THE DOCTRINE OF THE N.A.F.T.A. GLOBALIST DEMOCRATS IS TO SERVE THE BILLIONAIRE CLASS WITH ENDLESS WAVES OF INVADING 'CHEAP' LABOR SUBSIDIZED WITH WELFARE FUNDED BY TAXES ON MIDDLE AMERICA.
In many speeches, Mayorkas says he is building a mass migration system to deliver workers to wealthy employers and investors and “equity” to poor foreigners. The nation’s border laws are subordinate to elites’ opinion about “the values of our country,” Mayorkas claims.
Saturday, April 27, 2019
MORE REASONS TO DUMP THE HOUSE OF WINDSOR - PRINCE CHARLIE DUFUS HATES JEWS AS HIS COUNTRY IS OVERRUN BY MUSLIMS
Prince Charles blamed Mideast conflict on ‘foreign Jews’
Prince Charles, heir to the British throne, is a fool, and perhaps inevitably given his royal status, an arrogant fool -- the worst kind. He has embarrassed and arguably endangered the institution of the monarchy with his treatment of his late wife, Diana, his affair with Camilla Parker Bowles (and their ultra-creepy hackedtext messages about him being reincarnated as a box of Tampax so as to be closer to her), and his environmentalist lunacy.
A recently uncovered letter from Charles to friend reveals that he is also an antisemite (not that unusual among the British upper class, but nonetheless appalling in a man of such privilege and obligation to his subjects).
Prince Charles has come under fire after it came to light that he blamed the “influx of foreign Jews” for causing unrest in the Middle East and called on the US to “take on the Jewish lobby” in a letter penned in 1986.
Writing to his friend Laurens van der Post, the Prince argued that the exodus of European Jews in the middle of the last century “helped to cause the great problems” in the Middle East.
“I now appreciate that Arabs and Jews were all a Semitic people originally and it is the influx of foreign, European Jews (especially from Poland, they say) which has helped to cause the great problems,” the Prince wrote in a letter published by the Daily Mail.
Half of all land in England owned by less than one percent of the population EAT THIS CHARLIE! THESE CRIMES ARE COMMITTED BY YOUR MUSLIMS!
Violent Crime Soars 19% in England and Wales in One Year, 112 Knife Crimes a Day
Violent crime across England and Wales has risen by one fifth in one year, the latest figures show.
The new Office for National Statistics (ONS) figures show that in the year ending December 2018 violent crime rose by almost a fifth — 19-per-cent — with 1.6 million incidents reported, compared to 1.35 million the year before.
The numbers show that possession of bladed objects, incidents involving knives, robberies, and homicides all rose across the period.
There’s been a 12% increase in fraud in the year ending December 2018. Just over half of these (54%) involved some type of online activity http://ow.ly/kYV230ox2e6
Among the breakdown of the figures was a rise in knife crime, which itself was up six-per-cent, the highest level since comparable records began, with 40,829 incidents reported across England and Wales involving a knife or sharp object, an average of 112 every day.
Possession of a bladed or pointed object was up significantly, rising 20-per-cent to 20,958 recorded cases in the year.
Homicides were up in the year by six-per-cent to 732, their highest for a decade with four-in-ten involving a knife or sharp instrument. These figures do factor in the Manchester and London terrorist attacks from 2017, however. If those terror-related deaths are removed from the statistics, the rise in the number of homicides from 2017 to 2018 jumps to 12-per-cent.
There was also an 11-per-cent increase in robberies across the period.
In terms of the breakdown of locations, Merseyside saw the highest rise in knife-related crime. Wales was also badly affected with North Wales, South Wales and Dyfed Powys making up three of the top five areas to see the largest increase in knife-related crime.
London remains top in terms of overall figures, with 166 reported incidents of knife-related crime per 100,000 people. This is compared to the lowest on the list, Surrey, with only 5 instances per 100,000.
The latest statistics follow London-only figures from early April which claimed an average of 40 knife related incidents in the city every day, and a fatal stabbing every four days.
DOCUMENTARY:
ELIZABETH II
THE HOUSE OF WINDSOR AND THE WINDSOR DICTATORSHIP’S PARTNERSHIP WITH GLOBAL MUSLIM DICTATORSHIPS.
PIERS MORGAN: Why should the taxpayer fork out millions to make Harry and Meghan the King and Queen of Africa just to keep them away from Wills and Kate?
Apparently, Britain’s already got too small for the couple dubbed ‘royal rock stars’ by their own palace courtiers.
So it’s been revealed that they’re planning to move to the much larger global stage of the gigantic African continent after their baby arrives, to rub off a bit of their regal stardust magic there.
Lucky Africans!
Poor Brits!
Well yes, very poor Brits actually, because we’ll be the ones who pay for it for however long this African jolly, or should I say folly, lasts.
+8
+8
+8
Meghan and Harry visited Morocco in Africa together recently (seen directly above), and now it is rumored the pair will relocate to Africa once their child - due imminently - is born. The couple have also been on several solo trips to Africa before they married (top).
And with full Metropolitan Police protection teams required to provide 24/7 security, and Meghan’s large retinue of personal staff, the cost could run into millions.
Not that ‘Queen’ Meghan will care.
Since marrying into the British Royal Family, she’s already shown a gleeful propensity for spending money in a manner so extravagant she’s been dubbed ‘Meghan Antoinette’ in honour of the infamously over-the-top 18th Century French Queen.
There was her wedding to Harry a year ago, estimated to have cost $40 million including a $500,000 Clare Waight Keller wedding dress, that was mostly financed by British taxpayers.
There was the absurdly lavish recent five-day $500,000 baby-shower at a five-star hotel in New York, brimming with celebrities, private jets, paparazzi and heartfelt floral gifts for the…. less fortunate.
Was Meghan Markle's baby shower too extravagant?
Loaded: 0%
Progress: 0%
0:00
Previous
Play
Skip
Mute
Current Time0:00
/
Duration Time3:14
Fullscreen
+8
+8
The Royal Wedding (pictured left) was said to have cost in the region of $40million, while Meghan's friends and the British taxpayer forked out $500,000 for her lavish New York baby shower (pictured leaving her hotel after the event, right)
Much of the tab was picked up by her millionaire mates Serena Williams and Amal Clooney, but British taxpayers paid for her security team to accompany her and the optics were horribly inappropriate at a time when Meghan and Harry had literally just tweeted from their Kensington Palace account asking people to remember the poor, saying: ‘’73% of the poorest families cannot always afford to feed their children during the school holidays, a gap which is estimated to affect 3 million across the UK.’
I bet she would - given it was the same Marie Anotinette who when told her subjects were starving and had no bread, replied: ‘Let them eat cake.’
Then there’s the massive on-going refurbishment of the couple’s luxury new home, Frogmore Cottage near Windsor Castle – a gift from the Queen - that is already thought to have cost over $4 million.
Prince Harry and Meghan to move to Frogmore Cottage
Loaded: 0%
Progress: 0%
0:00
Previous
Play
Skip
Mute
Current Time0:00
/
Duration Time1:21
Fullscreen
+8
New home: Frogmore Cottage, above, was gifted to the royal couple by the Queen and is since understood to have undergone an extensive renovation at the behest of Meghan
The work reportedly includes an expansive yoga studio, an ‘elaborate Gone With The Wind-style double staircase’, grand new fireplaces, and vegan eucalyptus-infused paint for the baby’s nursery.
Where does most of the money to pay for all this come from?
Once again, the British taxpayer.
Now, we have the grand African plan.
It was reported, by the Sunday Times, that Meghan and Harry’s courtiers came up with the idea because they’re concerned about the sheer scale of the couple’s fame and power.
‘There are discussions in palace circles about how do we harness Harry and Meghan and this tremendous global attention they get?’ said one palace source.
The source added that there were serious fears Meghan could become ‘bigger than Princess Diana.’
Oh pur-lease….!
What a load of over-hyped baloney.
Meghan Markle is not in the same fame stratosphere as Diana occupied, for all manner of reasons; the most significant of which relates to the order of ascension to the throne.
Diana was married to Prince Charles, who is the direct heir to Queen Elizabeth II and will be Britain’s next King.
Meghan is married to Prince Harry, who is currently sixth in line to the throne and sliding down fast, and therefore has two hopes of becoming King – no hope and Bob Hope.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex may think they’re the biggest young royal stars, and their behaviour certainly suggests they do.
+8
Harry and Meghan are allegedly in a feud with Wills and Kate, all pictured above together in March, which is rumured to be a reason behind their Africa move
Prince Harry walks ahead of Prince William at Easter Sunday service
Loaded: 0%
Progress: 0%
0:00
Previous
Play
Skip
Mute
Current Time0:00
/
Duration Time1:02
Fullscreen
But they pale into royal power insignificance compared to their rivals, William and Kate, the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge, who will one day be King and Queen.
We’re further told that one of the other reasons for Harry and Meghan leaving Britain is to keep the feuding royal couples apart, because the wives especially can’t stand each other.
So this ridiculous African adventure smacks of Meghan and Harry trying to create their own new rival version of the Monarchy, on an alternative continent, to preen in.
Aside from the hideous cost of it all, their timing also couldn’t be worse.
There was a massive backlash in Britain recently to the annual Comic Relief fund-raising effort to support the poor and needy in Africa, with white celebrities accused of patronising Africans by hugging young black children for photo opportunities in ‘white saviour’ poses they then posted to social media.
David Lammy, a black British Labour politician, accused the stars of ‘perpetuating tired and unhelpful stereotypes’, and said such ‘poverty porn’ was fuelling a ‘distorted image’ of the continent and ‘an old idea from the colonial era.’
+8
David Lammy, a black British Labour politician, recently criticized white stars going on charitable missions to Africa as indulging in 'poverty porn'
Comic Relief suffered a substantial drop in donations as a result of his tirade, and the impassioned debate that followed it, suggesting many British people shared Lammy’s view.
I fear a similar negative reaction to Harry and Meghan, notwithstanding the fact she is herself from a mixed race family, if they now spend several years wrapping their arms around African children to show how much they care.
Africans, as Lammy pointed out, increasingly have no wish to be ‘saved’ in this way by celebrities, and I suspect particularly not by an entitled white British celebrity Prince and his TV actress bride.
And British people certainly won’t want to be paying their taxes to support Harry and Meghan as they play virtue-signalling King and Queen of Africa at the same time as Britain suffers widely predicted serious economic hardship as a result of the Brexit vote to leave the European Union.
And at the same that the Metropolitan Police are already struggling to cope with a horrendous surge in murderous knife crime in London.
But as we know from Harry himself, what Meghan wants, Meghan gets.
High-society magazine Tatler recently reported in a long editorial that long-suffering Kensington Palace staff have a new nickname for Meghan: ‘Me-Gain’.
Sadly, it’s hard to argue with it.
Meghan Markle’s hit the jackpot, but at what cost to the rest of us?
Revealed: How HALF of England is owned by less than ONE PER CENT of its population with oligarchs, City bankers and aristocracy among those with an 'astonishingly unequal' share
Research revealed around 25,000 landowners control half of England
About 30% of country is owned by aristocracy and 18% by corporations
The Queen and Royals hold around 1.4% and the public sector has 8.5%
Critics say it shows how 'astonishingly equal' division of wealth and power is
This map shows how half of England is owned by less than one per cent of the population. Around 25,000 landowners, made up mostly of the aristocracy and corporations, control vast swathes of the country
Half of England is owned by less than one per cent of the population, new figures have revealed.
Analysis of Land Registry documents and maps for a new book shows just 25,000 landowners control huge swathes of the country despite the population being 55million.
The research found the 25,000 is mostly made up of members of the aristocracy and large corporations, with critics saying it shows how 'astonishingly unequal' the distribution of wealth is in England.
And the data was also used to create a full break down of land ownership across England, showing that the aristocracy alone holds 30 per cent of the country.
Another 18 per cent belongs to corporations while City bankers and oligarchs own 17 per cent of land.
Public sector bodies including councils and universities own another 8.5 per cent, with private homeowners, conservation charities and the Church of England owning around 7.5 per cent combined.
The research by activist and author Guy Shrubsole also shows that if the land was distributed equally across the entire population of 55million, each person would have around an acre of land.
It has been shared with The Guardian and shows major landowners include The Queen, businessman James Dyson and water firm United Utilities.
In his book, Mr Shrubsole wrote: 'A few thousand dukes, baronets and country squires own far more land than all of middle England put together.
'Land ownership in England is astonishingly unequal, heavily concentrated in the hands of a tiny elite.'
+6
This graph shows the full breakdown of land ownership in England and how much each sector owns. The aristocracy and gentry own 30 per cent, corporations 18 per cent and oligarch and City bankers 17 per cent. The 1 per cent of 25,000 landowners who own half of England are made up primarily of the aristocracy, corporations and the royal family
+6
+6
Among the most prominent landowners in England are The Queen, left, and Royal Family, who own around 1.4 per cent, and businessman James Dyson, right, who owns thousands of acres of farmland in Lincolnshire. Business oligarchs and City bankers are believed to own around 17 per cent of land in England
Another 17 per cent of land in England is 'undeclared', which means it has not been sold on the open market and therefore does not have to be logged with the Land Registry.
It is likely this section also belongs to aristocrats who have kept it in their family for generations and never sold it.
Among the prominent landowners in the aristocracy are the Duke of Buccleuch, who owns the Boughton estate in Northamptonshire, and the Duke and Duchess of Beaufort who own the Badminton estate in Gloucestershire.
The Royal Family is believed to hold around 1.4 per cent of English land through the Crown Estate and the Duchies of Cornwall and Lancaster.
+6
+6
The aristocracy owns about 30 per cent of land in England and critics say it shows they wield as much power and influence as they always have. Pictured left is the Duke and Duchess of Beaufort, who own the Badminton estate in Gloucestershire, and right is the Duke of Buccleuch, the largest private landowner in Scotland who also owns the Boughton estate in Northamptonshire
The findings led to calls for a debate in Parliament as critics claim it is 'unfair' that aristocrats and corporations have 'more influence over neighbourhoods than the people who live there'.
Labour shadow minister Jon Trickett told the Guardian: 'The dramatic concentration of land ownership is an inescapable reminder that ours is a country for the few and not the many.'
Carys Roberts, chief economist at thinktank The Institute for Public Policy Research, added the figures were 'shocking but not surprising' and that it revealed that the aristocracy is still as important in modern society 'in terms of wealth and power' as it was in past centuries.
The book reveals the public sector, ie councils and universities, owns around eight per cent of the country and is the most 'open' sector around land holdings because such institutions frequently sell off sections.
Meanwhile charities including the National Trust own around two per cent of the country, with the church holding around 0.5 per cent.
Half of all land in England owned by less than one percent of the population
The UK is one of the most unequal societies on the planet. The scale of this is effectively documented in new research revealing that one half of all the land in England is the private property of less than one percent of the population. This equates to just 25,000 people. England accounts for just over half (53 percent) of the total area of the UK.
The research is available in a new book by Guy Shrubsole, Who Owns England?: How We Lost Our Green and Pleasant Land and How to Take It Back. Shrubsole is a writer, campaigner and investigator at Friends of the Earth.
Although it was broadly understood that the ruling elite owned much of the land, this reality has generally been shrouded in secrecy. New developments in digital mapping, however, as well as the work of campaign groups enabling the release of data under Freedom of Information legislation (FOI), made possible the research that revealed the following statistics:
The aristocracy and gentry still own 30 percent of the land.
18 percent is owned by corporations.
17 percent is in the possession of oligarchs and bankers.
The crown and royal family own 1.4 percent and the Church of England 0.5 percent.
Therefore, this tiny stratum of society owns nearly 70 percent of all land privately. Moreover, it should be noted that the percentage attributed to the aristocracy is likely a vast underestimation, according to Shrubsole. The ownership of 17 percent of the land remains undeclared at the Land Registry—a database that registers property and land sold in England and Wales—because it has not been sold on the open market. This is most likely the property of the aristocracy, passing down the generations. This percentage has barely changed for centuries.
Among the pieces of land owned by the monarchy is the Crown Estate, the Queen’s personal estate at Sandringham, Norfolk. The land within the Duchies of Cornwall and Lancaster also provide vast amounts of income to Royal family members.
The public sector owns just 8.5 percent of English soil, followed by home owners who own just five percent. Two percent is owned by conservation charities, including the National Trust.
Shrubsole lists the top 100 corporations that possess the most land in England, including some based abroad or offshore to avoid tax liabilities or for money-laundering purposes. The Land Registry, reportedly by accident, sent Private Eye investigative journalist Christian Eriksson, after a FOI request, a huge database of offshore companies that had purchased land in England and Wales from 2005 to 2014. This comprised 113,119 hectares of land worth an astonishing £170 billion [$US 220 billion].
At the top of the list of landowning companies is United Utilities, formed when the Tories privatised the water industry in 1989. Much of the land surrounding its reservoirs is owned by the firm.
Pro-Brexit businessman Sir James Dyson is high on the list. He owns several large grouse moor estates and Beeswax Dyson Farming. Other household names owning vast swathes of land are Tesco, the UK’s largest supermarket chain, Tata Steel and housebuilder Taylor Wimpey.
In an extract from Who Owns England? published in the Guardian, Shrubsole discusses the extensive interests of landowning company Peel Holdings and its many subsidiaries. The company owns up to 1,000 tracts of land nationally totaling around 13,000 hectares. Just in the northwest of England its land interests spread from Liverpool’s John Lennon airport, through fracking country in Lancashire, to one of the largest wind farms in the UK, taking in shopping centres and ports, including the Port of Liverpool.
Peel was the developer behind the 15-hectare MediaCityUK in Salford, the main northern hub of the BBC and ITV. It is based on land next to the 36-mile Manchester Ship Canal that Peel bought in 1993.
Shrubsole searched for Peel Holdings and its subsidiaries on the Companies House website. This revealed a systematic lack of transparency with one holding company owned by another, “like a series of Russian dolls, one nested inside another.”
“Peel Holdings… is also illustrative of corporate landowners everywhere,” continues Shrubsole, adding that “[c]ompanies with big enough budgets can often ride roughshod over the planning system, beating cash-strapped councils and volunteer community groups.”
The public sector, which includes central and local government as well as universities, is less secretive about the land they own. This is because they are compelled to advertise land for sale on the open market to offset austerity cuts—and in the process transfer even more land into private hands.
The sale of public land means it cannot be used for housebuilding or environmental improvements. In the last period, vast amounts of public spaces and parks in towns and cities have been hoovered up by the private sector. These landscaped areas are then out of bounds to the general public and especially public protests.
In 1980, Conservative Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher introduced the sale of public housing under “right to buy” and council house building began to drastically decline. Britain was apparently to become a “nation of home owners.” However, most such housing consists of tiny “shoebox” units, as is indicated by the fact that all the 15.1 million homeowners in Britain own just 5 percent of the land.
The Guardian noted that “figures show that if the land were distributed evenly across England’s population, each person would have just over half an acre [0.2 hectare]—an area roughly half the size of Parliament Square in central London.”
Those who can afford to buy their own home may not necessarily own the land it stands on, but only lease it, which ensures not ownership but long-term tenancy. Leasehold properties comprise 27 percent of properties in England and Wales. An annual ground rent is paid to whoever owns the freehold for the length of the lease. After the lease runs out the freeholder becomes the owner of house and land, lock stock and barrel.
Developers are raking in a huge revenue stream in building leasehold properties. A House of Commons Library report revealed an increase in leasehold new builds, from seven percent in 1995 to 15 percent in 2016—with clauses in leases doubling the ground rent every ten years, which are sold on to speculators.
One of those companies that makes its money from the ground rents market is Wallace Estates, which possesses thousands of freehold properties, selling long leases for the annual rents. Wallace Estates is the company with the third-highest number of land titles, possessing a property portfolio worth £200m, the details of which are in the public domain and owned by an elusive Italian count.
The buying up of land is also a convenient investment to avoid paying inheritance or capital gains tax.
Speculation in land has led to parasitical land banking. In the 1990s and early 2000s, Tesco, for example, purchased huge land banks for the future construction of out-of-town shopping complexes. The Guardian estimates that in 2014 the supermarket was sitting on enough land to accommodate 15,000 homes.
Some land promotion companies specialize in preparing land sites for development by doing the leg work of gaining planning permission for developers and then taking a cut from the final sales. The Gladman company made a pretax profit in 2016 of £11.6 million, while in the same year Gallagher’s raked in £79 million.
The Shelter housing charity revealed last month that almost of third of sites approved for building on five years ago have still not been completed. The top ten housing developers have land banks with space for more than 400,000 homes.
UK pension funds and insurance companies commonly buy land as a long-term investment. For example, Legal and General is in possession of 1,500 hectares stretching from Luton to Cardiff.
The Telegraph revealed that close associate of former Tory Prime Minister David Cameron, Tony Gallagher, head of the aforementioned company, sold his land promotions company after three decades for £250 million—lucrative indeed. This wealth propelled his total fortune to £850 million, but such is the enormity of the wealth of the richest of the rich in Britain that Gallagher was only able to place 52nd on the Sunday Times Rich List.
NHS doctor and UK pharmacist who became Nazi-style torturers for ISIS: Team of vile medics took organs from prisoners and gave them to wounded terrorists
Issam Abuanza, 40, a former NHS doctor, was appointed ISIS 'health minister'
He left his wife and two children in Sheffield when he travelled to Syria in 2014
Mohammad Anwar Miah, 40, a former pharmacist from Birmingham, helped Abuanza remove detained prisoners' organs, according to Syrian witnesses
These were given to injured ISIS jihadis, used to frighten prisoners or sold on
A picture of NHS doctor Issam Abuanza who deserted his wife and two children in Sheffield to join Islamic State in Syria
Two British health workers who sneaked into Islamic State territory carried out ‘Nazi-style’ medical experiments on prisoners, Syrian witnesses claim.
Issam Abuanza, 40, a former NHS doctor who left behind his wife and two children in Sheffield when he travelled to Syria in 2014, was appointed the terror group’s ‘health minister’, the British Government believes.
Abuanza, now thought to be hiding in caves near the village of Baghouz, carried out such brutal torture on his victims that even IS fighters opposed it.
He appointed Mohammad Anwar Miah, also 40, a former pharmacist from Birmingham, who helped him remove organs from detained prisoners, the Syrian witnesses claim.
The body parts were either transplanted into injured jihadis, passed on to middle men who sold them on the black market to fund terror, or put in the cells of prisoners to frighten them, it is alleged.
A ten-man medical team headed by Abuanza also allegedly carried out chemical tests on prisoners, it is claimed.
The exact nature of the chemicals are unknown.
The allegations are at odds with Miah’s account of his years with the group, which he gave to the Daily Mail from northern Syria just weeks ago.
This newspaper has since been able to piece together an extraordinary alternative account of the pair’s lives inside the brutal terrorist organisation.
Details of their alleged roles come from activist group Sound and Picture, whose members lived under the jihadis’ rule and closely followed their activities.
+6
Mohammed Anwar Miah left the UK for Syria after being struck off as a pharmacist for falsifying records
Western intelligence has corroborated some of the claims. Abuanza deserted his family in 2014 after ranting about the NHS, saying doctors were treated like beggars in Britain. He told overseas graduates sitting tests for their English language and clinical skills that they would need anti-psychotic drugs to work in the NHS. In one chilling online post, he said he wished that a Jordanian pilot burnt alive in a cage by Islamic State had taken longer to die.
Miah, who renamed himself Abu Obayda al-Britani once he joined IS, left Birmingham in September 2014 to sneak into territory held by the terror group.
In his first newspaper interview in February, he told the Mail he never swore allegiance to the group and had gone there, illegally, for ‘humanitarian work’.
He said he lived in the town of Mayadin in eastern Syria under IS rule for four years, and claimed to have met no other British citizens and to have treated only civilians.
He said he worked there as an assistant orthopaedic surgeon, learning from a book as he went. But Sound and Picture claims he met Abuanza in Mayadin in 2015 and they became close.
Both men shared the nickname Abu Obayda.
Horrors of German concentration camps
The Nazis carried out grotesque medical experiments in concentration camps during the Second World War.
They included studies in which prisoners were forced into chambers that duplicated altitude conditions of up to 68,000ft.
Others included the removal of sections of bone, muscle and nerves, including whole legs removed at the hips to transplant to other victims.
Studies of hypothermia treatment involved prisoners standing naked in temperatures as low as -6C (21F) for hours.
Josef Mengele spent hours examining twins at Auschwitz in an effort to find ways to more effectively multiply the German race.
In many cases, he injected one twin with a mysterious substance and monitored the illness that ensued. Mengele, nicknamed the ‘Angel of Death’ also applied painful clamps to children’s limbs to induce gangrene, injected dye into their eyes, and gave them spinal taps.
They worked in a hospital in the town, called ‘Alteb Alhadith’ in Arabic, and it was there that Abuanza allowed Miah to perform surgery on civilians, it is claimed. That year, Abuanza was made IS’s health minister.
Aghiad al-Kheder, co-founder of Sound and Picture, said: ‘Islamic State needed to show that it was a government not a radical group and so it appointed a minister for everything.
‘Issam was minister for health which meant he was responsible for everything health related.’ He said Abuanza developed a reputation for his cruel techniques, adding: ‘Issam first chose Mohammed Anwar – he needed someone to help.’
Mr al-Kheder said they both went to work at the ‘Pharmex Hospital’ in the city of Deir Ezzor in eastern Syria in February 2016.
‘Anwar was involved in the transfer of human organs from the prisoners to members of IS and the human organ trade that was conducted by IS,’ he claimed.
Later that year they returned to Mayadin, where Abuanza allegedly headed a team of nine others, including Miah as well as a Jordanian doctor, two Iraqis and five Syrians.
According to witnesses, the group performed medical experiments on prisoners, transferred organs from prisoners to wounded jihadis, and were involved in the organ trade.
Mr al-Kheder said one IS member described the methods of medical torture as ‘Nazi-style’ and that they were considered even by fighters as ‘brutal’.
He added: ‘They experimented with torture and with chemical materials but we are not sure for what purposes.
‘They used the materials on the prisoners.’
He also claimed the group put prisoners in an empty room and left them with dismembered bodies as a method of torture.
Mr al-Kheder said Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi visited the Mayadin hospital in 2017 when he was injured.
Miah was working in the hospital at the time but it is not known if he directly communicated with al-Baghdadi.
The most up-to-date information suggests Abuanza was in the town of Hajin in eastern Syria and then fled to caves east of Baghouz, the final stronghold of IS.
Miah is one of more than six suspected jihadi Britons being held by the Kurdish-led opposition Syrian Democratic Forces, along with two members of the notorious ‘Beatles’ gang responsible for beheading British hostages. He told the Mail in February that he wanted to return to Britain.
He claimed he was innocent of any crimes, adding: ‘I came here to do humanitarian work, I came here with that intention and that’s what I did.
‘I did not take part in any of these atrocities or incited any hatred or made any videos. I have never killed or hurt anybody.’
Miah’s family declined to comment. Abuanza and his wife Sally lived in Sheffield with their two children.
A former neighbour said Sally had moved away with her new boyfriend and had a baby with him. She could not be located for comment.
After deserting family, British doctor became IS’s ‘minister for health’
+6
Dr Issam Abuanza, a former NHS doctor from Sheffield, was appointed 'health minister' for ISIS. He is pictured reading the Koran while holding a rifle
Issam Abuanza advanced quickly through the Islamic State ranks after he deserted his wife and two children in Sheffield in July 2014 to join the ‘caliphate’ in Syria.
By 2015, he was appointed the terror group’s health minister, responsible for all the medical care in the territory under IS control, Syrian witnesses claim.
Western intelligence sources said he was so senior that he had to have known about the brutal treatment of prisoners captured on the battlefield.
Syrian witnesses claim Abuanza himself carried out the most barbaric methods of torture, using medical practices which even battle-hardened jihadis opposed.
Abuanza, 40, is believed to be on the run in caves near the village of Baghouz in northern Syria.
He worked in Britain for seven years before going to Syria.
Palestinian-born but with British citizenship, Abuanza had previously ranted about the NHS, saying medical staff were treated like beggars.
In comments on a bulletin board in April 2006, he listed things that foreign doctors should leave at home.
He wrote: ‘Your dignity, because you are a beggar here; your career, no progress as either locum or clinical observer, you won’t write more than that in your CV; your future, there isn’t any; and your family, no doubt.’
Despite his outburst, Abuanza secured a position at Glan Clwyd Hospital in Rhyl, North Wales, where he was working in July 2009.
He also worked at Scarborough Hospital in North Yorkshire, where he posted an online video of himself praying in the on-call room. Later he moved with his family to Sheffield, where he is reported to have combined shifts as a registrar with running an online company selling kaftan dresses.
+6
Syrian witnesses said Issam Abuanza and Mohammad Anwar Miah, both 40, removed prisoners' organs and frightened other detainees with them, transplanted them into injured jihadis or sold them on the black market
He wrote that 100 per cent of the profits of his business were going to Syria – raising fears he may have been funding jihad.
Abuanza, who comes from a family of doctors and dentists, trained as a doctor in Iraq in 2002 before gaining British citizenship. He is thought to be the first NHS clinician to join IS. His postings on social media revealed how he became increasingly radicalised. In a rant in March 2014, he expressed his disgust at doctors having to treat drunken yobs brought in to casualty by police.
That July, Abuanza fled Sheffield, leaving his then 30-year-old wife penniless and with no means to support their daughters, aged six and four.
Abuanza, who crossed into Syria soon after IS declared itself as an Islamic caliphate, appealed for other Western doctors to join him.
A photo on his Facebook page showed him wearing scrubs and carrying a gun in a holster. In another, he is wearing combat fatigues, cradling an assault rifle and reading the Koran.
Abuanza’s sister Najla said in 2016 that his parents would never forgive him.
Chemist who says he only did humanitarian work in Syria
+6
Mohammed Anwar Miah, the pharmacist from Birmingham, who is languishing in a Kurdish prison in Northern Syria. He claims he knew nothing of the evil of ISIS, despite deciding to join them, and says he has sent his time working in a hospital
British pharmacist Mohammed Anwar Miah renamed himself Abu Obayda al-Britannia once inside Islamic State’s self-styled caliphate.
He claimed he left his family home in Birmingham, where he was born, in September 2014 to travel to Syria to carry out humanitarian work.
The 40-year-old re-emerged in video footage in September 2018 when he was detained in eastern Syria on suspicion of fighting for the terror group.
Footage showed him blindfolded and handcuffed as he denied being an IS fighter, saying he was just ‘helping the people’ in hospitals.
He is currently languishing in a prison in north-eastern Syria.
Miah was left jobless in 2013 after he was struck off the register for inventing ‘phantom’ employees to enable him to work more hours in contravention of EU legislation.
In his first newspaper interview, with the Daily Mail in February, he said: ‘They took away something I worked for the whole of my life. They punished me so harshly.’
Miah crossed the border from Turkey on September 15, 2014.
Speaking with a Midlands accent, Miah, whose family is of Bangladeshi origin, said he married a Syrian teenager in the town of Mayadin and had two children with her.
He has not met his second child because he was detained when his wife was five months pregnant. He added that his children were British citizens and he would like them to go back to the UK with him.
+6
Miah is pictured here is a screen grab from a Twitter video of the moment he was caught by Kurdish forces
Miah said he was innocent of any crimes and had travelled to the war zone to carry out ‘humanitarian’ work. He added: ‘I’m not a danger to the public. But if they feel that I am a danger to the public I am more than happy to enter into any rehabilitation programme.’
Miah said he worked in a hospital in IS-held Mayadin, but had never treated a fighter unless by mistake because they were wearing civilian clothes.
He said the worst thing he ever saw was a man being forced to stand in a cage and being humiliated for smoking a cigarette.
‘I came here to do humanitarian work, I came here with that intention and that’s what I did. I didn’t have any political or military involvement. I did not take part in any of these atrocities or incited any hatred or made any videos. I have never killed or hurt anybody.’
Miah claimed that in September last year he and his pregnant wife decided to leave in the middle of the night, taking their nine-month-old daughter, Mariam, with them.
He was detained near the town of Hajin in Deir Ezzor province, eastern Syria, by opposition Syrian Democratic Forces.
Money launderer, 35, jailed for trying to fly from Stansted to Dubai with four suitcases stuffed with £1.5million in cash has the money confiscated
Sathar Khan was jailed in 2018 after admitting two counts of money laundering
Now a judge has agreed that the 35-year-old will never get the money back
The forfeiture order was signed off by Canterbury Magistrates' Court this week
Sathar Khan (pictured above) was stopped as he tried to fly to Dubai with the ill-gotten gains concealed in four suitcases last year
A money launderer who tried to fly from Stansted to Dubai with four cases of cash has been jailed for three years.
Sathar Khan was caught flying with £1.5million in cash concealed in four suitcases, weighing more than 80kg.
The 35-year-old was jailed for three years and nine months at Chelmsford Crown Court in 2018 after admitting two counts of money laundering - and now a judge has agreed he will never get the money back.
The forfeiture order was signed off by Canterbury Magistrates' Court this week after an investigation by the National Crime Agency.
The court heard Khan, from Ilford, east London, checked four suitcases in at Stansted Airport on August 29.
Each weighed 20kg and were rammed with £10 and £20 notes, Border Force officers found.
Matt Rivers from the NCA said: 'The forfeiture order demonstrates our determination to remove the proceeds of crime from organised criminals.
A bag of cash (pictured above) that Khan had in one of his suitcases on the flight to Dubai
+4
Khan attempted to fly from Stansted (pictured above) with the bags of cash
'Over the past year we have investigated cash seizures at UK borders totalling more than £8 million.
'In this case, with the help of our partners, we were able to intercept the cash during the money laundering process. Our investigation continues in relation to the wider criminal network behind this seizure.'
At the time, assistant director of the Border Force at Stansted Airport, Taylor Wilson, said: 'By making this detection, Border Force officers have taken a substantial quantity of criminal cash out of circulation and ensured it will be returned to the public purse.
'Depriving criminals of their wealth disrupts organised crime and we will continue to work with law enforcement partners like the NCA to both bring offenders to justice and to hit them in the pocket.'
+4
The 35-year-old was jailed for three years and nine months at Chelmsford Crown Court (pictured above) in 2018
No comments:
Post a Comment