THERE IS NO SUB-CULTURE MORE RACIST OR VIOLENT THAN THE MEXICAN INVADERS!
"The American Southwest
seems to be slowly returning to the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a
single shot." --- Excelsior, the
national newspaper of Mexico
“The radicals seek nothing less than
secession from the United States whether to form their own sovereign state or
to reunify with Mexico. Those who desire reunification with Mexico are
irredentists who seek to reclaim Mexico's "lost" territories in the
American Southwest.” Maria Hsia Chang
Professor of Political Science, University of Nevada Reno
Exclusive: The Truth About ‘La Raza’
http://humanevents.com/2006/04/07/emexclusive-emthe-truth-about-la-raza/
The nation’s
television screens many days recently have been filled with scenes of huge
crowds carrying the colorful green and red flag of Mexico viewers could well
have thought it was a national holiday in Mexico City.
It was instead,
downtown Los Angeles, Calif., although the scene was recreated in numerous
other cities around the country with substantial Mexican populations. Hordes of
Mexican expatriates, many here illegally, were protesting the very U.S.
immigration laws they were violating with impunity. They found it offensive and
a violation of their rights that the U.S. dared to have immigration laws to
begin with.
Los Angeles Mayor
Antonio Villaraigosa mounted the podium, but any hopes that he would quiet the
crowds and defend the law were soon dashed. Villaraigosa, himself, has spent a
lifetime opposing U.S. immigration law.
For law-abiding Americans without knowledge of the dark side of
our current illegal immigration crisis, all this is unfathomable. For those who
know the truth about the “La Raza” movement,
these demonstrations were a prophecy fulfilled.
It is past time for
all Americans to know what is at the root of this outrageous behavior, and the
extent to which the nation is at risk because of “La Raza” — The Race.
There are many
immigrant groups joined in the overall “La Raza” movement. The most prominent
and mainstream organization is the National Council de La Raza — the Council of
“The Race”.
To most of the
mainstream media, most members of Congress, and even many of their own members,
the National Council of La Raza is no more than a Hispanic Rotary Club.
But the National Council
of La Raza succeeded in raking in over $15.2 million in federal grants last
year alone, of which $7.9 million was in U.S. Department of Education grants
for Charter Schools, and undisclosed amounts were for get-out-the-vote efforts
supporting La Raza political positions.
The Council of La
Raza succeeded in having itself added to congressional hearings by Republican
House and Senate leaders. And an anonymous senator even gave the Council of La
Raza an extra $4 million in earmarked taxpayer money, supposedly for “housing
reform,” while La Raza continues to lobby the Senate for virtual open borders
and amnesty for illegal aliens.
The
Mexican flag flew over a crowd of pro-amnesty marchers in New York. Marches
like this across the U.S. have been supported by the “La Raza” movement.
(Reuters/Seth Wenig)
|
Radical ‘Reconquista’ Agenda
Behind the
respectable front of the National Council of La Raza lies the real agenda of
the La Raza movement, the agenda that led to those thousands of illegal
immigrants in the streets of American cities, waving Mexican flags, brazenly
defying our laws, and demanding concessions.
Key among the
secondary organizations is the radical racist group Movimiento Estudiantil
Chicano de Aztlan, or Chicano Student Movement of Aztlan (MEChA), one of the
most anti-American groups in the country, which has permeated U.S. campuses
since the 1960s, and continues its push to carve a racist nation out of the
American West.
One of America’s
greatest strengths has always been taking in immigrants from cultures around
the world, and assimilating them into our country as Americans. By being
citizens of the U.S. we are Americans first, and only, in our national
loyalties.
This is totally
opposed by MEChA for the hordes of illegal immigrants pouring across our
borders, to whom they say:
“Chicano is our
identity; it defines who we are as people. It rejects the notion that we…should
assimilate into the Anglo-American melting pot…Aztlan was the legendary
homeland of the Aztecas … It became synonymous with the vast territories of the
Southwest, brutally stolen from a Mexican people marginalized and betrayed by
the hostile custodians of the Manifest Destiny.” (Statement on University of
Oregon MEChA Website, Jan. 3, 2006)
MEChA isn’t at all
shy about their goals, or their views of other races. Their founding principles
are contained in these words in “El Plan Espiritual de Aztlan” (The Spiritual
Plan for Aztlan):
“In the spirit of a
new people that is conscious not only of its proud historical heritage but also
of the brutal gringo invasion of our territories, we, the Chicano inhabitants
and civilizers of the northern land of Aztlan from whence came our forefathers,
reclaiming the land of their birth and consecrating the determination of our
people of the sun, declare that the call of our blood is our power, our
responsibility, and our inevitable destiny. … Aztlan belongs to those who plant
the seeds, water the fields, and gather the crops and not to the foreign
Europeans. … We are a bronze people with a bronze culture. Before the world,
before all of North America, before all our brothers in the bronze continent,
we are a nation, we are a union of free pueblos, we are Aztlan. For La Raza
todo. Fuera de La Raza nada.”
That closing
two-sentence motto is chilling to everyone who values equal rights for all. It
says: “For The Race everything. Outside The Race, nothing.”
If these morally
sickening MEChA quotes were coming from some fringe website, Americans could at
least console themselves that it was just a small group of nuts behind it.
Nearly every racial and ethnic group has some shady characters and positions in
its past and some unbalanced individuals today claiming racial superiority and
demanding separatism. But this is coming straight from the official MEChA sites
at Georgetown University, the University of Texas, UCLA, University of
Michigan, University of Colorado, University of Oregon, and many other colleges
and universities around the country.
MEChA was in fact
reported to be one of the main organizers of those street demonstrations we
witnessed over the past weeks. That helps explain why those hordes of illegal
immigrants weren’t asking for amnesty — they were demanding an end to U.S. law,
period. Unlike past waves of immigrants who sought to become responsible
members of American society, these protesters reject American society
altogether, because they have been taught that America rightfully belongs to
them.
MEChA and the La Raza
movement teach that Colorado, California, Arizona, Texas, Utah, New Mexico,
Oregon and parts of Washington State make up an area known as “Aztlan” — a
fictional ancestral homeland of the Aztecs before Europeans arrived in North
America. As such, it belongs to the followers of MEChA. These are all areas
America should surrender to “La Raza” once enough immigrants, legal or illegal,
enter to claim a majority, as in Los Angeles. The current borders of the United
States will simply be extinguished.
This plan is what is
referred to as the “Reconquista” or reconquest, of the Western U.S.
But it won’t end with
territorial occupation and secession. The final plan for the La Raza movement
includes the ethnic cleansing of Americans of European, African, and Asian
descent out of “Aztlan.”
As Miguel Perez of
Cal State-Northridge’s MEChA chapter has been quoted as saying: “The ultimate
ideology is the liberation of Aztlan. Communism would be closest [to it]. Once
Aztlan is established, ethnic cleansing would commence: Non-Chicanos would have
to be expelled — opposition groups would be quashed because you have to keep
power.”
MEChA Plants
Members of these
radical, anti-American, racist organizations are frequently smoothly polished
into public respectability by the National Council of La Raza.
Former MEChA members
include Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, who was officially endorsed by
La Raza for mayor and was awarded La Raza’s Graciela Olivarez Award. Now we
know why he refuses to condemn a sea of foreign flags in his city. California
Lt. Gov. Cruz Bustamante is also a former MEChA member. He delivered the
keynote address at La Raza’s 2002 Annual Convention.
The National Council
of La Raza and its allies in public office make no repudiation of the radical
MEChA and its positions. In fact, as recently as 2003, La Raza was actively
funding MEChA, according to federal tax records.
Imagine Robert Byrd’s
refusing to disavow the views of the KKK, or if Strom Thurmond had failed to
admit segregation was wrong. Imagine Heritage or Brookings Foundation making
grants to the American Nazi Party.
Is the National
Council of La Raza itself a racist organization? Regardless of the
organization’s suspect ties, the majority of its members are not. When one
examines all the organization’s activities, they are commendable non-profit
projects, such as education and housing programs.
But even these
defensible efforts raise the question of whether education and housing programs
funded with federal tax dollars should be used in programs specifically
targeted to benefit just one ethnic group.
La Raza defenders
usually respond by calling anyone making these allegations “a racist” for
having called attention to La Raza’s racist links. All the groups and public
officials with ties to the La Raza movement can take a big step towards
disproving these allegations by simply following the examples of Senators Byrd
and Thurmond and repenting of their past ways.
If they are unwilling
to admit past misdeeds, they can at least state — unequivocally — that they
officially oppose the racist and anti-American positions of MEChA, and any
other groups that espouse similar views.
Through public
appearances, written statements, and on their respective websites, La Raza
groups and allies must:
1. Denounce the motto “For La Raza todo. Fuera de La Raza nada,”
as repugnant, racist, and totally incompatible with American society or
citizenship.
2. Acknowledge the right of all Americans to live wherever they
choose in the U.S. without segregation.
3. Commit to sponsorship of nationwide educational programs to
combat racism and anti-Semitism in the Hispanic community.
4. Denounce and sever all ties with MEChA and any other
organizations with which they have ever been associated which held to the
racist doctrines held by MEChA.
5. Acknowledge the
internationally recognized borders of the U.S., the right of the citizens of
the U.S. to determine immigration policy through the democratic
process, and the right of the U.S. to undertake any and all necessary steps to
effectively enforce immigration law and defend its border against unauthorized
entry.
6. Repudiate all claims that current American territory rightfully
belongs to Mexico.
If the National
Council of La Raza, other La Raza groups, and local and national political
leaders with past ties and associations with the radical elements of the La
Raza movement can publicly issue such a statement and live by every one of
these principles, they should be welcomed into the American public policy
arena, with past sins — real or imaginary — forgiven.
If they cannot
publicly and fully support these principles, Congress needs to take appropriate
steps and immediately bar any group refusing to comply from receiving any
future federal funds. Both the House and Senate should strike these groups from
testifying before any committees, and the White House should sever all ties.
Both political parties should disengage from any further contact with these
groups and individuals.
There are plenty of
decent, patriotic Hispanic organizations and elected officials to provide
Congress with necessary feedback on specific issues confronting Americans of
Latino heritage. Any group or individual who can agree with the simple six
points should be welcomed into that fold.
If not, the American
people will know there’s a wolf in their midst, and take the necessary
precautions to defend our Republic against an enemy.
Ocasio-Cortez Supports ‘$0’ for ‘Racist Border Wall’
1:27
Rep.-elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) on Thursday expressed support for allocating absolutely “$0” for President Donald Trump’s “racist border wall.”
Our Revolution, the group that spun off after Sen. Bernie Sanders’ (I-VT) presidential campaign, tweeted on Thursday: “$0. $0 is what should be allocated for this president’s racist border wall.”
The Democratic-Socialist, who campaigned in 2018 on abolishing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and supported Sanders in 2016, re-tweeted it and added: “Say it again for the people in the Senate.”
Ocasio-Cortez’s remarks come days after Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) outraged left-wing activists by saying he would support giving President Donald Trump $1.6 billion for the border wall.
Trump said this week that he would be “willing” to shut down the government this month if he does not get just $5 billion of the $25 billion needed for the border wall.
Ocasio-Cortez’s comments targeting the Senate will raise eyebrows especially since left-wing activists and reporters called for her to primary Schumer after he put $1.6 billion on the table to fund Trump’s border wall.
MULTICULTURALISM,
IMMIGRATION AND AZTLAN
By Maria Hsia Chang Professor of
Political Science, University of Nevada Reno
One
of the standard arguments invoked by those in favor of massive immigration into
the United States is that our country is founded on immigrants who have always
been successfully assimilated into America's mainstream culture and society. As
one commentator put it, "Assimilation evokes the misty past of Ellis
Island, through which millions entered, eventually seeing their descendants
become as American as George Washington."1 Nothing more vividly testifies
against that romantic faith in America's ability to continuously assimilate new
members than the events of October 16, 1994 in Los Angeles. On that day, 70,000
people marched beneath "a sea of Mexican flags" protesting
Proposition 187, a referendum measure that would deny many state benefits to
illegal immigrants and their children. Two weeks later, more protestors marched
down the street, this time carrying an American flag upside down. Both protests point to a disturbing and rising phenomenon of Chicano
separatism in the United States — the product of a complex of forces, among
which are multiculturalism and a generous immigration policy combined with a
lax border control. The Problem Chicanos refer to "people of Mexican
descent in the United States" or "Mexican Americans in general." Today, there are reasons to believe
that Chicanos as a group are unlike previous immigrants in that they are more
likely to remain unassimilated and unintegrated, whether by choice or
circumstance — resulting in the formation of a separate quasi-nation within the
United States. More than that, there are Chicano political activists who intend
to marry cultural separateness with territorial and political
self-determination. The more moderate among them aspire to the cultural and
political autonomy of "home rule". The radicals seek nothing less than secession from the United States
whether to form their own sovereign state or to reunify with Mexico. Those who
desire reunification with Mexico are irredentists who seek to reclaim Mexico's
"lost" territories in the American Southwest.
Whatever
their goals, what animates all of them is the dream of Aztlan. According to
legend, Aztlan was the ancestral homeland of the Aztecs which they left in
journeying southward to found Tenochtitlan, the center of their new
civilization, which is today's Mexico City. Today, the "Nation of
Aztlan" refers to the American southwestern states of California, Arizona,
Texas, New Mexico, portions of Nevada, Utah, Colorado, which Chicano
nationalists claim were stolen by the United States and must be reconquered
(Reconquista) and reclaimed for Mexico. The myth of Aztlan was revived by
Chicano political activists in the 1960s as a central symbol of Chicano
nationalist ideology. In 1969, at the Chicano National Liberation Youth
Conference in Denver, Rodolfo "Corky" Gonzales put forth a political
document entitled El Plan de Aztlan (Spiritual Plan of Aztlan). The Plan is a
clarion call to Mexican-Americans to form a separate Chicano nation: In the
spirit of a new people that is conscious not only of its proud historial
heritage, but also of the brutal "gringo" invasion of our
territories, we, the Chicano inhabitants and civilizers of the nothern land of
Aztlan from whence came our forefathers ...declare that the call of our blood
is...our inevitable destiny.... Aztlan belongs to those who plant the seeds,
water the fields, and gather the crops, and not to the foreign Europeans. We do
not recognize capricious frontiers on the bronze continent.... Brotherhood
unites us, and love for our brothers makes us a people whose time has come ....
With our heart in our hands and our hands in the soil, we declare the
independence of our mestizo nation. We are a bronze people with a bronze
culture. Before the world, before all of North America, before all our brothers
in the bronze continent, we are a nation, we are a union of free pueblos, we
are Aztlan.
How
Chicanos are Unlike Previous Immigrants Brent A. Nelson, writing in 1994,
observed that in the 1980s America's Southwest had begun to be transformed into
"a de facto nation" with its own culture, history, myth, geography,
religion, education, and language. Whatever evidence there is indicates that
Chicanos, as a group, are unlike previous waves of immigrants into the United
States. In the first place, many Chicanos do not consider themselves immigrants
at all because their people "have been here for 450 years" before the
English, French, or Dutch. Before California and the Southwest were seized by
the United States, they were the lands of Spain and Mexico. As late as 1780 the
Spanish crown laid claim to territories from Florida to California, and on the
far side of the Mississippi up to the Great Lakes and the Rockies. Mexico held
title to much of Spanish possessions in the United States until the Treaty of
Guadalupe Hidalgo ended the Mexican-American war in 1848. As a consequence,
Mexicans "never accepted the borders drawn up by the 1848 treaty."
That
history has created among Chicanos a feeling of resentment for being "a
conquered people," made part of the United States against their will and
by the force of arms. Their resentment is amply expressed by Voz Fronteriza, a
Chicano student publication, which referred to Border Patrol officers killed in
the line of duty as "pigs (migra)" trying to defend "the false
frontier."
Chicanos
are also distinct from other immigrant groups because of the geographic
proximity of their native country. Their physical proximity to Mexico gives
Chicanos "the option of life in both Americas, in two places and in two
cultures, something earlier immigrants never had." Geographic proximity
and ease of transportation are augmented by the media. Radio and television
keep the spoken language alive and current so that Spanish, unlike the native
languages of previous immigrants into the United States, "shows no sign of
fading."
A
result of all that is the failure by Chicanos to be fully assimilated into the
larger American society and culture. As Earl Shorris, author
of Latinos: A Biography of the People, observed: "Latinos have been more
resistant to the melting pot than any other group. Their entry en masse into
the United States will test the limits of the American experiment...." The continuous influx of Mexican
immigrants into the United States serve to continuously renew Chicano culture
so that their sense of separateness will probably continue "far into the
future...." There are other reasons for the failure of Chicano
assimilation. Historically, a powerful force for assimilation was upward social
mobility: Immigrants into the United States became assimilated as they rose in
educational achievement and income. But today's post-industrial American
economy, with its narrower paths to upward mobility, is making it more
difficult for certain groups to improve their socioeconomic circumstances.
Unionized factory jobs, which once provided a step up for the second generation
of past waves of immigrants, have been disappearing for decades. Instead of the
diamond-shaped economy of industrial America, the modern American economy is
shaped like an hourglass. There is a good number of jobs for unskilled people
at the bottom, a fair number of jobs for the highly educated at the top, but
comparatively few jobs for those in the middle without a college education or
special skills. To illustrate, a RAND Corporation study forecasts that 85
percent of California's new jobs will require post-secondary education. For a
variety of reasons, the nationwide high-school dropout rate for Hispanics (the
majority of whom are Chicano) is 30 percent — three times the rate for whites
and twice the rate for blacks. Paradoxically, the dropout rate for Hispanics
born in the United States is even higher than for young immigrants. Among
Chicanos, high-school dropout rates actually rise between the second and third
generations. Their low educational achievement accounts for why Chicanos as a
group are poor despite being hardworking. In 1996, for the first time, Hispanic
poverty rate began to exceed that of American blacks. In 1995, household income
rose for every ethnic group except Hispanics, for whom it dropped 5 percent.
Latinos now make up a quarter of the nation's poor people, and are more than
three times as likely to be impoverished than whites. This decline in income
has taken place despite high rates of labor-force participation by Latino men,
and despite an emerging Latino middle class. In California, where
Latinos now approach one-third of the population, their education levels are
far lower than those of other immigrants, and they earn about half of what
native-born Californians earn. This means that, for the first time in the history of
American immigration, hard work is not leading to economic advancement because
immigrants in service jobs face unrelenting labor-market pressure from more
recently arrived immigrants who are eager to work for less. The narrowing of
the pathways of upward mobility has implications for the children of recent
Mexican immigrants. Their ascent into the middle-class mainstream will likely
be blocked and they will join children of earlier black and Puerto Rican migrants
as part of an expanded multiethnic underclass. Whereas first generation
immigrants compare their circumstances to the Mexico that they left — and
thereby feel immeasurably better off — their children and grandchildren will
compare themelves to other U.S. groups. Given their lower educational
achievement and income, that comparison will only lead to feelings of relative
deprivation and resentment. They are unlikely to be content as maids,
gardeners, or fruit pickers. Many young Latinos in the second and third
generations see themselves as locked in irremediable conflict with white
society, and are quick to deride successful Chicano students as
"wannabes." For them, to study hard is to
"act white" and exhibit group disloyalty. That attitude is part of
the Chicano culture of resistance — a culture that actively resists
assimilation into mainstream America. That culture is created, reinforced, and maintained by
radical Chicano intellectuals, politicians, and the many Chicano Studies
programs in U.S. colleges and universities. As examples, according to its
editor, Elizabeth Martinez, the purpose of Five Hundred Years of Chicano
History, a book used in over 300 schools throughout the West, is to
"celebrate our resistance to being colonized and absorbed by racist empire
builders." The book calls the INS and the Border Patrol "the Gestapo
for Mexicans."
For
Rodolfo Acuna, author of Occupied America: The Chicano's Struggle Toward
Liberation, probably the most widely assigned text in U.S. Chicano Studies
programs, the Anglo-American invasion of Mexico was "as vicious as that of
Hitler's invasion of Poland and other Central European nations...." The
book also includes a map showing "the Mexican republic" in 1822
reaching up into Kansas and Oklahoma, and including within it Utah, Nevada, and
everything west and south of there
"This is country belongs to Mexico" is said by the Mexican Militant.
This is a common teaching that the U.S. is really AZTLAN, belonging to
Mexicans, which is taught to Mexican kids in Arizona and California through a
LA Raza educational program funded by American Tax Payers via President Obama,
when he gave LA RAZA $800,000.00 in March of 2009!
Mecha's (M.E.Ch.A.) own slogan
reads, "For the race everything. For those outside the race,
nothing."
LA RAZA: The Mexican Fascist Party of
LA RAZA “THE RACE” and the Reconquista and surrender of America to NARCOMEX
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2010/07/la-raza-reconquista-of-america.html
The comparison to the Nazi Party is well
deserved. La Raza openly supports pushing all but Latino Americans out of a
portion of the United States (ethnic cleansing), they call for 'Reconquista' or
the re-conquest of the American Southwest by Mexico (the re-occupation of the
Sudetanland), and the establishment of 'Atzlan' which is the utopian all-Latino
version of the American Southwestern states (Adolf Hitler planned to called his
utopia Germania).
"Despite the fact that the majority
of documented hispanics oppose illegal immigration, as do the majority of
Americans, Aztlan and La
Raza (NOW CALLING ITSELF
UNIDOSus) race hate groups have become the self-appointed voice for a
separatist movement that threatens a violent overthrow of the Constitutional system
and a barbaric program of ethnic cleansing. This is held up by the media as
'diversity' and to vociferously oppose it is scorned as racism."
Jose Pescador Osuna, Mexican Consul General We are
practicing "La Reconquista" in California."
"Remember
187 -- the Proposition to deny taxpayer funds for services to non-citizens ---
was the last gasp of white America in California." --- Art Torres,
Chairman of the California Democratic Party
"The American Southwest seems to be
slowly returning to the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a single
shot." --- Excelsior, the national newspaper of Mexico
“The watchdogs at Judicial Watch discovered documents that
reveal how the Obama administration's close coordination with the Mexican
government entices Mexicans to hop over the fence and on to the American dole.” Washington Times
No comments:
Post a Comment