Friday, March 2, 2012

OBAMA - PRESIDENT of the 1% GETS OCCUPIED! AS THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA INFESTE HIS ADMINISTRATION & OCCUPIES OUR WHITE HOUSE!

http://www.thenation.com/article/165157/obama-gets-occupied

NO ONE PERFORMS LIKE BARACK OBAMA!

HE'S STILL DOING HIS STAGED PRODUCTION OF "CHANGE"!


MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com, JUDICIAL WATCH.org & WIKIleaks EXPOSES OBAMA’S AGENDA OF OPEN BORDERS, FUNDING OF LA RAZA SUPREMACY, AND HISPANDERING FOR THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES!

SHOCKING!




 ISN’T OBAMA REALLY JUST A WORSE VERSION BUSH THIRD TERM??

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2012/02/obama-poster-boy-for-his-paymasters.html

“Despite the bitter
recriminations and mudslinging between the parties, what dominates the 2012
elections is the inability of either party to offer any proposals to address
mass unemployment and mounting poverty. They have no differences on the need to
destroy the living standards of working people, wage aggressive war and gut
democratic rights in an attempt to halt the decline of American capitalism and
protect the wealth of the financial elite.”
*
OBAMA’S HISPANICAZATION of AMERICA
– THE NATION HE SEEMS TO HATE!

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/obamas-hispanicazation-of-america-push.html
*
The American “left” and Obama’s
State of the Union address
By Janel Flechsig
7 February 2012
The
response of representatives of left-liberal and pseudo-socialist circles to
Barack Obama’s January 24 State of the Union address confirms their role as
adjuncts of the Democratic Party and supporters of Obama’s reelection campaign.
The
speech itself was as dishonest and cynical as it was reactionary. Billed as a
populist response to the economic crisis, it was nothing of the sort. Rather,
it was an exercise in jingoism, economic nationalism, and election year myth-making.
Its centerpiece was Obama’s blueprint for an “economy built to last,” with the
supposed success of the auto bailout as its model.
What Obama did not mention is
that the revival of US auto industry profits is based entirely on the abolition
of decent wages and benefits for auto workers and the establishment of
poverty-level wages as the benchmark for American manufacturing. His auto task
force imposed a 50 percent pay cut for all newly hired General Motors and
Chrysler workers, along with a no-strike clause and drastic cuts in benefits
for new workers as well as retirees.
(OBAMA HAS
REPEATEDLY REMOVED BORDER GUARDS ON THE NARCOMEX BORDER TO ASSURE HIS LA RAZA
PARTY BASE EASY MOVEMENT BACK AND FORTH OVER
OUR BORDERS. THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS ENDORSE OBAMA’S OPEN &
UNDEFENDED BORDERS AGENDA FOR THAT REASON. IT’S ALL ABOUT KEEPING WAGES
DEPRESSED FOR HIS WALL ST PAYMASTERS. )
This
economic plan was, moreover, presented within the context of a celebration of
American militarism. Obama praised the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan and
the murder of Muamar Gaddafi, as well as extra-judicial drone assassinations in
Africa and the Middle East. He threatened China with economic war, Syria with
diplomatic war and Iran with military attack. He concluded by invoking the Navy
SEAL hit squad that assassinated Osama bin Laden as the apotheosis of American
values and a model for US society as a whole.
David
Corn, former Washington editor of the Nation who now heads the
Washington bureau of Mother Jones magazine, published a full-throated
endorsement of Obama’s speech almost immediately after it was delivered.
Perhaps the most revealing aspect of Corn’s rave review was his enthusiastic
response to Obama’s appalling peroration.
“Obama
did not cite this success [the murder of bin Laden] as a reply to GOP charges
that he's an appeasing wuss,” Corn wrote. “Instead, he used it like a
national-security version of an Amish barn-raising—defining the American story
as one of communal action: We’re not individual actors being bounced around by
market forces; we band together for the greater good. It’s worth a read.”
These
are the words of a man who, whatever connections he may have once had to
anti-war and anti-imperialist sentiments, has joined the camp of American
imperialism body and soul. His transition is not simply that of an individual.
He represents an entire milieu of middle-class ex-radicals and liberals who
have benefited personally and financially from decades of political reaction
and attacks on working class living standards. This affluent social layer has
grown alienated from and hostile to the working class.
This
is fundamentally what underlies Corn’s enthusiasm for Obama and his economic
blueprint. “The 2012 race,” he writes, “is shaping up as a titanic face-off
between a president who advocates using government to bolster the economy and
address inequities and Republicans who have one answer to everything: Smother
government and let the markets run free. In his speech, Obama called for ‘great
projects.’ Republicans call for no projects—that is, nothing outside the
private sector. This is a damn clear contrast.”
Corn’s
claim that there exist huge policy differences between the Democrats and the
Republicans is a rather obvious lie, and he knows it. Despite the bitter recriminations and mudslinging between the parties,
what dominates the 2012 elections is the inability of either party to offer any
proposals to address mass unemployment and mounting poverty. They have no
differences on the need to destroy the living standards of working people, wage
aggressive war and gut democratic rights in an attempt to halt the decline of
American capitalism and protect the wealth of the financial elite.
“Obama,”
Corn continues, “is pitching a patriotic, quasi-populist progressivism (while
conceding the need for deficit reduction and government cost efficiencies).” A
“progressivism” based on austerity and chauvinism—such is the reactionary
program applauded by Corn.
An
editorial posted January 25 on the web site of the International Socialist
Organization (ISO) likewise tail-ends Obama, although in a less overt and crude
manner. Perhaps the most remarkable aspect of this multi-page excavation of the
speech is what it does not talk about. It mentions neither the wage-cutting
that underlies Obama’s economic plan for manufacturing nor the sinister
militarism of the speech.
The
basic outlook is summed up in the first lines of the statement: “Barack Obama
talked tough about Wall Street in his State of the Union speech. But look
behind the rhetoric, and his economic proposals fall short of what’s needed.”
Obama’s
timid and empty swipes at Wall Street—meant to obscure a policy that is
dictated by the banks and corporations—evidently impress the ISO. But his
proposals “fall short.” This formulation is significant. It is not a matter of
a brutal anti-working class offensive, but rather a positive program that just
doesn’t go far enough. This, of course, implies that Obama and the Democrats
can be pushed by applying more pressure from below to go further and carry out
genuinely progressive policies. Here, in a nutshell, is the ISO’s real
perspective of channeling popular opposition behind the Democrats and Obama’s
reelection campaign.
This
is spelled out more explicitly in the following passage:
“To
some extent, the sharper edge in Obama’s speech is another result of the rise
of the Occupy movement and its impact on US politics. Even mainstream
Washington politicians have had to acknowledge the increasingly vocal
discontent about a society divided between the super-rich 1 percent at the top
and the rest of us. This shift has been a breath of fresh air…”
In
other words, the Occupy protests have shifted Obama and the Democrats to the
left, proving the efficacy of a perspective that rejects a break with the two
parties of big business and the development of an independent movement of the
working class fighting for socialism.
As
is frequently the case with this supposedly socialist tendency, the editorial
concludes with a formal injunction not to “place any hopes in the Democrats”
and an assertion of the need to “remain independent of both capitalist
parties.” This, however, is rhetorical window dressing for a political
orientation and practice aimed at promoting illusions in the Democrats and
their allied organizations, beginning with the trade unions.
The
United States is entering a new period of great class struggles. This is,
moreover, an international phenomenon. It is driven by a historic crisis of
American and world capitalism and the increasingly obvious failure of the
profit system. Millions are beginning to recognize that this system and all of
its political parties and representatives have nothing to offer except war,
depression and the destruction of democratic rights. They are looking for an
alternative and moving into struggle.
The
single-minded focus of left-liberals and fake-socialists such as the ISO is to
prevent the emergence of an independent movement of the working class fighting
for a socialist program. They are not opponents of the capitalist status quo,
but rather its left flank of defenders.
About the WSWS Contact Us Privacy Statement Top of page

*

We could cut unemployment in half simply by reclaiming the jobs
taken by illegal workers,” said Representative Lamar Smith of
Texas, co-chairman of the Reclaim American Jobs Caucus. “President Obama is on
the wrong side of the American people on immigration. The president should
support policies that help citizens and legal immigrants find the jobs they
need and deserve rather than fail to enforce immigration laws.”
*
“Obama’s
rejection of any serious jobs program is part of a conscious class war policy.
Two years after the financial crisis and the multi-trillion dollar bailout of
the banks, the administration is spearheading a campaign by corporations to
sharply increase the exploitation of the working class, using the “new normal”
of mass unemployment to force workers to accept lower wages, longer hours, and
more brutal working conditions.” WSWS.ORG
*
“The principal beneficiaries of our current
immigration policy are affluent Americans who hire immigrants at substandard
wages for low-end work. Harvard economist George Borjas estimates that American
workers lose $190 billion annually in depressed wages caused by the constant flooding
of the labor market at the low-wage end.” Christian Science Monitor
*
Michelle Malkin
The U.S. Department of Illegal Alien Labor
President Obama's Labor Secretary Hilda
Solis is supposed to represent American workers. What you need to know is that
this longtime open–borders sympathizer has always had a rather radical
definition of "American." At a Latino voter registration project
conference in Los Angeles many years ago, Solis asserted to thunderous
applause, "We are all Americans, whether you are legalized or not."
That's right. The woman in charge of enforcing our employment laws doesn't
give a hoot about our immigration laws –– or about the fundamental distinction
between those who followed the rules in pursuit of the American dream and those
who didn't.
While in Congress, she opposed strengthening the border fence, supported
expansion of illegal alien benefits (including driver's licenses and in–state
tuition discounts), embraced sanctuary cities that refused to cooperate with
federal homeland security officials to enforce immigration laws, and
aggressively championed a mass amnesty. Solis was steeped in the pro–illegal
alien worker organizing movement in Southern California and was buoyed by
amnesty–supporting Big Labor groups led by the Service Employees International
Union. She has now caused a Capitol Hill firestorm over her new taxpayer–funded
advertising and outreach campaign to illegal aliens regarding fair wages:
"I'm here to tell you that your president, your secretary of labor and this
department will not allow anyone to be denied his or her rightful pay ––
especially when so many in our nation are working long, hard and often
dangerous hours," Solis says in the video pitch. "We can help, and we
will help. If you work in this country, you are protected by our laws. And you
can count on the U.S. Department of Labor to see to it that those protections
work for you."
To be sure, no one should be scammed out of "fair wages." Employers
that hire and exploit illegal immigrant workers deserve full sanctions and
punishment. But it's the timing, tone–deafness and underlying blanket amnesty
agenda of Solis' illegal alien outreach that has so many American workers and
their representatives on Capitol Hill rightly upset.
With double–digit unemployment and a growing nationwide revolt over
Washington's border security failures, why has Solis chosen now to hire 250 new
government field investigators to bolster her illegal alien workers' rights
campaign? (Hint: Leftists unhappy with Obama's lack of progress on
"comprehensive immigration reform" need appeasing. This is a quick
bone to distract them.)
Unfortunately, the federal government is not alone in lavishing attention and
resources on workers who shouldn't be here in the first place. As of 2008, California,
Florida, Nevada, New York, Texas and Utah all expressly included illegal aliens
in their state workers' compensation plans –– and more than a dozen other
states implicitly cover them.
Solis' public service announcement comes
on the heels of little–noticed but far more troubling comments encouraging
illegal alien workers in the Gulf Coast. Earlier this month, in the aftermath
of the BP oil spill, according to Spanish language publication El Diario La
Prensa, Solis signaled that her department was going out of its way to shield
illegal immigrant laborers involved in cleanup efforts. "My purpose is to
assist the workers with respect to safety and protection," she said.
"We're protecting all workers regardless of migration status because
that's the federal law." She told reporters that her department was in
talks with local Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials who had
visited coastal worksites to try to verify that workers were legal.
No word yet on whether she gave ICE her "we are all Americans,
whether you are legalized or not" lecture. But it's a safe bet.
*
MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com
*
FAIRUS.org
The
Administration's Phantom Immigration Enforcement Policy
According
to DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s borders (Southwestern or
otherwise) are secure, and gaining control is not even a goal of the
department.
By
Ira Mehlman
Published on 12/07/2009
Townhall.com
The
setting was not quite the flight deck of the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln with a
“Mission Accomplished” banner as the backdrop, but it was the next best thing.
Speaking at the Center for American Progress (CAP) on Nov. 13, Homeland
Security Secretary Janet Napolitano declared victory over illegal immigration
and announced that the Obama administration is ready to move forward with a
mass amnesty for the millions of illegal aliens already living in the United
States.
Arguing
the Obama administration’s case for amnesty, Napolitano laid out what she
described as the “three-legged stool” for immigration reform. As the
administration views it, immigration reform must include “a commitment to
serious and effective enforcement, improved legal flows for families and
workers, and a firm but fair way to deal with those who are already here.”
Acknowledging
that a lack of confidence in the government’s ability and commitment to
effectively enforce the immigration laws it passes proved to be the Waterloo of
previous efforts to gain amnesty for illegal aliens, Napolitano was quick to
reassure the American public that those concerns could be put to rest.
“For
starters, the security of the Southwest border has been transformed from where
it was in 2007,” stated the secretary. Not only is the border locked up tight,
she continued, but the situation is well in-hand in the interior of the country
as well. “We’ve also shown that the government is serious and strategic in its
approach to enforcement by making changes in how we enforce the law in the
interior of the country and at worksites…Furthermore, we’ve transformed
worksite enforcement to truly address the demand side of illegal immigration.”
If
Rep. Joe Wilson had been in attendance to hear Secretary Napolitano’s CAP
speech he might well have had a few choice comments to offer. But since he
wasn’t, we will have to rely on the Department of Homeland Security’s own data
to assess the veracity of Napolitano’s claims.
According
to DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s borders (Southwestern or
otherwise) are secure, and gaining control is not even a goal of the
department. DHS claims to have “effective control” over just 894 miles of
border. That’s 894 out of 8,607 miles they are charged with protecting. As for
the other 7,713 miles? DHS’s stated border security goal for FY 2010 is the
same 894 miles.
The
administration’s strategic approach to interior and worksite enforcement is
just as chimerical as its strategy at the border, unless one considers
shuffling paper to be a strategy. DHS data, released November 18, show that
administrative arrests of immigration law violators fell by 68 percent between
2008 and 2009. The department also carried out 60 percent fewer arrests for
criminal violations of immigration laws, 58 percent fewer criminal indictments,
and won 63 percent fewer convictions.
While
the official unemployment rate has climbed from 7.6 percent when President
Obama took office in January to 10 percent today, the administration’s worksite
enforcement strategy has amounted to a bureaucratic game of musical chairs. The
administration has all but ended worksite enforcement actions and replaced them
with paperwork audits. When the audits determine that illegal aliens are on the
payroll, employers are given the opportunity to fire them with little or no
adverse consequence to the company, while no action is taken to remove the
illegal workers from the country. The illegal workers simply acquire a new set
of fraudulent documents and move on to the next employer seeking workers
willing to accept substandard wages.
In
Janet Napolitano’s alternative reality a mere 10 percent of our borders under
“effective control” and sharp declines in arrests and prosecutions of
immigration lawbreakers may be construed as confidence builders, but it is hard
to imagine that the American public is going to see it that way. If anything,
the administration’s record has left the public less confident that promises of
future immigration enforcement would be worth the government paper they’re
printed on.
As
Americans scrutinize the administration’s plans to overhaul immigration policy,
they are likely to find little in the “three-legged stool” being offered that
they like or trust. The first leg – enforcement – the administration has all
but sawed off. The second – increased admissions of extended family members and
workers – makes little sense with some 25 million Americans either unemployed
or relegated to part-time work. And the third – amnesty for millions of illegal
aliens – is anathema to their sense of justice and fair play.
As
Americans well know, declaring “Mission Accomplished” and actually
accomplishing a mission are two completely different things. When it comes to
enforcing immigration laws, the only message the public is receiving from this
administration is “Mission Aborted.”

*
IS OBAMA REALLY THINKING OF “ECONOMIC IMPERATIVES”? OR THE
ILLEGALS’ VOTES? WHAT DOES IT SAY ABOUT A PRESIDENT THAT HISPANDERS FOR ILLEGAL
VOTES? THE ARE SIMPLY JOKES?

In a speech at the Chamizal National Memorial, Obama also
sought to link the challenge of illegal immigration with another major
political concern: economic anxiety. He said immigration reform "is an
economic imperative."… “ECONOMIC IMPERATIVE” FOR WHOM? LET’S LOOK AT THE
FACTS WE WILL NEVER HEAR FROM OBAMA: WE ARE MEXICO’S WELFARE, FREE BIRTHING,
FREE EMERGENCY ROOM HEALTHCARE, JOBS AND JAILS PROGRAMS. THIS IS AN ECONOMIC
IMPERATIVE FOR MEXICO, BECAUSE THAT NATION HAS MORE BILLIONAIRES THAN SAUDIS
ARABIA! THE RICHEST MAN IN THE WORLD IS NO LONGER BILL GATES, IT IS MEXICAN
CARLOS SLIM.
ALSO DEMANDING OBAMA’S NON-ENFORCEMENT AND BIT BY BIT
AMNESTY IS THE U.S. CHAMBER of COMMERCE, THE FASCIST FRONT FOR BIG BUSINESS
THAT DEMANDS WAGES BE DEPRESSED. MOST OF THE FORTUNE 500 ARE GENEROUS DONORS TO
THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA! IN FACT YOU ARE A DONOR TOO! OBAMA HANDS
OVER A FORTUNE TO THIS MEXICAN SUPREMACIST ORGANIZATION BENT ON OPEN BORDERS
AND PUSH 2 FOR ENGLISH!
*
"One way to strengthen the middle class in America is
to reform the immigration system so that there's no longer a massive underground
economy that exploits a cheap source of labor while depressing wages for
everybody else," he said……OBAMA COULD EASILY END THE EXPLOITATION OF
ILLEGALS, AND ALSO PUT JOBS BACK IN THE HANDS OF AMERICAN SIMPLY BY ENFORCING
THE LAWS! INSTEAD HE’S HABITUALLY SABOTAGED E-VERIFY AND RELEASE THOUSANDS
OF ILLEGALS RATHER THAN DEPORTING THEM.
HIS ADMINISTRATION IS INFESTED WITH LA RAZA PARTY MEMBERS!
*
But he said that illegal immigration requires a
"comprehensive" solution that would also provide a path to legal
status for the 11 million people living illegally in the United States. He also
made another pitch for the Dream Act, which failed in the lame-duck session of
Congress in December.
EVEN IF NO AMNESTY IS IN THE FUTURE, OBAMA WILL CONTINUE TO
KEEP BORDERS OPEN AND UNDEFENDED, AS MEXICO DEMANDS, AND CONTINUE TO CATCH AND
RELEASE ILLEGALS, CUT FUNDS FOR BORDER SECURITY, REFUSE TO ENFORCE LAWS, FILL
HIS ADMINISTRATION WITH LA RAZA SUPREMACIST LIKE THE OBAMA SEC. OF LABOR, HILDA
SOLIS, AND HISPANDER FOR THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES EVERY WHERE HE GOES. ARE YOU
GETTING THE PICTURE THAT OBAMA DOESN’T DO MUCH OF ANYTHING FOR THE AMERICAN
PEOPLE? IT’S ALL ABOUT HIS CRIMINAL BANKSTER DONORS, AND LA RAZA!!!
OH, AND FAR AS ECONOMIC IMPERATIVE, CALIFORNIA ALONE PUTS OUT $20
BILLION PER YEAR IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS. LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUTS OUT
$600 MILLION TO ILLEGALS ON WELFARE… RIGHT OUT OF YOUR PROPERTY TAXES. DO THE
MATH!

latimes.com
At southern border, Obama calls
immigration reform an 'economic imperative'
By
Peter Nicholas and Michael A. Memoli, Washington Bureau
12:59
PM PDT, May 10, 2011
Reporting
from El Paso and Washington






President
Obama visited the southern border Tuesday to push for an overhaul of the
immigration system, part of a renewed effort to shore up his standing among
Latinos and paint Republicans as hostile to a minority group that is a growing
force in U.S. politics.
In a speech at the Chamizal National Memorial, Obama also sought to link the
challenge of illegal immigration with another major political concern: economic
anxiety. He said immigration reform "is an economic imperative."
"One way to strengthen the middle class in America is to reform the
immigration system so that there's no longer a massive underground economy that
exploits a cheap source of labor while depressing wages for everybody
else," he said.
The chances of passing an immigration bill are low, but the White House is
taking high-visibility steps to show it is not abandoning a goal that has its
roots in the 2008 campaign.
In his appearance, Obama said his administration has made great strides in
stopping immigrants from illegally crossing the southern border, even as
Republican critics say he can do more.
"We have strengthened border security beyond what many believed was
possible," he said.
But he said that illegal immigration requires a "comprehensive"
solution that would also provide a path to legal status for the 11 million
people living illegally in the United States. He also made another pitch for
the Dream Act, which failed in the lame-duck session of Congress in December.
The speech comes after a series of meetings between the president and various
stakeholders and reform activists in the past months. It was heavily promoted
by the White House on a range of social media platforms, and Obama made a
campaign-like pitch for the crowd to visit the White House website to sign up
in support of his call for reform.
With Obama actively running for reelection, Republicans have questioned the
sincerity and timing of his immigration push. House Speaker John A.
Boehner's office said it hasn't even heard from the White House on the issue,
evidence that immigration is not a serious legislative priority.
White House aides have not released a timetable for passing a bill, nor have
they put forward a draft that could be the basis for congressional action.
Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said in
a statement: "It seems President Obama has once again put on his
campaigner-in-chief hat. The president's push to legalize millions of illegal
immigrants is purely political. The president wasn't able to pass his version
of immigration reform when he had large Democratic majorities in the House and
Senate because of bipartisan opposition."
Following the speech, Obama was to travel to Austin for a pair of fundraisers
for his 2012 reelection campaign.

OBAMA: President For the 1% - Why the Media Love the Violence of Protesters and Not of Banks | The Nation

Why the Media Love the Violence of Protesters and Not of Banks The Nation

NO PRESIDENT IN HISTORY HAS TAKEN MORE LOOT FROM HIS CRIMINAL BANKSTER  DONORS THAN BARACK OBAMA!

PROFITS FOR THESE NO-STRINGS BAILED OUT CRIMINALS HAVE SOARED UNDER OBAMA. IN FACT, PROFITS ARE GREATER FOR BANKS DURING OBAMA'S FIRST TWO YEARS THAN ALL 8 UNDER BUSH!

THERE IS A REASON WHY THE BANKSTER HAVE INVESTED IN HIM AGAIN!

HE'S PROMISED THEM NO PRISON TIME!

"I'm not here to punish the banks!" BARACK OBAMA, State of the Union Message - FLOOR of the SENATE, IN THE FACES OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!


ISN’T OBAMA REALLY JUST A WORSE VERSION BUSH THIRD TERM??






“Despite the bitter recriminations and mudslinging between the parties, what dominates the 2012 elections is the inability of either party to offer any proposals to address mass unemployment and mounting poverty. They have no differences on the need to destroy the living standards of working people, wage aggressive war and gut democratic rights in an attempt to halt the decline of American capitalism and protect the wealth of the financial elite.”

*

OBAMA’S HISPANICAZATION of AMERICA – THE NATION HE SEEMS TO HATE!




*

The American “left” and Obama’s State of the Union address

By Janel Flechsig
7 February 2012

The response of representatives of left-liberal and pseudo-socialist circles to Barack Obama’s January 24 State of the Union address confirms their role as adjuncts of the Democratic Party and supporters of Obama’s reelection campaign.

The speech itself was as dishonest and cynical as it was reactionary. Billed as a populist response to the economic crisis, it was nothing of the sort. Rather, it was an exercise in jingoism, economic nationalism, and election year myth-making. Its centerpiece was Obama’s blueprint for an “economy built to last,” with the supposed success of the auto bailout as its model.

What Obama did not mention is that the revival of US auto industry profits is based entirely on the abolition of decent wages and benefits for auto workers and the establishment of poverty-level wages as the benchmark for American manufacturing. His auto task force imposed a 50 percent pay cut for all newly hired General Motors and Chrysler workers, along with a no-strike clause and drastic cuts in benefits for new workers as well as retirees.

(OBAMA HAS REPEATEDLY REMOVED BORDER GUARDS ON THE NARCOMEX BORDER TO ASSURE HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE EASY MOVEMENT BACK AND FORTH OVER  OUR BORDERS. THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS ENDORSE OBAMA’S OPEN & UNDEFENDED BORDERS AGENDA FOR THAT REASON. IT’S ALL ABOUT KEEPING WAGES DEPRESSED FOR HIS WALL ST PAYMASTERS. )

This economic plan was, moreover, presented within the context of a celebration of American militarism. Obama praised the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan and the murder of Muamar Gaddafi, as well as extra-judicial drone assassinations in Africa and the Middle East. He threatened China with economic war, Syria with diplomatic war and Iran with military attack. He concluded by invoking the Navy SEAL hit squad that assassinated Osama bin Laden as the apotheosis of American values and a model for US society as a whole.

David Corn, former Washington editor of the Nation who now heads the Washington bureau of Mother Jones magazine, published a full-throated endorsement of Obama’s speech almost immediately after it was delivered. Perhaps the most revealing aspect of Corn’s rave review was his enthusiastic response to Obama’s appalling peroration.

“Obama did not cite this success [the murder of bin Laden] as a reply to GOP charges that he's an appeasing wuss,” Corn wrote. “Instead, he used it like a national-security version of an Amish barn-raising—defining the American story as one of communal action: We’re not individual actors being bounced around by market forces; we band together for the greater good. It’s worth a read.”

These are the words of a man who, whatever connections he may have once had to anti-war and anti-imperialist sentiments, has joined the camp of American imperialism body and soul. His transition is not simply that of an individual. He represents an entire milieu of middle-class ex-radicals and liberals who have benefited personally and financially from decades of political reaction and attacks on working class living standards. This affluent social layer has grown alienated from and hostile to the working class.

This is fundamentally what underlies Corn’s enthusiasm for Obama and his economic blueprint. “The 2012 race,” he writes, “is shaping up as a titanic face-off between a president who advocates using government to bolster the economy and address inequities and Republicans who have one answer to everything: Smother government and let the markets run free. In his speech, Obama called for ‘great projects.’ Republicans call for no projects—that is, nothing outside the private sector. This is a damn clear contrast.”

Corn’s claim that there exist huge policy differences between the Democrats and the Republicans is a rather obvious lie, and he knows it. Despite the bitter recriminations and mudslinging between the parties, what dominates the 2012 elections is the inability of either party to offer any proposals to address mass unemployment and mounting poverty. They have no differences on the need to destroy the living standards of working people, wage aggressive war and gut democratic rights in an attempt to halt the decline of American capitalism and protect the wealth of the financial elite.

“Obama,” Corn continues, “is pitching a patriotic, quasi-populist progressivism (while conceding the need for deficit reduction and government cost efficiencies).” A “progressivism” based on austerity and chauvinism—such is the reactionary program applauded by Corn.

An editorial posted January 25 on the web site of the International Socialist Organization (ISO) likewise tail-ends Obama, although in a less overt and crude manner. Perhaps the most remarkable aspect of this multi-page excavation of the speech is what it does not talk about. It mentions neither the wage-cutting that underlies Obama’s economic plan for manufacturing nor the sinister militarism of the speech.

The basic outlook is summed up in the first lines of the statement: “Barack Obama talked tough about Wall Street in his State of the Union speech. But look behind the rhetoric, and his economic proposals fall short of what’s needed.”

Obama’s timid and empty swipes at Wall Street—meant to obscure a policy that is dictated by the banks and corporations—evidently impress the ISO. But his proposals “fall short.” This formulation is significant. It is not a matter of a brutal anti-working class offensive, but rather a positive program that just doesn’t go far enough. This, of course, implies that Obama and the Democrats can be pushed by applying more pressure from below to go further and carry out genuinely progressive policies. Here, in a nutshell, is the ISO’s real perspective of channeling popular opposition behind the Democrats and Obama’s reelection campaign.

This is spelled out more explicitly in the following passage:

“To some extent, the sharper edge in Obama’s speech is another result of the rise of the Occupy movement and its impact on US politics. Even mainstream Washington politicians have had to acknowledge the increasingly vocal discontent about a society divided between the super-rich 1 percent at the top and the rest of us. This shift has been a breath of fresh air…”

In other words, the Occupy protests have shifted Obama and the Democrats to the left, proving the efficacy of a perspective that rejects a break with the two parties of big business and the development of an independent movement of the working class fighting for socialism.

As is frequently the case with this supposedly socialist tendency, the editorial concludes with a formal injunction not to “place any hopes in the Democrats” and an assertion of the need to “remain independent of both capitalist parties.” This, however, is rhetorical window dressing for a political orientation and practice aimed at promoting illusions in the Democrats and their allied organizations, beginning with the trade unions.

The United States is entering a new period of great class struggles. This is, moreover, an international phenomenon. It is driven by a historic crisis of American and world capitalism and the increasingly obvious failure of the profit system. Millions are beginning to recognize that this system and all of its political parties and representatives have nothing to offer except war, depression and the destruction of democratic rights. They are looking for an alternative and moving into struggle.

The single-minded focus of left-liberals and fake-socialists such as the ISO is to prevent the emergence of an independent movement of the working class fighting for a socialist program. They are not opponents of the capitalist status quo, but rather its left flank of defenders.




*



We could cut unemployment in half simply by reclaiming the jobs taken by illegal workers,” said Representative Lamar Smith of Texas, co-chairman of the Reclaim American Jobs Caucus. “President Obama is on the wrong side of the American people on immigration. The president should support policies that help citizens and legal immigrants find the jobs they need and deserve rather than fail to enforce immigration laws.”

*

“Obama’s rejection of any serious jobs program is part of a conscious class war policy. Two years after the financial crisis and the multi-trillion dollar bailout of the banks, the administration is spearheading a campaign by corporations to sharply increase the exploitation of the working class, using the “new normal” of mass unemployment to force workers to accept lower wages, longer hours, and more brutal working conditions.” WSWS.ORG

*

 “The principal beneficiaries of our current immigration policy are affluent Americans who hire immigrants at substandard wages for low-end work. Harvard economist George Borjas estimates that American workers lose $190 billion annually in depressed wages caused by the constant flooding of the labor market at the low-wage end.” Christian Science Monitor

*

Michelle Malkin
The U.S. Department of Illegal Alien Labor


President Obama's Labor Secretary Hilda Solis is supposed to represent American workers. What you need to know is that this longtime open–borders sympathizer has always had a rather radical definition of "American." At a Latino voter registration project conference in Los Angeles many years ago, Solis asserted to thunderous applause, "We are all Americans, whether you are legalized or not."
That's right. The woman in charge of enforcing our employment laws doesn't give a hoot about our immigration laws –– or about the fundamental distinction between those who followed the rules in pursuit of the American dream and those who didn't.
While in Congress, she opposed strengthening the border fence, supported expansion of illegal alien benefits (including driver's licenses and in–state tuition discounts), embraced sanctuary cities that refused to cooperate with federal homeland security officials to enforce immigration laws, and aggressively championed a mass amnesty. Solis was steeped in the pro–illegal alien worker organizing movement in Southern California and was buoyed by amnesty–supporting Big Labor groups led by the Service Employees International Union. She has now caused a Capitol Hill firestorm over her new taxpayer–funded advertising and outreach campaign to illegal aliens regarding fair wages:
"I'm here to tell you that your president, your secretary of labor and this department will not allow anyone to be denied his or her rightful pay –– especially when so many in our nation are working long, hard and often dangerous hours," Solis says in the video pitch. "We can help, and we will help. If you work in this country, you are protected by our laws. And you can count on the U.S. Department of Labor to see to it that those protections work for you."
To be sure, no one should be scammed out of "fair wages." Employers that hire and exploit illegal immigrant workers deserve full sanctions and punishment. But it's the timing, tone–deafness and underlying blanket amnesty agenda of Solis' illegal alien outreach that has so many American workers and their representatives on Capitol Hill rightly upset.

With double–digit unemployment and a growing nationwide revolt over Washington's border security failures, why has Solis chosen now to hire 250 new government field investigators to bolster her illegal alien workers' rights campaign? (Hint: Leftists unhappy with Obama's lack of progress on "comprehensive immigration reform" need appeasing. This is a quick bone to distract them.)
Unfortunately, the federal government is not alone in lavishing attention and resources on workers who shouldn't be here in the first place. As of 2008, California, Florida, Nevada, New York, Texas and Utah all expressly included illegal aliens in their state workers' compensation plans –– and more than a dozen other states implicitly cover them.


Solis' public service announcement comes on the heels of little–noticed but far more troubling comments encouraging illegal alien workers in the Gulf Coast. Earlier this month, in the aftermath of the BP oil spill, according to Spanish language publication El Diario La Prensa, Solis signaled that her department was going out of its way to shield illegal immigrant laborers involved in cleanup efforts. "My purpose is to assist the workers with respect to safety and protection," she said. "We're protecting all workers regardless of migration status because that's the federal law." She told reporters that her department was in talks with local Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials who had visited coastal worksites to try to verify that workers were legal.
No word yet on whether she gave ICE her "we are all Americans, whether you are legalized or not" lecture. But it's a safe bet.
*
MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com

*

FAIRUS.org

The Administration's Phantom Immigration Enforcement Policy

According to DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s borders (Southwestern or otherwise) are secure, and gaining control is not even a goal of the department.

By Ira Mehlman
Published on 12/07/2009
Townhall.com

The setting was not quite the flight deck of the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln with a “Mission Accomplished” banner as the backdrop, but it was the next best thing. Speaking at the Center for American Progress (CAP) on Nov. 13, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano declared victory over illegal immigration and announced that the Obama administration is ready to move forward with a mass amnesty for the millions of illegal aliens already living in the United States.

Arguing the Obama administration’s case for amnesty, Napolitano laid out what she described as the “three-legged stool” for immigration reform. As the administration views it, immigration reform must include “a commitment to serious and effective enforcement, improved legal flows for families and workers, and a firm but fair way to deal with those who are already here.”

Acknowledging that a lack of confidence in the government’s ability and commitment to effectively enforce the immigration laws it passes proved to be the Waterloo of previous efforts to gain amnesty for illegal aliens, Napolitano was quick to reassure the American public that those concerns could be put to rest.

“For starters, the security of the Southwest border has been transformed from where it was in 2007,” stated the secretary. Not only is the border locked up tight, she continued, but the situation is well in-hand in the interior of the country as well. “We’ve also shown that the government is serious and strategic in its approach to enforcement by making changes in how we enforce the law in the interior of the country and at worksites…Furthermore, we’ve transformed worksite enforcement to truly address the demand side of illegal immigration.”

If Rep. Joe Wilson had been in attendance to hear Secretary Napolitano’s CAP speech he might well have had a few choice comments to offer. But since he wasn’t, we will have to rely on the Department of Homeland Security’s own data to assess the veracity of Napolitano’s claims.

According to DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s borders (Southwestern or otherwise) are secure, and gaining control is not even a goal of the department. DHS claims to have “effective control” over just 894 miles of border. That’s 894 out of 8,607 miles they are charged with protecting. As for the other 7,713 miles? DHS’s stated border security goal for FY 2010 is the same 894 miles.

The administration’s strategic approach to interior and worksite enforcement is just as chimerical as its strategy at the border, unless one considers shuffling paper to be a strategy. DHS data, released November 18, show that administrative arrests of immigration law violators fell by 68 percent between 2008 and 2009. The department also carried out 60 percent fewer arrests for criminal violations of immigration laws, 58 percent fewer criminal indictments, and won 63 percent fewer convictions.

While the official unemployment rate has climbed from 7.6 percent when President Obama took office in January to 10 percent today, the administration’s worksite enforcement strategy has amounted to a bureaucratic game of musical chairs. The administration has all but ended worksite enforcement actions and replaced them with paperwork audits. When the audits determine that illegal aliens are on the payroll, employers are given the opportunity to fire them with little or no adverse consequence to the company, while no action is taken to remove the illegal workers from the country. The illegal workers simply acquire a new set of fraudulent documents and move on to the next employer seeking workers willing to accept substandard wages.

In Janet Napolitano’s alternative reality a mere 10 percent of our borders under “effective control” and sharp declines in arrests and prosecutions of immigration lawbreakers may be construed as confidence builders, but it is hard to imagine that the American public is going to see it that way. If anything, the administration’s record has left the public less confident that promises of future immigration enforcement would be worth the government paper they’re printed on.

As Americans scrutinize the administration’s plans to overhaul immigration policy, they are likely to find little in the “three-legged stool” being offered that they like or trust. The first leg – enforcement – the administration has all but sawed off. The second – increased admissions of extended family members and workers – makes little sense with some 25 million Americans either unemployed or relegated to part-time work. And the third – amnesty for millions of illegal aliens – is anathema to their sense of justice and fair play.

As Americans well know, declaring “Mission Accomplished” and actually accomplishing a mission are two completely different things. When it comes to enforcing immigration laws, the only message the public is receiving from this administration is “Mission Aborted.”



*

IS OBAMA REALLY THINKING OF “ECONOMIC IMPERATIVES”? OR THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES? WHAT DOES IT SAY ABOUT A PRESIDENT THAT HISPANDERS FOR ILLEGAL VOTES? THE ARE SIMPLY JOKES?



In a speech at the Chamizal National Memorial, Obama also sought to link the challenge of illegal immigration with another major political concern: economic anxiety. He said immigration reform "is an economic imperative."… “ECONOMIC IMPERATIVE” FOR WHOM? LET’S LOOK AT THE FACTS WE WILL NEVER HEAR FROM OBAMA: WE ARE MEXICO’S WELFARE, FREE BIRTHING, FREE EMERGENCY ROOM HEALTHCARE, JOBS AND JAILS PROGRAMS. THIS IS AN ECONOMIC IMPERATIVE FOR MEXICO, BECAUSE THAT NATION HAS MORE BILLIONAIRES THAN SAUDIS ARABIA! THE RICHEST MAN IN THE WORLD IS NO LONGER BILL GATES, IT IS MEXICAN CARLOS SLIM.

ALSO DEMANDING OBAMA’S NON-ENFORCEMENT AND BIT BY BIT AMNESTY IS THE U.S. CHAMBER of COMMERCE, THE FASCIST FRONT FOR BIG BUSINESS THAT DEMANDS WAGES BE DEPRESSED. MOST OF THE FORTUNE 500 ARE GENEROUS DONORS TO THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA! IN FACT YOU ARE A DONOR TOO! OBAMA HANDS OVER A FORTUNE TO THIS MEXICAN SUPREMACIST ORGANIZATION BENT ON OPEN BORDERS AND PUSH 2 FOR ENGLISH!

*

"One way to strengthen the middle class in America is to reform the immigration system so that there's no longer a massive underground economy that exploits a cheap source of labor while depressing wages for everybody else," he said……OBAMA COULD EASILY END THE EXPLOITATION OF ILLEGALS, AND ALSO PUT JOBS BACK IN THE HANDS OF AMERICAN SIMPLY BY ENFORCING THE LAWS! INSTEAD HE’S HABITUALLY SABOTAGED E-VERIFY AND RELEASE THOUSANDS OF  ILLEGALS RATHER THAN DEPORTING THEM. HIS ADMINISTRATION IS INFESTED WITH LA RAZA PARTY MEMBERS!
*

But he said that illegal immigration requires a "comprehensive" solution that would also provide a path to legal status for the 11 million people living illegally in the United States. He also made another pitch for the Dream Act, which failed in the lame-duck session of Congress in December.

EVEN IF NO AMNESTY IS IN THE FUTURE, OBAMA WILL CONTINUE TO KEEP BORDERS OPEN AND UNDEFENDED, AS MEXICO DEMANDS, AND CONTINUE TO CATCH AND RELEASE ILLEGALS, CUT FUNDS FOR BORDER SECURITY, REFUSE TO ENFORCE LAWS, FILL HIS ADMINISTRATION WITH LA RAZA SUPREMACIST LIKE THE OBAMA SEC. OF LABOR, HILDA SOLIS, AND HISPANDER FOR THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES EVERY WHERE HE GOES. ARE YOU GETTING THE PICTURE THAT OBAMA DOESN’T DO MUCH OF ANYTHING FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE? IT’S ALL ABOUT HIS CRIMINAL BANKSTER DONORS, AND LA RAZA!!!
OH, AND FAR AS ECONOMIC IMPERATIVE, CALIFORNIA ALONE PUTS OUT $20 BILLION PER YEAR IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS. LOS ANGELES COUNTY PUTS OUT $600 MILLION TO ILLEGALS ON WELFARE… RIGHT OUT OF YOUR PROPERTY TAXES. DO THE MATH!



latimes.com

At southern border, Obama calls immigration reform an 'economic imperative'

By Peter Nicholas and Michael A. Memoli, Washington Bureau

12:59 PM PDT, May 10, 2011

Reporting from El Paso and Washington


President Obama visited the southern border Tuesday to push for an overhaul of the immigration system, part of a renewed effort to shore up his standing among Latinos and paint Republicans as hostile to a minority group that is a growing force in U.S. politics.

In a speech at the Chamizal National Memorial, Obama also sought to link the challenge of illegal immigration with another major political concern: economic anxiety. He said immigration reform "is an economic imperative."

"One way to strengthen the middle class in America is to reform the immigration system so that there's no longer a massive underground economy that exploits a cheap source of labor while depressing wages for everybody else," he said.

The chances of passing an immigration bill are low, but the White House is taking high-visibility steps to show it is not abandoning a goal that has its roots in the 2008 campaign.

In his appearance, Obama said his administration has made great strides in stopping immigrants from illegally crossing the southern border, even as Republican critics say he can do more.

"We have strengthened border security beyond what many believed was possible," he said.

But he said that illegal immigration requires a "comprehensive" solution that would also provide a path to legal status for the 11 million people living illegally in the United States. He also made another pitch for the Dream Act, which failed in the lame-duck session of Congress in December.

The speech comes after a series of meetings between the president and various stakeholders and reform activists in the past months. It was heavily promoted by the White House on a range of social media platforms, and Obama made a campaign-like pitch for the crowd to visit the White House website to sign up in support of his call for reform.

With Obama actively running for reelection, Republicans have questioned the sincerity and timing of his immigration push.  House Speaker John A. Boehner's office said it hasn't even heard from the White House on the issue, evidence that immigration is not a serious legislative priority.

White House aides have not released a timetable for passing a bill, nor have they put forward a draft that could be the basis for congressional action.

Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said in a statement: "It seems President Obama has once again put on his campaigner-in-chief hat. The president's push to legalize millions of illegal immigrants is purely political. The president wasn't able to pass his version of immigration reform when he had large Democratic majorities in the House and Senate because of bipartisan opposition."

Following the speech, Obama was to travel to Austin for a pair of fundraisers for his 2012 reelection campaign.




ALIPAC Fights Back LA RAZA SUPREMACY In Indiana

IS IT TIME WE STOPPED BEING MEXICO'S GRINGO-PAID WELFARE, "FREE" OBAMAcare, "FREE" EMERGENCY ROOM CARE, "FREE" ANCHOR BABY BIRTHING = 18 YEARS OF WEFLARE, "FREE" EDUCATION SYSTEMS....?

OH, TIRED OF PAYING TAXES TO KEEP MEXICAN CRIMINALS LOCKED UP WHO SHOULDN'T HAVE BEEN IN OUR OPEN & UNFENDED BORDERS ANYWAY?


THE U.S. CHAMBER of COMMERNCE FRONT FOR WALL ST BIG BUSINESS WHICH WANTS WAGES DEPRESSED WITH ENDLESS HORDES OF ILLEGALS!

THE CHAMBER DEMANDS OBAMA'S NO E-VERIFY, OPEN BORDERS, AMNESTY OR CONTINUED NON-ENFORCEMENT... AND THE REAL COST OF ALL THIS "CHEAP" MEX LABOR TO BE TRANSFERRED TO LEGALS IN THE FORM OF.. (REREAD THE ABOVE)!



Friends of ALIPAC,

We need to warn all Americans in all states that the illegal immigration invasion supporters know they cannot win a fair fight in the state legislatures. Our experiences and victory in Indiana prove they are turning to stealth tactics.

Last year Indiana prohibited illegal aliens from receiving in-state tuition after it was discovered that 300 American students were not going to college because illegal aliens were receiving that taxpayer subsidy to be in limited college seats!

In order to try and protect the stolen classroom seats for illegal aliens, which was happening without public or lawmaker awareness, Indiana State Senator Jean Leising conspired with Angela Smith Jones, a lobbyist for the Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce, and officials at Indiana University to sneak in-state tuition for illegals into law this week!

We narrowly dodged a political bullet and stopped Indiana from joining the official list of states that encourage illegal immigration by forcing taxpayers to pay for most of the cost of college for illegal aliens, this thanks to the alert efforts of Indiana Federation for Immigration Reform and Enforcement (IFIRE) and Citizens for Immigration Law Enforcement.

These two state groups detected the stealth plan, then alerted us and our legendary ALIPAC activists swung into action with only a few hours left. Since we have worked with IFIRE before, we skipped all of the usual verification steps and spring into action.

Citing your calls and lobbying efforts, the Chicago Tribune and Associated Press along with Indiana Senator Yoder agree we killed HB 1326 and thus stopped in-state tuition for illegal aliens!

Article
Fight over in-state tuition for illegal immigrants derails billhttp://www.alipac.us/content/alipac-...ails-bill-217/

Hopefully, this will lead to 300 college seats in Indiana being returned to the innocent American students who have been displaced, replaced, and deprived of college seats and victimized by these invasion supporters.

This is great news considering that our team also defeated in-state tuition for illegals in Florida this past week as well!

The ballot initiative we are supporting in Maryland will prove a devastating blow to our opponents if we win there this November which we can accomplish with your support.

We ask that these state level groups and our ALIPAC supporters on the ground work to throw Jean Leising and everyone voting for the addition of that amendment out of office as soon as possible! This should be easy to do since 81% of the constituents they swore to serve oppose in-state tuition for illegal aliens.

In the 21 states ALIPAC has helped to defeat in-state tuition for illegal aliens we have never seen a fight like this one.

We were a few short hours away from lawmakers accidentally passing a major policy change when the citizens of Indiana had no clue such a vote was about to take place! On the morning ALIPAC swung into action, there was ZERO detectible press coverage on this issue.

Our conversations with lawmakers and staff members indicated they had no clue in-state tuition for illegal aliens was even in HB 1326!

After the bill died, we determined that most of the Indiana state house members did not know including the bill's creator Rep. Rhonda Rhoads.

We want to thank Senator Carlin Yoder for pulling the bill from the calender, thus killing it on the crossover deadline day in response to our calls and lobbying. Senator Yoder was the bill's sponsor on the senate side, and from conversations with staff, we get the impression that even he did not know Senator Leising had added in-state tuition for illegals by amendment in committee the week before.

The illegal immigration invasion supporters are relying more and more on unethical, underhanded, and stealthy methods.

We have won an important battle in the war to reverse the invasion of America. We have learned a lot in the last three days.

Thank you for your support and activism which made this important victory possible!


William Gheen
President, Americans for Legal Immigration PAC




PS: If you are pleased with our performance defeating in-state tuition for illegal aliens in our 21st state, please visit our online donations page now to donate by mail, PayPal, or credit card. We are running out of time to meet our minimum funds requirements and if you want ALIPAC in the fight we need your strong and immediate support at....
http://www.alipac.us/donations/

BLANCA CARDENAS IS DEPORTED - THAT LEAVES 38 MILLION MORE!

half the population of Mexifornia is illegal!
one-third of the population of Nevada is illegal!
20% of Colorado is illegal!

it will be a painful process of sending these people back, however if we don't we will continue to PUSH 2 FOR ENGLISH, and be dealing La Raza supremacy in our borders...!

they're voting in droves!


Blanca Cardenas, L.A. Mom Protesting the Foreclosure of Her Home, Deported to Mexico
By Simone Wilson
published: Thu., Mar. 1 2012 @ 11:30AM
Estrella TV
Cardenas' husband and baby daughter.
A married couple with two children were protesting the foreclosure of their home in North Hollywood on February 22, when the unthinkable happened.
Blanca Cardenas, a 37-year-old mother with a 19-month-old baby girl, was arrested by LAPD officers for trespassing at the property. According to her U.S. citizen husband, Gerardo Quinones, she was hauled down to the Van Nuys station, where she posted $1,000 bail -- "but they didn't let her leave."
Cardenas stayed in LAPD custody for one week, until yesterday...
... when Immigrations and Customs Enforcement picked her up at the Lynwood station. Within hours, says Quinones, she was on a bus to the border.
ICE gave the Weekly this statement on Cardenas' deportation:
Ms. Cardenas Flores was removed to Mexico at approximately 5:15 p.m. Wednesday (Feb. 29) after coming into ICE's custody earlier in the day. Cardenas Flores was previously removed from the United States in 2002. ICE reinstated her prior order of removal, paving the way for her repatriation Wednesday afternoon. ICE is focused on smart, effective immigration enforcement that prioritizes the removal of criminal aliens, recent border crossers and egregious immigration law violators, such as those who have been previously removed from the United States.
Quinones explains that about 10 years ago, his wife "had to go to Mexico for a problem with the family." When she tried to cross again, she was arrested and thrown back over the border. Quinones says she eventually made it home to her family in L.A. (illegally), but never went to court.
So -- despite ICE's promise not to deport mothers of small babies, spouses of U.S. citizens, etc. -- officers apparently felt Cardenas' inability to obtain citizenship made her a danger to the community.
Then there was the foreclosure last week.
According to Quinones, he and his wife were "in a fight" with Bank of America over their home. The couple filed for bankruptcy, believing that would protect them from the foreclosure. But he claims then Bank of America resold the home, and the new owner reported Cardenas and Quinones for trespassing.
"She tried to show [the police] paperwork that shows she is the legal owner of the property," says Quinones. "And she refused to leave the house."
Which led to her arrest -- and eventual deportation.
Here's a heartbreaking news report from Estrella TV, shot one day before Cardenas was kicked out of the country, when there was still hope:
Quinones is in San Ysidro at the moment, meeting some TV news reporters before going to see his wife in Rosarito.
His most disconcerting claim is that ICE officers refused Cardenas her right to an attorney, and that she never signed any papers. ICE spokeswoman Virginia Kice has not confirmed or denied that allegation.
Meanwhile, Occupy L.A. -- which has thrown itself behind both the housing-bubble and illegal-immigration debates -- is mobilizing. At 6 p.m. tonight, protesters will meet at Senor Fish Restaurant downtown to plan a "major march" in outrage of Cardenas' deportation.

ILLEGALS - OBAMA PROMISES LA RAZA "LA RAZA" HIS PARTY BASE of ILLEGALS EITHER AMNESTY or CONTINUED NON-ENFORCEMENT FOR THEIR ILLEGAL VOTES!


  • February 23, 2012, 2:05 PM ET

  • Obama to Hispanics: ‘I’ve Got Another 5 Years’ to Fix Immigration


    President Barack Obama told a Hispanic audience that he has “another five years coming up” in his presidency and will use the time to push for an overhaul of the U.S. immigration system.
    “My presidency is not over. I’ve got another five years coming up. We’re going to get this done,” the president said in an interview Wednesday with Univision Radio. The interview came ahead of the president’s trip to Florida Thursday to deliver remarks on energy policy and the economy and to raise money for his re-election campaign.
    The Hispanic community has criticized Mr. Obama for doing little to carry out his promise to overhauling the immigration system. They have also taken issue with the Obama administration’s increase in deportations.
    Mr. Obama said Republicans in Congress shoulder most of the blame for the lack of progress in changing the country’s immigration laws. “Unfortunately, the Republican side, which used to at least give lip service to immigration reform, now they’ve gone completely to a different place, and have shown themselves unwilling to talk at all about any sensible solutions to this issue, and we’re going to have to just keep up the pressure until they act,” he said.
    He also criticized Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney. “So far, have we haven’t seen any of the Republican candidates even support immigration reform,” the president said. He continued, “In fact, their leading candidate said he would veto even the Dream Act, much less comprehensive immigration reform.”
    The Dream Act would grant permanent-resident status to undocumented immigrant students who completed some college or military service. Mr. Romney has called the act a “handout.”
    Latinos, who generally lean Democratic, will play a crucial role in the election in states such as Florida and Virginia. Mr. Obama said he doesn’t think the choice for Latinos will be difficult.


  • February 23, 2012, 2:05 PM ET



  • *

    THE ONLY REASON OBAMA NOMINATED SOTOMAYER WAS BECAUSE SHE’S A LA RAZA SUPREMACIST, AND HAD A LOOOOOOOOG HISTORY OF PANDERING TO BIG BUSINESS INTERESTS, IN OTHER WORDS, SHE’S OBAMA IN A SKIRT!

    SOTOMAYOR ALREADY HAD A LONG HISTORY OF BEING A RANTING BITCH FROM HER THRONE ON THE BENCH. SHE’S ALSO A MEMBER OF THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA!

    THE LA RAZA BITCH NO SOONER GOT HER FAT ASS ON THE HIGH COURT THAN SHE WAS REFERRING TO CRIMINALS THAT HOP OUR BORDERS AS “UNDOCUMENTED ALIENS”. OBAMA REFERS TO THEM AS “MY UNREGISTERED VOTERS!”



    DEMS ARE THE PARTY FOR ILLEGALS AND LA RAZA SUPREMACY!

    YOU SHOULD REFER TO THEM AS THE FUCKERS THAT TOOK YOUR JOB, AND THEN HANDED YOU THE TAX BILLS TO PAY FOR HIS RAPID ANCHOR BABY BIRTHING AND WELFARE, AS HE SHOVED HIS MEXICAN FLAG UP YOUR NOSE AND DEMANDED YOU LEARN TO SPEAK SPANISH!



    *

    THE REASON WHY OBAMA WANTED DALEY AS CHIEF OF STAFF IS BECAUSE DALY, LIKE OBAMA IS AN ADVOCATE FOR OPEN BORDERS, NO BORDER SECURITY, NO E-VERIFY.

    THESE LA RAZA FUCKERS WILL DO ANYTHING TO ASSURE OBAMA GETS THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES AGAIN!



    VIVA LA RAZA?



    Sonia Sotomayor opposes E-Verify requirement



    Date: 2011-05-29, 7:24PM EDT
    Reply to:
    comm-98zma-2409816667@craigslist.org [Errors when replying to ads?]





    True to form, she said it was illegal to make employers e-verify citizen status of new hires.

    Interesting, she says a state cannot force employers to check if employees they are hiring are illegal. Thankfully the court ruled 5-3 supporting law. But now we know for sure just how extreme far left Obama's choice was. We cannot afford Obama to get another term, or you can bet this country will be overrun by illegals. I don't want this country to be poor and corrupt like Mexico, which it will if illegals overrun the country.

    ·         it's NOT ok to contact this poster with services or other commercial interests


    PostingID: 2409816667





    *

    MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com

    *






    *


    *



    OBAMA’S AMERICA: Open & Undefended Borders!



    “What we're seeing is our Congress and national leadership dismantling our laws by not enforcing them. Lawlessness becomes the norm, just like Third World corruption. Illegal aliens now have more rights and privileges than Americans. If you are an illegal alien, you can drive a car without a driver's license or insurance. You may obtain medical care without paying. You may work without paying taxes. Your children enjoy free education at the expense of taxpaying Americans.”



    http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/feds-allow-illegal-aliens-to-cross.html



    *

    THE LA RAZA PRESIDENT’S SABOTAGE OF OUR COUNTRY’S BORDERS FOR ILLEGALS’ VOTES!



    *

    *

    “PUNISH OUR ENEMIES”… does that mean assault the legals of Arizona that must fend off the Mexican invasion, occupation, growing criminal and welfare state, as well as Mex Drug cartels???



    OBAMA TELLS ILLEGALS “PUNISH OUR ENEMIES”

    Friends of ALIPAC,

    Each day new reports come in from across the nation that our movement is surging and more incumbents, mostly Democrats, are about to fall on Election Day. Obama's approval ratings are falling to new lows as he makes highly inappropriate statements to Spanish language audiences asking illegal alien supporters to help him "punish our enemies."





    *

    http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/04/obamas-la-raza-dept-of-illegal-labor-la.html





    *

    “While the declining job market in the United States may be discouraging some would-be border crossers, a flow of illegal aliens continues unabated, with many entering the United States as drug-smuggling “mules.”

    *

    MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com

    *








    *



    OBAMA’S PLAN TO ONCE AGAIN GET THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES IS AS FOLLOWS:



    1. SABOTAGE E-VERIFY – PUTTING ILLEGALS IN OUR JOBS MAKES LA RAZA AND THE U.S. CHAMBER of COMMERCE HAPPY, ALONG WITH LA RAZA DONORS OF THE FORTUNE 500. ALSO KEEPS CALDERON’S BIG FAT FUCKING MOUTH CLOSED ABOUT GRINGO RACIST.



    2. SUE AMERICANS ON BEHALF OF LA RAZA INVADERS IN MEXICO.



    3. TURN HOMELAND INTO Dept. Homeland Security = PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP.



    4. BRING INTO THE ADMINISTRATION AS MANY LA RAZA SUPREMACIST AS POSSIBLE.



    5. PUT A “WISE LATINA” BITCH, AND LA RAZA PARTY MEMBER, SONYA SOTOMAYER TO LABEL LA RAZA AS “undocumented aliens”.



    6. STOP THE BUILDING OF THE WALL. MEXICANS DON’T LIKE CLIMBING IT, EVEN IF IT IS A PHONY PILE OF WORTHLESS CRAP.



    7. REMIND LA RAZA THAT AMERICANS ARE “OUR ENEMY”… OUT OF THE MOUTH OF AN AMERICAN PRESIDENT!



    8. LIE TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ABOUT HOMELAND SECURITY LIKE IT WAS WRITTEN BY MEXICO!



    9. LET MEXICAN TRUCK DRIVER START HAULING OVER OUR BORDERS MEX DRUG AND ILLEGALS. THE DRUG CARTELS WERE GETTING TIRED OF ENGINEERING ALL THOSE AIR-CONDITIONED TUNNELS.



    10. ARM THE FUCKING MEX DRUG CARTELS… YES, YOU READ IT RIGHT!

    11. DANCE FOR A MEX DRUNK CALLED CALDERON! FIRE THE AMERICAN AMBASSADOR TO MEXICO LIKE THE LIMP PUSSY YOU ARE! IT’S WHAT OBAMA DOES WELL… PUSSY ALL OVER EVERYTHING LIKE THE STATUS-QUO’S LAP DOG!



    `12. SQUANDER BILLIONS ON MUSLIM DICTATORS AND CUT FUNDING FOR BORDER PATROL.



    13. PUT A LA RAZA SUPREMACIST, HILDA SOLIS IN AS HEAD OF DEPT. O LABOR, TO ASSURE THAT LA RAZA GETS PREFERENTIAL JOBS.



    14. GENERATE ENDLESS PLOYS AND DEVICES FOR BIT-BY-BIT BY BIT AMNESTY, UNTIL THERE ARE SO MANY ILLEGALS VOTING IN THIS COUNTRY WE WILL ALL PUSH 2 FOR ENGLISH.

    15. DEVISE OBAMACARE SO THAT ILLEGALS GET SPECIAL SUPREMACY, AND THEN LIE AGAIN IN THE FACE OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE CLAIMING THAT OBAMACARE DOES NOT INCLUDE ILLEGALS.

    16. FOR THE SAKE OF TRANSPARENCY, HAVE LA RAZA CONVENTIONS IN THE WHITE HOUSE – PRESS NOT INVITED.



    17. KISS THE ASS OF THE MEXICAN DRUNK, CALDERON. THAT MEX MAY SLOW THE HORDES OF ILLEGALS POURING OVER OUR BORDERS IF OBAMA DOESN’T KISS HIS ASS ENOUGH! THEN CALDERON PROBABLY SAW OBAMA KNELL AND KISS THE ASS OF THE SAUDI LARDBUCKET DICTATOR, THE ONE THAT INVADE US 9-11, AND FINANCES MOST OF THE GLOBAL TERRORISM THROUGH WABBABIST TERRORIST.





    Obama Administration Challenges Arizona E-Verify Law

    The Obama administration has asked the Supreme Court to strike down a 2007 Arizona law that punishes employers who hire illegal aliens, a law enacted by then-Governor Janet Napolitano.  (Solicitor General's Amicus Curiae Brief).  Called the “Legal Arizona Workers Act,” the law requires all employers in Arizona to use E-Verify and provides that the business licenses of those who hire illegal workers shall be repealed.  From the date of enactment, the Chamber of Commerce and other special interest groups have been trying to undo it, attacking it through a failed ballot initiative and also through a lawsuit. Now the Chamber is asking the United States Supreme Court to hear the case (Chamber of Commerce v. Candelaria), and the Obama Administration is weighing in against the law.

    To date, Arizona’s E-Verify law has been upheld by all lower courts, including the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Ninth Circuit, in particular, viewed it as an exercise of a state’s traditional power to regulate businesses.  (San Francisco Chronicle, June 2, 2010).  Obama’s Justice Department, however, disagrees. Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal said in his filing with the Supreme Court that the lower courts were wrong to uphold the statute because federal immigration law expressly preempts any state law imposing sanctions on employers hiring illegal immigrants.  Mr. Katyal argues that this is not a licensing law, but “a statute that prohibits the hiring of unauthorized aliens and uses suspension and revocation of all state-issued licenses as its ultimate sanction.”  (Solicitor General's Amicus Curiae Brief, p. 10).  This is the administration’s first court challenge to a state’s authority to act against illegal immigration, and could be a preview of the battle brewing over Arizona’s recent illegal immigration crackdown through SB 1070. 

    Napolitano has made no comment on the Department of Justice’s decision to challenge the 2007 law, but federal officials said that she has taken an active part in the debate over whether to do so. (Politico, May 28, 2010).   As Governor of Arizona, Napolitano said she believed the state law was valid and became a defendant in the many lawsuits against it. (Id.).



    *

    OBAMA’S CRONY CAPITALISM, A LOVE STORY BETWEEN THE ACTOR PRESIDENT, AND HIS BANKSTER DONORS!



    Records show that four out of Obama's top five contributors are employees of financial industry giants - Goldman Sachs ($571,330), UBS AG ($364,806), JPMorgan Chase ($362,207) and Citigroup ($358,054).




    *

    HOW WOULD LA RAZA BITCH SOTOMAYER VOTES ON HER PARTY FLYING THE MEXICAN FLAG OVER THE OBAMA WHITE HOUSE? Si! Si!

    *

    School forces student to remove Old Glory from bike (Hispanics want only the Mexican flag!)

    School forces student to remove Old Glory from bike
    By The Scribe November 12, 2010 8:01 AM

    Political correctness runs amuck again. It seems there is a new story involving misguided school officials every week.

    This time, eighth grader Cody Alicea is learning a lesson that no parent expects to be taught in an American school.

    The latest story comes via KSBW from the Stanislaus School District in Denair, CA where a middle school student is not allowed to fly the American flag from his bicycle because other students have complained.

    A Stanislaus County school is forcing a student to take an American flag off of his bike. Thirteen-year-old Cody Alicea put the flag there as a show of support for the veterans in his family. But officials at Denair Middle School told him he couldn't fly it. He said he was told some students had complained.

    Obviously, the appropriate response to this would have been for school officials to tell the complainers that this is America, Old Glory is the American flag and it will fly on American soil or even American bikes. Any attempt to prevent it from flying should result in immediate discipline for the student who creates a disturbance or takes an action to interfere with private property.

    Thatdoes not happen because school officials are terrified of ACLU lawsuits which immediately follow any attempt to defend American traditions.

    Who are the complainers who so dislike our flag? Let's see how Superintendent Edward Parraz described them.


    "Our Hispanic, you know, kids will, you know, bring their Mexican flags and they'll display it, and then of course the kids would do the American flag situation, and it does cause kind of a racial tension which we don't really want," Parraz said. "We want them to appreciate the cultures."

    Common sense has obviously deserted the officials of Stanislaus School District. Let's hope there are enough Americans left in this area of California to bring it back.


    -----

    UPDATE: The good news is that there are still patriotic Americans in California.


    A California school has done a U-turn after it forced a student to remove an American flag attached to his bike, saying the Stars and Stripes could spur racial tensions on campus.

    Now, after a public outcry, the school has decided that the grand old flag can come back.

    "I'm supposed to be free in this country and I should be able to fly the flag wherever I want to," he (Cody) told Fox40.

    Read more at Fox News...


    You betcha, buddy. You may be only 13 but you taught everyone an important civics lesson.

    Categories:Education

    Read more:
    http://www.gopusa.com/fresh-ink/2010/11/school-forces-student-to-remove-old-glory-from-bike.php#ixzz15Axe0OMh



    *

    Obama soft on illegals enforcement




    Arrests of illegal immigrant workers have dropped precipitously under President Obama, according to figures released Wednesday. Criminal arrests, administrative arrests, indictments and convictions of illegal immigrants at work sites all fell by more than 50 percent from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009.

    The figures show that Mr. Obama has made good on his pledge to shift enforcement away from going after illegal immigrant workers themselves - but at the expense of Americans' jobs, said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the Republican who compiled the numbers from the Department of Homeland Security's U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE). Mr. Smith, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, said a period of economic turmoil is the wrong time to be cutting enforcement and letting illegal immigrants take jobs that Americans otherwise would hold.

    *

    Obama Quietly Erasing Borders (Article)






    *

    Obamanomics: How Barack Obama Is Bankrupting You and Enriching His Wall Street Friends, Corporate Lobbyists, and Union Bosses




    BY TIMOTHY P CARNEY





    Editorial Reviews

    Obama Is Making You Poorer—But Who’s Getting Rich?

    Goldman Sachs, GE, Pfizer, the United Auto Workers—the same “special interests” Barack Obama was supposed to chase from the temple—are profiting handsomely from Obama’s Big Government policies that crush taxpayers, small businesses, and consumers. In Obamanomics, investigative reporter Timothy P. Carney digs up the dirt the mainstream media ignores and the White House wishes you wouldn’t see. Rather than Hope and Change, Obama is delivering corporate socialism to America, all while claiming he’s battling corporate America. It’s corporate welfare and regulatory robbery—it’s Obamanomics.

    Congressman Ron Paul says, “Every libertarian and free-market conservative needs to read Obamanomics.” And Johan Goldberg, columnist and bestselling author says, “Obamanomics is conservative muckraking at its best and an indispensable field guide to the Obama years.”

    If you’ve wondered what’s happening to America, as the federal government swallows up the financial sector, the auto industry, and healthcare, and enacts deficit exploding “stimulus packages,” this book makes it all clear—it’s a big scam. Ultimately, Obamanomics boils down to this: every time government gets bigger, somebody’s getting rich, and those somebodies are friends of Barack. This book names the names—and it will make your blood boil.

    *


    Obama Is Making You Poorer—But Who’s Getting Rich?

    Goldman Sachs, GE, Pfizer, the United Auto Workers—the same “special interests” Barack Obama was supposed to chase from the temple—are profiting handsomely from Obama’s Big Government policies that crush taxpayers, small businesses, and consumers.

    Investigative reporter Timothy P. Carney digs up the dirt the mainstream media ignores and the White House wishes you wouldn’t see. Rather than Hope and Change, Obama is delivering corporate socialism to America, all while claiming he’s battling corporate America. It’s corporate welfare and regulatory robbery—it’s Obamanomics. In this explosive book, Carney reveals:

    * The Great Health Care Scam—Obama’s backroom deals with drug companies spell corporate profits and more government control
    * The Global Warming Hoax—Obama has bought off industries with a pork-filled bill that will drain your wallet for Al Gore’s agenda
    * Obama and Wall Street—“Change” means more bailouts and a heavy Goldman Sachs presence in the West Wing (including Rahm Emanuel)
    * Stimulating K Street—The largest spending bill in history gave pork to the well-connected and created a feeding frenzy for lobbyists
    * How the GOP needs to change its tune—drastically—to battle Obamanomics

    If you’ve wondered what’s happening to our country, as the federal government swallows up the financial sector, the auto industry, and healthcare, and enacts deficit exploding “stimulus packages” that create make-work government jobs, this book makes it all clear—it’s a big scam. Ultimately, Obamanomics boils down to this: every time government gets bigger, somebody’s getting rich, and those somebodies are friends of Barack. This book names the names—and it will make your blood boil.

    *
    Praise for Obamanomics

    “The notion that ‘big business’ is on the side of the free market is one of progressivism’s most valuable myths. It allows them to demonize corporations by day and get in bed with them by night. Obamanomics is conservative muckraking at its best. It reveals how President Obama is exploiting the big business mythology to undermine the free market and stick it to entrepreneurs, taxpayers, and consumers. It’s an indispensable field guide to the Obama years.”
    —Jonha Goldberg, LA Times columnist and best-selling author

    “‘Every time government gets bigger, somebody’s getting rich.’ With this astute observation, Tim Carney begins his task of laying bare the Obama administration’s corporatist governing strategy, hidden behind the president’s populist veneer. This meticulously researched book is a must-read for anyone who wants to understand how Washington really works.”
    —David Freddoso, best-selling author of The Case Against Barack Obama

    “Every libertarian and free-market conservative who still believes that large corporations are trusted allies in the battle for economic liberty needs to read this book, as does every well-meaning liberal who believes that expansions of the welfare-regulatory state are done to benefit the common people.”
    —Congressman Ron Paul

    “It’s understandable for critics to condemn President Obama for his ‘socialism.’ But as Tim Carney shows, the real situation is at once more subtle and more sinister. Obamanomics favors big business while disproportionately punishing everyone else. So-called progressives are too clueless to notice, as usual, which is why we have Tim Carney and this book.”
    —Thomas E. Woods, Jr., best-selling author of Meltdown and The Politically Incorrect Guideto American History

    *

    ·         Hardcover: 256 pages

    ·         Publisher: Regnery Press (November 30, 2009)

    ·         Language: English

    ·         ISBN-10: 1596986123

    ·         ISBN-13: 978-1596986121