FAIRUS.org
JUDICIAL WATCH.og
ALIPAC.us
A major aspect of Mexican racism is their LOATHING FOR THE GRINGOS LANGUAGE. Illegals simply refuse to speak it unless they absolutely have to.
LA RAZA DEMS Feinstein, Boxer and Pelosi, ever HISPANDERING make this easy.
ALL THREE HAVE FOUGHT ENGLISH ONLY bills, despite the fact that the AMERICAN PEOPLE are having to pay out millions across the country to make everything bi-lingual to accommodate the Mexican invasion and occupation.
BOXER AND FEINSTEIN HAVE LONG FOUGHT AGAINST ENGLISH ONLY, AND FOR I.D. TO VOTE.
*
“Now House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has moved to kill an amendment that would protect employers from federal lawsuits for requiring their workers to speak English.”
Nancy Pelosi tries to force the Salvation Army to hire people
http://opinionjournal.com/diary/?id=110010881
It's been less than a week since New York's Sen. Hillary Clinton and Gov. Eliot Spitzer had to climb down from their support of driver's licenses for illegal aliens. Now House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has moved to kill an amendment that would protect employers from federal lawsuits for requiring their workers to speak English. Among the employers targeted by such lawsuits: the Salvation Army. Sen. Lamar Alexander, a moderate Republican from Tennessee, is dumbstruck that legislation he views as simple common sense would be blocked. He noted that the full Senate passed his amendment to shield the Salvation Army by 75-19 last month, and the House followed suit with a 218-186 vote just this month. "I cannot imagine that the framers of the 1964 Civil Rights Act intended to say that it's discrimination for a shoe shop owner to say to his or her employee, 'I want you to be able to speak America's common language on the job,' " he told the Senate last Thursday. But that's exactly what the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is trying to do. In March the EEOC sued the Salvation Army because its thrift store in Framingham, Mass., required its employees to speak English on the job. The requirement was clearly posted and employees were given a year to learn the language. The EEOC claimed the store had fired two Hispanic employees for continuing to speak Spanish on the job. It said that the firings violated the law because the English-only policy was not "relevant" to job performance or safety. "If it is not relevant, it is discriminatory, it is gratuitous, it is a subterfuge to discriminate against people based on national origin," says Rep. Charles Gonzalez of Texas, one of several Hispanic Democrats in the House who threatened to block Ms. Pelosi's attempts to curtail the Alternative Minimum Tax unless she killed the Alexander amendment. The confrontation on the night of Nov. 8 was ugly. Members of the Hispanic Caucus initially voted against the rule allowing debate on a tax bill that included the AMT "patch," which for a year would protect some 23 million Americans from being kicked into a higher income tax bracket. Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, a moderate from Maryland, was beside himself. Congressional Quarterly reports that he jabbed his finger on the House floor at Joe Baca, the California Democrat who chairs the Hispanic Caucus, and yelled, "How dare you destroy this party? This will be the worst loss in 10 years." Mr. Baca was having none of it. "You see this on the [voting] board?," he yelled back. "This is against me. This is against me personally." Luckily for Democrats, C-Span's microphones did not pick up the exchange. But it was audible to reporters in the press gallery. They also heard Rep. Luis Gutierrez of Illinois say that English-only efforts were symbolic of "bigotry and prejudice" against those who speak other languages. After testy negotiations, the Hispanic Caucus finally agreed to let the tax bill proceed after extracting a promise from Ms. Pelosi that the House will not vote on the bill funding the Justice and Commerce Departments unless the English-only protection language is dropped. "There ain't going to be a bill" with the Alexander language, Mr. Baca has told reporters.
THOUSANDS OF SMALL BUSINESSES HIRING “CHEAP” MEXICAN LABOR THAT CAN’T SPEAK A BIT OF ENGLISH WILL BE INCONVENIENCE .Sen. Alexander says that if that's the case, "thousands of small businesses across America will have to show there is some special reason to justify requiring their employees to speak our country's common language on the job." He notes that the number of EEOC actions against English-only policies grew to some 200 last year from 32 a decade ago. In an attempt at compromise, he has offered watered-down language that would still allow the EEOC to file many actions, but he says House Democrats rejected it.
*
Cost of teaching English learning students in SB County $34M
Stephen Wall, Staff Writer
Posted: 01/30/2010 02:59:01 PM PST
San Bernardino County public schools are spending more than $34 million in state and federal money this school year to educate English learners, a group whose population has doubled since 1995.
That amount doesn't include additional funding for services and programs available to English learners as well as other students.
Fueled by skyrocketing immigration over the past 15 years, the growth is forcing school districts to make dramatic changes in the classroom.
Districts are making huge investments in teacher preparation and training, hiring bilingual aides and purchasing bilingual materials to help teachers handle the demographic shift.
Some are concerned about the need to focus limited resources on students who may be in the country illegally or whose parents are illegal immigrants. Federal law requires public schools to provide a free kindergarten through 12th grade education to all students regardless of immigration status.
"A lot of parents came here illegally with their children or had children born here. It's creating a huge burden on the state," said Assemblyman Steve Knight, R-Palmdale, whose district includes Victorville and the High Desert. "We have to have so many of these classes that it takes away from the core classes that I'd like to fund."
Gil Navarro, a member of the San Bernardino County board of education, said that immigrant students and English learners are not a drain on the educational system.
"I get tired of people complaining about English learners receiving lawful services when our school districts are just following federal laws," Navarro said. "Taxpayer money is being put to good use because the funding will provide an educated workforce."
More than one-in-five kindergarten through 12th grade students in the county public school system is an English learner, according to the state Department of Education. Five school districts have English learner enrollments of at least 25 percent. The overwhelming majority of English learners - 94 percent - identify Spanish as their first language.
"With the growth, we have had to relook at how we approach our English learners," said Martha Duenas, coordinator of the Department of English Learner Services for the Fontana Unified School District. Nearly four-in-10 Fontana Unified students is an English learner.
"It's a challenge for schools to meet the needs of English learners," said Bertha Arreguin, director of language support services for the Colton Joint Unified School District, where one-quarter of students are English learners.
Most English learners were born in the United States, but their parents came here during the immigration boom that started in the 1980s, intensified in the 1990s and continued through the last decade, according to the Pew Hispanic Center, a nonprofit research organization in Washington, D.C.
The school-age population in the United States, which now stands at about 53 million, is expected to reach 58 million by 2020.
More than 80 percent of that growth - about 4.5 million kids - will be the children of immigrant parents, the center projects.
Growing up in immigrant families where English is not spoken at home puts added pressure on schools to help students meet increasingly rigorous academic requirements.
"Nationally, schools and school districts are going to be faced with more and more students who will need English learner services," said Richard Fry, senior research associate at the center.
Locally, school districts receive three pots of state and federal money to specifically to educate students with limited English skills.
Districts get an average of $244 per student from the state in economic impact aid. They also receive about $95 per student in federal Title III funds for immigrant students. An additional $100 per student is available for pupils in grades four through eight from the state-funded English Language Acquisition Program.
The three funding sources total $34.4 million when multiplied the number of students in each category.
English learners often use other services such as free and reduced lunch programs that are not included in that cost, school officials say.
There are other pools of money that support English learners who receive special education, as well as English learners who are in the Gifted and Talented Education program.
"It's money well-spent because the majority of these students are U.S. citizens," said Lupe Andrade, director of English learner programs in the Rialto Unified School District, where nearly one-in-three students is an English learner.
"We want them to leave our educational system well-educated so they can contribute well to our economy," Andrade said. "Language shouldn't be a barrier to educating somebody."
While programs have their differences, many districts spend their English learner money in similar ways.
A large chunk is devoted to staff development to provide teachers with strategies to engage English learners. Administrators are also trained to identify the needs of English learners.
Many districts have teacher coaches specializing in English learner students who act as a resource for their colleagues and supplemental classroom supplies.
Districts also set aside time every day for intensive speaking, listening, reading and writing in English.
Officials say support systems are critical to help districts whose large numbers of English learner students are one reason for their low test scores.
"We've had good growth (in test scores) with English learners," said Daniel Arellano, director of English learner programs for the San Bernardino City Unified School District, which has a 33-percent English learner population.
"We're aren't anywhere near where we should be," Arellano said, "but we are much better than we were."
The Ontario-Montclair Unified School District, where nearly half the students are English learners, offers a newcomer class to help immigrant students get acclimated to this country.
"Our job is to educate students and take them from wherever they're at and move them forward," said Karla Wells, the district's director of academic accountability.
Critics say illegal immigration is breaking the state's bank and that illegal immigrants shouldn't get special services.
In 2004, California spent $7.7 billion to educate illegal immigrants and the U.S.-born children of illegal immigrants, according to a report from the Federation for American Immigration Reform, which supports strict limits on immigration.
"The costs are astronomical," said Raymond Herrera, founder and president of We The People California's Crusader, a Claremont-based anti-illegal immigration group. "American posterity is very much in peril. We can't go on this way."
________________________________________
English learner students in selected San Bernardino County school districts (2008-2009 school year):
* San Bernardino City Unified School District: 18,131 (33 percent of total students).
* Fontana Unified School District: 16,049 (39 percent of total).
* Ontario-Montclair Unified School District: 11,237 (49 percent of total).
* Rialto Unified School District: 8,486 (31 percent of total).
* Colton Joint Unified School District: 6,117 (25 percent of total).
* Source: California Department of Education
*
No comments:
Post a Comment