New York Mayor
De Blasio makes token gesture against evictions
By Philip Guelpa
21 August 2017
New York City mayor Bill de Blasio signed a new law on August 11
that is supposed to guarantee legal representation to low-income residents
facing eviction from their apartments. As of 2014, when the law was first proposed,
90 percent of landlords had lawyers in eviction cases while only 10 percent of
tenants had legal representation. The new law will not come into full effect
until 2020.
In New York’s extremely tight housing market, the city’s big
landlords are notorious for using illegal and at times brutal tactics to drive
out tenants, especially those in rent-controlled or rent-stabilized apartments,
in order to substantially increase rents and maximize profits. Those tenants
who cannot afford legal representation are at an overwhelming disadvantage when
confronted by the high-priced lawyers representing wealthy real estate
interests. In 2015, for example, nearly 22,000 tenants suffered eviction from
their homes.
The so-called progressive Democrat de Blasio, elected four years
ago pledging to fight the city’s extreme and growing inequality, is making a
number of cosmetic and ineffectual moves regarding housing and homelessness, in
order to burnish his credentials in advance of his coming re-election campaign.
For example, in addition to this latest law, a few of the most notorious
landlords have recently been subject to legal action.
Not only do landlords force out existing tenants, they also
flagrantly violate existing regulations intended to moderate the rate at which apartment
rents can be increased.
In one recent and especially telling example, Kushner Companies, a
major real estate firm in New York, and the family firm of Jared Kushner,
President Donald Trump’s son-in-law and senior advisor, has been accused of a
“systematic effort to illegally overcharge tenants and remove affordable
apartments from rent regulation.”
The suit, brought by the non-profit Housing Rights Initiative
(HRI), alleges that Kushner Companies buys existing buildings subject to city
rent regulations and then uses brazen subterfuges to proceed as if most or all
of the units are unregulated. In one case cited by HRI, Kushner bought a
building in Brooklyn in which all the apartments were subject to rent
stabilization (i.e. a limitation on the rate at which rents could be
increased), but registered only 10 percent of the units as falling under the
regulation.
The head of HRI cites one instance in which a Kushner-owned
one-bedroom apartment in which the tenant was being charged $2,500 per month
but the legal rent was only $1,100. According to the New York Times, Kushner owns more than
20,000 apartments and nearly 14 million square feet of office space.
A recent audit by New York State’s Tenant Protection Unit (TPU)
revealed that out of a sample of 1,100 landlords 40 percent were unable to
justify their rents.
Supporters of the law on legal representation for poor tenants
claim that it will result in a significant reduction in homelessness. This is
highly unlikely. Or, at least, they say, it could “soften the blow” by various
mitigative measures such as finding alternative housing for those losing their
homes, a cosmetic solution at best. The real significance of this legislation
must be viewed within the context of the city’s ever-worsening crisis in
homelessness and lack of affordable housing.
In recent years, homelessness in New York City has reached a
record high. Approximately sixty-thousand people, the equivalent of a small
city, now spend the night in homeless shelters and thousands more are living on
the streets, “in the rough.” Between 2010 and 2017, the numbers for families
with children in shelters shot up by nearly 49 percent. The de Blasio administration’s
efforts have had no substantial effect on the homelessness crisis in New York.
A recent study by the real estate web site EasyStreet reveals that
for most of the population rents are rising twice as quickly as wages. The
study showed that since 2010, while median rents rose by 3.9 percent a year,
wages increased by only 1.8 percent. The rate of increase for the lowest rents,
the bottom 20 percent, was the highest: 4.9 percent a year since 2010. At the
same time, the lowest fifth of wage earners saw their incomes fall by 1.1
percent.
By contrast, the highest priced rentals rose only 3 percent per
year over the same period while the wealth of the city’s elite grows ever
greater. The result is that the cost of housing is becoming increasingly unaffordable
for all but the wealthiest segments of the population.
The disparity between income and housing costs places working
class tenants at a growing risk of economic catastrophe. A 2016 report by the
Association for Neighborhood & Housing Development found that the savings
of nearly 60 percent of city residents are insufficient to cover three months
of basic household expenses. The level of poverty and its concentration in a
growing number of neighborhoods is rising rapidly.
The fundamental problem stems from ever-growing economic
inequality caused by the crisis of the capitalist system. This is manifested in
the twin phenomena of upwardly spiraling rents and stagnant or declining wages.
Under these conditions, free legal representation for those facing eviction, no
matter how effective in individual cases, will do little to stem the growing
tide of homelessness.
In addition, funding for the promised legal services is in
jeopardy. Twenty percent of Legal Services NYC’s funding, the agency that would
provide legal representation to the poor in eviction cases, comes from the
federal government’s Legal Services Corporation, the budget of which the Trump
administration has promised to slash, as part of the overall assault on social
services.
AMERICA UNRAVELS:
Millions of children go hungry as the super- rich gorge themselves
and ILLEGALS SUCK IN BILLIONS IN WELFARE!
*
"The top 10 percent of Americans now own roughly
three-quarters of all household wealth."
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/08/america-unravels-millions-of-children.html
*
BLOG: OBAMA'S FLOODING OF THIS COUNTRY WAS TO
FINISH OFF THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS, DESTROY
THE GOP AND BUILD HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE OF
LOOTING MEXICANS. HE OPERATED LA RAZA OUT OF
THE WHITE HOUSE FOR 8 YEARS.
SOARING
POVERTY AND DRUG ADDICTION UNDER OBAMA
"These
figures present a scathing indictment of the social order that prevails in
America, the world’s wealthiest country, whose government proclaims itself to
be the globe’s leading democracy. They are just one manifestation of the human
toll taken by the vast and all-pervasive inequality and mass poverty
AMERICA UNRAVELS:
Millions of children go hungry as the super- rich gorge themselves
and ILLEGALS SUCK IN BILLIONS IN WELFARE!
*
"The top 10 percent of Americans now own roughly
three-quarters of all household wealth."
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/08/america-unravels-millions-of-children.html
*
"While
telling workers there is “not enough money” for wage increases, or to fund
social programs, both parties hailed the recent construction of the U.S.S.
Gerald Ford, a massive aircraft carrier that cost $13 billion to build,
stuffing the pockets of numerous contractors and war profiteers."
Big business, military tighten their grip on Washington
21 August 2017
It is often the case that the outcome of events reveals the essential issues underlying political developments. This is true of the conflicts that erupted within the ruling class over the Nazi rampage in Charlottesville, which culminated in the dismissal Friday of Trump’s chief strategist Stephen Bannon.
The corporate-controlled media has sought to portray the sequence of events entirely in racial terms, with Bannon and other advocates of “white nationalism” now purged, leaving political control of the White House and the Trump administration in steadier and more “moderate” political hands: a group of generals and ex-generals, headed by White House Chief of Staff John Kelly, together with Wall Street financiers such as Gary Cohn, Trump’s chief economic adviser, and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin.
The New York Times has led the way, with an editorial Sunday declaring that “Americans accustomed constitutionally and politically to civilian leadership now find themselves relying on three current and former generals—John Kelly, the new White House chief of staff; H. R. McMaster, the national security adviser; and Jim Mattis, the secretary of defense—to stop Mr. Trump from going completely off the rails. Experienced and educated, well-versed in the terrible costs of global confrontation and driven by an impulse toward public service that Mr. Trump doesn’t possess, these three, it is hoped, can counter his worst instincts.”
In the same edition of the Times, a news analysis celebrates what its headline calls “The Moral Voice of Corporate America.” In this account, “a chorus of business leaders rose up this past week to condemn hate groups and espouse tolerance and inclusion.”
Among those named as part of this “chorus” of “moral” leaders are such corporate criminals as Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase, one of those responsible for the 2008 financial collapse; Mary Barra of General Motors, who oversaw the cover-up of an ignition-switch defect that killed hundreds of people; and WalMart CEO Doug McMillon, whose company is a synonym for low-wage exploitation.
The ruling elite saw Trump’s incautious remarks defending the neo-Nazis who rioted in Charlottesville as a serious threat to the interests of American imperialism abroad as well as the maintenance of social and political stability at home. Powerful corporate interests feared the implications for Trump’s agenda of corporate tax cuts, the removal of business regulations, a profit windfall in the guise of infrastructure reform and the gutting of Medicaid and other social programs.
Trump’s self-exposure of his efforts to build an extra-parliamentary fascistic base increased the nervousness in financial circles over the danger of a collapse of the speculative bubble that has been built up since the 2008 Wall Street crash.
The response, laid out most clearly by the Times, has been to increase the grip of the military and corporate America over the government to an extent unprecedented in US history. It is 56 years since President Dwight D. Eisenhower, in his 1961 farewell address, warned of the dangers to democracy posed by the rise of the “military-industrial complex.” He could have no conception of the size, power and degree of dominance exercised by the vast military/intelligence/corporate complex of today.
The first result of this consolidation was the announcement that Trump will deliver a nationwide address tonight, unveiling plans for an expansion of the war in Afghanistan.
What the ruling elite fears above all is the growth of working-class opposition to the Trump administration and the entire political system. Thus, excised from the official narrative promoted by the media is any reference to the reality of social life in America—a country in which 20 individuals control as much wealth as the poorest half of the population—as well as the reactionary agenda of the Trump administration itself. Nor is there any discussion of war and the crimes carried out by “responsible” leaders such as Mattis, who won his appellation “Mad Dog” for his role in destroying the Iraqi city of Fallujah.
This is replaced with a series of diversionary issues, centered on a grossly distorted presentation of the United States as a country seething with racial intolerance and an exaggerated picture of the strength and influence of neo-Nazi and racist forces. Hence one has the apparently contradictory but in fact compatible phenomena, ubiquitous in the Democratic Party-aligned media, of the promotion of identity politics alongside respectful and even admiring portrayals of the white supremacist thugs who demonstrated in Charlottesville.
Typical was a newsletter released Sunday by the New Yorker under the headline, “White Supremacy in America.”
FINISH OFF THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS, DESTROY
THE GOP AND BUILD HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE OF
LOOTING MEXICANS. HE OPERATED LA RAZA OUT OF
THE WHITE HOUSE FOR 8 YEARS.
In an introduction, David Remnick, author of the hagiographic biography of Obama, The Bridge, proclaims, “Make no mistake: neo-Nazis and white supremacists are now at the forefront of American politics.”
Among the featured articles is one by author Toni Morrison titled “Making America White Again,” which insists that “Unlike any nation in Europe, the United States holds whiteness as the unifying force.” In line with the Democratic Party and its various appendages among the pseudo-left organizations of the privileged middle class, Morrison explains the election of Trump as the product of the racism of “white America”:
On Election Day, how eagerly so many white voters—both the poorly educated and the well educated—embraced the shame and fear sowed by Donald Trump. The candidate whose company has been sued by the Justice Department for not renting apartments to black people. The candidate who questioned whether Barack Obama was born in the United States, and who seemed to condone the beating of a Black Lives Matter protester at a campaign rally. The candidate who kept black workers off the floors of his casinos. The candidate who is beloved by David Duke and endorsed by the Ku Klux Klan.
This effort to portray all whites, and particularly white men, as secret supporters of the KKK is a political fraud. Racism does exist. However, the white supremacists and neo-Nazis who marched in Charlottesville are a tiny minority who are regarded with deep revulsion by the vast majority of working people. A nationwide mobilization could dredge up only a few hundred proponents of this barbaric ideology. Meanwhile, tens of thousands of all races have marched to denounce both Trump and the fascists he defends.
Trump is president today, not because of a mass vote for racism, but because he more successfully appealed to social discontent than the Democratic Party and Hillary Clinton, the personification of the alliance between Wall Street and the military-intelligence apparatus, who did not attempt to conceal her complacent contempt for the plight of tens of millions of working people struggling to survive.
The racialist narrative is being used to demonize large sections of the population, buttress the identity politics of privileged layers of the middle class, provide political cover for a massive transfer of wealth to the rich, rally support for a virtual palace coup by the generals and corporate billionaires, and, above all, divert and suppress an independent movement of the working class.
The overriding threat to democratic rights comes not from a handful of fascist thugs, but from the very alliance of Wall Street and the Pentagon that is being touted as the antidote to the racists in the streets.
As for the Times and the various affiliates of the Democratic Party, they see the real threat coming not from neo-Nazis, but from a socialist movement of the working class.
The promotion of racialist politics and the tightening of military-corporate control over the government go hand-in-hand with the suppression of oppositional views, above all the World Socialist Web Site. Thus the decision taken by Google, in close coordination with the state, to censor and blacklist the WSWS through the manipulation of search results. This is the prelude to more aggressive actions to target socialist opposition to the policies of the corporate and financial elite.
Patrick Martin and Joseph Kishore
No comments:
Post a Comment