Tuesday, September 7, 2021

JOE BIDEN'S ASSAULT ON HOMELAND SECURITY FOR MORE 'CHEAP' LABOR

 

Commentary
Kabuki Vetting of Afghans
By Mark Krikorian
National Review, August 30, 2021
Excerpt: There is no connection between the vetting of Afghans and their admission to the U.S. The moment the doors of a C-17 closed on the tarmac in Kabul, every Afghan on board, regardless of background or possible security threat, became a de facto permanent resident of the U.S. Anyone telling you otherwise is misinformed or mendacious.
Podcast
Chain Migration and Why It Matters
Moderator: Mark Krikorian
Guest: Jessica M. Vaughan
Parsing Immigration Policy, Episode 19
Featured Blog Posts
Report: Government Can’t Locate a Third of Alien Children It Released
By Andrew R. Arthur
Excerpt: If Biden won’t take the needed steps to stop unaccompanied minors from coming, he is on the hook for ensuring that they are properly placed in this country. Trump was hammered in 2018 when it was revealed that HHS had “lost track” of 1,475 UACs; Biden has “lost track” of more than triple that number.

Poll: Almost Half of the Electorate Deems Illegal Immigration a ‘Critical Threat’
By Andrew R. Arthur
Excerpt: In a poll conducted between August 28 and 30 by Morning Consult and Politico of 1,997 registered voters, 55 percent of respondents disapproved of President Biden’s handling of immigration (41 percent “strongly”), and almost half (47 percent) saw “illegal immigration” as a “critical threat to the vital interests of the United States in the next 10 years”.

Is Biden’s Plan a Five-Year Path to Citizenship for Every Illegal Migrant?
By Andrew R. Arthur
Excerpt: Biden's proposed asylum changes would vastly expand eligibility and increase the number of illegal crossings at the border.

Welfare Use for Immigrants and Native-Born Households
By Steven A. Camarota
Excerpt: Analysis by the Center for Immigration Studies of the latest data (2018) from the Census Bureau's Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) shows that welfare use by households headed by immigrants remains high relative to the native-born. The desire to reduce welfare among future immigrants was the primary justification for “public charge” rules issued by the Trump administration that have now been abandoned by the Biden administration.

AMERICA THE SICK! - THE CULT OF THE SELF BY CHRIS HEDGES

 IT'S TIME TO GET 

MAD! REAL MAD!

even if it's probably too late!


Chris Hedges | UNFETTERED Capitalism Promotes Cult Of The Self





YOU MEAN THE FUCKERS ARE GETTING THE MESSAGE?

Democrats Move To Expand Social Safety Net




America's Quiet Wealth Crisis, Middle Class Collapse



Chris Hedges | The HORRIFIC State of the American Empire



Congressman exposes Biden's lies after rescuing stranded Americans




Biden Requests $6.4B in Taxpayer Money to Resettle 95,000 Afghans Across U.S.

RAMSTEIN-MIESENBACH, GERMANY - AUGUST 26: Evacuees from Afghanistan are seen at a temporary emergency shelter at the Ramstein Air Base on August 26, 2021 in Ramstein-Miesenbach, Germany. Ramstein has become one of the main preliminary destinations for evacuees leaving Afghanistan on U.S. military flights. U.S. forces there have built a …
Andreas Rentz/Getty Images
3:03

President Joe Biden’s administration is asking Congress to authorize about $6.4 billion in American taxpayer money to bring 95,000 Afghans to the United States for permanent resettlement.

In a call with reporters on Tuesday, administration officials said the White House would request Congress to authorize about $6.4 billion in funding to resettle tens of thousands of Afghans across the U.S.

Pro-mass migration groups had asked Biden to authorize $8 billion in funds for Afghans.

Roughly $1.7 billion of the funding will go toward “funding and resources to the Afghans to help them set up a new home in the U.S.,” NBC News reports. In total, the administration official said they have already brought 65,000 Afghans to the U.S. for permanent resettlement over the last month and expect to bring an additional 30,000 Afghans to the U.S.

The administration’s goal to resettle in the U.S. about 95,000 Afghans is the first glimpse into Biden’s massive resettlement operation — the largest since former President Barack Obama brought more than 12,000 Syrians to the U.S. from 2012 to 2016.

Though Biden has pitched the Afghan resettlement as a commitment to the nation’s allies in the Afghanistan War, the overwhelming majority of Afghans arriving in the U.S. do not qualify for Special Immigrant Visas (SIVs) or even P-2 visas. Those visa programs are reserved only for Afghans and their families who worked directly for the U.S. Armed Forces.

Instead, the majority of Afghans are arriving on “humanitarian parole” and some are coming on refugee status. An estimated 50,000 Afghans will be brought to the U.S. as parolees where they will stay at a number of U.S. military bases and receive one-time $1,250 payments.

Afghans are being extracted from Afghanistan and flown to third safe countries like Germany, Spain, and Qatar before they eventually are flown into Dulles International Airport in Virginia and Philadelphia International Airport in Pennsylvania.

Most Afghans arriving in the U.S. have not completed their immigration processing.

Over the last 20 years, nearly a million refugees have been resettled in the nation — more than double that of residents living in Miami, Florida, and it would be the equivalent of annually adding the population of Pensacola, Florida.

Refugee resettlement costs American taxpayers nearly $9 billion every five years, according to research, and each refugee costs taxpayers about $133,000 over the course of their lifetime. Within five years, an estimated 16 percent of all refugees admitted will need housing assistance paid for by taxpayers.

John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Email him at jbinder@breitbart.com. Follow him on Twitter here.


KAMALA HARRIS FLEES D.C. - SAYS SHE DOES NOT WANT TO BE AROUND WHEN THEY COME FOR JOE WITH THE CHAINS!

LOOKS LIKE BIDEN HAS BEEN RUBBING FACES WITH THE ORANGE BABOON TRUMPER. OR IS HE UP TRUMP'S ASS?!?


Trump loses weight post-presidency, ditches spray tan for Florida sun

Trump loses weight post-presidency, ditches spray tan for Florida sun
In this article:

Explore the topics mentioned in this article

Leaving the White House may be a weight off former President Donald Trump's shoulders in more ways than one, with observers noting that physical changes in the former president's appearance may demonstrate the physical toll the presidency took while also signaling future ambitions.

Trump had lost about 15 pounds as of April, and he traded his typical spray tan for a natural hue at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, according to Business Insider. Trump advisers say the former president has seen marked improvements to his health, upgrading his diet and playing golf frequently.

"Mar-a-Lago guests frequently comment about how good he's looking over these last couple of months," a source told the outlet. "He feels great as well."

Out of Sight: Kamala Harris Bails on Sinking Joe Biden

harris and biden
AP Photo/Evan Vucci
1:51

Vice President Kamala Harris effectively vanished from public view after returning from her trip to Asia to find President Joe Biden struggling on nearly every major issue facing the country.

The vice president effectively ghosted the Biden White House after arriving back in Washington, DC, on August 26.

For 12 days, Harris has remained out of sight, except for a brief ceremony where she swore in U.S. Ambassador to Mexico Ken Salazar on Thursday.

The vice president ignored questions from reporters, maintaining public silence on controversial issues.

On Tuesday, Harris scheduled a meeting with Salazar but closed the event to the press.

Harris has not appeared publicly standing with Biden since August 20, more than two weeks after he struggled to defend his botched exit from Afghanistan.

During her trip to Asia, Harris earned mockery for reading from her notes to try to praise the president for “expressing sadness” and “great emotion” in reaction to the horrific images emerging from Afghanistan.

On paper, Harris continues to perform her vice-presidential duties, as the White House schedule notes her attendance at the presidential daily briefings and national security meetings on the crisis in Afghanistan.

Harris was also scheduled to participate in a weekly economic briefing last week.

Matt Perdie
Volume 90%
 

But her public distancing from the president in recent weeks is notable.

Harris’ schedule has not included any mention of her weekly lunch with the president since July 23.

On Wednesday, however, the vice president plans to emerge from Washington, DC, as she is scheduled for a trip to California to campaign for embattled California Governor Gavin Newsom in his recall election.

 

ASK SOCIOPATH LAWYER KAMALA HARRIS HOW MUCH SHE HAS SUCKED OFF PLANNED PARENTHOOD!

The best-case scenario is that she’s a progressive who repeatedly violated her own principles so that she could promote her career. In the worst-case scenario, she’s just another corrupt, rotten, regressive prosecutor.

                                                           JESSER HOROWITZ


Despite Domestic, International Strife V.P. Harris to Campaign for Gavin Newsom

US Democratic vice presidential nominee and Senator from California, Kamala Harris chats with California Governor Gavin Newsom as they visit Pine Ridge Elementary School where they met with firefighters and toured fire-ravaged properties damaged from the Creek Fire nearby in an unincorporated area of Fresno, California on September 15, 2020. …
FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images
2:32

Vice President Kamala Harris has been mostly absent as President Joe Biden deals with crises at the border, in the economy, and in Afghanistan, but she will be traveling to California to campaign for California Gov. Gavin Newsom ahead of the recall election that seeks to remove him from office.

Taxpayer funded Public Broadcasting System (PBS) reported Harris will travel to California on Wednesday.

Left-wing PBS’s Jeff Greenfield spoke about the recall, which the media outlet described as “a simple, and yet complicated, political event:”

Under California law, you only need 12 percent of the statewide turnout to sign petitions to trigger a recall. And with paid petition gatherers and with a couple of million dollars in ad money that the Republicans threw into this process, the recall qualified. But it’s the way this happens that’s so bizarre. If I can use that term, it’s a two part ballot. First, should Governor Newsom be recalled, yes or no? If 50 percent say yes, he’s out. Then part two is triggered. Which of the 46 candidates on the ballot should be the next governor? And whoever finishes first wins. There’s no runoff, which is why conservative talk show host Larry Elder, with about 20 or 22 percent of the vote, could be the next governor, even though Newsom got 49 percent of the vote in the first recall.

“What’s the consequence here? If Gavin Newsom is recalled, and if Larry Elder is elected?” Greenfield was asked.

Greenfield answered:

For one thing, Elder is committed to repealing any kind of mandate in terms of vaccinations and masks, he has called global warming essentially mythological. But there’s another very awkward point. Dianne Feinstein, the United States senator from California, is 88 years old. And in recent years, her performance has concerned Democrats who have been urging her to resign. If Larry Elder becomes governor and if Dianne Feinstein has to leave the Senate, he has said he will appoint a Republican in her place to serve the remainder of her term, which would make the U.S. Senate no longer controlled by Democrats. So there’s potentially a lot at stake here.

Early voting in the recall election is already underway and the recall election day is September 14.

Follow Penny Starr on Twitter or send news tips to pstarr@breitbart.com.

Planned Parenthood Targeted Pro-Life Democrat with Racial Slur, Now His Bill is Headed to Governor's Desk

Rebecca Downs
|
Posted: Sep 06, 2021 7:15 PM
Planned Parenthood Targeted Pro-Life Democrat with Racial Slur, Now His Bill is Headed to Governor's Desk

Source: RoschetzkyIstockPhoto/iStock/Getty Images Plus

A Texas law signed by Gov. Greg Abbott (R-TX) recently went into effect which restricts abortions once a fetal heartbeat is detected, which is at around six weeks. Now, a bill restricting chemical abortion, also known as medication abortion, to seven rather than 10 weeks is headed to the governor's desk. The bill, SB 4, was sponsored by state Sen. Eddie Lucio, Jr., who is a pro-life Democrat. 

Throughout the 2020 primary and runoff primary, Planned Parenthood Texas Votes referred to Lucio as "Sucio Lucio" when calling for a primary opponent to oust him. The term "sucio" is considered to be a slur and derogatory against Mexicans. 

While the abortion group was criticized for using such a term, social media posts with such language remain.

Planned Parenthood and others also used the term in mailers. Bishop Daniel Flores, the bishop of Brownsville, issued a statement criticizing the groups' use of the term. The state senator's son, Eddie Lucio III, who is a Democratic member of the Texas House of Representatives, echoed Bishop Flores' statement.

Sen. Lucio affirmed his stance on pro-life issues, which he said "I don't make any excuses for that, and I don't apologize for that" when speaking to the Catholic News Agency in July 2020. According to Matt Hadro's reporting for the outlet:

Pro-abortion groups such as Planned Parenthood Texas Votes PAC and the Texas Freedom Network have repeatedly referred to Lucio as "Sucio Lucio" in direct mailing campaigns and online, calling him "dirty" in an apparent reference to his politics; the term, he and others have said, is offensive to Hispanics.

"It's been used in the past to describe a 'dirty Mexican,'" Lucio told CNA. "I take it hard for someone to use an adjective that speaks badly of my surname that I'm very proud of. My dad was a very decent, hard-working man who contributed so much to his fellow man." Lucio said his father was a disabled American veteran who fought in World War II in North Africa and Italy.

The groups "appropriated this offensive term, without consideration of its racist undertones, and it's wrong to use the term to describe any person of color," Lucio said. The opposition, he said, is "wanting to defeat me because I am pro-life."

Lucio beat Democratic primary opponent Sara Stapleton-Barrera in a runoff primary election, 53.5 percent to 46.5 percent. In the general election, he defeated Republican candidate Vanessa Tijerina 64.8 percent to 35.2 percent. 

Despite authoring SB 4, one would be hard pressed to find mention of the pro-life Democrat's name in mainstream media coverage of the bill. 

As Laura Nicole with Live Action explained about the legislation:

SB 4 aims to codify safety protections surrounding the use of the abortion pill mifepristone. The bill limits the administration of the abortion pill to no later than seven weeks’ gestation (it is currently FDA approved for up to 10 weeks gestation), and it prohibits the prescription of the abortion pill by mail. The law requires physicians to provide a minimum standard of care to include: conducting an in-person examination to confirm the pregnancy; ruling out ectopic pregnancy; and determining the woman’s blood type and treat for Rh negativity, as well as to document any treatment. The physician must also schedule a follow up within 14 days to assess the woman’s health.

The Biden administration in April lifted certain regulations on the method by making it available through the mail, citing the pandemic as an excuse. It makes the method much less safe, however. 

Recommended
Pandemic Idiots And Opportunists
Derek Hunter

As I've reported in the past: 

Not shockingly, this method is particularly dangerous. It carries with it four times the complications of surgical abortions. Incomplete abortions happen 5 percent of the time, with some studies finding 10 percent of women facing incomplete abortions at 9-weeks gestation. This can lead to death from infection if remaining fetal parts or tissue are not properly removed. 

Side-effects and risk associated with this method include abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, weakness, fever/chills, and headaches. The bleeding may last for weeks after the abortion. 

It's also gaining popularity. Thanks to this method--which accounted for 41 percent of abortions in 2018--total abortions have actually increased.  

Some abortion groups have continuously touted the willingness to assist women in acquiring pills even if they are illegal, despite the danger of the method. Pro-abortion politicians and organizations have also been pushing  chemical abortion as of late. 

KAMALA HARRIS, THE GODLESS.

https://kamala-harris-sociopath.blogspot.com/2020/10/kamala-harris-godless-just-follow-money.html

Harris is no friend of religious liberty. Her recent decision to exclaim in the year of our Lord, which has been conveniently picked up by her staff, is a ploy designed to appeal to unassuming Christian voters impressed by "God talk." As the old adage says, actions speak louder than words, and on this score, Harris fails to convince.

It is the handmaidens working for Planned Parenthood who have joked about selling aborted baby body parts.  And it was Kamala Harris, when she was A.G. of California, who viciously prosecuted the young man who exposed that scandal, after she had received a hefty donation from Planned Parenthood.

 US Vice President Kamala

Harris 'is such a hoax'



How Kamala Harris Made Her Millions


The Shady Side Of Kamala Harris


The United States is 'literally leaderless'

Newt Gingrich calls Joe Biden a 'sickness'

White House Still Cannot Explain Why ‘Devout Catholic’ Joe Biden Supports Abortion

Democratic presidential candidate, former Vice President Joe Biden bows his head and prays as he visits Bethel AME Church in Wilmington, Del., Monday, June 1, 2020. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)
AP Photo/Andrew Harnik
2:55

The White House continues struggling with President Joe Biden’s support for abortion, even though he claims to be a practicing Catholic.

The president’s contradictory position will face additional scrutiny as reports say he is eager to attack the new pro-life law in Texas for political gain.

On Thursday, EWTN’s Owen Jensen questioned White House press secretary Jen Psaki about the issue after the president condemned the new pro-life law in Texas.

“Why does the President support abortion when his own Catholic faith teaches abortion is morally wrong?” Jensen asked.

“Well, he believes that it’s a woman’s right, it’s a woman’s body, and it’s her choice,” Psaki replied.

As Jensen continued to press Psaki on the president’s position she said Biden believed it was “up to a woman to make those decisions” about aborting her child.

“I know you’ve never faced those choices, nor have you ever been pregnant,” she continued. “But for women out there who have faced those choices, this is an incredibly difficult thing.”

White House
Volume 90%

As Jensen pursued his line of questioning, Psaki dismissed him as a “wise guy” and moved on to other reporters.

Democrat abortion activists cheered on Psaki for calling out Jensen for “being a man” and asking questions about abortions, but her exchange shows the White House still unable to answer the question about Biden’s contradictory position.

The White House either repeats Biden is a practicing Catholic or repeats he is a supporter of abortion rights.

Jensen questioned Psaki about Biden’s position on abortion on Inauguration Day, but Psaki only reiterated the president’s decision to continue attending Mass.

“I will just take the opportunity to remind all of you that he is a devout Catholic and somebody who attends church regularly,” she said.

When asked about Biden’s support for the Equality Act, which would force doctors to perform abortions against their conscience, Psaki only reiterated his support for the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision.

“The President has been a longtime supporter of Roe v. Wade,” she said. “It has been his consistent belief that should be law, and he will fight to continue to protect that as being law.”

When asked about Biden’s position on abortion in June, Psaki replied the president’s faith was a private matter.

“The President’s faith is personal. It’s something that has helped guide him through some challenging moments in his life,” she said. “And that’s how many Americans see their faith as well, not through a political prism.”

Biden himself struggled with the question after the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops voted to draft a teaching document about whether public figures claiming to be Catholic could receive communion while vocally supporting abortion.

“That’s a private matter,” Biden replied. “And I don’t think that’s going to happen.”

The White House
Volume 90%


President Biden Claims Killing an Unborn Baby Who Has a Beating Heart is a ‘Private and Personal’ Decision

By Terence P. Jeffrey | September 2, 2021 | 3:00pm EDT

 
 
(Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
(Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

(CNSNews.com) - President Joe Biden put out a statement today condemning the Supreme Court’s decision not to issue an injunction to immediately stop a Texas law (SB 8) that seeks to prevent the abortion of babies who have a detectable heartbeat--which generally occurs at six weeks into pregnancy.

The Texas law, which took effect Wednesday, allows individuals to sue abortionists and those who aid a woman in obtaining the abortion of an unborn baby with a beating heart.

Texas Atty. Gen. Ken Paxton filed a brief with the Supreme Court that summarized the Texas law as follows: "SB 8 creates a private cause of action that enables Texans to sue those who perform, or aid and abet the performance of, abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected."

President Biden's statement, published Thursday, characterized the abortion of a baby with a beating heart as a "private and personal" health decision.

“Complete strangers will now be empowered to inject themselves in the most private and personal health decisions faced by women,” Biden said in his statement.

“The Supreme Court’s ruling overnight is an unprecedented assault on a woman’s constitutional rights under Roe v. Wade, which has been the law of the land for almost fifty years,” said Biden.

“By allowing a law to go into effect that empowers private citizens in Texas to sue health care providers, family members supporting a woman exercising her right to choose after six weeks, or even a friend who drives her to a hospital or clinic, it unleashes unconstitutional chaos and empowers self-anointed enforcers to have devastating impacts,” he said.

“This law is so extreme it does not even allow for exceptions in the case of rape or incest,” said Biden. “And it not only empowers complete strangers to inject themselves into the most private of decisions made by a woman—it actually incentivizes them to do so with the prospect of $10,000 if they win their case.

Biden went on to argue that the majority of the Supreme Court had insulted “the rule of law and the rights of all Americans” by not issuing an injunction to stop the law from going into effect.

“For the majority to do this without a hearing, without the benefit of an opinion from a court below, and without due consideration of the issues, insults the rule of law and the rights of all Americans to seek redress from our courts,” he said.

“Rather than use its supreme authority to ensure justice could be fairly sought, the highest Court of our land will allow millions of women in Texas in need of critical reproductive care to suffer while courts sift through procedural complexities,” he said.

Biden claimed that the fact that Chief Justice John Roberts and the courts three most liberal justices—Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan—would have issued an injunction, shows that the court’s majority was wrong not to do so.

“The dissents by Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan all demonstrate the error of the Court’s action here powerfully,” said Biden.

Here is the full text of Biden’s statement:

Statement by President Joe Biden on Supreme Court Ruling on Texas Law SB8

September 02, 2021

"The Supreme Court’s ruling overnight is an unprecedented assault on a woman’s constitutional rights under Roe v. Wade, which has been the law of the land for almost fifty years. By allowing a law to go into effect that empowers private citizens in Texas to sue health care providers, family members supporting a woman exercising her right to choose after six weeks, or even a friend who drives her to a hospital or clinic, it unleashes unconstitutional chaos and empowers self-anointed enforcers to have devastating impacts. Complete strangers will now be empowered to inject themselves in the most private and personal health decisions faced by women. This law is so extreme it does not even allow for exceptions in the case of rape or incest. And it not only empowers complete strangers to inject themselves into the most private of decisions made by a woman—it actually incentivizes them to do so with the prospect of $10,000 if they win their case. For the majority to do this without a hearing, without the benefit of an opinion from a court below, and without due consideration of the issues, insults the rule of law and the rights of all Americans to seek redress from our courts. Rather than use its supreme authority to ensure justice could be fairly sought, the highest Court of our land will allow millions of women in Texas in need of critical reproductive care to suffer while courts sift through procedural complexities. The dissents by Chief Justice Roberts, and Justices Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan all demonstrate the error of the Court’s action here powerfully.

"While the Chief Justice was clear to stress that the action by the Supreme Court is not a final ruling on the future of Roe, the impact of last night’s decision will be immediate and requires an immediate response. One reason I became the first president in history to create a Gender Policy Council was to be prepared to react to such assaults on women’s rights. Hence, I am directing that Council and the Office of the White House Counsel to launch a whole-of-government effort to respond to this decision, looking specifically to the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Justice to see what steps the Federal Government can take to ensure that women in Texas have access to safe and legal abortions as protected by Roe, and what legal tools we have to insulate women and providers from the impact of Texas’ bizarre scheme of outsourced enforcement to private parties."

###


Biden: ‘Deeply Committed to the Constitutional Right’ to Kill an Unborn Baby With a Heartbeat

 By Terence P. Jeffrey | September 1, 2021 | 3:26pm EDT

 
 
(Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
(Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

President Joe Biden put out a statement on Wednesday stating his opposition to a Texas law—SB8--that bans the abortion of an unborn baby who already has a detectable heartbeat.

The law went into effect today.

“SB8,” explained a brief that Texas Gov. Ken Paxton submitted to the Supreme Court, “creates a private cause of action that enables Texans to sue those who perform, or aid and abet the performance of, abortions, after a fetal heartbeat has been detected.”

The law, according to a suit filed against it, effectively bans abortions at approximately six weeks into pregnancy.

In his statement on Wednesday, President Biden said: “This extreme Texas law blatantly violates the constitutional right established under Roe v. Wade and upheld as precedent for nearly half a century.”

“My administration is deeply committed to the constitutional right established in Roe v. Wade nearly five decades ago and will protect and defend that right,” Biden said in his statement.

Here is the full text of Biden's statement:

"Statement by President Joe Biden on Texas Law SB8

"SEPTEMBER 01, 2021

"Today, Texas law SB8 went into effect. This extreme Texas law blatantly violates the constitutional right established under Roe v. Wade and upheld as precedent for nearly half a century.

"The Texas law will significantly impair women’s access to the health care they need, particularly for communities of color and individuals with low incomes. And, outrageously, it deputizes private citizens to bring lawsuits against anyone who they believe has helped another person get an abortion, which might even include family members, health care workers, front desk staff at a health care clinic, or strangers with no connection to the individual.

"My administration is deeply committed to the constitutional right established in Roe v. Wade nearly five decades ago and will protect and defend that right."

###

ASK THE BRIBES SUCKING KAMALA HOW MUCH SHE HAS SUCKED OFF OF PLANNED PARRENTHOOD!!! 

Kamala Harris: Texas Abortion Law Will Hurt ‘Women of Color’

US Vice President Kamala Harris steps off Air Force Two as she arrives at Honolulu Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii, before continuing to Washington instead of scheduled travel to California because of the situation in Afghanistan, August 26, 2021. (Photo by EVELYN HOCKSTEIN / POOL / AFP) (Photo by EVELYN …
EVELYN HOCKSTEIN/POOL/AFP via Getty Images
2:43

Vice President Kamala Harris on Wednesday released a statement in reaction to the Texas abortion law that went into effect, asserting it will “dramatically reduce access to reproductive care” for “women of color.” She ultimately joined President Biden and other left-wing politicians in promising to fight for every woman’s ability to abort her child.

“Today, a new law takes effect in Texas that directly violates the precedent established in the landmark case of Roe v. Wade. This all-out assault on reproductive health effectively bans abortion for the nearly 7 million Texans of reproductive age,” Harris said in a statement.

“Patients in Texas will now be forced to travel out-of-state or carry their pregnancy to term against their will. This law will dramatically reduce access to reproductive care for women in Texas, particularly for women with low incomes and women of color,” Harris, who reigned as one of the most left-wing Democrats during her time in the U.S. Senate, continued.

US Vice President Kamala Harris holds a press conference before departing Vietnam for the United States, following her first official visit to Asia, in Hanoi on August 26, 2021. (Photo by EVELYN HOCKSTEIN / POOL / AFP) (Photo by EVELYN HOCKSTEIN/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

US Vice President Kamala Harris holds a press conference. (EVELYN HOCKSTEIN/POOL/AFP via Getty Images).

“It also includes a disturbing provision that incentivizes private citizens to sue anyone who assists another person in receiving an abortion,” she said.

“The Biden-Harris Administration will always fight to protect access to healthcare and defend a woman’s right to make decisions about her body and determine her future,” Harris added.

Texas’s abortion law went into effect Wednesday, banning abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected.

As Breitbart News reported:

In a last-minute effort to block the law, abortion providers applied to the U.S. Supreme Court for an injunction, but the Court has not yet ruled on the matter – though could do so at any time – and the law, as passed by the Texas legislature and signed into law by Gov. Greg Abbott (R), is now in effect.

However, for major matters like this, standard procedure is for the justice supervising the relevant appeals court – in this case, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit – to refer the application to his eight colleagues for the full Supreme Court to vote on the matter.

The abortion providers’ appeal comes after their hopes to block the law were thwarted over the weekend when the Fifth Circuit canceled a hearing initially planned for Monday. The district judge was blocked from granting a preliminary injunction before September 1.

The event also triggered a statement from Biden, who also claimed the law would “significantly impair women’s access to the health care they need, particularly for communities of color and individuals with low incomes.”

WASHINGTON, DC - SEPTEMBER 01: Wearing a necktie decorated with donkeys, U.S. President Joe Biden listens to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during a press availability in the Oval Office at the White House on September 01, 2021 in Washington, DC. This was the two leaders' first face-to-face meeting and the first by a Ukrainian leader in more than four years. (Photo by Doug Mills-Pool/Getty Images)

Wearing a necktie decorated with donkeys, U.S. President Joe Biden listens to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky during a press availability in the Oval Office at the White House. (Doug Mills-Pool/Getty Images).

Twice-failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton also expressed outrage, equating abortion rights to human rights:

FaithHealthPoliticsHillary ClintonJoe BidenKamala Harris


Biden to Launch Federal Response Targeting Texas Abortion Law

Madeline Leesman
|
Posted: Sep 02, 2021 5:30 PM
Biden to Launch Federal Response Targeting Texas Abortion Law

Source: AP Photo/Susan Walsh

President Joe Biden issued a lengthy statement in response to the Supreme Court of the United States’ decision to allow S.B. 8, a historic “heartbeat bill” signed into law in Texas, to take effect. Predictably, Biden thinks the Court ruling is unconstitutional, and will launch a “whole-of-government” effort to respond to the decision.

By a 5-4 vote, the High Court allowed abortion to be outlawed in the state of Texas once fetal heartbeat is detected. Additionally, the new law allows citizens to pursue legal action against individuals who provide or assist with obtaining an illegal abortion procedure.

“The Supreme Court’s ruling overnight is an unprecedented assault on a woman’s constitutional rights under Roe v. Wade, which has been the law of the land for almost fifty years,” Biden’s statement reads. “Rather than use its supreme authority to ensure justice could be fairly sought, the highest Court of our land will allow millions of women in Texas in need of critical reproductive care to suffer while courts sift through procedural complexities.”

Biden, a longtime pro-abortion proponent, described the decision “unleashes unconstitutional chaos” and stated he plans to utilize his self-created White House Gender Policy Council to explore his options at the federal level to ensure that women in Texas have access to abortion, as protected by Roe v. Wade.

“One reason I became the first president in history to create a Gender Policy Council was to be prepared to react to such assaults on women’s rights,” the statement reads. “Hence, I am directing that Council and the Office of the White House Counsel to launch a whole-of-government effort to respond to this decision, looking specifically to the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Justice to see what steps the Federal Government can take to ensure that women in Texas have access to safe and legal abortions as protected by Roe, and what legal tools we have to insulate women and providers from the impact of Texas’ bizarre scheme of outsourced enforcement to private parties.”

Biden’s pledge to take action against this pro-life legislation further exemplifies his unwavering pro-abortion support. From removing the longstanding Hyde Amendment from the 2022 budget to taking aim at Texas’ new law, this is just another example of hypocrisy from our “devout Catholic” president.

FNC’s Carlson: For Jeffrey Toobin, Abortion ‘a Great Option’ if You’re Married and Don’t Want to Pay for More Kids with Random Women

15:09

Thursday on FNC’s “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” host Tucker Carlson took a dig at CNN’s Jeffrey Toobin for his pro-abortion defense in the wake of the Texas legislature’s thus far successful efforts to limit the practice of abortion in the high court.

Carlson reminded viewers of a personal situation Toobin encounter involving a woman he allegedly impregnated during an extramarital affair.

Transcript as follows:

CARLSON: Here’s an interesting observation/theory: The slogans that yell the loudest are the ones they believe the least. We’ve been noticing that recently. Volume is inversely proportional to sincerity. Maybe you scream it because you don’t really believe it.

Why do we think this? Well, here’s why. The very same people who have told us for decades now that it is my body my choice and seemed to mean it when they said it, those same people abandoned their own argument immediately when COVID arrived.

Suddenly, on a dime, they turned and they were demanding that we wear the mask and get the shot, but these were not optional suggestions, they weren’t deeply personal decisions to be made according to the dictates of individual conscience after consulting with family physicians and clergy, they weren’t between you, your doctor, and God. No, not at all. These were mandates.

Al of a sudden, Democrats were arguing that actually, politicians do get to decide what you do with your body. It’s their choice not yours. Inject these powerful drugs whether you want to or not because we own you.

Now, whatever else that is, that is not a pro-choice position to put it mildly. So, as we watch this happen, we wondered, what are these people going to say the next time so-called abortion rights get challenged in court? And now we know the answer, because last night, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled on a new abortion law in the State of Texas. That decision came down by the way five to four, that’s the exact split the decided Roe v. Wade almost 50 years ago. So, it’s good enough to have meaning.

This time, the court upheld a Texas law that effectively bans abortion once a fetal heartbeat is detected, typically that’s about six weeks into a pregnancy. Now, this new law does not allow the government of Texas to enforce the ban, so no one is going to jail over abortion; instead, the new law let citizens sue clinics that commit illegal abortions.

So no matter how you feel about abortion, it is kind of hard to argue this is an especially radical law. Intentionally stopping a person’s heart from beating is the definition of killing. Government has a right to regulate that. In fact, deciding when it’s okay to kill a person is on the most basic level the whole reason to have laws in the first place.

So whether it’s right or wrong or whether you like it or not, it’s not a crazy statute. It did, however, drive the media crazy. Here is CBS quote “news” last night.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

NORAH O’DONNELL, CBS NEWS ANCHOR: It is nearly impossible to get an abortion in Texas. The most restrictive abortion law in the country went into effect after the U.S. Supreme Court declined to act on a request to block it.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE (voice over): Abortion providers say Texas has essentially outlawed 85 percent of abortion procedures, which will force many clinics to close.

Amy Hagstrom Miller runs four clinics providing abortion services and is one of the plaintiffs asking the Supreme Court to intervene.

AMY HAGSTROM MILLER, FOUNDER, WHOLE WOMAN’S HEALTH: It is heartbreaking to deny them the care that our staff are fully trained and ready to provide. So really most people are going to be forced to carry a pregnancy against their will.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE (voice over): The law signed by Republican Governor Greg Abbott bans abortion once a so-called fetal heartbeat is detected, usually around six weeks.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

CARLSON: How is an abortion service different from abortion? Why not just call it what it is. But here’s the best line from CBS, “a so-called fetal heartbeat.” Imagine saying something like that out loud.

Once they’ve decided you should die, they won’t even admit you have a heartbeat. Do the very worst people in this country go into journalism or does it just seem that way?

Anyway, you’ll notice that CBS does not make a case for abortion. No. They didn’t tell you why it’s so important to stop fetal hearts from beating. They just asserted that it is.

What they didn’t do is say a single word of how this violates your physical autonomy, about how it’s your body your choice. They can’t say that now. They are for mandating vaccines and masks.

So in that way over at CBS, they are still a little bit smarter than the protesters you’re seeing on your screen right now. These are the people who gathered outside the Texas State Capitol in Austin today. You’ll notice that many of them are holding signs affirming their physical autonomy. You can’t tell them what to do with their bodies. Politicians, hands off my body.

But wait a second, at the very same moment they’re declaring their physical autonomy, they are wearing their little obedience masks and you can bet money all of them are vaccinated. Why? Because they were told to get the shot, so of course they obeyed.

They don’t see the irony here. On the other hand, how could they see it?

So few sane people are left with big platforms in this country that you almost never hear a sensible logical rational argument about anything.

Just hours ago, for example, the ACLU, the American Civil Liberties Union released this statement and we’re quoting, “Far from compromising them, vaccine mandates actually further civil liberties.” You have more civil liberties when they control your body. You can just imagine the 1860s version, far from compromising civil liberties, slavery actually enhances personal freedom.

It’s not even Orwellian at this point, it’s post-Orwell. This is uncharted.

Things are changing so fast that a lot of people on the left are having trouble keeping up with the shifting justifications for the policies they want. Poor Jen Psaki. Never a genius to begin with, unintentionally blew herself up today at the White House press briefing. Watch this.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

QUESTION: Why does the President support abortion when his own Catholic faith teaches abortion is morally wrong?

JEN PSAKI, WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY: Well, he believes that it’s a woman’s right, it’s a woman’s body, and it’s her choice.

QUESTION: Why does the President — who does he believe then should look out for the unborn child?

PSAKI: He believes that it’s up to a woman to make those decisions and up to a woman to make those decisions with her doctor. I know you’ve never faced those choices nor have you ever been pregnant, but for women out there who have faced those choices, this is an incredibly difficult thing.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

CARLSON: Oh, getting the sophomore year Gender Studies lecture from Jen Saki. Here at Wesleyan, Mr. Man, men don’t get to talk about abortion. Have you ever been pregnant before? I don’t think so. You can’t get pregnant because you’re a man. So, abortion is a women’s issue. Shut up.

They’ve been saying that for so long they forgot to update the talking points. You think Jen Psaki when she does this for a living, she should know that men get pregnant now. The science people tell us that every day. Men get pregnant. It’s on the cover of magazines. I think it’s on the cover of “People” Magazine right now, a dude who is pregnant.

Now, what does that mean? It means that abortion is now a men’s issue. Men are child bearers, so men, dudes, have an equal right to choose to terminate their pregnancies and they have a right to weigh in on the policy itself. It’s not a women’s issue anymore, Jen Psaki.

She may get an outrage call from Congresswoman Cori Bush of St. Louis who was on this early. Watch.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

REP. CORI BUSH (D-MO): I sit before you today as a single mom, as a nurse, as an activist, and as a congresswoman and I am committed to doing the absolute most to protect black mothers, to protect black babies, to protect black birthing people.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

CARLSON: See, Cori Bush is on this. Maybe she should be White House Press Secretary. She knows it’s not a woman’s choice, it’s a birthing people choice.

So how is it an attack on women to ban abortion in Texas? That’s a tough one. They are not really sure. So in MSNBC, they’re not even trying to explain, they just want you to know that if you’re for this law in Texas, you’re the Taliban.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

FRANK SCHAEFFER, AUTHOR: And we have a situation in Texas right now tonight where the American Taliban — because that’s what it is. This is not an American evangelical right-wing movement, there is an American Taliban is weirdly similar in so many ways to the Middle Eastern Islamist terrorists.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

CARLSON: You just feel so sorry for these people. America is again changing so fast that like people over 16 who are on TikTok half the day just can’t keep up. There was a time like two weeks ago when the Taliban were bad before they were a critical member of the international community who are talking daily with the Secretary of State the National Security adviser and waiting for their American aid.

The American Taliban? No that’s different. Unfortunately, unlike the Pashtun Taliban, no one in Texas is getting tens of billions in free weapons from Joe Biden. The National Rifle Association is getting Blackhawks or 360,000 AR-15s, so it’s a little different actually to be the American Taliban, but the Taliban is still bad? No, they’re good. We need to update our talking points.

But still, this MSNBC anchor, the most fiery in their lineup wants you to know that if you tell people what to do with their bodies, you’re a bad person unless you’re Tony Fauci, in which case you’re America’s doctor and a hero.

The whole thing she said reminds her of that book she once read, maybe the only book she’s read. Listen.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

JOY REID, MSNBC HOST: By next summer, we could be living in our own version of the Handmaid’s Tale where forced birth is the law in large sections of the country.

You know and Senator Warren, you know people think it’s hyperbolic when I tweet about the Handmaid’s Tale coming to America, but I don’t think it seems hyperbolic now. Does it to you?

SEN. ELIZABETH WARREN (D-MA): No.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

CARLSON: It’s like — it’s like the greatest question ever asked, Elizabeth Warren, does this seem hyperbolic to you? Is there anything you can say to Elizabeth Warren where she might reply, “Well, that seems hyperbolic.” You’re going too far there. Slow down a little bit. Reign in your rhetoric.

But when MSNBC trots out Elizabeth Warren, it doesn’t matter what she says. The point is, she is there. This is a serious moment.

CNN had to top it and they did. They went farther even than MSNBC.

To assess yesterday’s court decision on abortion, CNN found a man with personal experience. That would be Jeffrey Toobin. Now, Toobin is most famous for masturbating on Zoom. That will define his obit, unfortunately.

There may not be room for a much more relevant fact which is Jeffrey Toobin once impregnated a co-worker’s daughter and then pressured her to get an abortion. He knows this topic cold. Now, she refused, but in the process of pushing her to get an abortion unsuccessfully, Jeffrey Toobin learned what a lot of crappy men have learned over the years, which is, this is a great option if you’re a married guy who doesn’t want to pay for more kids with random women.

So Jeffrey Toobin means it when he tells you it’s bad to ban it. Watch.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

JEFFREY TOOBIN, CNN CHIEF LEGAL ANALYST: Today is the first day that a state could legally ban abortion.

And Roe v. Wade essentially does not exist at least in the State of Texas and probably more states to come.

Texas has banned abortion in the state and the Supreme Court has done nothing about it. That is immensely significant, mostly for the women of Texas, 29 million people in total live in Texas.

DON LEMON, CNN ANCHOR: What does that mean for Roe v. Wade? I said it could effectively end Roe v. Wade. Was that an overstatement?

TOOBIN: I don’t think so.

The point of Roe v. Wade is that states cannot ban abortion.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

CARLSON: “It’s immensely significant for the women,” he mansplains. They’ve been telling you that for a long time when the truth is every person who lives here knows abortion is the best deal for the men who impregnate say the daughters of their coworkers because it allows them to skate without having to deal with the consequences.

Abortion makes actual women the ones who until recently were having all the babies before dudes could get pregnant, it makes them feel pretty bad about it. If you ask women, how do you feel about the abortion again? Not many feel that great about it, at all.

People like Jeffrey Toobin feel fine, so it’s his prerogative he is defending, but whatever. There he is lecturing us about Roe v. Wade, the sacred five to four ruling that invented the right to abortion. Out of nothing.

Now, here you have a duly elected state legislature right now in 2021 contradicting the five unelected judges who concocted the right to abortion back in 1973 and Jeffrey Toobin is suggesting that’s an attack on democracy. When elected people contravene the judgment of unelected people who died decades ago, that’s what they’re telling you. These people can’t even hear themselves.

But millions of normal Americans do recognize this moment for what it is. It’s proof that democracy does still exist, voters can decide what they want for their communities, their states, their towns and that courts will at least potentially respect that right. It’s called self-government.

The legislature in Texas has realized this for months now. They’ve passed laws banning vaccine passports, homeless encampments, racist struggle sessions in schools, laws that block protests that prevent emergency vehicles from riding down the road et cetera et cetera. Laws specific to Texas that the people of Texas want and a lot of those laws are still on the books.

So, that’s not a bad thing. How is that a bad thing? Why should Texas have to be exactly like California? The problem is, if that kind of thinking goes national, it gravely disempowers the people at CNN and the so-called civil rights organizations that think they are in control of everything.

On the other hand, it might actually save Civil Rights for the rest of us and that might be a good thing.

Follow Jeff Poor on Twitter @jeff_poor

Senate GOP Gives Victory to Kamala Harris, Her Big Tech Donors with Green Card Giveaway…. WITH KAMALA, JUST FOLLOW HER LONG HISTORY OF BRIBES SUCKING!

https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2020/12/kamala-harris-servant-big-tech.html

 

https://kamala-harris-sociopath.blogspot.com/2020/12/is-kamala-harris-another-closet.html

 

 

(SECOND INVASION ILLEGALS VOTING)

FOR LAWYER KAMALA HARRIS, THE LAWS SIMPLY DO NOT FACTOR INTO ANYTHING. SHE’S IN IT TO MAKE MONEY.

SO IS HER LAWYER HUSBAND!

https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2020/11/lawyer-kamala-harris-as-vice-president.html

9. Why did your office decline to investigate the health supplement fraud cases involving companies your husband’s law firm represented? Did you, as California’s attorney general, ever purposefully decline investigating or prosecuting clients of your husband’s law firm?

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) and her husband, attorney Douglas Emhoff, gave 1.1% of their income to charity in 2019, tax records show.

Harris reported giving $35,390 to charity, while she and her husband earned $3,095,950 in taxable income.

The best-case scenario is that she’s a progressive who repeatedly violated her own principles so that she could promote her career. In the worst-case scenario, she’s just another corrupt, rotten, regressive prosecutor.

                                                           JESSER HOROWITZ