The total number of federal arrests of Mexican nationals
living in the United States now exceeds the total number
of federal arrests of American citizens, federal data
reveals.
Another prominent Democrat who supports the
anti-capitalist Occupy movement is a self-declared
communist named Bill Ayers, in whose living
room Barack Obama launched his political career.
Islamists and the Border
There has been a growing effort by Islamist activists to convince their followers of a connection between American border security and the situation in Gaza.
Last weekend Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) and Linda Sarsour gave fiery speeches condemning the U.S. and Israel for their “white supremacy” and declaring the “interconnected” nature of the “oppression” in Palestine and the “oppression” at the U.S.-Mexico border.
Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich), as part of her keynote address at the American Muslims for Palestine conference in Chicago on December 1, stated:
“Do you know what I saw at the border? I saw Gaza. When you think about the border, you have got to understand how interconnected the oppression in Palestine is with the oppression taking place at the border.”
Islamist Linda Sarsour joined Tlaib in these false comparisons, but she went further to declare both Israel and the United States “white supremacist” at their core:
“Ask them this: How can you be against white supremacy in the United States of America and the idea of living in a supremacist state based on race and class, but then you support a state like Israel that is built on supremacy, that is built on the idea that Jews are supreme to everybody else?”
Tlaib and Sarsour’s statements represent a growing tendency by Islamists to link the question of U.S. border security to Israel’s efforts to deter and prevent terror from Hamas-ruled Gaza.
The goal is not just to turn Americans against Israel, although this is clearly a factor, but also to mobilize their Muslim constituents on behalf of their preferred political coalitions. Sarsour made this pitch explicitly at AMP, as she used the opportunity to urge the attendees to support her candidate of choice, Senator Bernie Sanders.
In a recent video at a sparsely attended talk in October 2019 at the John Hope Franklin Humanities Institute at Duke University, Texas-based Imam Omar Suleiman used language similar to Tlaib’s to compare the situation at the Texas-Mexico border to the situation in the Middle East.
He explained, “My journey with this doesn’t start at the border of Texas and Mexico; it actually starts in Syria.” Suleiman then goes on to compare the living conditions he encountered at a detention center in McAllen, Texas to those in that Syrian refugee camp, declaring definitively, “We are looking at dehumanization and torture and oppression in so many ways.”
Imam Suleiman also echoes Sarsour in calling the United States a “white supremacist country” that could not accept the presidency of Obama because of his blackness. At his keynote address at the Muslim American Society’s West Coast Conference in November 2018, Suleiman claimed that white supremacy was not only “enshrined” within the nation, but that racism was at the country’s core, “institutionalized” in all of its branches of government and systems of power.
The effort to conflate these issues, the border and Israel, and to paint America and Israel as fundamentally white supremacist in the minds of Americans isn’t just about speeches.
Suleiman recently joined another imam, Zaid Shakir, in an ongoing campaign to delegitimize U.S. border security. This summer, the two popular imams went all the way to Mecca to raise money for illegal migrants in the United States. Suleiman and Shakir, who head up the Muslims for Migrants campaign, took their fundraising drive on the hajj to Medina, raising more than $100,000 for illegal migrants who found themselves needing to post bail to avoid deportation. Today that amount has reached $162, 244.
Texas-based Islamic cleric Omar Suleiman released a video explaining the connection more relating the issue to Islamic history in his 1 Minute from Medina:
“I’m here in Dar-ul-Hijrah, Medina, the place where the Prophet migrated to and was welcomed with open arms by the Ansar, by the people that love those that migrated to them… The people [Ansar] took Muhammad in like they were his own family and we need to do our part to, inshallah, lead on something so special like bringing families together.”
The invocation of the Ansar example gives the game away, since it implicitly suggests that the current residents should adapt to the ways and beliefs of the migrants. According to Islamic tradition, the Ansar (which can mean “helper” or “supporter”) converted to Islam after taking the Islamic Prophet Muhammad and his followers into their homes when they emigrated from Mecca to Medina, thus creating the first place where Mohammad and his followers could rule in according with Islamic law.
Suleiman’s partner in this endeavor, Imam Zaid Shakir, has been somewhat more upfront about the need to impose Islamic law in America. In a 1993 article titled “Muslim Involvement in the American Political Process,” uncovered by the Investigative Project on Terrorism, Shakir warned Muslims not to align themselves with Christians and Jews or their systems of government:
“As the Christians and Jews of this country have rejected the divine law and created their own secular system of rule, the legal and political system of America is sinful and constitutes open rebellion against Allah. For a Muslim to join with the Jews and Christians in this system is to join them in their rebellion against Allah. Allah explicitly orders against this.”
From Suleiman to Shakir and Sarsour to Tlaib, Islamists continue to reveal to anyone willing to listen that the border represents more than just a humanitarian opportunity to help those in need. Rather they view the border as an opportunity to fundamentally change the country in the ways they prefer. They seek to delegitimize the United States as a country inherently cruel and white supremacist, and thus undeserving of a border. They implicitly assert that the U.S. should come to take on the mores and ways of those who have come. While “white supremacist” replaces overt attacks on the “secular system of rule” the outcome remains the same, an attack on traditional American ideas of governance. At the same time, Islamists continue to use the Israel comparison to rally their followers to embrace their current cause de jure.
Anne-Christine Hoff is the Dallas associate of the Counter Islamist Grid. You can connect with her on LinkedIn.
Immigration, Citizenship, and the Federal
Justice System, 1998-2018
By Mark Motivans
DOJ Office of Justice Programs, August 2019
https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/icfjs9818.pdf
Highlights: Based on fiscal years—
The portion of total federal arrests that took place in the five judicial
districts along the In 1998, 63% of all federal arrests were U.S.-Mexico border
almost doubled from 1998 of U.S. citizens; in 2018, 64% of all (33%) to 2018
(65%) (table 6). federal arrests were of non-U.S. citizens Ninety-five percent
of the increase in federal (figure 1 and table 4). arrests across 20 years was
due to immigration Non-U.S. citizens, who make up 7% of the offenses (table 1).
U.S. population (per the U.S. Census Bureau In 2018, 90% of suspects arrested
for federal for 2017) , accounted for 15% of all federal immigration crimes
were male; 10% were arrests and 15% of prosecutions in U.S. district female
(table 9).
Rich part of Washington,
D.C. goes tooth-and-claw to prevent new child-migrant shelter in its neighborhood
Putting
on its Victorian gentleman suit (pace Tom Wolfe), the Washington
Post's editorial board tut-tuts a rich part of Washington, D.C.
and its political patrons, for pulling out all stops to
prevent construction of a child-migrant shelter in its fancy environs.
MANY AMERICANS are rightly outraged by the Trump
administration’s treatment of migrant children, who have been separated from
parents and ill-treated by authorities. Democrats have been understandably
eager to distance themselves from such policies — a stance that can result in
knee-jerk opposition even to sensible practices in effect during the Obama
administration.
That might explain the nearly uniform outcry from
Washington-area politicians incensed at federal plans to build new shelters for
migrant children in Northern Virginia and the District . The shelters, state-licensed and similar
to scores across the county in operation since before President Trump took
office, would help move migrant children out of squalid, cramped Border
Patrol stations near the U.S.-Mexico border. They would provide a way
station for unaccompanied minors while federal officials seek to place them
with U.S.-based relatives or foster families.
But local politicians, nearly all Democrats, have
balked at cooperating with federal authorities on any immigration matter. They
have denounced the proposed new shelters with objections that smack of NIMBYism
masquerading as humane concern for children. This month, the administration of
D.C. Mayor Muriel E. Bowser (D) enacted emergency rules that blocked a planned federal
shelter.
Just
some misplaced never-Trumpism, maybe with a whiff of NIMBYism?
Actually, the area has been plagued
by some of these child migrants, getting its name in the news more than
once for its gruesome murders. Here's one of them, courtesy of, sure
enough, the Washington Post:
Edwin Rios, 18, of Southeast Washington has been
charged with murder in the killing of Ariana Funes-Diaz, 14, Prince George’s
County police announced Friday.
Funes-Diaz was slain April 18 by MS-13 gang
members who feared that she would go to police about a kidnapping and robbery
that had occurred in the District, prosecutors said.
Funes-Diaz was lured to a tunnel in Riverdale,
Md., where she was forced to strip and then was beaten with a baseball bat and
cut with a machete in an attack that was recorded on camera, charging documents
state.
Her body was abandoned in the woods for a month
before police found it in a creek near where she was attacked, police said.
Three others have been charged as adults in the
case: Joel Escobar, 17, of Northeast Washington; Cynthia Hernandez-Nucamendi,
14, of Lothian; and Josue Fuentes-Ponce, 16, of Bladensburg.
The case sparked wider national attention after
the federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency rebuked Maryland
officials, saying they had released Escobar and Fuentes-Ponce at the close
of an unrelated case without notifying federal immigration authorities.
Those
are some child migrants authorities are getting a new shelter pipeline set
up for.
The
map here says that Prince George's County in Maryland is about six miles from the Takoma
district in Washington, D.C. where the resistance is.
It's
indisputable that bringing in more unvetted migrants mean there are going
to be more of these killings going on, something that might just affect property
values and the quality of life in this tony district.
Here's
a local NBC news report on what's going
on in that area, keying off that same gruesome MS-13 murder commited by some
illegal child migrants. I have transcribed (and boldfaced) some choice
snippets:
"to get a better understanding of how
MS-13 has evolved and why we're seeing so many gruesome
crimes..."
...
'Two of the city's four murders last year --
MS-13."
...
"More than five years ago, we were given a
special invitation travel with law enforcement to El Salvador
to learn about the MS-13 gang and its ties to our area."
...
"Since the time that we went to El Salvador
till now, would you say the gang has a larger presence in our area or a smaller
presence?"
"Large."
"What would you attribute that to?"
"Recruitment.
...
"And he says kids are entering the gang at
a much younger age. You've seen in our area MS-13 gang members as
young as nine years old."
"Starting the process. But you look at
them and say 'innocence.' (Inaudible) may not know right from wrong, but
the gang knows that. So they'll take that for their benefit."
...
"They feel or they believe that a juvenile
can commit the same violence as an adult would such as a stabbing or a decapitation but
they think nothing is going to happen to them in the judicial
system. So that's why the target is juveniles."
...
So
many gruesome crimes? Gangs increasing? Recruitment younger and
younger? Child migrants here alone looking for some
"family"? Gangs know child decapitators won't get punished? With that sort of
thing going on, you can bet the migrant center is going to be a bonanza for
gang recruitment and a new wave of gruesome crimes. Funny how these asylum
seekers always seem to end up in U.S. areas where those gangs they're
supposedly fleeing are right there waiting for them.
The
2001 "missing intern" Chandra Levy murder, even closer to Takoma
than Prince George's County, by the way, was also done by one of El
Salvador's illegal immigrants.
Now
the battle is couched in "concern" for the comfort of illegal child
migrants along with opposition to President Trump, even though, as
the Post notes, the policy is Obama's. And the crocodile tears are flowing.
The
Post rightly notes that if the child migrant center is not built, the kids are
going to be waiting in squalid detention camps down at the border and then end
up somewhere in maybe the Southwest instead, a place that has long
complained about border crime and the problem unvetted migrants bring. In fact,
leftist elites have always been sheltered from this kind of thing, happy to let
the whole issue of unvetted foreigners getting in without enforcement
to be the border's problem, up until Trump at least. The migrant community
that rich Washington D.C. has encouraged for its cheap gardeners and maids
-- and "can't live without" -- as the Daily
Beast says, has always been insulated from the real problems of allowing all
unvetted comers into the coontry. Well, now the place for the child migrant
shelter is being rightly placed in an affluent part of Washington so they can live
with the consequences of their choices, too.
It
sounds like President Trump or whoever he's got on the federal side trying to
build this shelter is combining proximity to the Salvadoran illegal immigrant
community - Washington's largest - with a little taste of the medicine these
liberals would like to inflict on the border regions and poorer parts of
the country.
I
can't think of a better place to put that shelter. Let them live with the
result of their own hypocrisy.
DOJ: 64% of Federal Arrests in 2018 Were of Non-U.S. Citizens
Listen to the Article!
(CNSNews.com) - Approximately 64 percent of the
arrests that the federal government made in fiscal 2018 were of non-U.S.
citizens, according to
a report released today by the Justice Department’s Bureau of Justice
Statistics.
That represents a dramatic change from just two
decades ago, when approximately 63 percent of federal arrests were of citizens
and only approximately 37 percent were of non-citizens.
According to the data for fiscal years 1998
through 2018 that the BJS released today, federal arrests of non-U.S. citizen
first surpassed federal arrests of citizens in fiscal 2008.
“In 1998, 63 percent of all federal arrests were
of U.S. citizens; in 2008, 64 percent of all federal arrests were of non-U.S.
citizens,” said the BJS report (“Immigration,
Citizenship, and the Federal Justice System, 1998-2018”).
Although immigration and immigration-related
offenses accounted for the vast majority of non-U.S. citizen arrests,
non-citizens were also over-represented among those arrested for
non-immigration offenses, according to the report.
“The five crime types for which non-U.S. citizens
were most likely to be prosecuted in U.S. district court in 2018 were illegal
reentry (72 percent of prosecutions), drugs (13 percent of prosecutions), fraud
(4.5 percent), alien smuggling (4 percent), and misuse of visas (2 percent).”
“Non-U.S. citizens, who make up 7 percent of the
U.S. population (per the U.S. Census Bureau for 2017), accounted for 15 percent
of prosecutions in U.S. district court for non-immigration crimes in 2018,”
said the report.
“In 2018,” it said, “non-U.S. citizens accounted
for 24 percent of all federal drug arrests and 25 percent of all federal
property arrests, including 28 percent of all federal fraud arrests,” said the
report.
Table 4 in the report lists the number of federal
arrests by the country of citizenship of the individual arrested for the fiscal
years from 1998 through 2018.
The table shows that the largest total number of
federal arrests in any of those years came in the latest year, fiscal 2018,
when the federal government made 195,771 arrests.
That was up 88.5 percent from the 103,866 total
arrests that the federal government made in fiscal 1998.
Of the 195,771 that the federal government
arrested in fiscal 2018, 125,027—or 63.9 percent—were non-U.S. citizens.
That was up 233.5 percent from the 37,486 non-U.S.
citizens the federal government arrested in fiscal 1998.
At the same time that the federal government was
arresting 125,027 non-U.S. citizens in fiscal 2018, it was arresting 70,542
U.S. citizens.
That was up 10.0 percent from the 64,137 U.S.
citizens the federal government arrested in fiscal 1998.
Of the 125,027 non-U.S. citizens that the federal
government arrested in fiscal 2018, 78,062 (or 39.9 percent) were from Mexico;
39,858 (or 20.4 percent) were from Central America; and 7,107 (or 3.6 percent)
were from other regions.
In the years since fiscal 1998, the most dramatic
increase in the number of non-U.S. citizens arrested annually was among those
from Central America.
From fiscal 1998 to fiscal 2018, the number of
Mexicans arrested annually by the federal government grew from 28,388 to
78,062. That was an increase of 49,674—or 175 percent.
From fiscal 1998 to fiscal 2018, the number of
Central Americans arrested annually by the federal government grew from 1,171
to 39,858. That was an increase of 38,687—or 3,303.8 percent.
From fiscal 1998 to fiscal 2018, the number of
individuals from other regions arrested annually by the federal government
declined from 7,927 to 7,107. That was a drop of 820—or 10.3 percent.
|
DOJ:
Feds Arrested More Mexican Nationals than Americans in 2018
The total
number of federal arrests of Mexican nationals living in the United States now
exceeds the total number of federal arrests of American citizens, federal data
reveals.
A new report by the Department of Justice (DOJ) finds that in
2018, the number of Mexican nationals arrested for federal crimes exceeded the
number of American citizens who were arrested for federal crimes by about 8,000
arrests.
For example, more than 78,000 federal arrests of Mexicans were
made last year. Compare that to the roughly 70,500 federal arrests made of
American citizens the same year. Over 20 years, the number of federal arrests
made of Mexican nationals in the U.S. has soared by 175 percent while federal
arrests of Americans grew by only 10 percent.
Likewise, the number of federal arrests of non-U.S. citizens is
nearly double the arrests of Americans. In 2018, law enforcement officials
arrested more than 125,000 non-U.S. citizens for federal crimes — a 234 percent
increase since 1998.
Central Americans in the U.S. have had the largest increase in
federal arrests over the last two decades. In 1998, only about 1,200 Central
Americans were arrested for federal crimes. Fast-forward to 2018, when nearly
40,000 Central Americans were arrested for federal crimes. This indicates an
increase in federal arrests of more than 3,300 percent over the last 20 years.
DOJ: Federal Arrests of Foreigners More than Tripled in Last 20 Years
DOJ: Federal Arrests of
Foreigners More Than Tripled in Last 20 Years
As Breitbart News reported, though non-U.S.
citizens represent just seven percent of the total U.S. population, they
accounted for 15 percent of all federal arrests and 15 percent of all
prosecutions for non-immigration related crimes in 2018. This indicates that
non-U.S. citizens were about 2.3 times as likely to be arrested or prosecuted
for non-immigration related crimes.
For non-immigration offenses, the total of federal arrests for
non-U.S. citizens between 1998 and 2018 increased nearly eight percent, and
between 2017 and 2018 rose almost ten percent.
Non-U.S. citizens were most likely to be prosecuted for illegal
re-entry, that is illegal aliens who have been previously deported, drugs,
fraud, alien smuggling, and misuse of visas.
A 2018 Government Accountability
Office (GAO) report discovered nearly all
illegal and legal immigrants in U.S. federal prisons are from Mexico, Honduras,
El Salvador, the Dominican Republic, Colombia, and Guatemala.
Between 2010 and 2015, the average annual cost to incarcerate
criminal illegal and legal immigrants slightly decreased — as the criminal
alien population slightly decreased as well — from $1.56 billion to about $1.42
billion. That cost is paid for by American taxpayers who are forced to offset
the costs of mass immigration to the country.
Every year, the U.S. admits more
than 1.5 million foreign nationals, with the overwhelming majority arriving
through the process known as “chain migration,” whereby newly
naturalized are able to bring an unlimited number of foreign relatives to the
country. Between 2005 and 2017, chain migration, alone, brought nearly 10 million foreign nationals
to the U.S.
Red Tide Rising
On September 21, a protest was held in Aurora, Colorado demanding abolishment of U.S. borders and the Immigration & Customs Enforcement agency. Over the last three years, a myriad of similar anti-ICE, open-border demonstrations have been held in cities across America, all of which have been encouraged and supported, tacitly or otherwise, by the Democratic Party.
One of several Democratic front groups that participated in the protest calls itself the Party for Socialism and Liberation/Denver. To make sure its Marxist ideology doesn’t go unnoticed, the group’s Facebook page reads “Building a Worker’s Paradise in the Heartland of World Imperialism.” PSL/Denver’s name includes the word socialism, but the communist flag flown at its Aurora protest shows that to this profoundly anti-American group, socialism and communism are heads of the same snake.
The open borders demonstration was also attended by members of Rocky Mountain Antifa and Denver Communists, two other openly Marxist Democrat front groups. In this video, a member of Denver Communists confirms that the protestors are demanding elimination of U.S. borders and an end to enforcement of U.S. immigration law. An image on the group’s Facebook
page shows members carrying a banner
demanding no borders and no nations.
A borderless world without nations represents the culmination of the communist dream of a world united under the banner of the hammer and sickle. For that dream to be realized, America’s sovereignty must be yielded to an international governing body run by the UN, a one-world globalist organization run by an international assortment of socialists-cum-communists. Those who call for a borderless world with no nations are effectively calling for a permanent end to the United States in favor of a “new world order,” a world where Americans would be indoctrinated to no longer see themselves as citizens of their country, but as Citizens of the World.
Occupy Denver is another anti-capitalist group that showed up for the demonstration in Aurora. Hundreds of Occupy affiliates are active in cities, towns and campuses across America. Like other Democrat identity politics groups, Occupy affiliates are openly pro-communist -- Occupy Denver’s Facebook profile picture contains an image of “the Raised Fist,” one of communism’s most recognizable call to arms. Like other Democrat front groups, Occupy Denver helps the Democratic Party advance its hostility toward the police by mocking and ridiculing law enforcement officers, as shown in this photo on the group’s Facebook. Another photo on the group’s Facebook supports the Democrats’ class warfare election strategy with an ‘us vs. them’ propaganda graphic declaring that the poor in America are exploited victims of oppression, who therefore have a right to “destroy the system,” by violence if necessary. Victim vs. oppressor ideology is the means of achieving political power outlined in The Communist Manifesto.
The ties that bind the modern Democratic Party to pro-communist groups and organizations are unmistakable. Nowhere is that more evident than its ties to the Occupy movement. At an Aug. 19, 2012 pre-rally “People’s Assembly” meeting in the nation’s capitol, former labor boss/lifelong Democrat Mike Golash, leader of Occupy DC and a member of the openly-communist Progressive Labor Party, left no doubt about the intent of the Occupy movement when he was caught on video telling student occupiers “Our goal is to make revolution in the United States, overthrow the capitalist system and build communism in America.”
Another prominent Democrat who supports the
anti-capitalist Occupy movement is a self-declared
communist named Bill Ayers, in whose living
room Barack Obama launched his political career.
And, when Occupy Wall Street protests burst on the scene in 2011, the two most high profile Democrats in America -- President Obama (“We are on their side”) and Speaker Nancy Pelosi (“God bless them”) -- enthusiastically supported the 99% vs. the 1%, victim vs. oppressor protests, as did virtually every other high level official in the Democratic Party.
The Aurora protestors who demanded no borders and no nations -- and millions more like them who share their borderless world ideology -- have three things in common:
● They all are Americans who harbor deep contempt for their country.
● They all are communist revolutionaries committed to overthrowing America’s two-party capitalist system by any means necessary.
● They all support and are supported by the modern Democratic Party, a once-patriotic party that has quietly defected to the side of the hammer and sickle.
The choice you face in 2020
Overwhelming evidence shows that the red tide of communism is rising in America, and rapidly so. Whether it succeeds in upending our constitutional republic will be determined by the next national elections.
An electrical engineering graduate of Georgia Tech and now retired, John Eidson is a freelance writer in Atlanta.
The ‘Baby Muhammad’ Jihad Comes to America
The ‘Baby Muhammad’ Jihad Comes to America
For the first time ever, Muhammad has made
the list of top ten baby names in America.
Raymond Ibrahim is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center.
If Muhammad cannot beat the infidels on the battlefield, he’ll outbreed them—literally: Last year it was reported that “Mohammed most popular name for newborn boys in the Netherlands for second year in a row.” Muhammad is apparently also the most popular name in England. In fact, Muhammad is one of the most popular names throughout Northwest Europe.
And now, for the first time ever, Muhammad has made the list of top ten baby names in America.
While this may seem innocuous enough—what’s in a name?—the fact is many Muslims see their offspring as contributions to the “struggle” to make Islam supreme, since more numbers equate more influence and power. Nor is the naming of “Muhammad” a coincidence but rather a cryptic reminder from the parents concerning whom they most revere and hope their sons emulate—namely, the founder of Islam/jihad.
Although the original, historic jihad was straightforward warfare on the infidel to make Islam supreme, the ulema articulated a variety of other jihads, all of which work to the same end: as with jihad al-lisan (literally tongue, meaning propaganda, apologias, polemics, etc.) and jihad al-mal (monetarily or materially supporting jihadis, including through zakat), so too jihad al-wilada (or childbearing) is seen as a way to contribute to the “struggle” to make Islam supreme.
This can be achieved with either infidel or Muslim women. As an example of the first, a Muslim imam was videotaped saying that, because European men lack virility, their women seek fertility among Muslim men. Accordingly, “We will give them fertility! We will breed children with them, because we will conquer their countries! Whether you like it or not, you Germans, Americans, French, and Italians and all those akin to you [Western people]—take in the refugees. For soon we will call them [and their European born sons] in the name of the coming caliphate! And we will say to you, ‘These are our sons.’”
That some Muslim men operate along this logic is evident. The diary of Patrick Kabele, an African Muslim man who was living and arrested in Britain for trying to join the Islamic State—his primary motive being to purchase a nine-year-old sex slave—had references that only likeminded Muslims would understand: in an effort, as the aforementioned imam said, to use European women as incubators and “breed children with them,” Kabele noted that he had been “seeding some women over here, UK white,” adding, “I dont [sic] kiss anymore.” (Unlike straightforward mating, kissing is deemed an intimate act, and Muslims, in keeping with the doctrine of al-wala’ wa al-bara must never be intimate with, certainly not love, non-Muslims—even when married to them—though they can have carnal relations with them.)
Even so, Muslim women remain the primary incubators for the jihad—and many of them see it as their obligation. According to a 2008 report,” Muslim hate fanatics plan to take over Britain by having more babies and forcing a population explosion, it has been revealed. The swollen Muslim population would be enough to conquer Britain from inside, they claim.”
A Christian Eritrean volunteer and translator who worked in migrant centers in Germany and was often assumed to be Muslim by the migrants, confessed that “Muslim migrants often confide in her and tell her about their dislike towards Christians,” and that “a number of the Muslim migrants she has spoken to have revealed a hatred for Christians and are determined to destroy the religion.” As to how they plan on accomplishing this, “Some women told me, ‘We will multiply our numbers. We must have more children than the Christians because it’s the only way we can destroy them here.’”
The notion that more Muslim births mean more Muslim power is so ingrained among Muslims that recommendations of “family planning” in West Africa—which, despite its scarcity of resources, has the highest birthrate in the world—is regularly seen by Muslims as a Western conspiracy. “The West’s policy is about reducing our numbers,” said Hassane Seck, an imam from Senegal. “Because of their perverse promotion of contraception, women in Europe are no longer fertile, but ours are. There are going to be many more of us, and they’re afraid.” The report adds that he and other “imams cite a passage in the Koran imploring Muslims to ‘go forth and multiply,’ and family planning is seen by many in the region as a Western plot to curb the spread of Islam.”
“We have 50 million Muslims in Europe,” Muammar Gaddafi claimed back in 2006, more realistically adding, “There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe—without swords, without guns, without conquest—will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades.” Ongoing polls and reports—including that one out of every three people on earth are expected to be Muslim by 2070—suggest this long cherished Muslim dream may not be so farfetched.
One Pew report says that the Muslim population of Europe could triple by 2050—just when all those baby Muhammads are coming of age, and when the imams will “call” on them. In Germany alone, nearly 20 percent of the population could be Muslim by 2050; considering that the average Muslim man is more zealous over his way of and purpose in (Islamic) life than the average German male, 20 percent is not too little for an Islamic takeover of—or at least mass havoc in—Germany. Yet the report also finds that even “if all migration into Europe were to immediately and permanently stop” and due to significantly higher Muslim birthrates, Europe’s Muslim population will still grow significantly, to about 36 million, almost double the current population.
Not that many Western Europeans seem to care; some are even glad to see their own kind die off and be replaced by Muslims—such as Dr. Stefanie von Berg, who once exulted before the German parliament: “Mrs. President, ladies and gentlemen. Our society will change. Our city will change radically. I hold that in 20, 30 years there will no longer be a [German] majority in our city. …. And I want to make it very clear, especially towards those right wingers: This is a good thing!”
These are some of the things to think on in light of the recent news that, for the first time ever, Muhammad has made the list of top ten baby names in the United States.
#/media/File:Map_takoma.jpg){kind=link}
No comments:
Post a Comment