Wednesday, September 22, 2021

MICHELLE MALKIN - WE KNOW WHO CONSPIRED TO INVADE AMERICA AND HIS NAME IS JOE BIDEN!

 

Study: Over Half of Migrants Are on American Taxpayer-Funded Welfare

Brandon Bell/Getty Images

JOHN BINDER

2 Sep 20210

3:09

More than half of the nation’s non-citizen population — including legal immigrants, foreign visa workers, and illegal aliens — use American taxpayer-funded welfare after arriving in the United States, a new analysis reveals.

Research by Center for Immigration Studies Director of Research Steven Camarota finds that about 55 percent of non-citizen households in the U.S. use at least one form of welfare compared to just 32 percent of households headed by native-born Americans.

Camarota’s research analyzes the U.S. Census Bureau’s Survey of Income and Program Participation data from 2018, showing that 49 percent of households headed by foreign-born residents, including naturalized American citizens, use at least one welfare program.

In 2017, economist George Borjas called the U.S. immigration system “the largest anti-poverty program in the world” at the expense of America’s working and middle class.

(Center for Immigration Studies)

Specifically, foreign-born residents used vastly more Medicaid compared to native-born Americans and food stamps. For example, while 33 percent of foreign-born residents use Medicaid, just 20 percent of native-born Americans do so.

Likewise, while 31 percent of foreign-born residents are on food stamps, only 19 percent of native-born Americans use the program.

Camarota’s research reveals that even after years and years of residing in the U.S., foreign-born resident households continue to use high levels of welfare.

About 44 percent of foreign-born residents who resided in the U.S. for 10 years or less use at least one form of welfare. Roughly 50 percent of those who resided in the U.S. for more than 10 years are on welfare.

When naturalized Americans are excluded from that count, the level of welfare use rises significantly for those who have resided in the U.S. for a while. For example, among non-citizen households who resided in the U.S. for 10 years or less, 40 percent use welfare. For those in the U.S. for more than 10 years, about 62 percent are on welfare.

The latest data comes after similar numbers were released in March 2019 that showed that, in 2014, non-citizen households used nearly twice as much welfare as native-born Americans.

Currently, there is an estimated record high of 44.5 million foreign-born residents living in the U.S. This is nearly quadruple the immigrant population in 2000. The vast majority of those arriving in the country every year — more than 1.5 million annually — are low-skilled foreign nationals who go on to compete for jobs against working class Americans.

At current legal immigration levels, the Census Bureau projects that about 1-in-6 U.S. residents will be foreign-born by 2060 with the foreign-born population hitting a record 69 million.

John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Email him at jbinder@breitbart.com. Follow him on Twitter here.


Biden Taps ‘Sanctuary City’ Supporter To Oversee ICE Prosecutions

Move comes as Biden administration faces an influx of illegal immigrants in Del Rio, Tex.

LA JOYA, TEXAS - APRIL 10: A U.S. Border Patrol agent takes the names of Central American immigrants near the U.S.-Mexico border on April 10, 2021 in La Joya, Texas. A surge of immigrants crossing into the United States, including record numbers of children, continues along the southern border. (Photo by John Moore/Getty Images)
 • September 22, 2021 1:25 pm

SHARE

The Biden administration is tapping a left-wing attorney who has publicly endorsed sanctuary laws for illegal aliens to serve as Immigration and Customs Enforcement's top prosecutor, according to an internal memo obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.

ICE announced the hiring of Kerry Doyle, a longtime partner at the Boston-based law firm Graves & Doyle, as the agency's new principal legal adviser, a role that oversees 25 field locations and 1,250 attorneys. The office serves as ICE’s representative in all removal proceedings and litigates cases against illegal aliens and terrorists. 

"Throughout her legal practice in Boston, Ms. Doyle worked closely with the Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition and Massachusetts Law Reform Institute providing technical assistance and public testimony and various immigration-related policy issues before the state legislature and Boston City Council," the ICE memo reads. 

A spokesman for ICE did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Doyle's appointment comes as the Biden administration faces an influx of Haitian refugees, who are overrunning the border city of Del Rio, Texas. After reversing a bevy of Trump-era immigration rules, an uptick in illegal migration across the Southern border has strained resources and presented a political problem for the president, who repudiated Trump's hardline approach to policing the border but risks political blowback from an influx of illegal residents. 

Doyle's LinkedIn profile spotlights her work as co-counsel in a case that pushed for — and won — a temporary restraining order against then-president Donald Trump’s 2017 travel ban. The attorney also spoke in favor of a Massachusetts bill called the "Safe Communities Act" in early 2020 arguing that ICE was "out of control." . The measure would have applied sanctuary city laws nationwide and sharply limited the state’s cooperation with the federal government on the deportation of illegal immigrants.

"The Safe Communities Act limits state cooperation … [with ICE]: don’t ask about immigration status; don’t pay for sheriffs to act as ICE agents; tell people their rights," a description of the bill by the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts reads. In June, Doyle told a local news outlet that the state must pass the bill, saying state Democrats should not trust "the Biden administration’s more supportive tone as an excuse not to do what our state needs to do."

Doyle, who did not respond to a request for comment, has also helped represent illegal aliens convicted of crimes in the past. In March, she filed a petition with ACLU Massachusetts to release two criminal aliens with medical conditions, citing the COVID-19 pandemic. Doyle’s name has since been scrubbed from her previous law firm’s website.

One of President Joe Biden’s first executive orders in office was to suspend arrests, deportations, and investigations of most criminal aliens for 100 days. Deportations under Biden have hit a record low. U.S. immigration judges ordered just 25,000 deportations by the end of August, compared to 152,000 in August 2020. The total number of cases completed by immigration courts are at a 28-year low, even as Border Patrol apprehensions hit a 21-year high. 

Doyle will succeed John TrasviƱa, who assumed the role in January. 

Michelle Malkin: Stop Lapping Up the Manufactured Border Crisis

 By Michelle Malkin | September 22, 2021 | 11:14am EDT

 
 
Haitian migrants cross the Rio Grande river to get food and water in Mexico, as seen from Ciudad Acuna, Coahuila state, Mexico on Sept. 22. (Photo credit: PEDRO PARDO/AFP via Getty Images)
Haitian migrants cross the Rio Grande river to get food and water in Mexico, as seen from Ciudad Acuna, Coahuila state, Mexico on Sept. 22. (Photo credit: PEDRO PARDO/AFP via Getty Images)

In nearly 30 years of covering America's corrupted immigration and entrance policies, I can tell you definitively that every "border crisis" is a manufactured crisis. Caravans of Latin American illegal immigrants don't just form out of nowhere. Throngs of Middle Eastern refugees don't just amass spontaneously. Boatloads of Haitians don't just wash up on our shores by random circumstance.

All the world's a stage, and as I exposed in my most recent book, "Open Borders, Inc.," the world's migrants are nothing more than expedient tools to globalist elites, profit-maximizing corporations, self-aggrandizing religious and nonprofit groups, and criminal smuggling syndicates.

That's how the so-called border crises under former Presidents Bill Clinton, George Bush, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump all played out. The players are always the same: United Nations operatives, U.S. Chamber of Commerce lobbyists, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and its sovereignty-undermining shelter operators around the world, Jewish and evangelical Christian refugee resettlement contractors, international drug cartels, human traffickers, and their militant multicultural abettors. It's the same old, same old under President Joe Biden. The latest wave of Haitians traversing rough seas and barren deserts to trespass onto U.S. soil at our southern border in Del Rio, Tex., is no accidental phenomenon.

Todd Bensman, senior national security fellow at the Center for Immigration Studies, has been interviewing Haitians at Ciudad Acuna, Mexico, the town through which an estimated 15,000 of these illegals have passed to form the massive encampment in Del Rio, Tex. Several dozen told Bensman that "on Sunday, Sept. 12, the Mexican government effectively sent a mass of migrants it had bottled up for months in its southern states up to the American border. This move, which appears to have been done under the cover of Mexico's independence week of celebration known as El Grito, essentially foisted a humanitarian problem onto the Americans in a single week."

Several Haitians told Bensman that government officials in Tapachula informed them they no longer needed passports or other paperwork they had been waiting months for — and then were suddenly given a three-day grace period to make their rush for the border.

Because Ciudad Acuna and Del Rio are not as infested with Mexican cartel enforcers, thousands of Haitians took advantage of the relatively safe passage into America's promised land without having to pay the usual coyote fees.

Most have been lying in wait in Chile and Brazil for several years looking for better economic opportunities, so don't believe sob-story propaganda that the prime factor has to do with any recent natural disaster or sudden political turmoil. Open-borders academic Andrew Selee of the Migration Policy Institute himself tweeted that "for those wondering about where Haitian migrants are coming from, most left Haiti in 2010-12 after the earthquake and settled in Brazil....Later most moved to Chile & Ecuador....This means that most of those arriving in Texas have been out of their country for about a decade. The COVID recession, discrimination, and the perception that they could get into the U.S. now all played a role in the movement north over the past few months....Both Colombia and Panama registered huge increases in transit through the Darien Gap in July/August suggesting significant movement north."

Countless Catholic parishes, like the Franciscan parish in Necocli run by Father Henry Lopera, have facilitated Haitians' migration through the Darien Gap and on to Mexico and the U.S. by supplying food packages. Doctors Without Borders has three health posts to assist the trespassers. Along the way, these Haitian invaders have also been assisted by the United Nations' International Organization of Migration, which has dispatched minibuses filled with toiletries and hair ties, according to The Guardian.

As I reported in "Open Borders, Inc.," the International Organization of Migration, or IOM, is the same agency that signed "cooperation agreements" in Mexico with three migrant shelters along its southern border to assist border-busting "irregulars" traveling through the Mexican states of Chiapas and Oaxaca on their way to the U.S.

The IOM pact guaranteed supplies of medicine, hygiene products, construction materials, therapy services, and legal training at the Hermanos en el Camino shelter, along with the Catholic-run Hogar de la Misericordia shelter and Jesus el Buen Pastor del Pobre y el Migrante shelter. IOM extended similar aid to nine other migrant shelters in the northern and central parts of Mexico, from Chihuahua, Sonora, and Tamaulipas along the northern border to San Luis Potosi, Veracruz, and Tlaxcala in the center of the country.

Who's paying? Funding for IOM's operations comes from the U.S. State Department's Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration, which is subsidized by y-o-u.

The bozos in the Biden administration are now play-acting with their performative gestures of "mass deportation" of Haitians. But I've seen this show and all its reruns over the past three decades before. It ends with sneaky "temporary protected status" orders, mini-amnesties, and maxi-amnesties to feed the global Open Borders, Inc. beast.

All the world's a stage, and America is the overrun doormat being trampled upon while our own citizens suffer increasing deprivation and anarcho-tyranny. Ain't "diversity" grand?

Michelle Malkin is a conservative blogger at michellemalkin.com, syndicated columnist, author, and founder of hotair.com. Michelle Malkin's email address is MichelleMalkinInvestigates@protonmail.com.

Biden Proposes Highest Refugee Ceiling in Three Decades for FY 2022

By Patrick Goodenough | September 21, 2021 | 4:41am EDT

 
 
Syrian women and children from the Al-Hol camp in the northeastern Syria. (Photo by Delil Souleiman/AFP via Getty Images)
Syrian women and children from the Al-Hol camp in the northeastern Syria. (Photo by Delil Souleiman/AFP via Getty Images)

(CNSNews.com) – The Biden administration informed Congress on Monday that the United States will admit up to 125,000 refugees in fiscal year 2022, doubling the ceiling of 62,500 that it had hoped to resettle in FY 2021.

An admission ceiling of 125,000 refugees would be the highest set by any administration in almost three decades.

In 1993, a ceiling of 142,000 refugees was set, although actual resettlements that fiscal year reached only 119,448. If President Biden’s ceiling of 125,000 refugees next year is achieved, it will be the highest number of arrivals since 1992, when 132,531 refugees were resettled.

“New political violence, intensifying humanitarian crises, climate change-induced displacement, and increased threats to refugees in countries of asylum all support a need to increase refugee admissions to the United States and among our global resettlement partners,” states the proposed presidential determination (PD) sent to Congress.

The move comes after Trump administration reduced the annual refugee admission cap for five consecutive years, each time setting a new record low ceiling: 50,000 refugees in FY 2017, 45,000 in FY 2018, 30,000 in FY 2019, 18,000 in FY 2020, and 15,000 in FY 2021.

When Biden took office he initially did not throw out his predecessor’s cap of 15,000 – the lowest set since the modern-day refugee admissions program was established in 1980 – but after refugee advocacy groups protested he issued a new PD in May, with a ceiling of 62,500 admissions.

With just ten days of the fiscal year to run, however, it’s clear actual admissions for FY 2021 will fall well below that.

The latest State Department Refugee Processing Center data available indicate that as of the end of August, only 7,637 refugees – or just 12.2 percent of the 62,500 cap – had been resettled since the fiscal year began on October 1 last year.

The report sent to Congress on Monday projects that by the end of the month, the total number of actual FY 2021 admissions will be around 12,500, or 20 percent of the 62,500 cap.

The majority of the refugees admitted this year, almost 70 percent of the total, arrived in just four months – May, June, July and August.

(Graph: CNSNews.com / Data: State Department Refugee Processing Center)
(Graph: CNSNews.com / Data: State Department Refugee Processing Center)

The countries of origin of the largest groups are the Democratic Republic of Congo (3,449 refugees), Ukraine (702), Afghanistan (643), Burma (581), and Syria (541).

The Afghanistan figure does not apply to Afghans who have arrived under the Congress-created Special Immigrant Visa program covering those who worked for the U.S. over the past 20 years.

Arrivals of SIV-holders have increased significantly since July, as the drawdown of U.S. and coalition forces neared completion and the Taliban advanced across the country.

(Graph: CNSNews.com/Data: State Department Refugee Processing Center)
(Graph: CNSNews.com/Data: State Department Refugee Processing Center)

In Monday’s report, the administration is proposing to allocate 40,000 refugee places to applicants from Africa, 35,000 from the Near East-South Asia region, 15,000 from East Asia, 15,000 from Latin America and the Caribbean, and 10,000 from Europe and Central Asia, leaving the remaining 10,000 as an unallocated reserve.

Compared to last year’s regional allocations (see chart below), the most obvious change is a smaller allocation for refugees from Africa – from 44 percent of the total (excluding unallocated reserve) in FY 2021 to 34.7 percent in FY 2022, a drop of almost 10 percent.

(Graph: CNSNews.com / Data: State Department Refugee Processing Center)
(Graph: CNSNews.com / Data: State Department Refugee Processing Center)

Regarding the other four regions, allocations for FY 2022 are somewhat larger than they were for FY 2021 – bigger by 1 percent for East Asia; by 0.7 percent for Europe; by 3 percent for Latin America and the Caribbean; and by 4.4 percent for the Near East-South Asia.

“The proposed FY 2022 allocations are based on refugee resettlement needs and humanitarian policy priorities,” the report states. “Areas of particular focus in FY 2022 include higher expected arrivals of Afghan refugees with the recent P-2 designation and providing more safe and legal pathways, including resettlement, for vulnerable individuals in Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador.”

Among applicants to be prioritized are vulnerable people in the northern triangle countries and individuals falling within a category listed in the 1989 Lautenberg Amendment and its 2004 extension, including Jews and other minorities in Eurasia as well as persecuted religious minorities in Iran.

Ethnic minorities from Burma and the DRC are prioritized, as are Afghans under a new Priority 2 (P-2) designation applying to those who don’t meet the minimum time-in-service requirement for the SIV program, but were employed by the U.S. government or armed forces, a government-funded program or project, or a U.S.-based media or non-governmental organization.

Other groups determined to be priorities in FY 2022 include Uyghur and other Turkic Muslims in China; activists, journalists, and dissidents from Hong Kong; Rohingya Muslims from Burma; religious or ethnic minority Syrians and Iraqis; and “individuals persecuted on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, or sex characteristics.”

State Department spokesman Ned Price said the Departments of State, Homeland Security and Health and Human Services will now consult with Congress over the proposed PD.


Biden's grand return of 'catch and release'

By Monica Showalter

Should breaking into the U.S. illegally be a sure-thing win for the lawbreakers?

It is, with Joe Biden in the saddle.  So much for "do not come, do not come," as Kamala Harris once said.  Migrants are not fools and pay attention to what the Biden administration proceeds to do and respond accordingly.

Two things are going on that show the extent of this new "catch and release" farce.

One: As I noted the other day, Biden is releasing the vast community of 16,000 illegals, mostly from Haiti, camped out under a bridge near the Del Rio, Texas border into the country without so much as a court date.  His claims of mass deportations is just a few for show.

According to Fox News:

The Department of Homeland Security on Wednesday confirmed that some Haitian migrants are being released into the interior of the United States – despite a stern warning to migrants from DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas on Monday that their efforts "will not succeed."

In response to the surge in Haitian migrants, which has seen more than 14,000 migrants camped under the bridge in Del Rio, with reports of tens of thousands more on the way, DHS has emphasized that migrants are being removed on removal flights under Title 42 public health protections. DHS has ramped up deportation flights to Haiti as part of its strategy to combat the crisis.

"DHS continues to expel migrants under CDC’s Title 42 authority," a spokesperson said. "Those who cannot be expelled under Title 42 and do not have a legal basis to remain are placed in expedited or full removal proceedings."

That "some" is Biden-spin meaning "thousands."  Only a precious few — some 300 — who have broken into the U.S. illegally have been deported back to Haiti.  Most are being sent to their destinations of choice in the U.S. at taxpayer expense, unvetted, and unvaxxed, with just a "notice to report" to the local ICE office papers instead of so much as a "notice to appear" with a fixed court date to adjudicate their phony asylum-claim status. 

Either paper is easily ignored and usually is by such lawbreakers, and Biden refuses to allow interior enforcement of immigration law, so the migrants know they've gotten here scot-free.  Applying legally, you see, is for suckers.  And don't think they won't tell their friends.

Why the speed?  Because the Bidenites have public relations as their prime priority, same as they did with the Afghanistan pullout.  Given that photos of the vast, squalid Del Rio migrant camp are a political liability, Biden has his priorities.  Too bad about the country, let alone what the American people want.

Here's another issue well worth noting.  Migrants, not being stupid, are gaming the system in an additional way — they're throwing away their identification papers.

Virtually all of them are previously resettled refugees in third-world countries such as Chile and Brazil.  They took those deals as long as a decade ago but decided they wanted to upgrade, so they came to the States, knowing that Biden was inviting them in and had halted deportations.  It costs a lot of money to migrate, and, being no fools, they shelled it out only because they were sure.

The ID cards from Chile and Brazil made them ineligible for asylum right off the bat.  No ID, no problem — without those cards, they can then claim to be anyone and get the asylum upgrade they're looking for.  Country-shopping for the best package deal of benefits is getting to be pretty common under Biden.  He created that situation.

How the immigration officials sort that out is anyone's guess.  The reality on the ground says the Bidenites won't even try.

So once again, the migrants win, and the illegals will get in.  That won't be where it ends, though; the illegal migrants will also tell their friends and relatives that it's all so very easy.  Guess what the friends and relatives are going to do!

And Biden here thinks he's got the problem solved by sweeping it under the rug to get the cameras off.  What he's done with this catch-and-release idiocy is only make the problem get bigger.  He's like a foolish homeowner who thinks he can get rid of a bee's nest in his rafters by shutting the hole down.  Bees don't work that way, and leaving the honey in the attic will only bring more bees, in bigger numbers than ever.  People, like bees, respond to honeyed incentives, and Joe's solutions will only bring in more illegal aliens, as if two million new ones this year aren't enough.

Congress, the courts, the states, and anyone else out there have got to get tough with this lunacy.  And since Biden responds only to cameras, anyone else out there must keep the cameras on.

TWO OF BIDEN'S UNREGISTERED DEMOCRAT VOTING ILLEGALS - Two Afghans Brought to U.S. Charged with Child Sex Crimes, Strangling Wife While Living on WI Military Base

 

Study: Over Half of Migrants Are on American Taxpayer-Funded Welfare

Brandon Bell/Getty Images

JOHN BINDER

2 Sep 20210

3:09

More than half of the nation’s non-citizen population — including legal immigrants, foreign visa workers, and illegal aliens — use American taxpayer-funded welfare after arriving in the United States, a new analysis reveals.

Research by Center for Immigration Studies Director of Research Steven Camarota finds that about 55 percent of non-citizen households in the U.S. use at least one form of welfare compared to just 32 percent of households headed by native-born Americans.

Camarota’s research analyzes the U.S. Census Bureau’s Survey of Income and Program Participation data from 2018, showing that 49 percent of households headed by foreign-born residents, including naturalized American citizens, use at least one welfare program.

In 2017, economist George Borjas called the U.S. immigration system “the largest anti-poverty program in the world” at the expense of America’s working and middle class.

(Center for Immigration Studies)

Specifically, foreign-born residents used vastly more Medicaid compared to native-born Americans and food stamps. For example, while 33 percent of foreign-born residents use Medicaid, just 20 percent of native-born Americans do so.

Likewise, while 31 percent of foreign-born residents are on food stamps, only 19 percent of native-born Americans use the program.

Camarota’s research reveals that even after years and years of residing in the U.S., foreign-born resident households continue to use high levels of welfare.

About 44 percent of foreign-born residents who resided in the U.S. for 10 years or less use at least one form of welfare. Roughly 50 percent of those who resided in the U.S. for more than 10 years are on welfare.

When naturalized Americans are excluded from that count, the level of welfare use rises significantly for those who have resided in the U.S. for a while. For example, among non-citizen households who resided in the U.S. for 10 years or less, 40 percent use welfare. For those in the U.S. for more than 10 years, about 62 percent are on welfare.

The latest data comes after similar numbers were released in March 2019 that showed that, in 2014, non-citizen households used nearly twice as much welfare as native-born Americans.

Currently, there is an estimated record high of 44.5 million foreign-born residents living in the U.S. This is nearly quadruple the immigrant population in 2000. The vast majority of those arriving in the country every year — more than 1.5 million annually — are low-skilled foreign nationals who go on to compete for jobs against working class Americans.

At current legal immigration levels, the Census Bureau projects that about 1-in-6 U.S. residents will be foreign-born by 2060 with the foreign-born population hitting a record 69 million.

John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Email him at jbinder@breitbart.com. Follow him on Twitter here.


Biden Taps ‘Sanctuary City’ Supporter To Oversee ICE Prosecutions

Move comes as Biden administration faces an influx of illegal immigrants in Del Rio, Tex.

LA JOYA, TEXAS - APRIL 10: A U.S. Border Patrol agent takes the names of Central American immigrants near the U.S.-Mexico border on April 10, 2021 in La Joya, Texas. A surge of immigrants crossing into the United States, including record numbers of children, continues along the southern border. (Photo by John Moore/Getty Images)
 • September 22, 2021 1:25 pm

SHARE

The Biden administration is tapping a left-wing attorney who has publicly endorsed sanctuary laws for illegal aliens to serve as Immigration and Customs Enforcement's top prosecutor, according to an internal memo obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.

ICE announced the hiring of Kerry Doyle, a longtime partner at the Boston-based law firm Graves & Doyle, as the agency's new principal legal adviser, a role that oversees 25 field locations and 1,250 attorneys. The office serves as ICE’s representative in all removal proceedings and litigates cases against illegal aliens and terrorists. 

"Throughout her legal practice in Boston, Ms. Doyle worked closely with the Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition and Massachusetts Law Reform Institute providing technical assistance and public testimony and various immigration-related policy issues before the state legislature and Boston City Council," the ICE memo reads. 

A spokesman for ICE did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Doyle's appointment comes as the Biden administration faces an influx of Haitian refugees, who are overrunning the border city of Del Rio, Texas. After reversing a bevy of Trump-era immigration rules, an uptick in illegal migration across the Southern border has strained resources and presented a political problem for the president, who repudiated Trump's hardline approach to policing the border but risks political blowback from an influx of illegal residents. 

Doyle's LinkedIn profile spotlights her work as co-counsel in a case that pushed for — and won — a temporary restraining order against then-president Donald Trump’s 2017 travel ban. The attorney also spoke in favor of a Massachusetts bill called the "Safe Communities Act" in early 2020 arguing that ICE was "out of control." . The measure would have applied sanctuary city laws nationwide and sharply limited the state’s cooperation with the federal government on the deportation of illegal immigrants.

"The Safe Communities Act limits state cooperation … [with ICE]: don’t ask about immigration status; don’t pay for sheriffs to act as ICE agents; tell people their rights," a description of the bill by the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts reads. In June, Doyle told a local news outlet that the state must pass the bill, saying state Democrats should not trust "the Biden administration’s more supportive tone as an excuse not to do what our state needs to do."

Doyle, who did not respond to a request for comment, has also helped represent illegal aliens convicted of crimes in the past. In March, she filed a petition with ACLU Massachusetts to release two criminal aliens with medical conditions, citing the COVID-19 pandemic. Doyle’s name has since been scrubbed from her previous law firm’s website.

One of President Joe Biden’s first executive orders in office was to suspend arrests, deportations, and investigations of most criminal aliens for 100 days. Deportations under Biden have hit a record low. U.S. immigration judges ordered just 25,000 deportations by the end of August, compared to 152,000 in August 2020. The total number of cases completed by immigration courts are at a 28-year low, even as Border Patrol apprehensions hit a 21-year high. 

Doyle will succeed John TrasviƱa, who assumed the role in January. 

Two Afghans Brought to U.S. Charged with Child Sex Crimes, Strangling Wife While Living on WI Military Base

Afghans
DCSO
1:58

Two Afghan men, brought to the United States as part of President Joe Biden’s massive resettlement operation out of Afghanistan, have been charged with child sex crimes and domestic abuse while temporarily living at Fort McCoy in Wisconsin.

On Wednesday, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced federal charges against Afghans Bahrullah Noori, 20-years-old, and Mohammad Haroon Imaad, 32-years-old.

According to prosecutors, Noori is accused of trying to forcefully engage in sexual acts with a minor while temporarily living at Fort McCoy since being brought to the U.S. with tens of thousands of other Afghans. Noori has also been charged with three counts of engaging in a sexual act with a minor and one count alleging the use of force.

An indictment against Noori states that his victims were under the age of 16 and were at least four years younger than him.

In a separate incident, Imaad is accused by prosecutors of strangling and suffocating his wife while temporarily living at Fort McCoy after arriving in the U.S. from Afghanistan. The alleged assault apparently took place on September 7.

Both Noori and Imaad appeared in court in Madison, Wisconsin, on September 16 to face the charges against them and are currently being detained at the Dane County Jail. Their immigration statuses, whether they arrived as refugees, Special Immigrant Visa-holders (SIVs), P-2 visa-holders, or parolees remains unclear.

Noori is facing a mandatory minimum of 30 years in prison and a maximum sentence of life in prison. Imaad is facing a maximum of 10 years in prison.

John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Email him at jbinder@breitbart.com. Follow him on Twitter here.

Is Biden Bringing Terrorists From Afghanistan to America?

 By Terence P. Jeffrey | September 22, 2021 | 4:11am EDT

 
 
Afghan evacuees are escorted to a waiting bus after arriving at Dulles International Airport in Chantilly, Virginia on August 23, 2021. (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images)
Afghan evacuees are escorted to a waiting bus after arriving at Dulles International Airport in Chantilly, Virginia on August 23, 2021. (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images)

Is President Joe Biden bringing terrorists from Afghanistan to the United States?

The answer: Even Biden himself cannot know for sure.

The administration is bringing two distinct types of evacuees into the United States from Afghanistan. Some hold special immigrant visas. Others are so-called parolees.

In June, the Congressional Research Service published a report explaining SIVs.

"Congress has enacted a series of legislative provisions since 2006 to enable certain Iraqi and Afghan nationals to become U.S. lawful permanent residents (LPRs)," said CRS. "These provisions make certain Iraqis and Afghans who worked as translators or interpreters, or who were employed by, or on behalf of, the U.S. government in Iraq or Afghanistan, eligible for special immigrant visas (SIVs)."

Allowing Afghan SIV holders to come to the United States is not only understandable; it is laudable. These are people who aided our country in its war against al-Qaida and the Taliban.

But who is a parolee?

"The parole provision in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA)," CRS has reported, "gives the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) discretionary authority to 'parole into the United States temporarily under such conditions as he may prescribe only on a case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit any alien applying for admission to the United States."

"Parole does not grant, nor entitle beneficiaries to later obtain, a lawful permanent resident (LPR) status," said CRS.

So, the Afghan parolees who have been coming into the United States since the fall of Kabul are people who are not entitled to lawful permanent resident status here, but whom Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas has decided to grant entry into our country.

Do any of these parolees belong to, or sympathize with, al-Qaida, ISIS or any other terrorist group?

In a hearing in the House Foreign Affairs Committee on Sept. 13, Rep. Chris Smith of New Jersey questioned Secretary of State Antony Blinken on the vetting of Afghan evacuees brought to this country.

"Were there any gaps or weaknesses in the vetting process of Afghan evacuees, especially in light of the fact that reliable information on some, perhaps many, who got parole wasn't available to conduct a meaningful background check?" asked Smith. "Are you concerned that the Taliban may have embedded its members as evacuees?"

Blinken did not address the fundamental question of where and how the United States would get reliable background information on Afghan nationals, who, unlike SIV holders, had not worked for or on behalf of our government.

"With regard to the background checks, and this is very important, and you're right to focus on it," said Blinken, "as you know, before Afghans evacuated from Afghanistan reach the United States, they go to a transit country, and that's where the initial checks are done."

So, our government removed parolees from Afghanistan before it did background checks on them.

"We've surged Customs and Border Patrol. We've surged our intelligence and law enforcement capacity to do those initial checks," Blinken continued. "And then when they get to the United States, first, at a military base, those checks are continued using all of the law enforcement, intelligence, security agencies to do that so that we can make sure that we are not letting anyone into the country who could pose a threat or risk."

Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst in New Jersey is one of the locations the U.S. government has been bringing Afghan evacuees.

In an interview with CNS News on Sept. 20, Rep. Smith described a visit he made to that base on Sept. 2, when he discovered that "more than 70%" of the Afghan evacuees there then were parolees — not SIV holders.

"Well, they had about 3,000 Afghan evacuees there then. Now, it's about 9,400," said Smith. "I saw the military doing a magnificent job to make people feel at home, to make sure they had accommodations. But I was extraordinarily worried and continue to be about the vetting process before they get there."

"I asked very serious questions about: How do you do a background check on someone, particularly somebody in the age where they might be more prone to be an al-Qaida enthusiast," said Smith. "How do you do a background check back in Afghanistan to determine who they are and what their affiliations might have been? From date forward, yeah, you can get fingerprints and all the rest, biometrics, but you can't really look back all that well. So, I didn't get good answers."

Following up on his visit to JB-MDL, Smith sent a letter to Mayorkas on Sept. 13 asking some fundamental questions about the Afghans being brought there.

The most fundamental sought to discover how our government actually determines the identity of an Afghan evacuee. "Is there a biometric and historical database to vet and confirm the identity of any Afghan evacuee who has arrived at a military base, including information about one's history before leaving Afghanistan?" Smith asked the DHS secretary.

Assistant DHS Secretary Alice Lugo sent Smith a letter two days later stating that DHS would answer his questions — sometime in the future.

"Your correspondence is very important to us," Lugo said. "The appropriate Department of Homeland Security Components are preparing information so we can respond with the accuracy and completeness that your letter deserves. Please know that the Department's leadership has accorded your letter a high priority, and we are endeavoring to respond to you as soon as possible."

As of the afternoon of Sept. 21, DHS had still not responded to Smith.

In the meantime, according to Smith, Afghan evacuees have been leaving JB-MDL and venturing into the United States.

Smith was asked by CNS News on Sept. 20: "Have some of the parolees actually left the base there?"

"Yes," said Smith. "I just got the number today. 115 have departed."

(Terence P. Jeffrey is the editor-in-chief of CNSNews.com.)


How U.S. Failure in Afghanistan Validates the Koran’s Jihadist Teachings

Jihadist zeal is at an all-time high, for the Koran always “foretold” America’s failure.

 

 7 comments

Raymond Ibrahim is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center.

While it should be a no-brainer that the Taliban’s victory in Afghanistan has emboldened like-minded (read: “radical”) Muslims to no end, few in the West appreciate how this episode—especially America’s disastrous retreat under Biden—is being used to validate the Koran itself, and thus reignite Muslim zeal and faith in Islam.

Since August 15, 2021, when the Taliban reconquered Afghanistan, anytime I watched an Arabic language program or sheikh speak, they cited several Koran verses as “proof” that it was only inevitable—only a matter of time—that the U.S. would be humiliated and the Taliban exalted.

Consider, as one example, the words of popular sheikh, Wagdi Ghoneim (pictured above). An Egyptian scholar of Islam and member of the Muslim Brotherhood, he is notorious for issuing violent fatwas against Israel and inciting hatred against other “infidels” (including by threatening Egypt’s indigenous Christian minority, the Copts with genocide). With such “credentials,” it should come as no surprise that he once served as the imam of the Islamic Institute of Orange County, California, and was a fundraiser for the Toledo, Ohio charity, KindHearts (a Hamas front).

On August 15, 2021, this Ghoneim offered a “victory” speech that—at least as of publication of this article—still appears on YouTube, titled (in translation), “Allahu Akbar: The Taliban’s Victory Represents the Power of Jihad in Allah’s Way.”   He began his talk by quoting the Koran on the virtues of jihad, for example:

O believers! Be mindful of Allah and seek what brings you closer to him and perform jihad in his way, so you may be successful (5:35).

O believers! March forth [into battle] whether it is easy or difficult for you, and perform jihad with your wealth and your lives in the cause of Allah. That is best for you, if only you knew (9:41).

Having laid the doctrinal framework for jihad, Ghoneim moved on to its most important aspect—perseverance: “The Taliban persevered in its jihad for 20 years,” he stressed.  “This isn’t a problem—what’s 20 years in the context of history? Who said [the outcome of] jihad is instantaneous?  No! It requires patience and time!”

In fact, patience and perseverance in the jihad was his grand point—not to mention the grand takeaway lesson of Afghanistan for all Muslims.  It is for Allah to decree when the jihad succeeds; for every day Muslims, there duty is simply and always to wage it.  If they do so, Allah, according to his word, shall eventually bless them with victory.

Supporting Koran verses Ghoneim cited include,

We will certainly test you until we learn who among you are the true mujahidin [jihadists] who remain steadfast and how you conduct yourselves (47:31).

Do you think you will enter Paradise without Allah proving which of you truly performed jihad for his cause and patiently endured? (3:142).

O believers! Patiently endure, persevere, stand on guard, and be mindful of Allah, that you may be successful (3:200).

Interestingly, the phrase “stand on guard” in Koran 3:200 literally means “perform ribat,” that is, man the frontier zone, whence the infidels should be harried, including through guerilla tactics—precisely what the Taliban did.

Finally, Ghoneim moved onto Allah’s words concerning infidels, especially those who try to prevent Muslims from performing jihad and enforcing sharia; he quoted Koran 8:36: “Surely the infidels spend their wealth to prevent others from the Way of Allah [sabil allah, i.e., jihad]. They will continue to spend to the point of regret. Then they will be defeated and the infidels will be driven into hell.”

As countless other Muslim clerics and leaders have done, are doing, and will do for years to come, Ghoneim proceeded to expound how that particular Koran verse foretold America’s defeat—that is, so long as there were always Muslims willing to persevere in the jihad, namely the Taliban.  At one point he descended into wild gloating: “See how much they lost by way of dead and wounded—and trillions, all lost!...  So you see, trillions they have lost!”

Because Ghoneim made this video on August 15, when it was still unknown that billions of dollars’ worth of U.S. weapons had fallen into the hands of the Taliban, he did not mention it—though countless other clerics have since, citing it as proof of how Allah blesses his jihadist servants, while humiliating their infidel enemies.

At any rate, the take away lesson from Afghanistan for millions of Muslims the world over is that perseverance in jihad and patience pays off—just as the Koran says it will.   Put differently, the roles of both the Taliban and the U.S. have now confirmed for Muslims the truths of the Koran, specifically, that perseverance in the jihad always leads to victory over and leaves infidels broken—even if it takes years and decades.

“Therefore, thanks be to Allah,” concluded Ghoneim, “that they [Taliban] were patient and steadfast, and Allah rewarded them with victory over the infidel nations.”  He closed by supplicating Allah to let the umma, the entire Muslim world, learn from the Taliban—from “those heroes who raised all of our heads up high and cast the infidels’ heads down in shame.”

As such, expect a renewed and unwavering commitment to the jihad—in all its manifestations, violent and nonviolent—in the foreseeable future.