introduce evidence in the Sanchez criminal case alleged that Stuart Clegg, then Tarrant County Democratic Party executive director, funded the alleged voter fraud ring’s criminal activities.
Breitbart obtained the court documents which stated that “after learning that state police investigators were in Tarrant County interviewing voters and members of her vote harvesting group,” Sanchez sent a text message to her daughter, Leticia Sanchez Tepichin, “conveying a message from Sanchez and Stuart Clegg” that the others involved in the ring should not cooperate with investigators. The message, written in Spanish, told Tepichin to “advise immediately” that a group of “malicious people” were investigating “our work” and “our boss Mr. Stuart.” She also advised them that a lawyer was in charge of the matter and they should tell the lawyer immediately if they are approached by anyone with questions.
Previously, Breitbart reported the AG’s Election Fraud Unit said the women carried out their the ruse by “seeding” or proliferating mail ballots to the targeted precincts through forged signatures, altering historical applications, and resubmitting them without the voter’s knowledge.
Sanchez was one of four women indicted on a cumulative 30 counts of voter fraud. Tepichin, 39, was indicted on nine counts of voter fraud; Maria Rosa Solis, 40, was charged on two counts for forging signatures on the mail-in ballots; and Laura Parra, 24, received one count of forgery.
The state’s notice also stated that Sanchez faxed the fraudulently obtained applications for mail-in ballots using the fax machine of then Fort Worth City Councilman Sal Espino. The court document did not name Espino of any wrongdoing in connection with the case.
The court documents then said that Sanchez and her cohorts collaborated on the voter fraud scheme between January 2015 and March 2016, intending to affect the outcome of the 2016 March Democratic Primary election in the unidentified down-ballot races.
Despite these serious voter fraud charges, Greg Westfall, one of two attorneys for Tepichin, insisted the state’s case was politically motivated and sought to suppress minority voting, according to the Fort Worth Star-Telegram.
“They are being used by people who want to justify voter ID,” said Westfall. “At the end of the day, there’s not going to be any fraud in this deal.”
The other lawyer Frank Sellers described the four women as “intelligent, educated women” who are church goers that have “never been in trouble a day in their lives,” work “multiple jobs to support their families” and are “good, helpful people.”
Still, one alleged victim, 76-year-old Minnie Barela, a blind Fort Worth woman, said otherwise when she told the Star-Telegram that Sanchez turned up at her door “very friendly,” indicating she had the “authority” to help Barela with her mail-in ballot. Barela said she did not suspect anything wrong initially until Barela said she disagreed with Sanchez, who allegedly marked Barela’s ballot without her consent.
“While purporting to ‘assist’ the voter in filling out her ballot, Sanchez distracted the voter by talking only about the presidential race, while marking votes for the down-ballot candidates Sanchez was paid to support, without the voter’s knowledge or consent,” stated the court documents which included Barela’s testimony among many other elderly individuals impacted by the mail-in ballot voter fraud.
Barela called what Sanchez did “wrong” and expressed frustration that the accused took advantage of her “knowing that I was blind.” She said: “I learned my lesson.” Barela noted she will have one of her daughters take her to vote in person next time.
The Texas Democratic Party also made news recently when the Public Interest Legal Foundation released a complaint to county and state officers regarding “altered” voter registration forms in the Rio Grande Valley that were directed to noncitizen residents. The applications featured pre-printed claims of U.S. citizenship. On Monday, the Texas Secretary of State referred the matter to Attorney General Paxton for further investigation.
Follow Merrill Hope, a member of the original Breitbart Texas team, on Twitter.

The Second Caravan Sealed the Democrats' Fate




The herald of middle-American radicalism, Samuel Francis, famously described America's two parties as the evil party and the stupid party.  Under our secular savior, Donald Trump, the political division in America is changing: there is no more stupid party, and the evil party is consuming itself.  Vilfredo Pareto's classification of political elites as "Foxes and Lions" – the quick and cunning versus the strong and stalwart – now largely describes our two parties.  The pure foxes among Republicans have mostly been silenced or have left the party; it now consists mainly of a protective pride of lions led by a dominant male more cunning than any fox.  The Democrats' elites consist almost exclusively of foxes, and they are beset by a spreading plague of rabies.
Just in time to drive this division home with a sledgehammer and a ten-inch nail, the border crisis has exploded into America's consciousness.
On the heels of the now 14,000-strong human wave set to flood across our southern border in the coming weeks is another human army – and then another, and likely many more.  Faced with the prospect of paying human-smugglers $5,000-$10,000 to transport them to the American border, poor residents of Central American countries have come to realize that mass migrations are safer and cheaper.  The invaders know they have allies on this side of our border.  Most Democrat lawmakers remain silent; they are not proposing a solution because they don't see the invasion as a problem – to them, it is a feature of our immigration laws, not a bug.  Racialism is the new creed and currency of the left, so anything that swells the numbers of minorities in the United States is assumed by Democrat leaders to be a net benefit to the Democratic Party.  With the advent of invading armies, the democrats could not be more mistaken.
First, notice what was not said as the army approached Mexico and Mexican authorities pledged to prevent it from entering their country.  Whether this was possible was an open question – but what was never questioned was the right of Mexico to stop them.  Every leftist in Congress and in corporate media silently affirmed the right of the Mexican government to stop the army.  The Democrats' immigration message is finally crystal-clear: other nations have a right to control their borders, but we do not, even in the face of foreign invasion.  That is a politically untenable position.
Second, as more invading armies get underway, regardless of the fate of the first one, questions will invariably be asked of the left – and every question undermines the Democratic Party.
- How many are too many?  There can be no real answer to that question from the left if the first massive army proceeds into the interior of the country.  The left has welcomed the first army; consistency demands that they apply the same standards to those that follow.  The Democrats have shown that they're bluffing.  To fold will admit their error, wound their pride, and compromise their racialist creed.
- Do Democrats really believe that all or even most of the invading migrants face political, ethnic, or religious persecution?  Those are the standards for asylum.  The army comes from a region where ethnicity and religion are essentially uniform; there is no Latin American version of the Hutus and Tutsis.  People fleeing economic depression and criminal violence are not eligible for asylum, yet Democrats welcome them all with open arms.
- Assuming that we decide to stop the tenth, or twentieth, or fiftieth army, is there any legal way to do so without physical resistance?  The Democrats' silence on this issue insures that our laws will be changed, and not in ways that will benefit their party.  The wall is the most obvious but hardly the limit of these changes; immigration based upon merit will be the final defeat of the Democratic Party's desire to replace the American population with a largely illiterate and dependent foreign underclass.  The Democrats will resist every change, but their support for the current invasion has cut their credibility off at the knees.
Third, the left and its corporate media allies have misjudged Latinos.  The left's childish and simplistic view of minorities leads leftists to believe that all Latinos think alike and are uniformly elated by anything that grows the sheer number of Latinos in the country.  There are radical elements in the Latino community who do think that way, and naturally, they are drawn to active participation in the racialist Democrat mob.  But most Latinos are like the rest of us: they are concerned about their families first and foremost.  It doesn't benefit Latinos – whether here legally or illegally – to have endless waves of people arriving from outside the country, willing to work for lower and lower wages.  Shrewd Latinos also recognize that the less legitimate foreign arrivals appear to be, the greater the chance that large-scale deportations will eventually occur.  Most Latinos do not desire a place on the Democrat welfare plantation and the destruction of the family unit which such a place requires.  Note that there is no European analogue for the word "machismo" – among the various races, only Latinos use and celebrate such a term, defined as "aggressive masculinity."  The Democrat plantation is the home of emasculation.
Having already set in motion plans to limit or eliminate foreign aid to El Salvador, Honduras, and Guatemala, President Trump has already done more to fight this foreign invasion than Obama did in eight years.  Should the migrant army simply keep walking when it meets resistance, that will not be the victory many Democrats seem to anticipate.  It will not demoralize the Republican base, which recognizes that short of military resistance and the public relations nightmare a military confrontation may produce, Trump's hands are largely tied by our current immigration laws.  Instead, the human wave will be the punctuation mark on the end of the sentence, "Build the wall."
Months ago, Trump offered to trade legitimacy for DACA recipients for the wall.  The Democrats refused, as Trump surely knew they would.  Instead, Democrats dug their greedy hands ever deeper into the immigration candy jar.  Before all is said and done, they'll curse their greedy hands and wish they'd opted for amputation.

Exclusive–Dave Brat: Democrats Favor Importing ‘Cheap Labor’ over Securing American Jobs for Veterans
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/10/24/exclusive-dave-brat-democrats-favor-importing-cheap-labor-over-securing-american-jobs-for-veterans/



Latino Construction Workers
RICHARDSPAUL J. RICHARDS/AFP/Getty Images
   157
2:51


Rep. Dave Brat (R-VA) says Democrats favor importing cheap foreign labor to provide big business with low labor costs and readily available workers, rather than securing jobs for American veterans.

In an exclusive interview with SiriusXM Patriot’s Breitbart News Tonight, Brat told Breitbart News Senior Editors-at-Large, Rebecca Mansour and Joel Pollak Democrats, like his pro-amnesty opponent, Abigail Spanberger, are more concerned with providing cheap labor to the business lobby than job and wage growth for Americans.
Brat said:
That is what [Democrats] want to do. [Democrats] want to open the borders and bring in cheap labor for the cheap labor crowd and then that, of course, pushes down wage trades for American workers who can’t find jobs. And we’ve got 40 million people out of the workforce still, Americans, who we need to get into the economy.
The Trump economy is roaring right now and it’s a great opportunity to get our veterans all back in the labor force, all the kids that maybe didn’t want to go for the full college route maybe back into the labor force.
My opponent is way worse than that. [Abigail Spanberger] is open borders. [Emphasis added]
Listen to Brat’s full interview here:
As Breitbart News reported, Spanberger has endorsed amnesty for all 12 to 22 million illegal aliens living in the U.S. saying that the amnesty is necessary to “meet the needs of the employers,” a talking point often spouted by the pr0-amnesty U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Business Roundtable, and Wall Street executives.
In a case of wage depression due to mass immigration, California’s construction industry saw once good wages in the 1980s suddenly decreased and flatlined due to massive amounts of illegal and low-skilled legal immigration to the region.
Blaine Taylor, a whistleblower, said the construction industry in California once offered a starting wage of about $45 an hour in the late 1980s. Fast-forward to 2018 — nearly two decades into when illegal aliens began flooding the industry — he now says that wages have fallen by more than half, standing at just $11 an hour.
A recent Harvard/Harris Poll revealed that nearly half of Americans now say illegal immigration crushes U.S. wages. About 73 percent of supporters of President Trump say illegal immigration reduces wages for Americans. Another nearly 60 percent of Americans living in rural regions of the country say illegal immigration reduces U.S. wages.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder

The Second Caravan Sealed the Democrats' Fate




The herald of middle-American radicalism, Samuel Francis, famously described America's two parties as the evil party and the stupid party.  Under our secular savior, Donald Trump, the political division in America is changing: there is no more stupid party, and the evil party is consuming itself.  Vilfredo Pareto's classification of political elites as "Foxes and Lions" – the quick and cunning versus the strong and stalwart – now largely describes our two parties.  The pure foxes among Republicans have mostly been silenced or have left the party; it now consists mainly of a protective pride of lions led by a dominant male more cunning than any fox.  The Democrats' elites consist almost exclusively of foxes, and they are beset by a spreading plague of rabies.
Just in time to drive this division home with a sledgehammer and a ten-inch nail, the border crisis has exploded into America's consciousness.
On the heels of the now 14,000-strong human wave set to flood across our southern border in the coming weeks is another human army – and then another, and likely many more.  Faced with the prospect of paying human-smugglers $5,000-$10,000 to transport them to the American border, poor residents of Central American countries have come to realize that mass migrations are safer and cheaper.  The invaders know they have allies on this side of our border.  Most Democrat lawmakers remain silent; they are not proposing a solution because they don't see the invasion as a problem – to them, it is a feature of our immigration laws, not a bug.  Racialism is the new creed and currency of the left, so anything that swells the numbers of minorities in the United States is assumed by Democrat leaders to be a net benefit to the Democratic Party.  With the advent of invading armies, the democrats could not be more mistaken.
First, notice what was not said as the army approached Mexico and Mexican authorities pledged to prevent it from entering their country.  Whether this was possible was an open question – but what was never questioned was the right of Mexico to stop them.  Every leftist in Congress and in corporate media silently affirmed the right of the Mexican government to stop the army.  The Democrats' immigration message is finally crystal-clear: other nations have a right to control their borders, but we do not, even in the face of foreign invasion.  That is a politically untenable position.
Second, as more invading armies get underway, regardless of the fate of the first one, questions will invariably be asked of the left – and every question undermines the Democratic Party.
- How many are too many?  There can be no real answer to that question from the left if the first massive army proceeds into the interior of the country.  The left has welcomed the first army; consistency demands that they apply the same standards to those that follow.  The Democrats have shown that they're bluffing.  To fold will admit their error, wound their pride, and compromise their racialist creed.
- Do Democrats really believe that all or even most of the invading migrants face political, ethnic, or religious persecution?  Those are the standards for asylum.  The army comes from a region where ethnicity and religion are essentially uniform; there is no Latin American version of the Hutus and Tutsis.  People fleeing economic depression and criminal violence are not eligible for asylum, yet Democrats welcome them all with open arms.
- Assuming that we decide to stop the tenth, or twentieth, or fiftieth army, is there any legal way to do so without physical resistance?  The Democrats' silence on this issue insures that our laws will be changed, and not in ways that will benefit their party.  The wall is the most obvious but hardly the limit of these changes; immigration based upon merit will be the final defeat of the Democratic Party's desire to replace the American population with a largely illiterate and dependent foreign underclass.  The Democrats will resist every change, but their support for the current invasion has cut their credibility off at the knees.
Third, the left and its corporate media allies have misjudged Latinos.  The left's childish and simplistic view of minorities leads leftists to believe that all Latinos think alike and are uniformly elated by anything that grows the sheer number of Latinos in the country.  There are radical elements in the Latino community who do think that way, and naturally, they are drawn to active participation in the racialist Democrat mob.  But most Latinos are like the rest of us: they are concerned about their families first and foremost.  It doesn't benefit Latinos – whether here legally or illegally – to have endless waves of people arriving from outside the country, willing to work for lower and lower wages.  Shrewd Latinos also recognize that the less legitimate foreign arrivals appear to be, the greater the chance that large-scale deportations will eventually occur.  Most Latinos do not desire a place on the Democrat welfare plantation and the destruction of the family unit which such a place requires.  Note that there is no European analogue for the word "machismo" – among the various races, only Latinos use and celebrate such a term, defined as "aggressive masculinity."  The Democrat plantation is the home of emasculation.
Having already set in motion plans to limit or eliminate foreign aid to El Salvador, Honduras, and Guatemala, President Trump has already done more to fight this foreign invasion than Obama did in eight years.  Should the migrant army simply keep walking when it meets resistance, that will not be the victory many Democrats seem to anticipate.  It will not demoralize the Republican base, which recognizes that short of military resistance and the public relations nightmare a military confrontation may produce, Trump's hands are largely tied by our current immigration laws.  Instead, the human wave will be the punctuation mark on the end of the sentence, "Build the wall."
Months ago, Trump offered to trade legitimacy for DACA recipients for the wall.  The Democrats refused, as Trump surely knew they would.  Instead, Democrats dug their greedy hands ever deeper into the immigration candy jar.  Before all is said and done, they'll curse their greedy hands and wish they'd opted for amputation.

Gallup estimates that 147 million people around the globe want to migrate to the U.S., and of those, 37 million are from Latin America.

Invasion of the Country Snatchers
|
Posted: Oct 25, 2018 12:01 AM
  Share   Tweet
The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent the views of Townhall.com.
  
Is it more than coincidence that thousands of migrants from Central America are seeking to enter the United States illegally just two weeks before the midterm election? Who are these people? Who's paying for their transportation, food and expenses? Why doesn't the media find out? Is this migrant caravan a ploy by Democrats to win sympathy from Hispanic voters so they'll reverse their growing approval of Trump administration policies and vote against their interests?

One definition of invasion seems to fit what is transpiring at the southern border: "The entrance or advent of anything troublesome or harmful."