The Mexican Invasion and Occupation: Mexico Builds the LA RAZA "THE RACE" Supremacist Welfare State.
MEXIFORNIA IN METLDOWN: First, illegal immigration is the problem. CA has spent hundreds of billions on illegal aliens and their bills — public schools, free meals at school, special bi-lingual teachers, healthcare, housing allowances, low income energy assistance, aid to families with dependent children, prisons, cops, courts, public defenders, welfare, food stamps, and a hundred other gov handouts. And don’t forget lower college tuition for illegal immigrants. WAYNE ALLYN ROOT
If Gavin Newsom is not the worst governor of California, he will be by the time he gets through with it. Know-it-all "pretty boy" Newsom, predictably elected in a deeper-than-deep blue state, has no regard for anyone who thinks differently from how he does...if "thinks" is the word.
Newsom is willing enough to accept President Trump's pledge of federal funds to help California in its battle against the fires raging across the state. But he is not interested in any practical "advice" from the chief executive concerning fire prevention, since he labels Trump among those "deniers" who refuse to embrace the concept of global warming with the governor's cultist zeal.
It is convenient for liberals to blame all shortfalls on a heating planet, a condition for which they hold humans — especially those in capitalistic societies — largely responsible. Any caveats are dismissed in the dictatorial manner of rigid religious who condemn all opposition as heretical. (Perhaps they believe that all dissenters should be put to the stake.)
"Forest management" is not an original concept with the current administration. The clearing of debris from forest floors, the considered culling of trees to create fire-breaks, and the building of better access roads to and from forested areas make abundant good sense. So does the idea of not locating rural communities too close to the wilderness, and of making housing closer in to urban areas more affordable.
But even as the president emphasizes such cautionary measures, he is dismissed as an ignorant nuisance. Those who are allowed an opinion on the subject must first pledge allegiance to "global warming" as Public Enemy Number One. (Next to Trump himself, of course!) On the other hand, those who question the extent of man's role in climate change are labeled "flat earthers" by a global warming establishment that unscientifically cherry-picks opinions among scientists and excludes those that contradict the party line.
They are the saints, and all others are the sinners, destined for the fires of hell.
Saint Gavin's lack of judgment is not confined to this subject alone. If anyone dares, for instance, to blame Sacramento for not addressing the mounting numbers of homeless blighting California cities, Newsom turns his fire hose of wrath in that direction. The same denial of reality with which the Democrats viewed the "manufactured" border crisis is evident in their failure to acknowledge the severity of other national problems.
So despite California's current woes, Newsom remains defiantly full of braggadocio for his state and himself. One of the dubious claims he likes to throw in Trump's face is that California is more fiscally sound than is the federal government. But duplicitous accounting can easily add up to no more than a semblance of solvency, and among the budgetary smoke and mirrors is the un–factored in outsized pension obligation down the road to California's estimated 370,000 employees. And Newsom backs a Medicare-for-all single-payer plan, which the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst's Office in California estimates would cost more than double the state's current budget and put taxpayers on the hook for $200 billion a year.
Even without that costly medical system, economists predict that California is on a fast track to arrive at insolvency far sooner than ex-governor Jerry Brown's boondoggle bullet train could take them there. The undisclosed funds squandered (thus far) on that mismanaged project might have been better spent on, say, buying new forest-clearing and firefighting equipment and improving the infrastructure into communities nestled near California's forests.
Naturally, our "leaders" in Sacramento and Washington don't want to talk about that. Or if they do, it is all talk. While areas of Adam (Ahab) Schiff's district in Southern California burned to the ground, he hunkered down in a cramped Capitol basement office — possibly with a torture rack in one corner — figuring out how to harpoon the great orange whale in the White House.
It is hardly surprising that all Democrat presidential wannabes are obligated to worship the deity of global warming, even though the outrageous "Green New Deal" — first proposed by a radical congressional neophyte from the treeless New York jungle — would burn up all the money in the U.S. Treasury.
The most vociferous support for that draconian measure comes from those who won't have to pay for it, but who expect rich corporate fat cats — those responsible for global warming in the first place — to foot the outrageous bill. The guiltless "victims" might piously do without plastic straws or recycle cardboard pizza boxes, but that's where their noble intentions end. As for all the rhetoric about grounding airplanes or mandating costlier hybrid cars or predicting the end of the Earth within less than their own lifetimes — that's just meaningless, threatening chatter.
Would they feel the same if all electronic devices were suddenly found to contribute to global warming and thus had to be eliminated? The do-gooder line is consistently drawn at the point of self-interest. The Left would not be nearly as furious at Trump for "deserting" the Kurds or pulling out of endless wars, for example, if the United States had a policy of universal draft.
Meanwhile, California sporadically burns — and those living there also find themselves in the hot seat for high taxes; skyrocketing housing costs; deteriorating, gridlocked roads; and communities plagued by homelessness, litter, and crime.
So while Governor Newsom myopically sees greatness in the once-Golden State, others suspect that it is on a dangerous downward spiral to mediocrity. I was part of the growing exodus leaving California for other, "friendlier" states. Almost a year to the day, I relocated from Southern California to Las Vegas. The move, I'm pleased to report, has proved worth the gamble. As for Gavin Newsom, I'm sure he was more than happy to see me go.
California is collapsing
in front of our eyes. Everyone with the money and common sense is running for
their lives. The question is why is this happening to such a rich and beautiful
with a comparison of the taxes in California with my state of Nevada (right
next door to California). While California was burying its citizens with among
the nation’s highest personal income taxes, highest corporate income taxes,
highest sales taxes, and highest gas taxes, Nevada’s citizens have enjoyed
among the lowest taxes in the country.
That could be
why millions of people have left California in the past decade — almost all for
the low tax states like Nevada, Texas, Florida, Utah, Colorado, Washington, and
Arizona. Those states lead the nation in population growth, while California
and other high tax, blue states lead the nation in population loss.
Keep in mind
this was all before the
nonstop blackouts and $6 per gallon gas in California.
Who can live
in a place where the electric utility company shuts off the power to homes and
businesses for days on end, multiple times per year? Because the wind is
blowing hard? California has truly become a Third World Nation.
Keep in mind,
this is what you got for all those high taxes.
So why is this
happening? I lived in California for 15 wonderful years. The winds howled back
then too. We had 80 MPH Santa Ana winds. And plenty of fires, floods,
mudslides, and earthquakes. I lived through all of them. My home almost burned
three times. My car was almost carried away by a massive mudslide.
Yet in my 15
years in California, no one shut off electricity because the wind was blowing.
No one shut off electricity because there was the threat of a fire.
I’m not a
California hater. I loved my time in California. It is the most beautiful state
in America, with the greatest weather. But something has dramatically changed
since I left. Today I wouldn’t live there if you gave me a $5 million
oceanfront mansion for free.
What’s changed is disastrous
liberal ideas ruined California: high taxes, stifling regulations, climate
change policy, permissive policies towards homeless encampments, the highest
welfare benefits in the nation, a $15 minimum wage. It’s impossible to run a
business in California. Restaurants are closing by the hundreds.
And did I
mention poop, pee, and drug needles in the streets? And homeless camps
Now add in
blackouts that make life
and bankrupt businesses.
has become an unlivable third-
all those liberal policies that have contributed to the rot of California, one
issue is at the root of California’s current problems. One issue stands heads
and tails above all the rest.
foremost, illegal immigration is the problem. Since I left two decades ago,
California has collectively spent hundreds of billions of dollars on illegal
aliens and their bills — public schools, free meals at school, special
bi-lingual teachers, healthcare, housing allowances, low income energy
assistance, aid to families with dependent children, prisons, cops, courts,
public defenders, welfare, food stamps, and a hundred other government
handouts. And don’t forget special lower college tuition for illegal
imagine if all those billions of dollars were instead spent on new
infrastructure, moving power poles underground, upgraded electrical equipment,
modernized electrical systems, homeless vets, more cops, and better schools for
children born in California. Can you imagine what a better place California
would be for its own citizens?
Think about it
in personal terms. What if a husband and father has a drug problem. He's
addicted to cocaine or heroin. He spends $20,000 a year on his drug addiction
for 20 years. That's $400,000. But his life remains in control. Until one day
he finds out his child has cancer. The bill is $100,000 (after insurance pays).
But he doesn't have the $100,000. His child is dying. If only he had the
$400,000 back that he wasted on drugs.
California and illegal immigration. The state has squandered hundreds of
billions on illegal immigration in the 20 years since I've been gone. They
could use that money today. They desperately need it back to pay for the
hundred billion dollar job of upgrading and modernizing their electric grid.
But they don't
have the money. It's all
been wasted on
illegal aliens. And it's
you one thing Californians: if you had all that money back, you wouldn’t be
sitting in the dark.
In my next
column, I’ll get to Part II of the disastrous mistakes of liberalism that have
destroyed California. Think idiotic environmental policies and climate change
few hundred billion dollars wasted — and gone forever. Think about that, as you
sit in the dark, shivering or sizzling, with your food spoiling.
that as you fill up your gas tank with $5 our $6 per gallon gas, driving on
crumbling highways, in massive traffic jams.
money to fix your misery was spent
aliens, not you. How does that
Trust me, if
you impeach President Trump and elect Democrats to run the country, Democrats
will turn the whole America into one big crappy, miserable, unlivable
won't even get the sunshine and perfect 75 degree days.
Wayne Allyn Root is the host of
"The Wayne Allyn Root Show" on Newsmax TV, nightly at 8 p.m. ET,
found on DirecTV channel 349, Dish TV channel 216, or at NewsmaxTV.com. He is also a nationally
syndicated radio host. Wayne Allyn Root is a former libertarian vice
presidential nominee. He is the best-selling author of "The Power of
Relentless." Read more reports from Wayne Allyn Root — Click Here Now.
Democrats Move Towards
‘Oligarchical Socialism,’ Says Forecaster Joel Kotkin
progressives are embracing a political alliance with Silicon Valley oligarchs
who would trap Americans in a cramped future without hope of upward
mobility for themselves or their children, says a left-wing political analyst
Under the headline “America is moving toward an oligarchical
socialism,” Joel Kotkin writes:
Historically, liberals advocated helping the middle class
achieve greater independence, notably by owning houses and starting companies.
But the tech oligarchy — the people who run the five most capitalized firms on
Wall Street — have a far less egalitarian vision. Greg Fehrenstein, who
interviewed 147 digital company founders, says most believe that “an
increasingly greater share of economic wealth will be generated by a smaller
slice of very talented or original people. Everyone else will increasingly
subsist on some combination of part-time entrepreneurial ’gig work‘ and
Numerous oligarchs — Mark Zuckerberg, Pierre Omidyar, founder of
eBay, Elon Musk and Sam Altman, founder of the Y Combinator — have embraced
this vision including a “guaranteed wage,” usually $500 or a $1,000 monthly.
Our new economic overlords are not typical anti-tax billionaires in the
traditional mode; they see government spending as a means of keeping the
populist pitchforks away. This may be the only politically sustainable way to
expand “the gig economy,” which grew to 7 million workers this year, 26 percent
above the year before.
Handouts, including housing subsidies, could guarantee for the
next generation a future not of owned houses, but rented small, modest
apartments. Unable to grow into property-owning adults, they will subsist while
playing with their phones, video games and virtual reality in what Google calls
This plan, however, is being challenged by the return of
populism and nationalism when President Donald Trump defeated the GOP’s
corporatist candidates and the progressives’ candidate in 2016. In his 2017
inauguration, Trump declared:
For too long, a small group in our nation’s capital
has reaped the rewards of government while the people have borne the
cost. Washington flourished, but the people did not share in its wealth.
Politicians prospered, but the jobs left and the factories closed. The
establishment protected itself, but not the citizens of our country. Their
victories have not been your victories. Their triumphs have not been your
triumphs. And while they celebrated in our nation’s capital, there was little
to celebrate for struggling families all across our land.
That all changes starting right here and right now because this
moment is your moment, it belongs to you …
What truly matters is not which party controls our government,
but whether our government is controlled by the people.
For several years, Kotkin has been dissecting the Democrats’
shift from working-class politics toward a tacit alliance with the billionaires
in the new information-technology industries that are centralizing wealth and
power through the United States. In 2013, for example, he argued that
California’s politics were increasingly “feudal“:
As late as the 80s, California was democratic in a fundamental
sense, a place for outsiders and, increasingly, immigrants—roughly 60 percent
of the population was considered middle class. Now, instead of a land of
opportunity, California has become increasingly feudal. According to recent
census estimates, the state suffers some of the highest levels of inequality in the country. By some
estimates, the state’s level of inequality compares with that of such global models as the Dominican
Republic, Gambia, and the Republic of the Congo.
At the same time, the Golden State now suffers the highest level
of poverty in the country—23.5 percent compared to 16 percent nationally—worse
than long-term hard luck cases like Mississippi. It is also now home to
roughly one-third of the
nation’s welfare recipients, almost three times its proportion of the nation’s
Like medieval serfs, increasing numbers of Californians are
downwardly mobile, and doing worse than their parents: native born Latinos
actually have shorter lifespans than their parents, according to one
recent report. Nor are things expected to get
better any time soon. According to a recent Hoover Institution survey, most Californians expect their
incomes to stagnate in the coming six months, a sense widely shared among the
young, whites, Latinos, females, and the less educated.
citizens from industrial capitalism’s giant corporations? Where were the
Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Reserve, the Office of Thrift
Supervision, and the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight as the
mortgage bubble blew up in 2008, nearly taking the whole financial system with
it and producing the worst economic bust since the Great Depression, which even
today has sunk the labor-force participation rate and hiked the suicide rate
among working-class men and women to record levels?”
Exclusive: Jailed Mexican Cartel Boss Leading Kidnapping Ring from Inside Prison
MONTERREY, Nuevo Leon – A lieutenant from a faction of Los Zetas Cartel is considered responsible for orchestrating kidnapping and extortion schemes from inside a Mexican border state prison. The boss and his henchmen are also terrorizing citrus farmers in central Tamaulipas.
Known by the nickname “El Pariente,” Roberto Garcia Tinajero is currently one of the leading members of the “Vieja Escuela” faction of Los Zetas and is currently being held at a prison in Nuevo Leon. Breitbart Texas learned from law enforcement sources in both Nuevo Leon and Tamaulipas that El Pariente is also targeting citrus farmers on behalf of the Vieja Escuela. His gunmen demand hefty fees from growers under threats of violence.
It remains unclear how Garcia Tinajero is precisely able to run his cell from inside the prison. However, various police departments and prison personnel under the control of Nuevo Leon Public Security Secretary Aldo Fasci are plagued with corruption allegations.
In one of the most recent cases involving El Pariente’s cell, gunmen demanded $50,000 pesos ($2,500 USD) from a woman operating a citrus farm in the town of Guemez, law enforcement sources told Breitbart Texas. The woman was only able to produce $15,000 pesos or ($750 USD). Soon after, authorities received a call regarding a group of four gunmen in two SUVs moving along the highway that connects Ciudad Victoria with Monterrey. Tamaulipas state cops tracked the men to rural Plan de Ayala, where they found the kidnapped farmer and several weapons. State authorities learned the gunmen were part of the Vieja Escuela cell loyal El Pariente.
Prior to taking control of the cell, most extortion and kidnappings in central Tamaulipas were linked to Zeta figure Victor “El Chore” Morado Diaz, who is also inside a state prison. Since El Chore’s arrest in 2018, El Pariente was able wrest control of the operations while behind bars.
Editor’s Note: Breitbart Texas traveled to the Mexican States of Tamaulipas, Coahuila, and Nuevo León to recruit citizen journalists willing to risk their lives and expose the cartels silencing their communities. The writers would face certain death at the hands of the various cartels that operate in those areas including the Gulf Cartel and Los Zetas if a pseudonym were not used. Breitbart Texas’ Cartel Chronicles are published in both English and in their original Spanish. This article was written by Tony Aranda from Nuevo Leon, and Francisco Morales from Tamaulipas.
Ann Coulter: How to Get into Harvard Without Good S.A.T. Scores!
If you’re looking for a shortcut to get your kid into a prestigious college, but your little one doesn’t have high enough cheekbones to claim to be an Indian, consider the petal-strewn path of the newly elected San Francisco district attorney, Chesa Boudin.
Chesa’s sparkling credentials are: He is the son of celebrated cop-killers Kathy Boudin and David Gilbert! That was enough to win him admission to Yale, Oxford, and Yale Law School.
His mother consciously parlayed her way to success by becoming a violent revolutionary after realizing that she wasn’t going to set the world on fire with her SAT and LSAT scores.
By contrast, Kathy’s brother, Michael — the Republican — had nearly perfect board scores, graduated magna cum laude from Harvard College, went on to Harvard Law School, worked for a white-shoe law firm, then took a top position in the Reagan administration. Today, he is a federal appeals court judge, appointed by the first President Bush.
The only thing Kathy could do to impress her father — and our nation’s elite institutions — was to become a domestic terrorist.
It worked. Her parents showily displayed Kathy’s motorcycle helmet from her participation in the “Days of Rage” in Chicago. Jean Boudin’s “pride in her aristocratic position on the left,” Braudy writes, made her “the match of any Palm Beach hostess.”
In addition to the “Days of Rage,” which left a Democratic politician paralyzed, Kathy was part of the Weather Underground brain trust that blew up a Greenwich Village townhouse in 1970, killing three of the radicals. The bomb they were building was intended to kill servicemen and their dates at a Fort Dix dance. With body parts flying and walls collapsing around her, Kathy made it out of the house one step ahead of the police.
Again, Kathy’s parents were delighted with the townhouse bombing. Her mother had always envied the owners for their wealth, anyway. Her father thought seeing his daughter on FBI “wanted” posters was “good for his legend.”
As luck would have it, going underground after the townhouse explosion finally gave Kathy an excuse to get a nose job. She also dyed her hair bright red, mimicking Bernadine Dohrn, born Bernadine Ohrnstein. (These revolutionaries would engage in sex orgies to “smash monogamy,” but one convention the gritty radicals adhered to was the WASP ideal of beauty and gentrified names.)
The only thing that terrified Kathy, Braudy says, was that “if stripped of her glamorous and dramatic revolutionary attachments and subterfuges, she would be the dullest person in Leonard’s circle of admirers. … She would be a woman, no longer young, whose work was waiting tables and cleaning houses.”
In fact, that’s exactly what she was. While Kathy and David play-acted being on the run, theFBI wasn’t even looking for them anymore. A newspaper in Wisconsin published David Gilbert’s whereabouts and — OH MY GOSH … nothing happened. “No one arrested him,” Braudy writes; the “authorities weren’t interested in him.”
It was time for drastic action. Those LSAT scores weren’t going to bury themselves. So in 1981, Kathy conspired with violent drug-addicted members of the Black Liberation Army to rob a Brinks armored truck in Rockland County, New York. They wanted drug money and she wanted fame.
At the Nanuet Mall, her BLA co-conspirators murdered Brinks guard Peter Paige and wounded two others, then hopped in the getaway truck being driven by Kathy and David.
The truck was stopped by the police minutes later, but 38-year-old Kathy emerged from the truck’s cab, playing an innocent housewife, frightened by all the guns. She begged the perplexed police to lower their weapons. No sooner were their firearms holstered than six BLA members leapt out, guns blazing. They instantly killed the force’s only black officer, Waverly Brown. Sergeant Edward O’Grady died a few hours later on the operating table.
She’d done it. Kathy was a bona fide success! In jail, she received a string of celebrity visitors and fawning journalists. There would be documentaries, glorious write-ups, Oscar nominations, and poetry awards.
After decades of recounting her sufferings since the robbery that left Brown dead, Kathy was told that Brown’s son still attended the memorial service held for his father and Sgt. O’Grady at 4 p.m. every Oct. 20.
“Really?” Kathy said. “I never knew the guy had a son.”
According to our betters, that’s an “idealist.”
She was granted parole in 2003 — supported by none other than William F. Buckley. (The elites circle the wagons!) Soon she was a professor at Columbia University and director of the school’s Center for Justice.
These status-obsessed Yale rejects became “radicals” in order to win a lifetime of good press and cushy academic positions unavailable to them any other way.
Look at David Hogg, rejected from a half-dozen non-elite schools, only to be accepted by Harvard — all for raising his scrawny little arm in a preposterous one-arm salute after a speech denouncing the National Rifle Association. True, Hogg’s SAT score (1270) was far below that of the average Harvard student (1484). It was even below that of recruited athletes at Harvard (1297). But he had turned himself into a left-wing activist just in the nick of time. Harvard here I come!
The two “idealists” who raised Chesa Boudin were William Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn. On account of putting a bomb in the Pentagon, Ayers became a distinguished professor of education and senior university scholar at the University of Illinois at Chicago. For praising the Manson family and leading a group of protesters in a little ditty that mocked the government official paralyzed during the “Days of Rage” rampage, Dohrn was made a professor at Northwestern University School of Law.
Another leftist celebrity, Susan Rosenberg, had conspired to kill cops, blow up buildings and rob a Brinks truck; she was sentenced to 58 years in prison for felony murder and possession of more than 700 pounds of explosives. She was pardoned by President Bill Clinton on his last day in office.
A couple years later, Rosenberg was offered a teaching position at Hamilton College. Apart from her fondness for bombs and cop-killing, Rosenberg’s credentials consisted of: a master’s degree in writing from a correspondence course in prison.
Oh, by the way, when Kathy Boudin was finally arrested after the Brinks robbery, the police searching her Morningside Drive apartment found, amid the food stamps and welfare forms, Kathy’s application to New York University Law School.
It’s one thing to say a person shouldn’t be punished for the sins of his parents. But America’s elite institutions treat cop-killing — even merely being the child of cop-killers — as the equivalent of being a star athlete or getting double-800s on your SATs.
Say, instead of forcing taxpayers to take on the burden of student debt, how about letting the colleges eat their own student loans?
One of the most refreshing aspects of Resolution 296 -- which acknowledges the Armenian Genocide, and which the House recently overwhelmingly voted for -- is that it does not exclude those other peoples who also suffered a genocide under the Ottoman Turks. The opening sentence of Resolution 296 recognizes “the campaign of genocide against Armenians, Greeks, Assyrians, Chaldeans, Syriacs, Arameans, Maronites, and other Christians.”
And that last word -- Christians -- is key to understanding this tragic chapter of history: Christianity is what all those otherwise diverse peoples had in common, and therefore it -- not nationality, ethnicity, or grievances -- was the ultimate determining factor concerning whom the Turks would and would not “purge.”
The genocide is often conflated with the Armenians because many more of them than other ethnicities were killed -- causing them to be the face of the genocide. According to generally accepted figures, the Turks slaughtered 1.5 million Armenians, 750,000 Greeks, and 300,000 Assyrians.
As for the latter peoples -- the word “Assyrian” also encompasses Chaldeans, Syriacs, and Arameans -- half of their population of 600,000 was killed during the genocide. In other words, relative to their numbers, they lost more than any other Christian group, including the Armenians.
Year of the Sword: The Assyrian Christian Genocide (2016) underscores these points: that 1) the Assyrians were systematically massacred, and that 2) the ultimate reason for their -- and therefore the Armenians’ and Greeks’ -- genocide was their Christian identity.
The book’s author, Joseph Yacoub, an emeritus professor at the Catholic University of Lyon, offers copious documentation and reports from reliable eyewitnesses, state actors, and relief agencies that recount countless atrocities against the Assyrians -- massacres, rapes, death marches, sadistic eye-gouging, and the desecration and destruction of hundreds of churches.
While acknowledging that the Assyrians were “annihilated by the murderous madness of Ottoman power, driven by a hideous form of unbridled nationalism,” Yacoub also affirms that the “policy of ethnic cleansing was stirred up by pan-Islamism and religious fanaticism. Christians were considered infidels (kafir). The call to Jihad, decreed on 29 November 1914 and instigated and orchestrated for political ends, was part of the plan” to “combine and sweep over the lands of Christians and to exterminate them.” Several key documents, including one from 1920, confirm that there was “an Ottoman plan to exterminate Turkey’s Christians.”
The role played by other minorities under Ottoman rule -- that is, Muslim minorities -- further underscores that religion was the dividing line: enter that otherwise little-known people who recently made international headlines as “betrayed” freedom-fighters -- the Kurds.
Although there has never been any love lost between Turks and Kurds, once Christians were thrown into the mix, the two hitherto quarreling Muslim peoples temporarily set their longstanding differences aside: “Holy war [jihad] was proclaimed in Kurdistan and Kurdish tribes responded enthusiastically under the planned and concerted direction of the Turkish authorities,” writes Yacoub. Thus, the Kurds “were accomplices in the massacres, and participated in looting for ideological reasons (the Christians were infidels).”
Yacoub recounts many “atrocities carried out by Turks and Kurds from town to town and from village to village without exception.” In one instance, and according to primary source documents, Turks, Kurds, and other “Sunnis,” selected “eighteen of the most beautiful young girls” and hauled them into a local church, “where they were stripped naked and violated in turn on top of the Holy Gospel.” An eyewitness recalled that the “outrages” committed against “even children” were “so horrible that one recoils, it makes the flesh creep.”
Ample precedents presaged this Christian Genocide of the early twentieth century. As just one example, between 1843 and 1847, the Kurds “unleashed carnage” among the Assyrians of Van. More than 10,000 men were massacred, while “thousands of women and girls” were raped, mutilated, “and forcibly converted to Islam.”
Nor has history ceased. Those Christians most recently to undergo a genocide -- the Assyrians who found themselves under the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) -- are “themselves children of the Ottoman Empire’s victims,” notes Yacoub.
Not only is it important to remember that peoples other than Armenians were also victims of the Genocide, but that peoples other than Turks were also responsible. The perpetrators were all Muslim, and the victims were all Christian -- a dichotomy that remains alive and well in the world today.
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan claimed he will work to protect religious minorities in the Middle East, despite past persecution of Christians in the region.
During a press conference with President Trump, Erdogan was asked if he will protect Christians as he works with American forces to create a more peaceful region. He promised that he will help to “revive” the churches that had been destroyed in the area and ensure the safety of Christians.
“We’ll see that their sanctuaries are getting revived and their churches will be reconstructed so that they can go back and start praying again,” he said. “These are the plans that we are making for them.”
He claimed he has “no problem” with Christians living in Turkey and said he will work to “revive” those living in Syria, saying, “The ones remaining on the side of the Syrian territory will see their worshiping practices restored in a special manner. They are receiving healthcare. They’re receiving humanitarian aid in every aspect possible.”
Erdogan’s tone toward Christians during the press conference clashes with his past actions. The Turkish president has persecuted Christians, including Pastor Andrew Brunson, an American who was imprisoned for two years.
The Trump administration negotiated Brunson’s release.