Saturday, February 8, 2020

RAPIST HARVEY WEINSTEIN 'DEFORMED, INTERSEX, NO BALLS' - But it never bothered Hillary Clinton!


Everyone knows she stood by her man, blamed his women, and perhaps was a psychological co-rapist for the sake of her political ambitions. DEBORAH C TYLER

 

Tick...tick...tick -- The stench of Epstein closing in on Bill Clinton

 

Much of the fallout of the Jeffrey Epstein pedophilia among the powerful scandal has fallen onto Prince Andrew of U.K., an insignificant second son of Queen Elizabeth II. The pervert's suicide, though, and the increasingly suspicion-arousing circumstances point to much more important people. As I've argued before, the media scrum around Andrew seemed to be an attempt to deflect attention from more powerful players involved with Epstein as the story burns out and the public loses interest.
Beneficiary number remains is Bill Clinton, whose associations with Epstein are pretty astonishing. He's been listed on the flight logs of more than two dozen Epstein "Lolita Express" flights. He's been a regular at Epstein's "cowboy village" in New Mexico with its group showers which, based on the word of maintence staff, seemed to be all about perversion out of the public eye. He's been seen with all those candy stripers.
Well, now the lid's starting to bounce on that boiling pot, and maybe too soon for Bill's tastes. The Sun of the U.K.'s new U.S. edition, now has an astonishing series of photos of Clinton livin' it up on Epstein's airplanes, Clinton posing with Epstein's accused pimp, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Clinton whooping it up with underage staff, generally partying hearty on the pervert's dime. Yet to this day he claims to know nothing about what Epstein was about, never noticed a thing.
BILL Clinton poses side-by-side with suspected pimp Ghislaine Maxwell - as the pair board pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s notorious private jet.
The former US President is seen smiling on the steps of the plane – dubbed the Lolita Express - next to Maxwell, in astonishing pictures exclusively obtained by The Sun.
All it can do is raise suspicions about whether Epstein's prison "suicide" was in any way authentic - a question that even (tick, tick, tick) 60 Minutes gave credibility to, given the mounting evidence - and what Clinton might be trying to hide. It's possible there are still pictures and cell phones and other paraphernalia out there if it's not been preemptively destroyed. (After all, if someone could have taken Epstein out to keep him from talking, how much more likely they'd be to break and enter into some of Epstein's redoubts to destroy the evidence.) It's conspiracy stuff, sure, but it's linked to a strange chain of events. 
Why on earth would Clinton hang out with a revolting human being like Epstein anyway? As Andrea Widburg has noted here, it's almost as if the world's elites have some kind of power racket going, given that pedophilia is all about power over the powerless. Clinton himself was out of power when he started associating with the monster, and his wife Hillary had it while he didn't. She even blithely ignored him when he warned her to go to Wisconsin in 2016, which cost her the election. His association had some kind of roots in power.
What's really strange is why the media is so intent on protecting Bill. Shouldn't he, and for that matter, his longtime enabler Hillary Clinton be answering a few questions from the press. To date, they are amazingly incurious. Yet as pictures like the Sun's get out, the clock is now ticking. 
Photo illustration by Monica Showalter with use of public domain sources.

 

 

 

Ed Buck Will Finally Face Trial, but His Conviction Is Far From Guaranteed

Charged with the the deaths of two men who overdosed in his apartment, the former Democratic operative’s path to punishment could be difficult and uncertain
By
on September 11, a black man whom the authorities are calling “Joe Doe” hurried from a West Hollywood apartment to a nearby gas station and asked the attendant on duty to call 911. A wealthy older man had injected him with crystal meth, Doe said, and then refused to call an ambulance when he began overdosing.
Thus began a chain of events that resulted, at long last, in the arrest of Ed Buck. By then the longtime Democratic Party operative was the target of protest vigils, a wrongful death lawsuit, and a TV news stakeout. Though two black men had been found dead of meth overdoses in his home in a span of 18 months, and several others were telling investigators that Buck had brought them into his residence and injected them with a quantity of the drug that made them lose consciousness, local prosecutors had resisted calls to make an arrest. The 911 emergency of Joe Doe propelled the case suddenly forward out of what seemed, at least to observers, an interminable lapse of inertia. Within days after Doe was discharged from the hospital, Buck was arrested at his home by L.A. County sheriff’s deputies and booked on state charges in connection with Doe’s overdose. In Doe, investigators had a witness who had escaped Buck’s apartment alive, and what he told them gave prosecutors the break they needed to bring long-awaited charges in what was alleged to be one of the most macabre L.A. crime sprees in years. At that point, however, local prosecutors had competition.
Earlier this year, at the invitation of the L.A. County Sheriff’s Department, a federal drug task force opened an investigation into Buck’s alleged crimes. Where L.A. County District Attorney Jackie Lacey had previously judged the evidence insufficient to charge Buck in the two overdose deaths in his home, the United States attorney in L.A., Nicola Hanna, saw things differently. In a whiplash turn of events over 48 hours, Buck was arrested, charged in state court, and then promptly transferred to federal custody and hit with a new set of charges in the deaths of 26-year-old Gemmel Moore and 55-year-old Timothy Dean.
This summer, the legal drama of Ed Buck enters its improbable third act. The notoriety of Buck, once famous as a well-connected political donor, has long since eclipsed his renown. By the time he was handcuffed and hauled away from West Hollywood in a sheriff’s vehicle, the name Ed Buck had come to represent many things to many people: to local prosecutors, he is a scourge; to black and LGBTQ activists, an avatar of status and privilege; to the right wing, a cudgel with which to bash the Democrats; and, to black gay men working as escorts in West Hollywood, a kind of terrifying urban legend come to life. But while the case against him has progressed, the path to conviction is difficult and uncertain.
The Buck who appeared in court before federal Judge Frederick F. Mumm on October 10 was a shadow of the political phenom who arrived in L.A. three decades ago and became a major player in the local Democratic Party. He stood, looking drawn and anxious in a loose beige prison smock. When Mumm asked how he would plead to charges that he supplied the methamphetamine that killed Moore and Dean, the defendant hesitated for a long moment before responding: “I am working on one hearing aid. Not guilty.”
Family members of Moore and Dean attended the arraignment and assembled outside court afterward. Moore’s mother, LaTisha Nixon, later called Buck a “monster” and dismissed his apparent weakness as an act to gain pity from the court. The families and their activist supporters have long argued that Buck led a double life that protected him from the consequences of his alleged crimes, likening him to a modern-day Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde. “This was a really hard case for people in society and politics to wrap their heads around,” says Jasmyne Cannick, an L.A.-based media consultant active in the campaign that called for Buck’s arrest. “Here you have this white man, an animal rights activist who’s run for office and who seems like he’s a decent guy, a good person. It was really a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde situation.”
It’s not as if Buck hadn’t shown occasional glimpses of a darker side: He has been the subject of several requests for temporary restraining orders. And on at least two occasions, his vitriolic style convinced deputies at West Hollywood’s City Hall to escort the targets of his tirades to their cars after public meetings. Still, even to those who had run afoul of Buck’s temper, the depth of his fall from grace is astonishing.
“Here you have this white man, an animal rights activist who’s run for office and who seems like he’s a decent guy. It was really a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde situation.”
The Ed Buck of the late 1980s was a charismatic gay political celebrity who lead a quixotic crusade that helped bring down Evan Mecham, the rancorous Republican governor of Arizona. The Arizona Republic said Buck was “destined to go down in history as one of Arizona’s most unlikely political figures.” After moving to L.A., Buck acclimated quickly, forging political friendships with area congressmen, members of the state Assembly and the City Council. He fostered golden retrievers, railed against private development, and donated handsomely to scores of Democrats, including all but one of the present members of the West Hollywood City Council. But the same 65-year-old who had grinned in photos with Hillary Clinton and former Governor Jerry Brown was known to homeless men in WeHo’s Plummer Park as “Dr. Kevorkian.”
Buck was being held in early November without bond at the Metropolitan Detention Center in downtown L.A. An official with the Federal Bureau of Prisons declined to discuss the conditions of his confinement except to say that Buck is not permitted visitors. In state court, where he faces separate charges of operating a drug den and providing the drugs that caused Joe Doe’s hospitalization for a drug overdose, Buck wore a protective blue vest, the kind meant to prevent inmates from killing themselves and protect them from attacks by other prisoners.
The source of Buck’s wealth has always been shrouded in mystery. He claimed he retired in his early 30s on proceeds from the “million-dollar” sale of his business (he owned a service that provided driver’s license information to auto insurers). A former friend told me that more recently Buck has lived frugally off investment gains from the stock market. Local prosecutors put forward a different theory, arguing in a recent filing in state court that Buck “has no known source of income” and “may be funding his lifestyle with narcotics trafficking.”
Since 2005 Buck has donated more than a half-million dollars to political candidates and causes in Los Angeles. Though he was once a registered Republican in Arizona, nearly all of his donations have been linked to Democrats since he moved to West Hollywood in 1991. He has cut checks for 40 officeholders in California, including several in L.A. City Hall, the California Assembly, and Congress, the Los Angeles Times has reported. Some of those politicos have returned the money or redirected it to charitable causes after Buck’s arrest. Lacey returned the $100 donation that Buck made to her 2012 campaign for district attorney. She has said that she doesn’t know Buck and his modest largesse played no role in the decision about whether to prosecute him.
Whatever its source, Buck’s fortune seems depleted. Seymour Amster, the attorney who began representing Buck after the death of Moore, is not listed as his attorney in the federal case. Facing a possible life sentence in federal prison, Buck has elected to be represented by a public defender, at a cost of $500 a month, according to a court filing. Amster has spoken for Buck in the press, saying that Moore’s death was “a tragedy, not a crime,” which he attributed to Buck’s having “opened his home to an individual who was troubled.” He referred to the activist campaign against Buck as “a race war.” Amster appeared at Buck’s side in state court, but that case is on hold until the federal case is completed, says a spokesman for the DA’s office. Amster, who previously defended the serial killer known as the Grim Sleeper, did not respond to messages seeking comment.
When Moore was found dead in Buck’s apartment in 2017, the initial investigation by the Sheriff’s Department and coroner’s office treated the overdose as an accident. A law enforcement source told Los Angeles that this erroneous assumption contributed to errors that investigators committed at the scene. A year later, when Lacey decided not to prosecute Buck in Moore’s death, prosecutors listed “inadmissible search and seizure” as one of the reasons. Lacey later told a meeting of the Stonewall Democratic Club that investigators had illegally seized around two grams of methamphetamine from a toolbox in Buck’s apartment. Federal prosecutors later charged Buck with intentionally distributing the drugs that killed Moore and Dean and three counts of drug distribution. They must prove that the drugs provided by Buck were the drugs that entered into the victims. Court documents in the federal case make no mention of an illegal search.
Nearly three weeks after Moore’s death the Sheriff’s Department reopened the investigation as a possible homicide. It happened after Moore’s mother and a young man who had worked as an escort for Buck aired their suspicion that Buck had supplied and injected Moore with the drugs that killed him. Nixon told a local reporter: “[Buck] would have my son … go out to … Santa Monica Boulevard looking for young gay black guys so he could inject them with drugs, see their reaction and how [they] would react and take pictures of them.” The reporter, Ryan Gierach, had known Buck for 14 years and knew of his meth use. “I needed no convincing,” Gierach said. “Over 13 or 14 years I’ve seen a man, a vital, vigorous, incredible intellect, descend into a monster.”
Buck had once been a political mentor of sorts to Gierach, opening doors and giving him inside information until the two had a falling out in 2015 after Buck refused to lend him money. Gierach incorporated Nixon’s lurid allegations into a news feature that delved into Buck’s prominence in the Democratic Party and included a recent photo of Buck with Clinton. The Drudge Report promoted the story. The London tabloid The Daily Mail ran its version under the headline: “Male prostitute, 26, dies of meth overdose at Hollywood home of high-profile Democrat donor.” Fox News seemed to embrace the story as a chance to attack multiple foes at once: Democrats, the Clintons, and Hollywood. (On the night Buck was arrested, Tucker Carlson reported the story with a photo showing Buck with Hillary Clinton: “Turns out when Buck wasn’t donating to the Democrats, he liked to inject young men with narcotics in his living room.”)
“I’ve seen a man, a vital, vigorous, incredible intellect, descend into a monster.”
Entries from Moore’s personal journal were published in various news outlets in which he blamed Buck for getting him addicted to crystal meth. Moore wrote in a December 2016 entry that Buck “gave me my first injection of chrystal [sic] meth it was very painful, but after all the troubles, I became addicted to the pain and fetish/fantasy.”
Eighteen months after Moore’s death, Timothy Dean, a fashion consultant for Saks Fifth Avenue who had performed in adult films, died of a meth overdose in Buck’s living room. Nine months later Joe Doe fled Buck’s apartment and ended up being treated at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center for a drug overdose.
Federal prosecutors have the ability to charge Buck in the two deaths without having to prove that killing them was his intent. The same statute is being used to prosecute the men who sold the fentanyl-laced painkillers that killed rap star Mac Miller. Lacey said in a statement that “there is no comparable statute in California criminal law that my office could have used to charge defendant Buck in either of the deaths.”
Investigators eventually gathered testimony from at least nine men who said that Buck had brought them to his home and insisted that they take drugs he gave them as compensation for sexual services. Two of them reported that he had injected drugs into their bodies while they were asleep. One of those two men is Joe Doe.
With the exception of Doe, local and federal prosecutors have differed over the credibility of witnesses. Many have puzzled over how Buck had avoided so much as a drug charge in the case. Nixon’s attorneys in a wrongful death lawsuit against Buck have suggested that local prosecutors were influenced by the fact that many of the alleged victims were homeless, black, and sex workers. The federal trial of Ed Buck was originally scheduled to begin November 26, but has been moved to next summer.

 

And there's more than a few indicators that Clinton wasn't naive at all about Epstein. Though he wasn't accused by Epstein's credible accuser Virginia Giuffre, Clinton's been accused repeatedly being a sexual predator by others earlier.


She is incredibly incompetent, fundamentally dishonest, and criminally corrupt, and these are her good qualities. KENNETH ELIASBERG
Harvey Weinstein has been exposed in the media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary Clinton has been exposed as the craven money-grubber she is; money over morality is the mantra she lives by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY – AMERICAN THINKERcom

Hillary the Punisher: Ronan Farrow says he was cut dead from Clinton circles after he exposed Weinstein


Apparently, the queen and her moneymen are not to be challenged.
Young Ronan Farrow learned that the hard way when he found out he was persona non grata from charmed social circles of Hillary Clinton following his investigation into Hollywood movie producer Harvey Weinstein's long career of sexual harassment and intimidation, an investigation which won him the Pulitzer prize.
Which culminates a long road of indignities for the young man. Seems the threats from Weinstein's minions to him were not enough. Nor was the rejection he encountered from assorted media organizations who refused to run his work until the New Yorker finally picked it up. Nope, the punishment Farrow endured also extended to House Clinton, which cut him dead.
Which, to the rest of us, seems like a good thing, given their long history of moral turpitude. But to young Ronan, it was another sling and arrow, because he was a Democrat and that was his social circle.
According to the Washington Examiner:
“It’s remarkable how quickly even people with a long relationship with you will turn if you threaten the centres of power or the sources of funding around them,” Farrow told the Financial Times.
“Ultimately, there are a lot of people out there who operate in that way. They’re beholden to powerful interests and if you go up against those interests, you become radioactive very quickly,” he said.
Clinton appointed Farrow as her special adviser on global youth issues in 2011 when she was secretary of state. Farrow said he had worked with Clinton “for years” when he was looking into the Weinstein story.
Instead of praising young Ronan for standing up for the interests of sex-harrassed women, for igniting the #MeToo movement, Hillary, that supposed big champion of women's progress, shut him out, probably refusing to take his calls, and in his view, solely on the grounds that one of her most important moneymen was put out of commission. He was dead to her.
And that tells us a lot more about Clinton than it does about Farrow. 
It's a reminder of Clinton's pay-to-play orientation, and privilege-of-kings morality. Rules of decency do not apply to her. Women's rights, or anyone's rights, are window dressing. Money talks. Maybe that can be brought up next time someone bruits about her name for president again.

Everyone knows she stood by her man, blamed his women, and perhaps was a psychological co-rapist for the sake of her political ambitions.

Bill and Hill - and the Evil that Men Do

If you asked one hundred people what they think about when they hear the name Bill Clinton, a goodly number will say womanizer, cheater – a few will use the dreadful word rapist. And that number will increase. Time and neurology are working against the Clintons.
Most memory training programs are simply a matter of learning how to associate memories with emotionally charged ideas. This is because the brain is designed to remember where the dangers and the goodies lie and to forget the dry statistics. The brain is more inclined to remember Jennifer Flowers than the unemployment rate in 1996. This effect has tainted the collective memory of many presidents, for example, disclosures about the mistresses of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and John Kennedy. This effect will increase for Bill Clinton both because of the outrageous nature of his conduct and the way it has and will be reported.

People tend to cut quite a bit of slack for the weaknesses of the flesh because there’s a lot of that going around. But Hillary will gain no benefit from that latitude. Everyone knows she stood by her man, blamed his women, and perhaps was a psychological co-rapist for the sake of her political ambitions.  Before the next president is elected, Hillary will not only have an albatross around her neck, she will be covered with names like Wellstone, Broaddrick, Moffet, Ward Gracen, Brown, Dowdy, Jones, Ferguson, Zercher, Willey, and more. A majority of those one hundred people will remember the evil the Clintons did, and their legacy will be lost in the folds of tattered dresses and bleeding lips.
Lives -- after them, the good is oft interred with their bones. So let it be with the Clintons.
If you asked one hundred people what they think about when they hear the name Bill Clinton, a goodly number will say womanizer, cheater – a few will use the dreadful word rapist. And that number will increase. Time and neurology are working against the Clintons.
Most memory training programs are simply a matter of learning how to associate memories with emotionally charged ideas. This is because the brain is designed to remember where the dangers and the goodies lie and to forget the dry statistics. The brain is more inclined to remember Jennifer Flowers than the unemployment rate in 1996. This effect has tainted the collective memory of many presidents, for example, disclosures about the mistresses of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and John Kennedy. This effect will increase for Bill Clinton both because of the outrageous nature of his conduct and the way it has and will be reported.
People tend to cut quite a bit of slack for the weaknesses of the flesh because there’s a lot of that going around. But Hillary will gain no benefit from that latitude.
 Everyone knows she stood by her man, blamed his women, and perhaps was a psychological co-rapist for the sake of her political ambitions.  Before the next president is elected, Hillary will not only have an albatross around her neck, she will be covered with names like Wellstone, Broaddrick, Moffet, Ward Gracen, Brown, Dowdy, Jones, Ferguson, Zercher, Willey, and more. A majority of those one hundred people will remember the evil the Clintons did, and their legacy will be lost in the folds of tattered dresses and bleeding lips.
Lives -- after them, the good is oft interred with their bones. So let it be with the Clintons.

 

Hillary Clinton Is not just a sore loser, she is a total loser

As one can readily see, Hillary Clinton has been unable to recover from having lost the 2016 presidential election -- a self-inflicted wound that she will never cop to. Or, possibly, an act of divine intervention. She has come up with well over a dozen reasons for her defeat -- every one but the real one, i.e. she is a loser -- not just a sore loser, but a total loser. She is incredibly incompetent, fundamentally dishonest, and criminally corrupt, and these are her good qualities. In addition, she is bereft of a trace of integrity or character, has absolutely no judgment, and is devoid of people skills ( she’s very easy to dislike and distrust and thereby become a member of her deplorables). The 2016 race was hers to lose, and by failing to listen to advice on where to campaign, she managed to do just that -- lose! Thank God -- a Hillary Clinton presidency would be the last nail in America’s coffin.
We could go through the litany of Hillary Clinton’s failures – Cattlegate, Whitewater, Travelgate, Filegate, her clumsy and opaque handling of the health care assignment her husband handed her, her tour of duty in the U.S. Senate, or her stint at the State Department, starting with her failure to get the Russian word for “reset” correct and ending with her dereliction of duty in the case of Benghazi (which produced four dead Americans, including her “friend” Ambassador Christopher Stevens), which, on testifying before Congress, she fobbed off with “what difference, at this point, does it make?”
But, for present purposes, I would just like to focus on the liberties that she has always taken with the truth. When Bill Safire of the New York Times called her a congenital liar, he flattered her. You see, the Clintons don’t just tell lies, they live them.
Consider her most recent whopper -- the one in which she observed, on being asked what was her most difficult decision, that it was remaining in her marriage. Why was this her biggest whopper? Because she had no choice but to remain in her marriage, if, indeed, the arrangement that the Clintons have qualifies as a “marriage,” rather than a political partnership looking to advance the ambitions of each of the partners.
Some have applauded her incredible loyalty to Bill in view of his tawdry behavior. However, if all they had was an “arrangement” to advance their ambitions, his infidelities were irrelevant as far as hurt feelings were concerned.
But they were necessary to make her both the object of sympathy (although one has to wonder why you are deserving of pity on your husband’s 1000th marital transgression). Also, every time he got caught, so it goes, he owed her one. Ergo, the health care assignment, her Senate term, and, finally, her stint as Secretary of State. In each of these situations she distinguished herself more for her failures than any accomplishment.
The point here is that Hillary had no choice but to stay in her marriage. Without her connection to Bill Clinton, Hillary could not be nominated for, let alone be elected to, dog catcher of even the smallest of communities. Her successes in  securing all of these positions was achieved by attaching herself to Bill’s coattails and riding them to each one of these positions.
So why did Hillary lose the 2016 Presidential election? Because she’s Hillary Clinton, a born loser. And, more to the point, Hillary Clinton belongs in the Big House, not in the White House.

BILL CLINTON: SERIAL RAPIST and his enabler, Hillary!
MONICA’S VIDEO ON SERIAL RAPIST BILL CLINTON, HUSBAND OF SWAMP EMPRESS HILLARY CLINTON, CHARITY FOUNDATION FRAUDSTER

Harvey Weinstein has been exposed in the media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary Clinton has been exposed as the craven money-grubber she is; money over morality is the mantra she lives by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY – AMERICAN THINKERcom

Monica Lewinsky says Bill Clinton hinted she should perjure herself, arranged a farewell Christmas tryst before dumping her




Why is no one helping or caring about all these women? Who Hillary Viciously went after. The hypocrisy right now on the left is utterly stunning me. Bill Clinton-12 women on record telling their stories of him sexually assaulting them starting back in college! Imagine all the women who still have never told their stories about him?

Eileen Wellstone (1969)

Allegation: S-exual assault

Anonymous female student at Yale University (1972)

Anonymous female student at the University of Arkansas (1974)

Anonymous female lawyer (1977)

Juanita Broaddrick (1978)

R-ape

Carolyn Moffet (1979)

Elizabeth Ward (1983)

Sally Perdue (1983)

Paula Jones (1991)

Sandra Allen James (1991)

Christy Zercher (1992)

Kathleen Willey (1993)

Monica Lewinsky. 22-year-old intern working for the President

 

Ronan Farrow: Bill Clinton ‘Credibly’ Accused of Rape, Investigation Is ‘Overdue’

https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2019/11/03/ronan-farrow-bill-clinton-credibly-accused-of-rape-investigation-is-overdue/

 

 

3 Nov 20192,510
2:29

Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Ronan Farrow said on HBO’s Real Time With Bill Maher, that “credible” accusations of rape had been made against former President Bill Clinton by Juanita Broaddrick, adding that an investigation into the allegations is now “overdue.”

Maher asked Farrow, who is best known for helping uncover the Harvey Weinstein sexual assault scandal, whether Clinton could have survived in today’s political climate of hyper-awareness about sexual misconduct.
“I think that it is very important to interject that Bill Clinton is a different conversation,” responded Farrow. “He has been credibly accused of rape. That has nothing to do with gray areas. I think that the Juanita Broaddrick claim has been overdue for revisiting.”
Broaddrick, a former nursing administrator, first made the allegations against Clinton in 1999, claiming that he raped her in her hotel room in Little Rock in 1978, when he was Arkansas attorney general and running for governor. Clinton has denied the allegation through his attorney.
Farrow recently accused Hillary Clinton in his best-selling book Catch and Kill of pressuring him during his investigations into Harvey Weinstein’s behavior. According to Farrow, Clinton’s publicist Nick Merrill described the story as “a concern” for her reputation.
Meanwhile, Maher also pressed Farrow on longtime rumors that he is the son of singer Frank Sinatra, with his mother Mia Farrow having been romantically involved with the singer and the pair bearing a strong physical resemblance.
“Now, what do you think your father would think about what you’re doing now?” Maher asked Farrow, in reference to his investigative reporting.
“I knew I was walking into that so I asked,” Farrow said. “I didn’t want to give you the sound-bite of ‘Which one?’”
In 2013, Mia Farrow said in an interview with Vanity Fair that Sinatra could “possibly” be her son’s biological father.
“I feel like there’s no one more #MeToo-y than Frank Sinatra,” Maher said, asking. “You do own a mirror, don’t you?”
Farrow eventually admitted that he “doesn’t know” what Sinatra would have thought of his journalism, but joked that Maher could “ask my mom” for answers.
Follow Ben Kew on Facebook, on Twitter at @ben_kew, or email him at bkew@breitbart.com


Where were the HOWLERS when serial rapist Bill Clinton, Bill Cosby and Harvey Weinstein were on the prowl?

 

http://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2016/07/30-lies-of-hillary-clinton-and-thats.html

Harvey Weinstein has been exposed in the media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary Clinton has been exposed as the craven money-grubber she is; money over morality is the mantra she lives by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY – AMERICAN THINKERcom
"But what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by now."  ----  Patricia McCarthy - AMERICANTHINKER.com

Leaked Julian Assange Message:

Hillary Is A ‘Well Connected, Sadistic Sociopath’

"But what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by now."  ----  Patricia McCarthy - AMERICANTHINKER.com

Hillary, Billary, Cosby, Buttman Affleck, Oliver Stone, Harvey Weinstein and their boy Obomb….. new definitions of
degradation and sleaze.                              


Harvey Weinstein has been exposed in the media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary Clinton has been exposed as the craven money-grubber she is; money over morality is the mantra she lives by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY – AMERICAN THINKERcom

"But what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by now."  ----  Patricia McCarthy - AMERICANTHINKER.com
DO YOU GET SICK AND TIRED OF HOLLYWOOD’S STAGGERING HYPOCRISY???
RICH LIBERALS AND THEIR CELEBRATES P IMPS AND PERVS
…. The parasitism of  Hillary,  Billary, Obomb, Heffner, Cosby, Buttman Affleck, Oliver Stone, Weinstein and the rest.

Harvey Weinstein has been exposed in the media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary Clinton has been exposed as the craven money-grubber she is; money over morality is the mantra she lives by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY – AMERICAN THINKERcom



Former President Bill Clinton speaks during a plenary session at a Clinton Global Initiative meeting in Marrakech, Morocco, on May 6, 2015. (Abdeljalil Bounhar/AP Photo)

Bill Clinton Accusers Speak Out After Ronan Farrow Says Ex-President Was ‘Credibly Accused of Rape’

November 6, 2019 Updated: November 6, 2019
Share
   
Juanita Broaddrick, who has long accused former President Bill Clinton of sexual assault, said that she agrees with comments made by reporter Ronan Farrow.
Farrow wrote the book “Catch and Kill: Lies, Spies and a Conspiracy to Protect Predators,” touching on NBC News’ attempts to silence his reporting about Harvey Weinstein. He told “Real Time with Bill Maher” that Broaddrick had credibly accused Clinton of rape.
“Bill Clinton is a different conversation. He has been credibly accused of rape … That is, I think the Juanita Broaddrick claim has been overdue for revisiting,” he said on Nov. 1.
He was answering a question from Maher, who asked a panel, “Could Bill Clinton, if he had done what he did in 1998 survived today? Or would his own party have thrown him under the bus?”
According to the Daily Caller, three women who have accused Clinton of assault, including Broaddrick, said they are hoping for justice.
Clinton has denied all of the allegations.
“I always have thought that this should be revisited. … I would like for something to be done in order to expose this man for all of the things that he has done and possibly get all of his past presidential perks taken from him,” Broaddrick told the website. “That would be my biggest goal, because I don’t think anything else can be done after 40 years.”
Then-Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump (C) sits with, (L-R)Paula Jones, Kathy Shelton, Juanita Broaddrick, and Kathleen Willey, before the second presidential debate with Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton at Washington University in St. Louis, on Oct. 9, 2016. (Evan Vucci/AP Photo)
Broaddrick said that the allegations of assault never amounted to anything because of the power he wielded.
“I think it’s because of who it was,” she said. “[Lauer and others] are all lower characters. Who should have been exposed was the president of the United States.”
She accused him of rape when he was campaigning for governor of Arkansas in 1978.
Leslie Millwee, another Clinton accuser, told the Daily Caller that she was pleased to hear Farrow’s interest in the allegations.
“I absolutely agree that it’s long overdue. … I think that more things are going to come to light,” Millwee said. “I’m really excited that Ronan’s looking into it. I was sexually assaulted three times by Bill Clinton … and I would not only like for Juanita to get justice, you know, I’d like to get justice. I’m elated that he’s looking into this.”
“I don’t care what your political affiliation is—whether you lean left or right—sexual assault is bad and wrong and it should be looked at in that way, and nothing to do with political affiliation,” said Millwee, a former Arkansas reporter.
And Kathleen Willey, a former aide in the White House, said that she doesn’t believe Farrow’s interest in the topic will actually lead to charges against Clinton.
“The world knows that the Clintons have everybody in their back pocket, and I just don’t know who’s willing to come forward and take something like that on,” she told the news outlet. “I certainly agree with what Ronan Farrow said. … What does ‘revisit’ mean? Is the [district attorney] going to look into this? Is the special counsel?” Willey said. “It’s been 40 years, and I can’t see anybody picking the ball up and running with it.”
Willey claimed that Clinton assaulted her in 1993 in the Oval Office while she volunteered as an aide, according to Business Insider. Clinton denied the allegations.
Millwee alleged that the former president sexually assaulted her in 1980 several times at the television station where she worked. She came forward with the allegations in 2016, speaking to Breitbart.
Clinton eventually was impeached in 1998 by the House of Representatives for lying under oath and obstruction of justice following the publication of his relationship with Monica Lewinsky.
The Senate ultimately acquitted him in 1999 and he served out his second term until January 2001.

O.K., Prince Andrew's out of public life. Why isn't Bill Clinton?


The press is making a big deal out of Britain's Prince Andrew now being ousted from public life, based on his pretty gamy associations with pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. He had his hand draped around the bare midriff of a 17-year old, in one photo. He kibbitzed with Epstein after his Florida slap-on-the-wrist conviction and there's a photograph there, too. Flight records show he rode the Lolita Express. And incredibly, he claims he never knew anything untoward was going on.
little rich there, old chap. Or very, very, naive...
U.K.'s Daily Mail has this comprehensive report, reasonably explored from a U.K. perspective. But the U.S. press has been all over it, too. Here's CNNWashington PostVanity FairCNBCTimeFox News... 
It's good clean fun for the American press, given that the British royal family is unimportant here, and relies on a pristine public image to maintain U.K. public support which is pretty incompatible with jetting around with Epstein, but it also raises questions about why that other famous friend of Epstein's, Bill Clinton, who rode the Lolita Express again, and again, and again, isn't getting the same pariah treatment. Fact is, the press hasn't brought the disgusting thing up at all, even as Clinton's wife (and daughter) gallivant around the country on a thinly disguised campaign for Hillary as president.
Joe Biden's gotten all kinds of questions based on his son Hunter's gamy business dealings. But Hillary Clinton remains immune -- and not a word has been said in the media about hubby Bill, who's still carrying on his public life as usual. It's as if he's out of the picture, and all those denials he's thus far made are simply factual ... albeit about as factual as Prince Andrew's denials.
And there's more than a few indicators that Clinton wasn't naive at all about Epstein. Though he wasn't accused by Epstein's credible accuser Virginia Giuffre, Clinton's been accused repeatedly being a sexual predator by others earlier. Someone like Clinton turning up with Epstein, is pretty obviously a matter of public interest, particularly with his wife's presidential ambitions. Just recently, one of Clinton's accusers, Juanita Broaddrick, gave this interview to Australia's Sky News, bringing up the constant issues with the much-vaunted Democratic ex-president, and still seeking justice. She's not getting any so far:


My interview with Sky News Australia this evening

MeToo movement "never wanted anything to do with the victims of Bill Clinton” | Sky News Australia https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_6108127574001 

MeToo movement "never wanted anything to do with the victims of Bill Clinton” | Sky News Australia




Which brings up again why Clinton isn't getting any attention, let alone ostracization, on his well-known relationship with Epstein. Why not? The Brit press is interested in British angles, the American press should be similarly interested in American angles. But only Prince Andrew gets the full press attention. Maybe that's because he's not a Democrat to protect?
It just shows the press's credibility problem in conveniently attempting to protect another Democrat from any uncomfortable questions.


Is someone gonna ask the Clintons about all those trips to Epstein's 'cowboy village'?


The press is piling on against the U.K.'s Prince Andrew, who's been probably credibly accused of participating in "suicide" pervert Jeffrey Epstein's sex-with-little-girls operations.
Yes, it's wretched and appalling.  It's bad for a royal family that for decades has portrayed itself as the embodiment of middle-class values.  This is Shaka Zulu or Genghis Khan territory.
But it's also of limited interest, given that Prince Andrew is not even important in the royal succession lineup, and frankly, who cares what some rich overseas princeling is up to?  The media sure didn't, up until now.
There's likely a reason for it — to deflect attention from the growing evidence that Bill, Hillary, and even Chelsea Clinton have had a pretty spectacularly intense association with the very same pervert.
The Daily Mail has been on the job and has found another credible witness, a former contractor of Epstein's at his New Mexico "cowboy village" ranch who says the Clintons jetted in annually on Epstein's Lolita Express and had a grand old time on Epstein's many-camera'ed grounds.  Some opening points from the Mail:
  • Bill and Hillary Clinton would stay at Jeffrey Epstein's New Mexico ranch frequently after they left the White House, former estate workers told DailyMailTV

  • The former president was Epstein's closest 'celebrity mate' and the Clintons visited Zorro Ranch 'a whole bunch of times', a former contractor who ran the IT system at the property said

  • The family never stayed in the main house but bunked down in a special cowboy-themed village created by Epstein, which lies a mile south of his own villa, sources said 

  • The guest homes are next to other traditional Wild West-style buildings such as an old schoolhouse and saloon bar, which are all near Epstein's private airstrip, where he arrived on his private planes
And to read the details of the report is enough to give the gross-outs to anyone.  Why were the Clintons going to a place Epstein called his "baby-making ranch"?  What was that about Epstein having an eight-person "party shower"?  Did the Clintons do the "party shower"?  Was it on film?  How many times?  And who else was in the pen with them?  What about that party room with the stripper poles?  Did the Clintons go there, too?  What was the Secret Service thinking, or did Bill bug out again on his Secret Service?  And why are taxpayers paying for this farce?
Why again did Epstein have that icky portrait of Bill Clinton wearing a blue dress on his Manhattan mansion wall?
As one of the contractors who witnessed this, Jared Kellogg, told the Mail:
'My contact was Brice, their main concern was that there was no video surveillance on the property at all. I thought this was a simple request, as they wanted surveillance to protect their investment. It's a huge site.
'But what was weird was that the whole time I was on site, Brice would be bragging about how the Clintons would visit, the whole family. Not just Bill, but Bill, his wife, their kid, and they would stay on the ranch itself.
More ickiness about Epstein's obsession with cameras:
Instead of using an expensive, robust camera system, which used underground cables, he wanted a 'point-to-point wireless fluid mesh design', which means cameras are operating via antenna, and is considerably cheaper.
After Kellogg did an estimate and sent in a plan, he never heard back.
He said: 'They had this huge facility, but it felt like they didn't have the money to do anything. They were trying to find the most cost-effective way to transmit video footage and we had to come up with a point-to-point wireless fluid mesh design because normally we want to trench everything. It saves money as you don't have to build a trench and put in a cable.
Sound like someone who's been blackmailed?  You decide.
Now, arguably, one could argue that the press is saying nothing about this, given that the contractor was a different kind of witness from Virginia Giuffre, the credible young woman who says Epstein trafficked her with Prince Andrew when she was a teenager.
But the Mail slips in something that hasn't appeared significantly in the press at all: that Giuffre also says she saw Bill Clinton at Epstein's pervert haunts being honored by the pedophile himself. 
Why aren't the media covering that?  Now we have the Clintons pinned at two places — the "cowboy ranch" and the Caribbean pervert island — and no one's saying anything.  It's all about Prince Andrew.
Yet Eptein was obsessed with cameras and obviously blackmail.  He roped in Prince Andrew.  But the real question is to what extent he got the Clintons.  With all these new revelations rolling out, why is the press silent?
Image credit: Photo montage by Monica Showalter from public domain sources.

Convicted sex offender and Mueller witness George Nader indicted for illegal contributions to boost Hillary Clinton

Convicted sex offender George Nader, who was a key witness in special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation, has been indicted by United States prosecutors for his alleged role in a scheme to conceal large sums of illegal campaign contributions to help Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.
Nader, a 60-year-old Lebanese American lobbyist, is accused of conspiring with Ahmad “Andy” Khawaja, the Los Angeles-based 48-year-old chief executive of Allied Wallet, to conceal the source of more than $3.5 million in campaign contributions to political committees associated with a presidential candidate to gain influence during and after the 2016 campaign.
Nader and Khawaja were charged on Nov. 7 as part of a 53-count indictment dealt by a federal grand jury in the District of Columbia. The indictment was unsealed on Tuesday.
Khawaja gave more than $4 million to Clinton's campaign and other Democrats during the 2016 cycle but later donated $1 million to President Trump's inaugural committee after Clinton lost, according to the Associated Press. As he shifted his focus to Republicans after the 2016 election, the Lebanese-born Khawaja met with Trump at a Manhattan fundraiser and got a photo with the president in the Oval Office.
The Justice Department announced on Tuesday that Khawaja allegedly conspired with Nader to make $3.5 million in straw donations to boost a presidential candidate from March 2016 through January 2017.
No candidate is mentioned by name, but the indictment and campaign finance records make it clear that the money was directed towards helping Clinton during the 2016 campaign.
"By design, these contributions appeared to be in the names of Khawaja, his wife, and his company. In reality, they allegedly were funded by Nader," Assistant Attorney General Brian Benczkowski of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division and FBI Washington Field Office chief Timothy Slater announced in a statement.
"Khawaja and Nader allegedly made these contributions in an effort to gain influence with high-level political figures, including the candidate. As Khawaja and Nader arranged these payments, Nader allegedly reported to an official from a foreign government about his efforts to gain influence," they continued.
According to the indictment, after the election Khawaja used his company to steer $1 million to Trump's inaugural committee and attended Trump's inauguration with Nader.
The other charges in the indictment allege Khawaja and six associates — Roy Boulos, Rudy Dekermenjian, Mohammad “Moe” Diab, Rani El-Saadi, Stevan Hill, and Thayne Whipple — conspired to conceal executive contributions, totaling more than $1.8 million, to various political committees in 2016 through 2018. "Among other things, these contributions allegedly allowed Khawaja to host a private fundraiser for a presidential candidate in 2016 and a private fundraising dinner for an elected official in 2018," Benczkowski and Slater said.
Khawaja is also charged with obstructing the grand jury investigation in the summer by providing a witness called to testify in the case with false information about Nader and his connection to Khawaja’s company, while four of his associates are charged with obstruction by lying to the FBI.
Nader is already in federal custody on other charges. In July, he was charged with sex trafficking for allegedly transporting a 14-year-old boy from Europe and then abusing him. Nader pleaded not guilty in federal court in Alexandria, Virginia.
Part of a rap sheet dating to the 1980s, Nader pleaded guilty in 1991 to a federal child porn charge involving footage of 13- or 14-year-old boys and received a six-month sentence, served at a Baltimore halfway house.
Nader acted as a connection between Trump’s circle and Russian, United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabian officials in 2016 and 2017 as he pursued business deals in the Middle East. This included helping to set up a January 2017 meeting in the Seychelles between Trump associate and Blackwater founder Erik Prince and a Russian official with close ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin.
As reported by the Washington Examiner, records indicate Nader visited the White House at least 13 times to meet with Trump’s then-chief strategist Steve Bannon.
Nader was interviewed by Mueller's team on multiple occasions regarding possible UAE efforts to influence members of Trump's campaign, and was mentioned in Mueller's final report more than 100 times.
An attorney for Nader declined to comment to the Washington Post, and an attorney for Khawaja could not immediately be reached by the outlet.
Federal Election Commission records detail the millions of dollars Khawaja admitted donating to Democratic candidates, campaigns, and political action committees.
Khawaja told the Federal Election Commission he donated $2,700 in October 2015 and $2,700 in July 2016 to Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, Hillary for America. He said he donated $135,000 in March 2016, $150,000 in April 2016, $68,400 in June 2016, and $60,000 in September 2016 to the Clinton campaign’s joint fundraising committee, the Hillary Victory Fund. The records also show a donation totaling $200,400 in July 2016 to the Hillary Action Fund, a joint fundraising effort between Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee.
Khawaja told the FEC about donations to the DNC totaling $231,100, in addition to donations to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee totaling $33,400 in 2016 and $43,900 in 2017 and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee totaling $233,400 in 2016, $230,000 in 2017, and $237,300 in 2018.
Khawaja also reported donating massive sums to liberal PACs, including $1,100,000 to Priorities USA Action, the primary super PAC supporting Clinton's campaign, and $100,000 to Senate Majority PAC in 2016. He also donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to Senate and congressional races around the country with a special focus on his home state of California, including $4,200 in 2016 and $3,900 in 2017 to Schiff for Congress, the campaign committee for House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff.
In addition, Khawaja’s company, Allied Wallet, reported giving $550,000 to the Philadelphia 2016 Host Committee, the Democratic National Convention’s fundraising arm, in July 2016. The business also donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to Democratic super PACs in 2017 and 2018.
FEC records show Nader reported giving $595 in donations to Trump’s presidential campaign committee in 2016, as well as $100 dollars to Ben Carson's campaign, but not to any Democrats that election cycle.
Nader was a business associate of Elliott Broidy, a top Republican fundraiser and deputy finance chairman of the Republican National Committee who resigned from that position in April 2018 after reports that Trump lawyer Michael Cohen negotiated a $1.6 million settlement in 2017 between Broidy and a former Playboy model who said Broidy impregnated her. Nader and Broidy worked to influence U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East prior to Broidy's resignation and Nader's arrest in June.

Is that you, Bill Clinton? New book says Epstein blackmailed politicians


Jeffrey Epstein was a bizarre creep.  Not only was he a pedophile, but he seemed to be drawn to pulling in famous people to his pedophilery, in the interests of blackmail.
A new book lays out how strange it was, stating that Epstein got his entire spy operation from the media empire of the late Robert Maxwell, a sleazy tabloid-media character who was Epstein girlfriend Ghislane Maxwell's father, and who died under mysterious circumstances himself on his yacht, years ago.  Apparently, he was useful to the Mossad for blackmailing politicians, so they all had some kind of relationship, and Epstein, a pedophile, was brought in.  Here's an interesting review with excerpts from Medium:
According to the former spy, the ultimate order to embrace Epstein and involve him in the ongoing arms deals came from "the bosses" at Israeli intelligence headquarters.
"They were agents of the Israeli Intelligence Services," he told James Robertson.
"Later on [Ghislaine] got involved with Israeli intelligence together with him. But not in this arms deal with Iran business," Ben-Menashe also told Zev Shalev, former CBS News executive producer and investigative journalist for the website Narativ.
"These guys were seen as agents. They weren't really competent to do very much. And so they found a niche for themselves — blackmailing American and other political figures."
He told Robertson, "Mr. Epstein was the simple idiot who was going around providing girls to all kinds of politicians in the United States. See, f------ around is not a crime. It could be embarrassing, but it's not a crime. But f------ a fourteen-year-old girl is a crime. And he was taking photos of politicians f------ fourteen-year-old girls — if you want to get it straight. They would just blackmail people, they would just blackmail people like that."
This, if true, tells us two things: that Epstein was able to get away from the long arm of the law due to politics, but he also may have had some nefarious sway over a lot of politicians, what with his tabloid spy ties via House Maxwell and, apparently, the Israeli spy apparat, too.
So imagine a guy like Bubba Clinton strolling into this and indulging his enormous appetites, and not a clue as to the forces circling him.
If even a scintilla of this is what was going on, there may be forces out there with the wherewithal to rub out Epstein in his prison, as well as hold enormous sway over many gullible and immoral Western politicians.
It once again raises questions as to where Bill Clinton was in all this.  He's intersected the Epstein world all too often for something of this nature not to ensnare.  And with a compliant media establishment, he's still getting away with saying nothing was going on.
Image credit: Photo illustration by Monica Showalter from public domain sources.

How Stupid Do They Think We Are?

These days it seems like coincidence abounds in the precincts of leftism. And an unquestioning Deep State Media are only too happy to label anyone who points out the absurdities of the supposed coincidences as “conspiracy theorists,” having long ago abandoned journalistic inquisitiveness for allegiance to a political ideology.
A few examples spring to mind:  Jeffrey Epstein’s supposed suicide; a “chance” encounter on June 27, 2016 on the tarmac of Phoenix’s Sky Harbor International Airport between then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former President Bill Clinton, whose wife would be interviewed by FBI agents over her illegal email server five days later; and the failure by DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz to find  “political bias” in the initiation of the Obama administration’s outrageous and utterly illegal spying operation on the Trump presidential campaign and presidency.
Take the case of the “suicide” of Jeffrey Epstein. There’s a reason the phrase “Jeffrey Epstein didn’t kill himself” being tacked onto otherwise disconnected topics by people making public statements became a hilarious meme for a while. At the core of all good humor is an unspoken truth. It was a populist way of saying, “We’re not buying what you fake news media types are selling anymore.” And the flat-footed responses of the Deep State Media reporters confronted by these unexpected “Jeffrey Epstein didn’t kill himself” truth bombs were the best part of all.
At an LSU-Alabama football game that President Trump attended, MSNBC reporter Monica Alba asked a Trump-voting student on live television, “What [Trump] policies stand out to you?” The young man gamely replied, without cracking a smile or missing a beat, “Just mainly the no-nonsense policies and especially since Jeffrey Epstein didn’t kill himself.” Alba visibly had difficulty maintaining her composure but being part of today’s toadying Fourth Estate that must protect the Clintons at all cost, dutifully ignored the student’s non sequitur tweak and edto another question.



MSNBC REPORTER: “What [Trump] policies stand out to you?”

ALABAMA STUDENT: “Just mainly the no nonsense policies and especially since Jeffrey Epstein didn’t kill himself.”



She gets the joke, but knows she can’t acknowledge it, as the word has gone out to the entire corporate media class that no one is allowed to question the circumstances of the death of pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, who was as thick as thieves with Bill Clinton.
And the circumstances of Epstein’s supposed “suicide” are so outrageously questionable that any sentient person looking at the facts would have to have undergone a lobotomy not to conclude that a giant scam and cover-up occurred in relation to his death. But Epstein’s ability to expose rich and powerful liberals like Mr. Clinton, Prince Andrew and who knows how many others in his web of sexual perversion meant that the Bat Signal had to go out to Deep State Media members everywhere that no discussion of the possible murder of Epstein could be tolerated.
Consider the “coincidences” and anomalies that took place in Epstein’s final days and hours. Here you have the most high-profile criminal defendant in the United States, who had explosively damaging information on sexual predations involving perhaps scores or hundreds of the world’s most elite and powerful occurring aboard Epstein’s private 727 jet dubbed “The Lolita Express,” at his Caribbean estate wags nicknamed “Orgy Island,” at his sprawling New Mexico would-be baby farm, and at his Manhattan manse.
He finally ends up in jail at Manhattan’s Metropolitan Correctional Center in the custody of the federal Bureau of Prisons. He then supposedly attempted to kill myself but survived, yet was taken off suicide watch after only six days. Then lo and behold, both guards assigned to check on him fell asleep – simultaneously – and missed their rounds, both cameras trained on the area around Epstein’s cell failed, simultaneously, and the night before his death, Epstein’s one cellmate inexplicably was removed from the cell.
After his body was found on August 10, 2019, an autopsy performed by the city’s Chief Medical Examiner’s office determined the cause of death to be suicide after only five days, even before all of the evidence has been collected. Famed pathologist Dr. Michael Baden, who attended the autopsy at the behest of Epstein’s brother, gave a must-see interview to Fox News. He noted that the three bones fractured in Epstein’s neck were indicative of homicide, not suicide. Baden said that Epstein’s neck “had been crushed.” It was not the result of a ligature (like a noose made from bedsheets), as was claimed. He noted the scene of the death appeared staged to suggest suicide.
Yet, the Deep State Media pushed the suicide narrative nonetheless, pooh-poohing anyone who suggested otherwise. They attacked the esteemed Dr. Baden for questioning the Epstein autopsy, with New York Magazine describing him as having “demi-celebrity status” and being fond of “self-aggrandizement.” Never mind the fact pattern he points to that is wildly divergent from a “suicide” determination. But this is our corporatist media today. Accept the Deep State narrative and move on.
Then we have Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton “bumping into” each other at the culmination of the FBI’s pseudo-investigation into Hillary Clinton’s outrageously criminal conduct in running highly classified government records over a ridiculously unsecure personal server, surely in violation of the Espionage Act and Federal Records Act, if not other laws.
The advance planning that goes into the travel of both a former president and a current Attorney General by their protective details and logistics personnel is immense. Two such officials do not simply have their respective airplanes sidle up to each other on the tarmac of an airport like you might bump into an old high school chum at Starbucks. The impropriety of the Attorney General meeting privately with the spouse of the subject of a high-profile FBI investigation was off the charts.  But, we were told, they just discussed golf outings and grandchildren. Nothing to see here either folks. And the likes of CNN dutifully reported that it was only congressional Republicans who saw fit to question the circumstances.
And finally, we have DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz testifying to the Senate that, “We found no bias” on the part of those who initiated the counterintelligence operation targeting the Trump campaign, called Operation Crossfire Hurricane. His report itself said, “We did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced his decision [to open an investigation surveilling the Trump campaign].”
One might reasonably ask: When top FBI lawyer and principal in Operation Crossfire Hurricane, Lisa Page, says in an August 2016 text to fellow Crossfire Hurricane principal, FBI official Peter Strzok, that Trump is “not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” And Strzok responds “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it,” isn’t that perhaps documentary evidence of a political bias?
Perhaps Mr. Horowitz was looking for an FBI “To Do List” entitled “Steps We Will Take to Undermine the Presidential Candidacy of Donald J. Trump” and came up blank.
Nonetheless, the Deep State Media, like NBC News, dutifully and breathlessly declared in its headline on the story: “Internal Justice watchdog finds that Russia probe was justified, not biased against Trump.”
A representative republic is severely impaired, indeed threatened, when its constitutionally protected watchdogs in the Fourth Estate abandon their most basic critical faculties in favor of advancing the agenda of their preferred political party. Eventually, the absurdities they foist upon a skeptical populace lead inevitably to their deserved reputation as discredited Deep State handmaidens, not to be believed.
William F. Marshall has been an intelligence analyst and investigator in the government, private, and non-profit sectors for more than 30 years. He is a senior investigator for Judicial Watch, Inc., and a contributor to TownhallAmerican Thinker, and The Federalist. (The views expressed are the author’s alone, and not necessarily those of Judicial Watch.)




'The first time I saw him naked I thought he was deformed or intersex': Former actress Jessica Mann shocks Harvey Weinstein rape trial with graphic description of mogul and says he has NO testicles

  • Former aspiring actress Jessica Mann testified about her relationship with Harvey Weinstein on Friday
  • Mann, 34, a hairstylist, told the jury the first time she saw Weinstein, 67, naked she thought he was 'intersex' or a burns victim, claiming he does not have testicles and his penis 'looks like a vagina' 
  • When a reporter later asked Weinstein outside court if Mann's description of his body was accurate, he laughed and replied, 'Yeah, perfect'   
  • Mann testified that on one occasion, Weinstein made her massage his blackhead-covered back with lotion
  • During a breakfast meeting at a hotel, Mann told the court Weinstein forcibly performed oral sex on her. She said she faked an orgasm and told him 'it was the best I ever had,' even though she was 'horrified' 
  • Mann alleges Weinstein raped her in his New York City hotel room in March 2013, when she was 27 and he was 61, after injecting his penis with erection-inducing drug
  • Prosecution alleges Weinstein forcibly performed oral sex on Mann before the alleged rape, and forced himself on her a second time in November 2013, but he is not facing charges for that incident 
  • Mann told jurors Weinstein dragged her into a room, ripped off her pants and raped her until she blacked out; she she she then woke up to find the producer's penis in her mouth 
  • Weinstein allegedly apologized to Mann and suggested that she become his 'wing girl' and bring him other women to have sex with  
  • Defense will point to warm and flirtatious emails exchanged between Mann and Weinstein in an effort to prove their relationship was consensual 
  • In 2017, four years after alleged hotel room rape, Mann sent Weinstein an email that read: 'I love you, always do. But I hate feeling like a booty call' 
Advertisement
Former aspiring actress Jessica Mann, whose rape allegations led to charges being brought against Harvey Weinstein, described in graphic detail on the witness stand how she thought he was 'physically deformed or intersex' when she saw him naked for the first time. 
On the witness stand on Friday, the 34-year-old claimed the disgraced movie, 67, does not have testicles and his penis 'looks like a vagina'.
Mann sobbed on the witness stand as she told jurors that she was once forced to strip off her clothing during an alleged rape in a New York hotel room in March 2013. In another incident, she says that Weinstein flew into a rage after learning that she was dating an actor, and clawed at her thighs as he pulled off her pants, leaving her with bloody scratch marks. 
After the alleged rape, Mann said she regained consciousness to find Weinstein's penis in her mouth and 'choked' on a 'fluid' when he climaxed.    
Prosecutors hammered home the most serious charges in a case that stems from the allegations of just two of the scores of women who have accused Weinstein of violating them. A conviction could put him behind bars for the rest of his life.
Meanwhile, Weinstein's lawyers plan to seize on Mann's complicated history with the disgraced film producer, including continued interactions and warm emails she sent him, as they try to raise doubts about her credibility.
Mann's often sexually explicit testimony revealed how the producer allegedly had her massage his blackhead-covered back in a hotel room, how she faked an orgasm and falsely praised his prowess after he forcibly performed oral sex on her. 
Dressed in a black top and dark slacks, with her long black hair parted on the side, Mann was shaking with nerves as she sat in the witness box at Manhattan Criminal Court and had a small blue ball, which appeared to be a stress ball. 
She broke down in tears at the first question of where she was from, but then composed herself and spoke with a clear voice. 
Scroll down for video
Star witness: Former Actress Jessica Mann arrives at Manhattan court to testify against Harvey Weinstein at his rape trial on Friday, marking a pivotal moment in the proceedings
Star witness: Former Actress Jessica Mann arrives at Manhattan court to testify against Harvey Weinstein at his rape trial on Friday, marking a pivotal moment in the proceedings 
Weinstein, 67, emerges from a car outside the courthouse on Friday, when the jury will hear from his accuser Jessica Mann about her alleged rape
Weinstein, 67, emerges from a car outside the courthouse on Friday, when the jury will hear from his accuser Jessica Mann about her alleged rape 
Weinstein has been relying on a walker to get around since the beginning of his rape trial. He is seen approaching the courthouse with his walking aid on Friday
Weinstein has been relying on a walker to get around since the beginning of his rape trial. He is seen approaching the courthouse with his walking aid on Friday 
Mann told the jury that she grew up on a dairy farm in rural Washington state.
She said that her family were religious and she said she described the community where she was brought up as a 'cult, it was extremely religious Pentecostal evangelist'.
Mann said her parents divorced when she was four and she left home at 16. When she was 25, she moved to Los Angeles to pursuing an acting career.
She struggled and at one point was homeless and lived in her car, however, through her agent she was invited to parties.
Mann met Weinstein at the engagement party for Michael Lambert in the Hollywood Hills around the end of 2012 as he was talking to a friend of hers.
She said that saw an 'old man' who was wearing a tuxedo and looked 'jolly'.
Mann walked over and asked: 'Who is this guy?'
'Weinstein replied, 'I'm Harvey Weinstein' and said he produced X,Y,Z movies, I think he said Shakespeare in Love,' Mann said.
Weinstein thought she was joking, but it soon became apparent that she didn't know the film.
Later that night, Weinstein bumped into her on her own, Mann testified.
Mann said: 'He stopped me and said, 'I want to talk to you, come with me.' He started to pull me around to the side of the house. I was looking around as if to say, 'Why is this happening?'
'He said It's not good for me for anyone to see us talking,' she quoted Weinstein as telling her.
Weinstein said that he was 'interested in [Mann] as an actress' and said of her friend: 'Don't say anything to her but I'm not interested in her'.
Mann said she felt 'guilty' but gave Weinstein her number.
Mann said Weinstein once told her she reminded him of his wife
Harvey Weinstein (L) and Georgina Chapman attend the amfAR Gala Cannes 2017 at Hotel du Cap-Eden-Roc on May 25, 2017 in Cap d'Antibes, France
Mann said Weinstein once told her she reminded him of his wife, fashion designer Georgina Chapman (pictured together, right, in May 2017) because both women were 'clumsy'
Soon after, Weinstein's assistant asked Mann to come in for a meeting, and he took out to buy some books at Book Soup, a Los Angeles bookstore.
She turned up with two friends and he bought her four books, including one on Alfred Hitchcock.
Mann agreed she was 'excited' to meet with Weinstein and that it felt like he was 'interested in me for real.'
She said: 'This was the biggest…when I met Harvey I'd given up a lot to be in Hollywood. It was a big fight between me and my dad. I thought that God was blessing me for having committed to myself.'
Describing Weinstein's demeanor, she said he was mostly 'extremely passionate' about the books apart from occasion 'grunting sounds' that were an 'almost autistic trait'.
At a dinner at the Peninsula Hotel in Los Angeles, Weinstein pushed things further, Mann said.
Mann is pictured in a scene from the 2013 movie Caveman, where she played a date named Keira
Mann is pictured in a scene from the 2013 movie Caveman, where she played a date named Keira 
Mann said: 'It started pretty normal. He was extremely interested in who I was. He asked me many questions; he wanted to know about my family; he wanted to know about my parents' divorce, how much my father made, if I had a good relationship with my parents'.
At some point, somebody came up to their table and started trying to talk to Weinstein about his film and he got into a huff.
Mann said that she 'felt sorry for him for that' because he was famous and being harassed.
Weinstein ordered the hotel staff to take the food up to his hotel suite, and Mann followed him up.
She said: 'I didn't want to go up there but I felt I was helping him.
'He started to undress himself a little bit. I thought he was getting comfortable and he walked into the bedroom. I hesitated...he said let me give you a massage and he took off his shirt.
'I said, 'No, I don't want to give you a massage.' This went on for a good few minutes. He made me feel stupid, like why did I think it was such a big deal.
'He said, 'If you're not going to let me give you a massage, give me a massage.'
'At that point he had his shirt off and lotion in his hand'.
Weinstein lay face down on the bed and Mann put the lotion on with a 'flat palm and stiff fingers'.
Asked to describe the sensation, she said: 'He had a lot, a lot of blackheads. The texture of that was uncomfortable'.
Afterwards she said that 'I did express that I was not sexual or comfortable with this with someone I don't know.'
Assistant District Attorney Joan Illuzi said: 'Were you romantically or physically attracted to the defendant?
Mann replied: 'No.'
Mann started to receive invitations from Weinstein to more events, and he offered to buy her a dress to attend a fashion show, though she declined that offer.
Weinstein asked her to meet him at the Montage Beverly Hills, and she went with a friend.
In one of the bars, Weinstein continued to talk to Mann about her acting career.
Mann said that he told her she reminded him of his wife, fashion designer Georgina Chapman, because they were 'both clumsy' and recounted how his wife 'tripped when they first met'.
Weinstein told Mann she was 'prettier than Natalie Portman' but said she had to 'clear my skin up'.
He said her friend had to 'lose weight', Mann said.
Weinstein said that he had a vampire film and that they would be great for the lead part - so long as they came up to his suite to see the scripts.
Mann said: 'I laughed and said, 'Oh no, I know what that means.' He laughed at me and said, 'I'm a harmless old man.'
'Then I got embarrassed because he made fun of me. He was like, 'Girls, you have nothing to worry about.'
Mann and her friend looked at each other and they went with him. Mann said: 'I didn't think with my friend it would be anything bad.'
When they went into Weinstein's suite, Mann said from the stand, he began to undress himself and went into the bedroom.
Mann and her friend waited in the lounge area, but Weinstein came to the doorframe of the bedroom and called Mann's name.
Mann said: 'He grabbed my arm and he closes the bedroom door and (tells my friend) we'll just be a minute.
'He had me by both arms and he came to me and was pushing me back and trying to kiss me like crazy.
'I was like, :'Woah woah woah. I told you I wasn't sexual and I don't know you,' all this stuff trying to calm it down.
'He'd pushed be back to the bathroom and we got into this sort of tussle back and forth. I was able to turn around so his back was to the wall and I was able to, hopefully, get out to the door.
'He still had me one arm and wouldn't let go and the more I fought the angrier he got and his anger scared me and I tried to calm him down.
'He was saying, 'Look, you're going to let me do something for you.' I said 'What?' He wouldn't tell me. Then he told me to sit on the bed and then that's when he went down on me.'
Asked to describe his demeanor, Mann said: 'He was very high-low, high-low. He started to manipulate me, [saying], 'You accepted my invitations to parties. You aren't leaving until I do something for you.'
Mann said she was sitting on the bed when Weinstein put his mouth in her vagina, fighting back the tears as she did so.
Mann said: 'I sort of locked up and got really quiet. I was worried about my friend out there by herself. I faked an orgasm to get out of it. He asked me how it was, if I liked it. I was nervous, so I told him it was the best I ever had'.
In fact, Mann was 'horrified, confused', she told the jury.
'I was confused about what happened, and I made the decision to begin a relationship with him. Part of that was because I was sexual with very few people.
'I entered into what I thought was going to be a real relationship, but it was extremely degrading from that point on.'
Mann alleges that Weinstein raped her in his New York City hotel room in March 2013, when she was 27 and he was 61, after injecting his penis with erection-inducing drug
Weinstein's defense will argue the relationship was consensual
Mann (left) alleges that Weinstein raped her in his New York City hotel room in March 2013, when she was 27 and he was 61, after injecting his penis with erection-inducing drug. Weinstein's defense will argue the relationship was consensual 
A prosecutor said in an opening statement that Weinstein performed oral sex on Mann (third left) against her will after inviting her to a hotel to read a script
A prosecutor said in an opening statement that Weinstein performed oral sex on Mann (third left) against her will after inviting her to a hotel to read a script 
She went on: 'He would talk very dirty to me about fantasies and compared me to other actresses he said were doing kinky and dirty things'.
Mann said that Weinstein needed a 'fix like a drug addict' from her.
Asked what kinds of things he would say to her, she quoted him as telling her: 'Do you like my big fat Jewish d***?'
Mann told the court: 'The first time I saw him naked I thought he was deformed or intersex. I didn't know if he was a burn victim but it would make sense. He does not have testicles and it appears like he has a vagina. He does have a penis. 
Mann added: 'He also peed on me once. It was like being discarded after I served a purpose'.
Asked about Weinstein's hygiene, Mann said: 'It was bad. He smelled like s***, excuse me, poop'.
Mann said there was no physical attraction, but she said 'his approval would have meant so much to me.'
She described Weinstein as 'Jekyll and Hyde' because of his mood swings, and said there didn't seem to be a word to 'trigger' him into getting angry.  
Mann described how on another occasion Weinstein asked her to take part in a threesome with another woman who did not speak much English.
The night started at Soho House in Los Angeles and they went back to his hotel.
Mann said Weinstein 'orchestrated' events and told them both to undress.
She said: 'He said (to the other woman) I want you to go down on her (Mann). I said I don't want her to do that. She started to be very tense.'
Mann understood that the other woman had never had a threesome before but she could not express what she was feeling because of her poor English.
Mann said that she 'saw myself in her, unable to communicate, and I broke down'.
She fled into the bathroom and Weinstein was 'upset and said I'll never do that again with you'. 
Mann's rape allegation which led to criminal charges being laid against Weinstein stemmed from a trip to New York in March 2013. She said she had traveled to the city with a friend called Thomas, an agent who paid for her trip.  
But she 'panicked' when she saw Weinstein checking into a hotel shortly before they were supposed to have a breakfast meeting there.
She said that 'I knew what he was trying to do' and 'pleaded' with the hotel staff not to give him a room.
Mann said Weinstein pulled her to one side and told her not to 'embarrass him' and ordered her to go upstairs.
Inside the room, Mann said she was 'so scared' that her friends would see her coming out of the room with Weinstein and 'make all these assumptions'.
She said: 'I attempted twice to open the door but he blocked the door both times. I shut down a little bit and he told me to undress and then he comes to me and grabbed my hand and forced me to start undressing myself.
'I felt panicked as my worst nightmare was that this dynamic with him was about to be seen by (my two friends).'
Mann said she was 'very angry and scared' as that was one of the most 'escalated' incidents so far.
She said: 'I gave up at that point and I undressed and he stood over me until I was completely naked and he told me to lay on the bed. He walked into the bathroom and closed the door behind him.
'He came out naked and he got on top of me and that's when he put himself inside of me'.
Mann's rape allegation which led to criminal charges being laid against Weinstein stemmed from a trip to New York in March 2013. On the witness stand on Friday, she described Weinstein checking in to a hotel where they were meant to have a breakfast meeting before he called her up to the room
Mann's rape allegation which led to criminal charges being laid against Weinstein stemmed from a trip to New York in March 2013. On the witness stand on Friday, she described Weinstein checking in to a hotel where they were meant to have a breakfast meeting before he called her up to the room
Mann said Weinstein pulled her to one side and told her not to 'embarrass him' and ordered her to go upstairs
Weinstein's lawyers will argue that Mann exchanged flirtatious texts with Weinsten after the alleged incident
Mann said Weinstein pulled her to one side and told her not to 'embarrass him' and ordered her to go upstairs where the alleged rape took place. Weinstein's lawyers will argue that Mann exchanged flirtatious texts with Weinsten after the alleged incident 
While giving evidence in court, Mann burst into tears and took a few minutes to compose herself in the witness box. As she walked out of the court she could be heard sobbing loudly in the side room
While giving evidence in court, Mann burst into tears and took a few minutes to compose herself in the witness box. As she walked out of the court she could be heard sobbing loudly in the side room
Mann said that Weinstein had been giving 'commanding type statements' and was like a 'drill sergeant'.
After he finished she went into the bathroom and then she saw something that horrified her.
She said: 'I saw a needle in the trash can. I flipped out. I grabbed it and looked at it. I can't remember the name but I Googled it.'
Sobbing on the witness stand, Mann continued: 'It was the realization that he had stabbed himself with the needle and there was blood and he was inside me. I was in shock over that.'
Illuzi asked if Weinstein had used a condom and she said no.
Mann said that she later did some online research about the medication Weinstein used and said that when she Googled it what came up was a 'dead penis type thing'.
Mann said she did not tell her friends because she was 'embarrassed and wanted them to respect me'.
At breakfast Weinstein acted as if nothing had happened and asked Mann to stay another night to attend a movie premiere.
Mann resisted but eventually under pressure from her friend agreed - but she stayed at her friend's house because she was scared of Weinstein coming after her again.
Mann said that after the premiere Weinstein 'wanted me to have tea with him and his daughter Emma' as if everything was normal but she declined.
She dmitted that she continued to see Weinstein after this but tried to avoid physical contact by making excuses.
A lot of her decision was based on the needle she saw and said that she ascertained Weinstein 'could only use it so many times' before the judge cut her off.
Mann said she would 'delay' the times between them seeing each other the increase 'the likelihood of him having used' the medication, apparently meaning that month.
Illzui asked Mann about her emails to Weinstein after these incidents such as one where complained about feeling like a 'booty call' four years after the alleged incident at the Doubletree hotel.
Mann said that she wanted Weinstein to perceive her as 'innocent and naive'.
She said: 'It was like the emperor's clothes, his ego was so fragile and what made me feel safe is worshiping him.'
Illuzi asked: 'Were you afraid of the defendant?'
Mann said: 'Yes'.
Illuzi asked: 'Did that drive the tone of your emails?
Mann said: 'Yes'.
Jessica Mann points at Weinstein during his sexual assault trial. She described his penis as 'deformed' and looking like a vagina, and claimed he has no testicles
Jessica Mann points at Weinstein during his sexual assault trial. She described his penis as 'deformed' and looking like a vagina, and claimed he has no testicles 
During cross-examination, Weinstein’s lawyer Donna Rotunno (pictured standing) asked why Mann didn’t leave during the time he asked her to give him a massage
During cross-examination, Weinstein's lawyer Donna Rotunno (pictured standing) asked why Mann didn't leave during the time he asked her to give him a massage 
Illuzi also asked about Weinstein's connections to famous people, in particular Bill and Hillary Clinton.
Mann said: 'He loved to tell me about Bill Clinton who was his neighbor. He would talk about all this money he would raise for big organizations. He had a story for almost anyone in the world. The biggest one for me was Bill Clinton'.
Illuzi asked about phone calls between Weinstein and Clinton and Mann said she witnessed at least three.
Weinstien would refer to Clinton as 'Mr President', she said.
Mann said: 'The last two that I saw were when he was raising money for Hillary Clinton.'
Illuzi asked: 'How did that affect your conduct with regards to the defendant?'
Mann said: 'I was intimidated more because when you are raising that amount of money for that powerful a person they are not going to want to deal with someone crying rape.'
Before lunch on Friday, Mann began to talk about the last incident with Weinstein when he allegedly raped her in a jealous rage.
She had gotten a job as a hairstylist at the Peninsula Hotel in Los Angeles through Weinstein and had started dating an actor.
Mann said that during one meeting she decided to tell Weinstein.
She said: 'I was scared to tell Harvey. He would tell me rules such as you can date anyone but you cannot date anyone in the (entertainment) industry. I would find that disrespectful and unprofessional'.
Mann said she told him she was in a relationship and he asked if he was a Wall St guy or a banker.
She said: 'I looked down and didn't say anything. He knew'.
Mann burst into tears and took a few minutes to compose herself in the witness box. As she walked out of the court she could be heard sobbing loudly in the side room. 
Later in her testimony, Mann said that she knew Weinstein for around a year when the last serious incident happened at the Peninsula Hotel in Los Angeles, where she was working as a hairdresser.
Mann said that the second Weinstein realized she was seeing an actor, he 'flipped me up from my chair'.
She said: 'He was screaming: 'You owe me one more time' as he was dragging me into the bedroom. I didn't fall but I was having a lot of trouble keeping my balance because he was pulling me so fast.
'He threw me down on the bed and he was demanding that I take my clothes off. I was begging him, 'No, please, no. I have a boyfriend.''
Mann sobbed heavily as she continued her story.
She said: 'He stood over me and said take your clothes off and I said 'no' again. He said: 'I don't have time for games' and lunged at me with both hands onto my pants and he ripped my pants so hard and so fast off me that I had three scratches down each leg from the top of my thigh to right below the knee...the middle scratch had lots of blood.
'I froze and crawled back to the pillow and got into a ball and I had no strength'.
Weinstein went into the bathroom and came out and raped her, the woman told the court.
Mann blacked out and woke up to find Weinstein's penis in her mouth. She told the jury that he ejaculated a 'fluid' that 'choked' her.
Afterwards, Weinstein told her: 'OK, now you can go have your relationship and you can bring me other girls. You can be my wing girl. Then he apologized to me and said, 'I'm so sorry about earlier. I just find you so attractive I couldn't resist.''
Illuzi talked about the years afterwards and Mann said she had 'very minimal' contact with Weinstein until 2016.
Illuzi said was it right that 'something sexual' happened between her and Weinstein that year and Mann said, 'Yes.'
Illuzi asked if there was 'coercion' involved in that encounter. Mann said, 'No.'
During cross-examination, Weinstein's lawyer Donna Rotunno asked why Mann didn't leave during the time he asked her to give him a massage.
Mann said: 'I didn't want to offend him.'
Rotunno asked: 'You didn't want to offend him because you wanted what he had to offer?'
Mann said: 'He had a lot of power.'
Rotunno cut in and said: 'You liked that power?'
Mann said: 'It was in my interests not to try to hurt myself.'
Rotunno said: 'You wanted to use the power he had, correct?'
Mann said: 'No, I wanted it to be professional.'
Shortly after, Rotunno asked Mann: 'Miss Mann, you were using Harvey Weinstein?' but the judge told the witness not to answer that question.
Mann said that she has 'compassion' for Weinstein and described him 'role playing' an orgasm because she didn't think he could have one.
Rotunno brought up an email Mann received from a friend with a link to a news story on February 8, 2013, that mentioned that Weinstein had a wife.
Mann said that was the first time she knew he was married. She replied: 'Ha, ha, ha, I'm so going to ask him.'
Rotunno said: 'You decided to go out with a married man?
Mann said: 'Yes. I believe they had an open relationship.'
Rotunno asked Mann about a draft blog post that she had written on her phone, titled 'The Failed Threesome,' in which she talked about an 'older man I was casually dating.'
It was a thinly veiled account of her threesome with Weinstein, but Mann claimed it was meant as an 'exaggerated' account of reality and she never published it because it was 'painful.' 
Weinstein's lawyers say Mann followed up the alleged rape with warm - even flirtatious - emails that said things like 'Miss you, big guy,' and no one 'understands me quite like you.' The defense says the messages point to a consensual relationship, not a heinous sex crime.
Not once, in more than 400 messages between the two, did the woman accuse Weinstein of harming her, his lawyers have said.
As he left the court, a reporter asked Weinstein: 'What do you think of Jessica Mann's description of your body?'
Weinstein said: 'You should see what the lawyers said,' apparently referring to comments his lawyers had just made after the hearing.
Another reporter asked him if the description of his body was true.
Weinstein laughed and said: 'Yeah, perfect'.  
On Monday, jurors heard from the other woman whose allegations have led to charges in the New York case. Mimi Haleyi, a former production assistant for Project Runway, testified that Weinstein forcibly performed oral sex on her in 2006.
Weinstein has insisted any sexual encounters were consensual.
Two other accusers whose allegations are not part of the criminal charges against Weinstein also testified this week, called by prosecutors to bolster their case that he has violated many women in the same manner over the years.
Last week, Sopranos actress Annabella Sciorra testified that Weinstein overpowered and raped her after barging into her apartment in 1993 or 1994. That allegation is outside the statute of limitations, but is part of prosecutors' strategy to show that the powerful Hollywood mogul had a habit of preying on women.
Mann (center) is one of two accusers whose allegations of rape against the former producer led to criminal charges
Mann (center) is one of two accusers whose allegations of rape against the former producer led to criminal charges  
The embattled producer's lawyers will point to Mann's warm and flirtatious emails she sent to him after the alleged rape as evidence that he did not force himself on her
The embattled producer's lawyers will point to Mann's warm and flirtatious emails she sent to him after the alleged rape as evidence that he did not force himself on her 
Weisntein is seen going up a flight of stairs on foot on his way to court for another day of testimony on Friday
Weisntein is seen going up a flight of stairs on foot on his way to court for another day of testimony on Friday 
Prosecutors painted Mann (right) a young, vulnerable woman who believed the once-revered movie mogul sincerely wanted to help acting career
Prosecutors painted Mann (right) a young, vulnerable woman who believed the once-revered movie mogul sincerely wanted to help acting career 
Two women who are not part of the criminal charges, Dawn Dunning and Tarale Wulff, have also testified that Weinstein sexually assaulted them. Prosecutors are offering their testimony as evidence of Weinstein's methods and motives.
Wulff, a former model, said from the stand on Wednesday that Weinstein masturbated in front of her and raped her at his apartment in 2005.
Dunning, a former aspiring actress-turned-costume designer, claimed Weinstein offered her movie roles in exchange for a threesome in 2004 and put his hand up her skirt, touching her vagina, during a meeting at a Manhattan hotel.  
A third such witness, Lauren Young, is expected to offer her testimony against the former Miramax producer later in the trial, claiming he groped her in a hotel, masturbated and ejaculated onto a bathroom floor in February 2012 at a dinner event during Oscar season when she was 22. 
In questioning those women, Weinstein's lawyers also took aim at their continued interactions with him, suggesting that a follow-up meeting or communication with Weinstein was a sign that nothing untoward had happened.
But Dr. Barbara Ziv, a sex crimes expert whom the prosecution called as a witness, testified last week that most sex assault victims continue to have contact with their attackers, sometimes because those attackers threaten retaliation if the victims tell anyone what happened.
Victims are 'hoping this is just an aberration' and they can also end up blaming themselves, Ziv testified.
Anticipating the defense's expected line of questioning Friday, prosecutor Meghan Hast told jurors in an opening statement last week that the alleged rape victim had 'buried her trauma' and was trying to navigate Weinstein's powerful grip on her by pretending she wanted to see him and saying nice things.
Prosecutors allege Weinstein took advantage of Mann, a young, vulnerable woman who believed the producer wanted to help her career (pictured arriving in court Friday)
Prosecutors allege Weinstein took advantage of Mann, a young, vulnerable woman who believed the producer wanted to help her career (pictured arriving in court Friday) 
Weinstein has insisted any sexual encounters with Mann and his other accusers were strictly consensual
Weinstein has insisted any sexual encounters with Mann and his other accusers were strictly consensual 
Something's funny? Weinstein appeared to be in excellent spirits as he left the court for the day Friday
Something's funny? Weinstein appeared to be in excellent spirits as he left the court for the day Friday 
Weinstein, 67, was asked by a reporter if Mann's description of his body was accurate, to which he replied with a laugh, 'Yeah, perfect'
Weinstein, 67, was asked by a reporter if Mann's description of his body was accurate, to which he replied with a laugh, 'Yeah, perfect' 
Film producer Harvey Weinstein departs New York Criminal Court after his sexual assault trial in Manhattan
Film producer Harvey Weinstein departs New York Criminal Court after his sexual assault trial in Manhattan
To prosecutors, the woman behind the rape charge is a prime example of a Weinstein target: a young, vulnerable woman who believed the once-revered movie mogul sincerely wanted to help her fledgling career, only for him to make increasingly vile sexual advances.
'He was the old lady in the gingerbread house luring the kids in, missing the oven behind,' Hast said in her opening statement.
Hast said Mann and Weinstein met at a Hollywood party in February 2013 and Weinstein appeared to take an instant liking to her. They had several follow up meetings, ostensibly to talk about her career, but things turned more and more sexual, the prosecutor said.
At one meeting, Weinstein tried to give Mann a massage, only for her to rebuff him and offer him a massage instead, Hast said. At another meeting, the prosecutor said Weinstein invited Mann to read a script in a hotel room, where he pushed her onto a bed and forcibly performed oral sex on her. 
'Realizing there was nothing she could do, [Mann] faked an orgasm, hoping that that would end it,' Hast said 
Mann, Hast said, then made 'a decision that had disastrous consequences for her' and decided to have a relationship with Weinstein. Hast said Mann avoided having sexual intercourse with him for about a month, when Weinstein raped her.
Hast told jurors that Mann went on to maintain some form of a relationship with Weinstein even after that, though she felt 'trapped.'
Dawn Dunning
Tarale Wulff
Dawn Dunning (left) and Tarale Wulff (right) testified on Wednesday that Weinstein sexually assaulted them. They are not part of the criminal charges
The day of the alleged rape, Hast said, Mann and her actress roommate were supposed to meet Weinstein for breakfast, but instead Mann and Weinstein got into a heated confrontation that he demanded they finish in his hotel room.
There, Hast said, Weinstein started ripping the woman´s clothes off and raped her. The prosecutor said Weinstein raped the woman again in November 2013 when she was working as a hairdresser and went to cut his hair.
Weinstein has not been charged in that alleged incident.
His lawyers note that Mann's emails continued after the second alleged rape. In February 2017, she wrote Weinstein to tell him she had a scheduling conflict and couldn't make it to a hotel to see him.
'I love you, always do. But I hate feeling like a booty call,' she wrote, adding a smiling-face emoji afterward. 

What's happened in the trial so far 

So far two accusers, Mimi Haleyi and Soprano's actress Annabella Sciorra, have testified against Weinstein. 
On Monday Haleyi, whose allegations are at the heart of the Weinstein case, broke down in tears as she recounted how the film honcho, who got her a job as a production assistant on the show Project Runway, allegedly forcibly performed oral sex on her while she was on her period at his New York City apartment in July 2006. She also claimed he raped her at a TriBeCa hotel two weeks afterwards.
'I did reject him, but he insisted. Every time I tried to get off the bed, he would push me back and hold me down,' Haleyi, 42, said choking on tears. 
'I was crying no, no. I told him I'm on my period. It was as if he didn't believe me. I said something like where is it then? He literally pulled my tampon out,' she added. 
Haleyi (in cream trench coat) worked for Project Runway, a reality show Weinstein produced. Pictured in court on Monday
Haleyi (in cream trench coat) worked for Project Runway, a reality show Weinstein produced. Pictured in court on Monday
She underwent an intense cross-examination where Weinstein's attorney Damon Cheronis claimed she had a consensual relationship with Weinstein and zeroed in on her continued contact with the producer even after the alleged assaults, showing e-mails and notes in her diary.   
On Tuesday Haleyi's roommate in 2006, Elizabeth Entin, testified to corroborate her claims.  Entin said on one occasion Weinstein barged into their home to demand Haleyi go to Paris with him but got scared by her pet Chihuahua Peanut.
On Wednesday Tarale Wulff and Dawn Dunning, both so-called 'Molineux' witnesses, testified to demonstrate Weinstein's 'prior bad acts' and pattern of pattern behavior. Weinstein's charges do not stem from their accounts. 
Tarale Wulff testified that Weinstein masturbated in front of her while she was working as a cocktail waitress at the upscale New York club Cipriani and raped her at his New York City apartment in 2005 after calling her in for an audition saying 'Don't worry, I've had a vasectomy'. 
Dawn Dunning, who also met the movie mogul when trying to become an actress, said that Weinstein put his hand up her skirt during a business meeting at his hotel suite in 2004 and he offered her movie roles in exchange for a threesome, claiming, 'This is how the industry works!' 
Last week Annabella Sciorra testified that Weinstein forced his way into her Manhattan apartment one winter night in 1993 or 1994 and violently raped her. 
In total six women are expected to testify against the producer, while more than 90 women have accused the Miramax founder of sexual misconduct, harassment, rape, and unwanted touching. 
She broke down in tears as she recounted the alleged rape saying: 'I was crying no, no. I told him I’m on my period. It was as if he didn’t believe me. I said something like where is it then? He literally pulled my tampon out'
She broke down in tears as she recounted the alleged rape saying: 'I was crying no, no. I told him I'm on my period. It was as if he didn't believe me. I said something like where is it then? He literally pulled my tampon out'
Annabella Sciorra cried as she took the stand in Harvey Weinstein's New York trial on Thursday to tell how he raped her in 1993, a year before confiding fully in Perez about it
She appeared in The Sopranos as Tony Soprano's mistress
Annabella Sciorra cried as she took the stand in Harvey Weinstein's New York trial last week to tell how he allegedly raped her in 1993 or 1994. She appeared in The Sopranos as Tony Soprano's mistress (right)
Who are Weinstein's accusers who have or will testify?
Actress Annabella Sciorra testified last week against Weinstein, claiming he raped her in her New York City apartment in 1993. 
Former production assistant Mimi Haleyi testified Monday and claimed Weinstein forcibly performed oral sex on her inside his apartment in 2006. 
A third accuser, Jessica Mann, is slated to testify this week on how the movie mogul allegedly raped her in a Midtown Manhattan hotel in 2013. 
Costume designer Dawn Dunning testified Wednesday that Weinstein sexually harassed her and tried to pressure her into having a three-way with him and his assistant when she was 24 at a Manhattan hotel in 2004.   
Aspiring actress Tarale Wulff testified Wednesday that Weinstein masturbated in front of her as she was working as a cocktail waitress at Cipriani Upstairs in Manhattan and he later assaulted her in his bedroom in 2005.  
A sixth woman, Lauren Young, claims he groped her in a hotel, masturbated and ejaculated onto a bathroom floor in February 2012 at a dinner event during Oscar season when she was 22.  
In addition to these six accusers the judge is allowing four other women to testify to establish a pattern of behavior, even though most of their allegations are too old to prosecute as crimes according to state law. 
The trial started on January 6 and could last until early March.