Monday, March 25, 2013

ILLGALS VOTING - WILL ARKANSAS BE THE NEXT MEXIFORNIA? WILL ALL JOBS GO TO ILLEGALS? WILL MEXICAN GANGS TAKE OVER COMMUNITIES?


LA RAZA DEM GOV MIKE BEEBE VOWS TO EASE MORE ILLEGALS INTO THE PROCESS OF VOTING FOR THEIR OWN LA RAZA SUPREMACY.

WILL ARKANSAS BE THE NEXT MEXIFORNIA? LA RAZA NOW CONTROLLS THE STATE LEGISLATURE IN CA AND PASSES LAW AFTER LAW THAT BENEFITS MEXICANS.

OBAMA, ALONG WITH HARRY REID, BUSH WAR PROFITEER DIANNE FEINSTEIN, BOXER, PELOSI, SCHUMER AND HO CHASER MENENDEZ IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN ILLEGALS ARE VOTING!


Arkansas governor vetoes voter ID bill

By Suzi Parker

LITTLE ROCK, Ark (Reuters) - Arkansas Governor Mike Beebe on Monday vetoed a bill proposing citizens show photo identification before casting a ballot, citing risks it could disenfranchise voters, the governor's office said.

La Raza Dem Mike Beebe Vows to Illegals to EXPAND LA RAZA SUPREMACY and the MEXICAN WELFARE STATE in ARKANSAS


LA RAZA DEM GOV MIKE BEEBE VOWS TO EASE MORE ILLEGALS INTO THE PROCESS OF VOTING FOR THEIR OWN LA RAZA SUPREMACY.

WILL ARKANSAS BE THE NEXT MEXIFORNIA? LA RAZA NOW CONTROLLS THE STATE LEGISLATURE IN CA AND PASSES LAW AFTER LAW THAT BENEFITS MEXICANS.

OBAMA, ALONG WITH HARRY REID, BUSH WAR PROFITEER DIANNE FEINSTEIN, BOXER, PELOSI, SCHUMER AND HO CHASER MENENDEZ IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN ILLEGALS ARE VOTING!

Arkansas governor vetoes voter ID bill

By Suzi Parker

LITTLE ROCK, Ark (Reuters) - Arkansas Governor Mike Beebe on Monday vetoed a bill proposing citizens show photo identification before casting a ballot, citing risks it could disenfranchise voters, the governor's office said.

Supporters of the proposal, who say it would eliminate the possibility of fraud, plan to override the veto by Beebe, a Democrat. That would require a simple majority in a vote in each chamber of the Republican-dominated state legislature.

Should the bill become law, Arkansas would join the nearly three dozen U.S. states that have similar voter ID measures, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

In his veto letter, Beebe said he "believes that the bill will unnecessarily cost taxpayers money, grow bureaucracy and risk disenfranchisement of voters."

"I cannot approve such an unnecessary measure that would negatively impact one of our most precious rights as citizens," Beebe added.

The bill previously passed 22-12 in the state Senate and 51-44 in the House.

Legal challenges to voter ID laws are pending in several U.S. states and are expected in Arkansas if it adopts the measure.

Under current Arkansas law, poll workers can request identifying documents, but voters are not required to show them.

Under the proposed law, photo ID cards would be made by county clerks at no cost for registered voters who do not have other valid forms of identification. The state Bureau of Legislative Research has reported it would cost the state an additional $300,000.

Voters without an ID could still cast a provisional ballot, which would be counted if the voter returned with photo identification.

(Editing by Corrie MacLaggan and Andrew Hay)

AMERICAN STATES THAT HAVE FALLEN TO THE MEXICAN INVADERS AND LA RAZA SUPREMACY: Your state is next. You just don’t know it yet!

 

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/02/amnesty-american-states-fall-to-la-raza.html

 

 

1.      MEXIFORNIA, formerly California – PAYS OUT $22 BILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS

 

2.      . NEVADA – the population is now nearly 30% ILLEGALS. Sen. Harry Reid has handed out millions of American tax dollars to LA RAZA to get out the illegals’ votes.

 

3.      ARIZONA – gateway to the American southwest for the Mexican drug cartels. Phoenix is the second largest center next to Mexico City for kidnapping. Capital of America for Mexican car theft and home invasion. AZ is under assault not only by Mexico, but by Obama! He has sued the state to block E-verify.

 

 

4.      TEXAS – GOP is now surrendering Texas borders to Mexican drug cartels.

 

5.      COLORADO – the population is now 25% ILLEGALS and they are voting for anything that benefits LA RAZA.

 

6.      WISCONSIN – new market for the Mexican drug cartels.


NEW MEXICO - “First, New Mexico (population two million) has the highest percentage of Hispanics of any state — 45 percent, compared with 30 percent in Arizona (population 6.5 million), and they historically have commanded far more political power than their neighbors do. The New Mexico Legislature is 44 percent Hispanic, a contrast to the 16 percent in Arizona, according to the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials.”

 

7.      

 

·         The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel in November 2012 carried a story entitled, “Mexican pot growers infiltrate forest in Wis.” The story described damage to the environment by pot-growing guards and noted, “Heavily armed drug traffickers from Mexico are using the only national forest in Wisconsin as their personal farms and greenhouses, growing millions of dollars in marijuana . . .” Many national and state forests and parks have been controlled for years, in whole or in part, by Mexican Drug Cartels (MDC) with little environmentalist outrage and limited news media coverage.

 

 

 

THE LA RAZA MEXICAN WELFARE STATE IS SPREADING ACROSS THE NATION. ILLEGALS ARE VOTING IN DROVES TO EXPAND LA RAZA SUPREMACY. DEMS, THE PARTY OF ILLEGALS ARE NOW GETTING COMPETITION FORM THE GOP AS TO WHICH PARTY WILL HISPANDER AND SELL OUT AMERICA FASTER FOR THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES.

 


 

“While the Obama Administration downplays violence along the U.S.-Mexico border, authorities in Texas reveal that Mexican drug cartels have transformed parts of the state into a war zone where shootings, beheadings, kidnappings and murders are common.

In fact, drug-cartel violence is so severe that Texas counties along the Mexican border are under attack around the clock, according to an alarming report [1] published by the state’s Department of Agriculture. The agency was ordered by the state legislature to conduct an assessment of the impact of illegal activity along the Texas-Mexico border on rural landowners and the agriculture industry.”

*


 

Immigrating America Into a Colony of Mexico

 


 

 

Article by Frosty Wooldridge

Published on The Washington Dispatch.

America faces a greater and more dangerous threat from within than from without. While our armed forces secure Afghanistan and Iraq, our own borders stand unguarded 24 hours a day. Al-Qaeda insurgents plan their next attacks somewhere inside our country. They advocate a violent overthrow of America.

We’ve got an even more ominous enemy within our borders that promotes “Reconquista of Aztlan” or the reconquest of California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas into the country of Mexico. With 9.2 million Mexicans now living in America, their goal of colonizing our country back into Mexico moves forward. A more sobering reality stems from the evidence that it’s Mexican-American citizens in the forefront of this disintegration of our country.

What is the evidence? Because of massive immigration from south of the border, more Mexican flags brazenly fly in Los Angeles and surrounding cities than Old Glory. More Spanish speaking radio stations broadcast than English speaking. More people speak foreign languages than English in the City of Angels. More school kids can’t speak our national language in California. It’s so bad in the Golden Bear State, last year 800,000 Americans fled abrasive conditions growing like a cancer in southern California. Worse, the “18th Street Gang” in Los Angeles features 20,000 members with 60 percent of them being illegal aliens. They coordinate drug traffic, robberies and extortion. Finally, the corruption is so great, ‘Special Order 40,’ augmented by the Los Angeles Police Department, makes it impossible to arrest, detain or deport illegal aliens. Little wonder more than three million operate in California.

But as their numbers grow and their allegiance remains with Mexico, this country is at risk of an internal coup. But the worst danger comes from our own citizens of Mexican heritage. They want our southwestern United States back. Will they take it by violence? Use an army? No! They are colonizing us by sheer numbers. They are the fastest growing ethnic group in America, but they have no allegiance to our country.

They are organized, too. The following are two speeches from a dozen others: Augustin Cebada, Information Minister of Brown Berets, militant para-military soldiers of Aztlan shouting at U.S. citizens at an Independence Day rally in Los Angeles: "Augustin Cebada, Brown Berets, we're here today to show LA, show the minority people here, the Anglo-Saxons, that we are here, the majority. We do the work in this city, we take care of the spoiled brat children, we clean their offices, we pick the food, we do the manufacturing in the factories of LA, we are the majority here. We're here in Westwood, this is the fourth time we've been here in the last two months, to show white Anglo-Saxon Protestant LA, the few of you who remain, that we are the majority, and we claim this land as ours, it's always been ours, and we're still here, and none of the talk about deporting. If anyone's going to be deported it's going to be you! Go back to Simi Valley, you skunks! Go back to Boston! To back to the Plymouth Rock, Pilgrims! Get out! We are the future. You're old and tired. Go on. We have beaten you, leave like beaten rats. You old white people, it is your duty to die. Right now we're already controlling those elections by violence or nonviolence. Through love of having children we're going to take over." Other demonstrators: "Raza fuerza (brown race power), this is Aztlan, this is Mexico. They're the pilgrims on our land. Go back to the Nina, the Pinta, the Santa Maria."

If you don’t think he’s serious about taking over our border states, try this guy on for size: Jose Angel Gutierrez, Professor, University of Texas at Arlington, founder La Raza Party at UC Riverside: "The border remains a military zone. We remain a hunted people. Now you think you have a destiny to fulfill in the land that historically has been ours for forty thousand years. And we're a new Mestizo nation. And they want us to discuss civil rights. Civil rights. What law made by white men to oppress all of us of color, female and male. This is our homeland. We are not immigrants that came from another country to another country. We are migrants, free to travel the length and breadth of the Americas because we belong here. We are millions. We have an aging white America. They are not making babies. They are dying. It's a matter of time. The explosion is in our population."

For a sleepy American public and a politically correct Congress, the colonization of America by a foreign country proceeds quietly, pervasively, methodically and perversely. Forty-six Mexican consulates operate and dictate in major cities across our country. Mexico’s President Fox visits and makes demands. They’re pouring over our borders like water over a broken dam.

Our resources are being drained at $56 billion annually. Immigrants send $15 billion back to Mexico. They send $25 billion back to South America and $16 billion back to Asia. Our annual trade deficit exceeds $400 billion. Over $100 billion in cash flows out of our borders for drugs. We pay billions for illegals in our medical systems, schools and ESL classes. According to Professor Borgas of Harvard, American workers lose $133 billion in wages to illegal aliens taking over American jobs.

“Immigrant advocacy groups no longer promote legal immigration, citizenship, learning English or any other assimilation into this country. Hispanic-rights groups talk of reoccupation and repatriation of the southwestern United States,” wrote Linda Bentley in “Paving the Way to Aztlan: With Propaganda, Politics, Racism.”

Do you want America to be split up? Do you want Texas to become a state of Mexico? Do you want America to become as corrupt as Mexico? Do you want the filth, squalor and diseases of Mexico to become a part of America’s reality? Do you want to give up California to Aztlan? Do you want America to become a part of the Third World?

Keep doing nothing about this immigration invasion and you’ll get your wish.

 

*

 

CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR

 

 

from the May 28, 2009 edition - http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0528/p09s01-coop.htm

 

What will America stand for in 2050?

 

The US should think long and hard about the high number of Latino immigrants.

By Lawrence Harrison

 

Palo Alto, Calif.

President Obama has encouraged Americans to start laying a new foundation for the country – on a number of fronts. He has stressed that we'll need to have the courage to make some hard choices. One of those hard choices is how to handle immigration. The US must get serious about the tide of legal and illegal immigrants, above all from Latin America.

It's not just a short-run issue of immigrants competing with citizens for jobs as unemployment approaches 10 percent or the number of uninsured straining the quality of healthcare. Heavy immigration from Latin America threatens our cohesiveness as a nation.

The political realities of the rapidly growing Latino population are such that Mr. Obama may be the last president who can avert the permanent, vast underclass implied by the current Census Bureau projection for 2050.

Do I sound like a right-wing "nativist"? I'm not. I'm a lifelong Democrat; an early and avid supporter of Obama. I'm gratified by his nomination of Sonia Sotomayor to the Supreme Court. I'm also the grandson of Eastern European Jewish immigrants; and a member, along with several other Democrats, of the advisory boards of the Federation for American Immigration Reform and Pro English. Similar concerns preoccupied the distinguished Democrat Barbara Jordan when she chaired the congressionally mandated US Commission on Immigration Reform in the 1990s.

Congresswoman Jordan was worried about the adverse impact of high levels of legal and illegal immigration on poor citizens, disproportionately Latinos and African-Americans. The principal beneficiaries of our current immigration policy are affluent Americans who hire immigrants at substandard wages for low-end work. Harvard economist George Borjas estimates that American workers lose $190 billion annually in depressed wages caused by the constant flooding of the labor market at the low-wage end.

The healthcare cost of the illegal workforce is especially burdensome, and is subsidized by taxpayers. To claim Medicaid, you must be legal, but as the Health and Human Services inspector general found, 47 states allow self-declaration of status for Medicaid. Many hospitals and clinics are going broke because of the constant stream of uninsured, many of whom are the estimated 12 million to 15 million illegal immigrants. This translates into reduced services, particularly for lower-income citizens.

The US population totaled 281 million in 2000. About 35 million, or 12.5 percent, were Latino. The Census Bureau projects that our population will reach 439 million in 2050, a 56 percent increase over the 2000 census. The Hispanic population in 2050 is projected at 133 million – 30 percent of the total and almost quadruple the 2000 level. Population growth is the principal threat to the environment via natural resource use, sprawl, and pollution. And population growth is fueled chiefly by immigration.

Consider what this, combined with worrisome evidence that Latinos are not melting into our cultural mainstream, means for the US. Latinos have contributed some positive cultural attributes, such as multigenerational family bonds, to US society. But the same traditional values that lie behind Latin America's difficulties in achieving democratic stability, social justice, and prosperity are being substantially perpetuated among Hispanic-Americans.

Latin America's cultural problem is apparent in the persistent Latino high school dropout rate – 40 percent in California, according to a recent study – and the high incidence of teenage pregnancy, single mothers, and crime. The perpetuation of Latino culture is facilitated by the Spanish language's growing challenge to English as our national language. It makes it easier for Latinos to avoid the melting pot and for education to remain a low priority, as it is in Latin America – a problem highlighted in recent books by former New York City deputy mayor Herman Badillo, a Puerto Rican, and Mexican-Americans Lionel Sosa and Ernesto Caravantes.

Language is the conduit of culture. Consider: There is no word in Spanish for "compromise" (compromiso means "commitment") nor for "accountability," a problem that is compounded by a verb structure that converts "I dropped (broke, forgot) something" into "it got dropped" ("broken," "forgotten").

In a letter to me in 1991, Mexican-American columnist Richard Estrada described the essence of the problem of immigration as one of numbers. We should really worry, he wrote, "when the numbers begin to favor not only the maintenance and replenishment of the immigrants' source culture, but also its overall growth, and in particular growth so large that the numbers not only impede assimilation but go beyond to pose a challenge to the traditional culture of the American nation."

Obama should confront the challenges by enforcing immigration laws on employment to help end illegal immigration. We should calibrate legal immigration annually to (1) the needs of the economy, as Ms. Jordan urged, and (2) past performance of immigrant groups with respect to acculturation.

We must declare our national language to be English and discourage the proliferation of Spanish- language media. We should limit citizenship by birth to the offspring of citizens. And we should provide immigrants with easy-to-access educational services that facilitate acculturation, including English language, citizenship, and American values.

Lawrence Harrison directs the Cultural Change Institute at the Fletcher School, Tufts University, in Medford, Mass. He is the author of "The Central Liberal Truth: How Politics Can Change A Culture And Save It From Itself."

 

*

ALIEN NATION: Secrets of the Invasion



ALIEN NATION: Secrets of the Invasion – Why America's government invites rampant illegal immigration

It's widely regarded as America's biggest problem: Between 12 and 20 million aliens (MOST SOURCES SUGGEST THERE ARE MUCH MORE LIKELY NEARLY 40 MILLION ILLEGALS HERE NOW) – including large numbers of criminals, gang members and even terrorists – have entered this nation illegally, with countless more streaming across our scandalously unguarded borders daily.

The issue polarizes the nation, robs citizens of jobs, bleeds taxpayers, threatens America's national security and dangerously balkanizes the country into unassimilated ethnic groups with little loyalty or love for America's founding values. Indeed, the de facto invasion is rapidly transforming America into a totally different country than the one past generations have known and loved.


*

 

COLORADO UNDER LA RAZA-OCCUPATION:

 

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/01/judicial-watch-colorado-invites-more-la.html 

 

COLORADO IS NOW 25% ILLEGALS…AND BREEDING ANCHOR BABIES OFF AMERICAN DOLLARS BY THE DROVES.

AMERICANS SURRENDER THEIR JOBS TO ILLEGALS, AND THEN GET THE TAX BILLS FOR MEXICAN LOOTING AND CRIME TIDAL WAVE!

 

*

OBAMA’S ASSAULT ON AMERICA FOR MEXICO BEGINS WITH ARIZONA – CALIFORNIA ALREADY SURRENDERED TO MEXICO YEARS AGO!


*


 

SEN. DAVID VITTER (R-La.) PROPOSES END OF MEXICO’S ANCHOR BABY BREEDING PROGRAM THAT ANCHORS MEXICO’S OCCUPATION AND EXPANDS LA RAZA’S WELFARE STATE IN AMERICA.

MEX-OCCUPIED LOS ANGELES COUNTY ALONE PUTS OUT $600 MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS, PRIMARILY ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS (SOURCE: JUDICIAL WATCH.ORG)

GOP senators offer alternative immigration enforcement reforms

By Ramsey Cox - 02/13/13 04:13 PM ET



Conservative GOP senators expressed concern Wednesday that bipartisan comprehensive immigration reform proposals might promise more than they can deliver.

*


WHAT IS THE STATE of the AMERICAN DEMOCRACY WHERE THE GOVERNMENT ABATES A MEXICAN INVASION, AND THEN HANDS THE TAX BILLS FOR THE OCCUPATION TO THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS WITHOUT EVEN ONE VOTE?

*

MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS IN TEXAS


 

“While the Obama Administration downplays violence along the U.S.-Mexico border, authorities in Texas reveal that Mexican drug cartels have transformed parts of the state into a war zone where shootings, beheadings, kidnappings and murders are common.

 

In fact, drug-cartel violence is so severe that Texas counties along the Mexican border are under attack around the clock, according to an alarming report [1] published by the state’s Department of Agriculture. The agency was ordered by the state legislature to conduct an assessment of the impact of illegal activity along the Texas-Mexico border on rural landowners and the agriculture industry.”

*

 

"The American Southwest seems to be slowly returning to the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a single shot."  ---Excelsior, the national newspaper of Mexico LOOK AT MEXIFORNIA!


                         
(THE ABOVE QUOTE IS DATED. THE LA RAZA WELFARE STATE HAS SPREAD TO ALL 50 STATES)

"Remember 187 -- the Proposition to deny taxpayer funds for services to
non-citizens -- was the last gasp of white America in California."
---Art Torres, Chairman of the California Democratic Party

 

Richard Alatorre, Los Angeles City Council "They're afraid we're going to take over the governmental institutions and other institutions. They're right. We will take them over. . We are here to stay."

Mario Obledo, California Coalition of Hispanic Organizations and California State Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare under Jerry Brown, also awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by Bill Clinton "California is going to be a Hispanic state. Anyone who doesn't like it should leave."

Jose Pescador Osuna, Mexican Consul General We are practicing "La Reconquista" in California."

 

 

 

 

WILL AMERICA BECOME A COLONY of MEXICO? ISN'T CALIFORNIA ALREADY OCCUPIED?


OBAMA and MEXICO ANNOUCE OPEN BORDERS and EXPANDED LA RAZA LOOTING of AMERICANS

OBAMA ANNOUCES MASSIVE AMNESTY

OBAMA and MEXICO ANNOUCE OPEN BORDERS and EXPANDED LA RAZA LOOTING of AMERICANS


UK - BUT IT'S AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT PICTURE IN MEX-OCCUPIED AND LOOTED U.S.

DURING OBAMA'S FIRST TERM 2/3s OF ALL JOBS WENT TO IMMIGRANTS, BOTH LEGAL AND ILLEGAL.

WORKPLACE ENFORCEMENT PLUMMETED 70% AND OBAMA SETABOUT SABOTAGING E-VERIFY TO EASE MORE ILLEGALS INTO OUR JOBS.

MEANWHILE THE LA RAZA 'THE RACE" WELFARE STATE HAS EXPANDED TO ALL 50 STATES.

WE ARE MEXICO'S JOBS, WELFARE AND JAILS SYSTEM.

Under his plans, access to Britain's National Health Service will be curbed, new migrants will have to wait up to five years for social housing, fines for employers who hire illegal workers will be doubled, and landlords who let to illegal immigrants could face fines too. 

Britain's PM Cameron unveils sweeping immigration crackdown

By Andrew Osborn
LONDON (Reuters) - Prime Minister David Cameron will unveil a sweeping immigration crackdown on Monday aimed at discouraging migrants from Romania and Bulgaria from moving to Britain when EU restrictions on their right to travel and work there expire next year.

Under his plans, access to Britain's National Health Service will be curbed, new migrants will have to wait up to five years for social housing, fines for employers who hire illegal workers will be doubled, and landlords who let to illegal immigrants could face fines too.

The lifting of European Union freedom of movement restrictions on Romanians and Bulgarians has triggered warnings in the right-leaning press of "hordes" of welfare-hungry migrants descending on Britain at a time when the economy is stagnant and public resources are being squeezed.

Cameron's initiative reflects a change in the political mainstream after years of politicians shying away from the issue. All three main parties now talk tough on immigration after polls showed it had become one of voters' main worries ahead of a 2015 election and a once derided anti-immigration party surged in the polls.

In a speech that may stir controversy in Romania and Bulgaria, Cameron will say he wants to stop Britain's welfare system being "a soft touch" for migrants, saying that access to core public services is something newcomers should earn rather than automatically receive.

"Net migration needs to come down radically from hundreds of thousands a year to just tens of thousands," he will say, outlining measures that will apply to other EU nationals too.

The UK Independence Party or UKIP, has thrived in the polls after campaigning against "open-door" immigration, humiliating Cameron's ruling Conservative party in a vote for a parliamentary seat three weeks ago.

Cameron is expected to say: "While I have always believed in the benefits of immigration I have also always believed that immigration has to be properly controlled.

"As I have long argued, under the last government this simply wasn't the case. Immigration was far too high and badly out of control."

"SOMETHING FOR NOTHING CULTURE"

IN LA RAZA-OCCUPIED LOS ANGELES COUNTY, ILLGALS COLLECT $600 MILLIION PER YEAR IN WELFARE, PRIMARILY ANCHOR BABY BREEDING. THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO TALK ABOUT CURBING MEXICAN LOOTING. IN FACT, ILLEGALS ARE ELECTING LA RAZA SUPREMACIST TO THE STATE LEGISLATURE TO PASS BILL AFTER BILL BENEFITING ILLEGALS. THE LAST WAS A LAW THAT PROHIBITS EMPLOYERS FROM USING E-VERIFY.

He will announce new measures to make it more difficult for nationals from the European Economic Area (EEA), which includes Romania and Bulgaria, to claim welfare benefits after six months. They will take effect in early 2014.

He will also promise to close a loophole that allows some people who have no right to work in Britain to claim benefits and subject newcomers to a much harder test to see if they are eligible for income-related benefits.

"Ending the something for nothing culture needs to apply to immigration as well as welfare. We're going to give migrants from the EEA a very clear message. Just like British citizens, there is no absolute right to unemployment benefit," he will say.

Under the plans, newcomers would also have to wait for up to five years before they could join a waiting list for social housing, and face "stricter charging" to use the health service or be obliged to have private health insurance.

"We should be clear that what we have is a free National Health Service, not a free International Health Service," Cameron will say.

His initiative has already been criticized by David Walker, the Bishop of Dudley, who told The Observer newspaper that politicians were exaggerating the immigration problem and considering "disproportionate" measures.

Last Friday, Nick Clegg, the deputy prime minister and leader of the Liberal Democrat party, the junior member of Cameron's coalition, said Britain was considering obliging visitors from "high-risk" countries to hand over a returnable cash bond to deter them from overstaying their visas.

He also abandoned a promise to amnesty illegal immigrants after ten years.

 
Nigel Farage, the leader of UKIP, said on Saturday that the unexpected success of his own party had shifted the debate on immigration.

"If UKIP had not taken on this immigration debate, the others would not be talking about it at all," he told his party conference.

(Editing by Robin Pomeroy)

*

IS THE SAME THING HAPPENING IN AMERICA? ARE COMMUNITIES SO OVERRUN BY MEXICANS THAT ONE ONY HEARS SPANISH, AND ARE MUCH MORE LIKELY TO SEE THE MEX FLAG WAVING THAN ANY AMERICAN?

IN LA RAZA-OCCUPIED LOS ANGELES, AT THE SANTEE EDUCATIONAL COMPLEX, A PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOL WHERE THE STUNDENTS ARE OVERWHELMINGLY ILLEGALS OR ANCHORS, CLASSES ARE TAUGHT IN SPANISH, BOOKS AND HANDOUTS ARE IN SPANISH AND STUDENTS SIT ON THEIR WELL-FED ASSES WHEN THE AMERICAN NATIONAL ANTHEM IS PLAYE AND SCHOOL ASSEMBLIES END IN VIVA MEXICO! VIVA MEXICO!

TYPICALLY AT AMERICA’S EXPENSE, MEXICANS ARE BREEDING A POPULATION EXPLOSIONG. LOS ANGELES COUNTY ALONE PAYS OUT $600 MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE TO ILLGALS, PRIMARILY ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS = 18 YEARS OF WELFARE! 

*

YOU WILL NOT FIND THE FOLLOWING BELOW IN AMERICA WHERE THE LA RAZA DEMS ARE OPEN-HANDED IN HANDING LA RAZA DREMA ACTS OF WELFARE, OUR JOBS, HIGHER EDUCATION DISCOUNTS, FREE LOWER EDUCATION, OBAMAcare, FREE EMERGENCY ROOM CARE AT ANY FREE ENTERPRISE HOSPITAL AND ANCHOR BABY WEFLARE!

British taxpayers do not owe immigrants a living through benefits, warns Cameron as he announces restricted access to health care and housing

  • New EU migrants will be stripped of jobless benefits after six months
  • Part of a raft of new measures announced by David Cameron
  • He plans to restrict access to healthcare, social housing and handouts
  • He says that net migration to the UK needs to 'come down radically' 
  • Bishop of Dudley: Immigration fears 'bear little relationship' to reality


Britain's benefits system is to be overhauled to end the idea that it will payout to anyone who moves here, David Cameron pledged today. (“FREE” EMERGENCY ROOM CARE AT CA HOSPLITALS ALONE COST $1.4 BILLION PER YEAR! MEXICO’S “FREE” MEDICAL IS A BIT COSTLY!)

Housing, health and unemployment support will be restricted to people who have lived in the UK for several years or can prove they are entitled to state-funded help.

Mr Cameron used a major speech at University Campus Suffolk in Ipswich in Suffolk to promise to 'strengthen' tests to ensure only those who have paid into the system are able to receive handouts.

But the much-trailled crackdown was dismissed by critics who argued that many of the limits on benefits were already in place and the real fear for many in the UK was the threat posed to jobs by an influx of cheap labour.

Prime Minister David Cameron used a speech at the University Campus Suffolk in Ipswich to unveil a raft of measures to deter migrants from coming to Britain

Mr pledged to end end Britain’s ‘something for nothing’ reputation, although a more radical plan to ban new arrivals from claiming benefits at all in their first year was dropped for fear of breaching EU law.

Mr Cameron claimed net migration needs to ‘come down radically’ after getting ‘badly out of control’ under Labour.

He said: 'Right now the message through the benefit system is all wrong.

 

More...

'It says if you can’t find a job or drop out of work early, the British taxpayer owes you a living for as long as you like no matter how little you have contributed to social security since you arrived.

'My view is simple. Ending the something for nothing culture needs to apply to immigration as well as welfare.'

 

The Prime Minister said rules on accessing benefits, housing and health would be tightened

 

Mr Cameron claimed that the message from the benefit system is 'all wrong' and encouraged foreigners to think they could live off the British state

AT-A-GLANCE: KEY POINTS FROM THE PM'S IMMIGRATION SPEECH

David Cameron set out a raft of ideas in his speech on immigration today. They include:

Housing

Councils to introduce a local residency test, which will mean someone would have to live in an area for 2 or 5 years before they can join the waiting list for social housing.

Residence test

The Habitual Residence Test, which decides if someone is eligible to claim income-related benefits, will be toughened with more emphasis on being able to speak English.

Jobless benefits

New rules from January 2014 will mean that after six months anyone from the European Economic Area — the EU plus Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway — will lose out of work benefits if they cannot prove they are on the verge of getting a job. But critics point out that anyone who is unemployed now faces sanctions if they claim benefits for more than six months.

Outstaying visas

A loophole means someone can claim benefits even once their visa has expired, if they have paid National Insurance contributions.  This will be closed so someone with no right to work in the UK cannot receive state help.

Health

Ministers will look to introduce stricter charging for NHS services or require people from outside the EEA to have private health insurance.

Illegal immigration

Fines for gangmasters and business which employ illegal immigratnts to double to £20,000. Landlords will have to check the migration status of new tenants, so they are not renting to an illegal immigrant. 

The centrepiece of his reforms is a limit of six months on the right of EU nationals to claim out-of-work benefits.

From January, those who cannot show they are on the verge of  securing a job will have their benefits stopped.

But Chris Bryant, Labour's shadow immigration minister, said such restrictions were already in place.

He said current regulations say that EU migrants cannot claim benefits after six months if they are not ‘genuinely seeking work and have a reasonable chance of being engaged’.

Mr Cameron said migrants can only claim after six months if ‘they can prove not just that you are genuinely seeking employment but also that you have a genuine chance of getting a job’.

Mr Bryant said: 'It’s exactly the same, isn’t it, there’s no difference at all, this isn’t a new announcement.'

The Prime Minister also unveiled a crackdown on so-called health tourism, with hospitals ordered to start charging foreign visitors. Those from outside the EU will need health insurance before being granted a visa.

There will be a major shake-up of council housing rules designed to keep immigrant families off waiting lists for at least two years and possibly as many as five.

Town halls will have to stop allowing migrants to jump the queue – last year around 32,000 of the 360,000 available council homes went to foreigners.

Mr Cameron said: 'New migrants should not expect to be given a home on arrival. 

'And yet at present almost one in ten new social lettings go to foreign nationals.

'So I am going to introduce new statutory housing allocations guidance this spring to create a local residence test.

'This should mean that local people rightly get priority in the social housing system.

'And migrants will need to have lived here and contributed to this country for at least two years before they can qualify.'

The measures were described as ‘amongst the toughest in the world’ by immigration minister Mark Harper.

They are a response to public fears of an influx of thousands of migrants from Romania and Bulgaria when movement restrictions are lifted at the end of this year.

The Government is also anxious about growing support for the UK Independence Party, which has fed on concern about the impact of mass immigration.

There is nothing however in the proposals to stops migrants travelling here from the poorer parts of Eastern Europe.

The bid to cap eligibility for benefits to six months will put the Government on collision course with Brussels, which zealously guards the right to free movement across Europe.

Ministers will make the case that after six months migrants will have ‘exhausted’ their right to look for work in this country.

Sources say they are confident of winning an expected legal challenge at the European Court of Justice.

The Government will also seek to close a loophole which enables illegal over-stayers to continue claiming benefits when their visas expire.

And ministers will try to toughen up the rules on the  habitual residency test which governs how quickly migrants can start claiming in-work benefits such as tax credits. 

 VIDEO  Watch Cameron's speech warning migrants of tougher new rules

 

Cameron toughens up on migrants seeking handouts

 

 

EU migrants will be stripped of jobless benefits under the plans to be outlined by David Cameron

 

The plans could cause a clash with Brussels, which protects the right to free travel across Europe

 

David Walker, Bishop of Dudley, said immigration fears bear 'little relationship to the actual reality'

Tory councillor Jonathan Glanz, responsible for housing in Westminster, said: 'We welcome these powers on residency because there have been a lot of people who have come along with unrealistic expectations about their ability to be housed in central London.

'We have almost insatiable demand in Westminster from people arriving who say they would like to live here. We have people living here we would like to favour, and hopefully this legislation will allow us to do so.'

However Tory councillor Mike Jones, speaking for the Local Government Association, criticised the housing proposals.

He said: ‘If they are in the country legally we have a responsibility to do things that are right for people and that’s housing.’

And the Bishop of Dudley, David Walker, said: ‘Public fears around immigration are like fears around crime. They bear little relationship to the actual reality.’

Jonathan Portes, director of the National Institute for Economic and Social Research, said immigrants were "significantly less likely" to claim benefits than people born in the UK - and that those coming from EU countries put more into the economy than they took out.

He told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme that arrivals were mostly younger people whereas the bulk of spending went on healthcare and pensions for older people.

'All the evidence suggests that people who come here from within the European Union make a substantial net contribution to the public finances - they pay in far more than they take out,' he said.

He also played down the impact of health tourism as a 'minuscule' part of a wider funding issue.

JEREMY HUNT VOWS TO CLAMPDOWN ON COSTLY HEALTH TOURISM

 

The Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt has vowed to end 'health tourism'

Jeremy Hunt last night vowed to end the scandal of ‘health tourism’, which is thought to cost the NHS hundreds of millions of pounds a year.

The Health Secretary told the Daily Mail that hospitals will be ordered to start charging foreign nationals for treatment. 

Critics claim the NHS is ‘wide open’ to abuse, with doctors and hospitals making few checks on the eligibility of patients who may have flown to Britain solely to get free healthcare.

Under the crackdown, visitors from outside the EU could be required to take out health insurance or pay a bond before they are granted a visa. Ministers are also investigating whether to extend charging for foreign visitors to GP services.

It is part of a wider package of measures to curb migrants’ free access to services being unveiled by the Prime Minister today. 

Mr Hunt said: ‘The NHS is a National Health Service, not a global health service, and we must stamp out abuse of the system.’

Hospitals can already charge foreign visitors for treatment. In theory they can also reclaim the cost of treating EU visitors from their home governments.

But in many cases they do not, because it is easier to claim the money from NHS funds. Ministers will consult on setting up a central claims unit which would chase payments.

*

A mega mosque in a suburb that was 90 per cent white 30 years ago and the polite apartheid dividing Britain
  • David Goodhart argues that a new patriotism can unite our nation again
  • We will have an ethnic minority population of around 25 per cent by 2020
  • Goodhart says a confident and inclusive national identity can emerge


PUBLISHED: 17:52 EST, 24 March 2013 | UPDATED: 18:58 EST, 24 March 2013 

On Saturday, the leading liberal commentator David Goodhart described the profound effect mass immigration has had on social cohesion. He admitted that, for decades, liberals like him failed to realise its implications. Today, concluding his series, he sets out his vision of how a new Britishness can bind the nation’s fractured communities.

Large-scale immigration has created an England that is increasingly full of mysterious and unfamiliar worlds — as I discovered one day sitting in an enormous minareted mosque in a sedate London suburb among thousands of men in Pashtun dress listening to the words of an elderly man.

Mirza Masroor Ahmad is not any old preacher. To a couple of million Muslims of one particular sect, the Ahmadiyans, he is the holiest man on the planet.
New landscape: Merton's mosque, which dominates the skyline of the south London suburb, and can accommodate 10,000 people

The mosque in Merton, which dominates its neighbourhood, replaced an Express Dairies bottling plant which provided a few hundred jobs for local people and lots of milk bottles — an icon of an earlier, more homogenised age.

The symbolism is not lost on the mainly white older residents, who, when I was there researching the effects of mass immigration on British society, did not seem to be embracing diversity with as much enthusiasm as the proponents of multiculturalism think they should.

They are not unusual. Thanks to over-rapid immigration in recent years, Britain is heading for an ethnic minority population of around 25 per cent by the end of this decade.

And in Merton in South-West London, and too many places like it, a polite apartheid reigns: an accommodation rather than an integration. The white population has more or less reluctantly shuffled along the bench and allowed others to sit down.

Since 1980, Merton’s minority population has risen from 10 per cent to over 50 per cent today. Its primary schools — which were still majority white as recently as 2003 — are now 64 per cent ethnic minority. The area has become, in the jargon, ‘super diverse’.


More...


There is no dominant minority in Merton, which helps to make the changes feel less threatening; but there is not much evidence of a common life being built together either. London is not the happily colour-blind multi-racial city that many people like to imagine.

You can see it in action at weekends in a small park close to Morden station. On a sunny day, the place is usually full but divided along ethnic lines: large groups of Pakistani women picnicking with children, Polish guys drinking beer, young Indian men playing cricket, Africans playing basketball. 

Changing: Large-scale and rapid immigration has had an effect on social cohesion, particularly in big British cities

There is quite a large East European group in Merton which tends to keep itself to itself. Several of the more entrepreneurial communities, such  as the Indians and Tamils and  Iraqi Kurds, create jobs but they invariably go to members of their  own community.

Some minorities import historic feuds. Orthodox Muslims in the area are suspicious of the Ahmadiyans; Tamil youths fight among themselves, as do Somalis; and the historic black (Caribbean and African) versus Asian antipathy is also played out on  some streets.

YES, GIVE ASYLUM - BUT NOT FOREVER

There is a strong case for tightening the legal framework for asylum.

According to the UN Refugee Convention, anyone is entitled to asylum if they are being persecuted on grounds of ‘race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group or political opinion’.

These are wide-ranging  categories. As Charles Clarke, former Labour Home Secretary, has observed: ‘They probably cover hundreds of millions, if not billions, of people.’

But many of the largest groups, such as Somalis, applying to enter Britain and other rich countries as refugees are not facing individual persecution but rather are caught up in regional conflicts, civil wars or natural disasters. They are not the people for whom the Convention was designed.

However, in Britain in recent years, they have often been granted exceptional leave to remain — or what is now called ‘humanitarian protection’.

Between 1997 and 2010,  about 700,000 asylum seekers arrived in Britain. Less than a third were granted asylum or leave to remain, but three-quarters are believed still to be in the country.

There continue to be serious difficulties in removing this large backlog — because of legal constraints and the reluctance of many countries to take them back.

There is no reason why the leave to remain should be  permanent (in theory, in Britain it is reviewed after five years). Civil wars and natural disasters come to an end, and countries need rebuilding.

Rich countries should try to provide shelter from the storm for people badly affected — but then ensure that they return when the storm is over.

Economically, many minority Mertonites are doing pretty well in their enclaves. The Indians and Chinese are doing best of all in school and in jobs, closely tracked by Koreans and Tamils. As in the national picture, the white British are somewhere in the middle.

But not everyone is happy with this situation, whatever the local politicians might claim. To many poorer and older white people, there is a sense of loss.

‘We don’t like it, but we don’t have much choice, do we?’ the owner of a hairdressing salon said about competition from a Muslim hair-cutter who had set up shop two doors along.

Poorer working-class whites are doing worst of all in Merton, as in many similar parts of the country. Such people have mainly opted out: they seldom vote, and a lot of the younger people are ‘Neets’ — not in employment, education or training.

For many of the white people who have remained as the area’s personality has changed, the disappearance of familiar mental and physical landmarks has happened too fast —  symbolised by that giant Ahmadiya mosque with its capacity for 10,000 worshippers (plus six smaller, mainstream mosques in the borough).

The Ahmadiyans are model immigrants in many ways. They preach an ecumenical form of Islam and are grateful to be given refuge in this country. They even took out posters on London buses congratulating the Queen on her Diamond Jubilee.

But to many locals, that’s not the point. As one man — described as White Heritage Elder Male in the  jargon of race relations — told a  Merton council focus group: ‘We’ve lost this place to other cultures. It’s not English any more.’

Local political leaders will often  privately admit to the same concern — though, as in all areas of high minority settlement, they have no choice but to celebrate the new diversity.

And from their vantage point, things do often look more integrated  than they really are. For at the gatherings they attend, there will usually be a cross-section of the local minority elites mingling happily together and sharing the same interests  and concerns.

(Some cynics note that the places where the deepest common life is being forged between the new and the old tribes of urban England is in the local political class and the drug gangs.)

But what we need to do now is  to find a surer way of binding our communities together. One essential tool, I believe, is a national story that everyone can tap into: a story that  can underpin a sense of ‘emotional citizenship’; a belief that despite many different values and backgrounds, we’re also part of the same team.

One of the failings of the separatist multiculturism that developed in the Seventies and Eighties is that it prevented the emergence of a new sense of Britishness — one that absorbed newcomers while keeping a central place for the traditions of the existing society.

Because no clear national identity was on offer, when new citizens arrived here their own ethnic and religious identities filled the gap, leading  to charges that ‘They keep themselves to themselves’ or ‘They don’t want  to fit in’. Misunderstanding built  on misunderstanding, mistrust on mistrust.

Identity: David Goodhart argues that accommodating people of different beliefs does not mean that we have to abandon a sense of national unity

We now need a narrative to inspire and guide us, a new British Dream that encompasses both old and new citizens into this country of ours with its remarkable past.

For historical reasons to do with our imperial past, some parts of the British elite are uncomfortable with the idea of ‘nation’.

As a public schoolboy Leftie  who was then briefly attracted to Marxism while at university, I considered any expression of attachment to my country as stupid (with the exception of the England cricket and football teams).

Boundaries and borders were for the small-minded and the provincial. They were just so uncool. I now believe this disdain of mine was immature and premature,  as well as loftily dismissive of majority opinion.

And a nation state cannot just be a machine for providing individuals with rights, wealth and passports. It needs emotional ballast, too. We need to reinforce the idea of a ‘citizen nation’ that crosses class and ethnic boundaries.

An unembarrassed and un- chauvinistic attachment to this country — its language, its history, a sense of a common home — has long been the sensible, low-key national feeling of ordinary Britain.

Now, two generations after we stopped being an Empire, the opportunity is here for a benign, confident identity to emerge,  which is an aid, not an obstacle, to  integrating newcomers.

National feeling is not primarily about institutions but is rooted in everyday life, from sprawling conurbations to small villages; in shared experience and mutual interests; in a certain kind of humour; and in a rich language.

Very few British people think you have to be white to be part of this.

And most minority Britons, especially those born here, do join the ‘we’, do know something about the history of this country and connect to it, do speak the language as a native, and so on.

They may retain an attachment to other traditions and memories, but there have always been many different, hybrid ways to be English or British.

Immigration problems: British Prime Minister David Cameron and Home Secretary Theresa May, right, visiting the UK Border Agency staff in London

In accommodating people of  different backgrounds and beliefs, we do not need to abandon a sense of national history, or our popular democratic ‘ownership’ of the country we live in. An inclusive and strong national identity is possible.

To develop it, we need a few more stories like the following one. The Labour MP Siobhain McDonagh told me recently of her elderly Irish father sitting in the gallery of the House of Lords shaking his head in pride and disbelief as he watched his other daughter, Margaret, being elevated to the peerage.

He had come to England in the late Forties to work as a labourer, met and married an Irish nurse and they had two daughters.

Both did well. One daughter became an MP, the other  became general-secretary of the Labour Party.

And as he watched one of his girls becoming a baroness, he muttered under his breath: ‘Only in England … only in England.’

He was not technically correct — these things happen in other places, too — but they happen here far more than we admit, and it’s  time that our national story reflected them.

This is not about deference, but gratitude for the best features of an open society. After losing an Empire, perhaps Britain has finally found a role: just being itself.

Adapted from The British Dream by David Goodhart, to be published by Atlantic Books on April 1, 2013 at £20. © David Goodhart. To order a copy for £14 (including p&p), call 0844 472 4157.

*

NO AMERICAN (Legal) BELIEVES THE UNEMPLOYMENT LEVEL IS BELOW 7%. IF YOU’RE AN AMERICAN OVER 50, IT’S TWICE THAT. IF YOU’RE A BLACK AMERICAN IT IS THREE TIMES THAT FIGURE.

AND YET OBAMA CONTINUES TO ASSAULT THE AMERICAN WORKER TO EASE MORE ILLEGALS INTO OUR JOBS AND INTO THE DEMOCRAT PARTY!


Fed projects high US unemployment into 2015

By CHRISTOPHER S. RUGABER

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Federal Reserve foresees unemployment remaining high into 2015, suggesting it will keep short-term interest rates near record lows at least until then.

*

THE GREAT HISPANDERER KEEPS PROMISE TO DISMANTLE OUR BORDERS TO EASE MORE OF HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE of ILLEGALS OVER THESE BORDERS and INTO OUR JOBS AND VOTING BOOTHS!


*
WHO IS OBAMA’S LATEST LA RAZA FASCIST FOR SECRETARY of LABOR?


*

THE REALITY OF OBAMA’S IN-SOURCING US INTO A THIRD WORLD DUMPSTER THAT WILL KEEP HIS WALL STREET PAYMASTERS HAPPY AND GENEROUS!


"Wage-cutting, speedup and the imposition of sweat shop conditions are at the heart of Obama’s strategy for doubling US exports by 2015. He has repeatedly boasted of his administration’s success in “insourcing” jobs back to the US, omitting to mention that these jobs often pay half their previous wages.

The danger, as Washington Post economics columnist Robert Samuelson argues, is that of “importing poverty” in the form of a new underclass—a permanent group of working poor.

*

IN AMERICA, NOT LEGAL NEED APPLY!

Report details massive wealth loss for youth in US

By Nick Barrickman
18 March 2013

A recent report from Washington DC-based Urban Institute (UI) shows that overall percentage of wealth in society for those in “Generation X and Y” (those in their 20s and 30s) has been consistently dropping and is currently at a level which may be unprecedented.


*

DURING BARACK OBAMA’S FIRST TERM, 2/3s OF ALL JOBS WENT TO IMMIGRANTS, BOTH LEGAL AND ILLEGAL.
IT’S ALL ABOUT MAKING BILLIONAIRES BY KEEPING WAGES DEPRESSED.

Silicon Valley Poverty Is Often Ignored By The Tech Hub's Elite

*

AMERICANS (LEGALS) HAND THEIR JOBS OVER TO ILLEGALS USING STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS, PAY FOR THE ANCHOR BABY BREEDING = 18 YEARS OF WELFARE, AND CRIME TIDAL WAVE… but have NO vote in amnesty?

BUT THE DEMS ARE REALLY NOT CONCERNED ABOUT AMNESTY PASSING AS OBAMA WILL CONTINUE NON-ENFORCEMENT UNTIL ILLEGALS ARE VOTING FOR THEIR OWN LA RAZA WELFARE STATE like MEXIFORNIA!


AMERICANS SAY NO TO AMNESTY!American Politicians Say FUCK YOU GRIBGO! WE NEED TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED!


Poll: 64% of Americans Oppose Citizenship for Illegals in Gang of 8 Immigration Plan
http://www.alipac.us/content.php?r=1567-Poll-64-of-Americans-Oppose-Citizenship-for-Illegals-in-Gang-of-8-Immigration-Plan

Obama's 'Hispanicazation' of America  


*

Most Illegal Immigrant Families Collect Welfare… ALL GET AMERICAN JOBS???

April 05, 2011

Surprise, surprise; Census Bureau data reveals that most U.S. families headed by illegal immigrants use taxpayer-funded welfare programs on behalf of their American-born anchor babies.


*

CRIMES AGAINST AMERICA: Barack Obama, His Criminal Banksters and the Mexican Drug Cartels


“I’m not here to punish banks!” Barack Obama in the faces of the American People his bankster donors looted – State of the Union Message

“Records show that four out of Obama's top five contributors are employees of financial industry giants - Goldman Sachs ($571,330), UBS AG ($364,806), JPMorgan Chase ($362,207) and Citigroup ($358,054).”

*

THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA IS FUNDED BY BARACK OBAMA WITH AMERICAN TAX DOLLARS AND OPERATES OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE UNDER OBAMA APPOINTEE CECILIA MUNOZ


*